Poisoned Presidents? #4

POISONED PRESIDENTS?
Case 4 of 7 / Franklin Pierce

Franklin Pierce

Franklin Pierce of New Hampshire was a Democrat who was elected the 14th President in 1852. Though a northerner and a pro-Unionist, Pierce also enjoyed strong support in the South, and he viewed radical northern abolitionists as a threat to unity. Pierce’s one-term presidency would go on to be deemed a “failure” by establishment historians, and this “correctionist historian” would have to agree with academia in this case; while noting, in all fairness, that few placed in his predicament could have succeeded. Pierce’s fear of “The Slave Power” expansionists alienated pro-Union and anti-slavery groups for he, like President Fillmore, appeased the secessionists by signing the Kansas–Nebraska Act(which allowed slavery in new territories) and enforcing the Fugitive Slave Act.

Far from calming the situation, Pierce’s approach only exacerbated the related controversies of slavery expansion and the coming secession. It can rightly be said that the Civil War started under Pierce’s watch, in the new territory of Kansas where “free state” settlers bloodily battled with “slave staters.” (see “Bleeding Kansas“) Much like what was going on over in Europe, this period in US history was one in which the government, particularly the dangerous office of the presidency itself, regardless of who was holding it, was the most destabilized it had ever been — and it was all by design of “somebody.”

Before we review the possible, but not fatal, presidential poisoning of Pierce, it is important to note that he came close to dying in an “accident” two months before being sworn in.  Pierce and his wife, Jane, sustained minor injuries after their train-car derailed in Massachusetts and toppled down a 20-foot embankment — coming to rest on its roof. Killed in the strange accident was their 11-year-old son, Benny. Pierce himself pulled little Benny from the wreckage. The back of the boy’s head had been torn off by flying debris. After glimpsing the horrible sight, Jane, according to a witness,  went into “agony beyond any description.” She suffered from severe depression the rest of her days. It is also said that Pierce himself was never the same after the accident; and that be became weak and prone to manipulation. Understandable.

Things get even freakier. During this pre-inauguration period, Pierce’s vice-President-to-be, a southern pro-unionist named William R. King of Alabama, like Presidents Harrison, Polk and Taylor in recent years, also came down suddenly ill while in Cuba — “tuberculosis” they said. King was so ill that he couldn’t make it back to Washington DC for the March swearing-in. He was administered the oath of Vice Presidency while still in Cuba. Just 6 weeks later, King, 67, was dead and Pierce went without a VP for his whole 4-year presidency. Just imagine the political destabilization had Pierce and King both died during the pre-inauguartion period. Who would have become president then, when Fillmore’s term expired? Rules of succession only apply to sitting presidents & vice presidents — not pre-presidents.

1. Could someone have rigged the deadly pre-inauguration train derailment over a Massachusetts embankment? Agents of intrigue operated in the North as well as the South. // 2. Jane Pierce saw her son’s head smashed open and was never the same. // 3. Vice President William R. King — sudden pre-inauguration “tuberculosis,” followed by death — leaving the already weakened Pierce without a VP for the next four years.

Pierce’s compromises, on top of previous ones, were (as southern pro-Union presidents Jackson, Polk & Taylor had all previously foreseen) only strategic stepping stones toward the actual long term conspiratorial goal of what Unionists were calling, “The Slave Power”
 — namely, expansion and secession, by Civil War if necessary. 




May 22, 1856 — Congressman Preston Brooks (SC) surprise-attacked Senator Charles Sumner (MA) with a cane in the US Senate Chamber  — beating the defenseless Sumner over the head so severely that he almost died, and never fully recovered. Brooks had taken offense to Sumner’s anti-“Slave Power” / anti-Kansas-Nebraska Compromise speech in which he attacked his cousin, SC Senator Andrew Butler. Onlookers who moved to restrain Brooks were held back by another Congressman, 
Laurence M. Keitt (SC)
, who was brandishing a pistol.

In Summer 1853, Pierce developed a severe respiratory infection while traveling to the world’s fair in New York. He described his sudden affliction as  “a pain in his lungs” — and was forced to cancel some speeches. Back in Washington, he took to bed. Observers described his state as “broken and wretched.” Though called a severe cold at the time, the lung illness was obviously something more — possibly pneumonia.

Chills and fever again afflicted Pierce in summer 1854. Both the President and the First Lady developed a chronic cough — with both, according to one source, coughing up blood. (here) Were it not for the sudden and unexpected deaths of THREE recent presidents, the recent death of Pierce’s VP, and the horrible train derailment which killed his son — one could reasonably dismiss the sickness of the Pierces as pneumonia or tuberculosis. But given all of these strange occurrences and the crazy political climate leading up to the Civil War, Pierce’s sudden lung ailment, which he survived, should also be considered suspicious — because poisons can indeed cause what is known as “chemical pneumonia.” After leaving office in 1857, both Pierces died young, Jane in 1863, age 57 — and Franklin in 1869, at age 65.

POISONED PRESIDENTS? #3

POISONED PRESIDENTS?
Case 3 of 7 / Zachary Taylor

Zachary Taylor 1850

Zachary Taylor, elected the 12th president in 1848,  had been a general and national military hero from the War of 1812 and the Mexican-American War (1846-48). Like General Andrew Jackson, his military record served as the foundation for an eventual presidency. Like Jackson, he was a southerner (having lived in several southern states) and a slave owner. And like Jackson, he was a steadfast pro-Unionist with zero tolerance for the secessionists. Like William Henry Harrison, (see Case 1) Taylor’s presidency was brief — just 16 months.

Taylor’s tenure occurred at a momentous time in both world and United States history. As “spontaneous” secessionist / independence revolutions were “coincidentally” rocking Europe and Latin America, the issue (pretext) of slavery in the western territories of the US pitted southern secessionists dubbed by Unionists as “the fire-eaters” against  the pro-Union patriots of both North and South. The nation looked to General-turned-President Taylor for a solution.

Taylor wanted the western territories seeking statehood (New Mexico, California) to be admitted to the Union as soon as their state constitutions arrived in Washington, with no language from Congress about slavery. He did so understanding that both would bar slavery in their state constitutions (“free states”).

At that time, there were thirty states in the Union, equally split between slave and free states. Hence, Taylor’s proposal would have added two or three free states to the Union, upsetting the North-South balance in the Senate. The secessionists cried betrayal! The stage was set for either a clash or a “compromise.” The debate that ensued was one of the most contentious episodes in American history. Taylor, knowing that the Calhounites would only use compromise as a stepping stone for the next offensive (exactly as Andrew Jackson had warned a decade earlier) would have none of it. Some southern Democrats responded to Taylor’s position by calling for a secession convention.

In February of 1850, Taylor held a contentious conference with southern leaders who were threatening secession. He told them that he personally would lead the Army, and “Any persons taken in rebellion against the Union will be hanged with less reluctance than I had hanged deserters and spies in Mexico.”  Being a southerner, a slave holder and a popular military hero, he, like Jackson could have done exactly that and still retained the support of many common southerners while doing so. 

What to do, what to do about a strong “bad ass” southern Unionist like General Taylor? Fortunately for the secessionist intriguers, Taylor wouldn’t be around much longer.

1. Rothschild’s “spontaneous” European & Latin American “nationalist” secessionist revolutions of 1848 (also the same year that the Communist Manifesto was published) failed to break up the various empires, but they did succeed in weakening the existing order of things. The parallels between these subversive uprisings and the curious growth of anti-Union Southern nationalism are striking. // 2. The radical secessionists dubbed “the fire-eaters” originally formed in 1850. // 3. Edmund Ruffin — a leader of the Fire-Eaters — would later go on to fire the first gun of the Civil War, at the Union-held Fort Sumter in South Carolina in 1861.

After participating in Fourth of July ceremonies at the Washington Monument, Taylor became ill. Within five days he was dead.  A tummy ache caused by eating too many cherries and drinking cold milk, the Fake News said (rolling eyes). Diarrhea, fever, chills — a prolonged death — eerily similar to the death of Presidents Harrison (another pro-Union southern war hero opposed to expanding slavery westward) just nine years earlier, and Polk (another pro-Union southerner) the year before. How conveeenient!

After Taylor’s death, “The Compromise of 1850” — authored by “the great compromiser” that Andrew Jackson wished he had shot, Henry Clay of Kentucky — was passed and signed into law by Taylor’s weak successor, Millard Fillmore. Fillmore — a New York lawyer — feared the secessionists and tried to appease them. But exactly as Taylor had foreseen, it would not satisfy the intriguers. The tragedy of the Civil War was still on course, with the first wave of state secessions being just 12 years away. It would be a conflict in which a future president from a northern state — Abraham Lincoln of Illinois — could, unlike southern slave-owning military heros Jackson, Harrison and Taylor — easily be labeled as an anti-southern “Yankee” and “tyrant.”

As for South Carolina’s John C. Calhoun — the man that Jackson wished he had hanged about 20 years earlier — he died just four month’s before Taylor did. But conspiratorial Calhounism lived on and grew stronger throughout the South. After Calhoun’s passing, Mississippi Senator Jefferson Davis  assumed the unofficial role of southern leadership — until being named President of the Confederate States in 1862 — with “Davis’s pet Jew” (and probably Rothschild-linked)Judah Benjamin telling him what to do.

It’s also worth noting that Fillmore would also go on to send Commodore Matthew Perry to “open up Japan” by threat of force in 1853.  Thus began the military modernization of medieval Japan in advance of its Rothschild-US-UK backed war on Tsarist Russia in 1905 — a war which weakened Russia and strengthened the Bolsheviks. Commodore Perry’s daughter was married to the European-born Jew August Belmont(born August Schönberg — Rothschild’s openly known US agent who became head of the Democrat National Committee in 1860. Though a northerner, Belmont was later suspected of trying to undermine Lincoln and the Union during the Civil War. Yes indeed. The flow of history took some nasty and bloody turns because of those “cherries and milk!” 

* Conspiracy Theory: The same secret society networks  — quite likely connected (at the highest levels) to the “usual suspects” running the tumultuous 1848 secessionist movements of Europe & Latin America — realized that the tough Taylor was willing to smash — by military force if necessary — their southern “nationalist” scheme to split the United States in two. So (((they))) poisoned him to death.

1. Like General Jackson before him, son-of-the-South General Taylor was also ready to use force to hang secessionists. / 2. Taylor’s grave-site: Louisville, Kentucky. // Cherries & milk, eh?

At the urging of a researcher and with the permission of Taylor’s descendants, his body was exhumed in 1991 and tested for arsenic poisoning only. The results were negative, but no test for any other forms of poison were performed.

Some establishment Fake Historians now speculate that Harrison, Polk & Taylor were all killed by “bad water supply” flowing to the White House. Evidently, the “bad water” knew to kill only presidents, but not their wives, children, servants, staff etc.

Putin Calls Out “Scum & Traitors” of Russia

An antiwar protester being carried away by Russian police officers during a demonstration in Moscow last month. (*Photo probably staged by CIA ops)

NY Times:Putin Assails Russians Who Back the West, Signaling More Repression.

By now finally and firmly in control at home while protected from an external NATO war by Trump and the patriots, Vlad the Bad — the clever chess grandmaster who took 22 years to patiently outmaneuver the once untouchable Deep State (((oligarchs))) and Soros / NGO operatives of Russia — is finally unchained. Known historically to be reserved in both temperament and choice of words, Vlad the Mad’s recent verbal tirade before the nation comes as a welcome shock to our own ears.

From the speech, a few choice excerpts for your enjoyment:

The Russian people will always be able to distinguish true patriots from scum and traitors and simply spit them out onto the pavement like a fly that accidentally flew into their mouths. I am convinced that such a natural and necessary self-purification of society will only strengthen our country, our solidarity, cohesion and readiness to respond to any challenges.

“The so-called collective West has no use — simply no use — for a strong and sovereign Russia, and they will not forgive us for our independent policy or for standing up for our national interests. The struggle we are waging is a struggle for our sovereignty, for the future of our country and our children.”

Tell it, Tsar Vladimir. Tell it!

1. With “checkmate” of Ukraine and NATO in sight, Putin is now speaking his true thoughts and intentions. // 2. Russia has come a long way from the first baby steps of an unknown patriot seeking to take back Russia from the Globalists and Oligarchs who were looting Russia and weakening her militarily. // 3. Putin has placed a target on the libtard “scum and traitors” of Russia — both those in the streets, as well as in the suites.

Putin understands Russian history and must surely appreciate the parallels between Russia’s Middle Ages enslavement to, and eventual liberation from, the Mongols — and its more recent subordination to, and ongoing liberation from, the Khazarian Mafia (whose ancestors cooperated with the Mongols.)

The Monsters from Mongolia had conquered Moscow and Kiev by the mid-1200’s. During the early 1300’s, the Russians started an independence struggle which did not end Mongol rule (aka the  “Mongol Yoke“) until 1480. In the beginning of this generational struggle, Russian rulers (the Rus) resisted Mongol rule. As a result, the superior Mongol forces laid waste to much of the countryside. In time, the Rus, under the leadership of national hero Alexander Nevsky, realized that a direct frontal resistance was futile, and chose to patiently cooperate with the Mongols and bide time instead.

Their Empire was so vast that the Mongols simply couldn’t control everyone. As a result, the Rus and their all-important Christian Church were left alone, provided the oriental overlords got their taxes. The Rus gained the trust of their  masters and maintain a degree of power within the overall Mongol empire.

The overstretched Mongols ignored the seemingly loyal “Duchy of Moscow” as it slowly conquered other Russian states — patiently growing and growing until it became a force in its own right. When Moscow grew strong enough — as the vast Mongol empire weakened — Ivan III simply decided to stop paying the Asiatic overlords. In 1480, a force of Mongol-Turko-Tatars were told to back-off or face annihilation in battle. They left without fighting after the Great Stand on the Ugra River. also known as the bloodless Battle of Ugra. Russia was free.

Only a fool, governed by passion instead of reason, would launch a direct frontal assault against a vastly superior adversary. Muscovite leaders of centuries ago — from Nevsky of the 1200’s to Ivan III of the 1400’s — understood the political imperative of “kissing Mongol ass until you can kick it.” So did Putin. Unfortunately, members of the Sunshine Patriot desertion brigades, as well as the whiny backseat “Are-We-There-Yet?” chorus of today’s “far right” — who tend to wet their panties upon seeing old photos of Putin or Trump lighting candles and chit-chatting with rabbis; or shaking hands with Klaus Schwab at Davos — simply do not.

The doctrine, set forth by Chinese military philosopher Sun Tzu, is called the “Art of War.” Putin has studied it, and so has Trump. Patience, boys & girls. Patience.

January 6 Truth – Deep State Media Fears “Epiphany” 

We can now see where this heading — and so does the worried Fake News.

Picture
JANUARY 06, 2022

NY Times:
 The Next Big Lies: Jan. 6 Was a Left-Wing Plot

In November of 2020, the newly-elected mask-wearing imposter President-Elect “Biden” — who we maintain is working for the actual Emergency Power President, Donald Trump — made a cryptic prediction that Republicans were going to have an “epiphany”(a sudden and striking realization). Here’s the quote:

“With Donald Trump out of the way, you’re going to see a number of my Republican colleagues have an epiphany. Mark my words. Mark my words,” Biden said during a fundraiser on Wednesday.”

Much to the confusion of his commie supporters, ‘Biden” repeated the term in December. As “conspiracy theorists” always looking to crack a code, “The Editorial Board” of The Anti-New York Times interpreted this to mean that something big was being planned for January 6, 2021  — the date which Trump selected for his big anti-voter fraud rally.  January 6th is also the date assigned to the biblical “epiphany” story of the Three Kings (aka Three Wise Men) arriving to pay respects to baby Jesus.

Lo and behold, it did indeed turn out to be a historic day, which we can now refer to as “Jan 6.” Only we didn’t realize until recently what the higher purpose of this planned “epiphany” — dubbed by Fake News as the “insurrection” of “Jan 6 — was all about. We can now see where this is heading — and so does the worried Fake News.

Picture
The stumbling bumbling imposter (working for Trump) delivered a harsh anti-Trump 1-year anniversary speech. This (by design) draws even more attention to the growing impossible-to-ignore claims that Jan 6 was a Deep State false flag. 
Picture
Why does “The “President of the United States” continue to sit in a little boy’s desk, on a little waiting room chair, on a fake set with fake outdoor scenery in the window?
Picture
HUFFINGTON POST
Picture
BLOOMBERG NEWS
Picture
January 6

The Epiphany is celebrated on January 6. The word itself can also be defined as “A Great Awakening” — a term often linked to Q Anon. Is the explosive true story behind the events of January 6, set to come out now?

It didn’t really take an advanced “conspiracy theorist” to see what happened that day. We sniffed that shit out right quick. From the ANYT issue of January 7, 2020:

“In the aftermath of the invasion of Congress by a mob of fanatical and weird-looking “Trump supporters” (rolling eyes), two new trademark clichés have been emergency fast-tracked — They are “breached” and “stormed.” Oh you foolish “Trump supporters!” (rolling eyes). Did you not realize that your “breach” of the Capitol was going to be seized upon by Fake News to make “Trump supporters” look bad, while blaming Trump for “inciting” your lawless actions?

For those of you guys who will occasionally — and amusingly – fail to catch the sardonic humor of The Anti-New York Times, we’ll spell it out for you in no uncertain terms: The grungy-looking invaders who “stormed” Congress were CIA-Deep State-Antifa foot soldiers pretending to be Trump fans — and they were let in by Capitol security men who deliberately stood down.”

*

We waited patiently for this false-flag to blow up in the Deep State’s face, but the truth remained suppressed because the timing wasn’t quite right.

Picture
Why did these “Trump supporters” scale and “breach” the walls when they could have simply walked up the Capitol steps like any tourist can? Answer: It was a more dramatic made-for-TV “breach” shot. 
Picture
Picture
The ridiculous-looking “Buffalo Man” and his small band of  young “Trump supporters” just strolled right into the heavily guarded halls of Congress while it was in live session — and had a nice picture taken? How is that possible?

On the 1-year anniversary of Jan 6 ™, Trump loyalists in Congress are boldly calling out the event as a false flag. Matt Gaetz of Florida:

“We know this January 6 last year wasn’t an insurrection. No one has been charged with insurrection. No one has been charged with treason, but it very well may have been a Fed-surrection.”

And Q-Anon Congress-gal Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia called out, by name, the known Deep State provocateur Ray Epps — who was actually recorded inciting Trump supporters to enter the Capitol. (video clip here)

“I can tell you right now, I don’t trust our government even more. When I went through the D.C. jail, I’ll tell you who I did not see–I did not see Ray Epps.”

The Gaetz and Greene comments are indicators that the Jan 6 truth may be about to come out. That would indeed be the type of initial “epiphany” that the bewildered subjects of the overlapping tyrannical kingdoms of Normiedom & Libtardia need in order to finally understand that government false flags and media cover ups are REAL after all. Once their thick skulls are penetrated — other long-suppressed truths can be poured (gently and gradually) through the breach.

But the most promising sign of all is the obvious fact that this particular “conspiracy theory”  has just struck a nerve. The headlines below — all blasted out within hours of the G & G allegations — show how afraid (((they))) are of this potential “epiphany” going mainstream.

Stay tuned.

Picture
WASHINGTON POST
Picture
ROLLING STONE
Picture
AXIOS
Picture
PBS

US Military – Not Deep State – Oversaw the Vaccine Operation

NYT: “The BEHIND THE SCENES role of the military has been PERVASIVE.”

Picture

While no troops will be administering shots or dropping off doses, scores of Defense Department employees are involved in the effort.

After catching incoming flak (some of it downright nasty & surprisingly personal) my resent take of both Trump’s strategically necessary (for the normies) pro-vax comments as well as the claim that the magic jab — in spite of being totally unnecessary, based upon a hoax, and responsible for adverse reactions in some — is NOT the mass genocide / “Georgia Guidestones” depopulation jab which the Globalist Cabal had originally intended to force upon all of us.

That’s my opinion and I’m sticking to it. Hopefully, today’s presentation — based on a Times story from November 2020 — will ease the anxiety and anger some of “you guys” are experiencing over Trump’s recent comments.

Let’s analyze this article.

Picture
Picture
Though we have been bloodied (with tomato juice) — RHC / ANYT stands by Trump’s “Operation Warp Speed” as being strategically necessary for saving the economy from total melt-down — and not mass genocidal as the Deep State had intended.

NY Times: When President Trump talks about efforts to deliver the corona-virus vaccine to millions of Americans eager to return to their normal lives, he often says he is “counting on the military” to get it done.
Analysis: All along, the central thesis of Q and “The Storm” has been that the military elements (especially NSA, military intelligence & special forces) loyal to America constitute our last line of defense against the Globalists.

NY Times: Mr. Trump has given the impression that troops would be packing up vials, transporting them from factories to pharmacies and perhaps even administering shots. In reality, the role of the military has been less public and more pervasive than this characterization suggests.
Analysis: The military’s role has been “less public” and “pervasive” — negative-sounding terms which reveal the Times’ dissatisfaction with the military’s control over  “Operation Warp Speed.

NY Times: Scores of Defense Department employees are laced through the government offices involved in the effort, making up a large portion of the federal personnel devoted to the effort.
Analysis: Having so many White Hats “laced” within the project sure would make it kinda’ tough to slip a poison “mickey” and a nano-tracking chip into the magic jab, one would think. No?

NY Times: Those numbers have led some current and former officials at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to privately grumble that the military’s role in Operation Warp Speed was too large for a task that is, at its core, a public health campaign.
Analysis: The murderous Deep State scum at the CDC “privately grumbled” about the military’s “pervasive” role in Op Warp Speed, eh? Boom! “Youse guys” starting to feel a little better now?

NY Times: Paul Ostrowski, the director of supply, production and distribution for Operation Warp Speed. He is a retired Army lieutenant general who was selected to manage logistics for the program by Gen. Gustave F. Perna, the chief operating officer for Operation Warp Speed.
Analysis: A “retired Army lieutenant” selected by an Army General who himself was appointed by Trump to oversee a military role that was so “pervasive” that it upset the CDC. Trump’s trolling the Deep State? Seems that way.

NY Times: The military will also monitor vaccine distribution through an operations center. “They will know where every vaccine dose is,”
Analysis: Patriots — not the CDC, not Big Pharma, not Dr. Falsie, not the WHO, not the Bill Gates henchmen — have been in control of the vaccine the whole time.

Picture

Inside Defense
Picture
Government Technology
Picture
Stat News / September 28, 2020

It would have been impossible for the Deep State to mass distribute poisoned and nano-chipped vaccines under such a “pervasive” level of military oversight.

Picture
General Gustave Perna with Trump
Picture
Army Lt. General Paul Ostrowski
Picture
Flashback to Trump’s 2017 inauguration — military men strangely walk up to stand behind Trump, and then leave just as quietly.

Here’s some more reassurance from the Stat News story accompanying that headline posted above. The main punchlines are enhanced by us in bold and red for your convenience:

Operation Warp Speed is largely an abstraction in Washington, with little known about who works there other than its top leaders, or how it operates. Even pharmaceutical companies hoping to offer help have labored to figure out who to contact.

Now, an organizational chart of the $10 billion initiative, obtained by STAT, reveals the fullest picture yet of Operation Warp Speed: a highly structured organization in which military personnel vastly outnumber civilian scientists.

The labyrinthine chart shows that roughly 60 military officials — including at least four generals — are involved in the leaders of Operation Warp Speed, many of whom have never worked in health care or vaccine development.

Operation Warp Speed’s central goal is to develop, produce, and distribute 300 million doses of a coronavirus vaccine by January — and the military is intimately involved.

It has also set up significant cybersecurity and physical security operations to ensure an eventual vaccine is guarded very closely from “state actors who don’t want us to be successful in this,” …. many of the Warp Speed discussions take place in protected rooms used to discuss classified information.

The military’s extensive involvement in the development and distribution of a vaccine is a departure from pandemics of the past, but it is fitting for Trump, who has gushed about his love for “my military” and “my generals.”

One senior federal health official told STAT he was struck by the presence of soldiers in military uniforms walking around the health department’s headquarters in Washington, and said that recently he has seen more than 100 officials in the corridors wearing “Desert Storm fatigues.”

“Military personnel won’t be familiar with the health resources available in a community,” said John Auerbach, CEO of Trust for America’s Health, a group closely aligned with public health departments.  (* Deep State players upset about the military takeover!)

“They don’t know who the doctors are or where the community health centers are located or what resources they have. They don’t know where the pharmacies are. Public health people do know, that’s part of what they do.” (* Waaah! Waaah! Waaah! cried the Deep State when Trump’s military took the vaccine process away from them.)

Picture
Picture

Deep State CDC under military control? Image & caption above from the US Department of Defense website.

Defy International Law? Kill Millions Of People? So What?

According to the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989:7

“Whoever knowingly develops, produces, stockpiles, transfers, acquires, retains, or possesses any biological agent, toxin, or delivery system for use as a weapon, or knowingly assists a foreign state or any organization to do so, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for life or any term of years, or both. There is extraterritorial Federal jurisdiction over an offense under this section committed by or against a national of the United States.”

So what?

depopulation china


“Acts”, laws, regulations, restrictions all come with penalties. But without enforcement mechanisms and the willpower/authority to use them, any “Act” is just an arrangement of words on paper to make politicians look righteous.

Consider: If the government – and the public – knew for undeniable, irrefutable fact the dreaded ‘COVID virus’ was developed and released in Wuhan with the explicit intention of devastating the United States and the rest of the free world, what precisely would any entity effectively *do* about it? …

Impose severe financial sanctions? Condemn China on the world stage with a sternly worded State Department press release? Demand reparations? Express outrage? The political status of America indicates the answer is none of the above.

Consider: According to the act “Whoever knowingly develops… or knowingly assists… shall be fined or imprisoned for life…”.

So what?

Does any sentient being capable of walking upright believe China’s Chairman Xi Jinping would willingly surrender to such an indictment? That China would pay a fine of any amount? Or be forced to admit its guilt on the world stage for violating the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989, being responsible for the death of millions’? Only the recently lobotomized would check the “Yes” box.

In a recent scribbling, I posed two challenges:

  • Name the 2 things you come in contact with every day that are not taxed, regulated, embargoed, licensed, restricted, or prohibited by the Government;
  • Name the 2 issues impacting your life on a daily basis that have not originated from Government.

Answers: None and All.

With such an unambiguous universal indictment of government, how are we to understand – and accept – its continued existence? What “government service” could not be more economically, more effectively performed by private citizens working in voluntary cooperation to their mutual benefit and, subsequently, the benefit of others?

Aside from national defense, what human endeavors would be hobbled by the elimination of government taxation, confiscation, regulation, economic restrictions, personal as well as commercial prohibitions, and the agencies that enforce them?

The 535 ‘elected officials” – and thousands of unelected bureaucrats – in Washington, in addition to the several thousand who comprise the elected, appointed, and assumed state leaders, total a tiny fraction of the 330 million people whose lives they presume to run without authority or mutual agreement; the ‘social contract’ is a dirty joke.

Which begs the question: Why? With such an overwhelming number of acts, laws, orders, regulations negatively impacting the lives of literally every person, why is government even permitted to exist? Anyone can write a declaration, a Constitution, an act or law, and with enough guns, command compliance. That’s not freedom; that’s not liberty.

By any logic, reason, or objective analysis, Government is a criminal operation of intimidation, the immoral imposition of force yielding tyranny camouflaged by the fiction of tradition, the designed ineptitude of public education and the principled failure of the press acting as the citizen’s “Watchdog at the Gate”, guarding against the overreach of government intrusion.

Consider: what was the last act of government that advanced freedom, protected liberty; that secured your unalienable rights? When did you give your consent to be governed by sociopaths, psychopaths, narcissists, pedophiles, liars, thieves, and incompetents? Where is your signed copy of the “social contract”?

So what?

Until a cure for the true pandemic of aggressive ignorance and its variants – contagious apathy, instant gratification, and technologically induced narcissism – the continued erosion of the remainder of freedom and liberty will continue, leaving “so what?” unanswered.

George Orwell’s 1984 (Eric Arthur Blair) Will Be Re-Written To Be Politically Correct And Fit The Agenda

You know what George Orwell’s dystopian classic 1984 needs?

A politically correct modern day re-write from a feminist perspective.

Said no one ever.

“Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every book rewritten, every picture has been repainted, every statue and street building has been renamed, every date has been altered. And the process is continuing day by day and minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Party is always right.” ― George Orwell, 1984

Truth Bombs About The Feminist Agenda

Unfortunately, feminism was never about women’s rights. The Rockefeller Foundation sought to achieve multiple goals through the feminist movement, such as:

1). Depopulation by destroying the traditional family and having less kids as a result (statistically, there are more divorces than ever, even though less people than ever are getting married. Consequently, the Western population is in steep decline – which means that the plan was a resounding success).

2). Indoctrinating children in schools from a very early age, and destabilising society as a resul (this is according to Nicholas “Nick” Rockefeller himself) – before feminism, many kids were either home schooled by their mothers, or they would be sent to school later, and the curriculum was closely monitored by their mothers. Because both parents had to work a 9-5 job, the kids were sent to school earlier, and because the family was too busy working, the school became their main family. Of course, the curriculum deteriorated with each passing year, and we all know what abominations are being taught in schools today.

3). Taxing women and doubling the work force – double the work force, double the taxation, and double the income that was being pumped back into the economy.

We’ve all been lied to, people! If you really think about it, the women have actually been enslaved, not liberated. They’ve been put to work for eight hours a day, five days a week, until they’re 60. And today, all people are currency slaves, regardless of sex. What a sham!

Reference: YouTube.com

3 Psychological Experiments & 2 Syndromes That Explain Why So Many People Conform With Tyranny

The orchestrators of the COVID scamdemic understand human psychology very well and have been able to cleverly hack or exploit psychological weaknesses in the masses to engender compliance and obedience.

5 psychological experiments that explain why so many people conform with tyranny

By Makia Freeman

In this article, I will emphasize 4 experiments that shed light on how people come to conform, adapt to absurdity and obey authority, even if it goes against their personal moral code and principles.

We must be aware of these tendencies within ourselves as we strive to remain sovereign and free individuals.

Must-read: The COVID Cult and the 10 Stages of Genocide.

Making Sense of the Absurd COVID Trance-Like Behavior

1. The Asch Conformity Experiments

Peer pressure is not just something with which only kids or teenagers have to deal. The desire to belong is a deep-seated human drive. The Asch Conformity Experiments, conducted in 1951, were a set of experiments used to determine the degree to which people would adjust their behavior based on the need to fit in and not stand out.

Solomon Asch told the participants it was an experiment about visual perception. He first had them answer a simple question alone where they were comparing the length of 3 different lines on the right to the one on the left, and answering which line on the right was closest in length to the one on the left. 99% of people answered correctly.

Then, he put the participant in a room with others, where some of the others were actually confederates with the experimenter. The confederates would at times deliberately give the wrong answer. This had the effect of swaying the participant to give the wrong answer, denying their own eyes or senses in order to conform with the group.

Asch found people would go along with the group 37% of the time, but for different reasons: some because they thought they must be wrong (when so many others or “the group” has a different answer), and others because they wanted to avoid the discomfort of standing out. Asch also discovered that when he gave the participant a partner (i.e. another participant who was participating at the same time), then conformity dropped from 37% to 5%.

You can watch an except of the experiment here. The following is a revealing excerpt:

“Sometimes we go along with the group because what they say convinces us they are right. This is called informational conformity. Sometimes we conform because we are apprehensive that the group will disapprove if we are deviant. This is called normative conformity … The partnership variation shows that much of the power of the group came not merely from its numbers, but from the unanimity of its oppostion. When that unanimity is punctured, the group’s power is greatly reduced.”

2. The Milgram Experiments

The Milgram Experiment, conducted in 1961 and repeated many times, shows that ordinary people can be tricked into following orders and committing horrible acts if they believe the commands are coming from a legitimate authority.

The results show that generally 50-65% of people would obey authority even if it conflicted with their morals and conscience.

The experiment was set up by telling volunteers they would be helping with research to see how well people learnt via punishment. They needed to read questions to someone in another room, and if that person answered incorrectly, they were to administer an electric shock, each time at an increasing voltage.

As the experiment went on, they could hear the yells of pain after they inflicted the punishment, and they were led to believe they were causing it (although they were not; the person in the other room was a confederate of the experiment).

Although some of the volunteers clearly felt uncomfortable and objected, the experimenter in charge, who wore a white coat and introduced himself as a scientist, would merely say things like “the experiment requires that you continue” – and many did continue all the way to the highest voltage of shock.

You can watch an except of the experiment here. The following is narrated by Stanley Milgram himself:

“The results, as I observed them in the laboratory, are disturbing. They raise the possiblity that human nature cannot be counted on to insulate men from brutality and inhumane treatment at the direction of malevolent authorities. A substantial proportion of people do what they are told to do, irrespective of the content of the act, and without limitations of conscience, so long as they perceive that the command comes from a legitimate authority.

“If in this study, an anonymous experimenter could successfully command adults to subdue a 50 year old man, and force on him painful electric shocks against his protests, one can only wonder what government, with its vastly greater authority and prestige, can command of its subjects.”

3. Stanford Prison Experiment

The Stanford Prison Experiment was conducted in 1971 and has a website dedicated to it here. Student volunteers were told they would be adopting the roles of prison guard and prisoner, participating in an experiment to study the psychological effects of prison life.

The experimenters set up a simulated prison and carefully noted the effects of it on the behavior of all those within its walls. Shockingly and very quickly, those playing the role of prison guard fell into sadism, and those playing the role of prisoner fell into depression.

These were volunteer strangers who had no previous affiliation or connection with each other. The experiment was stopped after 6 days for ethical reasons and concern about mental, emotional and physical health of the participants:

“Blindfolded and in a state of mild shock over their surprise arrest by the city police, our prisoners were put into a car and driven to the “Stanford County Jail” for further processing. The prisoners were then brought into our jail one at a time and greeted by the warden, who conveyed the seriousness of their offense and their new status as prisoners.

“Each prisoner was systematically searched and stripped naked. He was then deloused with a spray … The guards were given no specific training on how to be guards. Instead they were free, within limits, to do whatever they thought was necessary to maintain law and order in the prison and to command the respect of the prisoners … On the fifth night, some visiting parents asked me to contact a lawyer in order to get their son out of prison.

“They said a Catholic priest had called to tell them they should get a lawyer or public defender if they wanted to bail their son out! I called the lawyer as requested, and he came the next day to interview the prisoners with a standard set of legal questions, even though he, too, knew it was just an experiment.

“At this point it became clear that we had to end the study. We had created an overwhelmingly powerful situation – a situation in which prisoners were withdrawing and behaving in pathological ways, and in which some of the guards were behaving sadistically. Even the “good” guards felt helpless to intervene … I ended the study prematurely for two reasons.

“First, we had learned through videotapes that the guards were escalating their abuse of prisoners in the middle of the night when they thought no researchers were watching and the experiment was “off.” Their boredom had driven them to ever more pornographic and degrading abuse of the prisoners.

“Second, Christina Maslach, a recent Stanford Ph.D. brought in to conduct interviews with the guards and prisoners, strongly objected when she saw our prisoners being marched on a toilet run, bags over their heads, legs chained together, hands on each other’s shoulders. Filled with outrage, she said, “It’s terrible what you are doing to these boys!” Out of 50 or more outsiders who had seen our prison, she was the only one who ever questioned its morality.”

You can watch the film here.

These following two are syndromes, not experiments, but further explain human behaviour.

4. Stockholm Syndrome

The term Stockholm syndrome was first used by the media in 1973 when 4 hostages were taken during a bank robbery in Stockholm, Sweden.

The hostages defended their captors after being released and would not agree to testify against them in court. They had developed a connection with and an affinity for their captors.

Stockholm syndrome is thus defined as a condition in which hostages develop a psychological bond with their captors during captivity.

Wikipedia quotes this research from the book Stockholm Syndrome by C. S. Sundaram, which lists 4 key components that characterize Stockholm syndrome:

  • A hostage’s development of positive feelings towards the captor
  • No previous relationship between hostage and captor
  • A refusal by hostages to cooperate with police forces and other government authorities
  • A hostage’s belief in the humanity of the captor, ceasing to perceive them as a threat, when the victim holds the same values as the aggressor.

Even before the advent of the COVID scamdemic, I believe the world was suffering from societal Stockholm syndrome, i.e. a society-wide disorder of citizens liking and defending their political leaders who were actively exploiting them.

5. Munchausen Syndrome By Proxy

Munchausen syndrome was first described in 1951, relating to a group of patients who invented stories about their supposed illnesses, and convinced doctors to perform unnecessary surgical procedures on them. The theory is that these people were unconsciously doing this because they craved attention or care.

Munchausen syndrome by proxy is a variation, but contains a key difference. It is a specific form of child abuse first described in 1977 which describes situations in which the parents or the caregivers, almost always the mother, invent illness stories about their children and attempt to substantiate the stories by fabricating physical symptoms and signs.

Usually, families or caregivers bring the child to the hospital with symptoms that cannot be explained easily via physiologic ways, and these symptoms occur only when the child is with the parents.

The Underlying Patterns

Now that you know about these 5 experiments and syndromes, can you see how they fit into the COVID plandemic and at least partially explain all the COVID trance behavior?

Think about all the conformity that has happened, as people in many places still continue obediently wearing their masks, getting their fake-vaccine and chastising those who don’t follow all the ridiculous, illegal and illogical COVID rules.

Think about all those who were influenced into getting the clot shot to conform with the expectations of their spouse, partner, family or friends.

Think about all the blind obedience and lack of critical thinking that has happened, as white coated misleaders like Dr. Anthony Fraud-ci instructed the masses to “follow the science” and that if you disbelieved him, you would be going against science itself.

Think about all the heavy-handed and sadistic brutality dished out by sociopathic cops, especially in places like Australia, to those who dared to peacefully protest, walk around without a mask or simply walk outside their home for a few hours.

Think about how those cops (who were so inclined) relished the chance to become prison guards while the rest of the citizenry was relegated to prisoner status.

Think about all the support and praise leaders, whether political or scientific, have received over the last 20+ months, while they have been actively engaged in violating fundamental and inherent human rights, such as the right to work, to trade, to travel and to breathe air in an unrestricted manner, not to mention the rights of medical freedom and bodily autonomy.

Finally, think about the psychopathic nature of the state, which has invented a virus, a pandemic and an emergency in order to turn the citizenry into patients that must be “cared” for, even when the majority never wanted that care and even when that “care” is actually grave harm.

Final Thoughts

In so many ways, Operation Coronavirus is a psychological operation. It is the grand psy-op.

It works by leveraging fear to induce conformity, docility, obedience and a blind trust in authority. It works, as Huxley and Orwell both said in different ways, by attempting to make you love your servitude and love your captor-abuser. It works by attempting to make you doubt your own sanity and capacity to assess your own state of health.

Although it is vital to expose the numerous medical and scientific fallacies of the official COVID narrative (and there are many), as I and others have been diligently doing since the start, it is, I would suggest, even more critical to understand the powerful psychological manipulation that has taken place. We must do this in order to break free of the COVID trance propaganda and reclaim our sovereignty.

By Makia Freeman

Is the USA Now Under Secret Military Government?

Trump’s post-election purge of the Pentagon and Intelligence now makes more sense.

As regular readers you know that in numerous articles over these past few months, grown bolder and bolder in asserting that prominent celebrities, politicians and journalists have been “disappeared” and replaced with skin-mask-wearing imposters and / or those “Deep Fakes” which Fake News has been “warning” us about for some time now. Furthermore, reports continue to come in about Washington DC being a military occupied ghost town. And we also presented the case for the Kyle Rittenhouse “shooting” event and recent trial as comical crisis actor dramas scripted by the White Hats to their advantage — as was the recent auto-massacre (by an outspoken Trump hater) — also in Wisconsin. 

Such sophisticated and sprawling psychological operations could only be orchestrated and concealed by a hidden power on par with or even stronger than the old CIA Deep State (which is slowly being choked to death) which staged crisis actor events like the Sandy Hook & Parkland High shootings. As Q had posted many times, “The only way is the military.” — specifically, Special Operations and Military Intelligence ( by the way, I’m still skeptical about the whole Q thing).

That being understood — and we know that these are very difficult “red pills” for even our fellow “conspiracy theorists” ™ to swallow — we are now re-posting a post-election article from one year ago. The event described was very, very intriguing one year ago. Today — in light of all this weirdness and counter-hoaxery — the motives for Trump’s bizarre post-election military & intelligence purges of 2020 are, in hindsight, starting to make more sense.

Was the Pentagon’s “Continuity of Government” emergency takeover plan actually activated by President Trump? We now suspect that it was.

Picture
Picture
More made-for-TV White Hat psycho drama in Wisconsin — Killer Darrell Brooks sang “Fuck Trump” on a video
 (How conveeenient!)
Picture
Picture
Pulling a bit too much on your skin mask, eh “Joe?” And whatever happened to those famous big pearly white implanted choppers you used to have?
Picture
The Frumpy Frau of Germany with chin unmasked
Picture
“Maricon” (not a typo, Spanish for ?) of France


Picture
Another of Biden
Picture
Dr. Fucking Fauci dangling neck.

FLASHBACK TO NOVEMBER 2020 POSTING
It all makes sense now.

Trump is ‘Going to the Mattresses’

Picture

In the classic film, Godfather I, the acting “Don,” Sonny Corleone, eager to avenge an attempted assassination upon his father, wanted to “go to the mattresses” against a rival Mafia family.

* Tom Hagen (Advisor) : Sonny, We ought to hear what they have to say.

* Sonny Corleone: No, no, no! No more! Not this time, consiglieri. No more meetings, no more discussions, no more Sollozzo tricks. You give ’em one message: I want Sollozzo. If not, it’s all-out war: we go to the mattresses.

“Going to the mattresses” means sending teams of hit-men to some apartment in rival territory, in anticipation of receiving a call to kill other mobsters. Mattresses would then be set up on the floor for the men to sleep. In short, GTTM = war, aka “whacking” your enemies — and GTTM is not something that “The Donald” would start if he was contemplating leaving the White House in just 7 weeks time. And yet, GTTM against the Deep State is exactly what the now fully-liberated “Don Trumpeone” is doing. Let’s have a look at what the panic-filled pinko press has dubbed: “The Purge at the Pentagon.”

Picture
NY Times 11/11/2020
Picture
FOREIGN POLICY MAGAZINE / 11/25/2020

The question on everyone’s mind is — WHY?

Picture
Picture
Picture

* SECRETARY OF DEFENSE — MARK ESPER

Swamp creature Esper holds a Master’s Degree in “Public Administration” from Harvard and membership in the Council on Foreign Relations. Just those two bullet-points on his resume make him guilty and guilty of being one of “them.” Esper — a former DC lobbyist and executive at defense giant Raytheon (two more strikes against him) — subtly undermined Trump’s plan to pull out of Afghanistan and openly undermined Trump’s wish to invoke the Insurrection Act against the Red street scum of Portland and Seattle. Just one week after the fraudulent election of 11.3, Esper was “whacked” and replaced by Chris Miller — a lifelong soldier, military scholar, and former Green Beret who is totally loyal to Trump.

* ESPER’S CHIEF OF STAFF — JEN STEWART

After her boss was shit-canned, Stewart was bumped off and replaced with Kash Patel. As a House staff member, Patel played an important role in helping to protect Trump by discrediting the “Russian collusion” investigation. Patel is a solid Trump loyalist.

* UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE — JAMES ANDERSON 

Anderson, the Pentagon’s acting policy chief, repeatedly clashed with the White House over the installation of Trump allies in the Defense Department. Anderson’s dismissal cleared the path for retired Brig. Gen. Anthony Tata to take over policy on a temporary basis. Tata has been trashed by Fake News as a “conspiracy theorist.”

* ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF DEFENSE FOR SPECIAL OPERATIONS — JOSEPH KERNAN

Like his boss, Esper, swamp creature Kernan also “resigned.” Kernan held a very high-level intelligence  position which has been assumed by Military Intel agent Ezra Cohen-Watnick — a young Mike Flynn protege whose rise was foretold to us by Q Anon in 2018. The mysterious Cohen-Watnick has been protected and promoted by Trump all along. Although we’re not all that crazy about his name (its ethnicity, that is) — ECW appears to be a hard-core anti-Communist Jew in the mold of Joe McCarthy‘s sidekick (and former Trump layer)Roy Cohn. We expect that ECW will be the one ordering and coordinating the expected mass arrests of Deep State scum.

Picture
Esper
Picture
Stewart
Picture
Anderson
Picture
Kernan

PENTAGON SWAMP CREATURES OUT! —

Picture
Miller
Picture
Patel
Picture
Tata
Picture
ECW

HARD CORE TRUMP LOYALISTS 

That was a substantial post-election decapitation of the civilian leadership of the Offense Department. But the best was yet to come. Quietly and unexpectedly, on the eve of Thanksgiving Day, “Don Trumpeone” again “went to the mattresses” and abruptly “whacked” 11 of the 13 members of the Pentagon’s high & mighty “bipartisan” ™Defense Policy Board.

CNN commented:

“The Trump administration has removed several members of the Pentagon’s Defense Policy Board in what some are calling its parting shot at some of the top leaders of the nation’s foreign policy establishment.”

A “parting shot,” eh? We shall see about who will be “parting.”

Included in Trump’s pre-Thanksgiving Massacre were the untouchable holy icons of Globalism — Madeleine Albright(cough cough) and — (pinch me, am I dreaming?) — Henry Frickin’ Kissinger (cough cough)! Yes, that’s right — the legendary “German-born” Globalist Secretary of State that President Richard Nixon privately mistrusted but could not touch, was dumped like the sack-of-seditious shit that he is by Donald J. Trump.

Other big names “whacked” from the entrenched Kosher Commie Policy Board were former House Republican leader Eric Cantor(cough cough) and former Demonrat Rep., AIPAC agent, 50% Newsweek mag owner, and multi-millionairess Jane Harman(cough cough). It was like the baptism scene / multiple mob hit from The GodFather — but it’s just firings now, not actual killings. Although, we pray, the killings of Deep Staters will happen later.

* Headline: The Independent (UK) (November 27, 2020):
Trump Pushing Through Dozens of Last Minute Policy Changes – Including Use of Firing Squads

Let’s kill em’ all Trump. Let’s kill em’ all. Now, while you got the muscle.

Picture
“Keep your friends close. Keep your enemies closer.” — With his power growing, Trump just rudely removed “Dr.” Henry the K, age 97 — a previously untouchable agent of the NWO — from the Pentagon Policy Board!
Picture
The sainted murderous bitch Madeleine Albright (500,000 dead Iraqi children was “worth the price” (here)) was also booted from the influential group. 
Picture
The untouchable Jane Harman — just got touched and sent packing. 
Picture
Eric Cantor (R-VA)– was a well-connected anti-Trump “Republican” and Israel Firster who was once expected to become “the first Jewish Speaker of the House” (until being shockingly unseated by a GOP primary challenger in 2014) — has also been removed.

Some of youse younger folk may not quite understand the magnitude of the age-defying Kissinger’s worldwide “rock star” stature as an NWO sub-capo over these past 50 years. Trump’s disrespectful dumping of Harvard Henry the K (and other big names) from the “bipartisan” Defense Policy Board is a HUGE indicator that — as Q so often has said: “the patriots are in control.”

Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
A puffed-up demi-God of the New World Order like no other.
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Your glory days have come to an end, St. Henry. Let’s hope your miserable life does too.
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
And St. Madeleine Halfbright too!
Picture
As thick as thieves, protected by Fake News, and drenched in blood
: Arch-criminals and traitors Mad Madeleine and Henry the Horrible 
Picture
Picture
Show me the books that a man writes and I’ll show you the man (or woman).

True definition of “Fascism” is: “a populist resistance to Marxism / Globalism centered around a strong and righteous man.”

Picture
Henry the K — oh-so-respected and living large with Jake the Snake Rothschild (center, standing) 
Picture
With subordinate scum-of-the-Earth Killary 
Picture
With subordinate scum-of-the-Earth McCain

The Origins Of The New World Order

Secret societies, the unseen hands that steer national and international affairs from the shadows, go back to the dawn of Western civilisation. The individual most famously linked to these occult forces is Adam Weishaupt (1748-1830), a Jesuit trained philosopher and lay professor of canon law at the University of Ingolstadt in southern Germany.

the origins of the new world order

On 1 May 1776 Weishaupt founded a secret society called the ‘Perfectilibists’ (which soon became known as the ‘Order of the Illuminati’). The Illuminati recruited over 2,000 influential followers, but apparently lasted only until March 1785 when the Bavarian Government uncovered the conspiracy, exiled Weishaupt and outlawed the Order.

Some investigators suggest that rather than being wound up in 1785, the Illuminati (‘enlightened ones’) continued in existence to the present day. For the past 200 years controversy persisted over its role in influencing global affairs.

In 1798 John Robison, professor of philosophy at the University of Edinburgh, published Proofs of Conspiracy, a book alleging an Illuminati/Freemasonry plot to conspire against all religions, kings and governments of Europe.1

According to Robison, the Illuminati had been instrumental in fomenting the worst excesses of the French Revolution. That same year the Jesuit Abbé Augustin de Barruel published Memoires pour Servir a l’Histoire de Jacobinisme which supported Robison’s thesis.2

A century and a half later, Nesta Webster and William Guy Carr revived conspiracy theories about the Illuminati.

Nesta Webster (1876-1960), who was linked to the British Union of Fascists, wrote that rather than being banished, the Illuminati remained active and within a few years had “multiplied its hotbeds all through the south of Germany, and as a consequence in Saxony, in Prussia, in Sweden, and even in Russia.”3

William Guy Carr, an English born Canadian naval officer and lay Christian preacher, supported this thesis, maintaining that Weishaupt had been retained by moneylenders, including the House of Rothschild. Carr claimed there was an evil force at the forefront of an international conspiracy to destroy religious institutions and national governments in order to bring about a “Satanic One World Government.”4

According to Carr, the conspirators use a variety of methods to help them accomplish their aims, including:

1) Monetary and sex bribes to obtain control of individuals already occupying important positions. Such recruits are then held in bondage through blackmail, threats of financial ruin, public exposure or physical harm or death of their loved ones.

2) Illuminati in colleges and universities recruit students possessing exceptional mental ability.

3) Individuals trapped into Illuminati control are placed behind the scenes of all governments as ‘experts’ and ‘specialists’ who advise adoption of policies which serve the secret plans for one world government.

4) Control of the press and all other agencies which distribute information to the public.5

However, Illuminati researcher Dr. Tony Page says that Webster and Carr totally misrepresented the situation and were anti-Semites indulging in madcap conspiracy theory.

Page translated Weishaupt documents from the original German and presents him as a much maligned moral and virtuous man whose intentions were “assuredly high minded and benign.” A man who “strove for far nobler and morally exalted goals than are properly ascribed to him.

In fact, his intention (naive perhaps) but in my view, sincere, was to promote and disseminate human virtue, equality and freedom, and the happiness and dignity that flow from them.”6

Today, some see the Illuminati “as a major factor and influence in international power politics, allegedly fomenting wars, civil disorder and revolutions in their attempt to establish a one-world government.”7 It appears the jury is still out on whether the Illuminati is an ongoing occult force.

What we can say is that in our own intensive research over the past 10 years on the true origins of the First World War, we found no direct connection whatsoever to Weishaupt’s creation.

The secret society that we identify as responsible for the war employed similar tactics, but was a very different, very English creation. Furthermore, it remained concealed until exposed by the late Professor Carroll Quigley in the latter half of the 20th century.

Quigley (1910-1977) was a highly esteemed American historian who moved in Establishment circles, lectured at top universities, including Harvard, Princeton and Georgetown, and was a trusted consultant to both the US Department of Defense and US Navy.

He studied this secret network for 20 years and was permitted to examine its records. In 21st century parlance, Carroll Quigley was the whistle-blower par-excellence.

THE QUIGLEY ENIGMA

Professor Quigley wrote that the Rhodes secret society, or the ‘Milner Group’ as he called it after Cecil Rhodes’s death, was “one of the most important historical facts of the twentieth century” and of such significance that “evidence of its existence is not hard to find, if one knows where to look.”8

The ‘Milner Group’ exposed by Quigley is now widely recognised and variably named by others as the ‘Hidden Power’, the ‘Money Power’, the ‘Deep State’, or ‘the men behind the curtain’. All these labels are pertinent, but we call them, collectively, the Secret Elite.

Without Quigley’s revelations, the lid on this secret society would still be closed today. By opening Pandora’s Box and revealing some of the evils therein, he enabled others to see the truth.

His work exposing this powerful group has been enhanced and developed through years of careful research by other investigators into an explanation of how control of the civilised world has steadily been acquired through wars, economic manipulation and political chicanery by generations of privilege and money.

Our own work, including the book Hidden History: The Secret Origins of The First World War, closely examines the men involved and reveals their nefarious global influence was greater even than Quigley believed.

We garnered solid evidence that its members were directly responsible for taking the world to war in 1914 and deliberately prolonged the terrible carnage for over four long years while making massive fortunes from it.

The immensely rich and powerful Secret Elite controlled the British and US governments from behind the scenes, then as now, and much of the global mayhem over the last century arose at their instigation.

While Professor Quigley did mankind a great service, he remains an enigma. He exposed this ruthless, anti-democratic, totalitarian organisation and anguished over their determined attempts to suppress his writings, yet back-tracked on some of his original findings as if in fear of his life.

He also side-stepped a number of key issues and failed to discuss the Secret Elite’s role in the genesis of the 1914-18 war, or their audacious coup d’etat in 1916 whereby they literally took over the British government.

Rather bizarrely, Quigley stated that he agreed with their goals and aims.9 He did, however, disagree with their methods.

Their tendency to place power and influence into hands chosen by friendship rather than merit, their oblivion to the consequences of their actions, their ignorance of the point of view of persons in other countries or of persons in other classes in their own country – these things, it seems to me, have brought many of the things which they and I hold dear close to disaster.

In this Group were persons… who must command the admiration and affection of all who knew them. On the other hand, in this Group were persons whose lives have been a disaster to our way of life.

Unfortunately, in the long run, both in the Group and in the world, the influence of the latter kind has been stronger than the influence of the former.… I feel that the truth has a right to be told, and, once told, can be an injury to no men of good will.10

There is something deeply puzzling about Quigley’s assertion that while their methods brought much of what he held dear “close to disaster,” he agreed with their goals and aims for global control. These powerful men intended to replace democratically elected governments, arguing that their rule would be the rule of the best, whether or not the people wanted it.

A few researchers raise the possibility that Quigley was at some stage an actual member of the secret society, but failed to admit it. We believe it far more likely his strange statements of support were down to self-preservation.

In his major works – Tragedy and Hope and The Anglo-American Establishment – he narrated a history peopled by men who successfully concealed their power and influence, their connivance and common purpose. These individuals (and their descendants and agents ever since) conspired in secret towards the establishment of a world government that ultimately they, and they alone, would control.

It is worth noting that Quigley’s histories have themselves been subject to suppression. Tragedy and Hope was removed from bookstore shelves by unknown persons and withdrawn from sale shortly after its release. His publisher, the Macmillan Company, destroyed the book’s original plates and lied to him for the next six years.11

Quigley believed that powerful people suppressed the book because it exposed matters they did not want known. In this instance, unlike his exposure of the British Establishment, he did not name his tormentors.

IN THE BEGINNING

The opening passage of Quigley’s The Anglo-American Establishment may read like a John le Carré thriller, but it is no spy fiction:

One wintry afternoon in February 1891, three men were engaged in earnest conversation in London. From that conversation were to flow consequences of the greatest importance to the British Empire and to the world as a whole.

The staunch British imperialists who met that day – Cecil Rhodes, William Stead and Lord Esher – were well-known public figures but it should be noted from the outset that each was linked to infinitely greater wealth and influence. They were joined weeks later by Lord Alfred Milner and Lord Nathaniel Rothschild, the international merchant banker and richest man in the world.

He was inducted together with Lords Salisbury and Rosebery, whose families had for generations controlled the Conservative and Liberal parties in Britain and ruled the country as their personal fiefdom. Rothschild provided the financial clout while Salisbury and Rosebery provided the long-standing patronage and political networks.12

Cecil Rhodes, in association with Rothschild, had made his fortune in the gold and diamond mines of South Africa. Stead was the most prominent English journalist of the day and a moral crusader of great standing.

Esher represented the interests of the monarchy from Queen Victoria’s final years, through the exuberant excesses of King Edward VII, to the more sedate but pliable King George V. It was through Esher that the monarch was kept fully appraised of Secret Elite business.13

Alfred Milner, a contemporary of Rhodes at Oxford University, was a self-made man of ability and ideas who began his working life as an aspiring lawyer, turned to journalism, led the political agitation against the Boer separatists in South Africa, and eventually emerged as an immensely powerful and successful power-broker.

Milner was the master manipulator, the iron-willed assertive intellectual who offered that one essential factor: strong leadership. On Cecil Rhodes’s death in 1902, he became the undisputed leader of the world’s most powerful and far reaching secret society. These were the founding fathers of what we recognise today as the ‘New World Order’ movement.

They met at private town houses and magnificent stately homes. These might be lavish weekend affairs or dinners in private clubs which provided suitable London bases for their intrigues. The heady mix of international finance, political manipulation and the control of government policy was at the heart of this small clique who set out to dominate the world.

They drew up their plan for a secret society that would take political control in Britain and, later by extension, the United States of America. They renewed the Anglo-Saxon bond between the two countries – the ‘special relationship’ – expanding their power base to bring Anglophile Americans into the secret brotherhood; men who would go on to dominate the world through financial institutions, global corporations and dependent governments.

Wars, revolutions and other major events of the last 100 years are directly attributable to these individuals. The Boer War and the destruction of Germany in 1914-18 were merely the first steps in their long-term strategy.

The secret society comprised concentric circles with an inner core of trusted associates known as “The Society of the Elect” who unquestionably knew that they were members of an exclusive cabal devoted to taking and holding power worldwide.

A second circle “The Association of Helpers” was larger and quite fluid in its membership. A third outer ring comprised members who may or may not have been aware they were either an integral part of, or inadvertently being used by, a secret society, though “it is more likely they knew it.”14

The overlapping rings are themselves concealed, hidden behind formally organised groups of no obvious political significance. As Quigley put it, the group was able to “conceal its existence quite successfully, and many of its influential members, satisfied to possess the reality of power rather than the appearance of power, are unknown even to close students of British history.”15

In the early 20th century its tentacles spread throughout the British Empire to America, Russia, France, the Balkans and South Africa. Their targets were agents in the highest offices of foreign governments who were bought and nurtured for future use.

What’s more, they had the power to control history, to turn history from enlightenment to deception. The Secret Elite dictated the writing and teaching of history from the ivory towers of academia down to the smallest of schools. They carefully controlled the publication of official government papers, the selection of documents for inclusion in the official version of history, and refused access to any evidence that might betray their covert existence.

Incriminating documents were burned, removed from official records, shredded, falsified or deliberately rewritten, so that what remains for genuine researchers and historians is carefully selected material. Their ambitions overrode humanity and the consequences of their actions have been minimised, ignored or denied.

SPREADING THEIR TENTACLES

One of the problems facing anyone who turns to Quigley’s seminal The Anglo American Establishment is that it makes for a difficult read. Like several of the early chapters of the Christian Bible, his inter-connecting lists name many from the aristocracy, big business, high finance, politics and the press. Some were linked by matrimonial alliances while others by their gratitude for titles and positions of power.20 He devotes an entire chapter revealing how the Secret Elite controlled The Times (then Britain’s most influential newspaper) for more than 50 years with the exception of the period 1919-1922.21

A list of Oxford graduates, especially those given fellowships at All Souls College, included Milner’s heir apparent, Lionel Curtis, and numerous others who later gained positions of great significance and power.

Indeed, they all did, every single name listed by Quigley. Oxford gave the Secret Elite access to influential professorships, some of which they created and funded themselves, such as the Beit Chair of Colonial History, established in 1905.

It remains a serious concern that Carroll Quigley was absolutely correct when pointing an accusing finger at those who monopolised “so completely the writing and the teaching of the history of their own period.”22

There is no ambivalence in his accusation. The Secret Elite controlled the writing and teaching of history through numerous avenues including the press, but none more effectively than at Oxford University where they held huge influence over Balliol, New College and All Souls, and largely dominated the intellectual life of Oxford in the field of history.23 They ensured we learn only those ‘facts’ that support their version of history.

The influence was so powerful that they controlled the Dictionary of National Biography, meaning the Secret Elite wrote the biographies of its own members. They created their own official history of key members for public consumption, striking out any incriminating evidence and portraying the best public-spirited image that could be safely manufactured. Has anything changed?

Oxford University was also the Secret Elite base for the Rhodes Scholarships, funded by the legacy left by Cecil Rhodes when he died in 1902. Rhodes’s wish was to create a “worldwide” secret group devoted to English ideals and to the Empire as the embodiment of these ideals,24 and the scholarships brought that international dimension to the society.

They “were merely a facade to conceal the secret society, or, more accurately, they were to be one of the instruments by which members of the secret society could carry out his purpose.” Professor Quigley leaves us in no doubt that the secret society is the real power behind the scholarships.25

From its inception, Rhodes Scholarships favoured American students, with 100 places allocated, two for each of the 50 states and territories, whereas only 60 were made available for the entire British Empire and, strangely, several from Germany. The ‘best talents’ from the ‘best families’ were to be nurtured at Oxford University and imbued with an appreciation of ‘Englishness’ and the importance of the “retention of the unity of the Empire.”

In The Anglo-American Establishment, Quigley concluded that the secret cabal advanced its power-base through a triple-front penetration in politics, the press and education.26 We would go further, and can but wonder why he omitted banking and the military-industrial complex from his analysis. Politicians will always be easy targets.

Ambition, greed and sexual proclivity can be nurtured and harnessed. Sometimes men of real stature come to the fore and bring strong leadership to the cause.

In the early years Alfred Milner assumed that mantle. Fired by a zeal forged by Ruskin at Oxford, he was consumed by the need to establish the primacy of upper-class Englishness at the pinnacle of world power. He believed in the need to bring the British Empire and the American ideal together to sweep aside any rival for world domination.

Milner went to South Africa in 1897 to save it from falling to the Boers. He deliberately started the Boer War and saved the diamond and gold mines for fellow Secret Elites Rhodes, Rothschild, Beit and Bailey. He was idolised by Cecil Rhodes who placed his legacy in Milner’s safekeeping, and he was rewarded by the King with a knighthood and then a Viscountcy.

Critically, in South Africa between 1897 and 1905, he built a personal following of young carefully chosen civil servants who loyally followed his every decision behind the scenes in British and world politics. Lord Alfred Milner was arguably the most important man living in the first decades of the 20th century, yet his name remains virtually unknown outside academic and political circles. Why?

MILNER’S LEGACY

To demonstrate the privileged path that the Secret Elite created in their quest to establish a ‘New World Order’, we have chosen to follow the trail that began with Alfred Milner, the undisputed leader for 23 years following Rhodes’s death in 1902.

Critically, his most important achievement in South Africa was the creation of a network of extremely able acolytes to whom he entrusted the future direction of his cause: the domination of the world by the Anglo-Saxon race. His secretariat in South Africa comprised young men of “breeding, ability and conviction” from Oxford University, All Souls College in particular.

Dubbed “Milner’s Kindergarten,” they absorbed his commitment to Ruskin’s philosophy, his disdain for career politicians and his concern that democracy as it had developed in the Western world was corrupt and untrustworthy. It was akin to “a religious brotherhood like the Jesuits, a church for the extension of the British Empire.”27

From 1909 Milner began expanding the Kindergarten into a highly secretive organisation called the “Round Table,” with branches in South Africa, Canada, New Zealand, Australia and, crucially, the United States. (It is not to be confused with a benign charitable organisation of the same name.)

The grand Arthurian title suggested equality of rank and importance, nobility of purpose and fairness in debate, but was nothing of the kind.

Milner, and most of the Group, held democracy in contempt, and far inferior to rule by those who had an “intellectual capacity for judging the public interest” and “some moral capacity for treating it as paramount to their own.”28

Wealth, of course, also counted and “the key to all economics and prosperity was considered to rest with banking and finance”29 which the Secret Elite controlled. Alfred Milner acted as both elder statesman and father figure to the Round Table with his role described as “President of an Intellectual Republic.”

The Round Table groups across the world kept in touch through regular correspondence and a quarterly journal called The Round Table that was controlled by the Secret Elite.

They saw Britain as the defender of all that was fine or civilised in the modern world. Her “civilising mission” was to be carried out by force if necessary, for the “function of force is to give moral ideas time to take root.”

Asians, for example, would be compelled to accept “civilisation” on the grounds they would be better off under British rule than that of fellow Asians.

“To be sure, the blessings to be extended to the less fortunate peoples of the world did not include democracy.” They would simply be educated up to a level where they could appreciate and cherish “British ideals.”30 The ‘White Man’s Burden’ is indeed great.

Milner, his Round Table, and the Secret Elite generally saw the new Germany with its economic, industrial and commercial strength as the great threat to their global ambitions.

In The Round Table journal of August 1911, Lord Lothian, a member of the Secret Elite’s inner core, wrote: “There are at present two codes of international morality – the British or Anglo-Saxon and the continental or German. Both cannot prevail.”31

Alliances with France and Russia were created for the specific task of destroying Germany through a prolonged war.32 These men had no fear of war, though they rarely put themselves in the direct firing line.

EXPANDING THE ANGLO-AMERICAN PRIMACY

Cecil Rhodes had long dreamed of Anglo-American unity, and in 1891 actually discussed the possibility of achieving it by Britain joining the United States.33 On his death, the Secret Elite developed an even greater appreciation of America’s vast potential and the need for closer union.

They adjusted the original concept of British race supremacy to Anglo-Saxon supremacy, so that Rhodes’s dream had only to be slightly modified. They created a common ideology and world outlook among the peoples of the United Kingdom and the United States, and the instruments and practices of cooperation in order to pursue parallel policies.34

Alfred Milner believed these goals should be pursued by a secret political and economic elite influencing “journalistic, educational and propaganda agencies” behind the scenes. The flow of money into the United States during the 19th century advanced industrial development to the immense benefit of the millionaires it created: Rockefeller, Carnegie, Morgan, Vanderbilt and their associates. The Rothschilds represented British interests, either directly through front companies or indirectly through agencies they controlled.

Small groups of massively rich individuals on both sides of the Atlantic knew one another well, and the Secret Elite in London initiated the very select and secretive dining club, the Pilgrims, that brought them together on a regular basis. On 11 July 1902, an inaugural meeting was held at the Carlton Hotel of what became known as the London Chapter of the Pilgrims Society. It was to have a select membership limited by individual scrutiny to 500.

Ostensibly, The Pilgrims was created to “promote goodwill, good friendship and everlasting peace” between Britain and the United States, but its highly secretive and exclusive membership leaves little doubt as to its real purpose.35

Seven months later the American chapter was formally created on similarly exclusive lines. This was the pool of wealth and talent that the Secret Elite drew together to promote its agenda in the years preceding the First World War.

Behind an image of the Pilgrim Fathers, the persecuted pioneers of Christian values, this elite cabal advocated the idea that “Englishmen and Americans would promote international friendship through their pilgrimages to and fro across the Atlantic.”

It presented itself as a spontaneous movement to promote democracy across the world, and most of the membership probably believed that. But the Pilgrims included a select collective of the wealthiest figures in both Britain and the United States who were deeply involved with the Secret Elite. They shared Rhodes’s dream and wanted to be party to it.36

In Britain, at least 18 members of the Secret Elite, including Lords Rothschild, Curzon, Northcliffe and Esher, and Sir Edward Grey and Arthur Balfour, attended Pilgrims dinners, though the regularity of their attendance is difficult to establish. Such is the perennial problem with secret groups. We know something about the guests invited to dinner but not what was discussed between courses.

In New York, members included both the Rockefeller and Morgan dynasties, and many men in senior government posts. The power elite in America was New York centred, carried great influence in domestic and international politics, and was heavily indulgent of Yale, Harvard and Princeton universities.

Within a short period of time they created an American version of what Carroll Quigley termed the triple-front penetration of politics, the press and education. The Pilgrims Society brought together American money and British aristocracy, royalty, presidents and diplomatic representatives. It was indeed a special relationship.37

Because closer ties with the United States were considered of such crucial importance, a Round Table group was also established in New York to further develop links between Westminster and Washington, and high finance in the City of London and Wall Street.

It was supported by Rockefeller and Morgan, managed in secret, hidden from the electorate and the politicians, and normally its meetings went unreported in the press. Members aimed to gain political influence and set the political agenda in the US, but they were rarely willing to speak out in public.

All was to be carried out in secret.38 How dangerous are those who believe they have the capacity to think and plan for the world’s good, impervious to the will of the people and disdainful of democracy itself?

The first American to be directly associated with the Round Table was George Louis Beer, an outspoken Anglophile academic and writer who contributed reports and articles to their magazine for many years. Beer called Alfred Milner “the intellectual leader of the most progressive school of imperial thought throughout Europe,” and was one of the chief supporters of America’s intervention in the First World War. His link to the Secret Elite opened many associated doors and Beer became the recognised expert on colonial questions at the Paris Peace Conference in 1918-19.

In the manner which typifies how these powerful men write their own histories, Beer and his Secret Elite compatriot, Lord Eustace Percy, later drew up the outline plan for the History of the Peace Conference.

In other words, the Secret Elite made sure that the record for future generations was one they dictated. They supported Beer’s appointment to the head of the Mandate Group of the League of Nations and he was one of the creators of the Royal Institute of International Affairs in London (Chatham House), its American branch, The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) and sister organisation the Institute of Pacific Relations.39 Lest there be any doubt, these were all Secret Elite creations.

Milner’s Kindergarten had been expanded into the Round Table and that, in turn, had been expanded into the Royal Institute of International Affairs in London, the CFR in New York, and other Institutes across the globe.

The dominant role of the CFR in controlling American policy and politics cannot be overstated because almost all of America’s leadership has stemmed from this elite group.

That includes US presidents and their advisors, cabinet members, ambassadors, members of the board of the Federal Reserve, directors of the largest banks and financial houses, presidents of universities and heads of metropolitan newspapers, news services, and television networks.

“It is not an exaggeration to describe this group as the hidden government of the United States.”40

It is no less than a carbon copy of how the Secret Elite took control of Britain in the 20th century. These organisations were direct extensions of the Round Table Groups and have helped drive the Secret Elite agenda through the 20th century and beyond.

Carroll Quigley was the trailblazer in unmasking the Secret Elite, and it is plain to see they still dominate the British and American governments among others; still control banking and finance, politics, the press, the military-industrial complex, the universities and the key offices of state.

Wherever you live, ask yourself this, “is it happening here?” The grotesque plan set in motion by Rhodes and Milner at the end of the 19th century rolls on. Can it be stopped from reaching its ultimate destination – totalitarian, elite-controlled one world government?

The challenge is to reach beyond what Gore Vidal described as a conditioned response to the word ‘conspiracy’ where people react with a smirk and a chuckle; where historical analysis and contemporary evidence that demonstrates the power these people wield is dismissed as the product of ‘nuts and loners’ or fringe extremists.41

If we give up trying to educate the doubters, give up telling it as it really is, we the people are doomed to an Orwellian nightmare.

By Jim MacGregor & Gerry Docherty, NewDawnMagazine.com

Readers are encouraged to obtain a copy of the authors’ book Hidden History: The Secret Origins of the First World War and visit the authors’ blog at FirstWorldWarHiddenHistory. Hidden History is available from all good bookstores and online retailers.

Footnotes:

  1. E-book available at www.sacred-texts.com/sro/pc/pc03.htm
  2. E-book available at books.google.com.pe
  3. Nesta H Webster, Secret Societies and Subversive Movements, HRP edition, 254
  4. William Guy Carr, Pawns in the Game, X
  5. Ibid., X-XI
  6. Tony Page, A Brief Justification of My Intentions by Adam Weishaupt
  7. ‘The Enlightened Ones: The Illuminati and the New World Order’ by Michael Howard, New Dawn Special Issue 11
  8. Carroll Quigley, The Anglo-American Establishment, IX-X
  9. Ibid., XI
  10. Ibid., IX-X
  11. YouTube.com
  12. Gerry Docherty & Jim Macgregor, Hidden History: The Secret Origins of the First World War, 17-29
  13. Carroll Quigley, Tragedy and Hope: A History of the World in Our Time, 137
  14. Quigley, The Anglo-American Establishment, X
  15. Ibid., 4-5
  16. YouTube.com
  17. D. J. Markwell, ‘Zimmern, Sir Alfred Eckhard (1879–1957)’, Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, Oxford University Press, 2004, www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/37088
  18. Quigley, The Anglo-American Establishment, X
  19. Docherty & Macgregor, Hidden History, 14
  20. Quigley, The Anglo-American Establishment, 15
  21. Ibid., 101-116
  22. Ibid., 197
  23. Ibid., 84-100
  24. Ibid., 37
  25. Quigley, Tragedy and Hope, 131
  26. Quigley, The Anglo-American Establishment, 15
  27. Ibid., 34
  28. Ibid, 134
  29. Ibid., 122
  30. Ibid., 133-6
  31. Ibid., 329
  32. Docherty & Macgregor, Hidden History, 75-96
  33. Quigley, The Anglo-American Establishment, 38
  34. Ibid., 150
  35. Docherty & Macgregor, Hidden History, 210-224
  36. Ibid.
  37. Ibid.
  38. Ibid.
  39. Quigley, The Anglo-American Establishment, 168
  40. G. Edward Griffin, The Creature From Jekyll Island, 110
  41. Gore Vidal, Perpetual War for Perpetual Peace