Please do your own research. The information I share is only a catalyst to expanding ones confined consciousness. I have NO desire for anyone to blindly believe or agree with what I share. Seek the truth for yourself and put your own puzzle together that has been presented to you. I'm not here to teach, preach or lead, but rather assist in awakening the consciousness of the collective from its temporary dormancy.
♦ In late March 2022, New Zealand recorded 20,000 cases of COVID-19 infection (yesterday), and announces they are dropping almost all COVID restrictions, removing vaccination mandates and eliminating COVID passports.
Nothing shouts ‘scamdemic‘ louder than the government’s own behavior in this example.
Was COVID-19 ever more concerning than a severe flu, which was then weaponized by government to induce a global fear and trigger mass formation psychosis as a gateway for a new model society?
That question is for the history books. However, the changed political landscape, in combination with the Florida result, appear to hold the answers. (…)
Keep in mind, this announcement is happening at the same time COVID-19 infections are higher than at any time previously in Kiwi history.
You will never be able to convince the masses of people that they have been victimized by the most widespread global hysteria in modern history.
Indeed, it would be a futile effort to do so, just like it would be futile to try and stop the people who are thirsting desperately for their fourth, fifth or whatever booster shot.
People now define themselves and others by their behavior during the pandemic scare of the past two years. It would be an exercise in futility to try and convince anyone; and factually it would be exhausting and wasteful.
However, for anyone who can intellectually look at the landscape, it is impossible not to have seriously well founded questions about the statistics of the COVID-19 pandemic – when contrast against two ordinary years of a strong flu season in both the northern and southern hemisphere.
One of the key *tells*, amid this entire COVID fear timeline, is the difference between how western government leaders spoke publicly about the rules, regulations, mandates and restrictions, and how they personally acted in private when they didn’t know they were being watched.
And now we find ourselves with barely enough time to take down the COVID-19 decorations before those same western government officials began weaponizing the Ukraine fear.
Here is the announcement, straight from the horse’s mouth:
To those who have been paying attention since the beginning of the pandemic, the authoritarianism currently unfolding in front of us was easily predictable.
In fact, in March of 2020, TFTP predicted mandatory injections, the police state, and travel restrictions. This doesn’t make us special or psychic, it is easy to deduce once you realize the nature of the state and their tendency to use the only tool in their toolbox to tackle problems faced by society. That sole tool is force.
While the intentions of the state may have been noble at first in order to prevent transmission of the virus, thanks to their tendency to use force without question, their noble intentions quickly became a conduit for tyrants to usurp your freedoms.
“Give us your freedom, and we will make the pandemic go away,” was the mantra of team lock-down and, despite completely eroding what little freedom Americans had left, we are seeing yet another large spike in cases and hospitalizations.
One need only look at Australia and the sheer Nazi-esque approach they took to covid to see that no amount of police state can stop a virus. Over the last year, Australia has beaten, kidnapped, arrested, and harassed anyone who didn’t toe the line and submit to their authority. A few months ago, they even began kidnapping completely healthy people and locking them up in internment camps for merely being exposed to someone who may have been positive with covid.
The country has fallen. Everyone was locked down and everyone was vaccinated, yet covid did what covid does. Despite becoming one of the most tyrannical countries on the planet in regards to the pandemic, Australia is seeing its largest spike of cases since the covid hysteria began.
On top of the loss of economic and physical freedom, governments across the planet also took to attacking your medical freedom. Politicians once again grabbed their only tool in the toolbox and began forcing people to take the jab — informed consent be damned.
People were forced out of their jobs, thousands of frontline medical workers laid off — creating a staffing shortage — because they didn’t take a jab for a disease which they may have already been immune to.
Vaccines, Americans were told, would be our way out of this mess. Early on, politicians and media blowhards alike, took to their soapboxes and falsely claimed that getting the jab would keep you safe from covid. The fact checkers are unable to run cover for these folks now, as they did it so often that they are on video.
In the video below, from earlier this year, media blowhard and known liar, Rachel Maddox claims — with no scientific data to back her up — that the vaccine will keep you safe from getting covid.
“Now we know that the vaccines work well enough that the virus stops with every vaccinated person… A vaccinated person gets infected with the virus… the virus does not infect them…the virus then cannot… use a vaccinated person as a host to get more people.”
It wasn’t just Maddow either.
From Bill Gates to Fauci to the president himself, these people took to their pulpits to spread a false narrative that getting vaccinated would stop covid in its tracks. Spoiler alert: it did not.
Also, remember the mantra repeated by corporate media and the US government ad nauseum, about the “pandemic of the unvaccinated,” which the White House COVID-19 Response Team introduced in mid-July, and which the president was still regurgitating inaccurately as late as December 14?
Now, as the tyrannical Branch Covidians watch their predictions and fear mongering fall flat, they are forced into a corner and are attempting to suppress their comments like the ones made in the videos above. But the cat is out of the bag and people have had enough.
No amount of definitions can be changed, boosters mandated, or lock-downs enforced that can keep the establishment’s ship from sinking.
Sure, there are still fearful people locked away in their homes, paralyzed with fear because their leaders tell them to be scared. But they are now the minority. In many parts of the world, despite constant fear mongering about “cases surging,” people are getting back to normal.
Despite tyrannical mandates, people are disobeying. And despite the best efforts of corporate media and their puppet masters in the establishment, the narrative around covid is collapsing. We welcome this collapse with open arms.
It is high time we take “normal” back. This virus is here, you will come into contact with it, and you need to make your own personal choices on how to deal with it. The government has not and never will be able to protect you from getting sick. Thankfully, many people are starting to get it.
As more people resist, the state will lose its grip and freedom will once again take center stage. They even admit it. As the CDC director announced loosening the restrictions on quarantine from 10 days to 5, Director Rochelle Walensky admitted that their new policy is dependent on “what we thought people would be able to tolerate.”
More than 900 pages of newly released top secret documents on the pandemic expose for the first time through official materials how the US funded deadly coronavirus research at the Wuhan lab through an organization called the EcoHealth Alliance.
Although our regular readers would know much of this information and documents and more has already been published by GreatGameIndia since the beginning of the declared pandemic (as the embedded links in the article would show).
The trove of documents includes two previously unpublished grant proposals that were funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, as well as project updates relating to EcoHealth Alliance’s research, which has been scrutinized amid increased interest in the origins of the pandemic.
The documents were released in connection with ongoing Freedom of Information Act litigation by The Intercept against the National Institutes of Health. The Intercept is making the full documents available to the public.
“This is a road map to the high-risk research that could have led to the current pandemic,” said Gary Ruskin, executive director of U.S. Right To Know, a group that has been investigating the origins of Covid-19.
One of the grants, titled “Understanding the Risk of Bat Coronavirus Emergence,” outlines an ambitious effort led by EcoHealth Alliance President Peter Daszak to screen thousands of bat samples for novel coronaviruses. The research also involved screening people who work with live animals.
The documents contain several critical details about the research in Wuhan, including the fact that key experimental work with humanized mice was conducted at a biosafety level 3 lab at Wuhan University Center for Animal Experiment — and not at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, as was previously assumed.
Even before the pandemic, many scientists were concerned about the potential dangers associated with such experiments.
The grant proposal acknowledges some of those dangers:
“Fieldwork involves the highest risk of exposure to SARS or other CoVs, while working in caves with high bat density overhead and the potential for fecal dust to be inhaled.”
Alina Chan, a molecular biologist at the Broad Institute said, “In this proposal, they actually point out that they know how risky this work is. They keep talking about people potentially getting bitten — and they kept records of everyone who got bitten. Does EcoHealth have those records? And if not, how can they possibly rule out a research-related accident?”
“The viruses they constructed were tested for their ability to infect mice that were engineered to display human type receptors on their cell,” Ebright wrote to The Intercept after reviewing the documents.
Ebright also said the documents make it clear that two different types of novel coronaviruses were able to infect humanized mice.
“While they were working on SARS-related coronavirus, they were carrying out a parallel project at the same time on MERS-related coronavirus,” Ebright said, referring to the virus that causes Middle East Respiratory Syndrome.
The grant was initially awarded for a five-year period — from 2014 to 2019. Funding was renewed in 2019 but suspended by the Trump administration in April 2020.
The proposal, written in 2019, often seems prescient, focusing on scaling up and deploying resources in Asia in case of an outbreak of an “emergent infectious disease” and referring to Asia as “this hottest of the EID hotspots.”
In Israel, people who do not receive COVID-19 booster shots will eventually be denied a Green Pass, which allows entry into various venues, Health Minister Nitzan Horowitz said on Tuesday.
In Israel, the fully vaccinated who refuse the COVID-19 booster shots will immediately become the unvaccinated and their Mark of the Beast prototype Green Passport then revoked. Earlier today we did a program on the Mark of the Beast system that has now come online, and today’s article on Israel turning the vaccinated into the unvaccinated really proves our point. It’s not a booster shot, it’s never-ending booster shots that will be required for, well… ever.
“Behold ye among the heathen, and regard, and wonder marvellously: for I will work a work in your days, which ye will not believe, though it be told you.” Habakkuk 1:5 (King James Bible)
Israel Will Deny Green Passports To People Who Have Not Received COVID Booster Shots
From HAARETZ: “This is simply because, in terms of its effectiveness, the vaccine is valid only for a period of five or six months,” Horowitz told Channel 13 television. “After about half a year, you have to get a third dose. Otherwise, the vaccine loses its power.”
“The Green Pass testifies that a person is safe in a certain way,” he added. “So the moment we know that the vaccine loses its effectiveness after a certain period, there’s no justification for giving a green pass to someone who hasn’t gotten another dose.”
Nevertheless, he said, the booster will become a requirement for a Green Pass only when the shot is available to everyone aged 12 and older. Currently, only people aged 30 and up qualify for the third dose.
Earlier Tuesday, the Health Ministry approved giving the third shot to anyone aged 30 and over who had received the second dose at least five months ago. It had previously only been available to people aged 40 and up. The move was recommended by a number of expert advisory committees. So far, 1,575,898 Israelis have gotten the third dose. (…)
Researchers from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) found a way to record a patient’s vaccination history. It involved injected dye containing data underneath the skin at the same time as administering a vaccine.
In a 2019 press release by MIT, investors suggested that the injection method was mainly to aid developing countries where traditional medical records are rare or do not exist.
Before the Covid pandemic, vaccination campaigns in developing countries were made difficult often due to the inability to store medical records. Therefore, it’s difficult to determine who needs a particular vaccine.
Kevin McHugh, former MIT postdoc, and co-lead author of the study said at the time:
“In areas where paper vaccination cards are often lost or do not exist at all, and electronic databases are unheard of, this technology could enable the rapid and anonymous detection of patient vaccination history to ensure that every child is vaccinated.”
MIT researchers sought to create a method for recording vaccination information in a way that does not require a centralised database or other infrastructure.
Often, vaccines such as those for measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR), require several doses to be spaced out at set intervals. However, without accurate and reliable records, some children may not receive all the doses.
Ana Jaklenec, MIT research scientist, said in the 2019 press release:
“In order to be protected against most pathogens, one needs multiple vaccinations. In some areas in the developing world, it can be very challenging to do this, as there is a lack of data about who has been vaccinated and whether they need additional shots or not.”
To create a decentralised vaccination record, researchers developed a new type of copper-based quantum dots (nanocrystals) which radiate slightly sub-infrared light that can be read by a certain type of smartphone.
The dots measure about four nanometres in diameter and are held in tiny biocompatible spheres which are 20 microns in length. The encapsulation allows the dye to remain in place underneath the skin post-injection.
Researchers designed the dye to be delivered by a microneedle patch rather than a traditional syringe and needle. The patches used in this study were made from a mixture of dissolvable sugar and a polymer called PVA, as well as the quantum-dot dye and the vaccine.
When applied to the skin, the microneedles, which are 1.5 millimeters long, partially dissolve, releasing their payload within around two minutes.
By selectively loading microparticles into microneedles, the patches deliver a pattern in the skin that is invisible to the naked eye but can be picked up and scanned by a smartphone that has the infrared filter removed.
Researchers said that tests on cadaver skin showed that the dye can emit light for up to five years. The method was also tested on rats, using microneedle patches that delivered the quantum dots along with a polio vaccine.
Researchers discovered that those rats generated an immune response similar to the response of rats that received a traditional polio vaccine.
“This study confirmed that incorporating the vaccine with the dye in the microneedle patches did not affect the efficacy of the vaccine or our ability to detect the dye.”
At the time, researchers planned to expand the amount of data that could be encoded in a single pattern, allowing them to include information such as the date of vaccine administration and the lot number of the vaccine batch. They said that the quantum dots are safe to use in this way because they are encapsulated in a biocompatible polymer.
Mark Prasunitz, chair of chemical and biomolecular engineering at Georgia Tech, who was not involved in the research, said at the time:
“Storage, access, and control of medical records is an important topic with many possible approaches. This study presents a novel approach where the medical record is stored and controlled by the patient within the patient’s skin in a minimally invasive and elegant way.”
The investors of the study are listed at the bottom of the study and include The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the Koch Institute Support (core) Grant from the National Cancer Institute.
Considering that these studies were carried out years before the Covid-19 pandemic, before vaccine passports were considered, it is worth questioning whether this was the plan all along. Furthermore, how do we know that this technology hasn’t already been implemented?
Trump trade adviser Peter Navarro revealed what he believes are the true intentions of Anthony Fauci’s push to stir up more coronavirus fears.
“From the first time I met him he just did not make a lot of sense. We’ve seen all of his flipflops,” Navarro said. “My new theory is that he’s simply a sociopath. He just lies to advance his own interest.”
Dr. Fauci lies to improve his own fan club. He pretends he is the Father of the Vaccine claiming credit for it on January 10th, 2020. Offensive to @POTUS45 & everyone in HHS, BARDA, FEMA that ACTUALLY had something to do with it.https://t.co/OdEkiS84um
Navarro said Fauci first downplayed coronavirus, then said it would take years to develop a vaccine and now he’s trying to steal credit for the vaccine.
He added, in reality Fauci was helping China to create COVID-19.
“So, Fauci is a sociopath. Fauci created the Wuhan lab gain of function genetically engineered virus,” Navarro stated. “If you allow the Chinese communists working with the People’s Liberation Army to go in and screw around with a bioweapon using your gain of function, which was slipped past President Trump behind his back, guess what? You’re going to get deadly and dangerous viruses that are then going to mutate and continue to thwart our efforts to get herd immunity through things like vaccines and people who are already being infected.”
Navarro went on to add Fauci must be held accountable for all his lies.
Daily we hear and observe a stream of endless propaganda about the miracles of the new generation of Covid vaccines in order to calm fears and increase public compliance.
In unison, editors at the New York Times, Washington Post and the major multimedia networks encourage everyone to be vaccinated as soon as enough vaccines are available.
Anthony Fauci and the captains in the pandemic efforts claim Moderna’s and Pfizer’s vaccines are about 95 percent effective, and the Department of Health and Human Services is convincing us they are safe and effective.
Therefore, we should all be willing to stand in the waiting line.
There is nothing to be concerned about, we are told, except those anti-vaccine heretics, who the World Health Organization has now dubbed among the ten most dangerous risks to global health.
What The Media Blitzkrieg Is Ignoring Are The Very Legitimate And Even Worrisome Unanswered Questions What the media blitzkrieg is ignoring are the very legitimate and even worrisome unanswered questions on the minds of many citizens.
Aside from concerns over these vaccines’ uncertainties for effectiveness and safety due to quickly being fast-tracked past the usual regulatory analyses and reviews, Moderna’s and Pfizer’s vaccines are largely experimental.
Never before has an mRNA vaccine been distributed en masse to tens of millions of people.
Other suspicions include:
1) the length of time neutralizing antibodies are effective before immunity wanes, 2) what kind of protection the vaccines will actually offer, 3) does the data truly support Moderna and Pfizer claims that their vaccines are 95 percent effective, 4) are vaccine recipients protected from contracting the virus, and if not, can they transmit it to others, and 5) the absence of long-term safety profiles following vaccination that are still pending.
The Pfizer Phase 3 trial lasted less than 4 months. Moderna only completed its COVE trial enrollment on October 22; now two months later people are receiving the vaccine.
Therefore, insufficient time has lapsed to make any realistic clinical determination about either vaccine’s safety following months after vaccination.
Yet despite these questions, over half of Americans believe that being vaccinated will provide complete immunity from infection and therefore their lives will return to normal.
New Discrimination Against Unvaccinated? Now the most recent narrative we are witnessing is stoking public fear that unless we are vaccinated we will be unable to board a plane or train, will be prevented from attending schools or public events, and may even become victims to more austere and harsh quarantine laws.
There is also the lingering myth of the PCR test as a reliable standard for diagnosing Covid infections.
Due to the widespread abuse of PCR, which was never designed nor intended to be relied upon as a confirmatory diagnostic tool, a growing number of medical experts argue that the US, the UK, Germany and other EU nations are facing a “casedemic” rather than a pandemic due to a pathogenic virus.
Despite PCR’s high rate of misdiagnoses, positive results are still being reported as Covid cases.
How Much Protection Will The New MRNA Covid Vaccines Provide And For How Long? In early December, the New England Journal of Medicine published a National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease analysis of the Moderna vaccine’s length of efficacy based upon neutralizing antibody levels.
This was the first data published of its kind for any of the Covid vaccines.
Although the analysis only included 34 individuals who had received both shots, it found that antibody counts were significant over a 3-month period, averaging between 50-75 percent.
The report stated this was “less than we were hoping for.”
The rate of antibody decline increased among the older trial participants.
This disappointing result should not be a surprise, although even a sharp drop in antibodies may still provide sufficient immunity, at least for some.
The most recent issue of the British Medical Journal reports that natural immunity following infection lasts approximately 6 months.
Yet this study conducted by Oxford University Hospitals likely has serious flaws since it relied upon PCR for diagnosing the data.
Furthermore, Moderna has also been using its mRNA technology for vaccines against several influenza strains.
A similar pattern of antibody decline was noted in their flu vaccines, showing effectiveness for about 6 months and then an antibody drop by as much 90 percent.
So how much protection will the new mRNA Covid vaccines provide and for how long? Only time and further monitoring of vaccine recipients will tell.
Can One Still Be Infected After Vaccination And Can They Transmit The Virus To Others? Another important question on people’s minds is whether they can still be infected after vaccination and whether they can transmit the virus to others.
In principle, vaccine proponents argue that vaccines prevent both infection and transmission.
But the data does not support this conclusion.
It is well known that persons vaccinated against the flu will frequently contract the virus, become ill and spread it to others.
This is largely because we are dealing with viruses that enter the upper respiratory tract by way of the mucous layer in the nose and throat.
Mucous itself slows down the spread of the virus to the lungs.
However, it is also an obstacle for antibodies and immune cells, such as T-cells, from reaching the multiplying virus.
For this reason, Anthony Fauci has continued to state that vaccinated persons should continue to wear masks and observe social distancing to avoid transmitting the virus.
The World Health Organization has stated that there is no “evidence on any of the vaccines to be confident that it’s going to prevent people from actually getting the infection and therefore being able to pass it on.”
95 Percent Efficacy? Back in October, Dr. Peter Doshi, at the time an editor for the British Medical Journal, had already warned that the later vaccine clinical trials were never properly designed to determine whether it would reduce the likelihood of falling ill nor preventing infection.
In a later article Doshi questions the vaccines’ purported 95 percent efficacy based upon how the results are being reported and the ambiguity between “suspected” and “confirmed” Covid cases among the trial participants who received the vaccine.
If the “suspected” cases are included, there is a 20-fold higher number of vaccinated individuals who later contracted the virus.
However, Doshi reminds us that neither Pfizer nor Moderna have provided the raw data for public scrutiny.
Moderna says it will make the data available after the trial is completed, which will be in 2022.
Repeatedly Bill Gates, Fauci and all of the media pundits tell us that unless there is large vaccination compliance, the transmission of Covid will never be interrupted.
However, based upon what we are learning, these new Covid vaccines have always been and remain an unsupported illusion to realistically end the pandemic.
Another important piece of information that is very rarely mentioned is Covid-19’s 4-5 day incubation period. In the event a person is asymptomatically infected with the virus, the CDC states:
mRNA vaccines are not currently recommended for outbreak management or for post-exposure prophylaxis, which is vaccination to prevent the development of SARS-CoV-2 infection in a person with a specific known exposure.
“Because the median incubation period of SARS-CoV-2 is 4 to 5 days, it is unlikely that the first dose of COVID-19 vaccine would provide an adequate immune response within the incubation period for effective post-exposure prophylaxis. Thus, vaccination is unlikely to be effective in preventing disease following an exposure.”
Reports are already coming in to confirm this.
Recently, hundreds of Israelis became infected with the virus after receiving Pfizer’s Covid vaccine. There may be several reasons for this.
First, were the vaccine recipients already carrying the virus at the time of vaccination?
Second, it takes 8-10 days for immunity to sufficiently increase after receiving the vaccine, and after the first dose there is only about 50 percent efficacy.
This is why the second shot for the mRNA vaccines is so critical in order to reach the magical 95 percent effectiveness.
Serious Adverse Effects Now that the Moderna and Pfizer vaccines are being administered throughout the US – 4.6 million recipients since January 4th – and in other nations, we are beginning to read reports about serious adverse effects.
Recently Covid vaccine injuries have started to be reported in the CDC’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).
During a seven-day period, December 15-22, there were 1,158 cases entered. However, this is but a fraction, albeit significant, of the actual number of adverse events.
On December 19, the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices convened to review the cases of life-threatening anaphylaxis following mRNA vaccination.
In his presentation to the Working Group, Dr. Thomas Clark presented statistics showing that there was a minimum of 3,150 “health impact events” among 112,807 vaccine recipients (2.7 percent) during only a five-day period (December 14-18).
Moreover, these 3,150 adverse events were tagged as “unable to perform normal daily activities, unable to work, required care from a doctor or health care professional.”
The presentation did not include the number of minor and moderate adverse events which are likely much higher.
Reproductive Issues? In early October we reported on Covid-19 vaccine risks stated by Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi, the former chair of microbiology at the University of Mainz Medical School in Germany.
Among those risks is the possibility of the vaccine’s mRNA contributing to mutogenesis in reproductive cells that may be inherited later by children.
Subsequently, the University of Miami has reported it is following up on its earlier discovery of the virus present in men’s testicles up to six months after infection.
Now the researchers are investigating whether the vaccine’s Covid genetic information may do likewise and interfere with sperm quality and reproduction.
What About The Precautionary Principle? The final question is why are we failing to discuss, let alone adhere, to the precautionary principle before this massive undertaking to produce and distribute potentially billions of vaccines to inoculate the global population?
The precautionary principle quite simply states that any new medical intervention with results that are either disputed or unknown should be avoided.
In fact, the principle has frequently been invoked for products or processes that would introduce genetically modified organisms or foods for consumption.
Now we are injecting questionable genetically engineered substances into human bodies, and worse there are voices that want to mandate this enormously expensive experiment long before any reliable medical consensus can be reached on their long-term safety.
If the precautionary principle had been respected and honored during the past 100 years, the US would have prevented untold numbers of life-long injuries and deaths due to the public If the precautionary principle had been respected and honored during the past 100 years, the US would have prevented untold numbers of life-long injuries and deaths due to the public advertising of smoking, asbestos and DDT poisoning, synthetic hormone replacement, toxic pesticides such as Monsanto’s glyphosate, AZT during the early part of the AIDS epidemic, and the swine flu and Gardasil vaccines that were also rushed to market without proper scientific oversight.
The US Government Has An Atrocious Track Record For Introducing Toxic Chemicals To The American Public Then Denying All Responsibility For Their Adverse Effects The US government has an atrocious track record for introducing toxic chemicals to the American public then denying all responsibility for their adverse effects and the indescribable suffering that their shortsightedness has caused.
It is only well after the tragedy gains some public attention that a whistleblower or someone “in the know” comes forward to reveal the wrongdoings and corruption behind the companies developing these toxic products.
And how often do we find the government, the regulatory agencies and mainstream media being the primary source to expose these felonies? Rarely ever.
Even when protective laws are enacted, such as the Clean Air, Food, Water and Energy acts, corporate lobbyists and big money apply their trade to buy off legislators and heads of federal agencies to gradually scrub away these laws’ safeguards.
This is part of the corporate cancel culture to erase our protections.
Today’s largest propaganda campaign
These trends that have become ingrained into the government’s politick have led to today’s largest propaganda campaign in the country’s history and is now orchestrated by the CDC and NIH in collusion with the pharmaceutical industrial complex, Bill Gates, many of our leading corporate-funded medical schools and institutions and across the ideological spectrum of the media.
All are heavily invested in the new generations of Covid vaccines and whatever new novel drugs in the pipeline and to invalidate the highly effective and cheap drugs, such as hydroxychloroquine and invermectin, that have been proven to treat Covid infections quickly and safety.
This is the same artifice of corporate scoundrels and their media escorts that have relied on faulty science, fabricate their own research to serve their financial interests, and hide behind a cloak of non-transparency who Fauci now encourages us to openheartedly trust as Covid vaccines reach your local clinics and downtown pharmacies.
Sadly their past track records of colluding and showing favoritism to private interests over public health should top the list of our worries.
Whatever the long term consequences from this massive vaccination campaign, praise, condemnation or even criminal accusations will ultimately rest upon the shoulders of our nation’s Anthony Fauci-s, Bill Gates and Moncef-s.
Anyone who understands that these lockdowns were never about health, but about control, know that the first lockdowns didn’t quite devastate the middle class to the point that the elitists needed them to.