Please do your own research. The information I share is only a catalyst to expanding ones confined consciousness. I have NO desire for anyone to blindly believe or agree with what I share. Seek the truth for yourself and put your own puzzle together that has been presented to you. I'm not here to teach, preach or lead, but rather assist in awakening the consciousness of the collective from its temporary dormancy.
The 96-year-old scientist who came up with an idea for an “unpregnancy pill” decades ago has led an eventful life, from his teenage days in the French Resistance to his friendships with famous artists.
Not too many — if any at all — biochemists have ever been glorified with such lengthy puff-pieces in “the paper of record.” One would reasonably assume, on the basis of such a gushing homage, that 96-year-old Dr. Étienne-Émile Baulieu must be the type of rare genius whose discoveries saved lives or radically uplifted the human condition like few others have — like Lister’s antiseptics, Fleming’s penicillin, or Roentgen’s x-rays — Right? Not exactly.
The Slimes explains the great “accomplishment” which has immortalized this “French” Doctor:
“When the idea struck him, nearly 50 years ago, Dr. Étienne-Émile Baulieu believed it could be revolutionary. Creating a pill that could abort a pregnancy would transform reproductive health care and allow women to carry out their decisions in private.”(emphasis added)
Molech in a bottle. Wonderful. Such a noble cause to dedicate one’s talents toward, eh?
What’s up with these Jewish medical scientists and their fixation with either preventing or ending pregnancy, anyway? Carl Djerassi, for example, was “the father of the birth control pill.” Though Gregory Pincusalso laid claim to that distinction. Yes sir. When it comes to facilitating promiscuity — in this case, the mitigation of its immediate consequences — the usual suspects, whether involved in porn production and distribution, “abortion rights” promotion, lowering the “age of consent,” grooming for homosexuality / gender disorder / child rape etc, are always front and center. Always.
1.Baulieu: “Father of the Abortion Pill”2. Pincus: “Father of the Birth Control Pill”3. Injustice Ginsberg wanted to lower the age of consent to 12.
Now, back to this Baulieu character so evidently adored by “the paper of record.” We learn in the article that he, as a teenager, fought in the terrorist French “resistance” during World War 2 and, like most of “La Résistance,” was a Communist. That affiliation, no doubt, makes him even more of a heroic figure in the eyes of Sulzberger’s seditious scribblers.
Baulieu’s work as a mad scientist earned him many honors, including the “prestigious” Lasker Award which recognizes “public service performed on behalf of medicine.” That dubious distinction is administered by the Lasker Foundation — founded by Mr. & Mrs. Albert Lasker. More recently, France’s president, Emmanuel Maricon (not a typo, Spanish for ‘faggot’) decorated “the Father of the Abortion Pill” with the Grand Cross of the Legion of Honor, France’s highest distinction.
Sacre bleu! You’d think this commie clown had cured cancer or something.
1. Mifepristone (aka RU-486), typically followed by misoprostol, is now used in about half of ‘in utero’ baby killings. // 2. The Abortion Pill can be used to induce a miscarriage up until 9 weeks of pregnancy. // 3. The “French” bio-chemical baby killer shows off his Grand Cross of the Legion of Honor — the famous award established by Napoleon Bonaparte in 1802.
In what would be typical Satanic form, the 1980’s ghouls who branded and marketed Baulieu’s once extremely controversial human pesticide, appear to have had a little fun with selecting its market name — RU-486.
RU = Are You 4 = For 86 = slang for “get rid of” (here)
Are you for 86ing (getting rid of) your baby is the coded trade name.
* Note: To “86” someone or something refer to someone getting kicked out of a restaurant or club, or simply to get rid of something — “86 him.”
They just love putting their evil deeds in your face — and laughing about it.
1. A demonstration against Baulieu’s RU-486 in Paris in 1991. // 2. Texas protester stands in front of a Planned Parenthood clinic.
The Supreme Court has overturned its 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling and now the issue of abortion will be part of our national debate as much as ever. Here are some of the many reasons the usual arguments in favor of abortion are wrong.
Pro-Abortion Claim:The government should stay out of people’s private lives. This is a woman’s choice, not anyone else’s, and a women’s rights issue.
Why It’s Wrong: Laws often restrict an individual’s rights, including the right to hurt another person or infringe upon another’s rights. In taking the life of an unborn child, a woman is taking away the most basic of all rights.
An unborn child is not part of a woman’s body, but a separate, individual human being with his or her own rights. A child is not the mother’s property, just as parents are legal guardians of children but not the children’s owners and are not allowed to abuse their children.
Pro-Abortion Claim:When most abortions take place, in early pregnancy, a fertilized egg is just a mass of cells, not a human being. It doesn’t feel pain.
Why It’s Wrong: A new life begins at conception and should not be destroyed by human interference.
The beginning of life could be defined by many different points of development — fertilization (the fusion of the nuclei of the sperm and egg cell), implantation, the first movement, heartbeat, or brain waves, consciousness, or birth. Any point you choose could be just a day’s difference between life and death for an unborn child.
Drawing the line at the point of viability is also problematic — that point will continue to get earlier in the pregnancy as medical advances create better means of keeping the unborn alive outside the womb; indeed, viability is now weeks earlier than it was when Roe was decided.
Yet the unborn child did not become a person because he could survive due to modern science. Newborns are not technically viable either, as they cannot survive on their own. By this logic, we should consider it acceptable to kill newborns.
Pro-Abortion Claim:Abortion can’t be a crime against nature if fertilized eggs are spontaneously miscarried in nature.
Why It’s Wrong: The occurrence of an event in nature does not justify deliberately mimicking that event. The elderly die of natural causes, but that doesn’t make it right to kill them. And many miscarriages are associated with extra or missing chromosomes.
Pro-Abortion Claim: Birth control isn’t 100 percent effective.When it fails, women have been responsible and need abortion as another method to avoid having a child.
The pregnancy prevention rate of birth-control pills used consistently and correctly is 99 percent. For that small portion who correctly used birth control but it did not prevent conception, they have to accept the risks of sexual activity, which include a child. Contraception is free with most health insurance plans and easily available.
Pro-Abortion Claim:In the case of rape or incest, when a woman was an innocent victim of an involuntary act, she should not be forced to carry a child. She would be forced to suffer even more.
Why It’s Wrong:One percent of women say they want an abortion because they were raped, and less than 0.5 percent say they are pregnant as a result of incest. Even in such very rare cases, an unborn child should not be killed because of another person’s evil deed. The pregnant woman needs love and support, not more trauma.
An estimated 800,000 abortions take place in the United States each year. Common reasons given for seeking an abortion are that a child would disrupt the mother’s education (38 percent), interfere with job or career (38 percent), or be unaffordable (73 percent). About half of respondents said they didn’t want to be a single mom or were having relationship problems.
About a third said they didn’t want any more kids; 25 percent said they didn’t want people to know they had sex or got pregnant; 32 percent said they weren’t ready for a child; and 22 percent didn’t feel mature enough to raise children. More than half of those seeking abortion have had at least one previous birth.
Pro-Abortion Claim:Minors are too young for the responsibilities of parenthood.
Why It’s Wrong: About 3 percent of females who get abortions are younger than 18, and 8 percent are 18 to 19 years old. Parents of minors should teach their children about the consequences of sex, the benefits of abstinence, and the limitations of contraception, among other things: Sex can lead to pregnancy and if it does the unborn child should not be killed.
Accepting truths that you don’t like is part of maturity, and sex should be reserved for mature people ready to care for a child.
Pro-Abortion Claim:If abortion were made legal only in cases of rape or incest, women would lie.
Why It’s Wrong: The court system could settle the truth of their claims and more reporting of rape and incest would help bring perpetrators to justice.
Pro-Abortion Claim: Abortion is safer than continuing a pregnancy to term.
Why It’s Wrong: Even if abortion is safer than pregnancy, that doesn’t make it right. But with modern medicine, the death risks for both abortion and pregnancy are very low.
Pro-Abortion Claim: It would be better for abnormal fetuses to be aborted than to live with poor health or a disability.
Why It’s Wrong: In the case of the small minority of fetuses with a potentially life-threatening abnormality, a natural death may result, but, if not, the child should be given the benefit of the doubt, not be killed. It’s wrong to kill disabled people for their disabilities.
Pro-Abortion Claim: If abortion were outlawed, women would just get riskier, dangerous abortions.
Why It’s Wrong: People break other laws with repercussions too, but we don’t avoid that outcome by not making those laws. Outlawing abortion would save millions of unborn babies’ lives.
It is difficult to know the number of abortions resulting in death before abortion was legalized, because many illegal abortions went unreported. Education is the best alternative, so women know the risks of trying to get an abortion illegally, how to effectively use birth control, and how they can receive assistance as mothers.
Pro-Abortion Claim:The right to an abortion has led to a more prosperous societyas women have continued in their careers and low-income couples have not been burdened with an additional expense. Abortion has reduced the child abuse and crime that arise from unwanted children.
Why It’s Wrong: Abortion has been bad for our society, as it devalues human life and the fulfillment that only family and children, not a job, can provide. If women want to put careers first or can’t afford children, they should practice abstinence or correctly use birth control and make plans for accepting the consequences if that fails.
If women are poor and do have children, the government provides assistance. Adoption is also a better option than killing an unborn child. Many loving, screened, financially stable parents are waiting to adopt babies.
As for whether studies prove that abortion has reduced crime or abuse, this is a dangerous line of argument. Should we abort babies of certain groups more likely to be criminals?
Pro-Abortion Claim:A woman has a right to privacy, as recognized by the Supreme Court, and to make her own decisions about her life and happiness.
Why It’s Wrong:Roe v. Wade was so strongly resisted because it was a deeply flawed decision.
The legal arguments are lengthy, but the short answer is that the constitutional right to liberty simply does not grant the right to kill another person, and an unborn child is a person.
Abortion is a deeply divisive issue, and about half of Americans consider themselves pro-life and half call themselves pro-choice. Overturning Roe will not end abortion rights but return the issue to the states, allowing for a more democratic process — the debate will continue, but the truth remains the same.
According to the most recent stats released by the CDC this past Saturday, August 14, 2021, their Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) now has recorded more than twice as many deaths following the non-FDA approved experimental COVID-19 shots during the past 8 and a half months, than deaths recorded following ALL FDA approved vaccines for the past 30 years.
This has to be the most censored information in the U.S. right now, even though these statistics come directly from the CDC.
They have now recorded 12,791 deaths, 16,044 permanent disabilities, 70,667 emergency room visits, 51,242 hospitalizations, 13,139 life threatening events, among 682,873 reported injuries from 571,831 cases.
The CDC’s official response to these statistics is that they are basically coincidences, and are not related to the experimental COVID-19 shots.
Reports of adverse events to VAERS following vaccination, including deaths, do not necessarily mean that a vaccine caused a health problem. A review of available clinical information, including death certificates, autopsy, and medical records, has not established a causal link to COVID-19 vaccines. (Source.)
Trusting in the CDC for COVID-19 safety information is quite obviously deadly. Because it is widely known that these statistics that they admit to are but a fraction of actual cases, as very few medical professionals are willing to classify an injury or death as caused by COVID-19 injections.
By way of contrast, deaths following all FDA-approved vaccines for the 30 years prior to the emergency use authorizations of the COVID-19 shots total 6,068 over 30 years according to the CDC.
What are NOT included in these 12,791 deaths the CDC is reporting following COVID-19 shots, are the number of fetal deaths following COVID-19 injections into pregnant women, which now numbers 1,360 deaths according to the CDC.
The Big Pharma cartel is now fully in control of just about every aspect of our lives. They own the corporate media which is not reporting any of these statistics from VAERS, and they control the health agencies like the NIH, the CDC, and the FDA.
Anthony Fauci did the Sunday talk show tour yesterday, and stated that Americans need to surrender their liberties (yes, he actually said that) because we are all fighting a common enemy, “the virus.”
In addition, the Department of Homeland Security has now issued a bulletin declaring that anyone who questions COVID-19 measures like masks and “vaccines” are potential “domestic terrorists.”
They are using a bogus COVID-19 “outbreak” called the “Delta variant,” and the CDC has already been caught lyingabout who are actually being hospitalized right now, falsely stating that the “unvaccinated” are filling up hospitals, when almost the exact opposite is happening around the world.
The real tragedy that is happening in our nation’s hospitals is that they are financially motivated to treat as many COVID patients as possible, and this has resulted, especially among our senior population, in more deaths due to COVID-19 injections than to actual cases of COVID.
People are dying NEEDLESSLY because they are being forced to be treated as COVID patients in hospitals, and this is truly a crime against humanity.
Please see this article if you have not yet read it, and be sure to read the comments at the bottom to understand what families are going through today when a family member is admitted to a hospital and ends up DEAD.
What are you going to do America? Humanity literally hangs in the balance.
The federal government gave at least $2.7 million in taxpayer money to researchers who sought out minority babies who had been aborted in order to harvest their organs, according to internal documents (pdf) released Tuesday.
The University of Pittsburgh targeted minorities in its request for infant organs — including those taken from full-term babies — to create a “pipeline” for fetal research.
Researchers said they needed 50 percent of the donated fetuses to be minorities and specified that 25 percent must come from black women. The Pittsburgh metropolitan area is 85 percent white and 8 percent black.
Researchers stressed the importance of maintaining organ blood flow in the request, which watchdogs say could violate federal law by asking doctors to illegally preserve organs during labor-inducing abortions.
The National Institutes of Health has overseen experiments on fetal organs at the University of Pittsburgh since 2015 in what the school claimed to be a “tissue hub.”
Aborted babies used in this research ranged from 6 to 42 weeks of gestation, according to government documents.
The grant request from the university to the government agency redacts key information, including how many fetuses were obtained and who provided them. Its language, however, raised troubling questions.
David Daleiden, founder and president of the pro-life Center for Medical Progress, called on the federal government to investigate the NIH and Pitt after obtaining more than 300 pages of information related to the program through a public records request.
“The experiments with aborted infants at the University of Pittsburgh, sponsored by the NIH, are like Kermit Gosnell’s house of horrors, but this time funded by the federal government,” Daleiden told the Washington Free Beacon.
“It was systemic bias and abortion extremism that permitted Gosnell to evade the law for so long, and the same thing is happening in Pittsburgh. These atrocities deserve the full response of law enforcement and government officials — law enforcement should put a stop to it and arrest the perpetrators.”
The fetal research focused on harvested kidneys. The University of Pittsburgh said fetuses should have minimized “warm ischemic time” — a medical term to describe the time that an organ is without blood flow. It also lists “labor induction” as a utilized abortion procedure to obtain the organs.
“There’s the distinct possibility that some of these babies are born alive and then their organs and tissues are removed,” Dr. David Prentice, vice president and research director of the pro-life Charlotte Lozier Institute, told the Free Beacon.
“This is horrific — almost medieval. It is certainly antiquated science.”
Federal law bans the purchasing of aborted fetuses, which must be donated for research. It is illegal to request how donated fetuses are to be aborted.
A university spokesman said researchers played no role in the “timing, method, or procedures used to terminate the pregnancy.”
“In this case, ischemia time refers to the time after the tissue collection procedure and before cooling for storage and transport. It does not have an impact on how the procedure is performed, which is always at the discretion of the attending physician,” the university said in an email.
The spokesman also said “projects funded by the National Institutes of Health must ensure appropriate inclusion of women and minorities” and that the study’s racial distribution was appropriate.
One of the study’s goals, he said, was “to support researchers looking for treatments and cures for kidney disease,” which disproportionately afflicts minorities.
Federal officials released the records 17 months after Daleiden’s initial request — and only after the activist enlisted the help of attorneys with the government watchdog Judicial Watch.
Meredith Di Liberto, the lead attorney on the case, said further information about the program is required to find definitive proof of illegal behavior, but the redactions leave many unanswered questions.
“We keep getting this pushback that ‘Oh, it’s not illegal’ — but it’s all done behind closed doors with redactions,” Di Liberto told the Free Beacon.
“If this is all legit, why did we have to fight so hard to get a document, and when we get them, they’re redacted? Why did we have to go to court to see who’s paying for this?”
The University of Pittsburgh has been involved in fetal organ research for more than a decade. It conducted an experiment in 2020 that implanted the scalps of aborted fetuses onto lab mice in a study that was funded by Dr. Anthony Fauci’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.
The grant proposal boasts of the institution’s experience handling a variety of fetal organs, including the liver, heart, legs, brain, kidneys, and bladders.
The university outlined its goal of becoming a “pipeline” for fetal organ research, which would mean not only conducting this research but providing organs for other institutions to experiment on.
“You see words like ‘we have a sample’ and ‘subdivided,’ and it’s like, well, we’re talking about a human being,” Di Liberto told the Free Beacon. “It’s a little Frankenstein-ish”.
Terry Schilling, president of the American Principles Project, said voters must hold their representatives accountable to ensure government funding goes nowhere near experiments on aborted fetuses.
“This latest discovery that millions of taxpayer dollars have apparently been funding this same barbaric practice through NIH is nothing short of outrageous and should profoundly trouble the conscience of every American,” Schilling told the Free Beacon.
“Congress should act to ensure that any future funding of NIH be explicitly barred from going toward such inhumane practices, and any lawmaker who opposes such action should be forced to answer for it to their voters.”
The documents redacted the identity of the provider, but the university has longstanding partnerships with Planned Parenthood of Western Pennsylvania as a “contracted care site” and shares some senior-level staffers.
Dr. Beatrice Chen, for example, serves as both the medical director for Planned Parenthood of Western Pennsylvania and the director of family planning at the University of Pittsburgh.
Local Planned Parenthood staffers admitted to providing aborted fetuses to the University of Pittsburgh in an undercover video released by the Center for Medical Progress in 2019:
Planned Parenthood of Western Pennsylvania has denied that any of their three facilities participate in fetal organ donation programs.
The U.S. CDC announced today that they have “new data” that they claim shows that the COVID-19 experimental injections are now safe for pregnant women.
Of course they have been recommending all along that pregnant women get the experimental injections, so it appears that this is just a new marketing strategy to get more pregnant women to get the shots.
The CDC admits that this “new study” of nearly 2,500 pregnant women who received an mRNA COVID-19 injection before 20 weeks of pregnancy had 13% of them suffer miscarriages.
the known severe risks of COVID-19 during pregnancy demonstrate that the benefits of receiving a COVID-19 vaccine for pregnant people outweigh any known or potential risks. (Source.)
A search of the CDC Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) lists 1,270 premature fetal deaths in pregnant women following one of the experimental, non-FDA approved COVID-19 injections. (Source.)
As we have previously reported here at Health Impact News, a pro-life group out of New Mexico has reported that a whistleblower who sits on a COVID-19 task force is claiming that many pregnancy complications, including preterm birth, miscarriage, and spontaneous abortions following COVID vaccines are being concealed from the public.
This whistleblower has uncovered documents that Pfizer had supplied to the European Medicines Agency (EMA) that shows their mRNA COVID vaccines did have animal trials that showed serious birth defects occurred in the rat specimens.
Also, at the Advisory Commission on Childhood Vaccines (ACCV) last quarterly meeting, on March 4, 2021, the CDC supplied a report on “Maternal vaccination safety summary” for the COVID vaccines that had been granted emergency use authorization.
* Pregnant women were not specifically included in pre-authorization clinical trials of COVID-19 vaccines – Post-authorization safety monitoring and research are the primary ways to obtain safety data on COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy * Larger than expected numbers of self-reported pregnant women have registered in v-safe * The reactogenicity profile and adverse events observed among pregnant women in v-safe did not indicate any safety problems * Most reports to VAERS among pregnant women (73%) involved non-pregnancy specific adverse events (e.g., local and systemic reactions) * Miscarriage was the most frequently reported pregnancy-specific adverse event to VAERS; numbers are within the known background rates based on presumed COVID-19 vaccine doses administered to pregnant women
So even though there were “larger than expected numbers of self-reported pregnant women” reporting adverse reactions to the experimental vaccines, and even though “miscarriage was the most frequently reported pregnancy-specific adverse event,” the CDC concluded that this “did not indicate any safety problems.”
And that is what they are doing with this study, which they admit caused miscarriages in 13% of the women.
They brush all these fetal deaths aside by stating:
the known severe risks of COVID-19 during pregnancy demonstrate that the benefits of receiving a COVID-19 vaccine for pregnant people outweigh any known or potential risks. (Source.)
But what exactly are these “benefits” of receiving a COVID-19 “vaccine” that “outweigh the risks?” They admit they don’t stop transmission, they admit you can still get COVID-19 after being vaccinated, and they admit that people who are fully vaccinated are still dying.
Do You Trust The CDC?
As we have reported numerous times here at Health Impact News, the CDC is a corrupt organization that cannot be trusted. They are the largest purchaser and distributor of vaccines in the world, allocating over $5 BILLION in their budget (supplied by American taxpayers) each year to purchase and distribute vaccines from Big Pharma.
The CDC also owns over 56 patents on vaccines, and many of their scientists earn royalties from the sale of vaccines. (Source.)
The CDC has a long history of corruption, and over the years many of their own scientists have tried to blow the whistle on this corruption only to be silenced.
In addition, many of the directors running the CDC go on to work for Big Pharma developing vaccines after they complete their term at the CDC.
The CDC protects the pharmaceutical industry. They get caught lying all the time. They are not your friend, they don’t care about your health, and they don’t care if your unborn baby lives or dies.
David Daleiden of The Center for Medical Progress testified about fetal experimentation before the Pennsylvania House Committee on Health on this week and exposed the government-sponsored trafficking of human fetuses.
Publicly available information demonstrates that Pitt hosts some of the most barbaric experiments carried out on aborted human infants, including scalping 5-month-old aborted fetuses to stitch onto lab rats, exporting fetal kidneys across the country, and killing infants delivered alive for liverharvesting–funded by U.S. taxpayers via the National Institutes of Health, and in particular Dr. Anthony Fauci’s NIAID office.
Local Planned Parenthood of Western Pennsylvania abortionproviderssupply the aborted fetuses, while Pitt sponsors the local Planned Parenthood’s operations, in what looks like an illegal Quid Pro Quo for fetal body parts, forbidden by 42 U.S. Code 289g-2 and 18 Pennsylvania Statutes 3216. Pennsylvania law also makes it a felony to experiment on a living fetus or to fail to provide immediate medical care to an infant born alive.
Listen to David Daleiden’s interview with Rose Unplugged on WJAS 1320 AM:
Almost $400,000 have been spent on these experiments. These studies were meant to investigate the tendency of human skin to develop infections.
The research was published in the journal Nature during last fall.
The experiments performed by a dozen scientists out of the University of Pittsburgh involved developing rat and mouse “models” using, in part, “full-thickness fetal skin” in order to “provide a platform for studying human skin infections.”
The report (read below) notes that the “human skin tissues” used in the skin grafting experiments were obtained “from the scalp and dorsum” of “donors,” namely aborted fetuses.
“Full-thickness human fetal skin was processed via removal of excess fat tissues attached to the subcutaneous layer of the skin, then engrafted over the rib cage, where the mouse skin was previously excised,” the study states.
As per the study, some of the grafted fetal skin matured into “adult-like human skin.” Some of the grafts even developed “human skin appendages,” including “human hair evident at 12 weeks post-transplantation.”
Patches of human skin grafted to rodent bodies can be seen in the photographs taken during the study and it is clearly sprouting human hair.
Federal records show that the NIAID supported the project with about $430,000 in funding over 2018 and 2019.
The research was referenced during a Pennsylvania state legislature hearing on fetal experimentation, this week.
The research was published last year without any publicity and therefore it received relatively little attention outside of pro-life circles.
In that hearing, a pro-life activist and journalist, David Daleiden, criticized the scientists, whom he described as “scalping 5-month-old aborted babies and grafting their scalps onto the backs of lab rats.”
David Daleiden became famous for his series of undercover videos of Planned Parenthood executives discussing aborted fetal body part exchanges.
Peter Daszak is also the same guy the WHO sent to China to investigate the claims whether the virus evolved naturally or was coronavirus engineered.
Many scientists have criticized gain of function research, which involves manipulating viruses in the lab to explore their potential for infecting humans, because it creates a risk of starting a pandemic from accidental release.Similar controversial research was also conducted by Dutch Virologist Ron Fouchier, a controversial figure in the field of Viroscience.
Since these projects were shutdown in the west due to heavy criticism, they were exported to other countries like China and India.
China is conducting secret Frankenstein-style human-animal hybrid experiments creating super viruses, human-monkey hybrids, human head transplants on monkeys and pigs, gene-editing babies, super soldiers etc.
Experts have raised concerns legally that such experiments could not only lead to a global pandemic but could also lead to bio-terrorism.
Earlier in February last year the Indian government launched an investigation into another secret research being conducted on bat hunters in the eastern Indian state of Nagaland, funded by the US Department of Defense in collaboration with Wuhan Institute of Virology and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
A new video overview of the COVID-19 vaccine label for AstraZeneca’s vaccine reveals that it’s made with MRC-5, a strain of aborted human fetal tissue.
The video was originally posted to Instagram. It walks the viewer through a closer look at the packaging labeling of the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine, beginning with the ChAdOx1-S (recombinant) designation on the label.
This ingredient leads the viewer down a rabbit hole of online research, eventually discovering that recombinant strains used in the vaccine are grown from the aborted fetal tissue of a 14-week-old aborted human baby.
Last week, a California abortionist testified under oath that there is “no question” abortionists are allowing babies to be born alive in order to harvest their organs, a report from LifeSiteNews revealed.
Testifying during a preliminary hearing in the criminal case against undercover journalists David Daleiden and Sandra Merritt earlier in the month, Dr. Forrest Smith outlined gruesome details of the abortion business, of which he said Daleiden and Merritt only captured the “tip of the iceberg” with their shocking undercover videos.
“Smith testified that it is almost certain that some of the abortionists featured in the undercover videos deliberately altered abortion procedures in a way that both led to the birth of living babies with beating hearts, and put women at risk. The goal in these cases would be to obtain fresher, more intact organs,” LifeSiteNews reported.
Smith, who has reportedly preformed some 50,000 abortions, reviewed a video from the 2014 Planned Parenthood conference as an expert for the defense.
Alisa Goldberg, who presented the video, “spoke about using large doses of the drug misoprostol in order to carry out second-trimester induced abortions in one day rather than the four it usually takes,” Live Action reported.
“Smith testified that this would lead to a live birth. Large doses of misoprostol, said Smith, would cause ‘tumultuous labor’ that leads to ‘fetal expulsion’ — meaning the baby would be born without any assistance from the abortionist and no instruments would be used. He testified that very few abortionists other than Planned Parenthood do this.”
“In this case clearly the intent is same-day surgery. They fully intend to put the uterus into labor,” Smith said.
When pressed if this would “lead to a live birth,” the abortionist answered:
“There’s no question in my mind that at least some of these fetuses were live births.”
Smith also noted that a baby would “no question” be born “alive” in cases where Digoxin, which is used to cause heart failure in abortions, is not used, according to Live Action. “No question it’s alive,” Smith said.
The California abortionist said that a beating heart is what indicates a live or deceased baby — as opposed to “no breathing” or “no movement.”
“All testimony we have seen, no breathing, no movement, no cord” he said, or “arms, legs torn off, the assumption is: that is fetal demise. But that’s completely wrong.”
The abortionist’s testimony was particular jarring since Smith once loathed Daleiden and wished to expose him as a “fraud.” That changed when the doctor watched the undercover videos and spoke to Daleiden directly.
“I’m going to take down that son of a bitch. He’s f***ing with me now,’” Smith told the court he said of Daleiden in 2015.
According to LifeSiteNews, Smith then met with the journalist in August of that year with the intention of exposing “Daleiden as a fraud.”
Smith soon realized Daleiden was exposing the truth about the abortion industry and, chillingly, “didn’t know the half of what was going on.”