Please do your own research. The information I share is only a catalyst to expanding ones confined consciousness. I have NO desire for anyone to blindly believe or agree with what I share. Seek the truth for yourself and put your own puzzle together that has been presented to you. I'm not here to teach, preach or lead, but rather assist in awakening the consciousness of the collective from its temporary dormancy.
NY Times: King Charles Arrives in Berlin for First State Visit as Monarch
Charles and Camilla, the queen consort, visited the Brandenburg Gate in Berlin to start their three-day trip to Germany.
These are not the best of times for the fake reality show called “The British Monarchy.” After the death of the grand old lady Queen Elizabeth last year, the doofus King Charles ushered in the end of the outdated veneration of this useless bunch of Jewified traitors to their subjects. Today’s featured Times article reveals — albeit inadvertently — just how far the monarchy has fallen.
“Making his first official overseas trip as Britain’s new monarch, King Charles III began a three-day state visit to Germany on Wednesday, with Camilla, the queen consort, greeting a crowd of hundreds of spectators at the landmark Brandenburg Gate in Berlin.”
“Hundreds of people lined up with the famous Unter den Linden, a boulevard in central Berlin (emphasis added)“
Only “hundreds” — in the heart of a city of 3.5 million population with a metro area of 6.1 million — turned out to greet the new King and Queen Consort of Great Britain for the first stop in Charlie’s pre-announced “world debut” tour??? — Or might that be “King” and “Queen Consort” — hmmm? Heck, on any given afternoon, one would expect “hundreds” of locals and tourists to be strolling about the Brandenburg Gate anyway! Couldn’t the Germans have at least conjured-up a rent-a-mob of several thousand for the meet and greet? Not even a few High School field trips to come out and say “hello” to the British King of German descent, or something?
No doubt about it, boys and girls — the high and once mighty Windsors are old news now, and good riddance too.
Today’s “nobles” — a bunch of lazy, selfish, gutless, Globalist worthless eaters and perverts who provide spectacle and circus for the “has been” subjects of dying un-jolly old England. // Image 3: Only a Rothschild can stick his finger in royalty’s chest like that.
There was a time when the word “nobility” actually meant something. The French term “noblesse oblige” (literally “nobility obliges”) meant that royalty / nobility extends beyond mere titles and privileges — requiring the monarch and the “blue bloods” to fulfill social responsibilities. Even in serfdom days, when those who lived on the nobles’ land had obligations to the “lord,” the Nobleman in turn had obligations to the people’s welfare — including, most of all, protection. And the Lord’s cut of the crops was a far lower percentage than what we-the-tyrannized pay in direct and indirect taxes today.
Examples of truly “noble” (protective) attitudes and measures would include:
* England’s King Edward I expelling the Jews in 1290 * Hungary’s King Louis I expelling the Jews in 1360 * France’s King Charles VI expelling the Jews in 1394 * Spain’s King Ferdinand & Queen Isabella expelling the Jews in 1492 * Portugal’s King Manuel I expelling the Jews in 1496 * Austria’s Queen Maria Theresa expelling the Jews from Bohemia in 1744 * Russia’s Tzarina (Queen) Catherine the Great banishing Jews to western territories in 1791
Hmmm. There seems to be a pattern here.
These “anti-Semitic” decrees (just to list a few) were all issued in protective response to the usual suspects committing the usual dirty deeds — you know, stuff like coin clipping, well poisoning, ritual sacrifice of a kidnapped Christian child and, of course, the most common “canard” ™ of them all — usurious & ruinous money lending. Notwithstanding the shortfalls of a system of hereditary monarchy, the Christian monarchs of days-gone-by generally had the best interests of their subjects at heart.
So, whatever happened to “noblesse oblige?”
During the tumultuous century following the formation of Adam Weishaupt‘s Illuminati (New World Order secret society) in 1776, the nobility of just about every country in Europe sustained a relentless bloodbath of assassinations and “close call” assassination attempts at the hands of Red radicals and deluded “nationalists” carrying out the policy of “propaganda of the deed” — in which a suicidal assassin would gain eternal notoriety by sacrificing his own life (“taking one for the team”) by publicly murdering an Emperor, King, Queen or Prince (Presidents & Prime Ministers too). There was absolutely no one that Rothschild’s Reds couldn’t get to, or at least get close enough to scare. Even England’s Queen Victoria had eight attempts made against her (here).
In due time, personal fear of death and revolution — combined with the golden carrot of favorable Rothschild finance and flattering Jewish press (a mighty weapon which “the goyim” carelessly allowed to slip from their hands) — led to the “democratic” domestication of much of Europe. This was then followed by the “if-ya-can’t-beat-em-join-em” corruption of the surviving monarchies — England in particular.
This bit of undeniable history is also boastfully summarized in the turn-of-the-century “hoax” known as The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion. From Protocol 1: Point 26
“This helped us to our triumph: it gave us the possibility, among other things, of getting into our hands the master card – the destruction of the privileges, or in other words of the very existence of the aristocracy of the Goyim — that class which was the only defense peoples and countries had against us.
On the ruins of the natural and genealogical aristocracy of the Goyim we have set up the aristocracy of our educated class headed by the aristocracy of money. The qualifications for this aristocracy we have established in wealth, which is dependent upon us, and in knowledge, for which our learned elders provide the motive force.”
And so, after having terrorized, neutered and Judaized the British and European Monarchies for so long, “noblesse oblige” is about to become “nobles obliterated” as (((they))) will gleefully flush the rotten royal remnants down the toilet bowl of history.
“It is untrue that I or anyone else in Germany wanted the war in 1939. It was desired and instigated exclusively by those international statesmen who were either of Jewish descent or worked for Jewish interests. I have made too many offers for the control and limitation of armaments, which posterity will not for all time be able to disregard for the responsibility for the outbreak of this war to be laid on me. I have further never wished that after the first fatal world war a second against England, or even against America, should break out.”
— Adolf Hitler, Final Testament, April 29, 1945
1. Averting war with UK Prime Minister Chamberlain in 1938 // 2. Making peace with French Marshal Petain in 1940
Adolf Hitler’s numerous and reasonable offers of peace to the Allied powers are a matter of indisputable historical record. Establishment Court Historians (Fake Historians) cannot deny the reality of these reasonable offers, so they choose to simply ignore them instead.
(((They))) know that if the truth of Hitler’s pleas for peace were to become widely known, it would stand the conventional narrative of World War II (and subsequent events) on its head. Consider the following true statements and events, and decide for yourself who the “aggressor” behind World War II really was.
1939 Hitler proposes peaceful solutions to the problem of the ‘Polish Corridor’
After World War I, the victorious allies had carved up German territory and given part of Germany (Western Prussia) to the newly re-established nation of Poland. Eastern Prussia was left isolated; totally cut off from Germany. Tensions among Poles, Jews and minority Germans simmered in the area.
To resolve the problem, Hitler makes numerous sensible proposals; which include: demilitarization of the key port areas, public referendum, accepting Gdynia as a Polish port city on the Baltic Sea, 1 km wide rail & road passages to link Eastern Prussia to Germany, or to link Poland to the Baltic Sea.
Finally, as attacks against Germans living in Poland escalate, Hitler proposes that the region be placed under International control. Every German proposal is ignored. We now know that, behind the scenes, US President Roosevelt had been pressuring Poland to not make any deals with Germany.
“BERLIN THINKS DOOR IS LEFT OPEN TO PEACEFUL SOLUTION”
Even the pre-war August 28th headline of the Hitler-hating New York Times confirmed that Hitler sought to avoid war with Britain & France. Hitler’s thoughtful letter to France is published in full.
Six years before the war was to even start, International Jewry had already declared war against Germany. The “Polish Corridor” was to serve as the match which lit the flame.
LATE AUGUST – SEPTEMBER 1939 In 11th hour attempt to avert war, Hitler calls for emergency talks between Germany and Poland
Just three days before the actual outbreak of what was to become World War II, Britain agrees to come to the Poland’s assistance in the event of a conflict with Germany (Anglo Polish Military Alliance). This unnecessary deal emboldens the Polish and Jewish militias who want the West to wage war upon Germany. To force Hitler’s hand, terrorists begin murdering German civilians in large numbers. A British ex-Pat named William Joyce describes the events:
“On the nights of August 25 to August 31 inclusive, there occurred, besides innumerable attacks on civilians of German blood, 44 perfectly authenticated acts of armed violence against German official persons and property. These incidents took place either on the border or inside German territory.
On the night of August 31, a band of Polish desperadoes actually occupied the German Broadcasting Station at Gleiwitz. Now it was clear that unless German troops marched at once, not a man, woman or child of German blood within the Polish territory could reasonably expect to avoid persecution and slaughter.”
And yet, just prior to ordering the invasion of Poland (September 1, 1939), Hitler is still trying to resolve the situation peacefully by summoning the Polish Foreign Minister for talks. Unbeknown to Hitler, the fix was already in. After the 3 week German-Polish War ends in victory for the Germans, Hitler declares:
“I attempted to find a tolerable solution. I submitted this attempt to the Polish rulers. You know these proposals. They were more than moderate. I do not know what mental condition the Polish Government was in when it refused these proposals. As an answer, Poland gave the order for the first mobilization, and my request to the Polish Foreign Minister to visit me to discuss these questions was refused. Instead of going to Berlin, he went to London.”
Germans of all ages massacred in Poland. This type of nasty business had been going on for months as “the international community” remained silent.
OCTOBER 1939 Hitler pleads with Britain & France to rescind recent war declarations.
Before the actual shooting was to start in the Western theater, Hitler did all could to reassure Britian & France of his peaceful intentions. The two Allied powers had, under the pretext of saving Poland, both declared war upon Germany on September 3, 1939. Before the Reichstag, and the world, Hitler declares:
“I have always expressed to France my desire to bury forever our ancient enmity and bring together these two nations, both of which have such glorious pasts. ….I have devoted no less effort to the achievement of Anglo-German understanding, no, more than that, of an Anglo-German friendship. At no time and in no place have I ever acted contrary to British interests…”Why should this war in the West be fought?”
Britain (and later France) declares war. Meanwhile, Hitler declares peace!
MAY 1940 Hitler deliberately allows the British Army to escape at Dunkirk
The German “blitzkrieg” across Holland and Belgium, as well as the earlier occupation of parts of Denmark and Norway, had denied the Allies of the opportunity to encircle Germany before invading it. As a show of good faith, and over the objections of his own Generals, Hitler then allows the trapped Allied forces to escape untouched from the beaches of Dunkirk (France). Hitler hopes that this gracious act will make the British more willing to make peace. General Gunther von Blumentritt, in describing the reasons behind Hitler’s decision regarding Dunkirk, later explains:
“He (Hitler) then astonished us by speaking with admiration of the British Empire, of the necessity for its existence, and of the civilization that Britain had brought into the world. ….He compared the British Empire with the Catholic Church saying they were both essential elements of stability in the world. He said that all he wanted from Britain was that she should acknowledge Germany’s position on the Continent. The return of Germany’s colonies would be desirable but not essential, and he would even offer to support Britain with troops if she should be involved in difficulties anywhere.”
It is interesting to note that, in recent years, some Establishment historianshave been permitted to talk about Hitler’s halt order for what it was — an offer of peace.(here)
The Allied army could have easily been captured at Dunkirk, but Hitler allowed them to escape. General Blumentritt reveals Hitler’s admiration for the British and his desire to end the war.
MAY 1940 After having defeated France and chasing the British invaders off of the continent, Hitler, via Swedish third party, proposes generous peace terms to Britain
The Germans contact the British ambassador in Sweden, Victor Mallet, through Sweden´s Supreme Court Judge Ekeberg, who is known to Hitler’s legal advisor, Ludwig Weissauer.
According to Mallet:
“Hitler, according to his emissary [Weissauer], sincerely wishes friendship with England. He wishes peace to be restored, but the ground must be prepared for it: only after careful preparation may official negotiations begin. Until then the condition must be considered that discussions be unofficial and secret.
Hitler´s basic ideas [are that] today´s economic problems are different from those of the past […] In order to achieve economic progress one must calculate on the basis of big territories and consider them an economic unit. Napoleon tried, but in his days it wasn’t possible because France wasn’t in the center of Europe and communications were too hard. Now Germany is in the center of Europe and has the necessary means to provide communication and transportation services.
England and America now have the best fleets and will naturally continue to, because they will need the oceans for their supply. Germany has the continent. In what concerns Russia (USSR), Weissauer has given the impression that it should be seen as a potential enemy. “
Hitler´s peace proposal is as follows:
1- The British Empire retains all its Colonies 2- Germany´s position on the continent will not be questioned 3- All questions concerning the Mediterranean and its French, Belgian & Dutch colonies are open to discussion 4- Poland. A Polish state must exist 5- The former Czechoslovakian states remain independent but under German protection.
Ekeberg understands that this implies that the states occupied by Germany would be de-occupied. Germany´s occupation was only due to the present war situation. Churchill is not interested in making peace.
1. Excerpt from “Himmler’s Secret War,” by Martin Allen // 2. Thanks to Churchill, German peace efforts via Sweden failed. Ambassador Victor Mallet (left) walking with Princess Elizabeth (now Queen Elizabeth) and Prince Phillip.
MAY 1940 Churchill turns down Mussolini’s offer to mediate peace between Germany and Britain
On May 25, 1940, Giuseppe Bastianini, the Italian ambassador in London, requests a meeting with British Foreign Secretary Lord Halifax to discuss Italy’s neutrality. Halifax meets Bastianini later that afternoon. The discussion soon moves to that of Italian mediation between the Allies and Germany.
Bastiani reveals that the goal of Italian leader Benito Mussolini (Hitler’s ally) is to negotiate a settlement “that would not merely be an armistice, but would protect European peace for the century.” Halifax responds favorably to the idea and takes it to the British War Cabinet.
The following morning Halifax gives his report, telling the Cabinet that in his opinion they “had to face the fact that it was not so much now a question of imposing a complete defeat upon Germany but of safeguarding the independence of our own Empire.”
Halifax summarizes his meeting with Bastianini and urges his colleagues to consider Italian mediation. Again, Churchill would have none of it!
For several days, Halifax continues to press for the Mussolini mediation. In an apparent attempt to placate Halifax, Churchill finally says that he “doubts whether anything would come of an approach to Italy, but that the matter was one which the War Cabinet would have to consider.”
But Churchill is lying to Halifax. Never did Churchill even consider Mussolini’s offer to mediate peace between Britain and Germany. The matter eventually dies. The conflict between Churchill and Halifax became known as ‘The War Cabinet Crisis.’
Instead of accepting any peace offers, Churchill’s gang chose to frighten the British public with idiotic tales of imminent poison gas attacks from Hitler.
1. Halifax (r) tried very hard to convince the warmonger Churchill (l) to at least hear Mussolini’s mediation proposal. // 2. Mussolini, shaking hands with UK Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain in 1938, had helped Britain and Germany to keep the peace of Europe at the Munich Conference of 1938. That’s when Churchill wrongly condemned Chamberlain as an “appeaser” – a slanderous label that has clung to Chamberlain ever since.
JUNE 1940 Hitler drops “peace leaflets” over London!
With Germany now in total control of the continent and riding high in “the driver’s seat”. Hitler continues his campaign for peace by bypassing the British press and air-dropping leaflets explaining the causes of the senseless war, and ending with “an appeal to “reason”.
EXCERPT:
“In this hour I feel it to be my duty before my own conscience to appeal once more to reason and common sense in Great Britain as much as elsewhere. I consider myself in a position to make this appeal, since I am not the vanquished, begging favors, but the victor speaking in the name of reason. I can see no reason why this war must go on. I am grieved to think of the sacrifices it will claim.
I should like to avert them. As for my own people, I know that millions of German men, young and old alike, are burning with the desire to settle accounts with the enemy who for the second time has declared war upon us for no reason whatever. But I also know that at home there are many women and mothers who, ready as they are to sacrifice all they have in life, yet are bound to it by their heartstrings.
Possibly Mr. Churchill again will brush aside this statement of mine by saying that it is merely born of fear and of doubt in our final victory. In that case I shall have relieved my conscience in regard to the things to come.”
1- Dropped over London // 2- British ‘Black propagandist’ Sefton Delmer (of Jewish heritage) keeps the war-fires burning by mocking Hitler’s peace leaflets. // 3- Ignorant British soldier shown laughing as he reads Hitler’s leaflets.
Over on the other side of the Atlantic, the Fake News in response to Hitler’s air-dropped appeals was just as bad. — (New York Daily News)
NOVEMBER 1940 The Vatican’s ‘Papal Nuncio’ (ambassador) presents Hitler’s peace proposal to British officials
This excerpt from ‘Himmler’s Secret War’ describes a meeting held in Spain between the Papal Nuncio and British officials Hoare and Hilgarth in Spain; and the latest peace offer from Hitler:
“The nature of the concessions that the German Fuhrer was prepared to make in order to obtain peace with Britain must have astounded the men at the head of SO1. This was not even a deal worked out through a process of hard negotiation. It was Hitler’s opening gambit….an offer so generous and pragmatic that it would be very tempting to anyone who genuinely wanted peace.
His (Hitler’s) offer of such remarkable concessions was an extremely threatening development. Should the terms become public, it had the potential to render British resolve to stand firm against German aggression to a shuttering halt.”
Neither the Pope’s prayers nor his emissaries could sway Mad Dog Churchill’s gang away from their warpath.
May 1941 The Amazing Peace Mission of Deputy Fuhrer Rudolf Hess
Deputy Fuhrer Rudolf Hess is Hitler’s “Right Hand Man” and long time friend. He is Germany’s 2nd in command, or perhaps 3rd (behind Air Marshall Goring). In May of 1941, at a time when Germany is winning the war, Hess (who is fluent in English) flies a solo mission over Scotland and parachutes in with an offer of peace.
Hess is attempting to link up with what he believes to be British anti-war patriots. His goal is to end the war and, according to Stalin (whose agents infested the UK hierarchy), to make a pact against the Soviets. Instead, he falls into Churchill’s hands; to be held in solitary confinement for the duration of the war.
After the war, Hess is sentenced to life in East Berlin’s Spandau Prison. With the liberalization of the USSR in the late 1980’s, there is talk of finally releasing him. But he is said to have committed “suicide” in his cell in 1987. Many believes that the 93-year-old Hess was murdered so that details of his peace mission would remain buried forever.
One couldn’t be any closer to Hitler than Rudolf Hess. Right: Old man Hess was imprisoned for nearly half a century. The public was to remain ignorant of his peace mission.
1940, 1941, 1942, 1943 Hitler maintains a standing generous peace offer on the table. Churchill, by his own admission, refuses to accept!
At all times, the Hitler-Hess offer of total cessation of the war in the West remains on the table. Germany offers to evacuate all of France except Alsace and Lorraine, which would remain German. It would evacuate Holland and Belgium. It would evacuate Norway and Denmark. In short, Hitler wants to withdraw from Western Europe, except for the two French provinces and Luxembourg (Luxembourg was never a French province, but an independent state of ethnically German origin), in return for which Great Britain would agree to an attitude of benevolent neutrality towards Germany.
In addition, Hitler is ready to withdraw from Yugoslavia and Greece. German troops would evacuate from the Mediterranean and Hitler would use his influence to arrange a settlement of the Mediterranean conflict between Britain and Italy. No country would be entitled to demand reparations from any other.
As Churchill leaves London to meet Roosevelt for a conference in Quebec late in the summer of 1943, a reporter asks if they were planning to offer peace terms to Germany. Churchill replied:
“Heavens, no. They would accept immediately.”
Again, in a 1944 letter to his ally, the mass-murdering Bolshevik Joe Stalin, Churchill reassures Stalin that Britain will remain at war with Germany. In so doing, Churchill confirms the undeniable reality of Hitler’s generous peace proposals:
“We never thought of peace, not even in that year when we were completely isolated and could have made peace without serious detriment to the British Empire, and extensively at your cost. Why should we think of it now, when victory approaches for the three of us?”
Churchill and FDR were very chummy with the great mass-murderer Joseph Stalin; who worried that German peace offers might be accepted by his Western Allies.
APRIL 1945 Berlin Bunker: Hitler’s Final Testament
On April 29, 1945, with the Red Army closing in, Hitler dictated the final public communication of his life, My Political Testament. Right up until the very end, when he had nothing to gain, Hitler wanted the world to know that he had never wanted war. Here’s a telling excerpt:
“More than thirty years have passed since 1914 when I made my modest contribution as a volunteer in the First World War, which was forced upon the Reich.
In these three decades love and loyalty to my people have guided all my thoughts, actions and my life. They gave me the strength to make the most difficult decisions ever to confront mortal man. In these three decades I have spent my strength and my health.
It is untrue that I or anyone else in Germany wanted war in 1939. It was wanted and provoked solely by international statesmen either of Jewish origin or working for Jewish interests. I have made too many offers for the limitation and control of armaments, which posterity will not be cowardly enough always to disregard, for responsibility for the outbreak of this war to be placed on me. Nor have I ever wished that, after the appalling First World War, there would ever be a second against either England or America.
Only three days before the outbreak of the German-Polish war I proposed a solution of the German-Polish problem to the British Ambassador in Berlin – international control as in the case of the Saar. This offer, too, cannot be lied away. It was only rejected because the ruling clique in England wanted war, partly for commercial reasons and partly because it was influenced by the propaganda put out by international Jewry.”
Hitler wasn’t lying — not in his Final Testament, not ever. The bloody war which either killed, maimed or traumatized scores of millions of innocent people, and has stunted the progress of western civilization ever since, did not have to happen. What a shame. What a damn shame.
1. Hitler enjoying the 1936 Berlin Olympics — Given what we have just learned about Hitler’s numerous attempts to first prevent, and to then stop the war – the claims of innocence made in his Final Testament do indeed ring true. // 2. The opinion presented in Hitler’s Testament is supported by the private diaries of famed British authors Harold Nicolson and Evelyn Waugh, who quote the 5th Duke of Wellington (Image 2) on the day war broke out as saying: “It’s all the fault of the anti-appeasers and the Jews.”
These are Just FACTS that History has decided to just ignore since it doesn’t go along with the ever ending rhetoric.
NY Times:Jewish Heirs Sue Guggenheim Over Ownership of a Prized Picasso The museum says the painting’s owner, who sold it after fleeing Nazi Germany, made a “fair transaction.” His heirs say he sold under duress.
A bit of amusing comic relief today from the negative noise of a world gone mad. When the usual suspects aren’t preying upon a goy target, (((they))) have been observed to viciously turn upon each other from time to time. Reminds me of the pet piranhas that I kept during my sadistic youth. Miss a few days of live goldfish feedings and they’d start eating each other — bones and all!
From the article:
“In 1916, Karl Adler, a German Jew, purchased a Pablo Picasso painting now viewed as a masterpiece, “Woman Ironing,” from the owner of a prestigious gallery in Munich. But 22 years later, when he and his family fled Germany to escape Nazi persecution, he was forced to sell the painting back to the gallery for a pittance, according to a recently filed lawsuit that describes the sale as “a desperate attempt to raise cash needed to flee.”
Now several of Adler’s distant relatives are suing the Solomon R. Guggenheim Foundation, to which the painting was donated more than four decades ago, claiming ownership of the work, and citing the 1938 sale price — $1,552 (the equivalent of about $32,000 in today’s dollars) — as clear evidence that it was sold under duress.”
Jew plaintiffs (surely retaining Jew lawyers) suing a Jew museum (also surely retaining Jew lawyers) for ownership of a poor painting (though much better than his subsequent works) crapped out by a degenerate artist who was artificially manufactured and puffed-up by the Jew Stein siblings (Gertrude & Leo) and the Guggenheims of 100 years ago.
Oy vey! It’s my college piranha tank all over again. Which side do we root for here?
1. Picasso was the creation of Gertrude Stein (and her brother). His UGLY paintings are worth so much ONLY because (((they))) had hyped him. // 2. A team of piranhas in a tank will tear apart a gold (goy) fish in seconds. But when left unfed, they will eat each other. // 3. Though they will always unite when they perceive “persecution,” Jew on Jew arguments can be savagely epic!
This particular Jew-on-Jew battle is about money, not politics. Nonetheless, there is a significant “teachable moment” here which has indeed had a practical application in the political realm. It is no secret that the once-almighty Israel Lobby — AIPAC has been declining in influence. The reason for that is twofold:
1. The Left Internationalist “One World” Jews of the George Soros / Bernie Sanders stripe have been making war against the ultra-nationalist Jews of AIPAC and Likud for some time now.
2. Within AIPAC itself, libtarded Trump-hating elements started feuding with the pro-Trump faction of AIPAC. Trump — by baiting the libtards while blowing strategic kisses at the ultras — knowingly fed this bitter internal division.
The external pressures brought to bear upon AIPAC by the Soros Jews — later combined with the severe internal Jewish split over Trump — has left the piranha tank in bad shape. The headlines below confirm this delightful development.
NYT
Al Jazeera
MoveOn // Soros
Times of Israel
The Jew-on-Jew damage wasn’t only one way. The Israel First Likudniks — maneuvered into backing Trump so strongly — insulated Trump from the Left Jews’ claims that he was “antisemitic”or, at the very least, “dog-whistling” to the “antisemites’. This not only helped Trump to win a respectable 25% of (((their))) vote and a chunk of their money — even as he was adopting the “antisemitic”slogan, “America First” — but it also pacified and pleased the many millions of Christian-Zionist nut jobs who then turned out for Trump, “bigly.”
The Globalist Piranhas and the Zionist Piranhas politically maimed each other — while America First MAGA continued to gain strength. This mutual damage would not have happened if chess master Trump had imprudently gone after (((them))) in a full frontal assault that would have united both Frankfurt schools of gefilte-eating piranhas in a common feeding frenzy. As it is with the brewing Jew-on-Jew battle over that Picasso painting, so it is here. Let them eat each other.
PIRANHA FIGHT! 1. Satanyahoo’s (BiBi) son tweeted an “antisemitic” meme aimed at Globalist George Soros. // 2. Trump later dumped Satanyahoo & Adelson.
The Black Death killed a third of Europe’s population.
JANUARY 29, 2023
NY Times:Where Did the Black Death Begin? DNA Detectives Find a Key Clue.By fishing shards of bacterial DNA from the teeth of bodies in a cemetery, researchers found the starting point for the plague that devastated Eurasia, they say.
Where, when and how did the medieval Black Death— falsely blamed on rats (here) by most modern circle-jerk whorestorians — really originate? This Times article claims that the “where” may have been found:
“The question has been asked for centuries and led to heated debate among historians. Now, a group of researchers reports that it has found the answer in the pulp of teeth from people buried in the 14th century. Based on their analysis of the preserved genetic material, the researchers report that the Black Death arrived in 1338 or 1339 near Issyk-Kul, a lake in a mountainous area just west of China in what is now Kyrgyzstan.”
Science by conjecture and probably some computer modeling. Not buying it.
As always, the “anthropologists” and whorestorians refuse to even consider a taboo element of the history of the Black Death which killed one third of Europe’s population between 1347 and 1351. Specifically, they will not revisit the widespread belief among our Medieval Christian ancestors that the disease was the result of the usual suspects causing the pandemic by poisoning the wells of Europe. It is very interesting to note that the ensuing “Holocaust” of the Jews which this “conspiracy theory” triggered is seldom ever whined about — and not even mentioned in this article. Why is that?
Answer: Because the mere mention of what inspired this forgotten mass persecution — even if sympathetically spun to favor the Jews — would still bring unwanted historical attention to a deeply held Medieval suspicion that the usual suspects do not even want discussed.
1 & 2. The suffering and death were unimaginable. // 3. “I didn’t do it!” — Black Death is falsely blamed on rats — just like Stupid-19 was falsely blamed on bats.
Establishment whorestorians freely acknowledge the fact that Jewish communities were much less affected by the Black Death than the Christian population — much like the biblical story of “Passover.” They also acknowledge that segregated Jews chose not to use the common wells of towns of cities; and that suspected Jews confessed, under torture, to poisoning wells with dried-up pulverized bits of rotted flesh from various animals.
These bits of hard data are explained away by claiming that Medieval Jews, by religious custom, washed their hands more often than Gentiles (here — ha ha ha) — and that people will confess to anything under torture. Be that as it may, the strange “passing over” of the Jewish areas — coupled with the infamous Jewish hatred for all things “goy” (white) and Catholic (no protestants yet at that time) — made Medieval “conspiracy theorists” deeply suspicious.
The first anti-Jewish Black Death reprisals directly related to the plague took place in early 1348 in Toulon, France. The Jewish quarter was sacked and forty Jews were killed. The next “pogrom” happened in Barcelona (Spain). The following year, more killings were carried out in Erfurt (Germany), Basel (Switzerland), Flanders (Belgium), and Aragon (Spain). In the “Valentines Day Massacre“ in Strasbourg (Germanic population at the time) hundreds of Jews were burnt alive on February 14, 1349.
In the spring of 1349, the Jewish community in Frankfurt was devastated — followed by the destruction of Jewish ghettos in Mainz and Cologne. Around this time, the attacks on Jews began increasing near the Baltic Sea Coast and in Eastern Europe. The mainly German-based attacks caused the eastward migration of Northern European Jews to Poland and Lithuania, where they remained for the next six centuries. King Casimir III of Poland gave refuge to the Jews. He was said to have had a Jewish mistress and was also interested in tapping the economic potential of Jewry. And that is how so many Jews came to be settled throughout the Polish-Lithuanian Empire.
1. “Oy. What can I say? I just like to wash my hands a lot.” // 2. February 14, 1349 — Medieval painting depicts Jews being burned at the stake by Strasbourg Germans who blamed them for deliberately spreading the Black Death. // 3. King Casimir III of Poland welcomed the fleeing Jews into Poland — where they would come to again be resented by the local population. Their descendants would one day occupy the ranks of Stalin’s dreaded secret police in Poland after World War II.
As the plague finally wound down in 1350, so did the violence against the Jews. Ordinary Medieval folks had already hated the wealthy Jewish money lenders; and resented their influence over the governing cliques of the various city-states of Europe. The indebted artisans felt exploited by being trapped into loans at usurious rates. Again, Establishment whorestorians do acknowledge this resentment — but they then twist the hatred into the cause of the Black Death riots while assuming that the well-poisoning accusations were but a phony pretext.
How do they know that the accusations were false? Have not the Jewish Cabalist-Supremacists long since demonstrated to the world that they are indeed capable of mass-killing us “Goyim?” — Ever hear of the Bolshevik Red Terror? Or the Stalin-Kaganovich Gulags? Or the Dresden Firebombing? Or the Eisenhower Death Camps? Or the Deir Yassin Massacre in Palestine? Or the 9/11 false-flag? If (((they))) could do genocide in contemporary times, why would anyone think that their forefathers couldn’t do it 700 years ago?
Wethinks the rioting Black Death “conspiracy theorists” of those times may have been on to something.
1. BANCAROTTA, by yours truly, is a tale about the Medieval folk of Pizza & Pasta and Beer & Strudel learning how the debt swindle worked; and then turning against their oppressor. // 2. Polish poster depicts what the mass murdering Trotsky did to the Christians of Russia. // 3. February 13-14, 1945: The Jewish-inspired firebomb-genocide of Dresden — carried out on the same date that Germans burned the Jews during the 1349 Black Death “Valentines Day Massacre.” — Coincidence? Or generational revenge?
Portraits of European Jews “murdered” during the Holohoax, at the Holohoax Memorial in Berlin
JANUARY 25, 2023
NY Times:The Nazis Planned the ‘Final Solution.’ It Took 90 Minutes.
As Germany observes the anniversary of the Wannsee Conference, witnesses of the Nazi era are dying and antisemitism is resurgent in Europe and the United States.
By Katrin Bennhold
The song that never ends about the event which never happened has a new date to commemorate. January 20th is now “observed” in pathetic Germany as the anniversary of “The Wannsee Conference” in which the alleged planning for the event which never happened took place in 1942. Katrin Bennhold — the Slimes’ German-based pantie-pissing, self-hating, not-bad-looking German libtardette shiksa who penned this piece oh-so-solemnly reports:
“On Jan. 20, 1942, 15 high-ranking officials of the Nazi bureaucracy met in a villa on Lake Wannsee on the western edge of Berlin. Nibbles were served and washed down with cognac. There was only one point on the agenda: “The organizational, logistical and material steps for a final solution of the Jewish question in Europe.”
Planning the Holocaust took all of 90 minutes.” *
Nibbles and cognac were served, eh? And how do you know that, Katie?
It’s hard to tell if Frau Bennhold actually believes in Jewish-scripted Holocaustianity or if she’s just whoring for shekels. It’s probably a bit of both. In any case, as long as the “usual suspects” and their henchmen (in this case, henchwoman) insist upon defaming the German people with the song that never ends about the event which never happened, I will continue rebutting their rubbish. Hazmat suits on, boys and girls. Into the Marxist Myst of the Zyklon B we go for some badly needed clarification of “The “Wannsee Conference” and its “Final Solution.”
1. Times Berlin correspondent Katrin Bennhold — a beautiful German Frau that (((they))) have totally messed up in the head. / 2 & 3. Many shekels have been raked in by publishing books about the alleged Wannsee Conference.
Waaaahn$ee — Waaaahn$ee — Waaaahn$ee
Bennhold: Eighty years after the infamous Wannsee Conference that meticulously mapped out the Holocaust, the bureaucratic efficiency of it remains as unnerving as ever. Rebuttal: Whoa! Slow down there Katie! What’s this business about the Holohoax having been “meticulously mapped out” at Wannsee? I’ve studied this issue in depth for years and am still not aware of any documents “meticulously” describing a Jewish genocide. Did I miss something here?
Bennhold: The minutes taken that day and typed up on 15 pages do not explicitly refer to murder. Rebuttal: They don’t???? But if there is no “explicit” language, then how do you know that the conference was about mass murder?
Bennhold: They use phrases like “evacuation” and “reduction” and “treatment.” Rebuttal: Oh. I see. It’s like an inference thing. But that means that the actual minutes of the conference were therefore not so “meticulous” after all. Double-think / double-talk much, Katrin?
Bennhold: “You read that protocol, and it’s chilling,” said Deborah E. Lipstadt, a renowned Holocaust scholar. Rebuttal: Deborah Lipstadt! That vile harridan and tireless persecutor of “Holocaust Deniers?” Mein Gott! That’s your go-to source for these “chilling” inferences, Katie?
Bennhold: (quoting Lipstadt): “It’s all very camouflaged language. But they had very big plans.” Rebuttal: In other words, the actual words say nothing about genociding the Jews. We must blindly trust “scholars” like Professorette Lipshit to decode the “camouflaged language” — aka “dog whistles” for us.
Bennhold: The anniversary of that fateful meeting … Rebuttal: So “fateful” — and “chilling” — and “unnerving.” Oh the bloody literary drama with these people!
Bennhold: ….has a special resonance at a time when survivors of the Holocaust are dwindling ….. Analysis: As the last of the “survivors” die out, the Holohoax Card begins to lose more and more of its potency.
Bennhold: …. and antisemitism is resurgent in Europe and the United States, along with attacks targeting Jewish people. Analysis: I’m calling false flag / crisis acting on these events. Such stunts always are. That’s how (((they))) got my once-best-selling book, The Bad War, banned by Amazon in 2018 — not long after a graffiti attack on a Seattle Jewish synogogue not far from Amazon’s headquarters. Soon after the ban, just for good measure, a pair of Jewish cemeteries in Seattle were also vandalized.
1. For the writer to simultaneously describe the Wannsee plan as “meticulous” and “not explicit” represents a perfect example of what Orwell’s 1984 referred to as “double-think.” // 2. The vile “scholar” Deborah Lipstadt has been a fanatical advocate for the imprisonment of “Holocaust Deniers” and 90-100 year-old SS men. // 3. The usual suspects are almost always behind the usual vandalism.
Bennhold: The anniversary of the Wannsee Conference stands out as a date to focus on the perpetrators of the Holocaust, documenting the genocidal machinery of the Nazi state. Analysis: There you go again, Katie — using terms like “meticulous” and “documented” in one breath; and then “not explicit” and “camouflaged language” in the next. Do you even bother to proofread your stuff? Do you have an editor?
Bennhold: The meeting that day laid the groundwork for a machinery of mass murder that would involve the entire state apparatus and ultimately millions of Germans in different roles. “That’s where the bureaucracy fell into place,” Dr. Lipstadt said. Analysis: Can either of you loony ladies quote for your readers — directly from the Wannsee minutes — the precise lines which “laid the groundwork for a machinery of mass murder?” Hmm?
….. Hello…….. hello. (crickets)
Bennhold: Only one of 30 copies of the 15-page protocol, marked in red as “secret” on the first page, survived. It was discovered by American soldiers among the files of the Foreign Ministry after the war. Analysis: How conveeenient — a single remaining copy — discovered (and “translated”) by “American” (Jewish OSS / “Ritchie Boys“) soldiers.
Bennhold: It was the language of bureaucrats. But there was never any doubt what the document was laying out: Analysis: To summarize the demented douchebag’s double-talk: “not explicit,” “camouflaged language,” “language of bureaucrats” —– but then, on the other hand, “never any doubt.”
Bennhold: Frank-Walter Steinmeier, Germany’s current president and a former foreign minister, expressed his profound unease and horror after he read the protocol during a visit to the villa. Analysis: “Profound unease” — “horror.” Wow Katie. That sho nuff’ sounds pretty nasty. But if it’s only 15 pages long, then surely you must have read the Wannsee Protocol and can quote the really “chilling” and “unnerving” parts to us, no? Why must you rely upon Lipstadt and Steinmeir to school us on how bad the minutes are? We can read.
Bennhold (quoting Steinmeier): “What we see is a smoothly functioning administrative machine, departments coordinating, templates and procedures which — apart from the content of the meeting — are indistinguishable from those that we still have in ministries and administrations. It is the ordinary, the familiar, that jumps out at us, horrifies us and unsettles us.” Analysis: Well, Herr Steinmeier, Frau Bennhold and Yenta Lipstadt, all of your shock-talk may impress the easily impressed boobs who worship “the paper of record” — but your humble reporter here just went ahead and did something which not 1 in 10,000 Slimes readers would ever even think of doing. Yeah, that’s right. I actually searched for the “camouflaged” Wannsee minutes online; and found them in less than 5 seconds — and read everything in about 10 minutes!
Even putting aside questions about their authenticity * and possible mis-translation — there is nothing in the “chilling” / “unsettling” minutes that even remotely suggests anything other than “relocation” to the East as being “The Final Solution.” And unlike the sneaky slimy “paper of record” — the ANYT encourages its readers to actually read the dubious Waansee minutes for themselves. — HERE
*Personally — benign as the document is — I don’t believe the “lucky find” of the only surviving copy of the “discovered” Wannsee minutes are even real. The notes just keep repeating “Final Solution” … “Final Solution” …. “Final Solution” — leaving the reader to infer that it must mean extermination. The forgers would not have been bold enough to invent a German document saying straight up: “Vee vill kill every last Jew in Europe.” — It wouldn’t be credible.
1. The myth-makers have created an entire pseudo-academic mythology — complete with flowcharts and “decoding” of “bureaucratic” terms — surrounding the “historic” Wannsee Conference of 1942. // 2. An actual reading of the Wannsee notes (assuming the papers were even legitimate and that the translation was accurate) indicates nothing more than an intention to deport the Jewish population to the East. // 3. Frank-Walter Steinmeier — another traitor to his people.
“Even if you go back into 1917, that was the worst of all time, but it was also not as bad as here. It was very bad, it was very rough. It was a bad one, but it wasn’t quite like what we’re going through right now.” ********************************
Released in December 2019, the film titled 1917 was widely acclaimed and decorated with awards — including the Golden Globes awards for Best Motion Picture Drama and Best Director. Not having seen the film, we will refrain from reviewing the story which is set against the ghastly battlefield of World War I. It’s interesting to note that out of the five individual years which encompassed “The Great War” (1914-1918) the filmmakers chose the holy year (for many Jews) of 1917 for its title — instead of 1914, 1915, 1916 or 1918. Maybe it’s just a coincidence — or maybe it’s a message among “their crowd.” Who knows?
But the number does offer us a good “teachable moment” for explaining the history-altering significance of 1917 — a year that was very good for “the usual suspects” (so good that (((they))) made a museum exhibit in its memory) — yet utterly disastrous for so many millions of “goyim.” We now republish a popular Anti-NY Times piece which originally appeared in one of our 2017 issues.
A FLASHBACK CLASSIC
Herbert Johnson’s anti-immigration cartoon (with “anti-Semitic” overtones) from the era, titled “Make This Flood Control Permanent.”
New York Times: Revisiting 1917, a Year That Reverberates for Jews Around the World
A museum exhibit set to open this weekend at the National Museum of American Jewish History in Philadelphia and later this year at the American Jewish Historical Society in New York will focus on three historic events and their impact on Jews (evidently, no one else really matters). The exhibit titled, “1917: How One Year Changed the World,” will feature America’s entry into World War I, the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia and the Balfour Declaration.
Though much of what this particular Slimes article tells of these three events is indeed accurate, the deception lies in what is omitted about this sad centennial. Let’s dive in and see what we mean.
Two major Jewish museums are teaming up to school their flocks on 1917 — but their exhibit leaves out a few details.
Times: The war and the revolution resulted in strict limits on immigration to the United States, reflecting a fear among Americans that unrest in Europe would spread to their country. The restrictions were not overtly aimed at Jews, but because the quotas from countries with high Jewish populations were tightened, fewer Jews were able to settle in the United States.
The Omission: The restrictions were aimed, in large part, at stopping the influx of Anarchists and Communists who had been causing problems in America since the 1880’s. And it just so happened (surprise, surprise) that many of these subversive characters were of a certain ethnic group.
1 & 2 – 1901: President McKinley was murdered by Leon Czolgosz, an anarchist son of Polish immigrants // 3. The lovely and gracious Anarchist guru Emma Goldman from Lithuania (Russian Empire) defended Czolgosz’s dirty deed.
Times: After the revolution, when the Bolsheviks came to power, and the xenophobia coalesced together and had the power to influence, that fear accelerated.
The Omission: The genocidal Bolshevik Revolution was a Jewish affair. With the exception of front man Lenin (1/4 jew who spoke Yiddish), a review of the roster of Russia’s leading Bolshevik killers reads like the guest list for a Russian-Jewish Bar Mitzvah — Trotsky(Bronstein), Sverdlov, Dzerzhinsky, Litvinov(Wallach), Radek(Sobelsohn), Kamenev(Rosenfeld), Uritsky and many, many more.
The Bolshevik Revolution and subsequent bloodbath were Jewish — no “ifs,” no “ands,” and no “buts” about it!
Times: As the United States was entering the war, there were concerns among Jews over the persecution of those still in Russia and Eastern Europe.
Omission: Apart from the fact that the “persecution” of the chosenites was greatly exaggerated, it is important to note that the Communist movements of the other nations of Eastern Europe were also led by the usual suspects — Bela Kun in Hungary; Max Goldstein in Romania: Rosa Luxemburg in Germany et al. It is understandable that the good Christian people of these nations might come to justifiably resent the Jewish-led drive for a Bolshevik Europe.
Times: Not all Jewish immigrants viewed the United States as a safe haven. A handful of documents highlight the little-known story of Boris Reinstein, who came from Russia and made a career as a druggist in Buffalo. His 1917 application for a passport is on display, as is his 1923 renunciation of his United States citizenship. Mr. Reinstein was a true believer in the Bolshevik Revolution and the Soviet ideology and left his wife, Anna, to return to Russia, where he worked in the Library of the Marx, Lenin and Engels Institute.
Comment: An interesting and useful little truth gem which validates our points of argument. Thanks Times!
Blah-blah-blah…Always soapbox rabble-rousing on behalf of “the people.” Trotsky (Russia), Kun (Hungary) Luxemburg (Germany)
Tiimes: The Balfour Declaration, meanwhile, expressed Britain’s support for a Jewish home in Palestine. For Dr. Perelman and Rachel Lithgow, executive director of the American Jewish Historical Society, one gratifying coup was the loan of two draft versions of the Balfour Declaration from the financier Martin Franklin…This was the text that was forwarded to Lord Balfour and was used as the basis of the Balfour Declaration. Arthur James Balfour, for whom the declaration is named, was Britain’s foreign secretary. The final declaration, in the form of a letter dated Nov. 2, 1917, was sent to one of Britain’s most distinguished Jewish citizens, Baron Lionel Walter Rothschild.
Ultimately, it said, in part: “His Majesty’s government view with favor the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavors to facilitate the achievement of this object.” The document also added that “nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine.”
Omission: Solid history, but the direct linkage between the Balfour Declaration and America’s entry into World War I is oh-so-conveniently “forgotten” about.
A wealthy New Yorker named Benjamin Freedman, a former aide to Bernard Baruch, later split with his fellow Jewish millionaires and “blew the whistle” on The Balfour Declaration and Zionist treachery in general. Freedman at his finest, from a 1961 speech at the Willard Hotel in Washington:
“Let me show what happened while we were all asleep……
World War I broke out in the summer of 1914. … There are few people here my age who remember that. Now that war was waged on one side by Great Britain, France, and Russia; and on the other side by Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Turkey. What happened?
Within two years, Germany had won that war: not alone won it nominally, but won it actually. The German submarines, which were a surprise to the world, had swept all the convoys from the Atlantic Ocean, and Great Britain stood there without ammunition for her soldiers, stood there with one week’s food supply facing her — and after that, starvation.
At that time, the French army had mutinied. They lost 600,000 of the flower of French youth in the defense of Verdun on the Somme. The Russian army was defecting. They were picking up their toys and going home, they didn’t want to play war anymore, they didn’t like the Czar. And the Italian army had collapsed.
Now Germany — not a shot had been fired on the German soil. Not an enemy soldier had crossed the border into Germany. And yet, here was Germany offering England peace terms. They offered England a negotiated peace on what the lawyers call a status quo ante basis. That means: “Let’s call the war off, and let everything be as it was before the war started.”
Well, England, in the summer of 1916 was considering that. Seriously! They had no choice. It was either accepting this negotiated peace that Germany was magnanimously offering them, or going on with the war and being totally defeated.
While that was going on, the Zionists in Germany, who represented the Zionists from Eastern Europe, went to the British War Cabinet and — I am going to be brief because this is a long story, but I have all the documents to prove any statement that I make if anyone here is curious, or doesn’t believe what I’m saying is at all possible — the Zionists in London went to the British war cabinet and they said: “Look here. You can yet win this war. You don’t have to give up. You don’t have to accept the negotiated peace offered to you now by Germany. You can win this war if the United States will come in as your ally.”
The United States was not in the war at that time. We were fresh; we were young; we were rich; we were powerful. They [Zionists] told England: “We will guarantee to bring the United States into the war as your ally, to fight with you on your side, if you will promise us Palestine after you win the war.”
In other words, they made this deal: “We will get the United States into this war as your ally. The price you must pay us is Palestine after you have won the war and defeated Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Turkey.”
Now England had as much right to promise Palestine to anybody, as the United States would have to promise Japan to Ireland for any reason whatsoever. It’s absolutely absurd that Great Britain — that never had any connection or any interest or any right in what is known as Palestine — should offer it as coin of the realm to pay the Zionists for bringing the United States into the war.
However, they made that promise, in October of 1916. And shortly after that — I don’t know how many here remember it — the United States, which was almost totally pro-German — totally pro-German — because the newspapers here were controlled by Jews, the bankers were Jews, all the media of mass communications in this country were controlled by Jews, and they were pro-German because their people, in the majority of cases came from Germany, and they wanted to see Germany lick the Czar.
The Jews didn’t like the Czar, and they didn’t want Russia to win this war. So the German bankers — the German-Jews — Kuhn Loeb and the other big banking firms in the United States refused to finance France or England to the extent of one dollar. They stood aside and they said: “As long as France and England are tied up with Russia, not one cent!” But they poured money into Germany, they fought with Germany against Russia, trying to lick the Czarist regime.
Now those same Jews, when they saw the possibility of getting Palestine, they went to England and they made this deal. At that time, everything changed, like the traffic light that changes from red to green. Where the newspapers had been all pro-German, where they’d been telling the people of the difficulties that Germany was having fighting Great Britain commercially and in other respects, all of a sudden the Germans were no good. They were villains. They were Huns. They were shooting Red Cross nurses. They were cutting off babies’ hands. And they were no good.
Well, shortly after that, Mr. Wilson declared war on Germany.
The Zionists in London sent these cables to the United States, to Justice Brandeis: “Go to work on President Wilson. We’re getting from England what we want. Now you go to work, and you go to work on President Wilson and get the United States into the war.” And that did happen. That’s how the United States got into the war. We had no more interest in it; we had no more right to be in it than we have to be on the moon tonight instead of in this room.
Now the war — World War One — in which the United States participated had absolutely no reason to be our war. We went in there — we were railroaded into it — if I can be vulgar, we were suckered into — that war merely so that the Zionists of the world could obtain Palestine. Now, that is something that the people in the United States have never been told. They never knew why we went into World War One. Now, what happened?
After we got into the war, the Zionists went to Great Britain and they said: “Well, we performed our part of the agreement. Let’s have something in writing that shows that you are going to keep your bargain and give us Palestine after you win the war.” Because they didn’t know whether the war would last another year or another ten years. So they started to work out a receipt. The receipt took the form of a letter, and it was worded in very cryptic language so that the world at large wouldn’t know what it was all about. And that was called the Balfour Declaration.
The Balfour Declaration was merely Great Britain’s promise to pay the Zionists what they had agreed upon as a consideration for getting the United States into the war. So this great Balfour Declaration, that you hear so much about, is just as phony as a three dollar bill. And I don’t think I could make it more emphatic than that.”
**** End quote ***
Yes indeed. That fateful history-altering year of 1917 was very bad for humanity. But it was very “good for the Jews” — as the popular inside-the-Tribe saying goes — which is why the Jewish museums commemorate that fateful year. And that, dear reader, is some serious REAL history.
* Note: On repeated occasions, Trump has referred to his “war against an invisible enemy” and a “deadly scourge” that hasn’t been this bad “since 1917.” The press continually mocks him for being off by one year on “The Great Pandemic of 1918.” But Trump knows exactly what he is saying.
What has been done to Christmas is straight out of the Frankfurt School of cultural Marxism.
DECEMBER 23, 2022
NY Times: 5 Ways to Celebrate the Holidays With The New York Times
Seasonal suggestions for things to read, watch, write about and create, for students and teachers.
Harkening back to our childhood, we “Gen X” are old enough to recall a time when at least a remnant of spirituality was still attached to the cultural recognition of CHRISTmas. The cringe term “Happy Holidays” was seldom, if ever, heard – and not a menorah or Star of Moloch in sight. We boldly proclaimed “Merry Christmas” to friends and strangers alike. And although many secularized Christmas Carols had already been popularized decades earlier – the splendid renditions of “Silent Night,” “Hark! The Herald Angels Sing,” and “O Holy Night” are still ranked at or near the top of the Christmas music charts. The fat man in the red suit was already an established seasonal superstar by the time the 1970’s rolled around –but the baby in the manger still shared top billing with him. Not any more.
So, what happened to Christmas? Who bastardized, commercialized and secularized what was supposed to be a remembrance of Jesus Christ and, by extension, the eternally valid moral teachings of Christianity. Answer: “the usual suspects” – as evidenced by the opening line of this particular Jew York Times article:
“Merry Christmas, Happy Hanukkah, joyous Kwanzaa and happy New Year.“
You see, the only time that is still acceptable to utter “Merry Christmas” is if you immediately water it down by attaching the day to Hanukkah (which commemorates Jewish violence against the Greeks) and Kwanzaa (a recently Marxist-invented “holiday” for “African Americans.”
1. Christmas has been de-Christianized. // 2. The modern Santa Claus was created by a Coca-Cola ad campaign. // 3. The fake holiday of Kwanzaa incorporates Hannukah-style candle-lighting of a menorah into its observance.
The War on Christmas – an extension of the War on Christianity itself – made perhaps its most significant advancement in an unnoticeable, benign-seeming manner. From the 1940’s through the 1960’s, Jewish composers “gave us” just about all of the most popular Christmas songs we began hearing, ad nauseam, in early November now. They are catchy tunes which we all grew up on — and were relatively harmless, or so it seemed. The true agenda was not to enhance Christmas with songs not mentioning its meaning; but rather, to fundamentally alter the true meaning of Christmas — changing it into a season about snow and shopping (credit card debt).
The following list of secular Christmas songs and their composers — a quite astonishing compilation — provokes the question: From whence this sudden love for Christmas by “the usual suspects?”
In closing this piece, I present my two favorite Jesus quotes – one from each side of Him – which people of all faiths (believers) can appreciate and learn from:
* “Nice Guy” Jesus:
“In everything, do to others what you would have them do to you, for this sums up the Law and the Prophets.” Matthew 7:12
* “Macho Man” Jesus (speaking to the “elite” of the usual suspects):
“Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees, you hypocrites! You travel over land and sea to win a single convert (to Judaism) — and when you have succeeded, you make them twice as much a child of hell as you are.” Matthew 23:15
And Merry Christmas to all of you guys.
Though Christ preached love, kindness, forgiveness, mercy etc, He was also not afraid to open up a can of whoop-ass on the “international bankers” of the day. He was eventually set up to be crucified because of that — which is why (((they))) want to separate Christmas from Christ.
NY Times: The Nazi-Fighting Women of the Jewish Resistance The ‘Ghetto Girls’ Fought the Nazis With Weapons and Wiles
By Dr. Judy Battalion
In attempting to snap normies out of the deep trance induced by the song that never ends about the event that never happened (the Holohoax) — one of the predictable objections that frequently comes up is: “Then why did Hitler put them in the camps in the first place?” To which, the proper reply should always be: “The internment was a necessary wartime security precaution because Jews were generally hostile toward Germany and clandestine Jewish partisans were actively killing German troops.”
Though that won’t be enough to satisfy 95 out of 100 normies, this piece appearing in “the paper of record” now gives us truthers the ability to say: “Even the New York Times confirms the nature of the deadly threat posed to German troops by well-organized Jewish-Marxist guerrilla partisans — including female assassins operating under cover!”
Don’t expect miracle conversions over this because we’re dealing with TV-addled zombies — but a story such as this could prompt 1 or 2 additional normies out of 100 to wanting to know more about “Holocaust Denial.” Let’s have a closer look.
(((They))) started the propaganda and economic war on Germany in 1933 and the “partisan” guerrilla war on German troops in 1939 — which is why, for the basic security of Germany and German troops, Jews in the nations which Germany had been forced to occupy had to eventually be interned, but not until 1941 and beyond.
Times: In 1943, Niuta Teitelbaum strolled into a Gestapo apartment in Warsaw and faced three Nazis. A 24-year-old Jewish woman who had studied history at Warsaw University, Niuta was likely now dressed in her characteristic guise as a Polish farm girl with a kerchief tied around her braided blond hair. …. She smiled meekly and then pulled out a gun and shot each one. Two were killed, one wounded. —- Niuta, however, wasn’t satisfied. She found a physician’s coat, entered the hospital where the injured man was being treated, and killed both the Nazi and the police officer who had been guarding him. Analysis: A mass-murdering young Jewess disguised as a Polish farm girl, then as doctor. This is the type of evil shit that Bolsheviks had been doing to Germans trapped in Poland long before the war had even started.
Times: “Little Wanda With the Braids,” as she was nicknamed on every Gestapo most-wanted list, was one of manyyoung Jewish women who, with supreme cunning and daring, fought the Nazis in Poland. Analysis: Ya hear that? “Many young Jewish women murdered Germans “with supreme cunning” — Geneva Convention rules of humane engagement be damned. Oh, by the way, these partisan gangs were the very same “Polish” characters who had volunteered to fight in the Spanish Civil War of just a few years prior — in which they carried out horrific massacres of priests, nuns and other assorted supporters of General Franco.
Times: One (book) I noticed, was unusual — “Freuen in di Ghettos,” Yiddish for “Women in the Ghettos.” I opened it and found 180 sheets of tiny script, all in Yiddish, a language I was fluent in. To my surprise, the book relayed tales of dozens of other young Jewish women who defied the Nazis, many of whom had the chance to leave Nazi-occupied Poland but didn’t; some even voluntarily returned. Analysis: The ranks of the Bolshevik “resistance” (and their non-combatant Jewish helpers) were filled with young Jewish women — and children too.
Times: All this was a revelation to me. Where I had expected mourning and gloom, I found guns, grenades and espionage. This was a Yiddish thriller, telling the stories of Polish-Jewish “ghetto girls” who paid off Gestapo guards, hid revolvers in teddy bears, flirted with Nazis and then killed them. They distributed underground bulletins, flung Molotov cocktails and bombed train lines…. Analysis: These non-uniformed ferocious feminists were straight-up killers whose terrorist tactics necessitated the internment of all of their brethren — regardless of whether they were partisans or not.
Times: I was stunned. I was raised in a community of Holocaust survivors and had earned a doctorate in women’s history. Why had I never heard these stories? Analysis: Ya know why? Because if the full extent of the cold-blooded female and child participation in these murderous “resistance” cells were to become too widely known, then the true reason for the internment of the Jews starts to sound much more plausible than the standard old explanation of: “Hitler hated the Jews.”
Better take a cold shower and leave that flirty, shapely “Polish” girl alone, Fritz.
Times: I learned of the scope of Jewish rebellion: More than 90 European ghettos had armed Jewish resistance units. All this alongside daily acts of resilience — Women, aged 16 to 25, were at the helm of many of these efforts. I learned their names: Tosia Altman, Gusta Davidson, Frumka Plotnicka. Hundreds of others. Analysis: Speaks for itself.
Times: Women who were selected for undercover missions were required to look “good,” or passably “Aryan” with light hair, blue or green eyes, good posture and an assured gait. Analysis: How, especially during wartime, does a nation fight such an invisible enemy who resorts to such nefarious tactics —- other than by mass temporary incarceration of the greater group, innocent or not. Recall that the sainted FDR ordered the mass internment of Japanese-Americans (some Italians & Germans too) for not even doing anything wrong!
Times: In 1942, Hela Schupper met a “Mr. X” from the Polish underground on a Warsaw street corner, followed him to a safe house, stuffed her fashionable handbag, and brought five guns and clips of cartridges to Krakow’s “Fighting Pioneers,” who then bombed a Christmas week gathering at a cafe frequented by Nazi officers, killing at least seven Germans and wounding more. Analysis: Bolshevik Villainy! Now we can better understand why the big-bad “Gestapo” needed to identify the chosenites with Yellow Stars and ask: “Papers please.” It was because that cute flirty “blond,” or that harmless little “Polish” boy with a soccer ball — could actually have been a soulless mass killer.
As for any innocent Jews who may have lost their lives in the work camps (due to typhus or even Allied bombing) — they have the Bolshevik Jewish “resistance” (including “women age 16-25”) – to thank for their otherwise comfy stint at Bullshwitz, not Hitler. And this inadvertent “testimony against self-interest” appearing in Sulzberger’s Slimes absolutely confirms it.
The Jewish-Marxist Partisans were vicious killers — who incorporated undercover women, elderly and children into their covert schemes. After the war, many of these crazed brutes went down to Palestine and did to the Arabs and British what they had done to the Germans.
The celebrity “rapper” (rolling eyes) Kanye West — who now calls himself “Ye” — or his thick-bearded replacement, that is (he neither sounds nor looks like Kanye West) — is now being used as the black-faced tip of the spear to introduce the idea of hidden Jewish Power to the broader masses of Normiedom. Yes — he looks, acts and talks like a deranged nutter; but red pills are still red pills. And it is precisely that perceived crazy-like-a-fox “insanity” — combined with West’s protective pigmentation — that gives him and his growing numbers of defenders / “apologists” (including Trump) a plausible escape card — “Oh that’s just Kanye being Kanye. Sure, he’s always been troubled and eccentric, but he’s not a bad guy.”
The red pills which West’s intensifying bombing runs are dropping down upon the citizens of Normiedom — exponentially amplified by the outraged Judenpresse — are getting an important message out. Specifically this: the “usual suspects” hold an unusual amount of power. You can be sure that growing numbers of normies — especially fans of “rap” both Black & White as well as many of our lesser brethren on the not-so-far-right — are now, within the confined solitude of their own minds, saying to themselves: “Yes, Kanye may be bat-shit crazy … but the Jews sure are powerful.”(as they nervously look over their shoulder while, for the first time, daring to go online to read stuff or watch videos that they “shouldn’t” be).
Mission accomplished.
(Image 1 is a known photo of West) — Thick-bearded “Ye” looks different and speaks differently than “Kanye” (I have good ears for this stuff). Was the mask used to cover up the fact that this particular imposter doesn’t look like the original? Might the Black Hats have killed the real Kanye? Reasonable speculation, given the secret war that is raging — and that mask!
Red Pills are red pills. It doesn’t matter who is dropping them over Normiedom or if they all explode right away. It’s the repetition of the “bombings” and the planting of seeds that’s most important. West’s antics are invaluable in this respect.
Kanye / Ye’s 2-hour interview on the Alex Jones / Info Wars show — which also featured Kanye’s “friend,” the erudite and very well-spoken, “Holocaust denying” America First “zoomer” (age 24)Nick Fuentes — absolutely “broke the Internet” as they say, and spilled over “bigly” into the polluted waters of the huffing & puffing “mainstream media.” Jones played the part of the “straight man” perfectly as the masked “madman” and Fuentes covered everything from Jesus Christ to Hitler admiration (West praised Hitler’s autobahn highway system, fashion sense and artistic ability) to child sex abuse to the Clinton murder machine to the hidden Jewish power in America to irreverent mockery of Bibi Netanyahu to denying the “6 million Jews” story to the planned extinction of Whites to world government to Israeli involvement in the killings of JFK & RFK in the 1960’s. Heck! Homeboy sounded like yours truly here!
Overall, it was a lovefest. Jones did briefly express some obligatory disagreement on a few points, but in a totally non-confrontational manner. He even conceded: “I don’t agree with the whole Jewish thing, but there is a Jewish Mafia.”
Far more effective than the show itself — which was originally confined only to one part of the “far right” echo chamber — was the Piranha Press’s overreaction to it. Had they simply ignored it and not given it “legs,” only our crowd would ever have heard about this “tempest in a teapot.” But whenever the name of “Hitler” is dropped, “these people” simply cannot help themselves. The wall-to-wall shrieking and oy vying — also partially motivated by a desire to tie Trump to this (won’t happen) — amounts to a free publicity for these ideas that we could never have achieved by ourselves. Clearly, the Judo tactic of turning the adversary’s own weight and strength against him is being utilized here.
Elon Musk (or rather, his White Hat stand-in?) played his part in adding to the free publicity effect by “banning” West from Twitter over a perceived “anti-Semitic” post later that same day. This (surely by design) generated still more publicity for “The Jewish Question.” What most of the people praising or condemning “Musk” for his action failed to notice is that the “ban” was actually listed as a suspension — a sanction which, in the past, has sometimes been permanent — but we shall see what happens now that “Musk” is in charge.
What’s next for “2024 presidential candidate” Kanye or “Kanye / “Ye”? It is clear that he is a man on a mission following orders; so we’ll be watching. It sure is fun to watch the panicked reaction which West (and Fuentes) have kicked off (with the help of Alex Jones). How delightful it would be if “Ye” — who actually did come out as a “holocaust denier” on the show starts to really focus on the Holohoax!
*Editor’s Note: Kanye’s Exact Quote: “Hitler didn’t kill 6 million Jews. That is factually incorrect.”
Jones could not have been any nicer to the masked “Ye” West & the leader of the young “Groypers,” Nick Fuentes.
1. The “respectable” Tucker Carlson promoted “Ye.” // 2. The respectable “Elon Musk” promoted Ye.
Musk — who recently posted an image of “Pepe” the antisemitic frog on his own Twitter account — has just given West tons of free publicity with what is only a “suspension,” not a permanent ban. The ensuing Musk-West “split” seems like a publicity stunt which calls even more attention to the fact that we are not allowed to offend a certain powerful group.
Genesis 6:7 KJV – “And the Lord said, I will destroy man whom I have created from the face of the earth…”
Genesis 6:13 KJV – “And God said unto Noah, The end of all flesh is come before me; for the earth is filled with violence through them; and, behold, I will destroy them with the earth.”
Genesis 19:13 KJV – “For we will destroy this place, because the cry of them is waxen great before the face of the Lord; and the Lord hath sent us to destroy it.”
Exodus 23:27 KJV – “I will send my fear before thee, and will destroy all the people to whom thou shalt come…”
Exodus 32:10 NIV – “Now leave me alone so that my anger may burn against them and that I may destroy them.”
Exodus 15:9 KJV – “The enemy said, I will pursue, I will overtake, I will divide the spoil; my lust shall be satisfied upon them; I will draw my sword, my hand shall destroy them.”
Leviticus 23:30 KJV – “And whatsoever soul it be that doeth any work in that same day, the same soul will I destroy from among his people.
Leviticus 26:22 KJV – “I will also send wild beasts among you, which shall rob you of your children, and destroy your cattle, and make you few in number; and your high ways shall be desolate.”
Numbers 14:12 NIV – “I will strike them down with a plague and destroy them, but I will make you into a nation greater and stronger than they.”
Number 24:19 KJV – “Out of Jacob shall come he that shall have dominion, and shall destroy him that remaineth of the city.”
Deuteronomy 9:3 KJV – “Understand therefore this day, that the Lord thy God is he which goeth over before thee; as a consuming fire he shall destroy them, and he shall bring them down before thy face: so shalt thou drive them out, and destroy them quickly, as the Lord hath said unto thee.”
Deuteronomy 9:14 KJV – “Let me alone, that I may destroy them, and blot out their name from under heaven”
Deuteronomy 7:10 KJV – “And repayeth them that hate him to their face, to destroy them: he will not be slack to him that hateth him, he will repay him to his face.
Deuteronomy 7:16 NIV – “You must destroy all the peoples the Lord your God gives over to you. Do not look on them with pity and do not serve their gods, for that will be a snare to you.
Deuteronomy 7:26 NIV – “But the Lord your God will deliver them over to you, throwing them into great confusion until they are destroyed.”
Deuteronomy 7:24 KJV – “And he shall deliver their kings into thine hand, and thou shalt destroy their name from under heaven”
Deuteronomy 31:3 KJV – “The Lord thy God, he will go over before thee, and he will destroy these nations from before thee…”
Deuteronomy 28:20 NIV – “The Lord will send on you curses, confusion and rebuke in everything you put your hand to, until you are destroyed…”
Deuteronomy 28:21 NIV – “The Lord will plague you with diseases until he has destroyed you from the land you are entering to possess.”
Deuteronomy 28:22 NIV – “The Lord will strike you with wasting disease, with fever and inflammation, with scorching heat and drought, with blight and mildew, which will plague you until you perish.
Deuteronomy 28:24 NIV – “The Lord will turn the rain of your country into dust and powder; it will come down from the skies until you are destroyed.”
Deuteronomy 28:63 NIV – “Just as it pleased the Lord to make you prosper and increase in number, so it will please him to ruin and destroy you.”
Deuteronomy 31:3 NIV – “The Lord your God himself will crossover ahead of you. He will destroy these nations before you, and you will take possession of their land.”
Joshua 7:12 NIV – “I will not be with you anymore unless you destroy whatever among you is devoted to destruction.”
Apart from that verse in (Joshua) all indicates that the vindictive and vengeful God of the Old Testament, might be another deity totally different from the God (give the other cheek) of the New Testament and the Trinity, which by the way where never mentioned in the Old Testament.
The World We Live In 