Trump & DeSantis Attack the Fed

Gov. Ron DeSantis, above, has begun to criticize Jerome Powell, the Federal Reserve chair, in speeches and news conferences.

NY Times: Why Ron DeSantis Is Taking Aim at the Federal Reserve

By Jeanna Smialek and Linda Qiu

It wasn’t that long ago when no politician — other than the lonely lovable Congressman Ron Paul (R-TX) — would dare to commit the ideological sacrilege of condemning “The Fed” (Federal Reserve System). Now, in the age of Trump, Fed-bashing is “the new normal.” Yes indeed; the times are changing.

In this selected Times piece, a pair of millennial morons, less than 10 years out of their respective commie colleges, combine to spout appalling disinformation and ignorance about the history of this criminal syndicate which we are not supposed to criticize. Economics writer (rolling eyes) Jeanna Smialek and “Fact Check” specialist (sighing) Linda Qiu mock Florida Governor Ron DeSantis for his recent barbs aimed at Rothschild’s bank — an attack which harmonizes nicely with both Trump’s and Q’s recent statements concerning the Central Bank. 

Let’s dive in and debunk some of the dubious dung dropped by this duo of deceptive dingbats.

1. Congressman Paul’s “END THE FED” crusade was considered “lunatic fringe.” Now, it’s becoming “the new normal.” // 2. Dingbat Duo: Idiot liars Jeanna Smialek & Linda Qiu // 3. Q Post 4962 makes a direct threat to “END THE ENDLESS” criminality of the 1913 Fed.

Jeanna & Linda: Gov. Ron DeSantis of Florida, who is preparing to take a widely anticipated leap into a 2024 presidential campaign, ….
Analysis: Is he? Trump “rival” DeSantis hasn’t even formed the necessary exploratory committee yet, let alone declared his candidacy for 2024. Let’s not tell these silly scribblers that DeSantis is Naval Intel working for Trump. They’d never believe it.

Jeanna & Linda:… appears to have discovered something that populists throughout history have found to be true: Bashing the Federal Reserve is good politics.
Analysis: Notice how they frame attacks on the Fed as being politically motivated. So limited in knowledge and in intellect is the Dingbat Duo that they never pause to consider the reasons which Fed critics have had for loathing this counterfeiting, market-rigging and loan sharking operation.

Jeanna & Linda: Mr. DeSantis has begun to criticize Jerome H. Powell, the Fed chair,….
Analysis: Let’s not tell the Dingbat Duo that Mr. Powell is also a White Hat.

Jeanna & Linda: He has alleged without evidence …
Analysis: The term “without evidence” is journo-speak for something being true.

The Dingbat Duo: … that the Biden administration is about to introduce a Central Bank Digital Currency
Analysis: In an ironic sense, the Dingbat Duo is correct because there isn’t going to be a CBDC. The White Hats’ game here is to mimic what the Deep State would have done — but then not actually do it. This is similar to how “Biden” is pretending to embroil us in a European War, but actually isn’t. Or how he threatened to further hobble the coal industry and “go green” — but actually didn’t…. etc. etc. etc. These controlled awakening events are only intended to raise eyebrows and cause concern, not to actually be executed. Understand?

Jeanna & Linda: Former President Donald J. Trump often blasted the central bank during the 2016 campaign and while he was in office.
Analysis: Trump, to the best of our knowledge, is actually the only US president to even speak ill of the 1913 Fed.

Jeanna & Linda: Mr. Trump at one point called Mr. Powell — his own pick for Fed chair — an “enemy,” comparing him to President Xi Jinping of China.
Analysis: In this case, Trump branding Powell and Xi (and DeSantis) as “enemies” is his way of camouflaging the fact that they are actually his White Hat allies.

Jeanna & Linda: Because the central bank is responsible for controlling inflation, it is often blamed both for periods of rapid price increases and for the economic damage it inflicts when it raises rates to bring that inflation under control.
Analysis: Inadvertently, these two idiots have just summed up the fundamental problem with the scam. When the Fed inundates the economy with new debt-money, inflationary bubbles form. When the Fed contracts the money-supply to fight the very inflation that is caused, everything crashes.

Jeanna & Linda: That can make it an easy political target.
Analysis: Ya think? Does not such economic evil warrant criticism?

Dingbats.

1. Powell, whether he is an actual White Hat or simply under submission — works for Trump. // 2. Talk of Orwellian CBDC is for scare optics only. It’s not going to actually happen, but it was supposed to. // 3. 1800’s cartoon of Trump’s favorite president — Andrew Jackson — slaying the multi-headed monster of the 2nd US Central Bank.

Jeanna & Linda: And populist skepticism of government control of money dates back centuries in America.
Analysis: The term “populist skepticism” is the dingbats’ snobby way of saying that only an unsophisticated rube in “flyover country” would be “skeptical” of the all-mighty, all-knowing Fed.

Jeanna & Linda: The nation’s first and second attempts at creating a central bank failed partly because of such concerns.
Analysis: No. The first two banks of the early 19th century failed because of the economic distress which they caused with their boom-bust “business cycles.” If the institutions were necessary, their 20-year charters would certainly have been renewed, instead of killed.

Jeanna & Linda: The Fed, set up in 1913, was designed as a decentralized institution with quasi-private branches dotted around the country in part to avoid concentrating too much power in one place.
Analysis: No! No! No! No! The Fed was only, out of political necessity, sold to the public as a “decentralized institution with quasi-private branches.” In reality, it has always been a single entity, first run by Paul Warburg(cough cough) out of Jew York City.

Jeanna & Linda: It has been the subject of conspiracy theories and political attacks ever since.
Analysis: “Conspiracy theories,”  eh? Like this one — admitted to (years later) — by Frank Vanderlip, a New York bankster who was actually present at the SECRET meeting at JP Morgan‘s estate on Jekyll Island (GA) — out of which the Fed monster came about:

“There was an occasion, near the close of 1910, when I was as secretive—indeed, as furtive—as any conspirator….I do not feel it is any exaggeration to speak of our secret expedition to Jekyll Island as the occasion of the actual conception of what eventually became the Federal Reserve System.…We were told to leave our last names behind us. We were told, further, that we should avoid dining together on the night of our departure. We were instructed to come one at a time and as unobtrusively as possible to the railroad terminal on the New Jersey littoral of the Hudson, where Senator Aldrich’s private car would be in readiness, attached to the rear end of a train for the South.…Once aboard the private car we began to observe the taboo that had been fixed on last names.…Discovery, we knew, simply must not happen, or else all our time and effort would be wasted.”

“Jeanna & Linda: “It is not surprising at all,” said Sarah Binder, a political scientist at George Washington University who has studied politics and the Fed.
Analysis: “Binder,” eh? (cough cough) They always dredge up such quackademic “experts” to buttress their bullshit.

Jeanna & Linda: Mr. DeSantis is placing himself to Mr. Trump’s right, she said, “and it sounds like many populist right-side critiques of the Fed, of monetary control, that we’ve heard throughout history.”
Analysis: The usual suspects are worried that Trump, VP DeSantis and the House Freedom Caucus may, as Q recently promised, “end the Fed” in due time. Expect more propaganda pieces like this one from the Times.

1. The “German” Paul Warburg is regarded as “The Father of the Fed.” (He was also the 1st Director of the Council on Foreign Relations). // 2. J.P. Morgan — a Rothschild goy frontman — hosted the secret 1910 meeting on Jekyll Island from which sprang the central bank, 3 years later. // 3. More than 20 years later, Jekyll attendee Vanderlip confessed to being a “conspirator” present at the secret meeting.

Bank Collapses and Stock Crashes

MARCH 17, 2023

NY Times:Bank Fears Go Global As Markets Convulse Over Lurking Hazards

NY Times:Federal Reserve and Lawmakers Eye Bank Rules After  Collapse

Stomach-churning volatility in stocks, bonds and other assets reflect renewed worries about the state of the economy and the risks lurking in the financial system.

Inflation, rising interest rates, bank failures, stocks crashing — 2023 is starting to look like 1929, or at least 2008. Though White Hats Jerome Powell at the Fed and “Joe Biden” in the fake White House may have triggered this crisis in order to induce the necessary storm which will wash away the Deep State; a nasty “correction” of some sort was an inevitability anyway.

Year upon year of legalized counterfeiting, widespread usury and wild government spending will always lead to a bubble-popping day of wreckoning  (typo deliberate). The best that “policy makers” can do is delay it or drag it out over time to a “soft landing” before starting the boom-bust bamboozle all over again. It is best that it happens now “under Biden’s watch,” as Trump comes off looking like a prophet that more and more normies want back.

The boom-bust cycle takes about a decade, more or less. This has been an endless up & down throughout American history — but especially severe after the establishment of the Fed in 1913 — a scam which was sold to Normiedom as a way to PREVENT the reoccurring cycles!

What really is this “business cycle” that we hear of? What causes the  “booms” and the “busts?” Is the financial roller coaster a natural occurrence in a free economy? Might someone with advance knowledge be able to profit from both the ups and the downs?

In reality, the Fed’s endless casino game is rigged for the purpose of fleecing the sheep, and then letting the wool grow back for the next fleecing. The monetary madness is really quite simple to understand — but few know how to explain it in simple language. Here’s the “business / boom-bust / expansion-recession cycle,” explained “in a nutshell.”

* The “business cycle” WITHOUT a central bank:
Panic of 1873, Panic of 1893, Panic of 1907

1. Banks lend money they don’t have, at interest.
2. This practice of “fractional reserve” lending gets out of hand.
3. The economy “booms” as asset values rise
4. Rumors of insolvency trigger bank runs.
5. The banks close their doors and depositors lose their money
6. Lending is tightened and money supply shrinks. (bust)
7. Bankruptcies increase as borrowers can’t get their hands on enough currency to pay back their old debts.
8. Stocks and real estate values crash
9. The bad debt is liquidated and the economy corrects itself.
10. Back to Step 1.

* The “business cycle” WITH a central bank issuing debt-currency:

The same as above, except #4 and #5 are not applicable due to the Octopus Fed’s open-checkbook support (“lender of last resort”) of the nation’s banks both large and small. The bubbles grow much bigger, as does the damage (seen and unseen) caused by the inevitable bursting of the bubbles. Though there generally are no bank runs and depositor losses, the public loses wealth through the inflation caused by debt-currency issuance and bailouts. Though there were still banking abuses during the 19th Century, inflation was essentially non-existent prior to the Fed’s establishment in 1913.

The currency-injecting central bank — which makes us pay interest for our own money supply — took the localized and limited scamming of the fractional usurers and made them worse both in terms of their widespread effect and their duration. This will be an endless cycle — until someone forcefully ends it — as Andrew Jackson did when he “killed the bank” following his epic “Bank War“ of the 1830’s.

Is there a modern day Andrew Jackson out there dauntless enough to “end the endless?” We shall have to wait and see what blows will be actually struck against the financial engine of the Rothschild Crime Syndicate in Trump’s coming third term (not a typo). As far as words and symbolism go, Trump — who hung a portrait of Jackson (his favorite president) in the Oval Office — reversed the directive to replace Jackson’s image on the $20 bill;  compared himself to Jackson many times; visited his grave site just 6 weeks into his presidency; and has verbally attacked the Federal Reserve System like no other president. He is also the first president to ever dump one of the Fed’s sainted Jewish chairmen (Janet Yellen). 

Further cause for hope comes to us from Q — who is 100% linked to the Trump team and has consistently posted anti-Rothschild and anti-Fed “crumbs.” On November 8, 2022, and again on November 11, 2022 — (the day of and just after the current Freedom Caucus Congress had been elected) — Q issued direct threats to “end” the “endless inflation and bubbles” of the “silent thieves” at the Fed. And given what has happened to other criminal elements of the NWO that Q has targeted, that should be troubling news for (((them))), and hopeful news for us. Let’s see what comes out of the current “crisis.”

“End the endless.”

1. Trump is not shy about showing off his favorite president. // 2.  Trump at the grave site of Andrew // 3. Trump “controversially” defied the “woke” order which Obongo had issued that would have replaced Jackson’s image with Aunt Jemima [abolitionist Harriet Tubman] in 2020.

Evil Fake News Says Inflation is Ending

By Jeanna Smialek

FEBRUARY 03, 2023

The econo-propagandists at the Times will always spin a decline in the rate of inflation – which still represents an ongoing increase in prices – as positive news.

From the article:

“People across the country are finally experiencing some relief from what had been a relentless rise in living costs. After repeated false dawns in 2021 and early 2022 — when price increases slowed only to accelerate again — signs that inflation is genuinely turning a corner have begun to accumulate.”

Happy days are here again!

What nonsense. This is akin to a morbidly obese man reducing the rate of his monthly weight gain — yet still gaining a few pounds each month — and declaring progress.  Along with their diversionary tricks, the seditious scribblers of Sulzberger’s Times have “memory holed” the fact that two years ago, the evil “paper of record” and their preferred quack-economists were actually cheer-leading for a “weakened dollar.”I rebutted one such piece. The article is re-posted below. See for yourself who called it correctly. (toot toot)

1. Times economics writer Jeanna Smialek knows more about shoes and handbags than she will ever understand about macroeconomics. // 2. Good news fatboy! Your rate of monthly weight gain fell from 7 pounds to “only” 3 this month! // 3. On the topic of inflation, we dug up a doozy from The Times Orwellian “Memory Hole.”

FLASHBACK / 03-02-21

Noam Scheiber

Rebuttal
March 2, 2021:
Only in the upside-down Orwellian world of Fake Economics — where the most basic dynamic of action & reaction is never understood — would the deliberate debasement of the national currency be considered a good thing if it increases exports sold to countries with a stronger currency (hence, theoretically, more manufacturing jobs here). Never mind the real income and wealth diminution of struggling elderly savers; or the decline in purchasing power of already strapped American consumers which such an insane policy would worsen. Those issues can be addressed separately — perhaps with even more money printing and debasement to pay for more welfare schemes.

This is some really crazy stuff — the equivalent of Stupid-19 insanity for economics. Let’s analyze and rebut a few lines. Hazmat suits and hip waders on, boys & girls, into Sulzberger’s macroeconomic muck we go.

Times: President Biden has made reviving American manufacturing a top priority. To deliver, he may first have to deal with something even more fundamental to the U.S. economy: the strength of the dollar.
Rebuttal: The surest way to revive manufacturing (as the pre-Stupid-19 Trump years proved) is through aggressive deregulation, tax cuts, tort reform (lawsuit control), and protective tariffs. Instead, the eggheads want to debase the currency and drive up prices.

Times: “Dollar overvaluation is the big problem,” said Mike Stumo, chief executive of the Coalition for a Prosperous America, …. Mr. Stumo describes policies that prop up the dollar as a “war on the working class.”
Rebuttal: Mike Stumo is out of touch with reality. We presume, given his title, that his salary and net worth in equities render his family immune to the ravages of a weakening currency. But for “working class” people living paycheck to paycheck with neither guaranteed salary increases nor higher-than-inflation capital gains each year, inflation is deadly. Nothing wages “war on the working class” like rising food and fuel prices. Nothing.

Times: Mr. Biden has hired a handful of senior economic advisers who are concerned about the dollar’s strength and have explored ways to reduce it.(emphasis added)
Translation: Inflation coupled with stagnant wages is coming. Brilliant!

Times: At its simplest level, the trade deficit represents a kind of leakage from the U.S. economy: Americans buy more in goods and services from abroad than the rest of the world buys from the United States … If Americans bought more domestically made products and fewer imports, the spending would create jobs for U.S.-based workers.
Rebuttal: But you’re creating another, even more serious problem (inflation, particularly on imported goods) in order to “solve” the import-export “imbalance.”  It’s like trying to prevent weight gain by smoking a pack of cigarettes daily in order to tamp down the hunger pangs! Why not just exercise and gradually condition yourself to eat smaller portions? — And why not just maintain a strong currency (consumer purchasing power) and a vibrant manufacturing economy (through business friendly policies, sensible tariffs and, ironically, increased consumer purchasing power).

What is most dangerous about this system is the fact that the US dollar is already artificially propped-up due to its status as the world’s reserve currency. Worldwide dollar demand actually keeps the dollar much stronger and more stable than what it would otherwise be. If (((they))) were to start weakening the “strong” dollar, there’s no telling how fast the existing illusion would unravel as investors start dumping them. It’s quite a pickle.

1. British Sodomite crypto-Marxist John Maynard Keynes (1883-1946) distorted the field of Economics. At the behest of his Globalist Masters, Keynesian ideology replaced the free market with grand and disastrous schemes of boom-bust monetary manipulation and state intervention. // 2. Let the presses roll — at interest! // 3. The elites don’t really worry about rising food prices.

1. The government sinks businesses (especially manufacturing) — then proposes to debase the currency in order to help business? // 2. Mr. Stumo is Mr. Stupid. // 3. “If I smoke more cigarettes, I’ll eat less and lose weight.”

In a perfectly honest monetary system, no government nor Central Bank would be rigging its currency values up or down to achieve this or that economic metric. Ideally, the ratio of debt-free currency to “stuff” (GDP) should be kept relatively constant because the only legitimate functions of currency are to facilitate trade and act as a store of value. In such an honest system, your money should neither depreciate (no theft of citizens) nor appreciate (we don’t want speculative hoarding either) as actual wages and saved wealth increase along with GDP.

Indeed, from 1800 until 1913, wealth increased greatly as prices for clothes and food stayed pretty much constant as neither the state nor the banksters could steal it. But then came “The Fed” (1913); the gradual abandonment of the gold standard (starting in 1933 & ending in 1973); and the post World War II enthronement of “Keynesian” economic gibberish and manipulation on a global scale.

At this advanced stage in society’s mental and moral decline, the monetary error has become so institutionalized that even “educated” business leaders seriously and openly talk about degrading the value of what’s left in our pockets, salaries and bank accounts — as if its  good thing for “the working class.” Nuts!

1. From 1800-early 1900’s — booming exports AND stable currency value. Why was that? // 2. The Fed destroys the value of the dollar. // 3. Hitler’s Germany: The strongest currency in the world AND a booming manufacturing with lots of exports. Why was that?

“Sir” Evelyn de Rothschild Is Dead

In the grand scheme of things, “Sir” Evelyn’s crooked clan outranked the Windsor Family.

1931-2022NOVEMBER xx, 2022NY Times: Evelyn de Rothschild, Scion of Banking Dynasty, Dies at 91

Initially showing little promise, he eventually joined the family firm and rose to chairman, wielding vast influence in Britain’s financial and political affairs.

Heads up, Satan. Incoming! And oh what a big fish it is! The Slimes obituary, though flattering, actually confirms the historical generational power of this wretched clan.

From the article:

“Evelyn de Rothschild, who as a London scion of the European banking dynasty helped Britain privatize its railroads, steel and coal in the tradition of his ancestors, who had helped finance the acquisition of the Suez Canal and the defeat of Napoleon, died on Monday evening at his home in London. He was 91.

Sir Evelyn’s father was the chairman, and his great-great-grandfather the founder, of N.M. Rothschild & Sons, the British branch of the family banking empire that began in 18th-century Frankfurt, Germany, and that, with its networks of couriers and spies, financial wizardry and political alliances, spread across Europe, making fortunes and influencing the destinies of nations for 200 years.”
(emphasis added)

Wow! Sure sounds like a “conspiracy theory” to me — “antisemitic even!” 

1. Q has exposed, attacked and even threatened the Rothschild family many times (here) — I know he was old, but might the “White Hats” have taken him out on the day of “The Blood Moon?” // 2 & 3. Two centuries ago, Evelyn’s great-great-grandfather financed the take-down of Napoleon and (using insider advance information) the takeover of Britain in the same move.

More of what sounds like “conspiracy theory” — from the article:

“Like his forebears, he promoted strong ties with Britain’s government, news media and financial and business communities. He became chairman of The Economist and director of Lord Beaverbrook’s newspaper group, chairman of the British Merchant Banking & Securities House Association and a financial adviser to Queen Elizabeth II, who knighted him in 1989.”

Government, media, financial adviser to recently departed Queen, royal connections —- move along — nothing to see here.

More “antisemitism”  —

“Since the 1760’s, when the patriarch Mayer Amschel Rothschild founded the dynasty in Frankfurt and sent four of his five sons — the five arrows in the family crest — to establish four more businesses in London, Paris, Vienna and Naples, the Rothschilds had been a partnership whose wealth and family ties had been a bulwark.”

Oh not that old canard about the five sons running the banking operations out of the five great capitals of Europe at the time? Come on, man. That’s ‘Nazi” stuff!

This parasitic Satanic filth has been at the core and at the pinnacle of the New World Order conspiracy movement and all of its sub-conspiracies for about 220 years. As one generation passes, a new one takes its place. But this time around, it may no longer be the case. Rothschild’s NWO — thanks in no small measure to its exposure by Q and the maneuvering of Trump & Putin — is weakening. 

Next up on the Rothschild death list: Jacob, age 86.

Horror in Hamburg: German Version of “Hamilton”

As if the hyped-up Broadway Freak Show about a hyped-up villain of history wasn’t “woke” idiotic enough — now comes word that the moronic musical has been duplicated for audiences in occupied Germany.

Gino Emnes (Aaron Burr) and Benet Monteiro (Alexander Hamilton) are in the German production of “Hamilton.”
NY Times: 
They Translated ‘Hamilton’ Into German. Was It Easy? Nein.

For the musical’s Hamburg premiere, a team wrestled with language and cultural differences to bring the story alive for a new audience.

As if the hyped-up Broadway Freak Show about an equally hyped-up villain of American history — featuring mulatto / Hispanic actors playing the 18th Century Anglo-Saxon founders of the United States — wasn’t “woke” idiotic enough; now comes word that the moronic musical has been duplicated for stupefied audiences in occupied Germany.

From the article’s opening:

“For the last four years, a team of translators has been working with the “Hamilton” creators to develop a German version — The German-speaking cast — most of them black actors, reflecting the show’s defining decision to retell America’s revolutionary origins with the voices of today’s diverse society — is now in the final days of rehearsal.”

Adding insanity to idiocy, we learn that the German cast isn’t merely of mixed race, but straight-up Black instead! Nothing against “people of color” (Me Included) per se, you understand – but come on man! Were it not for its blot-out-Whitey-from-history symbolism, this spectacle would be laughable. You wouldn’t expect to see a blond-haired / blue eyed actor playing the part of Martin Luther King, or Simon Bolivar for example, would you?

I know, Mr. First President. I know I know, Mein Fuhrer. I know lol

This horror in Hamburg does offer us a “teachable moment” to bring the exalted reputation of Alexander Hamilton – the nation’s first Secretary of the Treasury – down a few notches. Contrary to the wishes of many of America’s founders, the non-American-born Hamilton (British West Indies) passionately advocated for the establishment of the First Bank of the United States — the privately owned “Fed” of its day. When Hamilton submitted a report to Congress outlining his proposal in 1790, he used the charter of the Bank of England as the model.

Among others, Thomas Jefferson — primary author of the Declaration of Independence and first Secretary of State — feared that a central bank would create a dangerous financial monopoly favoring financiers over plantation owners and family farmers, who tended to be debtors. Jefferson also argued that the Constitution did not grant the government the authority to establish corporations, including a national bank. Despite the contentious opposing voices, Hamilton’s bill cleared Congress and President George Washington signed the bill into law in 1791.

During the young nation’s first “Bank War,” Hamilton had been accused by some of pursuing policies to enrich Jewish financiers overseas (here).  When the first subscriptions to the new bank quickly sold out, an editorial in a Philadelphia newspaper fingered “Amsterdam Jews” as among those “bereft of  honesty or industry” who would benefit from Hamilton’s bank. (here)

Given Hamilton’s closeness to and gushing admiration for “the usual suspects,” it’s not surprising that he wanted such an institution (a destructive institution which died 20 years later when Congress refused to renew its charter, thus triggering the UK-US war of 1812). As a child, Hamilton, born out of wedlock, was educated in a Jewish school which was run out of a synagogue (here) and learned to speak Hebrew. That fact, combined with his “Danish” stepfather’s Jewish-sounding surname of “Lavien,” has prompted even some Establishment whorestorians to speculate that he may have been raised Jewish. In any event, Alexander “Levine” was not shy about declaring his love and even mystical reverence for “The Tribe.” He once wrote:

“The state and progress of the Jews, from their earliest history to the present time, has been so entirely out of the ordinary course of human affairs, is it not then a fair conclusion, that the cause also is an extraordinary one—in other words, that it is the effect of some great providential plan? The man who will draw this conclusion, will look for the solution in the Bible. He who will not draw it ought to give us another fair solution.”

Hamilton also advocated in favor of Jewish immigration and once argued in a court case:

“Why distrust the evidence of the Jews? Discredit them and you destroy the Christian religion.”

Oh barf! He sounds as bad as the Austrian Count Kalergi! 

1. The Jefferson-Hamilton rivalry wasn’t just about monetary ideology. Jefferson viewed Hamilton as ambitious and corrupt. // 2. Hamilton won the first “Bank War” and the First Bank of the United States (owned in large part by foreign shareholders) was established in Philadelphia. // 3. Ah, show us the shekels, Alex. Show us the shekels!

Hamilton made bitter enemies not just because of economic differences; but because he was a sneaky, dishonorable and dirty tactician — an elitist scumbag with both a keen intellect and a legendary “gift of gab” which appeared to have President Washington under its spell at times. Many of Hamilton’s founding contemporaries — including FOUR future Presidents: John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison & James Monroe — not only opposed Hamilton’s grand schemes, but they all despised him on a personal level. Though the whorestorians do not dispute this astonishing universal antipathy toward the arrogant bankster; it is seldom mentioned in the modern white-washing (or shall we say, “black-washing”?) of St. Alexander.

Aside from the banksterism, following is a bullet point review of Hamilton’s other most shameful antics:

* Offered to lead soldiers to violently crush the Whiskey Tax Rebellion in Pennsylvania — an idea which Washington refused before resolving the matter peacefully
* Slept with another man’s wife (The Maria Reynolds Affair) and later paid off her husband to keep the matter quiet, until it was finally exposed
* Circulated nasty pamphlets personally attacking John Adams
* Falsely accused Jefferson — who was a Deist — of being an “atheist”
* Used a pen name to falsely accuse Jefferson of keeping a Black slave-girl as his concubine — the origin of the Sally Hemmings baby LIE.

As is often the case with these types of characters, they eventually mess with the wrong man. In Hamilton’s case, that would be Jefferson’s sitting Vice President, Aaron Burr.

Burr was running for Governor of New York in 1804 and lost to little known Morgan Lewis. He blamed his loss on a personal smear campaign orchestrated by the great smear-master Hamilton — a Kingmaker of New York politics. In April, the Albany Register published a letter from Dr. Charles D. Cooper to Philip Schuyler, which relayed Hamilton’s judgment that Burr was “a dangerous man and one who ought not to be trusted with the reins of government,” and claiming to know of “a still more despicable opinion which General Hamilton has expressed of Mr. Burr.” It was the word “despicable” that triggered Burr. In June, Burr wrote to Hamilton, seeking a clarification and disavowal of the remark attributed to him. When Hamilton refused, Burr challenged him to a duel — which took place across the Hudson River on July 12, 1804 at Weehawken Heights, New Jersey because there were laws against dueling in New York.

And that, boys and girls was the end of Alexander “Levine” Hamilton.

Good shot, Mr. Burr!

World Economic Forum’s ‘Young Global Leaders’ Is A Massive Network Of Royals, Politicians, Big Tech, Billionaires And Other ‘Elites’

Through its Young Global Leaders program, the World Economic Forum has been instrumental in shaping a world order that undermines all democratic principles. For several decades, this program has nurtured compliant leaders acting as WEF agents in governments around the world. The consequences are far-reaching and may turn out to be devastating for humanity.

Billy Boy (Global Leader of Tomorrow 1992) and Justin Trudeau (Young Global Leader).

“I have to say then I mention names like Mrs Merkel, even Vladimir Putin and so on they all have been Young Global Leaders of The World Economic Forum. But what we are really proud of now with the young generation like Prime Minister Trudeau, President of Argentina and so on, is that we penetrate the cabinets… It is true in Argentina and it is true in France now…” – Klaus Schwab

Watch below:

In 1992, Klaus Schwab and World Economic Forum launched a program initially called Global Leaders of Tomorrow. In 2004, this program was turned into the Forum for Young Global Leaders (which I cover in my book The Global Coup D’Etat) – a 5-year program of indoctrination into WEFs principles and goals.

The aim was – and is – to find suitable future leaders for the emerging global society. The program has since its inception has included politicians, business leaders, royalty, journalists, performers and other cultural influencers who have excelled in their fields but have not yet turned 40 years of age (originally 43 in order to include Angela Merkel).

It has since grown into an extensive global network of dedicated leaders with enormous resources and influence, all working to implement the technocratic plans of the World Economic Forum in their respective nations and fields.

“The network creates a force for worldwide influence through the combination of the individual skills and resources of its members.”

As Klaus Schwab says in the introductory quote, it has become very successful. Already in the first year, 1992, a number of highly influential candidates were elected. Among 200 selected were global profiles such as Angela Merkel, Tony Blair, Nicolas Sarkozy, Billy Boy, Bono, Richard Branson (Virgin), Jorma Ollila (Shell Oil), and José Manuel Barroso (President of the European Commission 2004–2014). [1]

Another “Global Leader of Tomorrow” 2000 was Chrystia Freeland, Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Finance of Canada, a journalist and author who was previously managing director of Thomson Reuters and deputy editor of the Financial Times. She is also a board member of the World Economic Forum.

“As Foreign Minister, she led and successfully concluded the renegotiation of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) between Canada, Mexico, and the United States. In November, 2019, Ms. Freeland was appointed Deputy Prime Minister of Canada and Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs. In this capacity, she led Canada’s united response to the COVID-19 pandemic.” (World Economic Forum) [2]

More Examples Of Influential Young Global Leaders [3]:

Crown Princess Victoria of Sweden
Crown Prince Haakon of Norway
Crown Prince Fredrik of Denmark
Prince Jaime de Bourbon de Parme, Netherlands
Princess Reema Bint Bandar Al-Saud, Ambassador for Saudi-Arabia in USA
Jacinda Arden, Prime Minister, New Zeeland
Alexander De Croo, Prime Minister, Belgium
Emmanuel Macron, President, France
Sanna Marin, Prime Minister, Finland
Carlos Alvarado Quesada, President, Costa Rica
Faisal Alibrahim, Minister of Economy and Planning, Saudi Arabia
Shauna Aminath, Minister of Environment, Climate Change and Technology, Maldives
Ida Auken, MP, former Minister of Environment, Denmark (author to the infamous article “Welcome To 2030: I Own Nothing, Have No Privacy And Life Has Never Been Better”)
Annalena Baerbock, Minister of Foreign Affairs, Leader of Alliance 90/Die Grünen, Germany
Kamissa Camara, Minister of the Digital Economy and Planning, Mali
Ugyen Dorji, Minister of Domestic Affairs, Bhutan
Martín Guzmán, Minister of Finance, Argentina
Muhammad Hammad Azhar, Minister of Energy, Pakistan
Paula Ingabire, Minister of Information and communications technology and Innovation, Rwanda
Ronald Lamola, Minister of Justice and Correctional Services, South Africa
Birgitta Ohlson, Minister for European Union Affairs 2010–2014, Sweden
Mona Sahlin, Party Leader of the Social Democrats 2007–2011, Sweden
Stav Shaffir, Leader of the Green Party, Israel
Vera Daves de Sousa, Minister of Finance, Angola
Leonardo Di Caprio, actor and Climate Activist
Mattias Klum, photographer and Environmentalist, Sweden
Jack Ma, Founder of Alibaba
Larry Page, Founder of Google
Ricken Patel, Founder of Avaaz
Jimmy Wale, Founder of Wikipedia
Jacob Wallenberg, Chairman of Investor
Niklas Zennström, Founder of Skype
Mark Zuckerberg, Founder of Facebook

The purpose from the beginning has been to “identify and advance a future-oriented global agenda, focusing on issues at the intersection of the public and private sectors.”

Public–Private Partnerships is one of the cornerstones of the World Economic Forum philosophy. That is, a merger between state and large companies (also known as corporativism) with the aim of solving global problems of in a more “effective” way. The choice of leaders clearly reflects this aspiration.

The Young Global Leaders group was initially instructed to identify the major challenges of the 21st century. These included peace, the environment, education, technology and health – areas which these upcoming leaders could exploit politically, economically, and culturally in the new millennium.

Partners for Global Leaders of Tomorrow in 2000 were large global companies such as The Coca Cola Company, Ernst & Young, Volkswagen, and BP Amoco. These could contribute to the agenda by “playing an active role in developing and implementing the concept of the GLT project. The partners can therefore actively participate in the development of GLT programs; representatives of the partner companies as well as their guests are invited to GLT meetings .. ” Since the Global Leaders of Tomorrow was turned into Young Global Leaders 2004, partners such as the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Google, and JPMorganChase (with alumni from the program) have also participated as sponsors.

Partners for Global Leaders of Tomorrow in 2000 were large global companies such as The Coca Cola Company, Ernst & Young, Volkswagen, and BP Amoco. These could contribute to the agenda by “playing an active role in developing and implementing the concept of the GLT project. The partners can therefore actively participate in the development of GLT programs; representatives of the partner companies as well as their guests are invited to GLT meetings … ”

Since the Global Leaders of Tomorrow was turned into Young Global Leaders 2004, partners such as the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Google, and JPMorganChase (with alumni from the program) have also participated as sponsors.

The ultimate consequence of both public–private partnerships and these target areas is the creation of a largely fascist social contract in which the individual has become subordinated to these powerful interests. Noble goals of creating a better world have also been kidnapped. This is especially evident in the context of the partnership between the WEF and the UN and the implementation of the global goals (Agenda 2030) through the application of the technologies of the Fourth Industrial Revolution.

This means that the democratic principles and division of power of the 20th century have largely been completely undermined and instead replaced by a new global class that shapes our common future based on their own interests. This has led to a de facto privatisation of both national governments and international organisations, where lobbyists are no longer kept in the lobby but have moved into the seat of power, shaping policies directly affecting our lives. What this means has become particularly evident since the pandemic was declared in March 2020.

In addition, leading multinational investment management corporations such as BlackRock, led by the World Economic Forum’s own Larry Fink, have constantly moved their positions forward.

German economist and journalist Ernst Wolff believes that many of the national leaders included in the Young Global Leader program have been selected for their willingness to carry out the tough agenda of lockdowns in recent years without asking any questions, and that their impending failure (as evidenced by in a growing dissatisfaction of the masses) will be used as an excuse to create a new form of Global Government where the old nation states become largely obsolete. A new global digital currency with Universal Basic Income (UBI) can then be gradually introduced to replace our doomed monetary system. [4]

This conclusion partly coincides with my own. It is also supported by Paul Raskin‘s scenarios from The Great Transition Initiative on how a totalitarian “New Earth Order” is established, to be replaced in the long run by a global democratic government (Earth Federation) with a World Constitution. [5]

“The COVID-19 pandemic has underscored the catastrophic failure of an every-country-for-itself approach to public health, and national economic interests, rather than global needs, continue to dominate discussions of climate policy, paving the path toward climate chaos.

Under the tricameral World Parliament come the four main agencies of the Earth Federation government: the World Supreme Court system, the World Executive, the World Enforcement System, and the World Ombudsman.” [6] – Glen T. Martin, The Earth Constitution

The vision is that a peaceful and harmonious world in balance is created through the establishment of a World Federation with a World Parliament, World Government and a World Court. These are ideas that have long circulated in Club of Rome and closely connected New Age circles. The question is how such a new global system of power would escape the fate of being kidnapped by the same interests that created our current corrupt and failing system? This is in view of those who support projects such as The Great Transition (initiated with start-up capital from Steven Rockefeller). What is happening is rather a method of taking us to their ultimate solution in the form of a global technocratic control system.

However, it is highly unlikely that this plan will succeed. Awareness is spreading like wildfire and the panic of the elite increases as their narrative crumbles and people become more and more immune to the propaganda. Hence all the inquisitors and “fact checkers” who diligently gatekeep the narrative and help steer public opinion in the “right” direction. They are surely to be trusted since, for example, David Roy Thomson, Chairman of the Thomson Reuters Corporation, is an alumni of Global Leaders of Tomorrow, class of 1993.

It is now time to take control of our own destinies and to avoid falling into new traps.

Reference: Pharos.stiftelsen-pharos.org / References:

Thanks to investigative journalist Cory Morningstar for the clip that inspired this blog article. Follow her blog Wrong Kind of Green.

[1] World Economic Forum, GLT Class of 1993.pdf
[2] World Economic Forum, Chrystia Freeland
[3] World Economic Forum, Young Global Leaders Community (searchable list over YGL alumni)
[4] Michael Lord, “Exposed: Klaus Schwab’s School For Covid Dictators, Plan for ‘Great Reset’“, RAIR Foundation, November 10, 2021
[5] Paul Raskin, Journey to Earthland: The Great Transition to Planetary Civilization.pdf, Tellus Institute, Boston, 2016
[6] Glen T. Martin, The Great Transition Requires the Earth Constitution“, Great Transition Initiative, November 2021

How The Flow Of Money Created The One World Government

“We are grateful to The Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications…. [for] their promises of discretion for almost forty years… [t]he work is now much more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a World Government… The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries.” David Rockefeller to the Trilateral Commission, 1991.

Image: David Rockefeller (meeting in 1976 with Iraqi bankers during a visit to Bahrain) dreamed of a one-world government through banking. Photo by Hashmoder. CC BY-SA 4.0.

This statement, made thirty years ago, means that the conspiracy to replace our Constitutional Republic began forty years before that — 1951 — with the assistance of respected journalists. Seventy years of concerted effort to leave We the People in the dark. (It is probably more like over one hundred years.)

James Warburg, financial advisor to FDR, and part of a banking family that stood to gain financially from world government, testified in 1950 before a Senate Congressional subcommittee that “We shall have world government whether you like it or not, by conquest or consent.”

This leaves We the People with two large questions: how did this happen and what can we do if either of those two options is unacceptable to the American people?

This issue has been with us since George Washington took office in 1789. A small cadre of interconnected bankers was already well-established in England, France, Austria, Germany, and Italy.

These bankers took advantage of the chaos growing out of the rejection of Roman Catholicism and the social breakdown and vehement hatreds that grew out of the Protestant Reformation by funding both sides (through government debt) of the many resultant wars and revolutions and then funding the peace afterward.

The profits were enormous. As Europe went through the revolutionary turmoil of the 19th and early 20th centuries, world bankers wove through societies like a malignancy, manipulating world leaders, destabilizing whole nations of people, and supporting philosophies that promote centralized authority (including international authority) that would strengthen world banking arrangements.

America is a different matter. First, we are isolated by two oceans and developed a stable and productive society away from the horrors of Europe. We had no Roman Catholic experience to reject. We did reject atheism — we are a God-fearing and God – respecting nation.

The federal Constitution, as well as each state Constitution, created a framework for ordered Liberty — America’s unique and irreplaceable Rule of Law. Decentralizing authority — Federalism — is one of the philosophical anchors to that framework.

But we have been the prize for this group since the beginning of our Republic. Creating central banks in each country that the cartel could control was part of the scheme. Washington reluctantly supported Alexander Hamilton’s First Bank of the United States. That bank’s funding came almost entirely from private investors, with one of the most significant being the Bank of England.

When the charter for the First Bank of the United States was not renewed amid great public opposition in 1811, it was one more point of contention between the British and Americans leading to the war of 1812, so much so that the Bank of England had a leading role in the decision to go to war.

Had the Bank of England not wanted the war, it likely would not have happened. (Other reasons were connected to the Napoleonic wars. England was concerned that the U.S. was helping Napoleon.

The British were impressing U.S. sailors into the British Navy, they feared American support for France, they placed restrictions on trade, and there was still fallout from the 1807 British attack on the USS Chesapeake.)

After the peace, a Second Bank of the United States was chartered but was vehemently opposed by President Andrew Jackson when its charter came up for renewal in 1832. Jackson’s view of European bankers was “You are a den of vipers and thieves.” He was attacked by an assassin at point-blank range whose pistols misfired. We do not know if the two events are linked.

Lincoln, Garfield, and Kennedy opposed this cancer, as well. As President Garfield put it, “Whoever controls the money of a nation, controls that nation.”

America surrendered to the pressure for a central bank in 1913 with the help of James Warburg’s father, Paul. Woodrow Wilson signed the Federal Reserve Act, following the model of Europe, but in a way thought palatable to the American people.

Thus, we have been at constant war ever since 1917, and have allowed our wealth to be transferred elsewhere. In one hundred years we have gone from a debt of $3 billion to $30 trillion.

Decentralized authority — Federalism — gave way to the more easily corruptible federal power.

This is the reality of today — the mission by those opposed to our Constitutional Republic is now how to get the American people to consent to the loss of their Constitutional system and accept perpetual debt slavery and control through the United Nations.

“The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers” as David Rockefeller tells us; “by conquest or consent” adds James Warburg.

What if Americans just say “no.” America does not need to surrender her wealth, her potential wealth, our Constitutional system, or our nation-state. We are not Europe. We do not want to dispose of the foundations of our moral roots and end up as soulless atheists imprisoned in nihilism and drowning in dependence. George Washington warned us about this; so did Dwight Eisenhower and many others.

We the People urgently need to demand a comprehensive plan from our public servants to re-establish the prosperity of our nation, stabilize and reduce our national debt, and establish a strong enough military defense to buy us time to get our national financial house in order.

One important component of this defense is rebuilding and strengthening a strong moral core in the American people and encouraging authentic education in history, civics, philosophy, and economics.

It is through prayer, discipline, grit, and education that our Republic will be saved — by the Grace of God. If it takes two generations or another one hundred years to accomplish it, so be it.

If recovered, let us hope We the People, America’s Sovereign, never let our system or our country go to this den of vipers and thieves, again.

By M. E. Boyd, AmericanThinker.com

M. E. Boyd is the author of “Apples of Gold – Voices From the Past that Speak to Us Now“.

False Flag Warning: Israel Leads 10-Country Simulation Of Major Cyber Attack On Global Financial System, Just Months After WEF Did The Same Thing

A simulation took place on December 9th 2021 in Israel. It was about a major cyber security attack on global financial systems. The simulation took place with 9 other countries, the World Bank, as well as the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the Finance Ministry in Jerusalem.

[Worryingly, back in March of this year, the World Economic Forum also ran a financial cyberattack simulation, which led to the Great Reset of the global economy. History has shown us that this is precisely how the powers that shouldn’t be train and prepare for their never-ending false flags.]

The exercise simulated several scenarios, including sensitive data surfacing on the dark web alongside fake news [i.e. censoring the truth after labelling it “fake news“], leading to global financial chaos.

“The unique and groundbreaking exercise held today showed the importance of coordinated global action by governments together with central banks in the face of financial cyber threats.” – Israeli Finance Ministry’s chief economist, Shira Greenberg. Times of Israel.

Have we seen this before? Israel recently announced that they were on the verge of a state of emergency due to the emergence of the COVID Omicron variant. This announcement came just two week after Israel held the world’s first war games exercise preparing for the possible emergence of a deadly variant of the COVID virus named “Omega.”

Also read: The New COVID Variant Scam Was Simulated In Israel Weeks Before It Was ‘Discovered’.

Just two months before China reported a mysterious pneumonia outbreak in the city of Wuhan, which marked the beginning of COVID-19, government officials and business leaders met in New York to simulate a novel coronavirus emergence in Brazil that killed 65 million within 18 months. The event was called ‘Event 201’ and was put on by Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, along with the World Economic Forum and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

[A bombshell that very few people are actually aware of is this: The Chinese Government ALSO Ran a Coronavirus Drill Before the Plandemic, and it Was Held in Wuhan — Exactly Where the Actual Outbreak Started. That’s one might coincidence, if you believe in coincidences.]

According to the Israeli government, cyber security threats are possible especially in the wake of multiple large cyber attacks on large companies and the only way to contain any damage is through global cooperation.

The National Cyber Directorate in Israel issued a warning to Israeli businesses regarding potential cyber attacks last October. On average, one in every 60 Israeli organizations is targeted every week with ransomware attacks. This is an increase of 30 percent over the rate in 2020. The rate happens to be increasing all over the planet.

Coincidences? Nah, False Flags!

Event 201 and the ‘war game exercise’ involving a new variant of COVID were held right before these events actually occurred. Event 201 led many people to believe that the COVID outbreak was a planned event by the powers that shouldn’t be. Mainstream media outlets and “fact-checkers” claimed this was false news and a “conspiracy theory.”

Sure, there is no way to determine whether or not COVID was a planned event used as a tool for ulterior motives, but any discussion that this could be a possibility was not had within the mainstream dialogue.

Despite being labelled as a conspiracy, many academics early on in the pandemic were sharing these feelings. For example, Francis Boyle, a law professor who drafted the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act, shared his thoughts about this early on.

[The scenario that COVID-19 was released during the Military Games in Wuhan China is very solid. We have a credible Chinese whistleblower who stated just that, a Chinese doctor who defected China and released documents showing that COVID-19 was engineered by the Chinese military and deployed as a bioweapon, a Canadian Army whistleblower who stated that COVID-19 was brought to Canada by the soldiers returning home from the Wuhan Military Games, as well as multiple athletes who also came back home from Wuhan infected and fell sick with the bug (many of whom actually died)].

Whether or not these major global events are planned, there’s two common themes they all share: profit and control. Big corporations seem to profit exponentially while wealth is stripped from the masses.

The world’s richest 10 percent own approximately 90 percent of the world’s wealth, and the rich have become richer during the pandemic.

Governments themselves seem to capitalize tremendously off of global crises as well, gaining more power and control over the citizenry. We saw this with 9/11 and a following increase in the surveillance state.

Are we seeing the same thing with COVID? Our rights and freedoms have been extremely restricted during the event, with precedents set that can be called upon any time in the future.

“As authoritarianism spreads, as emergency laws proliferate, as we sacrifice our rights, we also sacrifice our capability to arrest the slide into a less liberal and less free world. Do you truly believe that when the first wave, this second wave, the 16th wave of the coronavirus is a long forgotten memory, that these capabilities will not be kept?” – NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden. VICE.

All of the measures taken to combat crises’ like 9/11 and COVID have caused a tremendous amount of harm. Take lockdowns for example, the science and evidence explaining how lockdowns have caused more harm than COVID itself has been completely unacknowledged. There are well over 400 studies on the failure of compulsory COVID interventions, but the studies showing success are the only ones acknowledged within the mainstream.

How can the public know what to support if information is not given to them openly and honestly in a transparent manner?

We are living in an age where any evidence or opinion that is critical of measures that governments take is subjected to censorship and ridicule.

Why have we given governments the power to control the citizenry under the guise of goodwill in “emergency” situations? Are we going to see the same thing in the future with major cyber security attacks on global financial systems?

A different path forward is needed. One where instead of citizens waiting for governments to tell them what to do, citizens engage in creating grass roots movements and become responsible for the state of public perception and dialogue. This can happen when people choose to change the state of conversation, sensemaking, and their overall state of being.

Reference: ThePulse.one

You Won’t Believe Who the NYT Blames for Inflation!

Since the inception of the criminal counterfeiting, market-rigging, loan-sharking syndicate deceptively named “The Federal Reserve System” — the “paper of record” has run interference for the banksters.

Why do so many things seem to cost more now?


By NEIL IRWIN

Since the very inception of the criminal counterfeiting, market-rigging, loan-sharking syndicate deceptively named “The Federal Reserve System” (NOT “Federal,” NO “Reserves” and NOT a decentralized “System”) the “paper of record” has run interference for the banksters. Think of the Fed as the financing tentacle of the NWO octopus, and the Slimes as the communications tentacle. Seemingly different entities, but actually part of the same beast.

When the JudenFed booms up depressed stocks and the general economy with “easy money” financing, the Judenpresse sings its praises for the prosperity it has brought us.

Conversely, when the JudenFed busts the stock bubble and crashes the general economy with “tight money” financing, the Judenpresse again applauds the Fed for “fighting inflation” (which it had actually caused in the first place with its compounding debt-based currency issue!) You see, the all-wise and benevolent Judenbank can do no wrong.

This astonishingly deceitful (even by Slimes standards) article by “Senior Economics Correspondent” Neil Irwin — intended to cover-up the Fed’s responsibility for the current inflation — is the latest example of how these two con artists (the Fed & The Slimes) work together. Let’s clean up some of Irwin’s Marxist manure.

Neil Irwin serves up the usual Fake Macro Economics. Who does he blame for inflation? Wait until you find out!

Dating back for 100 years, the top men of The Fed and the top men at The Slimes have all been members of the exclusive Council on Foreign Relations
 in New York.

The “Business Cycle” is NOT organic. It is scientifically engineered by the banksters, for the banksters.

Irwin: Inflation is dragging down President Biden’s approval ratings and fueling discontent among Americans.
Analysis: The “elites” — through their perceived frontman, “Joe Biden” — are really afraid of being engulfed in an anti-inflation political backlash

Irwin: How did we get here? Who is to blame? To help you understand, today I’ll walk you through the most obvious candidates — and where the evidence looks strongest.
Analysis: The condescending con artist is framing his propaganda to make readers think that he is about to objectively educate them.

Irwin: President Biden:

Presidents have less control over the economy than headlines might suggest, but the current situation is an exception to the rule. You can draw a direct line from a specific policy decision that Biden and congressional Democrats made this past winter to some of the inflation happening now.

In designing the stimulus that Congress passed in March, Biden’s administration went big, with $1.9 trillion in pandemic relief — on top of a separate $900 billion package that passed three months earlier. Put the two together, and $2.8 trillion in federal money has been coursing through the economy this year.
Analysis: Wow! Two whole paragraphs of solid truth! How can this be? This has gotta be an obligatory “limited hangout” — soon to be followed by the liar’s classic “yeah but” trick.

Irwin: But ….
Analysis: There it is! — Now comes the bullshit.

Irwin: For all the trillions spent, Americans’ purchases through the end of September were only about $52 billion higher than would have been expected in a world where the pandemic never happened. I take that as evidence that the inflation story is more complicated than just too much money floating around.
Analysis: Of course, it’s “complicated” — but Professor Irwin will “walk us through,” I’m sure — as he predictably scratches Biden off of his list of inflationary culprits.

Irwin: The Fed:

The nation’s central bank has kept ultra-easy monetary policy in place for far longer than in past economic cycles.
Analysis: Exactly right. Tell it, Irwin. Tell it! — How much youse guys wanna bet that another “yeah but” is coming next?

Irwin:But …
Analysis: Oh how well do I know these slippery sons-of-bitches!

Irwin: Chairman Powell and other policymakers might be fighting the last war. At a minimum, the Fed has not played its traditional role of pre-empting an inflation surge by deliberately slowing the economy. That said, monetary policy takes a long time to affect consumer prices, so it’s not a given that the inflation situation would be terribly different now if the Fed had started raising rates already.                                                                                                                                                 
Translation: You can also scratch the innocent Fed off of the list of suspects for the worsening inflation.

Hmmmm. If it’s not Biden and the Demonrat’s fault — and it’s not the Fed’s fault — then where are we going with this “investigation” of yours, Mr. “Senior Economics Correspondent?”

Irwin cites the Demonrats’ massive “stimulus” spending — then “yeah buts” us into another direction. 

Irwin cites the Fed’s “printing press”— then “yeah buts” us into another direction. 

“Yeah but.”

Irwin: Corporate America:

When the pandemic shut down the world in 2020, operations managers at companies concluded: We need to do whatever we can to survive. Automakers cut back production and orders for new supplies. Airlines canceled orders for new jets. Energy companies canceled drilling projects. Companies laid off workers.

We’re still dealing with the effects of those decisions. Now, automakers are wishing they hadn’t canceled orders for semiconductors, car rental companies are struggling to add vehicles, shipping prices are through the roof, fuel prices are spiking, and companies are wrestling with labor shortages. What seemed like sensible decisions turned out to be wrong for the actual economy.

Translation: Ignore the wild Federal spending and the historic explosion of the monetary base / debt-money supply. Inflation is the fault of poor decisions made by “capitalists.”

HO–LEE–SHIT — This brazen Bolshevik bullshitter needs to have his forked-tongue ripped out with a pair of pliers. But the worst is yet to come. Let’s see who the next “culprit” behind inflation is.

Irwin: All of Us:

We shifted our spending toward stuff, rather than services. Americans purchased 18 percent more physical goods in September than they did in February 2020, while their consumption of services fell. Because demand for such goods is off-the-charts high while supplies are limited, they are more expensive.
Translation: It’s your fault, Americans!

Irwin: And many of us elected to stop working, or work less. The shortage of workers has led employers to offer higher wages to attract employees. That fuels price increases.
Analysis: Half truth. Irwin completely ignores the fact that employees — even during “normal” times — constantly require higher wages because the value of the dollar is constantly being debased. Irwin is blaming wet sidewalks for the rain.

Irwin: The Takeaway

The great shift in Americans’ purchasing and employment patterns prompted by the pandemic look like the primary culprit in this bout of inflation. That means the future of inflation depends on how quickly Americans return to more typical spending patterns and more people go back to work.
Analysis: The “yeah but” punchlines of this horrible reality-inverting article should actually be the secondary points (“supply chain” issues, labor shortages etc) — and the limited hangouts about the “stimulus” spending and the Fed printing press should be the “yeah buts.”  As inflation worsens, even the most dim-witted inhabitants of the overlapping Kingdoms of Libtardia and Normiedom aren’t going to swallow this convoluted crap. Irwin and his paymasters know it — but (((they))) are desperate to protect the Fed and somehow try to thwart the coming 2022 devastation of the Demonrat Party.

Dumb old White men in corporate board rooms caused the inflation? 

Unsuspecting “consumers” caused the inflation?

No one is going to buy this bullshit.

The Sad Truth About “Memorial Day”

As we all know, Memorial Day is a federal holiday in the United States for remembering the men (and many women now too!) who died while serving in America’s armed forces. The holiday, which is observed on the last Monday of May, originated after the U.S. Civil War, in 1868 as Decoration Day.

Families of the Northern dead would decorate the graves of their kinfolk with flags and flowers. By 1900, competing Union and Confederate holiday traditions, celebrated on different days, had merged into a single Memorial Day, which was eventually extended to honor all Americans who died in military service. Since World War II, the stupid cliche of “thank our veterans for our freedom” was unofficially attached to the day. Of course, Americans haven’t died in defense of freedom since the War of 1812.

So, this Memorial Day, with all due respect to the veterans who died under false pretenses, let us dispense with all this “thank you for our freedom” bullshit and declare a more historically accurate “gratitude” to the deserving parties.

1 & 2. Sorry to rain on your Memorial Day Parade, pops — but with all respect and affection, you and your buddies got played for chumps.

The last American battle truly fought for the cause of freedom and independence was  The Battle of New Orleans, won  by General Andrew Jackson in 1815.

1898: Thank you Globalists for the gift of the Spanish-American War in which 2,450 Americans were killed so that the New World Order gang could establish a presence in the Asian Pacific (Philippines & Guam).

1898-1913: Thank you Globalists for the gift of the Philippines War in which 4,200 American were killed so that the Filipinos, to whom you promised independence in exchange for rising up against Spain, could be kept under control.

1900-1901: Thank you Globalists for the Boxer Rebellion in which 131 Americans were killed so that the Chinese could be kept in line.

1917-1918: Thank you Globalists and Zionists for World War I in which 120,000 Americans were killed so that the first steps of world government could be taken in Europe (League of Nations) and Palestine could be stolen from the Turks and their Arab subjects.

Spanish-American War 

Philippines War 

World War I

1941-1945: Thank you Globalists and Zionists for World War II in which 410,000 Americans were killed so that Germany and Japan could be enslaved to the New World Order, and Britain eventually forced to turn over most of Palestine to the Jews.

1950-1953: Thank you Globalists for the Korean War in which 36,000 Americans were killed in a rigged no-win war designed to maintain a permanent trip-wire between the two Koreas.

1965-1975: Thank you Globalists for the Vietnam War in which 58,000 Americans were killed in another rigged no-win war designed to drain and destabilize America.

World War II 

Korean War 

Vietnam War

1982-1984: Thank you Globalists and Zionists for the Beirut Deployment in which 266 Americans were killed in a false-flag attack staged by Israel and blamed on “terrorists.”

1990-1991: Thank you Globalists and Zionists for the Gulf War in which 300 Americans were killed so that the rising power of politically independent Iraq could be weakened.

2001-2011: Thank you Globalists and Zionists for the War on Terror in which 7000 Americans were killed in Afghanistan and Iraq as part of a multi-trillion dollar farce kicked-off after the false-flag terror attacks of September 11, 2001.

Beirut 

 Iraq

Afghanistan

“They died to keep us free,” really?

Heavily indebted & abusively overtaxed Americans enjoying their mandatory “freedom” (from germs) during the lock-down of the Stupid-19 scamdemic.

Mandatory masks — 6-feet long “social distancing” pool noodles attached to hats — Arrested for surfing during Stupid-19 “crisis.

More mandatory “freedom” (from  make-believe “terrorists”) at the airport. — TSA airport goons get to harass us and steal from our luggage — with total impunity and immunity!

We can best honor our dead veterans by exposing the “who” and the “why” behind both their tragic and premature deaths — and our actual enslavement imposed under the guise of “security.”