Eisenhower’s Death Camps: The Last Dirty Secret of World War Two

Call it callousness, call it reprisal, call it a policy of hostile neglect: a million Germans taken prisoner by Eisenhower’s armies died in captivity after the surrender.

In the spring of 1945, Adolph Hitler’s Third Reich was on the brink of collapse, ground between the Red Army, advancing westward towards Berlin, and the American, British, and Canadian armies, under the overall command of General Dwight Eisenhower, moving eastward over the Rhine.  Since the D-Day landings in Normandy the previous June, the westward Allies had won back France and the Low Countries, and some Wehrmacht commanders were already trying to negotiate local surrenders.  Other units, though, continued to obey Hitler’s orders to fight to the last man.  Most systems, including transport, had broken down, and civilians in panic flight fromt he advancing Russians roamed at large.

“Hungry and frightened, lying in grain fields within fifty feet of us, awaiting the appropriate time to jump up with their hands in the air”; that’s how Captain H. F. McCullough of the 2nd Anti-Tank Regiment Division described the chaos of the German surrender at the end of the Second World War.  In a day and a half, according to Field Marshall Bernard Montgomery, 500,000 Germans surrendered to his 21st Army Group in Northern Germany.  Soon after V-E Day–May 8, 1945–the British-Canadian catch totalled more that 2 million.  Virtually nothing about their treatment survives in the archives in Ottawa or London, but some skimpy evidence from the International Committee of the Red Cross, the armies concerned, and the prisoners themselves indicates that almost all continued in fair health.  In any case, most were quickly released and sent home, or else transferred to the French to help in the post-war work of reconstruction.  The French army had itself taken fewer than 300,000 prisoners.

Like the British and Canadians, the Americans suddenly faced astounding numbers of surrendering German troops: the final tally of prisoners taken by the U.S. army in Europe (excluding Italy and North Africa) was 5.25 million.  But the Americans responded very differently.

Among the early U.S captives was one Corporal Helmut Liebich, who had been working in an anti-aircraft experimental group at Peenemunde on the Baltic.  Liebich was captured by the Americans on April 17, near Gotha in Central Germany.  Forty-two years later, he recalled vividly that there were no tents in the Gotha camp, just barbed wire fences around a field soon churned to mud.  The prisoners received a small ration of food on the first day but it was then cut in half.  In order to get it, they were forced to run a gauntlet.  Hunched ocer, they ran between lines of American guards who hit them with sticks as they scurried towards their food.  On April 27, they were transferred to the U.S. camp at Heidesheim farther wet, where there was no food at all for days, then very little.  Exposed, starved, and thirsty, the men started to die.  Liebich saw between ten and thirty bodies a day being dragged out of his section, B, which at first held around 5,200 men.. He saw one prisoner beat another to death to get his piece of bread.  One night when it rained, Liebich saw the sides of the holes in which they were sheltered, dug in soft sandy earth, collapse on men who were too weak to struggle out.  They smothered before anyone could get to them.  Liebich sat down and wept.  “I could hardly believe men could be so cruel to each other.”

Typhus broke out in Heidesheim about the beginning of May.  Five days after V-E Day, on May 13, Liebich was transferred to another U.S. POW camp, at Bingen-Rudesheim in the Rhineland near Bad Kreuznach, where he was told that the prisoners numbered somewhere between 200,000 and 400,000, all without shelter, food, water, medicine, or sufficient space.

Soon he fell sick with dysentery and typhus.  he was moved again, semiconscious and delirious, in an open-topped railway car with about sixty other prisoners: northwest down the Rhine, with a detour through Holland, where the Dutch stood on bridges to smash stones down on the heads of the prisoners.  Sometimes the American guards fired warning shots near the Dutch to keep them off.  After three nights, his fellow prisoners helped him stagger into the hug camp at Rheinberg, near the border with the Netherlands, again without shelter or food.

When a little food finally did arrive, it was rotten.  In none of the four camps had Leibich seen any shelter for the prisoners.  the death rate in the U.S. Rhineland camps at this point, according to surrviving data from a medical survey, was about thirty per cent per year.  A normal death rate for a civilian population in 1945 was between one and two percent.

One day in June, through hallucinations of his fever, Liebich saw “the Tommies” coming into the camp.  The British had taken over Rheinberg, and that probably saved his life.  At this point, Liebich, who is five-foot-ten, weighed 96.8 ponds.

According to stories told to this day by other ex-prisoners of Rheinberg, tha last act of the Americans before the British took over was to bulldoze one section level while there were still men living in their holes in the ground.

Under the Geneva Convention, three important rights are guaranteed prisoners of war: that they will be fed and sheltered to the same standard as base or depot troops of the Capturing Power; that they can send and receive mail; and that they will be visited by delegates of the International Red Cross (ICRC) who will report in secret on their treatment to a Protecting Power.  (In the cas eof Germany, as the government disintegrated in the closing stages of the war, Switzerland had been designated the protecting power.)

In fact, German prisoners taken by the U.S. Army at the end of the Second World War were denied these and most other rights by a series of specific decisions and directives stemming mainly from SHAEF–Supreme Headquarters, Allied Expeditionary Force.  General Dwight Eisenhower was both supreme commander of SHAEF–all the Allied armies in northwest Europe–and the commanding general of the U.S. forces in the European theatre.  He was subject to the Combined Chiefs of Staff (CCS) of Britain and the U.S., to the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS), and to the policy of the U.S. government, but in the absence of explicit directives–to the contrary or otherwise–ultimate responsibility for the treatment of the German prisoners in American hands lies with him.

“God , I hate the Germans,” Eisenhower wrote to his wife, Mamie, in September, 1944.  Earlier, in front of the British ambassador to Washington, he had said that all the 3,500 or so officers of the German General Staff should be “exterminated.”

In March, 1945, a message to the Combined Chiefs of Staff signed and initialled by Eisenhower recommended creating a new class of prisoners–Disarmed Enemy Forces, or DEFs–who, unlike Geneva-defined prisoners of war, would not be fed by the army after the surrender of Germany.  This would be a direct breach of the Geneva Convention.  The message, dated March 10, argues in part: “The additional maintenance commitment entailed by declaring the German Armed Forces prisoners [sic] of war which would necessitate the prevision of rations on a scale equal to that of base troops would prove far beyond the capacity of the Allies even if all German sources were tapped.”  It ends: “Your approval is requested.  Existing plans have been prepared upon this basis.”

On April 26, 1945, the Combined Chiefs approved the DEF status for prisoners of war in American hands only: the British members had refused to adopt the American plan for their own prisoners.  The Combined Chiefs stipulated that the status of disarmed troops be kept secret.

By that time, Eisenhower’s quartermaster general at SHAEF, General Robert Littlejohn, had already twice reduced rations for prisoners, and a SHAEF message signed “Eisenhower” had reported to General George Marshall, the U.S. Army Chief of staff, that the prisoner pens would provide “no shelter or other comforts….”

The problem was not supplies.  There was more than enough material stockpiled in Europe to construct prison camp facilities.  Eisenhower’s special assistant, general Everett Hughes, had visited the huge supply dumps at Naples and Marseille and reported:  “More stocks than we can ever use.  Stretch as far as eye can see.”  Food should not have been a problem, either.  In the U.S., wheat and corn surpluses were higher than they had ever been, and there was a record crop of potatoes.  The army itself had so much food in reserve that when a whole warehouse was dropped from the supply list by accident in England it was not noticed for three months.  In addition, the International Red Cross had over 100,000 tons of food in storage in Switzerland.  When it tried to send two trainloads of this to the American sector of Germany, U.S. Army Officers turned the trains back, saying their warehouses were already overflowing with ICRC food which they had never distributed.

Nonetheless it was through the supply side that the policy of deprivation was carried out.  Water, food, tents, space, medicine–everything necessary for the prisoners was kept fatally scarce.  Camp Rheinberg, where Corporal Liebich would fetch up in in mid-May, shivering with dysentery and typhus, had no food at all when it was opened on April 17.  As in the other big “Rhine meadow” camps, opened by the Americans in mid-April, there were no guard towers, tents, buildings, cooking facilities, water, latrines, or food.

George Weiss, at tank repairman who now lives in Toronto, recalls of his camp on the Rhine:  “All night we had to sit up jammed against each other.  But the lack of water was the worst thing of all.  For three and a half days, we had no water at all.  We would drink our own urine….”

Private Heinz T. (his surname is withheld at his request) had just turned eighteen in hospital when the Americans walked into his ward on April 18.  he and all his fellow patients were taken out to the camp at Bad Kreuzpath in the Rhineland, which already held several hundred thousand prisoners.  Heinz was wearing only a pair of shorts, shoes, and a shirt.

Heinz was far from the youngest in the camp, which also held thousands of displaced German civilians.  there were children as young as six among the prisoners, as well as pregnant women, and men over sixty.  At the beginning, when trees still grew i the camp, some men managed to cut off limbs to build a fire.  the guards ordered the fire put out.  In many of the enclosures, it was forbidden to dig holes in the ground for shelter.  “All we had to eat was grass,” Heinz remembers.

Charles von Luttichau was convalescing at home when he decided to surrender voluntarily to US troops about to occupy his house.  He was taken to Camp Kripp, on the Rhine near Remagen.

“We were kept in crowded barbed wire cages in the open with scarcely any food,” he recalled recently.  “More than half the days we had no food at all.  On the rest, we got a little K ration.  I could see from the package that they were giving us one-tenth of the rations that they issued to their own men….I complained to the American camp commander that he was breaking the Geneva Convention, but he just said, ‘Forget the Convention.  You haven’t any rights.’

“The latrines were just logs flung over ditches next to the barbed-wire fences.  Because of illness, the men had to defecate on the ground.  Soon, many of us were  too weak to take our trousers off first.  So our clothing was infected, and so was the mud where we had to walk and sit and lie down.  In these conditions, our men very soon started to die.  Within  a few days, some of the men who had gone healthy into the camp were dead.  I saw our men dragging many bodies to the gate of the camp, where they were thrown loose on top of each other onto trucks, which took them away.”

Von Luttichau’s mother was American and he later emigrated to Washington, D.C., where he became a historian and wrote a military history for the U.S. Army.  he was in the Kripp camp for about three months.

Wolfgang Iff, who was imprisoned at Rheinberg and still lives in Germany, reports that, in his subsection of perhaps 10,000 prisoners, thirty to fifty bodies were dragged out every day.  A member of the burial work party, Iff says he helped haul the dead from his cage out to the gate of the camp, where the bodies were carried by wheel barrow to several big steel garages.  there Iff and his team stripped the corpses of clothing, snapped off half of their aluminium dog tag, spread the bodies in layers of fifteen to twenty, with ten shovelfuls of quicklime over each layer till they were stacked a metre high, placed the personal efefcts in a bag for the Americans, then left.  Some of the corpses were dead of gangrene following frostbite.  (It was an unusually wet, cold spring.)  A dozen or more others had grown too weak to cling to the log flung across the ditch for a latrine, and had fallen off and drowned.

The conditions in the American camps along the Rhine in late April were observed by two colonels in the U.S. Army Medical Corps, James Mason and Charles Beasley, who described them in a paper published in 1950:  “Huddled close together for warmth, behind the barbed wire was a most awesome sight–nearly 100,000 haggard, apathetic, dirty, gaunt, blank-staring med clad in dirty field grey uniforms, and standing ankle-deep in mud….The German Divisions Commander reported that the men had not eaten for at least two days, and the provisions of water was a major problem–yet only 200 yards away was the River Rhine running bankfull.”

On May 4, 1945, the first German prisoners of war in U.S. hands were transferred to DEF status.  The same day, the U.S. war Department banned mail to or from the prisoners.  (when the International Committee of the Red Cross suggested a plan for restoring mail in June, it was rejected.)

On May 8, V-E Day, the German government was abolished and, simultaneously, the U.S. State Department dismissed Switzerland as the protecting power for the German prisoners.  (Prime Minister Mackenzie King of Canada protested to the foreign Office in London the parallel removal of the Swiss as protecting power in British-Canadian camps, but was squelched for his pains.)  With this done, the State Department informed the International Red Cross that, since there was no protecting power to report to, there was no longer and point in visiting the camps.

From then on, prisoners held by the US Army had no access to any impartial observer, nor could they receive food parcels, clothing, or medicines from any relief agency, or letters from their kin.

general George Patton’s US Third Army was the only army in the whole European theatre to free significant numbers of captives during ma, saving many of them from probable death.  Bothe Omar Bradley and General J.C.H. lee, Commander Communications Zone (Com Z) Europe, ordered a release of prisoners within a week of the war’s end, but a SHAEF order signed “Eisenhower” countermanded them on my 15.

That same day, according to a minute of their meeting, General Eisenhower and Prime Minister Churchill talked about reducing prisoner rations.  Churchill asked for an agreement on the scale of rations for prisoners, because he would soon have to announce cuts in the British meat ration and wanted to make sure that the prisoners “as far as possible…should be fed on those supplies which we could best spare.”  Eisenhower replied that he had already “given the matter considerable attention,” but was planning to re-examine the whole thing to see “whether or not a further ereduction was possible.”  He told Churchill that POWs had been getting 2,200 calories a day.  (The US Army medical Corps considered 2,150 an absolute minimum subsistence level for sedentary adults living under shelter.  US troops were issued 4,000 calories a day.)  What he did not tell Churchill was that the army was not feeding the DEFs at all, or was feeding them far less than those who still enjoyed prisoner-of-war status.

Rations were reduced again soon after this: a direct cut was recorded in the Quartermaster Reports.  But indirect cuts were taking place as well.  One was the effect of extraordinary gaps between prisoner strength as given on the ration lists and official “on hand” accounts, and between the on-hand counts, and between the on-hand count and the actual number of prisoners in the camps.

The meticulous General Lee grew so worried about the discrepancies that he fired off a challenging cable from his headquarters in paris to SHAEF headquarters in Frankfurt:

“This Headquarters is having considerable difficulty in establishing adequate basis for requisitioning rations for prisoners of war currently held in Theatre…In response to inquiries from this Headquarters…several varying statements of number of prisoners held in theatre have been published by SHAEF.”

He then cites the latest SHAEF statement:

“Cable…dated 31 May states 1,890,000 prisoners of war and 1,200,000 disarmed German forces on hand.  Best available figures at this Headquarters show prisoners of war in ComZ910,980, in ComZ transient enclosures 1,002,422 and in Twelfth Army GP 965,125, making a total of 2,878,537 and an additional 1,000,000 disarmed German forces Germany and Austria.”

The situation was astounding: Lee was reporting a million or more men in the US Army camps in Europe than SHAEF said it ha don its books.  But he was wrestling with the wind: he had to his issue of food on the number of prisoners on hand supplied to him by SHAEF G-3 (Operations).

Given the general turmoil, fluctuating and inaccurate tallies were probably inevitable, but more than 1 million captives can actual be seen disappearing between two reports of the Theatre Provost Marshal, issued on the same day, June2.  the last in a series of daily reports from the TPM logs 2,870,400 POWs on hand at June 2.  The first report of the new weekly series, dated the same day, says that there are only 1,836,000 on hand.  At one point in the middle of June, the prisoner strength on the ration list was shown as 1,421,559, while on Lee’s and other evidence there were probably almost three times that number.

Spreading the rations thinner was one way to guarantee starvation.  Another was accomplished by some strange army bookkeeping during June and July.  A million prisoners who had been receiving at least some food because of their nominal POW status lost their rights and their food when they were secretly transferred to the DEF status.  The shift was made deliberately over many week, with careful attention paid to maintaining plausible balances in SHAEF’s weekly POW and DEF reports.  (The discrepancy between those “shifted” from POW status during the period from June 2 to July 28 and those “received” in the DEF status is only 0.43 per cent.)  The reclassification to DEF did not require any transfer of men to new camps, or involve any new organisation to get German civilians supplies to them.  The men stayed where they were.  All that happened was that, by the clatter of a typewriter, their skimpy bit of US Army food was stopped.

The effect of a policy arranged through accountancy and conveyed by winks and nods–without written orders–was first to mystify, then to frustrate, then to exhaust the middle-rank officers who were responsible for POWs.  A colonel in the Quartermaster Section of the advance US fighting units wrote a personal plea to Quartermaster General Robert Littlejohn as early as April 27:  “Aside from the 750 tons received from Fifteenth Army, no subsistence has been received nor do I expect any.  What desirable Class II and IV (rations) we have received has been entirely at the suffernece of the Armies, upon personbal appeal and has been insignificant in relation to the demands which are being put upon us by the influx of prisoners of war.”

Rumours of conditions in the camps ran through the US Army.  “Boy, those camps were bad news,” said Benedict K. Zobrist, a technical sergeant in the Medical Corps.  “We were warned to stay as far away as we could.”  In May and early June of 1945, a team of US Medical Corps doctors did survey some of the Rhineland camps, holding just over 80,000 German POWs.  Its report is missing from the appropriate section of the National Archives in Washington, but two secondary sources reproduce some of the findings.  The three main killers were diarrhoea and dysentery (treated as one category), cardiac disease, and pneumonia.  But, straining medical terminology, the doctors also recorded deaths from “emaciation” and “exhaustion.”  And their data revealed death rates eighty times as high as any peacetime norm.

Only 9.7 percent to fifteen percent of the prisoners had died of causes clearly associated with lack of food, such as emaciation and dehydration, and “exhaustion.”  But the other diseases, directly attributable to exposure, overcrowding, filth, and lack of sanitation, were undoubtedly exacerbated by starvation.  As the report noted, “Exposure, overcrowding of pens and lack of food and sanitary facilities all contributed to these excessive (death) rates.”  The data, it must be remembered, were taken from the POW camps, not from the DEF camps.

By the end of May,1945, more people had already died in the US camps than would die in the atomic blast at Hiroshima.

On June 4, 1945, a cable signed “Eisenhower” told Washington that it was “urgently necessary to reduce the number of prisoners at earliest opportunity by discharging all classes of prisoners not likely to be required by Allies.”  It is hard to understand what prompted this cable.  No reason for it is evident in the massive cable traffic that survives the period in the archives in London, Washington, and Abilene, Kansas.  And far from ordering Eisenhower to take or hold on to prisoners, the Combined Chiefs’ message of April 26 had urged him not to take in any more after V-E Day, even for labour.  Nonetheless more than 2 million DEFs were impounded after May 8.

During June, Germany was partitioned into zones of occupation and in July, 1945, SHAEF was disbanded.  Eisenhower, reverting to his single role as US commanding general in Europe, becoming military governor of the US zone.  He continued to keep out Red Cross representatives, and the US Army also informed American relief teams that the zone was closed to them.  It was closed to all relief shipments as well–until December, 1945, when a slight relaxation came in to effect. 

Also starting in July, the Americans turned over between 600,000 and 700,000 German captives to the French to help repair damages done to their country during the war.  many of the transferees were in five US camps clustered around Dietersheim, near Mainz, in the section of Germany that had just come under French control.  (most of the rest were in US camps in France.)

On July 10, a French unit took over Dietersheim and seventeen days later a Captain Julien arrived to assume command.  His report survives as part of an army inquiry into a dispute between Julien and his predecessor.  In the first camp he entered, he testified to finding muddy ground “people living skeletons,” some of whom died as he watched.  others huddled under bits of cardboard which they clutched although the July day was hot.  Women lying in holes in the ground stared up at him with hunger oedema bulging their bellies in gross parody of pregnancy; old men with long grey hair watched him feebly; children of six or seven with the racoon rings of starvation looked at him from lifeless eyes.  Tow German doctors in the “hospital” were trying to care for the dying on the ground under the hot sky, between, the marks of the tent that the Americans had taken with them.  Julien, who had fought against the Germans with his regiment, the 3erne Regiment de Tirailleure Algeriens, found himself thinking in horror:  “This is just like the photographs of Buchenwald and Dachau.”

There were 103, 500 people in the five camps round Dietersheim and amongst them Julien’s officers counted 32, 640 who could do no work at all.  These were released immediately.  In all, two-thirds of the prisoners taken over by the French that summer from American camps in Germany and in France were useless for reparations labour.  In the camp at Sainte-Marthe, 615 of 700 captives were reported to be unable to work.  At Erbiseul near Mons, Belgium, according to a written complaint, twenty-five per cent of the men received by the French were “dechets,” or garbage.

In July and August, as US Quartermaster Littejohn signalled to Eisenhower in due course, the Army food reserves in Europe grew by thirty-nine percent.

On August 4, a one-sentence order signed “Eisenhower” condemned all prisoners of wear still on hand in the US camps to DEF status:  “Effective immediately all members of the German forces held in US custody in the American zone of occupation in GERMANY will be considered as disarmed enemy forces and and not as having the status of prisoner of war.”  No reason was given.  Surviving weekly tallies suggest the dual classification was preserved, but, for the POWs now being treated as DEFs, the death rate quadrupled within a few weeks, from .2 percent per week to .8 percent.

Long-time DEFs were dying at nearly five times that rate.  the official “Weekly PW and DEF Report” for the week ending Sept 8, 1945, still exists in the US National archives in Washington.  It shows an aggregate of 1,056,482 prisoners being held by the US Army in the European theatre, of whom about two-thirds are identified as POWs.  the other third–363,587 men–are DEFs.  During that one week, 13,051 of them died.

In November, 1045, general Eisenhower succeeded George Marshall as US Army chief of staff and returned to the US.  In January, 1946, the camps still held significant numbers of captives but the US had wound down its prisoner holdings almost to zero by the end of 1946.  the French continued holding hundreds of of thousands through 1946, but gradually reduced the number to nothing by about 1949.  During the 1950’s, most non-record material relating to the US prison camps was destroyed by the Army.

Eisenhower had deplored the Germans’ useless  defence of the Reich in the last months of the war because of the waste of life.  At least ten times as many Germans–undoubtedly 800,000, almost certainly more than 900,000, and quite probably over 1 million–died in the French and American camps as were killed in all the combat on the Western Front in northwest Europe from America’s entry into the war in 1941 through to April, 1945.

A German newspaper, Rhein-Zeltung has identified this uncaptioned U.S Army photograph of German POWs as : camp at Sinzig-Remagen, spring, 1945

The Long Marxist March Through the Universities

Picture
Members of the Leftist Students for a Democratic Society in 1963  give the Communist raised-fist salute.


FEBRUARY 10, 2022


NY Times:

 Requiem for a Liberal Giant


By Michelle Goldberg

In case there was any doubt about what Times Columnist Michelle Goldberg is all about, the Bolshevik Bitch clears that up for us by paying tribute to the recently deceased Todd Gitlin — a leader of the Marxist SDS (Students for a Democratic Society) during the early 1960s. Goldberg, not born until 1975, was -12 when Gitlin became president of SDS in the relatively normal-seeming university days of 1963. As a “Masters of Science in Journalism” (rolling eyes) graduate from Commiefornia’s Bolshevik Berkeley, yenta Goldberg surely understands what the elder “intellectual” Gitlin (who taught at Berkeley for 16 years) and his ilk did to bring today’s “intellectuals” to this sorry state of affairs.

A quote from Gitlin:

“My generation of the New Left relinquished any title to patriotism without much sense of loss. All that was left to the Left was to unearth righteous traditions and cultivate them in universities. The much-mocked political correctness of the next academic generations was a consolation prize. We lost — we squandered the politics — but we won the textbooks.

What Gitlin described was the success of the Left’s “Frankfurt School” strategy known as “the long march through the institutions.” Frankfurt “critical theorists” pursue gradual Marxist evolution when instant revolution is not possible. Gitlin was a God-hating, White-hating, America-hating scumbag, and so is his little groupie, Ms. Goldberg.

SDS launched in 1960, at a time when even radical male college students wore short hair, button down shirts and slacks — and the girls, dresses. Surely guided and aided by the Deep State / CIA, the SDS grew rapidly over the course of the turbulent decade which followed.  By 1969, SDS had 300 campus chapters and 30,000 student members nationwide — not counting those who had previously graduated. Most of these young “intellectuals” had adopted the appearance of unwashed unkempt hippies by that time.

This organization eventually splintered due to rival factionalism — with one faction (The Weathermen) going full blown terrorist, and others becoming “long marchers.” One can only imagine how many of that Red Army of “intellectuals” — many from wealthy well-connected families and “elite” universities — went on to shed their slob image and quietly blend into key institutions, all the while maintaining their radical activism and seething hatred for all things normal, natural and beautiful. One can only imagine.

1. After Hitler came to power in Germany, many of the “long marchers” of the infamous “Frankfurt School” fled to American universities. // 2 & 3. Bill Clinton and Killary Rotten Clinton — a perfect example of SDS-type hippies normalizing their appearance after graduation and then “marching through the institutions” undetected.

Just as the buttoned-up, normal-looking early SDS eventually spawned the outwardly radical drugged-up “hippies,” there was another earlier stage of the “long march” during the post-war years and the 1950s. You see, since the days of the French Revolution, the “students” have always been and will always be nothing more than stupid malleable clumps of raw material. Before the usual suspects could fry the minds and pollute the souls of their star-struck students, (((they))) had to capture the top spots at the “elite” universities. Once inside the ivy walls of the college towns, the NWO’s hand-picked presidents then lowered the drawbridge and allowed the Marxist professors (many of them Jew commies exiled from Europe) to invade. With these operatives placed in the key spots, the radicalization of the next generation of “leaders” could commence and, over the course of time, spread like a commie cancer both outwardly into society, and also downward into the high schools and elementary schools.

It is very interesting to note that during this era of conservative appearance, three men closely associated with the mass-murdering Globalist traitor Dwight D. Eisenhower served as university presidents. Under the reign of each of these “respectable” traitors, the important universities which they oversaw eagerly gobbled up UNESCO material and let radical professors in to establish, or enhance, the Bolshevik beachhead.

The three were, Dwight Eisenhower (“Ike”) himself (Columbia University), his brother Milton Eisenhower (Kansas State, Penn State & Johns Hopkins), and Ike’s speech writer, Malcolm Moos (University of Minnesota). Back then, very few people would have believed or could have foreseen that such “respectable” and patriotic-seeming individuals were, deliberately, laying the “long march” groundwork for the counter-cultural hippiedom of the 1960s and the “Critical Race Theory” of today. But that’s exactly what they, and many other “respectable” suit-wearing, conservative-appearing college presidents did. What a “march” it has been!

1
1. To add a phony air of “intellectualism” to the resume of the untalented “war hero” who would later become the US President, the “powers that be” arranged for Eisenhower to do a stint as president of elite Columbia. Under his watch, commie professors were brought in and protected (see “I Don’t Like Ike“) // 2. Ike’s Brother Milton injected UNESCO poison into the THREE universities he presided over at varying times. (Above, at Penn State) // 3. Malcolm Moos of Minnesota U — an extreme Left Globalist — wrote Eisenhower’s famous “Military Industrial Complex” warning speech. It was really meant as a “warning” that the “MIC” could one day overthrow the New World Order.

Will Poland Kill the Globalist EUSSR?

Picture
Polish traitors, libtards protest Poland’s rebellion against the EU


OCTOBER 9, 2021


NY Times:
 Poland’s Top Court Rules Its Constitution Trumps E.U. Law

How ironic that Poland — the nation whose folly in 1939 set into motion the pre-planned world war which itself laid the foundation for the pre-planned European Union — has now redeemed itself by striking a mighty blow against EU tyranny. From the article:

“Poland’s constitutional court set up a head-on collision with the European Union by ruling that the country’s Constitution trumps some laws set by the bloc, a decision that threatens to dissolve the glue that holds the union’s 27 members together.

The ruling, issued in Warsaw by the Constitutional Tribunal after months of delays in a closely watched case, effectively challenges the primacy of European law, a cornerstone of the continent’s push for an “ever closer union” since it began more than 60 years ago.” 

The court decision in Warsaw also raised perilous long-term questions about the future European Union membership of Poland. (emphasis added)

*
This unprecedented decision is Poland’s successful version of the proposed sovereignty-protecting  “Bricker Amendment” to the U.S. constitution — a noble effort which Globalist President Dwight Eisenhower and Senate Minority Leader Lyndon Baines Johnson conspired to thwart in 1954. Even more so than the half-ass “Brexit,” the ruling of the Polish court truly is very “perilous” for the Globalists. Should Poland escape the EU plantation, Hungary will not be far behind. And if the EU falls apart, or simply becomes neutered a la the old League of Nations, then the dirty work of many decades (centuries actually) will all have been for naught. This is very welcome news, which is why the Bolsheviks of Brussels and Sulzberger’s Slimes are whining about it.

Picture
Polish patriots wave their constitution at anti-EU rally
Picture
A “Polexit” would humiliate and cripple the EU beyond repair.
Picture
EU Boss-Bitch Ursula von der Leyen takes her orders from George Soros.

The seeds of the EU were planted soon after World War II. The Allied bombardment & destabilization  had caused immense displacement and suffering for the people of post-war Europe. The New York based Council on Foreign Relations then capitalized upon the crisis by implementing their long range plot to bring the nations of Europe under a single socialist system. But they needed a trusted “front man,” a creative “cover story,” and a clever “gimmick” to sell an expensive scheme to a reluctant Congress and skeptical American public.

The phony “war hero”, General George Marshall (CFR) was trotted out to announce The European Recovery Program during a speech at Harvard. The multi-billion dollar foreign aid (bribery) giveaway scheme was soon hyped up as “The Marshall Plan” by the propaganda press. It was sold by tugging upon the heart strings of America. The Plan, it was said, was also needed to save the people of Europe from hunger, poverty and Communist takeover.

Picture
The New York-based Council on Foreign Relations cooked-up the scheme to unite Europe — using the cover of a massive “humanitarian aid” package.
Picture
The plan was then named after the “war hero” and Time Mag “Man of the Year” — George Marshall.
Picture
Marshall Plan propaganda poster clearly shows the true intent — European unification under the NWO’s control!

The $17 Billion Economic Cooperation Act, aka The European Recovery Act(which ended up consisting of 85% grants or loan forgiveness and only 15% in paid-back loans) passed a divided Congress and was signed into law by President Harry Truman (whose administration was actually infested with inherited Communists) in April of 1948. The “poison pill” of the Marshall Scam was the CIA-run sub-group that it created in order to administer the economic aid package: the 18 member Organization for European Economic Cooperation — a stepping-stone toward regional government and eventually, world government. Winston Churchill himself, in a post-war speech before a gathering of Globalists in London, “let the cat out of the bag.” In speaking of regional groupings, the British Mad Dog said:

In this way alone, can the skeletal structure of world government be clothed with the flesh and blood of a living organism and the acts of state be confirmed by the passionate heartbeats of millions of men.”  (video here)

And that, boys and girls, is why World War II was imposed upon nationalist Germany, Italy and Japan. Should the tyranny project that is the EU ultimately unravel, the whole New World Order system will collapse with it. What will replace the NWO is anyone’s guess. The West is so diseased by now that even a total rout of the Globalist elite would not at all guarantee a return to sanity, morality, social health and liberty. There is so much “rehab” work to be done. Yet we should, nonetheless, rejoice over the system’s slow-motion demise and then “hope and pray” for the best. Go Poland!

Picture
Hiroshima Harry signs “The Marshall Plan” for European Federation into law.
Picture
Picture
Churchill openly (on film) declared his support for European regional government as a bridge to world government.

Globalist Bernard Baruch’s Puppet Generals Plot World War 2

Picture
The “War Heroes” Eisenhower & Marshall were created by a higher power.

For nearly half-a-century, the financier Bernard Baruch wielded immense political power from “behind the scenes.” It was Baruch who, according to Curtis Dall, introduced the future president Woodrow Wilson to New York city political elite “leading him like one would a poodle on a string.” Baruch later exerted similar career-making dominance over ambitious scoundrels such as Winston Churchill and Dall’s father-in-law, Franklin D. Roosevelt — the two main front protagonists who started World War II, at the behest of Baruch and his fellow finance mobsters.

Among “conspiracy theorist” historians, Baruch’s decades-long control over scum such as Wilson, FDR, Churchill and Harry Truman is fairly well known. What fewer real historians are aware of, however, is Baruch’s critical role in grooming and promoting the ambitious military men who were needed to eagerly carry out the orders of those political buffers. These traitor generals included John Pershing and Fox Conner of World War I fame, as well as George Marshall and Dwight Eisenhower from World War II.

Picture
The “Wall Street Legend” and notorious war profiteer Bernard Baruch was the George Soros of his era, only bigger.
Picture
In 1912, Baruch led presidential candidate Woodrow Wilson Wilson around New York “like a poodle on a string.” Wilson, under the control of mighty Jews Baruch, Warburg & Schiff, then ushered in the Federal Reserve System scam and the Income Tax, before dragging the USA into World War I with Baruch heading up the all mighty, economy-controlling “War Industries Board.”
Picture
Twenty years later, Baruch used FDR to drag America into yet another war for Globalism and Zionism.
Big Baruch rescued (bought) little Winnie the drunken, spendaholic, gambler during the stock market Crash of 1929. (here
Picture
Baruch’s deep pockets also saved Harry Truman struggling Senate re-election campaign in 1940 (here). Hiroshima Harry would become FDR’s new Vice President in 1944, and then President when FDR died in April of 1945.

JULY, 1939
GEORGE MARSHALL & BERNARD BARUCH PLOT A NEW WAR

It was not for nothing that the rocket-like upward mobility of George Marshall paralleled that of Dwight Eisenhower  — although Marshall, who was 10 years older, had a head-start. Both men were pulled up the ladder by politically connected World War I Generals Fox Conner and John Pershing, and, more importantly, Bernard Baruch.

As General Pershing’s aide, Lt. Colonel Marshall had become personally acquainted with Baruch in 1918. By 1922, Marshall was hunting ducks down in Louisiana with Baruch and Pershing (here). In later years, after World War II, Marshall once described Baruch as: “one of my dear friends and one of the great helpers”

Marshall and Eisenhower first worked together during the 1920’s, under Pershing, another self-described “dear friend” of Bernard Baruch. Because the Baruch-Pershing-Marshall-Eisenhower complex was so intertwined, it’s worth reviewing the contents of letters which Baruch and Marshall exchanged in July 1939, at a time when:

1. Europe itself was not even at war
2. Hitler was passionately pleading with Britain and France for peaceful dialogue (not war!) regarding the situation of German minorities being abused in Poland.
3. Few people in “isolationist” America would even have imagined that FDR and his crowd were preparing for another world war.

*
Excerpts from Baruch’s letter to George Marshall
(July 19, 1939)

As you are aware, or can find out upon inquiry, I did as much as anybody to stir up the action which resulted in the expenditures which are giving the Army a part of what they need. I know we have not yet a well balanced program and as soon as I get on my feet, I am going to go after it again. I was in hopes we would have a neutrality legislation that would permit the manufacture of airplanes and the export thereof during war, because I wanted to see a development in this country that our orders alone would not permit.

Also, I wanted the United States to take first place again in quality and quantity…. Always remember that the Army, and you particularly, have a friend in me if I can be of any use.”

(Baruch’s letter also mentioned that General Pershing had visited him in the hospital).

Excerpts from to Marshall’s letter in response to Baruch’s:
(July 30, 1939)

* (The astute reader will note the “kissing-the-boss’s-ass” undertone evident in Marshall’s writing.)

My dear Mr. Baruch:

I have just this moment read your letter of July 19th, and learned for the first time of your misfortune in having to undergo a mastoid operation. My full sympathy goes to you, and I am delighted to judge from your letter that you have fully recovered.

I have been concerned about General Pershing’s health in France, as he had—most confidentially—several attacks. He has endeavored to minimize this, and emphatically denies them. I suppose they are inevitable under the circumstances, but it worries me to have him off in France even though he seems to be particularly happy there the pleasanter period of the year.

I am well aware of your important part in the stirring up of the national conscience to our serious situation last year, and the tremendous effect it had on public opinion.

I do hope I may have an opportunity to talk things over with you personally, and if I am in New York I will try to make an appointment with you in advance, and if you are in Washington I hope you will lunch with me.

I have an invitation to shoot ducks at the mouth of the Mississippi (with Mississippian and good friend Fox Conner?). It should be “to shoot at ducks,” but it recalls a very amusing expedition with you.

With warm regards, and thanks for your letter

Faithfully yours,
George Marshall

The Marshall-Baruch correspondence clearly reveals a plot to build up the U.S. military for a pending war by undoing post-World War I neutrality legislation. It can rightly be described as treasonous and conspiratorial. And indeed, not long after war broke out in Europe, FDR, while promising that the USA would stay out of it, repealed the neutrality acts and started shipping war supplies, first to the British, and later on, to the Soviets.

In regard to the military component of the evil plot to again foment another, even more destructive war in Europe — and then, to again manipulate and maneuver the American people into that war, clique-member Eisenhower was, obviously, also “in on it.” The super-ambitious Eisenhower – a low officer with a checkered record who helped General Pershing to write his post-war memoirs — became a willing subordinate of Baruch’s as far back as 1929 (see “I Don’t Like Ike,” page 61). He (or, most likely, his ghost-writer, Globalist, academic brother, Milton Eisenhower) served King Baruch by writing papers in support of resurrecting a new type of War Industries Board during the 1930s.

** End of Excerpt***

Picture
In Mafia parlance, Baruch “made” General Pershing, pictured in Image 1 (on left) with WW 1 sidekick George Marshall — who would soon also be “made” into a big-shot by Baruch and Pershing.
Picture
Baruch, Pershing and Marshall then “made” Eisenhower (a lowlife rat who was almost kicked out the army for financial fraud.) Baruch’s second war against Germany brought “hero” status upon the two traitorous generals who deliberately murdered 1.5 million German POW’s after handing Eastern Europe over to Joe Stalin.
Picture
Picture
xactly as plotted out in the 1939 letters between Baruch and Marshall, FDR changed the existing neutrality act which had forbidden US military exports to warring parties. The ability to ship arms to the UK on a “cash & carry” basis paved the way for Britain’s warmongers to pick a fight with Germany. Later on, a total repeal of the amended act would allow arms to be shipped as part of lease deals (Lend Lease).
Picture
Eisenhower linked up with Baruch while he was still an unknown, low-level army officer.
Picture
Their longtime “friendship” with the mighty financier lifted Churchill and Eisenhower (both of whom were incompetent) to the highest positions of military, then political authority. Image 2 depicts Baruch meeting with then-Prime Minister Churchill (his 2nd go-around as PM) and then-President Eisenhower, at Baruch’s home. 
Picture
Marshall, who in later years became Secretary of State under Harry Truman (another known pawn of Baruch’s), greets his old “friend” and master Baruch at the airport.