1500 Scientists Say ‘There Is No Climate Emergency’ – The Real Environment Movement Was Hijacked

Many people worldwide are concerned about climate change and believe there is a climate emergency. For decades we have been told by the United Nations that Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from human activity are causing disastrous climate change. In 2018, a UN IPCC report even warned that ‘we have 12 years to save the Earth’, thus sending millions of people worldwide into a frenzy.

Thirty-five years ago, the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and the (World Meteorological Organization) WMO established the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) to provide scientific advice on the complex topic of climate change. The panel was asked to prepare, based on available scientific information, a report on all aspects relevant to climate change and its impacts and to formulate realistic response strategies. The first assessment report of the IPCC served as the basis for negotiating the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). Governments worldwide have signed this convention, thereby, significantly impacting the lives of the people of the world.

However, many scientists dispute with the UN-promoted man-made climate change theory, and many people worldwide are confused by the subject, or are unaware of the full facts. Please allow me to provide some information you may not be aware of.

1. Very few people actually dig into the data, they simply accept the UN IPPC reports. Yet many highly respectable and distinguished scientists have done exactly that and found that the UN-promoted manmade climate change theory is seriously flawed. Are you aware that 1500 of the world’s leading climate scientists and professionals in over 30 countries have signed a declaration that there is no climate emergency and have refuted the United Nations claims in relation to man-made climate change? See this

2. I have also signed this declaration. How can I make such an assertion? I have experience in the field as a former scientist at the Department of Energy and Climate Change, UK Government; and as former staff member at the United Nations Environment Division, where I was responsible for servicing the Pollution Release and Transfer Register Protocol, a Multinational Environmental Agreement, involving the monitoring of pollutants to land, air, and water worldwide. Real pollution exists, but the problem is not CO2. Industrial globalisation has produced many substances that are registered as pollutants, including thousands of new man-made chemical compounds, toxins, nano-particles and genetically modified organisms (GMOs) that are in violation of the scientific pre-cautionary principle.

A book I published recently also provides ample evidence and testimony from renowned scientists that there is no Climate emergency. The book titled ‘Transcending the Climate Change Deception Toward Real Sustainability’ is available here on amazon.COM

3. Next, I will mention the Irish Climate Science Forum (ICSF) website, a valuable resource founded by Jim O’Brien. I am grateful to the ICSF for their excellent work in highlighting the scientific flaws in the UN climate narrative. The ICSF provides a comprehensive lecture series from renowned international scientists providing much evidence, analysis, and data that contradicts the UN assertions. The lectures are available here.

The ICSF scientific view coincides with those of the Climate Intelligence (CLINTEL) foundation that operates in the fields of climate change and climate policy. CLINTEL was founded in 2019 by emeritus professor of geophysics Guus Berkhout and science journalist Marcel Crok. Based on this common conviction, 20 Irish scientists and several ICSF members have co-signed the CLINTEL World Climate Declaration “There is No Climate Emergency” (see this).

4. The reality is that the climate changes naturally and slowly in its own cycle, and solar activity is the dominant factor in climate and not Co2. We can conclude that carbon emissions or methane from livestock, such as cows, are not the dominant factors in climate change. In essence, therefore, the incessant UN, government, and corporate-media-produced climate hysteria in relation to carbon emissions and methane from cows has no scientific basis.

Please note that I have no commercial interest in stating that climate change is not caused by CO2. In truth I am against ‘real’ pollution, and the reality is that the CO2 component is not a pollutant. Unfortunately, many misinformed environmentalists are driving around in electric cars, the battery production for which has caused vast amounts of ‘real’ pollution via the industrial mining and processing of rare earth metals, and the consequent pollution to land, air and water systems. Note that the UN does not focus on the thousands of real pollutants that corporate industrial globalisation creates.

5. The conclusions of the Climate Intelligence foundation include the following

There is no climate emergency. Therefore, there is no cause for panic and alarm.

Natural as well as anthropogenic factors cause warming: The geological archive reveals that Earth’s climate has varied as long as the planet has existed, with natural cold and warm phases. The Little Ice Age ended as recently as 1850. Therefore, it is no surprise that we now are experiencing a period of warming.

Warming is far slower than predicted: The world has warmed significantly less than predicted by IPCC on the basis of modeled anthropogenic forcing. The gap between the real world and the modeled world tells us that we are far from understanding climate change.

Climate policy relies on inadequate models: Climate models have many shortcomings and are not remotely plausible as global policy tools. They blow up the effect of greenhouse gases such as CO2. In addition, they ignore the fact that enriching the atmosphere with COis beneficial.

CO2 is plant food, the basis of all life on Earth: CO2 is not a pollutant. It is essential to all life on Earth. Photosynthesis is a blessing. More CO2 is beneficial for nature, greening the Earth: additional CO2 in the air has promoted growth in global plant biomass. It is also good for agriculture, increasing the yields of crops worldwide.

Global warming has not increased natural disasters: There is no statistical evidence that global warming is intensifying hurricanes, floods, droughts and suchlike natural disasters, or making them more frequent.

6. In the above book I reference the relevant work and scientific presentations of some of the world’s leading climate scientists. Let us examine some of the work and testimonies of these scientists:

“deeply flawed logic, obscured by shrewd and unrelenting propaganda, actually enabled a coalition of powerful special interests to convince nearly everyone in the world that Co2 from human industry was a dangerous plant destroying toxin. It will be remembered as the greatest mass delusion in the history of the world – that Co2 the life of plants was considered for a time to be a deadly poison.” – Professor Richard Lindzen, Professor Emeritus of Atmospheric Sciences at MIT.

Dr Nils-Axel Mörner was a former Committee Chairman at the UN International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). He was an expert involved in reviewing the first IPPC documents. He says the UN IPPC is misleading humanity about climate change.  He tried to warn that the IPPC were publishing lies and false information that would inevitably be discredited. In an interview, he stated: “This is the most dangerous and frightening part of it. How a lobbyist group, such as the IPPC, has been able to fool the whole world. These organised and deceitful forces are dangerous” and expressed shock “that the UN and governments would parade children around the place at UN Climate summits as propaganda props”. The following is his testimony as detailed

“solar activity is the dominant factor in climate and not Co2… something is basically sick in the blame Co2 hypothesis…  It was launched more than 100 years ago and almost immediately excellent physicists demonstrated that the hypothesis did not work.

I was the chairman of the only international committee on sea levels changes and as such a person I was elected to be the expert reviewer on the (UN IPPC) sea levels chapter. It was written by 38 persons and not a single one was a sea level specialist… I was shocked by the low quality it was like a student paper… I went through it and showed them that it was wrong and wrong and wrong…

The scientific truth is on the side of the sceptics… I have thousands of high ranked scientists all over the world who agree that NO, CO2 is not the driving mechanism and that everything is exaggerated. In the field of physics 80 to 90% of physicists know that the Co2 hypothesis is wrong… Of course, metrologists they believe in this because that is their own profession – they live on it.… I suspect that behind-the-scenes promoters… have an ulterior motive… It’s a wonderful way of controlling taxation controlling people” – Dr Nils-Axel Mörner, a former Committee Chairman at the UN IPPC, and former head of the Paleo Geo-physics and Geo-dynamics department in Stockholm

Another climate scientist with impeccable credentials that has broken rank is Dr Mototaka Nakamura. He asserts:  “Our models are mickey-mouse mockeries of the real world”. Dr Nakamura received a Doctorate of Science from MIT, and for nearly 25 years specialized in abnormal weather and climate change at prestigious institutions that included MIT, Georgia Institute of Technology, NASA, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, JAMSTEC and Duke University. Dr Nakamura explains why the data foundation underpinning global warming science is “untrustworthy” and cannot be relied on and that:“Global mean temperatures before 1980 are based on untrustworthy data”.

Professor John R. Christy, Director of Atmospheric and Earth Sciences, University of Alabama, has provided detailed analysis of climate data, see Endnote [i]. I summarise the main points from his analysis below:

“The established global warming theory significantly misrepresents the impact of extra greenhouse gases; the weather that affects people the most is not becoming more extreme or more dangerous; temperatures were higher in the 1930s than today; between 1895 and 2015, 14 of the top 15 years with the highest heat records occurred before 1960; the temperatures we are experiencing now in 2021 were the same as 120 years ago…

the number of major tornadoes between 1954 and 1986 averaged 56/year, but between 1987 and 2020 the average was only 34/year; between 1895 and 2015 on average there has been no change in the number of very wet days per month, and no change in the number of very dry days per month, and the 20 driest months were before 1988. Between 1950 and 2019 the percentage of land area experiencing droughts has not increased globally – the trend is flat; the incidence of wildfires in North America between 1600 and 2000 has decreased substantially. Sea levels rose 12.5 cm per decade for 8,000 years and then it levelled off, now it rising only 2.5 cm per decade… worrying about 30 cm rise in sea level in a decade is ridiculous, in a hurricane the east coast of the U.S. gets a 20 foot rise in 6 hours, so a 30 cm rise will be easily handled!”

In a lecture titled The imaginary climate crisis – how can we change the message? Available on the Irish Climate Science Forum website, see Endnote [ii]. Richard L Lindzen, Professor Emeritus of Atmospheric Sciences at MIT summarises the battle against the climate hysteria as follows:

“in the long history of the earth there has been almost no correlation between climate and co2… the paleoclimate record shows unambiguously that Co2 is not a control knob… the narrative is absurd…  it gives governments the power to control the energy sector… for about 33 years, many of us have been battling against the climate hysteria… There were more important leading people who were objecting to it, they were unfortunately older and by now most of them dead…

Elites are always searching for ways to advertise their virtue and assert their authority. They believe they are entitled to view science as a source of authority rather than a process, and they try to appropriate science, suitably and incorrectly simplified, as the basis for their movement.”

“CO2…  it’s not a pollutant… it’s the product of all plant respiration, it is essential for plant life and photosynthesis…  if you ever wanted a leverage point to control everything from exhalation to driving, this would be a dream. So it has a kind of fundamental attractiveness to bureaucratic mentality.” – Prof. Richard Lindzen, Professor Emeritus of Atmospheric Sciences at MIT

Patrick Moore, co-founder of Greenpeace, and President of Greenpeace in Canada for seven years, states:

“the whole climate crisis is not only fake news its fake science… of course climate change is real it’s been happening since the beginning of time, but it’s not dangerous and it’s not caused by people… climate change is a perfectly natural phenomenon and this modern warming period actually began about 300 years ago when the little ice age began to come to an end. There is nothing to be afraid of and all they are doing is instilling fear. Most of the scientists who are saying it’s a crisis are on perpetual government grants.

I was one of the (Greenpeace) founders… by the mid-80s… we were hijacked by the extreme left who basically took Greenpeace from a science-based organisation to an organisation based on sensationalism, misinformation and fear… you don’t have a plan to feed 8 billion people without fossils fuels or get the food into the cities…” – Patrick Moore, co-founder of Greenpeace

Professor William Happer, Princeton University, Former Director of Science at the US Department of Energy, is also a strong voice against the myth of man-made global warming. He states: “More CO2 benefits the Earth”.

7. The UN IPCC cherry picks data, uses flawed modelling and scenarios not remotely related to the real world

The UN climate crisis predictions are not based on physical evidence, rather they are based on complex computer modelling. One has to decode and analyse the modelling process to ascertain whether or not the models are valid and accurate or whether they have obvious flaws. The vast majority of scientists, economists, politicians and the general public have simply assumed that the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) models are accurate. Very few people have the time or skills to analyse these models, not to mention actually dispute them. Nonetheless, there were many senior and highly distinguished scientists that did exactly that – they claimed the UN narrative was incorrect and that there was no climate emergency. Their voices have been drowned out by a vast money-driven political and media establishment of the globalised ‘system’. The vitally important work of some of these renowned scientists is referenced in the above book.

“The computer models are making systematic dramatic errors… they are all parametrised… fudged…  the models really don’t work” – Patrick J. Michaels, Director, Cato Institute Center for the Study of Science

Dr Roger Pielke Jr, University of Colorado, has conducted a detailed scientific review and analysis of the UN IPCC AR6 report, see Endnote [iii].  He describes that in relation to climate modelling, the IPCC detached the models from socio-economic plausibility. In creating the models, instead of first completing integrative assessment models (IAMs), the IPCC skipped this essential step and jumped straight to radiative forcing scenarios and thus these scenarios are not based on competed IAMs. This led much of climate modelling down the wrong track. I quote points from Dr Pielke’s analysis as follows:

“The four IPCC scenarios came from a large family of models so instead of splitting modelling from socio-economic assumptions the models already had the assumptions faked and baked in to them, because they had to have those assumptions to produce the required radiative forcing (to produce a desired climate ‘crisis scenario’ outcome).

In another fateful decision the 4 representative concentration pathways (RCPs) came from 4 different IAMs, which was a huge mistake.  These models are completely unrelated to each other, but the impression has been given that they are of a common set, only differing in their radiative forcing, this was a huge mistake. Furthermore, no-one has responsibility for determining whether these scenarios are plausible. The climate community decided which scenario to prioritise and they chose the two most implausible scenarios! There are thousands of climate assumptions, but only 8 to 12 of them are available currently for climate research. The IPCC report even states that “no likelihood is attached to the scenarios in this report”. The likelihood is considered low they admit – This is an incredible admission by the IPCC.

These extreme unlikely scenarios dominate the literature and the IPCC report; therefore, the IPCC report is biased. Bottom line is that there is massive confusion. The IPCCs’ Richard Moss warned that RCP 8.5 was not to be used as a reference for the other RCPs, but 5,800 scientific papers worldwide misuse it like that… The whole process is seriously flawed… Nothing close to the real world is represented by the IPCC scenarios. Climate science has a huge problem! The IPCC currently uses RCP 8.5 as the ‘business as usual’ scenario, but RCP 8.5 is wild fantasy land and not remotely related to current reality at all… climate science has a scientific integrity crisis.” – Dr Roger Pielke Jr, University of Colorado,

8. Financialization of the entire world economy is now based on a life-killing ‘net-zero’ greenhouse gas emissions strategy.

The UN Agenda 2030 plan and the Paris Agreement goal to reduce CO2 emissions by 7% per annum until 2030 is in effect a plan that would disable the current resource mechanisms of the industrial economy for the food, energy and goods that enable human life and survival. This is being implemented before humanity has transitioned away from the flawed polluting trans-national industrial economy toward self-sufficient local/regional economies.

Zero carbon emissions, in essence, means pulling the plug on current systems of industrial agriculture, transport, goods production, electricity production, etc., and many millions of people reliant on these systems worldwide could be faced with a lack of electricity, food, goods, etc. This could have terrible consequences, particularly in locations and countries, that are currently unable to produce much food.

It should be noted that for decades, these same political, government, and corporate powers have rampantly promoted corporate economic globalization and fossil fuel dependency. Whilst, at the same time actively hindering the funding, creation, or government support of, more self-sufficient local communities/regions, and local co-operatives. Most of the world population thus became reliant on the globalized fossil-fuel dependent system.

9. Central bankers are entirely funding / controlling the advancement of the worldwide climate change ‘project’

The decision to drastically reduce CO2, one of the most essential compounds to sustain all life, is no co-incidence. It should be noted that it is the world’s central bankers that are behind this decision and are entirely funding and controlling the advancement of the worldwide project of combatting man-made climate-change.

This project involves an attempt to de-carbonise the activities of the entire world population. In December 2015, the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) created the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosure (TCFD), which represents $118 trillion of assets globally, see Endnote  [iv]. In essence this means that the financialization of the entire world economy is based on meeting nonsensical aims such as “net-zero greenhouse gas emissions”. The TCFD includes key people from the world’s mega-banks and asset management companies, including JP Morgan Chase; BlackRock; Barclays Bank; HSBC; China’s ICBC bank; Tata Steel, ENI oil, Dow Chemical, and more.

The fact that the world’s largest banks and asset management corporations, including BlackRock, Goldman Sachs, the UN, the World Bank, the Bank of England and other central banks of the BIS, have all linked to push a vague, mathematically nonsensical ‘green’ economy, is no coincidence. There is another agenda at play that has nothing to do with environmentalism. The green economy along with UN Agenda 2030 is an agenda of world control, and will also develop trillions of dollars for the behind-the-scenes mega-banks. When the world largest banks, corporations, and institutions, all align to push a climate change agenda that has zero evidence, one can see there is another major agenda going on behind the scenes. This agenda tries to convince the common people of the world to make huge sacrifices under the emotive guise of “saving our planet.”. While all the time the corporations and banks make vast profits, and political institutions implement worldwide technocratic control systems under the banner of combatting, and adapting to, so-called man-made climate change.

“The links between the world’s largest financial groups, central banks and global corporations to the current push for a radical climate strategy to abandon the fossil fuel economy in favor of a vague, unexplained Green economy, it seems, is less about genuine concern to make our planet a clean and healthy environment to live. Rather it is an agenda, intimately tied to the UN Agenda 2030 for “sustainable” economy, and to developing literally trillions of dollars in new wealth for the global banks and financial giants who constitute the real powers that be… “ – F. William Engdahl, strategic risk consultant and lecturer

Back in 2010, the head of Working Group 3 of the UN IPCC, Dr Otmar Edenhofer, told an interviewer,

“…one must say clearly that we redistribute de facto the world’s wealth by climate policy. One has to free oneself from the illusion that international climate policy is environmental policy. This has almost nothing to do with environmental policy anymore.”

To better perceive what is ‘behind the curtain’ of the Climate hoax and the UN/WEF agenda it also helps to examine what has happened in the decades beforehand. It is important to perceive the implications of the worldwide fractional-reserve debt-money banking scam and the subtle system of debt-slavery that has existed for decades.  If you look at the World Bank website you will see that virtually every nation on Earth is in vast debt. In debt to who you may ask? The answer is to privately owned mega-banks. For many decades the so-called banking and corporate elites have had full control of the source of money creation and its allocation, via the debt-money system, and have therefore, by default, been able to fund, and increasingly control and manipulate the entire world spectrum of industry, media, government, education, ideological supremacy and war to their own design, agenda and benefit. Mayer Amschel Rothschild (banker) is widely reported to have said:

 “Give me control of a nation’s money supply and I care not who makes its laws.”

10. Central bankers hijacked the real environmental movement in 1992 creating the fake climate change agenda

Psychopaths can utilise any ideology and, change it from within to something that may eventually be entirely different to its original purpose.  Meanwhile, the original followers and advocates continue to pursue what they believe is the original ideology, but gradually become mere pawns in the agenda of a self-serving elite. Unfortunately, over the past decades, this is exactly what has happened in the environmental movement.

Whistleblower George Hunt served as an official host at a key environmental meeting in Denver, Colorado in 1987, and states that David Rockefeller; Baron Edmund De Rothschild; US Secretary of State Baker; Maurice Strong, a UN official and an employee of the Rockefeller and Rothschild trusts; EPA administrator William Ruccleshaus; UN Secretary General in Geneva MacNeill, along with World Bank and IMF officials were at this meeting. Hunt was surprised to see all these rich elite bankers at the meeting and questioned what they were doing there at an environmental congress.

In a video recording, Hunt later provided important evidence from the documents of the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3-14 June 1992. This conference was the well-known UN ’92 Earth Summit and was run by UNCED. According to Hunt, via the Earth summit, the UN was setting a net, an agenda, to place the power over the Earth and its peoples into their own hands. The world private banking cartel are the same ultra-rich banking families that had been instrumental in the setting up of the World Bank, the UN, and other international institutions, after WW2. Their political cohorts included Stalin (the leader of a brutal communist regime in the USSR that committed genocide of millions of people), UK Prime minister Churchill, and US President Roosevelt. Hunt refers to these banking families and their financial and international institutional networks as:

“The same world order that tricked third world countries to borrow funds and rack up enormous debts… and purposely creating war and debt to bring societies into their control. The world order crowd are not a nice group of people…”– George Hunt, Whistleblower speaking about the UN Earth summit of 1992

As a consequence of the UN Earth Summit, the honest, genuine environment movement that actually cared about real pollution to land, air and water, was politically hi-jacked by powerful political and financial interests with a different agenda.

Maurice Strong, a UN official and an employee of the Rockefeller and Rothschild trusts, had convened the first UNCED congress in Stockholm, Sweden, in 1972. Then, 20 years later he was the convenor and secretary general of UNCED. Hunt also provided video evidence from the Fourth UNCED World Congress meeting in 1987 of an international investment banker, stating that:

“I suggest therefore that this be sold not through a democratic process that would take too long and require far too much funds to educate the cannon-fodder, unfortunately, which populates the Earth. We have to take almost an elitist program…”

Thus, the decrees leading to the 1992 UN Earth summit were dictated without debate or opportunity for dissent and would supersede national laws. The decrees were dictated into existence by the banker Edmund de Rothschild, who got these major decrees into the ’92 UN resolutions without debate or challenge. Hunt asserts that he was denied the opportunity to openly challenge Rothschild’s remarks by the meeting Chairman.

Is it any surprise that the Rothschild bank of Geneva is the nucleus of the World Conservation bank and the wealthy elite are integrated into the bank via the Rothschilds private offering of shares. The banks assumes control of world conservation and decides and controls how these resources are allocated or utilized.

11. Despite the deceptive and fake environmental facade, it has adopted, the vast institutional entity of the UN has fully endorsed environmentally destructive industrial globalisation for the past 70 years. The UN climate change, sustainable development and green economy policies over the past 30 years are little more than worldwide marketing tricks that have tragically brainwashed two generations of young people who do not understand what the UN actually is, and who is it is really designed to serve.

This current globalised system involves the promotion of beliefs and fake science that claim to be unchallengeable truths, but are, in fact, ideologies in which evidence is manipulated, twisted, and distorted to prove the ‘governing idea’, and thus promote its worldwide dissemination. They start with the conclusion they want and then wrench and manipulate what scant evidence they can to fit that conclusion. Man-made climate change due to anthropogenic carbon emission is a major example of this.

Institutions, including the UN, the World Economic Forum (WEF), and the World Health Organisation (WHO), are privately-motivated unelected unaccountable organisations controlled by the source of debt-money creation, i.e., the world private-banking cartel; and are just clever marketing tools and political mechanisms for implementing and maintaining a corrupt worldwide system, under the clever guise of ‘fixing the problems of the world’.

These powerful special interests have been promoting certain ‘ideologies’ for decades to advance their corporate and political aims. The word “sustainable” was hijacked decades ago, and it is now deceptively used to advance the agendas of globalist mega-corporate interests who couldn’t care less about the environment. The aim is to catapult humanity into the arms of UN Agenda 2030 and the WEF ‘reset’ plan, which are clever marketing plans entirely designed by the so-called elite mega-corporate interests of the WEF Davos group.

12. Furthermore, the current green energy/renewable technologies being promoted by the UN and WEF, are not a viable solution for the world’s energy supply. Although these technologies have some limited viability in certain locations and scenarios, the fact remains that the Energy Returned on Energy Invested is much too low – in essence the entire process is mathematically flawed. This is evidenced by the work of scientists, including Professor David MacKay, former Regius Professor of Engineering at Cambridge University and former Chief Scientific Advisor at the UK Department of Energy and Climate Change.


In summary, CO2 reduction is the main focus of the UN-promoted climate-change-hysteria that has been rampant among the world’s population. However, the proclaimed climate crisis exists in computer models only.  The cult of ‘manmade climate change’ is a media and UN politically-promoted ‘ideology’, that is used for a wider political and corporate agenda. Manmade climate change is not based in fact, and has hijacked real environmental concerns.

The world’s central bankers are fully funding the worldwide climate change ‘project’. The truism ‘follow the money’ springs to mind – and by doing so, one quickly discovers who runs the corporate, political, and media world.

Due to incessant UN, government, and corporate-promoted climate change propaganda, many people are, thus, in a media-induced state of confusion, and, thus, blindly assume their pre-determined role in society under this ‘dictatorship of words’ without even being aware of it. For example, we now have millions of so-called climate change warriors blind to the fact that climate change is not actually caused by carbon emissions. This is all to scare people into accepting totalitarian authority and limitations to their freedom and personal wellbeing.

The unpalatable reality is that people’s access to energy and resources is being intentionally reduced via bogus climate change policies, high inflation, ongoing geo-political theatre and intentionally instigated war.

We cannot understand how to create a truly resilient society unless we correctly perceive the current society we live in and how it came to exist. So, who are the architects of the current paradigm. The above book is designed to help in that regard. Unless we recognize the untruths of the current paradigm, even if it is not ‘politically correct’ to do so, then we will not be able to make the correct adjustments to our current communities and local/regional networks, or create a truly resilient thriving society in Ireland. In this spirit of truth, new networks are emerging worldwide.


[i] Source: Irish Climate Science Forum lecture titled Testing Climate Claims 2021 Update available at http://www.icsf.ie

[ii] The Irish Climate Science Forum website URL is http://www.icsf.ie

[iii] Source: Irish Climate Science Forum lecture titled What does IPCC AR6 say on scenarios and extreme weather? available at www/icsf.ie

[iv] Source: https://data.parliament.uk/DepositedPapers/Files/DEP2019-0718/Green_Finance_Strategy.pdf

The Incredible Shrinking Bibi Netanyahu

Aryeh Deri, left, with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu this month in Jerusalem. Mr. Deri’s support is key to the survival of the coalition government.

JANUARY 26, 2023

NY Times: Netanyahu Fires a Top Minister to Comply With a Supreme Court Ruling.

Aryeh Deri, who has a conviction for tax fraud, was deemed unfit to serve in the government, leaving Prime Minister Netanyahu in a legal and political predicament.

The worldwide strangeness tour brings us to the Shitty Little State that has been nothing but a headache and a bloody thorn in America’s side ever since its conspiratorial pre-founders drafted the Balfour Declaration — that dirty Zionist-UK deal which would prolong World War I by finally dragging the United States into the bloodbath. The modern day front-man for the insane dream of establishing a Zionist superstate stretching from the Euphrates River (Iraq) to the Nile (Egypt) is (was) Benjamin “Bibi” Netanyahu — who we like to refer to as Bibi Satanyahoo. With the exception of Balfour conspirator Chaim Weizmann and Kennedy killer David Ben Gurion, no Israeli political personage has wielded as much power and influence — both domestically and internationally — than this soulless bloodthirsty fanatic.

The ultra-nationalist Satanyahoo has held the office of Israeli Prime Minister for 15 years over three separate terms, including this one which is only one month old. He has chaired the ever-war-mongering Likud Party for the past 18 years. At varying times, he has been Finance Minister, Foreign Minister and Representative to the United Nations. Satanyahoo was not only a political giant at home. Presidents, Prime Ministers, Foreign Ministers, Intelligence Chiefs and politicians worldwide — even those who were known to have hated him*— genuflected in his presence and showed him the utmost respect. But now, both at home and abroad, and in spite of his recent re-installment (if it’s even him?) by the slimmest of margins, everything about this formerly fearsome loony Likudnik screams “has been.”

* Note: Not all of the hatred for Satanyahoo comes from America First patriots. Since the days of FDR, many Globalists have generally disliked ultra-nationalist Zionists because their regional imperialism has always complicated the efforts of Globalists, and their corrupt Arab stooges, to get the Arab people on board with the New World Order.

The decline of Satanyahoo (Bibi) is remarkable. What the heck happened? Yet again, the truthful and provable answer is simply this: Trump happened. That’s what! Let me explain.

At varying times, Satanyahoo’s sick dream of involving the US in a major regional war against Iran and Syria appeared to be in the process of becoming a reality. Now, with the US out of the Middle East and Russia in, the Greater Israel Project is dead.

1. Globalist Bill Clinton hated Ultra-Nationalist Satanyahoo (here) // 2.  Globalist Barack Obama hated Ultra-Nationalist Satanyahoo (here) // 3. Globalist Nicolas Sarkozy (French PM) hated Ultra-Nationalist Satanyahoo  (here)

You see, boys and girls — Satanyahoo’s power — and that of the Shitty Little State and its Israel Firster agents in general — derived from the capability to politically cow American leaders through the deployment of 5 formidable weapons of irregular covert warfare. They were:

1. Honey & Pedo Sex Blackmail Traps (Wexner-Epstein-Maxwell Island)
2. The Israel Lobby (AIPAC)
3. The Evangelical “Christian-Zionist” loons. (led by the Paid Pastors)
4. The “Neo-Conservatives” of the Republican Party (Bush, Cheney, Romney et al)
5. The “Neo-Conservative” writers and commentators. (George Will, Bill Kristol et al)

By simply pressing any or all of these buttons, Satanyahoo’s Mossad had the capability to whip up a firestorm and induce pants-wetting fear in any Republican’t — as well as a certain level of intimidation among even the most Soros-protected Demonrats. When Trump arrived upon the “world stage,” he understood that in addition to the Globalists on the Left — he was also facing a very formidable adversary who could wield tremendous influence from the neo-conned Israel Firster “Right.” But Trump had a plan.

1 & 2. The Satanic temple on Epstein-Maxwell’s perverted Mossad Blackmail Island has the blue & white stripes of the Israeli flag. // 3. Satanyahoo speaks before the conference of the AIPAC powerhouse lobby.

1. Satanyahoo (who owned the crooked Paid Pastors) speaks before Christians United For Israel — an organization of deluded “end times” crazies that was even more fearsome than AIPAC.  // 2. Though also Globalist, the Bush-Cheney wing of the GOP was completely in cahoots with Satanyahoo’s Likud. // 3. Pro Likud Neo-Con pundit “intellectuals” such as George Will & William Kristol told GOP loyalists what to think.

As the very first order of business, before Trump could even think of moving against Mossad, he had to neutralize (((their))) ability to stir up the Evangelical Christian Zionist Hornet’s Nest (about 30 million of these deluded fanatics populate GOP voting ranks.) This was accomplished by way of necessarily nauseating displays such as:

* An unusual public chumminess with Satanyahoo
Anti-Muslim language and “travel bans”
* Condemnations of “antisemitism”
* Boasts about his Jewish grandchildren / Jared Kushner
The repeal of “The Iran Deal”
The harmless bombing of a Syrian field
The much-hyped though actually unimportant moving of the US Embassy to Jerusalem
The equally hyped and equally unimportant recognition of the Golan Heights as Israeli territory (Israel had already stolen and colonized the Heights 55 years ago).
A beanie-wearing visit to the Wailing Wall
Somber statements about the Holohoax
Waving the Bible around for photo ops
* Inviting the Paid Pastors to the White House for prayer sessions
Declarations of love and promises of protection for Israel
Menorah lighting photo ops at the White House
Empty threats hurled at Iran
A make-believe assassination of an Iranian General

All of this clever cosmetic posturing (aka “optics”) sent both the Scofield Bible crazies and also the normies of Israel into an orgasmic love frenzy over Trump — “the great defender of Israel.”  By this strategic design, Trump essentially displaced both Bibi and his Paid Pastors as the leader of their respective flocks.

* Editor’s Note: The grand deception also had the predictable and unavoidable consequence of upsetting many on the “far right” (myself included, in the beginning). Online Deep State operatives — posing as “far right” — are also inciting this schism.Many “far right” anti-Trumpers still don’t understand the chess,and some can no longer be reasoned with.

The Donald further weakened Satanyahoo’s hand by:

Shutting down Epstein-Maxwell Blackmail Island
* Ending the CIA’s funding of Mossad-controlled ISIS
* Pulling out of the Middle East — leaving Russia & Iran as the regional protectors
* Shaming and chasing the Neo-Con politicians and commentators out of the GOP
* Deliberately engineering a destructive divide & conquer rift within AIPAC — with the Israel Firsters loving him and the Marxist Zionists hating him.

Having deactivated all of these irregular weapons, Trump was then able to throw Satanyahoo — as well as the late Zionist GOP money-man Sheldon Adelson — out like used-up lemons. The historically DEADLY “antisemitism” card could never be played against Trump — although “they” certainly did try to brand him as such, but with no effect. THIS is how a wise hunter gradually lures, traps and de-claws / de-fangs a large and dangerous wild animal — NOT by charging it with bare hands in a frontal assault screaming: “da Jews! da Jews! da Jews!” — as certain “black pill” keyboard generals of the “far right” had wanted Trump to do.

Bibi, at least as an international kingpin and dangerous war agitator, is, after 25 years, finally finished. — And Trump himself, when asked about him in 2021, said it best:

“Fuck him!”

Tell it, Trump. Tell it!

By making himself so loved among both Christian Zionists and Israeli normies, Trump positioned himself to outmaneuver Satanyahoo and his powerful Paid Pastors. The Paid Pastors have since turned on Trump for “being used,” — but it’s far too late now to turn the lost flocks away from Lord Trump.

Bible Boy Trump wows the Scofield Cult — Always a method to his madness.

The headlines speak for themselves.

Trump knew what he was dealing with all along. He played Satanyahoo & Sheldon Adelson accordingly — chumming up with them (using Adelson’s cash) while stealthily neutralizing and / or co-opting all of Israel’s weapons of irregular warfare (including the Evangelical leaders) and then discarding them like pieces of dog shit when the time was right.

Holohoax Debunk: The “Wannsee Conference” Lie

Portraits of European Jews “murdered” during the Holohoax, at the Holohoax Memorial in Berlin

JANUARY 25, 2023

NY Times:The Nazis Planned the ‘Final Solution.’ It Took 90 Minutes.

As Germany observes the anniversary of the Wannsee Conference, witnesses of the Nazi era are dying and antisemitism is resurgent in Europe and the United States.

By Katrin Bennhold

The song that never ends about the event which never happened has a new date to commemorate. January 20th is now  “observed” in pathetic Germany as the anniversary of “The Wannsee Conference” in which the alleged planning for the event which never happened took place in 1942. Katrin Bennhold — the Slimes’ German-based pantie-pissing, self-hating, not-bad-looking German libtardette shiksa who penned this piece oh-so-solemnly reports:

“On Jan. 20, 1942, 15 high-ranking officials of the Nazi bureaucracy met in a villa on Lake Wannsee on the western edge of Berlin. Nibbles were served and washed down with cognac. There was only one point on the agenda: “The organizational, logistical and material steps for a final solution of the Jewish question in Europe.”

Planning the Holocaust took all of 90 minutes.”


Nibbles and cognac were served, eh? And how do you know that, Katie?

It’s hard to tell if Frau Bennhold actually believes in Jewish-scripted Holocaustianity or if she’s just whoring for shekels. It’s probably a bit of both. In any case, as long as the “usual suspects” and their henchmen (in this case, henchwoman) insist upon defaming the German people with the song that never ends about the event which never happened, I will continue rebutting their rubbish. Hazmat suits on, boys and girls. Into the Marxist Myst of the Zyklon B we go for some badly needed clarification of “The “Wannsee Conference” and its “Final Solution.”

1. Times Berlin correspondent Katrin Bennhold — a beautiful German Frau that (((they))) have totally messed up in the head. / 2 & 3. Many shekels have been raked in by publishing books about the alleged Wannsee Conference.

Waaaahn$ee — Waaaahn$ee — Waaaahn$ee

Bennhold: Eighty years after the infamous Wannsee Conference that meticulously mapped out the Holocaust, the bureaucratic efficiency of it remains as unnerving as ever.
Rebuttal: Whoa! Slow down there Katie! What’s this business about the Holohoax having been “meticulously mapped out” at Wannsee? I’ve studied this issue in depth for years and am still not aware of any documents “meticulously” describing a Jewish genocide. Did I miss something here?

Bennhold: The minutes taken that day and typed up on 15 pages do not explicitly refer to murder.
Rebuttal: They don’t???? But if there is no “explicit” language, then how do you know that the conference was about mass murder?

Bennhold: They use phrases like “evacuation” and “reduction” and “treatment.”
Rebuttal: Oh. I see. It’s like an inference thing. But that means that the actual minutes of the conference were therefore not so “meticulous” after all. Double-think / double-talk much, Katrin?

Bennhold: “You read that protocol, and it’s chilling,” said Deborah E. Lipstadt, a renowned Holocaust scholar.
Rebuttal: Deborah Lipstadt! That vile harridan and tireless persecutor of “Holocaust Deniers?” Mein Gott! That’s your go-to source for these “chilling” inferences, Katie?

Bennhold: (quoting Lipstadt): “It’s all very camouflaged language. But they had very big plans.”
Rebuttal: In other words, the actual words say nothing about genociding the Jews. We must blindly trust “scholars” like Professorette Lipshit to decode the “camouflaged language” — aka “dog whistles” for us.

Bennhold: The anniversary of that fateful meeting …
Rebuttal: So “fateful” — and “chilling” — and “unnerving.” Oh the bloody literary drama with these people!

Bennhold: ….has a special resonance at a time when survivors of the Holocaust are dwindling …..
Analysis: As the last of the “survivors” die out, the Holohoax Card begins to lose more and more of its potency.

Bennhold: …. and antisemitism is resurgent in Europe and the United States, along with attacks targeting Jewish people.
Analysis: I’m calling false flag / crisis acting on these events. Such stunts always are. That’s how (((they))) got my once-best-selling book, The Bad War, banned by Amazon in 2018 — not long after a graffiti attack on a Seattle Jewish synogogue not far from Amazon’s headquarters. Soon after the ban, just for good measure, a pair of Jewish cemeteries in Seattle were also vandalized.

1. For the writer to simultaneously describe the Wannsee plan as “meticulous” and “not explicit” represents a perfect example of what Orwell’s 1984 referred to as “double-think.”  // 2. The vile “scholar” Deborah Lipstadt has been a fanatical advocate for the imprisonment of “Holocaust Deniers” and 90-100 year-old SS men. // 3. The usual suspects are almost always behind the usual vandalism.

Bennhold: The anniversary of the Wannsee Conference stands out as a date to focus on the perpetrators of the Holocaust, documenting the genocidal machinery of the Nazi state.
Analysis: There you go again, Katie — using terms like “meticulous” and “documented” in one breath; and then “not explicit” and “camouflaged language” in the next. Do you even bother to proofread your stuff? Do you have an editor?

Bennhold: The meeting that day laid the groundwork for a machinery of mass murder that would involve the entire state apparatus and ultimately millions of Germans in different roles. “That’s where the bureaucracy fell into place,” Dr. Lipstadt said.
Analysis: Can either of you loony ladies quote for your readers — directly from the Wannsee minutes — the precise lines which “laid the groundwork for a machinery of mass murder?” Hmm?

….. Hello…….. hello. (crickets)

Bennhold:  Only one of 30 copies of the 15-page protocol, marked in red as “secret” on the first page, survived. It was discovered by American soldiers among the files of the Foreign Ministry after the war.
Analysis: How conveeenient — a single remaining copy — discovered (and “translated”) by “American” (Jewish OSS / “Ritchie Boys“) soldiers.

Bennhold:  It was the language of bureaucrats. But there was never any doubt what the document was laying out:
Analysis: To summarize the demented douchebag’s double-talk: “not explicit,” “camouflaged language,” “language of bureaucrats” —– but then, on the other hand, “never any doubt.”

Bennhold:  Frank-Walter Steinmeier, Germany’s current president and a former foreign minister, expressed his profound unease and horror after he read the protocol during a visit to the villa.
Analysis: “Profound unease” — “horror.” Wow Katie. That sho nuff’ sounds pretty nasty. But if it’s only 15 pages long, then surely you must have read the Wannsee Protocol and can quote the really “chilling” and “unnerving” parts to us, no? Why must you rely upon Lipstadt and Steinmeir to school us on how bad the minutes are? We can read.

Bennhold (quoting Steinmeier): “What we see is a smoothly functioning administrative machine, departments coordinating, templates and procedures which — apart from the content of the meeting — are indistinguishable from those that we still have in ministries and administrations. It is the ordinary, the familiar, that jumps out at us, horrifies us and unsettles us.”
Analysis: Well, Herr Steinmeier, Frau Bennhold and Yenta Lipstadt, all of your shock-talk may impress the easily impressed boobs who worship “the paper of record” — but your humble reporter here just went ahead and did something which not 1 in 10,000 Slimes readers would ever even think of doing. Yeah, that’s right. I actually searched for the “camouflaged” Wannsee minutes online; and found them in less than 5 seconds — and read everything in about 10 minutes!

Even putting aside questions about their authenticity * and possible mis-translation — there is nothing in the “chilling” / “unsettling” minutes that even remotely suggests anything other than “relocation” to the East as being “The Final Solution.” And unlike the sneaky slimy “paper of record” — the ANYT encourages its readers to actually read the dubious Waansee minutes for themselves. — HERE

Personally — benign as the document is — I don’t believe the “lucky find” of the only surviving copy of the “discovered” Wannsee minutes are even real. The notes just keep repeating “Final Solution” … “Final Solution” …. “Final Solution” — leaving the reader to infer that it must mean extermination. The forgers would not have been bold enough to invent a German document saying straight up: “Vee vill kill every last Jew in Europe.” — It wouldn’t be credible.

1. The myth-makers have created an entire pseudo-academic mythology — complete with flowcharts and “decoding” of “bureaucratic” terms — surrounding the “historic” Wannsee Conference of 1942. // 2. An actual reading of the Wannsee notes (assuming the papers were even legitimate and that the translation was accurate) indicates nothing more than an intention to deport the Jewish population to the East. // 3. Frank-Walter Steinmeier — another traitor to his people.

Communist Historians Clear Name of Communist Scientists

J. Robert Oppenheimer // 1904-1967

DECEMBER 19, 2022

NY Times:Robert Oppenheimer Cleared of ‘Black Mark’ After 68 Years

The physicist and architect of the American atomic bomb was stripped of his security clearance in 1954 after what is now called a flawed investigation.

Well how about that?! After nearly seven decades, it turns out that communist psychopath scientist St. Robert Oppenheimer wasn’t a communist after all – thus sayeth the communist whorestorians and the communist Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm. So, it must be true that he was actually a loyal American who bled red, white & blue, right? (rolling eyes). Suuuuure. Next they’ll be telling us that Karl Marx has been falsely accused of being a Marxist!

From the article:

“The Secretary of Energy on Friday nullified a 1954 decision to revoke the security clearance of J. Robert Oppenheimer, a top government scientist who led the making of the atomic bomb in World War II but fell under suspicion of being a Soviet spy at the height of the McCarthy era.

In a statement, the Energy Secretary, Jennifer M. Granholm, said the decision of the Atomic Energy Commission, to bar Oppenheimer’s clearance was the result of a “flawed process” that violated its own regulations.

As time has passed, she added, “more evidence has come to light of the bias and unfairness of the process that Dr. Oppenheimer was subjected to while the evidence of his loyalty and love of country have only been further affirmed.”

Historians, who have long lobbied for the reversal of the clearance revocation, praised the vacating order as a milestone.”

The supposed clearing of the “black mark” on Oppenheimer’s sainted name means absolutely nothing so many years after the fact; but it does offer us a good “teachable moment” to review what a wretched human being that “the father of the atomic bomb” truly was.

The Fake News of the day transformed the mediocre TRAITOR into a genius saint. After he was stripped of his security clearance in 1954, he was then cast as a living martyr — a testament to the evils of “McCarthyism” and “antisemitism.”

J. Robert Oppenheimer was a “theoretical physicist” — one who practices “science” by conjecture and elaborate mathematical calculations, not actual experimentation. While teaching physics at Berkeley, Oppenheimer, over the objections of some concerned military men, was named the wartime head of the Manhattan Project at Los Alamos Laboratory, in 1942. Though his technical role in creating the monstrous weapon –which Jewish mad scientists such as Albert Einstein and Leo Szilard hoped to drop on German civilians — was nil to minimal, it is Oppenheimer who, absurdly, gets the historical credit as “father of the FAKE atomic bomb.” (((They))) always manage to get the credit for everything, don’t they?

In his role as Project Director, Oppenheimer — who himself had more communist front affiliations than one could shake a hammer & sickle at — opened the door and “looked the other way” as a whole rats’ nest of subversive Jews and other Marxists penetrated Los Alamos and passed on the secrets to their Soviet contacts. As a result, Stalin would have a bomb of his own by 1949 — way sooner than was expected. Though others associated with the Los Alamos espionage ring would in due time be disgraced, arrested or even executed — Oppenheimer the enabler was too important of a chess piece to sacrifice.

One year after the end of World War II, the communist-infested administration of Harry Truman named Oppenheimer as chairman of the General Advisory Committee of the newly created United States Atomic Energy Commission. Under the pretext of averting “nuclear proliferation”, Oppenheimer would use that position to lobby for international control of nuclear power (world government). During the “McCarthy Era”, those stances, together with his past associations with admitted Communist Party members — (including his brother, his wife, his landlord, and his ex-girlfriend!) — led to the revocation of Oppenheimer’s security clearance. Imagine that — telling an outspoken One-Worlder who absolutely reeked of redness that he may no longer have access the nation’s top secrets. Oh those horrible, horrible “McCarthyites!”

And thus was born the legend of poor Bobby Oppenheimer — the persecuted Jew who had a black mark wrongly attached to his good name.

The fiendish Jewish mad scientists dreamed of burning cities full of “German civilians”. They had to settle for Japanese (supposedly)

1. Katherine Oppenheimer was a member of the Communist Party. A prior husband, before Oppenheimer, was a Communist partisan who was killed during the Spanish Civil War. She was impregnated by Oppenheimer (her future husband) while married to her 2nd husband. She became an alcoholic in later years. // 2. Robert’s brother, Frank Oppenheimer, was also a member of the Communist Party. // 3. Jean Tatlock — a “bisexual” and Communist Party member — was romantically involved with Oppenheimer during the 1930s. Oppenheimer was introduced to her at a fundraiser for the Communist side of the Spanish Civil War. Ms. Tatlock died by suicide in 1944. // 4. Mary Ellen Washburn was Oppenheimer’s landlord at Berkeley. She too was a Communist Party member; and had introduced the mad scientist to Jean Tatlock.

On a personal level, Red Robert was truly a rotten human being and quite insane (aren’t all Jewish Marxists?) An event which occurred in 1924 tells us all we need to know about the true character and mental state of this sainted charlatan. Oppenheimer had been accepted to study as a physicist at the prestigious Christ’s College of the University of Cambridge. While there, he was placed under the tutelage of a brilliant experimental physicist named Patrick Blackett — a true genius who would go on to become famous for his work on cosmic rays and magnetism. Due to his own ineptitude in the laboratory (true science) — Oppenheimer became insanely jealous of Blackett’s skills as an experimental physicist. Oppenheimer’s “clumsiness” in the lab is a matter of admitted historical record. Frauds like Oppenheimer and Einstein may know how to crunch numbers, but they can neither discover nor invent — and they know it!

In 1926, while on vacation with two friends, the mad young man confessed to them that he had to return to Cambridge immediately. In a fit of jealous wrath, Oppenheimer had coated an apple in noxious chemicals and placed it on Blackett’s desk. Afterwards, probably fearful of being discovered, he wanted to make sure that Blackett was alright. Fortunately, Blackett had not eaten the poisoned fruit. When informed of his dirty deed, the University began to move ahead with plans to press charges against the would-be potential murderer. After the intervention of his wealthy and well-connected parents, Oppenheimer was instead placed on academic probation and ordered to undergo psychiatric evaluations.

On another occasion, the insecure and ever-jealous psychopath tried to strangle a fellow roommate (and future famous writer) named Francis Fergusson, after he had announced to Oppenheimer that he had just gotten engaged to be married. Fergusson easily fended off the 130 pound weakling, and remained sympathetic to his pathetic school mate. Yet he had always and would always regard Oppenheimer as mentally ill. (here) Indeed, Oppenheimer himself later told Fergusson that his troubles were caused and fueled by personal frustration with his experimental inabilities. (here)

Incompetence at experimental science, a crackpot, an envious weakling, an almost murderer, a violent genocidal psychopath, and a communist — what could possibly go wrong by placing dangerous state secrets into the hands of such a miserable Marxist miscreant? Let’s keep that black mark on his name by sharing this article.

J. Robert Oppenheimer // 1904-1967

Nuclear Bombs do not exist Part 1

Nuclear weapons are just nonsense propaganda! A-bombs have never worked or exploded anywhere since 1945. They were never used then and cannot be used today. Imagine how easy it has been to fool the whole world with nuclear bombs that never existed nor exploded during 77 years.

This is my opinion about fake-US/Soviet/UK/France/North Korea/Israel/Pakistan,etc A-Bombs and fake nuclear weapons, based on evidencepersonal research/findings, and common senseNuclear weapons cannot explode! but let it be clear, I am a supporter of safe, civilian nuclear Power Stations (Big Difference)

I hope you find this at least interesting. Share it with your friends, There are plenty people publishing fake news about nuclear weapons! Including the Swedish Academy of Sciences and their Nobel prize winners physics.


Hiroshima + Nagasaki were FIREBOMBED along with 65 OTHER CITIES before anyone had taken up the Nuke rhetoric. You don’t find memorials for burning Japanese children alive with gasoline, only for incinerating them with fake ‘flash nuclear’ bombs.
Did you know it’s 100% Illegal to deny the existence of Nuclear bombs in USA, UK, Japan, Korea, etc etc etc. WHY IS THAT??

According to official legend, there were NO tests of uranium bomb, which was said to blow up Hiroshima.

Just imagine, some science-fiction guys tell you that they think that uranium can detonate if you put together some 84 kg of enriched uranium. You spend several years and who knows how many billions to enrich that uranium and you make a bomb, and drop it in Japan without any test.

How do you know if chain reaction is possible at all? How are you sure that you need exactly 84 kg for that? How you know the level of enrichment?

Today you could tell the world that you use a super computer to simulate everything (even Space), that you don’t need real tests, and people will believe. But in 1945 they didn’t have supercomputers, oops.

So that’s bullshit. If it were real, there would be dozens failed tests before they could make a working bomb.

Nuclear bombs don’t exist. They are just a hoax. The big explosions that most people see in movies are fake. People set up trees, cars, houses and other models and blow them up to make them look like a nuclear explosion. In the future, we might be able to make nuclear bombs, but that would be very dangerous. In 2015, people do not make or use nuclear bombs.

Germany had the best nuclear scientists and they failed. So how could less talented American scientists succeed and in fairy tale fashion? Why doesn’t Germany have nuclear weapons when Pakistan has? Nuclear bombs could have end Korean war and Vietnam War decisively and saved over 80k US deaths and 500M wounded. Not used. Atomic bombs and conventional bombs look the same… Both produce light and mushroom cloud. Why so much secrecy. Hiroshima appeared to be napalmed. Seismographs are missing during the reported blasts. Why is Kim Un laughing and taunting US with nuclear bombs rather than conventional? Why is US backing off using nuclear against Korea treating with conventional ? Why is it when Trump was in office, sweating the Korean issue? Why doesn’t US explode a demonstration atomic bomb to potential foes?

America has not used any nuclear weapons (not even Hiroshima) ever. No war has ever used nuclear weapons. Incredible that warmongering USA has not used atomic bomb unless….

The US public should demand a PUBLIC A-bonb demonstration of the US Nuclear arms program. I will guarantee USGov will refuse than admit a lie.

This is a picture of Aioi Bashi (bridge) at Hiroshima with its walking bridge T to the “memorial” park left taken 6 October 1945. The fake “A-bomb” exploded just above it 6 August 1945. Soon after the trams running over the bridge were up and working again and you could walk to the island where the “memoral” park is today . But all wooden housing with gardens were burnt down by napalm carpet bombings! Only concrete buildings survived. But most house owners were soon back and cleared their grounds …

Aerial view of central Hiroshima taken a few weeks after,where the alleged A-bomb is said to have exploded over Rijo Dori street at Kamiya-cho, Naka-ku in the middle producing a blast/heat wave according this propaganda film. The main streets were quickly cleaned of ash and soot after the fires and no bridges were damaged (as they were made of steel/concrete). The flat thin roofs of the concrete/brick office buildings were intact. People caught inside the office buildings at the time of explosion survived unhurt!Only the wood/paper/straw huts making up 95% of central Hiroshima were burnt down … by carpet napalm bombings. Where the fires stopped, intact housing could be found. Many people jumped into the river to survive the fires and testified that no A-bomb exploded.

Picture Hiroshima Google 2022:


1. Nobody died at Hiroshima/Nagasaki, Japan August 1945 due to atomic bombs explosions and radiation. Both towns were destroyed by US napalm carpet bombings.

2. The US government decided to fake it! It still goes on 2022!

3I am not joking.

4. I am serious.

A common question is: How many people died at Hiroshima/Nagasaki August/October 1945 due to the alleged atomic bombs nuclear FLASH explosions and radiation?

Media was not there. Censorship was introduced. Media just published what they were told to publish.

The simple answer today is that nobody died. According 1945 fake news the atomic bombs exploded high, >500 m, up in the sky in a big FLASH, that was the end for all observers down below except surviving witnesses. The stupid clowns making up the stupid stories couldn’t invent anything better. They had to invent people surviving the show to tell media!

Sun radiation is a flow of atomic, light and heat, particles and waves – photons – affecting your skin. Sitting in the sun for a couple of hours (!) may cause burns. Photons are described as a necessary consequence of physical laws having a certain symmetry at every point in spacetime, if you belive that nonsense. Photons have a a very small mass and a very small charge and they have eternal life!

The atomic bomb nuclear radiation only lasted a nano-second, a fraction of a second. How could it cause any damage and sickness? Or sun burn?

There was a FLASH of light, then a shock wave of heat and then a high pressure shock wave physically destroying everything we are told by lucky survivors watching (!!) it… but radiation??? Sickness? How come that plenty Japanese witnesses survived until today and didn’t die of radiation sickness within a month or two? Bill Gates have recently explained it!

There are plenty old and recent descriptions of the falsifications of the 1945 A-Bombs.

Dr. Michael Palmer, MD, has just written a book about it:

“We breathed the GASES when the Atom BOMB Fell – The evidence that the nuclear bombings were faked with napalm and mustard gas” 

Palmer shows how US authorities faked the medical records in Japan to support the 1945 manipulations. Palmer thinks that working nuclear weapons were only made years later. I think nuclear weapons are 100% pure propaganda!


The combined number of surviving hibakusha from the two atomic bombings stood at 136.682 as of March 2020, down about 9.200 from a year earlier, the Health, Labor and Welfare Ministry said, with an average age of 83.31 years.

The city government of Hiroshima had 2020 enrolled a further 4.943 people in the past year on the list of people who died from the 1945 atomic bombing, bringing the death toll to 324.129.

Imagine that!

324 129 persons died at Hiroshima 1945 due to an atomic nuclear FLASH.

Chaotic conditions made accurate accounts most difficult then, we are told! Some victims were vaporized instantly, many survivors were horribly disfigured, and death from nuclear radiation sickness was uncertain – it might not claim its victims for days, weeks, months, or even years, bla, bla. It was similar to the four different companies, three foreign owned, that cleaned up the 911 crime scene 2001 at NYC 56 years earlier! Identical type of cover-up!

The initial (sic) death count in Hiroshima, set at 42 000 – 93 000, was based solely on the alleged disposal of vaporized bodies, and was thus much too low, we are told! Later (more fake) surveys covered body countsmissing persons, and neighborhood surveys during the first (!) months after the bombing, yielding a more reliable estimate of 130 000 dead as of November 1945.

A similar survey by officials in Nagasaki set its death toll at 60 000 – 70 000. Its plutonium* bomb was more powerful, but its destructive range was limited by surrounding hills and mountains, it was said.

*Plutonium is a fake element invented by USA in 1940 and further described below. It is also fissile and can be used in atomic bombs, we are told. It is named after the planet Pluto discovered in the 1930’s that probably doesn’t exist either.

Of course there is no evidence of anything, incl. atomic bombs FLASHexploding!

So additional counts (?) indicated high levels of short-term mortality (?) in both cities, we were also told:

– Over 90% of persons within 500 meters of ground zero in both cities died. (Only some persons survived that could testify about it >75 years later!!)

– At 1.5 km over 2/3 were casualties and 1/3 died.

– Of those at a distance of 2 km half were casualties, 10% of whom died.

– Casualties dropped to 10% at distances over 4 km.

Most persons close to ground zero who received high radiation dosages died immediately or during the first day. Imagine that!! One-third of all fatalities occurred by the 4th day: two-thirds by the 10th day: and 90% by the remaing three-thirds end of three weeks. … etc, etc, bla, bla.

Severe illness (!) occurred with 1 000 rads, causing destruction of bone marrow, marked drop in white cell counts, anemia, bleeding, destruction of stomach and intestinal fluids (mucosa). Most victims died within 30 days. (Note: “rad” indicates a unit of absorbed radiation.)

So what are we talking about?

Ionizing radiation energy can be measured using units of electron volts, ergs, and joules (J) to confuse matters.

One electron-volt is 1.6 x 10-19 J. An erg is one-ten-millionth of a J. Not very much energy.

Radiation doses are often calculated in the units of rad (short for radiation absorbed dose). One rad is 100 ergs/gram, in other words, 100 ergs of energy absorbed by one gram of a given body tissue. 100 rads equal one Joule/kilogram (J/kg), which also equals one Gray (Gy), the standard international unit for measuring radiation dose. Confusion is part of all manipulations.

Suppose time is involved? Then we are talking about dose rate (or dose per unit time). An example of the units for dose rate is millirad/hour. In everyday terms, a joule (J) (and even more so, an erg) is a rather small amount of energy. But in terms of ionization potential of molecules or elements, a joule is a huge amount of energy. One joule of ionizing radiation can cause tens of thousands of trillions of ionizations. But the Hiroshima/Nagasaki bomb FLASHES only lasted some nano-seconds.

To boil one liter of water into vapour you need 2 591 720 J. To make a cup of tea you need much less and it doesn’t kill anyone.

Physically speaking, the most elementary way to measure the effect of radiation is to measure the amount of energy deposited in a given weight of material. However, the deposition of energy is only one aspect of the potential of radiation to cause biological damage. For context, 400 rads is normally enough to kill 50% of humans in the world. 1 000 rads kills pretty much everybody we are told. But there is no evidence of anything. More about radiation.

So how many rads were Hiroshima/Nagasaki atomic bomb victims exposed to? The explosion only lasted some nano-seconds!

Answer is – 0!

Because no atomic bombs exploded anywhere! It was 1945 and is 2022 propaganda!

Personally I don’t believe in nuclear radiation! If anyone dies after contact with radioactive material, I think the death is caused by poison. But deadly, nuclear radiation was invented 1945 as part of the atomic bomb hoax and became … pseudoscientific nonsense … still around today.

So this is pure, giant nonsense:

… the Japanese and the Americans launched a giant epidemiological study after the war. The study included all residents of Hiroshima and Nagasaki who had survived the atomic explosion within a 10-kilometer (6.2-mile) radius. Investigators questioned the residents to obtain their precise locations when the bomb exploded, and used this information to calculate a personal radiation dose for each resident. Data was collected for 86,572 survivors. Today, 60 years later, the study’s results are clear. More than 700 people eventually died as a result of radiation received from the atomic attack.

Of course there is no evidence of any such study at all! Or this

Exposure in utero and microcephaly (Source)

Nagasaki survey of 98 pregnant women exposed at a distance of 2.0 km from ground zero and 113 pregnant women exposed at 4.0 and 5.0 km from ground zero, showed a high percentage of neonatal and infantile deaths for those exposed within a 2.0 km range, as well as signs of acute radiation illness such as loss of hair, bleeding tendency, and inner mouth lesions. Mental retardation was noted in 25% of newborn survivors.

Imagine being one of 211 newborn baby survivors at Nagasaki 1945/6 a quarter of which (52+!) is mentally retarded! Only sick people in Japan can invent such monstrous lies!

The Radiation Effects Research FoundationRERF, is a US-Japan cooperative research institute at Hiroshima and Nagasaki that investigates the health effects of atomic bomb radiation for peaceful purposes. According REFR radiation is harmful to health because radiation exposure can damage cellular DNA. So what happens then according REFR?

Early effects of radiation include various acute radiation symptoms. Information on these symptoms was obtained by interviewing more than 100,000 atomic-bomb survivors primarily from 1956 to 1961. Among the acute radiation symptoms recalled by survivors hair loss is regarded as the most reliably reported.

Imagine that! A majority of 100 000 suvivors had lost hair after 10-15 years.

Late effects of radiation, such as cancer (and possibly other diseases), reflect DNA mutations induced in living cells by radiation exposure. While the exact mechanisms by which such mutations lead to cancer are not clear, it is believed that the process requires a series of mutations, accumulated over periods of years. Mutations can occur either spontaneously or as a result of exposure to any of a wide range of environmental mutagens, including radiation. Since many years must pass before a given cell and its progeny acquire sufficient mutations to result in clinical disease, excess cancers attributable to radiation do not become evident until years after exposure (or somewhat fewer years in the case of leukemia). Excess cancer risks in RERF data correspond broadly with the age-time patterns predicted by such hypothetical considerations.

Let’s face it. There is no scientific evidence that a (fake) nano-seconds radiation exposure (an A-Bomb FLASH 500 meter up in the sky) can produce health effects 30-75 years later. RERF is thus just cheap US propaganda 2022.

The 1946 Conspiracy Theory

The International Military Tribunal for the Far East – in occupied Japan with its Civil Censorship Detachment (CCD) running the country – established 1946/8 that a number of Japanese military and bureaucrats were responsible for WW2 and had to be executed/murdered. These Japanese criminals had conspired since 1928 to take over the Far East by wars of aggression and murders. So WW2 in the Far East was a conspiracy!

What a theory!

conspiracy theory1946!

The USSR/Stalin had stopped it August 1945 by liberating Japanese occupied Manchuria and Korea and USA had definitively defeated Japan same month by dropping two fake atomic bombs.

Justice (?) was done by executing some Japanese military and civil bureaucrats 1948! But they were just patsies working for the real rulers of Japan.

1951 USA forced Japan to sign a Mutual Security Pact because communist China (Mao Zedong)North Korea (Kim I) and USSR (Stalin) planned to attack Japan and the “free world”!

A fake “cold war” could get started = plenty money! Later, 1961, this pact became a USA/Japan military alliance, which is still in force today. Of course nobody planned to attack Japan ever, but USA had to keep the atomic bomb nuclear hoax alive to have military bases in Japan. Stupid, isn’t it? No, just business, as usual! 11 years later, JapanUSA, China and USSR suddenly became best friends, but the USA told Japan that the USA had to stay in Japan because North Korea could attack any moment, e.g. today!

For defense officials in Tokyo, it is time to revisit the 

National Security Strategy (NSS). Following the monumental decision to cancel the deployment of the Aegis Ashore ballistic missile defense system in June 2020, the central debate consuming Japanese security thinking is straddling between missile defense and strike capability, or what is called “enemy base strike.” 

Most Japan citizens back in 1945 had no idea that it was Japan that attacked Russia at Port Arthur already 1904/5 in a war of aggression, where 100.000+ Japan soldiers were killed. It started the whole thing. Japan got away with it, because education was not very good then and most Japan citizens just did what they were told and studied hard to pass tests of all sorts. Japan then won WW1 allied with USAEngland and France by attacking the Tsingtao German colony in China 1914. It took a week on the ground. Japan also occupied part of USSR Eastern Siberia 1918/22 losing 1.000’s of soldiers.

Most Japan citizens thought 1945 (and today?) that it was the Japan army (?) that developed Manchuria 1932/45, while the government didn’t notice anything. Actually it was Japan oligarques with power since 1870 – the secret Black Dragon Society – that took over Manchuria, installed Pu YiChina‘s former emperor as king, and started companies there using local slave labour to support the Japan wars of aggression until 1945. Most Japan citizens also thought that there was a civil war in China 1937/45 that Japan tried to stop but was dragged into, where USA/UK (Roosevelt/Churchill) supported Chiang Kai- Shek, CKS, and his wife and gangsters and USSR (Stalin) supported Mao Zedong and his wife and bolsjeviks, so they could kill each other. The big loser was China – 50 millions died. Education was not very good and most Japan citizens just did what they were told. While studying hard to pass the tests!

One serious mistake 1945 was that ordinary Japan citizens including children – could immediately return to Hiroshima and the damaged suburb of Nagasaki and rebuild the towns and the shipyards and go to school there in spite of the alleged deadly radiation, etc. There was no danger of course but to make the nuclear hoax more realistic, the towns should have been sealed off and abandoned at least 10 years! Like Fukushima!

A US Atomic Bomb Casualty Commission to review the alleged a-bombings was not formed until October 1946. It visited Hiroshima and Nagasaki then and issued a General Report January 1947. You can read a little about it on the Internet here and there, etc. The five members just thought that atomic bombs had exploded and included in the report the standard pseudoscientific nonsense about damages and radiation. The report must be considered as pure propaganda and bad science.

The USSR gangsters and criminals around Stalin (his wife committed suicide early), that used to steal information from the west since before and during WW2, became partners of the US/Japan a-bomb radiation hoax 1945.

The “cold war” started a little later. It became part of the hoax, too! 25 June 1950 USA said North Korea (!) was attacking Japan (!) (in Korea!) and had to be stopped, which was achieved 27 July 1953 by a cease fire. No nuclear bombs were used! Korea was completely destroyed by napalm bombings.

1991 the ‘cold war’ was finished! USSR collapsed. A Russian republic was created that took over some responsibilities of the ex-USSR. It was a golden opportunity to announce that nuclear weapons were a hoax since 1945. But some crazy Russians decided to keep it going.

So the hoax works fine today, even if the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW), or the Nuclear Weapon Ban Treaty, is the first legally binding international agreement to comprehensively prohibit nuclear weapons, with the goal of leading towards their total elimination. It was passed on 7 July 2017, i.e. >70 years too late. It assumes, without evidence, that nuclear weapons are real! In order to come into effect, signature and ratification by at least 50 countries is required. For those nations that are party to it, the treaty prohibits the development, testing, production, stockpiling, stationing, transfer, use and threat of use of (fake) nuclear weapons, as well as assistance and encouragement to the prohibited activities. For nuclear armed states joining the treaty, it provides for a time-bound framework for negotiations leading to the verified and irreversible elimination of its (fake) nuclear weapons programme.

According to a mandate adopted by the United Nations General Assembly in December 2016, negotiations on the treaty began in the United Nations in March 2017 and continued from 15 June to 7 July 2017. In the vote on the treaty text, 122 were in favour, 1 voted against (Netherlands), and 1 abstained (Singapore). 69 nations did not vote, among them all of the alleged (fake) nuclear weapon states and all NATO members except the Netherlands. As of 11 April 201970 states have signed the Treaty and 23 have ratified it. But no nation supports my findings that nuclear weapons are a hoax and deception that was created 1945, even if it is beyond doubt that any use of nuclear weapons would be catastrophic to humanity, as well as to the environment. Nobody is prepared to say today that nuclear weapons do not work. They are bad science but good propaganda.

On 2 August 2019 the US, i.e. Potus Trump formally withdrew from the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty ratified on 1 June 1988. The treaty banned all US/Russia land-based ballistic missiles, cruise missiles, and missile launchers with ranges of 500 – 1.000 km and 1.000 – 5.500 km. Fake News media announced it that the risk of nuclear war has increased. Fake News media and Potus Trump don’t know that nuclear weapons do not work. But maybe Trump will change his mind? He is a little erratic.

US is at war with Afghanistan since 2001 at a cost of US$ billions and almost 3.000 US KIAs and ten times more post-stress damaged US soldiers. US maintains that the Taliban Afghan government – terrorists – 2001 supported the 911 attack at New York. The Taliban denies any involvement. US attacked! Without nuclear weapons! I cannot understand why Trump doesn’t sign an agreement with the Taliban today, withdraw all US troops from Afghanistan, lends Afghanistan US$ billions for rebuilding the country = everyone is a winner! Trump should at the same time announce that US nuclear weapons are a hoax! Of course it is against US law since 2012 to even discuss with Taliban:


(a) IN GENERAL.- Congress affirms that the authority of the President to use all necessary and appropriate force pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public Law 107-40; 50 U.S.C. 1541 note) includes the authority for the Armed Forces of the United States to detain covered persons (as defined in subsection (b)) pending disposition under the law of war.

(b) COVERED PERSONS. – A covered person under this section is any person as follows: 

(1) A person who planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, or harbored those responsible for those attacks.

(2) A person who was a part of or substantially supported al-Qaeda, the Taliban, or associated forces that are engaged in hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners, including any person who has committed a belligerent act or has directly supported such hostilities in aid of such enemy forces.

The Massive Damage of Covid-Mania Is Now Clear

Not a single state was able to improve test scores for math

NOVEMBER 02, 2022

NY Times:

 Math Scores Fell in Nearly Every State, and Reading Dipped on National Exam.

The results, from what is known as the nation’s report card, offer the most definitive picture yet of the pandemic’s devastating impact on students.

Now here’s a real shocker: the Stupid-19 lock-downs of the nation’s schools and the associated era of “virtual learning” turned out to have had a severely negative impact on academic progress. From the article:

“U.S. students in most states and across almost all demographic groups have experienced troubling setbacks in both math and reading, according to an authoritative national exam released on Monday, offering the most definitive indictment yet of the pandemic’s impact on millions of schoolchildren.

In math, the results were especially devastating, representing the steepest declines ever recorded on the National Assessment of Educational Progress, known as the nation’s report card, which tests a broad sampling of fourth and eighth graders and dates to the early 1990’s.”

Apart from the fact that the whole bloody “pandemic” drama of 2020-2022 was a HOAX — even if, for sake of argument, we were to accept the moronic myth as real; the fact remains that school age children were always invulnerable to this “virus” which, like all other cold & flu illnesses, disproportionately impacted the elderly. The closing of schools — enthusiastically embraced by the Communist Teacher’s Unions — was totally uncalled for and contrary to “the science  .” The children were dumb enough to begin with  — without mentally stunting them out of a whole year of reading, writing and arithmetic. Somebody has got to pay for this — and all of the other hurtful policies that people were made to suffer through as well.

1. Remote learning was a joke. // 2. Pure child abuse on so many levels. // 3.Lesbian Randi Weingarten — president of the American Federation of Teachers — was a forceful advocate for school closures.

As is often the case in post-mania, clearer and calmer thinking is now overtaking the irrationality. In hindsight, most rational people understand by now that the school closure scheme advocated by the Left was a really bad (evil) idea. In fact, the Marxists and Libtards themselves aren’t even defending their past actions anymore. We now witness a new pattern of “gas-lighting” – which goes like this: “Let us not focus on the past. Let us move forward to help the children.”

Here are a few examples of this latest save-our-ass talking point:

* From today’s Times article: Kevin Huffman, former Education Commissioner of Tennessee, urged leaders to: set aside finger pointing about what went wrong during the pandemic, and instead make a moral commitment to helping students recover.”

* The aforementioned Randi Weingarten: “The bottom line is that everyone suffered. We are now focused on the urgent need to help kids recover and thrive.”

* In a story for the Globalist Atlantic Magazine titled, “Let’s Declare a Pandemic Amnesty,” Ivy League Professorete Emily Oster writes: “We need to forgive one another for what we did and said when we were in the dark about COVID.”

“Let’s all just “move on” like nothing happened, right? Sure, mistakes were made, but let’s look forward, not backwards. Screw that! The purposefully guilty as well as the sanctimoniously stupid must be punished severely. Justice demands blood!

Huffman — Weingarten — Oster”No finger pointing.” — Let’s “forgive” and “move on.”

On the other end of the life spectrum, another class of victims, the elderly, suffered horribly and needlessly. Those fortunate enough to have not been misdiagnosed with “Covid” and then ventilator murdered were still made to endure 1-2 years of unnecessary and unhealthy isolation by their stupid normie children.

Funerals cancelled, weddings cancelled, businesses ruined and inflation through the roof. Again, even if one were to accept the false underlying premise of Stupid-19, the “cure,” by any objective standard, turned out to be far worse than disease. They have got to pay for this!

This talk about “amnesty” is a good indicator that “they” fear that accountability is coming. Let us see what the coming new MAGA Congress majority — whose leading members have already promised to investigate the infamous Dr. Falsie — will bring.

“Rambostein” Liberated Auschwitz

“Rambostein” Liberated Auschwitz the bloody fictional made-for-normies drama! As even the Holohoaxers acknowledge, the Germans had already abandoned the camp before the Soviets arrived.
NY Times: David Dushman, Soviet Soldier Who Helped Liberate Auschwitz, Dies at 98

No pretext for Sulzberger’s Times to sing the song that never ends about the event that never happened is too trivial. In this case, the death of a 98-year-old Soviet “liberator” of the Bullshwitz concentration camp is enough to merit a longer than usual obituary — because David Dushman was like, ya know — such a famous and important personage of world history (rolling eyes sarcastically).

Hours after the Germans had unconditionally surrendered (and were thus rendered voiceless) on May 8, 1945, the “paper of record” ran an uncritical account of a just-released Soviet report of the “horrors” which took place there. Incredibly, it is that specific atrocity propaganda report — pooped out by the commie comedy writers of Stalin’s “Extraordinary State Commission for the Establishment and Investigation of the Atrocities of the German Fascist Invaders and Their Accomplices and the Damage They Caused to Citizens, Collective Farms, Public Organizations, State Enterprises and Institutions of the USSR”(we kid you not, that’s the actual official name of the commission) — which remains the academic foundation of the Holocaust tale until this day.

Let’s dive in into this obituary of Devious Dushman for some Anti-New York Times debunking that will never end about the song that never ends about the event that never happened (like they say it did.)

1 & 2. As soon as Germany has unconditionally surrendered — and hence, could no longer speak in its defense — C.L. Sulzberger of the Sulzberger Crime Family published an article summarizing the Soviet “Extraordinary Commission’s” report on Bullshwitz — which included false tales of gas chambers, torture and experiments on live humans. // 3. Dushman is the only witness to his “heroic and proudly told (again, and again, and again) tale of driving a tank through the “electric fence” surrounding Bullschwitz.

Times: David Dushman, who as a soldier for the Soviet Union drove his tank through the electric fence surrounding the Nazi death camp at Auschwitz on Jan. 27, 1945,…
Rebuttal: Oh the bloody fictional made-for-normies drama! As even the Holohoaxers acknowledge, the Germans had already abandoned the camp before the Soviets arrived. There would have been no need for Dushman to “drive his tank through the electric fence.” The gates of Bullshwitz were wide open!

Times: … died in Munich on Saturday. He was 98.
Rebuttal: Such a tragic irony — the Bolshevik invader ended up living in Germany. God only knows how many blonde Berlin “shiksas” he must have raped back in ’45.

Times: Mr. Dushman was a 21-year-old Red Army soldier when he drove his T-34 into the high, electric barbed-wire fence surrounding the Auschwitz death camp in Nazi-occupied Poland.
Rebuttal: Did anyone, other than Dushman, actually witness this heroic tank assault on Bullshwitz? No matter how many times the writer, Berlin correspondent Melissa Eddy, states that Dushman drove his tank through the electric fence (twice in the text of the article and once again in a picture caption), the story is still implausible and unverifiable.

Times: Approaching the camp, he recalled, he peered through the viewing slit of his tank and was shocked by what he saw.
Rebuttal: Oh dear. Get your hip waders on, boys and girls. Here comes the stinky stuff.

Times: “Everywhere there were skeletons,” he told the German newspaper Süddeutsche Zeitung in 2015. “They stumbled from the barracks, sat and lay among the dead. It was horrifying. We threw all of our canned food at them and drove on quickly, to keep chasing the fascists.”
Rebuttal: (palm to face, sighing, shaking head) I hope you didn’t hit any of those skeletal Jews and Communists on the head with those cans of food (made in the USA and shipped via Alaska, by the way) that you threw at them, Mr. Dushman.

1. Soviet soldiers staged drama shots as they walked in and out of the undamaged front gate
 of Bullschwitz — while tank-boy Dushman drove “through the electric fence” throwing canned food at “the skeletons.” // 2. Starving skeletons? Where? In other photos, some of the “survivors” actually look a bit chubby! //  3. Oy vey! I see skeletons stumbling from the barracks!

FLASHBACK / October 2020
Same tank-through-gate and skeletons drama, from the American side: 

“World War II Hero Who Drove Tank Through Gate of Dachau Concentration Camp Dies At 95”

“We were facing the front gate at Dachau prison,” Feezel said. “My commander said, ‘Jim, put the tank through that gate.’ So, I have the dubious honor of doing that. And, immediately glancing over at the bodies stacked like cordwood, this young 19-year-old just about lost it.”

Times: By the time Mr. Dushman reached Auschwitz, he had been wounded three times. He said he was one of only 69 men from the 12,000 in his division to survive.
Rebuttal: Wow. He was a regular “John Rambostein.” If you say so, Mr. Dushman. We won’t ask for verification of your battlefield heroism. That would be “anti-Semitic ,” dontcha’ know?

Times: More than 1.1 million men, women and children were murdered in the camp…
Rebuttal: But the original report issued by the “Extraordinary State Commission,” pumped-up by the Slimes, and cited by “scholars” up until about 1990 said it was 4 million. Oops.

Times: A Russian Jew, Mr. Dushman and his family were familiar with anti-Semitism and state-sanctioned discrimination against Jews in the Soviet Union.
Rebuttal: You see, even in the Jewish-established Soviet Union, the atheistic anti-Christian “Goy” Communists, like Stalin, never trusted the Trotskyite Jews and turned on them later on. I guess that blows the “anti-Semitism is the product of Christian bigotry” argument out of the water, no?

Times: “My biggest dream and hope for future generations is to live in a world where there is no war,” Dushman (a former fencing coach) said during a 2015 visit to Switzerland.
Rebuttal: Well, that’s a noble sentiment, Doucheman. But if you were sincere about that dream, you should have had that talk with some of your “higher brethren” during the living years — the same gang of greasy ghouls that engineered and funded just about every major war since the “Coalition Wars” against Napoleon. But I suspect that when your ilk speaks of “a world where there is no war,” you mean a planetary government lorded over by “the usual suspects.”

1. From “4 million” dead at Bullschwitz down to 1.5 million — now down to 1.1 million (yet the total of 6 Million never changes!
 // 2. (top) — When (((they))) speak of a world without war, they often mean One World Government over helplessly disarmed nations and individuals.

Greenpeace Founder Patrick Moore Says Climate Change Based On False Narratives

A series of email exchanges between Greenpeace Founder Patrick Moore and South Korean Professor Seok-soon Park shows him saying that climate change is based on false narratives and that it has become more of a political movement than an environmental movement.

greenpeace founder patrick moore says climate change based on false narratives

One of Greenpeace’s founding members, Patrick Moore, said in an email why he had quit the organisation:

“Greenpeace was ‘hijacked’ by the political left when they realised there was money and power in the environmental movement. [Left-leaning] political activists in North America and Europe changed Greenpeace from a science-based organisation to a political fundraising organization,” Moore said.

15 years after he co-founded Greenpeace, Moore left the organisation in 1986.

“The ‘environmental’ movement has become more of a political movement than an environmental movement,” he said. “They are primarily focused on creating narratives, stories, that are designed to instil fear and guilt into the public so the public will send them money.”

He claimed that they typically carry out their political operations behind closed doors with other operatives at the United Nations, the World Economic Forum, and other organisations of a similar kind.

He asserted that the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [IPCC] is “not a science organization.” The World Meteorological Entity and the United Nations Environment Program make up this political organisation.

“The IPCC hires scientists to provide them with ‘information’ that supports the ‘climate emergency’ narrative.

Their campaigns against fossil fuels, nuclear energy, CO2, plastic, etc., are misguided and designed to make people think the world will come to an end unless we cripple our civilization and destroy our economy. They are now a negative influence on the future of both the environment and human civilization.”

“Today, the left has adopted many policies that would be very destructive to civilization as they are not technically achievable. Only look at the looming energy crisis in Europe and the UK, which Putin is taking advantage of.

“But it is of their own making in refusing to develop their own natural gas resources, opposing nuclear energy, and adopting an impossible position on fossil fuels in general,” Moore wrote.

The Left ‘Hijacked’ Greenpeace

The organization’s basic values, according to him, were “green” for the environment and “peace” for the people, but peace had largely been forgotten and green had taken precedence.

“Many [so-called] ‘environmental’ leaders were now saying that ‘humans are the enemies of the Earth, the enemies of Nature.’ I could not accept that humans are the only evil species. This is too much like ‘original sin,’ that humans are born with evil, but all the other species are good, even cockroaches, mosquitos, and diseases,” Moore argued.

The idea that there should be fewer people in the world is the current dominant philosophy, according to him.

“But the people who said this were not volunteering to be the first to go away. They behave as if they are superior to others. This kind of ‘pride’ and ‘conceit’ is the worst of the Cardinal Sins,” Moore said.

False Narrative on Chlorine

“At the time I decided to leave Greenpeace, I was one of 6 Directors of Greenpeace International. I was the only one with formal science education, BSc Honors in Science and Forestry, and Ph.D. in Ecology. My fellow directors decided that Greenpeace should begin a campaign to ‘Ban Chlorine Worldwide.’”

Moore argued that although chlorine is one of the 94 [naturally-occurring] elements on the Periodic Table and plays many important roles in biology and human health, it is also true that elemental chlorine gas is very toxic and was employed as a weapon in World War I.

For instance, sodium chloride, also known as table salt, is a necessary nutrient for all animals and many plants. NaCl cannot be “banned.”

He emphasised that one of the most important developments in public health history in reducing the spread of water-borne communicable illnesses like cholera was the addition of chlorine to drinking water, swimming pools, and spas.

Additionally, roughly 25% of all of our medicines involve chlorine, and about 85% of pharmaceutical drugs are created using chemistry related to chlorine. Without halogens, such as chlorine, bromine, and iodine, medicine would not be the same. Halogens are all potent antibiotics.

“Greenpeace named chlorine ‘The Devil’s Element’ and calls PVC, polyvinyl chloride, or simply vinyl, ‘the Poison Plastic.’ All of this is fake [and] to scare the public. In addition, this misguided policy reinforces the attitude that humans are not a worthy species and that the world would be better off without them. I could not convince my fellow Greenpeace directors to abandon this misguided policy. This was the turning point for me,” Moore said.

False Narrative on Polar Bears

Moore responded when asked how Greenpeace used its big contributions, saying money was used to fund “a very large staff” (possibly numbering over 2,000), extensive advertising, and fundraising initiatives.

Additionally, almost all of the organization’s fundraising advertisements are founded on myths that he had thoroughly debunked in his books, with polar bears serving as one such example.

“The International Treaty on Polar Bears, signed by all polar countries in 1973, to ban unrestricted hunting of polar bears, is never mentioned in the media, Greenpeace, or politicians who say the polar bear is going extinct due to melting ice in the Arctic. In fact, the polar bear population has increased from 6,000 to 8,000 in 1973 to 30,000 to 50,000 today. This is not disputed,” Moore said.

“But now they say the polar bear will go extinct in 2100 as if they have a magic crystal ball that can predict the future. In fact, this past winter in the Arctic saw an expansion of ice from previous years, and Antarctica was colder during the last winter than in the past 50 years.”

Like many in the “climate emergency” sector, Moore said he does not pretend to be an expert or foresee the future with certainty.

The Goal of the ‘Environmental Apocalypse’ Theory

“I believe the human population has always been vulnerable to people who predict doom with false stories,” Moore said.

“The Aztecs threw virgins into volcanos, and the Europeans and Americans burned women as witches for 200 years claiming this would ‘save the world’ from evil people. This has been [referred to as] ‘herd mentality,’ ‘groupthink,’ and ‘cult behavior.’ Humans are social animals with a hierarchy, and it is easiest to gain a high position by using fear and control.”

Moore added that he is committed to proving to people that the situation is not as dire as they are led to believe that the environmental apocalypse hypothesis is really about “political power and control.”

“Today, in the richest countries, our descendants are making decisions that our grandchildren will have to pay for,” he said. “Predictions that the world is coming to an end have been made for thousands of years. Not once has this come true. Why should we believe it now?”

“People are naturally afraid of the future because it is unknown and full of risks and difficult decisions. I believe there is also an element of ‘self-loathing’ in this apocalypse movement.”

According to Moore, today’s youth are taught that people are unworthy and are destroying the planet. They now feel guilty and ashamed of themselves as a result of this indoctrination, which is the incorrect attitude to have in life.

The Demonization of Carbon Dioxide

“Very few people believe the world is not warming. The record is clear that the world has been warming since about the year 1700, 150 years before we were using fossil fuels. 1700 was the peak of the Little Ice Age, which was very cold and caused crop failures and starvation. Before that, around 1000 A.D. was the Medieval Warm period when Vikings farmed Greenland. [And] before that, around 500 A.D. were the Dark Ages, and before that, the Roman Warm Period when it was warmer than today, and the sea level was 1–2 meters higher than today,” Moore said.

“Even until about 1950, the amount of fossil fuel used and CO2 emitted were very small compared to today. We do not know the cause of these periodic fluctuations in temperature, but it was certainly not CO2.”

Moore made it clear that the “minority opinion” is not about the temperature history of the Earth; rather, the relationship between the temperature and CO2 is the subject of dispute.

“In this regard, I agree that many believe CO2 is the main cause of warming. CO2 is invisible, so no one can actually see what it is doing. And this ‘majority’ are mainly scientists paid by politicians and bureaucrats, media making headlines, or activists making money. [The rest are] the public who believe this story even though they can’t actually see what CO2 is doing,” Moore said.

Moore presented a graph showing the temperature in central England during a period of 350 years, from 1659 to 2009. He said that “If carbon dioxide was the main cause of warming, then there should be a rise in temperature along the carbon dioxide curve, but it doesn’t.”

In addition to stating that CO2 is the foundation of all life on Earth and that its concentration in the atmosphere is currently lower than it has been for a significant portion of life’s history, Moore called the demonization of CO2 “completely ridiculous.”

‘Wind and Solar Power Are Parasites on the Economy’

“Solar and wind power are both very expensive and very unreliable. It is almost like a mental illness that so many people have been brainwashed to think entire countries can be supported with these technologies,” Moore said.

“I believe wind and solar energy are parasites on the larger economy. In other words, they make the country poorer than if other more reliable and less costly technologies were used.”

According to Moore, companies that provide wind and solar energy heavily rely on government mandates, tax write-offs, and subsidies. Under these mandates, people are compelled to buy wind and solar energy, even if it is more expensive, under the guise that it is “environmentally friendly.”

“Millions of people pay more for wind and solar energy while a few people make millions of dollars, marks, pounds, etc. It is a bit like a Ponzi scheme in the stock markets,” Moore added.

“They require vast areas of land, are not available most of the time, and require reliable energy such as nuclear, hydroelectric, [coal, and natural] gas to be available when wind and solar are unavailable.”

According to Moore, the mining, transporting, and building of wind and solar farms need significant amounts of fossil fuels. In many places, they also don’t generate nearly as much energy during their lifetimes as is needed to construct and maintain them.

“Why not use reliable energy [such as nuclear, hydroelectricity, natural gas, etc.] as the primary source?” Moore questioned, adding if that were the case, “then wind and solar would be unnecessary.”

‘Plastic Is Not a Toxic Substance’

“Plastic is not a toxic substance. That is why we package and wrap our food in it, to prevent it from becoming contaminated. Plastic does not magically become toxic when it enters the ocean,” Moore said.

“Of course, they say on one hand that plastic will never break down, and then, on the other hand, they say it will quickly decay into ‘microplastics,’ which, of course, are conveniently invisible so no one can observe or verify this for themselves. How clever!”

Moore claims that our digestive system can distinguish between “food” and plastic or minute sand particles. No matter how minute the sand is, our body does not absorb it into our bloodstream.

He claimed that, like driftwood, floating plastic in the ocean is similar to a little floating reef. It gives marine organisms a surface to attach to, lay their eggs on, and eat things that are attached to it.

“Pollution is usually toxic or causes harm to life. Plastic is simply ‘litter’ beside the road. It is not hurting anything. One exception is discarded fishing nets, not because they are plastic but because they are shaped to catch fish.

“The environmental community should work with the fishing industry to stop throwing damaged nets in the sea and bring them back to the dock, where they can be recycled, used in a waste-to-energy plant, or discarded safely,” Moore added.

Three Signs We’re in a Banana Republic

Satirist Sol Luckman defines “banana republic” in his irreverent glossary, The Angel’s Dictionary, as a “lawless society where the monkeys rule.”  

Looking around the United States today, it’s hard to say we don’t fit his meaning.  Nearly 80% of Americans believe we live under a two-tiered system of justice.  Likewise, in Gallup’s recent survey of Americans’ confidence in U.S. institutions, it notes, “This year’s poll marks new lows in confidence for all three branches of the federal government — the Supreme Court (25%), the presidency (23%) and Congress.”  Of sixteen institutions tested, confidence in the U.S. Congress sits at the very bottom with a scant 7%!  Even though there is now “record-low confidence across all institutions,” confidence in the Office of the Presidency suffered the largest year-over-year drop in 2022 — cratering 15%!  In other words, not only do Americans believe the country is lawless, they’re also convinced that it is being run by a barrel of monkeys!  Clearly, Americans “get” that we’re living in a “banana republic” today.  

Just consider these three telltale signs:  

(1) Manipulation of language and mandatory leftist religion:

The political Left’s most potent weapon is its penchant for undermining the meaning of words.  For decades Democrats have branded anything antithetical to their worldview as “hateful” and banned “offending” viewpoints from civic culture altogether.  When “authorities” deconstruct biological sex so preposterously that they can’t even tell the difference between boys and girls, though, they’ve lost the plot.  One school board in Wisconsin is so fearful of the language police crashing through its doors that it has replaced all references to “girls” with sterilized language concerning a “person with a vulva.”  When “teachers” are afraid to say “girl” out loud, it’s banana republic time!  

Joe Biden and his communist brigades have tanked the economy and unleashed torrential inflation upon the country.  In a less banana-y time, that would have huge political consequences.  But now his regime enforcers and media propagandists simply redefine the meaning of an economic recession in order to proclaim — à la North Korea — that Americans have never been so well off!  

In our topsy-turvy, upside-down world, where the government insists on establishing its own Ministry of Truth, words don’t mean squat!  How can aborting a baby be called “reproductive healthcare” when it ends with at least one death?  How can discrimination on the basis of a person’s skin color be defended as “equitable,” when it perpetuates racial inequality?  Why do Leftists describe transgender body mutilation, illegal immigration, abortion, and even mRNA vaccination as “acts of love,” while regularly condemning Christians as “bigots” and “extremists”?  Why do Democrats fret that “democracy” is under attack (when we don’t live in one) while saying nothing of attacks on Americans’ free speech, right to self-defense, and other individual rights (all supposedly guaranteed by the Bill of Rights)?  Why is every ordinary weather event now dressed up as evidence for human-created “climate change”?  

The answer is simple: manipulative language perverts rational discussion of ideas and short-circuits reasonable debate. Propaganda distorts reality until nothing can be known as truth at all — unless it is officially sanctioned and blessed by the State.  When government destroys objective meaning, it makes itself a New Age god.

(2) Selective prosecution and political persecution:

The federal Leviathan has two standing orders today: (1) Get Trump!, and (2) protect the Establishment Uniparty and permanent bureaucratic Deep State at all costs.  When the Intelligence Community isn’t busy framing President Trump as a Russian spy, the FBI and DOJ are committed to slapping him with imaginary process crimes they’d never dare try against a Clinton, Biden, Bush, or Obama.  That’s one hell of a way to thank a president who took no salary, while using his time in office to increase middle class Americans’ wealth, security, and future prospects!  

In the summer before the 2016 presidential election, FBI Director James Comey publicly articulated Hillary Clinton’s criminal culpability for storing classified emails on a private, unsecured server kept in a spare bathroom before declaring imperiously that “no reasonable prosecutor” would bring a case against her.  Obama’s IRS got caught targeting conservatives for their political beliefs, but the president assured the nation that the obvious scandal revealed “not even a smidgeon of corruption” within his administration.  Attorney General Eric Holder, Obama’s self-anointed “wingman,” was held in contempt of Congress for refusing to hand over documents relating to the Fast and Furious gun-running conspiracy, yet his Department of Justice unsurprisingly declined to pursue criminal charges.  

In contrast, Americans have watched for six years as President Trump and his associates (including Steve Bannon, who was recently convicted for the same crime Eric Holder effortlessly eluded) have been hounded by an irredeemably corrupt DOJ and FBI, malicious state prosecutors, and a petty, Machiavellian Congress running shameless show trials devoid of due process, impartiality, or fairness.  When Democrats routinely get a slap on the wrist (see Nancy Pelosi’s drunk-driving-get-out-of-jail-free husband as just the latest proof) and MAGA Republicans get a never-ending clown show of Soviet “justice,” impeachment theater, and Star Chamber persecution all rolled up into one rotten twist, two-tiered justice is shockingly visible for all to see.

(3) Forced citizen compliance and increased government dependence:

Obedience + financial dependence = enslavement to the State.  

This is the only math our Leviathan knows.  Wealthy lawmakers don’t mind bankrupting America if it means their control over us increases.  Racial provocateurs don’t mind burning cities to the ground if Antifa and Black Lives Matter shock troops can intimidate Americans into docility.  Medical mercenaries don’t mind issuing unscientific orders arbitrarily enforcing experimental “vaccine,” mask, and travel restrictions if their perceived “authority” over Americans is permanently established.  The religious zealots who worship “climate change” as a false idol do not mind if their aberrant worldview requires Americans to relinquish free will, pray to false gods, and descend into the depths of both physical and spiritual poverty.  The more Americans feel impoverished, the more they become dependent on handouts from the State.  Welfare is hardly “fair” because it always takes more from the soul than it gives.

“Because I said so” is not a reasonable governing policy for any nation purporting to be free, but it does seem to encapsulate the Biden administration’s obsessions with illegal mandates and policing thoughts and language.  Between the government’s COVID-1984 authoritarianism, its attacks on speech it dislikes as “misinformation” deserving of censorship, and its farcical “climate change” alarmism unleashing skyrocketing food and fuel prices today, rule by government fiat has quickly become the new norm.  Totalitarianism, however, is neither new nor normal.  

The World Economic Forum notoriously declared that Westerners would “own nothing and be happy.”  Democrats’ embrace of those wicked oligarchs’ “build back better” buffoonery in the guises of tax and spend “climate change” legislation, Marxist redistribution of wealth, and a militarized IRS takes the WEF’s plan for widespread indentured servitude to heart.  

When things fall apart, as they always do when communism is recycled into a “progressive,” trendy, “we’re all in this together” new form, the D.C. despots will watch their intentional destruction of society unfold without feeling the slightest remorse.  Their bureaucratic unaccountability, after all, is fueled by rampant narcissism.  Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama will never apologize for their Russia hoax.  High Priest Fauci will never apologize for nationwide mandates that destroyed livelihoods and took lives.  That’s just not who they are.

So, remember this: when the feds give you a banana republic, make banana daiquiris.  Never miss an opportunity to point out how corrupt, vindictive, and illegitimate Washington, D.C.’s monkey class has become.  Republicans, Democrats — I say a pox on both their houses!  I think Lord Fauci and his medical mandators might even have a vaccine for that!

Comical Clash of the Climate Eggheads

Battle of the eggheads

AUGUST 26, 2022

NY Times:
 Pace of Climate Change Sends Economists Back to Drawing Board

They underestimated the impact of global warming, and their preferred policy solution floundered in the United States.

What’s this? The Globalist “paper of record” admitting that the infallible models of warmist Fake Economists were actually wrong? Well, of course they are wrong because the whole Climate Con is a HOAX — but that’s not the context of this particular propaganda piece. According to the Times, they got it wrong in the opposite way, meaning — “climate change” is affecting the world to an even worse extent that had been previously modeled and more aggressive solutions are needed.

A bit of undecipherable dung, from the article:

“The Yale economist William Nordhaus began constructing a model meant to gauge the effect of warming on economic growth. The work, first published in 1992, gave rise to a field of scholarship assessing the cost to society of each ton of emitted carbon offset by the benefits of cheap power — and thus how much it was worth paying to avert it.

Robert Kopp, a climate scientist at Rutgers University, worked on developing carbon pricing methods at the Department of Energy. He thinks the relentless focus on prices, with little attention paid to direct investments, lasted too long.

There was an idealization and simplification of the problem that started in the economics literature,” Dr. Kopp said. “And things that start out in the economics literature have half-lives in the applied policy world that are longer than the time period during which they’re the frontier of the field.

At the same time, Dr. Nordhaus’s model was drawing criticism for underestimating the havoc that climate change would wreak.”

In short, the young commie crackpot economist Professor Robert Kopp says that the punitive tax hike models of the old commie crackpot scientist Professor William Nordhaus are outdated and not aggressive enough — an assertion to which Comrade Nordhaus takes umbrage against. Kopp wants more direct “investment” in “green energy” scams. You see, that’s what the “academic debate” on this issue is all about — how best to punish, control and degrade the goyim.

Under. Every. Rock.

1. The Star of Moloch comes in green too. // 2. Nordhaus of Yale wants to focus on mass behavioral control by punishing us with higher taxes for using “fossil fuels.” // 3. Beaked Bolshevik Kopp of Rutgers & NASA (or is that NASAL?) advocates for a far more aggressive “investment regime” in wind & solar scams instead.

These types of “models” are the paid-for product of a quackademic marriage between Fake Science and Fake Economics — a match made in Hell! With the exception of Fake History, no other fields of academic research are more prone to reckless conjecture and malevolent manipulation than Fake (theoretical) Science and Fake Economics. A skilled mathematician / wordsmith sophist with “PhD.” after his name can easily wow the “educated” normies with technical verbosity, cherry-picked data and ponderous mathematical equations with no relation to reality. Plug it all into what are essentially cartoons and video game “models” — throw in some “peer reviews”from fellow Oy Vey League whores — threaten the “deniers” with ridicule, publishing lockouts and defunding — amplify it all with ample amounts of Fake News hype and voilà — “the science is settled!”

Indeed, the entirety of the “science” underpinning the Climate Con amounts to a giant Fallacy of Verbosity & Complexity, aka Argumentum Verbosium, which is textbook defined as:

“… when a conclusion is supported with an argument too complex and verbose to reasonably deal with in all its intimate details. This fallacy is similar to the fallacy of information overload. Sometimes, verbosity can be a means of intimidation, especially when insider jargon is used to confuse and overwhelm the listener/reader.”

Truth tellers simplify — liars complicate with blah blah blah and lots of numbers. The closing line of the Slimes article — when read with a “third eye” –reveals the bamboozle for us:

“The larger lesson is that modern climate policy is a complex endeavor that calls for large, interdisciplinary teams — which is not historically how the economics field has operated.

You can only do so much by writing things down on a single sheet of paper from your office at Yale,” said Dr. Kopp, of Rutgers. “That’s not how science gets done. That’s how a lot of economics gets done. But you run into limits.”

These Climate Con crackpots are not only wicked wordsmiths — but to the extent which they eventually start to, in due time, actually believe their own bullshit (and many of them will)— are also insane.

Sophisticated blah blah blah +
 complex math equations =
 BULLSHIT! — not “science.”