Please do your own research. The information I share is only a catalyst to expanding ones confined consciousness. I have NO desire for anyone to blindly believe or agree with what I share. Seek the truth for yourself and put your own puzzle together that has been presented to you. I'm not here to teach, preach or lead, but rather assist in awakening the consciousness of the collective from its temporary dormancy.
NY Times: Covid Updates: New York Reports 85,000 Cases, a New Daily Record
Cases — Cases — Cases — They come in “waves” — exactly as a “prophetic” 2008 Director of National Intelligence reportreferencing a “potential” pre-2025 pandemic had predicted. But how exactly do we define a “case”anyway? And how do the “authorities” and their Fake News co-conspirators manage to conjure up these scary numbers and then, after they flatten out, dial up another “wave” again and again at regular intervals?
The pathetic spectacle has been re-run more times than an old episode of the “I Love Lucy” Show — and it would even be funnier that Lucy’s famous chocolates-on-the-conveyor-belt skit, were it not for the fact that the various tragic consequences of the Stupid-19 scamdemic are no laughing matter. Let’s break down the process by which the dumb-as-dirt terrorized masses of the overlapping tyrannical kingdoms of Normiedom & Libtardia have been tricked — again and again and again — into self-fulfilling the next predicted “wave” or rise in “cases.”
Have the CDC issue a scary press release announcing that a new “breakthrough” in “case numbers” — or even a scary brand new Greek-lettered “variant” — has just arrived in New York by way of Africa or Asia.
Sit back and laugh as millions of brain-dead normies — with no flu like symptoms AT ALL — line up, in the cold, outside of their local testing facilities.
Utilize either the flawed “antigen tests” to yield false positives or, better yet, the PCR “test” — which was specifically designed (for research purposes), to multiply any tiny harmless remnant of this or that genetic material into a billion-copies — an “infection.” This will yield large numbers of “positives.”
1. “One of the things about PCR is that, if you do it well, you can find just about anything in anybody. I suppose you could call that a misuse of PCR.” — Kary Mullis (inventor of PCR) 2. The genius dies of “pneumonia” — and his PCR research tool is soon hijacked for “testing.” How convenient!
Step 4
More tests = more “cases”and more “cases” = more TV hype and even more healthy normies lining up to get nose raped (often for the 2nd or 3rd time!).
Don’t over-do it all at once! The terror is much more effective when it comes in never-ending “waves”. So dial down the “surge” from time to time — and then dash the hopes of the demented and demoralized normies by dialing up another “wave” at a pre-determined time. Return to Step 1
Call it sad, call it funny — but that’s exactly how the scam of Stupid 19 “cases” has been played. As for the “death toll” — the PCR tests (or even just “diagnosis by symptoms”) occurs with captive and isolated seniors at the financially incentivized hospitals and nursing homes. Whatever the sick patient dies of, he will be tagged as “Covid.” In the most egregious “cases” , the Ghouls in Gowns will straight-up MURDER granny (and sometimes younger people as well) with drugs and ventilators.
A “Chain Reaction Lab Technique” (not a “test”) — “used to amplify” — “DNA Replication” — “Can produce a billion copies” (of molecules)
IN SHORT — PCR CAN MAKE SOMETHING OUT OF ALMOST NOTHING!
Once upon a time, in the peaceful and quiet town of Normieville, the crooked Mayor and his minions devised a plot to increase their power and raise taxes — the pretext being to “fight crime” and protect the public. With crime virtually non-existent in Normieville, this cunning operation required a fake “epidemic” of an invisible, though forensically discoverable crime and the “flood-the-zone” cooperation of TheNormieville Times.
The first manufactured case occurred at a Mini Mart store on Main Street. Like so many small shops, the Mini Mart had one of those little “Take-a-Penny / Leave-a-Penny” plastic trays at the checkout counter. Customers who were short only a penny or two could take them from the tray and balance out the transaction. Conversely, customer who receive a few pennies in change could drop them in the tray for someone else’s convenience.
One day, Nickie Normie checked out a few items and the tab came out to $8.01. So he handed the cashier $8 in cash along with a penny lifted from the common penny tray. Just before he could exit the store, a burly police officer nabbed him by the arm.
Policeman: You’re under arrest for probable cause of Grand Larceny! Nickie Normie: What?! I didn’t steal anything! Policeman: I saw you take that penny from the tray. And you’re on camera too. Nickie Normie:(laughing) Officer, that’s the take-a-penny tray! That’s what it’s for. And besides, Grand Larceny has to be over $1000. Policeman: I’m well are of the law, punk! Yes, it may appear that you only took a penny; but when I get you down to the station, our new PCR test machine will tell us exactly how much you really stole. Nickie Normie: PCR test? What’s that? Policeman: It stands for Penny Chain Reaction. PCR allows us to amplify the penny in question through what are known as cycles. It is the “Gold Standard” of forensic testing. Nickie Normie: Oh dear. Now I’m worried. I could have sworn that I only took one penny.
At the station, the pilfered penny was handed off to a lab technician and placed in the PCR magic minting machine and amplified as Nicky Normie waited nervously in his cell. After one cycle, the original penny had doubled into 2 pennies, the next cycle brought the total to 4 cents; the next, 8 cents; the next, 16 cents; the next 32 cents; the next 64 cents — $1.28 — $2.56 — $5.12 — $10.24 — $20.48 — $40.96 –$81.92 — $163. 84 and so on until the $1,000 milestone for Grand Larceny was reached — 100,000 pennies!
When Nickie was informed of the “test results,” he broke down and sobbed.
Nickie Normie: I’ve never stolen anything in my life. I’m such an honest person. I don’t know what must have gotten into me. Detective Fauci: Nickie, as a first-time offender, I’m sure that the judge will take your history as a model citizen into consideration. And if you help us, we’re willing to make a plea deal to reduce your sentence Nickie Normie: Sure. How can I help you? Detective Fauci: Give us the names of anyone else you may know that has taken pennies out of that or any other such tray — or even picked up a penny off the ground.
And so it began.
The next day, The Normieville Times blasted the news of the shocking theft across its front page. In a full page editorial titled “Follow the Science,” the Editorial Board — quoting the Chief of Police — speculated that Nickie Normie’s theft of $1000 was probably not an isolated case. The innocent citizens of Normieville were urged to “get tested” for their invisible crimes. From the editorial:
“Protect yourself, protect your community! If you’ve ever shorted any cashiers of a penny, or lifted a penny from any of the many “Take-a-Penny” counter trays around town, we urge you to bring some pennies to the Normieville police station and submit them to the Penny Chain Reaction test to find out if you are a thief. Follow the science!”
The very next day, hundreds of honest normies voluntarily lined up at the Normieville police station to have their pennies tested. About 20% of them “tested positive” for $1,000 Grand Larceny. Again the headlines screamed:
“Record Crime Wave Sweeps Through Normiedom! Hundreds Arrested!”
The frightened citizens rushed out to buy guns, alarm systems and guard dogs. Those who refused to have their pennies PCR tested were socially ostracized. No one was safe from suspicion — not even those who tested negative because another PCR could always expose them as crooks at a later date. More tests led to more PCR positives (“cases”) — which led to more arrests — which led to more shocking headlines — which led to more tests.
In such a state of trauma-induced “mass formation psychosis,” the Mayor’s calls for higher taxes, a larger and more intrusive police force, and a “Great Reset” of the local economy were welcomed by the demented denizens of Normiedom — who, by now, were willing to subject themselves and innocent others to any indignity in order to end the “crime wave” epidemic. The “common good” was what The Normieville Times referred to the mass psychosis as.
The allegorical account of the Normiedom PCR Crime Wave — admittedly amusing and exaggerated as it may be — is really not all that far off from the mass madness — fueled by PCR and also phony “antigen tests” — which we are witnessing with Stupid-19. Just drive by your local “Testing Facility” and behold the healthy masked-up boobs waiting in line, in the cold, to get nose-raped for a false positive from a technique which was developed for the sole purpose of facilitating research through “amplification” of genetic material.
But don’t take my word for it. Hear it from Kary Mullis (1:40 video below) the outspoken Nobel Prize winning genius and a legend in the field of biochemistry. Mullis invented the revolutionary PCR technique — and oh so conveniently died (of “pneumonia”) just three months before Stupid-19 was kicked off by abusing his PCR.
And please share this allegory with the frightened and bewildered normies in your life.
NY Times: Omicron variant upends global pandemic response.
Britain, Israel and others implemented new security measures as some health experts urged caution.
Don’t throw those face-diapers away just yet, boys and girls. The Sons of Covid “variant”count has just reached the 15th letter of the 24-letter Greek alphabet. Like a script for a cheesy Hollyweird film, “Omicron” has escaped from Africa. You see, when you’re writing fictitious fecal matter, you can make Son of Covid — and even Grandson of Covid — appear wherever and whenever you need him to.
From the article:
“Omicron, a new variant first detected in Botswana, sent Europe into high alert on Saturday after cases were detected in the United Kingdom, Germany and Italy. Omicron cases were already detected in Belgium on Friday. The Czech Republic, Austria, Israel and the Netherlands were all investigating suspected cases of the variant.“
Oooh. So scary! Of course, from a health standpoint, regular readers of The Anti-New York Times do not need to be told that there is nothing to worry about because the original Stupid-19 (itself a “variant” of a previous coronavirus) doesn’t actually exist. But we’re also confident in reassuring folks that even in terms of the geo-political, there is nothing to worry about either. After nearly two years, even many normies are losing their fear. The Stupid-19 / Great Reset plot is gradually turning into the Great Yawn and Great Backlash as patriots assume control.
Nonetheless, this article makes for some good comic rebuttal. Hazmat suits and hip waders on, boys and girls. Into Sulzberger’s Cesspool we go for some “debunking” clean-up work.
— “Son of Covid” — If it feels as though you’re watching a corny monster movie with an even cornier “son of” sequel — it’s because you are! Look out world — here come the Omnicrons!
Slimes: There is still relatively little known about Omicron. Rebuttal: Then why are certain government and “the paper of record” freaking out over it?
Slimes: It has mutations that scientists fear could make it more infectious and less susceptible to vaccines. Rebuttal: Has that “fear” actually been established scientifically?
Slimes: — though neither of these effects is yet to be established. Rebuttal: (Palm to face, shaking my head, sighing) — No comment necessary.
Slimes: Most confirmed cases of the variant are contained to southern African countries … Rebuttal: If there are no “confirmed cases” of the original (purified, isolated) — then how the bloody heck were “variants” ™ of the fake original ever “confirmed?”
Slimes: … but there are worries the virus could have spread more widely before scientists there discovered it. Rebuttal: There are “worries” over a non-existent “variant” — of which “relatively little is known” — of a non-existent original??? Say what kind of “scientists” are these?
Slimes: “There’s been a window of probably about two weeks conservatively that this virus has been spreading,” said Andrew Pekosz … Rebuttal: Pekosz, eh? A “Polish” scientist.
Slimes: … an epidemiologist from Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Rebuttal: Johns Hopkins! Of course — a wholly-owned whore house of NWO “sub-capos” Mike Bloomberg & Bill Gates. —- Boom …. and boom!
Professor Pekosz Gates Bloomberg
Professor Pekosz (left) works for Globalist billionaires Gates & Bloomberg (both of whom have been strangely quiet and unseen lately)
Slimes: It is likely the variant is already in New York, Pekosz said. “There certainly is a chance that it has already spread globally, but we just don’t know yet,” Mr. Pekosz added. Rebuttal: “We just don’t know.” —– but be afraid anyway.
Slimes: Britain will require travelers from abroad to get a PCR test within 48 hours of their arrival and require contacts of those who test positive with a suspected case of Omicron to self-isolate for 10 days, regardless of vaccination status. Rebuttal: The PCR “test” — and this is according to its Nobel-prize-winning inventor, Kary Mullis — was never intended to be a diagnostic tool. Conveniently for the Globalists, the outspoken Mullis died of “pneumonia” a few months before Stupid-19 was launched. The scamsters rely upon the deliberate misuse of his invention to yield false positives.
Slimes: Philip A. Chan, an infectious disease doctor at Brown University cautioned that without a robust global vaccination effort, “we are half-treating the pandemic” and leaving the world open to new and more transmittable variants. Rebuttal: A “robust global vaccination effort,” eh? Ah, show us the shekels, Dr. Chan. Show us the shekels.
****END OF REBUTTALS****
Quite appropriately, as an astute reader just pointed out to us, OMICRON is an anagram for MORONIC. And indeed, even by the standards of many dumb-as-dirt normies, one would have to be an abject moron to keep falling for this manifest idiocy.
Keep right on pushing your endless “booster shots” Deep Staters. For with every new Greek letter “variant”, a new handful of jabbed and re-jabbed normies begin to slowly — and I do mean “slowly” — awaken. There can be no “storm” without the impassioned masses of Normiedom awakened, or at least neutralized — and that takes time.
Kary Mullis (who died in late 2019) invented PCR as a technique for amplifying genetic material for research purposes. It is now being misused to yield false positives. Boy Chan of Brown University wants mandatory global vaccination.Bozo Johnson of the UK (or an imposter?) is issuing new decrees to fight Omicron.It’s a medical clown show.
NY Times:U.S. Coronavirus Death Toll Surpasses 700,000 Despite Wide Availability of Vaccines
Every age group under 55 saw its highest death toll of the pandemic.
Nine months ago — which was about 10 months into the Stupid-19 hoax — just as vaccine-mania was being rolled out across America, Sulzbergers Slimes wrote: “The first shots were given as the U.S. surpassed 300,000 virus-related deaths.” And now, the “death count” has reached 700,000? In terms of both total numbers and monthly averages, that would mean that more people have died and are still dying of “Covid” since mass vaccination than before it! “Trust the math,” right?
So, either the magic jab doesn’t really offer any “protection” against the imaginary ailment, or the numbers are being rigged upward more aggressively than ever. Actually, it’s a bit of both, with some adverse reaction vaccination death cases thrown into the mix and then also counted as “Covid.”
In summer of 2020, the “Editorial Board” of The Anti-New York Times warned its readership that because there is a constant fresh supply of dead bodies from various causes — 2.9 million per year in the United States to be precise — “deaths” attributed to phony “flares-ups,” ™ “second waves” and “variants”of Stupid-19 would be about as easy to conjure up as the opening or closing of a water spigot. Now, about 19 months into the great Globalist Scamdemic, the felonious faucet of fatality has pumped up the “national death toll” to 700,000, and counting. How was this sickening sleight of hand achieved? The methods were surprisingly simple.
Before we review the magic tricks behind these fake numbers, let us note that even if one were to accept, purely for argument’s sake, this phony 700,000 number as absolute truth — that in a nation of 330-360 million inhabitants (depends on how many illegal aliens dwell amongst us), the figure amounts to just one Stupid-19 death per every 500 persons OVER A 19-MONTH SPAN. That’s hardly the stuff of the Medieval “Black Death” plague. And with an average age per alleged * “Covid” death of 80 — with 94% of the deceased having had at least one other life-threatening condition — moderately healthy people under the age of 75 are actually more likely to die by choking to death on a meal than succumbing to this common cold or flu. So, you see, even the false official story of Stupid-19 can hardly be classified as a “deadly pandemic.”
* We say “alleged Covid death” because there is no evidence of a “new” corona-virus ever having been actually isolated and identified. Total “Covid-19” deaths would therefore be zero.
It’s all an illusionist’s trick.
THE SIX FOUNDATIONS OF FRAUD
1. Presumption of cases without testing 2. Rigged kits & crooked labs 3. Misuse of PCR technique for testing 4. Death “with” Covid, but not “from” Covid 5. Politicians inflating numbers after the fact 6. Medical murders in hospitals & nursing homes
*** Referenced sources can easily be found by entering the headlines below into a search engine
* 1. Cases Misdiagnosed by “Symptoms” and “Presumption”
Hospitals and nursing homes are – as per CDC directives – allowed to diagnose cases “by symptoms” and still receive their hefty per case Covid commission checks. How many cases of pneumonia, influenza, COPD and even heart attacks and strokes etc. were diagnosed as “presumed” Stupid-19 “by symptoms” such as fever or difficulty breathing? Answer: Lots! From the CDC’s own bloody website / Q&A:
National Vital Statistics System Covid – 19 Alert #2 / March 19, 2020 Q: What happens if the terms reported on the death certificate indicate uncertainty? A: If the death certificate reports terms such as “probable COVID-19” or “likely COVID-19,” these terms would be assigned the new ICD code. It is not likely that NCHS will follow up on these cases.
Translation: “Go ahead and put ‘Covid-19’ on the Death Certificate — We won’t ever ‘follow up.'” (wink wink — cha ching cha ching for you!) ****** Headline: New York Times (March 27, 2020) A Heart Attack? No. It was the Coronavirus
* Headline: Statnews.com (June 25, 2020) Covid-19 Brain Complications Include Stroke and Dementia-like Syndrome
LabCorp and Quest Diagnostics are handling the bulk of the tests. The Mayo Clinic is also conducting many of them. Apart from the fact that LabCorp and Quest are Fortune 500 giants that cannot be trusted – and that Mayo is heavily government-funded — CDC’s own website reveals that any of the other strains of coronavirus (common colds) can be detected as “positives” both for Stupid-19 and the antibodies generated by “recovered” cases. The lab-rigging, in many cases, has also involved faulty, Covid-contaminated test kits.
CDC Guidelines for COVID-19 Antibody Testing Some tests may exhibit cross-reactivity with other coronaviruses, such as those that cause the common cold. This could result in false-positive test results. * Headline: NY Times (February 12, 2020) Coronavirus Test Kits Sent to States Are Flawed, C.D.C. Says * Headline: NY Times (April 18, 2020) C.D.C. Labs Were Contaminated, Delaying Coronavirus Testing, Officials Say * Headline : (USA Today) Florida Reported 100% Positive Covid-19 tests From Some Labs. That’s Wrong, Hospital System Says * Headline: (CBS News) Dozens of Florida Labs Still Reporting Only Positive Covid Tests, Skewing Positivity Rate
* Headline: Al Jazeera (May 3, 2020) Tanzania President Questions Coronavirus Kits After Animal Test President Magufuli says tests were found to be faulty after goat, sheep and pawpaw samples test positive for COVID-19. * Headline: New York Post (July 21, 2020) Connecticut Lab Finds 90 Positive COVID Cases were False * Testimonial From a Reader (August 2, 2020) My friend went to get Covid testing. She filled out all the paperwork and got frustrated after waiting an hour. So, she got up and left without getting tested. About a week later she received a notice she had tested positive. Unbelievable! I wonder if the lab gets money from the federal government for every positive. This is absolutely happening all over the country.
Fake Death Certificates based upon CDC’s not-even-concealed encouragement to deem Covid as “probable” or “presumed” — and the hospital / nursing home gets paid!Under the “presumption” guidelines, if a patient is running a fever, that can be grounds for a Stupid-19 “diagnosis by symptoms.”Lab Corp & Quest — Both Fortune 500 giants are heavily reliant upon government reimbursements (Medicare, Medicaid and VA), have a history of shady business practices and are plugged into the Federal system.((They))) couldn’t make-a-foolie out of President Magafuli of Tanzania. The WHO / Gates kits sent to corrupted labs returned “positive” results for a papaya, a goat and a sheep! (And then they killed Magafuli)Put enough of that dirty green stuff out on the street and you’ll be amazed at how many willing participants will line up for it. Governments around the world — all of them tied into the W.H.O. / Bill Gates Mafia Syndicate — are paying good money for inflated case numbers ($11,000 each) and ventilator deaths ($39,000 each). Those who know that it is wrong are usually too intimidated to speak out against the system which they are trapped in.
* 3. Misuse of PCR Technique for Testing
The distinguished biochemist Kary Mullis was the 1993 Nobel Prize and Japan Prize winner for Chemistry who invented the research-onlyPCR(Polymerase Chain Reaction) test that is currently being deliberately misused to “diagnose” Stupid-19 cases through “amplification.” Mullis developed the technique so that genetic material could be amplified and studied. But its current usage, PCR is being used to pinpoint harmless tiny traces of cold viruses through amplification cycles. Once a remnant of a cold virus is picked up, a false “positive” is recorded.
The Nobel website confirms that this amplification technique was intended to facilitate DNA research — NOT for diagnosis. From NobelPrize.org: “An organism’s genome is stored inside DNA molecules, but analyzing this genetic information requires quite a large amount of DNA. … Kary Mullis invented (PCR), in which a small amount of DNA can be copied in large quantities over a short period of time.” … PCR has been of major importance in both medical research and forensic science.”
Mullis himself once referred to the sainted Dr. Anthony Fauci (Falsie) as a “liar” who “doesn’t know anything about anything.” How convenient for Falsie and friends that the outspoken and highly respected Mullis didn’t live to see the madness of Stupid-19 and get to expose Falsie for misusing the PCR technology which he developed. You see, Mullis died of “pneumonia” just a few months before the scamdemic kicked-off with that nasty “bat” in a “wet market” (rolling eyes) somewhere in Wuhan, China.
* 4. Cases of Death Openly Acknowledged as Other Causes (Heart Attacks, Strokes etc) — butin which Covid-19 is also “added on” — even if the patient had no such symptoms!
Self-important libtards are always admonishing us unrefined rubes to “trust the science” ™ — but this inexplicable and thoroughly un-scientific practice was confirmed by Covid conspirator and “leading infectious disease expert” Dr. Deborah Birx herself. Said Ms. Birx — in a rare moment of candor during a White House press briefing:
“I think in this country we’ve taken a very liberal approach to mortality. …There are other countries that if you had a preexisting condition and let’s say the virus caused you to go to the ICU and then have a heart or kidney problem some countries are recording as a heart issue or a kidney issue and not a COVID-19 death. Right now we are still recording it (as COVID) and … I mean the great thing about having a form that has the ability to market as COVID-19 infection, the intent is right now that if someone dies with COVID-19 we are counting that as a COVID-19 death.”
Mullis never intended for his PCR to be used as a diagnostic tool.Drs. Dan Erickson and Dr. Artin Massihi of Accelerated Urgent Care in California held a press conference. During their discussion with reporters, Dr. Erickson noted he has spoken to numerous physicians who say they are being pressured to add COVID-19 to death certificates and diagnostic lists—even when the coronavirus appears to have no relation to the victim’s death. Dr. Erikson: “You know, it’s interesting. When I’m writing up my death report I’m being pressured to add Covid. Why is that? Why are we being pressured to add Covid? To maybe increase the numbers, and make it look a little bit worse than it is? I think so.”Dr. Scott Jansen of Minnesota blasted the CDC’s death count guidelines as being “ridiculous.” Candace Owens — your observation is correct! Dr. Scarf-Lady Birx confirms it! In the United States, no distinction is made between a patient dying WITH corona-virus versus one dying FROM corona-virus.
* 5. Demonrat Politicians Inflating Numbers After the Fact
Headline (June 9, 2020): Med Page Today
Nursing Homes Shocked at ‘Insanely Wrong’ CMS Data on COVID-19: — One facility supposedly had eight coronavirus deaths for each bed
When the administrator of the Saugus Rehab and Nursing Center in Saugus, Massachusetts, heard that a new Medicare website reported her facility had 794 confirmed cases of COVID-19 — the second highest in the country — and 281 cases among staff, she gasped. — “Oh my God. Where are they getting those numbers from?” said Josephine Ajayi. “That doesn’t make any sense.” — Those weren’t the numbers that her facility reported to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network, under new rules from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), she said.
* Headline (July 22, 2020): Military.com In Error, Tricare Tells 600K Beneficiaries They’ve Had COVID-19 More than 600,000 Tricare users in the military health system’s East Region received emails Friday asking them to consider donating blood for research as “survivors of COVID-19. But given that just 31,000 persons affiliated with the U.S. military have been diagnosed with the coronavirus, the email came as a surprise to beneficiaries.” *
Headline: Washington Times (April 15, 2020) CDC Tells States to Add “Probable” Corona-virus Cases to Death Toll The U.S. tally of corona-virus cases and deaths could soon jump because federal health officials will now count illnesses that are not confirmed by lab testing.
* Headline Bloomberg News (April 14, 2020) New York City Adds 3,800 Probable Virus Victims to Death Toll New York City added thousands of people to its corona-virus death toll to account for victims who died in recent weeks without a confirmed diagnosis. Freddi Goldstein, press secretary to Mayor Bill de Blasio, said Tuesday that the data include at-home deaths of people suspected of having Covid-19
* Headline: New York Post (June 25, 2020) New Jersey’s Corona-virus Death Toll Adds Nearly 2,000 Probable Fatalities New Jersey’s corona-virus death toll climbed by nearly 2,000 Thursday — after the state began recording probable fatalities from the bug. The state added 1,854 fatalities that were deemed likely due to COVID-19, but were not confirmed by a test, to its tally.
* Headline: U.S. News & World Report (April 15, 2020) Connecticut Sees Big Jump in Coronavirus Deaths Gov. Ned Lamont said during a press conference that the increase in the death toll includes people who have died in their homes and were not previously counted. New York CIty this week similarly revised its death toll upward. That revision included people who were presumed to have died from the virus but never tested positive.
* Headline: The Detroit News (June 5, 2020) Michigan Coronavirus Death Toll Jumps With Revised Count The state also released for the first time a count of 5,014 probable cases of COVID-19. Those presumptive cases increased the state’s total known cases…Probable cases include individuals without a COVID-positive diagnostic lab test who were presumed to be infected due to their symptoms.
* Headline: My Sun Coast News, Florida (July 19, 2020) Concerns arise as some receive positive COVID-19 results but never got tested “I got a call asking for me, and they told me that I had tested positive. I was like, ‘Positive for what?” Then, the lady said for COVID, and I said, ‘That’s impossible. I never got tested, Ma’am,’” Mindy Clark said.
* Headline” AP News, (June 17,2020) Washington State Removes Homicides, Suicides From Covid -19 Deaths Washington health officials removed seven deaths from the state’s Covid-19 mortality count, including three homocides. The Department of Health said it had been counting as coronavirus deaths all people who died and tested positive for the disease. Authorities say they have now removed deaths from the count that weren’t caused specifically by COVID-19.
* 6. Outright MURDER of Seniors in Hospitals & Nursing Homes
With elderly patients cut-off from visitors, the Ghouls in Gowns (aka “Frontline Heroes”) – already known to be genocidal maniacs (see “The Morphine Genocide,” by yours truly (here)) have an even freer hand now to finish off our octogenarians and nonagenarians (and in some New York City cases, even young poorer people) with sedatives and ventilators. Every senior bumped off represents a big SS/MediCare savings to the government and bonus money for the hospitals / nursing homes ($39,000 per ventilator case plus the standard “palliative care” payout!)
In the scamdemic “epicenter” of New York City, where outside doctors and nurses were brought in to “help,” the mass killing got so out-of-control that several nurses took to YouTube to tell their compelling horror stories of murders by neglect and ventilators. Might some of these outsiders been CIA medical assassins dispatched to the poorer areas of New York (and other European cities) with a “license to kill?” You might be surprised to know that the CIA aggressively recruits nurses, nurse practitioners, physician assistants and doctors. The Deep State even sets up information booths at various medical expositions.
******* This is how the New World Order international crime syndicate’s game has been played — worldwide — but most aggressively in Election-Year-America (the short term objective being to cripple the economy and get rid of Donald Trump; and the long term goal is to prepare humanity for the “Great Reset” and getting micro-chipped with Bill Gates’ nano-particles). And for as long as people continue to die of old age and old age-related diseases, (((they))) will just keep on padding the “National Death Toll” ™. For the love of God —this evil scheme has got to stop, and the guilty Globalist Ghouls have got to pay — with their own lives!
Across America, MANY stories of “errors” in case counts have been reported on local news affiliate stations. Yet somehow, the big national news programs never seem to pick up on the disturbing and obvious pattern.he Morphine Genocide (here) reveals how (((they))) have been killing-off the elderly for years. All they are doing now is classifying these murders as “Covid-19.” The lung-busting ventilator is the kiss-of-death — at a nifty Covid profit of $39,000 per patient for the hospital or nursing home.Alexander Lukashenko — the president of Belarus — told his cabinet how he was ordered by the International Monetary Fund to impose quarantine, isolation, masking and curfew upon the populace as a condition for a loan. When he refused the Globalist demands, “spontaneous” anti-Lukashenko “voter fraud” protests erupted in Minsk (the capital city of Belarus).
You are the one who hangs on every word of the oh-so-authoritative CDC.
You adore that money-grubbing, vaccine-peddling midget St. Anthony Falsie — perhaps even pleasuring yourself to the sound of his raspy voice.
You lecture all of us to “follow the science” when you yourself have actually never examined any real science regarding this matter.
You trust the multi-millionaire talking-heads on your TV set while reflexively denigrating critical independent thinkers as “conspiracy theorists.”
You dismiss us as “paranoid” for claiming it’s a hoax — as you nervously piss your pink panties over every breathless news report of a new “surge” in cases.
You obediently and gladly wear those silly useless masks and “social distance” – even when you are not required to.
You have a virtue-signalling “Thank You Health Care Heroes” sign on your front lawn. Evidently, dutifully showing up for work and euthanizing elderly flu victims in between “Tik Tok” dance videos is now considered “heroism.”
You cast dirty looks at us nostril cheaters as you bathe in hand sanitizer.
You abusively isolated your elderly parents or grandparents simply because you were ordered to.
You allowed the “powers that be” to steal your Christmas, Thanksgiving, graduations, weddings, birthday parties, funerals and other family events.
You alienated family members who dared to think for themselves.
You screwed up your own children – stunting their scholastic growth, ruining their sports seasons, and turning them into pussified germophobes during their formative years.
And now, after 18 months of this geo-political con-job designed to control society and transform political & economic systems worldwide; and even after you obediently took your “magic jab” in the arm – you are again pissing and moaning about “The Delta Variant” and aggressively virtue-shaming us rational folks for not submitting to a “Fauci Ouchie.”
“Anti-vaxxers” are putting society at risk! They pose a health risk to the public. They must be compelled!”
No, not exactly, my dear normie. With no due respect, the mob morality of your commie cult really disgusts those of us who dare to think – and those of us who still hold to quaint outdated ideals such as liberty and “conspiratorial” notions such as mistrusting powerful people and institutions. You know, this attitude we have that we once proudly called Americanism. Have you forgotten Ben Franklin’s timeless proverb?
“Those who would give up essential liberty, to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.”
Dr. Anthony Fauci — a dishonest publicity-seeking bureaucrat connected to the Bill Gates / WHO crime syndicate — poses as an “infectious disease expert.”Following corrupted “scientists” on the government payroll doesn’t make one “educated.” A useless and, in some cases, even dangerous vaccine for a non-existent “novel” coronavirus.
If you want to know who the true public menace is, have a look in the mirror, normie. It is YOU! Your mental laziness, moral cowardice and irrational obedience to the New York Times and the TV screen is – more so than any government mandate or armed Federal agent could ever be — the true foundation upon which the horrible and unnecessary tyranny of the past couple of years was built upon.
It is because of YOU that so many businesses and lives have been ruined.
It is because of YOU that so many suddenly defenseless seniors have had to endure soul-crushing loneliness in the killer nursing homes and hospitals — waiting for the medical ghouls to purposely stop their hearts as part of the cost-saving “Living Will” / DNR (Do Not Resuscitate) scam that you’ve all been tricked into.
It is because of YOU that we are now experiencing the inevitable price-inflation caused by the historic levels of debt-based money printing mandated by the Covid scam.
It is because of YOU that future generations will be stuck paying the enormous bill, plus interest.
It is because of YOU that suicide rates, particularly among young people, have risen.
It is because of YOU that so many people have gained weight sitting at home while the gyms were closed. Oh you’re so “health conscious,” aren’t ya?
I know. I know. “It was all necessary to save lives.” And, “Rights are subject to restrictions when they threaten others.” Right? Newsflash, normie! You’ve been played for a paranoid fool. Let’s “follow the science” – the real science, shall we?
Not a single government agency in the world has been able to provide – through Freedom of Information requests – any confirming data proving that the “novel” (new) coronavirus of 2019 was ever scientifically isolated and identified. If they cannot, that suggests that it’s actually just the same old cold & flu of years past. In fact, as part of a court case in Canada against a Covid “non-complier” in the province of Alberta, the state was not able to produce such records (later claiming that the defendant did not file his subpoena properly).
* The PCR “test” which is used to “diagnose” the imaginary illness was never intended to be used as a diagnostic tool. The inventor of the process – 1994 Nobel Prize winner Kary Mullis – said so himself! Mullis: “With PCR, if you do it well, you can find almost anything in anybody. If you amplify one single molecule up to something you can really measure, which PCR can do – then there are very few molecules that you don’t have at least one of them in your body. So that can be a misuse of it, to claim that it is meaningful.”
Dr. Mullis ought to know. PCR is his baby! By the way, the distinguished Dr. Mullis (who conveniently died just before the Covid scam started) despised St. Anthony Falsie and referred to him as a liar for the way he was already misapplying the PCR to diagnose other fake diseases.
* Even with the fake test results, hospitals and nursing homes have been authorized to diagnose “cases” by “symptoms” and “presumption.” This means that anyone with the sniffles or a fever can be tagged as “Covid.” …. Cha ching!!!
* There is no evidence to show that masks can prevent the spread of viruses. The micro “bugs” are generally not airborne, and can easily penetrate through the fibers of your bacteria-infested, oxygen-limiting mask as a mosquito would through a chain-link fence.
* According to the CDC, the average age of a so-called “Covid victim” is almost 80. According to the same CDC, the average life expectancy in the United States is —- also about 80! So, what’s the frickin’ fuss all about?!
* Again, according to the CDC, 94% of those who died had at least one other life-threatening condition, and 70% had TWO other life-threatening conditions (in addition to their old age).
* According to CDC statistics, a person in his or her 50s, without any other pre-existing life-threatening conditions, is about as likely to choke to death during a meal than of dying from “Covid.” (which isn’t even real). So then, why are you not pureeing all of your food?
* Hospitals and nursing homes were paid $10,000 for each diagnosis of “Covid” and an additional $39,000 for each patient then placed on a dangerous ventilator. Sheer greed (by design of the master planners) drove our “health care heroes” to list deaths by pneumonia, flu, COPD, asthma attacks, strokes, diabetes, heart attacks etc as “Covid.” Murder victims were even tagged as “Covid!” And a few brave doctors have come forward and admitted that administrators are “pressuring” them to list “Covid” on death certificates.
* Several countries (Sweden & Belarus in Europe, for example) mostly ignored the “pandemic” and never shut down nor masked-up (although Sweden, after months of intense international pressure, did finally ask people to voluntarily “social distance.”) And yet, life went on as normal in those countries. Were you even aware of that?
Kary Mullis receives Nobel Prize in Chemistry for inventing PCR — which was NOT intended for diagnosis.President Lukashenko of Belarus referred to Covid-19 as an “international psychosis.” His country remained open and healthy.The self-promoting “Healthcare Heroes” got paid big bucks for sedating seniors to death and tagging everyone with a cold or flu as “Covid” on the death certificates.
While the rest of us were FORCED to lock down, mask up and “socially distance”…..
Swedish beach in Summer of 2020Belarus political rallies, Summer of 2020
Dismiss this as “conspiracy theory” if you like; but know this: Anyone who is not a “Conspiracy Analysts” in this day and age of universal deceit (especially in high places) is a fucking idiot!
Now if you insist upon still wearing that stupid mask, social distancing, and getting jabbed and re-jabbed until all the fake-ass “variants” run out of Greek letters, then feel free to do so as the rest of us (as well as future generations) exercise our own right to laugh at you. Just stop vilifying us as uninformed and uneducated enemies of society when, in reality, YOU ARE!
Oh the bloody front-page drama! 500,000 little dots to keep the normies frightened and compliant.
About 9 months ago, the “Editorial Board” of The New York Times warned its readership that because there is a constant fresh supply of dead bodies from various causes — 2.9 million per year in the United States to be precise — “deaths” attributed to phony “flares-ups,” “second waves” and “variants” of Stupid-19 would be about as easy to conjure up as the opening or closing of a water spigot. Now, exactly one year into the great Globalist Scamdemic, the felonious faucet of fatality has pumped up the “national death toll” to 500,000, and counting. How was this sickening sleight of hand achieved? The methods were surprisingly simple.
Before we review the magic tricks behind these fake numbers, let us note that even if one were to accept, purely for argument’s sake, this phony 500,000 number as absolute truth — that in a nation of 330-360 million inhabitants (depends on how many illegal aliens dwell amongst us), the figure amounts to just one Stupid-19 death per every 700 persons. That’s hardly the stuff of the Medieval “Black Death” plague. And with an average age per alleged * Covid death of 80 — with 94% of the deceased having had at least one other life-threatening condition — moderately healthy people under the age of 75 are actually more likely to die by choking to death on a meal than succumbing to this common cold or flu. So, you see, even the false official story of Stupid-19 can hardly be classified as a “deadly pandemic.”
* We say “alleged Covid death” because there is no evidence of a “new” coronavirus ever having been actually isolated and identified. Total “Covid-19” deaths would therefore be zero.
It’s all an illusionist’s trick.
THE SIX FOUNDATIONS OF FRAUD
1. Presumption of cases without testing 2. Rigged kits & crooked labs 3. Misuse of PCR technique for testing 4. Death “with” Covid, but not “from” Covid 5. Politicians inflating numbers after the fact 6. Medical murders in hospitals & nursing homes
*** Referenced sources can easily be found by entering titles into a search engine
* 1. Cases Misdiagnosed by “Symptoms” and “Presumption”
Hospitals and nursing homes are – as per CDC directives – are allowed to diagnose cases “by symptoms” and still receive their hefty per case Covid commission checks. How many cases of pneumonia, influenza, COPD and even heart attacks and strokes etc. were diagnosed as “presumed” Stupid-19 “by symptoms” such as fever or difficulty breathing? Answer: Lots! From the CDC’s own bloody website / Q&A:
National Vital Statistics System Covid – 19 Alert #2 / March 19, 2020 Q: What happens if the terms reported on the death certificate indicate uncertainty? A: If the death certificate reports terms such as “probable COVID-19” or “likely COVID-19,” these terms would be assigned the new ICD code. It is not likely that NCHS will follow up on these cases.
Translation: “Go ahead and put ‘Covid-19’ on the Death Certificate — We won’t ever ‘follow up.'” (wink wink — cha ching cha ching for you!) ****** Headline: New York Times (March 27, 2020) A Heart Attack? No. It was the Coronavirus
* Headline: Statnews.com (June 25, 2020) Covid-19 Brain Complications Include Stroke and Dementia-like Syndrome
LabCorp and Quest Diagnostics are handling the bulk of the tests. The Mayo Clinic is also conducting many of them. Apart from the fact that LabCorp and Quest are Fortune 500 giants that cannot be trusted – and that Mayo is heavily government-funded — CDC’s own website reveals that any of the other strains of coronavirus (common colds) can be detected as “positives” both for Stupid-19 and the anti-bodies generated by “recovered” cases. The lab-rigging, in many cases, has also involved faulty, Covid-contaminated test kits.
CDC Guidelines for COVID-19 Antibody Testing Some tests may exhibit cross-reactivity with other coronaviruses, such as those that cause the common cold. This could result in false-positive test results. * Headline: NY Times (February 12, 2020) Coronavirus Test Kits Sent to States Are Flawed, C.D.C. Says * Headline: NY Times (April 18, 2020) C.D.C. Labs Were Contaminated, Delaying Coronavirus Testing, Officials Say * Headline : (USA Today) Florida Reported 100% Positive Covid-19 tests From Some Labs. That’s Wrong, Hospital System Says * Headline: (CBS News) Dozens of Florida Labs Still Reporting Only Positive Covid Tests, Skewing Positivity Rate
* Headline: Al Jazeera (May 3, 2020) Tanzania President Questions Coronavirus Kits After Animal Test President Magufuli says tests were found to be faulty after goat, sheep and pawpaw samples test positive for COVID-19. * Headline: New York Post (July 21, 2020) Connecticut Lab Finds 90 Positive COVID Cases were False * Testimonial From a Reader (August 2, 2020) My friend went to get Covid testing. She filled out all the paperwork and got frustrated after waiting an hour. So, she got up and left without getting tested. About a week later she received a notice she had tested positive. Unbelievable! I wonder if the lab gets money from the federal government for every positive. This is absolutely happening all over the country.
Fake Death Certificates based upon CDC’s not-even-concealed encouragement to deem Covid as “probable” or “presumed” — and the hospital / nursing home gets paid!Under the “presumption” guidelines, if a patient is running a fever, that can be grounds for a Stupid-19 “diagnosis by symptoms.” Lab Corp & Quest — Both Fortune 500 giants are heavily reliant upon government reimbursements (Medicare, Medicaid and VA), have a history of shady business practices and are plugged into the Federal system. (((They))) couldn’t make-a-foolie out of President Magafuli of Tanzania. The WHO / Gates kits sent to corrupted labs returned “positive” results for a papaya, a goat and a sheep!
Put enough of that dirty green stuff out on the street and you’ll be amazed at how many willing participants will line up for it. Governments around the world — all of them tied into the W.H.O. / Bill Gates Mafia Syndicate — are paying good money for inflated case numbers ($11,000 each) and ventilator deaths ($39,000 each). Those who know that it is wrong are usually too intimidated to speak out against the system which they are trapped in.
* 3. Misuse of PCR Technique for Testing
The distinguished biochemist Kary Mullis — the 1993 Nobel Prize and Japan Prize winner for Chemistry who invented the research-onlyPCR(Polymerase Chain Reaction) test that is currently being deliberately misused to “diagnose” Stupid-19 cases through “amplification.” Mullis developed the technique so that genetic material could be amplified and studied. But its current usage, PCR is being used to pinpoint harmless tiny traces of cold viruses through amplification cycles. Once a remnant of a cold virus is picked up, a false “positive” is recorded.
The Nobel website confirms that this amplification technique was intended to facilitate DNA research, not for diagnosis. From NobelPrize.org: “An organism’s genome is stored inside DNA molecules, but analyzing this genetic information requires quite a large amount of DNA. … Kary Mullis invented (PCR), in which a small amount of DNA can be copied in large quantities over a short period of time.” … PCR has been of major importance in both medical research and forensic science.”
Mulis himself once referred to the sainted Dr. Anthony Fauci (Falsie) as a “liar” who “doesn’t know anything about anything.” How convenieeent for Falsie and friends that the outspoken and highly respected Mullis didn’t live to see the madness of Stupid-19 and get to expose Falsie for misusing the PCR technology which he developed. You see, Mullis died of “pneumonia” just a few months before the scamdemic kicked-off with that nasty “bat” in a “wet market” (rolling eyes) somewhere in Wuhan, China.
* 4. Cases of Death Openly Acknowledged as Other Causes (Heart Attacks, Strokes etc) — butin which Covid-19 is also “added on” — even if the patient had no such symptoms!
Self-important libtards are always admonishing us unrefined rubes to “trust the science” ™ — but this inexplicable and thoroughly un-scientific practice was confirmed by Covid conspirator and “leading infectious disease expert” Dr. Deborah Birx herself. Said Ms. Birx — in a rare moment of candor during a White House press briefing:
“I think in this country we’ve taken a very liberal approach to mortality. …There are other countries that if you had a preexisting condition and let’s say the virus caused you to go to the ICU and then have a heart or kidney problem some countries are recording as a heart issue or a kidney issue and not a COVID-19 death. Right now we are still recording it (as COVID) and … I mean the great thing about having a form that has the ability to market as COVID-19 infection, the intent is right now that if someone dies with COVID-19 we are counting that as a COVID-19 death.”
Mullis never intended for his PCR to be used as a diagnostic tool.Drs. Dan Erickson and Dr. Artin Massihi of Accelerated Urgent Care in California held a press conference. During their discussion with reporters, Dr. Erickson noted he has spoken to numerous physicians who say they are being pressured to add COVID-19 to death certificates and diagnostic lists—even when the coronavirus appears to have no relation to the victim’s death. Dr. Erikson: “You know, it’s interesting. When I’m writing up my death report I’m being pressured to add Covid. Why is that? Why are we being pressured to add Covid? To maybe increase the numbers, and make it look a little bit worse than it is? I think so.” Dr. Scott Jansen of Minnesota blasted the CDC’s death count guidelines as being “ridiculous.” Candace Owens — your observation is correct! Dr. Scarf-Lady Birx confirms it! In the United States, no distinction is made between a patient dying WITH coronavirus versus one dying FROM coronavirus.
5. Demonrat Politicians Inflating Numbers After the Fact
Headline (June 9, 2020): Med Page Today
Nursing Homes Shocked at ‘Insanely Wrong’ CMS Data on COVID-19: — One facility supposedly had eight coronavirus deaths for each bed
When the administrator of the Saugus Rehab and Nursing Center in Saugus, Massachusetts, heard that a new Medicare website reported her facility had 794 confirmed cases of COVID-19 — the second highest in the country — and 281 cases among staff, she gasped. — “Oh my God. Where are they getting those numbers from?” said Josephine Ajayi. “That doesn’t make any sense.” — Those weren’t the numbers that her facility reported to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network, under new rules from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), she said.
* Headline (July 22, 2020): Military.com In Error, Tricare Tells 600K Beneficiaries They’ve Had COVID-19 More than 600,000 Tricare users in the military health system’s East Region received emails Friday asking them to consider donating blood for research as “survivors of COVID-19. But given that just 31,000 persons affiliated with the U.S. military have been diagnosed with the coronavirus, the email came as a surprise to beneficiaries.” *
Headline: Washington Times (April 15, 2020) CDC Tells States to Add “Probable” Coronavirus Cases to Death Toll The U.S. tally of coronavirus cases and deaths could soon jump because federal health officials will now count illnesses that are not confirmed by lab testing.
* Headline Bloomberg News (April 14, 2020) New York City Adds 3,800 Probable Virus Victims to Death Toll New York City added thousands of people to its coronavirus death toll to account for victims who died in recent weeks without a confirmed diagnosis. Freddi Goldstein, press secretary to Mayor Bill de Blasio, said Tuesday that the data include at-home deaths of people suspected of having Covid-19
* Headline: New York Post (June 25, 2020) New Jersey’s Coronavirus Death Toll Adds Nearly 2,000 Probable Fatalities New Jersey’s coronavirus death toll climbed by nearly 2,000 Thursday — after the state began recording probable fatalities from the bug. The state added 1,854 fatalities that were deemed likely due to COVID-19, but were not confirmed by a test, to its tally.
* Headline: U.S. News & World Report (April 15, 2020) Connecticut Sees Big Jump in Coronavirus Deaths Gov. Ned Lamont said during a press conference that the increase in the death toll includes people who have died in their homes and were not previously counted. New York CIty this week similarly revised its death toll upward. That revision included people who were presumed to have died from the virus but never tested positive.
* Headline: The Detroit News (June 5, 2020) Michigan Coronavirus Death Toll Jumps With Revised Count The state also released for the first time a count of 5,014 probable cases of COVID-19. Those presumptive cases increased the state’s total known cases…Probable cases include individuals without a COVID-positive diagnostic lab test who were presumed to be infected due to their symptoms.
* Headline: My Sun Coast News, Florida (July 19, 2020) Concerns arise as some receive positive COVID-19 results but never got tested “I got a call asking for me, and they told me that I had tested positive. I was like, ‘Positive for what?” Then, the lady said for COVID, and I said, ‘That’s impossible. I never got tested, Ma’am,’” Mindy Clark said.
* Headline” AP News, (June 17,2020) Washington State Removes Homicides, Suicides From Covid -19 Deaths Washington health officials removed seven deaths from the state’s Covid-19 mortality count, including three homocides. The Department of Health said it had been counting as coronavirus deaths all people who died and tested positive for the disease. Authorities say they have now removed deaths from the count that weren’t caused specifically by COVID-19.
* 6. Outright MURDER of Seniors in Hospitals & Nursing Homes
With elderly patients cut-off from visitors, the Ghouls in Gowns (aka “Frontline Heroes”) – already known to be genocidal maniacs (see “The Morphine Genocide,” by yours truly (here)) have an even freer hand now to finish off our octogenarians and nonagenarians (and in some New York City cases, even young poorer people) with sedatives and ventilators. Every senior bumped off represents a big SS/MediCare savings to the government and bonus money for the hospitals / nursing homes ($39,000 per ventilator case plus the standard “palliative care” payout!)
In the scamdemic “epicenter” of New York City, where outside doctors and nurses were brought in to “help,” the mass killing got so out-of-control that several nurses took to YouTube to tell their compelling horror stories of murders by neglect and ventilators. Might some of these outsiders been CIA medical assassins dispatched to the poorer areas of New York (and other European cities) with a “license to kill?” You might be surprised to know that the CIA aggressively recruits nurses, nurse practitioners, physician assistants and doctors. The Deep State even sets up information booths at various medical expositions.
******* This is how the New World Order international crime syndicate’s game has been played — worldwide — but most aggressively in Election-Year-America (the short term objective being to cripple the economy and get rid of Donald Trump; and the long term goal is to prepare humanity for the “Great Reset” and getting micro-chipped with Bill Gates’ nano-particles). And for as long as people continue to die of old age and old age-related diseases, (((they))) will just keep on padding the “National Death Toll”. For the love of God —this evil scheme has got to stop, and the guilty Globalist Ghouls have got to pay — with their own lives!
Across America, MANY stories of “errors” in case counts have been reported on local news affiliate stations. Yet somehow, the big national news programs never seem to pick up on the disturbing and obvious pattern.The lung-busting ventilator is the kiss-of-death — at a nifty Covid profit of $39,000 per patient for the hospital or nursing home.Alexander Lukashenko — the president of Belarus — told his cabinet how he was ordered by the International Monetary Fund to impose quarantine, isolation, masking and curfew upon the populace as a condition for a loan. When he refused the Globalist demands, “spontaneous” anti-Lukashenko “voter fraud” protests erupted in Minsk (the capital city of Belarus).
“It is easier to deceive people than to convince them that they have been deceived.” — Mark Twain
*
We bring to the attention of our readers a series of quotations by the CDC, FDA, scientists and medical doctors (emphasis added) compiled by Dr. Gary Kohls.
Media reports as well as government officials have failed to outline the nature of the PCR Test. The public has been been deliberately misinformed.
We suggest that you bring these quotations to the attention of the government officials who are enforcing the Lockdown.
Covid-19 Quotations: Questioning PCR Reliability
“Detection of viral RNA may not indicate the presence of infectious virus or that 2019-nCoV is the causative agent for clinical symptoms. The performance of this test has not been established for monitoring treatment of 2019-nCoV infection. This test cannot rule out diseases caused by other bacterial or viral pathogens.” — The Centers For Disease Control and Prevention
“Detection of viral RNA may not indicate the presence of infectious virus or that 2019-nCoV is the causative agent for clinical symptoms. The performance of this test has not been established for monitoring treatment of 2019-nCoV infection. This test cannot rule out diseases caused by other bacterial or viral pathogens.” — The Centers For Disease Control and Prevention
“…false positive results will occur regularly, despite high specificity, causing unnecessary community isolation and contact tracing, and nosocomial infection if inpatients with false positive tests are cohorted with infectious patients.” — The European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases
“I’m skeptical that a PCR test is ever true. It’s a great scientific research tool. It’s a horrible tool for clinical medicine.” — Dr. David Rasnick, biochemist and protease developer
“…up to 90 percent of people testing positive carried barely any virus.” — The New York Times
“A positive RT-qPCR result may not necessarily mean the person is still infectious or that he or she still has any meaningful disease.” — Michael R Tom, Michael J Mina
“Detection of viral RNA does not necessarily mean that a person is infectious and able to transmit the virus to another person” — The World Health Organization
“positive results […] do not rule out bacterial infection or co-infection with other viruses. The agent detected may not be the definite.” —FDA
“A positive RT-qPCR result may not necessarily mean the person is still infectious or that he or she still has any meaningful disease.” — Michael R Tom, Michael J Mina
1. What is the use of the PCR test for SARS-CoV-2? This is obviously a trick question, because there is no such thing as “the test”, and that is a problem.
2. A PCR test works if gene sequences are found in the smear that indicate the presence of a virus. Tests can search for multiple gene sequences or for one; this decision influences the sensitivity and the error rate.
3. In order for a gene sequence to be recognized optically, it must first be duplicated (amplified) in several cycles. The number of cycles at which the test takes effect is called “cycle threshold” or ct for short. A ct value of 25 means that the gene sequence was recognized after 25 cycles, with a value of 40 it was only recognized after 40 cycles. At high ct values, the test is so sensitive that it reacts to the smallest quantities of particles.
4. While everything is standardized in the modern world, organizations like the WHO or the RKI refuse to standardize the PCR test. Since no one knows which laboratories are looking for which gene sequences and from which ct values they report positive results, all speculations about sensitivity and specificity are irrelevant.
5. The only thing that is clear is that handling or manufacturing errors can lead to grossly wrong measures. 77 NFL players tested positive in one fell swoop, and all results were false-positive, as post-testing showed. Similarly, the tests on 12 crew members of “Mein Schiff 6” were false-positive. You can find these and other examples in my retweet of October 5, 2020.
6. A positive test result does not mean that the person concerned is infectious, ie that it can infect other people. Nonetheless, positive test results are followed by serious encroachments on fundamental rights such as quarantine, company or school closings.
7. PCR tests were designed to determine the cause of the disease in symptomatically ill patients in order to ensure appropriate treatment. They were not intended for mass screening of healthy people.
8. Due to the WHO guidelines, PCR mass tests are misused, a) deceased persons are counted as “corona deaths” regardless of the real cause of death, provided they had previously had a positive test result and b) all people who tested positive are classified as “infectious” . While travel and sports companies can enforce repetitions of tests with positive results, ordinary people and students are often denied this counter-evidence.
9. Especially when viewed globally, the number of positive test results exceeds the imagination. Similar shocking numbers could also be obtained through indiscriminate mass tests for influenza or other viruses, which in individual cases are similarly dangerous or even fatal as SARS-CoV-2.
10. From all this there is the demand for an immediate end of the PCR mass tests and for a return to the previous routine, according to which only sick people are tested and the general situation is monitored by sentinels. Once the “numbers” have disappeared from the media, the general hysteria can gradually subside.
Lost in this whole pandemic hysteria are some key considerations that when carefully analyzed place the whole COVID-19 narrative in a highly questionable light. The gatekeepers of information dissemination are manufacturing consent at an alarming rate, but their fatigue is setting in, and their masks are falling off. What better, albeit unlikely, source to go for some much needed illumination than the New York Times?
During a considerably quieter time, back in 2007, the New York Times featured a very interesting exposé on molecular diagnostic testing — specifically, the inadequacy of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test in achieving reliable results. The most significant concern highlighted in the Times report is how molecular tests, most notably the PCR, are highly sensitive and prone to false positives. At the center of the controversy was a potential outbreak in a hospital in New Hampshire that proved to be nothing more than “ordinary respiratory diseases like the common cold.” Unfortunately, the results wrought by the PCR told a different story.
Thankfully, a faux epidemic was avoided but not before thousands of workers were furloughed and given antibiotics and ultimately a vaccine, and hospital beds (including some in intensive care) were taken out of commission. Eight months later, what was thought to be an epidemic was deemed a non-malicious hoax. The culprit? According to “epidemiologists and infectious disease specialists … too much faith in a quick and highly sensitive molecular test….led them astray.” At the time, such tests were “coming into increasing use” as maybe “the only way to get a quick answer in diagnosing diseases like … SARS and deciding whether an epidemic is under way.”
Nevertheless, today, the PCR test is considered the gold standard of molecular diagnostics, most notably in the diagnosis of COVID-19. However, a closer analysis reveals that the PCR has actually been pretty spotty and that false positives abound. Thankfully, the New York Times is once again on the case.
“Your Coronavirus Test is Positive; Maybe it Shouldn’t Be,” according to NYT reporter Apoorva Mandavilli. Essentially, positive results are getting tossed around way too frequently. Rather, they should probably be reserved for individuals with “greater viral load.” So how have they’ve been doing it all this time you ask?
“The PCR test amplifies genetic matter from the virus in cycles; the fewer cycles required, the greater the amount of virus, or viral load, in the sample… the more likely the patient is to be contagious.”
Unfortunately, the “cycle threshold” has been ramped up.
What happens when it’s ramped up? Basically, “huge numbers of people who may be carrying relatively insignificant amounts of the virus” are deemed infected.
However, the severity of the infection is never quantified, which essentially amounts to a false positive. Their level of contagion is essentially nil.
How are they determining the cycle threshold? If I didn’t suspect that it was based on maximizing the amount of “cases,” I would find the determination pretty arbitrary. More than a few of the professionals on record for Times report appear pretty perplexed on this vital detail which is essentially driving “clinical diagnostics for public health and policy decision-making.”
Considering all that’s at stake and everything that hinges on positive vs negative case tallies, it’s outrageous that these tests would be tweaked in a way that would inflate the positive rate totals and percentages. According to one virologist, “any test with a cycle threshold above 35 is too sensitive.” She went on to to say, “I’m shocked that people would think that 40 could represent a positive.”
Personally, I think the science is just about settled on COVID-19.
It is time for everyone to come out of this negative trance, this collective hysteria, because famine, poverty, massive unemployment will kill, mow down many more people than SARS-CoV-2!
Introduction: using a technique to lock down society
All current propaganda on the COVID-19 pandemic is based on an assumption that is considered obvious, true and no longer questioned:
Positive RT-PCR test means being sick with COVID. This assumption is misleading.
Very few people, including doctors, understand how a PCR test works.
RT-PCR means Real Time-Polymerase Chain Reaction.
In French, it means: Réaction de Polymérisation en Chaîne en Temps Réel.
In medicine, we use this tool mainly to diagnose a viral infection.
Starting from a clinical situation with the presence or absence of particular symptoms in a patient, we consider different diagnoses based on tests.
In the case of certain infections, particularly viral infections, we use the RT-PCR technique to confirm a diagnostic hypothesis suggested by a clinical picture.
We do not routinely perform RT-PCR on any patient who is overheated, coughing or has an inflammatory syndrome!
It is a laboratory, molecular biology technique of gene amplification because it looks for gene traces (DNA or RNA) by amplifying them.
In addition to medicine, other fields of application are genetics, research, industry and forensics.
The technique is carried out in a specialized laboratory, it cannot be done in any laboratory, even a hospital. This entails a certain cost, and a delay sometimes of several days between the sample and the result.
Today, since the emergence of the new disease called COVID-19 (COrona VIrus Disease-2019), the RT-PCR diagnostic technique is used to define positive cases, confirmed as SARS-CoV-2 (coronavirus responsible for the new acute respiratory distress syndrome called COVID-19).
These positive cases are assimilated to COVID-19 cases, some of whom are hospitalized or even admitted to intensive care units.
Official postulate of our managers: positive RT-PCR cases = COVID-19 patients. [1]
This is the starting postulate, the premise of all official propaganda, which justifies all restrictive government measures: isolation, confinement, quarantine, mandatory masks, color codes by country and travel bans, tracking, social distances in companies, stores and even, even more importantly, in schools [2].
This misuse of RT-PCR technique is used as a relentless and intentional strategy by some governments, supported by scientific safety councils and by the dominant media, to justify excessive measures such as the violation of a large number of constitutional rights, the destruction of the economy with the bankruptcy of entire active sectors of society, the degradation of living conditions for a large number of ordinary citizens, under the pretext of a pandemic based on a number of positive RT-PCR tests, and not on a real number of patients.
Technical aspects: to better understand and not be manipulated
The PCR technique was developed by chemist Kary B. Mullis in 1986. Kary Mullis was awarded the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1993.
Although this is disputed [3], Kary Mullis himself is said to have criticized the interest of PCR as a diagnostic tool for an infection, especially a viral one.
He stated that if PCR was a good tool for research, it was a very bad tool in medicine, in the clinic [4].
Mullis was referring to the AIDS virus (HIV retrovirus or HIV) [5], before the COVID-19 pandemic, but this opinion on the limitation of the technique in viral infections [6], by its creator, cannot be dismissed out of hand; it must be taken into account!
PCR was perfected in 1992.
As the analysis can be performed in real time, continuously, it becomes RT (Real-Time) – PCR, even more efficient.
It can be done from any molecule, including those of the living, the nucleic acids that make up the genes:
DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid)
RNA (Ribonucleic Acid)
Viruses are not considered as “living” beings, they are packets of information (DNA or RNA) forming a genome.
It is by an amplification technique (multiplication) that the molecule sought is highlighted and this point is very important.
RT-PCR is an amplification technique [7].
If there is DNA or RNA of the desired element in a sample, it is not identifiable as such.
This DNA or RNA must be amplified (multiplied) a certain number of times, sometimes a very large number of times, before it can be detected. From a minute trace, up to billions of copies of a specific sample can be obtained, but this does not mean that there is all that amount in the organism being tested.
In the case of COVID-19, the element sought by RT-PCR is SARS-CoV-2, an RNA virus [8].
There are DNA viruses such as Herpes and Varicella viruses.
The most well known RNA viruses, in addition to coronaviruses, are Influenza, Measles, EBOLA, ZIKA viruses.
In the case of SARS-CoV-2, RNA virus, an additional specific step is required, a transcription of RNA into DNA by means of an enzyme, Reverse Transcriptase.
This step precedes the amplification phase.
It is not the whole virus that is identified, but sequences of its viral genome.
This does not mean that this gene sequence, a fragment of the virus, is not specific to the virus being sought, but it is an important nuance nonetheless:
RT-PCR does not reveal any virus, but only parts, specific gene sequences of the virus.
At the beginning of the year, the SARS-CoV-2 genome was sequenced.
It consists of about 30,000 base pairs. The nucleic acid (DNA-RNA), the component of the genes, is a sequence of bases. In comparison, the human genome has more than 3 billion base pairs.
Teams are continuously monitoring the evolution of the SARS-CoV-2 viral genome as it evolves [9-10-11], through the mutations it undergoes. Today, there are many variants [12].
By taking a few specific genes from the SARS-CoV-2 genome, it is possible to initiate RT-PCR on a sample from the respiratory tract.
For COVID-19 disease, which has a nasopharyngeal (nose) and oropharyngeal (mouth) entry point, the sample should be taken from the upper respiratory tract as deeply as possible in order to avoid contamination by saliva in particular.
A
ll the people tested said that it is very painful [13].
The Gold Standard (preferred site for sampling) is the nasopharyngeal (nasal) approach, the most painful route.
If there is a contraindication to the nasal approach, or preferably to the individual being tested, depending on the official organs, the oropharyngeal approach (through the mouth) is also acceptable. The test may trigger a nausea/vomiting reflex in the individual being tested.
Normally, for the result of an RT-PCR test to be considered reliable, amplification from3 different genes (primers) of the virus under investigation is required.
“The primers are single-stranded DNA sequences specific to the virus. They guarantee the specificity of the amplification reaction. » [14]
“The first test developed at La Charité in Berlin by Dr. Victor Corman and his associates in January 2020 allows to highlight the RNA sequences present in 3 genes of the virus called E, RdRp and N. To know if the sequences of these genes are present in the RNA samples collected, it is necessary to amplify the sequences of these 3 genes in order to obtain a signal sufficient for their detection and quantification. »[15].
The essential notion of Cycle Time or Cycle Threshold or Ct positivity threshold [16].
An RT-PCR test is negative (no traces of the desired element) or positive (presence of traces of the desired element).
However, even if the desired element is present in a minute, negligible quantity, the principle of RT-PCR is to be able to finally highlight it by continuing the amplification cycles as much as necessary.
RT-PCR can push up to 60 amplification cycles, or even more!
Here is how it works:
Cycle 1: target x 2 (2 copies)
Cycle 2: target x 4 (4 copies)
Cycle 3: target x 8 (8 copies)
Cycle 4: target x 16 (16 copies)
Cycle 5; target x 32 (32 copies)
Etc exponentially up to 40 to 60 cycles!
When we say that the Ct (Cycle Time or Cycle Threshold or RT-PCR positivity threshold) is equal to 40, it means that the laboratory has used 40 amplification cycles, i.e. obtained 240 copies.
This is what underlies the sensitivity of the RT-PCR assay.
While it is true that in medicine we like to have high specificity and sensitivity of the tests to avoid false positives and false negatives, in the case of COVID-19 disease, this hypersensitivity of the RT-PCR test caused by the number of amplification cycles used has backfired.
This over-sensitivity of the RT-PCR test is deleterious and misleading!
It detaches us from the medical reality which must remain based on the real clinical state of the person: is the person ill, does he or she have symptoms?
That is the most important thing!
As I said at the beginning of the article, in medicine we always start from the person: we examine him/her, we collect his/her symptoms (complaints-anamnesis) and objective clinical signs (examination) and on the basis of a clinical reflection in which scientific knowledge and experience intervene, we make diagnostic hypotheses.
Only then do we prescribe the most appropriate tests, based on this clinical reflection.
We constantly compare the test results with the patient’s clinical condition (symptoms and signs), which takes precedence over everything else when it comes to our decisions and treatments.
Today, our governments, supported by their scientific safety advice, are making us do the opposite and put the test first, followed by a clinical reflection necessarily influenced by this prior test, whose weaknesses we have just seen, particularly its hypersensitivity.
None of my clinical colleagues can contradict me.
Apart from very special cases such as genetic screening for certain categories of populations (age groups, sex) and certain cancers or family genetic diseases, we always work in this direction: from the person (symptoms, signs) to the appropriate tests, never the other way around.
This is the conclusion of an article in the Swiss Medical Journal (RMS) published in 2007, written by doctors Katia Jaton and Gilbert Greub microbiologists from the University of Lausanne :
“To interpret the result of a PCR, it is essential that clinicians and microbiologists share their experiences, so that the analytical and clinical levels of interpretation can be combined.”
It would be indefensible to give everyone an electrocardiogram to screen everyone who might have a heart attack one day.
On the other hand, in certain clinical contexts or on the basis of specific evocative symptoms, there, yes, an electrocardiogram can be beneficial.
Back to RT-PCR and Ct (Cycle Time or Cycle Threshold).
In the case of an infectious disease, especially a viral one, the notion of contagiousness is another important element.
Since some scientific circles consider that an asymptomatic person can transmit the virus, they believe it is important to test for the presence of virus, even if the person is asymptomatic, thus extending the indication of RT-PCR to everyone.
Are RT-PCR tests good tests for contagiousness? [17]
This question brings us back to the notion of viral load and therefore Ct.
The relationship between contagiousness and viral load is disputed by some people [18] and no formal proof, to date, allows us to make a decision.
However, common sense gives obvious credence to the notion that the more virus a person has inside him or her, especially in the upper airways (oropharynx and nasopharynx), with symptoms such as coughing and sneezing, the higher the risk of contagiousness, proportional to the viral load and the importance of the person’s symptoms.
This is called common sense, and although modern medicine has benefited greatly from the contribution of science through statistics and Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM), it is still based primarily on common sense, experience and empiricism.
Medicine is the art of healing.
No test measures the amount of virus in the sample!
RT-PCR is qualitative: positive (presence of the virus) or negative (absence of the virus).
This notion of quantity, therefore of viral load, can be estimated indirectly by the number of amplification cycles (Ct) used to highlight the virus sought.
The lower the Ct used to detect the virus fragment, the higher the viral load is considered to be (high).
The higher the Ct used to detect the virus fragment, the lower the viral load is considered to be (low).
Thus, the French National Reference Centre (CNR), in the acute phase of the pandemic, estimated that the peak of viral shedding occurred at the onset of symptoms, with an amount of virus corresponding to approximately 108 (100 million) copies of SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA on average (French COVID-19 cohort data) with a variable duration of shedding in the upper airways (from 5 days to more than 5 weeks) [19].
This number of 108 (100 million) copies/μl corresponds to a very low Ct.
A Ct of 32 corresponds to 10-15 copies/μl.
A Ct of 35 corresponds to about 1 copy/μl.
Above Ct 35, it becomes impossible to isolate a complete virus sequence and culture it!
In France and in most countries, Ct levels above 35, even 40, are still used even today!
The French Society of Microbiology (SFM) issued an opinion on September 25, 2020 in which it does not recommend quantitative results, and it recommends to make positive up to a Ct of 37 for a single gene [20]!
With 1 copy/μl of a sample (Ct 35), without cough, without symptoms, one can understand why all these doctors and scientists say that a positive RT-PCR test means nothing, nothing at all in terms of medicine and clinic!
Positive RT-PCR tests, without any mention of Ct or its relation to the presence or absence of symptoms, are used as is by our governments as the exclusive argument to apply and justify their policy of severity, austerity, isolation and aggression of our freedoms, with the impossibility to travel, to meet, to live normally!
There is no medical justification for these decisions, for these governmental choices!
In an article published on the website of the New York Times (NYT) on Saturday, August 29, American experts from Harvard University are surprised that RT-PCR tests as practiced can serve as tests of contagiousness, even more so as evidence of pandemic progression in the case of SARS-CoV-2 infection [21].The Tests: The Achilles Heel of the COVID-19 House of Cards
According to them, the threshold (Ct) considered results in positive diagnoses in people who do not represent any risk of transmitting the virus!
The binary “yes/no” answer is not enough, according to this epidemiologist from the Harvard University School of Public Health.
“It’s the amount of virus that should dictate the course of action for each patient tested. »
The amount of virus (viral load); but also and above all the clinical state, symptomatic or not of the person!
This calls into question the use of the binary result of this RT-PCR test to determine whether a person is contagious and must follow strict isolation measures.
According to them: “We are going to put tens of thousands of people in confinement, in isolation, for nothing. » [22]. 22] And inflict suffering, anguish, economic and psychological dramas by the thousands!
Most RT-PCR tests set the Ct at 40, according to the NYT. Some set it at 37.
“Tests with such high thresholds (Ct) may not only detect live virus but also gene fragments, remnants of an old infection that do not represent any particular danger,” the experts said.
A virologist at the University of California admits that an RT-PCR test with a Ct greater than 35 is too sensitive. “A more reasonable threshold would be between 30 and 35,” she adds.
Almost no laboratory specifies the Ct (number of amplification cycles performed) or the number of copies of viral RNA per sample μl.
Here is an example of a laboratory result (approved by Sciensano, the Belgian national reference center) in an RT-PCR negative patient:
No mention of Ct.
In the NYT, experts compiled three datasets with officials from the states of Massachusetts, New York and Nevada that mention them.
Conclusion?
“Up to 90% of the people who tested positive did not carry a virus. »
The Wadworth Center, a New York State laboratory, analyzed the results of its July tests at the request of the NYT: 794 positive tests with a Ct of 40.
“With a Ct threshold of 35, approximately half of these PCR tests would no longer be considered positive,” said the NYT.
“And about 70% would no longer be considered positive with a Ct of 30! “
In Massachusetts, between 85 and 90% of people who tested positive in July with a Ct of 40 would have been considered negative with a Ct of 30, adds the NYT. And yet, all these people had to isolate themselves, with all the dramatic psychological and economic consequences, while they were not sick and probably not contagious at all.
In France, the Centre National de Référence (CNR), the French Society of Microbiology (SFM) continue to push Ct to 37 and recommend to laboratories to use only one gene of the virus as a primer.
I remind you that from Ct 32 onwards, it becomes very difficult to culture the virus or to extract a complete sequence, which shows the completely artificial nature of this positivity of the test, with such high Ct levels, above 30.
Similar results were reported by researchers from the UK Public Health Agency in an article published on August 13 in Eurosurveillance: “The probability of culturing the virus drops to 8% in samples with Ct levels above 35.” [23]
In addition, currently, the National Reference Center in France only evaluates the sensitivity of commercially available reagent kits, not their specificity: serious doubts persist about the possibility of cross-reactivity with viruses other than SARS-CoV-2, such as other benign cold coronaviruses. [20]
It is potentially the same situation in other countries, including Belgium.
Similarly, mutations in the virus may have invalidated certain primers (genes) used to detect SARS-CoV-2: the manufacturers give no guarantees on this, and if the AFP fast-checking journalists tell you otherwise, test their good faith by asking for these guarantees, these proofs.
If they have nothing to hide and if what I say is false, this guarantee will be provided to you and will prove their good faith.
We must demand that the RT-PCR results be returned mentioning the Ct used because beyond Ct 30, a positive RT-PCR test means nothing.
We must listen to the scientists and doctors, specialists, virologists who recommend the use of adapted Ct, lower, at 30. An alternative is to obtain the number of copies of viral RNA/μl or /ml sample. [23]
We need to go back to the patient, to the person, to his or her clinical condition (presence or absence of symptoms) and from there to judge the appropriateness of testing and the best way to interpret the result.
Until there is a better rationale for PCR screening, with a known and appropriate Ct threshold, an asymptomatic person should not be tested in any way.
Even a symptomatic person should not automatically be tested, as long as they can place themselves in isolation for 7 days.
Let’s stop this debauchery of RT-PCR testing at too high Ct levels and return to clinical, quality medicine.
Once we understand how RT-PCR testing works, it becomes impossible to let the current government routine screening strategy, inexplicably supported by the virologists in the safety councils, continue.
My hope is that, finally, properly informed, more and more people will demand that this strategy be stopped, because it is all of us, enlightened, guided by real benevolence and common sense, who must decide our collective and individual destinies.
No one else should do it for us, especially when we realize that those who decide are no longer reasonable or rational.
Summary of important points :
The RT-PCR test is a laboratory diagnostic technique that is not well suited to clinical medicine.
It is a binary, qualitative diagnostic technique that confirms (positive test) or not (negative test) the presence of an element in the medium being analyzed. In the case of SARS-CoV-2, the element is a fragment of the viral genome, not the virus itself.
In medicine, even in an epidemic or pandemic situation, it is dangerous to place tests, examinations, techniques above clinical evaluation (symptoms, signs). It is the opposite that guarantees quality medicine.
The main limitation (weakness) of the RT-PCR test, in the current pandemic situation, is its extreme sensitivity (false positive) if a suitable threshold of positivity (Ct) is not chosen. Today, experts recommend using a maximum Ct threshold of 30.
This Ct threshold must be informed with the positive RT-PCR result so that the physician knows how to interpret this positive result, especially in an asymptomatic person, in order to avoid unnecessary isolation, quarantine, psychological trauma.
In addition to mentioning the Ct used, laboratories must continue to ensure the specificity of their detection kits for SARS-CoV-2, taking into account its most recent mutations, and must continue to use three genes from the viral genome being studied as primers or, if not, mention it.
Overall Conclusion
Is the obstinacy of governments to use the current disastrous strategy, systematic screening by RT-PCR, due to ignorance?
Is it due to stupidity?
To a kind of cognitive trap trapping their ego?
In any case, we should be able to question them, and if among the readers of this article there are still honest journalists, or naive politicians, or people who have the possibility to question our rulers, then do so, using these clear and scientific arguments.
It is all the more incomprehensible that our rulers have surrounded themselves with some of the most experienced specialists in these matters.
If I have been able to gather this information myself, shared, I remind you, by competent people above all suspicion of conspiracy, such as Hélène Banoun, Pierre Sonigo, Jean-François Toussaint, Christophe De Brouwer, whose intelligence, intellectual honesty and legitimacy cannot be questioned, then the Belgian, French and Quebec scientific advisors, etc., know all this as well.
So?
What’s going on?
Why continue in this distorted direction, obstinately making mistakes?
It is not insignificant to reimpose confinements, curfews, quarantines, reduced social bubbles, to shake up again our shaky economies, to plunge entire families into precariousness, to sow so much fear and anxiety generating a real state of post-traumatic stress worldwide, to reduce access to care for other pathologies that nevertheless reduce life expectancy much more than COVID-19! [24]
Is there intent to harm?
Is there an intention to use the alibi of a pandemic to move humanity towards an outcome it would otherwise never have accepted? In any case, not like that!
Would this hypothesis, which modern censors will hasten to label “conspiracy”, be the most valid explanation for all this?
Indeed, if we draw a straight line from the present events, if they are maintained, we could find ourselves once again confined with hundreds, thousands of human beings forced to remain inactive, which, for the professions of catering, entertainment, sales, fairgrounds, itinerants, canvassers, risks being catastrophic with bankruptcies, unemployment, depression, suicides by the hundreds of thousands. [25-26-27-28]
The impact on education, on our children, on teaching, on medicine with long planned care, operations, treatments to be cancelled, postponed, will be profound and destructive.
“We risk a looming food crisis if action is not taken quickly.” [29].
It is time for everyone to come out of this negative trance, this collective hysteria, because famine, poverty, massive unemployment will kill, mow down many more people than SARS-CoV-2!
Does all this make sense in the face of a disease that is declining, over-diagnosed and misinterpreted by this misuse of overly sensitively calibrated PCR tests?
For many, the continuous wearing of the mask seems to have become a new norm.
Even if it is constantly downplayed by some health professionals and fact-checking journalists, other doctors warn of the harmful consequences, both medical and psychological, of this hygienic obsession which, maintained permanently, is in fact an abnormality!
What a hindrance to social relations, which are the true foundation of a physically and psychologically healthy humanity!
Some dare to find all this normal, or a lesser price to pay in the face of the pandemic of positive PCR tests.
Isolation, distancing, masking of the face, impoverishment of emotional communication, fear of touching and kissing even within families, communities, between relatives…
Spontaneous gestures of daily life hindered and replaced by mechanical and controlled gestures …
Terrified children, kept in permanent fear and guilt…
All this will have a deep, lasting and negative impact on human organisms, in their physical, mental, emotional and representation of the world and society.
This is not normal!
We cannot let our rulers, for whatever reason, organize our collective suicide any longer.
Translated from French. Original source: Mondialisation.ca
Dr Pascal Sacré is a physician specialized in critical care, author and renowned public health analyst, Charleroi, Belgium. He is a Research Associate of the entre for Research on Globalization (CRG)
****
Professionals whose references and comments are the basis of this article in its scientific aspect (especially and mainly on RT-PCR):
[9] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CaAcSJI0oMs&feature=youtu.be, 8 octobre 2020. Évolution génomique des virus ARN à l’Institut Pasteur, environ la moitié des nucléotides sont susceptibles d’avoir muté sur les 30 000 nucléotides de l’ARN viral. « Pour l’instant aucune mutation ou délétion n’a été associée à une perte de sévérité de la maladie sur une grande échelle géographique mais de nombreuses publications devraient bientôt préciser ces points. »
Dans l’ensemble, comme l’ont récemment souligné Tomaszewski et al. (7) qui ont décrit pour les génomes viraux disponibles jusqu’en mai 2020 un déplacement mutationnel sur la spike et le complexe de réplication vers des gènes codant pour d’autres protéines non structurelles qui interagissent avec les voies de défense de l’hôte, il semble que le taux de mutation du SARS-CoV-2 s’accélère depuis mai, impliquant principalement des mutations C vers U. L’augmentation du taux de mutation du SRAS-CoV-2 génère des génotypes viraux plus éloignés de la souche Wuhan initiale que ceux observés de mars à avril. Cela semble entraîner des épidémies de durée limitée, du moins pour le premier nouveau génotype que nous avons identifié, et est associé à une gravité globalement moindre à ce stade du développement de cette nouvelle épidémie.
Mutations observed in these seven different viral genotypes are located in most SARS- CoV-2 genes including structural and non-structural genes among which nsp2, nsp3 (predicted phosphoesterase), nsp5 (membrane glycoprotein), nsp12 (RNA-dependent RNA polymerase), S (Spike glycoprotein), ORF3a, E (membrane glycoprotein), M (membrane glycoprotein), ORF8 and N (Nucleocapsid phosphoprotein).
PhD, Pharmacien biologiste, ancien Chargé de Recherches INSERM, ancien Interne des Hôpitaux de Paris.
[12] https://nextstrain.org/, We are incorporating SARS-CoV-2 genomes as soon as they are shared and providing analyses and situation reports. In addition we have developed a number of resources and tools, and are facilitating independent groups to run their own analysis. Please see the main SARS-CoV-2 page for more.
Diagnostic du COVID19 : comprendre les tests PCR, leur interprétation et leurs limites, publié le 16 septembre 2020
La PCR utilise un principe très particulier : la cible du test, un fragment d’ARN viral, est massivement amplifiée afin de permettre sa détection. Au cours de l’analyse, une réaction enzymatique associée à des « cycles » de variation de température permet une série de « réplications » successives de l’acide nucléique cible. Chaque cycle correspond à une multiplication théorique de la cible par 2. On multiplie donc par 2 en un cycle, par 4 en 2 cycles, par 8 en 3 cycles, par 16 en 4 cycles, et ainsi de suite de manière exponentielle. A l’heure actuelle, l’amplification est généralement pratiquée sur 40 cycles, soit une amplification théorique de 2^40, environ mille milliards de fois ! En réalité, la réplication n’est pas efficace à 100%, mais la cible est amplifiée environ un million de fois, ce qui permet de détecter moins d’une dizaine de fragments d’ARN dans le volume analysé.
Lorsque l’acide nucléique viral est détectable après un petit nombre de cycles, cela signifie que la quantité de virus dans l’échantillon de départ est grande. Au contraire, lorsqu’il faut un grand nombre de cycles de réplication pour détecter l’ARN viral, cela signifie que l’échantillon de départ contient une quantité de virus très faible. On parle alors en nombre de cycles, ou Ct, qui signifie « cycle time », pour définir, au moins de façon semi quantitative, la quantité d’ARN présent dans l’échantillon de départ. Ainsi, un petit Ct correspond à un grand nombre de copies, un grand Ct à un petit nombre de copies.
Cette spectaculaire sensibilité n’est pas sans inconvénient et nécessite des précautions particulières. En effet, un échantillon positif amplifié un million de fois contient une très haute concentration de cible et le risque qu’il contamine (carry over) d’autres échantillons est particulièrement élevé. La saturation des laboratoires peut encore accroître ce risque et générer des faux positifs accidentels. Dans ces conditions, il est important que les résultats positifs soient confirmés par un second test, à plus forte raison lorsqu’un test positif présente des conséquences significatives, qu’elles soient médicales, professionnelles ou liées à l’obligation d’isolement.
La deuxième question importante concernant la PCR, une fois encore conséquence de sa spectaculaire sensibilité, est celle de sa signification clinique. Un sujet parfaitement asymptomatique présentant une PCR positive ne peut être qualifié de « malade », comme on le lit dans les médias qui rapportent la progression de l’épidémie ! Peut-on même parler de « cas » ? C’est pourtant le terme utilisé dans les dénombrements officiels. Ne sommes-nous pas en train d’oublier le patient pour se focaliser sur la technologie ? Est-ce une épidémie d’ARN dans des tubes que nous surveillons ou une maladie grave et potentiellement mortelle ?
Des publications récentes soulignent que la dose détectable par PCR est inférieure à la dose infectieuse ou contagieuse : aucun virus infectieux n’a pu être retrouvé chez les patients asymptomatiques présentant des tests PCR positifs avec un Ct élevé. Suite à ces résultats, la question du seuil de Ct qui permet de déclarer un échantillon positif est débattue. Peut-on rendre un résultat négatif chez un sujet asymptomatique dont la positivité apparaît au-delà de 35 cycles ? A défaut, est-il utile de retester ces échantillons ? Comme souvent en matière de diagnostic médical, lorsqu’un seuil de positivité est déterminé, faut-il privilégier la sensibilité ou la spécificité du test ?
De plus, un échantillon confirmé positif d’un point de vue analytique reste un faux positif du point de vue de la clinique, si la personne testée est en parfaite santé, parfois même prêt à affronter une compétition de tennis ou de football professionnels ! La question devient uniquement celle de sa potentielle contagiosité. C’est la question de la transmission éventuelle par des sujets asymptomatiques, qui sans être eux-mêmes en danger, pourraient en représenter un pour les autres.
Par rapport à cette question, il est important de raisonner quantitativement. La virologie, ce n’est pas du tout ou rien. De manière générale, au cours des infections virales aiguës, le risque de contagion et la gravité de l’infection varient en fonction de la quantité de virus présents dans l’organisme et de leur excrétion dans le milieu extérieur. Quelques copies de virus tapis dans les sinus n’ont pas la dangerosité d’un million projetés par la toux. Un sujet asymptomatique produit moins de virus qu’un sujet symptomatique et les sécrète moins vers l’extérieur. La quantité de virus produite et donc le risque de contagion sont corrélés à la gravité des symptômes. Même si elle n’est pas de zéro, le risque de transmission est donc vraisemblablement faible pour un sujet asymptomatique. Malheureusement, répéter sans cesse que la contagion venant d’un sujet parfaitement asymptomatique est possible sans aucune précision sur le niveau de risque pousse à prendre des mesures disproportionnées avec le risque.
De même, la stratégie « dépister-isoler » n’est pas réaliste lorsque le dépistage n’est pas suffisamment fiable et surtout lorsque le virus est déjà largement répandu dans la population. Il est bien trop tard pour appliquer une méthode conçue pour bloquer une épidémie à sa naissance. Comme pour une invasion de coccinelles ou de frelons, on ne peut stopper un virus qui est déjà partout avec une passoire trouée à 25% et bouchée par endroits. L’échec de la stratégie actuelle est plutôt lié à sa conception naïve et inapplicable qu’aux mauvais comportements des citoyens.
Si, comme on l’observe en ce moment, la diffusion virale reprend, faut-il dépister plus massivement ou revoir la stratégie de protection de la population ?
Cette question ne relève pas de la science. Elle dépend des risques acceptables par un individu ou par un groupe. Si on est dans la recherche du risque minimal, proche de zéro, parce que le risque n’a pas été quantifié, ou pour des raisons de responsabilité juridique, on doit prendre les précautions maximales. Si on accepte un risque même faible, on peut reprendre certaines libertés et protéger ceux qui en ont réellement besoin.
Le scientifique doit mesurer la grandeur des risques et ne pas se contenter d’affirmer qu’un événement adverse est « possible ». Mais ce n’est pas son rôle de décider si ces risques peuvent être pris par autrui.
Les tests PCR permettent une détection extrêmement sensible de l’ARN viral. Ils sont indispensables mais ne sont pas la solution ultime et unique qui permettra de contrôler l’épidémie et de gérer efficacement les risques de contagion. Appliquée lorsque le virus est largement disséminé dans la population, la stratégie « dépister isoler » est vouée à l’échec. Du fait de la sensibilité très élevée et des limites de leur spécificité, les tests PCR doivent être pratiqués et interprétés avec précaution, et comme toujours en lien avec le contexte clinique et épidémiologique. N’oublions pas qu’un sujet asymptomatique doit plutôt être considéré comme immunisé que comme malade.
[20] Avis du 25 septembre 2020 de la Société Française de Microbiologie (SFM) relatif à l’interprétation de la valeur de Ct (estimation de la charge virale) obtenue en cas de RT-PCR SARS-CoV-2 positive sur les prélèvements cliniques réalisés à des fins diagnostiques ou de dépistage, 25 septembre 2020
« Pour eux, la limite du test PCR (prélèvement par voie nasale ou salivaire) réside dans la brutalité et la simplicité du résultat qu’il donne. La personne est soit positive, soit négative. Pas plus de renseignement, notamment sur la contagiosité du malade.
Or, les scientifiques d’Harvard soulèvent le problème de la quantité de virus que ce test PCR ne donne pas et qui pourrait, selon eux, permettre de donner des clés supplémentaires pour contrer l’épidémie.
« Les tests standards diagnostiquent un grand nombre de personnes qui peuvent être porteuses de quantités relativement insignifiantes du virus », explique ainsi le Dr. Michael Mina, épidémiologiste à la Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health. »
The World We Live In 