JANUARY 29, 1913
NY Times:How the Rothschild Fortune of $2,000,000,000 Was Made
It’s not “stunning” for its revelations (which we “conspiracy theorists” are already well acquainted with) — but rather, for the fact that such a spread actually appeared in the Jewish-owned (since 1896) “paper of record.” Evidently, during those pre-“politically correct” / pre-“woke” days of the early 20th Century, even Arthur Ochs (maternal-side patriarch of the Sulzberger Dynasty) could not completely censor the “goy” journalists of his staff.
This one is a real gem which should prove highly useful in approaching the normies in our midst who automatically slip into full reactionary retard mode the moment they hear the name “Rothschild.” A piece like this — coming from the oh-so-prestigious and Jewish-owned “paper of record” (did I say that already?) — will go a long, long way in opening up minds to the reality of this foul generational crime syndicate. Excerpts and analysis of this article to follow — and a link to the full pdf of that lengthy 1913 article / book review is available at the end.
NY Times 1913: A passion for old coins and skill as a chess player formed the basis for the most colossal fortune ever conceived or recorded among the facts of history.
Analysis: “The most colossal fortune ever conceived or recorded.” — Ya hear dat, normie?
NY Times 1913: So writes Ignatius Balla in “The Romance of the Rothschilds,” a book which the great bankers whose name adorns its title-page are endeavoring to suppress in England….
Analysis: So, not only was the wealth of the Rothschilds the “most colossal ever recorded” — the clan apparently had enough influence to “endeavor to suppress” books written about them in England.
NY Times 1913: … and which shortly will be published in this country by G.P. Putnam’s Sons.
Analysis: In 1913, the major U.S. publishers were owned by White Gentiles. Such a book could NEVER be published by any of the majors today.
NY Times 1913: How the Rothschilds amassed their fortune, how for a century they wielded an irresistible power in the affairs of Europe, and have more than once shaped the destiny of nations, has before now occupied the attention of both historian and journalist.
Analysis: Aw come on now, NY Times! Not that old “canard” about the Rothschilds “wielding irresistible power” and “shaping the destiny of nations.” That’s been “debunked” and “fact-checked” a million times, donctha’ know?
NY Times 1913: But the Rothschild secret has been hard to pierce.
Analysis: A “secret,” eh? You mean, like a “conspiracy theory”, right? Right? Shame on The Times!
NY Times: Maier Amschel became a clerk in a banking house and before his death this “obscure child of the Frankfurt ghetto” had founded the House of Rothschild, whose fortune today is estimated at $2,000,000,000.
Analysis: According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, $2 Billion in 1913 would be the equivalent of $58 Billion today. However, the Bureau uses a ridiculously underestimated average annual rate of compounding inflation of 3.1%. We estimate — based on 1913 Gold at $20 per ounce vs 2021 Gold at $1785 per ounce (artificially suppressed) — that those 1913 dollars would actually be worth about 200 Billion dollars today. And when you factor in “paper market” suppression of Gold and Silver PLUS the appreciation of their hard assets and equities — we’re talking about an extended family fortune in the Trillions.
NY Times: Neither Rockefeller, nor Carnegie nor Astor, nor any other transatlantic prince of finance has a capital equal to the Rothschilds. It increases daily. It would be bound to increase even if they never engaged in another transaction. As invested in interest of not more than 4%, their capital would yield more than $80,000,000 yearly (1913 dollars).
Analysis: Oh the “anti-Semitism” ™ of it all! Make it stop! In the “paper of record” of all places!
Now mind you, the privately owned Federal Reserve System had not even been established yet. That came in December of that same year, 1913. So, just imagine how their money-machine got supercharged after that event. – Maybe 10T? … 15T? … 20T of hidden net worth? And yet, none of these Satanic sons of bitches appear on any lists of the world’s richest.
1. George Palmer Putnam founded the Putnam Publishing empire in 1838. The company today — since swallowed up by kosherized Penguin Books — would never touch a book such as “The Romance of the Rothschilds.” // 2. A large extended family of money mad usurers and One-Worlders drunk on their trillions. // 3. Waddesdon Manor — One of the Rothschild cribs, in England.
1. Jacob Rothschild & (l) and David Rockefeller (r) plotted business and political adventures (like the Bilderberg Group) together for many years. In the vast power scheme of Globalism, the Rothschilds far outranked even the mighty Rockefellers in both fortune and influence. // 2. “Sir” Evelyn de Rothschild and wife Lynn were very chummy with the Clintons. // 3. Jake the Snake Rothschild poses with Satanic Witch Marina Abramovic before a 19th Century painting titled “Satan Summoning His Legions.”
Parasitic filth — spawned exponentially across Europe from the five banker sons of loanshark Maier Amschel Rothschild.
NY Times: Frankfurt, Vienna, Naples, London and Paris were the five cities in which the sons of Maier Amschel were originally stationed.
Analysis: The famous “five sons” branching out all across Europe — sounds a lot like what yours truly wrote in Planet Rothschild — which got me banned from Amazon. Maybe it’s time to ban the “Times Machine” archives as well.
NY Times: It should be added, also, that the “House of Rothschild” is far richer and more prosperous today than ever before in its remarkable history.
Analysis: Ha ha ha ha. Very funny NY Times. Yeah, right, sure. Next The Times will be telling us that “da Jews” control the media, or academia, or Hollywood, or the music industry, or the porn business, or the art world, or Wall Street, or the World Economic Forum — ha ha ha ha ha.
NY Times: The genius, shown by the founder of the London House, Nathan Rothschild… It was Nathan who figured in the speculation on the result of the Battle of Waterloo, the story of which, as related in “The Romance of the Rothschild,” has aroused the anger of the British branch of the family, and which has been denounced as a falsehood.
Analysis: The story of how that no good dirty rat bastard Nathan Rothschild deliberately crashed the market in 1815 by spreading false rumors of a Napoleon victory at Waterloo (Belgium) — and then, through his secret agents on the floor of the Exchange — buying it up on-the-cheap evidently struck a raw nerve with the 1913 clan. According to the book review, Rothschild had advance knowledge because he was at Waterloo.
The moment that Nathan Rothschild was satisfied that the hated Napoleon —who was anti-money-lending and wanted to “Frenchify” the Jews out of their race cult— would be defeated, he raced back to London in the fastest carriage and boat that money could buy and then pulled off the greatest dump & pump market heist in world history.
NY Times: Rothschild changed London from being merely the largest money center in Europe into the emporium of the markets of the world.
Analysis: World financial domination, eh? Oy vey. The “paper of record” in 1913, in so hatefully dignifying this book, sounded exactly like The Protocols of the Learned Elder of Zion! It’s a good thing that the Anti-Defamation League(ADL) was founded about eight months after this article appeared. Nothing like it has been published ever since.
What a find this item is. (bowing) — Thanks Sulzberger! Please share this story far and wide.
The charge of the Scots Greys at Waterloo. The Rothschild-funded British claimed the victory as their own but 55% of the Allied force was made up of troops from German states. — The 1913 book review claims that Rothschild witnessed the event, and then rushed back to London to pull off his monstrous trick before official word of Napoleon’s defeat arrived. Others believed that his agents were sent to witness the battle and then sent carrier pigeons (which Rothschild was known to utilize) back to London.
FROM THE NEW YORK TIMES?!
Image and excerpt above describe the scene in 1815 in which sneaky blood-soaked Nathan (armed with early knowledge of Waterloo) ruined so many others while buying up the whole market that he had just secretly crashed.
Full Pdf of 1913 NYT Article