Please do your own research. The information I share is only a catalyst to expanding ones confined consciousness. I have NO desire for anyone to blindly believe or agree with what I share. Seek the truth for yourself and put your own puzzle together that has been presented to you. I'm not here to teach, preach or lead, but rather assist in awakening the consciousness of the collective from its temporary dormancy.
As we conclude our day of gluttonous BBQing for Labor Day, I thought it would be a good “teachable moment” to review how this “holiday” came about. With all due respect to the “blue collar” working folks who keep the country afloat, the fact is, Labor Day is every bit as much of a Communist creation as May Day (May 1st). As a matter of fact, May Day (the date of the founding of the Illuminati in 1776) is also known as International Workers’ Day and/or Labor Day in many other countries.
But here in the turn-of-the-19th-century anti-communist United States, establishing a Labor Day holiday on May 1st would not have been possible — much too obvious. And so, the Reds and their libtard dupes instead lobbied for the first Monday in September. Labor Day was heavily promoted by the Central Labor Union(forerunner of the AFL-CIO) and the Knights of Labor / KoL (some of whose members were involved in the infamous Haymarket Square riots / cop-killings of 1886). The Masonic-linked unions organized the first parade in New York City. In 1887, Oregon became the first U.S. state to proclaim it as a public holiday. By the time it became an official federal holiday in 1894, thirty states had already officially, and innocently, adopted the Communist-inspired Labor Day.
Since the days of Karl Marx and his “workers of the world unite” shtick, the “anti-capitalist” Reds have always manipulated the passions of “the working man” as a means to destabilize the system and redirect power and wealth towards a super-centralized state. That state, of course, is then financed and controlled by the very same big banker “capitalists” that secretly control the “anti-capitalist” Reds! The big joke on Joe Hardhat, who may very well have legitimate grievances and honest concerns about his work conditions, is that neither the Red union bosses nor their secret capitalist bosses give a rat’s ass about him. Once the national economy is consolidated into the hands of the New World Order big money boys, “the working man” ™ – who had so faithfully and often violently fought for “change” – gets tossed aside like a used up lemon. Whatever good that his union may have done for him and his family was only a necessary side-effect, never the main objective.
And that is why the phony labor bosses chose to only cosmetically fight the Globalists’ disastrous job-killing NAFTA trade deal of 1994; and it is also why they were strangely silent about Obama’s push to ratify the doubly disastrous TPP trade deal — a program which Trump would stop cold in his first week in office. The banker “capitalists” hold a tight leash on their “labor leader” puppets – a hidden reality which Hitler understood and warned about many years ago. Indeed, very soon after coming to power in Germany in 1933, Hitler disbanded the Marxist trade unions and replaced them with the German Labor Front — an organization which imposed better working conditions while respecting the interests of business and industry. In short order, both management and labor came to respect each other and work as a team.
In Mein Kampf, Hitler’s famous autobiography, He wrote that the trade unions:
“… created the economic weapon which the international world Jew uses for the ruination of the economic basis of free, independent states, for the annihilation of their national industry and of their national commerce, and thereby for the enslavement of free people in the service of the above-the-state-standing, world finance Jewry.”
Tell it, please,Tell it!
The game works the same today as it did back then, notwithstanding the fact that trade unions aren’t as powerful as they once were. Hitler showed the world that the dignity and welfare of labor and the legitimate interests of the business class need not be adversarial concerns. To the contrary, when labor and management come to respect each other and work together, it benefits all. Unfortunately, in today’s America, too many propagandized union members fail to appreciate what it really takes to keep a business up and running. Likewise, too many CEOs do indeed (pardon the commie-sounding slogan here) “place profits over people.”
In spite of the holiday’s Red origins – I hope that our American readers enjoyed a very relaxing Labor Day extended weekend and cookout. It’s going to be an interesting fall election season.
NY Times: Putin Aims to Shape a New Generation of Supporters, Through Schools
Sweeping changes in the curriculum will soon cast the Russian president as a pivotal historical figure and mark an end of openness to the West.
Oh the horrible howls of non-lubricated butt-hurt emanating from high atop Manhattan’s Marxist Mendacity Machine! Not only has (((their crowd))) lost the opportunity to mind-rape the youth of Russia like they have been doing in “the free world” — but Vlad the Bad & friends are now doing a bit of benevolent brainwashing themselves instead!
From the article:
“Starting in first grade, students across Russia will soon sit through weekly classes featuring war movies and virtual tours through Crimea. They will be given a steady dose of lectures on topics like “the geopolitical situation” and “traditional values.” In addition to a regular flag-raising ceremony, they will be introduced to lessons celebrating Russia’s “rebirth” under President Vladimir V. Putin.
And, according to legislation signed into law by Mr. Putin on Thursday, all Russian children will be encouraged to join a new patriotic youth movement in the likeness of the Soviet Union’s red-cravatted “Pioneers” — presided over by the president himself.”
Oy vey! Vlad the Bad is busting out his own version of the Hitler youth!
Notwithstanding the deeply embedded historical errors surrounding Russia’s “heroic” resistance against Napoleon and Hitler — both of whom had multi-national wars imposed upon them by “the usual suspects” — this is the sort of patriotic, social and moral indoctrination that our misguided youth so desperately need. Let us analyze a few excerpts from the story:
Times: As the war in Ukraine approaches the five-month mark, the vast ambitions of Putin’s plans for the home front are coming into focus: a wholesale reprogramming of Russian society to end 30 years of openness to the West. Analysis: The necessary and proper military action in Ukraine gave Putin the opening he needed to smoke out the libtarded “scum and traitors” (his actual words) of Russia and “reprogram” society with strong doses of truth and decency.
Times: The Kremlin has already jailed or forced into exile just about all activists speaking out against the war; it has criminalized what remained of Russia’s independent journalism; it has cracked down on academics, bloggers and even a hockey player with suspect loyalties. Analysis: Good! These traitors should be thankful they weren’t publicly flogged and then hanged in Red Square.
Times: But nowhere are these ambitions clearer than in the Kremlin’s race to overhaul how children are taught at Russia’s 40,000 public schools. Analysis: The hand that rocks the cradle rules the future. In this case, the cradle is in the hands of the good guys.
Times: The nationwide education initiatives, which start in September, are part of the Russian government’s scramble to indoctrinate children with Mr. Putin’s militarized and anti-Western version of patriotism. Analysis: The Slimes didn’t complain about “indoctrination” when NGO-engineered Russian school books containing Globalist propaganda and even chapters on US history and presidents started popping up during the Yeltsin years.
Times: A ninth-grader, Irina, said that a computer class in Moscow was replaced by the viewing of a state television report on Ukrainians surrendering to Russian troops and a lecture explaining that only information from official Russian sources was to be trusted. Analysis: The Slimes dug up a little Russian traitoress named Irina– probably coached by her bitch of a mother (assuming these people even exist) — and interviewed her by phone (supposedly).
Times: She soon noticed a transformation among some friends who had been initially scared or confused by the war. “They suddenly started repeating everything after the television.” Analysis: Repeating the TV News is suddenly bad? Idiotic Irina sounds like one of them “conspiracy theorists” now.
Times: Irina said in a phone interview alongside her mother, “They suddenly started saying that this is all deserved, that this had to happen. They couldn’t even attempt to explain this to me.” Analysis: Allow me. It’s very simple, Irina. You see, the CIA/Mossad puppets based in Kiev have been oppressing the Russians in the east for years while threatening to extend the reach of the violent NATO war machine 800 miles closer to the heart of Russia itself. Putin ain’t putin (pun intended) up with it — nor should he. Understand?
Times: Irina said that when she challenged her friends about Russian war crimes, they shot back: “It’s all propaganda.” Analysis: Irina’s friends are correct. The brainwashed one is Irina.
Times: Irina’s parents, driven in part by their refusal to raise their children in an increasingly militarized environment, left for Poland this spring. Analysis: Ah… so the red rats abandoned Russia! They are indeed traitors after all. Good riddance — filthy scum pigs. Wonder if this alleged family is actually even “Russian,” — know what I’m sayin’?
Times: In the city of Pskov near the Estonian border, Irina Milyutina (an English teacher) said that the children at her school scrawled Z’s and V’s — symbols of support for the war — on chalkboards, desks and even the floors. At recess, fifth and sixth graders pretended to be Russian soldiers. Analysis: The libtard traitor teachers have lost their students. Hopefully, they’ll soon lose their jobs.
Times: A proposed decree published by the education ministry shows that Mr. Putin’s two decades in power are set to be enshrined in the standard curriculum as a historical turning point. The decree says that Russian history classes will be required to include several new topics like “the rebirth of Russia as a great power in the 21st century,” “reunification with Crimea,” and “the special military operation in Ukraine.” Analysis: In other words, everything that yours truly wrote in “The War Against Putin” is about to be taught to millions and millions of Russian kids. Take that, Globalists!
When assessing Italy’s role in World War II, fake historians and real historians both agree on one thing: the adventures of Benito Mussolini cost Germany dearly. We’ll review the blunders and how they weighed on Germany shortly; but first, a piece of data which we just recently discovered at establishmentarian ForeignPolicy.com. The item, dated October 14, 2009, was titled Benito Mussolini: British Secret Agent. An excerpt:
“It is fall 1917 in Italy. World War I rages; in late October the German army gasses the Italians to defeat in the Battle of Caporetto. Hyperinflation and food shortages cripple the economy, and suddenly a large number of Italians don’t see the point of fighting anymore. At the same time, Lenin and the Bolsheviks seize St. Petersburg and the allies see that soon they will lose a key partner in the war. …. no more Russian-British alliance. And now Britain is looking at losing another ally, Italy.
Enter Sir Samuel Hoare, the man in Rome for British counter-intelligence. He is charged with keeping the Italian front fighting, and he quickly finds an ambitious newspaper editor to help him with the task, Benito Mussolini. This is the story Cambridge historian Peter Martland tells after uncovering documents proving the relationship.
Yes, MI5 paid Il Duce *£100 a week to keep the fighting spirit alive and well in Italy.
*Editor’s Note: Mamma Mia! That’s $8,000 weekly in today’s US Dollars, and that’s based on phony inflation numbers. So it’s probably about $20,000 weekly!
He did this through his newspaper as well as through his gang of armed thugs who bludgeoned peace protesters into staying home. …. Mussolini, 34 at the time, received the exorbitant salary for at least a year, according to Martland.
“I suspect that Mussolini, who was a noted womanizer, also spent a good deal of the money on his mistresses,” Martland said.
After Mussolini’s brief stint as a British agent, he rose to power and became the dictator of Italy. He met Hoare again when the two signed the Hoare-Lavalpact that gave Italy control of present-day Ethiopia and Eritrea.” (emphasis added)
* Editor’s Note: The British government soon withdrew the plan, and Hoare resigned. In early 1936 Italy began a new, larger advance into Ethiopia, using poison gas. In his memoirs, Hoare noted the killing of the Hoare–Laval Pact, pushed Italy closer to Germany.
So then, the post-World War I rise and rise of the young, ambitious Mussolini from womanizing 34-year-old newspaper editor working for British war aims, to appointed Prime Minister at age 39, to supreme dictator dubbed “Il Duce” (1925) at just 42, was “made in London.” Interesting, and frankly, borderline treasonous because it means that he worked to keep Italy in the war for Britain’s interests, even if he himself somehow believed he was acting in Italy’s. And what’s really astonishing is that this bit of data was not unearthed until 2009, only 3 years before your favorite historian here (who knew nothing about this until now!) had penned the first draft manuscript of The Bad War, in which Mussolini’s costly misadventures in WW 2 were reviewed.
Now, let’s fast forward to World War II and review how Mussolini’s blunders severely hindered Hitler’s war efforts and may have cost Germany an opportunity to win the war in 1941 or 1942, before the Soviets (with massive US weapons aid) could regroup and rebuild, and before the Americans could arrive and deploy to save the day for the ALL LIES. TIMELINE OF KEY EVENTS
May 1940: Neutral Italy, via its Ambassador to the UK, offers to broker a peace deal between Germany and the UK. Some in the British War Cabinet are interested in hearing a proposal. But Churchill, who surely must know that Mussolini had been made by British Intel, will have none of it.
June 5 – June 8, 1940: The Germans have already completed the heavy lifting of winning the land-based war in the West. The retreating British are high-tailing it out of Europe from Dunkirk. And France, much to Churchill’s consternation, is poised to negotiate a surrender as Marshal Phillipe Petain prepares to take power in France.
June 10, 1940: After having remained neutral, and just weeks after cordially dealing with the British, Mussolini — acting on his own initiative and independent of the German campaign — declares war on France and Great Britain. This stab-in-the-back invasion at the Alps (which pissed away the lives of 1,000 Italian soldiers just to conquer 13 small villages!) causes tremendous resentment among the already-defeated French. North Africa now opens up as a theater of war as Italy and Britain both have a presence there (as does defeated France).
July 3, 1940: The British attack the French naval base at Mers El Kébir — killing 1,300 French sailors and damaging / destroying 3 battleships and 2 destroyers. Churchill then claims that the pretext for this dastardly deed was to stop the victorious Germans from seizing the vessels of French navy.
Summer, 1940: The Italians struggle against the superior British in North Africa. Mussolini appeals to Hitler for help and that’s how Germany’s costly involvement with the Africa Korps under the leadership of Erwin Rommel began in 1941.
* Editor’s Note: In the alternative news & history community, Hitler is often criticized for having graciously allowed 300,000 British troops to safely evacuate from the shores of Dunkirk. The Germans would later have to fight these very same men in North Africa. In Hitler’s defense, he had no way of knowing that Mussolini, just one week after the end of the Dunkirk boat-lift, would suddenly and dishonorably abandon his neutrality and declare war against the already defeatedAllies — and then proceed to make such a mess in North Africa.
October, 1940: Against Hitler’s wishes, Mussolini, having already inflamed Africa and now occupying Albania, invades Greece in what will bog down into an even more disastrous military campaign. Mussolini’s war will cost the Italians 14,000 killed and 25,000 missing. In his private diary, one of his own generals recorded his disgust with Il Duce’s recklessness (here). Churchill uses this event as a pretext to offer military assistance to the Greeks — which would entail a renewed British presence on the European mainland via “the soft underbelly of Europe.”
* Editor’s Note: Mussolini had been wrongly informed that bribes paid to key Greek politicians and generals to not resist the Italian invasion would be enough to assure an easy conquest. Was British Intel feeding him the same “cakewalk” lie fled to aggressor Poland in 1939?
April, 1941: To block the British from setting up military action in Europe, Hitler — who had earlier sought to mediate a peace between Italy and Greece — has no choice but to bailout his Italian “ally” (again) and thus thwart the British advance by subduing Greece. As is the ongoing case in North Africa, valuable manpower and resources are thus diverted and valuable time is lost because Hitler’s preemptive invasion of the Soviet Union has to be postponed by two months. The lost months could have been enough to finish off the Soviet Union in 1941, before the winter pause arrived.
* Editor’s Note: The Germans were also forced to invade Yugoslavia at this time because British Intel had engineered a coup which installed an anti-German government.
June 22, 1941: Having lost two months and being spread thin in North Africa and southern Europe, Hitler launches the necessary invasion of the Soviet Union just in the nick of time. Operation Barbarossa is a stunning success for the Germans, but the lost time and resources enabled Stalin to barely hang on until the brutal winter of 1941 set in and stalled the advance. That allowed the Soviets to regroup and, with US help, rearm in 1942. Oh what have been had the Germans not lost all that time and all that firepower in 1941!
November, 1942: The Joint American & British Operation Torch launches in November 1942. Stalin now has the “Second Front” that he had been openly pleading for to relieve pressure on the Red Army by diverting German forces to North Africa. After a slow start by the allies, General George Patton is brought in to win North Africa. Now the Germans really have problems! Half the German transport planes that were needed to supply the encircled Axis forces at Stalingrad will eventually be tied up supplying the German and Italian armies in North Africa. And it was all because Mussolini picked a fight he couldn’t win against Britain in Africa.
Summer, 1943: After winning Africa, it was a short hop to Sicily and then onto the Italian mainland for the ALL LIES. It was through Italy, not Normandy (1944), that the Allies will establish their first true presence on the European mainland — through which they began tightening the noose on Germany from the South (and later, the West) — all while diverting German power away from the Russian front. Again, none of this happens if Mussolini had not declared war on France & Britain AFTER Germany had already secured Western Europe.
************** No doubt about it, Italian debacles in Africa and Greece came at a heavy cost for Germany to fix. In addition to the damage caused to the German war effort overtly, certain events that might have happened didn’t happen because of Mussolini. By abandoning Italy’s neutrality and attaching himself to Hitler’s hip the way he did, it made it politically impossible for Petain’s France (which was really done dirty by Mussolini) to join Germany in protecting Northern Europe from Allied invasion. Whatever French resentment the anti-communist French had toward Britain for its treacherous attack at Mers El Kébir, was offset by Italy’s stab-in-the-back just one month earlier. Hitler’s idea of rallying the North Africans and Arabs against the British colonialists could have worked as well, but not with poison gas man of Ethiopia attached to him. Oh what might have been if not for blundering Benito!
The disillusioning (for me) 2009 discovery of Mussolini having served as a paid agent of the British during World War I not only tells us A LOT about his ambition and his flawed character; but it leads us to this very logical and rational question: With this bit of dirt hanging over his head — this old skeleton hiding in his closet — might British Intelligence — partly with a carrot and partly with a stick — have reactivated the ambitious egoist which they made into “Il Duce?” Following is a plausible THEORY — for which there is no hard evidence (at this time) but for which proof may surface from the bowels of some dusty archive one day — just like the amazing find of 2009.
********************** Hitler controls the continent and the British are worried that Germany may invade their island if they refuse to make peace. Mussolini, through his ambassador to the UK, conveys a peace offer from Hitler, which Churchill will kill. The British then reactivate their old asset.
The Island of Britain needs a land presence somewhere in order to confront the Germans directly, and, more importantly, secure a staging ground for the inevitable entry of the United States into the war, and an invasion into the southern “soft underbelly of Europe.” To that end, the ego-maniac Mussolini (who was always jealous of Hitler and talked behind his back) is once again bought — not with money this time — but with the promise an expanded African Empire (paired with a disclosure of the bribes he accepted during World War I!).
This is very similar to how Tsarist Russia was induced into the pre-WWI British-French Alliance in 1907 — with the secretive empty promise of Constantinople (Istanbul) being returned to eastern Christendom’s control….or, more recently, how the mad MarshalEdvard Rydz Smigly of expansionist-minded Poland was manipulated into picking a fight with Germany in 1939. Standard British foreign policy for centuries!
The British know that a stab-in-the-back of France by Mussolini will make a French-German alliance impossible. His opening of hostilities against Britain in Africa is a fake war with real casualties on both sides; but what would the lives of enlisted men ever mean to men like Churchill and Mussolini anyway? They die for the cause of Italian Empire. The trap works and the Germans are drawn into the quicksand of Africa.
An Italian invasion of Greece is also needed to provide a pretext for diverting more German resources and manpower there; and to finally give the British a Europe-based land opening. “Benny, our dear old friend. Thanks for your help in Africa. As a show of our appreciation, we’ll let you take Greece and control the Mediterranean Sea. Our sources us tell us that the pathetic Greeks won’t even put up a fight, as long as you bribe them. You’ll be the second coming of Julius Caeser!” Mussolini — who is expecting a “cakewalk” in Greece (as Rydz Smigly had been led to believe with respect to attacking Germany in 1939) takes the bait and reaps the whirlwind.
And what about the subsequent British crippling of the Italian fleet at Taranto, later that same year; and the savage Allied bombardment and invasion of Italy; and the eventual toppling (July 1943); and brutal “dead-men-tell-no-tales” killing (1945) of Mussolini and his mistress by Allied-controlled “partisans?” Well, that’s the same type of “double cross” that the Brits did to the Tsar after they reneged on taking Constantinople; and the same “double cross” that they did to Rydz Smigly when they refused to help after he was tricked into starting the war in 1939, and then invaded by Germany from the West and the Soviet Union from the east. Standard British foreign policy — and there wasn’t a darn thing the already compromised fool could ever have done about it. British Intel had their ambitious ex-Italian newspaper man by “i cuglione” (the balls) all along.
********************** Far fetched? Before learning that newspaper man Mussolini accepted BIG MONEY from British Intel to propagandize his war weary countrymen into remaining immersed in the WW1 bloodbath (1.1 million dead Italians, military & civilian), I would probably not have entertained this idea. But in light of this new data, anything is possible. Legendary historian Edward Gibbon taught us: “History is indeed little more than the register of the crimes, follies and misfortunes of mankind.” — And indeed it is. In any event, both for his acceptance of British bribes and his stupendous “blundering” in World War II — we can no longer honor Il Duce, in spite of his anti-communism and other laudable domestic achievements.
Oh if only I could get unlimited access to the secret archives of British Intel!
A “new lead” in the Anne Frank “cold case” has surfaced. Yes, after 78 years, “researchers” have dug up yet another “suspect” — a “variant,” if you will — in the “ratting-out” to the big bad Gestapo of the Frank family’s hideout in Amsterdam. Oh the drama and suspense of it all! Congratulations to author Rosemary Sullivan on having “the paper of record” poop out this puff-piece pimping her pretend paperback: The Betrayal of Anne Frank. Cha-ching, cha-ching, cha-ching to you girl.
Seriously now, is St. Anne of Amsterdam — who died of typhus at age 15, in 1945 — the only girl to have lost her life during that horrible intercontinental bloodbath which her “greater brethren” engineered? Can anyone tell me the name of a single contemporary German girl, or French girl, or Belgian girl, or Polish girl, or Dutch girl, or Finnish girl, or Romanian girl, or Italian girl, or Japanese girl who lost her life — in many cases, after also having lost her virginity and her front teeth to some brutal All Lied rapist — during those dark days of All Lied carpet bombing of civilian neighborhoods? Just one. Go ahead, I’ll wait.
What has always been most interesting to your astute researcher here about the story of the Frank family’s internment and Anne’s subsequent death is that it offers the critical reader (few and far between these days) compelling clues — in addition to all the others — which debunk the subject of the song that never ends about the event which never happened —- the Holocausts. What follows are some details from the official story — taken directly from Wikipedia — and accompanied by analysis:
Official Story: In September 1944, the Franks were transported to the Auschwitz concentration camp. Upon arrival at Auschwitz, Anne was disinfected and had her head shaved. Analysis: Does the shaving and disinfecting not prove that the Germans were trying to save the lives of inmates (from typhus)? What does that do to the “extermination camp” story?
Official Story: Anne’s skin became infected by scabies. She and her sister were moved into an infirmary. Analysis: Now why would “Dr. Mengele” and the big bad SS — at a time when the war was being lost — waste time and resources trying to cure these young girls in the camp “infirmary?” Would not a short walk to “zee gas chambers” have been much easier for everybody?
Official Story: In October 1944, the Frank women (two girls and the mom) were scheduled to join a transport to the Liebau labour camp in Upper Silesia. Analysis: Given the rate at which the Soviets were rapidly advancing, the Germans had begun relocating the internees westward. If Bullschwitz had become an “extermination camp” by this time (as official Holocaust claims) then why not just kill the women?
Official Story: Anne was prohibited from going because of the scabies, and her mother and sister opted to stay with her. Analysis: So, the big bad “Nazis” of Bullschwitz allowed mom and sis to make their own choice and stay with Anne?
Official Story: On October 28, selections began for women to be relocated to Bergen-Belsen. More than 8,000 women, including Anne and Margot Frank were transported. Analysis: This doesn’t make any sense! Why weren’t all of these women — particularly the sick ones — gassed at Bullschwitz? Did “zee Nazis” run out of “Zyklon B?” Why were the Germans relocating the Jews if their “Final solution” was to genocide them all?
Official Story: Edith Frank was left behind and died of disease. Analysis: Mom died in Bullschwitz of disease — not “zee gas chambers.”
Official Story: Tents were erected at Bergen-Belsen to accommodate the influx of prisoners. Analysis: The Germans erected tents to “accommodate?” But why “accommodate” people that you intend to murder? Hotel guests are “accommodated.” Genocide targets are not.
Official Story: As the population rose, the death toll due to disease increased rapidly. In early 1945, a typhus epidemic spread through the camp (Bergen-Belsen), killing 17,000 prisoners. Other diseases, including typhoid fever, were rampant. Due to these chaotic conditions, it was not possible to determine the specific cause of Anne’s death; however, there was evidence that she died from the epidemic. Analysis: Amazing. People have actually been put in prison for saying that it was diseases, not “gassings,” — particularly during the “chaotic conditions” of the closing months of the war — which killed thousands of inmates. And yet, the “respectable historians” recounting the story of Anne Frank actually confirm as much.
Official Story: Gena Turgel, who worked in the camp hospital, said that the typhus epidemic at the camp took a terrible toll on the inmates: “The people were dying like flies.” Analysis: Camp hospital? I suppose “zee Nazis” wanted the Jews to get healthy for their final trip to “zee gas chambers.” Makes perfect sense.
Official Story: Otto Frank survived his internment in Auschwitz. After the war ended, he returned to Amsterdam in June 1945. Analysis: The SS also forgot to “gas” Papa Frank — who went on to cash in “bigly” on the death of his daughter.
More than thirty years have now passed since I in 1914 made my modest contribution as a volunteer in the first world war that was forced upon the Reich.
In these three decades I have been actuated solely by love and loyalty to my people in all my thoughts, acts, and life. They gave me the strength to make the most difficult decisions which have ever confronted mortal man. I have spent my time, my working strength, and my health in these three decades.
It is untrue that I or anyone else in Germany wanted the war in 1939. It was desired and instigated exclusively by those international statesmen who were either of Jewish descent or worked for Jewish interests.
I have made too many offers for the control and limitation of armaments, which posterity will not for all time be able to disregard for the responsibility for the outbreak of this war to be laid on me. I have further never wished that after the first fatal world war a second against England, or even against America, should break out. Centuries will pass away, but out of the ruins of our towns and monuments the hatred against those finally responsible whom we have to thank for everything, international Jewry and its helpers, will grow.
Three days before the outbreak of the German-Polish war I again proposed to the British ambassador in Berlin a solution to the German-Polish problem—similar to that in the case of the Saar district, under international control. This offer also cannot be denied. It was only rejected because the leading circles in English politics wanted the war, partly on account of the business hoped for and partly under influence of propaganda organized by international Jewry.
I have also made it quite plain that, if the nations of Europe are again to be regarded as mere shares to be bought and sold by these international conspirators in money and finance, then that race, Jewry, which is the real criminal of this murderous struggle, will be saddled with the responsibility. I further left no one in doubt that this time not only would millions of children of Europe’s Aryan peoples die of hunger, not only would millions of grown men suffer death, and not only hundreds of thousands of women and children be burnt and bombed to death in the towns, without the real criminal having to atone for this guilt, even if by more humane means.
After six years of war, which in spite of all setbacks will go down one day in history as the most glorious and valiant demonstration of a nation’s life purpose, I cannot forsake the city which is the capital of this Reich. As the forces are too small to make any further stand against the enemy attack at this place, and our resistance is gradually being weakened by men who are as deluded as they are lacking in initiative, I should like, by remaining in this town, to share my fate with those, the millions of others, who have also taken upon themselves to do so. Moreover I do not wish to fall into the hands of an enemy who requires a new spectacle organized by the Jews for the amusement of their hysterical masses.
I have decided therefore to remain in Berlin and there of my own free will to choose death at the moment when I believe the position of the Fuehrer and Chancellor itself can no longer be held.
I die with a happy heart, aware of the immeasurable deeds and achievements of our soldiers at the front, our women at home, the achievements of our farmers and workers and the work, unique in history, of our youth who bear my name.
That from the bottom of my heart I express my thanks to you all, is just as self-evident as my wish that you should, because of that, on no account give up the struggle but rather continue it against the enemies of the Fatherland, no matter where, true to the creed of a great Clausewitz. From the sacrifice of our soldiers and from my own unity with them unto death, will in any case spring up in the history of Germany, the seed of a radiant renaissance of the National-Socialist movement and thus of the realization of a true community of nations.
Many of the most courageous men and women have decided to unite their lives with mine until the very last I have begged and finally ordered them not to do this, but to take part in the further battle of the Nation. I beg the heads of the Armies, the Navy, and the Air Force to strengthen by all possible means the spirit of resistance of our soldiers in the National-Socialist sense, with special reference to the fact that also I myself, as founder and creator of this movement, have preferred death to cowardly abdication or even capitulation.
May it, at some future time, become part of the code of honor of the German officer—as is already the case in our Navy—that the surrender of a district or of a town is impossible, and that above all the leaders here must march ahead as shining examples, faithfully fulfilling their duty unto death.
Second Part of the Political Testament
Before my death I expel the former Reichsmarschall Hermann Goering from the party and deprive him of all rights which he may enjoy by virtue of the decree of June 29th, 1941; and also by virtue of my statement in the Reichstag on September 1st, 1939, I appoint in his place Grossadmiral Doenitz, President of the Reich and Supreme Commander of the Armed Forces.
Before my death I expel the former Reichsfuehrer-SS and Minister of the Interior, Heinrich Himmler, from the party and from all offices of State. In his stead I appoint Gauleiter Karl Hanke as Reichsfuehrer-SS and Chief of the German Police, and Gauleiter Paul Giesler as Reich Minister of the Interior.
Goering and Himmler, quite apart from their disloyalty to my person, have done immeasurable harm to the country and the whole nation by secret negotiations with the enemy, which they conducted without my knowledge and against my wishes, and by illegally attempting to seize power in the State for themselves.
(Editor’s Note: Goering & Himmler naively believed that they could end the war by making peace with the United States and fighting the Soviets together instead.)
In order to give the German people a government composed of honorable men,—a government which will fulfill its pledge to continue the war by every means—I appoint the following members of the new Cabinet as leaders of the nation:
President of the Reich: DOENITZ Chancellor of the Reich: DR. GOEBBELS Party Minister: BORMANN Foreign Minister: SEYSS-INQUART
[Here follow fifteen others.]
Although a number of these men, such as Martin Bormann, Dr. Goebbels, etc., together with their wives, have joined me of their own free will and did not wish to leave the capital of the Reich under any circumstances, but were willing to perish with me here, I must nevertheless ask them to obey my request, and in this case set the interests of the nation above their own feelings. By their work and loyalty as comrades they will be just as close to me after death, as I hope that my spirit will linger among them and always go with them. Let them be hard, but never unjust, above all let them never allow fear to influence their actions, and set the honor of the nation above everything in the world. Finally, let them be conscious of the fact that our task, that of continuing the building of a National Socialist State, represents the work of the coming centuries, which places every single person under an obligation always to serve the common interest and to subordinate his own advantage to this end. I demand of all Germans, all National Socialists, men, women, and all the men of the Armed Forces, that they be faithful and obedient unto death to the new government and its President.
Above all I charge the leaders of the nation and those under them to scrupulous observance of the laws of race and to merciless opposition to the universal poisoner of all peoples, international Jewry. Given in Berlin, this 29th day of April 1945. 4:00 A.M.
Enter the word “appeasement” into a Google Search browser, and then click on “Images.” You will see image after image after image of UK Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain, whose very name has long since become synonymous with “appeasement” and weakness in the face of a bully.
As the tiresome cliched story vomited out ad nauseam by the High Priests of circle-jerk Quackademia goes, Chamberlain “appeased” Hitler at the Munich Conference(September 1938) by handing over Czechoslovakia to his domination. War was thus temporarily averted, but Hitler was now emboldened by Chamberlain’s “appeasement.”
That’s the official moronic moralism — a fable that is routinely resurrected and repeated to wrongly describe the dangers of “appeasing” this or that contemporary bad-guy-of-the-month. NOW, ONCE AGAIN, THE REAL HISTORY!
1937: Did the Usual Suspects Blow Up The Hindenburg?The disaster, which occurred here in New Jersey, along with, shall we say, “geo-political” issues eventually brought about the demise of Zeppelins — structures which had been the pride of Germany .
Paul von Hindenburg, left, and Adolf Hitler ride in an open car during a parade in Berlin, Germany, May 1933
The New York Slimes (February 27, 2020):
Berlin Drops Hindenburg’s Honorary Title for his Role in Nazis’ Rise: State government strikes former president off list, citing his 1933 act of appointing Hitler as chancellor.
He led Germany’s army in World War I and served for nearly a decade as the country’s president, but thanks to his role in Nazi dictator Adolf Hitler’s rise to power, Paul von Hindenburg is an honorary Berliner no more.
Oh well. It was only a matter of time before (((they))) could kill the historical personage of Paul von Hindenburg — whose namesake airship became even better known than him.
A Zeppelin airship takes its name from German Count Ferdinand von Zeppelin — a German General and inventor whose company — Luftschiffbau Zeppelin (LZ)–led the development of the rigid flying machines in the late 1800s / early 1900s. After the great success of Zeppelin’s design, the word “zeppelin” became used to refer to all rigid airships.
Zeppelins were first flown commercially in 1910 by Deutsche Luftschiffahrts-AG (DELAG) — essentially the world’s first airline service. By the outbreak of World War I in 1914, DELAG had made more than 1,500 flights. During the war, the German military made use of Zeppelins for bombing and scouting.
The defeat of Germany in 1918 (engineered by Jewish Marxists at home and Jewish Globalists & Zionists from the outside) slowed down DELAG’s business substantially. In 1919, DELAG’s airships were surrendered under the terms of the vicious Treaty of Versailles which had been imposed upon a disarmed Germany. The treaty also prohibited the Germans from building more airships. An exception was made to allow for the construction of a single airship for the US Navy — a transaction which spared DELAG from total extinction and bought the company some more time.
In 1926 the restrictions on airship construction were lifted at a time when some of the oppressive monetary reparations of the Versailles Treaty were restructured. Work was then started on the construction of the airship, Graf Zeppelin (775 feet) — named after the Count. The company was revived and, during the 1930s, the airships Graf Zeppelin and the larger Hindenburg (803-feet) operated regular transatlantic flights from Germany to North America and Brazil.
To enhance revenue, the zeppelins carried transatlantic mail from the United States to Europe. Special postage stamps were minted and sold for this purpose — but the practice was suddenly discontinued (by the U.S.) and the unsold zeppelin stamps were destroyed by the Post Office (a most unusual act which enraged many stamp collectors (here)) Although neither Hitler nor FDR were in power in 1930, could the sudden discontinuation and strange destruction of the stamps have been the result of a general hatred of Germans held by some people already embedded within the federal bureaucracy? Probably.
The spire of the Empire State Building was originally designed to serve as a mooring mast for the jaw-dropping 750-foot-long marvels of German engineering. But it was found that high winds associated with such high-altitude moorings made the Manhattan mooring idea too impractical. The airships did pass over Jew York during the 1930’s. After 1933, the zeppelins came with Hitler’s Swastika flag on the tail as street-level onlookers gave the “Sieg Heil” salute. “Oy vey!”– the “usual suspects” — who had already, in 1933, “declared war” upon Germany — must surely have shrieked.
The legendary Hindenburg disaster of 1937, which occurred right here in New Jersey, along with, shall we say, “geo-political” issues eventually brought about the demise of Zeppelins — structures which had been the great pride of Germany — both before and during the righteous reign of The Great One(that’s Hitler for all you newbies * normies).
The preceding account is pretty much standard knowledge. But there is a little bit more to the story that (((they))) don’t want you to know about.
Begun in 1932 and finally launched in 1936, the Hindenburg Airship — named after Paul von Hindenburg — measured an astounding 803 feet — but its beautiful interior could only accommodate about 100 people, a number which includes the well-to-do passengers and crew. General Hindenburg, we should note, was the respected World War I general and later president of Germany who — in order to break the contentious multi-party gridlock that was crippling Germany — named, albeit somewhat reluctantly, Hitler as Chancellor in 1933.
Prior zeppelins had always been designed to stay afloat using helium — a gas which is not flammable. At the time, however, helium was only available in industrial quantities from plants in the United States. Despite a U.S. ban on the export of helium under the Helium Control Act of 1927, the Germans designed the Hindenburg to use helium in the belief that the US government would license its export. But that assumption was made before FDR and his Jewish-Marxist gang took over America in 1933.
Some important background context….
When the designers learned that FDR’s administration would not allow helium to be shipped to “Nazi” Germany, the Hindenberg was re-engineered to use hydrogen for its lift instead — a gas which is flammable. The man responsible for denying helium to Germany was Secretary of the Interior Harold Ickes — a fanatical German-hater and FDR Marxist. Though the German engineering geniuses were still able to construct a very safe airship — because hydrogen was flammable — there now existed an opportunity for an “accident” with a plausible “explanation” for it.
On May 6, 1937, at the very moment that the Hindenburg was docking before an awed crowd at Lakehurst, NJ, the grand airship burst into flames and crashed, killing 35 of the 97 passengers & crew. “Static electricity” was blamed, yet the Hindenburg had previously endured direct lightning hits! The true cause of the explosion remains unknown to this day. But the unusual amount of news reel cameras present that day, the helium embargo, the timing of the mysterious ignition just as the ship was mooring, the hyping of the idiotic “static electricity” theory, and the anti-German hysteria being whipped up by the press all combine to suggest that the Hindenburg disaster was actually an act of sabotage. Theories ranged from an on-board fanatic-bomber to an incendiary rifle-bullet fired from the nearby woods. The incident shattered confidence in Germany’s zeppelins and marked the end of the airship era. How conveeenient.
And now, more than 80 years after the dramatic killing of the Hindenburg Airship, (((they))) are still out to kill Hindenburg’s name — even though the Marshall, being of an aristocratic background, was never actually a true supporter of Hitler’s populist movement.
Fascist! — It is the all-purpose insult which both libtards and misguided conservatives — each in full agreement that Fascism is the worst epithet one can use to describe another person’s political beliefs — constantly accuse the other of being. “You’re a Fascist!” — “No. You’re a Fascist!” — “Oh yeah, your mamma’s a Fascist!” That’s what we call “debate” in our modern “Democrazy.” But how many people actually understand what “Fascism” really even means? Very few.
Time Magazine offers up a typically incomplete, superficial and vague “textbook definition” of Fascism as follows:
“Fascism is a movement that promotes the idea of a forcibly monolithic, regimented nation under the control of an autocratic ruler.”
Actually, when you think about it — ALL forms of government (including “democracies”) and their laws are maintained by “force” — ALL stripes of politicians promote “monolithic” ideology (their own) — ALL systems require some degree of “regimentation” (common language laws, common currency, compulsory education etc) — and ALL are “autocratic” (in democracies, the autocrats hide behind the curtain). There’s no way around it, boys and girls. ALL Government, by design and by necessity, is force. So don’t kid yourself. The only question at hand is, will the force of government be unlimited and used to oppress and exploit (Globalism / Marxism / liberal “democracy”) — or will it be limited and used to serve and protect (Fascism).
Unfortunately, due to ignorance and decades of intense Marxist-Globalist propaganda, Fascism — in spite of the general happiness of those who had actually lived under such a system — has acquired an undeservedly bad reputation. RHC presents this piece in order to light up the darkness concerning this historical subject.
Before we can define Fascism in terms of its political, economic and cultural manifestations — some critical historical context (always lacking in the conventional definitions) needs to be known. Though Fascism comes in several different flavors unique to the nations that have “gone Fascist,” it is, first and foremost,a self-defensive and opposite reaction to the growing political, economic and cultural cancer of degenerative atheistic totalitarian Marxism and the international financiers who control it.
Consider this: History’s three most well-known Fascists — Adolf Hitler of Germany, Benito Mussolini of Italy and Francisco Franco of Spain all came to power at the precise moment in time when their respective countries were about to be swallowed up by the “democratic” force of Communist subversion. The same can be said for various other Fascist / Military leaders in Latin America during the 1960s and 1970s — or even Napoleon Bonaparte with his crack-down upon the terrorist Jacobin Reds and subsequent rise to supreme ruler of France, more than 200 years ago. And when Fascists — usually supported by the majority of the grateful anti-Communist population — do come into power, they must necessarily continue to limit the “human rights” ™ of the evil terrorist Marxist scum which would enslave the nation if they could. The “repression” associated with Fascism is therefore not one of tyranny, but rather, of a just punishment for traitors and would-be tyrants.
With this contextual history in mind, the discerning reader — specifically a conservative one — should already have begun to understand the obvious reason why the term Fascism has such a negative stink to it. You see, when Fascism rises, Globalism / Marxism falls. And because the Globalist / Marxist Left controls Fake News, Fake Academia and degenerate Hollywood, we’ve been taught — brainwashed, that is — to believe that Fascism is inherently oppressive and evil. Get it? Good. Now, let us move on to defining what Fascism is and does after the Reds have been removed from power.
There are several different brands of Fascism and not any one defined set of rules. The word itself is derived from the Italian word, fascia — a band — fasciare meaning to band/ bundle together. In this case, to unite the people as brothers and sisters under a leader who in turn serves the interests of the people, not the leftist elites. The symbol of the Italian Fascists dates back to Ancient Rome (and used to be on the back of America dimes). In Latin, “fasces” — a bundle of wooden rods with an ax head, carried by leaders. In short, a good motto for Fascism would be “One for All and All for One.”
Though Fascism is “authoritarian” in the sense that the head of state and his associates reject the liberal model of multi-party chaos and Fake News-controlled mob voting, it is not to be confused with Marxist totalitarianism. In various spheres of the national life, there is certainly a higher degree of personal and economic liberty under Fascism than there is under Marxism or democratic liberalism. Under Fascism, as long as one’s activities do not harm society or corrupt the youth, citizens are free to own guns, or to start businesses, or to worship as they see fit, or to move about freely within the country or even leave the country altogether — like the Communist Albert Einstein left Hitler’s Germany; or the Communist Enrico Fermi left Mussolini’s Italy.
The three major realms of existence which Fascism oversees are the POLITICAL, the ECONOMIC and the CULTURAL — but the objective always centers around the same question: “What’s best for the people?” Let’s review each.
We have already discussed how history teaches us that the Fascist leader always seems to emerge at the 11th hour to save the people from imminent Communist takeover. Taking that a step further, history also teaches us that the prep work preceding the rapid spread of this Marxist cancer was always cultivated in the putrid Petri Dish of temporary “democracy.” Upon coming to power, a good Fascist therefore understands that it is not enough to rapidly remove Marxists from all positions of political authority, media influence and education; he must also remove the parliamentary system of multi-party mob voting altogether for it would inevitably enable the cancer to return.
The noble hero of the hour thus becomes the “leader” and his devoted followers thus form the basis of the governing group that knows how to get important stuff done — instead of just talking bullshit all day. Their ranks are generally open to all men of ability and good character from all social and economic classes — thus making the Party truly “democratic” in the positive sense of the word.
The Fascist political order is therefore wholly consistent with the natural order of things — the God-given order which we may discern through logic. Fascism values meritocracy — and rejects the nit-witted notion that the obtainment of 50.1% of the vote somehow magically infers unlimited wisdom and should bestow unlimited power upon the clever rascal who “won the election.” Hitler said it best:
“Sooner will a camel pass through a needle’s eye than a great man be ‘discovered’ by an election.”
Yes, Fascism in this sense is “authoritarian” — but as previously stated, so is “democracy” — a system in which an elected official can shut down your business or arrest you for not enforcing Covid-19 “social distancing” and mask requirements, all on the basis of an invented hoax. Think about it!
The Fascist leader is bound ”fasces” to the people — but should he turn out to be incompetent or corrupt — there’s a better chance of him being removed by the dissatisfied Party membership, backed by the public, than there is of any real change concurring at a ” ballot box” in some corrupted “democratic” nation in which the people are are given a “choice” between Globalist Puppet #1 or Globalist Puppet #2 — or, in some cases, Globalist Puppets #3, #4, #5 et al. (Prior to Hitler’s rise in chaotic, Germany had more than FIFTY political parties vying for votes.)
In the realm of foreign relations, and contrary to historical distortion, Fascists — notwithstanding Mussolini’s adventures in North Africa — are pro-sovereignty, anti-Globalist and believe in minding-one’s own business while getting along with other countries. Just to set the record straight, both of the tragic World Wars of the 20th Century as well as all of the “Napoleonic Wars” 200+ years ago were imposed upon the peaceful Fascist states by the British-Rothschild complex.
In terms of economics, there is no one-size-fits-all school of economic Fascism. One Fascist economic model might be more “hands off,” whereas another Fascist state may take a more cooperative “partnership” approach with certain corporations. The one constant is that the government plays an important role in monitoring banking, trade, production, and labor activity. Any intervention is done for the sole purpose of safeguarding & advancing the interest of the people. Under Fascism, the state will not approve of any business activity unless that business has a positive impact on the nation as a whole. Author James Miller puts it this way”
“In a Fascist country, the government asks, “Is XYZ Enterprises good for our nation and our people?” If yes, it’s approved. If no, it’s not approved. When they ask, “Is it good?”, they mean, “Is XYZ Enterprises good for the workers, do they pay a fair wage, do they produce a product or provide a service which advances our nation & our people technologically, morally, spiritually, health-wise, etc???” For example, a pornography company would not be allowed because pornography corrupts people generally and exploits & degrades women particularly.”
Though Fascism is generally pro-business and free market, harmful “free trade” agreements would never be allowed because such bad deals result in companies shipping jobs overseas (where labor is dirt cheap). Such activity may benefit the share-holding elite, but it would undermine a nation’s labor class. This is entirely unacceptable and thus prohibited under a Fascist economic model.
A businessman can become wealthy in a Fascist country, and the government has no objection to this — which is clear contrast to Communism. Fascism also protects the private ownership of property — again, in stark contrast to Communism where private property is not allowed, or even liberal “democracy” in which property is brutally taxed and elderly widows are forcibly removed from their homes if they can’t pay. Such abuse by the state would NEVER happen under “all for one” Fascism.
Though firmly anti-Communist and business-friendly, Fascism also rejects the self-centered “me me me” mentality so common under extreme “Capitalism.” The primary goal of corporate Capitalism is profit and stock price. The main objective of Fascism is the well being of the people. Fascism basically tells entrepreneurs: “Go ahead and run your business. Earn a lot of money. Be successful. Create jobs. But don’t produce any products or services which will damage our nation and our people. Be honest. Treat your workers well and pay them a living wage. If you don’t follow this simple standard, we may shut you down.”
With regard to public welfare, the Fascist state may utilize a certain degree of “socialism” to assist the truly needy or deserving. This should in no way be confused with the high-tax Marxist / “democratic” brand of socialism which is calculated to foster mass dependency, create fatherless children and essentially buy votes. The “socialism” of “National Socialist” Germany, for example, was used to help a good hard-working German to buy a Volkswagen (“the people’s wagon”), access higher education, or take a nice family vacation. Hitler’s targeted “socialism” was as far removed from Marx’s comprehensive socialism as a few drops of rum used in a cake recipe is from guzzling down a fifth of vodka straight.
With regard to banking (and this is HUGE!) — money-supply usury is forbidden under Fascism. The government tightly controls monetary policy, including terms of lending and it issues/prints debt-free currency as needed to grow the economy and serve the citizens. And THAT, dear reader, more so than any other factor, is why the blood-sucking / money mad PRC (Predatory Ruling Class) of the modern “liberal” western world HATES Fascism and wants you to fear it.
Economic Fascism values professionals and “Blue Collar” workers equally and, unlike elitist Marxism, promotes harmony between them.
The Fascist accepts the self-evident existence of a Creator and the natural law which logically derives from such belief. He appreciates the importance of a healthy and high culture. He understands that a trashy culture must, in due time, yield the rotten fruit of a trashy broken people — and that a society full of trashy, broken, stupid people is the Marxist’s playground.
This is why Marxist / Trotskyites invariably promote Atheism, the destruction of the traditional family, sexual promiscuity, homosexuality, cross-dressing, sexualization of children, degenerate “modern art,” lousy music, senseless literature, disrespect toward tradition, patriotism, & elders, and all conceivable forms of vulgarity, stupidity, Fake News falsehood, ugliness and moral depravity. The confused, alienated, dumbed-down and demoralized masses thus become putty in the hands of the Marxist master who fills the void left behind by the destruction of the God-centered sane culture which is no more.
This is what Marxists mean when they say: “The proletariat class is the progressive class” — proletariat meaning the masses of beaten down humanity with low class and morals — and “progressive” meaning progress toward a worldwide Communist state. It’s like one of America’s founding revolutionaries, Samuel Adams, once warned:
“It is in the interest of tyrants to reduce the people to ignorance and vice. For they cannot live in any country where virtue and knowledge prevail. The religion and public liberty of a people are intimately connected; their interests are interwoven, they cannot subsist separately; and therefore they rise and fall together. For this reason, it is always observable, that those who are combined to destroy the people’s liberties, practice every art to poison their morals.”
Fascism protects the people from this insidious form of cultural / moral warfare (known as “The Frankfurt School”) which is, at its core, purely political. Not out of “oppression,” but for protection, the Fascist state will closely monitor news, film, theater, art, literature, music, education, etc in order to maintain high moral standards, keep things respectable, promote a proper sense of patriotism and honor, and prevent the dissemination of the type of depraved filth which corrupts society and makes it ripe for Marxist takeover.
With respect to the sexes, unlike Marxism and Predatory Capitalism which view women as “human resources” which add to the Gross Domestic Product and the tax base, Fascism holds the bearers of life in very high regard. Though they are expected to be educated, worldly, and well read., women are encouraged to marry and have children. Contrary to the deliberate and grotesque bitchification and whoreification the young girls we see in the decadent West today, Fascist gals are raised to be strong and proper, yet feminine and submissive. The complementing corollary of this is the rearing of boys to be tough, honorable and responsible — yet gentlemanly. To the extent that this natural order of socialization makes women and men more compatible, the stronger the nuclear family unit — the building block of all healthy civilization — will become.
IN A NUTSHELL
In short, Fascism is an “authoritarian” yet merit-based form of populist government based upon natural order and backed up by the military. Its leaders are expected to aggressively protect and boldly serve the true well-being of the people and nation as a whole — politically, economically and culturally. Under Fascism all people of one’s ethnicity — or at least of common culture if the state is multi-ethnic — are regarded as the greater family of that person. This is the essence of Fascism – a strong consideration of the group’s interests balanced with the rights of the individual.
Whereas Marxists and / “Liberals” are like a pair of abusive domineering parents who barely keep their frightened and depressed children fed; Fascist “parents,” on the other hand, though also “authoritarian,” live for and protect their “children” while encouraging them to become happy, virtuous, free, productive and independent. Hitler, in his Final Testament, written on the eve of his suicide, summed up the Fascist ideal perfectly:
“In these three decades love and loyalty to my people have guided all my thoughts, actions and my life. They gave me the strength to make the most difficult decisions ever to confront mortal man. In these three decades I have spent my strength and my health. … I die with a joyful heart in the knowledge of the immeasurable deeds and achievements of our peasants and workers and of a contribution unique in the history of our youth which bears my name.” (emphasis added)
It is only when the Marxist devil tries to set foot in the happy family home that the Fascist will “crack down” with what Hitler referred to as “Holy Hatred” for the Leftist evil-doers who would once again use “democracy” to reduce the people to moral depravity, economic plunder, alienation and emotional misery.
I don’t know about “youse guys,” but this Fascism stuff actually sounds pretty good to me. Ironically, the greatest endorsement for Fascism comes from the amoral and insane Marxist vermin themselves. You see, the mere fact that both the Red Devils of “Antifa” (Anti-Fascism) “in the streets” — as well as the snobby New World Order Globalist predator string-pullers “in the suites” — all HATE pro-people Fascism so much — is all the evidence one needs of its positive value as the ultimate anti-septic treatment for the plague of Marxism / Libtardism. And so, to you “conservatives” who hate “Antifa” and the evil Marxist Demonrat Party as much as any right-thinking, red-blooded American should — please stop using terms such as “Nazi” and “Fascist” as an insult of the Left.
IS DONALD TRUMP A FASCIST?
*Washington Post (August 21, 2020): How Fascist is Donald Trump *Historians for Peace: (2018): Is Donald Trump a Fascist? *Los Angeles Times (July 25): Portland Proves it. Donald Trump is a Fascist *Boston Globe: (September 22, 2020): Is it Fascism Yet? *Haartez (Israel) (June 22, 2020): Is Donald Trump a Fascist *The Daily Beast (September 3, 2020): I Resisted Calling Donald Trump a Fascist. Not Any More. *New York Daily News: (October 9, 2020): Trump Just Went Full Fascist
Well, considering the fact that America’s Fake News is infested, from top-to-bottom, with Globalist / Marxist vermin, the relentless attacks on Trump the “Fascist” are a good sign that the man is doing something right. It is interesting to note that the oft-repeated motto of Q Anon — long since proved to be an integral part of the Trump inner circle — is the unifying (fasce)“Where We Go One, We Go All!”
The Trump / Q message is unmistakably anti-Globalist, anti-Marxist, anti-Rothschild, anti-Soros, anti-Fake News, anti-Hollywood, and anti-Academia. In spite of the unfortunately necessary negative references to “Nazis,” the astute student of Q Anon and 20th Century history cannot fail to see that the very same self-perpetuating geo-political forces that killed Mussolini and Hitler by murder and forced suicide respectively in April of 1945 — and undid Francoism in Spain by patiently waiting for his natural death which finally came in 1975 — are now out to stop Trumpism.
Like the aforementioned Fascist leaders, Trump also emerged at the 11th hour to save the country from the human horror show that would have been a Killary Clinton presidency. Trump also has the backing of the military, albeit “behind the scenes.” And, if Q Anon is to be believed, Trump and company are planning to arrest countless numbers of these Marxist traitors in government and media in advance of unifying the nation and restoring both political and economic control back to the people.
On the all-important cultural front however, we just don’t see a return to basic decency being possible at this advanced stage of the Marxist cancer. Without such a return to mass sanity and common morality, “the people” will just muck things up again sooner or later. Nonetheless, we welcome whatever rout of the Deep State Globalists which Trump and the Patriots have planned for them. Who knows? Maybe — just maybe — a mass disclosure of Satanic child sex and torture rings operating among the elites would shock the nation to the return to God and his natural order — an order of things which can properly be referred to as “Fascism.”
The First World War (1914-1918) started because the “Triple Entente” of Britain, France & Russia initiated a fight against the “Triple Alliance” of Germany, Austria-Hungary & Ottoman Empire (Turkey). With the objective of inciting an Arab rebellion against their Turkish rulers, the British promised the Arabs an independent state of their own if they helped them to topple and chop up the Ottoman Empire. Though the Arabs fought valiantly during The Arab Revolt of 1916-1918 , little did they know of the secret deal that had been previously hatched behind their backs by the Rothschild – British – French syndicate.
In January of 1916, the secret Sykes–Picot Agreementbetween the United Kingdom and France (with assent from the Russian Empire and the Kingdom of Italy) defined their coming spheres of influence and control that were to be established after their expected victory over the Ottomans. The negotiations — led by diplomats Mark Sykes of Britain and Francois Georges-Picot of France — were held mainly in late 1915.
The dirty deal divided the Ottoman provinces (except for the Arabian Peninsula) into areas of British and French control and influence. The UK would take over what is today Israel (Palestine), Jordan, and southern Iraq. France was to control southeastern Turkey, northern Iraq, Syria and Lebanon. And the Arabs who would be induced into shedding their blood for the independence that the Allies were to promise them? Well, not only did the humiliated Arabs receive nothing for their efforts – but they had to stand by and watch helplessly as the British allowed wave after wave of European Jews (many of them violent) to emigrate to the new “British Mandate” in Arab Palestine, including their holy city of Jerusalem.
In short, the Allies (All-Lies) cunningly, and in premeditated fashion, betrayed the Arabs in general, and the Palestinians in particular.
In 1935, Lawrence, who remained pro-Arab and anti-Zionist (and rumored to have been pro-Hitler), was killed in a motorcycle “accident” that even some “mainstream” researchers now speculate may have been a hit-job by British Intelligence. (here)
Another dirty backroom deal which was hatched during that same period was the infamous Balfour Agreement — by which the British would, after the war, secure Palestine for Jewish immigration as payoff for American Zionists forcing President Woodrow Wilson to drag the United States into the war on Britain’s side — which happened in 1917 (U.S. troops deployed in 1918). // Latter Day Israeli postage stamps commemorate “Balfour Day” with images of Zionist schemer Chaim Weizmann (l) and Lord Balfour (r).
Hitler’s Meeting with the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem
On November 28, 1941 — at a time when Germany was in a very good position in its war against the Soviet Union and the United States is still not involved in the war — Haj Amin al-Husseini, the Grand Mufti (spiritual leader / scholar) of Jerusalem met with Hitler in Berlin. The conventional historical account of the meeting vaguely indicates that the Mufti wanted German support for an uprising against the British and French imperialists, but that Hitler said no. It wasn’t until the 1960’s that a full German record of the meeting between al-Husseini and Hitler was declassified and published. So, who needs academic eggheads to lecture us about historical when the original source for this amazing bit of history is now available to us?
The Real History Chan is pleased to present the official German record of the meeting between Adolf Hitler and the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, Haj Amin al-Husseini, which took place at the Reich Chancellery in Berlin. The record is complete and unaltered – with some analysis added to enhance understanding.
Bosnia and Herzegovina — the Mufti of Jerusalem reviewing a unit of Muslim Bosnians in the service of the Waffen SS
SS Chief Himmler’s 1943 Telegram to the Grand Mufti:
“To the Grand Mufti Amin al-Husseini,
The National-Socialist movement of greater Germany has made its fight against world Jewry a guiding principle since its very beginning. For that reason it has been closely following the battle of freedom-seeking Arabs — and especially in Palestine against the Jewish invaders. The joint recognition of the enemy, and the joint battle against him are what creates the firm allegiance between Germany and freedom-seeking Muslims all over the world. In this spirit, I am happy to wish you on the anniversary of the Balfour Declaration, warm wishes for the continuation of your battle until the big victory.”
German Report: The Grand Mufti began by thanking the Fuhrer for the great honor he had bestowed by receiving him. He wished to seize the opportunity to convey to the Fuhrer of the Greater German Reich, admired by the entire Arab world, his thanks of the sympathy which he had always shown for the Arab and especially the Palestinian cause, and to which he had given clear expression in his public speeches. (emphasis added)
Analysis: Indeed, the Arabs respected Hitler for his expressed sympathy for the Palestinians. Contrary to the false claims of assorted charlatans and fools (or worse?) like Christopher Bjerkness that “Hitler was a Zionist,” nothing could be further from the truth. As far back as Mein Kampf, written in 1925, Hitler scorned the Zionist scheme. He wrote:
“While the Zionists try to make the rest of the World believe that the national consciousness of the Jew finds its satisfaction in the creation of a Palestinian state, the Jews again slyly dupe the dumb Goyim. It doesn’t even enter their heads to build up a Jewish state in Palestine for the purpose of living there; all they want is a central organization for their international world swindler, endowed with its own sovereign rights and removed from the intervention of other states: a haven for convicted scoundrels and a university for budding crooks.”
The only reason why Germany allowed some its Jews to emigrate to Palestine in 1933 was to break the economic sanctions and get rid of some malcontents at the same time.
German Report (continued) : The Arab countries were firmly convinced that Germany would win the war and that the Arab cause would then prosper. The Arabs were Germany’s natural friends because they had the same enemies as had Germany, namely the English, the Jews and the Communists. Therefore they were prepared to cooperate with Germany with all their hearts and stood ready to participate in the war, not only negatively by the commission of acts of sabotage and the instigation of revolutions, but also positively by the formation of an Arab Legion.
Analysis: The Arabs were willing to rise up against their new rulers exactly as they had against the old ones (the Ottomans). The difference this time around would be that if the Germans won, Hitler — a man who, if anything, was sometimes too honorable — would never have betrayed them like the British and French had three decades earlier. The Arabs trusted Hitler.
German Report (continued): The Arabs could be more useful to Germany as allies than might be apparent at first glance, both for geographical reasons and because of the suffering inflicted upon them by the English and the Jews. Furthermore, they had had close relations with all Muslim nations, of which they could make use in behalf of the common cause. The Arab Legion would be quite easy to raise. An appeal by the Mufti to the Arab countries and the prisoners of Arab, Algerian, Tunisian and Moroccan nationality in Germany would produce a great number of volunteers eager to fight. Of Germany’s victory the Arab world was firmly convinced, not only because the Reich possessed a large army, brave soldiers and military leaders of genius, but also because the Almighty could never award the victory to an unjust cause.
Analysis: Clearly, Hitler understood the benefit of an alliance with the Arabs and the vast Muslim world in general. The “great number” of Arab “prisoners” mentioned in the report refers to the 80,000 POW’s from France’s Arab colonies that Germany was humanely holding until a final peace treaty — blocked by the British — could be reached. These already-trained soldiers could be unleashed against the depleted British in the Middle East, when the time was right.
German Report (continued) : In this struggle, the Arabs were striving for the independence and unity of Palestine, Syria and Iraq. They had the fullest confidence in the Fuhrer and looked to his hand for the balm on their wounds, which had been inflicted upon them by the enemies of Germany. The Mufti then mentioned the letter he had received from Germany, which stated that Germany was holding no Arab territories and understood and recognized the aspirations to independence and freedom of the Arabs, just as she supported the elimination of the Jewish national home. (emphasis added)
A public declaration in this sense would be very useful for its propagandistic effect on the Arab peoples at this moment. It would rouse the Arabs from their momentary lethargy and give them new courage. It would also ease the Mufti’s work of secretly organizing the Arabs against the moment when they could strike. At the same time, he could give the assurance that the Arabs would in strict discipline patiently wait for the right moment and only strike upon an order from Berlin.
With regard to the events in Iraq, the Mufti observed that the Arabs in that country certainly had by no means been incited by Germany to attack England, but solely had acted in reaction to a direct English assault upon their honor.
The Turks, he believed, would welcome the establishment of an Arab government in the neighboring territories because they would prefer weaker Arab to strong European governments in the neighboring countries and, being themselves a nation of 7 million (actually, 18 million in 1941), they had more over nothing to fear from the 1,700,000 Arabs inhabiting Syria, Transjordan, Iraq and Palestine.
France likewise would have no objections to the unification plan because it had conceded independence to Syria as early as 1936 and had given her approval to the unification of Iraq and Syria under King Faisal as early as 1933.
Analysis: This plan to break British power in the Middle East was well thought-out — not only logistically, but geo-politically.
German Report (continued) : In these circumstances he was renewing his request that the Fuhrer make a public declaration so that the Arabs would not lose hope, which is so powerful a force in the life of nations. With such hope in their hearts the Arabs, as he had said, were willing to wait. They were not pressing for immediate realization for their aspirations; they could easily wait half a year or a whole year. But if they were not inspired with such a hope by a declaration of this sort, it could be expected that the English would be the gainers from it.
The Fuhrer replied that Germany’s fundamental attitude on these questions, as the Mufti himself had already stated, was clear. Germany stood for uncompromising war against the Jews. That naturally included active opposition to the Jewish national home in Palestine, which was nothing other than a center, in the form of a state, for the exercise of destructive influence by Jewish interests. Germany was also aware that the assertion that the Jews were carrying out the functions of economic pioneers in Palestine was a lie. The work there was done only by the Arabs, not by the Jews. Germany was resolved, step by step, to ask one European nation after the other to solve its Jewish problem, and at the proper time to direct a similar appeal to non-European nations as well.
Germany was at the present time engaged in a life and death struggle with two citadels of Jewish power: Great Britain and Soviet Russia. Theoretically there was a difference between England’s capitalism and Soviet Russia’s communism; actually, however, the Jews in both countries were pursuing a common goal. This was the decisive struggle; on the political plane, it presented itself in the main as a conflict between Germany and England, but ideologically it was a battle between National Socialism and the Jews. It went without saying that Germany would furnish positive and practical aid to the Arabs involved in the same struggle, because platonic promises were useless in a war for survival or destruction in which the Jews were able to mobilize all of England’s power for their ends.
The aid to the Arabs would have to be material aid. Of how little help sympathies alone were in such a battle had been demonstrated plainly by the operation in Iraq, where circumstances had not permitted the rendering of really effective, practical aid. In spite of all the sympathies, German aid had not been sufficient and Iraq was overcome by the power of Britain, that is, the guardian of the Jews.
Analysis: This is confirmation that Hitler wanted to bring the fight to the British in the Middle East, and expel both them and the Zionist invaders of Palestine.
German Report: The Mufti could not but be aware, however, that the outcome of the struggle going on at present would also decide the fate of the Arab world. The Fuhrer therefore had to think and speak coolly and deliberately, as a rational man and primarily as a soldier, as the leader of the German and allied armies. Everything of a nature to help in this titanic battle for the common cause, and thus also for the Arabs, would have to be done. Anything however, that might contribute to weakening the military situation must be put aside, no matter how unpopular this move might be.
Germany was now engaged in very severe battles to force the gateway to the northern Caucasus region. The difficulties were mainly with regard to maintaining the supply, which was most difficult as a result of the destruction of railroads and highways as well as the oncoming winter. If at such a moment, the Fuhrer were to raise the problem of Syria in a declaration, those elements in France which were under de Gaulle’s influence would receive new strength. They would interpret the Fuhrer’s declaration as an intention to break up France’s colonial empire and appeal to their fellow countrymen that they should rather make common cause with the English to try to save what still could be saved. A German declaration regarding Syria would in France be understood to refer to the French colonies in general, and that would at the present time create new troubles in western Europe, which means that a portion of the German armed forces would be immobilized in the west and no longer be available for the campaign in the east.
The Fuhrer then made the following statement to the Mufti, enjoining him to lock it in the uttermost depths of his heart:
1. He (the Fuhrer) would carry on the battle to the total destruction of the Judeo-Communist empire in Europe.
2. At some moment which was impossible to set exactly today but which in any event was not distant, the German armies would in the course of this struggle reach the southern exit from Caucasia.
3. As soon as this had happened, the Fuhrer would on his own give the Arab world the assurance that its hour of liberation had arrived. Germany’s objective would then be solely the destruction of the Jewish element residing in the Arab sphere under the protection of British power. In that hour the Mufti would be the most authoritative spokesman for the Arab world. It would then be his task to set off the Arab operations, which he had secretly prepared. When that time had come, Germany could also be indifferent to French reaction to such a declaration.
Once Germany had forced open the road to Iran and Iraq through Rostov; it would be also the beginning of the end of the British World Empire. He (the Fuhrer) hoped that the coming year would make it possible for Germany to thrust open the Caucasian gate to the Middle East. For the good of their common cause, it would be better if the Arab proclamation were put off for a few more months than if Germany were to create difficulties for herself without being able thereby to help the Arabs.
The Fuhrer fully appreciated the eagerness of the Arabs for a public declaration of the sort requested by the Grand Mufti. But he would beg him to consider that he (the Fuhrer) himself was the Chief of State of the German Reich for five long years during which he was unable to make to his own homeland the announcement of its liberation. He had to wait with that until the announcement could be made on the basis of a situation brought about by the force of arms that the Anschluss had been carried out.
The moment that Germany’s tank divisions and air squadrons had made their appearance south of the Caucasus, the public appeal requested by the Grand Mufti could go out to the Arab world.
Analysis: You see, Hitler did not “turn down” the Mufti’s request for a public declaration. To the contrary, he promised bold words and actions, when the timing was right, sometime in 1942.
Hitler’s plan was to first defeat the Soviets in southern Russia, grab their oil fields, and then head south towards the Middle East. At that historical moment of supreme strength and momentum, Hitler would excite and inspire the Arab world by publicly announcing the secret German-Arab alliance to expel the Rothschild British and Zionists from the Middle East – with the Jews (both in Europe and in Palestine) being humanely transferred to a new homeland on the beautiful island of Madagascar. (here)
German Report (continued) : The Grand Mufti replied that it was his view that everything would come to pass just as the Fuhrer had indicated. He was fully reassured and satisfied by the words which he had heard from the Chief of the German State. He asked, however, whether it would not be possible, secretly at least, to enter into an agreement with Germany of the kind he had just outlined for the Fuhrer. (emphasis added)
The Fuhrer replied that he had just now given the Grand Mufti precisely that confidential declaration. The Grand Mufti thanked him for it and stated in conclusion that he was taking his leave from the Fuhrer in full confidence and with reiterated thanks for the interest shown in the Arab cause.
Analysis: Unfortunately for both Germany and the Arabs, the pivotal 1942-1943 Battle of Stalingrad
(in southern Russia) prevented the German breakout through the Caucuses and down to the Middle East. With the limitless bodies of the Red Army being so heavily (and I mean heavily!) supplied by FDR’s “Lend Lease” arsenal of state-of-the-art weaponry and essential supplies; and with Germany facing an American-led second front in the West and in Africa — the promised and expected German liberation of the Arabs and of occupied Palestine (including Jerusalem!) never happened. Oh what a moment in time that would have been!
As we prepare to kick up our respective feet for a bit of lake-bound R&R with some gluttonous BBQing for Labor Day, “The Editorial Board” of The New York Times thought it would be a good “teachable moment” ™ to review how this “holiday” came about. With all due respect to the “blue collar” working folks who keep the country afloat, the fact is, Labor Day is every bit as much of a communist creation as May Day (May 1st). As a matter of fact, May Day (the date of the founding of the Illuminati in 1776) is also known as International Workers’ Day and/or Labor Day in many other countries.
But here in the turn-of-the-19th-century anti-communist United States, establishing a Labor Day holiday on May 1st would not have been be possible — much too obvious. And so, the Reds and their libtard dupes instead lobbied for the first Monday in September. Labor Day was heavily promoted by the Central Labor Union(forerunner of the AFL-CIO) and the Knights of Labor / KoL (some of whose members were involved in the infamous Haymarket Square riots / cop-killings of 1886). The masonic-linked unions organized the first parade in New York City. In 1887, Oregon became the first U.S. state to proclaim it as a public holiday. By the time it became an official federal holiday in 1894, thirty states had already officially, and innocently, adopted the Communist-inspired Labor Day.
Since the days of Karl Marx and his “workers of the world unite” shtick, the “anti-capitalist” Reds have always manipulated the passions of “the working man” ™ as a means to destabilize the system and redirect power and wealth towards a super-centralized state. That state, of course, is then financed and controlled by the very same big banker “capitalists” that secretly control the “anti-capitalist” Reds! The big joke on Joe Hardhat, who may very well have legitimate grievances and honest concerns about his work conditions, is that neither the Red union bosses nor their secret capitalist bosses give a rat’s ass about him. Once the national economy is consolidated into the hands of the New World Order big money boys, “the working man” ™ – who had so faithfully and often violently fought for “change” – gets tossed aside like a used up lemon. Whatever good that his union may have done for him and his family was only a necessary side-effect, never the main objective.
And that is why the phony labor bosses chose to only cosmetically fight the Globalists’ disastrous job-killing NAFTA trade deal of 1994; and it is also why they were strangely silent about Obongo’s push to ratify the doubly disastrous TPP trade deal — a program which Trump would stop cold in his first week in office. The banker “capitalists” hold a tight leash on their “labor leader” puppets — a hidden reality which The Great One (that’s Hitler for you newbies) understood and warned about many years ago. Indeed, very soon after coming to power in Germany in 1933, Hitler disbanded the Marxist trade unions and replaced them with the German Labor Front — an organization which imposed better working conditions while respecting the interests of business and industry. In short order, both management and labor came to respect each other and work as a team.
In Mein Kampf, Hitler’s famous autobiography, Hitler wrote that the trade unions:
“… created the economic weapon which the international world Jew uses for the ruination of the economic basis of free, independent states, for the annihilation of their national industry and of their national commerce, and thereby for the enslavement of free people in the service of the above-the-state-standing, world finance Jewry.”
Tell it, Great One. Tell it!
The game works the same today as it did back then, notwithstanding the fact that trade unions aren’t as powerful as they once were. Hitler showed the world that the dignity and welfare of labor and the legitimate interests of the business class need not be adversarial concerns. To the contrary, when labor and management come to respect each other and work together, it benefits all. Unfortunately, in today’s America, too many propagandized union members fail to appreciate what it really takes to keep a business up and running. Likewise, too many CEO’s do indeed (pardon the commie-sounding slogan here) “place profits over people.” We sure could use another Great One again.
In spite of the holiday’s Red origins — a very relaxing Labor Day extended weekend and cookout to our readers. It’s going to be an interesting fall season.