How to Decode The “Two Faces” of Donald Trump

With this epic battle for the world still raging, the RHC — in spite of all the cancellations and hate mail — is not about to betray the dauntless man who saved us all from the unimaginable Hell-on-Earth apocalypse which the sainted Killary Clinton(who would now be 1-year into a second term) would have unleashed upon humanity. The game that Chess Master Trump is playing against the Deep State amounts to a ruse so clever that it’s even got many of his followers (er, “ex” followers) tricked.

Write him off as a con man or even a traitor if you insist; but before doing so, do consider some undeniable precedents of Trump being “two-faced” — for the sake of strategy. The pattern is unmistakable by now. In each of the following cases, Trump, in order to silence the ferocious media cannons firing at him, said something which deeply upset many of us — while continuing to quietly work against the Deep State Globalists and getting his way in the end.

On the Clintons

Trump’s True Position: Lock her up!
The Media Attack: “Trump’s threats to arrest the Clintons smack of “Fascism!”
How Trump Silenced the Attack: After winning the election, he stated, on 60 Minutes: “The Clintons are good people. I don’t want to hurt them.”
The Sunshine Patriots: “Oh no! Trump’s not even in office yet and he has already broken his promise to have Hillary arrested!”
The End Result: Prosecutor John Durham — who was appointed by Trump! — is indeed investigating the dirty dealings of the Clinton Mafia. Patience on this one, boys and girls. The timing has got to be perfect for such a move as the arrest of such high-ranking players as the Clintons — who may actually already have been arrested and replaced by those “Deep Fakes” that the New York Times and Killary herself had warned about.

On Climate Change

Trump’s True Position: The Climate Con is a hoax.
The Media Attack: “Trump is a climate denier! The world is in crisis.”
How Trump Silenced the Attack: While still President-Elect, he invited climate con artists Leonardo DiCaprio & Al Gore to Trump Tower to “open mindedly” hear what they had to say about the “crisis.”
The Sunshine Patriots: “Oh no! Stupid Trump is being controlled by libtarded Ivanka! He is a Global Warmist now!”
End Result: Trump pulled us out of the Paris Climate Scam, ramped up domestic energy production and defunded / fired a whole bunch of warmist scientists.

On North Korea

Trump’s True Position: The dangerous Korean Cold War must end.
The Media Attack: “Trump is being soft on the evil dictator Kim Jong Un”
How Trump Silenced the Attack: He called Kim “Rocket Man” and threatened to attack North Korea with “fire and fury.” Kim (also in on the game) responded by calling Trump a “frightened dog.”
The Sunshine Patriots: “Oh no! Trump is a neo-con warmonger!”
The End Result: Trump’s people had been in secret back-channel communication with Kim’s people all along. The Korean Cold War — which always had the potential of bringing the US and China into war with each other — is over.

On Afghanistan

Trump’s True Position: Pull all US troops out of Afghanistan
The Media Attack: “Trump is negotiating with the terrorist Taliban!”
How Trump Silenced the Attack: He publicly ended the talks with the Taliban and threatened to bomb them – as he privately maintained back-channel negotiations.
The Sunshine Patriots: “Oh no! Traitor Trump is going to keep us in Afghanistan!”
The End Result: The final US withdrawal (as planned by Trump) occurred under “Biden” in a way that made it seem as though “Biden” botched it!

On NATO

Trump’s True Position: Work with Putin to kill NATO and avoid World War III
The Media Attack: “Trump is leaving Europe vulnerable to Russian attack!”
How Trump Silenced the Attack: He boasted about how he strengthened NATO.
The Sunshine Patriots: “Oh no! Trump is a pro-NATO Globalist!”
The End Result: NATO cannot counter Russia’s justified actions in Ukraine because Trump (not “Biden”) is the true Commander-in-Chief. The war-making alliance is dying right before our eyes.

On Syria

Trump’s True Position: End the CIA-Mossad proxy war against Syria
The Media Attack: “Trump is being soft on the evil Bashir al Assad”
How Trump Silenced the Attack: He called Assad “an animal” and — after telling Assad’s Russian ally in advance — launched a harmless missile attack on an empty field.
The Sunshine Patriots: “Oh no! Trump is an Israeli-owned warmonger!”
The End Result: After Trump defunded the CIA program propping up “the moderate rebels” (ISIS), Russia and Iran finished off the CIA-Mossad mercenaries on the ground. The Assad government was saved.

On Iran

Trump’s True Position: Maintain peace in the region
The Neo-Con Media Attack: “Trump is being too soft on Iran.”
How Trump Silenced the Attack: He threatened to attack Iran.
The Sunshine Patriots: “Oh no! Trump is an Israeli-owned warmonger!”
The End Result: Iran, now free of Obama’s “Iran Nuclear Deal,” is free to pursue nuclear weapons to defend itself against Israel. Along with Russia, Iran is now an influential power in the region.

On Gun Control

Trump’s True Position: Pro 2nd Amendment — 100%
The Media Attack: After the 2018 hoax shooting at Parkland High School in Florida, a deafening roar for “gun control” went forth from Fake News and prominent politicians of both parties.
How Trump Silenced the Attack: He publicly agreed that something had to be done.
The Sunshine Patriots: “Oh no! Trump is about to betray us on the 2nd Amendment!”
The End Result:  After allowing the temporary furor over Parkland to fizzle out, Trump did nothing. Since Parkland, there has also been a noticeable decrease in these hoax shootings.

On Russia / Ukraine

Trump’s True Position: End the dangerous CIA-Mossad proxy war against pro-Russian east Ukraine and cripple NATO before it ignites a World War.
The Media Attack: “Trump is Putin’s bitch!”
How Trump Silenced the Attack: He said a few nasty things about Putin and made a public show about the weapons he was selling to Ukraine.
The Sunshine Patriots: “Trump wants a war with Russia!”
The End Result: The military aid to Ukraine was delayed and came with the condition that they not use the new equipment! The Ukrainian warmongers were demoralized and the tension eased. The Ukraine “civil war” ended (update: February, 2022: Putin is cleaning up Ukraine while Trump pretends to condemn his actions).

On Israel

Trump’s True Position: Peace in the broader Middle East and a deal between the Israelis and Palestinians.
The Media Attack: In this case, there was no attack because Trump skillfully preempted the Israel First elements.
How Trump Silenced the Attack: Trump blocked any Jewish attack by pretending to kiss Satanyaoo’s ass and making the meaningless gesture of moving the US embassy to Jerusalem.
The Sunshine Patriots: “Oh no! Trump is a Zionist puppet! Muh Jared Kushner!”
The End Result: Satanyahoo is out of power (as are Israel’s top blackmail agents, Jeffrey Epstein & Ghislane Maxwell) and the whole Middle East is quieter than it has ever been in 70 years. The US is out and Russia and Iran are now the regional powers. Said Trump recently of Satanyahoo: F*ck him!

Stupid 19 & The Vaccine

Trump’s True Position: Give the chicken-shit normies their magical vaccine in order to thwart the planned multi-year Scamdemic; block the Great Reset that was to come out of the deadly multi-year lock down; and launch the great counter punch of 2022.
The Media Attack: “Trump is being negligent! His supporters refuse to take the vaccine and he’s not saying anything to encourage them.”
How Trump Silenced the Attack: He recently made his strongest public statements yet in favor of voluntary vaccination (knowing full well that it wasn’t going to change anyone’s mind on either side of the issue).
The Sunshine Patriots: “Trump is evil! Mike King is a shill!” (rolling eyes)
The End Result:  (As we foresee it) In the eyes of the bewildered masses of Normiedom, Trump comes out of this manufactured controversy looking like “the adult in the room” — as the “Biden” administration and the Demonrats continue to implode. The international hysteria over Stupid-19 will end this Spring, soon after Trump’s “Truth Social” media giant (an absolutely critical element to all of this) comes online. Investigations into election fraud, human trafficking, the Russia hoax etc are continuing. The “Storm” will begin to hit (in the public eye) no later than this summer — intensifying in stages and finally culminating with a historic electoral rout — which even the media is already projecting — by America First Republicans in November.

Be patient, boys and girls. Understand that we are fighting an irregular war, with regular casualties, against an “invisible enemy” (more Trumpian code). Stop taking Trump literally.

The Long Marxist March Through the Universities

Picture
Members of the Leftist Students for a Democratic Society in 1963  give the Communist raised-fist salute.


FEBRUARY 10, 2022


NY Times:

 Requiem for a Liberal Giant


By Michelle Goldberg

In case there was any doubt about what Times Columnist Michelle Goldberg is all about, the Bolshevik Bitch clears that up for us by paying tribute to the recently deceased Todd Gitlin — a leader of the Marxist SDS (Students for a Democratic Society) during the early 1960s. Goldberg, not born until 1975, was -12 when Gitlin became president of SDS in the relatively normal-seeming university days of 1963. As a “Masters of Science in Journalism” (rolling eyes) graduate from Commiefornia’s Bolshevik Berkeley, yenta Goldberg surely understands what the elder “intellectual” Gitlin (who taught at Berkeley for 16 years) and his ilk did to bring today’s “intellectuals” to this sorry state of affairs.

A quote from Gitlin:

“My generation of the New Left relinquished any title to patriotism without much sense of loss. All that was left to the Left was to unearth righteous traditions and cultivate them in universities. The much-mocked political correctness of the next academic generations was a consolation prize. We lost — we squandered the politics — but we won the textbooks.

What Gitlin described was the success of the Left’s “Frankfurt School” strategy known as “the long march through the institutions.” Frankfurt “critical theorists” pursue gradual Marxist evolution when instant revolution is not possible. Gitlin was a God-hating, White-hating, America-hating scumbag, and so is his little groupie, Ms. Goldberg.

SDS launched in 1960, at a time when even radical male college students wore short hair, button down shirts and slacks — and the girls, dresses. Surely guided and aided by the Deep State / CIA, the SDS grew rapidly over the course of the turbulent decade which followed.  By 1969, SDS had 300 campus chapters and 30,000 student members nationwide — not counting those who had previously graduated. Most of these young “intellectuals” had adopted the appearance of unwashed unkempt hippies by that time.

This organization eventually splintered due to rival factionalism — with one faction (The Weathermen) going full blown terrorist, and others becoming “long marchers.” One can only imagine how many of that Red Army of “intellectuals” — many from wealthy well-connected families and “elite” universities — went on to shed their slob image and quietly blend into key institutions, all the while maintaining their radical activism and seething hatred for all things normal, natural and beautiful. One can only imagine.

1. After Hitler came to power in Germany, many of the “long marchers” of the infamous “Frankfurt School” fled to American universities. // 2 & 3. Bill Clinton and Killary Rotten Clinton — a perfect example of SDS-type hippies normalizing their appearance after graduation and then “marching through the institutions” undetected.

Just as the buttoned-up, normal-looking early SDS eventually spawned the outwardly radical drugged-up “hippies,” there was another earlier stage of the “long march” during the post-war years and the 1950s. You see, since the days of the French Revolution, the “students” have always been and will always be nothing more than stupid malleable clumps of raw material. Before the usual suspects could fry the minds and pollute the souls of their star-struck students, (((they))) had to capture the top spots at the “elite” universities. Once inside the ivy walls of the college towns, the NWO’s hand-picked presidents then lowered the drawbridge and allowed the Marxist professors (many of them Jew commies exiled from Europe) to invade. With these operatives placed in the key spots, the radicalization of the next generation of “leaders” could commence and, over the course of time, spread like a commie cancer both outwardly into society, and also downward into the high schools and elementary schools.

It is very interesting to note that during this era of conservative appearance, three men closely associated with the mass-murdering Globalist traitor Dwight D. Eisenhower served as university presidents. Under the reign of each of these “respectable” traitors, the important universities which they oversaw eagerly gobbled up UNESCO material and let radical professors in to establish, or enhance, the Bolshevik beachhead.

The three were, Dwight Eisenhower (“Ike”) himself (Columbia University), his brother Milton Eisenhower (Kansas State, Penn State & Johns Hopkins), and Ike’s speech writer, Malcolm Moos (University of Minnesota). Back then, very few people would have believed or could have foreseen that such “respectable” and patriotic-seeming individuals were, deliberately, laying the “long march” groundwork for the counter-cultural hippiedom of the 1960s and the “Critical Race Theory” of today. But that’s exactly what they, and many other “respectable” suit-wearing, conservative-appearing college presidents did. What a “march” it has been!

1
1. To add a phony air of “intellectualism” to the resume of the untalented “war hero” who would later become the US President, the “powers that be” arranged for Eisenhower to do a stint as president of elite Columbia. Under his watch, commie professors were brought in and protected (see “I Don’t Like Ike“) // 2. Ike’s Brother Milton injected UNESCO poison into the THREE universities he presided over at varying times. (Above, at Penn State) // 3. Malcolm Moos of Minnesota U — an extreme Left Globalist — wrote Eisenhower’s famous “Military Industrial Complex” warning speech. It was really meant as a “warning” that the “MIC” could one day overthrow the New World Order.

Bill Clinton Took Two Previously Undisclosed Trips Abroad With Ghislaine Maxwell

As the world awaits the trial of Jeffrey Epstein ‘madame’ Ghislaine Maxwell, the Daily Mail reported Friday – citing information revealed in a forthcoming podcast – that President Bill Clinton flew on Epstein’s “Lolita Express” (the private jet belonging to the deceased billionaire and convicted pedophile) during a trip to Taiwan, Japan and China.

bill clinton took 2 previously undisclosed trips abroad with ghislaine maxwell

At some point during the trip, Clinton and Ghislaine were joined by billionaire Ted Waitt.

During the trip, Clinton and Maxwell met various foreign dignitaries, and even promised a small donation to help combat AIDS in China.

Additionally, Clinton and Maxwell took a trip together on a private jet owned by billionaire Ron Burkle during a trip to India in November 2003.

Journalist Vicki Ward – who revealed the new details in her podcast “Chasing Ghislaine” – reported that Maxwell was part of the official Clinton entourage and even shared the same hotel with the ex-president.

This latter trip with Burkle was part of Clinton’s work with the Clinton Foundation, his philanthropic initiative, to lower the cost of AIDS drugs.

Maxwell used Clinton as an “escape” from Epstein, a badly needed break to get away from the ‘toxicity’ of recruiting underage women to be abused by Epstein.

Maxwell was invited on the trip for one simple reason: she was seen as a critical go-between for the Clinton Foundation as it solicited millions in donations from Epstein.

Journalist Vicki Ward – who revealed the new details in her podcast “Chasing Ghislaine” – reported that Maxwell was part of the official Clinton entourage and even shared the same hotel with the ex-president.

This latter trip with Burkle was part of Clinton’s work with the Clinton Foundation, his philanthropic initiative, to lower the cost of AIDS drugs.

Maxwell used Clinton as an “escape” from Epstein, a badly needed break to get away from the ‘toxicity’ of recruiting underage women to be abused by Epstein.

Maxwell was invited on the trip for one simple reason: she was seen as a critical go-between for the Clinton Foundation as it solicited millions in donations from Epstein.

Maxwell was considered by Clinton’s personal staff to be ‘just as important’ as Epstein for raising money for the Clinton Foundation and was the ‘go-to person’ when it came to asking for donations from the pedophile.

Ward claims in the podcast: “I’ve also only recently learned from sources close to Bill Clinton that he and his post-presidency staff considered Ghislaine to be just as important as Jeffrey – if not more so.”

Ward’s reporting places a new, and uncomfortable (for the Clintons), spotlight on the relationship between Clinton, Epstein and Maxwell.

Flight logs show Clinton took at least 26 trips aboard the ‘Lolita Express‘ – even apparently ditching his Secret Service detail for at least five of these flights between 2001 and 2003.

The former president was closest to Epstein during the early 2000s, just after his presidency had ended, which also coincided with the period where Epstein was running his original sex-trafficking ring in West Palm Beach.

Of course, Clinton has denied any involvement in and/or knowledge of Epstein’s criminal activities. He also denies reports that he ever visited Epstein’s private island.

According to Ward, Maxwell “used” the former president as she attempted (and failed) to make a permanent break from her relationship with Epstein.

Ward’s name might be familiar to some who have closely followed the Epstein story. She has reported on Epstein for decades both at CNN and Vanity Fair. She has appeared in documentaries (including one on Netflix) about Epstein and his crimes.

According to a book about Epstein and Maxwell called “A Convenient Death“, Clinton was mainly interested in Epstein because of Maxwell, with whom he had an affair. Aside from the trips, Maxwell was among the guests to attend Chelsea Clinton’s 2010 wedding.

Maxwell was considered by Clinton’s personal staff to be ‘just as important’ as Epstein for raising money for the Clinton Foundation and was the ‘go-to person’ when it came to asking for donations from the pedophile.

Ward claims in the podcast: “I’ve also only recently learned from sources close to Bill Clinton that he and his post-presidency staff considered Ghislaine to be just as important as Jeffrey – if not more so.”

Ward’s reporting places a new, and uncomfortable (for the Clintons), spotlight on the relationship between Clinton, Epstein and Maxwell.

Flight logs show Clinton took at least 26 trips aboard the ‘Lolita Express‘ – even apparently ditching his Secret Service detail for at least five of these flights between 2001 and 2003.

The former president was closest to Epstein during the early 2000s, just after his presidency had ended, which also coincided with the period where Epstein was running his original sex-trafficking ring in West Palm Beach.

Of course, Clinton has denied any involvement in and/or knowledge of Epstein’s criminal activities. He also denies reports that he ever visited Epstein’s private island.

According to Ward, Maxwell “used” the former president as she attempted (and failed) to make a permanent break from her relationship with Epstein.

Ward’s name might be familiar to some who have closely followed the Epstein story. She has reported on Epstein for decades both at CNN and Vanity Fair. She has appeared in documentaries (including one on Netflix) about Epstein and his crimes.

According to a book about Epstein and Maxwell called “A Convenient Death“, Clinton was mainly interested in Epstein because of Maxwell, with whom he had an affair. Aside from the trips, Maxwell was among the guests to attend Chelsea Clinton’s 2010 wedding.

Reference: ZeroHedge.com

The War on Freedom: How Tyranny Overran the United States

Slowly, against their will, and against their natural inclination to watch football and eat pizza, Americans are awaking to the reality of a totalitarian system with its tentacles wrapped around every aspect of their existence. Sadly, the true nature of this tyranny still eludes the understanding of most citizens, in part because the process by which America was transformed utterly has been slow, in part because the commercial media points us away from the true causes of this slippage and pins all blame on easily identifiable bad guys.

Those seeped in the progressive political tradition sensed a radical loss of justice and transparency under the George W. Bush administration, a trend that only accelerated under the Trump administration—with a perceived reprieve under Obama and the possibility of a positive turn under Biden.

Those marinated in the juices of conservative politics observed an end of freedom and the spread of fake “leftist,” ideology that oppresses the citizen under Clinton and Obama.

Both interpretive communities refer to the same social and political trends, to the war on freedom that renders us up as sacrificial lambs to the cruel gods of global capital. The rhetoric employed by the two groups is so radically different, however, and the histories of the United States that they embrace are so divergent, that they are lost in intense ideological conflicts even as they describe the same creeping totalitarianism.

That conflict is no accident. That ideological battle over the insignificant is just what the doctor ordered for the interests of high finance. Or as J. P. Morgan put it,

“By dividing the people, we can get them to expend their energies in fighting over questions of no importance to us except as teachers of the common herd.”

The super-rich already had their consultants come up with detailed studies on how to divide up citizens by religion, by ethnic identity, by cultural signifiers, and by class so that they are incapable of unity even in the face of the complete takeover of the economy, the media, education and the political process.

“Progressives” refer to the supporters of Trump in rural areas as “stupid” and fundamentalist Christians refer to the followers of the Democratic Party as “evil.”

This profound misunderstanding is probably reinforced by numerous classified operations in which individuals promoting divisive left-wing, or right-wing, positions are encouraged, and paid, to do so as render those who should have common cause as foes.

There is another reason why we have such a difficult time understanding the transformation of our society. The nature of this totalitarianism runs against the assumptions we were taught by movies, novels, and news reports. Our minds are cluttered with archetypes for dictatorship and evil that are at odds with the reality.

The greatest crime of Hollywood was convincing us that evil takes the form of a monster with fangs and claws, of an evil leader with a sinister smile. Corrupt journalists extend this fiction to the public sphere, explaining how evil is embodied in foreign leaders like Kim Jong-un, Xi Jinping, or Vladimir Putin, or in domestic ill-doers like Hillary Clinton (for the right) or Donald Trump (for the left).

As a result, we are unable to detect, or to understand, the takeover of our society that has taken place.

That is to say that we are confronted by “inverted totalitarianism,” to borrow the term of the philosopher Sheldon Wolin, a cultural and political state in which all aspects of our daily lives are controlled by multinational corporations without our knowing and we lose all freedom.

As a result, our actions are profoundly limited; we are constantly beaten down by an iron fist covered in the soft glove of interest charges, student loans, and constant surveillance.

The totalitarianism that we face is “inverted” in the sense that we expect some dictator standing on top and playing the bad buy, oppressing us out of personal greed, vanity or cruelty. But the true source of our misery is rather the manner in which multinational corporations use supercomputers to calculate profits and then extract as much money as possible from us by making it impossible for us to grow our own food, to heal our own illnesses, to teach ourselves, or to entertain ourselves. Instead, we must buy products, online, or in supermarkets, in transactions from which multinational corporations and banks will invariably take a major cut. The only learning that is recognized and accredited is expensive and is controlled by corporations.

We are offered only false choices between Pepsi or Coke, between Taco Bell or Wendy’s, between action films or romantic comedies, and between the Democratic or Republican Parties.

The process by which citizens lost their self-reliance, their self-sufficiency in food production and in energy production, and the basic skills of sewing, knitting and carpentry, growing dependent on products supplied by corporations, began 100 years ago. We can trace the current crisis back to the campaigns of John D. Rockefeller to force citizens to be dependent on petroleum through the promotion of automobiles and trade, the slashing of budgets for public transportation and the massive funding for highways, the push for the mechanization of farming and the popularization of plastics.

Rockefeller also paid off experts so as to marginalize homeopathic medicine and traditional treatments and create dependency on overpriced hospitals that are tied to corporations, while rendering universities and research institutes dependent on the benevolence of the rich, thus making systematic critiques of the sources of wealth a taboo topic.

To be more specific, the invisible inverted totalitarianism that has taken control of our daily experiences can be traced back to the launch of Windows as an operating system in 1985. Microsoft Word, under the rule of Bill Gates (an ardent student of John D. Rockefeller), set out to control the means by which citizens utilize their computers and later, to control how they interacted with each other over the internet.

Sure, presidential elections were held every four years, and the public was given a chance express itself. Secret secret police did not cart off those who criticized the government—in fact criticism of government was encouraged as way to distract from the impact of bank deregulation.

Most citizens were hardly aware that having one corporation control the system software for all computers that they supposedly “owed” meant that they had lost their freedom.

Yet the shift was profound. Whereas the individual previously could decide for himself where to place files in his office, how to organize documents and layout his papers around his typewriter, the manner in which information is organized within Windows is extremely limited, determined in advance by unaccountable forces and the format and layout cannot be modified by the user.

Needless to say, this first step down the road to tyranny, this fatal loss of basic autonomy, was carefully covered up in the rhetoric of convenience and efficiency, exciting innovation and technological advancement, so that few recognized the loss.

Myths about the importance of convenience, of connectivity and of globalization were swallowed by the entire population. Critical topics like the scientific method, the control of the means of production and the decision-making process in government, and in other institutions, were forgotten.

The next step in this hidden tyranny over our daily lives came in the form of search engines like Google, social networks like Facebook, and other massive, interconnected, corporations that mediated the interactions of the individual with the community, often taking over critical functions that previously belonged to the community or to non-profit institutions like schools or research centers.

Under the guise of greater convenience for the individual, businessmen with unlimited funding from investment banks were able to buy up rivals, block out alternatives that offered search engines as cooperatives, and thereby created search engines that pose as transparent institutions but derive money through the sophisticated manipulation of human interactions using algorithms.

Because Google and Facebook had such resources that they could lose money for years, the manner in which they whittled away at the autonomy of the citizen was almost undetectable. Equally important was the strategy of using short-term stimulation of the brain by postings, instant messages and gaudy news reports, to remap the connections between synapses so as to render most incapable of complex, three-dimensional, thinking. That service, the creation of a dumbed down, passive, population, was true product that internet giants offer to their real clients.

Google controls what information we access to, in what order we have access to it, and it lays out a hierarchy of significance in search results that has some basis in fact, but is primarily a political act for sale to the highest bidder.

Results of Google searches are altered, on a case-by-case basis, in response to the needs of corporations to promote their views to extremely specific audiences.

Although we are trained to think of Google as a public service, its falsehoods, increasingly given authority by the parallel Wikipedia entries created by public relations firms, are not subject to external review. Google users are never permitted to participate in the process of the formulation of policy, or in the review of content. That is to say, the United States calls itself a democracy, but the primary tool that citizens rely on for information is run as a dictatorship.

Another popular cloak for the slip into tyranny is the framing of “opinion” as content in the news. Scientific fact ceased to be central in reporting from 1990s. In its stead, opinion polls of groups selected by polling companies are held up as a confirmation of what is true.

Public opinion polls are the propaganda equivalent of stock buybacks. The billionaires, having radically deregulated the economy and dumbed down the population, merely force-feed their opinions to the public through the media that they control and then claim that the policies they want are demanded by the public.

Facebook gives the appearance that the citizen can express himself freely, and can make friends with anyone. Yet, since Facebook Inc. controls whom a citizen can easily find through its network, and who sees what, and it does not permit users to use their own software, or design their own page, or own the networks they create on Facebook, or to have any say in how Facebook is administered, the freedom is fiction.

Legal concepts like the contract have been twisted beyond recognition in the totalitarian cyberspace that surrounds us.

A contract is a negotiated agreement between two parties. On-line, however, whether it is the decision to accept cookies, or to comply with the rules for a commercial application, the user has no right to make demands of the corporation. He or she is given the false choice of either agreeing with all conditions offered, or not having access to the service. The contract is an empty ritual.

We are accustomed to permitting Facebook, Twitter, SnapChat or Instagram to determine what becomes of information that we share, and we are unaware of the billions in profits those corporations make by selling off the information, the content, and the creative ideas that we supply without giving us any compensation. In a sense, these social networks are a form of virtual slavery.

COVID19 Totalitarianism

Because the thinking of citizens has been degraded for decades, and citizens rely on corporate-sponsored sources for basic information, it became possible, for the first time, to create a virtual pandemic, planned by the super-rich, promoted by the news sources that they own, authorized by experts at the institutes and universities that they fund, and legitimated by government agencies (and international institutions like the World Health Organization) that have been radically privatized.

Previously, a significant number of citizens were capable of assessing the accuracy of information on their own. Research institutes like Harvard University still had an ethical commitment to the scientific method and to academic integrity.

All that is over now. The façades of the NIH and Harvard remain the same, maybe they are even better maintained, but the intellectual innards have rotted away. Distinguished professors are easily assembled to give testimony to ridiculous theories about COVID19.

The dangers of the COVID19 vaccines are not the primary threat. The danger lies rather in the shift of the decision-making process for policy away from science, and away from a transparent policy debate. COVID19 serves a successful precedent for invisible forces at private equity funds to decide medical policy in secret and then feed it to us through authority figures.

Those invisible forces now feel they are free to require of us, without any accountability to science, that we have any substance that they offer injected into our bodies as a condition for the right to attend school, to find employment or to receive medical treatment.

The process was made possible by the interaction of social networks, search engines, commercial media, and other critical components of daily experience that determine opinions concerning reliable and authoritative voices. That process is run as an invisible dictatorship that controls a distracted, confused and unfocused population, drowning in connectivity.

Nothing will get better until citizens recognize the cause of this nightmare was not the legacy of the Bushes, the Clintons, the Obamas or the Trumps, although they all played their role, but rather the end of the self-reliant and informed citizen with access to the writings of experts with a deep commitment to the scientific method and to ethical principles.

Meet Klaus Schwab of the “World Economic Forum”

Picture
Globo-Gangster Klaus Schwab

In 1971, the first annual meeting of the World Economic Forum(then called the European Management Symposium) convened in the Swiss resort town of Davos. The annual Globalist conference was organized by a 33-year-old technocrat “intellectual” named Klaus Schwab(cough cough) of Germany — in collaboration with his then-fiance, Hilde Stoll.

Through the years, the WEF meetings — similar to those of the infamous Bilderberg Group — have been attended by or supported by every “elite” scum-of-the-Earth Globalist one can think of. Rockefeller, Gates, Bloomberg, Zuckerberg, Sorosthe Clintons, Obongo,Merkel, McStain, Dr. Falsie, Greta Gloomberg, Prince Charles et al. The Deep State celebrity attendees have included Leonardo DiCaprio, Bono and Angelina Jolie. The power and “prestige” of Schwab’s annual nerd-prom is such that even Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump have attended — although, to their credit, both presidents used the occasion to directly challenge Globalist ideology, right to their faces — albeit in diplomatic terms.

Picture
Every January, the beautiful Swiss resort town of Davos gets polluted by a flatulent herd of self-important conspiratorial Globalist swine.
Picture
“Professor” Schwab & Stoll — still plotting at Davos after a half-a-century! 
Picture
Trump at Davos (2018): “I believe in America. As president of the United States I will always put America first just like the leaders of other countries should put their country first also.”
Picture
Picture
Picture
Schwab’s credentials as a “behind-the-scenes” global power player of the highest rank are undeniable. Above: With Henry Kissinger, Bill Gates, Bill Clinton

About Schwab’s WEF, there’s really not much else that a regular advanced reader of The Anti-New York Times — or even just an intermediate-level student of New World Order studies in general — needs to be told that cannot already be inferred. These pieces-of-shit — using scams like the Climate Con, “Free Trade,” Turd World Immigration and Stupid-19 — work towards the establishment of an all-powerful One World Government modeled on the basis of a bee-hive — with us “global citizens” serving as  dispensable worker bees toiling away to produce unlimited amounts of golden honey for (((them))). Then, when the time comes, their medical monsters will finish us off with a morphine ventilator combo.

What’s different about Schwab is that very few high-profile Globalists have left such a blatant spoken and written paper trail as he has. When it comes to Satan Klaus and his WEF, there’s no “conspiracy theory” ™ here, boys and girls. The man is a straight-up and candid gangster whose words are very useful to us activists who must struggle to convert the normies within our midst.

Straight from the mouth (and pen) of one of the most high-ranking control freaks on Planet Rothschild.

* On the Climate Con
“We speak about a carbon-free world. That’s the objective of the Paris Agreement. Most countries have subscribed to this objective. And many, many companies have now also issued statements that they would achieve carbon neutrality.

It’s not enough to hold only corporations responsible. I think we have a common responsibility, all stakeholders of global society, which means it’s also us individual consumers, and it’s the government.

And the government has to contribute to fighting climate change by creating the necessary incentives and also disincentives. We need the government to step in to build the necessary infrastructures. We cannot fight climate change by doing here a little bit, there a little bit. We need to have an integrated (governments & corporations) ecosystem approach. And I think here the government has a major role to play, to provide the kind of integrated vision for the future.”

* On Stupid-19
“The worldwide crisis triggered by the coronavirus pandemic has no parallel in modern history. It is our defining moment — we will be dealing with its fallout for years, and many things will change forever….  A new world will emerge, the contours of which are for us to both imagine and draw.” (here)

Picture
Picture
Picture

More:

* On “The Great Reset”
You will own nothing, and you will be happy. This is how our world could change by 2030.” (see image below, from WEF Twitter)

* On Marxism
From WEF website: “Does capitalism need some Marxism to survive the Fourth Industrial Revolution?” (here)

* On Microchips in Humans
“Certainly within the next 10 years we will have microchips. At first we will implant them in our clothes. And then we could imagine that we will implant them in our brains, or in our skin. And in the end, we can imagine that there will be a direct communication between our brain and the digital world.” (video here)

***

To sum it all up for newbies & normies — this New World Order of (((theirs))) intends to obliterate national boundaries, abolish private property, fuse politically oppressive Communism with economically exploitative Cartel Capitalism, severely restrict the production of energy and chip us in our brains. Schwab’s words — not ours. Now do you believe? (If you’re a normie, probably not).

Picture
Picture
Picture

Total global domination by “the elite” would mean Marxist abolition of private property and brain micro-chipping. Schwab’s words, not ours!

Picture
Picture

OK, Satan.