2008 Spy Paper Predicted the Covid Scamdemic

As a Conspiracy Analyst, just sniffed out and channeled a real gem for us. Of all the past hints and “prophecies” which the Globalists communicated to their Deep State henchmen about a future “pandemic,” this find ranks high when it comes to pinpoint accuracy and shock value.

In a November 2008 report titled: Global Trends 2025: A Transformed World, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (DNI) — the agency which oversees all intelligence agencies — and the National Intelligence Council didn’t just telegraph Stupid-19, but also “guessed” the time-window and foretold how many people were to have been genocided in America and worldwide.

Just to add a bit of critical context, the multi-topic report about a “transformed world” was published right about the time that Obongo was elected, marking the start of the Bilderberg-certified “16-year plan” to finish off America once and for all with 8 years of Bath House Barry followed by 8 years of Killary Clinton. The math: 2009 + 16 = 2025.

The opening page provides the synopsis of the report:

“We prepared Global Trends 2025: A Transformed World to stimulate strategic thinking about the future by identifying key trends, the factors that drive them, where they seem to be headed, and how they might interact. It uses scenarios to illustrate some of the many ways in which the drivers examined in the study may interact to generate challenges and opportunities for future decision makers. The study as a whole is more a description of the factors likely to shape events than a prediction of what will actually happen.”

Spy-Speak to English translation: These are our goals and secret programs for the coming 16 years.

The “study” covers issues like BRICS, the Climate Con, migration, terrorism, international trade etc. — always from the Globalist perspective. But it is the “description of a factor” on page 75 — which was not a “prediction,” of course (rolling eyes) — that really causes the jaw to drop and the blood to boil. As you read this evil excerpt, keep in mind that this scamdemic was supposed to have struck with the Satanic Witch Killary lording over us in her second term. Evidently, it was moved up a few years in order to strike at Trump during an election year (mail-in ballot fraud.)

Headlined Potential Emergence of a Global Pandemic, the entire 1-page item is copied below.

The Deep State doesn’t get any deeper than the DNI — whose “scenario” of a “before 2025” global pandemic constitutes proof of a conspiracy.

Potential Emergence of a Global Pandemic
(bold emphasis and parentheticals in certain places are ours)

The emergence of a novel, highly transmissible, and virulent human respiratory illness for which there are no adequate countermeasures could initiate a global pandemicIf a pandemic diseaseemerges by 2025, internal and cross-border tension and conflict will become more likely as nations struggle—with degraded capabilities—to control the movement of populations seeking to avoid infection or maintain access to resources.

The emergence of a pandemic disease depends upon the natural genetic mutation or reassortment of currently circulating disease strains or the emergence of a new pathogen into the humanpopulation. Experts consider highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) strains, such as H5N1, to be likely candidates for such a transformation, but other pathogens– such as the SARScoronavirus or other influenza strains—also have this potential.

If a pandemic disease emerges, it probably will first occur in an area marked by high population density and close association between humans and animals, such as many areas of China and Southeast Asia, where human populations live in close proximity to livestock. Unregulated animal husbandry practices could allow a zoonotic (from humans to animals) disease such as H5N1 to circulate in livestock populations—increasing the opportunity for mutation into a strain with pandemic potential. To propagate effectively, a disease would have to be transmitted to areas of higher population density.

Under such a scenario, inadequate health-monitoring capability within the nation of origin probably would prevent early identification of the disease. Slow public health response would delay the realization that a highly transmissible pathogen had emerged. Weeks might pass before definitive laboratory results could be obtained confirming the existence of a disease with pandemic potential. In the interim, clusters of the disease would begin to appear in towns and cities within Southeast Asia. Despite limits imposed on international travel, travelers with mildsymptoms or who were asymptomatic could carry the disease to other continents.

Waves of new cases would occur every few months (variants). The absence of an effective vaccine (they would have waited years before coming up with their death jab.) and near universal lack of immunity would render populations vulnerable to infection. In this worst-case, tens to hundreds of millions of Americans within the US Homeland would become ill anddeaths would mount into the tens of millions.

Outside the US, critical infrastructure degradation and economic loss on a global scale would result as approximately a third of the worldwide population became ill and hundreds of millions died.
_____________________________
A: US and global health organizations currently are working to develop vaccines that may prevent or mitigate influenza pandemics. A breakthrough in the next several years could reduce the risk posed by
pandemic influenza during upcoming decades.

B: How fast a disease spreads, how many people become sick, how long they stay sick, the mortality rate, and the symptoms and after-effects will vary according to the specific characteristics of whatever pathogen is responsible for a pandemic. This scenario posits plausible characteristics that fall within a
range of possibilities for these variables.

End ***

2008 Scenario / DNI Report


“If a pandemic disease emerges, it probably will first occur in an area marked by high population density and close association between humans and animals, such as many areas of China.”

***

2021 Headline / Nature Magazine

FAKE! // Tell it, Church Lady. Tell it!

Let us review:

“Before 2025” — “Coronavirus” — “respiratory illness” — “animal to human transition” — “from China” — “spread by air travel” — “waves of new cases every few months”
 — “hundreds of millions dead.”

But not a “prediction,” eh?

These demonic bastards had a long term plan to crush the world economy, cull humanity with their vaccine, and then nano-chip the survivors with the Bill Gates “666” technology. And they would have succeeded had Killary Clinton not been derailed by the man that some of “youse guys” are now attacking (and in some cases, defunding) little ol’ me for defending.

Please share this amazing find.

*The full DNI.gov pdf of the report itself is linked here.

Page 75 of the official report, page 95 of the pdf: “Tens to hundreds of millions of Americans within the US Homeland would become ill and deaths would mount into the tens of millions.”

The Great Reset Agenda Has Failed – Is Ukraine Plan B?

By Brandon Smith

There are people in the liberty movement that attribute FAR too much intelligence to the global power elites, to the point that they seem to think the globalists are always planning “ten steps ahead.”

the great reset agenda has failed – is ukraine plan b?

The funny thing about planning ten steps ahead though is that if anything goes wrong with steps 1-9 then getting to step number 10 will be impossible and you just wasted a whole lot of energy on an elaborate plan that ended up going nowhere.

The globalists are NOT the smartest people around; not even close. They aren’t even all that effective when their plans actually function and there are no surprises. Their ideas fail constantly.

There is only one reason that centralizing criminals have not been brought down, and that is because no one has ever targeted them directly.

Every time there is a governmental shake up or rebellion or mass movement for change people target “the system”; they blame the system for all our problems (or they blame a handful of political puppets) and they seek to add a fresh coat of paint or change some of its basic functions, but the men behind the curtain always end up back behind the curtain.

The problem is never “the system”, it’s the people running and influencing the system while enjoying the comfort of the shadows.

Here is how the globalists seem to operate the best that I can tell – They aim a fist full of darts at a board and throw as hard as they can and whatever sticks is what sticks. When a plan does stick, well the globalists appear to be brilliant, don’t they?

In reality they were just throwing around schemes blindfolded and half of those schemes landed in the gutter. The problem is that while the globalists are fumbling around in the dark searching for a plan that works they can do a lot of damage and draw a lot of attention.

Every once in a while it becomes obvious when they have invested an immense amount of time and planning into a single unique scheme, a fulcrum point that many of their other plans will rely on in the future.

There is no doubt that the response to the covid outbreak was meant to bulldoze over numerous social and legal conventions and achieve full bore centralization before the vast majority of people even knew what hit them.

The pure excitement and adrenaline on display by the globalists at the onset of the pandemic was palpable. They were practically dancing in the streets, jabbering about how many worldwide socialist programs they were about to railroad through, not to mention how many individual liberties they were about to erase.

That said, when a plan doesn’t stick the way they want, sometimes they try to force it to work and this never goes well for them. We’ve seen this multiple times with their attempts to institute gun control in the US and they have failed over and over again.

More recently, the covid agenda and by extension the globalist “Reset” has fallen apart in the US and this has led to problems for them in other parts of the world.

American resistance to the vax mandates and lockdowns was key to everything, more so than I think many people realize. Even if the globalists could implement medical tyranny through much of the rest of the world, with conservative red states blocking the agenda at every turn this created a focal point for resistance.

Meaning, all the people in the world can still see that there is another way to do things that does not involve authoritarianism.

Life in the red states goes on as if covid barely existed. Conservatives are not “dying in the streets” like the lunatic liberals said would happen.

In fact, millions of people have been LEAVING blue states and coming to red states just to be free.

When you offer people alternatives, you offer them a glimpse of freedom, and sometimes a glimpse is all that is needed to inspire rebellion.

I believe that it was red state resistance that led directly to the Supreme Court blocking Biden’s illegal and unconstitutional vaccine mandates.

If the red states had not take such an aggressive stand, the whole country might be under Biden’s thumb right now as he hands out dictates from on high, or, we would be at war.

I also don’t think it’s a coincidence that the UK government decided to remove all covid mandates right after the US Supreme Court dropped restrictions in the US. When freedom is visible it spreads.

It’s hard for western governments to explain to their people why they should be enslaved over the covid virus when so many other people across the ocean live their lives normally in the face of the same illness.

This doesn’t mean that some of the worst offenders will not try to maintain their wretched grip on their populations. It would seem that the Australian government has been lost to globalist tyranny forever, but they still will not be able to deny the reality that conservative Americans are free.

There will always be a chance for revolt within Australia exactly because we are living proof that covid mandates do not need to exist.

Since the very beginning of the covid pandemic I have argued that the virus itself was a lab engineered bioweapon, most likely created in the bowels of the Level 4 facilities in Wuhan right down the street from what is widely recognized as ground zero. I have also argued from the very beginning that evidence shows that the NIH and Anthony Fauci have been involved in the funding of manipulation of coronaviruses at the Wuhan Lab for many years. Meaning, there has been collusion between western elitists and Chinese scientists to weaponize covid through gain of function research. This is now exposed as FACT.

What I don’t know for certain is if the virus was released deliberately, or accidentally. What I can say, though, is that the globalists at the World Economic Forum and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation held a “simulation” of a global coronavirus pandemic only two months before the real thing happened. The simulation, called “Event 201”, seemed to predict almost everything that would eventually happen with the real coronavirus outbreak that started in China, right down to news companies and social media giants locking down all information that didn’t fit the narrative. There was just one problem – The virus wasn’t as deadly as they had hoped.

Event 201 predicted 65 million initial deaths worldwide and the WHO predicted a much higher infection fatality rate of 3% of the population or more. This never happened. The globalists and the media have been scrambling for the past couple years to convince the public that the death rate of covid is much higher higher than it is, but the fact remains that dozens of studies show covid’s average IFR is a mere 0.27%. It’s not going to change for the worse, it is only going to decline as covid continues to mutate into less deadly forms of itself.

Why did this happen? It’s impossible to say. Maybe the virus performed differently in the lab but then changed dramatically once it was let out into the wild? That would be my guess. Maybe it was divine intervention?

For whatever reason, the globalists invested an intense amount of energy into the covid virus and it let them down, and now they are stuck trying to create mass panic over a nothing-burger.

So, what happens next?

It makes sense that they will need a distraction as a means to redirect momentum, and the globalists will do what they always do, which is create war tensions. This does not mean that large scale war is the intended outcome, but limited regional wars that could grow into something more are always on the table.

It is not a mistake that the US could potentially be caught up in not one but two major regional conflicts at this time, including a Chinese invasion of Taiwan as well as a Russian invasion of Ukraine.

For now, Ukraine is the most hyped. We have seen such spill over with Ukraine many times in the past and it’s hard to say if this is yet another false start or if a full blown Russian attack is going to happen.

With constant US influence, funding and arming being pursued in the region I suppose getting the Russians to invade would not be that hard. I’m not really interested in trying to read the dice on this one. My only interest in Ukraine is in how it might benefit the overall globalist agenda.

First, the economic instability that has been growing exponentially the past couple years will now hit overdrive.

Inflation, gas prices, the supply chain, all the threats that are already looming over us will expand tenfold with two nuclear powers at odds. Even if Ukraine saber rattling was to choke out into nothing just the existence of the danger is enough to inspire widespread economic fear.

Second, the pandemic issue can be cast to the wayside with little fanfare. The globalists know its going nowhere for them but they need a way to exit without explaining the numerous lies they have peddled in the past two years. War is a way to wipe the slate clean on the news cycle.

Third, heightened tensions with Russia open the door to a different form of paranoia at home. How many times have we heard media claims of “Russian influence” on US elections? There is ZERO proof of this, but the narrative has already been planted among leftists.

It would not surprise me in the slightest if US elections were “postponed” or the outcomes ignored because of unverified claims of Russian “interference.” What better way to prevent a complete conservative sweep in the US than to simply stop the elections altogether?

Fourth, by extension, it is only a matter of time before a conservative rebellion arises in the US to unseat the globalists from power. It is already happening in may forms today, for those who are paying attention.

The most common way for corrupt governments to undermine a rebellion for freedom is to accuse it of being an astroturf revolution created by a foreign enemy.

That is to say, the corrupt government seeks to take away the heart and soul of the rebellion by claiming they aren’t fighting for freedom, they are only fighting in exchange for money or power from a foreign nation. Their reason for fighting is “fake.”

We saw this with the Chinese CCP when they brutally took over Hong Kong. We also saw this in Kazakhstan when the people rioted in the streets over price inflation and Russian troops were sent in to quell what was called a “foreign created color revolution.” Nothing could have been further from the truth.

Make no mistake, when the fighting starts in the US, our rebellion will not be called a fight for freedom. We will be accused as “Russian agents”, traitors, insurrectionists, etc, etc..

They’ll say we’re fighting to support foreign governments, not to bring liberty and sanity back to our society. We’ll be the villains; it’s important to understand this and not be bogged down by 4th generation warfare. It is for this reason primarily that conflict with Russia makes a lot of sense for the globalists.

Perhaps not on the scale of a global war, but enough to keep their prospective populations in line. Whether or not this plan succeeds is another matter entirely. As already mentioned, these people fail regularly.

Conflict Of Interest: Documents Prove Bill Gates Gave $319 Million To Top Mainstream Media Outlets

According to MintPress News, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation donated at least $319 million to fund media projects at hundreds of organizations including CNN, NBC, NPR, PBS and The Atlantic, raising questions about those news outlets’ ability to report objectively on Gates and his work.

by Alan Macleod

conflict of interest bill gates gave $319 million to major media outlets

Up until his recent messy divorce, Bill Gates enjoyed something of a free pass in corporate media. Generally presented as a kindly nerd who wants to save the world, the Microsoft co-founder was even unironically christened “Saint Bill” by The Guardian.

While other billionaires’ media empires are relatively well known, the extent to which Gates’s cash underwrites the modern media landscape is not. After sorting through over 30,000 individual grants, MintPress can reveal that the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) has made over $300 million worth of donations to fund media projects.

Recipients of this cash include many of America’s most important news outlets, including CNN, NBC, NPR, PBS and The Atlantic.

Gates also sponsors a myriad of influential foreign organizations, including the BBC, The Guardian, The Financial Times and The Daily Telegraph in the UK; prominent European newspapers such as Le Monde (France), Der Spiegel (Germany) and El País (Spain); as well as big global broadcasters like Al-Jazeera.

The Gates Foundation money going towards media programs has been split up into a number of sections, presented in descending numerical order, and includes a link to the relevant grant on the organization’s website.

Awards Directly to Media Outlets:

Together, these donations total $166,216,526. The money is generally directed towards issues close to the Gates’ hearts.

For example, the $3.6 million CNN grant went towards “report[ing] on gender equality with a particular focus on least developed countries, producing journalism on the everyday inequalities endured by women and girls across the world,” while the Texas Tribune received millions to “to increase public awareness and engagement of education reform issues in Texas.”

Given that Bill is one of the charter schools’ most fervent supporters, a cynic might interpret this as planting pro-corporate charter school propaganda into the media, disguised as objective news reporting.

The Gates Foundation has also given nearly $63 million to charities closely aligned with big mediaoutlets, including nearly $53 million to BBC Media Action, over $9 million to MTV’s Staying Alive Foundation and $1 million to The New York Times Neediest Causes Fund.

While not specifically funding journalism, donations to the philanthropic arm of a media player should still be noted.

Gates continues to underwrite a wide network of investigative journalism centers as well, totaling just over $38 million, more than half of which has gone to the D.C.-based International Center for Journalists to expand and develop African media.

These centers include:

  • International Center for Journalists — $20,436,938.
  • Premium Times Centre for Investigative Journalism (Nigeria) — $3,800,357.
  • The Pulitzer Center for Crisis Reporting — $2,432,552.
  • Fondation EurActiv Politech — $2,368,300.
  • International Women’s Media Foundation — $1,500,000.
  • Center for Investigative Reporting — $1,446,639.
  • InterMedia Survey institute — $1,297,545.
  • The Bureau of Investigative Journalism — $1,068,169.
  • Internews Network — $985,126.
  • Communications Consortium Media Center — $858,000.
  • Institute for Nonprofit News — $650,021.
  • The Poynter Institute for Media Studies — $382,997.
  • Wole Soyinka Centre for Investigative Journalism (Nigeria) — $360,211.
  • Institute for Advanced Journalism Studies — $254,500.
  • Global Forum for Media Development (Belgium) — $124,823.
  • Mississippi Center for Investigative Reporting — $100,000.

In addition to this, the Gates Foundation also plies press and journalism associations with cash, to the tune of at least $12 million. For example, the National Newspaper Publishers Association — a group representing more than 200 outlets — has received $3.2 million.

The list of these organizations includes:

  • Education Writers Association — $5,938,475.
  • National Newspaper Publishers Association —$3,249,176.
  • National Press Foundation — $1,916,172.
  • Washington News Council — $698,200.
  • American Society of News Editors Foundation — $250,000.
  • Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press — $25,000.

This brings our running total up to $216.4 million.

The foundation also puts up the money to directly train journalists all over the world, in the form of scholarships, courses and workshops.

Today, it is possible for an individual to train as a reporter thanks to a Gates Foundation grant, find work at a Gates-funded outlet, and to belong to a press association funded by Gates.

This is especially true of journalists working in the fields of health, education and global development, the ones Gates himself is most active in and where scrutiny of the billionaire’s actions and motives are most necessary.

Gates Foundation grants pertaining to the instruction of journalists include:

  • Johns Hopkins University — $1,866,408.
  • Teachers College, Columbia University — $1,462,500.
  • University of California Berkeley — $767,800.
  • Tsinghua University (China) — $450,000.
  • Seattle University — $414,524.
  • Institute for Advanced Journalism Studies — $254,500.
  • Rhodes University (South Africa) — $189,000.
  • Montclair State University —$160,538.
  • Pan-Atlantic University Foundation — $130,718.
  • World Health Organization — $38,403.
  • The Aftermath Project — $15,435.

The BMGF also pays for a wide range of specific media campaigns around the world. For example, since 2014 it has donated $5.7 million to the Population Foundation of India in order to create dramas that promote sexual and reproductive health, with the intent to increase family planning methods in South Asia.

Meanwhile, it alloted over $3.5 million to a Senegalese organization to develop radio shows and online content that would feature health information.

Supporters consider this to be helping critically underfunded media, while opponents might consider it a case of a billionaire using his money to plant his ideas and opinions into the press.

Media projects supported by the Gates Foundation:

Total: $97,315,408

$319.4 Million And (A Lot) More

Added together, these Gates-sponsored media projects come to a total of $319.4 million.

However, there are clear shortcomings with this non-exhaustive list, meaning the true figure is undoubtedly far higher. First, it does not count sub-grants — money given by recipients to media around the world.

And while the Gates Foundation fosters an air of openness about itself, there is actually precious little public information about what happens to the money from each grant, save for a short, one- or two-sentence description written by the foundation itself on its website.

Only donations to press organizations themselves or projects that could be identified from the information on the Gates Foundation’s website as media campaigns were counted, meaning that thousands of grants having some media element do not appear in this list.

A case in point is the BMGF’s partnership with ViacomCBS, the company that controls CBS News, MTV, VH1, Nickelodeon and BET. Media reports at the time noted that the Gates Foundation was paying the entertainment giant to insert information and PSAs into its programming and that Gates had intervened to change storylines in popular shows like ER and Law & Order: SVU.

However, when checking BMGF’s grants database, “Viacom” and “CBS” are nowhere to be found, the likely grant in question (totaling over $6 million) merely describing the project as a “public engagement campaign aimed at improving high school graduation rates and postsecondary completion rates specifically aimed at parents and students,” meaning that it was not counted in the official total.

There are surely many more examples like this. “For a tax-privileged charity that so very often trumpets the importance of transparency, it’s remarkable how intensely secretive the Gates Foundation is about its financial flows,” Tim Schwab, one of the few investigative journalists who has scrutinized the tech billionaire, told MintPress.

Also not included are grants aimed at producing articles for academic journals. While these articles are not meant for mass consumption, they regularly form the basis for stories in the mainstream press and help shape narratives around key issues.

The Gates Foundation has given far and wide to academic sources, with at least $13.6 milliongoing toward creating content for the prestigious medical journal The Lancet.

And, of course, even money given to universities for purely research projects eventually ends up in academic journals, and ultimately, downstream into mass media. Academics are under heavy pressure to print their results in prestigious journals; “publish or perish” is the mantra in university departments.

Therefore, even these sorts of grants have an effect on our media. Neither these nor grants funding the printing of books or establishment of websites counted in the total, although they too are forms of media.

Low Profile, Long Tentacles

In comparison to other tech billionaires, Gates has kept his profile as a media controller relatively low. Amazon founder Jeff Bezos’s purchase of The Washington Post for $250 million in 2013 was a very clear and obvious form of media influence, as was eBay founder Pierre Omidyar’s creation of First Look Media, the company that owns The Intercept.

Despite flying more under the radar, Gates and his companies have amassed considerable influence in media.

We already rely on Microsoft-owned products for communication (e.g., Skype, Hotmail), social media (LinkedIn), and entertainment (Microsoft XBox). Furthermore, the hardware and software we use to communicate often comes courtesy of the 66-year-old Seattleite.

How many people reading this are doing so on a Microsoft Surface or Windows phone and doing so via Windows OS? Not only that, Microsoft owns stakes in media giants such as Comcast and AT&T. And the “MS” in MSNBC stands for Microsoft.

Media Gates Keepers

That the Gates Foundation is underwriting a significant chunk of our media ecosystem leads to serious problems with objectivity. “The foundation’s grants to media organizations … raise obvious conflict-of-interest questions: How can reporting be unbiased when a major player holds the purse strings?” wrote Gates’s local Seattle Times in 2011.

This was before the newspaper accepted BMGF money to fund its “education lab” section.

Schwab’s research has found that this conflict of interests goes right to the very top: two New York Times columnists had been writing glowingly about the Gates Foundation for years without disclosing that they also work for a group — the Solutions Journalism Network — that, as shown above, has received over $7 million from the tech billionaire’s charity.

Earlier this year, Schwab also declined to co-report on a story about COVAX for The Bureau of Investigative Journalism, suspecting that the money Gates had been pumping into the outlet would make it impossible to accurately report on a subject so close to Gates’s heart.

Sure enough, when the article was published last month, it repeated the assertion that Gates had little to do with COVAX’s failure, mirroring the BMGF’s stance and quoting them throughout. Only at the very end of the more than 5,000-word story did it reveal that the organization it was defending was paying the wages of its staff.

“I don’t believe Gates told The Bureau of Investigative Journalism what to write. I think the bureau implicitly, if subconsciously, knew they had to find a way to tell this story that didn’t target their funder.

The biasing effects of financial conflicts are complex but very real and reliable,” Schwab said, describing it as “a case study in the perils of Gates-funded journalism.”

MintPress also contacted the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation for comment, but it did not respond.

Gates, who amassed his fortune by building a monopoly and zealously guarding his intellectual property, bears significant blame for the failure of the coronavirus vaccine rollout across the world.

Quite aside from the COVAX fiasco, he pressured Oxford University not to make its publicly-funded vaccine open-source and available to all for free, but instead to partner with private corporation AstraZeneca, a decision that meant that those who could not pay were blocked from using it.

That Gates has made over 100 donations to the university, totaling hundreds of millions of dollars, likely played some role in the decision. To this day, fewer than 5% of people in low-income countries have received even one dose of COVID vaccine. The death toll from this is immense.

Unfortunately, many of these real criticisms of Gates and his network are obscured by wild and untrue conspiracy theories about such things as inserting microchips in vaccines to control the population.

This has meant that genuine critiques of the Microsoft co-founder are often demonetized and algorithmically suppressed, meaning that outlets are strongly dissuaded from covering the topic, knowing they will likely lose money if they do so. The paucity of scrutiny of the world’s second-richest individual, in turn, feeds into outlandish suspicions.

Gates certainly deserves it. Quite apart from his deep and potentially decades-long ties to the infamous Jeffrey Epstein, his attempts to radically change African society, and his investment in controversial chemical giant Monsanto, he is perhaps the key driver behind the American charter school movement — an attempt to essentially privatize the U.S. education system.

Charter schools are deeply unpopular with teachers’ unions, which see the movement as an attempt to lessen their autonomy and reduce public oversight into how and what children are taught.

All the way to the bank

In most coverage, Gates’s donations are broadly presented as altruistic gestures. Yet many have pointed to the inherent flaws with this model, noting that allowing billionaires to decide what they do with their money allows them to set the public agenda, giving them enormous power over society.

“Philanthropy can and is being used deliberately to divert attention away from different forms of economic exploitation that underpin global inequality today,” said Linsey McGoey, Professor of Sociology at the University of Essex, U.K., and author of “No Such Thing as a Free Gift: The Gates Foundation and the Price of Philanthropy.” She adds:

“The new ‘philanthrocapitalism’ threatens democracy by increasing the power of the corporate sector at the expense of the public sector organizations, which increasingly face budget squeezes, in part by excessively remunerating for-profit organizations to deliver public services that could be delivered more cheaply without private sector involvement.”

Charity, as former British Prime Minister Clement Attlee noted, “is a cold grey loveless thing. If a rich man wants to help the poor, he should pay his taxes gladly, not dole out money at a whim.”

None of this means that the organizations receiving Gates’ money — media or otherwise — are irredeemably corrupt, nor that the Gates Foundation does not do any good in the world.

But it does introduce a glaring conflict of interest whereby the very institutions we rely on to hold accountable one of the richest and most powerful men in the planet’s history are quietly being funded by him.

This conflict of interest is one that corporate media have largely tried to ignore, while the supposedly altruistic philanthropist Gates just keeps getting richer, laughing all the way to the bank.

Seeking To Fulfill Kalergi Depopulation Agenda

The Venetians were once the most powerful maritime force in Europe, with an Empire that traversed the Eurasian continent. By aligning with mercenary armies of Khazars, Mongolians and Turks, they slashed and burned their way through one community after another, killing millions of people and seizing their wealth. In the process, they established trade routes that would later be resurrected in the modern-day Silk and Road Initiative, linking Eurasia with the Middle East through Israel.

Given their rapaciousness, heresy, disregard for convention, human life, and rule of law, and indulgence in the dark, occult arts, the Venetian empire fell to chaos, infighting, and pirate-upon-pirate plunder. They had established transnational spy networks throughout the Eurasian continent to alert them to threats, giving the the advantage in war and conquest.

Armed with a single-minded desire to amass the world’s wealth and power within their own hands and rule over the subjugated masses as tyrants who answered to no one but themselves, they endeavored to topple legitimate governments and Monarchs and implant themselves into positions of power.

rothschild dynasty is seeking to fulfill kalergi depopulation agenda

Becoming the ultimate rulers of the world required supplanting the divine right to rule, which was based upon initiation and bloodline, with “Enlightened” rulers rejecting God and replacing legitimate, lawful governments with the illegitimate and the corrupt.

The Vatican, which was controlled by powerful merchant families, first attempted to claim the authority to confer the ” divine right to rule” upon rulers. The opportunistic Rothschild patriarch acquired knowledge of the agenda in play and co-opted it to place his family and bloodlines in line to rule over all of humanity.

The tactics involved occult black magic, endless war and revolution, the exploitation of grievances for the purposes of income redistribution from others to themselves; debt, compromise, assassinations, and the corruption of public virtue for private (their) gain. Through each war, revolution, and skirmish, they reorganized more of society’s wealth and power under their control.

Fascism, Communism, Marxism, socialism, revolution, and pitting people against each other were all Rothschild tactics pursued to divide the enemy (humanity) while they (the Rothschild bloodlines and agents) remains unified in purpose.

Napoleon Dynamite Blows Up Europe

napoleon bonaparte

After Rothschild successfully bankrolled the American and French Revolutions, his agent, Napoleon Bonaparte toppled governments around Europe, with Rothschild “helpfully” bankrolling all sides of the war, placing governments in debt and under the control of the Rothschilds.

Mayer Amschel Rothschild (1744-1812) founded the House of Rothschild in Frankfurt am Main, an imperial city within the Holy Roman Empire. Quickly he joined the Oppenheimer Bank, which provided him access to princes within the Holy Roman Empire, the British Monarchy, and the East India Company. Through these connections, the covetous Rothschild wannabe became banker to elites and aristocrats with a view to separating them from their wealth and becoming the wealthiest man in Europe.

By financing the American Revolution and revolutions throughout Latin America and elsewhere, the Rothschilds separated colonies from their Monarchies, weakening both in the process while placing their respective governments in Rothschild debt. Once in debt, the Rothschilds attempted to control the money supply in those countries through a central bank while promoting a rational Enlightened government in the form of a republic, based upon the Platonic model in which the elite held all the wealth and power and the people were stripped of their wealth and denied a say in their own governments.

Bankrolling the French Revolution, which drew upon the principles of the rational Enlightenment, helped the Rothschilds eliminate rival aristocrats and steal their wealth, with the treasures of aristocrats finding their way into Rothschild mansions.

Each successive war and revolution, which were based upon manufactured grievances, enabled the Rothschilds to reorganize society under Rothschild control and claim more of the wealth that belonged to others for themselves.

Understanding that the Vatican carried “moral authority” from God from which it attempted to confer upon rulers the “divine right to rule,” the Rothschilds took aim at the Vatican — and the British Monarchy, which legitimately held the divine right, independent of the Pope, and which had chartered the East India Company.

While the EIC had been launched as a simple trading company to help the Merchants of London acquire more markets in the North American colonies and elsewhere in the world, the Venetians infiltrated EIC ranks and transformed this benevolent company into an imperialistic force for conquest for the British Empire over which the Venetians sought to rule.

Having successfully waged the American Revolution, which separated the Monarch from its colonies, the Rothschilds set their sights on financial control of the Vatican and the British royal family. They also betrayed the princes of the Holy Roman Empire who had given the Rothschilds the leverage and connections to forge their predatory banking careers.

Through the Frankfurt post office, which had been erected by Venetians for the purposes of intelligence gathering, Rothschild was able to intercept correspondence among leaders and rivals to help him win wars and fell his opponents.

The Rothschilds would later build upon existing Venetian spy networks to manipulate troop movements through the Eurasian continent and elsewhere to achieve the result they sought. The dynasty built upon these networks to create modern day intelligence agencies that served Rothschild financial interests over national interests, including the Office of Strategic Services, the CIA, Mossad, MI-5/6, Cheka, among others.

During the Napoleonic Wars, Venice was used as a bargaining chip for the Rothschilds who had dislodged aristocrats and Monarchs through revolutions and coups and implanted puppet governments in their place. This time, Austria swapped Lombardy for Venice and then implanted its own people into power within the Venetian government, with the Rothschilds controlling Austria through finance.

Concluding that the Venetian rulers were privileged, but uneducated and undisciplined opportunists who owed their position to nepotism, inheritance, and plunder, the Austrians would not allow the Venetians to claim responsible positions within the new government, no doubt spurring more grievances among them which Rothschild could exploit later. In this way, the Rothschild dislodged some of the remaining Venetian royal families from the lagoon.

With the Rothschilds bankrolling all sides of the Napoleonic Wars, French Emperor Napoleon Bonaparte dismantled the Austrian Empire and established obedient puppet rulers.

Lombardy was one of the largest commercial centers in Europe. The Lombard Kingdom was ruled by German Lombards who controlled most of Italy since their invasion of Byzantine Italy in 568. The Lombards had once ruled all of Italy, with the exception of the Vatican and Venice – and now the Rothschilds were on the track to rule them all.

Having stolen the wealth and treasures of fallen aristocrats and placed targeted nations into debt through war, revolutions, and infrastructure projects, the Rothschilds purchased aristocratic titles for themselves so that they could have the rank of nobles whose status they desperately coveted.

During the Battle of Waterloo, which ended Napoleon’s campaign through Europe, the Rothschilds crashed the British stock market, enabling them to buy breeding rights into the British Royal family.

Much to her dismay, Queen Victoria went on to produced illegitimate Rothschild bastard heirs, through rape, who proceeded to destroy Great Britain and marry themselves into Royal families throughout Europe.

The Rothschilds were, by then, well on their way to becoming aristocrats, but in name, purchased title, and with stolen wealth. They affected the airs of the nobles while remaining entirely degenerate, vulgar, uncouth, and unworthy. Instead of serving as noble stewards of society, they were predatory snakes who thought only of themselves.

In 1817, Austria became the first country to grant the dynasty a coat of arms. This honor was conferred upon Solomon Rothschild as a reward for financing Kaiser Ferdinand’s Nordham rail links, Austria’s first steam railway, and other government projects. The design submitted by the Rothschilds separated the crest into four quadrants, including: an eagle (representing Imperial and Royal Austrians); a leopard (representing English Royalty); a lion (representing their Hessian conquest); and a hand clutching five arrows (a symbol of the unity among the five Rothschild brothers who could seek to divide Europe among themselves).

The following year, the English granted a coat of arms to Nathan Rothschild and his heirs.

Four years later, the Rothschilds were granted the title of “Baron” through Austrian Imperial Decree.karl marx

London-educated Karl Marx provided the intellectual foundation for Rothschild-driven revolutions and power grabs,

The French (Venetian) rational Enlightenment spread throughout Europe, promoting feminism, social justice, and Marxist culture critiques designed to weaken the family and foment revolution to weaken societies for ultimate conquest under Rothschild tyranny. Salons, an Italian invention of the 16th century, emerged to promote revolutionary principles that would later devour Europe completely.

Wherever there was a Rothschild, the salons would increase in notoriety and popularity. Heralded as intellectual social gatherings for the elite, they promoted the principles of the rational Enlightenment, often drawing in well meaning people inspired by the lofty principles and ideals espousing fairness, equality, and representative governments, buzz words used to appeal to the higher aspirations of people but which cloaked sinister Rothschild power grabs.

With generous financing from Rothschild and his allies, revolutions that were inspired by the rational Enlightenment continued to spread throughout Europe in 1848. While professing to be democratic and liberal in nature, these movements were directed at removing old monarchical structures, which supported legitimate Christian rulers, and creating independent nation states controlled by the Rothschilds. Over 50 countries were affected, with tens of thousands of people losing their lives.

Disgusted with the vile Rothschilds, Queen Victoria secretly maintained the true Royal bloodline through a secret marriage — a legitimate heir the Rothschilds attempted, but failed, to assassinate.

Russian Tsar Alexander II was made godparent to the future Queen Victoria, who was baptized Alexandrina Victoria. Alexander shared Queen Victoria’s efforts to preserve the Christian Monarchy through a “Third Rome” to spur a revival of Christianity.

Stirrings Of The Antichrist

the antichrist

The Antichrist was a long Venetian goal of displacing the spiritual power of Jesus over Europe with the temporal power of a tyrant who drew his/her power from the occult.

Among the Russian novelists to espouse the Third Rome doctrine was Vladimir Soloviev. An active member of the Society for the Promotion of Culture Among the Jews of Russia, Soloviev built bridges between Judaism and Christianity, reflecting that the natural state of affairs between Jews and Christians was one of harmony and friendship, one the Rothschilds sought to replace with enmity and distrust.

In his apocalyptic Tale of the Anti-Christ, which was subtitled A Fable of the Deceiver, Soloviev warned of an evil force that sought to conquer Christian Russia. He characterized the force as “Pan-Mongolism – the unification of all the races of Eastern Asia with the aim of conducting a decisive war against foreign intruders, that is, against Europeans.” The Mongolians were the mercenaries of the Venetians who drew upon power from their occult, including Satanic rituals. for the purposes of casting “a new Mongolian yoke” over Europe.

Soloviev wrote about the signs of the Satanic deceiver in The Open Path to World Peace and Welfare. The Antichrist, he said, would be a seemingly well intentioned person who promised freedom but delivered slavery; preached universal rights but imposed tyranny; promoted world government to vanquish war for peace; and preached scarcity over abundance.

The devils, he observed, were radicals, reformers, and revolutionaries who promised enlightenment, peace, and prosperity while delivering destruction, poverty, and eternal darkness.

The Antichrist, he said, would deliver a “manifesto” which “compelled governments to join the United States of Europe under the supreme authority of the Roman Emperor.”

Since the fall of the Roman Empire, the Venetians had sought to resurrect the Roman Empire under their control. As aspiring world tyrants, the Rothschilds attempted to fulfill the agenda. After the World Wars had laid waste to Europe, killing tens of millions of people with generous financing provided by the Rothschilds and their allies in Wall Street and governments, the dynasty promoted the European Coal and Steel Community, which became the basis for the European Union as a next step towards the restoration of Rome.

The Rothschilds were the shadow power behind such groups as the Round Table, the Pilgrims Society, the Committee of 300, and the Club of Rome which recruited heads of state and government, UN administrators, politicians, and government officials, diplomats, scientists, economists, and business leaders who could help them implement their agenda.

In 1972, the Club of Rome published Limits to Growth which recommended eliminating “surplus populations” and deindustrializing society so the Rothschilds could ration resources to reduce people to a subsistence levels while the Rothschilds and the chosen few enjoyed the life of effete aristocrats with unrestrained abundance on the backs of everyone else.the rothschild depopulation agenda has been acknowledged by h.g. wells

The Rothschild depopulation agenda has been acknowledged by H.G. Wells, among many others who were privy to it.

Among the Russian novelists to espouse the Third Rome doctrine was Vladimir Soloviev. An active member of the Society for the Promotion of Culture Among the Jews of Russia, Soloviev built bridges between Judaism and Christianity, reflecting that the natural state of affairs between Jews and Christians was one of harmony and friendship, one the Rothschilds sought to replace with enmity and distrust.

In his apocalyptic Tale of the Anti-Christ, which was subtitled A Fable of the Deceiver, Soloviev warned of an evil force that sought to conquer Christian Russia. He characterized the force as “Pan-Mongolism – the unification of all the races of Eastern Asia with the aim of conducting a decisive war against foreign intruders, that is, against Europeans.” The Mongolians were the mercenaries of the Venetians who drew upon power from their occult, including Satanic rituals. for the purposes of casting “a new Mongolian yoke” over Europe.

Soloviev wrote about the signs of the Satanic deceiver in The Open Path to World Peace and Welfare. The Antichrist, he said, would be a seemingly well intentioned person who promised freedom but delivered slavery; preached universal rights but imposed tyranny; promoted world government to vanquish war for peace; and preached scarcity over abundance.

The devils, he observed, were radicals, reformers, and revolutionaries who promised enlightenment, peace, and prosperity while delivering destruction, poverty, and eternal darkness.

The Antichrist, he said, would deliver a “manifesto” which “compelled governments to join the United States of Europe under the supreme authority of the Roman Emperor.”

Since the fall of the Roman Empire, the Venetians had sought to resurrect the Roman Empire under their control. As aspiring world tyrants, the Rothschilds attempted to fulfill the agenda. After the World Wars had laid waste to Europe, killing tens of millions of people with generous financing provided by the Rothschilds and their allies in Wall Street and governments, the dynasty promoted the European Coal and Steel Community, which became the basis for the European Union as a next step towards the restoration of Rome.

The Rothschilds were the shadow power behind such groups as the Round Table, the Pilgrims Society, the Committee of 300, and the Club of Rome which recruited heads of state and government, UN administrators, politicians, and government officials, diplomats, scientists, economists, and business leaders who could help them implement their agenda.

In 1972, the Club of Rome published Limits to Growth which recommended eliminating “surplus populations” and deindustrializing society so the Rothschilds could ration resources to reduce people to a subsistence levels while the Rothschilds and the chosen few enjoyed the life of effete aristocrats with unrestrained abundance on the backs of everyone else.

Among the founders of the Club of Rome was David Rockefeller, an heir to the Standard Oil fortune, who was both a rival and friend to Jacob Rothschild.

In order to rule the world, the Rothschilds concluded, populations needed to be kept within manageable numbers. After the World Wars, Richard von Coudenhoe-Kalergi mapped out an agenda for European genocide, known as the Kalgeri Plan:

“The European man of the future will be of mixed race,” Kalgeri wrote. “Today’s races and classes will disappear owing to the disappearing of nations, time, and prejudice. The Eurasian-Negroid race of the future, similar in its outward appearance to the Ancient Egyptians, will replace the diversity of peoples with a diversity of individuals.”

The Rothschilds had effectively co-opted the agenda of the Venetians and their mercenary Khazarian, Mongolian, and Turkish horde armies for world conquest.

The mixed raced son of an Austrian father and Japanese mother, Kalgeri was an enthusiastic proponent of European integration – that is, the elimination of the national sovereignty so that a supranational structure could be built over Europe, creating a European common market with a European army, European economy, and a European political structure run by Rothschild-managed bureaucrats who owed no allegiance to any nation.

Wealth and privileges were to be stripped from the people, with revenues redistributed to Rothschild interests.

Within this view, the elite sought to claim all the power and wealth of the world for themselves while stripping the people of all their power, property, and rights, not unlike the Great Reset the Rothschilds and their agent, World Economic Forum founder Klaus Schwab is promoting today.

As a supporter of the Kalgeri plan, the Rothschilds sought to Islamicize Europe by allowing Muslims, who had been radicalized through foreign meddling of the East India Company, to cross through the Turkey land bridge and into Europe – and then have free, visa-free movement around the continent through the Shenegen Agreement, allowing them to tap out welfare programs intended for Europeans and attack Jews and Christians.

While the Rothschilds secretly weaponized radical Islam against the West, they mobilized Zionists against Islam to preserve Judeo- Christian civilization, pitting races and religions against each other as part of a divide-and-conquer strategy to lay waste to the West and its populations.

Absolute must-read: How The Illuminati (Luciferian Satanists) Infiltrated Religion, Secret Socities & Government And Hijacked Them From Within.

The Kalgeri Plan was conceived by Austrian Baron Louis Nathaniel, Baron de Rothschild who introduced Kalgeri to Max Warburg, who, in turn, financed Kalgeri’s pan-European efforts.

Another Kalgeri supporter was “Wild Bill” Donovan, the founder of the Office of Strategic Services, a precursor to the CIA, which helped launch Rothschild bloodline Mao Tse-tung’s Communist Revolution, setting the stage for Communist China, which was to be secretly controlled by the Rothschilds, to lead the new world order after destroying American exceptionalism and reducing the United States to a bankrupt welfare state.

The Russian Revolution was fomented against the Russian government, with financing provided by the Rothschilds and Jacob Schiff, a banker who had been linked with the Rothschilds since the 1800s, with both families occupying the same building within the Jewish ghetto in Frankfurt am Main.

Schiff would later establish Kuhn, Loeb & Co., an extension of the Rothschild banking empire, and hire Paul Warburg who established the Federal Reserve Bank, which placed the finances and monetary policy of the United States under the control of the Rothschilds.

In the ensuing decades, the federal government would be looted of trillions of dollars, with the Rothschilds and their agents rapaciously plundering the public’s assets.

The Rothschilds envisioned a global tyrannical welfare state run by their taxpayer-subsidized corporations, with the dynasty hording all the assets and controlling all the levers of power.

Renowned socialist author H.G. Wells depicted this future in The New World Order and The Open Conspiracy:

“This new and complete Revolution we contemplate can be defined in a very few words. It is outright world-socialism; scientifically planned and directed…. Countless people will hate the new world order and will die protesting against it. When we attempt to evaluate its promise, we have to bear in mind the distress of a generation or so of malcontents. The term ‘internationalism’ has been popularized in recent years to cover an interlocking financial, political and economic world force for the purpose of establishing a World Government.”

The Rothschild’s Coronavirus

To call the coronavirus “the Wuhan flu” or the “China virus” is an affront to the Chinese. More accurately, it is the Rothschild virus, with the dynasty pulling the strings of the Communist Chinese, to provide cover for the global economic bubble, punish the world for resisting its global control with yet more oppressive measures, and pit the West against China as part of yet another all too predictable divide-and-conquer strategy.

All was on track for Rothschild’s new world order until evidence was uncovered in London concerning the illegitimacy of Queen Elizabeth II, which, in turn, exposed, the illegitimacy of all the Rothschild puppet governments around the world. And just like that, a scheme centuries in the making, was poised to unravel, resulting in massive arrests and prosecutions for all concerned.

Atomic Bombshell: We Have Proof That Rothschilds Patented Covid-19 Biometric Tests In 2015royal coronavirus

The Coronavirus broke out after the “sickness” within the British Monarchy was discovered.

The Rothschild agenda had been exposed during the Clinton Administration. As a Rothschild bloodline, President Bill Clinton failed to act upon it — though he teamed up with Congressman Tom DeLay to help secure China’s membership in the World Trade Organization. Both were determined to champion corporate America’s interest in Communist China over the welfare of the United States and its people.

The stealth war against the people — the Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars, which had been launched with the coronation of Queen Elizabeth II — was now out in the open and moving ahead at rapid speed, to implement the agenda before the agenda could be derailed. The second Bush and Obama Administrations furiously rammed through the agenda to fundamentally transform the United States, with Hillary Clinton poised to preside over its collapse as President.

And then God intervened, with Donald Trump beating all odds to become President, giving humanity a second chance.

Just like that, the Rothschilds who had paraded themselves around like the second coming of Christ, were on the offensive. They were not about to go quietly.

Public records reveal that the United States issued a patent for the coronavirus (along with a prospective vaccine) to the Pirbright Institute, a UK-based research organization, which is funded by the Wellcome Trust, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the European Commission, World Health Organization, and the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), an agency of the Department of Defense for emerging military technologies.

A Chinese lab in Wuhan, which received money from the federal government at Dr. Anthony Fauci’s direction, was carrying out research on bats around the time of the outbreak. This provided Gates and others a cover along with plausible deniability. However, the patent had been approved before then.

The very financial interests that funded the Institute also promoted and funded the global coordinated government and media response. After having patented the coronavirus and its vaccine, the same entrenched network solicited billions of dollars for vaccines, research, and other remedies for the coronavirus cure.

The sponsors had a vested interest in applying military technology to vaccines to turn a profit and solidify the Crown’s control of Rothschild’s ill-gotten empire.

Must-read article: Still Denying The Rothschilds Are Behind The Great Reset? Stop, It’s Getting Ridiculous!lady lynn forester de rothschild

Lady Lynn Forester de Rothschild: Virtue signaling with the Vatican to convince the people to entrust her family with control and ownership of the entire world, recommending Inclusive Capitalism so that the dynasty can ration out the wealth they have stolen in exchange for putting an end to Rothschild-backed Antifa and BLM riots and allowing everyone else a universal basic income.

The antecedent to the Wellcome Trust is Burroughs, Wellcome & Co, which supplied experimental vaccines to the British during the Second Boer War, which killed over 60,000 people. The Pirbright Institute was named after Henry de Worms, 1st Baron Pirbright, a Rothschild whose cousins were employed at N.M. Rothschild & Co. Pirbright’s great grandfather was Mayer Amschel Rothschild, the patriarch who established the dynasty.

Pirbright was employed with the East India Company, the imperialistic Rothschild force that financed the British Empire through the slave and opium trade, and which sponsored the secret Skull and Bones society at Yale University, which has produced Presidents and other statesmen who advanced the deep state agenda and groomed Mao Tse-tung to lead the Chinese Communist Revolution that resulted in between 40 and 80 million deaths.

In 1880, Henry Solomon Wellcome, an American-born British entrepreneur, founded Burroughs Wellcome & Company, a pharmaceutical company that eventually formed Glaxo Smith Kline, which is currently working with China’s Clover Biopharmaceuticals in a clinical-stage vaccine to combat the spread of coronavirus.

If the people refused to comply, the Rothschild-controlled Crown had methods to enslave humanity through nanotechnology that could control subjects at a cellular level, enabling them to override free will to direct a person’s decision making and actions through radio frequencies, evidenced by rats guided through mazes via energy directed at computer chips implanted in their paws.

Through 5-G technology, the public could be robotized with technologically-enhanced vaccines, fulfilling a sick transhumanist agenda, that would separate man and his soul from his Creator for eternity. Instead of seeking God’s will, the people would be controlled by Rothshchild.

In place of a creative, free thinking human would be an automatized drone who served the so-called elites until he outlasted his usefulness at which point he would be terminated. Is it any wonder that Bill Gates, the public face of Her Majesty’s medical agenda, has taken to the media gleefully discussing his plans for population reduction, sterilization, and vaccines?

The coronavirus pandemic gave rise to imposed lock downs which have destroyed lives, stripped citizens of their civil liberties and wealth and supported corporate fascism.

As the world fell to ruin, the Rothschilds promoted the Great Reset which had been launched at the World Economic Forum – that of deindustrializing the world, preventing people from having independence or driving cars.

Their food was to be rationed and GMO-lab created while people were ushered into techno-gulags, working from home, limited in their ability to reproduce or travel, tracked and traced, monitored and rationed, and dependent upon guaranteed income, with opportunities for self-employment and entrepreneurship eradicated and replaced with Rothschild-controlled monopolies.

In place of the foot perpetually stamping on the face of humanity would be a mask stifling its free speech. Somehow the people would be “happy” in their servitude, the Rothschilds and their agents promised.klaus schwab

Klaus Schwab thinks he is entitled to control your own life and decide the fate of humanity since he was knighted by the illegitimate Queen Elizabeth II, worked for the Rothschild-created United Nations, and appointed himself head of the World Economic Forum.

Supporting WEF founder and Kissinger protégé Klaus Schwab in this endeavor is Lynn Forester de Rothschild, who founded Inclusive Capital Partners. Rothschild has partnered with the Rothschild- controlled Vatican to promote, through endless virtue signaling, including everyone in an economy so that no one is left out.

Instead of returning the wealth the Rothschilds have stolen from the world for generations, they have decided to offer a guaranteed income which can be taken away if one inspires a negative social credit score based upon Rothschild’s AI algorithms.

Having destroyed small businesses, the Rothschilds will offer employment in their taxpayer-sponsored mega-corporations.

Instead of promoting wellness, the Rothschilds have incentivized sickness to enhance profits for their pharmaceutical companies.

While the populations of homeless grow on the streets of what used to be the land of plenty, the Rothschilds are driving refugees and needy immigrants across the nation’s borders, with innocent babies filmed being abused and hurled across walls, an agenda supported by Rothschild-affiliated organizations, like the International Rescue Committee whose advisory group includes such people as Tim Geithner, President Barack Obama’s Secretary of Treasury; Laurence Fink, the CEO of Blackrock who oversees massive federal government bailouts for Rothschild’s taxpayer-subsidized Big Business; and Winston Lord, who helped craft Rothschild’s China policy, which has placed the United States at the mercy of Communist China.

According to Rothschild’s website, members of the Council for Inclusive Capitalism seek “actionable commitments aligned with the World Economic Forum International Business Council’s Pillars for sustainable value creation — People, Planet, Principles of Governance, and Prosperity—and that advance the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals.”

The group promotes more “sustainable growth” to answer to “the cry of the earth” and the “cry of the poor” after the dynasty has plundered trillions in assets, polluted the planet, and destroyed economies, governments, and societies worldwide.

The Open Conspiracy

h.g. wells

Socialist author H.G. Wells envisioned a dystopian future for humanity based upon plans devised by the Rothschilds who commissioned his works. He predicted the Great Reset and Inclusive Capitalism before Lynn Forester de Rothschild or Klaus Schwab were even born.

The Rothschild agenda for depopulation has been decades, even centuries in the making. British writer H.G. Wells laid out the Rothschild-Kalgeri plan in 1928 in The Open Conspiracy – Plans for World Revolution. His books were commissioned by the Rothschilds. They provide the step-by-step plan the Rothschilds and agents have followed in their quest for world domination, much of which has come to fruition:

The Open Conspiracy will appear first, I believe, as a conscious organization of intelligent, and in some cases wealthy men, as a movement having distinct social and political aims…

One World Government and one-unit monetary system under permanent non-elected hereditary oligarchs who self-select from among their numbers in the form of a feudal system as it was in the Middle Ages.

In this One World entity, population will be limited by restrictions on the number of children per family, diseases, wars, famines, until one billion people who are useful to the ruling class, in areas which will be strictly and clearly defined, remain as the total world population. There will be no middle class, only rulers and servants….

All laws will be uniform under a legal system of world courts practicing the same unified code of laws, backed up by a One World Government police force and a One World unified military to enforce laws in all former countries where no national boundaries shall exist.

The system will be on the basis of a welfare state; those who are obedient and subservient to the One World Government will be rewarded with the means to live; those who are rebellious will simply be starved to death or be declared outlaws, thus a target for anyone who wishes to kill them….

Privately owned firearms or weapons of any kind will be prohibited.

Only one religion will be allowed and that will be in the form of a One World Government Church, which has been in existence since 1920 as we shall see.

Satanism, Luciferianism and Witchcraft shall he recognized as legitimate One World Government curricula with no private or church schools.

All Christian churches have already been subverted and Christianity will be a thing of the past in the One World Government.

To induce a state where there is no individual freedom or any concept of liberty surviving, there shall be no such thing as republicanism, sovereignty or rights residing with the people.

National pride and racial identity shall be stamped out, and in the transition phase it shall be subject to the severest penalties to even mention one’s racial origin.

Each person shall be fully indoctrinated that he or she is a creature of the One World Government with an identification number clearly marked on their person so as to be readily accessible, which identifying number shall be in the master file, subject to instant retrieval by any agency of the One World Government at any time.

Non-elite masses will be reduced to the level and behavior of controlled animals with no will of their own and easily regimented and controlled. The economic system shall be based upon the ruling oligar-ethical class allowing just enough foods and services to be produced to keep the mass slave labor camps going.

All wealth shall be aggregated in the hands of the elite members. Each individual shall be indoctrinated to understand that he or she is totally dependent upon the state for survival.

World Economic Forum: By 2030 ‘You Will Own Nothing’ (New World Order Detailed)

Industry Is To Be Totally Destroyed….

Only the elites shall have the right to any of the earth’s resources. Agriculture shall be solely in the hands of the elites with food production strictly controlled.

As these measures begin to take effect, large populations in the cities shall be forcibly removed to remote areas and those who refuse to go shall be exterminated.

Euthanasia for the terminally ill and the aged shall be compulsory.

No cities shall be larger than a predetermined number as described in the work of Kalgeri. Essential workers will be moved to other cities if the one they are in becomes overpopulated.

Other non-essential workers will be chosen at random and sent to underpopulated cities to fill quotas.

At least four billion useless eaters shall be eliminated by the year 2050 by means of limited wars, organized epidemics of fatal rapid-acting diseases and starvation.

Energy, food and water shall be kept at subsistence levels for the non-elite, starting with the White populations of Western Europe and North America and then spreading to other races. The population of Canada, Western Europe, and the United States will be decimated more rapidly than on other continents, until the world’s population reaches a manageable level of one billion, of which 500 million will consist of Chinese and Japanese races, selected because they are people who have been regimented for centuries and who are accustomed to obeying authority without question.

From time to time there shall be artificially contrived food and water shortages and medical care to remind the masses that their very existence depends on the goodwill of the (elites). After the destruction of housing, auto, steel and heavy goods industries, there shall he limited housing, and industries of any kind allowed to remain shall be under the direction of (elites).

The United States will be flooded by peoples of alien cultures who will eventually overwhelm White America, people with no concept of what the United States Constitution stands for and who will, in consequence, do nothing to defend it, and in whose minds the concept of liberty and justice is so weak as to matter little.

Those who break the law will be instantly executed.

There shall be no cash or coinage in the hands of the non-elite. All transactions shall be carried out by means of a debit card which shall bear the identification number of the holder.

Any person who in any way infringes the rules and regulations of the (elites) shall have the use of his or her card suspended for varying times according to the nature and severity of the infringement. Such persons will find, when they go to make purchases, that their card is blacklisted and they will not be able to obtain services of any kind. Attempts to trade old coins, that is to say silver coins of previous and now defunct nations, shall be treated as a capital crime subject to the death penalty.

All such coinage shall be required to be surrendered within a given time along with guns, rifles, explosives and automobiles. Only the elite and One World Government high-ranking functionaries will be allowed private transport, weapons, coinage and automobiles.

If the offense is a serious one, the card will be seized at the checking point where it is presented. Thereafter that person shall not be able to obtain food, water, shelter and employment medical services, and shall be officially listed as an outlaw.

Large bands of outlaws will thus be created and they will live in regions that best afford subsistence, subject to being hunted down and shot on sight.

Persons assisting outlaws in any way whatsoever, shall likewise be shot. Outlaws who fail to surrender to the police or military after a declared period of time, shall have a former family member selected at random to serve prison terms in their stead.

Rival factions and groups such as Arabs and Jews and African tribes shall have differences magnified and allowed the wage wars of extermination against each other. The same tactics will be used in Central and South America. These wars of attrition shall take place before the take-over of the One World Government and shall be engineered on every continent where large groups of people with ethnic and religious differences live….

Ethnic and religious differences shall be magnified and exacerbated and violent conflict as a means of settling their differences shall be encouraged and fostered.

All information services and print media shall be under the control of the One World Government. Regular brainwashing control measures shall be passed off as entertainment in the manner in which it was practiced and became a fine art in the United States.

This is the plan as envisioned by the Rothschilds should the public wish to accept it. A century later, the world is facing crypto-currencies, v-passports, social credit scores, track and trace technologies, lethal pandemics, “sustainable” smart cities, forced vaccinations linked to societal participation, manufactured, corporate-sponsored racial wars and social unrest, deindustrialization of society, efforts to eradicate automobiles, forced dependency upon the state, destruction of supply chains and privately owned farms, the culling of the elderly and weak, pillaging by mega-corporations in a rapidly encroaching corporate fascist state, Rothschild-backed nonprofits flooding White countries with refugees while fomenting hatred against Whites and Christians, the erasure of America’s history, customs, and traditions, fact-free media that is seeped in bias, propaganda, and misinformation, the rejection of God, and a virtue-less society where human life is stripped of its value and morals are in short supply.

The Rothschild-affiliated elite are wanting to “build back better.” This can be achieved by restoring integrity to our governments, values to society, and God to our hearts. Building back better amounts to establishing governments and institutions separate from Rothschilds, true Republics that answer to we the people with international relations based upon good will, friendship, human rights and rule of law rather than exploitation, plunder, war, and betrayal. With integrity restored, universities, hospitals, media, and societal institutions can once again serve the public interest rather than profit motive at the expense of all else.

A global financial system totally independent of the corrupt, illegitimate elites can be created based upon sound, economic principles, with the backing of hard assets. Rule of law, human rights, and constitutional protections can replace the eternal boot to the head as prognosticated in Orwell’s chilling dystopian novel, 1984.

The rights conferred upon the people are not granted by the Rothschilds, but given freely by God, whose world is full of abundance, not scarcity.

The Rothschilds, the ultimate purveyors of misery, mayhem, and maliciousness, should be consigned to the dustbin of history, to serve as a cautionary tale, lest history be tempted to repeat itself.

By Susan Bradford, author of Royal Blood Lies (The Inside Story on How the Rothschilds Took Over the British Monarchy, Purged Royals, Created Puppet Leaders, Waged Revolutions, Corrupted Morals and Institutions, Plundered Wealth, Created False Realities, and Pitted Nations, Societies, and Peoples Against Each Other in a Ruthless, Megalomaniacal Quest for World Domination).

We Should All Be Worried About The United Nations (UN) Food Systems Summit: The Battle For The Future Of Food

A battle for the future of food is already underway. There’s still time to change the outcome.

Later this year, the United Nations is set to hold a historic Food Systems Summit, recognizing the need for urgent action to disrupt business-as-usual practices in the food system.we should all be worried about the united nations food systems summit

But far from serving as a meaningful avenue for much-needed change, the summit is shaping up to facilitate increased corporate capture of the food system. So much so, that peasant and indigenous-led organizations and civil society groups are organizing an independent counter-summit in order to have their voices heard.

At the heart of the opposition is the fact that the conference has been co-opted by corporate interests who are pushing towards a highly industrialized style of agriculture promoted by supporters of the Green Revolution, an approach that is meant to eradicate hunger by increasing production through hybrid seeds and other agrochemical inputs. It has been widely discredited for failing to achieve its goals and damaging the environment.

The Summit’s concept paper perpetuates the same Green Revolution narrative — it is dominated by topics like AI-controlled farming systems, gene editing, and other high-tech solutions geared towards large-scale agriculture, as well as finance and market mechanisms to address food insecurity, with methods like agroecology notably absent or minimally discussed.

A Crisis Of Participation

But the problem is not only the subject matter that the conference has put on the agenda. It’s also the remarkably undemocratic way of choosing who gets to participate, and in what ways. The agenda was set behind closed doors at Davos, the World Economic Forum’s exclusive conference. As Sofia Monsalve, Secretary General of FIAN International puts it, “They have cherry picked representatives of civil society. We don’t know why, or which procedure they used.”

“The multi-stakeholder model of governance is problematic because it sounds very inclusive,” Monsalve continues. “But in fact we are worried about the concealing of power asymmetries, without having a clear rule in terms of accountability. What is the rule here — who decides? And if you don’t decide according to a rule, where can we go to claim you are doing wrong?”

The conference organizers have claimed that they have given peasant-led and civil society groups ample opportunity to participate in the conference, but this is a facade. The UN’s definition of ‘participation’ differs significantly from that of the hundreds of civil society groups that have spoken out against the Summit.

The Summit claims that allowing groups to attend virtual sessions and give suggestions amounts to participation. But true participation means being consulted about crucial agenda items that have a massive impact on the communities they represent. This was not done.

“We didn’t have the opportunity to shape the agenda,” Monsalve explains.

“The agenda was set. Full stop. And therefore we are asking ‘why is it that we are not discussing how to dismantle corporate power? This is a very urgent issue on the ground for the people. How is it that we are not discussing about COVID and the food crisis related to COVID?’”

Organizations like the People’s Coalition on Food Sovereignty (PCFS), which represents 148 grassroots groups from 28 countries, feel similarly.

“It’s just like having a table set,” explains Sylvia Mallari, Global Co-Chairperson of PCFS.

“So you have a dinner table set, then the questions would be who set the table, who is invited to the table, who sits beside whom during dinner? And what is the menu? For whom and for what is the food summit? And right now, the way it has been, the agenda they’ve set leaves out crucial peoples and even their own UN nation agencies being left behind.”

Elizabeth Mpofu of La Vía Campesina, the largest peasant-led organization representing over 2 million people worldwide, explains how “The United Nation food systems summit, from the beginning, was really not inclusive of the peasants’ voices. And if they’re going to talk about the food systems, on behalf of whom? Because the people who are on the ground, who are really working on producing the food should be involved in the planning. Before they even organized this summit, they should have made some consultations and this was not done.”

The concerns are not only coming from outside the UN. Two former UN Special Rapporteurs to the Right to Food — Olivier De Schutter and Hilal Elver — as well as Michael Fakhri, who currently holds the position, wrote a statement to the summit organizers early on in the process.

“Having all served as UN Special Rapporteur on the Right to Food,” they write, “we have witnessed first-hand the importance of improving accountability and democracy in food systems, and the value of people’s local and traditional knowledge.

It is deeply concerning that we had to spend a year persuading the convenors that human rights matter for this UN Secretary General’s Food Systems Summit. It is also highly problematic that issues of power, participation, and accountability (i.e. how and by whom will the outcomes be delivered) remain unresolved.”

Michael Fakhri has also expressed concern about the sidelining of the Committee on Food Security (CFS), a unique civil society organization that allows “people to directly dialogue and debate with governments, holding them to account.”

As Fakhri explains, if the CFS is sidelined in this summit (as they have been thus far), there is a real danger that “there will no longer be a place for human rights in food policy, diminishing anyone’s ability to hold powerful actors accountable.”

Gertrude Kenyangi, executive director of Support for Women in Agriculture and Environment (SWAGEN) and PCFS member, stated during a Hunger for Justice Broadcast on April 30th that the problem comes down to one of fundamentally conflicting values:

“Multinational corporations and small-holder farmers have different values,” said Kenyangi. “While the former value profit, the latter value the integrity of ecosystems. Meaningful input of small-holder farmers, respect for Indigenous knowledge, consideration for biodiversity… will not be taken into account [at the Summit]. They will not tell the truth: that hunger is political; that food insecurity in Africa is not only as a result of law and agriculture production, but it’s a question of justice, democracy and political will. That’s our concern.”

The Presence Of AGRA

The problems with the Summit were compounded further by UN Secretary General António Guterres choosing to appoint Agnes Kalibata, president of the Alliance for a Green Revolution for Africa (AGRA), as Special Envoy to the conference.

AGRA is an organization, funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates and Rockefeller Foundations (as well as our governments), that promotes a high-tech, high-cost approach to agriculture, heavily reliant on agrochemical inputs and fertilizers. They have been at the forefront of predatory seed laws and policies that marginalize and disenfranchise peasant farmers on a massive scale.

AGRA has devastated small-scale farmers under the mission of “doubling productivity and incomes by 2020 for 30 million small-scale farming households while reducing food insecurity by half in 20 countries.” Their approach has been proven to be markedly unsuccessful. Timothy Wise, a senior adviser at the Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy, began to research AGRA’s efficacy in the last fourteen years of work.

Unlike many nonprofits who are held to strict transparency standards, AGRA refuses to share any information about their performance metrics with researchers. It took a U.S. Freedom of Information Act request to find out what AGRA has to show for their US$1 billion budget. Researchers found that AGRA ‘apparently’ had not been collecting this data until 2017 (eleven years after their founding in 2006).

Food security has not decreased in their target countries. In fact, for the countries in which AGRA operates as a whole, food insecurity has increased by 30% during their years of operation; crop production has fared no better. Yet this narrative continues to be pervasive around the world. It is the backbone of the UN Food Systems Summit and most development agendas. And AGRA’s president is leading the conference.

Attempts to build bridges with civil society organizations have failed. In sessions with civil society groups, Ms. Kalibata has demonstrated a lack of awareness of the growing peasant-led movements that reclaim traditional agricultural methods as promising avenues to a more sustainable food system.

Wise explains, “During the session she held with peasant groups, she basically indicated that she didn’t know about the peasant rights declaration that the UN had passed just two years ago. And she told them, why do you keep calling yourselves peasants? She said that she calls them business people because she thinks they’re needing to learn how to farm as a business.”

“It’s also a pretty significant conflict of interest, which people don’t quite realise,” Wise continues. “AGRA is a nonprofit organisation that’s funded by the Gates foundation and a couple other foundations — and our governments. They are about to enter a period where they desperately need to replenish their financing. And so they are going to be undertaking a major fund drive exactly when this conference is happening. And the summit is being positioned to help with that fund drive.”

Since Ms. Kalibata was named special envoy, there has been a public outcry over this clear conflict of interest. 176 civil society organizations from 83 countries sent a letter to the UN Secretary General António Guterres voicing their concerns over Ms. Kalibata’s corporate ties. They never received a response. 500 civil society organizations, academics, and other actors sent the UN an additional statement laying out the growing list of concerns about the Summit. Again, they received no reply.

While 676 total civil society organizations and individuals expressed clear concern over Ms. Kalibata’s appointment, only twelve people signed a letter supporting the nomination. The Community Alliance for Global Justice’s AGRA Watch team found that all but one of these individuals have received funds from the Gates Foundation.

Competing Pathways For Food Systems Change

This summit isn’t just a case of poor planning and a lack of genuine participation for peasant-led organizations. It represents a deeper and more insidious trend in food systems governance: the erosion of democratic decision-making and the rise of powerful, unaccountable, private-sector actors who continue to consolidate power over the food system.

The absence of practices like agroecology from the agenda shows how deeply the private sector has consolidated power — these methods are highly promising, low-input and low-cost solutions for farmers to increase their yields while farming more sustainably. But they are mentioned only in passing.

“If you ever look at a situation and see something that looks like the most obvious, sensible solution and it’s not happening, ask who’s making money from it not happening,” explains Timothy Wise.

The answer here is clear: high-input agriculture makes many people extraordinarily wealthy. This power allows them to set the agenda for food systems change, at the expense of farmers, and at the expense of the environment.

That’s why this conference is so important: it will set the stage for the approach to food systems change in the coming decades. We the people need to decide who should set the agenda for a food future that affects us all — one that preserves biodiversity and prioritizes human rights and well-being.

Are we willing to let the corporations who pursue profits at all cost continue to claim that they know what’s in our best interest?

Do we want a future governed by the likes of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, in partnership with the largest agrochemical and seed companies in the world? Or are we ready to demand that those who actually grow our food — peasants, farmers, and Indigenous peoples around the world — be the ones to determine our direction?

This is what’s at stake. Right now, the most powerful players in the food system are poised to set an agenda that will allow them to continue amassing profits at staggering rates, at the expense of farmers, consumers, and the environment.

But there is still time to fight back. Where the conference holds most of its power is in its legitimacy. As groups mobilize, organize, and demand genuine participation, this false legitimacy driven by actors like the Gates Foundation begins to crumble.

We must stand in solidarity with the grassroots communities who are telling the truth about this conference and what it represents. We must get to work.

someone said Codex Alimentarius ?

Source: AGrowingCulture.Medium.com

Bill Gates Has MAJOR Shares In Both Pfizer & BioNTech – FOI Revealed He Is The PRIMARY FUNDER Of The MHRA

An investigation has revealed that the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation are the primary funders of the UK’s Medicine & Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, and that the Foundation also owns major shares in both Pfizer and BioNTech.

The Medicine & Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) extended the emergency authorisation of the Pfizer / BioNTech mRNA jab in the UK to allow it to be given to children between the ages of 12 – 15 on the 4th June 2021.

bill gates shares pfizer biontech

At the time, the Chief Executive of the MHRA, Dr June Raine said the MHRA had “carefully reviewed clinical trial data in children aged 12 to 15 years and have concluded that the Pfizer vaccine is safe and effective in this age group and that the benefits outweigh any risk”.

We are left wondering if Dr June Raine and the MHRA have even read the results of the extremely short and small study. If they have then they would have seen that 86% of children in the study suffered an adverse reaction ranging from mild to extremely serious.

Just 1,127 children took part of the trial, however only 1,097 children completed the trial, with 30 of them not participating after being given the first dose of the Pfizer jab. The results do not state why the 30 children did not go on to complete the trial.

The information is publicly available and contained within an FDA fact sheet which can be viewed here (see page 25, table 5 on-wards).

mhra would give emergency authorisation for the pfizer : biontech vaccine to be used in children

There was never any doubt that the MHRA would give emergency authorisation for the Pfizer / BioNTech vaccine to be used in children when you consider that a certain Mr Bill Gates owns shares in both Pfizer and BioNTech and is the primary funder of the MHRA.

The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation bought shares in Pfizer back in 2002, and back in September 2020 Bill Gates ensured the value of his shares went up by announcing to the mainstream media in a CNBC interview that he viewed the Pfizer jab as the leader in the Covid-19 vaccine race.

“The only vaccine that, if everything went perfectly, might seek the emergency use license by the end of October, would be Pfizer.”

The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation also “coincidentally” bought $55 million worth of shares in BioNTech in September 2019, just before the alleged Covid-19 pandemic struck.

mhra bill and melinda gates foundation

The MHRA received a grant from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation in 2017 to the tune of £980,000 for a “collaboration” with the foundation. However, a Freedom of Information request which the MHRA responded to in May 2021 revealed that the current level of grant funding received from the Gates Foundation amounts to $3 million and covers “a number of projects”.

Can we really trust the MHRA to remain impartial when its primary funder is the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, who also own shares in Pfizer and BioNTech? We don’t think so.

Source: DailyExpose.co.uk

African Faith Leaders Call On The Psychopathic Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation To Drop African Green Revolution

In August 2021, an alliance of African faith leaders delivered a powerful message to the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation: Stop promoting failing and harmful high-input Green Revolution programs, such as the Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa (AGRA).

african faith leaders call on the psychopathic bill & melinda gates foundation to drop african green revolution

At a virtual press conference, the Southern African Faith Communities’ Environment Institute (SAFCEI) released its public letter to the Gates Foundation, which it sent two months ago with 500 signatures from African faith and farming communities. They have received neither an acknowledgment nor a response from the Foundation.

“Faith leaders are witnessing the negative impact of industrialized farming to the land and in their communities and have come together in this letter to say to the Gates Foundation: please re-think your approach to farming in Africa,” says SAFCEI Executive Director Francesca de Gasparis.

Farmers and faith leaders speaking at the press conference urged donors to shift their funding to more effective and sustainable approaches such as agroecology.

Crucial Challenge At A Critical Time

Their call comes at a critical time. In Sub-Saharan Africa, 66 percent of people (724 million) now suffer moderate to severe food insecurity, up from 51 percent in 2014, according to the State of Food Insecurity report recently released by the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization.

As food insecurity increases — intensified by the ongoing crises of climate change and the COVID-19 pandemic — the United Nations is convening a Food Systems Summit in September to address global failures to reduce hunger in line with commitments made in the Sustainable Development goals.

The summit, which is led by AGRA President Agnes Kalibata, is mired in controversy, accused by farmer groups of promoting the same kinds of industrialized agricultural development that have failed to address the hunger crisis.

The letter to the Gates Foundation detailed the negative impacts that industrialized agriculture has had on the land and in the communities of faith leaders from around the continent.

At the press conference, presenters emphasized the need for the Gates Foundation and other donors to break with the current agriculture agenda and instead invest in more regenerative, agroecological approaches.

“Farmers have become wary of programs that promote monoculture and chemical-intensive farming. They have lost control of their seeds. Now, they say they are being held hostage on their own farms,” says Celestine Otieno, a permaculture farmer from Kenya. “Is this food security or food slavery?”

South African agroecology farmer Busisiwe Mgangxelareiterated that farmers practicing agroecology “do not feed the soil with chemicals, we feed it with organic matter and fertility from other companion plants.”

As the letter details, input-intensive monoculture agriculture damages ecosystems, threatens local livelihoods, increases climate vulnerabilities and undermines smallholder farmers engaged in more sustainable methods of production.

Fletcher Harper, director of GreenFaith, an international network, was direct:

“The plan of displacing millions of small holding farmers, using an industrial monoculture approach to farming, lacing the soil and water supplies with toxic chemicals and concentrating ownership of the means of production and land ownership in a small elite is an immoral and dangerous vision that must be stopped.”

AGRA In The Crosshairs

Anne Maina, national coordinator of the Biodiversity and Biosafety Association of Kenya (BIBA), highlights the negative impacts and lack of accountability of AGRA. Launched in 2006 by the Gates Foundation in partnership the Rockefeller Foundation, AGRA set goals of doubling crop productivity and incomes for 30 million small-scale farming households while halving food insecurity in 20 focus countries by 2020.

As IATP’s Timothy A. Wise documented in a report last year, the deadline has passed, and productivity has improved only marginally, poverty remains high and the number of “undernourished” people in AGRA’s 13 focus countries had increased 30 percent by 2018.

BIBA and other groups engaged with AGRA demanding evidence to counter these findings, but Maina says they received no substantive answers. Even AGRA’s own 2020 Annual Report offers little convincing evidence of success.

According to SAFCEI, another insidious aspect of the Gates Foundation’s efforts in Africa is the foundation’s attempt to influence and restructure seed laws.

“80% of non-certified seeds come from millions of smallholder farmers who recycle and exchange seeds each year,” SAFCEI reports in its press statement at the event, “building an ‘open-source knowledge bank’ of seeds that cost little to nothing but have all the nutritional value needed to sustain these communities. In contrast, the approach supported by the Gates Foundation threatens to replace seed systems diversity and the agro-biodiversity system that is critical for human and ecosystem health and replace it with a privatized, corporate approach that will reduce food systems resilience.”

SAFCEI director de Gasparis is clear on the social and environmental stakes:

“What African farmers need is support to find communal solutions that increase climate resilience, rather than top-down profit-driven industrial-scale farming systems. When it comes to the climate, African faith communities are urging the world to think twice before pushing a technical and corporate farming approach,” she says.

Summarizing the demands of African faith communities, Rev.Wellington Sibanda, intern resident minister in South Africa, says:

“We can’t keep quiet as faith leaders. We call on the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation to shift its funding into agroecological farming.”

Reference: FoodTank.com

Elites Hide Their Satanism in Plain Sight

Picture
Marina Abramovic’s “7 Deaths of Maria Callas,” in Munich, includes opera excerpts and short films.

The Satanist to the Stars (who, due to Q-Anon-related public exposure, has had to deny being a Satanist –here) is touring Europe with, as usual, a bizarre show fixated with death and the summoning of the spirit of opera star, Maria Callas(1923-1977). After a stint in Munich, Marina Abramovic will “perform” in Paris, Athens, Berlin and Rome. What’s most noteworthy about this article is the fact that a New York Slimes review, in and of itself, confirms that Abramovic is not some small potatoes nobody that we needn’t worry about. Though certainly not well-known among the normie public, the low-life “elite” crowd is very well acquainted with her ghastly “performance art.” From the article:

“The performance is bound for Paris and Athens in September, then Berlin and Naples — and who knows where else, with Abramovic’s celebrity behind it.” (emphasis added)

Key word: celebrity. But if the average Joe or Jane has never even heard of this death-obsessed / blood-obsessed freak; then to whom, may we ask, is she considered a “celebrity?” Answer: to the well-connected Satanic and Marxist muckety-mucks of who lord over us “deplorables.”  That’s who!

Picture
Picture
Lady Gaga drinks “fake” blood at her friend Abramovic’s exhibit.
Picture
With Jacob Rothschild in front of painting titled “Satan Summoning His Legions”
Picture
Picture
Note statue of a child in the corner — drenched in blood
Picture
“I’m an artist, not a Satanist.” …. (Ok, Marina)

There’s no denying it — Satanism is quite popular among the PRC (Predatory Ruling Class), and the proof of that is in your face, actually. Members of the demonic cult always seem compelled to — or perhaps are even required to —  reveal their “Duper’s Delight,” without us understanding it or believing it.

In the belief that a picture is worth a thousand words, what follows amounts to a whole booklet proving how they hide in plain sight.

ENERGY DRINKS

Picture
Monster” Energy Drink — “666” — “Unleash the Beast!” — And a cross embedded within the letter “O” that inverts when you drink up.
Picture
“Red Bull” is a red devil. The motto is “Red Bull gives you wings (Satan’s wings, get it?)
Picture
“Rock Star” features the Pentagram.

TELEVISED POP STAR PERFORMANCES

Picture
2014: Katy Perry at the Grammy’s, with Satan.
Picture
2012: Madonna at the Stupor Bowl 
Picture
2017: Lady Gaga at the Stupor Bowl

UPSIDE DOWN CROSS WEARING

Picture
Killary Clinton — with pedo-Satanists John Legend and Chrissy Tiegen — forms an upside-down crucifix with her hands and white under-blouse.
Picture
Daughter Chelsea Clinton wears an upside cross. 
Picture
Melinda Gates does too.

LOGOS

Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
666’s all over the place!

PRESENTED IN JEST

Picture
Saturday Night Live: “Songs by Lucifer” 
Picture
More SNL: The Devil delivers a News Broadcast. 
Picture
From the Chris Gethard Show: Will Farrell and secret society initiate a new recruit to the secret society of mask wearing Satanists (Think Covid “6” feet apart and masks).

Have you ever wondered how the Globalists of the past have been able to keep  their New World Order thing  going so strong and relatively undetected for so many centuries — knowing that they’d never live to see it come to fruition in their lifetimes? Well, the Satanic and ritualistic elements of their Monster Plot are the keys to making sense of the astonishing generational consistency. You see, an evil spirit — whether you take that to be a preternatural force or manmade — transcends this temporal world. Understand that, and you’ll begin to appreciate the challenges of our defensive task at hand. 

​Fight these mass-murderous, reality-inverting, truth-hating, child-raping, baby-eating bitches and bastards like there’s no tomorrow — and pray.

Bill Gates Funded The Creation Of A ‘Vaccine Passport’ Years Before The Covid Pandemic

The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation provided funding for a study that aims to record a patient’s vaccination history by injecting dye [called Luciferase] under their skin.

bill gates funded the creation of a 'vaccine passport' years before the covid pandemic

The study was published in Science Translational Medicine on December 18th, 2019.

Researchers from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) found a way to record a patient’s vaccination history. It involved injected dye containing data underneath the skin at the same time as administering a vaccine.

In a 2019 press release by MIT, investors suggested that the injection method was mainly to aid developing countries where traditional medical records are rare or do not exist.

As the press release states, people are, quite literally, going to be injected with a vaccine passport. The Covid-19 pandemic may have revealed the true purpose of the specialised dye, as the vaccine begins to become mandatory across the globe, with countries now beginning to implement vaccine passports.

Before the Covid pandemic, vaccination campaigns in developing countries were made difficult often due to the inability to store medical records. Therefore, it’s difficult to determine who needs a particular vaccine.

Kevin McHugh, former MIT postdoc, and co-lead author of the study said at the time:

“In areas where paper vaccination cards are often lost or do not exist at all, and electronic databases are unheard of, this technology could enable the rapid and anonymous detection of patient vaccination history to ensure that every child is vaccinated.”

MIT researchers sought to create a method for recording vaccination information in a way that does not require a centralised database or other infrastructure.

Often, vaccines such as those for measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR), require several doses to be spaced out at set intervals. However, without accurate and reliable records, some children may not receive all the doses.

Ana Jaklenec, MIT research scientist, said in the 2019 press release:

“In order to be protected against most pathogens, one needs multiple vaccinations. In some areas in the developing world, it can be very challenging to do this, as there is a lack of data about who has been vaccinated and whether they need additional shots or not.”

To create a decentralised vaccination record, researchers developed a new type of copper-based quantum dots (nanocrystals) which radiate slightly sub-infrared light that can be read by a certain type of smartphone.

The dots measure about four nanometres in diameter and are held in tiny biocompatible spheres which are 20 microns in length. The encapsulation allows the dye to remain in place underneath the skin post-injection.

Researchers designed the dye to be delivered by a microneedle patch rather than a traditional syringe and needle. The patches used in this study were made from a mixture of dissolvable sugar and a polymer called PVA, as well as the quantum-dot dye and the vaccine.

When applied to the skin, the microneedles, which are 1.5 millimeters long, partially dissolve, releasing their payload within around two minutes.

By selectively loading microparticles into microneedles, the patches deliver a pattern in the skin that is invisible to the naked eye but can be picked up and scanned by a smartphone that has the infrared filter removed.

Researchers said that tests on cadaver skin showed that the dye can emit light for up to five years. The method was also tested on rats, using microneedle patches that delivered the quantum dots along with a polio vaccine.

Must-read on the subject: An Enzyme Called LUCIFERASE Is What Makes Bill Gates Implantable Vaccine Work

Researchers discovered that those rats generated an immune response similar to the response of rats that received a traditional polio vaccine.

Jaklenec said:

“This study confirmed that incorporating the vaccine with the dye in the microneedle patches did not affect the efficacy of the vaccine or our ability to detect the dye.”

At the time, researchers planned to expand the amount of data that could be encoded in a single pattern, allowing them to include information such as the date of vaccine administration and the lot number of the vaccine batch. They said that the quantum dots are safe to use in this way because they are encapsulated in a biocompatible polymer.

Mark Prasunitz, chair of chemical and biomolecular engineering at Georgia Tech, who was not involved in the research, said at the time:

“Storage, access, and control of medical records is an important topic with many possible approaches. This study presents a novel approach where the medical record is stored and controlled by the patient within the patient’s skin in a minimally invasive and elegant way.”

The investors of the study are listed at the bottom of the study and include The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the Koch Institute Support (core) Grant from the National Cancer Institute.

Considering that these studies were carried out years before the Covid-19 pandemic, before vaccine passports were considered, it is worth questioning whether this was the plan all along. Furthermore, how do we know that this technology hasn’t already been implemented?

Source: DailyExpose.co.uk

What’s Going On? India Sees Surge Of Deaths And Injuries Following COVID-19 Vaccine Roll-Out

Comments by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News

After seeing relatively good success in handling the COVID crisis with an emphasis on early treatments such as Ivermectin, India is all of a sudden seeing a surge in cases and deaths being attributed to the COVID-19 virus.

But some are wondering if the ramping up of COVID “vaccines” is the cause behind these recent surges.

GreatGameIndia.com has reported that more than 100 patients in a single hospital have died just after receiving COVID shots.

A New Jersey Doctor, Dr. Rajendra Kapila, has also reportedly died in a trip to India even though he was fully vaccinated with both doses of the Pfizer vaccine before he traveled to India. (Source.)

Dr. Mathew Maavak has contacted us and asked us to publish his analysis on what is happening in India. It was originally published at Activist Post.

A Case of Graphical Correlations: Making Sense of India’s COVID-19 Surge

By Mathew Maavak
Activist Post

India is currently witnessing a COVID-19 surge of unprecedented proportions, with an allegedly triple-mutant strain stretching the nation’s healthcare infrastructure to the limits.  The uncertainty hanging over the nation is compounded by viral despatches of dead bodies piling up in morgues; of people dropping dead in the streets; of despondent souls jumping off their balconies; and of funeral pyres all over the country. There will be no public service-minded Big Tech censorship in this instance.

This is supposedly Wuhan 2.0. Any social media addict would be forgiven for thinking that India’s population of 1.3 billion might suffer a dip before the year is out.

Amidst the toxic miasma of fear-mongering, coherent explanations over this surge are hard to come by. Therefore, one needs to resort to correlations and proxies in order to gauge causations and effects. For starters, one should compare the yearly death tolls (from all causes) before and after the advent of COVID-19 in India, particularly for the year 2021. But relevant data will only be available a year from now. Many will die as a result of continued lockdowns which generally weaken the immune system. Essential medical procedures will be deferred as hospitals are compelled to focus on COVID-19.  Rising socioeconomic despair will naturally lead to a surge in suicides. In the end, not all coronavirus deaths can be directly attributed to the virus no matter how “experts” add them up.

Other correlations must also be explored in the Indian context. India was rather late in joining the mass vaccination bandwagon. Throughout 2020, its COVID-19 mortality figures were moderate by global standards due to the efficacy of low-cost treatment protocols. Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) was sanctioned for early stage treatment from March 2020 onwards; while a few months later, India’s most populous state of Uttar Pradesh (population 231 million) replaced HCQ with ivermectin (an anti-parasitic drug).

The results were highly encouraging. As the TrialSiteNews (TSN) reported on Jan 9 2021:

By the end of 2020, Uttar Pradesh — which distributed free ivermectin for home care — had the second-lowest fatality rate in India at 0.26 per 100,000 residents in December. Only the state of Bihar, with 128 million residents, was lower, and it, too, recommends ivermectin.

Despite having the coronavirus situation under control, New Delhi was under immense pressure from various international lobbies and their local proxies to roll out a mass vaccination campaign. It can be argued that India’s ongoing oxygen shortages are the direct result of prioritizing foreign-curated experimental vaccines over local necessities.

While the initial mass vaccination launch was pencilled for Jan 16, the campaign effectively took off only in late February. With uncanny timing, the New York Times hailed India as an “unmatched vaccine manufacturing power” that could counter China in the area of vaccine diplomacy.

As the goal of vaccinating 300 million people by August 2021 neared the midway mark, however, the number of COVID-19 cases surged accordingly. The graph below broadly charts this anomaly.

Not only has India’s COVID-19 cases surged in tandem with increased vaccination, the trajectory of infections and inoculations can be neatly superimposed as the following graph suggests.

Can one infer that there may be a correlation between increased vaccinations and infections? This is not the first time that gene-based therapies ended up creating new viral chimeras. The World Health Organisation (WHO) recently admitted that a Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF)-backed vaccine program was responsible for a new polio outbreak in Africa.  The usual suspects were also behind a vaccination-linked polio surge in Pakistan and Afghanistan.

Vaccines causing deadly outbreaks of the very diseases they are supposed to eradicate happen to be a 21st century phenomenon – brought to you by an unholy alliance of Big Tech and Big Pharma. In the process, new mutant strains or “vaccine-derived viruses” emerge, necessitating even more potent vaccines which deliver greater profits and levers of global control to Big Tech. This is how the Davos cabal tries to stay relevant in a century that should otherwise be dominated by Asia. India may end up being the first Asian victim of Big Tech’s Great Reset against the East.

A recent study by Tel Aviv University may shed further light on India’s bizarre surge. It seems those who have been vaccinated with the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine are 8 times more likely to contract the new South African variant of COVID-19 than the unvaccinated.

The Covishield (Oxford University-AstraZeneca) and Covaxin (Bharat Biotech) vaccines used in India may have produced a similar effect. Dr. Harvey Risch, a professor of epidemiology at Yale University, has estimated that over 60 percent of all new COVID-19 cases seem to occur among the “vaccinated.” Dr Michael Yeadon, former vice president and chief science officer for Pfizer, fears a more alarming outcome which includes the possibility of “massive-scale depopulation”. These are not your average basement-dwelling conspiratorial kooks!

“The vaccine,” to paraphrase Francis Bacon, “is now appearing to be the worse than the disease itself.” Gene-based vaccines open up a Pandora’s Box of what systems theorists call “emergence”. The human body is a complex system that may react unpredictably to interferences at its most substrate (or genetic) levels. As a result, mutant virus strains may emerge alongside unforeseen side effects. This is what we are witnessing worldwide.

But as the virus mutates, so does the official narrative. The Indian Medical Association (IMA) now claims that mass vaccinations in densely-packed stadiums and halls are “superspreader” events. Is the IMA suggesting that new vaccine delivery systems, as lobbied by Big Tech, will solve this problem? Let us wait and see. Furthermore, is close proximity the prime culprit behind the super-surge in India? India is a nation where trains, buses and all forms of public spaces teem with human bodies. Yet, it did not lead to mass casualties in 2020 as many had feared.

In the absence of a watertight scientific explanation from mainstream gatekeepers, a more plausible narrative may be sought from peripheral sources. The Daily Expose offers one such graphic-laden narrative to explain the correlation between mass vaccinations and the rising death toll in India.

While the Daily Expose concedes that correlation does not always equal causation, a similar pattern was noticed in other nations. The vaccination-mortality graph for Mongolia, for example, is particularly eye-popping.

Did Mongolia witness a near-zero to mutant COVID-19 surge just when mass vaccinations rolled out? How coincidental can that be?

The Case of America: Red vs Blue States

One may scientifically argue that India’s surge had nothing to do with ramped-up vaccinations. A new mutant virus may also somehow explain the vaccination-mortality correlations in Mongolia.

Therefore one should resort to another layman-friendly proxy to see whether similar correlations exist elsewhere. How about a comparison within the most coronavirus-affected nation on earth – the United States of America?

Reports thus far suggest that US states which have been resisting mass vaccinations and/or mandatory masking, at least in relative terms, are generally faring better than those adhering to draconian COVID-19 guidelines. Just weeks after Texas lifted its public mask mandate – featuring full crowds at bars, restaurants and concerts  no less – COVID-19 cases as well as hospitalizations dropped to its lowest levels since October 2020. The current White House occupant, who continues to make a buzz over his mental acuity, nonetheless panned the move as a symptom of “Neanderthal thinking”.  In the meantime, South Dakota Governor Kristi Noem, a prominent opponent of mandatory masking, is using COVID-19 restrictions elsewhere to lure businesses to her state. Other red states such as Florida and Arizona have moved to ban the so-called vaccine passports.

Rather coincidentally, the annual flu has virtually disappeared in the United States since the onset of the pandemic. It must be a modern medical miracle!

How will India fare?

With the surge affecting the nation badly, the CEOs of Google, Microsoft and Apple, among others, have pledged heartfelt aid to India. With friends like these, one wonders why Indians cannot question the global COVID-19 narrative on Twitter, Facebook or YouTube without being summarily banned or censored. If India can concede the digital rights of its own citizens and the digital sovereignty of the nation to Big Tech, then how is it going to crowdsource solutions for COVID-19? Or deal with any other future crisis for that matter? An Indian scientific paper which tentatively explored a laboratory origin for COVID-19 can be summarily removed after concerted condemnation from Western academics but a similar claim made by the former head of the US Centers for Disease Control (CDC) appears relatively palatable. Isn’t this a textbook example of neoliberal racism?

Indians should also question why Africa has not been badly affected thus far, despite a South African variant hovering in the region. This is a continent mired in conflicts, poverty, serious healthcare deficits and other Third World-related woes. It lacks world-class scientists and institutions which India admittedly has. Is it because Africa does not pose an economic threat to the Western oligarchy the way Asia does? Or maybe, mass vaccinations haven’t yet taken off in Africa?

For the time being, India cannot reverse course on its vaccination drive and adopt measures similar to the one employed by the Eisenhower administration during the 1957-58 Asian Flu pandemic. The fear genie is already out of the bottle. Big Tech controls the digital narrative in India as it does elsewhere. Even if New Delhi manages to tame the COVID-19 crisis within the next few weeks or months, Big Tech will still be around to stifle India’s destiny.

Ultimately, this game is much bigger than COVID-19; it is about global domination through perennial mass-manufactured crises until a Great Reset is achieved.

Read the full article at Activist Post.

See Also:

URGENT! 5 Doctors Agree that COVID-19 Injections are Bioweapons and Discuss What to do About It

Doctors Around the World Issue Dire WARNING: DO NOT GET THE COVID VACCINE!!

45-Year-Old California Father of Two Dead 10 Days After COVID Injection

57-Year-Old Syracuse Man Mocks “Anti-vaxxers,” DEAD Seven Days After Johnson & Johnson Shot

Healthy Utah High School Athlete Develops Blood Clots in His Brain Following COVID Injection

CDC Reports 2 More Infant DEATHS Following Experimental COVID Injections During Clinical Trials

48-Year-Old Surgeon DEAD after Mocking “Anti-vaxxers” and Writing His Own Obituary after Moderna COVID Injections

16-Year-Old Wisconsin Girl DEAD Following 2 Doses of the Experimental Pfizer COVID Injections

Tragedy Continues to Strike Families with Loved Ones Dying After being Injected with Experimental COVID Shots

CDC: 4,178 Americans DEAD Following Experimental COVID Injections – Deaths from COVID Shots now Equal 20 Years of Recorded Deaths Following Vaccines Since 2001

Experimental Adenovirus COVID Injections Continuing to Kill Younger, Middle-Aged People

GENOCIDE in the U.S. Continues: 3,848 DEATHS 118,902 Injuries Following COVID Injections – Children Now being Reported as Dying Also

8,430 DEAD 354,177 Injuries: European Database of Adverse Drug Reactions for COVID-19 “Vaccines”

1,047 Dead 725,079 Reported Injuries following COVID19 Experimental “Vaccines” Reported in the U.K.

59-Year-Old Israeli Fashion Icon Alber Elbaz DEAD After Being “Fully Vaccinated” for COVID-19

Pro-Vaccine Cybersecurity Expert Dan Kaminsky DEAD at 42 Following Experimental COVID Shot

44-Year-Old Pastor DEAD after Moderna COVID Shot – Wanted Other Pastors and African Americans to Follow her Example and Take the Shot

‘Baldwin Hills’ Star 30-Year-Old Ashley Taylor Gerren DEAD after Getting COVID Injection

Brain Injuries and DEATH Continue to Follow J&J COVID Injections

Family Member of Rapper DMX Claims COVID “Vaccine” Injection Preceded his Fatal Heart Attack – Not Drug Overdose

35-Year-Old Nurse and Mother of 2 DEAD Following Pfizer Experimental COVID Injections in UK

21-Year-Old University of Cincinnati Student DEAD 24 Hours after Johnson & Johnson COVID Injection

Healthy 43-Year-Old Father of 7 Suffers Stroke and is Paralyzed after Johnson and Johnson COVID Shot

20-Year-Old Scottish Man DEAD 12 Hours After being Injected with the Experimental Pfizer mRNA COVID Jab

Healthy 27-Year-Old Chicago Doctor DEAD 3 Months Following COVID Shots Raising Long-term Safety Concerns

Midwin Charles: 47-Year-Old MSNBC Legal Analyst DEAD After Experimental mRNA COVID Shot

22-Year-Old Israeli Girl DEAD Following Experimental Pfizer mRNA COVID Injection

Italy: Two More Teachers DEAD After AstraZeneca COVID Shot

40-Year-Old Wisconsin Music Teacher DEAD Following Experimental COVID Injection

Canada Suspends AstraZeneca COVID Shot – 2,530 Injuries and 24 DEAD Following Mostly Pfizer and Moderna Shots

North Carolina College Professor DEAD After Johnson and Johnson COVID Shot

Entire City in Shock as Another Italian Professor is DEAD Following the AstraZeneca COVID Injection

31-Year-Old Italian Professor DEAD following the Experimental AstraZeneca COVID Injection

Kansas City Council Woman DEAD Hours After Receiving Experimental COVID Injection

2 Men Dead at Senior Care Home following Experimental Pfizer COVID Injections as Australia Begins COVID Shots

People Now Dying Following the Experimental Johnson and Johnson COVID Injections

27-Year-Old Georgian Nurse DEAD One Day after AstraZeneca Experimental COVID Shot

Ireland: Nine Nursing Home Residents Die of COVID-19 Despite Being mRNA “Vaccinated”

Teacher Dies Hours After Getting AstraZeneca COVID Shot in Italy – Manslaughter Investigation Launched

Pediatric Nurse Brags About Getting COVID Vaccine While Pregnant – Baby is Stillborn 8 Days Later

Boxing Champion Marvin Hagler DEAD at Age 66 After Receiving an Experimental COVID “Vaccine”

39-Year-Old Surgical Technician and Mother Dies 4 Days After Second Experimental Moderna COVID mRNA Shot

UK Government Changes Recommendations on Pregnant Women Getting Experimental COVID Injections Causing at Least 20 Miscarriages So Far

First Week of COVID Experimental Vaccines in South Korea: 7 DEAD and More than 2,800 Injured

Whistleblower Reveals Many Pregnancy Complications following Experimental COVID Injections – “Vaccine Leaving a Trail of Devastated Mothers”

12 Residents Die After First COVID Vaccine in Wales Nursing and Dementia Care Centre

Death Rates Skyrocket in Israel Following Pfizer Experimental COVID “Vaccines”

28-Year-Old PhD Physical Therapist DEAD 2 Days After Being Injected with COVID Experimental mRNA Vaccine

22 Elderly with Dementia Dead in 1 Week After the Experimental mRNA COVID Injection in the Netherlands

Two Nuns Dead and 28 COVID Positive 2 Days After Experimental COVID mRNA Injections

Formerly Healthy American Serviceman Now has Heart Disease Following the Moderna COVID Shots

Whistleblower Video Footage of Forced COVID Vaccines in German Nursing Homes Goes Public – Attorney: “We’re Dealing with Homicide, Maybe Even Murder”

Second Pfizer COVID Shot Halted in Spain After 46 Deaths in One Nursing Home Following the First Shot

Former Detroit TV Anchor Karen Hudson-Samuels Suddenly Dies One Day After Being Injected with Experimental mRNA COVID Shot

Whistleblower: 8 of 31 Residents Dead in German Nursing Home After They Were Forcibly Injected with Pfizer Experimental mRNA COVID Shots Against Their Will

28-Year-old Wisconsin Healthcare Worker has Aneurysm – Brain Dead Five Days After Second Experimental Pfizer mRNA COVID Injection

Another Medical Professional in the Prime of Life DEAD Weeks After Receiving the mRNA Experimental Injection as Memphis Mourns Loss of 36-Year-Old Doctor

Wisconsin Resident Doctor has Miscarriage 3 Days After Being Injected with Experimental COVID mRNA Shot

39-Year-Old Medical Doctor and Son of Former Chief Justice of Trinidad Found Dead After COVID Injection in Ireland

TRAGEDY! 9 Dead in Spanish Nursing Home Shortly After First Pfizer Shots but Second Doses Given Anyway – Religious Beliefs in Vaccines Causing Massive Senior Deaths?

Another Jewish Holocaust? Local Talk Radio Reports “Many Dying” in Israel Following Pfizer Experimental mRNA Injections

45-Year-Old Italian Doctor “In the Prime of Life and in Perfect Health” Drops Dead After the Pfizer mRNA COVID Shot: 39-Year-Old Nurse, 42-Year-Old Surgical Technician Also Dead

58-Year-Old Mother and Grandmother of Six in Virginia Dies Within Hours of Receiving Experimental Pfizer mRNA Injection

Israeli Teenager Hospitalized in ICU for “Inflammation of the Heart” Days after Receiving Second Pfizer Vaccine

24 Residents Dead in 3 Weeks as One Third of UK Nursing Home Residents Die After Experimental mRNA COVID Injections

CNA Nursing Home Whistleblower: Seniors Are DYING LIKE FLIES After COVID Injections! SPEAK OUT!!!

Did Larry King Receive an Experimental COVID Shot Just Before His Death?

53 Dead in Gibraltar in 10 Days After Experimental Pfizer mRNA COVID Injections Started

Baseball Legend Hank Aaron Dead After Receiving the Experimental Moderna mRNA COVID Injection

10 Dead with 51 Severe Side-Effects Among Germany’s Elderly after Experimental Pfizer COVID Injections

55 Americans Have Died Following mRNA COVID Injections as Norway Death Toll Rises To 29

23 Seniors Have Died in Norway After Receiving the Pfizer Experimental COVID mRNA Injection

Louisiana Woman Convulses Uncontrollably after Being Injected with the Experimental Pfizer COVID Shot – “I can’t stand to see my mom this way it makes me want to cry knowing I can’t do anything to help her.”

24 Dead and 137 Infected at NY Nursing Home After Experimental COVID Injections

“Very Healthy 56-Year-Old” Miami Obstetrician Dies after Being Injected with the Experimental Pfizer COVID Vaccine

“Perfectly Healthy” 41-year-old Pediatric Assistant Dies Suddenly After Injected with Experimental Pfizer COVID Vaccine

Is the Tennessee Nurse Who Passed Out on Live Camera After the COVID Vaccine Still Alive?

32-Year-Old Mexican Doctor Suffers Seizures and is Paralyzed After Receiving the Pfizer Experimental Vaccine

Join and support the National Vaccine Information Center!