Please do your own research. The information I share is only a catalyst to expanding ones confined consciousness. I have NO desire for anyone to blindly believe or agree with what I share. Seek the truth for yourself and put your own puzzle together that has been presented to you. I'm not here to teach, preach or lead, but rather assist in awakening the consciousness of the collective from its temporary dormancy.
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. on Wednesday in Boston, his family’s longtime base of power, announcing his bid for the Democratic presidential nomination.
NY Times: Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Makes His White House Run Official Robert Kennedy Jr. was nearly 10 years old when his uncle, President John F. Kennedy, had his head blown off by CIA-Mossad snipers on November 22, 1963. He was 14 1/2 years old when his father, Robert Kennedy Sr. was murdered by the same Cabal (framing a Palestinian) while on his way to the US presidency in 1968. So, for RFK Jr. — much like his cousin JFK Jr. (murdered by Killary Clinton’s Mafia in 1999) — this struggle against The Cabal is deeply personal. Because we have long believed that RFK Jr. is in league with Trump and the Q team, the announcement of his presidential campaign for 2024 ought not be taken seriously. Instead, it should be interpreted as a strategic flanking attack upon the “bad guys” coming from within the ranks of well-meaning, semi-sane but deluded Democrat voters.
Naturally, this type of historical context would be omitted from a Slimes article. After all, JFK and RFK were each killed by a “lone nut gunman,” and John-John was a reckless pilot, dontcha’ know? (rolling eyes) But the Slimes’ lies of omission — the most effective type of lie there is — don’t end there. The juiciest parts of RFK Jr.’s announcement speech were completely ignored. Here’s an example of the media template controlled crap fed to the readers:
“Robert F. Kennedy Jr. announced a presidential campaign on Wednesday built on re-litigating Covid-19 shutdowns and shaking Americans’ faith in science.
In a rambling speech lasting nearly two hours, Mr. Kennedy, 69, …. aimed criticisms at the pharmaceutical industry. … For Mr. Kennedy, the cause is vaccine skepticism, which he cloaked in terms of truth-seeking and free speech, a crusade that in the past led him to falsely link childhood vaccines to autism. At the height of the Covid-19 pandemic, he sought to undermine public trust in vaccines…. Both Facebook and Instagram took down accounts of a group he runs for spreading medical misinformation.
Family members have accused Mr. Kennedy of sowing distrust in the science behind vaccines. His campaign has appalled members of his famous Democratic clan.” *
Crazy, single-issue, anti-vax, “conspiracy theorist” Uncle Bobby who doesn’t understand science. But is that really all there was to his “rambling speech” and to his campaign?
Robert Kennedy Jr. was nearly 10 years old when his uncle, President John F. Kennedy, had his head blown off by CIA-Mossad snipers on November 22, 1963. He was 14 1/2 years old when his father, Robert Kennedy Sr. was murdered by the same Cabal (framing a Palestinian) while on his way to the US presidency in 1968. So, for RFK Jr. — much like his cousin JFK Jr. (murdered by Killary Clinton’s Mafia in 1999) — this struggle against The Cabal is deeply personal. Because we have long believed that RFK Jr. is in league with Trump and the Q team, the announcement of his presidential campaign for 2024 ought not be taken seriously. Instead, it should be interpreted as a strategic flanking attack upon the “bad guys” coming from within the ranks of well-meaning, semi-sane but deluded Democrat voters.
Naturally, this type of historical context would be omitted from a Slimes article. After all, JFK and RFK were each killed by a “lone nut gunman,” and John-John was a reckless pilot, dontcha’ know? (rolling eyes) But the Slimes’ lies of omission — the most effective type of lie there is — don’t end there. The juiciest parts of RFK Jr.’s announcement speech were completely ignored. Here’s an example of the media template controlled crap fed to the readers:
“Robert F. Kennedy Jr. announced a presidential campaign on Wednesday built on re-litigating Covid-19 shutdowns and shaking Americans’ faith in science.
In a rambling speech lasting nearly two hours, Mr. Kennedy, 69, …. aimed criticisms at the pharmaceutical industry. … For Mr. Kennedy, the cause is vaccine skepticism, which he cloaked in terms of truth-seeking and free speech, a crusade that in the past led him to falsely link childhood vaccines to autism. At the height of the Covid-19 pandemic, he sought to undermine public trust in vaccines…. Both Facebook and Instagram took down accounts of a group he runs for spreading medical misinformation.
Family members have accused Mr. Kennedy of sowing distrust in the science behind vaccines. His campaign has appalled members of his famous Democratic clan.” *
Crazy, single-issue, anti-vax, “conspiracy theorist” Uncle Bobby who doesn’t understand science. But is that really all there was to his “rambling speech” and to his campaign?
President John F. Kennedy with his nephew, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.RFK Sr. & Jr.They killed his uncle and his father — and Bobby Jr. knows it.
I went to the original source (imagine that!) and listened to RFK’s entire speech. Surprise surprise — it was NOT just a nearly 2-hour rant about “anti-vax” — which he only touched upon for a few minutes. There were many other truth bombs dropped by RFK that “they” evidently don’t want you to know about. Though not mentioned in this particular speech, RFK has stated that the CIA killed both his uncle and father; and that the CIA, Johns Hopkins University, the WHO and the Bill Gates Foundation conspired to stage “Covid” as a pretext for establishing totalitarian control over the population.
The key points of RFK’s ‘rambling speech’ (which, in spite of a few liberal bromides here and there, was actually quite impressive) are summarized below:
* The government lies. * The media lies. * Everyone now knows that the government and media lie. * The media-government complex attacks alternative media sources because they feel threatened by them. * The government and many large corporations now conspire together. * JFK and RFK were opposed to involvement in the Vietnam War. * The New York Times was opposed to RFK’s campaign in 1968. * Politicians divide people by class and race. * The Covid lockdowns were unnecessary and deadly. * Economic distress causes 30,000 excess deaths per 1 point of increased unemployment. * Lockdown-related weight gain and suicide also increased the death rate. * Deep State operatives lied to JFK about the Bay of Pigs (Cuba) and nearly triggered World War III. * JFK wanted to “splinter the CIA into a thousand pieces.” * The US should not support “regime change” in Russia, and should seek to end the war in Ukraine. * Is Ukraine being used as a pawn in a proxy war? (asked rhetorically) * War, bailouts and lockdowns were paid for with money-printing, which caused the current inflation. * Inflation is a government tax on the poor and middle class. * The US killed 1 million Iraqis. * The US destabilized Syria and drove refugees into Europe. * The Democrats are becoming the party of warmongering “neocons with woke bobble-heads” — not JFK Democrats.
Tell it, Bobby. Tell it! —- because Sulzberger’s seditious censoring Times sure as hell won’t.
*note: It was very interesting (and very telling) to observe that RFK Jr. barely laid a glove on Trump (only a few obligatory but vague soft shots) while savaging the neo-cons, the CIA and the Democrats.
RFK Jr. and Trump operative Tucker Carlson get along very well.Trump and JFK Jr. were friends.Q suggests that HRC (Hillary Rodham Clinton) killed JFK Jr., and the 1999 plane crash was, for Trump, “the start.”
Welcome to my prophetic nightmare — the one that didn’t come true.
Like most of “you guys,” I shall never forget Election Night, November 8th, 2016 — albeit for a different reason. It was memorable not for the unexpected excitement over the unforeseen unfolding and shocking final defeat of Satanic Witch Killary Clinton (not a metaphor, seriously, the bitch worships Satan). I didn’t even stay up to watch the historic event. No, the permanent memory was the sense of foreboding, despair and despondence I keenly felt when going to bed early that night. You see, none of us knew about Q and the White Hats acting as Trump’s invisible “guardian angels” back then.
My partner at the time was surprised to see me turn in so early and asked why I wasn’t going to stay up to watch some of the results. I told her that both the polls and the vote itself were rigged, and that there was no way that (((the powers that be))) would ever allow her to lose. Imagine my shock the following morning!
I had truly believed that it was over before it began, and that publication on my Blog and articles would in due time be branded as illegal “hate speech” by Killary’s wicked regime. Indeed, months prior to the election, Killary herself openly spoke about the importance of working with “our friends in the technology world” to “deny online space“ to “terrorists.”
Killary:
“You’re going to hear all of the usual complaints—you know, ‘freedom of speech,’ etc., but if we truly are in a war against terrorism and we are truly looking for ways to shut off their funding, shut off the flow of foreign fighters, then we’ve got to shut off their means of communicating.”
Now, once one understands that “Islamic Terrorism” was created and controlled by the very same “usual suspects” who created and controlled the Clinton Crime Syndicate, the question arises: Who would be the real targets of Killary’s internet censorship proposal? Hmmm? Look in mirror. Hell’s Bells of “terrorist” censorship were tolling for thee, boys and girls! No doubt about it, the horrible harridan, the loony lesbian, the crooked communist was fixin’ to close down the “digital army” of truthers once and for all.
But even such a personal disappointment I could bear because it would have been nothing compared to the Hell-on-Earth that she — in service to her dark lord — was plotting to visit upon humanity. For the benefit of the “black-pilled” holdouts who still refuse to acknowledge what the rise of Trump saved us all from, let us pretend that ‘Madam President” is now in the 7th year of her 24/7 glorified crisis-presidency, and review her “accomplishments.” As you go through these points, understand that very little, if any, of this is conjecture or retroactive “prophecy.” This is basic “if-then” flowchart stuff.
1. Me on Election Night, 2016 — expecting Killary to win and being declared a “far right terrorist” in the near future. // 2. Trump “Ditched the Witch” and shocked the world. // 3. Simple flowchart logic reveals where we’d all be by now in the 7th year of our sainted and untouchable “Madam President.”
A basic knowledge the power players behind that Satanic Witch and an understanding of the history of the Clinton Crime Family are all one needs to logically infer the points of this “what if” scenario with near certainty. If Killary was in Year 7, then most or all of the following would likely have happened by now:
As of 2020, American ATM’s would have been churning out the $20 bill with Harriet Tubman face on them — not Andrew Jackson’s. All of the other bills were set for “diversity” modification on the backs as well. In your face, White Man! But it was Trump who ignored the pressure and reversed Obama’s order.
Race tension and riots, stirred up by Al Charlatan and the BLM operatives — with Killary tacitly encouraging the mayhem and capitalizing upon it.
The ISIS proxy war with Syria would either have toppled Assad or led to war with Russia, Iran and China in the Middle East.
The Korean Cold War — with potential to bring the US into war against China — would still be a trigger point.
Ukraine would have been a member of NATO by now — another World War 3 trigger point.
The Supreme Court would have a young 6 out of 9 Marxist majority, with one compromised “centrist” and isolated conservative justices Thomas and Alito both in their 70’s.
The record number of satisfactory to excellent Federal judges appointed by Trump would not be there today — their positions held by vicious Marxist Jews and nasty lesbians instead.
The U.S. would be fully implementing the economically destructive policies of the Paris Climate Accords — including the colossal carbon credit scam and both seen and hidden taxes.
The U.S. would have joined the sovereignty-killing TPP (Trans Pacific Partnership)
The enormous blackmail operation that was Epstein-Maxwell-Wexner Mossad Island would still be in business with no end in sight. Bill Clinton himself was a regular at Epstein-Mossad Island!
With Epstein Island still in business and the US still fully engaged in the Middle East, Israeli warmongering toward Lebanon and Iran would have reached new levels of intensity and insanity.
The US would still be in Afghanistan.
Murderous drone bombings would still be happening all over the Central Asia and Africa.
The CIA-Mossad international proxy army known as ISIS would still be stirring up chaos in as many as 30 different nations.
CIA “Color Revolutions” would still be destabilizing nationalist governments the world over.
“Obama Care” — which was planned to fail — would have been replaced by the total communistic system which Killary, as First Lady, wanted to impose (along with a European-style 22% VAT tax) on the United States in 1993.
Roe vs Wade / unlimited abortion would still be in effect.
“Hate Speech” and “Holocaust Denial” laws — prompted by false flag vandalism attacks — would have been imposed by now along with total Internet censorship.
There would be no border wall (Trump’s was mostly completed and will be totally completed upon his return).
The EPA would be exercising its authority to control CO2 “emissions” and cripple the energy sector.
The Demonrats would have rigged permanent majority control of the House and Senate by now.
The GOP “opposition” would be led by weak traitors such as Paul Ryan, Mitt Romney, the Cheneys, the Bushes et al. (all of whom were publicly humiliated and then disempowered by Trump).
People like Harvey Weinstein, Anthony Fauci, Bill Gates, Andrew Cuomo and so many other Deep State villains who “fell into the Trump Quicksand” would still be prominent.
The Killary administration would have been packed with angry abusive lesbians at all levels.
The Communist John Brennan — or someone even worse — would still be heading the CIA.
The Congressional Freedom Caucus would have remained marginalized as “far right kooks” — instead of now running Congress.
There would NOT currently be an unfolding investigation into Hunter and Joe Biden’s corruption — a trail of fraud that is ultimately going to lead to Obama, Clinton herself and above.
Voter fraud would have been expanded and protected to such an extent that any challenge to the Establishment would have been mathematically impossible by now.
The vast, secret, international child abduction, torture, rape and murder industry would have expanded massively with one of its chief practitioners in the White House.
School shootings (which were all CIA hoaxes) would still be going on and semi-automatic rifles probably banned by now.
The Covid Hoax would still have been launched(probably after 2020). The lockdowns, I-phone “contact tracing,” “stimulus” payments, “variants” and mandatory “self quarantines” would have lasted up to 5 years as the broken world anxiously waited for the magic vaccine.
The Killary-Gates vaccine would have been MANDATORY, genocidal for 10-15% of humanity, and contained tracking chips to monitor and control us in Orwellian fashion.
Covid dissenters would have been subjected to forced isolation in detention camps which Killary once joked about as “fun camps for adults.” (Satanists love to telegraph their evil intentions by joking about them.)
Total demoralization and neutralizing of conservatives with no means of communicating or spreading truth online — Jack Dorsey still at Twitter and no Gab, BitChute, Rumble, Minds, Sovren, Q posts or Truth Social either.
The epic mass misery, war, death, disease, poverty, pessimism, fear and hunger would have positioned the normies of the world up for an easy and accepted transition into “The Great Reset” — a glorious One World Order in which we would “own nothing” and “be happy” packed into storage-unit-sized apartments in herded urban areas and eating fried insects.
And there are more, many more, horrors that we can add to the list — as well as the ‘X-factor” nasty surprises we would not have been able to foresee.
The hate-filled nasty witch glows in the presence of evil Globalist billionaires — all of whom have been attacked and taken down under Trump. (Weinstein is in prison and I believe that Soros and Gates are also in Gitmo — Killary as well.)
1. Totally in league with Klaus Schwab. // 2. The wretched race-hustler / vote fraudster Al Charlatan would have had the ear of “Madam President.” // 3. Imagine the Queen of child-sex-trafficking in the White House!
Do the points of the retroactive forecast not constitute an accurate and objective picture of where the world would be right now with that Satanic, child killing, blood-drinking, lesbian bitch from Hell lording over us and, by extension, the world? Is this in any way an exaggeration of the scope of this Hellish Hag’s evil intent, or that of her NWO bosses?
Did not her first reign as co-president (1993-2001) — during which she and her tranny Attorney General, Janet Reno, roasted and suffocated 76 innocent American men, women and children alive at Waco, Texas — reveal what she was capable of? Did not the likes of George Soros, Mike Bloomberg and Klaus Schwab, in essence, say — both in spoken word and in writing for the consumption of their fellow “elites” — that this was their plan for the world? Is this not what that infamous mural image at the creepy Denver Airport depicts? Do any of the “never-Trumpers” of the “far right” care to dispute the “if-then” validity of the points from the above-listed retroactive forecast?
Donald Trump — who also speaks in code — was NOT exaggerating when he talked about “saving the world” from an “invisible enemy” and “saving 100 million lives.” Actually, his tireless peacemaking and early Covid-lockdown-busting may have saved BILLIONS of lives.
And yet, hearing some of the “black-pilled” among our ranks continue to make inadvertently careless common cause with the Council on Foreign Relations, the US Communist party, the Church of Satan, Soros, Rothschild, the New York Slimes, Hollyweird and Jewish Quackademia by viciously dumping on Trump — whose epic, extremely difficult, dangerous, strategic and time-consuming task isn’t even finished yet — is as astonishing as it is disappointing.
1. Very early in Satanist Killary’s first term as co-president, in 1993, the Feds attacked a harmlessly eccentric Christian sect with tanks and mass-murdered 76 of them (17 of them little children) for no reason at all. // 2. Long before Big Mike Obama, 6′ 2″ strong-jawed, broad-shouldered AG Janet Reno stood eye to eye with Al Gore and Bill Clinton, both 6′ 2″ as well.
Madam President’s Program(thwarted by Donald Trump) World War III + widespread fear and poverty + MANDATORY Gates vaccine (after 5-year lockdown) with pure poison and injected microchips = New World Order.
But but Batman… I read online that Trump is a Globalist. Why didn’t he get rid of the Deep State when he was president? And what about muh bump stocks, and muh Israel, and…… SMACK! — “A vast, deeply-rooted, centuries-old global Mafia is not legally dismantled, by the letter of the law, in a day!”
NY Times:Biden Administration Expected to Move Ahead on a Major Oil Project in Alaska
The decision would allow an enormous $8 billion drilling project in the largest expanse of pristine wilderness in the United States.
Trump’s trusty agent of the CGI & skin mask, working out of a FAKE Oval Office has struck again! In advance of Trump’s inevitable and glorious return, Resident “Joe Biden” is doing something long forbidden by the Green Globalists “in the suites” of The New World Order — that is, authorizing an “enormous” oil development project on virgin land in Alaska. It’s called “The Willow Project.” It was initially approved by the Trump administration until some Communist judge blocked it; but it was the “Biden”administration which actually put it back in play.
How can this be? Do the NWO Globalists want the US to become energy independent all of a sudden? What about all that retarded tommyrot about “carbon footprints” and “emissions” and “renewables.” Equally intriguing is the relative lack of “spontaneous” backlash from the Greens “in the streets.” Rumors of this move had been circulating for a while; so the rent-a-mobs had ample time to organize, but did not. Why aren’t we seeing Greta Gloomberg and Leopedo DiCraprio leading mob marches on Washington DC over this? Silence in the face of massive oil drilling projects in pristine areas of Alaska? Are you kidding me? Is the dangerously subversive 50-year-old “environmentalist movement” dead now?
The best that the controlled Green activists in the streets have been able to muster in opposition against the Willow Project are some pathetic online petitions and press releases. The mob protests are a thing of the past because the de-funded and de-fanged Deep State can’t pull them off anymore.
The demonic little Greta GloombergandLeopedo DiCraprio don’t seem to have that mob-forming magic anymore. Perhaps they are in Gitmo?
The spin of the Slimes article is that “Biden” is doing this in order to lower gas prices as his reelection campaign approaches. That is a severely flawed analysis for five reasons:
1. As the article itself reveals, “Biden’s” fight for this project actually began at the start of his “presidency,” when gas prices were still very low. 2. Prices have been falling rapidly these past few months. 3. The new oil won’t be coming online in time for the 2024 election. 4. “Biden” will lose young Green commie voters over this. 5. “Biden” is not scripted to be re-elected anyway because he isn’t real. Trump must and will return — either through removal of “Biden” for high crimes or a 2024 landslide.
This surprising move — along with so many other acts running totally contrary to Globalist and Zionist objectives — doesn’t make any sense, until one understands that Biden is actually “Biden.” As far as “optics” go, this character is doing a damn good job of scaring the mushy political center squarely into the right side of the spectrum. But when we look deeper at some very important policies, an unmistakable pattern more consistent with MAGAism than Marxism becomes clear. Here’s the running list of the broken promises and unexpected moves (in our favor) — in spite of ‘Biden” having had a Demonrat-majority House and Senate for two whole years:
* “Biden” has NOT implemented the harsh policies of the Paris Climate Con. * “Biden” did NOT rehire the Climate Commies which Trump fired at the EPA. * “Biden” did NOT replace key personnel that Trump placed at the Justice Dept. * “Biden” has NOT repealed Trump’s most important emergency Executive Orders. * “Biden” has NOT repealed the Trump tax cuts. * “Biden” finished off NY Governor Andrew Cuomo by calling for him to resign. * “Biden” is now undermining Bibi Satanyahoo. * “Biden” completed the process of getting US troops out of Afghanistan. * “Biden” – to the dismay of Globalists – is easing sanctions on Syria and engaging with Assad. * “Biden” has NOT delivered the promised weapons and tanks to Ukraine. * “Biden” has NOT repealed Trump’s protective tariffs. * “Biden” has NOT moved to bring the Jukraine into NATO * “Biden” has NOT torn down Trump’s Border Wall and is instead expanding it! * “Biden” has NOT closed down Gitmo and has instead approved funding for it. * “Biden” has NOT pursued any gun control initiatives. * “Biden” did NOT stir up the usual trouble with North Korea. * “Biden” has NOT launched any new wars or proxy wars anywhere in the world (Ukraine conflict is being rigged to help Russia, not Jukraine) * “Biden” has NOT repealed some of Trump’s key immigration policies — even going to court to keep them in place. (The current “optical” wave of border-crashing wetbacks, if they are even real, will be shipped back as soon as Trump returns.)
In order to maintain the important illusion of “Biden” the climate extremist (“optics”), the Willow Project decision was timed to coincide with the announcement that the phantom administration will be “indefinitely” blocking 16 million acres of federally owned lands and waters in Alaska from future drilling (here). This means NOTHING because those areas weren’t being drilled anyway; and the ban can be repealed with the stroke of a pen by a future president. See the magician’s trick here?
Both by action and inaction, “Biden’s” Residential resume constitutes much Trumpism camouflaged by crazy Leftist talk and a necessary bit of superficial (and temporary) scary-as-hell policy. The plan is to awaken the sleepy captive subjects of the Kingdom of Normiedom, while keeping the nation on life-support and viable until Trump rides in on his White Horse. How else to account for a Demonrat wanting to finally open up Alaska? (and those mask lines, and those embarrassing tumbles, and that pitiful stuttering and stammering, and that fake Oval Office etc).
Trust the plan.
“Biden’s” surprising actions on oil drilling do not match his Marxist promises and nor are they consistent with important NWO Globalist directives.
1. Q post about “actors” and “movies” from 5 years ago // 2. Resident “Biden” deserves both an Academy Award and a Congressional Medal of Honor.
NY Times: Conspiracy Theorizing Goes Off the Rails BY PAUL KRUGMAN
Having just pounded this malevolent Marxist Mole back into the pits of Hell (over his vile Russia-bashing) only several days ago, I would generally not revisit the same Times scribbler for at least another few weeks. But this particular piece by Paulie Krugman about “conspiracy theories” is just too bad – and also too good – to pass up. Krugman’s crap is bad because it is deceitful. However, this item is also “good” because — for the astute among us — his pathological obsession with various “conspiracy theories” actually proves their veracity.
Krugman’s prolific propaganda production is like that arcade game of “Whack-a-Mole” — in which no matter how many times you pound the mechanical creature back into his hole, the little son-of-a-bitch — and also his rodent relatives — just keep popping up somewhere else.
Let’s pound this greasy bastard back into Satan’s cesspool once again.
THE GAME OF WHACK-A-MARXIST-MOLE (or rat) NEVER ENDS! Take that, Krugman, And Friedman, And Haberman, And Goldberg, And Brooks, And Sanger, And Meyer, And Landler.
2020: Perverted Paulie — in an obvious attempt to get out ahead of the story — tweeted out that Q-Anon people may have been responsible for downloading child pornography onto his computer. — Sure Paulie, sure.
Krugman: The right is on the attack, claiming that blame for the disaster in Ohio rests on the Biden administration, which it says doesn’t care about or is even actively hostile to white people. Analysis: Let’s put aside, for argument’s sake, our belief that this train drama was staged by the White Hats in order to shame Biden; and let us play along with the “accident” and “disaster” story-line instead. “Biden’s” refusal to visit rural Trump Country in Ohio — sending his little sodomite Secretary of Transportation Pete Buttplug(who looks different these days) instead — is indeed disrespectful and characteristic of the disdain which the “elites” and big city Jews have for White folks in “flyover country.”
Krugman: Right-wing commentators have just invented a whole new class of conspiracy theory* , one that doesn’t even try to explain how the alleged conspiracy * is supposed to work. Conspiracy theories* generally come in two forms: those that involve a small, powerful cabal and those that require that thousands of people collude to hide the truth. Analysis: We’re keeping count of how many times this clever bastard utilizes the trick of repetition in order to train his idiot readers. That’s 3 times he has dropped the term “conspiracy theory” or one of its elements.
Krugman: Historically, theories* about … Analysis: That’s 4 times.
Krugman: … powerful cabals have often been tied to antisemitism, to the belief that the Elders of Zion and/or the Rothschilds were shaping history …… Analysis: Amazing. After 125 years, the usual suspects STILL can’t stop talking about The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion. What does that tell ya? Hitlerexplained it like this:
“With groans and moans, the Frankfurter Zeitung (newspaper) repeats again and again that these are forgeries. This alone is evidence enough of their authenticity.“
Tell it, Tell it!
Krugman: …a view promoted by some actually powerful people, including Henry Ford. Analysis: That’s right. The great auto pioneer spent a fortune trying to warn Americans about the plot described in The Protocols. Only after an assassination-by-auto attempt upon his life did Ford back down and “apologize.”
Krugman: These days, however, the most prominent example is Q-Anon, with its claim that a secret ring of pedophiles controls the U.S. government. Analysis: Ya know, Paulie, might this anti-Q-Anon obsession of yours have something to do with that child porn which you claim was “planted” on your computer? To tweak and paraphrase what Hitler said about the Protocols:
“With groans and moans, Krugman repeats again and again that Q is a hoax. This alone is evidence enough of Q’s authenticity.”
Hitler & Ford both widely distributed copies of The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion.
More than 100 years ago, the “paper of record” used up a lot of ink to “debunk” The Protocols.
Krugman: The thing about secret-cabal theories* is that while they’re generally absurd, they’re hard to definitively disprove. Analysis: “secret-cabal theories” — That’s 5 times.
Krugman: Is President Biden actually a shape-shifting alien lizard? The White House physician will tell you no, but how do you know that he isn’t a lizard, too? Analysis: Straw Man Fallacy. Krugman wants to link the solid assertions about the Rothschilds and elite child rapists with belief in “alien lizards.” This smug, dishonest little rat bastard should make the skin of any decent man crawl!
Krugman: The other kind of conspiracy theory*….. Analysis: “conspiracy theory” — That’s 6 times.
Krugman: ….. by contrast, seems as if it would be easy to disprove, because thousands of people would have to be in on the plot,…. Analysis: When people in high places engineer a culture of common interest (the carrot) and fear (the stick) within their organizations and circles of influence; that will indeed unite “thousands of people” behind a big lie. That is basic social dynamics — not “conspiracy theory.”
Krugman: …. without a single one breaking ranks. Analysis: People actually “break ranks” and blow the whistle on conspiracies all the time. But because the good and the brave are relatively few, it is a simple enough matter for Fake News scum like Krugman to ignore them.
Krugman: A prime example, still highly influential on the right, is the assertion that climate change is a hoax. Analysis: Well, it is a hoax — one which MANY scientists have “broken ranks” on — (not that it takes a “scientist” to see through this scam).
Krugman: To believe that, you have to claim that thousands of scientists are colluding to falsify the evidence. Analysis: Wave enough grant money around on College Avenue and, soon enough, “thousands of scientists” will drop their trousers and bend over for their paymasters.
Krugman: But that hasn’t stopped the belief that climate change isn’t real from being widespread, maybe even dominant, on the U.S. political right. Analysis: Evidently, Paulie has no problem dismissing the “thousands of scientists” who do NOT believe in the Climate Con as “right wing” conspirators. When it suits his Marxist agenda, he and his ilk peddle the “conspiracy theory” of scientists “falsifying data” for “Big Oil.” What a dad-gum HYPOCRITE!
Krugman: The Big Lie about the “stolen” 2020 election would seem to fall into the same category, requiring malfeasance by election officials across the country. Analysis: Krugman has just confirmed for us that the 2020 Election was indeed stolen (though the White Hats allowed it to happen for their own reasons.) Does Krugman not believe in the election fraud “conspiracy theories” which his own newspaper reported about in past years?
Krugman: And there’s a new conspiracy theory in town: ………………….. Analysis: “conspiracy theory” — That’s 7 times.
Krugman: .. the claim that the war in Ukraine isn’t really happening, that it’s some kind of fake. Analysis: Krugman has just confirmed for us that the “war” (limited military operation) — though not totally fake — was actually won and East Ukraine liberated a long time ago. If anything is going on now, it’s just minor skirmishes and/or mopping up operations.
Krugman: But the conspiracy theorizing about the Ohio derailment …. Analysis: “conspiracy theorizing” — That’s 8 times.
Krugman: But they (Fox News) know their audience, and probably believe that it’s good business to propound racist conspiracy theories …. Analysis: “conspiracy theories” — That’s 9 times — plus the headline makes 10.
We’re getting to (((them))), boys and girls — and in the process, garnering lots of free publicity. So keep on “conspiracy theorizing.”
1. NOAA scientist & whistleblower John Bates “broke ranks” with fellow government scientists and revealed that temperature data was rigged in advance of the Paris Climate Accords. The Times ignored the story. // 2. Climate scientists for hire! // 3. The Times has run many stories on stolen elections of the past – including how LBJ stole his Senate seat in Texas, in 1948. But any talk of 2020 is “conspiracy theory.”
Many people worldwide are concerned about climate change and believe there is a climate emergency. For decades we have been told by the United Nations that Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from human activity are causing disastrous climate change. In 2018, a UN IPCC report even warned that ‘we have 12 years to save the Earth’, thus sending millions of people worldwide into a frenzy.
Thirty-five years ago, the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and the (World Meteorological Organization) WMO established the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) to provide scientific advice on the complex topic of climate change. The panel was asked to prepare, based on available scientific information, a report on all aspects relevant to climate change and its impacts and to formulate realistic response strategies. The first assessment report of the IPCC served as the basis for negotiating the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). Governments worldwide have signed this convention, thereby, significantly impacting the lives of the people of the world.
However, many scientists dispute with the UN-promoted man-made climate change theory, and many people worldwide are confused by the subject, or are unaware of the full facts. Please allow me to provide some information you may not be aware of.
1. Very few people actually dig into the data, they simply accept the UN IPPC reports. Yet many highly respectable and distinguished scientists have done exactly that and found that the UN-promoted manmade climate change theory is seriously flawed. Are you aware that 1500 of the world’s leading climate scientists and professionals in over 30 countries have signed a declaration that there is no climate emergency and have refuted the United Nations claims in relation to man-made climate change? See this
2. I have also signed this declaration. How can I make such an assertion? I have experience in the field as a former scientist at the Department of Energy and Climate Change, UK Government; and as former staff member at the United Nations Environment Division, where I was responsible for servicing the Pollution Release and Transfer Register Protocol, a Multinational Environmental Agreement, involving the monitoring of pollutants to land, air, and water worldwide. Real pollution exists, but the problem is not CO2. Industrial globalisation has produced many substances that are registered as pollutants, including thousands of new man-made chemical compounds, toxins, nano-particles and genetically modified organisms (GMOs) that are in violation of the scientific pre-cautionary principle.
A book I published recently also provides ample evidence and testimony from renowned scientists that there is no Climate emergency. The book titled ‘Transcending the Climate Change Deception Toward Real Sustainability’ is available here on amazon.COM
3. Next, I will mention the Irish Climate Science Forum (ICSF) website, a valuable resource founded by Jim O’Brien. I am grateful to the ICSF for their excellent work in highlighting the scientific flaws in the UN climate narrative. The ICSF provides a comprehensive lecture series from renowned international scientists providing much evidence, analysis, and data that contradicts the UN assertions. The lectures are available here.
The ICSF scientific view coincides with those of the Climate Intelligence (CLINTEL) foundation that operates in the fields of climate change and climate policy. CLINTEL was founded in 2019 by emeritus professor of geophysics Guus Berkhout and science journalist Marcel Crok. Based on this common conviction, 20 Irish scientists and several ICSF members have co-signed the CLINTEL World Climate Declaration “There is No Climate Emergency” (see this).
4. The reality is that the climate changes naturally and slowly in its own cycle, and solar activity is the dominant factor in climate and not Co2. We can conclude that carbon emissions or methane from livestock, such as cows, are not the dominant factors in climate change. In essence, therefore, the incessant UN, government, and corporate-media-produced climate hysteria in relation to carbon emissions and methane from cows has no scientific basis.
Please note that I have no commercial interest in stating that climate change is not caused by CO2. In truth I am against ‘real’ pollution, and the reality is that the CO2 component is not a pollutant. Unfortunately, many misinformed environmentalists are driving around in electric cars, the battery production for which has caused vast amounts of ‘real’ pollution via the industrial mining and processing of rare earth metals, and the consequent pollution to land, air and water systems. Note that the UN does not focus on the thousands of real pollutants that corporate industrial globalisation creates.
5. The conclusions of the Climate Intelligence foundation include the following
There is no climate emergency. Therefore, there is no cause for panic and alarm.
Natural as well as anthropogenic factors cause warming: The geological archive reveals that Earth’s climate has varied as long as the planet has existed, with natural cold and warm phases. The Little Ice Age ended as recently as 1850. Therefore, it is no surprise that we now are experiencing a period of warming.
Warming is far slower than predicted: The world has warmed significantly less than predicted by IPCC on the basis of modeled anthropogenic forcing. The gap between the real world and the modeled world tells us that we are far from understanding climate change.
Climate policy relies on inadequate models: Climate models have many shortcomings and are not remotely plausible as global policy tools. They blow up the effect of greenhouse gases such as CO2. In addition, they ignore the fact that enriching the atmosphere with CO2 is beneficial.
CO2 is plant food, the basis of all life on Earth: CO2 is not a pollutant. It is essential to all life on Earth. Photosynthesis is a blessing. More CO2 is beneficial for nature, greening the Earth: additional CO2 in the air has promoted growth in global plant biomass. It is also good for agriculture, increasing the yields of crops worldwide.
Global warming has not increased natural disasters: There is no statistical evidence that global warming is intensifying hurricanes, floods, droughts and suchlike natural disasters, or making them more frequent.
6. In the above book I reference the relevant work and scientific presentations of some of the world’s leading climate scientists. Let us examine some of the work and testimonies of these scientists:
“deeply flawed logic, obscured by shrewd and unrelenting propaganda, actually enabled a coalition of powerful special interests to convince nearly everyone in the world that Co2 from human industry was a dangerous plant destroying toxin. It will be remembered as the greatest mass delusion in the history of the world – that Co2 the life of plants was considered for a time to be a deadly poison.” – Professor Richard Lindzen, Professor Emeritus of Atmospheric Sciences at MIT.
Dr Nils-Axel Mörner was a former Committee Chairman at the UN International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). He was an expert involved in reviewing the first IPPC documents. He says the UN IPPC is misleading humanity about climate change. He tried to warn that the IPPC were publishing lies and false information that would inevitably be discredited. In an interview, he stated: “This is the most dangerous and frightening part of it. How a lobbyist group, such as the IPPC, has been able to fool the whole world. These organised and deceitful forces are dangerous” and expressed shock “that the UN and governments would parade children around the place at UN Climate summits as propaganda props”. The following is his testimony as detailed
“solar activity is the dominant factor in climate and not Co2… something is basically sick in the blame Co2 hypothesis… It was launched more than 100 years ago and almost immediately excellent physicists demonstrated that the hypothesis did not work.
I was the chairman of the only international committee on sea levels changes and as such a person I was elected to be the expert reviewer on the (UN IPPC) sea levels chapter. It was written by 38 persons and not a single one was a sea level specialist… I was shocked by the low quality it was like a student paper… I went through it and showed them that it was wrong and wrong and wrong…
The scientific truth is on the side of the sceptics… I have thousands of high ranked scientists all over the world who agree that NO, CO2 is not the driving mechanism and that everything is exaggerated. In the field of physics 80 to 90% of physicists know that the Co2 hypothesis is wrong… Of course, metrologists they believe in this because that is their own profession – they live on it.… I suspect that behind-the-scenes promoters… have an ulterior motive… It’s a wonderful way of controlling taxation controlling people” – Dr Nils-Axel Mörner, a former Committee Chairman at the UN IPPC, and former head of the Paleo Geo-physics and Geo-dynamics department in Stockholm
Another climate scientist with impeccable credentials that has broken rank is Dr Mototaka Nakamura. He asserts: “Our models are mickey-mouse mockeries of the real world”. Dr Nakamura received a Doctorate of Science from MIT, and for nearly 25 years specialized in abnormal weather and climate change at prestigious institutions that included MIT, Georgia Institute of Technology, NASA, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, JAMSTEC and Duke University. Dr Nakamura explains why the data foundation underpinning global warming science is “untrustworthy” and cannot be relied on and that:“Global mean temperatures before 1980 are based on untrustworthy data”.
Professor John R. Christy, Director of Atmospheric and Earth Sciences, University of Alabama, has provided detailed analysis of climate data, see Endnote [i]. I summarise the main points from his analysis below:
“The established global warming theory significantly misrepresents the impact of extra greenhouse gases; the weather that affects people the most is not becoming more extreme or more dangerous; temperatures were higher in the 1930s than today; between 1895 and 2015, 14 of the top 15 years with the highest heat records occurred before 1960; the temperatures we are experiencing now in 2021 were the same as 120 years ago…
the number of major tornadoes between 1954 and 1986 averaged 56/year, but between 1987 and 2020 the average was only 34/year; between 1895 and 2015 on average there has been no change in the number of very wet days per month, and no change in the number of very dry days per month, and the 20 driest months were before 1988. Between 1950 and 2019 the percentage of land area experiencing droughts has not increased globally – the trend is flat; the incidence of wildfires in North America between 1600 and 2000 has decreased substantially. Sea levels rose 12.5 cm per decade for 8,000 years and then it levelled off, now it rising only 2.5 cm per decade… worrying about 30 cm rise in sea level in a decade is ridiculous, in a hurricane the east coast of the U.S. gets a 20 foot rise in 6 hours, so a 30 cm rise will be easily handled!”
In a lecture titled The imaginary climate crisis – how can we change the message? Available on the Irish Climate Science Forum website, see Endnote [ii]. Richard L Lindzen, Professor Emeritus of Atmospheric Sciences at MIT summarises the battle against the climate hysteria as follows:
“in the long history of the earth there has been almost no correlation between climate and co2… the paleoclimate record shows unambiguously that Co2 is not a control knob… the narrative is absurd… it gives governments the power to control the energy sector… for about 33 years, many of us have been battling against the climate hysteria… There were more important leading people who were objecting to it, they were unfortunately older and by now most of them dead…
Elites are always searching for ways to advertise their virtue and assert their authority. They believe they are entitled to view science as a source of authority rather than a process, and they try to appropriate science, suitably and incorrectly simplified, as the basis for their movement.”
“CO2… it’s not a pollutant… it’s the product of all plant respiration, it is essential for plant life and photosynthesis… if you ever wanted a leverage point to control everything from exhalation to driving, this would be a dream. So it has a kind of fundamental attractiveness to bureaucratic mentality.” – Prof. Richard Lindzen, Professor Emeritus of Atmospheric Sciences at MIT
Patrick Moore, co-founder of Greenpeace, and President of Greenpeace in Canada for seven years, states:
“the whole climate crisis is not only fake news its fake science… of course climate change is real it’s been happening since the beginning of time, but it’s not dangerous and it’s not caused by people… climate change is a perfectly natural phenomenon and this modern warming period actually began about 300 years ago when the little ice age began to come to an end. There is nothing to be afraid of and all they are doing is instilling fear. Most of the scientists who are saying it’s a crisis are on perpetual government grants.
I was one of the (Greenpeace) founders… by the mid-80s… we were hijacked by the extreme left who basically took Greenpeace from a science-based organisation to an organisation based on sensationalism, misinformation and fear… you don’t have a plan to feed 8 billion people without fossils fuels or get the food into the cities…” – Patrick Moore, co-founder of Greenpeace
Professor William Happer, Princeton University, Former Director of Science at the US Department of Energy, is also a strong voice against the myth of man-made global warming. He states: “More CO2 benefits the Earth”.
7. The UN IPCC cherry picks data, uses flawed modelling and scenarios not remotely related to the real world
The UN climate crisis predictions are not based on physical evidence, rather they are based on complex computer modelling. One has to decode and analyse the modelling process to ascertain whether or not the models are valid and accurate or whether they have obvious flaws. The vast majority of scientists, economists, politicians and the general public have simply assumed that the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) models are accurate. Very few people have the time or skills to analyse these models, not to mention actually dispute them. Nonetheless, there were many senior and highly distinguished scientists that did exactly that – they claimed the UN narrative was incorrect and that there was no climate emergency. Their voices have been drowned out by a vast money-driven political and media establishment of the globalised ‘system’. The vitally important work of some of these renowned scientists is referenced in the above book.
“The computer models are making systematic dramatic errors… they are all parametrised… fudged… the models really don’t work” – Patrick J. Michaels, Director, Cato Institute Center for the Study of Science
Dr Roger Pielke Jr, University of Colorado, has conducted a detailed scientific review and analysis of the UN IPCC AR6 report, see Endnote [iii]. He describes that in relation to climate modelling, the IPCC detached the models from socio-economic plausibility. In creating the models, instead of first completing integrative assessment models (IAMs), the IPCC skipped this essential step and jumped straight to radiative forcing scenarios and thus these scenarios are not based on competed IAMs. This led much of climate modelling down the wrong track. I quote points from Dr Pielke’s analysis as follows:
“The four IPCC scenarios came from a large family of models so instead of splitting modelling from socio-economic assumptions the models already had the assumptions faked and baked in to them, because they had to have those assumptions to produce the required radiative forcing (to produce a desired climate ‘crisis scenario’ outcome).
In another fateful decision the 4 representative concentration pathways (RCPs) came from 4 different IAMs, which was a huge mistake. These models are completely unrelated to each other, but the impression has been given that they are of a common set, only differing in their radiative forcing, this was a huge mistake. Furthermore, no-one has responsibility for determining whether these scenarios are plausible. The climate community decided which scenario to prioritise and they chose the two most implausible scenarios! There are thousands of climate assumptions, but only 8 to 12 of them are available currently for climate research. The IPCC report even states that “no likelihood is attached to the scenarios in this report”. The likelihood is considered low they admit – This is an incredible admission by the IPCC.
These extreme unlikely scenarios dominate the literature and the IPCC report; therefore, the IPCC report is biased. Bottom line is that there is massive confusion. The IPCCs’ Richard Moss warned that RCP 8.5 was not to be used as a reference for the other RCPs, but 5,800 scientific papers worldwide misuse it like that… The whole process is seriously flawed… Nothing close to the real world is represented by the IPCC scenarios. Climate science has a huge problem! The IPCC currently uses RCP 8.5 as the ‘business as usual’ scenario, but RCP 8.5 is wild fantasy land and not remotely related to current reality at all… climate science has a scientific integrity crisis.” – Dr Roger Pielke Jr, University of Colorado,
8. Financialization of the entire world economy is now based on a life-killing ‘net-zero’ greenhouse gas emissions strategy.
The UN Agenda 2030 plan and the Paris Agreement goal to reduce CO2 emissions by 7% per annum until 2030 is in effect a plan that would disable the current resource mechanisms of the industrial economy for the food, energy and goods that enable human life and survival. This is being implemented before humanity has transitioned away from the flawed polluting trans-national industrial economy toward self-sufficient local/regional economies.
Zero carbon emissions, in essence, means pulling the plug on current systems of industrial agriculture, transport, goods production, electricity production, etc., and many millions of people reliant on these systems worldwide could be faced with a lack of electricity, food, goods, etc. This could have terrible consequences, particularly in locations and countries, that are currently unable to produce much food.
It should be noted that for decades, these same political, government, and corporate powers have rampantly promoted corporate economic globalization and fossil fuel dependency. Whilst, at the same time actively hindering the funding, creation, or government support of, more self-sufficient local communities/regions, and local co-operatives. Most of the world population thus became reliant on the globalized fossil-fuel dependent system.
9. Central bankers are entirely funding / controlling the advancement of the worldwide climate change ‘project’
The decision to drastically reduce CO2, one of the most essential compounds to sustain all life, is no co-incidence. It should be noted that it is the world’s central bankers that are behind this decision and are entirely funding and controlling the advancement of the worldwide project of combatting man-made climate-change.
This project involves an attempt to de-carbonise the activities of the entire world population. In December 2015, the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) created the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosure (TCFD), which represents $118 trillion of assets globally, see Endnote [iv]. In essence this means that the financialization of the entire world economy is based on meeting nonsensical aims such as “net-zero greenhouse gas emissions”. The TCFD includes key people from the world’s mega-banks and asset management companies, including JP Morgan Chase; BlackRock; Barclays Bank; HSBC; China’s ICBC bank; Tata Steel, ENI oil, Dow Chemical, and more.
The fact that the world’s largest banks and asset management corporations, including BlackRock, Goldman Sachs, the UN, the World Bank, the Bank of England and other central banks of the BIS, have all linked to push a vague, mathematically nonsensical ‘green’ economy, is no coincidence. There is another agenda at play that has nothing to do with environmentalism. The green economy along with UN Agenda 2030 is an agenda of world control, and will also develop trillions of dollars for the behind-the-scenes mega-banks. When the world largest banks, corporations, and institutions, all align to push a climate change agenda that has zero evidence, one can see there is another major agenda going on behind the scenes. This agenda tries to convince the common people of the world to make huge sacrifices under the emotive guise of “saving our planet.”. While all the time the corporations and banks make vast profits, and political institutions implement worldwide technocratic control systems under the banner of combatting, and adapting to, so-called man-made climate change.
“The links between the world’s largest financial groups, central banks and global corporations to the current push for a radical climate strategy to abandon the fossil fuel economy in favor of a vague, unexplained Green economy, it seems, is less about genuine concern to make our planet a clean and healthy environment to live. Rather it is an agenda, intimately tied to the UN Agenda 2030 for “sustainable” economy, and to developing literally trillions of dollars in new wealth for the global banks and financial giants who constitute the real powers that be… “ – F. William Engdahl, strategic risk consultant and lecturer
Back in 2010, the head of Working Group 3 of the UN IPCC, Dr Otmar Edenhofer, told an interviewer,
“…one must say clearly that we redistribute de facto the world’s wealth by climate policy. One has to free oneself from the illusion that international climate policy is environmental policy. This has almost nothing to do with environmental policy anymore.”
To better perceive what is ‘behind the curtain’ of the Climate hoax and the UN/WEF agenda it also helps to examine what has happened in the decades beforehand. It is important to perceive the implications of the worldwide fractional-reserve debt-money banking scam and the subtle system of debt-slavery that has existed for decades. If you look at the World Bank website you will see that virtually every nation on Earth is in vast debt. In debt to who you may ask? The answer is to privately owned mega-banks. For many decades the so-called banking and corporate elites have had full control of the source of money creation and its allocation, via the debt-money system, and have therefore, by default, been able to fund, and increasingly control and manipulate the entire world spectrum of industry, media, government, education, ideological supremacy and war to their own design, agenda and benefit. Mayer Amschel Rothschild (banker) is widely reported to have said:
“Give me control of a nation’s money supply and I care not who makes its laws.”
10. Central bankers hijacked the real environmental movement in 1992 creating the fake climate change agenda
Psychopaths can utilise any ideology and, change it from within to something that may eventually be entirely different to its original purpose. Meanwhile, the original followers and advocates continue to pursue what they believe is the original ideology, but gradually become mere pawns in the agenda of a self-serving elite. Unfortunately, over the past decades, this is exactly what has happened in the environmental movement.
Whistleblower George Hunt served as an official host at a key environmental meeting in Denver, Colorado in 1987, and states that David Rockefeller; Baron Edmund De Rothschild; US Secretary of State Baker; Maurice Strong, a UN official and an employee of the Rockefeller and Rothschild trusts; EPA administrator William Ruccleshaus; UN Secretary General in Geneva MacNeill, along with World Bank and IMF officials were at this meeting. Hunt was surprised to see all these rich elite bankers at the meeting and questioned what they were doing there at an environmental congress.
In a video recording, Hunt later provided important evidence from the documents of the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3-14 June 1992. This conference was the well-known UN ’92 Earth Summit and was run by UNCED. According to Hunt, via the Earth summit, the UN was setting a net, an agenda, to place the power over the Earth and its peoples into their own hands. The world private banking cartel are the same ultra-rich banking families that had been instrumental in the setting up of the World Bank, the UN, and other international institutions, after WW2. Their political cohorts included Stalin (the leader of a brutal communist regime in the USSR that committed genocide of millions of people), UK Prime minister Churchill, and US President Roosevelt. Hunt refers to these banking families and their financial and international institutional networks as:
“The same world order that tricked third world countries to borrow funds and rack up enormous debts… and purposely creating war and debt to bring societies into their control. The world order crowd are not a nice group of people…”– George Hunt, Whistleblower speaking about the UN Earth summit of 1992
As a consequence of the UN Earth Summit, the honest, genuine environment movement that actually cared about real pollution to land, air and water, was politically hi-jacked by powerful political and financial interests with a different agenda.
Maurice Strong, a UN official and an employee of the Rockefeller and Rothschild trusts, had convened the first UNCED congress in Stockholm, Sweden, in 1972. Then, 20 years later he was the convenor and secretary general of UNCED. Hunt also provided video evidence from the Fourth UNCED World Congress meeting in 1987 of an international investment banker, stating that:
“I suggest therefore that this be sold not through a democratic process that would take too long and require far too much funds to educate the cannon-fodder, unfortunately, which populates the Earth. We have to take almost an elitist program…”
Thus, the decrees leading to the 1992 UN Earth summit were dictated without debate or opportunity for dissent and would supersede national laws. The decrees were dictated into existence by the banker Edmund de Rothschild, who got these major decrees into the ’92 UN resolutions without debate or challenge. Hunt asserts that he was denied the opportunity to openly challenge Rothschild’s remarks by the meeting Chairman.
Is it any surprise that the Rothschild bank of Geneva is the nucleus of the World Conservation bank and the wealthy elite are integrated into the bank via the Rothschilds private offering of shares. The banks assumes control of world conservation and decides and controls how these resources are allocated or utilized.
11. Despite the deceptive and fake environmental facade, it has adopted, the vast institutional entity of the UN has fully endorsed environmentally destructive industrial globalisation for the past 70 years. The UN climate change, sustainable development and green economy policies over the past 30 years are little more than worldwide marketing tricks that have tragically brainwashed two generations of young people who do not understand what the UN actually is, and who is it is really designed to serve.
This current globalised system involves the promotion of beliefs and fake science that claim to be unchallengeable truths, but are, in fact, ideologies in which evidence is manipulated, twisted, and distorted to prove the ‘governing idea’, and thus promote its worldwide dissemination. They start with the conclusion they want and then wrench and manipulate what scant evidence they can to fit that conclusion. Man-made climate change due to anthropogenic carbon emission is a major example of this.
Institutions, including the UN, the World Economic Forum (WEF), and the World Health Organisation (WHO), are privately-motivated unelected unaccountable organisations controlled by the source of debt-money creation, i.e., the world private-banking cartel; and are just clever marketing tools and political mechanisms for implementing and maintaining a corrupt worldwide system, under the clever guise of ‘fixing the problems of the world’.
These powerful special interests have been promoting certain ‘ideologies’ for decades to advance their corporate and political aims. The word “sustainable” was hijacked decades ago, and it is now deceptively used to advance the agendas of globalist mega-corporate interests who couldn’t care less about the environment. The aim is to catapult humanity into the arms of UN Agenda 2030 and the WEF ‘reset’ plan, which are clever marketing plans entirely designed by the so-called elite mega-corporate interests of the WEF Davos group.
12. Furthermore, the current green energy/renewable technologies being promoted by the UN and WEF, are not a viable solution for the world’s energy supply. Although these technologies have some limited viability in certain locations and scenarios, the fact remains that the Energy Returned on Energy Invested is much too low – in essence the entire process is mathematically flawed. This is evidenced by the work of scientists, including Professor David MacKay, former Regius Professor of Engineering at Cambridge University and former Chief Scientific Advisor at the UK Department of Energy and Climate Change.
Conclusion
In summary, CO2 reduction is the main focus of the UN-promoted climate-change-hysteria that has been rampant among the world’s population. However, the proclaimed climate crisis exists in computer models only. The cult of ‘manmade climate change’ is a media and UN politically-promoted ‘ideology’, that is used for a wider political and corporate agenda. Manmade climate change is not based in fact, and has hijacked real environmental concerns.
The world’s central bankers are fully funding the worldwide climate change ‘project’. The truism ‘follow the money’ springs to mind – and by doing so, one quickly discovers who runs the corporate, political, and media world.
Due to incessant UN, government, and corporate-promoted climate change propaganda, many people are, thus, in a media-induced state of confusion, and, thus, blindly assume their pre-determined role in society under this ‘dictatorship of words’ without even being aware of it. For example, we now have millions of so-called climate change warriors blind to the fact that climate change is not actually caused by carbon emissions. This is all to scare people into accepting totalitarian authority and limitations to their freedom and personal wellbeing.
The unpalatable reality is that people’s access to energy and resources is being intentionally reduced via bogus climate change policies, high inflation, ongoing geo-political theatre and intentionally instigated war.
We cannot understand how to create a truly resilient society unless we correctly perceive the current society we live in and how it came to exist. So, who are the architects of the current paradigm. The above book is designed to help in that regard. Unless we recognize the untruths of the current paradigm, even if it is not ‘politically correct’ to do so, then we will not be able to make the correct adjustments to our current communities and local/regional networks, or create a truly resilient thriving society in Ireland. In this spirit of truth, new networks are emerging worldwide.
Notes
[i] Source: Irish Climate Science Forum lecture titled Testing Climate Claims 2021 Update available at http://www.icsf.ie
NY Times:Depleted Under Trump, a ‘Traumatized’ E.P.A. Struggles With Its Mission
Despite an injection of funding, the agency still has not recovered from an exodus of scientists and policy experts, both insiders and critics say.
Previously, I spoke about how Trump’s de-balling of NATO has saved the world from the planned World War III which Soros himself had been openly “predicting.” Today’s story in “the paper of record” whines about a similar neutering of the once almighty and tyrannical EPA (Environmental Protection Agency). Enjoy this bit of butt-hurt, from the article’s opening paragraph:
“The nation’s top environmental agency is still reeling from the exodus of more than 1,200 scientists and policy experts during the Trump administration. The chemicals chief said her staff can’t keep up with a mounting workload. The enforcement unit is prosecuting fewer polluters than at any time in the past two decades.” (emphasis added) *
Three other mighty blows struck against the extremely dangerous GreenReds which were not mentioned in the article — yet every bit as significant — are:
* 1. The Trump Supreme Court ruling barring the EPA from “regulating” harmless CO2 emissions * 2. Trump’s 2017 pullout from the Paris Climate Scam (*Biden’s “re-entry” has been properly described as “toothless”) * 3. Trump’s installation one of his own, Jeffrey Bossert Clark to run things at ENRD(Environment and Natural Resources Division) at the Justice Department. The ENRD — responsible for the civil and criminal enforcement of environmental laws — was loaded up with Trump’s people, as was the DOJ in general. Strangely enough, some of these key players remain in placeunder “Biden.”
1. Nominally speaking, “Biden’s” Justice Department is headed by Merrick Garland. But in essence — as observant Leftists are openly complaining about) — Trump’s people remain in charge! // 2. Jeffrey Bossert Clark may have resigned as the “Biden” administration came in — but his boys remain in charge on environmental enforcement — and will not prosecute petty “polluters.”
The genocidal NATO World War 3: — deactivated The genocidal CDC / WHO 5-year lock down scheme: — deactivated (by “Warp Speed”) The genocidal WEF Great Reset: — deactivated The genocidal EPA Climate Con / Carbon Tax Menace: — deactivated
And yet, some of the Sunshine Patriots and members of the whiny backseat “Are-We-There-Yet Chorus — under the pernicious influence of dirty trickster CIA cyber operatives pretending to be patriots — still denigrate the man as a “Globalist” …. “but but, muh Trump’s death jab.” (palm to face, shaking head, sighing)
More delightful whining from the Times article:
“Mr. Trump tried each year to slash the E.P.A. budget by at least 30 percent. Highly skilled scientists and other experts left the agency as the Trump administration dismantled science advisory panels, disregarded scientific evidence and weakened protections against pollution.”
“They beat down the E.P.A. work force, a lot of people left dispirited,” said Senator Tom Carper, Chairman of the Committee on Environment and Public Works, which oversees the E.P.A.”
At the same time that the Deep State Greens in the Suites were being de-funded and dis-empowered, the Greens in the Streets disappeared as well. Where’s Leonardo DiCaprio and the March for the Climate & March for Science rent-a-mobs? Where’s Greta Gloomberg’s commie kiddie Fridays for Future army? Bill Lie the Science Guy? — Neil DeGrasshole Tyson? — Hello? — You see, without a puppet master, the puppets can no longer dance.
Thank You, President Trump — and also, “President” “Biden.”
The Globo-Marxist-created “Climate Bogeyman” is failing because The Donald killed it.
With this epic battle for the world still raging, I — in spite of all the cancellations and hate mail — is not about to betray the dauntless man who saved us all from the unimaginable Hell-on-Earth apocalypse which the sainted Killary Clinton (who would now be 1-year into a second term) would have unleashed upon humanity. The game that Chess Master Trump is playing against the Deep State amounts to a ruse so clever that it’s even got many of his followers (er, “ex” followers) tricked.
Write him off as a con man or even a traitor if you insist; but before doing so, do consider some undeniable precedents of Trump being “two-faced” — for the sake of a strategy known as “optics.”
The pattern is unmistakable by now. In each of the following cases, Trump, in order to silence the ferocious media cannons firing at him, said something which deeply upset many of us — while continuing to quietly work against the Deep State Globalists and getting his way in the end.
1. (((They))) were so certain that the Satanic Witch was going to win. // 2. And when the demented child sex trafficking lesbian lost, the big guns of the Judenpresse, Academia, Hollyweird, the Fake Pope, the neo cons, organized sports, the fake “alt right,” the CEO class and the bosses of both political parties were all pointed at Trump. Working around such a handicap required patience and cunning on a level which even his supporters cannot grasp.
On the Clintons
Trump’s True Position: Lock her up! The Media Attack: “Trump’s threats to arrest the Clintons smack of “Fascism!” How Trump Silenced the Attack: After winning the election, he stated, on 60 Minutes: “The Clintons are good people. I don’t want to hurt them.” The Sunshine Patriots: “Oh no! Trump’s not even in office yet and he has already broken his promise to have Hillary arrested!” The End Result: Prosecutor John Durham — who was appointed by Trump! — is indeed investigating the dirty dealings of the Clinton Mafia. Patience on this one, boys and girls. The timing has got to be perfect for such a move as the arrest of such high-ranking players as the Clintons — who may actually already have been arrested and replaced by those “Deep Fakes” that the New York Slimes and Killary herself had warned about.
The Clintons // The Bait
NY Times The Hill
The Switch
The Hill
On the House Freedom Caucus
Trump’s True Position: Trump courts the true conservative bloc of anti-establishment “America First” Congressmen (Jim Jordan, Ron DeSantis, Mark Meadows etc). He sees this small group of fighters as his most important allies in the fight against the Deep State. The Media Attack: “The Freedom Caucus is made up of far right extremists!” How Trump Silenced the Attack: He sided with Speaker Paul Ryan (who Trump actually hated all along) in criticizing and threatening the House Freedom Caucus for being too extreme. The Sunshine Patriots: “Trump and Paul Ryan are attacking the finest members of Congress! Trump is a phony!” The End Result: Trump engineered a situation in which the Freedom Caucus now controls the US Congress — and its members are positioned to carry out serious investigations into very serious matters.
House Freedom Caucus // The Bait
The HillCNNThe Hill
The Switch
The HillBloomberg
On Climate Change
Trump’s True Position: The Climate Con is a hoax. The Media Attack: “Trump is a climate denier! The world is in crisis.” How Trump Silenced the Attack: While still President-Elect, he invited climate con artists Leonardo DiCaprio & Al Gore to Trump Tower to “open mindedly” hear what they had to say about the “crisis.” The Sunshine Patriots: “Oh no! Stupid Trump is being controlled by libtarded Ivanka! He is a Global Warmist now!” End Result: Trump pulled us out of the Paris Climate Scam, ramped up domestic energy production and defunded / fired a whole bunch of warmist scientists.
The Climate Con // The Bait
CNNNBC
The Switch
Scientific AmericanNY Times
On North Korea
Trump’s True Position: The dangerous Korean Cold War must end. The Media Attack: “Trump is being soft on the evil dictator Kim Jong Un” How Trump Silenced the Attack: He called Kim “Rocket Man” and threatened to attack North Korea with “fire and fury.” Kim (also in on the game) responded by calling Trump a “frightened dog.” The Sunshine Patriots: “Oh no! Trump is a neo-con warmonger!” The End Result: Trump’s people had been in secret back-channel communication with Kim’s people all along. The Korean Cold War — which always had the potential of bringing the US and China into war with each other — is over.
North Korea // The Bait
NBC
The Switch
NBCRadio Free AsiaThe buffonish bluster was strategically necessary.Trump used cunning to deactivate a Globalist time bomb once and for all.
On Afghanistan
Trump’s True Position: Pull all US troops out of Afghanistan The Media Attack: “Trump is negotiating with the terrorist Taliban!” How Trump Silenced the Attack: He publicly ended the talks with the Taliban and threatened to bomb them – as he privately maintained back-channel negotiations. The Sunshine Patriots: “Oh no! Traitor Trump is going to keep us in Afghanistan!” The End Result: The final US withdrawal (as planned by Trump) occurred under “Biden” in a way that made it seem as though “Biden” botched it!
Afghanistan // The Bait & The Switch — both described in the same headlines.
Político
The End Result
Business Insider
On NATO
Trump’s True Position: Work with Putin to kill NATO and avoid World War III The Media Attack: “Trump is leaving Europe vulnerable to Russian attack!” How Trump Silenced the Attack: He boasted about how he strengthened NATO. The Sunshine Patriots: “Oh no! Trump is a pro-NATO Globalist!” The End Result: NATO cannot counter Russia’s justified actions in Ukraine because Trump (not “Biden”) is the true Commander-in-Chief. The war-making alliance is dying right before our eyes.
NATO // The Bait & The Switch — both described in the same headlines.
The End Result
On Syria
Trump’s True Position: End the CIA-Mossad proxy war against Syria The Media Attack: “Trump is being soft on the evil Bashir al Assad” How Trump Silenced the Attack: He called Assad “an animal” and — after telling Assad’s Russian ally in advance — launched a harmless missile attack on an empty field. The Sunshine Patriots: “Oh no! Trump is an Israeli-owned warmonger!” The End Result: After Trump defunded the CIA program propping up “the moderate rebels” (ISIS), Russia and Iran finished off the CIA-Mossad mercenaries on the ground. The Assad government was saved.
Syria // The Bait
The Switch
On Iran
Trump’s True Position: Maintain peace in the region The Neo-Con Media Attack: “Trump is being too soft on Iran.” How Trump Silenced the Attack: He threatened to attack Iran. The Sunshine Patriots: “Oh no! Trump is an Israeli-owned warmonger!” The End Result: Iran, now free of Obama’s “Iran Nuclear Deal,” is free to pursue nuclear weapons to defend itself against Israel. Along with Russia, Iran is now an influential power in the region.
Iran // The Attack on Trump
The Bait
The Switch
On Gun Control
Trump’s True Position: Pro 2nd Amendment — 100% The Media Attack: After the 2018 hoax shooting at Parkland High School in Florida, a deafening roar for “gun control” went forth from Fake News and prominent politicians of both parties. How Trump Silenced the Attack: He publicly agreed that something had to be done. The Sunshine Patriots: “Oh no! Trump is about to betray us on the 2nd Amendment!” The End Result: After allowing the temporary furor over Parkland to fizzle out, Trump did nothing. Since Parkland, there has also been a noticeable decrease in these hoax shootings.
Gun Control // The Bait
The Switch
On Russia / Ukraine
Trump’s True Position: End the dangerous CIA-Mossad proxy war against pro-Russian east Ukraine and cripple NATO before it ignites a World War. The Media Attack: “Trump is Putin’s bitch!” How Trump Silenced the Attack: He said a few nasty things about Putin and made a public show about the weapons he was selling to Ukraine. The Sunshine Patriots: “Trump wants a war with Russia!” The End Result: The military aid to Ukraine was delayed and came with the condition that they not use the new equipment! The Ukrainian warmongers were demoralized and the tension eased. The Ukraine “civil war” ended (update: February, 2022: Putin is cleaning up Ukraine while Trump pretends to condemn his actions).
Ukraine War // The Bait
The Switch
On Israel
Trump’s True Position: Peace in the broader Middle East and a deal between the Israelis and Palestinians. The Media Attack: In this case, there was no attack because Trump skillfully preempted the Israel First elements. How Trump Silenced the Attack: Trump blocked any Jewish attack by pretending to kiss Satanyaoo’s ass and making the meaningless gesture of moving the US embassy to Jerusalem. The Sunshine Patriots: “Oh no! Trump is a Zionist puppet! Muh Jared Kushner!” The End Result: Satanyahoo is out of power (as are Israel’s top blackmail agents, Jeffrey Epstein & Ghislane Maxwell) and the whole Middle East is quieter than it has ever been in 70 years. The US is out and Russia and Iran are now the regional powers. Said Trump recently of Satanyahoo: “Fuck him!“
Israel // The Bait
The Switch
Stupid 19 & The Vaccine
Trump’s True Position: Give the chicken-shit normies their magical vaccine in order to thwart the planned multi-year Scamdemic; block the Great Reset that was to come out of the deadly multi-year lock down; and launch the great counter punch of 2022. The Media Attack: “Trump is being negligent! His supporters refuse to take the vaccine and he’s not saying anything to encourage them.” How Trump Silenced the Attack: He recently made his strongest public statements yet in favor of voluntary vaccination (knowing full well that it wasn’t going to change anyone’s mind on either side of the issue). The Sunshine Patriots: “Trump is evil! Mike King is a shill!” (rolling eyes) The End Result: (As we foresee it) In the eyes of the bewildered masses of Normiedom, Trump comes out of this manufactured controversy looking like “the adult in the room” — as the “Biden” administration and the Demonrats continue to implode. The international hysteria over Stupid-19 will end this Spring, soon after Trump’s “Truth Social” media giant (an absolutely critical element to all of this) comes online. Investigations into election fraud, human trafficking, the Russia hoax etc are continuing. The “Storm” will begin to hit (in the public eye) no later than this summer — intensifying in stages and finally culminating with a historic electoral rout — which even the media is already projecting — by America First Republicans in November.
Be patient, boys and girls. Understand that we are fighting an irregular war, with regular casualties, against an “invisible enemy” (more Trumpian code). Stop taking Trump literally.
At near the exact same time the leftist New York Times confirmed FTX money launderer Sam Bankman-Fried will speak at this forum, new Twitter owner Elon Musk announced that “amnesty is coming” for some suspended Twitter accounts, then he revealed details will be released about the censoring of Hunter Biden’s laptop right before the 2020 presidential election, saying: “This is necessary to restore public trust”—a bombshell revelation causing top Vox Media leftist journalist Kara Swisher posting a lying claim that FTX owned shares of Twitter, that was instantly regurgitated as truth by other leftist media outlets—a lying claim Elon Musk instantly proved was false by releasing Twitter financial documents, and he posted directly to FTX leftist media shill Swisher: “There was a time when you cared about the truth…That is long gone”.
From at least the 17th century to the 1950s, conspiracy theories were a widely accepted way of understanding the world and often the official versions of events.
They were articulated by elites and usually targeted external enemies or subversives who were allegedly trying to undermine the state.
It was only during the late 1950s and early 1960s that conspiracy theories started to become a stigmatized way of explaining big events.
One side-effect of this move from the mainstream to the margins of society was that conspiracy theories started to primarily target societal and political elites.
They are no longer concerned with alleged plots against the state but with those orchestrated by the state.
When Elon Musk stated to the leftist journalists telling lies: “There was a time when you cared about the truth…That is long gone”, I immediately thought of how many of you still care about the truth or have simply lost your minds—and is valid for me to ponder because I see how many of you come to the Dear Sisters seeking the truth they work tirelessly to provide you with, but then turn your backs to them when they plead for you help to keep doing so.
In my pondering, though, my life experiences have proven to me that the overwhelming majority of you are really good, kind and generous people, but who do turn their backs on others when they are afraid and confused, and is almost always caused by them forgetting that truth will always out in the end and carries in it its own defense.
A series of email exchanges between Greenpeace Founder Patrick Moore and South Korean Professor Seok-soon Park shows him saying that climate change is based on false narratives and that it has become more of a political movement than an environmental movement.
One of Greenpeace’s founding members, Patrick Moore, said in an email why he had quit the organisation:
“Greenpeace was ‘hijacked’ by the political left when they realised there was money and power in the environmental movement. [Left-leaning] political activists in North America and Europe changed Greenpeace from a science-based organisation to a political fundraising organization,” Moore said.
15 years after he co-founded Greenpeace, Moore left the organisation in 1986.
“The ‘environmental’ movement has become more of a political movement than an environmental movement,” he said. “They are primarily focused on creating narratives, stories, that are designed to instil fear and guilt into the public so the public will send them money.”
He claimed that they typically carry out their political operations behind closed doors with other operatives at the United Nations, the World Economic Forum, and other organisations of a similar kind.
He asserted that the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [IPCC] is “not a science organization.” The World Meteorological Entity and the United Nations Environment Program make up this political organisation.
“The IPCC hires scientists to provide them with ‘information’ that supports the ‘climate emergency’ narrative.
Their campaigns against fossil fuels, nuclear energy, CO2, plastic, etc., are misguided and designed to make people think the world will come to an end unless we cripple our civilization and destroy our economy. They are now a negative influence on the future of both the environment and human civilization.”
“Today, the left has adopted many policies that would be very destructive to civilization as they are not technically achievable. Only look at the looming energy crisis in Europe and the UK, which Putin is taking advantage of.
“But it is of their own making in refusing to develop their own natural gas resources, opposing nuclear energy, and adopting an impossible position on fossil fuels in general,” Moore wrote.
The Left ‘Hijacked’ Greenpeace
The organization’s basic values, according to him, were “green” for the environment and “peace” for the people, but peace had largely been forgotten and green had taken precedence.
“Many [so-called] ‘environmental’ leaders were now saying that ‘humans are the enemies of the Earth, the enemies of Nature.’ I could not accept that humans are the only evil species. This is too much like ‘original sin,’ that humans are born with evil, but all the other species are good, even cockroaches, mosquitos, and diseases,” Moore argued.
The idea that there should be fewer people in the world is the current dominant philosophy, according to him.
“But the people who said this were not volunteering to be the first to go away. They behave as if they are superior to others. This kind of ‘pride’ and ‘conceit’ is the worst of the Cardinal Sins,” Moore said.
False Narrative on Chlorine
“At the time I decided to leave Greenpeace, I was one of 6 Directors of Greenpeace International. I was the only one with formal science education, BSc Honors in Science and Forestry, and Ph.D. in Ecology. My fellow directors decided that Greenpeace should begin a campaign to ‘Ban Chlorine Worldwide.’”
Moore argued that although chlorine is one of the 94 [naturally-occurring] elements on the Periodic Table and plays many important roles in biology and human health, it is also true that elemental chlorine gas is very toxic and was employed as a weapon in World War I.
For instance, sodium chloride, also known as table salt, is a necessary nutrient for all animals and many plants. NaCl cannot be “banned.”
He emphasised that one of the most important developments in public health history in reducing the spread of water-borne communicable illnesses like cholera was the addition of chlorine to drinking water, swimming pools, and spas.
Additionally, roughly 25% of all of our medicines involve chlorine, and about 85% of pharmaceutical drugs are created using chemistry related to chlorine. Without halogens, such as chlorine, bromine, and iodine, medicine would not be the same. Halogens are all potent antibiotics.
“Greenpeace named chlorine ‘The Devil’s Element’ and calls PVC, polyvinyl chloride, or simply vinyl, ‘the Poison Plastic.’ All of this is fake [and] to scare the public. In addition, this misguided policy reinforces the attitude that humans are not a worthy species and that the world would be better off without them. I could not convince my fellow Greenpeace directors to abandon this misguided policy. This was the turning point for me,” Moore said.
False Narrative on Polar Bears
Moore responded when asked how Greenpeace used its big contributions, saying money was used to fund “a very large staff” (possibly numbering over 2,000), extensive advertising, and fundraising initiatives.
Additionally, almost all of the organization’s fundraising advertisements are founded on myths that he had thoroughly debunked in his books, with polar bears serving as one such example.
“The International Treaty on Polar Bears, signed by all polar countries in 1973, to ban unrestricted hunting of polar bears, is never mentioned in the media, Greenpeace, or politicians who say the polar bear is going extinct due to melting ice in the Arctic. In fact, the polar bear population has increased from 6,000 to 8,000 in 1973 to 30,000 to 50,000 today. This is not disputed,” Moore said.
“But now they say the polar bear will go extinct in 2100 as if they have a magic crystal ball that can predict the future. In fact, this past winter in the Arctic saw an expansion of ice from previous years, and Antarctica was colder during the last winter than in the past 50 years.”
Like many in the “climate emergency” sector, Moore said he does not pretend to be an expert or foresee the future with certainty.
The Goal of the ‘Environmental Apocalypse’ Theory
“I believe the human population has always been vulnerable to people who predict doom with false stories,” Moore said.
“The Aztecs threw virgins into volcanos, and the Europeans and Americans burned women as witches for 200 years claiming this would ‘save the world’ from evil people. This has been [referred to as] ‘herd mentality,’ ‘groupthink,’ and ‘cult behavior.’ Humans are social animals with a hierarchy, and it is easiest to gain a high position by using fear and control.”
Moore added that he is committed to proving to people that the situation is not as dire as they are led to believe that the environmental apocalypse hypothesis is really about “political power and control.”
“Today, in the richest countries, our descendants are making decisions that our grandchildren will have to pay for,” he said. “Predictions that the world is coming to an end have been made for thousands of years. Not once has this come true. Why should we believe it now?”
“People are naturally afraid of the future because it is unknown and full of risks and difficult decisions. I believe there is also an element of ‘self-loathing’ in this apocalypse movement.”
According to Moore, today’s youth are taught that people are unworthy and are destroying the planet. They now feel guilty and ashamed of themselves as a result of this indoctrination, which is the incorrect attitude to have in life.
The Demonization of Carbon Dioxide
“Very few people believe the world is not warming. The record is clear that the world has been warming since about the year 1700, 150 years before we were using fossil fuels. 1700 was the peak of the Little Ice Age, which was very cold and caused crop failures and starvation. Before that, around 1000 A.D. was the Medieval Warm period when Vikings farmed Greenland. [And] before that, around 500 A.D. were the Dark Ages, and before that, the Roman Warm Period when it was warmer than today, and the sea level was 1–2 meters higher than today,” Moore said.
“Even until about 1950, the amount of fossil fuel used and CO2 emitted were very small compared to today. We do not know the cause of these periodic fluctuations in temperature, but it was certainly not CO2.”
Moore made it clear that the “minority opinion” is not about the temperature history of the Earth; rather, the relationship between the temperature and CO2 is the subject of dispute.
“In this regard, I agree that many believe CO2 is the main cause of warming. CO2 is invisible, so no one can actually see what it is doing. And this ‘majority’ are mainly scientists paid by politicians and bureaucrats, media making headlines, or activists making money. [The rest are] the public who believe this story even though they can’t actually see what CO2 is doing,” Moore said.
Moore presented a graph showing the temperature in central England during a period of 350 years, from 1659 to 2009. He said that “If carbon dioxide was the main cause of warming, then there should be a rise in temperature along the carbon dioxide curve, but it doesn’t.”
In addition to stating that CO2 is the foundation of all life on Earth and that its concentration in the atmosphere is currently lower than it has been for a significant portion of life’s history, Moore called the demonization of CO2 “completely ridiculous.”
‘Wind and Solar Power Are Parasites on the Economy’
“Solar and wind power are both very expensive and very unreliable. It is almost like a mental illness that so many people have been brainwashed to think entire countries can be supported with these technologies,” Moore said.
“I believe wind and solar energy are parasites on the larger economy. In other words, they make the country poorer than if other more reliable and less costly technologies were used.”
According to Moore, companies that provide wind and solar energy heavily rely on government mandates, tax write-offs, and subsidies. Under these mandates, people are compelled to buy wind and solar energy, even if it is more expensive, under the guise that it is “environmentally friendly.”
“Millions of people pay more for wind and solar energy while a few people make millions of dollars, marks, pounds, etc. It is a bit like a Ponzi scheme in the stock markets,” Moore added.
“They require vast areas of land, are not available most of the time, and require reliable energy such as nuclear, hydroelectric, [coal, and natural] gas to be available when wind and solar are unavailable.”
According to Moore, the mining, transporting, and building of wind and solar farms need significant amounts of fossil fuels. In many places, they also don’t generate nearly as much energy during their lifetimes as is needed to construct and maintain them.
“Why not use reliable energy [such as nuclear, hydroelectricity, natural gas, etc.] as the primary source?” Moore questioned, adding if that were the case, “then wind and solar would be unnecessary.”
‘Plastic Is Not a Toxic Substance’
“Plastic is not a toxic substance. That is why we package and wrap our food in it, to prevent it from becoming contaminated. Plastic does not magically become toxic when it enters the ocean,” Moore said.
“Of course, they say on one hand that plastic will never break down, and then, on the other hand, they say it will quickly decay into ‘microplastics,’ which, of course, are conveniently invisible so no one can observe or verify this for themselves. How clever!”
Moore claims that our digestive system can distinguish between “food” and plastic or minute sand particles. No matter how minute the sand is, our body does not absorb it into our bloodstream.
He claimed that, like driftwood, floating plastic in the ocean is similar to a little floating reef. It gives marine organisms a surface to attach to, lay their eggs on, and eat things that are attached to it.
“Pollution is usually toxic or causes harm to life. Plastic is simply ‘litter’ beside the road. It is not hurting anything. One exception is discarded fishing nets, not because they are plastic but because they are shaped to catch fish.
“The environmental community should work with the fishing industry to stop throwing damaged nets in the sea and bring them back to the dock, where they can be recycled, used in a waste-to-energy plant, or discarded safely,” Moore added.
With ice coverage for July and August remaining above the ten-year average of 2010–20, the extent of summer sea ice in the Arctic has surprised experts who once predicted that such levels would be impossible.
This stands in stark contrast to the dominant climate narrative that predicts the dwindling of summer ice in the Arctic. Some politicians had even claimed that parts of the Arctic would be ice-free by now.
With the seasonal Arctic melt technically over, it is fair to conclude that the extent of ice in the summer of 2022 has been greater than the ten-year average. On most days in July and August, sea ice levels were above the ten-year average and significantly more than the previous few years.
The Japanese National Institute of Polar Research provides a useful visualization in the graph below. This year’s Arctic sea ice — shown in red — is compared with the ten-year average and the levels of the previous few years, including that of 2012, when ice had reached its lowest of the period tracked.
Data of sea-ice extent in square kilometers in the Arctic Ocean from June 2002 to the present and decadal averages of 1980’s, 1990’s, 2000’s, and 2010’s are included. Source: National Institute of Polar Research, https://ads.nipr.ac.jp/vishop/#/extent.
According to the Danish Meteorological Institute, the extent of Arctic sea ice was much greater than the last five years, as shown in the below graph.
Summer temperatures in the Arctic remained at levels similar to the 44-year average of 1958–2002, with no marked increase in warming. In the graph, temperature is shown in the Kelvin scale; the horizontal blue line is freezing, or zero degrees Celsius and 32 degrees Fahrenheit.
Daily mean temperature and climate north of the 80th northern parallel as a function of the day of year. Source: Danish Meteorological Institute, http://ocean.dmi.dk/arctic/meant80n.uk.php.
Now, here’s the big question: why were internationally acclaimed climate scientists unable to predict this marked increase in the extent of summer sea ice? Is it because their overall approach is biased toward supporting the theory that carbon dioxide is warming the planet to dangerous levels? Or is it because their models are incapable of predicting future temperatures?
The answers must come from the doomsayers themselves. They need to explain why Arctic summer temperatures have been not at all different from the 44-year average and why summer sea ice is above decadal averages.
Acknowledging that we have yet to understand the complex climate system will undermine the credibility of scientists and political institutions advancing destructive energy policies to address a fantasy of climate catastrophe.
Melting of Arctic ice has been used as a major data point in the justification of restrictive energy policies adopted by many countries. It is ironic — and infuriating — that millions across the world are suffering from high energy prices and blackouts at the same time that Arctic sea ice has been at its greatest extent in five years!
Europe is facing rapidly rising electricity prices and a natural gas shortage. Citizens in the U.S. are experiencing high energy prices as their access to cheap fossil fuels is restricted by government’s infatuation with solar and wind power. China is scampering to reduce blackouts. All this could have been avoided if political leaders had not promoted a false climate emergency.
It makes no sense to force people to live in darkness in the name of climate policy when the policy-makers themselves have so little understanding of the planet’s mechanisms of warming and cooling. Acknowledge the infancy of climate science and liberate people from energy tyranny.
Vijay Jayaraj is a research associate at the CO2 Coalition, Arlington, VA. He holds a Master’s degree in environmental sciences from the University of East Anglia, U.K. and resides in India.
The World We Live In 