When Libtards Write “Letters to the Editor”

DECEMBER 1, 2022

NY Times (Letter to Editor) :Dialogue Is Not Possible With ‘Opposing Views of Reality’

One need only peruse the “Letters to the Editor” section of “the paper of record” to find enough diagnostic evidence to prove that the demented denizens of Libtardia are indeed crazed members of an “authoritarian” cult. No matter how nonsensical or misinformed a given opinion may be; they all repeat the same talking points; they all engage in the mirroring of their journalistic or academic icons; they all read (or at least buy to collect dust with) the same books; they all psychotically project their own vices and madness onto those that they hate; they all have an inverted sense of reality; they all engage in Orwellian “double think;” and they are all consumed with a grossly inflated sense of self-importance and holier-than-thouism…. OK, maybe not all — but certainly above 95% are indeed deranged.

After previous reviews of Letters-to-the-Editor, some of “you guys” have suggested that the New York Times might be faking its own letters. Though (((they))) are certainly capable of such tactics, we “The Editorial Board” of the Anti-New York Times have had enough personal interaction with “educated” libtards — most memorably with those residing in the quaint but snooty New Jersey college towns of Montclair and Princeton —  to understand that there would be no need for Sulzberger’s henchmen to have to fake such idiotic responses. This is exactly how these creatures “think.”

Let’s analyze / psychoanalyze some of the Marxist madness recently submitted to the Times in response to an article originally titled, “We Don’t Have to be Fanatics” then changed online to Is There a Way to Dial Down the Political Hatred? by Molly Worthen — in which the writer argued, sensibly, that people “on both sides” should overcome political “fanaticism” and try to reconnect.

1. Historian Molly Worthen suggested that the political factions in society should “moderate” and try to get along better. // 2. For that, her reasonable, non-political piece was criticized by a pair of insane letter writers. // 3. The stained glass window from the Headquarters of the socialist Fabian Society of Britain depicts leading members (Sydney Webb & George Bernard Shaw) molding the world. An inscription reads: “Remold it nearer to the heart’s desire.” Beneath the floor of the workshop, a cult of gullible ‘”educated” idiots (libtards) fanatically worship (and recite from) the books that the Fabians above have fed to them.

To the Editor — by M. Zimmerman:

Writer: Dr. Worthen’s prayer that we get past the hatred characterizing contemporary American politics is not merely futile — it embodies a false equivalence. The brutal reality is that Democrats and Republicans are divided by fundamental values, as well as by opposing views of reality, and that the G.O.P. is just wrong.
Analysis: Demonrats = right — G.O.P. = wrong. End of discussion as far as he’s concerned.

Writer: I don’t regard all Republican voters as malign individuals. But I am convinced that their party and its leaders are indeed a force for evil,
Analysis: He believes that many Republican voters are simply the innocent dupes of “evil” individuals (presumably led by Trump). Very well, the writer is entitled to his opinion, especially if he can back up his claims. But the cult-like stupidity / insanity lies in what he will now define as “evil.”

Writer: … as they propagate the false claim of a stolen election,
Analysis: How can he say that the claim is “false” when the ballot audit results haven’t been completed yet? A reasonable man — politically inclined or not — would at least wait until the process has ended before condemning those who ordered the audit as “evil.”

Writer: … attack voting rights,
Analysis: In no way, shape, manner or form does the tightening of Voter ID requirements and mail-in ballot controls infringe upon anyone’s “right” to vote. How does one even begin to have a dialogue with someone who holds to such a distorted “view of reality?”

Writer: … foment political violence,
Analysis: By any objective observation, the heated and hateful class-warfare and race-warfare rhetoric routinely bellowed out by so many leading Demonrats, dwarfs Trump’s “incitement” of January 6th.

Writer: … defend authoritarianism,
Analysis: “Authoritarianism,” eh? Says the fool whose beloved Demonrat Party would have had us all forcefully locked down and masked up in perpetuity, and then vaxxed with microchips while under threat of punishment.

Writer: … pander to racism,
Analysis: “Racism,” eh? Says the moron whose beloved Demonrat Party degrades and disparages White people at every turn.

Writer: … promote white supremacy, and in the end move to destroy our democracy.
Analysis: “White supremacy,” eh? Says this probable member of “The Tribe” (surname Zimmerman) which proudly lords supreme over the White Man of North America and Western Europe.

Writer: I am not ashamed that I would be appalled if my son or daughter were to marry someone who voted for these evils.
Analysis: So, your child’s marital bliss would be secondary to your twisted politics? Sounds a bit “authoritarian,” doesn’t it? Goodness gracious. As much as I have always detested their libtardation, I have never personally hated the Demonrat voters in my extended family.

Dear Libtards:

If the idea of organized voter fraud is such a “baseless” “conspiracy theory” — then why have so many people (usually of color ™) been arrested for it over the years?

To the Editor — by J. Levandusky:

Writer: Unfortunately, Molly Worthen’s article is a few years too late. We appear to be beyond a point in America where respectful listening may be a viable path to reconciliation.

Analysis: Agreed.

Writer: Indeed, the debate has gotten too extreme and too divorced from factuality on one side.

Analysis: And which side is that?

Writer: As the Republican Party ….

Analysis: Of course. Just like the other writer — Demonrats = good — G.O.P. = bad. This is the type of personal hatred which leads to genocide.

Writer: …. slides ever closer to full-on fascism,

Analysis: Putting aside the misunderstood and misapplied term “fascism”  — (for the sake of argument) — and thus misdefining it as a repressive “authoritarian” system of total thought control — 100% of the recent Amazon book banning, You Tube censoring, Facebook / Twitter removals, Google algorithm-rigging, PayPal account terminations and career-killing events involves the silencing of “the right” by folks on “the left.” Can anyone cite a single occurrence of a Marxist or Libtard author or blogger ever having been subjected to such cyber “fascism?”

Writer: … there appear to be few remaining with whom to engage.

Analysis: He misses the phony Paul RyansJohn McStains & Liz Cheneys of the pre-Trump Republican’t Party.

Writer:  Can you have a respectful dialogue with someone who believes that the election was stolen from Donald Trump Analysis: Ya know, “you guys” really do seem a bit too concerned about election fraud coming out.

Writer:  … or that Hillary Clinton ran a child sex ring out of a pizza parlor?

Analysis: No. Killary ran the Haiti child kidnapping operation. That was James Alefantis who owned that pedo-pizzeria with the revolting Instagram and Twitter posts. You could at least get your facts straight before you distort them. And y’all seem a bit too concerned about the pedo-sex stuff as well.

Writer: …..Can you have a civilized conversation with people who violently storm the Capitol and beat up police officers?

Analysis: Uh, those were actually CIA / Antifa agents. I know, I know… “conspiracy theory.”

Writer:  We are facing a profound threat to our democracy.

Analysis: The single most “profound threat to our democracy” is Demonrat voter fraud, with online censorship and cancel culture a close second and third. Historical precedents of Republican’t voter fraud are actually very few; and almost always involve one Republican’t stealing an election from another.

Writer: There is a need for stronger, more strategic measures, lest our country go down a path not unlike Europe in the 1930’s.

Analysis: Oh how I wish that would happen! But you needn’t worry too much about a 1930’s scenario, Boobus. Though some good things may be coming, Americans haven’t got the moral or mental stuff to go full-blown Hitler. Too bad.

These loony letter writers may be actual Communists who KNOW that they are spouting lies — or they may just be Libtard cultists blindly repeating what their media masters tell them to. It’s a difference without a distinction. The late philosopher, conservative author and recovered communist James Burnham once put it this way:

“The only difference between a Communist and a liberal is that the Communist knows what he is doing.”

Tell it, Mr. Burnham. Tell it!

 1. Kari Lake’s now nearly 1-month-old refusal to concede defeat in the yet-to-be-certified Arizona steal has got the Left very worried. // 2. Image from the Instagram page of Comet Pizza shows two naked homosexuals licking a cheese pizza. “Cheese Pizza” is code language used by child-rapists. // 3. Tony Podesta — a disgraced Demonrat big shot and collector of disgusting child abuse / torture “art” — is pals with “James Alefantis” (openly homosexual owner of Comet Pizza) whose fake name loosely translates into “I Love Children” in French (J’aime les enfants).

About Those ‘Right Wing’ Threats of Violence

Picture

Ooooh. Such scary-looking people.

AUGUST 15, 2022

NY Times:As Right-Wing Rhetoric Escalates, So Do Threats and Violence

Both threats of political violence and actual attacks have become a steady reality of American life. Experts blame dehumanizing and apocalyptic language.

In the wake of that very strange “FBI raid” on Trump’s Florida estate last week, the “latest thing” talking points — with Sulzberger’s Times at the fore — have been dutifully distributed to the deranged denizens of the tyrannical kingdom of Libtardia. From the hallowed halls of quackademia, to the camous coffee shops, to printed propaganda, to the tell-lie-vision, to the Social Media activists, to the homosexual bath houses — the thoughtless Marxist Mantra now is all about “right wing violence.”

From the article:“Scholars who study political violence point to a common thread: the heightened use of bellicose, dehumanizing and apocalyptic language, particularly by prominent figures in right-wing politics and media.

Several right-wing or Republican figures reacted to the search of Mar-a-Lago not only with demands to dismantle the F.B.I., but also with warnings that the action had triggered “war.”

This “latest thing” about “right wing violence” offers us an excellent “teachable moment” to set the historical record straight as to the history of political violence in America — a murderous phenomenon that always has been, and still is, almost exclusively a left wing problem.

A trip down memory-hole lane for just a few past events.

There are plenty more incidents of Leftist violence — worldwide as well — always committed under the orders of and with the protection of “higher powers” that we can add to that list; but you get the point. This “right wing violence” theme is just another classic case of psychopaths and liars projecting their evil and their insanity onto us.

And mind you, that’s just the low-level violence carried out by the foot soldiers. Far more serious and deadly is the state-ordered military violence that has been imposed upon so many millions of innocent people by the very same Globalist Cabal that is now sanctimoniously wringing its hands over the mere language that some us “right wing” patriots are using.

Have a look at this list of “violent” acts — all of them genocidal and all of them enthusiastically cheered on by the oh-so peace-loving “paper of record” and the rest of the Jurisprudence while we of the true “far right” were yelling “Stop!”

  • World War I
  • Russian (Bolshevik) Revolution & Civil War
  • World War II
  • Korean War
  • Vietnam War
  • Afghanistan Proxy War Against the USSR
  • Bombing & Invasion of Panama
  • Gulf / Iraq War I
  • Deadly Sanctions (20 years)
  • First Lady Hillary’s Siege & Firebombing at Waco, Texas
  • Bombing of Serbia
  • Gulf War / Iraq War II & the War on Terror
  • Drone Strikes on multiple countries
  • War on Libya
  • War on Syria
  • Proxy Wars (ISIS, Ukraine etc)

Oceans of blood! Ah, so “non violent” is the Globalist-Marxist Left, eh? Frankly, a bit of actual violence directed at the devils who have been physically and mentally torturing innocent humanity for so long wouldn’t be such a bad thing. But let’s leave the killing to the White Hats — who will do it legally. I just hope we get to see some of these characters executed on TV one day — journalists included.

We Are Witnessing What Happens When Unrestrained Youth Gets Power

From Madison reading Cato and Cicero when framing the Constitution to the outsized impact both Rome and America had on the world around them, the United States has long been associated with historical Rome. There are great similarities, and there can be much to learn—and what’s happening now does not reflect well on either historical Rome or America.

When most of us think of the worst emperors in Roman history we think of names like Commodus, Nero, Caligula, and Elagabalus. To a man they were vain, self-centered, bloodthirsty hedonists who took what they wanted and tortured and killed many thousands of Romans and provincials.

All emperors, including the great ones like Augustus, Trajan, and Aurelian had blood on their hands to one degree or another but most tried to maintain or grow the empire. Commodus et al didn’t. Their goal was to satiate their lusts, whether literal lust or gluttony or, sadly, bloodlust. While there were other bad emperors, these four are among the worst.

What makes this relevant today is the fact that all four of these “men” were spoiled, pampered, entitled sadists who were given free rein when they were still essentially children. Commodus was the oldest at 19, while Nero was 17, and both Elagabalus and Caligula were 16.

They were overindulged brats who never faced consequences for their behavior. They were given virtually anything they wanted or, just as often, allowed to take what they wanted with impunity. And at those ripe young ages, and with that upbringing, they were literally given the keys to the kingdom and unleashed on the Empire—and virtually everyone in it suffered as a result.

Every day in America we see modern-day Commoduses or Caligulas wreaking havoc on our streets and in our stores, restaurants, schools, and more. Instead of a single entitled Emperor, America in 2022 is being ravaged by a generation of young men—many of whom have grown up fatherless—who have been told that they can do and say anything they want and that, regardless of what they do, there will be no consequences for them.

Just as Elagabalus et al brought nothing but blood, despair, and dysfunction to the Empire, these 21st-century youth are bringing blood, despair, and destruction to America. A generation of Americans has grown up being given “time outs”, “participation trophies,” and grades that have nothing to do with actual academic success, while at the same time they’ve been told that all inequality is due to racism, sexism, homophobia, or anything other than individual choices or actions.

The consequence of this indoctrination is that far too many young Americans think they can do anything with impunity. If they want something they take it. If they’re mad about something they protest, disrupt the lives of everyone within shouting distance, and frequently riot. They assault, rape and, sometimes, even murder, increasingly with impunity.

Pat Moynihan predicted much of this 60 years ago in his “The Negro Family: The Case for National Action.” In it he “…described through pages of disquieting charts and graphs, the emergence of a “tangle of pathology,” including delinquency, joblessness, school failure, crime, and fatherlessness that characterized ghetto—or what would come to be called underclass—behavior.”

While most of the scenes of flash mobs, carjackings, Knock Out Game punches, subway shovings, and daily shootings involve black male youth, this is not a race issue. Yes, the problem is disproportionately black, but White and Hispanic America is increasingly experiencing the same challenges of unwed mothers, school failures, and the lack of responsibility that underpins much of the dysfunction.

Whether a California college student getting 6 months for rape, a Texas boy getting no jail time for killing four people in a car crash, or charges being dropped against a South Carolina boy for killing someone in a boat crash, unaccountable America spans across races, wealth, and indeed the country itself. This is nowhere better demonstrated than by the legions of rioters who participated in the “peaceful protests” of 2020 who found their charges dropped or their bails funded by the glitterati.

The Age Of Intolerance: Cancel Culture’s War On Free Speech

“Political correctness is fascism pretending to be manners.” — George Carlin

Cancel culture — political correctness amped up on steroids, the self-righteousness of a narcissistic age, and a mass-marketed pseudo-morality that is little more than fascism disguised as tolerance — has shifted us into an Age of Intolerance, policed by techno-censors, social media bullies, and government watchdogs.

the age of intolerance cancel culture’s war on free speech

Everything is now fair game for censorship if it can be construed as hateful, hurtful, bigoted or offensive provided that it runs counter to the established viewpoint.

In this way, the most controversial issues of our day — race, religion, sex, sexuality, politics, science, health, government corruption, police brutality, etc. — have become battlegrounds for those who claim to believe in freedom of speech but only when it favors the views and positions they support.

Free speech for me but not for thee” is how my good friend and free speech purist Nat Hentoff used to sum up this double standard.

This tendency to censor, silence, delete, label as “hateful,” and demonize viewpoints that run counter to the cultural elite is being embraced with a near-fanatical zealotry by a cult-like establishment that values conformity and group-think over individuality.

For instance, are you skeptical about the efficacy of the COVID-19 jabs? Do you have concerns about the outcome of the 2020 presidential election? Do you subscribe to religious beliefs that shape your views on sexuality, marriage and gender? Do you, deliberately or inadvertently, engage in misgendering (identifying a person’s gender incorrectly) or deadnaming (using the wrong pronouns or birth name for a transgender person)?

Say yes to any of those questions and then dare to voice those views in anything louder than a whisper and you might find yourself suspended on Twitter, shut out of Facebook, and banned across various social media platforms.

This authoritarian intolerance masquerading as tolerance, civility and love (what comedian George Carlin referred to as “fascism pretending to be manners”) is the end result of a politically correct culture that has become radicalized, institutionalized and tyrannical.

Putin: Wokeness is ‘Reversed Discrimination’ and a ‘Crime Against Humanity’.

In the past few years, for example, prominent social media voices have been censored, silenced and made to disappear from Facebook, Twitter, YouTube and Instagram for voicing ideas that were deemed politically incorrect, hateful, dangerous or conspiratorial.

Most recently, Twitter suspended conservative podcaster Matt Walsh for violating its hate speech policy by sharing his views about transgendered individuals. “The greatest female Jeopardy champion of all time is a man. The top female college swimmer is a man. The first female four star admiral in the Public Health Service is a man. Men have dominated female high school track and the female MMA circuit. The patriarchy wins in the end,” Walsh tweeted on Dec. 30, 2021.

J.K. Rowling, author of the popular Harry Potter series, has found herself denounced as transphobic and widely shunned for daring to criticize efforts by transgender activists to erode the legal definition of sex and replace it with gender. Rowling’s essay explaining her views is a powerful, articulate, well-researched piece that not only stresses the importance of free speech and women’s rights while denouncing efforts by trans activists to demonize those who subscribe to “wrongthink,” but also recognizes that while the struggle over gender dysmorphia is real, concerns about safeguarding natal women and girls from abuse are also legitimate.

Ironically enough, Rowling’s shunning included literal book burning. Yet as Ray Bradbury once warned, “There is more than one way to burn a book. And the world is full of people running about with lit matches.”

Indeed, the First Amendment is going up in flames before our eyes, but those first sparks were lit long ago and have been fed by intolerance all along the political spectrum.

Consider some of the kinds of speech being targeted for censorship or outright elimination.

Offensive, politically incorrect and “unsafe” speech: Political correctness has resulted in the chilling of free speech and a growing hostility to those who exercise their rights to speak freely. Where this has become painfully evident is on college campuses, which have become hotbeds of student-led censorship, trigger warningsmicroaggressions, and “red light” speech policies targeting anything that might cause someone to feel uncomfortable, unsafe or offended.

Bullying, intimidating speech: Warning that “school bullies become tomorrow’s hate crimes defendants,” the Justice Department has led the way in urging schools to curtail bullying, going so far as to classify “teasing” as a form of “bullying,” and “rude” or “hurtful” “text messages” as “cyberbullying.”

Hateful speech: Hate speech—speech that attacks a person or group on the basis of attributes such as gender, ethnic origin, religion, race, disability, or sexual orientation—is the primary candidate for online censorship. Corporate internet giants Google, Twitter and Facebook continue to re-define what kinds of speech will be permitted online and what will be deleted.

Dangerous, anti-government speech: As part of its ongoing war on “extremism,” the government has partnered with the tech industry to counter online “propaganda” by terrorists hoping to recruit support or plan attacks. In this way, anyone who criticizes the government online can be considered an extremist and will have their content reported to government agencies for further investigation or deleted. In fact, the Justice Department is planning to form a new domestic terrorism unit to ferret out individuals “who seek to commit violent criminal acts in furtherance of domestic social or political goals.” What this will mean is more surveillance, more pre-crime programs, and more targeting of individuals whose speech may qualify as “dangerous.”

The upshot of all of this editing, parsing, banning and silencing is the emergence of a new language, what George Orwell referred to as Newspeak, which places the power to control language in the hands of the totalitarian state.

Under such a system, language becomes a weapon to change the way people think by changing the words they use.

The end result is mind control and a sleepwalking populace.

In totalitarian regimes — a.k.a. police states — where conformity and compliance are enforced at the end of a loaded gun, the government dictates what words can and cannot be used.

In countries where the police state hides behind a benevolent mask and disguises itself as tolerance, the citizens censor themselves, policing their words and thoughts to conform to the dictates of the mass mind lest they find themselves ostracized or placed under surveillance.

Even when the motives behind this rigidly calibrated reorientation of societal language appear well-intentioned — discouraging racism, condemning violence, denouncing discrimination and hatred — inevitably, the end result is the same: intolerance, indoctrination and infantilism.

The social shunning favored by activists and corporations borrows heavily from the mind control tactics used by authoritarian cults as a means of controlling its members. As Dr. Steven Hassan writes in Psychology Today:

“By ordering members to be cut off, they can no longer participate. Information and sharing of thoughts, feelings, and experiences are stifled. Thought-stopping and use of loaded terms keep a person constrained into a black-and-white, all-or-nothing world. This controls members through fear and guilt.”

This mind control can take many forms, but the end result is an enslaved, compliant populace incapable of challenging tyranny.

As Rod Serling, creator of The Twilight Zone, once observed, “We’re developing a new citizenry, one that will be very selective about cereals and automobiles, but won’t be able to think.”

The problem as I see it is that we’ve allowed ourselves to be persuaded that we need someone else to think and speak for us. And we’ve bought into the idea that we need the government and its corporate partners to shield us from that which is ugly or upsetting or mean. The result is a society in which we’ve stopped debating among ourselves, stopped thinking for ourselves, and stopped believing that we can fix our own problems and resolve our own differences.

In short, we have reduced ourselves to a largely silent, passive, polarized populace incapable of working through our own problems and reliant on the government to protect us from our fears.

As Nat Hentoff, that inveterate champion of the First Amendment, once observed, “The quintessential difference between a free nation, as we profess to be, and a totalitarian state, is that here everyone, including a foe of democracy, has the right to speak his mind.”

What this means is opening the door to more speech not less, even if that speech is offensive to some.

Understanding that freedom for those in the unpopular minority constitutes the ultimate tolerance in a free society, James Madison, the author of the Bill of Rights, fought for a First Amendment that protected the “minority” against the majority, ensuring that even in the face of overwhelming pressure, a minority of one — even one who espouses distasteful viewpoints — would still have the right to speak freely, pray freely, assemble freely, challenge the government freely, and broadcast his views in the press freely.

We haven’t done ourselves — or the nation — any favors by becoming so fearfully polite, careful to avoid offense, and largely unwilling to be labeled intolerant, hateful or closed-minded that we’ve eliminated words, phrases and symbols from public discourse.

We have allowed our fears — fear for our safety, fear of each other, fear of being labeled racist or hateful or prejudiced, etc. — to trump our freedom of speech and muzzle us far more effectively than any government edict could.

Ultimately the war on free speech — and that’s exactly what it is: a war being waged by Americans against other Americans — is a war that is driven by fear.

By bottling up dissent, we have created a pressure cooker of stifled misery and discontent that is now bubbling over and fomenting even more hate, distrust and paranoia among portions of the populace.

By muzzling free speech, we are contributing to a growing underclass of Americans who are being told that they can’t take part in American public life unless they “fit in.”

The First Amendment is a steam valve. It allows people to speak their minds, air their grievances and contribute to a larger dialogue that hopefully results in a more just world. When there is no steam valve to release the pressure, frustration builds, anger grows, and people become more volatile and desperate to force a conversation.

Be warned: whatever we tolerate now — whatever we turn a blind eye to — whatever we rationalize when it is inflicted on others will eventually come back to imprison us, one and all.

Eventually, “we the people” will be the ones in the crosshairs.

At some point or another, depending on how the government and its corporate allies define what constitutes “hate” or “extremism, “we the people” might all be considered guilty of some thought crime or other.

When that time comes, there may be no one left to speak out or speak up in our defense.

After all, it’s a slippery slope from censoring so-called illegitimate ideas to silencing truth. Eventually, as George Orwell predicted, telling the truth will become a revolutionary act.

We are on a fast-moving trajectory.

In other words, whatever powers you allow the government and its corporate operatives to claim now, for the sake of the greater good or because you like or trust those in charge, will eventually be abused and used against you by tyrants of your own making.

This is the tyranny of the majority against the minority marching in lockstep with technofascism.

If Americans don’t vociferously defend the right of a minority of one to subscribe to, let alone voice, ideas and opinions that may be offensive, hateful, intolerant or merely different, then we’re going to soon find that we have no rights whatsoever (to speak, assemble, agree, disagree, protest, opt in, opt out, or forge our own paths as individuals).

No matter what our numbers might be, no matter what our views might be, no matter what party we might belong to, it will not be long before “we the people” constitute a powerless minority in the eyes of a power-fueled fascist state driven to maintain its power at all costs.

We are almost at that point now.

Free speech is no longer free.

On paper — at least according to the U.S. Constitution — we are technically free to speak.

In reality, however, we are only as free to speak as a government official — or corporate entities such as Facebook, Google or YouTube — may allow.

The steady, pervasive censorship creep that is being inflicted on us by corporate tech giants with the blessing of the powers-that-be threatens to bring about a restructuring of reality straight out of Orwell’s 1984, where the Ministry of Truth polices speech and ensures that facts conform to whatever version of reality the government propagandists embrace.

Orwell intended 1984 as a warning. Instead, as I make clear in my book Battlefield America: The War on the American People and in its fictional counterpart The Erik Blair Diaries, it is being used as a dystopian instruction manual for socially engineering a populace that is compliant, conformist and obedient to Big Brother.

The police state could not ask for a better citizenry than one that carries out its own censorship, spying and policing.

Crushing Dissent Is Essential For Communism (And It’s Spreading Rapidly)

Here’s a news flash: Millions are watching serious cases of medical damage and even death grow and very little efficacy for these still experimental vaccines. If they work so well, why are they pushing booster after booster? Why are the most outbreaks clearly among the vaxxed?

Vaxx zealots have now had to admit that the purpose for all this force is that symptoms will be less severe. Really? Former health nuts were more careful about their tap water but now, they dutifully line up to take jab after jab after jab.

We are to believe that there’s nothing suspicious about the growing body of knowledge being suppressed or ignored about the dangers of these vaccines just as organized bullying and intimidation tactics continue and are even ramped up against those who refuse!

The argument for the use of force depends on the ridiculous and fraudulent claim that the unvaxxed are a threat to the vaxxed. If one gets past that preposterous notion, why would the vaxxed continue such fear and animosity toward the un-vaxxed?

Through the years, Rosen has rightfully pointed out that in a free society, 100% agreement is hardly a goal. Yet here, he seems to be saying that approximately 80 million people deserve the discrimination they get if they don’t comply. Huh?

We don’t demean those who refuse chemotherapy and I’m fairly sure most would oppose any government that would force it on patients “for their own good,” so why such anger at those who have said no? Didn’t we once revere the Patient’s Bill of Rights?

The deadliest virus right now is the one that is essential for socialism/communism to take hold, and it’s spreading rapidly: the crushing of dissent.

Full-scale mainstream media propaganda is being used to play on the emotions and constantly push fear and contempt for “Refusniks.” That makes the growing persecution and punishment of them more palatable to the public. We hope it won’t work.

It does appear to be working to some extent in Rosen’s case, whose article laid the responsibility for that persecution on the victims themselves. If they would just comply, they wouldn’t be inconvenienced.

Communist regimes begin with just that sort of emotional blackmail and they never stop with one group of scapegoats.

Also read: The Deadliest Virus In The World Is COMMUNISM And The ‘New Normal’ Is Modeled After Communist China.

https://www.brighteon.com/33090c2b-6100-4fd6-a4d0-ffa7022d8b31

https://www.brighteon.com/928449ea-331f-4277-a075-b388fef91914

January 6 Truth – Deep State Media Fears “Epiphany” 

We can now see where this heading — and so does the worried Fake News.

Picture
JANUARY 06, 2022

NY Times:
 The Next Big Lies: Jan. 6 Was a Left-Wing Plot

In November of 2020, the newly-elected mask-wearing imposter President-Elect “Biden” — who we maintain is working for the actual Emergency Power President, Donald Trump — made a cryptic prediction that Republicans were going to have an “epiphany”(a sudden and striking realization). Here’s the quote:

“With Donald Trump out of the way, you’re going to see a number of my Republican colleagues have an epiphany. Mark my words. Mark my words,” Biden said during a fundraiser on Wednesday.”

Much to the confusion of his commie supporters, ‘Biden” repeated the term in December. As “conspiracy theorists” always looking to crack a code, “The Editorial Board” of The Anti-New York Times interpreted this to mean that something big was being planned for January 6, 2021  — the date which Trump selected for his big anti-voter fraud rally.  January 6th is also the date assigned to the biblical “epiphany” story of the Three Kings (aka Three Wise Men) arriving to pay respects to baby Jesus.

Lo and behold, it did indeed turn out to be a historic day, which we can now refer to as “Jan 6.” Only we didn’t realize until recently what the higher purpose of this planned “epiphany” — dubbed by Fake News as the “insurrection” of “Jan 6 — was all about. We can now see where this is heading — and so does the worried Fake News.

Picture
The stumbling bumbling imposter (working for Trump) delivered a harsh anti-Trump 1-year anniversary speech. This (by design) draws even more attention to the growing impossible-to-ignore claims that Jan 6 was a Deep State false flag. 
Picture
Why does “The “President of the United States” continue to sit in a little boy’s desk, on a little waiting room chair, on a fake set with fake outdoor scenery in the window?
Picture
HUFFINGTON POST
Picture
BLOOMBERG NEWS
Picture
January 6

The Epiphany is celebrated on January 6. The word itself can also be defined as “A Great Awakening” — a term often linked to Q Anon. Is the explosive true story behind the events of January 6, set to come out now?

It didn’t really take an advanced “conspiracy theorist” to see what happened that day. We sniffed that shit out right quick. From the ANYT issue of January 7, 2020:

“In the aftermath of the invasion of Congress by a mob of fanatical and weird-looking “Trump supporters” (rolling eyes), two new trademark clichés have been emergency fast-tracked — They are “breached” and “stormed.” Oh you foolish “Trump supporters!” (rolling eyes). Did you not realize that your “breach” of the Capitol was going to be seized upon by Fake News to make “Trump supporters” look bad, while blaming Trump for “inciting” your lawless actions?

For those of you guys who will occasionally — and amusingly – fail to catch the sardonic humor of The Anti-New York Times, we’ll spell it out for you in no uncertain terms: The grungy-looking invaders who “stormed” Congress were CIA-Deep State-Antifa foot soldiers pretending to be Trump fans — and they were let in by Capitol security men who deliberately stood down.”

*

We waited patiently for this false-flag to blow up in the Deep State’s face, but the truth remained suppressed because the timing wasn’t quite right.

Picture
Why did these “Trump supporters” scale and “breach” the walls when they could have simply walked up the Capitol steps like any tourist can? Answer: It was a more dramatic made-for-TV “breach” shot. 
Picture
Picture
The ridiculous-looking “Buffalo Man” and his small band of  young “Trump supporters” just strolled right into the heavily guarded halls of Congress while it was in live session — and had a nice picture taken? How is that possible?

On the 1-year anniversary of Jan 6 ™, Trump loyalists in Congress are boldly calling out the event as a false flag. Matt Gaetz of Florida:

“We know this January 6 last year wasn’t an insurrection. No one has been charged with insurrection. No one has been charged with treason, but it very well may have been a Fed-surrection.”

And Q-Anon Congress-gal Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia called out, by name, the known Deep State provocateur Ray Epps — who was actually recorded inciting Trump supporters to enter the Capitol. (video clip here)

“I can tell you right now, I don’t trust our government even more. When I went through the D.C. jail, I’ll tell you who I did not see–I did not see Ray Epps.”

The Gaetz and Greene comments are indicators that the Jan 6 truth may be about to come out. That would indeed be the type of initial “epiphany” that the bewildered subjects of the overlapping tyrannical kingdoms of Normiedom & Libtardia need in order to finally understand that government false flags and media cover ups are REAL after all. Once their thick skulls are penetrated — other long-suppressed truths can be poured (gently and gradually) through the breach.

But the most promising sign of all is the obvious fact that this particular “conspiracy theory”  has just struck a nerve. The headlines below — all blasted out within hours of the G & G allegations — show how afraid (((they))) are of this potential “epiphany” going mainstream.

Stay tuned.

Picture
WASHINGTON POST
Picture
ROLLING STONE
Picture
AXIOS
Picture
PBS

Professor Of Clinical Psychiatry Who Studied The Psychology Of Totalitarianism: ‘This Is How We Win’

As many of you may know, all of humanity is under a massive psychological warfare attack. And Professor of Clinical Psychiatry, Matthias Desmet, who has studied the psychology of totalitarianism has done an excellent job of explaining how we got here and how we win.professor mattias Desmet

Professor of Clinical Psychiatry, Matthias Desmet

In dictatorships, obedience comes from a basic fear of the dictator. But with totalitarianism, people are hypnotized into obedience. In psychological terms, this mass hypnosis is known as mass formation.

And totalitarianism always starts with a mass formation inside the population.

A mass formation requires 4 conditions for it to take root:

1) The masses must feel alone and isolated.

2) Their lives must feel pointless and meaningless.

These conditions have been growing for years with social media [i.e. narcissism, sociopathy, addiction and mental illness]

3) The masses then must experience constant free-floating anxiety, and

4) They must experience free-floating frustration and aggression.

This simply means there is no discernible source for the anxiety or aggression. And so, the person begins to irrationally crave a remedy, no matter how absurd or destructive it may be.

And these conditions were met in 2020, with the COVID lockdowns and the BLM Riots.

They are now ripe for hypnosis.

And once they accept the experimental jabs, they feel solidarity, which validates the whole thing for them, no matter how senseless. They are now changed, no longer rational. They become intolerant and cruel.

So How Do We Win?

Studies have shown that about 25% of the population cannot be hypnotized. And about 10% are highly-susceptible to hypnosis.

Professor Desmet simplifies this even more for us. He says that 30% of people are now deeply hypnotized and have irrationally accepted the experimental shots as their solution40% are not yet hypnotized but will ultimately go along with the herd.

And the rest of us are seeing things clearly.

What the enemy is trying to do is extremely dangerous, because if the masses ever awaken from their spell, they will demand justice and so stress must constantly be maintained upon the masses until the “mass formation” is complete.

We are the voice of dissent. And while we may not have much in the way of influence over the hypnotized 30%, we must definitely hold sway over the 40% who will go along with the herd.

We need to become the herd.

Whether you think this all happened by accident or conspiracy; whether your reasons are based on religion or personal health, our voice of dissent must become one, it must grow and it must never end.

We must spread the seeds of doubt to everyone: At the gas station, at the grocery store, at work, with the neighbors.

They are desperately trying to provoke a civil war or a violent revolution, because they can control that.

Violence will not break people out of the hypnosis, it will only push more people into it.

Telling the truth has become a revolutionary act. Telling the truth to everyone you meet will save humanity, so keep doing it.

Learn Here: How to Defeat the New World Order Through Peaceful Non-Compliance.

https://rumble.com/vqf9fw-this-is-how-we-win.html

Government Files About “Remote Mind Control”

leademf3 1 Government Files About "Remote Mind Control"

A journalist who requested documents using the Freedom of Information Act received additional files on “remote mind control” and the effects of “psycho-electric weapons”.

A journalist working for the non-profit organization Muckrock made a bizarre discovery after requesting documents from the US government through the FOIA. Indeed, as part of an ongoing investigation about Antifa and white supremacist groups, the journalist sent a request to the Washington State Fusion Center, a Department of Homeland Security, which specializes in counter-terrorism, detecting criminal activity, disaster planning, cyber-security and other threat assessments.

Along with standard documents such as emails, intelligence briefings, and bulletins, the journalist received a bizarre filed named “EM effects on human body.zip”.

One document describes the effects of “psycho-electric weapons” including “forced memory blanking”, “forced rigor-mortis” and even “forced orgasm”.

EM effects on human body Government Files About "Remote Mind Control"

Another document explains biomagnetic fields and brainwaves (Alpha, Beta, Delta, etc.) two concepts that are extremely important in MKULTRA and Monarch mind control.

2RNM Government Files About "Remote Mind Control"

The final document describes how shady organizations can conduct “remote mind control” operations through mobile phone networks, trucks disguised as communication vehicles and “Black” helicopters.

9RNM Government Files About "Remote Mind Control"

Although these documents were sent by the WSFC, they do not appear to be created by a government agency. The first image “Psycho-Electric Weapon Effects” appears to be part of a 1996 article from Nexus Magazine which describes a lawsuit brought by John St. Clair Akewi against the NSA. The 1992 lawsuit claimed that the NSA had the “ability to assassinate US citizens covertly or run covert psychological control operations to cause subjects to be diagnosed with ill mental health”. The article states:

A lawsuit filed against the U.S. National Security Agency reveals a frightening array of technologies and programs designed to keep tabs on individuals. The following document comprises evidence for a lawsuit filed at the U.S. Courthouse in Washington, DC, by John St Clair Akwei against the National Security Agency, Ft George G. Meade, Maryland (Civil Action 92-0449), constitutes his knowledge of the NSA’s structure, national security activities proprietary technologies and covert operations to monitor individual citizens Ed.

The image also contains the web address http://www.raven1.net which is now offline.

The author of the second document appears to go by the name Supratik Saha a “Software And Electronics & Comm. Engg”.

The Muckrock journalist has no idea how he ended up with these documents.

“It’s entirely unclear how this ended up in this release. It could have been meant for another release, it could have been gathered for an upcoming WSFC report, or it could even be from the personal files of an intelligence officer that somehow got mixed up in the release. A call to the WSFC went unreturned as of press time, so until we hear back, their presence remains a mystery.”
– Muckrock, Washington State Fusion Center accidentally releases records on remote mind control

While these documents were probably not created by the government, they appear to be relevant enough for the WSFC to keep them archived.

Could these documents explain the mysterious Cuban “sonic attacks” where 24 government officials suffered “hearing loss, dizziness, sleep and vision problems, tinnitus, headaches, fatigue and brain damage” a few years back? Nearly all of these symptoms can be found in the first document.

Facebook Rolls Out Weird ‘You’ve Been Exposed To Extremist Content’ Alerts

Facebook users have begun to receive creepy messages warning them that they ‘may have been exposed to extremist content’ and asking if they need support, as well as asking them to report anyone they know who ‘may be becoming an extremist’.

antitrust, commercial and administrative law subcommittee hearing

The warnings began popping up Thursday and have little indication of what the platform considers to be ‘extremist content’:

Encouraging people to turn in their friends, relatives and neighbors for wrong-think, where have we heard about this before?

On closer inspection, the warnings further link to a group that calls itself Life After Hate.

The About description on their website reads:

Our Mission – Life After Hate is committed to helping people leave the violent far-right to connect with humanity and lead compassionate lives.

Our Programs – Our primary goal is to interrupt violence committed in the name of ideological or religious beliefs. We do this through education, interventions, academic research, and outreach.

04 life after hate about us

Note that there is still no definition of what ‘violent far-right’ means, and there is no mention of any far-left hate groups, of which there are plenty.

A ‘fact sheet’ posted to Life After Hate’s website also proclaims that “far right extremism and white supremacy are the greatest domestic terror threats facing the United States.” which is BULLSHIT

05 fact sheet

So, ok hate only exists on the right. And surely every woke leftist this message is sent to won’t use it against the conservative neighbour or colleague who merely disagrees with them.

You can see where this is heading.

Facebook responded to questions about the alerts Thursday, issuing a statement that says “This test is part of our larger work to assess ways to provide resources and support to people on Facebook who may have engaged with or were exposed to extremist content, or may know someone who is at risk,”

“We are partnering with NGOs and academic experts in this space and hope to have more to share in the future,” the Facebook statement also read.

This group appears to be yet another like the Southern Poverty Law Center, a far left political entity masquerading as a bipartisan organisation with the express goal of silencing anyone who does not adhere to their warped outlook.

We shouldn’t be surprised, Facebook has been doing this for years already, first targeting and attempting to silence those who publicly engage in wrongthink, and then going after everyone else.

As Pink Floyd legend Roger Waters recently noted, Facebook and Zuckerberg have an insatiable desire to “insidiously take over absolutely everything” and wipe out anyone or anything they cannot control.

What I dont undesrtand is WHY people are still in Facebook, Twitter, Etc,

The only way this Big Tech companies will learn, is by people getting out of it. “Lets Cancel Social Media”

Source: Summit.news

Top 10 Suppressed News Stories Of 2020

By Frank Miele

Back in the day, when I was managing editor at the Daily Inter Lake in Kalispell, Mont., I enjoyed the end-of-year ritual of voting in the Associated Press’s poll of the Top 10 news stories.

When I started participating in the year 2000, my list would include many of the same stories that made the final AP list, although often with differences in ranking.

But by the time I retired in 2018, my view of the news had sharply diverged from the AP’s consensus view.

Top 10 Suppressed News Stories Of 2020

I’d become something of a gadfly by then, questioning what seemed to be an ever more transparent left-leaning bias in mainstream reporting.

That divergence was probably magnified by the 2016 candidacy of Donald Trump and the bright light he had shined on Fake News, but my disenchantment with my profession had been growing for years, as chronicled in my book “The Media Matrix: What If Everything You Know Is Fake?

Still, there is no way that even as recently as four years ago I would have predicted just how abysmally irresponsible the media would become by 2020.

Major newspapers are winning Pulitzer Prizes for blatantly false reporting on topics such as “Russian collusion.”

Meanwhile, Silicon Valley oligarchs have appointed themselves censors – warning the American people not to read or watch anything that hasn’t been “fact-checked” by their hand-picked thought police.

The situation has gotten so bad that it’s no longer worth ranking the top news stories of the year because so little that is covered is news and so much that is news is written off as a “conspiracy theory.”

That’s why I’m introducing Heartland Diary USA’s first annual presentation of “Last Chance to Wake Up and Smell the News They Tried to Kill.”

So here are five of the biggest suppressed stories of 2020. Pardon me if I don’t go into great detail on them, but the closer I get to the truth, the more likely that Google, Twitter and Facebook will bury my story, too.

5) Mysterious Mutating Lockdown:

Has anyone ever figured out why it is OK for grocery store workers to remain on the job during an international pandemic while serving the needs of the entire population with no restrictions other than wearing a mask, but it is considered dangerous for gyms to open or, most ludicrously, for anyone other than spouses of governors to take their boat for a quick spin around the lake?

It seems like the lockdown can turn into whatever is convenient for politicians.

The uneven effects of the lockdown on different states and different sectors have resulted in the shift of trillions of dollars of capital in ways that will reshape the economy for generations to come, yet we are not supposed to talk about it.

4) Hydroxychloroquine:

If you know anything about this drug, it is probably just that some guy in Arizona died after drinking it, and that maybe President Trump was somehow responsible. Well, as they say, a little knowledge is a dangerous thing.

The guy in Arizona didn’t take hydroxychloroquine; he took a fish tank cleaner called chloroquine phosphate. And Trump never told anyone to take either the drug or the fish-tank cleaner.

He just said hydroxychloroquine was a promising treatment against COVID-19. Of course, as soon as he said it, the radical academic leftists who control medical journals and associations warned that hydroxychloroquine had no benefit as a treatment and was potentially dangerous even though it had been safely used against malaria and various immune deficiency syndromes for decades.

Fortunately, many doctors who were familiar with the drug continued to use it as a therapy in the early stages of COVID infections, and many patients around the world have been spared the most dire effects of the virus as a result. Just don’t expect to read about it in the New York Times.

3) Trump’s Vaccine Victory:

While the president has been painted as anti-science, it was his administration’s support that led to the fastest turnaround ever from viral discovery to viral vaccine — essentially less than a year.

Even as House Democrats are poised to launch investigations into Trump’s supposed crimes against humanity for being president during the COVID crisis, lives are being saved as a result of his policies.

Just don’t expect to read about it in the mainstream media, which spent much of 2020 ridiculing Trump for his prescient predictions that a vaccine would be developed by the end of the year.

2) Hunter Biden’s Laptop:

The ability to bury the Hunter Biden story throughout the 2020 presidential campaign ranks as one of the greatest victories in the history of propaganda. Hunter is the son of former Vice President Joe Biden, and his acknowledged history as a drug addict is now considered his strong suit.

The Senate Homeland Security Committee found extensive evidence that Hunter has made hundreds of millions of dollars for the Biden family by selling access to his father, so when Hunter’s laptop turned up with first-person incriminating evidence, it was pretty obvious that Joe Biden had a lot of answer for.

Except that the media never made him answer for anything. It preferred to rest on the bizarre assertion from 50 former U.S. intelligence officials that clear evidence of foreign collusion on Hunter’s laptop had all the earmarks of a “Russian disinformation” campaign. This was errant nonsense. Reporters, read the emails!

1) Election Fraud:

It turned out that everything that happened in 2020 before Nov. 3 was just prologue for the greatest deception in American history — namely the hijacking of a presidential election through means both legal and illegal.

Most importantly, every state that changed its election procedures without the consent of its legislature violated the U.S. Constitution. That’s why Republicans plan to challenge the Electoral College vote on Jan. 6.

Whether you like Donald Trump or not should be irrelevant. You either follow the Constitution or you don’t.

The fact that Trump increased his support in almost every demographic since 2016 and yet lost the election will apparently remain a mystery because the Democratic Party, with an assist from weak Republicans, is intent on continuing the charade that Joe Biden is a beloved elder statesman even more popular than Barack Obama.

I should add a disclaimer here. My list will not be your list. This is 2020, and there is plenty of suppression to go around.

You are hereby invited to submit your own contributions in the comments section below. In the meantime, rounding out my Top 10, here are some of the other major stories suppressed in 2020: