The Eulogy Of Queen Elizabeth II That You Won’t See On Your TV

Turn on a TV, open a web browser, or scroll social media and you will not be able to avoid headlines and hashtags about Queen Elizabeth II passing away. After news broke that she was under “medical supervision,” media crews have stationed themselves out front of Buckingham Palace and its a veritable red carpet event as royals from all over Europe arrive to pay their respects and offer support.

the eulogy of queen elizabeth ii that you won't see on your tv

On Thursday, newly elected British PM Liz Truss said the “whole country” was “deeply concerned” over the news of The Queen’s deteriorating health.

“My thoughts – and the thoughts of people across our United Kingdom – are with Her Majesty The Queen and her family at this time,” Truss stated.

Hours later, and surrounded by her royal family, Queen Elizabeth II took her last breath. Now, all the constant reporting has turned to memorializing her.

But is the queen really someone to be hailed as this expounder of all that is good? Should her face be plastered on screens worldwide and a 24/7 memorial be rolled out in her honor? Maybe so, but not for the reasons corporate media will tell you.

On top of mothering a child predator and helping to cover up his crimes, Queen Elizabeth — during her time as a monarch — fleeced the taxpayers of England for hundreds of millions just to pay for her castle.

During this time, she hid her finances offshore — despite the fact that the Royal Family is tax exempt — and made countless billions off the backs of her subjects.

She also oversaw the horrific colonization of multiple territories in Africa and Asia in which people were savagely tortured, their land stolen, and their people slaughtered.

Also read: Queen Elizabeth II Is Direct Lineage Of The Roman Caesars By Blood! (Proven Fact).

Though the Queen-friendly press have tried to downplay her role in the slaughter mentioned above, her racist roots were exposed in a document released last year by the Guardian. The papers revealed that the Queen’s courtiers banned “coloured immigrants or foreigners” from serving in clerical roles in the royal household until at least the late 1960s — when it was no longer considered “acceptable.”

It wasn’t just torture, racism and covering up her son’s affinity for children either. In one of the most damning admissions to date by the Church of England, the head of the church admitted in 2017 they “colluded” with and helped to hide the long-term sexual abuse of children and young men.

Archbishop of Canterbury Justin Welby apologized to the victims who spoke out and helped bring their attacker to justice in 2017. However, according to the report on how the church handled the case, as well as the slap on the wrist ex-bishop Peter Ball received for decades of abuse, ‘justice’ is a loosely thrown around term.

According to the AP, Welby ordered the report after Ball was convicted and imprisoned in 2015 for misconduct in public office and indecent assaults against teenagers and young men over a period of 20 years.

Despite admitting to sexually abusing 18 people, this serial child rapist was let out of prison after only serving 16 months.

The roots of the Church of England go back to the time of the Roman Empire when Christianity entered the Roman province of Britain and is the official state church of Britain. And, the supreme governor of the church is the Queen herself.

As the monarch is the supreme governor, it can be assumed that it took part in the cover up as well.

When not covering for pedophiles or overseeing torture, the Queen was also sympathizing with Nazis. In 2015, the Queen was seen on video giving the Nazi salute, during Hitler’s rise to power.

As TFTP reported at the time, in the video the Queen and the Queen’s mum raise their Nazi salutes proudly for the camera.

According to the Sun:

The film shows the then Princess Elizabeth, just seven, larking about in 1933.

Egging on her sister Princess Margaret, three, is their uncle Prince Edward, Prince of Wales. He was a sympathiser towards Hitler’s Nazi Germany and became King Edward VIII.

The stunning film footage of the Queen performing a Nazi salute is today revealed by The Sun.

The astonishing clip lay hidden for eight decades. The grainy home movie is thought to have been shot in 1933 or 1934, as Hitler rose to supreme power in Germany.

It is a matter of historical record that Edward VIII was, in fact, a Nazi sympathizer which makes the claims of childhood fun by the Queen to defend the video, all but irrelevant.

Exposed: All The Queen’s Agents And Corporations That Control The World.

It gets worse, intelligence given to the FBI claimed the Nazis were using the Duke and Duchess to glean information that would scuttle the war effort of the allies and help the Nazis win.

When the Queen isn’t saluting the regime responsible for the horrid deaths of 6 million Jews, she exploiting poor and mentally ill individuals.

As TFTP reported, the release of the Paradise Papers, a leak comprised of over 13.4 million documents, exposed the Queens insidious exploits of the mentally ill.

The documents included in the leak came from two offshore services providers and the company registries of 19 tax havens, which was obtained by the German newspaper Süddeutsche Zeitung and shared by the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists.

The report from ICIJ claimed that according to records from the offshore law firm Appleby, Queen Elizabeth II’s private estate has invested millions of pounds in a Cayman Islands fund that has a history of taking advantage of poor families:

“Queen Elizabeth II has invested millions of dollars in medical and consumer loan companies, Appleby’s files show. While the Queen’s private estate, the Duchy of Lancaster, provides some details of its investments in U.K. property, such as commercial buildings scattered across southern England, it has never disclosed details of its offshore investments.

‘Yes, the Duchy was aware that the Jubilee Absolute Return Fund was run offshore,’ said Chris Addock, chief finance officer of the Duchy of Lancaster.

The records show that as of 2007, the queen’s private estate invested in a Cayman Islands fund that in turn invested in a private equity company that controlled BrightHouse, a U.K. rent-to-own firm criticized by consumer watchdogs and members of Parliament for selling household goods to cash-strapped Britons on payment plans with interest rates as high as 99.9 percent.”

According to a report from the Guardian, which partnered in sharing the revelations from the Paradise Papers, over the span of more than a decade at least, the Queen’s estate has made significant investments in businesses such as the off-license chain Threshers and the retailer BrightHouse.

In 2017, BrightHouse, which is Britain’s biggest rent-to-own retailer, was ordered to pay 14.8 million pounds to 249,000 customers after the watchdog Financial Conduct Authority found that the retailer was guilty of overcharging customers and intentionally taking advantage of people with mental health problems and learning disabilities.

So, to recap, the queen has overseen horrifying torture and occupation for decades, covered for pedophiles, exploited people with disabilities for personal gain, fleece her subjects for billions in tax revenue, and has a history of sympathetic intentions to the Nazis. And, this is by no means, a comprehensive list… there is still much more.

Her legacy is not kindness, altruism and majesty — it is colonization, brutality, land disposition, mineral theft and torture.

After knowing all this, we have to ask ourselves why… why is her face plastered all over televisions, computers, and newspapers? Why are thousands going to weep in the streets for her? Why will corporate media make her out as a hero?

This is not normal. The queen was a monarch, an unaccountable, legally immune descendent of a long line of brutal dictators who continued that role — and no, it wasn’t merely “symbolic.” Society needs to stop celebrating people like this. If we continue to make role models out of abusive tyrants, don’t be surprised when society starts to resemble that very thing.

Elizabeth is Dead — Charles is King

What’s next for “The House of Windsor?”

SEPTEMBER 09, 2022

NY Times:


The Queen’s Death Comes at a Moment of Great Uncertainty for Britain

Long an Uneasy Prince, King Charles III Takes On a Role He Was Born To

Queen Elizabeth II, like her great great grandmother, Queen Victoria, reigned (in theory) over Great Britain for many years — close to 64 and 71 years respectively and 135 of the past 182 years — with a few shorter-lived Kings reigning briefly in between. Of course, the real power “behind the throne” of the far flung colonial empire that is no more was not the British Monarchy, but rather The House of Rothschild which seized the island’s finances following the “Napoleonic Wars” and, in the ensuing decades, took control of its media and parliament. By the time Queen Victoria (of the German House of Hanover) was crowned in 1837, the monarchy was not only politically detached from the parliament, but the parliament itself danced to Rothschild’s tune. Two-time Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli was openly linked to the Rothschild’s, as was political leader Randolph Churchill – Winston’s alleged father.

* Note:We say “alleged” because Winnie’s mom, Jenny Jerome, was abed-hopping trollop of the lowest order – but I digress.

Apart from not at all embodying the political power of Rothschild’s Island, neither lady — nor any of the men in between — ever really boldly asserted themselves in terms of expressing opinions on matters political or economic. The only exception was King Edward VII (Elizabeth’s uncle). Edward’s previous praise (while still a prince) of Hitler had already placed him in the cross-hairs of “the usual suspects.” Soon after ascending the throne in January, 1936, Edward continued to cause a stink in parliamentary circles with words and actions that were interpreted as “interference in political matters.” During a tour of poverty-stricken villages in South Wales, for example, Edward commented that “something must be done” for the unemployed coal miners. This simple empathetic comment, uttered during the Great Depression, was actually criticized as an attempt to guide government action — even though he had not  proposed any policy. 

In December of 1936, after less than one year as King, Edward was forced to abdicate the crown to Prince George, his stuttering brother and Elizabeth’s father — the phony pretext being that he was married to an American divorcee, Elizabeth Wallis Simpson. You see, the planned war with Germany would be impossible to pull off with an outspoken “pro-Hitler” King on the throne.

1. Queen Victoria was of the German Hanover line. // 2. Victoria’s spouse, 
Prince Albert of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha, came straight from Germany. // 3. In 1917, the First World War caused King George V (Victoria & Albert’s grandson and first cousin to both Kaiser Wilhelm of Germany and Tsar Nicholas of Russia) to officially change the family name from the German “Saxe-Coburg & Gotha” to the current “Windsor.” 
Edward VIII had an activist streak and a political bent — including admiration for Hitler — which could not be tolerated. A pretext was cooked-up to force his abdication in 1936. The following year, Edward visited Hitler with his American wife. Just look at how both of them light up in his presence.

This bit of history brings us to the new King, Charles. Unlike Victoria and Elizabeth, but very much like his granduncle Edward, Charles has not been one to shy away from making political statements and openly advocating for policy changes. Heck — Charlie makes Edward seem shy in comparison! However, unlike Edward, Charles has always remained in good standing with both the UK Judenpresse and the parliamentary class. Why the double standard, you ask?

It’s very simple. Goofy Charlie’s political forays — specifically his advocacy of the Climate Con and his condemnation of Vlad the Bad —  align perfectly with those of “The House.” It’s not that royals aren’t allowed to dabble in politics. If the political posturing is “correct,” then a prince, a queen, a king etc may speak as he please, provided it pleases Rothschild and the Global Crime Syndicate. Unless the White Hats have this creep (who, for all we know, may have had his ex-wife, Diana, murdered) under some sort of submission, expect to hear more nonsense coming from the pretend “king” of England. It’s also possible that, as King Charles, he may decide to finally keep quiet on these matters, especially since his brother, Andrew, was hooked up with Mossad pedo-sex-traffickers Epstein & Maxwell. Either way, we hope he will keep his stupid mouth shut. Better yet, we’d like to see someone shut his treasonous mouth, literally.

The Queen is dead. Short-lived be the King.

* This just in from reader Tom K: The number of days between Q’s very first post on October 28, 2017 and the Queen’s death is 1776 — the year during which the American colonies declared their independence from the Britain of Queen Elizabeth’s great great great great grandfather, King George III. Coincidence?

1. A Global Warmist // 2. A Putin-hater // 3. Not many people can get away with disrespectfully sticking a finger in Charles’s chest. Rothschild can!

WW 2 Truth: In Defense of Neville Chamberlain

Picture
Neville Chamberlain
Picture
On the subject of Neville Chamberlain and World War II, the circle-jerk Fake Historians all parrot the same line of “consensus” …..

Appeasement! – Appeasement!
Appeasement! – Appeasement! Appeasement! – Appeasement!
Picture
Blah…
Picture
Blah…
Picture
Blah!
Picture
Blah…
Picture
Blah…
Picture
Blah!

Enter the word “appeasement” into a Google Search browser, and then click on “Images.” You will see image after image after image of UK Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain, whose very name has long since become synonymous with “appeasement” and weakness in the face of a bully.

As the tiresome cliched story vomited out ad nauseam by the High Priests of circle-jerk Quackademia goes, Chamberlain “appeased” Hitler at the Munich Conference(September 1938) by handing over Czechoslovakia to his domination. War was thus temporarily averted, but Hitler was now emboldened by Chamberlain’s “appeasement.”

That’s the official moronic moralism — a fable that is routinely resurrected and repeated to wrongly describe the dangers of “appeasing” this or that contemporary  bad-guy-of-the-month.
NOW, ONCE AGAIN, THE REAL HISTORY!

Picture
Picture
At the conclusion of World War I, the victorious allies rewrote the map of Central & Eastern Europe. The artificial state of “Czechoslovakia” was pieced together in 1918, combining Czechs, Germans & Slovaks under the new state. Additional minorities of Romanians, Hungarians, and Poles were also forced to live under this ‘Frankenstein’ state. The German portion (formerly part of the Austro-Hungarian Empire) was a long strip of northern territory known as “Sudetenland.”
Picture
During the mid 1930’s, a closet Communist named Edvard Benes is President of Czechoslovakia. Under his regime, Germans endure brutal attacks and oppression at the hands of Marxists. The 3,500,000 Sudetenland Germans wish to join their German brothers under Hitler’s Reich, but are denied the right of self determination by the pro Stalinist Benes government.
Picture
With Stalin and friends in 1935
Picture
During this time, Jewish & Globalist warmongers in Great Britain are maneuvering Britain into a war against Germany. The Czechoslovakia-Sudetenland controversy is the perfect “hot spot” to get the war started.
Picture
In an attempt to force Hitler’s hand, Czech Marxists intensify their abuse of the helpless Germans.
Picture
Hitler: “I want peace with England!”
Picture
Picture
In an 11th hour attempt to avoid war, Hitler invites three European leaders for a conference in Munich.The Munich Conference is attended by four European heads of State. Hitler, Mussolini of Italy, Daladier of France, and Chamberlain of Britain meet in good faith for the purpose of resolving the crisis triggered by the artificial gangster State of Czechoslovakia.
Picture
The parties agree that the Sudetenland should be united with Germany, and that the Slovaks should have their own State. (Slovak Republic 1939-1945).
Picture
The fake Czechoslovakian state is dissolved and Germany later establishes autonomous protectorates over what remains (Bohemia & Moravia). Without a shot being fired, Germans are welcomed into the Reich, while ethnic Czechs and Slovaks also get their own states. Even the minority Poles and Hungarians then join their respective father nations. The Munich Agreement is a win-win-win-win–win for all 5 of Czechoslovakia’s ethnic groups!


The rat Benes soon exiles himself in London, where he resumes plotting with Churchill and the Jewish warmongers who welcome him with open arms.
Picture
Picture
The Munich Agreement: A fair deal for ALL parties! // “THREE INDEPENDENT STATES”
Picture
Picture
Upon his return to Britain, Chamberlain is greeted by a jubilant crowd. He applauds the Munich Agreement as “peace in our time.” All throughout Europe, Chamberlain was praised for his calm diplomacy.
Picture
Meanwhile, the degenerate, drunken, cigar chomping Winston Churchill denounces Neville Chamberlain, “You were given the choice between war and dishonor. You chose dishonor and you will have war.” Churchill said.  British historian David Irving later discovered that the warmongering Czech government had been secretly funneling money to the warmongering Churchill, who was plotting to replace Chamberlain.
Picture
Churchill get chummy with the rat Commie Czech Benes. It was Churchill and his Jewish bosses who wanted war, not Hitler!
Picture
Picture
Upon his triumphal visit to the peacefully liberated German Sudetenland, Hitler and the German troops receive a hero’s welcome.
Picture
Salvador Dali’s painting, “The Enigma of Hitler” depicts a desolate landscape, and telephone dripping tears as Chamberlain’s trademark umbrella hangs from the branch. The painting signifies how Hitler’s desperate phone calls to England were ignored. 
Picture
In the summer of 1939, the Globalist warmongers manipulate Poland (which also holds an oppressed German minority captive) into provoking Hitler, exactly as Czechoslovakia had done in 1938. Once again, Hitler calls for an emergency conference.

But by this time around, poor Neville Chamberlain’s hands have been tied by the powerful pro war forces in Britain. Less than 1 week before the conflict erupts, Chamberlain had been maneuvered into signing a military defense pact with Poland. There will be no peace talks. By September 1 of 1939, the killing of Germans at the hands of Polish-Jewish Communist militias becomes so widespread that Hitler is forced to invade.
Picture
Britain and France immediately declare war upon Germany. The gloating Churchill boasts of how his self fulfilling-prophecy regarding the danger of “appeasement” has come to pass.

Thus was born the FABLE of Neville Chamberlain’s “appeasement.” Conveniently for the fakers of history, Chamberlain himself died (or perhaps was poisoned?) just one year later, in November of 1940.

Fake History 1904: Germany’s “Genocide” in Namibia

Picture
JULY 10, 2021


NY Times:
 Germany Apologized for a Genocide. It’s Nowhere Near Enough.

The supine scum governing occupied Germany have once again wrongly shamed the name of a once-great people. As if the eternal groveling over felonious fables such as the culpability for both World Wars, “Kristallnacht”, “Nazi-looted art”  and “zee gas chambers” , weren’t enough — the Judaized Germans have, in recent years, been pounded over the head over their colonial-era “genocide” in what is today the southwestern African nation of Namibia. After 100 years of “hurtful denial,” the demented and de-balled democrats of Deutschland did finally “admit” to the “genocide.” From the article:

“More than a century ago, Germany carried out a systematic massacre. From 1904 to 1908, in what is now Namibia, the German colonial government killed about 80,000 Herero and Nama people.

In May, 113 years later, Germany at last acknowledged this massacre as genocidal. “In light of Germany’s historical and moral responsibility,” said Germany’s foreign minister, Heiko Maas, “we will ask Namibia and the descendants of the victims for forgiveness.” With this request for forgiveness came a “gesture” of $1.35 billion, to be spent on reconstruction and development projects and health care and training programs over 30 years. The Namibian government accepted. But many Nama and Herero feel it is nowhere near enough.

One of the co-writers of this commie crap, Kavena Hambira, is a descendant of Herero “survivors” ™ — while the other, young Miriam Gleckman-Krut, is a descendant of Holohoax “survivors” . Ah, show us the shekels Kaveena and Miriam. Show us the shekels.

Picture
Kavena Hambira is chairman of the Namibia Institute for Democracy, a “civil society” (Globalist) organization. 
Picture
Generation Z Jewess Miriam Gleckman-Krut is a Ph.D. candidate in sociology at the University of Michigan. The two anti-Whites want more “reparations” for Namibia and would like the German educational system to mandate the teaching about the “massacre.”
Picture
Nambia
Picture
Self-flagellating Germans join up with money-grubbing local Africans to call for “reparations.”.
Picture
In Namibia — “Gimme, gimme, gimme.”

Now, about this “genocide.” First of all, putting all cognitive bias aside, Germans simply don’t do that type of stuff unless they are threatened. Massacres are more of a British or Jewish thing. So, right away, the newly accepted account of this historical event stinks of fiction. Toward the end of the 19th century, Germany, like all other European powers, sought some more “living space” outside of its industrializing and overpopulated confines. In the process of African exploration and colonization, the big bad White Man brought some really cool, never-before-seen stuff to the sparsely-populated continent — ya know, really hi-tech things like the wheel, the plow, 2-story structures, animal harnesses, roads, coal-burning power, shoes, written language, etc. The positive effects of advanced civilization benefited the natives. Some were grateful and friendly. Others, not so much.

A “rebellion” broke out in January 1904 and continued until March 1907. The leader of the Herero tribes, Samuel Maharero ordered the extermination of all German White people, but specifically excluded the English, whose own colonial holdings surrounded those of the Germans. Much like the slaughter of the French Whites of Haiti a century earlier, the preparations for the racial attack were kept secret. The White victims had no time to prepare or protect themselves from the coming bloodbath. Several hundred mounted Herero attacked — killing 123 Germans and torching buildings. Germans who had escaped the farm attacks flocked to urban areas for protection. Within days, the violence had spread north. A German military station was occupied and every soldier was put to death, many of them mutilated.

Just thought we would mention those wee little contextual details which Kaveena & Miriam conveniently deemed not “fit to print.” No “reparations” for descendants of the slaughtered Germans, eh?

Picture
Samuel Maharero — mass murderer of innocent German colonial farmers. 
Picture
The Hereros, NOT the Germans, were the ones aiming for a racial genocide! 
Picture
A 1904 US cartoon by Bob Satterfield depicts savages chasing the Germans — very “politically incorrect” by today’s standards.

News of the slaughter shocked the German mainland. GeneralLothar von Trotha was tasked with protecting the peaceful Germans of Africa — who, by the way, never owned slaves and only laid claim to virgin lands for their fruitful farming which benefited everyone. Von Trotha didn’t mess around. He spoke to the Herero barbarians in the only language they would understand — brute force.

Trotha’s Order:

“The Hereros are German subjects no longer. They have killed, stolen, cut off the ears and other parts of the body of wounded soldiers, and now are too cowardly to want to fight any longer. I announce to the people that whoever hands me one of the chiefs shall receive 1,000 marks, and 5,000 marks for Samuel Maherero. The Herero nation must now leave the country. If it refuses, I shall compel it to do so with the ‘long tube’ (cannon). Any Herero found inside the German frontier, with or without a gun or cattle, will be executed. I shall spare neither women nor children. I shall give the order to drive them away and fire on them. Such are my words to the Herero people.”

He later clarified that women and children were not to be shot:

“The shooting at women and children is to be understood as shooting above their heads, so as to force them to run away. I assume absolutely that this proclamation will result in taking no more male prisoners, but will not degenerate into atrocities against women and children. The latter will run away if one shoots at them a couple of times. The troops will remain conscious of the good reputation of the German soldier.

But Kaveena & Miriam put a different spin on von Lotha. Some self-evident (and very familiar-sounding) fakery, from the article:

“Von Trotha confined survivors to camps, where captives were worked brutally hard and subjected to medical experiments. Some were sterilized; others were injected with arsenic and opium, or deliberately infected with smallpox, typhus and tuberculosis. An all-female camp was established for the purpose of sexual violence.

OK, Miriam. Anything you say. (palm to face, sighing, shaking head) — Say there, Miriam — instead of piously posturing against the Germans; why not lead by example by writing a reparations check to some Palestinian family whose recent ancestors were massacred at Deir Yassin, and whose property was stolen? Heck, youse guys are still jacking-up Gaza from time to time. What do ya say, Miriam? (sound of crickets)

The “indigenous peoples” (who had actually migrated to the German area, probably in search of work and a better life, as usual) were indeed forced out. Was there any other alternative in light of the massacre of Germans? We do not doubt that many Herero (who started the conflict) perished as a result of the war and the banishment; but we sense that the “80,000”( pending) number being bandied about these days has a certain “6 millionish”  malodorous scent about it — meaning, grossly exaggerated.

While researching this matter, a few clues point to a possible “handler” behind the rampaging Africans — a notorious global trouble-maker whose sordid history of arming and inciting savages to attack their enemies is actually spelled out in the American Declaration of Independence. Do the following dots connect? We believe they very well might:

* The African butcher Maherero decreed that no British were to be killed
The Africans were very well-armed and supplied. By whom?
* The British and French inked the “Entente Cordial” in that very same year, 1904. The pact was an anti-
German scheme which, 10 years later, would trigger World War I
* During World War I, South Africa (part of the British Empire) took the German colony (and its diamond mines)

I’ll betcha shekels to bagels that agents of the British Deep State and their Rothschild senior partners masterminded the murderous attack on the German colony in 1904. What do “you guys” think?

Picture

General Lothar von Trotha was disgusted by the brutality of the Hereros. He dealt with them severely, but not unjustly.

Picture

Thomas Jefferson wrote in the Declaration of July 4th: “He (British King George III) has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavored to bring on the inhabitants of our Frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages, whose known Rule of Warfare, is an undistinguished Destruction, of all Ages, Sexes and Conditions.”

Picture
Picture

The British-Rothschild syndicate wanted the whole of southernmost Africa. Only the German (red, white & black) colony of Southwest Africa stood in their way.