“Sir” Evelyn de Rothschild Is Dead

In the grand scheme of things, “Sir” Evelyn’s crooked clan outranked the Windsor Family.

1931-2022NOVEMBER xx, 2022NY Times: Evelyn de Rothschild, Scion of Banking Dynasty, Dies at 91

Initially showing little promise, he eventually joined the family firm and rose to chairman, wielding vast influence in Britain’s financial and political affairs.

Heads up, Satan. Incoming! And oh what a big fish it is! The Slimes obituary, though flattering, actually confirms the historical generational power of this wretched clan.

From the article:

“Evelyn de Rothschild, who as a London scion of the European banking dynasty helped Britain privatize its railroads, steel and coal in the tradition of his ancestors, who had helped finance the acquisition of the Suez Canal and the defeat of Napoleon, died on Monday evening at his home in London. He was 91.

Sir Evelyn’s father was the chairman, and his great-great-grandfather the founder, of N.M. Rothschild & Sons, the British branch of the family banking empire that began in 18th-century Frankfurt, Germany, and that, with its networks of couriers and spies, financial wizardry and political alliances, spread across Europe, making fortunes and influencing the destinies of nations for 200 years.”
(emphasis added)


Wow! Sure sounds like a “conspiracy theory” to me — “antisemitic even!” 

1. Q has exposed, attacked and even threatened the Rothschild family many times (here) — I know he was old, but might the “White Hats” have taken him out on the day of “The Blood Moon?” // 2 & 3. Two centuries ago, Evelyn’s great-great-grandfather financed the take-down of Napoleon and (using insider advance information) the takeover of Britain in the same move.

More of what sounds like “conspiracy theory” — from the article:

“Like his forebears, he promoted strong ties with Britain’s government, news media and financial and business communities. He became chairman of The Economist and director of Lord Beaverbrook’s newspaper group, chairman of the British Merchant Banking & Securities House Association and a financial adviser to Queen Elizabeth II, who knighted him in 1989.”

Government, media, financial adviser to recently departed Queen, royal connections —- move along — nothing to see here.

More “antisemitism”  —

“Since the 1760’s, when the patriarch Mayer Amschel Rothschild founded the dynasty in Frankfurt and sent four of his five sons — the five arrows in the family crest — to establish four more businesses in London, Paris, Vienna and Naples, the Rothschilds had been a partnership whose wealth and family ties had been a bulwark.”

Oh not that old canard about the five sons running the banking operations out of the five great capitals of Europe at the time? Come on, man. That’s ‘Nazi” stuff!

This parasitic Satanic filth has been at the core and at the pinnacle of the New World Order conspiracy movement and all of its sub-conspiracies for about 220 years. As one generation passes, a new one takes its place. But this time around, it may no longer be the case. Rothschild’s NWO — thanks in no small measure to its exposure by Q and the maneuvering of Trump & Putin — is weakening. 

Next up on the Rothschild death list: Jacob, age 86.

Horror in Hamburg: German Version of “Hamilton”

As if the hyped-up Broadway Freak Show about a hyped-up villain of history wasn’t “woke” idiotic enough — now comes word that the moronic musical has been duplicated for audiences in occupied Germany.

Gino Emnes (Aaron Burr) and Benet Monteiro (Alexander Hamilton) are in the German production of “Hamilton.”
NY Times: 
They Translated ‘Hamilton’ Into German. Was It Easy? Nein.


For the musical’s Hamburg premiere, a team wrestled with language and cultural differences to bring the story alive for a new audience.

As if the hyped-up Broadway Freak Show about an equally hyped-up villain of American history — featuring mulatto / Hispanic actors playing the 18th Century Anglo-Saxon founders of the United States — wasn’t “woke” idiotic enough; now comes word that the moronic musical has been duplicated for stupefied audiences in occupied Germany.

From the article’s opening:

“For the last four years, a team of translators has been working with the “Hamilton” creators to develop a German version — The German-speaking cast — most of them black actors, reflecting the show’s defining decision to retell America’s revolutionary origins with the voices of today’s diverse society — is now in the final days of rehearsal.”

Adding insanity to idiocy, we learn that the German cast isn’t merely of mixed race, but straight-up Black instead! Nothing against “people of color” (Me Included) per se, you understand – but come on man! Were it not for its blot-out-Whitey-from-history symbolism, this spectacle would be laughable. You wouldn’t expect to see a blond-haired / blue eyed actor playing the part of Martin Luther King, or Simon Bolivar for example, would you?

I know, Mr. First President. I know I know, Mein Fuhrer. I know lol

This horror in Hamburg does offer us a “teachable moment” to bring the exalted reputation of Alexander Hamilton – the nation’s first Secretary of the Treasury – down a few notches. Contrary to the wishes of many of America’s founders, the non-American-born Hamilton (British West Indies) passionately advocated for the establishment of the First Bank of the United States — the privately owned “Fed” of its day. When Hamilton submitted a report to Congress outlining his proposal in 1790, he used the charter of the Bank of England as the model.

Among others, Thomas Jefferson — primary author of the Declaration of Independence and first Secretary of State — feared that a central bank would create a dangerous financial monopoly favoring financiers over plantation owners and family farmers, who tended to be debtors. Jefferson also argued that the Constitution did not grant the government the authority to establish corporations, including a national bank. Despite the contentious opposing voices, Hamilton’s bill cleared Congress and President George Washington signed the bill into law in 1791.

During the young nation’s first “Bank War,” Hamilton had been accused by some of pursuing policies to enrich Jewish financiers overseas (here).  When the first subscriptions to the new bank quickly sold out, an editorial in a Philadelphia newspaper fingered “Amsterdam Jews” as among those “bereft of  honesty or industry” who would benefit from Hamilton’s bank. (here)

Given Hamilton’s closeness to and gushing admiration for “the usual suspects,” it’s not surprising that he wanted such an institution (a destructive institution which died 20 years later when Congress refused to renew its charter, thus triggering the UK-US war of 1812). As a child, Hamilton, born out of wedlock, was educated in a Jewish school which was run out of a synagogue (here) and learned to speak Hebrew. That fact, combined with his “Danish” stepfather’s Jewish-sounding surname of “Lavien,” has prompted even some Establishment whorestorians to speculate that he may have been raised Jewish. In any event, Alexander “Levine” was not shy about declaring his love and even mystical reverence for “The Tribe.” He once wrote:

“The state and progress of the Jews, from their earliest history to the present time, has been so entirely out of the ordinary course of human affairs, is it not then a fair conclusion, that the cause also is an extraordinary one—in other words, that it is the effect of some great providential plan? The man who will draw this conclusion, will look for the solution in the Bible. He who will not draw it ought to give us another fair solution.”

Hamilton also advocated in favor of Jewish immigration and once argued in a court case:

“Why distrust the evidence of the Jews? Discredit them and you destroy the Christian religion.”

Oh barf! He sounds as bad as the Austrian Count Kalergi

1. The Jefferson-Hamilton rivalry wasn’t just about monetary ideology. Jefferson viewed Hamilton as ambitious and corrupt. // 2. Hamilton won the first “Bank War” and the First Bank of the United States (owned in large part by foreign shareholders) was established in Philadelphia. // 3. Ah, show us the shekels, Alex. Show us the shekels!

Hamilton made bitter enemies not just because of economic differences; but because he was a sneaky, dishonorable and dirty tactician — an elitist scumbag with both a keen intellect and a legendary “gift of gab” which appeared to have President Washington under its spell at times. Many of Hamilton’s founding contemporaries — including FOUR future Presidents: John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison & James Monroe — not only opposed Hamilton’s grand schemes, but they all despised him on a personal level. Though the whorestorians do not dispute this astonishing universal antipathy toward the arrogant bankster; it is seldom mentioned in the modern white-washing (or shall we say, “black-washing”?) of St. Alexander.

Aside from the banksterism, following is a bullet point review of Hamilton’s other most shameful antics:

Offered to lead soldiers to violently crush the Whiskey Tax Rebellion in Pennsylvania — an idea which Washington refused before resolving the matter peacefully
* Slept with another man’s wife (The Maria Reynolds Affair) and later paid off her husband to keep the matter quiet, until it was finally exposed
* Circulated nasty pamphlets personally attacking John Adams
Falsely accused Jefferson — who was a Deist — of being an “atheist”
Used a pen name to falsely accuse Jefferson of keeping a Black slave-girl as his concubine  the origin of the Sally Hemmings baby LIE.

As is often the case with these types of characters, they eventually mess with the wrong man. In Hamilton’s case, that would be Jefferson’s sitting Vice President, Aaron Burr.

Burr was running for Governor of New York in 1804 and lost to little known Morgan Lewis. He blamed his loss on a personal smear campaign orchestrated by the great smear-master Hamilton — a Kingmaker of New York politics. In April, the Albany Register published a letter from Dr. Charles D. Cooper to Philip Schuyler, which relayed Hamilton’s judgment that Burr was “a dangerous man and one who ought not to be trusted with the reins of government,” and claiming to know of “a still more despicable opinion which General Hamilton has expressed of Mr. Burr.” It was the word “despicable” that triggered Burr. In June, Burr wrote to Hamilton, seeking a clarification and disavowal of the remark attributed to him. When Hamilton refused, Burr challenged him to a duel — which took place across the Hudson River on July 12, 1804 at Weehawken Heights, New Jersey because there were laws against dueling in New York.

And that, boys and girls was the end of Alexander “Levine” Hamilton.

Good shot, Mr. Burr!

World Economic Forum’s ‘Young Global Leaders’ Is A Massive Network Of Royals, Politicians, Big Tech, Billionaires And Other ‘Elites’

Through its Young Global Leaders program, the World Economic Forum has been instrumental in shaping a world order that undermines all democratic principles. For several decades, this program has nurtured compliant leaders acting as WEF agents in governments around the world. The consequences are far-reaching and may turn out to be devastating for humanity.

bill gates (global leader of tomorrow 1992) and justin trudeau (young global leader)

Billy Boy (Global Leader of Tomorrow 1992) and Justin Trudeau (Young Global Leader).

“I have to say then I mention names like Mrs Merkel, even Vladimir Putin and so on they all have been Young Global Leaders of The World Economic Forum. But what we are really proud of now with the young generation like Prime Minister Trudeau, President of Argentina and so on, is that we penetrate the cabinets… It is true in Argentina and it is true in France now…” – Klaus Schwab

Watch below:

In 1992, Klaus Schwab and World Economic Forum launched a program initially called Global Leaders of Tomorrow. In 2004, this program was turned into the Forum for Young Global Leaders (which I cover in my book The Global Coup D’Etat) – a 5-year program of indoctrination into WEFs principles and goals.

The aim was – and is – to find suitable future leaders for the emerging global society. The program has since its inception has included politicians, business leaders, royalty, journalists, performers and other cultural influencers who have excelled in their fields but have not yet turned 40 years of age (originally 43 in order to include Angela Merkel).

It has since grown into an extensive global network of dedicated leaders with enormous resources and influence, all working to implement the technocratic plans of the World Economic Forum in their respective nations and fields.

“The network creates a force for worldwide influence through the combination of the individual skills and resources of its members.”

As Klaus Schwab says in the introductory quote, it has become very successful. Already in the first year, 1992, a number of highly influential candidates were elected. Among 200 selected were global profiles such as Angela MerkelTony BlairNicolas SarkozyBilly BoyBonoRichard Branson (Virgin), Jorma Ollila (Shell Oil), and José Manuel Barroso (President of the European Commission 2004–2014). [1]

Another “Global Leader of Tomorrow” 2000 was Chrystia FreelandDeputy Prime Minister and Minister of Finance of Canada, a journalist and author who was previously managing director of Thomson Reuters and deputy editor of the Financial Times. She is also a board member of the World Economic Forum.

“As Foreign Minister, she led and successfully concluded the renegotiation of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) between Canada, Mexico, and the United States. In November, 2019, Ms. Freeland was appointed Deputy Prime Minister of Canada and Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs. In this capacity, she led Canada’s united response to the COVID-19 pandemic.” (World Economic Forum) [2]

More Examples Of Influential Young Global Leaders [3]:


Crown Princess Victoria of Sweden
Crown Prince Haakon of Norway
Crown Prince Fredrik of Denmark
Prince Jaime de Bourbon de Parme
, Netherlands
Princess Reema Bint Bandar Al-Saud, Ambassador for Saudi-Arabia in USA
Jacinda Arden, Prime Minister, New Zeeland
Alexander De Croo, Prime Minister, Belgium
Emmanuel Macron, President, France
Sanna Marin, Prime Minister, Finland
Carlos Alvarado Quesada, President, Costa Rica
Faisal Alibrahim, Minister of Economy and Planning, Saudi Arabia
Shauna Aminath, Minister of Environment, Climate Change and Technology, Maldives
Ida Auken, MP, former Minister of Environment, Denmark (author to the infamous article “Welcome To 2030: I Own Nothing, Have No Privacy And Life Has Never Been Better”)
Annalena Baerbock, Minister of Foreign Affairs, Leader of Alliance 90/Die Grünen, Germany
Kamissa Camara, Minister of the Digital Economy and Planning, Mali
Ugyen Dorji, Minister of Domestic Affairs, Bhutan
Martín Guzmán, Minister of Finance, Argentina
Muhammad Hammad Azhar, Minister of Energy, Pakistan
Paula Ingabire, Minister of Information and communications technology and Innovation, Rwanda
Ronald Lamola, Minister of Justice and Correctional Services, South Africa
Birgitta Ohlson, Minister for European Union Affairs 2010–2014, Sweden
Mona Sahlin, Party Leader of the Social Democrats 2007–2011, Sweden
Stav Shaffir, Leader of the Green Party, Israel
Vera Daves de Sousa, Minister of Finance, Angola
Leonardo Di Caprio, actor and Climate Activist
Mattias Klum, photographer and Environmentalist, Sweden
Jack Ma, Founder of Alibaba
Larry Page, Founder of Google
Ricken Patel, Founder of Avaaz
Jimmy Wale, Founder of Wikipedia
Jacob Wallenberg
, Chairman of Investor
Niklas Zennström, Founder of Skype
Mark Zuckerberg, Founder of Facebook

The purpose from the beginning has been to “identify and advance a future-oriented global agenda, focusing on issues at the intersection of the public and private sectors.”

Public–Private Partnerships is one of the cornerstones of the World Economic Forum philosophy. That is, a merger between state and large companies (also known as corporativism) with the aim of solving global problems of in a more “effective” way. The choice of leaders clearly reflects this aspiration.

The Young Global Leaders group was initially instructed to identify the major challenges of the 21st century. These included peace, the environment, education, technology and health – areas which these upcoming leaders could exploit politically, economically, and culturally in the new millennium.

Partners for Global Leaders of Tomorrow in 2000 were large global companies such as The Coca Cola CompanyErnst & YoungVolkswagen, and BP Amoco. These could contribute to the agenda by “playing an active role in developing and implementing the concept of the GLT project. The partners can therefore actively participate in the development of GLT programs; representatives of the partner companies as well as their guests are invited to GLT meetings .. ” Since the Global Leaders of Tomorrow was turned into Young Global Leaders 2004, partners such as the Bill & Melinda Gates FoundationGoogle, and JPMorganChase (with alumni from the program) have also participated as sponsors.

Partners for Global Leaders of Tomorrow in 2000 were large global companies such as The Coca Cola Company, Ernst & Young, Volkswagen, and BP Amoco. These could contribute to the agenda by “playing an active role in developing and implementing the concept of the GLT project. The partners can therefore actively participate in the development of GLT programs; representatives of the partner companies as well as their guests are invited to GLT meetings … ”

Since the Global Leaders of Tomorrow was turned into Young Global Leaders 2004, partners such as the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Google, and JPMorganChase (with alumni from the program) have also participated as sponsors.

The ultimate consequence of both public–private partnerships and these target areas is the creation of a largely fascist social contract in which the individual has become subordinated to these powerful interests. Noble goals of creating a better world have also been kidnapped. This is especially evident in the context of the partnership between the WEF and the UN and the implementation of the global goals (Agenda 2030) through the application of the technologies of the Fourth Industrial Revolution.

This means that the democratic principles and division of power of the 20th century have largely been completely undermined and instead replaced by a new global class that shapes our common future based on their own interests. This has led to a de facto privatisation of both national governments and international organisations, where lobbyists are no longer kept in the lobby but have moved into the seat of power, shaping policies directly affecting our lives. What this means has become particularly evident since the pandemic was declared in March 2020.

In addition, leading multinational investment management corporations such as BlackRock, led by the World Economic Forum’s own Larry Fink, have constantly moved their positions forward.

German economist and journalist Ernst Wolff believes that many of the national leaders included in the Young Global Leader program have been selected for their willingness to carry out the tough agenda of lockdowns in recent years without asking any questions, and that their impending failure (as evidenced by in a growing dissatisfaction of the masses) will be used as an excuse to create a new form of Global Government where the old nation states become largely obsolete. A new global digital currency with Universal Basic Income (UBI) can then be gradually introduced to replace our doomed monetary system. [4]

This conclusion partly coincides with my own. It is also supported by Paul Raskin‘s scenarios from The Great Transition Initiative on how a totalitarian “New Earth Order” is established, to be replaced in the long run by a global democratic government (Earth Federation) with a World Constitution. [5]

“The COVID-19 pandemic has underscored the catastrophic failure of an every-country-for-itself approach to public health, and national economic interests, rather than global needs, continue to dominate discussions of climate policy, paving the path toward climate chaos.

Under the tricameral World Parliament come the four main agencies of the Earth Federation government: the World Supreme Court system, the World Executive, the World Enforcement System, and the World Ombudsman.” [6] – Glen T. Martin, The Earth Constitution

The vision is that a peaceful and harmonious world in balance is created through the establishment of a World Federation with a World Parliament, World Government and a World Court. These are ideas that have long circulated in Club of Rome and closely connected New Age circles. The question is how such a new global system of power would escape the fate of being kidnapped by the same interests that created our current corrupt and failing system? This is in view of those who support projects such as The Great Transition (initiated with start-up capital from Steven Rockefeller). What is happening is rather a method of taking us to their ultimate solution in the form of a global technocratic control system.

However, it is highly unlikely that this plan will succeed. Awareness is spreading like wildfire and the panic of the elite increases as their narrative crumbles and people become more and more immune to the propaganda. Hence all the inquisitors and “fact checkers” who diligently gatekeep the narrative and help steer public opinion in the “right” direction. They are surely to be trusted since, for example, David Roy Thomson, Chairman of the Thomson Reuters Corporation, is an alumni of Global Leaders of Tomorrow, class of 1993.

It is now time to take control of our own destinies and to avoid falling into new traps.

Reference: Pharos.stiftelsen-pharos.org / References:

Thanks to investigative journalist Cory Morningstar for the clip that inspired this blog article. Follow her blog Wrong Kind of Green.

[1] World Economic Forum, GLT Class of 1993.pdf
[2] World Economic Forum, Chrystia Freeland
[3] World Economic Forum, Young Global Leaders Community (searchable list over YGL alumni)
[4] Michael Lord, “Exposed: Klaus Schwab’s School For Covid Dictators, Plan for ‘Great Reset’“, RAIR Foundation, November 10, 2021
[5] Paul Raskin, Journey to Earthland: The Great Transition to Planetary Civilization.pdf, Tellus Institute, Boston, 2016
[6] Glen T. Martin, The Great Transition Requires the Earth Constitution“, Great Transition Initiative, November 2021

How The Flow Of Money Created The One World Government

“We are grateful to The Washington PostThe New York TimesTime Magazine and other great publications…. [for] their promises of discretion for almost forty years… [t]he work is now much more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a World Government… The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries.” David Rockefeller to the Trilateral Commission, 1991.david rockefeller meeting in 1976 with iraqi bankers

Image: David Rockefeller (meeting in 1976 with Iraqi bankers during a visit to Bahrain) dreamed of a one-world government through banking. Photo by Hashmoder. CC BY-SA 4.0.

This statement, made thirty years ago, means that the conspiracy to replace our Constitutional Republic began forty years before that — 1951 — with the assistance of respected journalists. Seventy years of concerted effort to leave We the People in the dark. (It is probably more like over one hundred years.)

James Warburg, financial advisor to FDR, and part of a banking family that stood to gain financially from world government, testified in 1950 before a Senate Congressional subcommittee that “We shall have world government whether you like it or not, by conquest or consent.”

This leaves We the People with two large questions: how did this happen and what can we do if either of those two options is unacceptable to the American people?

This issue has been with us since George Washington took office in 1789. A small cadre of interconnected bankers was already well-established in England, France, Austria, Germany, and Italy.

These bankers took advantage of the chaos growing out of the rejection of Roman Catholicism and the social breakdown and vehement hatreds that grew out of the Protestant Reformation by funding both sides (through government debt) of the many resultant wars and revolutions and then funding the peace afterward.

The profits were enormous. As Europe went through the revolutionary turmoil of the 19th and early 20th centuries, world bankers wove through societies like a malignancy, manipulating world leaders, destabilizing whole nations of people, and supporting philosophies that promote centralized authority (including international authority) that would strengthen world banking arrangements.

America is a different matter. First, we are isolated by two oceans and developed a stable and productive society away from the horrors of Europe. We had no Roman Catholic experience to reject. We did reject atheism — we are a God-fearing and God – respecting nation.

The federal Constitution, as well as each state Constitution, created a framework for ordered Liberty — America’s unique and irreplaceable Rule of Law. Decentralizing authority — Federalism — is one of the philosophical anchors to that framework.

But we have been the prize for this group since the beginning of our Republic. Creating central banks in each country that the cartel could control was part of the scheme. Washington reluctantly supported Alexander Hamilton’s First Bank of the United States. That bank’s funding came almost entirely from private investors, with one of the most significant being the Bank of England.

When the charter for the First Bank of the United States was not renewed amid great public opposition in 1811, it was one more point of contention between the British and Americans leading to the war of 1812, so much so that the Bank of England had a leading role in the decision to go to war.

Had the Bank of England not wanted the war, it likely would not have happened. (Other reasons were connected to the Napoleonic wars. England was concerned that the U.S. was helping Napoleon.

The British were impressing U.S. sailors into the British Navy, they feared American support for France, they placed restrictions on trade, and there was still fallout from the 1807 British attack on the USS Chesapeake.)

After the peace, a Second Bank of the United States was chartered but was vehemently opposed by President Andrew Jackson when its charter came up for renewal in 1832. Jackson’s view of European bankers was “You are a den of vipers and thieves.” He was attacked by an assassin at point-blank range whose pistols misfired. We do not know if the two events are linked.

Lincoln, Garfield, and Kennedy opposed this cancer, as well. As President Garfield put it, “Whoever controls the money of a nation, controls that nation.”

America surrendered to the pressure for a central bank in 1913 with the help of James Warburg’s father, Paul. Woodrow Wilson signed the Federal Reserve Act, following the model of Europe, but in a way thought palatable to the American people.

Thus, we have been at constant war ever since 1917, and have allowed our wealth to be transferred elsewhere. In one hundred years we have gone from a debt of $3 billion to $30 trillion.

Decentralized authority — Federalism — gave way to the more easily corruptible federal power.

This is the reality of today — the mission by those opposed to our Constitutional Republic is now how to get the American people to consent to the loss of their Constitutional system and accept perpetual debt slavery and control through the United Nations.

“The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers” as David Rockefeller tells us; “by conquest or consent” adds James Warburg.

What if Americans just say “no.” America does not need to surrender her wealth, her potential wealth, our Constitutional system, or our nation-state. We are not Europe. We do not want to dispose of the foundations of our moral roots and end up as soulless atheists imprisoned in nihilism and drowning in dependence. George Washington warned us about this; so did Dwight Eisenhower and many others.

We the People urgently need to demand a comprehensive plan from our public servants to re-establish the prosperity of our nation, stabilize and reduce our national debt, and establish a strong enough military defense to buy us time to get our national financial house in order.

One important component of this defense is rebuilding and strengthening a strong moral core in the American people and encouraging authentic education in history, civics, philosophy, and economics.

It is through prayer, discipline, grit, and education that our Republic will be saved — by the Grace of God. If it takes two generations or another one hundred years to accomplish it, so be it.

If recovered, let us hope We the People, America’s Sovereign, never let our system or our country go to this den of vipers and thieves, again.

By M. E. Boyd, AmericanThinker.com

M. E. Boyd is the author of “Apples of Gold – Voices From the Past that Speak to Us Now“.

False Flag Warning: Israel Leads 10-Country Simulation Of Major Cyber Attack On Global Financial System, Just Months After WEF Did The Same Thing

A simulation took place on December 9th 2021 in Israel. It was about a major cyber security attack on global financial systems. The simulation took place with 9 other countries, the World Bank, as well as the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the Finance Ministry in Jerusalem.

[Worryingly, back in March of this year, the World Economic Forum also ran a financial cyberattack simulation, which led to the Great Reset of the global economy. History has shown us that this is precisely how the powers that shouldn’t be train and prepare for their never-ending false flags.]

israel leads 10 country simulation of major cyber attack on global financial system

The exercise simulated several scenarios, including sensitive data surfacing on the dark web alongside fake news [i.e. censoring the truth after labelling it “fake news“], leading to global financial chaos.

“The unique and groundbreaking exercise held today showed the importance of coordinated global action by governments together with central banks in the face of financial cyber threats.” – Israeli Finance Ministry’s chief economist, Shira Greenberg. Times of Israel.

Have we seen this before? Israel recently announced that they were on the verge of a state of emergency due to the emergence of the COVID Omicron variant. This announcement came just two week after Israel held the world’s first war games exercise preparing for the possible emergence of a deadly variant of the COVID virus named “Omega.”

Also read: The New COVID Variant Scam Was Simulated In Israel Weeks Before It Was ‘Discovered’.

Just two months before China reported a mysterious pneumonia outbreak in the city of Wuhan, which marked the beginning of COVID-19, government officials and business leaders met in New York to simulate a novel coronavirus emergence in Brazil that killed 65 million within 18 months. The event was called ‘Event 201’ and was put on by Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, along with the World Economic Forum and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

[A bombshell that very few people are actually aware of is this: The Chinese Government ALSO Ran a Coronavirus Drill Before the Plandemic, and it Was Held in Wuhan — Exactly Where the Actual Outbreak Started. That’s one might coincidence, if you believe in coincidences.]

According to the Israeli government, cyber security threats are possible especially in the wake of multiple large cyber attacks on large companies and the only way to contain any damage is through global cooperation.

The National Cyber Directorate in Israel issued a warning to Israeli businesses regarding potential cyber attacks last October. On average, one in every 60 Israeli organizations is targeted every week with ransomware attacks. This is an increase of 30 percent over the rate in 2020. The rate happens to be increasing all over the planet.

Coincidences? Nah, False Flags!

Event 201 and the ‘war game exercise’ involving a new variant of COVID were held right before these events actually occurred. Event 201 led many people to believe that the COVID outbreak was a planned event by the powers that shouldn’t be. Mainstream media outlets and “fact-checkers” claimed this was false news and a “conspiracy theory.”

Sure, there is no way to determine whether or not COVID was a planned event used as a tool for ulterior motives, but any discussion that this could be a possibility was not had within the mainstream dialogue.

Despite being labelled as a conspiracy, many academics early on in the pandemic were sharing these feelings. For example, Francis Boyle, a law professor who drafted the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act, shared his thoughts about this early on.

[The scenario that COVID-19 was released during the Military Games in Wuhan China is very solid. We have a credible Chinese whistleblower who stated just that, a Chinese doctor who defected China and released documents showing that COVID-19 was engineered by the Chinese military and deployed as a bioweapon, a Canadian Army whistleblower who stated that COVID-19 was brought to Canada by the soldiers returning home from the Wuhan Military Games, as well as multiple athletes who also came back home from Wuhan infected and fell sick with the bug (many of whom actually died)].

Whether or not these major global events are planned, there’s two common themes they all share: profit and control. Big corporations seem to profit exponentially while wealth is stripped from the masses.

The world’s richest 10 percent own approximately 90 percent of the world’s wealth, and the rich have become richer during the pandemic.

Governments themselves seem to capitalize tremendously off of global crises as well, gaining more power and control over the citizenry. We saw this with 9/11 and a following increase in the surveillance state.

Are we seeing the same thing with COVID? Our rights and freedoms have been extremely restricted during the event, with precedents set that can be called upon any time in the future.

“As authoritarianism spreads, as emergency laws proliferate, as we sacrifice our rights, we also sacrifice our capability to arrest the slide into a less liberal and less free world. Do you truly believe that when the first wave, this second wave, the 16th wave of the coronavirus is a long forgotten memory, that these capabilities will not be kept?” – NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden. VICE.

All of the measures taken to combat crises’ like 9/11 and COVID have caused a tremendous amount of harm. Take lockdowns for example, the science and evidence explaining how lockdowns have caused more harm than COVID itself has been completely unacknowledged. There are well over 400 studies on the failure of compulsory COVID interventions, but the studies showing success are the only ones acknowledged within the mainstream.

How can the public know what to support if information is not given to them openly and honestly in a transparent manner?

We are living in an age where any evidence or opinion that is critical of measures that governments take is subjected to censorship and ridicule.

Why have we given governments the power to control the citizenry under the guise of goodwill in “emergency” situations? Are we going to see the same thing in the future with major cyber security attacks on global financial systems?

A different path forward is needed. One where instead of citizens waiting for governments to tell them what to do, citizens engage in creating grass roots movements and become responsible for the state of public perception and dialogue. This can happen when people choose to change the state of conversation, sensemaking, and their overall state of being.

Reference: ThePulse.one

You Won’t Believe Who the NYT Blames for Inflation!

Since the inception of the criminal counterfeiting, market-rigging, loan-sharking syndicate deceptively named “The Federal Reserve System” — the “paper of record” has run interference for the banksters.

Picture
Why do so many things seem to cost more now?


By NEIL IRWIN

Since the very inception of the criminal counterfeiting, market-rigging, loan-sharking syndicate deceptively named “The Federal Reserve System” (NOT “Federal,” NO “Reserves” and NOT a decentralized “System”) the “paper of record” has run interference for the banksters. Think of the Fed as the financing tentacle of the NWO octopus, and the Slimes as the communications tentacle. Seemingly different entities, but actually part of the same beast.

When the JudenFed booms up depressed stocks and the general economy with “easy money” financing, the Judenpresse sings its praises for the prosperity it has brought us.

Conversely, when the JudenFed busts the stock bubble and crashes the general economy with “tight money” financing, the Judenpresse again applauds the Fed for “fighting inflation” (which it had actually caused in the first place with its compounding debt-based currency issue!) You see, the all-wise and benevolent Judenbank can do no wrong.

This astonishingly deceitful (even by Slimes standards) article by “Senior Economics Correspondent” Neil Irwin — intended to cover-up the Fed’s responsibility for the current inflation — is the latest example of how these two con artists (the Fed & The Slimes) work together. Let’s clean up some of Irwin’s Marxist manure.

Picture
Neil Irwin serves up the usual Fake Macro Economics. Who does he blame for inflation? Wait until you find out!
Picture
Dating back for 100 years, the top men of The Fed and the top men at The Slimes have all been members of the exclusive Council on Foreign Relations
 in New York.
Picture
The “Business Cycle” is NOT organic. It is scientifically engineered by the banksters, for the banksters.

Irwin: Inflation is dragging down President Biden’s approval ratings and fueling discontent among Americans.
Analysis: The “elites” — through their perceived frontman, “Joe Biden” — are really afraid of being engulfed in an anti-inflation political backlash

Irwin: How did we get here? Who is to blame? To help you understand, today I’ll walk you through the most obvious candidates — and where the evidence looks strongest.
Analysis: The condescending con artist is framing his propaganda to make readers think that he is about to objectively educate them.

Irwin: President Biden:

Presidents have less control over the economy than headlines might suggest, but the current situation is an exception to the rule. You can draw a direct line from a specific policy decision that Biden and congressional Democrats made this past winter to some of the inflation happening now.

In designing the stimulus that Congress passed in March, Biden’s administration went big, with $1.9 trillion in pandemic relief — on top of a separate $900 billion package that passed three months earlier. Put the two together, and $2.8 trillion in federal money has been coursing through the economy this year.
Analysis: Wow! Two whole paragraphs of solid truth! How can this be? This has gotta be an obligatory “limited hangout” — soon to be followed by the liar’s classic “yeah but” trick.

Irwin: But ….
Analysis: There it is! — Now comes the bullshit.

Irwin: For all the trillions spent, Americans’ purchases through the end of September were only about $52 billion higher than would have been expected in a world where the pandemic never happened. I take that as evidence that the inflation story is more complicated than just too much money floating around.
Analysis: Of course, it’s “complicated” — but Professor Irwin will “walk us through,” I’m sure — as he predictably scratches Biden off of his list of inflationary culprits.

Irwin: The Fed:

The nation’s central bank has kept ultra-easy monetary policy in place for far longer than in past economic cycles.
Analysis: Exactly right. Tell it, Irwin. Tell it! — How much youse guys wanna bet that another “yeah but” is coming next?

Irwin:But …
Analysis: Oh how well do I know these slippery sons-of-bitches!

Irwin: Chairman Powell and other policymakers might be fighting the last war. At a minimum, the Fed has not played its traditional role of pre-empting an inflation surge by deliberately slowing the economy. That said, monetary policy takes a long time to affect consumer prices, so it’s not a given that the inflation situation would be terribly different now if the Fed had started raising rates already.                                                                                                                                                 
Translation: You can also scratch the innocent Fed off of the list of suspects for the worsening inflation.

Hmmmm. If it’s not Biden and the Demonrat’s fault — and it’s not the Fed’s fault — then where are we going with this “investigation” of yours, Mr. “Senior Economics Correspondent?”

Picture
Irwin cites the Demonrats’ massive “stimulus” spending — then “yeah buts” us into another direction. 
Picture
Irwin cites the Fed’s “printing press”— then “yeah buts” us into another direction. 
Picture
“Yeah but.”

Irwin: Corporate America:

When the pandemic shut down the world in 2020, operations managers at companies concluded: We need to do whatever we can to survive. Automakers cut back production and orders for new supplies. Airlines canceled orders for new jets. Energy companies canceled drilling projects. Companies laid off workers.

We’re still dealing with the effects of those decisions. Now, automakers are wishing they hadn’t canceled orders for semiconductors, car rental companies are struggling to add vehicles, shipping prices are through the roof, fuel prices are spiking, and companies are wrestling with labor shortages. What seemed like sensible decisions turned out to be wrong for the actual economy.

Translation: Ignore the wild Federal spending and the historic explosion of the monetary base / debt-money supply. Inflation is the fault of poor decisions made by “capitalists.”

HO–LEE–SHIT — This brazen Bolshevik bullshitter needs to have his forked-tongue ripped out with a pair of pliers. But the worst is yet to come. Let’s see who the next “culprit” behind inflation is.

Irwin: All of Us:

We shifted our spending toward stuff, rather than services. Americans purchased 18 percent more physical goods in September than they did in February 2020, while their consumption of services fell. Because demand for such goods is off-the-charts high while supplies are limited, they are more expensive.
Translation: It’s your fault, Americans!

Irwin: And many of us elected to stop working, or work less. The shortage of workers has led employers to offer higher wages to attract employees. That fuels price increases.
Analysis: Half truth. Irwin completely ignores the fact that employees — even during “normal” times — constantly require higher wages because the value of the dollar is constantly being debased. Irwin is blaming wet sidewalks for the rain.

Irwin: The Takeaway

The great shift in Americans’ purchasing and employment patterns prompted by the pandemic look like the primary culprit in this bout of inflation. That means the future of inflation depends on how quickly Americans return to more typical spending patterns and more people go back to work.
Analysis: The “yeah but” punchlines of this horrible reality-inverting article should actually be the secondary points (“supply chain” issues, labor shortages etc) — and the limited hangouts about the “stimulus” spending and the Fed printing press should be the “yeah buts.”  As inflation worsens, even the most dim-witted inhabitants of the overlapping Kingdoms of Libtardia and Normiedom aren’t going to swallow this convoluted crap. Irwin and his paymasters know it — but (((they))) are desperate to protect the Fed and somehow try to thwart the coming 2022 devastation of the Demonrat Party.

Picture
Dumb old White men in corporate board rooms caused the inflation? 
Picture
Unsuspecting “consumers” caused the inflation?
Picture
Picture

No one is going to buy this bullshit.

The Sad Truth About “Memorial Day”

As we all know, Memorial Day is a federal holiday in the United States for remembering the men (and many women now too!) who died while serving in America’s armed forces. The holiday, which is observed on the last Monday of May, originated after the U.S. Civil War, in 1868 as Decoration Day.

Families of the Northern dead would decorate the graves of their kinfolk with flags and flowers. By 1900, competing Union and Confederate holiday traditions, celebrated on different days, had merged into a single Memorial Day, which was eventually extended to honor all Americans who died in military service. Since World War II, the stupid cliche of “thank our veterans for our freedom” was unofficially attached to the day. Of course, Americans haven’t died in defense of freedom since the War of 1812.

So, this Memorial Day, with all due respect to the veterans who died under false pretenses, let us dispense with all this “thank you for our freedom” bullshit and declare a more historically accurate “gratitude” to the deserving parties.

Picture
Picture
1 & 2. Sorry to rain on your Memorial Day Parade, pops — but with all respect and affection, you and your buddies got played for chumps.
Picture
The last American battle truly fought for the cause of freedom and independence was  The Battle of New Orleans, won  by General Andrew Jackson in 1815.

1898: Thank you Globalists for the gift of the Spanish-American War in which 2,450 Americans were killed so that the New World Order gang could establish a presence in the Asian Pacific (Philippines & Guam).

1898-1913: Thank you Globalists for the gift of the Philippines War in which 4,200 American were killed so that the Filipinos, to whom you promised independence in exchange for rising up against Spain, could be kept under control.

1900-1901: Thank you Globalists for the Boxer Rebellion in which 131 Americans were killed so that the Chinese could be kept in line.

1917-1918: Thank you Globalists and Zionists for World War I in which 120,000 Americans were killed so that the first steps of world government could be taken in Europe (League of Nations) and Palestine could be stolen from the Turks and their Arab subjects.

Picture
Spanish-American War 
Picture
Philippines War 
Picture
World War I

1941-1945: Thank you Globalists and Zionists for World War II in which 410,000 Americans were killed so that Germany and Japan could be enslaved to the New World Order, and Britain eventually forced to turn over most of Palestine to the Jews.

1950-1953: Thank you Globalists for the Korean War in which 36,000 Americans were killed in a rigged no-win war designed to maintain a permanent trip-wire between the two Koreas.

1965-1975: Thank you Globalists for the Vietnam War in which 58,000 Americans were killed in another rigged no-win war designed to drain and destabilize America.

Picture
World War II 
Picture
Korean War 
Picture
Vietnam War

1982-1984: Thank you Globalists and Zionists for the Beirut Deployment in which 266 Americans were killed in a false-flag attack staged by Israel and blamed on “terrorists.”

1990-1991: Thank you Globalists and Zionists for the Gulf War in which 300 Americans were killed so that the rising power of politically independent Iraq could be weakened.

2001-2011: Thank you Globalists and Zionists for the War on Terror in which 7000 Americans were killed in Afghanistan and Iraq as part of a multi-trillion dollar farce kicked-off after the false-flag terror attacks of September 11, 2001.

Picture
Beirut 
Picture
 Iraq
Picture
Afghanistan

“They died to keep us free,” really?

Heavily indebted & abusively overtaxed Americans enjoying their mandatory “freedom” (from germs) during the lock-down of the Stupid-19 scamdemic.

Picture
Picture
Picture
Mandatory masks — 6-feet long “social distancing” pool noodles attached to hats — Arrested for surfing during Stupid-19 “crisis.
Picture
Picture
Picture
More mandatory “freedom” (from  make-believe “terrorists”) at the airport. — TSA airport goons get to harass us and steal from our luggage — with total impunity and immunity!
Picture
Picture
We can best honor our dead veterans by exposing the “who” and the “why” behind both their tragic and premature deaths — and our actual enslavement imposed under the guise of “security.”

The Davos Revolution And The Re-Making Of Civilization

The Great Reset dangles before us: a global public-private partnership that follows the mystic path of social feelings, the holy writ of consensus politics, and the self-anointed prophets of international finance… all watched over by the priests of digital technology. It’s the operating system of the collective New Age, an algorithmic-technocratic revolution – maximum efficiency for managed harmony – and of course, it’s all for the “greater good.”

the davos revolution and the re making of civilization

“A crisis is a productive event.” – Guy Parmelin, President of the Swiss Confederation.

Since the 1970’s, the ski-resort community of Davos, Switzerland, has frequently been a gathering place for global elites during the month of January. Hosted by the World Economic Forum, an organization granted special status by the Swiss government, the Davos conference brings together an array of selected power-brokers; governors of central banks, international financiers, heads-of-state, UN leaders, CEOs from the largest corporations, and well-placed media personalities. To be a “Davos Man” typically means you’ve embraced an international perspective, and have the ability to influence long-term shifts in political and economic culture. You’re part of an elite club with the self-anointed task of directing global change.

Because of Covid complications, this year’s WEF annual meeting was postponed, and has since been re-scheduled with the hope of gathering in Singapore later this August. Nevertheless, the last week of January 2021 still witnessed a significant WEF event; a virtual conference titled the Davos Agenda, which could be live-monitored by anyone willing to take the time.

What was front-and-center of this online meeting? The Great Reset.

Before we go further, it’s important to note that this article only scratches the surface of what transpired. And how could it do anything but? The Davos Agenda ran five days, each being 10-to-12 hours long, and with most time slots holding multiple and simultaneous panel discussions. To give you an idea of the schedule, the first day – Monday, January 25 – had a total of 29 individual sessions. It was information overload.

It also must be stated that not everybody who officially participated was on the same page as the World Economic Forum. For example, Benjamin Netanyahu gave a talk outlining how he purposefully cut through the red tape to secure Covid vaccinations, making sure his nation had the supplies it needed. His approach didn’t fit with the WEF consensus of “vaccine solidarity,” to act globally before your national interests – after all, as another speaker explained, “the vaccine needs to be a public good.” The phrase “vaccine nationalism” was used throughout the week, a disparaging term for those who sought national health goals above global collaboration.

Another example was Brazil’s Minister of Foreign Affairs, Ernesto Araujo, who publicly encouraged the United States to stay the course as the “superpower of freedom.” Araujo went on to say that Brazil desired an open economy based on liberty, noting that this would challenge the global emergence of a rising “techno-totalitarianism.”

“I’m not a great fan of the concept of the Great Reset,” Araujo stated, explaining that while he generally supported ideas like sustainable development, there was a problem. The Great Reset was missing “freedom and democracy.”

Most others, however, were either on-board or otherwise playing the game.

President of China, Xi Jinping – introduced by Klaus Schwab, founder of the WEF – stressed collaborative action; we must create a new and global economic model, we must “abandon ideological prejudice and jointly follow a path of peaceful coexistence,” and we must bring “prosperity for all.” A “shared future for mankind,” he explained, is necessary. This would include strengthening global economic governance, committing to the UN system of world law, and supporting the World Health Organization as they build “a global community of health for all.” But who will lead the way?

The rest of his speech focused on how China, as a “modern socialist country,” is blazing the trail, including the Belt and Road initiative, and the promotion of a “new type of international relations.” His speech wrapped up with words of solidarity,

“There is only one Earth and one shared future for humanity. As we cope with the current crisis and endeavor to make a better day for everyone, we need to stand united and work together. We have been shown time and again that to beggar thy neighbor, to go it alone, and to slip into arrogant isolation will always fail. Let us all join hands and let multilateralism light our way toward a community with a shared future for mankind.”

Klaus responded by thanking Xi Jinping for “such an important speech, which at this crucial movement in history, provides us with a truly comprehensive framework for shaping the future.”

China was often applauded during the Davos Agenda, being admired for its digital leap forward. But there were some concerns, albeit framed through a globalist worldview.

For example, a few hours after the Chinese leader spoke, the UN Secretary General pointed to the growing rift between China and the United States, noting that both countries were dividing the world with their separate agendas. What was needed, he said, was “one global economy with universal respect for international law.”

Another star performance was from Ursula von der Leyen, the President of the European Commission. It only took a few minutes before she slapped the former Trump administration, saying, “democracy itself might have been permanently damaged in the last four years.” And like others throughout the week, she linked Covid with climate change. Ursula was clear; “We must learn from this crisis. We have to change the way we live and do business.”

Her speech pointed to Europe’s very own Green New Deal, the EU’s push for carbon neutrality by 2050, and how private companies will face stronger regulatory diligence. Regarding digital governance – for it’s vital that online platforms curb fake news while affirming democracy – Ursula called for the United States to join the EU and, together, create a worldwide digital rulebook “based on our values.”

All of the above – like the early pandemic collaboration between the EU, the WEF and the Gates Foundation – represents how “Europe is determined to contribute to this global common good.” At the end of her prepared talk, she affirmed to Schwab that new alliances will be necessary: “This is what we will work for – and I know I can count on you and the World Economic Forum to help us build it.”

Schwab was excited, afterwards saying that this speech represented the practical meaning of the Great Reset. He paraphrased a take-away; what we need is a “values based, social governance system” connected through a digital web.

With the Reset in mind, the Davos Agenda focused on seven interlocking subjects: “How to Save the Planet,” “Fairer Economies,” “Tech for Good,” “Society & Future of Work,” “Better Business,” “Healthy Futures,” and “Beyond Geopolitics.” A mountain of talking points emerged from these encompassing themes. However, we will only highlight a few:

1. Covid: Speaking on the pandemic, Li Xin of China-based Caixin Media, told us this “crisis should not be wasted.” Nor was it. We were constantly reminded that Covid revealed our interdependence while pointing to the problem of nationalism. Old values and conventions no longer work; the global supply chain needs to be digitized, the World Health Organization must be empowered, we need a universal healthcare system, there must be a centralizing program to pool national health data, and economic recovery should be tied to vaccination criteria.

“You’re going to need the vaccine year-after-year-after-year,” we were told.

2. Climate: If Covid was our existential crisis, climate is our planetary emergency. And in order to meet this supposed planetary challenge, the world must pursue a significant reduction in carbon emissions, all the way to net zero by 2050 at the latest. This requires nothing less than a complete overhaul of energy production, the transportation sector, all industry and especially agriculture, and our personal behavior.

Net-zero isn’t an abstract exercise. New Zealand and the United Kingdom have already passed legislation binding them to net-zero by 2050, and similar proposals are on the table in Canada, South Korea, and the European Union. Moreover, the Group of Thirty – a high-level consultative body comprised of the most influential figures in central banking and international financing, many with WEF connections – is pushing for net-zero across the spectrum of global economic activity. [1] In the United States, just a few days after Davos, the National Academies released their decarbonization report – “a technical blueprint and policy manual” – thus creating a roadmap for net-zero by mid-century. [2] And yes, there are working links between the Academies and the WEF.

So it was no surprise that on January 27 – day three of the Davos Agenda – John Kerry, President Biden’s Special Envoy for Climate, reminded the WEF audience how his government is “making climate central to foreign policy planning and national security preparedness.” Kerry explained that “a zero emissions future” will bring new opportunities for green growth: “To use the President’s words, to ‘build back better’ from the global economic crisis.”

Kerry reinforced that climate is everybody’s responsibility: “The whole world has to come to this table to solve the problem.”

3. Social Justice: An inclusive world for all was the mantra – unless, of course, you’re not in agreement with the global consensus. Nevertheless, social justice themes are directly bolted to the framework of the Great Reset. From racial issues to gender claims, social justice leaves its mark. However, a range of other justices needs to be considered, such as eco-justice, climate justice, and vaccine justice. Each of these justice-issues were attached, in some measure, to the Reset structure that was unfolding.

In the panel on creating a New Social Contract, economic justice was front-and-center. A Global Social Protection Fund must come into play, pairing international debt relief to a universal social-economy of “Living Wages and Living Communities.” On the same panel, James Quincey, CEO of Coca-Cola, described how his company is addressing social justice by fashioning an internal, racial/social economic ecosystem. More than that, industry-leading corporations must influence smaller companies to follow suit, especially those in their supply chains. Entire sectors need to re-align their economic models to social justice priorities, and that’s the essence of Stakeholder Capitalism.

4. Stakeholder Capitalism: Unlike shareholder capitalism shaped by company owners and direct market forces, stakeholder capitalism takes a social approach. Since the early 1970s, Schwab has been an advocate of the stakeholder model. Back then it was mainly geared to incorporating labor, union, and government interests in corporate decision-making. Today, Schwab is aggressively pushing a grander vision – capitalism in service to the planet while supporting social causes.

In a WEF article released a few days before the Davos Agenda, Schwab wrote,

   “The planet is thus the center of the global economic system, and its health should be optimized in the decisions made by all other stakeholders.

   The same interconnectedness can be observed for the people who live on the planet… it is incumbent on all of us as global citizens to optimize the well-being of all.”

In other words, capitalism bends to the demands of special interest groups and “green government.” Corporations, industries and sectors – including financial institutions – must shift their business models to appreciate and accelerate these new global norms.

How will this be ascertained?

In September 2020, the WEF released its White Paper, Measuring Stakeholder Capitalism, which envisioned a common standard for “sustainable value creation.”[3] What emerged was a set of principles and benchmarks coalescing around three headings: Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG). As a whole, the ESG framework is to dovetail with the UN Sustainable Development Goals. To put it in acronym parlance, the ESG process is the WEF mechanism to achieve the SDGs.

Upholding the ESG are four pillars: Governance, Planet, People, and Prosperity. Supporting these four categories are 21 core metrics, along with 34 expanded metrics to enable a deeper audit – for that is essentially what’s happening, an audit to ensure compliance and cooperation. Hence, each metric acts as an information node in a detailed review process, and in using this tool, businesses and institutions can measure their purpose and behavior, taking into account environmental issues and social expectations.

Does the board have gender and minority representation? Has it taken climate risk into consideration, and what internal policies are being implemented to achieve net-zero? How much land does the company own, and what is its relationship to key biodiversity areas? Wage and age and gender employment categories, healthcare support, collective agreements, water consumption, community investment and taxation levels; the list is long, incorporating financial details, energy usage, supply chain relationships, waste disposal, lobbying efforts, social ethics and diversity indicators, and on and on.

The trajectory of corporate governance, therefore, will no longer be “business as usual.” Governance, rather, will need to solicit and incorporate input from approving stakeholders, including special interest groups, unions and labor associations, government departments, and international agencies. In other words, stakeholder capitalism is a planetary public-private partnership that hinges on social license.

After the ESG process is complete and satisfactory, your “purpose driven company” will be certified within a global ecosystem of regulators and industry associations. This status will be the key to unlocking investment funds, favorable insurance pricing, and positive consumer recognition. Without achieving ESG benchmarks, however, your business may be cut off from licensing, funding sources, supply chains, government contracts, or marketplace access. Presently, ESG exists as screening criteria used by some investors, but the WEF agenda extends into a wider and more permanent realm.

So long as your business is complying with the global narrative, your company can make money. Those who don’t play ball will be pushed out of the game.

Welcome to “corporate cancel culture.”

5. Digitization: Nothing short of a total, global commitment will suffice if we want to save the planet, or so the narrative goes. Therefore, we need powerful new tools to manage our way forward. Digitization becomes the tie that binds, and data the lifeblood of our new technocratic era.

In this not-too futuristic vision, the information collected from our lifestyle choices will be aggregated, analyzed, and used to modify behaviors for planetary outcomes. One of the Davos themes was “Smart Cities,” noting that urban zones are rich information ecosystems. Here’s an emerging possibility: In our “smart cities,” street-based sensors will talk to smart cars, and payment apps will be notified of your movement, automatically deducting carbon taxes or travel credits from your account. It’s hardly far-fetched.

The overall trajectory is deeper integration with Artificial Intelligence, Central Bank Digital Currencies, universal healthcare data networks, smart supply chains, and more automation. Even greater feats are before us: through blockchain technologies, everything that can be cataloged has the potential to become a numerically assigned asset. Therefore, the life-cycle of anything can be theoretically traced, from raw resource to manufacturer to point-of-consumption. You, too, can become a number in the age of “managed harmony.”

What is not harmonious, however, is contrary thinking and behavior – anything unaligned with approved global narratives. Conservative values, national determination and traditional notions of sovereignty, personal rights attached to private property: If such concepts and beliefs are antithetical to the Great Reset, then they are part of the great problem.

On the last day, US Senator Gillibrand called for accountability regarding right-wing news outlets. More than that, she stressed the need for oversight of social media platforms, holding them to account for allowing right-wing messages to proliferate. She then affirmed these positions by appealing to her faith; that we need to love one another.

For conservative Christians, the idea of the Great Reset strikes at something deeper than talking points. The real question becomes one of salvation. Who ultimately saves the world? Is Jesus Christ our messiah, or does collective humanity redeem itself by saving the planet? It appears we are at a Romans 1 crossroad, faced with the question of worshiping and serving the creation, or the Creator.

And thus, the Reset dangles before us: a global public-private partnership that follows the mystic path of social feelings, the holy writ of consensus politics, and the prophets of international finance… all watched over, and guided by, the priests of technology. It’s the operating system of the collective New Age, an algorithmic-technocratic revolution – maximum efficiency for managed harmony – and of course, it’s all for the “greater good.”

Maybe the concerns expressed by Brazil’s Foreign Minister – the looming dangers of a rising techno-totalitarianism – are worth considering.

—————-

Carl Teichrib is the author of Game of Gods: The Temple of Man in the Age of Re-Enchantment. Excerpts of his book may be read at www.gameofgods.ca, and his research reports can be found at www.forcingchange.org.Audrey Vanderkley is the admin at Remnant Online Fellowship, www.remnantonlinefellowship.org, which exists to connect people to relevant Christian resources on Bible prophecy and worldview issues.

Endnotes:

1. Mainstreaming the Transition to a Net-Zero Economy (Group of Thirty, 2020).

2. Accelerating Decarbonization of the U.S. Energy System (National Academies of Sciences, Engineers, and Medicine, 2021).

3. Measuring Stakeholder Capitalism: Towards Common Metrics and Consistent Reporting of Sustainable Value Creation (World Economic Forum, 2020).

When America Had ZERO Income Tax

Picture

MARCH 10, 2021

NY Times: Biden Wants to Raise Taxes, Yet Many Trump Tax Cuts Are Here to Stay

Partly for political reasons and mainly for economic reasons, that person who looks like he’s wearing a state-of-the-art mask while “working” in what looks like a staged “Oval Office” will not be able to follow through on his campaign threat to revoke the Trump income tax cuts — at least not the one for less-than-wealthy households. That’s nice to hear, but always lost in the modern debate over tax levels is the forgotten fact that the U.S. Constitution — a document which all politicians solemnly pledge to uphold and defend — does not even permit a tax on labor. As hard as it may be for contemporary Americans to even imagine, it was little more than a single long lifetime ago, 108 years to be precise, that no American, rich, poor, or in-between, paid any income tax, at all! And even as recently as the eve of World War II, it was mainly the top 10% who paid any income tax.

Imagine that! A fast-growing, industrialized, dynamic, innovative, economic powerhouse nation of 100,000,000+ people — with a massive and booming middle class; and millions of European immigrants clamoring to get in, get to work, and climb up from the bottom of the ladder — with the Edison-Tesla electrical revolution already operational, and the Ford automotive revolution just getting started — and no limit to the potential of the vast United States of America of 1913. And just think, the great nation achieved it all without the “blessing” of an income tax or a debt-money central bank — a pair of related evil institutions — both established in 1913 — which today’s “smart people” assure us are indispensable for the proper functioning of a modern state.

How was it possible for America to have become so great without a central bank / income tax system, you ask? Why was the insidious form of debt-money printing and its attendant labor taxation scheme ever instituted in the first place when the country was doing just fine without them? Well, to the architects of the New World Order, both the counterfeit money from the “Fed” and the stolen “revenue” from the people were absolutely “needed” to fund the coming, pre-planned “Great War” (World War I) and the eventual welfare-control system which they already had in mind.

St. Sugar, fire up the Time Machine and set the dial to 1907, please. Into the Marxist mist of history we go!

Picture
Picture
Picture
America of the 1910’s was a booming, growing, thriving happy nation of 100.000.000 people with first-rate schools, universities, cars, roads, bridges, railways, hospitals  — all this, without an income tax 
or a central bank.
Picture
Picture
Picture
Americans even had ample leisure time to enjoy and support the amateur and professional sports leagues which were sweeping the country — 
all without an income tax 

or a central bank.
Picture
Picture
Contrary to Fake History, the patriotic Christian Blacks of America, less than a half-century removed from the end of slavery, were rapidly acquiring wealth and joining the ranks of the middle class — all without an income tax or a central bank. Image 1: Fraternity at Howard University  Image 2: The inventor George Washington Carver (seated center) and his staff at the Tuskegee Institute.

 * Note: The very same Jewish bankers behind the Fed and the Income Tax founded the NAACP in order to gradually turn conservative Blacks into libtarded victim-whiners — racial weapons to be used as sacrificial pawns against America’s White founding Class.

* JANUARY, 1907: SCHIFF ISSUES A WARNING
In a speech before the Chamber of Commerce, Zionist banking mogul and Rothschild ally, Jacob Schiff, “prophetically” warns:

“Unless we have a Central Bank with control of credit resources, this country is going to undergo the most severe and far reaching money panic in its history.” (here)

* OCTOBER, 1907: CRISIS SCARES AMERICA
The New York Bankers have inflated the stock market with easy loans. When lending is then tightened, the bubble bursts. Stocks crash 50%. Bank runs follow. The New York Times and Wall Street bankers use The Panic of 1907 to make a case for a European-style Central Bank (as Marx envisioned).

* 1911: SENATOR OWEN: “PANIC OF 07 WAS A CONSPIRACY!”
Four years after the 07 Panic, Senator Robert Owen of Oklahoma will demand an investigation into the sudden crash. He insists that the Panic was deliberately engineered:
.
“(The Panic) was brought about by a deliberate conspiracy for the enrichment of those who engineered it….I regard it as treason against the United States….a few men control the power of expanding or contracting credits. This unrestrained power means the power to create panics and coerce this country politically.”

Picture
Jacob Schiff, who spent millions to help the Communists take over Russia, “predicted” the very crisis that he and his fellow chosenites were deliberately engineering.
Picture
The Crash of 1907 — Panic and bank runs in New York.
Picture
Senator Owen smelled a rat.

* 1908: TEDDY ROOSEVELT APPOINTS COMMISSION
Wall Street sock puppet – President Theodore Roosevelt, appoints a “bi-partisan” National Monetary Commission to study the causes of the Panic and to make suggestions. The Chairman of the Commission is Senator Nelson Aldrich(whose daughter will one day be the mother of the 5 Rockefeller sons, David, John III, Nelson, Winthrop, & Lawrence)

* SURPRISE! COMMISSION CALLS FOR CENTRAL BANK
The main recommendation of Aldrich’s National Monetary Commission is to establish a Central Bank with monopoly control of credit and currency issue. The privately owned Bank would create money out of thin air and lend it local banks and the government at interest.

* 1910: SECRET MEETING AT JEKYLL ISLAND
Aldrich, Paul Warburg, and other agents of the Rockefeller & Rothschild dynasties meet secretly at JP Morgan’s private club in Jekyll Island, Georgia. One of the conspirators, Frank Vanderlip, will, years later, reveal to The Saturday Evening Post:
.
“There was an occasion, near the close of 1910, when I was as secretive, indeed, as furtive as any conspirator. … We were trying to plan a mechanism that would correct the weaknesses of our banking system as revealed under the strains and pressures of the Panic of 1907. I do not feel it is any exaggeration to speak of our secret expedition to Jekyll Island as the occasion of the actual conception of what eventually became the Federal Reserve System. … Discovery, we knew, simply must not happen, or else all our time and effort would be wasted. If it were to be exposed publicly that our group had gotten together and written a banking bill, that bill would have no chance whatever of passage by Congress.”

Picture
TR was a blustering loudmouth tool of the Jewish Banking Mafia.
Picture
Senator Aldrich was an in-law of the Rockefellers. Grandson David ran Trilateral Commission and CFR.
Picture
Paul Warburg: Father of The Fed; America’s Central Bank.

* 1912: THE ‘ALDRICH BILL’ DIES
Senator Aldrich introduces a bill to establish a Central Bank (The Aldrich Bill). The scheme (hatched at Jekyll Island) is transparent, and Aldrich’s name is too closely linked to the Money Masters of New York. Congressman Charles A Lindbergh Sr(father of the famous aviator) declares:
.
The Aldrich Plan is the Wall Street Plan. It means another panic, if necessary, to intimidate the people. Aldrich, paid by the government to represent the people, proposes a plan for the trusts instead.”
.
Opposition to Aldrich’s scheme is so strong, that the bill to create a Central Bank is never even brought to the floor for a vote.

* 1913: THE ‘ALDRICH BILL’ IS REPACKAGED – THE FED IS BORN! .
A few cosmetic changes are made to the old Aldrich Bill and the bill is renamed ‘The Federal Reserve Act’. Congressman Lindbergh is not fooled:
.
“This is the Aldrich Bill in disguise ….This Act establishes the most gigantic trust on earth. When the President signs this bill, the invisible government by the Monetary Power will be legalized. The people may not know it immediately, but the day of reckoning is only a few years removed. The worst legislative crime of the ages is perpetrated by this banking bill.”
.
The bill passes anyway, on December 23,after many Senators and Congressmen had left town for Christmas Break! Puppet President Woodrow Wilson quickly signs it — creating the privately-owned Federal Reserve System. Weeks earlier, Wilson, after the necessary states had ratified the Constitutional Amendment establishing an Income Tax — needed to pay for wars and for interest to the bankers after they set up their Central Bank — had already enacted the new tax law. The counterfeiting, insider trading, loan sharking, Globalist Money Masters were now in control America, and have been ever since.

Picture
Congressman Charles Lindbergh Sr. and his famous aviator son
Picture
An anti-Central Bank cartoon from 1912! 
Picture
Woodrow Warmonger Wilson sold the Federal Reserve scam as “Currency Reform”
Picture
Picture
The original 1913 Income Tax only affected about the top 1% of earners, with brackets in the single digits. Naturally, there were assurances that the rates would never rise, and that the income brackets would never expand to lower earners. 

We’ll take whatever tax-relief crumbs that our oh-so-magnanimous masters will drop on the floor for us to nibble on. But can you just imagine the EXPLOSION of economic activity, investment and expansion of opportunity for all if we actually undid the great robbery of 1913 and returned to sound money, strong families and personal responsibility?

Oh if people only understood the kind of better life they are being deprived of by the Predatory Ruling Class!