Please do your own research. The information I share is only a catalyst to expanding ones confined consciousness. I have NO desire for anyone to blindly believe or agree with what I share. Seek the truth for yourself and put your own puzzle together that has been presented to you. I'm not here to teach, preach or lead, but rather assist in awakening the consciousness of the collective from its temporary dormancy.
It’s a common American parable: Founding father George Washington got a hatchet as a gift when he was 6 years old and, eager to test out his new tool, he hacked up his father’s cherry tree. The story goes that when Washington’s father discovered the damage, Washington responded, “I can’t tell a lie, Pa; you know I can’t tell a lie. I did cut it with my hatchet.”
His father then delivered a tidy moral: “Glad am I, George, that you killed my tree; for you have paid me for it a thousand fold. Such an act of heroism in my son, is more worth than a thousand trees.”
If that dialogue feels a little too scripted, it’s because it was completely made up after Washington died. Ironically, this fable about honesty was fabricated by biographer and pastor Mason Locke Weems. Responding to public demand for more stories about Washington’s life, Weems embellished his book, The Life of Washington, with many enduring myths, including the ever-popular cherry tree anecdote.
Perhaps what cements this particular story in the Washington mythos more than others is its popularity as a standalone moral tale for children. Minister William Holmes McGuffy simplified the story and included it in his McGuffy’s Readers series, which were used in schools for around a century. The anecdote endures today through political cartoons, commentary, and, of course, countless additional children’s books.
Thomas Edison Didn’t Invent the Light Bulb
What’s a more iconic symbol for an inventor than the light bulb? With 1,093 patents to his name, it’s easy to picture Thomas Edison with a cartoon bulb above his head at all times — especially since he’s sometimes credited with inventing the incandescent bulb. He didn’t invent it, though; he just improved on it.
It took a series of inventors to create a light bulb that was practical for everyday use, and although Edison was responsible for multiple links on that chain, he didn’t do the work alone. Arc lamps, invented by Humphry Davy in the early 1800’s, provided many of the earliest electric street lights, while Scottish inventor James Bowman Lindsay was likely the first to demonstrate a sealed glass bulb that provided constant light through incandescent wires in 1835. In the 1870’s, incandescent bulbs became a hot topic in the science world, and many inventors helped move the technology along, including Joseph Swan, William Sawyer, Albon Mann, and, yes, Edison.
Edison did make some major contributions to the light bulb that we use in our homes today. He patented a long-lasting carbon filament and, along with other scientists, improved its manufacturing process. He also invented the Edison Screw, the twist-in light bulb socket that we still use today.
Marie Antoinette Didn’t Say “Let Them Eat Cake”
The most enduring legend about French Queen Marie Antoinette is that when she was told her people didn’t have bread, she coldheartedly replied, “Qu’ils mangent de la brioche” (“Let them eat cake”). The problem with that legend is that the quote is not directly attributable to her — and some historians believe it would have been out of character for her to say it, anyway.
Versions of the “let them eat cake” story had been circling French monarchs for years, starting at least 100 years before the reign of Marie Antoinette. The same anecdote with a slightly different quote was attributed to Marie-Terese — coincidentally, also the name of Antoinette’s mother and daughter — who married King Louis XIV in 1660. In that case, it was “the crust of the pate” rather than “cake.” In the intervening years, the story was attributed to a variety of French royals before it stuck to Antoinette.
In her book Marie Antoinette: The Journey, biographer Antonia Fraser argues that not only did Antoinette not deliver the famous line, but she also disagreed with the sentiment. While Marie Antoinette’s lavish royal lifestyle was perhaps unseemly in the face of her subjects’ plight, she often expressed a sense of responsibility toward them.
“It is quite certain that in seeing the people who treat us so well despite their own misfortune, we are more obliged than ever to work hard for their happiness,” Antoinette wrote in a letter to her mother.
William Tell Didn’t Shoot an Apple Off His Son’s Head
You probably know the legend of William Tell, or at least the gist of it. During the period of the Old Swiss Confederacy, Tell, a local farmer and renowned marksman, refused to acknowledge Austrian authority and was forced to shoot an arrow at an apple on his son’s head. In case he failed, he saved an arrow for the governor who had ordered him to do so. This, the story goes, inspired resistance to Austrian rule among the Swiss people.
There’s one problem: Many historians say Tell never existed in the first place.
The basic tale we’ve come to associate with Tell is common in European folklore, sometimes predating Tell himself. In several nearly identical versions, spare arrow and all, only the archer (and his oppressor) change; in some, the central figure is a German folk hero, a Danish chieftain, or English outlaw Adam Bell.
Even without that context, many consider the source dubious. The legend was first detailed around 1570, 250 years after it was supposed to have taken place. Later in the story, Tell is part of an oath of freedom and unity with leaders of three different areas. But other accounts of this event, which inspired Swiss Independence Day, say it took place several years earlier — without anybody named “William Tell” present.
However, thanks to works such as Friedrich Schiller’s 1804 play William Telland the iconic “William Tell Overture” (from a French opera by the same name), Tell is still a household name throughout the world. Just maybe a fictional one.
Paul Revere Was Not The Midnight Rider
Paul Revere gets all the glory for his midnight ride. After all, it’s a stirring tale of patriotism told by a great storyteller.
But one young messenger who called the colonists to arms during a remarkable five-day dash across five states is a mere footnote — a man mentioned in historical documents that didn’t even get his first name right. They called him Trail.
His name was Israel Bissell and he is one of the Revolutionary War’s most unheralded heroes.
Bissell, a 23-year-old postal rider when the war broke out on April 19, 1775, rode day and night with little sleep during an exhausting 345-mile journey from Boston’s western edge to Philadelphia. On the first leg, he rode one horse so hard that the animal collapsed and died beneath him as he arrived in Worcester, roughly two hours after leaving Watertown.
“To arms, to arms. The war has begun,” Bissell shouted as he passed through each little town.
Dozens of other messengers also raced on horseback to spread the word, making it likely that Revere was a composite of these brave men, said J.L. Bell, a Massachusetts writer who specializes in Revolutionary War-era Boston.
In response to their cries, church bells were rung and muskets were fired: British redcoats were attacking. The American Revolution had begun.
But there were no bells pealing for Israel Bissell, whose ride was obscured in history’s annals by Revere’s 20-mile gallop, which was so greatly amplified by Henry Wadsworth Longfellow. His 11-verse poem, first published in 1861 as “Paul Revere’s Ride,” became familiar to generations of American schoolchildren because it was a more dramatic story.
BONUS…
We’ve Never been to the Moon
According to Nazi war criminal turned NASA scientist Wernher von Braun’s own calculations, why the Saturn V rocket would have needed to weigh 800,000 tons and been taller than the Empire State Building in NY in order to have reached the moon. The Saturn V rocket weighed just 3,000 tons.
I will stress again, that this is Wernher von Braun’s calculation, not Bart Sibrel’s.
We heve never been to the moon, or anywhere near it.
According to Astronaut Donald Pettit:
“I’ll go to the Moon in a nanosecond, the problem is that we don’t have that technology anymore. We used to, but we destroyed that technology and it’s a painful process to build it back again”
The Myth of “The Fall of the Berlin Wall” By Mike King
More than three full decades have since passed since the grand made-for-TV spectacle known as “The Fall of the Berlin Wall” – an event which is still, by design, grossly misunderstood. The goose-bumpy cornball version of history for normies is summarized very well in the platitude-ridden opening of a 2019 Times piece titled, “The Fall of the Berlin Wall: An Accident of History That Changed the World” :
“The Communist regime was prepared for everything “except candles and prayers.” East Germany’s peaceful 1989 revolution showed that societies that don’t reform, die.
It had long been a dream for East Berliners like Mr. Krätschell to see this towering symbol of unfreedom running like a scar of cement and barbed wire through the heart of their home city ripped open.
And when the Cold War’s most notorious armed border opened overnight, and was torn apart in the days that followed, it was not in the end the result of some carefully crafted geopolitical grand bargain. It was, at the most basic level at least, the wondrous result of human error, spontaneity and individual courage.”
You hear that? It was the “candles and prayers” of “courageous individuals” which led to the “spontaneous” destruction of the wall that had separated the free from the unfree — the “capitalist” from the “communist.” And no one — not even the CIA — was able to have foreseen such a stunning development. How do you say “bullshit” in German?
he Communist East built the wall in 1961 to stem the embarrassing flow of escapees from East to West.
The destruction of the hated wall which divided Berlin brought great joy to Berliners.
Fake History: “It happened by chance, spontaneously.”
Now, don’t misunderstand. The long-overdue tearing down of that Communist monstrosity in 1989 was a welcome sight to see and a source of great satisfaction for Berliners of both West and East. The purpose of our pessimistic critique here is to simply point out that there was an ulterior and sinister long-term motive behind the planned event.
The reality of “The Fall of the Berlin Wall,” and the associated “Fall of Communism,” can best be understood by allegory. Imagine some prisoners locked inside of a dirty dungeon-like 10 x 10 ft cell which is separated, by a wall, from a more modern, 20 x 20 ft dormitory-like cell, — with heat and air-conditioning — housing several other prisoners. The poor captives as well as the “free world” sympathizers who dwell in the better adjacent room demand that the guard in charge of the tiny cell “tear down this wall.” They pray and plead and hold candlelight vigils for their cramped comrades.
When the guard can no longer ignore the moral “will of the people” nor “the tide of history”, he “spontaneously” grabs hold of a sledge hammer and tears down the wall separating the two cells. The “courageous” prisoners defiantly emerge from the old cell to find themselves warmly welcomed by the teary-eyed “free” prisoners of the larger, cleaner, better-decorated room. So grateful are the “liberated” prisoners for the “progress” and friendship of “the free world” ™ that neither they — nor the other candle lighting / prayerful inmates who had taken such pity over their previous condition – pause to reflect that they are all still inmates – albeit in a larger, more comfortable cell. As the “free” inmates and the new “ex-Communists” celebrate their “freedom,” the prison warden (cough cough) just shakes his head, laughs, and says to the guard who had torn down the barrier wall between cells: “Nice work, Gorby.”
Hungarian Jew George Soros, the CIA and their agents in the East had been very busy in the decade preceding “the fall of communism.” The long range plan of this “prison warden” was to bring the east and west into a European merger that is, essentially, communist but with a “multi-cultural” (anti-White) twist.
It’s only natural for prisoners to prefer a better cell, but they still remain prisoners..
So sorry to piss on everyone’s “Fall of the Berlin Wall,” delusion, but the big events of 1989 (including the Tienanmen Square protests in China) were not “spontaneous”. Furthermore, the unified, occupied, mind-raped, guilt-ridden, self-flagellating, childless slaves of today’s Germany are certainly neither “free” nor “independent.” Indeed, the retired Mamma Merkel — an enthusiastic member of Communist youth groups — was herself one of the “democratic” politicians pooped out of the rectum of that tyrannical East German system. Regular readers of The Anti-New York Times don’t need to be told about the type of “freedom” that this sainted sow, this frumpy frau, this commie cow had blessed Germany and all of Europe with.
The big event of 1989 was an important part of the Soros propaganda campaign which served to mask the fact that the New World Order Globalists — with the help of treasonous operatives working inside of the former Soviet Union / Eastern Bloc states — were overthrowing their rival Red regimes via internal “Color Revolutions.” These “spontaneous uprisings” were absolutely not for the purpose of bringing “freedom” and “democracy” to the captive peoples. The grand game was to incorporate the “Warsaw Pact” countries into their world government systems (EU, NATO etc) – before chopping up the Soviet Union / Russia into many smaller pieces and swallowing those up as well. And the grand conquest of Eurasia would have been complete by now, had it not been for the rise of Vladimir Putin. That is why (((they))) hate him so much.
Adored by the western Globalist media but despised by today’s Russians, Time Man-of-the-Year & Nobel Peace Prize winner Mikhail Gorbachev did not disintegrate the Soviet Union for the sake of “freedom.”
Time Man-of-the-Year & Nobel Peace Prize winner Lech Walesa of “liberated” Poland was another puffed-up “anti-Communist” fraud working for the One Worlders. He too is no longer popular among most Poles today.
Media darling and winner of Philadelphia Liberty Medal Vaclav Havel of “liberated” Czechoslovakia chatting with his boss, George Soros.
NY Times (Editorial): Biden Can Close the Extrajudicial Prison at Guantánamo
Why has it proven to be so difficult — impossible even — for presidents and prominent Congressional leaders to close the secret “extrajudicial” military prison at Guantanamo Bay in Cuba? Camp Gitmo opened during the Bush administration in 2002, ostensibly to house hundreds of “Al Qaeda” terrorists during the “War on Terror.” Not long afterwards, influential Leftist groups like the American Civil Liberties Union and the Soros-affiliated Amnesty International loudly called for it to be shut down. The puffed-up CIA operative Edward Snowden later stated that if he had not fled the USA, the NSA (Military White Hats) would have rendered him to Gitmo (here).
But what very few people realize is that the Neo-Con criminal Bush-Cheney administration had also wanted to close the prison in its second term. In a 2015 blogpost titled: “The Bush Administration Wanted to Close GTMO,” Harvard Law egghead and anti-Gitmo advocate Jack Goldsmith correctly reported:
“President Bush said in his memoir: While I believe opening Guantanamo after 9/11 was necessary, the detention facility had become a propaganda tool for our enemies and a distraction for our allies. I worked to find a way to close the prison without compromising security.”
And as President Bush’s Legal Advisor in the State Department, John Bellinger, said in 2010, GTMO “has come to symbolize abuse of Muslim prisoners and serves as a powerful recruiting tool for al-Qaeda.” Other Republicans thought and said similar things before 2009.”
And yet, even with a RINO-controlled Congress and all of the top Demonrats also wanting to close Gitmo down, Bush could not do so. Why not?
The final of the 2008QFS (Quadrennial Freak Show) featured a pair of despicable Deep State operatives (Barack Obongo & John McStain) who each stated that, if elected president, he would close down Gitmo. On only his second day in the White House, Bathhouse Barry — with a House and Senate controlled by his Demonrat allies — issued an Executive Order to close the prison within one year. Eight years passed, and, in spite of an Executive Order being in place, the closure never happened. Again, we ask, why not?
Even at the peak of their popularity and with ample media, “grassroots” and congressional support behind them, neither Bush nor Obongo were able to close the military prison at Gitmo.
From DC to Paris to London and more — “spontaneous” protests against Gitmo (financed by the people who will be going there) have not been enough to get Gitmo closed.
When Trump took office, he revoked Obongo’s Executive Order in early 2018. The prison — which was still open — not only remained open, but was greatly expanded as Trump promised to one day “fill it up with some bad dudes.” Trump’s commitment to Gitmo induced many negative stories in the Fake News — and now, the seemingly worried propagandists of the “paper of record” seem puzzled and disappointed (or scared?) about “Biden’s” do-nothing approach to keeping his campaign promise to reverse the Trump EO and close Gitmo.
From the article:
“The window for this administration to act may be closing. As the 2024 presidential campaign season begins, Republicans are more likely to label any efforts to close Guantánamo as soft on terrorism. Victory by Donald Trump or a like-minded candidate could well end any such efforts, as Mr. Trump did when he was in the White House.”
Way to go, President “Biden!”
* Note: Gitmo is actually EXPANDING under “Biden.”
NPR
Ass clown from NPR’s ”All Things Distorted” show doesn’t know (or pretends not to know) who “the bad dudes” slated for Gitmo could possibly be. “Bad Dudes” = the Cabal!
Headlines only — no live links
The Daily Beast
How is it that several US presidents — supported by the Judenpresse and phony “activists” — even after an Executive Order — have been unable to close down Gitmo? What is this mysterious power protecting the “notorious” military prison? Answer: It is the same invisible force that has protected Trump during his unexpected rise and pretended fall — and now during his unstoppable re-rise. It is the power of Q and the White Hats that is filling up Gitmo with “bad dudes” as we speak, with many more to come.
At his Truth Social page, country singer, military veteran and (we suspect) apparent White Hat Intel operative Derek Johnson has been posting the flight data and itineraries of the numerous military flights coming in and out of Gitmo. Now “you guys” should know by now and understand that we don’t label data as factual without “fact checking” the heck out of it first. Military planes (from various nations) and National Guard planes –– some with very interesting Aviation Call Signs (unique code-names) — have been buzzing all over US skies — and the traffic going in and out of Gitmo is very high now.
No magic tricks here. These are a few of the US Air Force flights that you can verify on your own by using the Flight Tracker search, or simply following the links below:
* Flights call-signed “CABAL“
CABAL71 (Elmendorf US Airforce Base, Alaska / October 2022) CABAL72 (Elmendorf US Airforce Base, Alaska / April 2023) CABAL73 (Elmendorf US Airforce Base, Alaska / April 2023) CABAL74 (Yokota US Airforce Base, Japan / 2021)
* Flights to GITMO call signed GTMO
GTMO842(April 26, 2023) GTMO845 (April 27, 2023 — which made 3 bizarre air “Qs” during its flight — also, 8+4+5 = 17 = Q GTMO844(April 28, 2023) GTMO001 (April 29, 2003)
Something is going on in the skies above — and something is going on at Gitmo. Trust the plan.
Derek Johnson smells of Military Intel to us (in a good way). He recently revealed that he was “invited” down to Gitmo and will be “reporting for a radio station” (hinting at future Emergency Broadcast Alerts)
The “plan” was communicated on Inauguration Day when officers of Military Intel and JAG tribunals (Gitmo) showed up and stood behind Trump.
GTMO845 made a series of unmistakable “Air Qs.” (8+4+5=17 = Q)
Be afraid, Sulzberger “Secret” Courtroom in Gitmo // “Secret” Chamber in Virginia streams to “tribunals” in Gitmo.
Times Caption: It might be the greatest victory of this city that the marathon bombings a decade ago had far from an overwhelming presence in Monday’s race.
Wow. Can you believe that 10 years have now passed since Obama’s Boston Smoke Bombing crisis-actor stunt, whose objective was — we have always believed — to conduct a beta test to measure exactly how obediently normies would comply during a declared “state-of-emergency” in which they were ordered to “shelter-in-place.” The bewildered boobs of Boston behaved beautifully as machine-gun toting militarized units went house to house looking for the “bad guys.” After two Muslim brothers were killed / apprehended, the normies emerged from their fearful confinement chanting “USA! USA! USA!” You guys had best believe that the lessons of that tragic comedy were surely not lost by the eventual architects of the Stupid-19 lock-downs.
A barf-worthy bit of cheesy remembrance drama, from the article:
“I don’t remember exactly where I was when I heard that two bombs had exploded near the finish line of the Boston Marathon 10 years ago, but I do remember exactly how I felt. …
It goes without saying, but it is important to say nevertheless, that the human toll of that day, the three lives lost, the amputations and hundreds of other injuries, will always be foremost in every runner’s mind. The pain of the victims and their families, on that day and enduring since, may evolve but will always be there.”
As was the case with the Sandy Hook school “mass shooting” of four months prior, nobody was killed or hurt in Boston either.
The hoax was followed by a total lock-down of Boston and a phony manhunt for the patsie “bombers.”
Through the miracle of the “Wayback Machine” archives, we present, copy / pasted below for your amusement, the “controversial” pictorial presentation of the suppose “tragedy” — as well as another from days later, when the two “perps” were killed and captured.
*** FLASHBACK // 2013 ***
THE PHONY PHOTOS OF THE BOSTON NON-BOMBING
This ‘victim’s’ clothes were shredded by shrapnel, and yet there is not one scratch on him! Flying ‘ball bearings’ would have punched tiny holes through the clothes and embedded in the flesh. For this phony photo, vertical linear incisions were made so that his clothes could be ripped apart for dramatic effect.
Left: The man on his back is Jeff Bauman (brown hair/green shirt sleeves). BOTH of Bauman’s legs were allegedly blown clean off. Pay attention to the Black lady on top of him (and her CLEAN white shirt), and the shady looking man with the the hood and sunglasses above her.
Bauman ‘bleeds’ out badly – about a gallon! (like red paint / fake blood). But his stub remains clean, and there is no torn flesh! Why is no one even paying attention to him? Notice that the Black woman with the clean white shirt, and the hooded man with sunglasses, are no longer in the picture. They were the ones on top of Bauman, covering him up while removing his prosthetic legs! Where did the missing legs end up anyway?
The ‘bomb’ was placed on the sidewalk. So why are the store windows blown outward, instead of inward? Three people allegedly died, 17 were allegedly in critical condition, and more than 200 people in total were allegedly injured. This photo shows the ‘ground zero’ of the ‘bombing’.Where do you see 200 people? Where do you see 17 critically wounded. Where are the 3 that supposedly died? Focus on the blonde woman sitting up, the man holding a cowboy hat, the black lady with the white shirt, and our shady friend who’s just ‘hanging out’ now. Where did legless Jeff Bauman run away to?
Healthy-looking Jeff is all smiles and ‘thumbs up’ , just days after his legs were ‘blown off’ and gallons of his ‘blood’ were lost. The ‘hero’ Cowboy is on the left.
Nicole Gross was allegedly hit by the impact of the bomb, suffering a broken leg and ankle in the process. She also suffered torn skin and her Achilles’ tendon was severed. Does this look like the face of a woman who just had her leg broken, her ankle broken, and her Achilles tendon severed (ouch!)? Notice the lack of blood on her arms in the spots where her shirt was torn. She has some theatrical dust on her legs, nothing more.
Above is our lady friend again, who we earlier saw laying on top of legless Bauman while wearing a clean white shirt. Now her white shirt, and her forehead, are suddenly drenched in ‘blood’ as she puts on her best ‘in shock’ face for the camera. Notice how she is strapped on a stretcher whereas double-amputee Bauman was hoisted on a wheelchair.
The bomb detonated by the flags. So why are no less than THREE cops in this photo (1 in foreground, others in background) running AWAY from the injured people?…And why did this particular runner fall down after the blast when all the other runners did not? This ‘iconic’ photo is a staged phony! (Notice how prominent the Israeli flag is.)
The day after the non-bombing, the unusually bright red color of the spilled ‘blood’ has still not changed! Spilled blood quickly begins to turn brownish-red as it dries. Try spilling a few drops of your own blood on the sidewalk, and see what color it turns! THIS IS CLEARLY RED PAINT!
(Nice little propaganda touch with the U.S. flag….. “USA!…USA!…. USA!’…Let’s bomb them Muslims!”)
One million Greater Bostonians and others obey mandatory lockdown orders as they cower in their homes. More than 20 square blocks of Watertown, MA are evacuated at machine gun point, and searched house-to-house by Federal and local thugs. When the “Boston Marathon Bomber” was supposedly caught, the Massachusetts Mice emerged from their fearful shelters to cheer, and actually thank, their Government oppressors.
*** END OF 2013 FLASHBACKS ***
The fact that Normiedom still “commemorates” so many hoaxes of yesteryear confirms the validity of one of our mottos:“Fake History is the Fake News that has passed into the rearview mirror.”
To close on an optimistic note, it now appears that the “White Hats” of military intelligence — through FEMA’s Continuity of Government program (which would include media censorship of sensitive matters) and various other Trumpian Executive Orders and military directives — have usurped the capability of the CIA/Mossad Axis to so easily pull off such unbelievable mass acting productions. Instead, they are giving the bad guys a taste of their own medicine.
In spite of the initial scorn and mockery of some of our early followers, the “Editorial Board” of TomatoBubble / RHC, clearly, turned out to be correct about the Boston Smoke Bombing then — and expects to be proven right about all of the masked imposters substituting for imprisoned or dead Deep Staters now. If “they” could do it so easily and repeatedly, then why can’t our guys?
Trump at Waco with a sea of “WITCH HUNT” signs behind him. The “witch” being “hunted” is the architect of the Waco massacre of 1993 — Killary Clinton!
MARCH 26, 2023
NY Times: A Trump Rally, a Right-Wing Cause and the Enduring Legacy of Waco
Thirty years ago, a fiery federal raid on a doomsday sect turned the city into a symbol of government overreach. Donald Trump speaking there is no accident, according to some supporters and critics.
Let’s play a bit of word association. Without thinking, what is the very first thing that pops into your mind when you hear: Waco, Texas? Unless you’re in your 30’s or younger, then certainly, the dramatic (and unnecessary) 51 day siege — culminating in those haunting images of the mass murderous 1993 inferno (preceded by “head shot” death of four Fed agents alleged to have served as ex-bodyguards for the Clintons (here)) — came to mind in less than one second. Right?
This month marks the 30-year-anniversary of the start of the dramatic made-for-TV Satanic ritual — which could only have been ordered by then-First Lady and known co-President Killary Clinton. The grand finale of April 19, 1993 was then dutifully (and absurdly) spun as a “mass suicide” by fire (76 dead, 25 of them children) which the weird, yet harmless, Branch Davidian sect set themselves. The monstrous 6′ 2″ trannie Attorney General, Janet Reno, was put up as the lightning rod to receive the watered-down “criticism” by the controlled feckless barkers of Conservative Inc. — who never once challenged the “mass suicide” fable, only Reno’s “mishandling” of the raid. As for the mainline Paid Pastors of America, there was not a peep of protest about the Dresden-like roasting of scores of innocent and terrorized members of this Christian sub-cult.
NO ONE, EXCEPT “THE FAR RIGHT,” GAVE A RAT’S ASS ABOUT THESE POOR VILIFIED SOULS WHOSE VERY HUMANITY HAD BEEN STRIPPED AWAY BY FAKE NEWS!
1. The surreal spectacle of flame-throwing, tear gas-spewing tanks attacking American citizens was accepted because the harmless Branch Davidians had been pre-demonized for 50 straight days by Fake News. / 2. Cult leader David Koresh — a weirdo for sure, but in no way a threat meriting a military-style assault. / 3. Hellary’s Satanic Inferno, with thick black smoke caused by God-knows-what substance that had been pumped into the compound.
The Deep State sold the “mass suicide” lie and the bewildered boobs of Normiedom swallowed it.
1. GOP RINOs and the bellowing barkers of Conservative Inc. didn’t dare to point a finger at the sainted Satanist, Killary Clinton // 2. So they gently slapped the cross-dressing Bolshevik bison serving as Attorney General on the wrist instead. // 3. The survivors of Hellary’s inferno were arrested and paraded about like circus freaks.
The psychological torture — (sleep deprivation tactics, including loud recordings of screeching rabbits being slaughtered) — and final tank attack upon the people living in the Waco Compound made for the biggest story of the early 1990’s, with an enduring legacy that is still fresh in the memories of those of us on “the far right” who were shocked, saddened and outraged by the event. Waco 1993 turbo-charged the growth of the American militia movement — an anti-Globalist uprising which was finally crippled by the 1995 false-flag bombing of the Oklahoma Federal Building on the two-year anniversary of the Waco fire.
What a delightful “Sicilian Message” that “The Donald” has just sent by holding the very first 2024 presidential rally in Waco, during the 30-year anniversary. In spite of the claim of “coincidence” put out by the Trump campaign, this was not a “coincidence.” The anniversary date, the “Witch Hunt” signs, and the location are too significant to miss — and this time, the Times seems to agree with us:
“’The date (of Trump’s rally) falls in the middle of the 30th anniversary of the weeks long standoff…..”
“Waco is a touchstone for the far right,’ said Stuart Wright, a professor of sociology at Lamar University in Beaumont, Texas, and an authority on the standoff. ‘There’s some deep symbolism.’”
Exactly what are Trump and the White Hats trying to communicate to us by staging the first rally for Campaign 2024 in Waco (not at all a major city) on the 30th anniversary? Let’s back up a few weeks to what the Judenpresse described as an “incendiary” quote from a speech that Trump made at CPAC:
“In 2016, I declared that I am your voice. Today I add, I am your warrior. I am your justice. And for those who have been wronged and betrayed: I am your retribution…. I am your retribution.”
There will be hell to pay for certain people when Trump officially”returns” (he is actually still president). And the “Sicilian Message” just sent at WACO is one that those who have so “wronged and betrayed” so many of us for so long have no doubt received — as the worried tone of this Times articles indicates.
1. The Holocaust (a real one) at WACO had the effect of swelling the ranks of armed militias and also the early “digital army.” // 2. The 1995 false-flag bombing in Oklahoma was blamed on everyone from the militias to Rush Limbaugh. It took the steam out of the “far right” and got Bill & Killary re-elected in 1996. // 3. Trump in Waco, on Saturday. He has pledged to be our “retribution.”
Sometimes, unusual and inexplicable events only begin to make sense after an amount of time and subsequent events have passed. This is especially true when it comes to coded messages. One such case was the unusual, sudden and fleeting appearance of military officers behind the newly inaugurated Donald Trump on January 20, 2017.
Many observers were baffled — with some on the Left “troubled” by it. The World Socialist Web Site whined as follows:
“A strange and disturbing sequence took place behind President Donald Trump as he delivered his inaugural address Friday, which has gone virtually without comment in the news media.
Early in his address, ten military officers walked up and stood behind the president so they would prominently appear with Trump in the camera shots beamed across the US and the world. After 45 seconds, a Marine officer prompts the sailors and soldiers to leave, and they walk away.”
The unusual incident prompted two comments during the New York Times live blog of the address. Jon Meacham, a presidential historian and the current executive editor at publisher Random House wrote, “The military guard behind him seems unusual; am I right?”
It certainly was unusual, but even then, it was clear to some of us that the brief presence of the officers had to have some theatrical purpose. Only now, with years of hindsight (and 5000 posts from Q since the start date of October, 2017) making our vision clearer, do we see what the “Sicilian Message” — happening at the precise moment when Trump was speaking about “transferring power from Washington and giving it back to you, the people” — really meant. You see, only the military would be able to “transfer power” from the Globalists.
It wasn’t for about another 8 months when Trump — surrounded by Generals and Admirals at a White House event — uttered the cryptic and then well-publicized phrase on October 5, 2017:“This (the military people) represents the calm before the storm.” A few weeks later, on October 28, the military operation known as Q kicked off by posting in a sub-forum of 4-chan titled, ‘The Storm.” For those that later followed the Q / Q Anon phenomenon, the Inauguration Day mystery of the appearing and disappearing officers was a mystery no more. The military (aka White Hats) “standing behind” Trump, has a “plan” to “transfer power back to the people.” So simple to see now, in hindsight. But there is still more to the “Sicilian Message” of Inauguration Day, 2017 — and it’s some pretty wild stuff.
Watch Trump’s “Calm Before the Storm” military threat October 5, 2017 / 0:38
Fake News was rattled by Trump’s cryptic “Storm” threat, but didn’t know what to make of it.
Now, back to the “party crashers” of Inauguration Day. Two officers flanking Trump had horizontally striped braids across their caps — one yellow & blue; the other yellow & black. The former represents the colors of Military Intelligence (the boys who gather the dirt on the bad guys) — and the latter, Judge Advocate General — aka “JAG” (the boys who prosecute the bad guys at Military Tribunals outside of the US Court System (Gitmo)).
This observation was first brought to our attention by a reader, without sourcing. But a visit to an online military apparel store confirmed the meaning of these braids. It’s true. So you see, not only were Trump and the White Hats telegraphing what they were intending to do to the Deep State Globalists — they were also telling us how they were going to do it! Who knew?
Trust the plan.
Secret Courtrooms and 848 National Guard soldiers stationed at Gitmo for 9 months at a time? Only the Commander-in-Chief of the US Armed Forces can deploy NG units outside of their states and the country. Why doesn’t “Biden” simply stop the development of Gitmo with an Executive Order, as he had promised during his campaign? Answer: Again, because Donald Trump is the acting CIC, not that actor in a mask!
Many people worldwide are concerned about climate change and believe there is a climate emergency. For decades we have been told by the United Nations that Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from human activity are causing disastrous climate change. In 2018, a UN IPCC report even warned that ‘we have 12 years to save the Earth’, thus sending millions of people worldwide into a frenzy.
Thirty-five years ago, the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and the (World Meteorological Organization) WMO established the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) to provide scientific advice on the complex topic of climate change. The panel was asked to prepare, based on available scientific information, a report on all aspects relevant to climate change and its impacts and to formulate realistic response strategies. The first assessment report of the IPCC served as the basis for negotiating the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). Governments worldwide have signed this convention, thereby, significantly impacting the lives of the people of the world.
However, many scientists dispute with the UN-promoted man-made climate change theory, and many people worldwide are confused by the subject, or are unaware of the full facts. Please allow me to provide some information you may not be aware of.
1. Very few people actually dig into the data, they simply accept the UN IPPC reports. Yet many highly respectable and distinguished scientists have done exactly that and found that the UN-promoted manmade climate change theory is seriously flawed. Are you aware that 1500 of the world’s leading climate scientists and professionals in over 30 countries have signed a declaration that there is no climate emergency and have refuted the United Nations claims in relation to man-made climate change? See this
2. I have also signed this declaration. How can I make such an assertion? I have experience in the field as a former scientist at the Department of Energy and Climate Change, UK Government; and as former staff member at the United Nations Environment Division, where I was responsible for servicing the Pollution Release and Transfer Register Protocol, a Multinational Environmental Agreement, involving the monitoring of pollutants to land, air, and water worldwide. Real pollution exists, but the problem is not CO2. Industrial globalisation has produced many substances that are registered as pollutants, including thousands of new man-made chemical compounds, toxins, nano-particles and genetically modified organisms (GMOs) that are in violation of the scientific pre-cautionary principle.
A book I published recently also provides ample evidence and testimony from renowned scientists that there is no Climate emergency. The book titled ‘Transcending the Climate Change Deception Toward Real Sustainability’ is available here on amazon.COM
3. Next, I will mention the Irish Climate Science Forum (ICSF) website, a valuable resource founded by Jim O’Brien. I am grateful to the ICSF for their excellent work in highlighting the scientific flaws in the UN climate narrative. The ICSF provides a comprehensive lecture series from renowned international scientists providing much evidence, analysis, and data that contradicts the UN assertions. The lectures are available here.
The ICSF scientific view coincides with those of the Climate Intelligence (CLINTEL) foundation that operates in the fields of climate change and climate policy. CLINTEL was founded in 2019 by emeritus professor of geophysics Guus Berkhout and science journalist Marcel Crok. Based on this common conviction, 20 Irish scientists and several ICSF members have co-signed the CLINTEL World Climate Declaration “There is No Climate Emergency” (see this).
4. The reality is that the climate changes naturally and slowly in its own cycle, and solar activity is the dominant factor in climate and not Co2. We can conclude that carbon emissions or methane from livestock, such as cows, are not the dominant factors in climate change. In essence, therefore, the incessant UN, government, and corporate-media-produced climate hysteria in relation to carbon emissions and methane from cows has no scientific basis.
Please note that I have no commercial interest in stating that climate change is not caused by CO2. In truth I am against ‘real’ pollution, and the reality is that the CO2 component is not a pollutant. Unfortunately, many misinformed environmentalists are driving around in electric cars, the battery production for which has caused vast amounts of ‘real’ pollution via the industrial mining and processing of rare earth metals, and the consequent pollution to land, air and water systems. Note that the UN does not focus on the thousands of real pollutants that corporate industrial globalisation creates.
5. The conclusions of the Climate Intelligence foundation include the following
There is no climate emergency. Therefore, there is no cause for panic and alarm.
Natural as well as anthropogenic factors cause warming: The geological archive reveals that Earth’s climate has varied as long as the planet has existed, with natural cold and warm phases. The Little Ice Age ended as recently as 1850. Therefore, it is no surprise that we now are experiencing a period of warming.
Warming is far slower than predicted: The world has warmed significantly less than predicted by IPCC on the basis of modeled anthropogenic forcing. The gap between the real world and the modeled world tells us that we are far from understanding climate change.
Climate policy relies on inadequate models: Climate models have many shortcomings and are not remotely plausible as global policy tools. They blow up the effect of greenhouse gases such as CO2. In addition, they ignore the fact that enriching the atmosphere with CO2 is beneficial.
CO2 is plant food, the basis of all life on Earth: CO2 is not a pollutant. It is essential to all life on Earth. Photosynthesis is a blessing. More CO2 is beneficial for nature, greening the Earth: additional CO2 in the air has promoted growth in global plant biomass. It is also good for agriculture, increasing the yields of crops worldwide.
Global warming has not increased natural disasters: There is no statistical evidence that global warming is intensifying hurricanes, floods, droughts and suchlike natural disasters, or making them more frequent.
6. In the above book I reference the relevant work and scientific presentations of some of the world’s leading climate scientists. Let us examine some of the work and testimonies of these scientists:
“deeply flawed logic, obscured by shrewd and unrelenting propaganda, actually enabled a coalition of powerful special interests to convince nearly everyone in the world that Co2 from human industry was a dangerous plant destroying toxin. It will be remembered as the greatest mass delusion in the history of the world – that Co2 the life of plants was considered for a time to be a deadly poison.” – Professor Richard Lindzen, Professor Emeritus of Atmospheric Sciences at MIT.
Dr Nils-Axel Mörner was a former Committee Chairman at the UN International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). He was an expert involved in reviewing the first IPPC documents. He says the UN IPPC is misleading humanity about climate change. He tried to warn that the IPPC were publishing lies and false information that would inevitably be discredited. In an interview, he stated: “This is the most dangerous and frightening part of it. How a lobbyist group, such as the IPPC, has been able to fool the whole world. These organised and deceitful forces are dangerous” and expressed shock “that the UN and governments would parade children around the place at UN Climate summits as propaganda props”. The following is his testimony as detailed
“solar activity is the dominant factor in climate and not Co2… something is basically sick in the blame Co2 hypothesis… It was launched more than 100 years ago and almost immediately excellent physicists demonstrated that the hypothesis did not work.
I was the chairman of the only international committee on sea levels changes and as such a person I was elected to be the expert reviewer on the (UN IPPC) sea levels chapter. It was written by 38 persons and not a single one was a sea level specialist… I was shocked by the low quality it was like a student paper… I went through it and showed them that it was wrong and wrong and wrong…
The scientific truth is on the side of the sceptics… I have thousands of high ranked scientists all over the world who agree that NO, CO2 is not the driving mechanism and that everything is exaggerated. In the field of physics 80 to 90% of physicists know that the Co2 hypothesis is wrong… Of course, metrologists they believe in this because that is their own profession – they live on it.… I suspect that behind-the-scenes promoters… have an ulterior motive… It’s a wonderful way of controlling taxation controlling people” – Dr Nils-Axel Mörner, a former Committee Chairman at the UN IPPC, and former head of the Paleo Geo-physics and Geo-dynamics department in Stockholm
Another climate scientist with impeccable credentials that has broken rank is Dr Mototaka Nakamura. He asserts: “Our models are mickey-mouse mockeries of the real world”. Dr Nakamura received a Doctorate of Science from MIT, and for nearly 25 years specialized in abnormal weather and climate change at prestigious institutions that included MIT, Georgia Institute of Technology, NASA, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, JAMSTEC and Duke University. Dr Nakamura explains why the data foundation underpinning global warming science is “untrustworthy” and cannot be relied on and that:“Global mean temperatures before 1980 are based on untrustworthy data”.
Professor John R. Christy, Director of Atmospheric and Earth Sciences, University of Alabama, has provided detailed analysis of climate data, see Endnote [i]. I summarise the main points from his analysis below:
“The established global warming theory significantly misrepresents the impact of extra greenhouse gases; the weather that affects people the most is not becoming more extreme or more dangerous; temperatures were higher in the 1930s than today; between 1895 and 2015, 14 of the top 15 years with the highest heat records occurred before 1960; the temperatures we are experiencing now in 2021 were the same as 120 years ago…
the number of major tornadoes between 1954 and 1986 averaged 56/year, but between 1987 and 2020 the average was only 34/year; between 1895 and 2015 on average there has been no change in the number of very wet days per month, and no change in the number of very dry days per month, and the 20 driest months were before 1988. Between 1950 and 2019 the percentage of land area experiencing droughts has not increased globally – the trend is flat; the incidence of wildfires in North America between 1600 and 2000 has decreased substantially. Sea levels rose 12.5 cm per decade for 8,000 years and then it levelled off, now it rising only 2.5 cm per decade… worrying about 30 cm rise in sea level in a decade is ridiculous, in a hurricane the east coast of the U.S. gets a 20 foot rise in 6 hours, so a 30 cm rise will be easily handled!”
In a lecture titled The imaginary climate crisis – how can we change the message? Available on the Irish Climate Science Forum website, see Endnote [ii]. Richard L Lindzen, Professor Emeritus of Atmospheric Sciences at MIT summarises the battle against the climate hysteria as follows:
“in the long history of the earth there has been almost no correlation between climate and co2… the paleoclimate record shows unambiguously that Co2 is not a control knob… the narrative is absurd… it gives governments the power to control the energy sector… for about 33 years, many of us have been battling against the climate hysteria… There were more important leading people who were objecting to it, they were unfortunately older and by now most of them dead…
Elites are always searching for ways to advertise their virtue and assert their authority. They believe they are entitled to view science as a source of authority rather than a process, and they try to appropriate science, suitably and incorrectly simplified, as the basis for their movement.”
“CO2… it’s not a pollutant… it’s the product of all plant respiration, it is essential for plant life and photosynthesis… if you ever wanted a leverage point to control everything from exhalation to driving, this would be a dream. So it has a kind of fundamental attractiveness to bureaucratic mentality.” – Prof. Richard Lindzen, Professor Emeritus of Atmospheric Sciences at MIT
Patrick Moore, co-founder of Greenpeace, and President of Greenpeace in Canada for seven years, states:
“the whole climate crisis is not only fake news its fake science… of course climate change is real it’s been happening since the beginning of time, but it’s not dangerous and it’s not caused by people… climate change is a perfectly natural phenomenon and this modern warming period actually began about 300 years ago when the little ice age began to come to an end. There is nothing to be afraid of and all they are doing is instilling fear. Most of the scientists who are saying it’s a crisis are on perpetual government grants.
I was one of the (Greenpeace) founders… by the mid-80s… we were hijacked by the extreme left who basically took Greenpeace from a science-based organisation to an organisation based on sensationalism, misinformation and fear… you don’t have a plan to feed 8 billion people without fossils fuels or get the food into the cities…” – Patrick Moore, co-founder of Greenpeace
Professor William Happer, Princeton University, Former Director of Science at the US Department of Energy, is also a strong voice against the myth of man-made global warming. He states: “More CO2 benefits the Earth”.
7. The UN IPCC cherry picks data, uses flawed modelling and scenarios not remotely related to the real world
The UN climate crisis predictions are not based on physical evidence, rather they are based on complex computer modelling. One has to decode and analyse the modelling process to ascertain whether or not the models are valid and accurate or whether they have obvious flaws. The vast majority of scientists, economists, politicians and the general public have simply assumed that the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) models are accurate. Very few people have the time or skills to analyse these models, not to mention actually dispute them. Nonetheless, there were many senior and highly distinguished scientists that did exactly that – they claimed the UN narrative was incorrect and that there was no climate emergency. Their voices have been drowned out by a vast money-driven political and media establishment of the globalised ‘system’. The vitally important work of some of these renowned scientists is referenced in the above book.
“The computer models are making systematic dramatic errors… they are all parametrised… fudged… the models really don’t work” – Patrick J. Michaels, Director, Cato Institute Center for the Study of Science
Dr Roger Pielke Jr, University of Colorado, has conducted a detailed scientific review and analysis of the UN IPCC AR6 report, see Endnote [iii]. He describes that in relation to climate modelling, the IPCC detached the models from socio-economic plausibility. In creating the models, instead of first completing integrative assessment models (IAMs), the IPCC skipped this essential step and jumped straight to radiative forcing scenarios and thus these scenarios are not based on competed IAMs. This led much of climate modelling down the wrong track. I quote points from Dr Pielke’s analysis as follows:
“The four IPCC scenarios came from a large family of models so instead of splitting modelling from socio-economic assumptions the models already had the assumptions faked and baked in to them, because they had to have those assumptions to produce the required radiative forcing (to produce a desired climate ‘crisis scenario’ outcome).
In another fateful decision the 4 representative concentration pathways (RCPs) came from 4 different IAMs, which was a huge mistake. These models are completely unrelated to each other, but the impression has been given that they are of a common set, only differing in their radiative forcing, this was a huge mistake. Furthermore, no-one has responsibility for determining whether these scenarios are plausible. The climate community decided which scenario to prioritise and they chose the two most implausible scenarios! There are thousands of climate assumptions, but only 8 to 12 of them are available currently for climate research. The IPCC report even states that “no likelihood is attached to the scenarios in this report”. The likelihood is considered low they admit – This is an incredible admission by the IPCC.
These extreme unlikely scenarios dominate the literature and the IPCC report; therefore, the IPCC report is biased. Bottom line is that there is massive confusion. The IPCCs’ Richard Moss warned that RCP 8.5 was not to be used as a reference for the other RCPs, but 5,800 scientific papers worldwide misuse it like that… The whole process is seriously flawed… Nothing close to the real world is represented by the IPCC scenarios. Climate science has a huge problem! The IPCC currently uses RCP 8.5 as the ‘business as usual’ scenario, but RCP 8.5 is wild fantasy land and not remotely related to current reality at all… climate science has a scientific integrity crisis.” – Dr Roger Pielke Jr, University of Colorado,
8. Financialization of the entire world economy is now based on a life-killing ‘net-zero’ greenhouse gas emissions strategy.
The UN Agenda 2030 plan and the Paris Agreement goal to reduce CO2 emissions by 7% per annum until 2030 is in effect a plan that would disable the current resource mechanisms of the industrial economy for the food, energy and goods that enable human life and survival. This is being implemented before humanity has transitioned away from the flawed polluting trans-national industrial economy toward self-sufficient local/regional economies.
Zero carbon emissions, in essence, means pulling the plug on current systems of industrial agriculture, transport, goods production, electricity production, etc., and many millions of people reliant on these systems worldwide could be faced with a lack of electricity, food, goods, etc. This could have terrible consequences, particularly in locations and countries, that are currently unable to produce much food.
It should be noted that for decades, these same political, government, and corporate powers have rampantly promoted corporate economic globalization and fossil fuel dependency. Whilst, at the same time actively hindering the funding, creation, or government support of, more self-sufficient local communities/regions, and local co-operatives. Most of the world population thus became reliant on the globalized fossil-fuel dependent system.
9. Central bankers are entirely funding / controlling the advancement of the worldwide climate change ‘project’
The decision to drastically reduce CO2, one of the most essential compounds to sustain all life, is no co-incidence. It should be noted that it is the world’s central bankers that are behind this decision and are entirely funding and controlling the advancement of the worldwide project of combatting man-made climate-change.
This project involves an attempt to de-carbonise the activities of the entire world population. In December 2015, the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) created the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosure (TCFD), which represents $118 trillion of assets globally, see Endnote [iv]. In essence this means that the financialization of the entire world economy is based on meeting nonsensical aims such as “net-zero greenhouse gas emissions”. The TCFD includes key people from the world’s mega-banks and asset management companies, including JP Morgan Chase; BlackRock; Barclays Bank; HSBC; China’s ICBC bank; Tata Steel, ENI oil, Dow Chemical, and more.
The fact that the world’s largest banks and asset management corporations, including BlackRock, Goldman Sachs, the UN, the World Bank, the Bank of England and other central banks of the BIS, have all linked to push a vague, mathematically nonsensical ‘green’ economy, is no coincidence. There is another agenda at play that has nothing to do with environmentalism. The green economy along with UN Agenda 2030 is an agenda of world control, and will also develop trillions of dollars for the behind-the-scenes mega-banks. When the world largest banks, corporations, and institutions, all align to push a climate change agenda that has zero evidence, one can see there is another major agenda going on behind the scenes. This agenda tries to convince the common people of the world to make huge sacrifices under the emotive guise of “saving our planet.”. While all the time the corporations and banks make vast profits, and political institutions implement worldwide technocratic control systems under the banner of combatting, and adapting to, so-called man-made climate change.
“The links between the world’s largest financial groups, central banks and global corporations to the current push for a radical climate strategy to abandon the fossil fuel economy in favor of a vague, unexplained Green economy, it seems, is less about genuine concern to make our planet a clean and healthy environment to live. Rather it is an agenda, intimately tied to the UN Agenda 2030 for “sustainable” economy, and to developing literally trillions of dollars in new wealth for the global banks and financial giants who constitute the real powers that be… “ – F. William Engdahl, strategic risk consultant and lecturer
Back in 2010, the head of Working Group 3 of the UN IPCC, Dr Otmar Edenhofer, told an interviewer,
“…one must say clearly that we redistribute de facto the world’s wealth by climate policy. One has to free oneself from the illusion that international climate policy is environmental policy. This has almost nothing to do with environmental policy anymore.”
To better perceive what is ‘behind the curtain’ of the Climate hoax and the UN/WEF agenda it also helps to examine what has happened in the decades beforehand. It is important to perceive the implications of the worldwide fractional-reserve debt-money banking scam and the subtle system of debt-slavery that has existed for decades. If you look at the World Bank website you will see that virtually every nation on Earth is in vast debt. In debt to who you may ask? The answer is to privately owned mega-banks. For many decades the so-called banking and corporate elites have had full control of the source of money creation and its allocation, via the debt-money system, and have therefore, by default, been able to fund, and increasingly control and manipulate the entire world spectrum of industry, media, government, education, ideological supremacy and war to their own design, agenda and benefit. Mayer Amschel Rothschild (banker) is widely reported to have said:
“Give me control of a nation’s money supply and I care not who makes its laws.”
10. Central bankers hijacked the real environmental movement in 1992 creating the fake climate change agenda
Psychopaths can utilise any ideology and, change it from within to something that may eventually be entirely different to its original purpose. Meanwhile, the original followers and advocates continue to pursue what they believe is the original ideology, but gradually become mere pawns in the agenda of a self-serving elite. Unfortunately, over the past decades, this is exactly what has happened in the environmental movement.
Whistleblower George Hunt served as an official host at a key environmental meeting in Denver, Colorado in 1987, and states that David Rockefeller; Baron Edmund De Rothschild; US Secretary of State Baker; Maurice Strong, a UN official and an employee of the Rockefeller and Rothschild trusts; EPA administrator William Ruccleshaus; UN Secretary General in Geneva MacNeill, along with World Bank and IMF officials were at this meeting. Hunt was surprised to see all these rich elite bankers at the meeting and questioned what they were doing there at an environmental congress.
In a video recording, Hunt later provided important evidence from the documents of the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3-14 June 1992. This conference was the well-known UN ’92 Earth Summit and was run by UNCED. According to Hunt, via the Earth summit, the UN was setting a net, an agenda, to place the power over the Earth and its peoples into their own hands. The world private banking cartel are the same ultra-rich banking families that had been instrumental in the setting up of the World Bank, the UN, and other international institutions, after WW2. Their political cohorts included Stalin (the leader of a brutal communist regime in the USSR that committed genocide of millions of people), UK Prime minister Churchill, and US President Roosevelt. Hunt refers to these banking families and their financial and international institutional networks as:
“The same world order that tricked third world countries to borrow funds and rack up enormous debts… and purposely creating war and debt to bring societies into their control. The world order crowd are not a nice group of people…”– George Hunt, Whistleblower speaking about the UN Earth summit of 1992
As a consequence of the UN Earth Summit, the honest, genuine environment movement that actually cared about real pollution to land, air and water, was politically hi-jacked by powerful political and financial interests with a different agenda.
Maurice Strong, a UN official and an employee of the Rockefeller and Rothschild trusts, had convened the first UNCED congress in Stockholm, Sweden, in 1972. Then, 20 years later he was the convenor and secretary general of UNCED. Hunt also provided video evidence from the Fourth UNCED World Congress meeting in 1987 of an international investment banker, stating that:
“I suggest therefore that this be sold not through a democratic process that would take too long and require far too much funds to educate the cannon-fodder, unfortunately, which populates the Earth. We have to take almost an elitist program…”
Thus, the decrees leading to the 1992 UN Earth summit were dictated without debate or opportunity for dissent and would supersede national laws. The decrees were dictated into existence by the banker Edmund de Rothschild, who got these major decrees into the ’92 UN resolutions without debate or challenge. Hunt asserts that he was denied the opportunity to openly challenge Rothschild’s remarks by the meeting Chairman.
Is it any surprise that the Rothschild bank of Geneva is the nucleus of the World Conservation bank and the wealthy elite are integrated into the bank via the Rothschilds private offering of shares. The banks assumes control of world conservation and decides and controls how these resources are allocated or utilized.
11. Despite the deceptive and fake environmental facade, it has adopted, the vast institutional entity of the UN has fully endorsed environmentally destructive industrial globalisation for the past 70 years. The UN climate change, sustainable development and green economy policies over the past 30 years are little more than worldwide marketing tricks that have tragically brainwashed two generations of young people who do not understand what the UN actually is, and who is it is really designed to serve.
This current globalised system involves the promotion of beliefs and fake science that claim to be unchallengeable truths, but are, in fact, ideologies in which evidence is manipulated, twisted, and distorted to prove the ‘governing idea’, and thus promote its worldwide dissemination. They start with the conclusion they want and then wrench and manipulate what scant evidence they can to fit that conclusion. Man-made climate change due to anthropogenic carbon emission is a major example of this.
Institutions, including the UN, the World Economic Forum (WEF), and the World Health Organisation (WHO), are privately-motivated unelected unaccountable organisations controlled by the source of debt-money creation, i.e., the world private-banking cartel; and are just clever marketing tools and political mechanisms for implementing and maintaining a corrupt worldwide system, under the clever guise of ‘fixing the problems of the world’.
These powerful special interests have been promoting certain ‘ideologies’ for decades to advance their corporate and political aims. The word “sustainable” was hijacked decades ago, and it is now deceptively used to advance the agendas of globalist mega-corporate interests who couldn’t care less about the environment. The aim is to catapult humanity into the arms of UN Agenda 2030 and the WEF ‘reset’ plan, which are clever marketing plans entirely designed by the so-called elite mega-corporate interests of the WEF Davos group.
12. Furthermore, the current green energy/renewable technologies being promoted by the UN and WEF, are not a viable solution for the world’s energy supply. Although these technologies have some limited viability in certain locations and scenarios, the fact remains that the Energy Returned on Energy Invested is much too low – in essence the entire process is mathematically flawed. This is evidenced by the work of scientists, including Professor David MacKay, former Regius Professor of Engineering at Cambridge University and former Chief Scientific Advisor at the UK Department of Energy and Climate Change.
Conclusion
In summary, CO2 reduction is the main focus of the UN-promoted climate-change-hysteria that has been rampant among the world’s population. However, the proclaimed climate crisis exists in computer models only. The cult of ‘manmade climate change’ is a media and UN politically-promoted ‘ideology’, that is used for a wider political and corporate agenda. Manmade climate change is not based in fact, and has hijacked real environmental concerns.
The world’s central bankers are fully funding the worldwide climate change ‘project’. The truism ‘follow the money’ springs to mind – and by doing so, one quickly discovers who runs the corporate, political, and media world.
Due to incessant UN, government, and corporate-promoted climate change propaganda, many people are, thus, in a media-induced state of confusion, and, thus, blindly assume their pre-determined role in society under this ‘dictatorship of words’ without even being aware of it. For example, we now have millions of so-called climate change warriors blind to the fact that climate change is not actually caused by carbon emissions. This is all to scare people into accepting totalitarian authority and limitations to their freedom and personal wellbeing.
The unpalatable reality is that people’s access to energy and resources is being intentionally reduced via bogus climate change policies, high inflation, ongoing geo-political theatre and intentionally instigated war.
We cannot understand how to create a truly resilient society unless we correctly perceive the current society we live in and how it came to exist. So, who are the architects of the current paradigm. The above book is designed to help in that regard. Unless we recognize the untruths of the current paradigm, even if it is not ‘politically correct’ to do so, then we will not be able to make the correct adjustments to our current communities and local/regional networks, or create a truly resilient thriving society in Ireland. In this spirit of truth, new networks are emerging worldwide.
Notes
[i] Source: Irish Climate Science Forum lecture titled Testing Climate Claims 2021 Update available at http://www.icsf.ie
NY Times: Biden’s Surreal and Secretive Journey Into a War Zone
NY Times:Trump Visits East Palestine, Seeks Contrast With Biden
Now one-year old, “the latest thing” in the Ukraine is — given the limited memory of the minuscule minds of the captive subjects of American Normiedom — no longer “the latest thing.” Oh sure, yeah yeah, “Putin bad” and “I Stand With Ukraine” are still the popular sentiments that manifest in “polls,” but the erection is long gone by now as fewer and fewer people support wasting taxpayer money over there. Nobody wants an actual NATO vs Russia shooting war. And even if the U.S. was to actually push for such a confrontation, the current political configuration in Germany, France and Italy would preclude the major European states from following. With the possible exception of some of the blind generational Russia-haters in Poland (who, evidently, learned nothing from 1939), no one in Europe wants World War III either.
As I have said from the very start of Russia’s successful limited action, there isn’t going to be World War III because Trump and the Patriots are in control. So then, what does “Joe Biden” actually hope to achieve with his alleged visit to Ukraine and his escalation of war talk? The key — the “Rosetta Stone” — to understanding the recent antics of this stumbling, mumbling, bumbling imposter is the realization that he is indeed an imposter acting according to the White Hats’ scripting of events. If you’re not quite “there yet,” (understandable) then our take on his bizarre visit to Kiev won’t make much sense to you. Underlying assumptions are everything. We have to go with our eyes because sight triumphs over incredulity.
*Note: It’s very interesting how the Times headline, described “Biden’s” trip as “surreal and secretive” — with the article describing an “anonymous train” sneaking into Kiev whilst people thought “Biden” had just finished eating at “an Italian restaurant in DC” with his wife.
1. White hat operative “Joe Biden” in skin mask. // 2. Different face and different signature. // 3. Fake White House set.
Is any of this real? “Biden” sneaks out of “an Italian restaurant in DC” to bring his love, his encouragement and US taxpayer money to the little green clown in Ukraine. Doesn’t this actor own an actual suit?
If our take on imitation / CGI “Biden” and no regional / world war is correct, then the next logical question is this: Why is this operative slandering Russia and still encouraging Ukrainian aggression? How does this benefit Trump and “the plan?” There has to be an answer, right? There is, and we think we have a solid hypothesis as to where this cheesy drama is ultimately heading. The clues come to us from Trump’s own statements and Truth Social posts about the Ukrainian situation as well as the recent toxic train derailment in “East Palestine,” Ohio (interesting town name).
The following headlines constitute the key data points.
The Hill
FOX
NY Times
FOX
Axios
Typo “leftover” copied / pasted from (Axios)
“Biden” in Fukraine pissing away US taxpayer money while Trump visits “East Palestine” to give comfort to and supply bottled water (at his own expense) for the forgotten Americans in the heartland? This was NOT a good look for “Biden,” to say the very least. And oh what a contrast between him and the “ex-president” who puts America first! And oh what a “coincidence” that a tiny town called “East Palestine” should feature so prominently in this White Hat pysop. Is this a coded swipe at the deceitful (((usual suspects))) who have always insisted that a place called Palestine never really existed by that name? We now suspect that the train derailment was also part of this play and that it wasn’t really “toxic.”
Another element to this slowly unfolding psyop-for-the-good-of-sleeping-Normiedom is Trump’s repeated claim that he could end the war in the Ukraine quickly and easily. We believe that is exactly what is going to happen, in due time. The only question is, will Trump the Peacemaker “end” the war as a “private citizen” and thus embarrass “Biden” on the “world stage,” — or will peace be achieved after his official return as Commander-in-Chief.
What a movie! Stay tuned, boys and girls.
*Editor’s Note: The never-ending circus of tiresome diversions such as the air balloon drama, the UFOs, the train derailment, the Ukraine visit etc. may not be the Deep State diversions that many of our fellow “conspiracy theorists” suspect. The White Hats also have an interest in diverting the news cycle whilst the investigations and secret arrests — as appear to be supported by unusual air traffic between the US and Gitmo — continue unabated.
The notion that these people suggest that Palestine never existed, its just fucking stupid.
Times Caption: A patriotic mural in Moscow dedicated to victory in World War II. The Kremlin is tapping into Russian pride in the nation’s victory over the Nazis to demonize Ukraine. FEBRUARY 21, 2023
NY Times: One Year Into War, Putin Is Crafting the Russia He Craves
I have mixed feelings on what’s described in this article. The positive news from this whiny Times piece? The cancer of libtardation is being systematically eradicated in Russia as wartime anti-NATO patriotism continues to be stoked. The negative part? World War II mythology — specifically, the falsely stated cause of that history-shaping war and the absurdly inflated casualties of the Russians — is being used as a propaganda tool to whip up today’s patriotic “anti-Nazi” (anti-NATO) fervor. The big and virtually irrevocable lie about “Nazis” — a monstrous mendacity deeply drilled into the minds of Russian Normiedom for eight decades now — is serving the noble goals of nationalist revival and winning the propaganda war against the “Nazi” gangsters of NWO Ukraine.* From the article // The questionable means: “Schoolchildren learn in a new weekly class that the Russian military has always liberated humanity from “aggressors who seek world domination.” (oh barf!)“New museum exhibits put on by the state have titles like “NATOzism” — a play on “Nazism” that seeks to cast the Western military alliance as posing a threat as existential as the Nazis of World War II.”* From the article // The noble ends:
“Liberalism in Russia is dead forever, thank God,” Konstantin Malofeyev, an ultraconservative business tycoon, bragged in a phone interview on Saturday. “The longer this war lasts, the more Russian society is cleansing itself from liberalism and the Western poison.”
Like I said, mixed feelings.
Now, the Russians may not be able to realistically revise the mentally embedded useful mythology, but once again — for the benefit of those of “you guys” here’s the deal: The German invasion of the Soviet Union in 1941 was a 100% justifiable and necessary preemptive operation. Some background Information: With Germany preoccupied by its war with Great Britain (started by Britain):
Stalin violated the Soviet-Polish Non-Aggression Pact by invading Poland in 1939
Stalin violated the Soviet-Finnish Non-Aggression Pact by invading Finland in 1939
Stalin violated a provision of the Soviet-German Non-Aggression Pact (1939) by invading Lithuania in 1940
Stalin grabbed a piece of eastern Romania in 1940
Hitler knew that Stalin, in secret collaboration with the British, was planning to totally break the Soviet-German Non Aggression Pact by launching a massive surprise attack upon anti-Communist Germany. We’ll let Hitler explain, in his own truthful words:
“Already in 1940 it had become increasingly clear from month to month that the plans of the men in the Kremlin were aimed at the domination, and thus the destruction, of all of Europe. I have already told the nation of the build-up of Soviet military power in the East during a period when Germany had only a few divisions in the provinces bordering Soviet Russia. Only a blind person could fail to see that a military build-up of world-historical dimensions was being carried out. And this was not in order to protect something that was being threatened, but rather to attack that which seemed incapable of defense … I may say this today: If the wave of more than 20,000 tanks, hundreds of divisions, tens of thousands of artillery pieces, along with more than 10,000 airplanes, had not been kept from being set into motion against the Reich, Europe would have been lost. “Tell it, just Tell it!
But who will tell today’s Rooskies?
Millions of Soviet troops were quickly taken prisoner because they were packed along the front line, in OFFENSIVE positions. The Germans then advanced easily across undefended territory. There was so little defense behind the front lines because Stalin was planning an invasion of eastern Europe, NOT a defense of Russia. After the war, the prisoners shown above would be condemned to death in Stalin’s gulags. In Stalin’s mind, There were no prisoners of war, just traitors.
Ironically, the Russians of today and the Germans of the 1930’s-40’s are and were fighting the very same forces of Globalism — the “liberal New World Order” which Hitler referred to as “international hyenas” and Putin now calls “Satanic scum.” Another amazing similarity relates to the type of characters who fled Germany and the ones who are now leaving Russia.
* Hitler / 1933:
“The guilty ones are right here with us. They live among us and abuse day in and day out the hospitality granted to them by the German people.
In gratitude for that, while millions of our own people are without work and go to pieces, a clan of Jewish intellectuals, professors and businessmen agitate hate against us in the world.”
* Putin / 2022:
“The West will try to rely on the so-called fifth column, on national traitors, on those who earn money here with us but live there. And I mean ‘live there’ not even in the geographical sense of the word, but according to their thoughts, their slavish consciousness — I do not judge those with villas in Miami or the French Riviera or who can’t get by without oysters or foie gras or so-called ‘gender freedoms. The problem is they mentally exist there, and not here, with our people with Russia.
But the Russian people, will always be able to distinguish true patriots from scum and traitors, and simply spit them out like a gnat that accidentally flew into their mouths, spit them out on the pavement.”
By the way, the two leaders were both talking about the same people as the headlines below, from 2022, confirm.
Ironically, and in a good way, the Hitler – Putin comparisons are actually spot-on correct…. but WW2 mythology lives on in Russia nonetheless.
NY Times:Far-Right Militias in Europe Plan to Confront Russian Forces, a Research Group Says.
Many on the “far right” have expressed confusion and concern as to why Vlad the Bad Putin has vowed to crush the “far right” “ultra-nationalists”(aka “Nazis”) in Ukraine. Why do these “ultras” — both within Ukraine and Russia itself — hate Putin anyway? Don’t they realize that they are making common cause with the Globalists who also hate Putin and especially hate the very concepts of “nationalism” and national sovereignty? Shouldn’t these “nationalists” — some of them now arriving from other European countries to “volunteer” in Jewish Ukraine’s fight against Russia — be joining forces with anti-Globalist Russia instead? This doesn’t make any sense, at all — on the surface, that is. We will need to dig into this article a bit deeper to see what lurks underneath this seemingly contradictory alliance between Globalists and ultra-nationalist “extremists.”
The more astute regular readers here already suspect whom we are about to chisel-out of the deepest stratum of the petrified shit pit that is “nationalist” Ukraine. But first, for the sake of better understanding, it behooves us to revisit a similar mystery of contradiction. Specifically, that would be the “Islamic extremists”of ISIS — another well-armed, well-financed group which, very oddly, made similar common cause with (((the usual suspects))) in their bloody war to overthrow Assad of Syria.
1. Why is the Ukrainian “far right” doing the heavy lifting for Jewish Globalists and their degenerate, Marxist, anti-White European Union?
At theold Tomato Bubble location, they ran numerous articles exposing the link between the anti-Assad “Islamic terrorists” of ISIS and their hidden Mossad / CIA controllers. Of particular interest was how Israeli-American Rita Katz and her “SITE” group always seemed to get the insider information on the masked “be-headers” of ISIS. Pasted below are screenshot excerpts from the 2015 piece titled, “What Do Spider Man and ISIS Have in Common?(a few images did not survive).
Digest this slowly, and then we’ll come back to Ukraine.
The manufactured phoniness of this bogeyman known as ‘ISIS’ is obvious in so many ways – (see related links at bottom of this article). For today’s bit of ISIS-debunking, your child-at-heart reporter here harkens back to the exciting comic-book tales of ‘The Amazing Spider Man’ — the coolest super-hero ever!
Apart from the fact that both Spider Man and ISIS Man are children’s stories; and apart from the fact that both wear full facial masks; there is a third thing the two have in common — a commonality which gives the game away by exposing their respective identities.
As those of you who read the comics as children, or saw either the TV cartoons or the more recent Hollywood movie versions know; Spider Man is really Peter Parker — a teen-aged nerd who works part-time as a photographer for The Daily Bugle. Month after month, as Spider Man dispatches one super-villain after another, Peter Parker amazes his cigar-chomping boss, J. Jonah Jameson, with his uncanny ability to be in the right place at the right time to capture photos of Spider Man in action. The photos pay well for young Parker. Scoop after scoop after scoop, and still no one is able to figure out Peter’s secret for obtaining such blockbuster photos of New York’s favorite Super Hero and the related crime scenes.
Now, what has this got to do with ISIS Man? Well, you see boys and girls, ISIS Man also has a photographer – and videographer – with this weird ability to obtain the only images of ISIS Man. Her name is Rita Katz (an Israeli Defense Force veteran), and her Washington DC-based “organization” is known as SITE (Search for International Terrorist Entities). You may have seen the SITE logo on so many of the internationally televised images of ISIS Man. Have a look:
***END OF FLASHBACK***
Now, with that 8-year-old bit of real history about Rita Katz / SITE / Mossad / ISIS refreshed for you, all that is necessary to crack this riddle about “far right” “Nazis” coming from “all across Europe” to make common cause with “far left” Jewish Trotskyites and Globalists in Ukraine is to simply quote from this selected NY Times article. Here goes:
“Militia leaders in France, Finland and Ukraine have posted declarations urging their supporters to join in the fight to defend Ukraine against a Russian invasion. The posts have been located and translated by the SITE Intelligence Group, a private organization that specializes in tracking extremist groups.
Rita Katz, the director of SITE, said that numerous far-right white nationalist and neo-Nazi groups throughout Europe and North America had expressed an outpouring of support for Ukraine, including by seeking to join paramilitary units in battling Russia.”
Hello again, Rita. — No further comment needed — except this: “Under. Every. Rock.”
Once you have learned to read the code, SITE’s website essentially tells you who the anti-Assad “Islamic” terrorists and the anti-Putin “Far Right” extremists are actually serving — though most of the stupid “Nazi” foot-soldiers of the Azov Battalion — like the ‘Islamist” chumps of ISIS — don’t even realize it.
SITE = ISLAMIC STATE (ISIS)
SITE = AL QAEDA
SITE = “FAR RIGHT” IN UKRAINE
CIA / MOSSAD
NO COMPARISON! 1. The originals, the “real deal” — good and proper gentlemen with a noble vision for healthy nationalism, cultural development and peaceful relations with all other nations. // 2. Pathetic, violent, “us vs. them,” football hooligan, imitation knock-offs inspired by an artificial media-created caricature of “Nazis” — Mercenaries and low IQ idiots easily manipulated and duped into fighting their Russian brothers.
The World We Live In 