Utah Ritualized Sexual Abuse Investigation: The Mormon Church And Child Sexual Abuse

As the public waits for updates on the Utah County Sheriff’s Office investigation into “ritualized child sexual abuse”, we take a deep dive into the history of the allegations which involve The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.

An investigation into ritualized child sexual abuse was first announced by the Utah County Sheriff’s Office on May 31st. The USCO released a statement detailing how “multiple county and federal agencies are investigating reports of ritualistic child sexual abuse from as far back as 1990”.

I have been following the investigation since the initial announcement and reporting on various angles of the story. I encourage readers to spend time with the previous four parts of this series, particularly the third report on the history of similar allegations in the state of Utah.

For this report I will be looking at the historical record, including lawsuits, church records, and previous reporting from other outlets to document the history of allegations involving members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, otherwise known as the Mormon Church. I have spoken with current and former members of the Church who hold varying views regarding allegations of ritualized child sexual abuse.

Some former members of the Church of Mormon believe the church itself is corrupted at its root which allows for these types of activities to happen in the first place. I have also spoken with members of the Church of Mormon who acknowledge that the church has a pedophile problem, but do not believe the core structures of the church are infected by pedophiles.

I want to make it clear that this investigation is not intended to be an attack on anyone’s religious beliefs, or individual Mormons. Nor is this piece intended to paint the picture that the entire Church of Mormon is aware of the reports of child sexual abuse. Although some former members of the church have gone so far as accusing the Church of Mormon of being a front for Masonic and/or Satanic activity, I am not ready to make such a judgement. However, I do believe these controversial claims warrant further investigation.

For part 5 of our series we will be examining 4 different examples of sexual abuse involving members of the Church of Mormon over the last 40 plus years.

The Pace Memo

In 1990, Glenn L. Pace, a general authority in The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, wrote a memo to church leadership describing claims of widespread ritualistic abuse within the church. The memo, dated July 19, 1990, was based on the complaints of sixty members of the church who claimed they were forced to participate in various rituals, sometimes referred to as “satanic.”

“I have met with sixty victims. That number could be twice or three times as many if I did not discipline myself to only one meeting per week,” Pace wrote. “I have not wanted my involvement with this issue to become a handicap in fulfilling my assigned responsibilities. On the other hand, I felt someone needed to pay the price to obtain an intellectual and spiritual conviction as to the seriousness of this problem within the Church.”

Pace sent the memo to LDS President Ezra Taft Benson detailing a year of interviews with alleged ritual abuse survivors in Utah, Idaho, California, and Mexico. The Pace memo describes incidents of ritualized abuse, and even claims of human sacrifice.

Pace would state that he was convinced at least 800 members of the church were involved or had knowledge of the abuse, including bishops, a diocese president, patriarchs, temple workers, members of the church’s Young Women and Young Men groups, and members of the Mormon Tabernacle Choir.

Pace said he believed the purpose of the torture of children was to cause disassociation. He said as a result of the disassociation, children would “develop a new personality to enable them to endure various forms of abuse”.

“The basic objective is premeditated — to systematically and methodically torture and terrorize children until they are forced to dissociate,” Pace wrote. “The torture is not a consequence of the loss of temper, but the execution of well-planned, well-thought out rituals often performed by close relatives. The only escape for the children is to dissociate.”

Once the Pace Memo leaked to the public, the Church of Mormon was quick to dismiss the claims made by Pace. ‘‘It seems to me that even though one actual case is tragic and is one too many, the reports of ritualistic killings are likely overblown, whether they be in connection with members of our church, of other churches or any other segment of society, none of which is immune,” Church spokesman Don LeFevre told the Chicago Tribune at the time of the leak.

Sgt. Don Bell, chief of the Salt Lake City police department’s intelligence unit at the time of the Pace Memo, told the Tribune that his office receives about six reports a year alleging satanic abuse. “I have no doubt whatsoever that these people who describe enduring satanic ritual abuse are victims of some very profound type of abuse,” Bell said. “But I do not believe that there is an inter-generational network of Satanists active in this valley.”

Pace himself told the media he was skeptical of the allegations until he spent a year interviewing survivors of the rituals, many who suffered from disassociated identity disorder and various psychological traumas as a result of the abuse.

As a result of the Pace Memo, the church’s ruling three-man First Presidency, led by Ezra Taft Benson at the time, sent a letter to local church leaders warning about Satanism. The letter warned church members against affiliating with “the occult or those mysterious powers it espouses”.

The Pace Memo going mainstream was one of the reasons the Utah Attorney General’s office launched their own investigation into ritual abuse in 1992. As detailed in part 3 of this series, the Utah Attorney General’s office hired Mike King and Mark Jacobson to further investigate the claims of ritualistic sexual abuse.

The final report for the AG’s office found that “evidence has been uncovered to support the thought that individuals have in the past, and are now committing crime in the name of Satan or other deity”. However, they also found that “the allegations” of organized satanists, even groups of satanists who have permeated every “level of government and religion were unsubstantiated”.

Regarding the accusations against the leadership of the Church of Mormon, Mike King told the Salt Lake Tribune they were “absurd”.

Thirty years after the Pace Memo was released to the public, it has largely been forgotten by those outside of the Church of Mormon. Despite the claims of absurdity by Mike King, Glen Pace remained committed to telling the stories of the alleged victims. In the conclusion to his memo, he writes:

“I also believe that the scriptures cited and many others that could be quoted argue against our being passive about the problem. I don’t want to be known as an alarmist or a fanatic on the issue. Now that I have put what I have learned in writing to you, I feel the issue is in the right court.

“I hope to take a low profile on the subject and get on with the duties which I have been formally assigned. This is not to say I would not be willing to be of service. Over the last eighteen months I have acquired a compassionate love and respect for the victims who are fighting for the safety of their physical lives and, more importantly, their souls.”

Paperdolls

In 1993, a book was published purporting to be the stories of two different women in the Church of Mormon who has suffered sexual abuse within the community. The book, Paperdolls: Healing from Sexual Abuse in Mormon Neighborhoods, is written by the pseudonymous authors April Daniels and Carol Scott.

Publisher’s Weekly described the book as a “moving and often frustrating” document that alternates between the experiences of Daniels and Scott.

“Daniels, a banker in her early 30s, begins to recall the abuse she suffered, beginning when she was five, at the hands of various relatives and neighbors,” the review states. “Scott, the mother of a friend of hers and a psychology professor, records her discovery that many of the same people recently have been abusing her grandchildren. Both women are Mormons, and most of the nearly 20 abusers appear to be church members.”

April claims her parents were “secret alcoholics” who took pornographic photos of each other with the family’s Polaroid camera. She says when she was seven years old she was “orally raped” by her father to the point that her front teeth were loose for six months. April says her mother had a nervous breakdown and never noticed or commented on the smell of urine on her clothes, the blood and semen on her underwear, or the hours she cried at night.

While Carol and April do not describe the abuse as “Satanic”, Carol did believe that “touching parties” had a ritualized element to them. She outlined how first the children would be shown pornographic movies of other children before being made to undress and masturbate each other. This would be followed by oral and anal sex with everyone present.

After the publication of Paperdolls there were apparently internal discussions among the church leadershipregarding the true identities of the women and their alleged abusers. However, if the stories are indeed accurate, it does not appear anyone was ever held accountable.

Leaving The Saints

In 2005, Martha Beck, daughter of Mormon scholar Hugh Nibley, released the book, Leaving the Saints: how I lost the Mormons and found my faith. Beck’s book was controversial for accusations that she was sexually abused by her father, and for her claim of recovered memories of the abuse.

Beck says that church leadership were aware of her father’s crimes and chose to do nothing. Further, she accuses the church leadership of aiding his crimes, by failing to act.

“I speculated about how widely gossip about my accusations had already spread through the Latter-day Saint community, a community singularly skilled at sweeping allegations of sexual abuse under various homespun carpets,” Beck writes. “I imagined that certain people now looked at me strangely, spoke to me in guarded, hesitant tones. I suspected that even though the Mormon powers that be might not actually threaten my life, they would probably try to ruin it. Yes, these suspicions were outlandish. Yes, they were paranoid. And yes, they were completely accurate.”

On page 261 of her book, she laments the fact that more hasn’t been done to establish whether child sexual abuse is more common in Mormon country than in the rest of the United States.

“Personally, I think the answer is yes, particularly in the core population of Mormons who are descended from polygamous ancestors,” she writes. “Since moving away from Utah and working as a life coach for hundreds of people from all walks of life, I have encountered only a handful who say they were sexually abused as children. In Provo, at the Lord’s University, it seemed that I couldn’t open my car door without smacking an incest survivor.”

Warren Jeffs

In the chronology of the sexual abuse in the larger Mormon community, the case of Warren Jeffs looms large. Jeffs is a convicted pedophile and former president of the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (FLDS Church), a denomination of the Church of Mormon which still practices polygamy.

Warren Jeffs’ father, Rulon Jeffs, became the president of the FLDS Church in 1986. This eventually paved the way for Warren to assume power in the church and begin amassing his own cult following which he ruled with an iron fist. Eventually, the accusations against Warren would enlighten the outside world to what exactly was taking place at Jeffs’ Yearning for Zion Ranch in Eldorado, Texas.

While we don’t have the space here to do a full exposition of Warren Jeffs and his rise and fall within the FLDS Church, it is worth noting a few points about his disturbing saga.

First, the case against Jeff’s includes accusations of rape and sexual assault by Jeffs’ own nephew, Brent Jeffs. In July 2004, Brent Jeffs filed a lawsuit that Warren Jeffs had anally raped him at the FLDS Church’s Salt Lake Valley compound in the late 1980s. Brent Jeffs wrote a memoir titled Lost Boy describing various incidents of child sexual abuse at the hands of Warren Jeffs, his brothers, and other family members. The sexual abuse happened when Brent Jeffs was 5 or 6 years old.

Brent’s brother Clayne also made accusations against Warren Jeffs before committing suicide.

Second, Warren Jeffs own children also accused him of sexually abusing them. The accusations make it clear that the case against Jeffs was not only about polygamy, as some have claimed, but about a serial pedophile who was enabled by the community around him who regarded him as a prophet of God.

Although the FLDS is a separate organization from the larger, mainstream LDS Church, the fact remains that silence from church members, family members, and church leadership allowed the crimes of Warren Jeffs to persist as long as they did.

For those wanting to know more about this topic, I recommend watching the documentary series, Keep Sweet: Pray and Obey.

Russell M. Nelson

The most recent example of accusations against Mormon Church leadership involves the current president of the church, Russel M. Nelson. Nelson is a retired surgeon who served in various church positions before becoming a member of the LDS Church’s Quorum of the Twelve Apostles for nearly 34 years, eventually becoming church president in January 2018. Nelson is considered a prophet by members of the LDS Church.

However, by late 2018 it was reported that a lawsuit was attempting to force Nelson to testify regarding allegations his daughter and son-in-law had been involved in sexual abuse of children.

FOX13 in Utah reported on the lawsuit:

“The lawsuit was filed in federal court in Salt Lake City on Wednesday by six unnamed people listed only as “Jane Doe” and “John Doe” against unnamed “Doe 1 Male Defendant” and “Doe 2 Female Defendant.” However, Brenda and Richard Miles’ attorney publicly disclosed their names after the lawsuit was filed and said they vigorously deny the allegations.”

FOX 13 reports that the lawsuit alleges that in 1985, a man only identified as “Perpetrator” in the court papers sexually abused his children. The lawsuit claims a 16-year-old babysitter was both a victim and an abuser, and later committed suicide.

The plaintiffs allege that “DOE 1 MALE DEFENDANT” and “DOE 2 FEMALE DEFENDANT” ran “touching parties” at their home and the Perpetrator’s home. These parties were attended by friends of the Defendants and Perpetrator.

The mother of the children told FOX 13 she reported the abuse to police, but they failed to pursue the case. She also said when LDS Church leaders were told of the incidents they did nothing and an Elder Neal A. Maxwell instructed them to “forgive and forget.”

“I assumed the highest leaders in the church would want to help my children heal, that the perpetrators would be put in jail. I was very quickly disillusioned about that,” she told FOX 13.

It would be revealed that the defendants were indeed Brenda and Richard Miles, daughter and son-in-law of Russell Nelson. James Jardine, lawyer for the Miles’, told FOX 13 “there’s no truth to these allegations. The Miles did not abuse these children or anyone else”.

Jardine said Bountiful Police — where the abuse is alleged to have happened — investigated the accusations in the 1980’s and concluded there was nothing to the claims. The Miles immediately filed a motion to dismiss the case with the U.S. District Court in Salt Lake City.

By December of 2018 an attorney representing six unnamed plaintiffs called for an early deposition of LDS Church President Russell M. Nelson. “Russell M. Nelson is simply a witness,” Craig Vernon, the attorney for the plaintiffs, told FOX 13.

Vernon said he was attempting to depose Nelson and Craig Smith, who was the president over the Bountiful ward at the time of the allegations, because James Jardine’s effort to delay the case until the Utah Supreme Court ruled on the issue of statutes of limitations in sexual abuse lawsuits.

Vernon argued that Nelson was 94 at the time and a delay could endanger the case. “Russell M. Nelson has information that’s relevant. He was there right after this came to light,” Vernon told FOX 13 in December 2018.

On January 6, 2019, the LDS Church would release their own statement defending Nelson and pushing back on the idea that he needed to be deposed. “Much of the abuse scare has been attributed to an over-reliance on recovered-memory therapy, a disowned practice which has the potential to create or ‘plant’ false memories through hypnosis, repetition and the power of suggestion,” the Church wrote.

Ten days later, U.S. District Judge Jill Parrish denied the motion to speed up the deposition of Nelson.

By summer 2020, the case would be dismissed due to a ruling by the Utah Supreme Court regarding statutes of limitations for sexual abuse claims. Judge Parrish agreed to dismiss the lawsuit at the request of lawyers for both the six unnamed plaintiffs, and Brenda and Richard Miles. The lawsuit was dismissed with prejudice so it cannot be refiled again.

“The Miles brought a motion to dismiss arguing that the new (2015) statute extending the time to sue perpetrators was unconstitutional. Our case was stayed so that very issue could be determined by the Utah Supreme Court in Mitchell v Roberts. Our case was eviscerated when it was determined that these claims could not be revived and that this statute was unconstitutional,” Craig Vernon told FOX 13.

With the case dismissed with prejudice it is difficult to imagine how the public might learn if the accusations were true, and, clearly, no one will be held accountable for the alleged crimes.

The 2021 Investigation By The UCSO

This history now brings us full circle to the current investigation being conducted by the Utah County Sheriff’s Office. For the last five weeks I have explored various elements of this case, interviewing current and former members of the LDS Church; speaking with Sgt Spencer Cannon of the UCSO, and poring over the documents related to the 2012 case against David Lee Hamblin.

I will continue to report any future updates involving the Sheriff’s Office investigation. I am also still open to receiving emails and messages from those who have a story to share relating to ritualized child sexual abuse in Utah, and elsewhere.

While I can’t speak to the validity of every single claim made regarding the LDS Church and the apparent abundance of sex rings in Utah, I can say, without a doubt, that these types of criminal activities do happen, and are often dismissed by the propagandized public, the compliant corporate media, and in some cases, law enforcement as well.

The only way we will ever get to the truth of the claims of ritualized sexual abuse of children is to listen to the alleged victims and conduct independent, transparent investigations into their claims. Unfortunately, many of the alleged victims have been ignored for decades, only to be told later in life that the statute of limitations has run out and their abusers cannot be held accountable.

We Have Arrived Into The Dystopian Future Dreamed Up By Science Fiction Writers

By John W. Whitehead,

The Internet is watching us now. If they want to. They can see what sites you visit. In the future, television will be watching us, and customizing itself to what it knows about us. The thrilling thing is, that will make us feel we’re part of the medium. The scary thing is, we’ll lose our right to privacy. An ad will appear in the air around us, talking directly to us.” — Director Steven Spielberg, Minority Report

We have arrived, way ahead of schedule, into the dystopian future dreamed up by such science fiction writers as George Orwell (Eric Arthur Blair)Aldous Huxley, Margaret Atwood and Philip K. Dick.

Much like Orwell’s Big Brother in 1984, the government and its corporate spies now watch our every move.

Much like Huxley’s A Brave New World, we are churning out a society of watchers who “have their liberties taken away from them, but … rather enjoy it, because they [are] distracted from any desire to rebel by propaganda or brainwashing.”

Much like Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale, the populace is now taught to “know their place and their duties, to understand that they have no real rights but will be protected up to a point if they conform, and to think so poorly of themselves that they will accept their assigned fate and not rebel or run away.”

And in keeping with Philip K. Dick’s darkly prophetic vision of a dystopian police state—which became the basis for Steven Spielberg’s futuristic thriller Minority Report which was released 20 years ago—we are now trapped into a world in which the government is all-seeing, all-knowing and all-powerful, and if you dare to step out of line, dark-clad police SWAT teams and pre-crime units will crack a few skulls to bring the populace under control.

Minority Report is set in the year 2054, but it could just as well have taken place in 2022.

Seemingly taking its cue from science fiction, technology has moved so fast in the short time since Minority Report premiered in 2002 that what once seemed futuristic no longer occupies the realm of science fiction.

Incredibly, as the various nascent technologies employed and shared by the government and corporations alike—facial recognition, iris scanners, massive databases, behavior prediction software, and so on—are incorporated into a complex, interwoven cyber network aimed at tracking our movements, predicting our thoughts and controlling our behavior, Spielberg’s unnerving vision of the future is fast becoming our reality.

Both worlds — our present-day reality and Spielberg’s celluloid vision of the future—are characterized by widespread surveillance, behavior prediction technologies, data mining, fusion centers, driverless cars, voice-controlled homes, facial recognition systems, cybugs and drones, and predictive policing (pre-crime) aimed at capturing would-be criminals before they can do any damage.

Surveillance cameras are everywhere. Government agents listen in on our telephone calls and read our emails. Political correctness — a philosophy that discourages diversity — has become a guiding principle of modern society.

The courts have shredded the Fourth Amendment’s protections against unreasonable searches and seizures. In fact, SWAT teams battering down doors without search warrants and FBI agents acting as a secret police that investigate dissenting citizens are common occurrences in contemporary America.

We are increasingly ruled by multi-corporations wedded to the police state. Much of the population is either hooked on illegal drugs or ones prescribed by doctors. And bodily privacy and integrity has been utterly eviscerated by a prevailing view that Americans have no rights over what happens to their bodies during an encounter with government officials, who are allowed to search, seize, strip, scan, spy on, probe, pat down, taser, and arrest any individual at any time and for the slightest provocation.

All of this has come about with little more than a whimper from an oblivious American populace largely comprised of nonreaders and television and internet zombies, but we have been warned about such an ominous future in novels and movies for years.

The following 15 films may be the best representation of what we now face as a society.

Fahrenheit 451 (1966). Adapted from Ray Bradbury’s novel and directed by Francois Truffaut, this film depicts a futuristic society in which books are banned, and firemen ironically are called on to burn contraband books—451 Fahrenheit being the temperature at which books burn. Montag is a fireman who develops a conscience and begins to question his book burning. This film is an adept metaphor for our obsessively politically correct society where virtually everyone now pre-censors speech. Here, a brainwashed people addicted to television and drugs do little to resist governmental oppressors.

2001: A Space Odyssey (1968). The plot of Stanley Kubrick’s masterpiece, as based on an Arthur C. Clarke short story, revolves around a space voyage to Jupiter. The astronauts soon learn, however, that the fully automated ship is orchestrated by a computer system — known as HAL 9000 — which has become an autonomous thinking being that will even murder to retain control. The idea is that at some point in human evolution, technology in the form of artificial intelligence will become autonomous and human beings will become mere appendages of technology. In fact, at present, we are seeing this development with massive databases generated and controlled by the government that are administered by such secretive agencies as the National Security Agency and sweep all websites and other information devices collecting information on average citizens. We are being watched from cradle to grave.

Planet of the Apes (1968). Based on Pierre Boulle’s novel, astronauts crash on a planet where apes are the masters and humans are treated as brutes and slaves. While fleeing from gorillas on horseback, astronaut Taylor is shot in the throat, captured and housed in a cage. From there, Taylor begins a journey wherein the truth revealed is that the planet was once controlled by technologically advanced humans who destroyed civilization. Taylor’s trek to the ominous Forbidden Zone reveals the startling fact that he was on planet earth all along. Descending into a fit of rage at what he sees in the final scene, Taylor screams: “We finally really did it. You maniacs! You blew it up! Damn you.” The lesson is obvious, but will we listen? The script, although rewritten, was initially drafted by Rod Serling and retains Serling’s Twilight Zone-ish ending.

THX 1138 (1970). George Lucas’ directorial debut, this is a somber view of a dehumanized society totally controlled by a police state. The people are force-fed drugs to keep them passive, and they no longer have names but only letter/number combinations such as THX 1138. Any citizen who steps out of line is quickly brought into compliance by robotic police equipped with “pain prods” — electro-shock batons. Sound like tasers?

A Clockwork Orange (1971). Director Stanley Kubrick presents a future ruled by sadistic punk gangs and a chaotic government that cracks down on its citizens sporadically. Alex is a violent punk who finds himself in the grinding, crushing wheels of injustice. This film may accurately portray the future of western society that grinds to a halt as oil supplies diminish, environmental crises increase, chaos rules, and the only thing left is brute force.

Soylent Green (1973). Set in a futuristic overpopulated New York City, the people depend on synthetic foods manufactured by the Soylent Corporation. A policeman investigating a murder discovers the grisly truth about what soylent green is really made of. The theme is chaos where the world is ruled by ruthless corporations whose only goal is greed and profit. Sound familiar?

Blade Runner (1982). In a 21st century Los Angeles, a world-weary cop tracks down a handful of renegade “replicants” (synthetically produced human slaves). Life is now dominated by mega-corporations, and people sleepwalk along rain-drenched streets. This is a world where human life is cheap, and where anyone can be exterminated at will by the police (or blade runners). Based upon a Philip K. Dick novel, this exquisite Ridley Scott film questions what it means to be human in an inhuman world.

Nineteen Eighty-Four (1984). The best adaptation of Orwell’s dark tale, this film visualizes the total loss of freedom in a world dominated by technology and its misuse, and the crushing inhumanity of an omniscient state. The government controls the masses by controlling their thoughts, altering history and changing the meaning of words. Winston Smith is a doubter who turns to self-expression through his diary and then begins questioning the ways and methods of Big Brother before being re-educated in a most brutal fashion.

Brazil (1985). Sharing a similar vision of the near future as 1984 and Franz Kafka’s novel The Trial, this is arguably director Terry Gilliam’s best work, one replete with a merging of the fantastic and stark reality. Here, a mother-dominated, hapless clerk takes refuge in flights of fantasy to escape the ordinary drabness of life. Caught within the chaotic tentacles of a police state, the longing for more innocent, free times lies behind the vicious surface of this film.

They Live (1988). John Carpenter’s bizarre sci-fi social satire action film assumes the future has already arrived. John Nada is a homeless person who stumbles across a resistance movement and finds a pair of sunglasses that enables him to see the real world around him. What he discovers is a world controlled by ominous beings who bombard the citizens with subliminal messages such as “obey” and “conform.” Carpenter manages to make an effective political point about the underclass — that is, everyone except those in power. The point: we, the prisoners of our devices, are too busy sucking up the entertainment trivia beamed into our brains and attacking each other up to start an effective resistance movement.

The Matrix (1999). The story centers on a computer programmer Thomas A. Anderson, secretly a hacker known by the alias “Neo,” who begins a relentless quest to learn the meaning of “The Matrix” — cryptic references that appear on his computer. Neo’s search leads him to Morpheus who reveals the truth that the present reality is not what it seems and that Anderson is actually living in the future — 2199. Humanity is at war against technology which has taken the form of intelligent beings, and Neo is actually living in The Matrix, an illusionary world that appears to be set in the present in order to keep the humans docile and under control. Neo soon joins Morpheus and his cohorts in a rebellion against the machines that use SWAT team tactics to keep things under control.

Minority Report (2002). Based on a short story by Philip K. Dick and directed by Steven Spielberg, the film offers a special effect-laden, techno-vision of a futuristic world in which the government is all-seeing, all-knowing and all-powerful. And if you dare to step out of line, dark-clad police SWAT teams will bring you under control. The setting is 2054 where PreCrime, a specialized police unit, apprehends criminals before they can commit the crime. Captain Anderton is the chief of the Washington, DC, PreCrime force which uses future visions generated by “pre-cogs” (mutated humans with precognitive abilities) to stop murders. Soon Anderton becomes the focus of an investigation when the precogs predict he will commit a murder. But the system can be manipulated. This film raises the issue of the danger of technology operating autonomously — which will happen eventually if it has not already occurred. To a hammer, all the world looks like a nail. In the same way, to a police state computer, we all look like suspects. In fact, before long, we all may be mere extensions or appendages of the police state — all suspects in a world commandeered by machines.

V for Vendetta (2006). This film depicts a society ruled by a corrupt and totalitarian government where everything is run by an abusive secret police. A vigilante named V dons a mask and leads a rebellion against the state. The subtext here is that authoritarian regimes through repression create their own enemies — that is, terrorists — forcing government agents and terrorists into a recurring cycle of violence. And who is caught in the middle? The citizens, of course. This film has a cult following among various underground political groups such as Anonymous, whose members wear the same Guy Fawkes mask as that worn by V.

Children of Men (2006). This film portrays a futuristic world without hope since humankind has lost its ability to procreate. Civilization has descended into chaos and is held together by a military state and a government that attempts to keep its totalitarian stronghold on the population. Most governments have collapsed, leaving Great Britain as one of the few remaining intact societies. As a result, millions of refugees seek asylum only to be rounded up and detained by the police. Suicide is a viable option as a suicide kit called Quietus is promoted on billboards and on television and newspapers. But hope for a new day comes when a woman becomes inexplicably pregnant.

Land of the Blind (2006). In this dark political satire, tyrannical rulers are overthrown by new leaders who prove to be just as evil as their predecessors. Maximilian II is a demented fascist ruler of a troubled land named Everycountry who has two main interests: tormenting his underlings and running his country’s movie industry. Citizens who are perceived as questioning the state are sent to “re-education camps” where the state’s concept of reality is drummed into their heads. Joe, a prison guard, is emotionally moved by the prisoner and renowned author Thorne and eventually joins a coup to remove the sadistic Maximilian, replacing him with Thorne. But soon Joe finds himself the target of the new government.

All of these films — and the writers who inspired them — understood what many Americans, caught up in their partisan, flag-waving, zombified states, are still struggling to come to terms with: that there is no such thing as a government organized for the good of the people. Even the best intentions among those in government inevitably give way to the desire to maintain power and control at all costs.

Eventually, as I make clear in my book Battlefield America: The War on the American People and in its fictional counterpart The Erik Blair Diaries, even the sleepwalking masses (who remain convinced that all of the bad things happening in the police state — the police shootings, the police beatings, the raids, the roadside strip searches—are happening to other people) will have to wake up.

Sooner or later, the things happening to other people will start happening to us.

When that painful reality sinks in, it will hit with the force of a SWAT team crashing through your door, a taser being aimed at your stomach, and a gun pointed at your head. And there will be no channel to change, no reality to alter, and no manufactured farce to hide behind.

As George Orwell (Eric Arthur Blair) warned, “If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face forever.”