Please do your own research. The information I share is only a catalyst to expanding ones confined consciousness. I have NO desire for anyone to blindly believe or agree with what I share. Seek the truth for yourself and put your own puzzle together that has been presented to you. I'm not here to teach, preach or lead, but rather assist in awakening the consciousness of the collective from its temporary dormancy.
NY Times: On an Austrian Train, Hitler’s Voice Played Over the Loudspeakers
Two men have been questioned in the bizarre case, where Hitler could be heard over an express train’s P.A. system. The episode has led to outrage and head-scratching.
In today’s episode, “I’ll make a much-needed departure from the noxious noise of the world to bring you guys a bit of light-hearted comic relief. A pair of hilarious heroes made a seditious splash in Vienna, Austria; and what these since-apprehended, though unidentified, pranksters managed to achieve has really got the usual suspects “oy veying.”
From the article:
“Passengers on an express train to Vienna were surprised and upset when instead of the usual overhead announcements, a scratchy recording of Adolf Hitler and the Nazi refrains of “Heil Hitler” and “Sieg Heil” played over the train’s public address system for about 20 minutes.
The train’s engineers were powerless to stop the broadcast or even use the loudspeaker system to communicate with passengers. The strange episode has led to outrage, embarrassment and head-scratching in Austria, where Hitler was born. Was the train hacked? Were national rail staff to blame? And why was nobody able to stop it?” (emphasis added) (JAJAJAJAJ…) Ha ha ha ha ha ha!!!!
Men after my own heart! Indeed, I would sometimes daydream about how fun and epic it would be to hack the Super Bowl “Halftime Show” and broadcast images of Hitler pumping out the pure truth, with English subtitles. Apart from the passengers who were “upset,” any slightly less normified ones got a serious 20-minute red-pilling direct from Adolf himself. Wunderbar!
Article: Rabbi Schlomo Hofmeister, Vienna’s community rabbi, who happened to be on the train when the recording blasted from the speaker, called it “disturbing” especially when the first reaction of some of his fellow passengers was laughter. Rebuttal: So — Vienna’s biggest rabbi — who just “happened to be” on the train — found the incident, and the laughter of some of the passengers, “disturbing,” eh? Lucky for Schlomo that yours truly wasn’t in on that Vienna train. What would the felonious Pharisee have said as I pumped my fist while pissing my pants with laughter?
Article: “Some Nazi ‘rascals’ apparently hacked into the loudspeaker system of the train” he wrote in a tweet. They were “quite undisturbed and uninhibited” for about 20 minutes, he wrote, recounting his experience. Rebuttal: Was Homo Schlomo really on board that train? Or is this like one of those tales of woe told by Bullshwitz “survivors” who, it turns out, were never actually there?
Article: David Stögmüller, a Green Party parliamentarian, was on board and managed to capture a short section of the recording. In a tweet he posted from the train, he said he hoped the case would be resolved and the guilty charged soon. Rebuttal: A commie parliamentarian was also on board the train and tweeted about the event as it was happening? Hmmm. Now this is starting to sound a bit gefilte fishy.
Article: Addressing the national rail service over Twitter, Colette Schmidt, a journalist with Der Standard, asked on Sunday night: “Quite apart from the fact that I and other Austrians were completely shocked: What does a guest from abroad think when Hitler speeches are played over loudspeakers in our trains?” Rebuttal: Frankly, Colette — had regular readers of The World We Live In been in Vienna as “guests from abroad,” they’d have been rolling on the train floor in laughter.
1 & 2. Vienna’s “community Rabbi” Schlomo Hofmeiste (who has a history of being in the wrong place at the wrong time) and a Marxist parliamentarian David Stögmüllerjust “happened to be on board” the Hitler Express. / 3. Scribbler Colette Schmidt (yikes!) asks: “What would a guest to Austria think?”
All that being said, the operational sophistication described in the article — along with the claimed presence of a “green” (red) parliamentarian and Vienna’s community Rabbi — further combined with the very peculiar fact that the two perps charged were not identified for public flagellation — makes us wonder if this well-publicized stunt may have been an operation staged by the usual suspects for the usual purpose of stoking fear of “zee Nazis,” as well as tears (and shekels) for the perpetually offended. Nevertheless, even if this was a false flagged broadcast, it was still funny as hell. We wholeheartedly approve.
“It is untrue that I or anyone else in Germany wanted the war in 1939. It was desired and instigated exclusively by those international statesmen who were either of Jewish descent or worked for Jewish interests. I have made too many offers for the control and limitation of armaments, which posterity will not for all time be able to disregard for the responsibility for the outbreak of this war to be laid on me. I have further never wished that after the first fatal world war a second against England, or even against America, should break out.”
— Adolf Hitler, Final Testament, April 29, 1945
1. Averting war with UK Prime Minister Chamberlain in 1938 // 2. Making peace with French Marshal Petain in 1940
Adolf Hitler’s numerous and reasonable offers of peace to the Allied powers are a matter of indisputable historical record. Establishment Court Historians (Fake Historians) cannot deny the reality of these reasonable offers, so they choose to simply ignore them instead.
(((They))) know that if the truth of Hitler’s pleas for peace were to become widely known, it would stand the conventional narrative of World War II (and subsequent events) on its head. Consider the following true statements and events, and decide for yourself who the “aggressor” behind World War II really was.
1939 Hitler proposes peaceful solutions to the problem of the ‘Polish Corridor’
After World War I, the victorious allies had carved up German territory and given part of Germany (Western Prussia) to the newly re-established nation of Poland. Eastern Prussia was left isolated; totally cut off from Germany. Tensions among Poles, Jews and minority Germans simmered in the area.
To resolve the problem, Hitler makes numerous sensible proposals; which include: demilitarization of the key port areas, public referendum, accepting Gdynia as a Polish port city on the Baltic Sea, 1 km wide rail & road passages to link Eastern Prussia to Germany, or to link Poland to the Baltic Sea.
Finally, as attacks against Germans living in Poland escalate, Hitler proposes that the region be placed under International control. Every German proposal is ignored. We now know that, behind the scenes, US President Roosevelt had been pressuring Poland to not make any deals with Germany.
“BERLIN THINKS DOOR IS LEFT OPEN TO PEACEFUL SOLUTION”
Even the pre-war August 28th headline of the Hitler-hating New York Times confirmed that Hitler sought to avoid war with Britain & France. Hitler’s thoughtful letter to France is published in full.
Six years before the war was to even start, International Jewry had already declared war against Germany. The “Polish Corridor” was to serve as the match which lit the flame.
LATE AUGUST – SEPTEMBER 1939 In 11th hour attempt to avert war, Hitler calls for emergency talks between Germany and Poland
Just three days before the actual outbreak of what was to become World War II, Britain agrees to come to the Poland’s assistance in the event of a conflict with Germany (Anglo Polish Military Alliance). This unnecessary deal emboldens the Polish and Jewish militias who want the West to wage war upon Germany. To force Hitler’s hand, terrorists begin murdering German civilians in large numbers. A British ex-Pat named William Joyce describes the events:
“On the nights of August 25 to August 31 inclusive, there occurred, besides innumerable attacks on civilians of German blood, 44 perfectly authenticated acts of armed violence against German official persons and property. These incidents took place either on the border or inside German territory.
On the night of August 31, a band of Polish desperadoes actually occupied the German Broadcasting Station at Gleiwitz. Now it was clear that unless German troops marched at once, not a man, woman or child of German blood within the Polish territory could reasonably expect to avoid persecution and slaughter.”
And yet, just prior to ordering the invasion of Poland (September 1, 1939), Hitler is still trying to resolve the situation peacefully by summoning the Polish Foreign Minister for talks. Unbeknown to Hitler, the fix was already in. After the 3 week German-Polish War ends in victory for the Germans, Hitler declares:
“I attempted to find a tolerable solution. I submitted this attempt to the Polish rulers. You know these proposals. They were more than moderate. I do not know what mental condition the Polish Government was in when it refused these proposals. As an answer, Poland gave the order for the first mobilization, and my request to the Polish Foreign Minister to visit me to discuss these questions was refused. Instead of going to Berlin, he went to London.”
Germans of all ages massacred in Poland. This type of nasty business had been going on for months as “the international community” remained silent.
OCTOBER 1939 Hitler pleads with Britain & France to rescind recent war declarations.
Before the actual shooting was to start in the Western theater, Hitler did all could to reassure Britian & France of his peaceful intentions. The two Allied powers had, under the pretext of saving Poland, both declared war upon Germany on September 3, 1939. Before the Reichstag, and the world, Hitler declares:
“I have always expressed to France my desire to bury forever our ancient enmity and bring together these two nations, both of which have such glorious pasts. ….I have devoted no less effort to the achievement of Anglo-German understanding, no, more than that, of an Anglo-German friendship. At no time and in no place have I ever acted contrary to British interests…”Why should this war in the West be fought?”
Britain (and later France) declares war. Meanwhile, Hitler declares peace!
MAY 1940 Hitler deliberately allows the British Army to escape at Dunkirk
The German “blitzkrieg” across Holland and Belgium, as well as the earlier occupation of parts of Denmark and Norway, had denied the Allies of the opportunity to encircle Germany before invading it. As a show of good faith, and over the objections of his own Generals, Hitler then allows the trapped Allied forces to escape untouched from the beaches of Dunkirk (France). Hitler hopes that this gracious act will make the British more willing to make peace. General Gunther von Blumentritt, in describing the reasons behind Hitler’s decision regarding Dunkirk, later explains:
“He (Hitler) then astonished us by speaking with admiration of the British Empire, of the necessity for its existence, and of the civilization that Britain had brought into the world. ….He compared the British Empire with the Catholic Church saying they were both essential elements of stability in the world. He said that all he wanted from Britain was that she should acknowledge Germany’s position on the Continent. The return of Germany’s colonies would be desirable but not essential, and he would even offer to support Britain with troops if she should be involved in difficulties anywhere.”
It is interesting to note that, in recent years, some Establishment historianshave been permitted to talk about Hitler’s halt order for what it was — an offer of peace.(here)
The Allied army could have easily been captured at Dunkirk, but Hitler allowed them to escape. General Blumentritt reveals Hitler’s admiration for the British and his desire to end the war.
MAY 1940 After having defeated France and chasing the British invaders off of the continent, Hitler, via Swedish third party, proposes generous peace terms to Britain
The Germans contact the British ambassador in Sweden, Victor Mallet, through Sweden´s Supreme Court Judge Ekeberg, who is known to Hitler’s legal advisor, Ludwig Weissauer.
According to Mallet:
“Hitler, according to his emissary [Weissauer], sincerely wishes friendship with England. He wishes peace to be restored, but the ground must be prepared for it: only after careful preparation may official negotiations begin. Until then the condition must be considered that discussions be unofficial and secret.
Hitler´s basic ideas [are that] today´s economic problems are different from those of the past […] In order to achieve economic progress one must calculate on the basis of big territories and consider them an economic unit. Napoleon tried, but in his days it wasn’t possible because France wasn’t in the center of Europe and communications were too hard. Now Germany is in the center of Europe and has the necessary means to provide communication and transportation services.
England and America now have the best fleets and will naturally continue to, because they will need the oceans for their supply. Germany has the continent. In what concerns Russia (USSR), Weissauer has given the impression that it should be seen as a potential enemy. “
Hitler´s peace proposal is as follows:
1- The British Empire retains all its Colonies 2- Germany´s position on the continent will not be questioned 3- All questions concerning the Mediterranean and its French, Belgian & Dutch colonies are open to discussion 4- Poland. A Polish state must exist 5- The former Czechoslovakian states remain independent but under German protection.
Ekeberg understands that this implies that the states occupied by Germany would be de-occupied. Germany´s occupation was only due to the present war situation. Churchill is not interested in making peace.
1. Excerpt from “Himmler’s Secret War,” by Martin Allen // 2. Thanks to Churchill, German peace efforts via Sweden failed. Ambassador Victor Mallet (left) walking with Princess Elizabeth (now Queen Elizabeth) and Prince Phillip.
MAY 1940 Churchill turns down Mussolini’s offer to mediate peace between Germany and Britain
On May 25, 1940, Giuseppe Bastianini, the Italian ambassador in London, requests a meeting with British Foreign Secretary Lord Halifax to discuss Italy’s neutrality. Halifax meets Bastianini later that afternoon. The discussion soon moves to that of Italian mediation between the Allies and Germany.
Bastiani reveals that the goal of Italian leader Benito Mussolini (Hitler’s ally) is to negotiate a settlement “that would not merely be an armistice, but would protect European peace for the century.” Halifax responds favorably to the idea and takes it to the British War Cabinet.
The following morning Halifax gives his report, telling the Cabinet that in his opinion they “had to face the fact that it was not so much now a question of imposing a complete defeat upon Germany but of safeguarding the independence of our own Empire.”
Halifax summarizes his meeting with Bastianini and urges his colleagues to consider Italian mediation. Again, Churchill would have none of it!
For several days, Halifax continues to press for the Mussolini mediation. In an apparent attempt to placate Halifax, Churchill finally says that he “doubts whether anything would come of an approach to Italy, but that the matter was one which the War Cabinet would have to consider.”
But Churchill is lying to Halifax. Never did Churchill even consider Mussolini’s offer to mediate peace between Britain and Germany. The matter eventually dies. The conflict between Churchill and Halifax became known as ‘The War Cabinet Crisis.’
Instead of accepting any peace offers, Churchill’s gang chose to frighten the British public with idiotic tales of imminent poison gas attacks from Hitler.
1. Halifax (r) tried very hard to convince the warmonger Churchill (l) to at least hear Mussolini’s mediation proposal. // 2. Mussolini, shaking hands with UK Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain in 1938, had helped Britain and Germany to keep the peace of Europe at the Munich Conference of 1938. That’s when Churchill wrongly condemned Chamberlain as an “appeaser” – a slanderous label that has clung to Chamberlain ever since.
JUNE 1940 Hitler drops “peace leaflets” over London!
With Germany now in total control of the continent and riding high in “the driver’s seat”. Hitler continues his campaign for peace by bypassing the British press and air-dropping leaflets explaining the causes of the senseless war, and ending with “an appeal to “reason”.
“In this hour I feel it to be my duty before my own conscience to appeal once more to reason and common sense in Great Britain as much as elsewhere. I consider myself in a position to make this appeal, since I am not the vanquished, begging favors, but the victor speaking in the name of reason. I can see no reason why this war must go on. I am grieved to think of the sacrifices it will claim.
I should like to avert them. As for my own people, I know that millions of German men, young and old alike, are burning with the desire to settle accounts with the enemy who for the second time has declared war upon us for no reason whatever. But I also know that at home there are many women and mothers who, ready as they are to sacrifice all they have in life, yet are bound to it by their heartstrings.
Possibly Mr. Churchill again will brush aside this statement of mine by saying that it is merely born of fear and of doubt in our final victory. In that case I shall have relieved my conscience in regard to the things to come.”
1- Dropped over London // 2- British ‘Black propagandist’ Sefton Delmer (of Jewish heritage) keeps the war-fires burning by mocking Hitler’s peace leaflets. // 3- Ignorant British soldier shown laughing as he reads Hitler’s leaflets.
Over on the other side of the Atlantic, the Fake News in response to Hitler’s air-dropped appeals was just as bad. — (New York Daily News)
NOVEMBER 1940 The Vatican’s ‘Papal Nuncio’ (ambassador) presents Hitler’s peace proposal to British officials
This excerpt from ‘Himmler’s Secret War’ describes a meeting held in Spain between the Papal Nuncio and British officials Hoare and Hilgarth in Spain; and the latest peace offer from Hitler:
“The nature of the concessions that the German Fuhrer was prepared to make in order to obtain peace with Britain must have astounded the men at the head of SO1. This was not even a deal worked out through a process of hard negotiation. It was Hitler’s opening gambit….an offer so generous and pragmatic that it would be very tempting to anyone who genuinely wanted peace.
His (Hitler’s) offer of such remarkable concessions was an extremely threatening development. Should the terms become public, it had the potential to render British resolve to stand firm against German aggression to a shuttering halt.”
Neither the Pope’s prayers nor his emissaries could sway Mad Dog Churchill’s gang away from their warpath.
May 1941 The Amazing Peace Mission of Deputy Fuhrer Rudolf Hess
Deputy Fuhrer Rudolf Hess is Hitler’s “Right Hand Man” and long time friend. He is Germany’s 2nd in command, or perhaps 3rd (behind Air Marshall Goring). In May of 1941, at a time when Germany is winning the war, Hess (who is fluent in English) flies a solo mission over Scotland and parachutes in with an offer of peace.
Hess is attempting to link up with what he believes to be British anti-war patriots. His goal is to end the war and, according to Stalin (whose agents infested the UK hierarchy), to make a pact against the Soviets. Instead, he falls into Churchill’s hands; to be held in solitary confinement for the duration of the war.
After the war, Hess is sentenced to life in East Berlin’s Spandau Prison. With the liberalization of the USSR in the late 1980’s, there is talk of finally releasing him. But he is said to have committed “suicide” in his cell in 1987. Many believes that the 93-year-old Hess was murdered so that details of his peace mission would remain buried forever.
One couldn’t be any closer to Hitler than Rudolf Hess. Right: Old man Hess was imprisoned for nearly half a century. The public was to remain ignorant of his peace mission.
1940, 1941, 1942, 1943 Hitler maintains a standing generous peace offer on the table. Churchill, by his own admission, refuses to accept!
At all times, the Hitler-Hess offer of total cessation of the war in the West remains on the table. Germany offers to evacuate all of France except Alsace and Lorraine, which would remain German. It would evacuate Holland and Belgium. It would evacuate Norway and Denmark. In short, Hitler wants to withdraw from Western Europe, except for the two French provinces and Luxembourg (Luxembourg was never a French province, but an independent state of ethnically German origin), in return for which Great Britain would agree to an attitude of benevolent neutrality towards Germany.
In addition, Hitler is ready to withdraw from Yugoslavia and Greece. German troops would evacuate from the Mediterranean and Hitler would use his influence to arrange a settlement of the Mediterranean conflict between Britain and Italy. No country would be entitled to demand reparations from any other.
As Churchill leaves London to meet Roosevelt for a conference in Quebec late in the summer of 1943, a reporter asks if they were planning to offer peace terms to Germany. Churchill replied:
“Heavens, no. They would accept immediately.”
Again, in a 1944 letter to his ally, the mass-murdering Bolshevik Joe Stalin, Churchill reassures Stalin that Britain will remain at war with Germany. In so doing, Churchill confirms the undeniable reality of Hitler’s generous peace proposals:
“We never thought of peace, not even in that year when we were completely isolated and could have made peace without serious detriment to the British Empire, and extensively at your cost. Why should we think of it now, when victory approaches for the three of us?”
Churchill and FDR were very chummy with the great mass-murderer Joseph Stalin; who worried that German peace offers might be accepted by his Western Allies.
APRIL 1945 Berlin Bunker: Hitler’s Final Testament
On April 29, 1945, with the Red Army closing in, Hitler dictated the final public communication of his life, My Political Testament. Right up until the very end, when he had nothing to gain, Hitler wanted the world to know that he had never wanted war. Here’s a telling excerpt:
“More than thirty years have passed since 1914 when I made my modest contribution as a volunteer in the First World War, which was forced upon the Reich.
In these three decades love and loyalty to my people have guided all my thoughts, actions and my life. They gave me the strength to make the most difficult decisions ever to confront mortal man. In these three decades I have spent my strength and my health.
It is untrue that I or anyone else in Germany wanted war in 1939. It was wanted and provoked solely by international statesmen either of Jewish origin or working for Jewish interests. I have made too many offers for the limitation and control of armaments, which posterity will not be cowardly enough always to disregard, for responsibility for the outbreak of this war to be placed on me. Nor have I ever wished that, after the appalling First World War, there would ever be a second against either England or America.
Only three days before the outbreak of the German-Polish war I proposed a solution of the German-Polish problem to the British Ambassador in Berlin – international control as in the case of the Saar. This offer, too, cannot be lied away. It was only rejected because the ruling clique in England wanted war, partly for commercial reasons and partly because it was influenced by the propaganda put out by international Jewry.”
Hitler wasn’t lying — not in his Final Testament, not ever. The bloody war which either killed, maimed or traumatized scores of millions of innocent people, and has stunted the progress of western civilization ever since, did not have to happen. What a shame. What a damn shame.
1. Hitler enjoying the 1936 Berlin Olympics — Given what we have just learned about Hitler’s numerous attempts to first prevent, and to then stop the war – the claims of innocence made in his Final Testament do indeed ring true. // 2. The opinion presented in Hitler’s Testament is supported by the private diaries of famed British authors Harold Nicolson and Evelyn Waugh, who quote the 5th Duke of Wellington (Image 2) on the day war broke out as saying: “It’s all the fault of the anti-appeasers and the Jews.”
These are Just FACTS that History has decided to just ignore since it doesn’t go along with the ever ending rhetoric.
NY Times: Conspiracy Theorizing Goes Off the Rails BY PAUL KRUGMAN
Having just pounded this malevolent Marxist Mole back into the pits of Hell (over his vile Russia-bashing) only several days ago, I would generally not revisit the same Times scribbler for at least another few weeks. But this particular piece by Paulie Krugman about “conspiracy theories” is just too bad – and also too good – to pass up. Krugman’s crap is bad because it is deceitful. However, this item is also “good” because — for the astute among us — his pathological obsession with various “conspiracy theories” actually proves their veracity.
Krugman’s prolific propaganda production is like that arcade game of “Whack-a-Mole” — in which no matter how many times you pound the mechanical creature back into his hole, the little son-of-a-bitch — and also his rodent relatives — just keep popping up somewhere else.
Let’s pound this greasy bastard back into Satan’s cesspool once again.
THE GAME OF WHACK-A-MARXIST-MOLE (or rat) NEVER ENDS! Take that, Krugman, And Friedman, And Haberman, And Goldberg, And Brooks, And Sanger, And Meyer, And Landler.
2020: Perverted Paulie — in an obvious attempt to get out ahead of the story — tweeted out that Q-Anon people may have been responsible for downloading child pornography onto his computer. — Sure Paulie, sure.
Krugman: The right is on the attack, claiming that blame for the disaster in Ohio rests on the Biden administration, which it says doesn’t care about or is even actively hostile to white people. Analysis: Let’s put aside, for argument’s sake, our belief that this train drama was staged by the White Hats in order to shame Biden; and let us play along with the “accident” and “disaster” story-line instead. “Biden’s” refusal to visit rural Trump Country in Ohio — sending his little sodomite Secretary of Transportation Pete Buttplug(who looks different these days) instead — is indeed disrespectful and characteristic of the disdain which the “elites” and big city Jews have for White folks in “flyover country.”
Krugman: Right-wing commentators have just invented a whole new class of conspiracy theory* , one that doesn’t even try to explain how the alleged conspiracy * is supposed to work. Conspiracy theories* generally come in two forms: those that involve a small, powerful cabal and those that require that thousands of people collude to hide the truth. Analysis: We’re keeping count of how many times this clever bastard utilizes the trick of repetition in order to train his idiot readers. That’s 3 times he has dropped the term “conspiracy theory” or one of its elements.
Krugman: Historically, theories* about … Analysis: That’s 4 times.
Krugman: … powerful cabals have often been tied to antisemitism, to the belief that the Elders of Zion and/or the Rothschilds were shaping history …… Analysis: Amazing. After 125 years, the usual suspects STILL can’t stop talking about The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion. What does that tell ya? Hitlerexplained it like this:
“With groans and moans, the Frankfurter Zeitung (newspaper) repeats again and again that these are forgeries. This alone is evidence enough of their authenticity.“
Tell it, Tell it!
Krugman: …a view promoted by some actually powerful people, including Henry Ford. Analysis: That’s right. The great auto pioneer spent a fortune trying to warn Americans about the plot described in The Protocols. Only after an assassination-by-auto attempt upon his life did Ford back down and “apologize.”
Krugman: These days, however, the most prominent example is Q-Anon, with its claim that a secret ring of pedophiles controls the U.S. government. Analysis: Ya know, Paulie, might this anti-Q-Anon obsession of yours have something to do with that child porn which you claim was “planted” on your computer? To tweak and paraphrase what Hitler said about the Protocols:
“With groans and moans, Krugman repeats again and again that Q is a hoax. This alone is evidence enough of Q’s authenticity.”
Hitler & Ford both widely distributed copies of The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion.
More than 100 years ago, the “paper of record” used up a lot of ink to “debunk” The Protocols.
Krugman: The thing about secret-cabal theories* is that while they’re generally absurd, they’re hard to definitively disprove. Analysis: “secret-cabal theories” — That’s 5 times.
Krugman: Is President Biden actually a shape-shifting alien lizard? The White House physician will tell you no, but how do you know that he isn’t a lizard, too? Analysis: Straw Man Fallacy. Krugman wants to link the solid assertions about the Rothschilds and elite child rapists with belief in “alien lizards.” This smug, dishonest little rat bastard should make the skin of any decent man crawl!
Krugman: The other kind of conspiracy theory*….. Analysis: “conspiracy theory” — That’s 6 times.
Krugman: ….. by contrast, seems as if it would be easy to disprove, because thousands of people would have to be in on the plot,…. Analysis: When people in high places engineer a culture of common interest (the carrot) and fear (the stick) within their organizations and circles of influence; that will indeed unite “thousands of people” behind a big lie. That is basic social dynamics — not “conspiracy theory.”
Krugman: …. without a single one breaking ranks. Analysis: People actually “break ranks” and blow the whistle on conspiracies all the time. But because the good and the brave are relatively few, it is a simple enough matter for Fake News scum like Krugman to ignore them.
Krugman: A prime example, still highly influential on the right, is the assertion that climate change is a hoax. Analysis: Well, it is a hoax — one which MANY scientists have “broken ranks” on — (not that it takes a “scientist” to see through this scam).
Krugman: To believe that, you have to claim that thousands of scientists are colluding to falsify the evidence. Analysis: Wave enough grant money around on College Avenue and, soon enough, “thousands of scientists” will drop their trousers and bend over for their paymasters.
Krugman: But that hasn’t stopped the belief that climate change isn’t real from being widespread, maybe even dominant, on the U.S. political right. Analysis: Evidently, Paulie has no problem dismissing the “thousands of scientists” who do NOT believe in the Climate Con as “right wing” conspirators. When it suits his Marxist agenda, he and his ilk peddle the “conspiracy theory” of scientists “falsifying data” for “Big Oil.” What a dad-gum HYPOCRITE!
Krugman: The Big Lie about the “stolen” 2020 election would seem to fall into the same category, requiring malfeasance by election officials across the country. Analysis: Krugman has just confirmed for us that the 2020 Election was indeed stolen (though the White Hats allowed it to happen for their own reasons.) Does Krugman not believe in the election fraud “conspiracy theories” which his own newspaper reported about in past years?
Krugman: And there’s a new conspiracy theory in town: ………………….. Analysis: “conspiracy theory” — That’s 7 times.
Krugman: .. the claim that the war in Ukraine isn’t really happening, that it’s some kind of fake. Analysis: Krugman has just confirmed for us that the “war” (limited military operation) — though not totally fake — was actually won and East Ukraine liberated a long time ago. If anything is going on now, it’s just minor skirmishes and/or mopping up operations.
Krugman: But the conspiracy theorizing about the Ohio derailment …. Analysis: “conspiracy theorizing” — That’s 8 times.
Krugman: But they (Fox News) know their audience, and probably believe that it’s good business to propound racist conspiracy theories …. Analysis: “conspiracy theories” — That’s 9 times — plus the headline makes 10.
We’re getting to (((them))), boys and girls — and in the process, garnering lots of free publicity. So keep on “conspiracy theorizing.”
1. NOAA scientist & whistleblower John Bates “broke ranks” with fellow government scientists and revealed that temperature data was rigged in advance of the Paris Climate Accords. The Times ignored the story. // 2. Climate scientists for hire! // 3. The Times has run many stories on stolen elections of the past – including how LBJ stole his Senate seat in Texas, in 1948. But any talk of 2020 is “conspiracy theory.”
Times Caption: A patriotic mural in Moscow dedicated to victory in World War II. The Kremlin is tapping into Russian pride in the nation’s victory over the Nazis to demonize Ukraine. FEBRUARY 21, 2023
NY Times: One Year Into War, Putin Is Crafting the Russia He Craves
I have mixed feelings on what’s described in this article. The positive news from this whiny Times piece? The cancer of libtardation is being systematically eradicated in Russia as wartime anti-NATO patriotism continues to be stoked. The negative part? World War II mythology — specifically, the falsely stated cause of that history-shaping war and the absurdly inflated casualties of the Russians — is being used as a propaganda tool to whip up today’s patriotic “anti-Nazi” (anti-NATO) fervor. The big and virtually irrevocable lie about “Nazis” — a monstrous mendacity deeply drilled into the minds of Russian Normiedom for eight decades now — is serving the noble goals of nationalist revival and winning the propaganda war against the “Nazi” gangsters of NWO Ukraine.* From the article // The questionable means: “Schoolchildren learn in a new weekly class that the Russian military has always liberated humanity from “aggressors who seek world domination.” (oh barf!)“New museum exhibits put on by the state have titles like “NATOzism” — a play on “Nazism” that seeks to cast the Western military alliance as posing a threat as existential as the Nazis of World War II.”* From the article // The noble ends:
“Liberalism in Russia is dead forever, thank God,” Konstantin Malofeyev, an ultraconservative business tycoon, bragged in a phone interview on Saturday. “The longer this war lasts, the more Russian society is cleansing itself from liberalism and the Western poison.”
Like I said, mixed feelings.
Now, the Russians may not be able to realistically revise the mentally embedded useful mythology, but once again — for the benefit of those of “you guys” here’s the deal: The German invasion of the Soviet Union in 1941 was a 100% justifiable and necessary preemptive operation. Some background Information: With Germany preoccupied by its war with Great Britain (started by Britain):
Stalin violated the Soviet-Polish Non-Aggression Pact by invading Poland in 1939
Stalin violated the Soviet-Finnish Non-Aggression Pact by invading Finland in 1939
Stalin violated a provision of the Soviet-German Non-Aggression Pact (1939) by invading Lithuania in 1940
Stalin grabbed a piece of eastern Romania in 1940
Hitler knew that Stalin, in secret collaboration with the British, was planning to totally break the Soviet-German Non Aggression Pact by launching a massive surprise attack upon anti-Communist Germany. We’ll let Hitler explain, in his own truthful words:
“Already in 1940 it had become increasingly clear from month to month that the plans of the men in the Kremlin were aimed at the domination, and thus the destruction, of all of Europe. I have already told the nation of the build-up of Soviet military power in the East during a period when Germany had only a few divisions in the provinces bordering Soviet Russia. Only a blind person could fail to see that a military build-up of world-historical dimensions was being carried out. And this was not in order to protect something that was being threatened, but rather to attack that which seemed incapable of defense … I may say this today: If the wave of more than 20,000 tanks, hundreds of divisions, tens of thousands of artillery pieces, along with more than 10,000 airplanes, had not been kept from being set into motion against the Reich, Europe would have been lost. “Tell it, just Tell it!
But who will tell today’s Rooskies?
Millions of Soviet troops were quickly taken prisoner because they were packed along the front line, in OFFENSIVE positions. The Germans then advanced easily across undefended territory. There was so little defense behind the front lines because Stalin was planning an invasion of eastern Europe, NOT a defense of Russia. After the war, the prisoners shown above would be condemned to death in Stalin’s gulags. In Stalin’s mind, There were no prisoners of war, just traitors.
Ironically, the Russians of today and the Germans of the 1930’s-40’s are and were fighting the very same forces of Globalism — the “liberal New World Order” which Hitler referred to as “international hyenas” and Putin now calls “Satanic scum.” Another amazing similarity relates to the type of characters who fled Germany and the ones who are now leaving Russia.
* Hitler / 1933:
“The guilty ones are right here with us. They live among us and abuse day in and day out the hospitality granted to them by the German people.
In gratitude for that, while millions of our own people are without work and go to pieces, a clan of Jewish intellectuals, professors and businessmen agitate hate against us in the world.”
* Putin / 2022:
“The West will try to rely on the so-called fifth column, on national traitors, on those who earn money here with us but live there. And I mean ‘live there’ not even in the geographical sense of the word, but according to their thoughts, their slavish consciousness — I do not judge those with villas in Miami or the French Riviera or who can’t get by without oysters or foie gras or so-called ‘gender freedoms. The problem is they mentally exist there, and not here, with our people with Russia.
But the Russian people, will always be able to distinguish true patriots from scum and traitors, and simply spit them out like a gnat that accidentally flew into their mouths, spit them out on the pavement.”
By the way, the two leaders were both talking about the same people as the headlines below, from 2022, confirm.
Ironically, and in a good way, the Hitler – Putin comparisons are actually spot-on correct…. but WW2 mythology lives on in Russia nonetheless.
Not that any credence should be placed in the Holocaust , but imagine a museum exhibit in a major American city honoring Hitler. How soon would 1 million Jews and other assorted libtards and “anti-racists” converge upon the event and tear the building apart brick by brick?
Not that any credence should be placed in the official version of the Spanish Inquisition either, but imagine a museum exhibit in a major American city honoring King Ferdinand and Queen Isabella – the Monarchs who, in 1492, expelled the Jews from Spain. Same reaction as above.
Again, not that any credence should be placed in the official version of 9/11, but imagine a museum exhibit in a major American city honoring Osama Bin Laden and his merry band of box-cutter-wielding madmen.
Or how about an exhibit dedicated to the Crusades, Christopher Columbus, the Confederacy, the Ku Klux Klan, Joe Stalin, or Pol Pot? Unthinkable! Heck, even statues of George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Andrew Jackson and White Jesus are now deemed “controversial” in this day and age of “Black Lives Matter.”
These famous “anti-Semites” would never have been given a sympathetic museum exhibit in their honor.
But when it comes to the single greatest killer of White people the world has ever seen (pre-Bolshevik era), there are no such delicate sensibilities. Philadelphia’s Franklin Institute has no self-righteous moral compunction about sponsoring a traveling exhibit honoring – yes, honoring – Mr. Genghis Khan of Mongoldom. Directly or indirectly, the Mongols were responsible for an estimated 40,000,000 deaths. (many White folks – Aryans of Northern India, Persia, Middle East, Eastern Europe – but also many Chinese)
From the Institute’s own website:
Genghis Khan: Bringing the Legend to Life
“Uncover the amazing story of one of the world’s greatest leaders and most misunderstood conquerors, Genghis Khan. Learn how his empire forever changed the face of the world, and discover his legacy as both a ruthless warrior and a revered statesman.”
Now, let’s try that same promo for Hitler:
Adolf Hitler: Bringing the Legend to Life
“Uncover the amazing story of one of the world’s greatest leaders and most misunderstood conquerors, Adolf Hitler. Learn how his empire forever changed the face of the world, and discover his legacy as both a ruthless warrior and a revered statesman.”
Can you see the double standard here? What ever happened to all that tommy-rot about “never again” and “we must never forget?” Before we continue, a crash course on Genghis Khan and his immediate successors is in order here. As you read this excerpt, keep in mind that the people who suffered at the hands of Khan were real people – our Indo-European ancestors – whose DNA we still carry. Visualize, if you can, the unimaginable terror that these gentle people must have felt as the mounted Mongol beasts rode into their villages and cities – torching their homes, exterminating the men, children and elderly; while riding off with the prettiest fair maidens.
An Excerpt from Genghis Monster Quoting Volume 7 of “A Glorious Disaster: The Christians: Their First 2000 Years” (Abridged, edited and illustrated by M S King) ************ In England, the herring business had all but collapsed when buyers from the Baltic just never showed up. Why? It seemed that there suddenly were fewer people left in the Slavic lands to buy the catch — wiped out, some reported, by hideous horsemen appearing like a whirlwind from the east.
People with dogs’ heads? Well, maybe not that, but they certainly behaved like wild dogs. They usually left nothing alive, and in any case the stench of corpses made whole cities uninhabitable. Resistance seemed useless. The princes of the Slavic people, then known as the Rus (Russians), reportedly had assembled the greatest army in their history, but in a single battle these hard-riding devils wiped it out.
Kill – Rape – Plunder – Enslave
Beyond them and beyond the lands east of Persia, they left the storied cities of Samarkand and Bukhara in charred ruin. According to the works of the Iranian historian Rashid al-Din the Mongols killed more than 700,000 people in Merv and 1,000,000 in Nishapur. No one knew where they might strike next, and they claimed that their destiny was to rule the whole world.
In conquering Asia, the Mongols murdered untold millions–a catastrophe of a magnitude never before experienced. These disasters are attributable to the evil genius of a single man, the tyrant Genghis Khan, who rejoiced in slaughter and commanded the killing of innocent men, women, and children as his mounted minions raped, pillaged, and plundered wherever they went. For centuries Genghis Khan would stand infamous as history’s most ruthless practitioner of genocide.
These Mongols were Asiatic, not Caucasian. They were also, as those in their path were about to discover to their grief, the world’s finest cavalry soldiers and by far the most brutal. By age twenty-eight, through an alliance with neighboring Turks, Khan had subjugated all the Mongol tribes. Then he turned on his Turkish allies, killed their leader, and subjugated them, too. He built loyalty through rewards of slaves and booty, plus endless promise of new horizons. In 1206 he declared himself supreme Khan (King).
Genghis ruled by imposing heavy tax revenues, troops on demand, and utter obedience to his laws. He once declared that “the greatest pleasure is to vanquish your enemies and chase them before you, to rob them of their wealth and to see those dear to them bathed in tears, to ride their horses, and clasp to your bosom their wives and daughters.”
Slaughter the priests and nuns — Kill the husbands and fathers — Then steal the White women. What a great guy, eh!
In one battle against Muslims, Khan’s hordes descended on a city and hacked to pieces every man, woman, and child there. All except the governor, that is. He died in slow agony as molten silver was dripped into his eyes and ears. Mongol armies then converged on the great trading city of Samarkand. After Genghis’s horsemen annihilated 50,000 foot soldiers. The defending cavalrymen tried to switch sides, which left the city undefended. The citizens surrendered, and the Mongols took 100,000 of them as slaves. They then executed 30,000 prisoners.
Meanwhile, there was more horrifying news. Bukhara, 100 miles northwest, had fallen to a Mongol army commanded by Genghis himself. He had surprised the city, hacked its fleeing garrison to pieces, and burned the place to the ground. Genghis then headed west, burning crops, razing cities, and slaughtering every human he encountered. He then dispatched 20,000 men on a mission to scout the rich lands to the west beyond the Caspian Sea. When confronted by a large force of Georgians, the Mongols fled with the Georgians pursuing them until their horses were exhausted – at which point the Mongols returned, mounted on the fresh steeds they had waiting for them, and massacred the entire Georgian army.
Riding out of the Caucasus, the Mongols tore a path westward. By 1222, their scouting army reached Hungary. They then lured an 80,000 strong Slavic force into a 250-mile chase. Then, at the river Kalka, the invaders suddenly turned, confronted the Slavs, and annihilated them. Slavic contingents coming up from behind were wiped out by Mongol archers hidden in clouds of dark smoke, making the battleground a black nightmare of slaughter.
By the time the prince of Kiev arrived with his army, half the original force of 80,000 lay dead. The horrified Kievans turned to flee but were butchered in their entirety. The prince was suffocated to death beneath the table on which the triumphant Mongols ate their victory banquet.
Mongols had no honor when it came to prisoners-of-war.
To Europeans, it did indeed seem that these heathen warriors would enslave every nation. Who could stop them? At the heart of their capability were the tribesmen themselves, toughened and disciplined from birth. They could ride for days without food or water. If necessary, they drank blood drawn from their horses’ leg veins.
The Mongols could outrace any foe. Their favorite tactic was to feign withdrawal, drawing the enemy past hidden flanks, then crush him from front and back. They created smoke and floods and by 1300 were using gunpowder cannons, incendiary grenades, and flaming bamboo rockets. All this was now directed toward the slaughter, enslavement, and subjugation of Europe.
In 1236 Genghis’s grandson Batu, with an army 120,000 strong, set about finishing off the northernmost Islamic state, the Bulgar kingdom. In the summer of 1237 he overwhelmed the Bulgarian capital, Bulgar, exterminating its entire population of 50,000 and razing the place so completely that it was never rebuilt.
The once-powerful state of Kiev, where more than 200 years ago Prince Vladimir had introduced Christianity, had disintegrated into quarreling provinces. The northern trading center of Novgorod had declared independence and was growing rich. Princes fought perpetually with each other over succession and against the free citizens in the emerging cities.
Ryazan became the Mongols’ first target. Driving an outpost garrison back into the city, the invaders spent a week erecting a wooden palisade all around it to protect their archers and catapults. A three-day barrage of arrows and rocks followed, after which the attackers burst in with battering rams and began their slaughter.
Civilians were hacked to pieces with swords, pierced with arrows, flayed alive, impaled, drowned, or burned alive. The Mongols raped girls before murdering them and defiled nuns in churches while priests were forced to watch, and then were thrown into the fires. They torched the city but did allow a few people to run away and tell the rest of the Slavs what awaited them.
Kill – Rape – Plunder – Enslave Gentle Medieval White folks who looked like the ones depicted above were exterminated, raped or enslaved by the MILLIONS!
As the Mongols burned a bloody path northward, the Grand Duke of Suzdal traveled the country gathering armies to defend his capital of Vladimir. The Mongols destroyed his city before he got home, then confronted his army by the river Sit, surrounded it, and annihilated it.
Now short of supplies, the invaders summered on the grassy plains west of the Don, where they received fresh herds of horses from Mongolia. Through the following winter, they annihilated or enslaved nomadic peoples as far south as the Crimea.
In autumn 1239 they went north and destroyed Chernigov. Then, they spent the winter on the Kipchak steppes but used the time to reconnoiter Kiev, still the largest and most magnificent city in all the Slavic territories.
In December 1240 they struck. Their army battered down the walls, then sliced its way through defenders atop the rubble. The carnage was merciless, and in a horrific conclusion, the weight of people crowding inside the cathedral collapsed its walls. All that remained of the once-splendid metropolis was a hideous pile of writhing and crushed humanity; six years later travelers found Kiev’s streets still filled with skulls and other bones. The Rus were close to being vanquished in a stroke.
The siege and slaughter of Russian Kiev
About this time, the Mongols made common cause with the Jews of Khazaria. Centuries earlier – before the Christian Rus warriors finally put the converted Khazar Hun Empire “out of business” – the Khazar Jews had conquered Hungary and Poland. (here) Israeli scholar Sophia Menache’s 2008 paper, entitled: Tartars, Jews, Saracens and the Jewish-Mongol ‘Plot’ of 1241. (here) explores this relationship.
The Jewish Khazar Empire was a Turko-Hun entity; and Turkics are the “cousins” of Mongols. Old Khazaria was indeed referred to as a “Khanate” (political entity ruled by a “Khan”). This is why derivatives of the word “Khan” (King) is a common Jewish surname – Kagan, Kaganovich etc. That dispersed Khazars and Mongols would vindictively cooperate in exterminating and enslaving the White Christians of Slavic-Rus Europe is not surprising.
Supreme Court Justice Kagan – Stalin’s ‘right hand man” Kaganovich – Putin-hater Vicky “Fuck the EU” Nuland & warmonger husband Robert Kagan.
RETURN TO EXCERPT
The Mongol army, like a hurricane gathering momentum, had grown bigger because of thousands of conscripts – (*surely including many Khazar Jews). Batu assigned 30,000 troops to hold the Rus while he led another 100,000 across an astounding 600-mile front. His target was Hungary, ruled by King Bela IV from Buda.
Neighboring rulers ignored Bela’s plight. Only after Batu annihilated Carpathian defenders did Hungary assemble an army. Bearing down on them through the mountain snows at an amazing 60 miles per day, the Mongols arrived at Vac, slaughtered everyone there, and set up camp.
Nevertheless, Bela’s remaining army of 100,000 was still the largest in Europe, and when Batu failed to attack immediately, Bela grew confident. Then, Mongol reinforcements arrived from the south and he watched in amazement as the invading army began a slow departure. They were giving up, thought the king; they must be afraid or in trouble. And so, disastrously, he chased them.
At Mohi, about eighty miles east of Pest, the Mongols sprang their trap. Surrounding the Hungarians, they unleashed a barrage of firebombs and arrows. When a gap finally appeared in the encircling horde and the Hungarians raced through it to escape, they found themselves trapped in a gorge where archers annihilated 60,000 of them.
By then all Europe had been further frightened by news of more mayhem to the north, where the northern wing of the Mongol army had destroyed the Polish cities of Lublin and Zawichost, sacked Sandomierz, and plundered a monastery.
In Krakow and Wroclaw terrified residents actually burned their own cities and fled. Finally, at Legnica the rampaging horsemen had met an army of 25,000 that included Templars, Teutonic Knights, the entire Polish aristocracy, and the full flower of northern chivalry. But even this assemblage was obliterated in short order.
Waves of panic now rippled all the way to the Atlantic. In cathedrals people prayed, “From the fury of the Tatars, O Lord, deliver us.” The pope called for a crusade against the Mongols in Germany. Bela, in exile, sent money to build forts on the west side of the Danube.
Months went by with no move from Batu. Then, on Christmas Day 1241, the Mongols exploded with fury against Buda and against Gran , 30 miles northwest. There they roasted citizens alive to make them reveal the locations of hidden treasure, before riding toward Vienna, about seventy miles away. The invasion of Austria had begun. Mongol troops were spotted as far away as Zagreb, east of the Adriatic. Panic also spread in Italy when some were spotted near Venice.
All Europe lay helpless before them. (By the way, In the far east, in centuries to come, the Mongols will inflict similar horror, genocide and cultural destruction upon Aryan India.) It would require the combined might of every army in Christendom to stop these horsemen, but such a unified force simply did not exist. Then, amazingly, the Mongols vanished.
What the Europeans did not know was that Ogedei Khan (son of Genghis) had died of a sudden convulsion. His death had saved Europe, because Batu had to go to Karakorum, where the succession would be contested. However, the dread fear remained, of course; these ghastly marauders would surely return, spelling the doom of Christendom.
The death of Ogedei saved western Europe and caused internal dissension among the Mongols.
There were some who took a different view of the Mongols, regarding them not as vanquishers of Christendom but as an instrument by which Christianity could actually overcome Islamic invasion. When Innocent IV became pope in 1243, his chief question about the Mongols was, could they be converted and used to fight the Muslims? Seeking answers, in 1245 he dispatched to them a diplomatic embassy led by a Franciscan monk called John of Plano Carpini. After a historic three-year adventure, his small party returned as heroes, the first Europeans to have visited the Far East. Unfortunately, the message he brought from Genghis Khan was a humiliating rebuff. Christendom had just two choices, the Mongols declared: submit or perish.
If the Mongols had had the chance, they would have destroyed Rome and Florence as they devastated Kiev and Baghdad, and there could never have been a Renaissance based on Christian culture.
The terror-filled population of Western Europe dreaded the final Mongol push – which, thankfully, never came. What would the world have been like if the Mongols had completed the dream of Genghis Khan?)
By 1256 Hulagu had assembled a force of 100,000. His first objective was to destroy the independent sect called the Assassins in their mountain fortresses near the Caspian Sea . More than 100 Assassin castles crumbled over the next year, pounded by a thousand crews of Chinese catapult bombers. Every inhabitant, including women and children, was slaughtered.
The Mongols rolled toward Baghdad, on the Tigris River, and drowned defending soldiers by the 1000’s by breaking a dike. Bursting through Baghdad’s walls, they unleashed one of the bloodiest single-city massacres in human history. It began after remaining troops voluntarily disarmed, expecting to be conscripted, but instead were marched out of the city and butchered. Then, the Mongols killed 500,000 surrendering civilians.
The Mongols burned Baghdad, then had the Caliph sewn up in a carpet and trampled to death by horses. Muslim historians put the total killed as high as 2,000,000.
In Russia, Alexander Nevsky was the first prince to become the Mongols’ servant. He knew that his people were too weak to expel the Mongols. Thus, he gave them the chance to survive by gaining the confidence of their overlords. About the mid-14th century the Russians would finally shake off the “Tatar-Mongol yoke.”
– Prince Alexander Nevsky bought time for Russia – paying the Mongols their taxes as Russia patiently waited for the Mongols to weaken internally. 2- The vast Mongol crime-Empire eventually shrank all the way back to what is modern day Mongolia.
“Ingsoc. The sacred principles of ingsoc. Newspeak, double-speak, the mutability of the past.” – George Orwell, 1984
I was greeted by an editorial from The New York Times’ Editorial Board, “A Brutal New Phase of the War in Ukraine.” It is a piece of propaganda so obvious that only those desperate to believe blatant lies would not fall down laughing. Yet it is no laughing matter, for The NY Times is advocating for a wider war, more lethal weapons for Ukraine, and escalation of the fighting that risks nuclear war. So their title is apt because they are promoting the brutality. This pissed me off.
The Times’ Editorial Board tells us that President Putin, like “Hitler”, is mad.
“Like the last European war, this one is mostly one man’s madness.” Russia and Putin are “cruel”; are conducting a “regular horror” with missile strikes against civilian targets; are “desperate”; are pursuing Putin’s “delusions”; are waging a “terrible and useless war”; are “committing atrocities”; are responsible for “murder, rape and pillaging,” etc.
On the other hand, “a heroic Ukraine” “has won repeated and decisive victories against Russian forces” (Bullshit) who have lost “well over 100,000 Russian soldiers killed and wounded,” according to the “reliable” source, chairman of the U.S. Joint Chief of Staff, Gen. Mark A. Milley (Asshole). To add to this rosy report, the Ukrainians seem to have suffered no causalities since none are mentioned by the cozy Times’ Editorial Board members from their keyboards on Eighth Avenue. When you support a U.S. war, as has always been TheTimes’ modus operandi as a stenographer for the government, mentioning the dead pawns used to accomplish the imperialists’ dreams is bad manners. So are the atrocities committed by those forces, so they too have been omitted. Neo-Nazis, the Azov Battalion? They too must never have existed since they are not mentioned.
But then, according to the esteemed editorial writers, this is not a U.S. proxy war waged via Ukraine by U.S./NATO “to strip Russia of its destiny and greatness.” No, it is simply Russian aggression, supported by “the Kremlin’s propaganda machinery” that has churned “out false narratives about a heroic Russian struggle against forces of fascism and debauchery.” U.S./NATO were “horrified by the crude violation of the postwar order,” so we are laughingly told, and so came to Ukraine’s defense as “Mr. Putin’s response has been to throw ever more lives, resources and cruelty at Ukraine.”
Nowhere in this diatribe by the Times’ Board of propagandists – and here the whole game is given away for anyone with a bit of an historical sense – is there any mention of the U.S. engineered coup d’état in Ukraine in 2014. It just didn’t happen. Never happened. Magic by omission. The U.S., together with the Ukrainian government “led” by the puppet-actor “President Volodymyr Zelensky,” are completely innocence parties, according to the Times.(Note also, that nowhere in this four page diatribe is President Putin addressed by his title, as if to say that “Mr. Putin” is illegitimate and Zelensky is the real thing.)
All the problems stem from when “Mr. Putin seized Crimea and stirred up a secessionist conflict in eastern Ukraine n 2014.”
Nowhere is it mentioned that for years on end:
that U.S./NATO has been moving troops and weapons right up to Russia’s borders,
that George W. Bush pulled the U.S. out of the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty and that
Trump did the same with the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty,
that the U.S. has set up so-called anti-ballistic missile sites in Poland and Rumania and asserted its right to a nuclear first-strike,
that more and more countries have been added to NATO’s eastern expansion despite promises to Russia to the contrary,
that 15,000 plus mostly Russian-speaking people in eastern Ukraine have been killed by Ukrainian forces for years before February 2022,
that the Minsk agreements were part of a scheme to give time for the arming of Ukraine, that the U.S. has rejected all calls from Russia to respect its borders and its integrity, that the U.S./NATO has surrounded Russia with military bases,
that there was a vote in Crimea after the coup,
that the U.S. has been for years waging economic war on Russia via sanctions, etc.
In short, all of the reasons that Russia felt that it was under attack for decades and that the U.S. was stone deaf to its appeals to negotiate these threats to its existence.
It doesn’t take a genius to realize that if all were reversed and Russia had put troops and weapons in Mexico and Canada that the United States would respond forcefully.
This editorial is propaganda by omission and strident stupidity by commission.
The editorial has all its facts “wrong,” and not by accident. The paper may say that its opinion journalists’ claims are separate from those of its newsroom, yet their claims echo the daily barrage of falsehoods from its front pages, such as:
Ukraine is winning on the battlefield. (lol)
“Russia faces decades of economic stagnation and regression even if the war ends soon.” (lol)
That on Jan.14, as part of its cruel attacks on civilian targets, a Russian missile struck an apartment building in Dnipro, killing many.
Only one man can stop this war – Vladimir Putin – because he started it.
Until now, the U.S. and its allies were reluctant to deploy heavy weapons to Ukraine “for fear of escalating this conflict into an all-in East-West war.”
Russia is desperate as Putin pursues “his delusions.”
Putin is “isolated from anyone who would dare to speak truth to his power.”
Putin began trying to change Ukraine’s borders by force in 2014.
During the last 11 months Ukraine has won repeated and decisive victories against Russian forces …. The war is at a stalemate.” (lol)
The Russian people are being subjected to the Kremlin’s propaganda machinery “churning out false narratives.”
This is expert opinion for dummies. A vast tapestry of lies, as Harold Pinter said in his Nobel Prize address. The war escalation the editorial writers are promoting is in their words, “this time pitting Western arms against a desperate Russia,” as if the U.S./NATO does not have CIA and special forces in Ukraine, just weapons, and as if “this time” means it wasn’t so for the past nine years at least as the U.S. was building Ukraine’s military and arms for this very fight.
It is a fight they will lose in the days to come. Russia was, is, and will triumph.
Everything in the editorial is disingenuous. Simple propaganda: the good guys against the bad guys. Putin another Hitler. The good guys are winning, just as they did in Vietnam, until reality dawned and it had to be admitted they weren’t (and didn’t). History is repeating itself.
We are being subjected to a vast tapestry of lies told by the corporate media for their bosses, as the U.S. continues its doomed efforts to control the world. It is not Russia that is desperate now, but propagandists such as the writers of this strident and stupid editorial. It is not the Russian people who need to wake up, as they claim, but the American people and those who still cling to the myth that The NY Times Corporation is an organ of truth. It is the Ministry of Truth with its newspeak, double-speak, and its efforts to change the past.
The crimes of the United States have been systematic, constant, vicious, remorseless, but very few people have actually talked about them. You have to hand it to America. It has exercised a quite clinical manipulation of power worldwide while masquerading as a force for universal good. It’s a brilliant, even witty, highly successful act of hypnosis.
NY Times:Maya Ruiz-Picasso, Artist’s Daughter and Inspiration, Dies at 87
As a girl she brought out a childlike quality in Picasso. As an adult she became an authority on his works.
The crazy “illegitimate” daughter of the crazy communist “artist” Pablo Picasso (who was married to another woman when he fathered her) has passed away. The death of Maya Ruiz-Picasso offers us a good “teachable moment” to review what a crazy charlatan and degenerate fake her artificially puffed-up “legendary” father really was. By the way, the derogatory description of him as “crazy” is supported by a quote from the deceased Ms. Picasso herself (whose mother committed suicide in 1977).
From the article:
‘With two crazy parents, it’s amazing I came out normal.”
Hmmm. Are you sure that you “came out normal,” Ms. Picasso? There was, after all, that friendly biographer of your fraudulent father who speculated that you and daddy had an incestuous thing going on (here) — as is indeed further suggested by some of his own paintings and odd fixation with painting so many shitty portraits of you. Maya’s fascination with her father’s garbage tells us a bit about her mental state as well.
1. Picasso Portrait of young Maya with doll. // 2. Maya stands before a painting of an old bald man admiring a young nude woman. Could it be a self-portrait of the degenerate communist Picasso with his grown up daughter? (He painted her up until she was 18) — Yeah — I think so. // 3. Friendly biographer John Richardson with Picasso. Richardson believed that Pablo and Maya were “lovers” —- sick!
Each one worth a fortune! Picasso: “Give me a museum and I’ll fill it.” (Not hard to do when you’re churning out trash like this!)
How the heck did a degenerate weirdo like Picasso achieve such an astonishing level of “international acclaim” ™ — still lasting nearly 50 years after his death? What powerful hand boosted this charlatan and his UGLY “artworks?”
Well, he was a Communist — later self-exiled from Franco’s Spain. That’s always a career booster in the “art world.” But going back further and climbing even higher up the ladder leading to immortality, we learn that a very young (in his early 20’s) and unknown Picasso, had, by 1905, become a favorite of “American” art collectors Leo & Gertrude Stein. Their older brother, Michael Stein also became a collector of his crap on canvas. Ghoulish Gerty — since relocated in France — became Picasso’s main patron. She acquired his drawings and paintings and exhibited them in her home salon for the retarded “in crowd” of Paris to discover and dutifully marvel at like so many “goy” dopes and dupes on a Yiddish string. And the rest, as the French say, is histoire.
Under. Every. Rock — Every. Single. Time. … Ah, show us the shekels, Pablo. Show us the shekels.
THE ANOINTED ARBITERS OF “ART”
1. Gertrude & Leo Stein manufactured and marketed Pablo Picasso Inc. –OUT OF NOTHING. // 2. Gruesome Gertrude was a lesbian. // 3. Picasso’s uncharacteristically realistic cartoon portrait of Boss Lady actually looks better than the real thing.
The hidden agenda behind this 100 + year-old movement (proudly referred to as “anti-art” by its early Marxist practitioners (here) to replace the good stuff with neurotic garbage benefits the Globalists. You see, “Modern Art” distorts and perverts the appreciation and understanding of the good, the true and the beautiful. Convince the idiotic “intelligentsia” in any given society that up is down, black is white, crap is gold, men can be women, etc — and soon you can sell these “educated” chumps anything. From there, the madness will eventually flow downhill to the mimicking masses.
The essence of “modernism” is to suppress one’s God-given instincts, and then choose to believe in nothing, unless the “powers that be” instruct and authorize you to believe in something, that is. In the final analysis, a people that can no longer distinguish truth and beauty from falsehood and ugliness, is a people that is ripe for all manner of mental & moral degradation, political deception, oppression and enslavement. And that is why Modern Art is the art-of-choice for the cultural vandals behind the New World Order — and it is also why Hitler— a talented painter himself (see examples below) — protected his people from this massive financial and psychological con-game that is still being played today. He declared:
“Works of art that cannot be understood but need a swollen set of instructions to prove their right to exist and find their way to neurotics who are receptive to such stupid or insolent nonsense will no longer openly reach the German nation.”
1941: Globalist agents FDR and Churchill want desperately to drag the United States into World War II. This becomes all the more urgent after Hitler had launched “Operation Barbarossa” in June of the same year — a justified preemptive invasion of the Soviet Union which now threatens to overthrow Stalin and his evil Bolshevik regime in Moscow.
Knowing that American entry into the war would endanger Germany’s war efforts, Hitler ignores repeated U.S. provocations of Germany. To further discourage U.S. entry into the war, Germany, Italy, and Japan sign on to a mutual defense pact in September of 1940- The TriPartite Pact. War against one means war with all three.
Ironically, the TriPartite Pact will have the unintended effect of facilitating FDR’s treasonous scheme to embroil the U.S. into the conflict. As a “backdoor” to the European conflict (which Germany was winning) FDR and Churchill intensify their instigation of Japan. When the aggressive moves become too much for Japan to bear (oil embargo, closure of Panama Canal to Japanese shipping, U.S. battleships cruising through Japanese waters, direct assistance to the Chinese aggressors etc.) Japan decides the make its first direct move against the U.S. aggressor — by attacking Pearl Harbor (the U.S. naval base in the territory of Hawaii) on December 7, 1941 ….exactly as FDR had intended! As a result of the attack, the powerful pro-peace movement in America is silenced in an instant.
In the ensuing days, war declarations between the TriPartite allies and the US/UK alliance were exchanged.
1. Hitler and Goering meet with Japanese foreign minister. // 2. Japanese poster celebrates the DEFENSIVE TriPartite Pact.
With his famous theatrical flair, the diabolical FDR, acting “surprised”, delivers his somber “Day of Infamy” speech to a confused and angry nation.
Exactly as FDR and the gang of Communists, Globalists, and Jews surrounding him had intended, the attack immediately put the pro-peace Charles Lindbergh, the “America First Movement” and the “Mothers Movement” out of business. Hence forward, the millions of patriotic Americans who had urged peace prior to Pearl Harbor would be ridiculed by Fake News and Fake Historians as “isolationists.”
1. Gullible young volunteers crowd military recruitment centers across America – 450,000 of these poor fools are destined to die in a war for International Jewry’s New World Order. // 2. The Five “Fighting Sullivan Brothers” volunteered after Pearl Harbor. They ALL died when the USS Juneau was sunk in November, 1942 — murdered by FDR.
But Japan tells a different story than the one spun by FDR and the Fake News — a story which (surprisingly) was printed once on page 2 of The New York Times on December 8, 1941, and has since disappeared into the black memory hole of forbidden history. Thanks to those of you who continue to support our monthly subscription fee for The New York Times Archives, The Real History Channel is pleased to bring you the actual text of Emperor Hirohito’s War Declaration — a message which rings far truer than the lies of FDR and company.
TEXT OF HIROHITO’S WAR DECLARATION
By the grace of heaven, Emperor of Japan, seated on the throne occupied by the same dynasty from time immemorial, enjoin upon ye, our loyal and brave subjects:
We hereby declare war upon the United States of America and the British Empire. The men and officers of our Army and Navy shall do their utmost in prosecuting the war. Our public servants of various departments shall perform faithfully and diligently their respective duties; the entire nation with a united will shall mobilize their total strength so that nothing will miscarry in the attainment of our war aims.
To ensure the stability of East Asia, and to contribute to world peace is the farsighted policy which was formulated by our great illustrious Imperial Grandsire and our Great Imperial Sire succeeding him and which we lay constantly to heart. To cultivate friendship among nations and to enjoy prosperity in common with all nations, has always been the guiding principle of our Empire’s foreign policy. It has truly been unavoidable and far from our wishes that our Empire has been brought to cross swords with America and Britain. More than four years have passed since China, failing to comprehend the true intentions of our Empire, and recklessly courting trouble, disturbed the peace of East Asia and compelled our Empire to take up arms. Although there has been reestablished the National Government of China, with which Japan had effected neighborly intercourse and cooperation, the regime which has survived in Chungking, relying upon American and British protection, still continues its fratricidal opposition.
Eager for the realization of their inordinate ambition to dominate the Orient, both America and Britain, giving support to the Chungking regime, have aggravated the disturbances in East Asia. Moreover these two powers, inducing other countries to follow suit, increased military preparations on all sides of our Empire to challenge us. They have obstructed by every means our peaceful commerce and finally resorted to a direct severance of economic relations, menacing greatly the existence of our Empire.
Patiently have we waited and long have we endured, in the hope that our Government might retrieve the situation in peace. But our adversaries, showing not the least spirit of conciliation, have unduly delayed a settlement; and in the meantime they have intensified the economic and political pressure to compel our Empire to submission. This trend of affairs, would, if left unchecked, not only nullify our Empire’s efforts of many years for the sake of the stabilization of East Asia, but also endanger the very existence of our nation. The situation being such as it is, our Empire, for its existence and self defense has no other recourse but to appeal to arms and to crush every obstacle in its path.
The hallowed spirits of our Imperial Ancestors, guarding us from above, we rely upon the loyalty and courage of our subjects in the confident expectation that the task bequeathed by our forefathers will be carried forward, and that the sources of evil will be speedily eradicated, and an enduring peace be established in East Asia, preserving thereby the glory of our Empire.”
December 8, 1941
“We face the delicate question of the diplomatic fencing to be done so as to be sure Japan is put into the wrong and makes the first bad move. … The question was how we should maneuver them into the position of firing the first shot.”
“When the news first came that Japan had attacked us my first feeling was of relief that … a crisis had come in a way which would unite all our people. This continued to be my dominant feeling in spite of the news of catastrophes which quickly developed.”
The celebrity “rapper” (rolling eyes) Kanye West — who now calls himself “Ye” — or his thick-bearded replacement, that is (he neither sounds nor looks like Kanye West) — is now being used as the black-faced tip of the spear to introduce the idea of hidden Jewish Power to the broader masses of Normiedom. Yes — he looks, acts and talks like a deranged nutter; but red pills are still red pills. And it is precisely that perceived crazy-like-a-fox “insanity” — combined with West’s protective pigmentation — that gives him and his growing numbers of defenders / “apologists” (including Trump) a plausible escape card — “Oh that’s just Kanye being Kanye. Sure, he’s always been troubled and eccentric, but he’s not a bad guy.”
The red pills which West’s intensifying bombing runs are dropping down upon the citizens of Normiedom — exponentially amplified by the outraged Judenpresse — are getting an important message out. Specifically this: the “usual suspects” hold an unusual amount of power. You can be sure that growing numbers of normies — especially fans of “rap” both Black & White as well as many of our lesser brethren on the not-so-far-right — are now, within the confined solitude of their own minds, saying to themselves: “Yes, Kanye may be bat-shit crazy … but the Jews sure are powerful.”(as they nervously look over their shoulder while, for the first time, daring to go online to read stuff or watch videos that they “shouldn’t” be).
(Image 1 is a known photo of West) — Thick-bearded “Ye” looks different and speaks differently than “Kanye” (I have good ears for this stuff). Was the mask used to cover up the fact that this particular imposter doesn’t look like the original? Might the Black Hats have killed the real Kanye? Reasonable speculation, given the secret war that is raging — and that mask!
Red Pills are red pills. It doesn’t matter who is dropping them over Normiedom or if they all explode right away. It’s the repetition of the “bombings” and the planting of seeds that’s most important. West’s antics are invaluable in this respect.
Kanye / Ye’s 2-hour interview on the Alex Jones / Info Wars show — which also featured Kanye’s “friend,” the erudite and very well-spoken, “Holocaust denying” America First “zoomer” (age 24)Nick Fuentes — absolutely “broke the Internet” as they say, and spilled over “bigly” into the polluted waters of the huffing & puffing “mainstream media.” Jones played the part of the “straight man” perfectly as the masked “madman” and Fuentes covered everything from Jesus Christ to Hitler admiration (West praised Hitler’s autobahn highway system, fashion sense and artistic ability) to child sex abuse to the Clinton murder machine to the hidden Jewish power in America to irreverent mockery of Bibi Netanyahu to denying the “6 million Jews” story to the planned extinction of Whites to world government to Israeli involvement in the killings of JFK & RFK in the 1960’s. Heck! Homeboy sounded like yours truly here!
Overall, it was a lovefest. Jones did briefly express some obligatory disagreement on a few points, but in a totally non-confrontational manner. He even conceded: “I don’t agree with the whole Jewish thing, but there is a Jewish Mafia.”
Far more effective than the show itself — which was originally confined only to one part of the “far right” echo chamber — was the Piranha Press’s overreaction to it. Had they simply ignored it and not given it “legs,” only our crowd would ever have heard about this “tempest in a teapot.” But whenever the name of “Hitler” is dropped, “these people” simply cannot help themselves. The wall-to-wall shrieking and oy vying — also partially motivated by a desire to tie Trump to this (won’t happen) — amounts to a free publicity for these ideas that we could never have achieved by ourselves. Clearly, the Judo tactic of turning the adversary’s own weight and strength against him is being utilized here.
Elon Musk (or rather, his White Hat stand-in?) played his part in adding to the free publicity effect by “banning” West from Twitter over a perceived “anti-Semitic” post later that same day. This (surely by design) generated still more publicity for “The Jewish Question.” What most of the people praising or condemning “Musk” for his action failed to notice is that the “ban” was actually listed as a suspension — a sanction which, in the past, has sometimes been permanent — but we shall see what happens now that “Musk” is in charge.
What’s next for “2024 presidential candidate” Kanye or “Kanye / “Ye”? It is clear that he is a man on a mission following orders; so we’ll be watching. It sure is fun to watch the panicked reaction which West (and Fuentes) have kicked off (with the help of Alex Jones). How delightful it would be if “Ye” — who actually did come out as a “holocaust denier” on the show starts to really focus on the Holohoax!
*Editor’s Note: Kanye’s Exact Quote: “Hitler didn’t kill 6 million Jews. That is factually incorrect.”
Jones could not have been any nicer to the masked “Ye” West & the leader of the young “Groypers,” Nick Fuentes.
1. The “respectable” Tucker Carlson promoted “Ye.” // 2. The respectable “Elon Musk” promoted Ye.
Musk — who recently posted an image of “Pepe” the antisemitic frog on his own Twitter account — has just given West tons of free publicity with what is only a “suspension,” not a permanent ban. The ensuing Musk-West “split” seems like a publicity stunt which calls even more attention to the fact that we are not allowed to offend a certain powerful group.
There is a remarkable similarity between the “Czech Crisis” of 1938-39 and the “Ukrainian Crisis” of 2022. In both cases, a peace-seeking but strong national leader — relentlessly pushed and viciously slandered by the Globalists and their vile henchmen in the Piranha Press — was forced to make a move upon a Globalist-occupied neighboring state which was abusing his countrymen there and being used as a staging ground to menace the Homeland itself.
In both cases, these leaders, for years, tried in vain to resolve an unjust situation diplomatically; but were repeatedly lied to and threatened by the Globalist-owned “free world” states to the West.
In both cases, these leaders, backed by a show of military resolve, finally deactivated a world war triggering point and set up (or recognized) a pair of friendly protectorates.
And, of course, in both cases, Sulzberger’s Slimes and the rest of the whore-pack Judenpresse squealed in horror, “Invasion! Invasion!” as the United States imposed sanctions.
1939: Hitler recognizes independent protectorates — USA responds with sanctions.
2022: Putin recognizes independent protectorates — USA responds with sanctions.
Putin = Hitler? Actually, in many ways, yes
Fortunately for the world, the one key difference here is that back in 1939, the deactivation of the crisis in Europe was short-lived because the Globalists had a backup plan for provoking a war with Hitler’s peaceful Germany (Yes, peaceful Germany) through Edward RydzSmigly— the expansionist-minded mad military dictator of Poland. But in 2022, there will be no war against Russia because the Globalists are not in control — at least not to the extent they need to be in order to pull off a major operation such as a world war.
Also working in favor of peace and justice this time around is the power of Russia itself — a nation which, when Vlad the Bad came to town more than 20 years ago– was on its knees and relatively toothless in the face of US / NATO / CIA / NGO aggression all along its frontiers and especially in the former Yugoslavia. It was Putin the Great who brought Russia back to a point where, by 2016, he was able to talk tough and back it up.
UK Express: (October 18, 2016)
Headline: Vladimir Putin warns Americans are in ‘impending and grave danger’ as he accused the United States of lying over its nuclear capabilities and revealed Russia continues to develop new generation warfare.
Putin: “I’m not going to list everything, all that matters is we have modernized our military-industrial complex and we continue to develop new generation warfare. No matter what we said to our American partners to curb the production of weaponry they refused to cooperate with us, they rejected our offers, and continue to do their own thing.
They rejected everything we had to offer. So here we are today and they’ve placed their missile defense system in Romania always saying ‘we must protect ourselves from the Iranian nuclear threat’. “Where’s the threat? There is no Iranian nuclear threat.
The missile defense systems are continuing to be positioned. That means we were right when we said that they are lying to us… So they built this system and now they are being loaded with missiles…. We know that technologies advance. We even know in which year the Americans will accomplish a new missile, which will be able to penetrate distances of up to 1000km, and then even further. “And from that moment on they will be able to directly threaten Russia’s nuclear potential.
We know year by year what’s going to happen and they know that we know. It’s only you (the media) that they tell tales to, and you spread it to the citizens of your countries. Your people, in turn, do not feel a sense of the impending danger – this is what worries me. How can you not understand that the world is being pulled in an irreversible direction?
Yes indeed; though all of bewildered Normiedom remained oblivious to the severity of the situation, those were some very dark and dangerous days in 2016. And with all expecting Satan’s Bitch to take over where the warmongers of Team Obongo would leave off in 2017, World War III against Russia & China — or at least a pair of really nasty regional wars in Europe and Syria (as we warned at the time) — seemed inevitable. George Soros was even threatening as much! (here)
It was the stunning rise of Donald Trump — coupled with the resurgence of Russia (both elements were necessary) — that saved the world from the planned international bloodbath. But don’t hold your breath waiting for either Trump or Putin to be awarded the “prestigious” Nobel Peace Prize any time soon. Only Globalist warmongers and Communist scumbags win those.
Russia, like Germany in 1938-39, has every right to overthrow an abusive and hostile puppet regime that the Globalists set up on its border.
Hitler: “For months the Germans in Sudetenland have been suffering under the torture of the Czechoslovak government. The Sudeten German population was and is German. This German minority living there has been ill-treated in the most distressing manner. … It is a lie when the outside world says that we only tried to carry through our revisions by pressure. On my own initiative I have, not once but several times, made proposals for the revision of intolerable conditions. All these proposals, as you know, have been rejected – proposals for limitation of armaments, proposals for limitation of war making.” Reichstag Address, October 1, 1938/ Read his speech … https://luis46pr.wordpress.com/2018/04/27/hitlers-sincere-peace-letter-to-french-president/