Bolsonaro and Lake Target Election Fraud

NOVEMBER 23, 2022

NY Times:

The Question Menacing Brazil: Coup or No Coup?

 Kari Lake Claims Arizona Voters Were Disenfranchised.

Since the widespread 1800’s inception of this political system referred to as “democracy” (a form of government in which the predatory “elite” utilize vote-seeking political front men to allow the manipulated masses to think that they are in charge) Marxists and run-of-the-mill crooks worldwide — under the protection of Fake News — have resorted to voter fraud to enhance their numbers. And following every stolen election, intimidated conservatives / centrists — “for the good of the country” — have always stood down and “graciously” congratulated their opponents — sometimes after meekly expressing “concerns” about “irregularities” before capitulating nonetheless. You see, nobody wants to be flogged by the screeching surround-sound Judenpresse for being a “sore loser” or a “conspiracy theorist,”. As surely as night follows day, a “right wing” capitulation always follows a “left wing” election theft. Until now, that is.

Seven weeks have passed since the Brazilian presidential election was stolen, and two weeks have passed since the farce in Arizona. Not only have the two key defrauded figures, Trump allies Jair Bolsonaro of Brazil and Kari Lake of Arizona NOT capitulated — but they are now escalating the situation. Arizona and Brazil are poised to bust the international vote rigging phenomenon wide open — and we believe this is by pre-planned design of the White Hats.

1. Every Election Day, the dead rise to vote for the  Demonrat ticket. // 2. The “Brazilian Trump” // 3. The Arizonan Trumpette

BRAZIL

Claiming “serous failures” in the voting machines, Bolsonaro — backed by millions of Brazilians who have taken to the streets to demand military intervention — has just filed a legal petition demanding that the votes from many of the machines be annulled. Citing analysis done by a company hired by his party, the complaint asserts that removing the illegitimate votes would give Bolsonaro the victory. The Globalists are now frantically spinning in defense of the voting machines — which only calls more attention to the troubling fact that elections in many countries have come to be so dominated by hackable or programmable machines now. In pointing to the machines, Bolsonaro — who began warning of voter fraud over a year before what many had expected to be his easy re-election — is taking this controversy to a place no other national leader has heretofore dared to go. The parallels between Trump’s “helpless” advance warning of 2020 and the final result and Bolsonaro’s exact repeat of the act indicate that these were both sting operations. Keep your eye on Brazil.

ARIZONA

Also citing failures in the voting machines, as well as chicanery with the ballots, the lovely Lake — along with “defeated” Attorney General candidate Abe Hamedeh and “defeated” Secretary of State candidate Mark Finchem — are also mounting a legal challenge and showing zero signs of capitulation. To the contrary, Ms. Lake — who revealed just yesterday, on Steve Bannon’s “War Room” podcast, that she is in communication with Trump over this matter — is openly threatening Arizona officials with dire consequences if they go ahead and certify the results. Lawyers working for Lake have also threatened Maricopa County officials (here). We did a piece on these Trump-approved “election denier”Arizona “bad asses” back in August. (here) Like Bolsonaro’s boys in Brazil — and totally unlike Republican’ts of years ago – the Arizona trio ain’t having it. Keep your eye on Arizona.

No Surrender! Bolsonaro and Lake are actually intensifying their respective (and likely coordinated) fights.

Kari Lake’s post from November 23rd talks about a “crime” and ongoing coverup— not incompetence or glitches.

Tying this all in to our favorite prophet / prognosticator — Q of Q Anon fame — his most recent post of November 18th preceded both the announcement of the Bolsonaro legal challenge in Brazil and the escalation of the threats coming from Lake & friends in Arizona. A bit of clarification of some of the terms in that post:

* “Runbeck” is an Arizona-based ballot printing company headed by Kevin Runbecka Demonrat donor.

* “Dominion” Voting Systems  provides electronic voting machines and tabulators.

“SOS” refers to the 50 state “Secretaries of State” — an important position which oversees elections and, dating back to 2006, had been specifically targeted for infiltration by a George Soros scheme known as the Secretary of State Project.

“Ascension”(don’t quote us on this one) has been claimed by some “anons” to refer to a space program which has been monitoring computer-based fraud.

As always, keep your eye on Q, just in case…

Will The Brazilian Military Save The Day?

NOVEMBER 03, 2022

NY Times:

Refusing to Accept Defeat, Bolsonaro Backers Call on Military to Intervene

Tens of thousands of people demonstrated in cities across Brazil, many of them demanding that the military stop the transfer of power to President-elect Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva.

With each passing day, what we are able to piece together from faraway Brazil points more and more toward a controlled military operation in which the Left was purposefully induced into stealing a presidential election. It’s essentially USA 2020 all over again — the difference being that military intervention appears to be more imminent and not at all covert. The Slimes article itself, though condescending and dismissive in its attitude toward the Bolsonaro voters, describes the military dynamic at play:

“They arrived by the tens of thousands on Wednesday, angry and draped in Brazilian flags, massing outside military bases across the country. They were there, they said, to save Brazil’s democracy from a rigged election, and there was only one way to do so: The armed forces needed to take control of the government.

It was an alarming demand in a country that suffered under a two-decade military dictatorship until 1985 — and yet another bizarre twist in the aftermath of Brazil’s polarizing elections.”

The great danger for the Left here lies in the fact that if a military intervention establishes that massive fraud took place, it will call into question election results in countries across the world — for any election in which a Marxist-Globalist candidate won.

The prospect of a military intervention in Brazil offers us a “teachable moment”  about the good old days of those Latin American military “juntas” who knew how to deal with “subversivos.” One such coup occurred in Brazil, in 1964 — and the military rulers remained in oversight of the nation until 1985.

Concerns over Brazilian President Joao Goulart began in 1962, during the presidency of John F Kennedy. JFK worried over Brazil’s slide toward the Marxist Left and concluded that the US should support military forces in opposition to Goulart. At first, the Kennedy administration attempted to work with Goulart and convince him to change his political views and policies to a more pro-Western system. In December 1962, Bobby Kennedy flew to Brazil to meet with Goulart. The two spoke for three hours, with Kennedy outlining “the presence of Communists” as the main American objection to his government.

In March 1963, Kennedy gave Goulart a choice: either he could remove the commie politicians from political power, or the United States would put economic pressure on Brazil. During the final months of 1963, the Kennedy administration began to search for paramilitary forces capable of overthrowing the Goulart government. JFK was assassinated in November of that year, but the coup-plotting continued.

In the early hours of March 31, 1964, General Olímpio Mourão Filho, Commander of the 4th Military Region, ordered his troops to start moving towards Rio de Janeiro.  In the early hours of April 2 the National Congress declared the presidency to be vacant. The leaders of the Senate and the Supreme Federal Tribunal swore in Pascoal Ranieri Mazzilli, as president as the Leftist Goulart exiled himself in Uruguay.

A year after the coup, the Brazilian Communist Party was banned in 1965 — and not legalized again until 1985. And that’s pretty much all you need to know about the glorious coup of 1964 — “in a nutshell.”

We Have Arrived Into The Dystopian Future Dreamed Up By Science Fiction Writers

By John W. Whitehead,

The Internet is watching us now. If they want to. They can see what sites you visit. In the future, television will be watching us, and customizing itself to what it knows about us. The thrilling thing is, that will make us feel we’re part of the medium. The scary thing is, we’ll lose our right to privacy. An ad will appear in the air around us, talking directly to us.” — Director Steven Spielberg, Minority Report

We have arrived, way ahead of schedule, into the dystopian future dreamed up by such science fiction writers as George Orwell (Eric Arthur Blair)Aldous Huxley, Margaret Atwood and Philip K. Dick.

Much like Orwell’s Big Brother in 1984, the government and its corporate spies now watch our every move.

Much like Huxley’s A Brave New World, we are churning out a society of watchers who “have their liberties taken away from them, but … rather enjoy it, because they [are] distracted from any desire to rebel by propaganda or brainwashing.”

Much like Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale, the populace is now taught to “know their place and their duties, to understand that they have no real rights but will be protected up to a point if they conform, and to think so poorly of themselves that they will accept their assigned fate and not rebel or run away.”

And in keeping with Philip K. Dick’s darkly prophetic vision of a dystopian police state—which became the basis for Steven Spielberg’s futuristic thriller Minority Report which was released 20 years ago—we are now trapped into a world in which the government is all-seeing, all-knowing and all-powerful, and if you dare to step out of line, dark-clad police SWAT teams and pre-crime units will crack a few skulls to bring the populace under control.

Minority Report is set in the year 2054, but it could just as well have taken place in 2022.

Seemingly taking its cue from science fiction, technology has moved so fast in the short time since Minority Report premiered in 2002 that what once seemed futuristic no longer occupies the realm of science fiction.

Incredibly, as the various nascent technologies employed and shared by the government and corporations alike—facial recognition, iris scanners, massive databases, behavior prediction software, and so on—are incorporated into a complex, interwoven cyber network aimed at tracking our movements, predicting our thoughts and controlling our behavior, Spielberg’s unnerving vision of the future is fast becoming our reality.

Both worlds — our present-day reality and Spielberg’s celluloid vision of the future—are characterized by widespread surveillance, behavior prediction technologies, data mining, fusion centers, driverless cars, voice-controlled homes, facial recognition systems, cybugs and drones, and predictive policing (pre-crime) aimed at capturing would-be criminals before they can do any damage.

Surveillance cameras are everywhere. Government agents listen in on our telephone calls and read our emails. Political correctness — a philosophy that discourages diversity — has become a guiding principle of modern society.

The courts have shredded the Fourth Amendment’s protections against unreasonable searches and seizures. In fact, SWAT teams battering down doors without search warrants and FBI agents acting as a secret police that investigate dissenting citizens are common occurrences in contemporary America.

We are increasingly ruled by multi-corporations wedded to the police state. Much of the population is either hooked on illegal drugs or ones prescribed by doctors. And bodily privacy and integrity has been utterly eviscerated by a prevailing view that Americans have no rights over what happens to their bodies during an encounter with government officials, who are allowed to search, seize, strip, scan, spy on, probe, pat down, taser, and arrest any individual at any time and for the slightest provocation.

All of this has come about with little more than a whimper from an oblivious American populace largely comprised of nonreaders and television and internet zombies, but we have been warned about such an ominous future in novels and movies for years.

The following 15 films may be the best representation of what we now face as a society.

Fahrenheit 451 (1966). Adapted from Ray Bradbury’s novel and directed by Francois Truffaut, this film depicts a futuristic society in which books are banned, and firemen ironically are called on to burn contraband books—451 Fahrenheit being the temperature at which books burn. Montag is a fireman who develops a conscience and begins to question his book burning. This film is an adept metaphor for our obsessively politically correct society where virtually everyone now pre-censors speech. Here, a brainwashed people addicted to television and drugs do little to resist governmental oppressors.

2001: A Space Odyssey (1968). The plot of Stanley Kubrick’s masterpiece, as based on an Arthur C. Clarke short story, revolves around a space voyage to Jupiter. The astronauts soon learn, however, that the fully automated ship is orchestrated by a computer system — known as HAL 9000 — which has become an autonomous thinking being that will even murder to retain control. The idea is that at some point in human evolution, technology in the form of artificial intelligence will become autonomous and human beings will become mere appendages of technology. In fact, at present, we are seeing this development with massive databases generated and controlled by the government that are administered by such secretive agencies as the National Security Agency and sweep all websites and other information devices collecting information on average citizens. We are being watched from cradle to grave.

Planet of the Apes (1968). Based on Pierre Boulle’s novel, astronauts crash on a planet where apes are the masters and humans are treated as brutes and slaves. While fleeing from gorillas on horseback, astronaut Taylor is shot in the throat, captured and housed in a cage. From there, Taylor begins a journey wherein the truth revealed is that the planet was once controlled by technologically advanced humans who destroyed civilization. Taylor’s trek to the ominous Forbidden Zone reveals the startling fact that he was on planet earth all along. Descending into a fit of rage at what he sees in the final scene, Taylor screams: “We finally really did it. You maniacs! You blew it up! Damn you.” The lesson is obvious, but will we listen? The script, although rewritten, was initially drafted by Rod Serling and retains Serling’s Twilight Zone-ish ending.

THX 1138 (1970). George Lucas’ directorial debut, this is a somber view of a dehumanized society totally controlled by a police state. The people are force-fed drugs to keep them passive, and they no longer have names but only letter/number combinations such as THX 1138. Any citizen who steps out of line is quickly brought into compliance by robotic police equipped with “pain prods” — electro-shock batons. Sound like tasers?

A Clockwork Orange (1971). Director Stanley Kubrick presents a future ruled by sadistic punk gangs and a chaotic government that cracks down on its citizens sporadically. Alex is a violent punk who finds himself in the grinding, crushing wheels of injustice. This film may accurately portray the future of western society that grinds to a halt as oil supplies diminish, environmental crises increase, chaos rules, and the only thing left is brute force.

Soylent Green (1973). Set in a futuristic overpopulated New York City, the people depend on synthetic foods manufactured by the Soylent Corporation. A policeman investigating a murder discovers the grisly truth about what soylent green is really made of. The theme is chaos where the world is ruled by ruthless corporations whose only goal is greed and profit. Sound familiar?

Blade Runner (1982). In a 21st century Los Angeles, a world-weary cop tracks down a handful of renegade “replicants” (synthetically produced human slaves). Life is now dominated by mega-corporations, and people sleepwalk along rain-drenched streets. This is a world where human life is cheap, and where anyone can be exterminated at will by the police (or blade runners). Based upon a Philip K. Dick novel, this exquisite Ridley Scott film questions what it means to be human in an inhuman world.

Nineteen Eighty-Four (1984). The best adaptation of Orwell’s dark tale, this film visualizes the total loss of freedom in a world dominated by technology and its misuse, and the crushing inhumanity of an omniscient state. The government controls the masses by controlling their thoughts, altering history and changing the meaning of words. Winston Smith is a doubter who turns to self-expression through his diary and then begins questioning the ways and methods of Big Brother before being re-educated in a most brutal fashion.

Brazil (1985). Sharing a similar vision of the near future as 1984 and Franz Kafka’s novel The Trial, this is arguably director Terry Gilliam’s best work, one replete with a merging of the fantastic and stark reality. Here, a mother-dominated, hapless clerk takes refuge in flights of fantasy to escape the ordinary drabness of life. Caught within the chaotic tentacles of a police state, the longing for more innocent, free times lies behind the vicious surface of this film.

They Live (1988). John Carpenter’s bizarre sci-fi social satire action film assumes the future has already arrived. John Nada is a homeless person who stumbles across a resistance movement and finds a pair of sunglasses that enables him to see the real world around him. What he discovers is a world controlled by ominous beings who bombard the citizens with subliminal messages such as “obey” and “conform.” Carpenter manages to make an effective political point about the underclass — that is, everyone except those in power. The point: we, the prisoners of our devices, are too busy sucking up the entertainment trivia beamed into our brains and attacking each other up to start an effective resistance movement.

The Matrix (1999). The story centers on a computer programmer Thomas A. Anderson, secretly a hacker known by the alias “Neo,” who begins a relentless quest to learn the meaning of “The Matrix” — cryptic references that appear on his computer. Neo’s search leads him to Morpheus who reveals the truth that the present reality is not what it seems and that Anderson is actually living in the future — 2199. Humanity is at war against technology which has taken the form of intelligent beings, and Neo is actually living in The Matrix, an illusionary world that appears to be set in the present in order to keep the humans docile and under control. Neo soon joins Morpheus and his cohorts in a rebellion against the machines that use SWAT team tactics to keep things under control.

Minority Report (2002). Based on a short story by Philip K. Dick and directed by Steven Spielberg, the film offers a special effect-laden, techno-vision of a futuristic world in which the government is all-seeing, all-knowing and all-powerful. And if you dare to step out of line, dark-clad police SWAT teams will bring you under control. The setting is 2054 where PreCrime, a specialized police unit, apprehends criminals before they can commit the crime. Captain Anderton is the chief of the Washington, DC, PreCrime force which uses future visions generated by “pre-cogs” (mutated humans with precognitive abilities) to stop murders. Soon Anderton becomes the focus of an investigation when the precogs predict he will commit a murder. But the system can be manipulated. This film raises the issue of the danger of technology operating autonomously — which will happen eventually if it has not already occurred. To a hammer, all the world looks like a nail. In the same way, to a police state computer, we all look like suspects. In fact, before long, we all may be mere extensions or appendages of the police state — all suspects in a world commandeered by machines.

V for Vendetta (2006). This film depicts a society ruled by a corrupt and totalitarian government where everything is run by an abusive secret police. A vigilante named V dons a mask and leads a rebellion against the state. The subtext here is that authoritarian regimes through repression create their own enemies — that is, terrorists — forcing government agents and terrorists into a recurring cycle of violence. And who is caught in the middle? The citizens, of course. This film has a cult following among various underground political groups such as Anonymous, whose members wear the same Guy Fawkes mask as that worn by V.

Children of Men (2006). This film portrays a futuristic world without hope since humankind has lost its ability to procreate. Civilization has descended into chaos and is held together by a military state and a government that attempts to keep its totalitarian stronghold on the population. Most governments have collapsed, leaving Great Britain as one of the few remaining intact societies. As a result, millions of refugees seek asylum only to be rounded up and detained by the police. Suicide is a viable option as a suicide kit called Quietus is promoted on billboards and on television and newspapers. But hope for a new day comes when a woman becomes inexplicably pregnant.

Land of the Blind (2006). In this dark political satire, tyrannical rulers are overthrown by new leaders who prove to be just as evil as their predecessors. Maximilian II is a demented fascist ruler of a troubled land named Everycountry who has two main interests: tormenting his underlings and running his country’s movie industry. Citizens who are perceived as questioning the state are sent to “re-education camps” where the state’s concept of reality is drummed into their heads. Joe, a prison guard, is emotionally moved by the prisoner and renowned author Thorne and eventually joins a coup to remove the sadistic Maximilian, replacing him with Thorne. But soon Joe finds himself the target of the new government.

All of these films — and the writers who inspired them — understood what many Americans, caught up in their partisan, flag-waving, zombified states, are still struggling to come to terms with: that there is no such thing as a government organized for the good of the people. Even the best intentions among those in government inevitably give way to the desire to maintain power and control at all costs.

Eventually, as I make clear in my book Battlefield America: The War on the American People and in its fictional counterpart The Erik Blair Diaries, even the sleepwalking masses (who remain convinced that all of the bad things happening in the police state — the police shootings, the police beatings, the raids, the roadside strip searches—are happening to other people) will have to wake up.

Sooner or later, the things happening to other people will start happening to us.

When that painful reality sinks in, it will hit with the force of a SWAT team crashing through your door, a taser being aimed at your stomach, and a gun pointed at your head. And there will be no channel to change, no reality to alter, and no manufactured farce to hide behind.

As George Orwell (Eric Arthur Blair) warned, “If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face forever.”

Pfizer’s Clinical Trial Data Strongly Indicates Their Covid-19 Jab Causes The Recipient To Develop AIDS (Just Like Brazilian President Warned)

I have discovered some extremely concerning findings in the Pfizer Phase I-II-III clinical trial data. The Sepsis death rate in the 21,926 double vaccinated group of the Pfizer Phase III Clinical trial was twenty-one times higher than normal, and the Cardiovascular death rate was two times higher than normal.

This strongly indicates that the Pfizer Covid-19 injection does in fact cause a new form of ‘acquired immunodeficiency syndrome’, as has been suggested by a mountain of data available from the UK Health Security Agency, because sepsis is caused by failure of the immune system.

pfizer’s clinical trial data strongly indicates their covid 19 jab causes the recipient to develop aids

Here is the table of Pfizer trial deaths from Dose 1 (July 2020) to un-blinding after 6 months (January 2021):

here is the table of pfizer trial deaths from dose 1 (july 2020) to un blinding after 6 months (january 2021)

Sepsis/Septicemia results from an immune system failure to defeat a microbial (viral yeast or bacterial) infection.

Emphysematous cholecystitis is a relatively rare variant of acute cholecystitis with infection by gas-producing organisms. Diagnosis involves the demonstration of gas within the lumen or wall of the gallbladder by ultrasound or CT scan.

In contrast to acute cholecystitis, emphysematous cholecystitis occurs more commonly in elderly and diabetic patients, and is frequently associated with perforation and death. – Pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

It is the result of an immune system failure to defeat a microbial (viral yeast or bacterial) infection.

Acute Cholecystitis. The most frequent cause of acute cholecystitis is gallstones. Other causes include typhoid fever and a malignant tumour obstructing the biliary tract. The inflammation may be secondary to a systemic sepsis. Medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com

Acute Cholecystitis is a biliary sepsis, a sepsis of the Gall Bladder and bile ducts:

acute cholecystitis is a biliary sepsis

Here are the US deaths in 2020 by cause and the percentages for each cause:

us deaths in 2020 by cause and the percentages for each cause

Jamanetwork.comhttps://wonder.cdc.gov

The first thing the jumps out of these figures is that Pfizer trial participants had a death rate of 17/19 per 21,921/6 per 6 months. Whereas the general US population has a death rate of 111.2 per 21,923 per 6 months. So Pfizer trial participants were over 6x less likely to die than the general public.

The age profile of the original selection of participants is advertised to be:

  • 12-15 years old:  2260,
  • 16-17 years old:  754,
  • 18-55 years old:  25,427
  • 56+ year old:  17,879
  • Pfizer.com

So Pfizer must have done some extremely heavy exclusions of morbidities to get such an absurdly low mortality figure. Their study protocol reveals whom they excluded – Clinicaltrials.gov

The next thing is the incredible match between the unvaccinated Covid and cardiovascular death rates (10.5% and 26.3%) and those in the general population for 2020 (10.3% and 25.3%). So even though the numbers of deaths are small. They appear to be a very good representation of the reality in general public.

Now we turn to the double vaccinated cardiovascular and sepsis rates and we see (52.9% and 23.5% death rates) compared to the general population (and the unvaccinated) who suffer only (26.3% and 1.1% or 25.3% and 0%).

And there is the toxicity of the Pfizer vaccination laid bare. It weakens the immune system to the point where people succumb to microbial infections and die at 21 times the normal rate in the first 6 months after vaccination.

CENSORED: Brazilian President Bolsonaro Reads Report Connecting COVID Vaccines to AIDS.

https://freeworldnews.tv/watch?id=617849e21085e517bb7409b8

One can argue that the numbers of deaths here are not large enough to draw any valid statistical conclusions. But against that the unvaccinated numbers are very clearly representative and the numbers of participants in both groups are large enough to draw valid statistical conclusions from.

When you combine these figures with the weekly 5% immune response degradation catalogued by the UKHSA from Weeks 35-41 – TheExpose.uk , you start to see a picture that suggests the vaccinated are developing acquired immunodeficiency syndrome.

he vaccinated are developing acquired immunodeficiency syndrome

However you look at this, the numbers flag up two major concerns which these days have plenty of other statistical, mass media, clinical and anecdotal evidence to support.

These findings absolutely necessitate further investigation specific to immune system degradation and cardiovascular inflammation. But Pfizer un-blinded the placebo group and permitted them to get vaccinated at the end of the 6 month trial period. So it is difficult to see how we can get any more data from Pfizer.

To be frank we are lucky to have the death data they have so far provided. Let us face facts. There are no long term clinical trials ongoing into the safety of these vaccines. Quite the reverse in fact. For one can argue that the purpose of the Pfizer lobbied vaccine mandates is to eradicate any unvaccinated control group from existence in order to prevent a proper evaluation of vaccine side effects over the medium term.

To that end, here is an edited copy letter recently sent to the UK’s Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE):

Dear Members of SAGE

I write to inform you of an oversight in your scientific advice on Covid-19.

1. As you will all be aware, the only acceptable scientific method for determining the safety or effectiveness of a medical intervention is to compare its effect upon a randomly chosen experimental group with a control group preferably of similar size for statistical reasons.

In the phase III clinical trials for Pfizer there were 21,921 participants in the vaccinated group and 21,926 in the placebo group, the control group.

The control group, the placebo group is the yardstick with which we measure the effectiveness of the intervention. Only by comparison with a control group can a researcher determine whether an intervention has a statistically significant effect on an experimental group, and the possibility of drawing a false conclusion is mathematically and precisely defined. This A B comparison between intervention and control groups is called the Scientific Method.

So without a control group the Scientific method has been abandoned, we are no longer following any science at all, and no statistically valid conclusion can be drawn from the intervention. Instead science and its method have gone out of the window and we are back in the dark ages of Papal decrees.

2. The medium term (1-3 year) safety or efficacy of the Adenovirus-DNA vaccines and the lipid nanoparticle-mRNA vaccines is not yet known because they have not yet been examined in the general population for more than 10 months.

In this country the intervention group for these vaccines in the age demographic over 18 years old is now over 90% of the population

Why has the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies failed to advise the UK government to follow the scientific method and formulate a commensurate control group who do not take the vaccines?

How are we to assess the effectiveness of these vaccine interventions in the absence of such a group?

How can a group of scientists fail so spectacularly to follow not only ‘the science’ but actually any science at all in what is undoubtedly the most important medical intervention in the UK in the history of science and of medical practice?

May I therefore insist in the name of Science that you put your lab coats back on and advise the Government of this country without further delay to preserve all presently unvaccinated people as members of a vastly undersized, under represented depleted and sadly less than commensurate control group in order that this entire vaccination experiment can actually reach a statistically valid and meaningful conclusion and in order to demonstrate to the government and to the British public and to the world in general – what science actually is.

Furthermore if you are going to use children as lab rats for the benefit of adults and against the advice of the JCVI, then would you please ensure that only 50% of them are vaccinated and the remaining 50% are kept free of intervention as a properly sized control group in order that we can learn something from the government’s hideous medical experimentation on them.

Yours Scientifically,

A concerned reader

As a final proof that Covid vaccines destroy the immune system, we now have the admission by the CDC in response to a Freedom of Information Request, that they have no record of a person with natural immunity becoming reinfected and transmitting the virus to anybody.

the cdc

Whereas the UKHSA has 450,992 records of people with double vaccine immunity who became infected with Covid in the last 4 weeks.

Could there be a clearer demonstration that vaccines prevent people reaching full natural immunity by damaging and degrading their immune systems?

Shocking! Over 32,000 People DEAD In Brazil Following COVID-19 Vaccines According To Official Media Report

Parts of this article were translated by DeepL. Via Brian Shilhavy.

Official media reports in Brazil stated that during a 5-month period, over 32,000 people in Brazil have died following a COVID-19 injection.over 32,000 people dead in brazil following covid 19 vaccines according to official media report

A COVID-19 ward in a hospital in Londrina, Brazil. Elderly are frequently hospitalized after two doses of the COVID-19 vaccine. Source.

Currently in Brazil, the following vaccines are authorized for use: AstraZeneca/Oxford, Pfizer/BioNTech, Coronavac (also called Sinovac), J&J/Janssen, and Butanvac.

The report was published on uol.com.br, which reportedly has about the same number of pageviews as CNN.com, according to data from SimilarWeb. It is so big, that ICANN has given its own domain: .uol.

Despite these high amounts of deaths following vaccination, the report states:

“Vaccination is still the best way to control the disease.”

But even these cases of deaths following COVID-19 injections might be under-reported, as the country’s state news agency reported in July that in the small state of Distrito Federal, at least 711 died after taking the first experimental vaccine, while another 263 people died after taking two doses of the experimental vaccines. (Source.)

Brazil’s state news agency reports:

“Vaccination does not prevent re-infection or the evolution to more serious conditions, including death. Therefore, the Health Secretary stressed the importance of keeping the prevention measures against the new coronavirus.

“We are always alerting people to wear masks, wash their hands, use alcohol gel, and avoid crowds. Even if we are vaccinated, we can acquire the virus and have complications”, he declared. (Source.)

Members Of Brazil’s Parliament Broke Into Hospital That Claimed To Have 5,000 Infected & 200 Dead From COVID19 – The Hospital Was EMPTY

Breaking news: Members of Parliament of Brazil break into hospital that claimed to have 5,000 infected & 200 deaths from COVID19 and caught them red handed. NOT ONE PERSON, the hospital is empty.

Translation:

Members Of Brazil's Parliament Broke Into Hospital That Claimed To Have 5,000 Infected & 200 Dead From Covid19 – The Hospital Was Empty

WOW!!! 😮 #Breaking #BreakingNews
Members of Parliament of #Brazil break into hospital that claimed to have 5,000 infected & 200 deaths from #COVID19 & CAUGHT THEM RED HANDED NOT ONE PERSON, they have FRAUDED THE WORLD!! #Italy #Spain #ArrestBillGates pic.twitter.com/V698rTxxR3

— Alpha OmegaEnergy (@AOECOIN) June 16, 2020

Five members of the Brazil parliament went to hospitals under encouragement by president Bolsonaro to break into hospitals & check to see the number of patients there.

This hospital was not even finished, but claiming it was treating 5000 people with COVID19 while 200 were already dead.

Officials broke in to check the claims and found the hospital is an absolute mess, not finished, and no patients.

The governor is frauding the state and nation and taxpayers and lying about the numbers to pad the numbers.

Embezzlement scheme & to help bring down the country and push vaccines.

#JailBillGates #ArrestBillGates

Brazil’s President is Actively Trying to Destroy Amazon Rainforest, Leaked Documents Show

The Brazilian president is actively trying to devastate the Amazon rainforest, leaked documents have revealed.

The documents show arguments put forward by Jair Bolsonaro that a strong government presence in the Amazon region is important to prevent any conservation projects going forward.

Intending to build bridges, motorways, and a hydroelectric plant in the rainforest, the Brazilian government hopes to ‘fight off international pressure’ to protect the Amazon, according to the leaked information.

As reported by The Independent, the plans were leaked to political website openDemocracy and include PowerPoint slides believed to have been presented at a meeting in February between Brazilian government officials and local leaders in Para state, which is home to the Amazonia National Park.

During the meeting, Brazilian ministers put forward projects planned for the region by President Bolsonaro’s government, with one slide mentioning a priority to strategically occupy the rainforest.

The slide reads, as per openDemocracy:

“Development projects must be implemented on the Amazon basin to integrate it into the rest of the national territory in order to fight off international pressure for the implementation of the so-called ‘Triple A’ project.

“To do this, it is necessary to build the Trombetas River hydroelectric plant, the Óbidos bridge over the Amazon River, and the implementation of the BR-163 highway to the border with Suriname.”

Even before the firesPresident Bolsonaro and Big Corporations Were Teaming Up to Destroy the Amazon

Image: NASA
The ‘Triple A’ (Andes, Amazon and Atlantic) project is a conservation effort led by the organisation Gaia Amazonas, which aims to conserve 265 million square kilometers of jungle and ‘the lungs of our world’.

But now Bolsonaro, Brazil’s controversial far-right president, appears to be sabotaging this effort as devastating fires rage through the Amazon. Fires which are causing a loss equivalent to three football fields per minute, according to the latest government data.

The rainforest – which covers northwestern Brazil and extends into Colombia, Peru and other South American countries – has been burning for weeks, plunging Brazil’s Sao Paulo into darkness and devastating the Amazon.

If the fire continues to burn at its current rate, this will be the first month for several years in which Brazil loses an area of forest bigger than Greater London, with many fearing it will never be able to recover.

According to the latest data from Brazilian satellites, as per The Guardian, 1,345 square kilometres of the region were cleared in July – a third higher than the previous monthly record under its current monitoring system, the Deter B satellite system, which started in 2015.

Bolsonaro yesterday (August 22) claimed his government ‘lacks the resources’ to extinguish the fire, although environmental groups are now placing the blame for the devastation directly on him.

President Bolsonaro displaying the Satanic hand sign Il Cornuto (Devil’s horns)
Richard George, head of forests at Greenpeace, told The Independent:

“The whole area around the Amazon has been highly volatile with loggers and farmers, and Bolsonaro has absolutely lit a torch under that.”

The fire currently sweeping through the rainforest reportedly took hold after farmers announced a coordinated ‘day of fire’ on August 10, due to the president giving the go-ahead for farmers and illegal loggers to enter indigenous communities.

Image: PA
The Amazon rainforest provides 20 per cent of the world’s oxygen, Business Insider reports. However, if it continues to burn it would not only stop producing this oxygen and supporting wildlife, but it could also worsen climate change by triggering a ‘doomsday dieback scenario’.

This would ultimately result in dry leaves which, as well as being unable to absorb as much carbon, would be much more flammable and likely to spread fires – potentially causing the release of 140 billion tonnes of carbon stored in the Amazon into the atmosphere. As a result, global temperatures could rise even further.

Since the public were made aware of the devastating fire, millions rallied together to sign a petition urging the Brazilian government to ban the burning of the Amazon – something which could easily play a detrimental role in the climate emergency we are currently facing.