Keeping Scientist Stephen Hawking Alive (Again)

Caption: Charles Seife describes the cultural and the broad scientific context of Stephen Hawking’s work, and its reception. The theoretical physicist is pictured here in 2010.

When the latest version of the propped-up “Weekend-at-Bernie’s” stiff known as St. Stephen Hawking “died” more than three years ago, Sugar the Crazed Conspiracy Cat (still alive at that time) and I — believing we’d heard the last of the vegetative Atheist and his handler’s magical talking machine — high-fived / high-pawed each other in righteous celebration. But much like St. Albert Einstein, (((they))) simply won’t let the legend of the all-knowing “Big Bang” bullshit-artist die, hence the post-mortem-published “final papers” of Hawking, continued articles and recent books about him. Hawking’s hogwash and status as all-knowing oracle is too valuable to (((them))).

Arrogant Englishman Hawking was a Cambridge University “theoretical physicist” and best-selling manufacturer of books (15 titles) whose “brilliant” mind, according to the Slimes: “roamed the cosmos from a wheelchair, pondering the nature of gravity and the origin of the universe.” His handlers sure did get paid big-time for ghost-writing and pay-to-attend lecturing for this physical dummy who, in spite of his alleged mathematical prowess, was, during his cognitive years, also a mental dummy — a “savant.”

“The Editorial Board” of The Anti-New York Times had always believed that the real Hawking died at least 40 years ago and was then replaced by a dummy version who supposedly spoke through a computer. As a graduate student in 1963, he was diagnosed with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, (ALS) a rapidly degenerative neuromuscular disease often referred to as Lou Gehrig’s disease — after the famous baseball player. Hawking was given only a few years to live at the time. Yet a half-century and many millions of dollars in book royalties later, at a moment in time when the Hawking impostor “conspiracy theory”  was actually beginning to get a bit of “mainstream media” attention (here), he finally “died” in 2018? Wethinks the illusion-makers thought it was time to kill off the character after a highly successful run — and then focus on sustaining his post-mortem legend for his deluded fanboys.


Queens, Presidents, Popes and others have all paid homage to a vegetative idiot who had neither discovered nor invented anything.

Putting aside the indications of a body-double fraud — given the hype over his demise, one would think that Hawking invented something revolutionary, or least made an astonishing discovery answering the riddles of the Universe. Actually, the obsessively outspoken Atheist Hawking’s only “accomplishment” was in concocting math equations (in lieu of actual experimentation and observation) to “prove” the “Big Bang” and “Black Holes.” This line, from a previous Slimes article, inadvertently reveals the problem with the type of “theoretical science” practiced by St. Hawking and his idiotic ilk:
In a long and daunting calculation, Dr. Hawking discovered to his befuddlement that black holes — those mythological avatars of cosmic doom — were not really black at all. In fact, he found, they would eventually fizzle, leaking radiation and particles, and finally explode and disappear over the eons.” (bold emphasis added)
Nikola Tesla — the greatest scientific genius of the 20th Century — warned us about crackpots such as St. Albert Einstein, St. Stephen Hawking et al and their exclusive use of “long and daunting” mathematical calculations (and today, computer models) to “prove” imaginary theories shaped from pre-existing, prior assumption bias:

Tell it, Nicky — tell it! 

Hawking’s hyped up 1988 “masterpiece:” A Brief History of Time: From the Big Bang to Black Holes, sold more than 10 million copies and inspired a documentary film by Errol Morris. Cha Ching! Cha Ching Cha Ching! It is interesting to note that there are quite a few secular cosmologists who refute Big Bangism and Black Hole-ism, yet their books, like those of “climate change deniers ,” don’t get the puff-up treatment. Big Bang and Black Hole “deniers,” — no matter how impressive their credentials — are also denied access to the major science publications as well as the pop-science media.

Even more annoying than his Fake Science and his sarcastic, juvenile, God-mocking Atheism, the most tiresome aspect  of Hawking Inc.’s operation was his (his handlers’) frequent “words of wisdom” on this or that issue of the day — empty slogans and platitudes which the Fake News would duly seize upon and hype as the decrees of the Almighty himself. Here is but a tiny sampling of the “brilliance” which “the smartest man in the world” bestowed upon the goofy groupies who hung on Hawking’s every computer-simulated utterance.

  • “A build up of greenhouse gases in Venus’s atmosphere burned off its oceans and turned it into the scorching hot planet seen today, with winds of up to 180mph (300km/h). Venus is an example of runaway greenhouse warming. 
  • The next time you meet a climate change denier, tell them to take a trip to Venus. I will pay the fare.”
  • “The world of science needs Africa’s brilliant talents, and I look forward to meeting prospective young Einsteins from Africa in the near future. As well as an African Einstein, we want to see the African Gates, Brins and Pages of the future.”
  • “Before we understand science, it is natural to believe that God created the universe. But now science offers a more convincing explanation. …I’m an Atheist. … In my opinion, there is no aspect of reality beyond the reach of the human mind.”
  • “Trump is a demagogue, who seems to appeal to the lowest common denominator.”

Hawking was no “scientist.” He, his handlers, and his Fake News promoters were con men— and Globo-Commies to boot! Good riddance to Hawking Inc. — or so we had previously thought.

Weekend at Bernie’s” (1989): Two young insurance corporation employees discover their boss, Bernie, dead at his beach house. Upon learning that Bernie had ordered their deaths to cover up his embezzlement (but with instructions to not kill them if he is around) they attempt to convince people that Bernie is still alive.
Was the speechless Hawking actually brain-damaged, but kept “smart” for money making and propaganda purposes?
Hawking Inc.
 — Puffed-up best-selling books and endless “speaking” tours — The “smartest man in the world” was just a front for a money-grubbing, multi-million dollar marketing machine.

The Protocols of he Learned Elders of Zion: From Protocol 4: Item 3: 
“It is indispensable for us to undermine all faith, to tear out of the mind of the Goyim the very principle of God-head and the spirit, and to put in its place arithmetical calculations and material needs.

The Einstein Monster


When we do a Google image search for the word “genius”, the first thing, and I do mean, thing, we see is the wretched mug of Albert Einstein. Plug in the word “scientist”, and again, St. Albert is the first face to populate. You can scroll and scroll way down those pages and not even find a hint of folks like Tesla, von Braun, Shockley, and other great names. Why is that? Was St. Albert really such a “genius”? Or is this a case of the press pumping-up a fellow tribesman? Let’s have a look.



Einstein was a serial, psychopathic plagiarist. Einstein’s plagiarism has been conclusively proven beyond doubt. (here). Einstein’s “Theory of Relativity” as well as his famous equation (E=Mc2), were actually published before Einstein claimed credit for them.



Einstein’s “discoveries”, stolen as they were, are still disputed to this day. 
Einstein himself expressed doubts about his “theories.” Though it is beyond the scope of this author to evaluate theories of physics, the fact that some physicists continue to passionately insist that Einstein’s ideas are false, is very intriguing. We wonder, for every one outspoken critic of Einstein, how many more scientists hold the very same doubts but are too intimidated to express them. Of even greater interest is the fact that the scientific doubters are often childishly ridiculed, but never openly debated.



“Einstein is a beggar dressed in purple clothes and made king using dazzling mathematics that obscure truth”…

The theory of relativity is a mass of error and deceptive ideas violently opposed to the teachings of great men of science of the past and even to common sense.”

“The theory, wraps all these errors and fallacies and clothes them in magnificent mathematical garb which fascinates, dazzles and makes people blind to the underlying errors. Not a single one of the relativity propositions has been proved.”



Einstein was very cruel to Mileva, his first wife and mother of their two sons. He not only cheated on her openly, but as the marriage unraveled, he laid out cruel conditions for staying with her as follows:
Under the heading: “Conditions.”
 “You will make sure that: 1. that my clothes and laundry are kept in good order; 2. that I will receive my three meals regularly in my room; 3. that my bedroom and study are kept neat, and especially that my desk is left for my use only.You will renounce all personal relations with me insofar as they are not completely necessary for social reasons…you will stop talking to me if I request it.”



Einstein eventually dumped Mileva to marry the woman with whom he was having an affair, his cousin Elsa. But the sex-crazed serial adulterer still wasn’t happy. He is now known to have cheated on the 2nd wife as well, having no fewer than SEVEN extra marital affairs during his second marriage! (here)



Under the easy terms of Einstein’s divorce agreement from Mileva, his 1921 Nobel Prize money was to have been deposited in a Swiss bank account. Mileva was to draw only upon the interest for herself and the couple’s sons, Hans Albert and Eduard. When the sons were grown, 100% of the principal would belong to Einstein.

Mileva had to constantly beg the affluent Einstein for child support. (here) She and her sons struggled while “the great scientist” lived the high life. Compounding her misery, Eduard would develop severe mental problems. Beaten down by life, Mileva died in 1955, at only 60.

Einstein became estranged from his adult sons. The boys had always been resentful over Einstein’s abuse and abandonment of their mother.  Upon Einstein’s death, the wealthy old bastard left an insulting pittance to Hans Albert, the other son that he had hurt so much.



A pure creation of Jewish media hype, Einstein was a pathological attention seeker. The mad scientist enjoyed shooting hot air out of his lying mouth on every subject imaginable. Though his sycophant worshipers eagerly ate up his bullshit, astute observers such as the great satirist H.L. Mencken saw right through the Marxist clown. Mencken once referred to Einstein as “that fiend for publicity.”

“Top 10 Friends of the Soviet Union”


Einstein fled Hitler’s Germany in 1933 not because he was Jewish, but because he was a politically active Marxist! Einstein held membership in more Communist front groups than one could shake a hammer and sickle at.

These activities continued upon his arrival to America, where he would later defend the traitorous Rosenbergs (executed in 1952 for having passed A-Bomb secrets to the Soviets). Einstein defended other Communist traitors as well (Oppenheimer, Robeson, Fuchs, DuBois etc). In 1947, Stalin’s Pravda Newspaper named Einstein to its list of ‘Top-Ten Friends of the Soviet Union.’ 

Einstein and Szilard plot GENOCIDE against German civilians!


Einstein the fraud was a self described “pacifist”. However, during the 1930’s, the “pacifist” suddenly became an fierce advocate for total war against Germany! The famous Einstein-Szilard letter, in which the two Jewish scientists urge the Jew owned President Roosevelt to develop an atomic weapon, was actually written during peacetime in August of 1939!  The letter falsely accuses Germany of developing an atomic bomb (the original WMD’s Lie!) and urges FDR to beat Hitler to the punch.

The EVIL letter to FDR.

The genocidal Einstein was looking forward to the day when Berlin, one of his former homes, could be nuked! Ironically, Einstein was never invited to participate in the Communist infested Manhattan Project (which grew out of Einstein’s letter) because the FBI deemed him a security risk. After the war ended, the USA and Stalin’s USSR become bitter adversaries. Red Albert conveniently reverted back to “pacifism”.

Einstein’s citizenship oath was meaningless to the self professed “Citizen of the World”.


Einstein was an America-basher. Not content with bad mouthing and betraying his former German host, Einstein had insults for his adopted American country as well. For example, this sarcastic gem: “Too many of us look upon Americans as dollar chasers. This is a cruel libel, even if it is reiterated thoughtlessly by the Americans themselves.”

Einstein hated McCarthy and urged Communists not to testify for any hearings.

While ignoring the racial basis for the “State of Israel”, hypocrite Einstein constantly denounced American racism. (see ‘Einstein The Racial Agitator’ section below). The Red scientist also had harsh words for American anti-Communist patriots, denouncing the great Senator Joseph McCarthy among others.

‘Nationalism is an infantile disease”….(except for Israel of course)


Einstein condemned Nationalism (except for Israeli nationalism) and was very open in his support for a One World Government. He wrote, “There is no salvation for civilization, or even the human race, other than the creation of a world government.”

Of course, it will be St. Albert’s synagogue buddies who will be running this World Federation, presumably from Israel.

The stacks of incinerated Germans pleased the demonic bastard who so pushed for both war and the monstrous atomic bombs.


With World War II coming to a close, vindictive Jews worldwide openly called for the genocide of the German people. Indeed, this policy was partially implemented. Among the demonic voices demanding more blood was the “pacifist” Einstein.
He wrote:  “The Germans can be killed or constrained after the war, but they cannot be re-educated to a democratic way of thinking and acting.”……it is hoped that by war’s end, they will largely have been killed off.

Jewish Marxists always promote anti White (anti Gentile) sentiment


In spite of segregation, American Blacks were making great economic progress in America during the 1940’s & 50’s. This didn’t stop the ungrateful foreigner Einstein from routinely trashing America for it’s “racism”. He wrote, “Race prejudice has unfortunately become an American tradition which is uncritically handed down from one generation to the next.”

The trouble making Einstein also joined the anti-White, Jewish funded NAACP, and became close friends with two of America’s most notorious Black “race hustlers” – W.E. DuBois and Paul Robeson, both Communists.

Einstein with Israeli Prime Minister and butcher of Palestinians, David Ben Gurion


 Though not a religious Jew, Einstein was indeed an ethnocentric Jew who saw the world through a “Jews vs Gentiles” lens. In 1952, soon after Jewish terror gangs had ethnically cleansed Arab villages, Einstein was offered the presidency of the illegitimate State of Israel. He politely declined the offer: “I am deeply moved by the offer from our State of Israel, and at once saddened and ashamed that I cannot accept it.”



Einstein was a fraud

Did Einstein cheat his first wife out of a Nobel prize?
When Einstein suspected that he would win the Nobel Prize for his paper showing time is relative — the infamous E = mc2 — he dumped all his prize money to his first wife, Mileva Marić.

Some argue that this is was merely a form of alimony and child support, not even an uncommon one among divorced Nobel winners. But others — including the not-so-implicit arguments made by National Geographic’s Genius — argue that these payments represented atonement for Einstein’s alleged decision to claim his wife’s efforts towards his discoveries as his own.

First things first: There’s no hard evidence that Marić collaborated in a meaningful way to Einstein’s research, nor can it be irrefutably shown that Einstein stole her ideas. But an analysis of the letters that they wrote to each other has given enough weight to the idea that Marić played an important role in developing the famous thought experiments that are attributed solely to Einstein.

This theory is the basis for Marić’s portrayal in Genius, where Marić grows increasingly frustrated as her husband takes her ideas and runs with them, eventually overlooking her contributions and celebrating their success as his own.

The foundation for the argument of Einstein as idea-thief comes from some of Einstein’s letters to Marić. In particular, he wrote in one 1901 letter, “How happy and proud I will be when the two of us together will have brought our work on the relative motion to a victorious conclusion!” Some argue that this — along with other letters where Einstein uses phrases like “our research” — provide support for the notion that Marić was more involved in her husband’s scientific endeavors than history suggests.

Critics of this idea, who remain unconvinced that Marić could have helped, point out that Einstein wrote about detailed scientific concepts to Marić much more than she did to him. They argue that Einstein was merely bouncing ideas off of his wife, not working with her in a scientific partnership. But just as Einstein’s word choice doesn’t necessarily prove that Marić contributed, the absence of technical terms in her letters doesn’t mean that she didn’t — particularly because most of Marić’s letters were destroyed, along with some earlier drafts of Einstein’s work.

Critics also like to point out that Marić failed out of school, arguing that her understanding of math and physics must have paled in comparison to Einstein’s. It’s true that Marić never received a diploma, but it’s important to note that she took her final exams — her entrance and midterm grades were better or the same as Einstein’s — while pregnant with her and Einstein’s first child, a daughter who either died or was adopted shortly after birth. Also, Marić was the only woman in her class and the only one who failed the final exams that were given by older male professors who may have wanted to keep their field masculine.

Again, these don’t prove that Marić was responsible for discoveries attributed to Einstein, but it means that the common arguments saying that she couldn’t have are bunk. Coupled with the fact that Einstein reportedly saw Marić as his intellectual equal, it is certainly possible that Einstein collaborated with his wife on much, if not all, of his research.

Some of Einstein’s letters to Marić suggest that certain scientific endeavors were collaborative while others were not. In several letters, Einstein was very specific about whose ideas were whose. In one, he wrote “The local Prof. Weber is very nice to me and shows interest in my investigations. I gave him our paper,” referring to two separate projects.

Looking at multiple letters that refer to the same project over time, it is likely that Marić played an early collaborative role in some ideas, but as time went on Einstein viewed them more and more as his own. All of Einstein’s papers bore his name and his name alone, even though it’s accepted by both sides of the debate that Marić did much of Einstein’s research, spending time at the library gathering information that he — or they — would later use.

Whether or not Einstein stole his wife’s work at the turn of the twentieth century, one thing is accepted by both sides of the debate: that Marić was an instrumental part of Einstein’s professional development.

Even if this claim it’s false, there is no denying that this guy was not the genius history wants us to believe.

was he a thief, a liar and a plagiarist?

ALBERT EINSTEIN is held up as “a rare genius,” who drastically changed the field of theoretical physics. However, using the technique known as ‘The Often-Repeated Lie=Truth,’ he has been made an idol to young people, and his very name has become synonymous with genius.
THE TRUTH, HOWEVER, IS VERY DIFFERENT. Einstein was an inept and moronic person, who could not even tie his own shoelaces; he contributed NOTHING ORIGINAL to the field of quantum mechanics, nor any other science. On the contrary—he stole the ideas of others, and the media made him a ‘hero.’
When we actually examine the life of Albert Einstein, we find that his only ‘brilliance’ was in his ability to PLAGIARIZE and STEAL OTHER PEOPLE’S IDEAS, PASSING THEM OFF AS HIS OWN. Einstein’s education, or lack thereof, is an important part of this story.

The Encyclopedia Britannica says of Einstein’s early education that he “showed little scholastic ability.” It also says that at the age of 15, “with poor grades in history, geography, and languages, he left school with no diploma.” Einstein himself wrote in a school paper of his “lack of imagination and practical ability.” In 1895, Einstein failed a simple entrance exam to an engineering school in Zurich.
This exam consisted mainly of mathematical problems, and Einstein showed himself to be mathematically inept in this exam. He then entered a lesser school hoping to use it as a stepping stone to the engineering school he could not get into, but after graduating in 1900, he still could not get a position at the engineering school!
Unable to go to the school as he had wanted, he got a job (with the help of a friend) at the patent office in Bern. He was to be a technical expert third class, which meant that he was not competent to hold a higher qualified position. Even after publishing his so-called ground-breaking papers of 1905 and after working in the patent office for six years, he was only elevated to a second class standing. Remember, the work he was doing at the patent office, for which he was only rated third class, was not quantum mechanics or theoretical physics, but was reviewing technical documents for patents of every day things; yet he was barely qualified.
He would work at the patent office until 1909, all the while continuously trying to get a position at a university, but without success. All of these facts are true, but now begins the myth.
Supposedly, while working a full time job, without the aid of university colleagues, a staff of graduate students, a laboratory, or any of the things normally associated with an academic setting, Einstein in his spare time wrote four ground-breaking essays in the field of theoretical physics and quantum mechanics that were published in 1905.
Many people have recognized the impossibility of such a feat, including Einstein himself, and therefore Einstein has led people to believe that many of these ideas came to him in his sleep, out of the blue, because indeed that is the only logical explanation of how an admittedly inept moron could have written such documents at the age of 26 without any real education. THE TRUTH IS: HE STOLE THE IDEAS AND PLAGIARIZED THE PAPERS.

Therefore, we will look at each of these ideas and discover the source of each. It should be remembered that these ideas are presented by Einstein’s worshipers as totally new and completely different, each of which would change the landscape of science. These four papers dealt with the following four ideas, respectively:

  • The foundation of the photon theory of light;
  • The equivalence of energy and mass;
  • The explanation of Brownian motion in liquids;
  • The special theory of relativity.

Let us first look at the last of these theories, the theory of relativity. This is perhaps the most famous idea falsely attributed to Einstein. Specifically, this 1905 paper dealt with what Einstein called the Special Theory of Relativity (the General Theory would come in 1915).

This theory contradicted the traditional Newtonian mechanics and was based upon two premises:

  1. In the absence of acceleration, the laws of nature are the same for all observers; and
  2. Since the speed of light is independent of the motion of its source, then the time interval between two events is longer for an observer in whose frame of reference the events occur at different places than for an observer in whose frame of reference the events occur in the same place.

This is basically the idea that time passes more slowly as one’s velocity approaches the speed of light, relative to slower velocities where time would pass faster.

This theory has been validated by modern experiments and is the basis for modern physics. But these two premises are far from being originally Einstein’s. FIRST OF ALL, THE IDEA THAT THE SPEED OF LIGHT WAS A CONSTANT AND WAS INDEPENDENT OF THE MOTION OF ITS SOURCE WAS NOT EINSTEIN’S AT ALL, BUT WAS PROPOSED BY THE SCOTTISH SCIENTIST JAMES MAXWELL in 1878.

Maxwell studied the phenomenon of light extensively and first proposed that it was electromagnetic in nature.

James Maxwell wrote an article to this effect for the 1878 edition of the Encyclopedia Britannica. His ideas prompted much debate, and by 1887, as a result of his work and the ensuing debate, the scientific community, particularly Lorentz, Michelson, and Morley reached the conclusion that the velocity of light was independent of the velocity of the observer. Thus, this piece of the Special Theory of Relativity was known 27 years before Einstein wrote his paper.

This debate over the nature of light also led Michelson and Morley to conduct an important experiment, the results of which could not be explained by Newtonian mechanics. They observed a phenomenon caused by relativity but they did not understand relativity.

They had attempted to detect the motion of the earth through ether, which was a medium thought to be necessary for the propagation of light. In response to this problem, in 1880, the Irish physicist George Fitzgerald, who had also first proposed a mechanism for producing radio waves, wrote a paper which stated that the results of the Michelson Morley experiment could be explained if, “. . . the length of material bodies change, according as they are moving through the either or across it by an amount depending on the square of the ratio of their velocities to that of light.”


FURTHER . . . IN 1892, HENDRIK LORENTZ, of the Netherlands, proposed the same solution and began to greatly expand the idea. All throughout the 1890’s, both Lorentz and Fitzgerald worked on these ideas and wrote articles strangely similar to Einstein’s Special Theory detailing what is now known as the Lorentz-Fitzgerald Contraction.

In 1898, the Irishman Joseph Larmor wrote down equations explaining the Lorentz-Fitzgerald contraction and its relativistic consequences, 7 years before Einstein’s paper. By 1904, “Lorentz transformations,” the series of equations explaining relativity, were published by Lorentz. They describe the increase of mass, the shortening of length, and the time dilation of a body moving at speeds close to the velocity of light. In short, by 1904, everything in “Einstein’s paper” regarding the Special Theory of Relativity had already been published.

The Frenchman Poincaré‚ had, in 1898, written a paper unifying many of these ideas. He stated seven years before Einstein’s paper: “. . . we have no direct intuition about the equality of two time intervals. The simultaneity of two events or the order of their succession, as well as the equality of two time intervals, must be defined in such a way that the statements of the natural laws be as simple as possible.”

Professor Umberto Bartocci, a mathematical historian, of the University of Perugia claims that Olinto De Pretto, an industrialist from Vicenza, published the equation E=mc^2 in a scientific magazine, Atte, in 1903. Einstein allegedly used De Pretto’s insight in a major paper published in 1905, but De Pretto was never acclaimed.

De Pretto had stumbled on the equation, but not the theory of relativity, while speculating about ether in the life of the universe, said Prof Bartocci. It was republished in 1904 by Veneto’s Royal Science Institute, but the equation’s significance was not understood.

According to Professor Bartocci, a Swiss Italian named Michele Besso alerted Einstein to the research and in 1905 Einstein published his own work. It took years for his breakthrough to be grasped. When the penny finally dropped, De Pretto’s contribution was overlooked while Einstein went on to become the century’s most famous scientist. De Pretto died in 1921.

“De Pretto did not discover relativity but there is no doubt that he was the first to use the equation. That is hugely significant. I also believe, though it’s impossible to prove, that Einstein used De Pretto’s research,” said Professor Bartocci, who has written a book on the subject. ( The Guardian Unlimited).

Anyone who has read Einstein’s 1905 paper will immediately recognize the similarity and the lack of originality on the part of Einstein.

In conclusion
Anyone who has studied much Physics will tell you that Special Relativity was mostly created by Poincare and Lorentz. The seminal 1905 paper by the plagiarist Einstein had no references! His 1915 paper on General Relativity, was submitted for publication two weeks after Hilbert’s deduction of the equations, and it is Hilbert’s Lagrangian technique that is used today to derive the field equations, not the idiotic heuristics of Einstein. Even E = mc2 was derived in the mid 1800s (well before Einstein ever stole anything).

Adding Marić’s contribution…
Nikola Tesla regarded Relativity as the greatest historical aberration of scientific thought. Relativity is no more than a philosophical standpoint, a virus to infect a “New Age”. From the standpoint of the electrical engineer Einstein’s Relativity is “Bravo-Sierra”! However, it has sunk its roots into the basic consideration of Inductance and Capacitance. L and C represent co-efficients of aetheric processes, and as such represent the aether, not Relativity. Albert Einstein stands in the way of Michael Faraday, and Pharisees are now Physicists (— Eric Dollard).