Who Blew Up the Hindenburg?

The legendary Hindenburg disaster of 1937, which occurred right here in New Jersey, along with, shall we say, “Geo-political” issues eventually brought about the demise of Zeppelin — structures which had been the great pride of Germany .

Hindenburg Disaster May 6, 1937
Paul von Hindenburg, left, and Adolf Hitler ride in an open car during a parade in Berlin, Germany, May 1933
Hitler shows his respect for the hero of World War I who, at the time, was the most honored man in Germany

The New York Times (February 27, 2020):

Berlin Drops Hindenburg’s Honorary Title for his Role in Nazis’ Rise:
State government strikes former president off list, citing his 1933 act of appointing Hitler as chancellor.

He led Germany’s army in World War I and served for nearly a decade as the country’s president, but thanks to his role in Nazi dictator Adolf Hitler’s rise to power, Paul Von Hindenburg is an honorary Berliner no more.

Oh well. It was only a matter of time before (((they))) could kill the historical personage of Paul Von Hindenburg — whose namesake airship became even better known than he was.

A Zeppelin airship takes its name from German Count Ferdinand Von Zeppelin — a German General and inventor whose company — Luftschiffbau Zeppelin (LZ)–led the development of the rigid flying machines in the late 1800’s / early 1900’s. After the great success of Zeppelin’s design, the word “zeppelin” became used to refer to all rigid airships.

Zeppelins were first flown commercially in 1910 by Deutsche Luftschiffahrts-AG (DELAG) — essentially the world’s first airline service. By the outbreak of World War I in 1914, DELAG had made more than 1,500 flights. During the war, the German military made use of Zeppelins for bombing and scouting.

1. Count Ferdinand von Zeppelin (1838-1917) // 2. 1900: The first flight of the 420-feet-long”LZ 1″ (shown above a large boat) // 3. By 1910, DELAG was flying the Zeppelins (now over 700-feet long) commercially.

The defeat of Germany in 1918 (engineered by Jewish Marxists at home and Jewish Globalists & Zionists from the outside) slowed down DELAG’s business substantially. In 1919, DELAG’s airships were surrendered under the terms of the vicious Treaty of Versailles which had been imposed upon a disarmed Germany. The treaty also prohibited the Germans from building more airships. An exception was made to allow for the construction of a single airship for the US Navy — a transaction which spared DELAG from total extinction and bought the company some more time.

In 1926 the restrictions on airship construction were lifted at a time when some of the oppressive monetary reparations of the Versailles Treaty were restructured. Work was then started on the construction of the airship, Graf Zeppelin (775 feet) — named after the Count. The company was revived and, during the 1930s, the airships Graf Zeppelin and the larger Hindenburg (803-feet) operated regular transatlantic flights from Germany to North America and Brazil.

To enhance revenue, the zeppelins carried transatlantic mail from the United States to Europe. Special postage stamps were minted and sold for this purpose — but the practice was suddenly discontinued (by the U.S.) and the unsold zeppelin stamps were destroyed by the Post Office (a most unusual act which enraged many stamp collectors (here)) Although neither Hitler nor FDR were in power in 1930, could the sudden discontinuation and strange destruction of the stamps have been the result of a general hatred of Germans held by some people already embedded within the federal bureaucracy? Probably.

1. In 1919, the Allies ruined Germany at Versailles — not only seizing land, money, colonies, people and resources from Germany, but also banning its amazing airships. // 2 & 3. DELAG managed to hang on until the ban was lifted in 1926. In 1930, the U.S. Postal Service issued special air-mail stamps for letters shipped to Europe aboard the Graf Zeppelin — but suddenly discontinued the service and destroyed the remaining stamps which could still have been sold to collectors.

The spire of the Empire State Building was originally designed to serve as a mooring mast for the jaw-dropping 750-foot-long marvels of German engineering. But it was found that high winds associated with such high-altitude moorings made the Manhattan mooring idea too impractical. The airships did pass over Jew York during the 1930’s. After 1933, the zeppelins came with Hitler’s Swastika flag on the tail as street-level onlookers gave the “Sieg Heil” salute. “Oy vey!”– the “usual suspects” — who had already, in 1933, “declared war” upon Germany — must surely have shrieked.

The legendary Hindenburg disaster of 1937, which occurred right here in New Jersey, along with, shall we say, “Geo-political” issues eventually brought about the demise of Zeppelins — structures which had been the great pride of Germany — both before and during the righteous reign of Hitler.

The preceding account is pretty much standard knowledge. But there is a little bit more to the story that (((they))) don’t want you to know about.

1. Swastikas flying over New York drove (((them))) crazy! // 2. 1937: The horrible explosion and crash was broadcast live via radio, and then shown on pre-TV news reels (generally seen by movie-goers before the show starts) // 3. Hard to imagine — given what was to come in a few years — that Americans saluted the flag-draped coffins of the fallen Germans.
1. The Hindenburg was a massive structure and engineering marvel, but passenger space was limited. // 2 & 3. The dining room offered spectacular views, slow moving views.

Begun in 1932 and finally launched in 1936, the Hindenburg Airship — named after Paul von Hindenburg — measured an astounding 803 feet — but its beautiful interior could only accommodate about 100 people, a number which includes the well-to-do passengers and crew. General Hindenburg, we should note, was the respected World War I general and later president of Germany who — in order to break the contentious multi-party gridlock that was crippling Germany — named, albeit somewhat reluctantly, Hitler as Chancellor in 1933.

1. Marshall Hindenburg had died in 1934, at age 87 — but the zeppelin bearing his name immortalized him. The Jews and Communists HATED Hindenburg for enabling Hitler’s rise in 1933, and then granting him Emergency Powers to thwart a Communist revolution soon afterwards. // 2. A 1933 KPD (German Communist Party) poster blares: “An End to This System,” and depicts an ominous Red threat aimed at Hitler and Hindenburg (in pointy military helmet).

Prior zeppelins had always been designed to stay afloat using helium — a gas which is not flammable. At the time, however, helium was only available in industrial quantities from plants in the United States. Despite a U.S. ban on the export of helium under the Helium Control Act of 1927, the Germans designed the Hindenburg to use helium in the belief that the US government would license its export. But that assumption was made before FDR and his Jewish-Marxist gang took over America in 1933.

Some important background context….

1. Jewish pressure to destroy Germany began years before the actual second world war started. // 2. 1933. Daily Express (London): “Judea Declares War on Germany.” // 3. 1933 / NY Daily News

When the designers learned that FDR’s administration would not allow helium to be shipped to “Nazi” Germany, the Hindenburg was re-engineered to use hydrogen for its lift instead — a gas which is flammable. The man responsible for denying helium to Germany was Secretary of the Interior Harold Ickes — a fanatical German-hater and FDR Marxist. Though the German engineering geniuses were still able to construct a very safe airship — because hydrogen was flammable — there now existed an opportunity for an “accident” with a plausible “explanation” for it.

On May 6, 1937, at the very moment that the Hindenburg was docking before an awed crowd at Lakehurst, NJ, the grand airship burst into flames and crashed, killing 35 of the 97 passengers & crew. “Static electricity” was blamed, yet the Hindenburg had previously endured direct lightning hits! The true cause of the explosion remains unknown to this day. But the unusual amount of news reel cameras present that day, the helium embargo, the timing of the mysterious ignition just as the ship was mooring, the hyping of the idiotic “static electricity” theory, and the anti-German hysteria being whipped up by the press all combine to suggest that the Hindenburg disaster was actually an act of sabotage. Theories ranged from an on-board fanatic-bomber to an incendiary rifle-bullet fired from the nearby woods. The incident shattered confidence in Germany’s zeppelins and marked the end of the airship era. How conveeenient, rriigghhtt.

And nowmore than 80 years after the dramatic killing of the Hindenburg Airship, (((they))) are still out to kill Hindenburg’s name — even though the Marshall, being of an aristocratic background, was never actually a true supporter of Hitler’s populist movement.

Paul Von Hindenburg — no longer to be honored.
1. A suspicious blast — at the exact moment of mooring with the cameras filming — destroys Germany’s Airship industry. // 2. It was FDR’s Jewish Secretary of the Interior, Harold Ickes, who would not permit helium exports to Germany. // 3. FDR with the mighty Ickes.

The Great Reset Is Turning Back The Clock On Civilization

The covid-19 pandemic featured an unprecedented fusion of the interests of large and powerful corporations with the power of the state. Democratically elected politicians in many countries failed to represent the interests of their own citizens and uphold their own constitutions and charters of rights.

great reset john bush

Specifically, they supported lock-down measures, jab mandates, the suppression of a variety of early treatment options, the censorship of dissenting views, propaganda, interference in the private spheres of individuals, and the suspension of various forms of freedom. All of these policies and measures were centrally designed by the social engineers of the pandemic.

Globalists, who are obsessed with societal control, decided to take advantage of the pandemic in order to increase their authoritarian power. Prominent among them was, Klaus Schwab, founder and executive chairman of World Economic Forum (WEF). In June 2020, he stated that “the pandemic represents a rare but narrow window of opportunity to reflect, reimagine, and reset our world.” According to him, “every country, from the United States to China, must participate, and every industry, from oil and gas to tech, must be transformed.”

It is no secret that the WEF has focused on accelerating the implementation of central planning for the entire global population since the early days of pandemic. This plan to establish a new world order, known as the Great Reset, was a key theme at the recent annual meeting of the WEF, which was held during May 22–26 in Davos, Switzerland.

Drastic changes to the world order like the Great Reset do not happen spontaneously; rather, they are designed by global policy makers, including influential billionaires, politicians, celebrities, biased academics, wealthy philanthropists, and the bureaucrats of international organizations and institutions. These types of people support social engineering, because it will enable them to acquire control over the world’s wealth and natural resources, and strengthen their ability to shape society as they see fit.

Like their predecessors across history, the social engineers of the WEF believe that “there must be no spontaneous, unguided activity, because it might produce results which cannot be foreseen and for which the plan does not provide. It might produce something new, undreamt of in the philosophy of the planner.”1

Based on the WEF agenda, the successful completion of the current industrial transformation will require redesigning and controlling every minuscule aspect of human life and behavior, including the private spheres of individuals, the economy, politics, and societal organizations, without the possibility of voluntary and spontaneous cooperation between individuals based on their will, values, thoughts, and beliefs.

We were warned almost two centuries ago that when this type of tyrannical power succeeds, it will be “busy with a multitude of small” tasks penetrating “into private life,” governing families, and dictating the “actions” and “tastes of individuals.”2

In fact, some of the most ridiculous controls proposed by the WEF included limiting the washing of jeans to no “more than once a month” and “pyjamas once a week.” The WEF also advocates for transforming entire food systems by encouraging people to consume insects, arguing that “insect protein has high-quality properties and can be used as an alternative source of protein throughout the food chain, from feed for aquaculture to ingredients for nutritional supplements for humans and pets.”

Reforming the food system would also involve eating “cultured meat,” referring to “meat product created by cultivating animal cells in a controlled lab environment.”

The WEF also supports the elimination of “car ownership,” as “paying for a ride or delivery is as easy as tapping a smart phone app,” and “renting a vehicle” means that “car loans and insurance payments shrink or disappear.” Ultimately, the Great Reset aims to create a world where “you will own nothing, and will be happy” by 2030, as people will not possess any private property and rent everything they “need in life.”

However, this premise ignores the fact that private property ownership is associated with the advancement of civilizations, higher stages of material and moral development, and the development of modern family life. The WEF scenario would also diminish the sense of security, which is strengthened by the possession of private property.

Once the Great Reset is complete, individuals will essentially have their thinking and decision-making “done for them by men much like themselves, addressing them or speaking in their name.”3 Such a “desire to force upon the people a creed which is regarded as salutary for them is … not a thing that is new or peculiar to our time.”4

However, as various totalitarian regimes throughout history have demonstrated, the oppressive central planning of social engineers leads to the masses’ losing their sense of autonomy, freedom, dignity, creativity, and strength. Also lost is the incentive to improve one’s own condition and contribute to the progress of society.5

If the social engineering of the WEF is successful, then, by 2030, one will not be able to rely on oneself, family members, relatives, friends, or the community. This is because the supporters any absolutist regime want traditions and customs to be corrupted, “memories obliterated, habits destroyed, … liberty, chased from the laws.”6

In other words, they want to design a societal order where sympathy and mutual assistance will be rendered obsolete and where every citizen of the world is equally powerless, poor, and isolated, so that people will be unable to oppose the organized strength of global governance and become dependent on governments and their allies for their survival.

Eventually, nothing will protect citizens any longer, and citizens will no longer protect themselves.

Social engineers of the WEF are essentially advocating for natural freedom, which would allow the strong to exercise their power while subjugating the weak.

In doing so, they are basically calling for the world to move backward in the development of human history toward the re-institution of feudalism and slavery.

It is important to remember that economic freedom, positive freedom, political freedom, freedom of thought, freedom of speech, and freedom of the press are not attributes of primitive man or serfdom; rather, they are products of the most advanced stages of society.

To be more precise, these types of freedom are outcomes of the efforts of countless thinkers, social movements, revolutions, and wars throughout human history.

However, social engineers are not interested in the history and struggles of our civilization, as they believe that they possess expertise in all areas, which is the line of thought at the heart of all dictatorial regimes.7 They do not think that social engineering is alien to the true nature of human beings, even though it is based on “mechanical exactness” and does not “spring from a man’s free choice.”8

Furthermore, advocates of social engineering ignore the fact that “the progress of mankind, in powers of mind and heart, in well-being and in technique, in law and morality, necessarily involves the participation of the lower classes.”9

Anyone who believes that the social engineers of the WEF have noble intentions at heart as they design and implement the Great Reset should heed the warning of President Franklin D. Roosevelt (1935), who (ironically) declared:

The doctrine of regulation and legislation by “master minds” in whose judgment and will all the people may gladly and quietly acquiesce, has been too glaringly apparent at Washington during these last 10 years. Were it possible to find “master minds” so unselfish, so willing to decide unhesitatingly against their own personal interests or private prejudices, men almost godlike in their ability hold the scales of justice with an even hand, such a government might be to the interests of the country; but there are no such on our political horizon, and we cannot expect a complete reversal of all the teachings of history.

References:

1. F.A. Hayek, The Road to Serfdom (1944; repr., New York: Routledge, 2006), p. 166.
2. Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy in America: Historical-Critical Edition of “De la démocratie en Amérique,” ed. Eduardo Nolla and trans. James T. Schleifer, bilingual ed., 4 vols. (Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund, 2010), 1:223.
3. John Stuart Mill, On Liberty (Kitchener, ON: Batoche Books, 2001), p. 261.
4. Hayek, The Road to Serfdom, p. 168.
5. Hayek, The Road to Serfdom.
6. Tocqueville, Democracy in America, 2:156.
7. Hayek, The Road to Serfdom.
8. Wilhelm von Humboldt, The Limits of State Action. (1792; repr., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969).
9. Gustav Friedrich Schmoller, “Class Conflicts in General.” (American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 20, No. 4, 1915), p. 519.

Source: MISES.org

The U.S. Betrays Its Heritage by Threatening World War III Against Russia and China

Americans who cherish our country’s legacy are horrified by our headlong rush to war. America at its best was the very motor of world progress, higher living standards and peace.

That is our true national identity. We betray “the better angels of our nature” by making military threats against those who are advancing world powers, as we once were. We commit suicide when we dishonor historic agreements that keep the world safe from nuclear annihilation.

When the Soviet Union collapsed in 1991, the U.S. promised Russian leaders that the U.S.-led military alliance known as NATO would not be extended eastward toward Russia. The transatlantic Globalist war-making faction broke this promise. NATO has moved eastward with eight new members, heavily armed and hostile to Russia. The U.S. installed a far-right anti-Russian regime in Ukraine on Russia’s border, and armed them for conflict.

China has been similarly ringed by threatening U.S. fleets and military bases.

Russia and China have made it plain they find this intolerable, and cannot permit it to go further.

The world is hurtling toward the unimaginable horror of nuclear war.

We must look soberly and deeply into U.S. history to see how our nation changed from a force for peace into an aggressive provocateur.

We were industrialized by progressive patriots. They won out against Southern slave-owners and imperial financiers who blocked American progress. The U.S. at its best boosted other nations to technological prowess.

Abraham Lincoln and his allies organized the greatest advances ever made in technology and living standards, and a long era of peace with the world. Franklin Roosevelt and John Kennedy sought a partnership with Russia to bring peace and a humane existence to all mankind.

America changed course after Kennedy’s murder. We gave up our industries and lost our skills. We gave power to unaccountable Globalist financiers. Their speculation and deindustrialization have bankrupted the Western world. Other powers are now rising who won’t follow Globalist rules into poverty and national suicide.

The gravest danger now comes from America abandoning its own historic mission, which is to elevate the common man. Those who know history are especially challenged to act now, to speak out, so that we may protect the civilization that America at its best did so much to advance.

Over the past half century since Kennedy’s death, the United States, guided by a transatlantic war-making faction, has launched war after war, winning nothing and bringing chaos and suffering to countless millions.

Our greatest past leaders warned that waging aggressive war would destroy our country

George Washington led our Revolution against the British Empire’s invading armies. But as President, Washington sought peace with the world. He warned,

The nation which indulges towards another an habitual hatred … is a slave to its animosity … which … lead[s] it astray from its duty and its interest. [This hatred] disposes each [country] more readily to offer insult and injury … and to be haughty and intractable when accidental or trifling occasions of dispute occur … The government … makes the animosity of the nation subservient to projects of hostility instigated by pride, ambition and other sinister and pernicious motives. The peace often, sometimes perhaps the liberty, of nations has been the victim.”Why Democracies in G7 and NATO Should Reject U.S. Leadership

(Washington, Farewell Address, September 19, 1796)

Abraham Lincoln as a congressman exposed the lies that President James Polk used to justify aggressive war against Mexico. (Lincoln’s “Spot Resolutions,” December 22, 1847). And just before he himself ran for President, Lincoln denounced war-makers as barbarians:

From the first appearance of man upon the earth … the words “stranger” and “enemy” were … almost synonymous. Long after civilized nations had defined robbery and murder as high crimes, and had affixed severe punishments to them, when practiced … upon their own people … it was deemed no offence, but even meritorious, to rob, and murder, and enslave strangers, whether as nations or as individuals … To correct the evils … which spring from want of sympathy … among strangers … is one of the highest functions of civilization.

(Lincoln, speech to Wisconsin Agricultural Fair, September 30, 1859).

As President, leading the defense of the Union against the slave-owners’ attack, Lincoln urged peace with the world:

With malice toward none; with charity for all … let us … do all which may achieve and cherish a just, and a lasting peace, among ourselves, and with all nations.

(Lincoln, Second Inaugural Address, March 4, 1865)

President Franklin Roosevelt organized the United Nations and proposed that world peace and poverty-fighting must be centered on continuing the anti-fascist partnership of the U.S., Russia, Britain and China.

The UN Charter begins,

We the peoples of the United Nations, determined to save succeeding generations from the scourge of war…

This is the bedrock of real human rights, not a phony cover-up for regime-change.

President John Kennedy pulled the USA and Russia away from nuclear catastrophe by a deal that removed U.S. missiles from Turkey in exchange for Russian missiles taken out of Cuba.

Kennedy asked Americans to

re-examine our attitude toward the Soviet Union… the American people [should] not … fall into the same trap as the Soviets, … to see only a distorted and desperate view of the other side, … [with] communication as nothing more than an exchange of threats.

No government or social system is so evil that its people must be considered as lacking in virtue. As Americans, we find communism profoundly repugnant as a negation of personal freedom and dignity. But we can still hail the Russian people for their many achievements—in science and space, in economic and industrial growth, in culture and in acts of courage….

[Our] two countries have … [a] mutual abhorrence of war…. [W]e have never been at war with each other. And no nation … ever suffered more than the Soviet Union suffered in … the Second World War. At least 20 million lost their lives…. A third of the nation’s territory, including nearly two thirds of its industrial base, was turned into a wasteland…

Today, should total war ever break out again … all we have built, all we have worked for, would be destroyed in the first 24 hours…. We must conduct our affairs in such a way that it becomes in the Communists’ interest to agree on a genuine peace….

(Kennedy, Commencement Address at Washington University, June 10, 1963)

A pioneering international treaty partially banning nuclear weapons was soon thereafter signed by the U.S., U.S.S.R., and 100 nations.

President Kennedy fired top officials (Allen Dulles, CIA, and Gen. Lyman Lemnitzer, Pentagon) who treacherously sabotaged U.S. peace policy. As he was working to prevent full-scale war in Vietnam, and seeking diplomatic ties with Cuba’s Fidel Castro, Kennedy was murdered.

Martin Luther King risked increased government oppression and even the condemnation of his civil rights allies when he took upon himself leadership of the movement against the Vietnam War.

King’s 1967 New York speech reaches out to us today and calls us to action.

I speak as one who loves America, to the leaders of our own nation: The great initiative in this war is ours; the initiative to stop it must be ours…

Each day the war goes on the hatred increases in the heart of the Vietnamese and in the hearts of those of humanitarian instinct. The Americans are forcing even their friends into becoming their enemies… they are incurring deep psychological and political defeat. The image of America will never again be the image of revolution, freedom, and democracy, but the image of violence and militarism…

The war in Vietnam is but a symptom of a far deeper malady within the American spirit, and if we ignore this sobering reality…, we will find ourselves organizing [anti-war] committees for the next generation… [We will have war] without end, unless there is a significant and profound change in American life and policy…

[The] words of the late John F. Kennedy come back to haunt us. Five years ago he said, “Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable” …

[The] Western nations that initiated so much of the revolutionary spirit of the modern world have now become the arch antirevolutionaries….

[We] call for a worldwide fellowship that lifts neighborly concern beyond one’s tribe, race, class, and nation … an all-embracing and unconditional love for all mankind…

We still have a choice today: nonviolent coexistence or violent co-annihilation…

A time comes when silence is betrayal…

(Martin Luther King, Speech at Riverside Church, April 4, 1967)

Washington, Lincoln, Roosevelt, Kennedy and King, who inspired America and the world, urge us not to remain silent when humanity’s existence is threatened.

Hitler’s 1945 “Suicide Note” — The Ultimate “Red Pill”

“It is untrue that I or anyone else in Germany wanted the war in 1939.”

HITLER’S TESTAMENT // APRIL 29, 1945:
*** IMAGES & CAPTIONS ADDED***

More than thirty years have now passed since I in 1914 made my modest contribution as a volunteer in the first world war that was forced upon the Reich.

In these three decades I have been actuated solely by love and loyalty to my people in all my thoughts, acts, and life. They gave me the strength to make the most difficult decisions which have ever confronted mortal man. I have spent my time, my working strength, and my health in these three decades.

It is untrue that I or anyone else in Germany wanted the war in 1939. It was desired and instigated exclusively by those international statesmen who were either of Jewish descent or worked for Jewish interests.

TESTAMENT CONTINUED:

I have made too many offers for the control and limitation of armaments, which posterity will not for all time be able to disregard for the responsibility for the outbreak of this war to be laid on me. I have further never wished that after the first fatal world war a second against England, or even against America, should break out. Centuries will pass away, but out of the ruins of our towns and monuments the hatred against those finally responsible whom we have to thank for everything, international Jewry and its helpers, will grow.

Three days before the outbreak of the German-Polish war I again proposed to the British ambassador in Berlin a solution to the German-Polish problem—similar to that in the case of the Saar district, under international control. This offer also cannot be denied. It was only rejected because the leading circles in English politics wanted the war, partly on account of the business hoped for and partly under influence of propaganda organized by international Jewry.

I have also made it quite plain that, if the nations of Europe are again to be regarded as mere shares to be bought and sold by these international conspirators in money and finance, then that race, Jewry, which is the real criminal of this murderous struggle, will be saddled with the responsibility. I further left no one in doubt that this time not only would millions of children of Europe’s Aryan peoples die of hunger, not only would millions of grown men suffer death, and not only hundreds of thousands of women and children be burnt and bombed to death in the towns, without the real criminal having to atone for this guilt, even if by more humane means.

After six years of war, which in spite of all setbacks will go down one day in history as the most glorious and valiant demonstration of a nation’s life purpose, I cannot forsake the city which is the capital of this Reich. As the forces are too small to make any further stand against the enemy attack at this place, and our resistance is gradually being weakened by men who are as deluded as they are lacking in initiative, I should like, by remaining in this town, to share my fate with those, the millions of others, who have also taken upon themselves to do so. Moreover I do not wish to fall into the hands of an enemy who requires a new spectacle organized by the Jews for the amusement of their hysterical masses.

TESTAMENT CONTINUED:

I have decided therefore to remain in Berlin and there of my own free will to choose death at the moment when I believe the position of the Fuehrer and Chancellor itself can no longer be held.

I die with a happy heart, aware of the immeasurable deeds and achievements of our soldiers at the front, our women at home, the achievements of our farmers and workers and the work, unique in history, of our youth who bear my name.

That from the bottom of my heart I express my thanks to you all, is just as self-evident as my wish that you should, because of that, on no account give up the struggle but rather continue it against the enemies of the Fatherland, no matter where, true to the creed of a great Clausewitz. From the sacrifice of our soldiers and from my own unity with them unto death, will in any case spring up in the history of Germany, the seed of a radiant renaissance of the National-Socialist movement and thus of the realization of a true community of nations.

Many of the most courageous men and women have decided to unite their lives with mine until the very last I have begged and finally ordered them not to do this, but to take part in the further battle of the Nation. I beg the heads of the Armies, the Navy, and the Air Force to strengthen by all possible means the spirit of resistance of our soldiers in the National-Socialist sense, with special reference to the fact that also I myself, as founder and creator of this movement, have preferred death to cowardly abdication or even capitulation.

May it, at some future time, become part of the code of honor of the German officer—as is already the case in our Navy—that the surrender of a district or of a town is impossible, and that above all the leaders here must march ahead as shining examples, faithfully fulfilling their duty unto death.

Second Part of the Political Testament

Before my death I expel the former Reichsmarschall Hermann Goering from the party and deprive him of all rights which he may enjoy by virtue of the decree of June 29th, 1941; and also by virtue of my statement in the Reichstag on September 1st, 1939, I appoint in his place Grossadmiral Doenitz, President of the Reich and Supreme Commander of the Armed Forces.

Before my death I expel the former Reichsfuehrer-SS and Minister of the Interior, Heinrich Himmler, from the party and from all offices of State. In his stead I appoint Gauleiter Karl Hanke as Reichsfuehrer-SS and Chief of the German Police, and Gauleiter Paul Giesler as Reich Minister of the Interior.

Goering and Himmler, quite apart from their disloyalty to my person, have done immeasurable harm to the country and the whole nation by secret negotiations with the enemy, which they conducted without my knowledge and against my wishes, and by illegally attempting to seize power in the State for themselves.

(Editor’s Note: Goering & Himmler naively believed that they could end the war by making peace with the United States and fighting the Soviets together instead.)

In order to give the German people a government composed of honorable men,—a government which will fulfill its pledge to continue the war by every means—I appoint the following members of the new Cabinet as leaders of the nation:

President of the Reich: DOENITZ
Chancellor of the Reich: DR. GOEBBELS
Party Minister: BORMANN
Foreign Minister: SEYSS-INQUART

[Here follow fifteen others.]

Although a number of these men, such as Martin Bormann, Dr. Goebbels, etc., together with their wives, have joined me of their own free will and did not wish to leave the capital of the Reich under any circumstances, but were willing to perish with me here, I must nevertheless ask them to obey my request, and in this case set the interests of the nation above their own feelings. By their work and loyalty as comrades they will be just as close to me after death, as I hope that my spirit will linger among them and always go with them. Let them be hard, but never unjust, above all let them never allow fear to influence their actions, and set the honor of the nation above everything in the world. Finally, let them be conscious of the fact that our task, that of continuing the building of a National Socialist State, represents the work of the coming centuries, which places every single person under an obligation always to serve the common interest and to subordinate his own advantage to this end. I demand of all Germans, all National Socialists, men, women, and all the men of the Armed Forces, that they be faithful and obedient unto death to the new government and its President.

Above all I charge the leaders of the nation and those under them to scrupulous observance of the laws of race and to merciless opposition to the universal poisoner of all peoples, international Jewry.
Given in Berlin, this 29th day of April 1945. 4:00 A.M.

ADOLF HITLER

How The Flow Of Money Created The One World Government

“We are grateful to The Washington PostThe New York TimesTime Magazine and other great publications…. [for] their promises of discretion for almost forty years… [t]he work is now much more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a World Government… The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries.” David Rockefeller to the Trilateral Commission, 1991.david rockefeller meeting in 1976 with iraqi bankers

Image: David Rockefeller (meeting in 1976 with Iraqi bankers during a visit to Bahrain) dreamed of a one-world government through banking. Photo by Hashmoder. CC BY-SA 4.0.

This statement, made thirty years ago, means that the conspiracy to replace our Constitutional Republic began forty years before that — 1951 — with the assistance of respected journalists. Seventy years of concerted effort to leave We the People in the dark. (It is probably more like over one hundred years.)

James Warburg, financial advisor to FDR, and part of a banking family that stood to gain financially from world government, testified in 1950 before a Senate Congressional subcommittee that “We shall have world government whether you like it or not, by conquest or consent.”

This leaves We the People with two large questions: how did this happen and what can we do if either of those two options is unacceptable to the American people?

This issue has been with us since George Washington took office in 1789. A small cadre of interconnected bankers was already well-established in England, France, Austria, Germany, and Italy.

These bankers took advantage of the chaos growing out of the rejection of Roman Catholicism and the social breakdown and vehement hatreds that grew out of the Protestant Reformation by funding both sides (through government debt) of the many resultant wars and revolutions and then funding the peace afterward.

The profits were enormous. As Europe went through the revolutionary turmoil of the 19th and early 20th centuries, world bankers wove through societies like a malignancy, manipulating world leaders, destabilizing whole nations of people, and supporting philosophies that promote centralized authority (including international authority) that would strengthen world banking arrangements.

America is a different matter. First, we are isolated by two oceans and developed a stable and productive society away from the horrors of Europe. We had no Roman Catholic experience to reject. We did reject atheism — we are a God-fearing and God – respecting nation.

The federal Constitution, as well as each state Constitution, created a framework for ordered Liberty — America’s unique and irreplaceable Rule of Law. Decentralizing authority — Federalism — is one of the philosophical anchors to that framework.

But we have been the prize for this group since the beginning of our Republic. Creating central banks in each country that the cartel could control was part of the scheme. Washington reluctantly supported Alexander Hamilton’s First Bank of the United States. That bank’s funding came almost entirely from private investors, with one of the most significant being the Bank of England.

When the charter for the First Bank of the United States was not renewed amid great public opposition in 1811, it was one more point of contention between the British and Americans leading to the war of 1812, so much so that the Bank of England had a leading role in the decision to go to war.

Had the Bank of England not wanted the war, it likely would not have happened. (Other reasons were connected to the Napoleonic wars. England was concerned that the U.S. was helping Napoleon.

The British were impressing U.S. sailors into the British Navy, they feared American support for France, they placed restrictions on trade, and there was still fallout from the 1807 British attack on the USS Chesapeake.)

After the peace, a Second Bank of the United States was chartered but was vehemently opposed by President Andrew Jackson when its charter came up for renewal in 1832. Jackson’s view of European bankers was “You are a den of vipers and thieves.” He was attacked by an assassin at point-blank range whose pistols misfired. We do not know if the two events are linked.

Lincoln, Garfield, and Kennedy opposed this cancer, as well. As President Garfield put it, “Whoever controls the money of a nation, controls that nation.”

America surrendered to the pressure for a central bank in 1913 with the help of James Warburg’s father, Paul. Woodrow Wilson signed the Federal Reserve Act, following the model of Europe, but in a way thought palatable to the American people.

Thus, we have been at constant war ever since 1917, and have allowed our wealth to be transferred elsewhere. In one hundred years we have gone from a debt of $3 billion to $30 trillion.

Decentralized authority — Federalism — gave way to the more easily corruptible federal power.

This is the reality of today — the mission by those opposed to our Constitutional Republic is now how to get the American people to consent to the loss of their Constitutional system and accept perpetual debt slavery and control through the United Nations.

“The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers” as David Rockefeller tells us; “by conquest or consent” adds James Warburg.

What if Americans just say “no.” America does not need to surrender her wealth, her potential wealth, our Constitutional system, or our nation-state. We are not Europe. We do not want to dispose of the foundations of our moral roots and end up as soulless atheists imprisoned in nihilism and drowning in dependence. George Washington warned us about this; so did Dwight Eisenhower and many others.

We the People urgently need to demand a comprehensive plan from our public servants to re-establish the prosperity of our nation, stabilize and reduce our national debt, and establish a strong enough military defense to buy us time to get our national financial house in order.

One important component of this defense is rebuilding and strengthening a strong moral core in the American people and encouraging authentic education in history, civics, philosophy, and economics.

It is through prayer, discipline, grit, and education that our Republic will be saved — by the Grace of God. If it takes two generations or another one hundred years to accomplish it, so be it.

If recovered, let us hope We the People, America’s Sovereign, never let our system or our country go to this den of vipers and thieves, again.

By M. E. Boyd, AmericanThinker.com

M. E. Boyd is the author of “Apples of Gold – Voices From the Past that Speak to Us Now“.

Pearl Harbor 80th: Hear Japan’s Side of the Story

Japan tells a different story than the one spun by FDR and the Fake News — a story which (surprisingly) was printed once on page 2 of The New York Times on December 8, 1941, and has since disappeared into the black memory hole of forbidden history.

Picture

DECEMBER 7, 1941

PEARL HARBOR 80th ANNIVERSARY EDITORIAL

The Truth About the Pearl Harbor Attack

The Setting

1941: Globalist agents FDR and Churchill want desperately to drag the United States into World War II. This becomes all the more urgent after Hitler had launched “Operation Barbarossa” in June of the same year — a justified preemptive invasion of the Soviet Union which now threatens to overthrow Stalin and his evil Bolshevik regime in Moscow.

Knowing that American entry into the war would endanger Germany’s war efforts, Hitler ignores repeated U.S. provocations of Germany. To further discourage U.S. entry into the war, Germany, Italy, and Japan sign on to a mutual defense pact in September of 1940- The Tripartite Pact. War against one means war with all three.

Ironically, the Tripartite Pact will have the unintended effect of facilitating FDR’s treasonous scheme to embroil the U.S. into the conflict. As a “backdoor” to the European conflict (which Germany was winning) FDR and Churchill intensify their instigation of Japan. When the aggressive moves become too much for Japan to bear (oil embargo, closure of Panama Canal to Japanese shipping, U.S. battleships cruising through Japanese waters, direct assistance to the Chinese aggressors etc.) Japan decides to make its first direct move against the U.S. aggressor — by attacking Pearl Harbor (the U.S. naval base in the territory of Hawaii) on December 7, 1941 ….exactly as FDR had intended! As a result of the attack, the powerful pro-peace movement in America is silenced in an instant.

Lets remember that only the old obsolete warships were in Hawaii, the newer more powerful American warships were at Midway.

In the ensuing days, war declarations between the Tripartite allies and the US/UK alliance were exchanged.

Picture
Hitler and Goering meet with Japanese foreign minister.
Picture
Japanese poster celebrates the DEFENSIVE Tripartite Pact.
Picture
Picture
With his famous theatrical flair, the diabolical FDR, acting “surprised”, delivers his  somber “Day of Infamy” speech to a confused and angry nation.
Picture
Picture
Exactly as FDR and the gang of Communists, Globalists, and Jews surrounding him had intended, the attack immediately put the pro-peace Charles Lindbergh, the “America First Movement” and the “Mothers Movement” out of business. Hence forward, the millions of patriotic Americans who had urged peace prior to Pearl Harbor would be ridiculed by Fake News and Fake Historians as “isolationists.”
Picture
Gullible young volunteers crowd military recruitment centers across America – 450,000 of these poor fools are destined to die in a war for International Jewry’s New World Order. 
Picture
The Five “Fighting Sullivan Brothers” volunteered after Pearl Harbor. They would ALL die when the USS Juneau was sunk in shark-infested waters on November, 1942 — murdered by FDR.

Japan tells a different story than the one spun by FDR and the Fake News — a story which (surprisingly) was printed once on page 2 of The New York Times on December 8, 1941, and has since disappeared into the black memory hole of forbidden history. But I’m pleased to bring you the actual text of Emperor Hirohito‘s War Declaration — a message which rings far truer than the lies of FDR and company.

Picture
Picture

TEXT OF HIROHITO’S WAR DECLARATION

By the grace of heaven, Emperor of Japan, seated on the throne occupied by the same dynasty from time immemorial, enjoin upon ye, our loyal and brave subjects:

We hereby declare war upon the United States of America and the British Empire. The men and officers of our Army and Navy shall do their utmost in prosecuting the war. Our public servants of various departments shall perform faithfully and diligently their respective duties; the entire nation with a united will shall mobilize their total strength so that nothing will miscarry in the attainment of our war aims.

To ensure the stability of East Asia, and to contribute to world peace is the farsighted policy which was formulated by our great illustrious Imperial Grandsire and our Great Imperial Sire succeeding him and which we lay constantly to heart. To cultivate friendship among nations and to enjoy prosperity in common with all nations, has always been the guiding principle of our Empire’s foreign policy. It has truly been unavoidable and far from our wishes that our Empire has been brought to cross swords with America and Britain. More than four years have passed since China, failing to comprehend the true intentions of our Empire, and recklessly courting trouble, disturbed the peace of East Asia and compelled our Empire to take up arms. Although there has been reestablished the National Government of China, with which Japan had effected neighborly intercourse and cooperation, the regime which has survived in Chungking, relying upon American and British protection, still continues its fratricidal opposition.

Eager for the realization of their inordinate ambition to dominate the Orient, both America and Britain, giving support to the Chungking regime, have aggravated the disturbances in East Asia. Moreover these two powers, inducing other countries to follow suit, increased military preparations on all sides of our Empire to challenge us. They have obstructed by every means our peaceful commerce and finally resorted to a direct severance of economic relations, menacing greatly the existence of our Empire.

Patiently have we waited and long have we endured, in the hope that our Government might retrieve the situation in peace. But our adversaries, showing not the least spirit of conciliation, have unduly delayed a settlement; and in the meantime they have intensified the economic and political pressure to compel our Empire to submission. This trend of affairs, would, if left unchecked, not only nullify our Empire’s efforts of many years for the sake of the stabilization of East Asia, but also endanger the very existence of our nation. The situation being such as it is, our Empire, for its existence and self defense has no other recourse but to appeal to arms and to crush every obstacle in its path.

The hallowed spirits of our Imperial Ancestors, guarding us from above, we rely upon the loyalty and courage of our subjects in the confident expectation that the task bequeathed by our forefathers will be carried forward, and that the sources of evil will be speedily eradicated, and an enduring peace be established in East Asia, preserving thereby the glory of our Empire.”

Picture
HARRY STIMSON

SECRETARY HARRY STIMSON’S CONFESSION

“We face the delicate question of the diplomatic fencing to be done so as to be sure Japan is put into the wrong and makes the first bad move. … The question was how we should maneuver them into the position of firing the first shot.”
***
“When the news first came that Japan had attacked us my first feeling was of relief that … a crisis had come in a way which would unite all our people. This continued to be my dominant feeling in spite of the news of catastrophes which quickly developed.”

From the diary of Henry Stimson, FDR’s Secretary of War

The War on German Airships

Picture

1937: Did the Usual Suspects Blow Up The Hindenburg?The disaster, which occurred here in New Jersey, along with, shall we say, “geo-political” issues eventually brought about the demise of Zeppelins — structures which had been the pride of Germany . 

Picture

Paul von Hindenburg, left, and Adolf Hitler ride in an open car during a parade in Berlin, Germany, May 1933

Picture
Hitler shows his respect for the hero of World War I who, at the time, was the most honored man in Germany

The New York Slimes (February 27, 2020):

Berlin Drops Hindenburg’s Honorary Title for his Role in Nazis’ Rise:
State government strikes former president off list, citing his 1933 act of appointing Hitler as chancellor.

He led Germany’s army in World War I and served for nearly a decade as the country’s president, but thanks to his role in Nazi dictator Adolf Hitler’s rise to power, Paul von Hindenburg is an honorary Berliner no more.

Oh well. It was only a matter of time before (((they))) could kill the historical personage of Paul von Hindenburg — whose namesake airship became even better known than him.

A Zeppelin airship takes its name from German Count Ferdinand von Zeppelin — a German General and inventor whose company — Luftschiffbau Zeppelin (LZ)–led the development of the rigid flying machines in the late 1800s / early 1900s. After the great success of Zeppelin’s design, the word “zeppelin” became used to refer to all rigid airships.

Zeppelins were first flown commercially in 1910 by Deutsche Luftschiffahrts-AG (DELAG) — essentially the world’s first airline service. By the outbreak of World War I in 1914, DELAG had made more than 1,500 flights. During the war, the German military made use of Zeppelins for bombing and scouting.

Picture
Count Ferdinand von Zeppelin (1838-1917)
Picture
1900: The first flight of the 420-feet-long”LZ 1″ (shown above a large boat)
Picture
By 1910, DELAG was flying the Zeppelins (now over 700-feet long) commercially.

The defeat of Germany in 1918 (engineered by Jewish Marxists at home and Jewish Globalists & Zionists from the outside) slowed down DELAG’s business substantially. In 1919, DELAG’s airships were surrendered under the terms of the vicious Treaty of Versailles which had been imposed upon a disarmed Germany. The treaty also prohibited the Germans from building more airships. An exception was made to allow for the construction of a single airship for the US Navy — a transaction which spared DELAG from total extinction and bought the company some more time.

In 1926 the restrictions on airship construction were lifted at a time when some of the oppressive monetary reparations of the Versailles Treaty were restructured. Work was then started on the construction of the airship, Graf Zeppelin (775 feet) — named after the Count. The company was revived and, during the 1930s, the airships Graf Zeppelin and the larger Hindenburg (803-feet) operated regular transatlantic flights from Germany to North America and Brazil.

To enhance revenue, the zeppelins carried transatlantic mail from the United States to Europe. Special postage stamps were minted and sold for this purpose — but the practice was suddenly discontinued (by the U.S.) and the unsold zeppelin stamps were destroyed by the Post Office (a most unusual act which enraged many stamp collectors (here)) Although neither Hitler nor FDR were in power in 1930, could the sudden discontinuation and strange destruction of the stamps have been the result of a general hatred of Germans held by some people already embedded within the federal bureaucracy? Probably.

Picture
In 1919, the Allies ruined Germany at Versailles — not only seizing land, money, colonies, people and resources from innocent Germany, but also banning its amazing airships. 
Picture
Picture
2 & 3. DELAG managed to hang on until the ban was lifted in 1926. In 1930, the U.S. Postal Service issued special air-mail stamps for letters shipped to Europe aboard the Graf Zeppelin — but suddenly discontinued the service and destroyed the remaining stamps which could still have been sold to collectors.

The spire of the Empire State Building was originally designed to serve as a mooring mast for the jaw-dropping 750-foot-long marvels of German engineering. But it was found that high winds associated with such high-altitude moorings made the Manhattan mooring idea too impractical. The airships did pass over Jew York during the 1930’s. After 1933, the zeppelins came with Hitler’s Swastika flag on the tail as street-level onlookers gave the “Sieg Heil” salute. “Oy vey!”– the “usual suspects” — who had already, in 1933, “declared war” upon Germany — must surely have shrieked.

The legendary Hindenburg disaster of 1937, which occurred right here in New Jersey, along with, shall we say, “geo-political” issues eventually brought about the demise of Zeppelins — structures which had been the great pride of Germany — both before and during the righteous reign of The Great One(that’s Hitler for all you newbies * normies).

The preceding account is pretty much standard knowledge. But there is a little bit more to the story that (((they))) don’t want you to know about.

Picture
Swastikas flying over New York drove (((them))) crazy! 
Picture
1937: The horrible explosion and crash was broadcast live via radio, and then shown on pre-TV news reels (generally seen by movie-goers before the show starts) 
Picture
Hard to imagine — given what was to come in a few years — that Americans saluted the flag-draped coffins of the fallen Germans
Picture
The Hindenburg was a massive structure and engineering marvel, but passenger space was limited.
Picture
Picture
2 & 3. The dining room offered spectacular views, slow moving views.

Begun in 1932 and finally launched in 1936, the Hindenburg Airship — named after Paul von Hindenburg — measured an astounding 803 feet — but its beautiful interior could only accommodate about 100 people, a number which includes the well-to-do passengers and crew. General Hindenburg, we should note, was the respected World War I general and later president of Germany who — in order to break the contentious multi-party gridlock that was crippling Germany — named, albeit somewhat reluctantly, Hitler as Chancellor in 1933.

Picture
Marshall Hindenburg had died in 1934, at age 87 — but the zeppelin bearing his name immortalized him. The Jews and Communists HATED Hindenburg for enabling The Great One’s rise in 1933, and then granting him Emergency Powers to thwart a Communist revolution soon afterwards.
Picture
A 1933 KPD (German Communist Party) poster blares: “An End to This System,” and depicts an ominous Red threat aimed at Hitler and Hindenburg (in pointy military helmet).

Prior zeppelins had always been designed to stay afloat using helium — a gas which is not flammable. At the time, however, helium was only available in industrial quantities from plants in the United States. Despite a U.S. ban on the export of helium under the Helium Control Act of 1927, the Germans designed the Hindenburg to use helium in the belief that the US government would license its export. But that assumption was made before FDR and his Jewish-Marxist gang took over America in 1933.

Some important background context….

Picture
Jewish pressure to destroy Germany began years before the actual second world war started.
Picture
1933. Daily Express (London): “Judea Declares War on Germany.” 
Picture
1933 / NY Daily News

When the designers learned that FDR’s administration would not allow helium to be shipped to “Nazi” Germany, the Hindenberg was re-engineered to use hydrogen for its lift instead — a gas which is flammable. The man responsible for denying helium to Germany was Secretary of the Interior Harold Ickes — a fanatical German-hater and FDR Marxist. Though the German engineering geniuses were still able to construct a very safe airship — because hydrogen was flammable — there now existed an opportunity for an “accident” with a plausible “explanation” for it.

On May 6, 1937, at the very moment that the Hindenburg was docking before an awed crowd at Lakehurst, NJ, the grand airship burst into flames and crashed, killing 35 of the 97 passengers & crew. “Static electricity” was blamed, yet the Hindenburg had previously endured direct lightning hits! The true cause of the explosion remains unknown to this day. But the unusual amount of news reel cameras present that day, the helium embargo, the timing of the mysterious ignition just as the ship was mooring, the hyping of the idiotic “static electricity” theory, and the anti-German hysteria being whipped up by the press all combine to suggest that the Hindenburg disaster was actually an act of sabotage. Theories ranged from an on-board fanatic-bomber to an incendiary rifle-bullet fired from the nearby woods. The incident shattered confidence in Germany’s zeppelins and marked the end of the airship era. How conveeenient.

And nowmore than 80 years after the dramatic killing of the Hindenburg Airship, (((they))) are still out to kill Hindenburg’s name — even though the Marshall, being of an aristocratic background, was never actually a true supporter of Hitler’s populist movement.

Picture
Picture
Paul von Hindenburg — no longer to be honored.
Picture
A suspicious blast — at the exact moment of mooring with the cameras filming — destroys Germany’s Airship industry. 
Picture
It was FDR’s Jewish Secretary of the Interior, Harold Ickes, who would not permit helium exports to Germany.
Picture
FDR with the mighty Ickes.

Globalist Bernard Baruch’s Puppet Generals Plot World War 2

Picture
The “War Heroes” Eisenhower & Marshall were created by a higher power.

For nearly half-a-century, the financier Bernard Baruch wielded immense political power from “behind the scenes.” It was Baruch who, according to Curtis Dall, introduced the future president Woodrow Wilson to New York city political elite “leading him like one would a poodle on a string.” Baruch later exerted similar career-making dominance over ambitious scoundrels such as Winston Churchill and Dall’s father-in-law, Franklin D. Roosevelt — the two main front protagonists who started World War II, at the behest of Baruch and his fellow finance mobsters.

Among “conspiracy theorist” historians, Baruch’s decades-long control over scum such as Wilson, FDR, Churchill and Harry Truman is fairly well known. What fewer real historians are aware of, however, is Baruch’s critical role in grooming and promoting the ambitious military men who were needed to eagerly carry out the orders of those political buffers. These traitor generals included John Pershing and Fox Conner of World War I fame, as well as George Marshall and Dwight Eisenhower from World War II.

Picture
The “Wall Street Legend” and notorious war profiteer Bernard Baruch was the George Soros of his era, only bigger.
Picture
In 1912, Baruch led presidential candidate Woodrow Wilson Wilson around New York “like a poodle on a string.” Wilson, under the control of mighty Jews Baruch, Warburg & Schiff, then ushered in the Federal Reserve System scam and the Income Tax, before dragging the USA into World War I with Baruch heading up the all mighty, economy-controlling “War Industries Board.”
Picture
Twenty years later, Baruch used FDR to drag America into yet another war for Globalism and Zionism.
Big Baruch rescued (bought) little Winnie the drunken, spendaholic, gambler during the stock market Crash of 1929. (here
Picture
Baruch’s deep pockets also saved Harry Truman struggling Senate re-election campaign in 1940 (here). Hiroshima Harry would become FDR’s new Vice President in 1944, and then President when FDR died in April of 1945.

JULY, 1939
GEORGE MARSHALL & BERNARD BARUCH PLOT A NEW WAR

It was not for nothing that the rocket-like upward mobility of George Marshall paralleled that of Dwight Eisenhower  — although Marshall, who was 10 years older, had a head-start. Both men were pulled up the ladder by politically connected World War I Generals Fox Conner and John Pershing, and, more importantly, Bernard Baruch.

As General Pershing’s aide, Lt. Colonel Marshall had become personally acquainted with Baruch in 1918. By 1922, Marshall was hunting ducks down in Louisiana with Baruch and Pershing (here). In later years, after World War II, Marshall once described Baruch as: “one of my dear friends and one of the great helpers”

Marshall and Eisenhower first worked together during the 1920’s, under Pershing, another self-described “dear friend” of Bernard Baruch. Because the Baruch-Pershing-Marshall-Eisenhower complex was so intertwined, it’s worth reviewing the contents of letters which Baruch and Marshall exchanged in July 1939, at a time when:

1. Europe itself was not even at war
2. Hitler was passionately pleading with Britain and France for peaceful dialogue (not war!) regarding the situation of German minorities being abused in Poland.
3. Few people in “isolationist” America would even have imagined that FDR and his crowd were preparing for another world war.

*
Excerpts from Baruch’s letter to George Marshall
(July 19, 1939)

As you are aware, or can find out upon inquiry, I did as much as anybody to stir up the action which resulted in the expenditures which are giving the Army a part of what they need. I know we have not yet a well balanced program and as soon as I get on my feet, I am going to go after it again. I was in hopes we would have a neutrality legislation that would permit the manufacture of airplanes and the export thereof during war, because I wanted to see a development in this country that our orders alone would not permit.

Also, I wanted the United States to take first place again in quality and quantity…. Always remember that the Army, and you particularly, have a friend in me if I can be of any use.”

(Baruch’s letter also mentioned that General Pershing had visited him in the hospital).

Excerpts from to Marshall’s letter in response to Baruch’s:
(July 30, 1939)

* (The astute reader will note the “kissing-the-boss’s-ass” undertone evident in Marshall’s writing.)

My dear Mr. Baruch:

I have just this moment read your letter of July 19th, and learned for the first time of your misfortune in having to undergo a mastoid operation. My full sympathy goes to you, and I am delighted to judge from your letter that you have fully recovered.

I have been concerned about General Pershing’s health in France, as he had—most confidentially—several attacks. He has endeavored to minimize this, and emphatically denies them. I suppose they are inevitable under the circumstances, but it worries me to have him off in France even though he seems to be particularly happy there the pleasanter period of the year.

I am well aware of your important part in the stirring up of the national conscience to our serious situation last year, and the tremendous effect it had on public opinion.

I do hope I may have an opportunity to talk things over with you personally, and if I am in New York I will try to make an appointment with you in advance, and if you are in Washington I hope you will lunch with me.

I have an invitation to shoot ducks at the mouth of the Mississippi (with Mississippian and good friend Fox Conner?). It should be “to shoot at ducks,” but it recalls a very amusing expedition with you.

With warm regards, and thanks for your letter

Faithfully yours,
George Marshall

The Marshall-Baruch correspondence clearly reveals a plot to build up the U.S. military for a pending war by undoing post-World War I neutrality legislation. It can rightly be described as treasonous and conspiratorial. And indeed, not long after war broke out in Europe, FDR, while promising that the USA would stay out of it, repealed the neutrality acts and started shipping war supplies, first to the British, and later on, to the Soviets.

In regard to the military component of the evil plot to again foment another, even more destructive war in Europe — and then, to again manipulate and maneuver the American people into that war, clique-member Eisenhower was, obviously, also “in on it.” The super-ambitious Eisenhower – a low officer with a checkered record who helped General Pershing to write his post-war memoirs — became a willing subordinate of Baruch’s as far back as 1929 (see “I Don’t Like Ike,” page 61). He (or, most likely, his ghost-writer, Globalist, academic brother, Milton Eisenhower) served King Baruch by writing papers in support of resurrecting a new type of War Industries Board during the 1930s.

** End of Excerpt***

Picture
In Mafia parlance, Baruch “made” General Pershing, pictured in Image 1 (on left) with WW 1 sidekick George Marshall — who would soon also be “made” into a big-shot by Baruch and Pershing.
Picture
Baruch, Pershing and Marshall then “made” Eisenhower (a lowlife rat who was almost kicked out the army for financial fraud.) Baruch’s second war against Germany brought “hero” status upon the two traitorous generals who deliberately murdered 1.5 million German POW’s after handing Eastern Europe over to Joe Stalin.
Picture
Picture
xactly as plotted out in the 1939 letters between Baruch and Marshall, FDR changed the existing neutrality act which had forbidden US military exports to warring parties. The ability to ship arms to the UK on a “cash & carry” basis paved the way for Britain’s warmongers to pick a fight with Germany. Later on, a total repeal of the amended act would allow arms to be shipped as part of lease deals (Lend Lease).
Picture
Eisenhower linked up with Baruch while he was still an unknown, low-level army officer.
Picture
Their longtime “friendship” with the mighty financier lifted Churchill and Eisenhower (both of whom were incompetent) to the highest positions of military, then political authority. Image 2 depicts Baruch meeting with then-Prime Minister Churchill (his 2nd go-around as PM) and then-President Eisenhower, at Baruch’s home. 
Picture
Marshall, who in later years became Secretary of State under Harry Truman (another known pawn of Baruch’s), greets his old “friend” and master Baruch at the airport.

“Nazi-Looted Art” vs Allied-Destroyed Art”

Picture

Once upon a time, the big bad “Nazis” looted the artworks of Europe — nearly all of it seeming to have belonged to “the usual suspects.” The German program of “Kunstschultz” (art protection) was actually implemented for the purpose of protecting art from the All-Lies merciless and often indiscriminate bombing campaigns.

Picture
Kaiser Wilhelm
Picture
Kaiser Wilhelm tried to avert World War I — which was forced upon Germany in 1914. Even while winning the war, the Kaiser held out an olive branch to the Allies, while his Kunstschutz units protected artworks belonging to enemy nations.
Picture
As men of culture, Hitler and Goering also placed high priority on art protection in World War II.

FRANCE

More than 100 French cities and towns sustained some degree of bombing by the All-Lies between  1940 and  1945. The “official number” of civilians killed, according to French historians, is said to have been about 70,000; injured, about 100,000 — which probably means that those numbers were actually much higher. The number of houses completely destroyed is listed as 432,000; and partly destroyed houses, 890,000.

The cities that saw the most destruction were the following:

  • Saint-Nazaire: 100%
  • Tilly-la-Campagne: 96%
  • Vire: 95%
  • Villers-Bocage: 88%
  • Le Havre: 82%
  • Saint-Lô: 77%
  • Falaise: 76%
  • Lisieux: 75%

The bombings of the Normandy coastal areas, both before and after D-Day, were devastating. Of the 70,000 French dead, an estimated 50,000 were killed during the months before and after D-Day (June, 1944)

BELGIUM

One year prior to D-Day and and then as the great liberators advanced eastward towards Germany in 1944, areas of the tiny nation of Belgium suffered devastating bombing attacks. If there was a German stationed anywhere near a civilian area, the mentality of “kill em’ all, let God sort them out” prevailed. The air raids blasted Belgian cities adjoining the strategic positions manned by Germans. Numerous civilians were killed. The Allied policy was condemned by many leading figures in Belgium, including Cardinal van Roey, who appealed to Allied commanders to: “spare the private possessions of the citizens, as otherwise the civilized world will one day call to account those responsible for the terrible treatment dealt out to an innocent and loyal country.”

On 21 July 1944, around 300 planes dropped over 5,000 bombs on the city center of Kortrihk. Many historical buildings on the central square were destroyed, and an estimated 170 citizens were killed that day alone. (official number). The total number of Belgians killed is estimated (by Allied sources) at 10,000, with 30,000 homes destroyed or damaged.

Picture
Caen, France was devastated on D-Day, June 6, 1944.
Picture
Even Establishment historians know that Normandy’s real “Nightmare” came from Allied bombardment.
Picture
The city of Kortrijk, Belgium was heavily bombed three times.

THE NETHERLANDS

Allied air forces carried out more than 100 raids on Rotterdam and the surrounding areas. During the 128 raids, casualties amounted to 884 killed and 631 wounded.

An attack on the industrial area of the city on March 31, 1943 dropped 99 tons of bombs, causing great damage to the nearby residential areas. The death toll was between 350 and 400 and left between up to 20,000 people homeless. This bombardment became known as the “Forgotten Bombardment.”

On February 22, 1944, American bombers “accidentally” destroyed the center of Nijmegen, killing 800 Dutch and wounding many more. The “jewel of Holland” — the oldest city in the Netherlands — fell into rubble in a few minutes of intense bombing. Three other Dutch cities — Enschede, Arnhem, and Deventer — were also hit very hard  that day.

ITALY

Formerly allied with Germany, Italy had overthrown Mussolini and signed an armistice with the All-Lies in 1943. Before the subsequent terror-induced “unconditional surrender” secretly forced upon Italy with the Germans still occupying the peninsula, the people and artistic works of historic Italy were fair game for extermination and destruction from the sky. It remained so with he Germans there. Major Italian cities and cultural centers were jacked-up pretty badly, including Milan, Turin, Genoa, Naples and, to the dismay of many in the West, the “Eternal City” and “Holy City” of Rome. Even the Vatican was hit a few times!

Following the first Allied bombing of Rome on May 16, 1943, Pope Pius XII (“Hitler’s Pope”) wrote to Franklin D Roosevelt pleading that Rome “be spared as far as possible further pain and devastation, and their many treasured shrines… from irreparable ruin.”   FDR responded with misleading and legalistic language that promised nothing:

“Attacks against Italy are limited, to the extent humanly possible, to military objectives. We have not and will not make warfare on civilians or against nonmilitary objectives.”

It was only when Hitler’s forces retreated, as Rome was declared an “open city,” that the aerial attacks on Rome ceased. During the thousands of sorties that comprised the All-Lies air campaign on Rome, 60,000 tons of bombs were dropped. The death toll among Italian civilians overall is estimated at about 70,000 (sounds too low given the images of destruction) — with 100,000s more injured and countless homes and very old buildings destroyed or damaged.

The Germans did the best they could to gather and protect the artworks located in these nations (as well as others in the East) — but given the level of barbaric bombardment, we can only imagine what treasures, architectural wonders and entire ancient city blocks were destroyed nonetheless by the US & UK Airforces. It’s high time we stop whining about “Nazi-Looted (Saved) Art” and remember the cultural crime of “Allied-Destroyed Art.” Remember this: regardless of what one wants to believe about the German program (“looting” or protection), the “looted” artworks still exist; but the obliterated stuff is gone to posterity forever — having taken a whole lot of unlucky “Goyim” along with it.

Picture
World Today News // Feb 22, 2020: “Silence About the Bombing of Nijmegan is Shameful
” (here
Picture
The bombing of Rome — “The Eternal City.”
Picture
Milan, Italy was brutally blasted, causing a refugee crisis — Boastful British newsreel (Pathe), with bombastic music and demonic glee declares: “Milan gets it again.” (here)

What If? Part 1

“What If?” histories are a good read. They are entertaining, and they provoke thought and encourage the imagination. How different the world would be if different judgments, decisions, and circumstances had prevailed at history’s turning points. Certainly English history would have been different if King Harold’s soldiers had obeyed his order not to pursue the defeated fleeing Normans down the hill. This broke the impenetrable Saxon shield wall and exposed King Harold to Norman cavalry. http://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Battle_of_Hastings

Would there ever have been a Soviet Union if the Czar had stayed out of World War I?

Would there have been a World War II if British, French, and American politicians had listened to John Maynard Keynes’ warning that the Treaty of Versailles would result in a second world war? Germany had been promised a different outcome–no reparations and no territorial loss–in exchange for an armistice. As Keynes realized, the betrayal of the peace led to another great war.

There are a couple of what ifs that I have been waiting for historians to explore. As no historians have risen to the challenge, I will have a go. Keep in mind that a what if outcome is not necessarily a better outcome. It might be a worse outcome. As what if did not happen and there is no what if history, there is no way of making a judgment.

Suppose Churchill had not succeeded in pressuring Chamberlain to interfere with Hitler’s negotiations with the Polish colonels by issuing a British guarantee to Poland in the event of German aggression. Would World War II have resulted or would it have been a different war?

The British guarantee emboldened the colonels and frustrated Hitler’s attempt to restore
a Germany dismantled by the Versailles Treaty. The result was Hitler’s secret pact with Stalin to divide up Poland, technically known as the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact.

Having given the guarantee, Britain was honor-bound to declare war on Germany (fortunately not also on the Soviet Union), which pulled in France because of the British-French alliance against Germany.

Without Britain’s guarantee, the German (September 1, 1939) and Soviet (September 17, 1939) invasions of Poland would have been prevented by the Polish colonels’ acquiescence to Hitler’s demands and would not have resulted in Britain and France starting World War II by declaring war on Germany, resulting in the fall of France, the British driven off the continent, and Roosevelt’s determination to involve the US in a foreign war unrelated in any significant way to Americans’ interests.

Historians write that Hitler’s ambitions were in the East, not the West. Without the British and French declaration of war, the war might have been contained, with the two totalitarian powers fighting it out.

Alternatively, Hitler and Stalin might have continued their cooperation and together seized the oil rich Middle East. The British, French, and Americans would have been a poor match for the German and Soviet militaries. General Patton, the best American commander, thought he could take on the Red Army that had crushed the Wehrmacht, but his hubris did not worry Red Army commanders, who defeated the bulk of the German Army, which was deployed on the Eastern Front, while the Americans, aided by German motorized units running out of fuel, struggled to contain a small part of German forces in the Battle of the Bulge. Today we would be buying our oil from a German/Soviet consortium.

This outcome implies a different history for the Middle East, and so does another what if. What if the 9/11 Commission consisted of experts instead of politicians with their fingers in the wind, and what if the commissioners had too much integrity to write a report dictated by the executive branch? The unlikely and untenable failure of every institution of the American national security state would have been investigated, and the collapse of WTC 7 at free fall speed would have had to have been acknowledged in the report and explained. A totally different story would have emerged, a story unlikely to have locked Americans into permanent war in an expanding number of countries and into a domestic police state.

Americans might still be a free people. And American liberty might still be a beacon to the world.

On the other hand, a finding of government complicity in 9/11 could have threatened powerful interests and resulted in violent conflict and martial law.

What ifs are provocative, and that is what makes them fun. Thinking is America’s national disability. I’m all for anything that provokes Americans to think.