“The People Rushed Out Of The Church & Saw In The Sky A Ship With Men On Board” – Gervase Of Tilbury, 1211

There are many examples of well documented cases, and one great one from the ancient world comes in the form of a ninth century Latin passage which, a thousand years later, is still inspiring the works of multiple UFO researchers around the globe.

Liber contra insulam vulgi opinionem is the name of the document.

In this document, the Archbishop of Lyons complained about a persistent belief among the French peasantry regarding a “certain region called Magonia from whence come ships in the clouds.” (UFOs for the 21st Century Mind)

“the People Rushed Out Of The Church & Saw In The Sky A Ship With Men On Board” – Gervase Of Tilbury, 1211

How fascinating is that statement? “From whence come ships in the clouds” given the fact that this passage is from the ninth century. Truly amazing to say the least.

According to the belief, the occupants of these vessels would “carry back to that region those fruits o the earth which are destroyed by hail and tempests: the sailors paying rewards to the storm wizards and themselves receiving corn and other produce.”

The Archbishop even said three men and a woman who had claimed to have “fallen from these same ships” had been stoned to death, an event he personally had witnessed. (UFOs for the 21st Century Mind)

Another example comes from the 13th century, from England. In the year 1211, Gervase of Tilbury, a chronicler of historical events and strange, unexplainable phenomenon, wrote this:

There happened in the borough of Cloera, one Sunday, while the people were at Mass, a marvel. In this town is a church dedicated to St. Kinarus.

It befell that an anchor was dropped from the sky, with a rope attached to it, and one of the flukes caught in the arch above the Church. door.

The people rushed out of the church and saw in the sky a ship with men on board, floating before the anchor cable, and they saw a man leap overboard and jump down to the anchor, as if to release it. He looked as if he were swimming in water.

The folk rushed up and tried to seize him; but the Bishop forbade the people to hold the man, for it might kill him, he said.

The man was freed, and hurried up to the ship, where the crew cut the rope and the ship sailed out of sight. But the anchor is in the church, and has been there ever since, as a testimony. (UFOs for the 21st Century Mind)

Another event from antiquity that seems to be popular among UFO researchers comes from Nuremberg, Germany, an event documented in the printing press that took place in 1561.

On that day, a number of “cylindrical objects” appeared in the sky.

Then, from the objects emerged were small round objects, and disk shaped objects that were red, black orange and blue. Below is an image of the Ariel display that was printed.

Nuremberg

Apparently, the objects began interacting with each other, and as reported by the press, began to “fight with one another.” Was this really fighting? Or simply a perceived battle? Who knows.

After about an hour of these interactions, the objects apparently began to catch fire, all of them, and fell to the ground where they disintegrated and disappeared.

The point is that there is no shortage of these stories from our past, and the phenomenon is not only being documented today, which seems to become more clear to the masses every single year, but also well documented in antiquity.

If you’re interested in discovering more examples, I highly recommend “Wonders In The Sky” published by Dr. Jacques Vallée and Chris Aubeck.

“Their rigorous scientific insistence allows Vallée and Aubeck to retain the most challenging and interesting aspects of these events without the distraction of premature commitment to any particular interpretation.

“A willingness to combine documentary research, the heart of humanities scholarship, with physical and astrophysical knowledge is rare.” – Professor David Hufford, Penn State College of Medicine, and Department of Religious Studies, University of Pennsylvania.

Their Rigorous Scientific Insistence Allows Vallée And Aubeck

It’s quite clear that the phenomenon we are dealing with, whatever it may be and whatever it may represent, is nothing new, but actually quite old. It appears that these objects have been around perhaps even longer than we’ve been able to document them.

Multiple Researchers: Great Pyramid And Sphinx Are MUCH Older Than Previously Thought

The Great Pyramid and surrounding pyramids at the Giza complex are much older than 4500 years old, as Egyptologists claim. New research, conducted by scientists free to think outside of the box, agree that this figure isn’t right.

Egyptologists assert that markings made by a “work gang” in the Great Pyramid, allegedly from the fourth dynasty, cite Pharaoh Khufu. And this, to them, proves it was made during his time.

But this argument isn’t proven because stone, in this case limestone, cannot be carbon dated since it is not an organic material. There’s no concrete proof it was built during Khufu’s reign.

This means, from an epistemology perspective, the Khufu claim is more akin to accepted myth and academic doctrine, than substantiated fact.

Multiple Researchers Great Pyramid And Sphinx Are Much Older Than Previously Thought

Why does this matter?

There are multiple reasons why this is important ranging from understanding the complexities of this ancient civilization to reconstructing what we know as the story of humanity and how we evolved on the planet.

The lack of an evidence-based argument for the age of the pyramid leaves the door open for other researchers and those that have stepped up to the plate haven’t disappointed us.

Robert Schoch

Robert M. Schoch is a professor at the College of General Studies at Boston University. He claims that the Great Sphinx, which sits in front of the Great Pyramid complex at Giza is about 13,500 years old.

He cites water erosion patterns as proof some kind of major catastrophe took place in antiquity, wherein large volumes of water were washing over the plateau.

Sphinx Water Erosion

Egyptolosts assert that the Sphinx was built during Pharaoh Khafre’s reign (c. 2558–2532 BC), a few short decades after the date cited above. But Egyptologists reject Schoch’s research, which has been summarily ignored by academics.

However, no valid counter argument is provided.

A valid counter argument is important because, in the scientific process, claims need to be evidence-based. Schoch provides superior evidence for his age of the Sphinx, citing weather erosion on the Sphinx itself and surrounding rock face.

This means, if Egyptologists wanted to truly debunk his claims, they’d have to incorporate his evidence, namely by providing a better explanation as to why there are water erosion patterns.

This suggests Schoch’s numbers are the more accurate ones, at least until more evidence becomes available.

Although Schoch’s claim doesn’t directly relate to the age of the pyramids, it is believed that they were likely built by the same much more ancient civilization.

What could that civilization be? Some claim the legendary Atlantean civilization discussed by Plato.

View Robert Schoch’s Detailed Presentation at the Portal to Ascension Conference 2018 where he explains the science and geology behind the dating of the Sphinx

Graham Hancock

Graham Hancock is a journalist and author, who’s written several New York Times Best Sellers. He’s known for his exploration of ancient history.

In this instance, Hancock worked with Robert Bauval to bring forth the Orion Constellation Theory, which claims that the Great Pyramid Complex is almost a perfect match for the Orion Constellation. Given this, Hancock and Bauval both claim that these megaliths could be at least 12,000 years old.

Other researchers, such as Billy Carson from 4BiddenKnowledge date the Sphinx to an even earlier period 36,000 years ago claiming that Leo was the constellation that the Sphinx was facing and that it would not have been possible to build the Sphinx 13,500 years ago due to the conditions of the terrain since the planet was coming right out of an ice age.

View Billy Carson’s Presentation at the Portal to Ascension Conference 2018 HERE.

Younger Dryas Impact

Multiple researchers, including Hancock, cite the Younger Dryas impact theory as evidence some massive cataclysm changed the face of the earth some 12,000 years ago.

Additionally, mainstream research suggests the Sahara desert was flooded by monsoon rains about 10,000 ago. Could this be the source of the water erosion patterns mentioned by Schoch?

Legends of Atlantis

No discussion of the pyramids would be complete without mentioning Atlantis.

Atlantis is a legendary highly advanced civilization from antiquity, which some say could have been a global civilization.

Plato is the most widely cited source for this, mentioning Atlantis in Timaeus and Critias.

In that work, Solon, a poet and law maker, claims to have visited Neith, where priests he met there told him of historic accounts of Atlantis.

Solon is believed to be a real person. And so, while Plato’s dialogues are fictional, they are considered laden with true history.

Atlantis Discovered in the Bermuda Triangle: The Sunken City Features Giant Pyramids and Sphinxes

Atlantis, is so widely discussed by so many people, from academics and archeologists, to ufologists, spiritualists, and even mediums. While not every claim matches up, dozens share the same basic narrative.

The story is that Atlantis was a highly advanced global civilization that appeared around 30,000 to 40,000 years ago.

They used advanced technology that we would regard as magic, such as free energy devices, portal technology, stargates, and spacecraft. Some even say that this civilization also colonized planets and moons in our solar system.

The common threads that relates to this discussion is when and how Atlantis fell. Almost all these alternative sources suggest that when Atlantis feel, the whole of the civilized world at the time went with it.

For thousands of years, humanity was effectively thrust back into the stone age. And then, seemingly out of nowhere, the Sumerian civilization burst onto the scene, complete with a financial system, legal system, agriculture, and fairly advanced technology at the time.

How is this possible?

Mainstream historians can’t answer this question. But anyone with common sense would likely agree that the Sumerian culture was likely influenced by a much older civilization.

Furthermore, would it not make sense that the erosion patterns on the Sphinx point to a time when water was more abundant? And that the Pyramids are most likely an artifact of a much older, advanced civilization?

If all of this isn’t enough to at least spark your curiosity, consider these incredible facts about the Great Pyramid.

There are over 2 million stone blocks in the Great Pyramid, weighing anywhere from 2 to 50 tones.

The Great Pyramid is aligned 0.067 degrees counterclockwise from perfect cardinal alignment of true north. Modern day buildings are not built with this level of precision.

The Great Pyramid is “earthquake proof” — the irregular blocks make an almost invincible structure.

The Great Pyramid is actually 8-sided, with such precision that, for decades, historians never noticed.

The Great Pyramid encodes fundamental mathematical constants like the pi and phi ratios.

The Great Pyramid, as Hancock and Buvaul assert, is an almost perfect reflection of the constellation of Orion.

The Great Pyramid can focus energy within its various chambers.

Last in this short list, a large void or cavity was recently detected inside the Great Pyramid.

These are just a few mysterious facts that leave modern-day scientists baffled.

Conclusion

Despite what mainstream media and academia contend, we know very little about arguably the most fascinating of the seven wonders of the ancient world.

The philosophy of knowledge, epistemology, helps us sort fact from fiction. Using these tried and true tools of analysis, the very same tools at the heart of science, the accepted age of the Great Pyramid is highly suspect.

There’s more evidence to support Schoch’s claim than there is to confirm official dogma coming from Egyptologists.

What Became of the Taíno?

What Became of the Taíno? | Travel | Smithsonian

The Indians who greeted Columbus were long believed to have died out. But a journalist’s search for their descendants turned up surprising results

Taino leader Francisco Ramirez Rojas
Taíno leader Francisco “Panchito” Ramírez Rojas offers a prayer to the sea near Baracoa on Cuba’s eastern coast. (Maggie Steber)

If you have ever paddled a canoe, napped in a hammock, savored a barbecue, smoked tobacco or tracked a hurricane across Cuba, you have paid tribute to the Taíno, the Indians who invented those words long before they welcomed Christopher Columbus to the New World in 1492.

From This Story

a legend holds hat the sun turned Macocael to stone after the sentinel deserted his post at the entrance of the cave near what today is Santo Domingo

Their world, which had its origins among the Arawak tribes of the Orinoco Delta, gradually spread from Venezuela across the Antilles in waves of voyaging and settlement begun around 400 B.C. Mingling with people already established in the Caribbean, they developed self-sufficient communities on the island of Hispaniola, in what is now Haiti and the Dominican Republic; in Jamaica and eastern Cuba; in Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands and the Bahamas. They cultivated yuca, sweet potatoes, maize, beans and other crops as their culture flourished, reaching its peak by the time of European contact.

Some scholars estimate the Taíno population may have reached more than three million on Hispaniola alone as the 15th century drew to a close, with smaller settlements elsewhere in the Caribbean. Whatever the number, the Taíno towns described by Spanish chroniclers were densely settled, well organized and widely dispersed. The Indians were inventive people who learned to strain cyanide from life-giving yuca, developed pepper gas for warfare, devised an extensive pharmacopeia from nature, built oceangoing canoes large enough for more than 100 paddlers and played games with a ball made of rubber, which fascinated Europeans seeing the material for the first time. Although the Taíno never developed a written language, they made exquisite pottery, wove intricate belts from dyed cotton and carved enigmatic images from wood, stone, shell and bone.

The Taíno impressed Columbus with their generosity, which may have contributed to their undoing. “They will give all that they do possess for anything that is given to them, exchanging things even for bits of broken crockery,” he noted upon meeting them in the Bahamas in 1492. “They were very well built, with very handsome bodies and very good faces….They do not carry arms or know them….They should be good servants.”

In short order, Columbus established the first American colony at La Isabela, on the north coast of Hispaniola, in 1494. After a brief period of coexistence, relations between the newcomers and natives deteriorated. Spaniards removed men from villages to work in gold mines and colonial plantations. This kept the Taíno from planting the crops that had fed them for centuries. They began to starve; many thousands fell prey to smallpox, measles and other European diseases for which they had no immunity; some committed suicide to avoid subjugation; hundreds fell in fighting with the Spaniards, while untold numbers fled to remote regions beyond colonial control. In time, many Taíno women married conquistadors, combining the genes of the New World and Old World to create a new mestizo population, which took on Creole characteristics with the arrival of African slaves in the 16th century. By 1514, barely two decades after first contact, an official survey showed that 40 percent of Spanish men had taken Indian wives. The unofficial number is undoubtedly higher.

“Very few Indians were left after 50 years,” said Ricardo Alegría, a Puerto Rican historian and anthropologist I interviewed before his death this past July. He had combed through Spanish archives to track the eclipse of the Taíno. “Their culture was interrupted by disease, marriage with Spanish and Africans, and so forth, but the main reason the Indians were exterminated as a group was sickness,” he told me. He ran through the figures from his native island: “By 1519, a third of the aboriginal population had died because of smallpox. You find documents very soon after that, in the 1530s, in which the question came from Spain to the governor. ‘How many Indians are there? Who are the chiefs?’ The answer was none. They are gone.” Alegría paused before adding: “Some remained probably…but it was not that many.”

Possibly as many as three million souls—some 85 percent of the Taíno population—had vanished by the early 1500s, according to a controversial extrapolation from Spanish records. As the Indian population faded, so did Taíno as a living language. The Indians’ reliance on beneficent icons known as cemís gave way to Christianity, as did their hal­lucinogen-induced cohoba ceremonies, which were thought to put shamans in touch with the spirit world. Their regional chieftaincies, each headed by a leader known as a cacique, crumbled away. Their well-maintained ball courts reverted to bush.

Given the dramatic collapse of the indigenous society, and the emergence of a population blending Spanish, Indian and African attributes, one might be tempted to declare the Taíno extinct. Yet five centuries after the Indians’ fateful meeting with Columbus, elements of their culture endure—in the genetic heritage of modern Antilleans, in the persistence of Taíno words and in isolated communities where people carry on traditional methods of architecture, farming, fishing and healing.

For more than a year, I searched for these glimpses of Taíno survival, among living descendants in New York City and dusty Caribbean villages, in museums displaying fantastic religious objects created by long-dead artists, in interviews with researchers who still debate the fate of the Taíno.

My search began in the nooks and crannies of limestone caves underlying the Dominican Republic, where the Taíno believed their world began. “Hispaniola is the heart of Taíno culture and the caves are the heart of the Taíno,” said Domingo Abréu Collado, chief of the speleology division in the Dominican Ministry on Environmental and Natural Resources. He clapped on a hard hat at the entrance to the Pomier Caves, a complex of 55 caverns less than an hour’s drive from the gridlock of Santo Domingo. He led me from the eye-numbing brilliance of tropical noon into a shadowy tunnel, where our headlamps picked out the image of a face carved into stone, its eyes wide in surprise.

“That’s Mácocael,” said Abréu. “This guy was supposed to guard the entrance of the cave at night, but he got curious and left his post for a look around outside. The sun caught him there and turned him to stone.” The sentinel, whose Taíno name means “No Eyelids,” now stands guard for eternity.

More than 1,000 years before the Spaniards arrived, local shamans and other pilgrims visited such caves to glimpse the future, to pray for rain and to draw surreal images on the walls with charcoal: mating dogs, giant birds swooping down on human prey, a bird-headed man copulating with a human, and a pantheon of naturalistically rendered owls, turtles, frogs, fish and other creatures important to the Taíno, who associated particular animals with specific powers of fecundity, healing, magic and death.

Abréu, a lean man with sharp features, paused before a sweaty wall crowded with images. “So many paintings! I think they are concentrated where the points of energy converge,” he said. Abréu’s headlamp fell upon images of stick figures who seemed to be smoking pipes; others bent over bowls to inhale snuff through long tubes. These were the tribal leaders who fasted until their ribs showed, cleansed themselves with vomiting sticks and snorted cohoba powder, a hallucinogen ground from the seeds of the Anadenanthera peregrina, a tree native to the Caribbean.

The cohoba ritual was first described by Friar Ramón Pané, a Hieronymite brother who, on the orders of Columbus himself, lived among the Taíno and chronicled their rich belief system. Pané’s writings—the most direct source we have on ancient Taíno culture—was the basis for Peter Martyr’s 1516 account of cohoba rites: “The intoxicating herb,” Martyr wrote, “is so strong that those who take it lose consciousness; when the stupefying action begins to wane, the arms and legs become loose and the head droops.” Under its influence, users “suddenly begin to rave, and at once they say . . . that the house is moving, turning things upside down, and that men are walking backwards.” Such visions guided leaders in planning war, judging tribal disputes, predicting the agricultural yield and other matters of importance. And the drug seems to have influenced the otherworldly art in Pomier and other caves.

“Country people are still afraid of caves—the ghosts, you see,” said Abréu. His voice was accompanied by the sound of dripping water and the fluttering of bats, which swirled around the ceiling and clicked in the dark.

The bats scattered before us; we trudged up into the daylight and by early the next morning we were rattling through the rain-washed streets of Santo Domingo bound for the northeast in search of living Taíno, in Abréu’s opinion a dubious objective. Formerly an archaeologist for the Museum of the Dominican Man, he was skeptical of finding real Indians but was happy enough to help scout for remnants of their influence. The first signs began to appear around the town of Bayaguana, where the road narrowed and we jounced past plots of yuca, plantains and maize, some of which were planted in the heaped-earth pattern favored by Taíno farmers of

old. New fields, cleared by the slash-and-burn methods Indians brought here from South America, smoldered along the way. On the fringes of Los Haitises National Park, we met a woman who had set up shop beside the road to sell casabe, the coarse, flat Taíno bread made from yuca. “None left,” she said. “I sold the last of it yesterday.” We began to see simple, sensibly designed houses with thin walls of palm planks and airy roofs of thatch, like those depicted in Spanish woodcuts from Columbus’ day.

The road ended at Sabana de los Javieles, a village known as a pocket of Taíno settlement since the 1530s, when Enrique, one of the last Taíno caciques of the colonial period, made peace with Spain and led some 600 followers to northeastern Hispaniola. They stayed, married Spaniards and Africans, and left descendants who still retain indigenous traits. In the 1950s, researchers found high percentages of the blood types that are predominant in Indians in blood samples they took here. In the 1970s, dental surveys established that 33 out of 74 villagers retained shovel-shaped incisors, the teeth characteristic of American Indians and Asians. And a recent nationwide genetic study established that 15 percent to 18 percent of Dominicans had Amerindian markers in their mitochondrial DNA, testifying to the continued presence of Taíno genes.

None of this would surprise Ramona Primitiva, a villager whose family has long embraced its indigenous antecedents. “My father used to tell us we came from the Indio,” she said, using another name for the Taíno. “My family has always been here. We didn’t come from somewhere else.” We sat in white plastic chairs at the local store, grateful for the shade of an overhanging roof and happy to have neighbors join the conversation.

“My father used to tell us we were descendants of the Indians,” said Meregilda Tholia Johelin.

“My ancestors were Indio,” said Rosa Arredondo Vasquez.

“My grandmother said we came from the Indians,” said Gabriela Javier Alvarez, who appeared with an aluminum guayo, Taíno for the grating boards once fashioned from rough stone and used for shredding yuca roots.

Jurda Arcacio Peguero wandered by, eavesdropped for a moment, then dashed next door to fetch a batea, Taíno for a long wooden tray for fruits or vegetables. “It’s an old one,” she said, handing over an object fragrant of garlic and worn buttery smooth from use.

The villagers did not call themselves Indian or Taíno, but they knew how Indian traditions had shaped life in the community. Most had kept a long silence about their indigenous heritage for fear of being ridiculed: Indians were country people—uneducated campesinos stereotyped as gullible or backward. The bigotry has softened somewhat, but nobody wants to be considered a rube.

It was late in the day when we said our farewells and turned for the capital, back down a rutted road through lumpy green hills. “I’m sorry we couldn’t find an Indian for you,” Abréu said, sensing my disappointment. Brooding in the passenger seat, I wondered if the prevailing academic wisdom might be true—that the Taíno had been extinct as a distinct people for half a millennium, existing at best as hybrids in fragments of their old homeland. Did any pure Taíno survive?

That question was the wrong one to ask. It took a nudge from Jorge Estevez, a self-described Taíno from New York City, to remind me that notions of racial purity went out the window with Adolf Hitler and the eugenics movement. “These concepts are really outdated,” said Estevez, who coordinates educational workshops at the Smithsonian’s National Museum of the American Indian in New York. “There’s no such thing as a pure Taíno,” he continued, “just like there are no pure Spaniards. It’s not even clear about the ethnicity of Christopher Columbus! The guys who came with him were mixed with Moors, with Sephardic Jews, with Basques—a great mixture that was going on. That story continues.”

Even the Taíno evolved as a distinct people only after centuries of traveling and merging with other populations in the Antilles. “So when people ask if I am pure Taíno, I say ‘yes,’” said Estevez, who traces his roots to the Dominican Republic and has the shovel incisors to prove it. “My ancestors were from a plethora of different tribes. They mixed with a lot of others to become Taíno. What you have to look at is how the culture persists and how it is being transmitted.”

Estevez, a former pugilist who retains a boxer’s brawn and grace, unzipped a black suitcase and began unpacking objects to bolster his argument for the survival of a Taíno culture: a feather-light makuto, a basket woven from palm fronds; ladles, cups, plates and a musical instrument known as a guiro, all made from gourds; a wooden batea for carrying produce, like the one I had seen in the Dominican Republic a few days before. These were not dusty artifacts from a museum but utensils made recently by Antillean villagers who still use them and call them by their Taíno names. “My mother knew how to weave these things,” he said, holding up the makuto. “We also made casabe.” As he got older, Estevez steadily collected Indian lore and objects from a network of uncles and aunts in the islands, adding new evidence to his suitcase every year. “All my life I’ve been on this journey looking for all these Taíno things to see how much survival is there,” he said.

Relegated to a footnote of history for 500 years, the Taíno came roaring back as front-page news in 2003, when Juan C. Martínez Cruzado, a biologist at the University of Puerto Rico, announced the results of an island-wide genetic study. Taking samples from 800 randomly selected subjects, Martínez reported that 61.1 percent of those surveyed had mitochondrial DNA of indigenous origin, indicating a persistence in the maternal line that surprised him and his fellow scientists. The same study revealed African markers in 26.4 percent of the population and 12.5 percent for those of European descent. The results encouraged a Taíno resurgence, with native groups urging Puerto Rican schools to take note of the indigenous contribution to Caribbean history, opposing construction on tribal sites and seeking federal recognition for the Taíno, with attendant benefits.

Though the question of Indian identity is often fraught with political implications, it is especially pronounced in Puerto Rico, which still struggles with its status as a territory of the United States. The island enjoys neither the benefits of statehood nor the independence of a nation, with deep divisions between proponents for each. Ardent nationalists view the recent surge in Taíno activism as a threat to political unity. Activists say their adversaries are promoting Eurocentric history and a colonial class system. Even Taíno leaders occasionally view one another with hostility.

“Here in Puerto Rico, power plays are rampant,” said Carlalynne Melendez Martínez, an anthropologist who has launched the nonprofit group Guakia Taina-Ke, Our Taíno Land, to promote native studies. Her goal is to boost Taíno culture by reviving the Arawak language, preserving cultural sites and establishing preserves for indigenous people. “We’re teaching the language to children and teaching people how to farm. We don’t do songs and dances for the tourists,” she said, referring to a competing group.

In Puerto Rico’s central mountains, I came upon a woman who called herself Kukuya, Taíno for firefly, who was getting ready for a gathering of Indians in Jayuya, a town associated with both revolution and indigenous festivals. She had grown up in New York City but had lived in Puerto Rico for 35 years, having been guided to this remote community, she said, by a vision. Green-eyed and rosy-cheeked, she said her forebears were Spanish, African, Mexican and Maya as well as Taíno.

“My great-grandmother was pure-blooded Taíno, my mother of mixed blood,” she said. “When I told people I was Taíno, they said, ‘What, are you crazy? There aren’t any left!’ But I don’t believe you have to look a certain way. I have all of my ancestors within me.”

Like Kukuya, thousands of Puerto Ricans have been discovering their inner Taíno in recent years. In the 2010 census, for example, 19,839 Puerto Ricans checked the identity box marked “American Indian or Alaskan Native,” an increase of almost 49 percent over the 2000 count, when 13,336 checked it. Neither canvass provided a Taíno option.The native population represents less than 1 percent of Puerto Rico’s 3.7 million people, but indigenous leaders consider the latest head count a milestone—further proof that some Indians live on long after they were thought to be annihilated.

“What I’m really excited about is that there’s a lot of youth coming into this and challenging the status quo,” said Roberto Mukaro Borrero, president of the United Confederation of Taíno People. Borrero, a New Yorker of Puerto Rican parentage, has tried to soothe fears about a Taíno land grab based on Indian identity.

“I want to make it clear that we’re not here to take back Puerto Rico or the Dominican Republic,” he said. “Or to establish a casino. If you just look at the statements we’ve made over the last ten years, there’s not one mention of casinos, kicking anybody out of the country or being divisive in any way. We just want a seat at the table.”

Still, some scholars remain skeptical. “You have to be aware of people running around saying they’re Taíno, because they are after a federal subsidy,” said Bernardo Vega, a former director of the Museum of the Dominican Man and the Dominican Republic’s former ambassador to the United States. Yvonne M. Narganes Storde, an archaeologist at the University of Puerto Rico agreed. She gives the activists credit for preserving important sites on the island, but she sounded wary of their emphasis on establishing a separate Taíno identity. “All the cultures are blended here,” she said. “I probably have Taíno genes. We all do. We have incorporated all these cultures—African, Spanish and Indian. We have to live with it.”

A few pockets of Taíno culture remain in eastern Cuba, an area shaped by rugged mountains and years of isolation. “Anybody who talks about the extinction of the Taíno has not really looked at the record,” said Alejandro Hartmann Matos, the city historian of Baracoa, Cuba’s oldest city, and an authority on the island’s earliest inhabitants. Hartmann, a Cuban of German ancestry, had invited me to meet Indian descendants from the island’s Oriente region, as well as to mark the 500th anniversary of Baracoa, founded in 1511. Joining us was José Barreiro, assistant director of research at the Smithsonian’s National Museum of the American Indian. With Hartmann, Barreiro has been tracking descendants of the Indians since 1989. Based on their research, the pair estimate that at least 5,000 Indians survive in Cuba, while hundreds of thousands likely have indigenous roots.

Late one night, after a day of quincentennial celebrations with live music, dancing, poetry recitations and occasional tots of rum, Barreiro and I sat bleary-eyed around a kitchen table as the indefatigable Hartmann raced through a list of historical references to Indians of the Oriente, beginning in 1492, when Columbus sailed into Baracoa harbor, planted a wooden cross on the shore and praised the place for its “good water, good land, good surroundings, and much wood.”

“Indians have appeared in the record ever since,” said Hartmann. Indigenous people established the city of Jiguaní in 1701 and formed the all-native Hatuey Regiment in the Cuban war against Spain in 1895. José Martí, founding father of Cuba’s independence movement, frequently mentioned Indians in his war diary. Mark Harrington, an American archaeologist conducting fieldwork in 1915 and 1919, found natives still hanging on in eastern Cuba. He was followed—in the 1950s, ’60s and ’70s—by anthropologists who scoured the region recording the skeletal structure, blood type and other physical attributes of Cuban villagers with indigenous ancestry. “So if you look to the past,” said Hartmann, “you see this long record of Indians living here. Anyone who says otherwise is speaking from ignorance.”

And today?

“Just look around!” said Hartmann, spreading his arms wide. In a week of exploring Baracoa and its environs, we had encountered many Cubans with the high cheekbones, coppery skin and other features that suggest Amerindian ancestry. And while it was clear that indigenous families have intermarried with Africans and Europeans, we met villagers in Baracoa and the nearby settlements of Playa Duaba and Guirito who proudly identified themselves as Indian. They kept the old traditions, planting their dense gardens, praying to the moon and sun for strength, gathering wild plants for healing and marking the passage of time without clocks or watches.

“When I see the vivijagua ant come out of his nest and crawl across the rafters in the morning, I know it’s time to go to the fields,” 75-year old Francisco “Panchito” Ramírez Rojas told us. “When the chipojo lizard comes down from the palm tree to get a drink of water, I know it’s noon. I also know it’s noon when my shadow disappears and I’m standing on my own head,” he said, getting up from our lunch table to illustrate his point.

A lean man bronzed by years in the sun, Panchito radiated a natural authority, which had earned him the title of cacique in the community of La Ranchería, not far from the U.S. naval station and prison at Guantánamo Bay.

Ramirez took the opportunity to search for useful plants in the woods along the Toa River. Striding up to a cedar, he patted the rough trunk as if it were an old amigo. “This tree is a relative,” he said. “It has feelings like we do, so it should be treated with respect. If you make tea from the bark of this tree, it has a lot of power. It’s good for colds and respiratory problems. But if you don’t ask permission before you cut the bark, it may not work. So I always say a little prayer so the tree knows I’m serious and I want to share its power. ‘Give me your strength for healing.’ That’s what I ask.”

Hearing Ramirez, I felt the hairs on the back of my neck bristling: His method of conversing with plants was almost identical to one described by 15th-century Spanish chroniclers. Although those accounts have been widely published, it is doubtful that Ramirez ever read them: He is illiterate. He learned his craft from a great-uncle and other elders who were natural healers in his mountain community.

“If we expect to get food from the earth,” he says, “we have to give something back. So at planting time we always say a prayer and bury a little stone or a coin in the field, just a little message to the earth, so that she will help with production.”

Like those who taught him, Ramirez is passing his knowledge on, to a son, Vladimir Lenin Ramírez Ramírez, and to other family members, so they will keep the traditions going. “The young ones will carry on for us,” Panchito Ramirez said. But he admitted concern over the dwindling of Indian communities, which have been reduced by marriage to outsiders. “I’d like for my children to marry Indians, but there just aren’t enough of us. So our people are leaving the mountain to find new families. They’re scattered all over.”







Tartary – an Empire hidden in history. It was bigger than Russia once…

#1“Tartary, a vast country in the northern parts of Asia, bounded by Siberia on the north and west: this is called Great Tartary. The Tartars who lie south of Muscovy and Siberia, are those of Astracan, Circassia, and Dagistan, situated north-west of the Caspian-sea; the Calmuc Tartars, who lie between Siberia and the Caspian-sea; the Usbec Tartars and Moguls, who lie north of Persia and India; and lastly, those of Tibet, who lie north-west of China.” – Encyclopedia Britannica, Vol. III, Edinburgh, 1771, p. 887.

1754 I-e Carte de l’Asie.jpg

Now compare to the description given by Wikipedia“Tartary (Latin: Tartaria) or Great Tartary (Latin: Tartaria Magna) was a name used from the Middle Ages until the twentieth century to designate the great tract of northern and central Asia stretching from the Caspian Sea and the Ural Mountains to the Pacific Ocean, settled mostly by Turko-Mongol peoples after the Mongol invasion and the subsequent Turkic migrations.”

Tartary was not a great tract. It was a country.
And to add some credibility (or to take away some) to the story, below you can find an excerpt from the CIA document declassified in 1998, and created in 1957.

CIA_tartar.png

Link to the document on the CIA website: NATIONAL CULTURAL DEVELOPMENT UNDER COMMUNISM

Though I do not think that Tartary was solely Muslim. It rather was multi-religious, and multi-cultural. One of the reasons I think so is the tremendous disparity between what leaders like Genghis Khan, Batu Khan, Timur aka Tamerlane looked like to the contemporary artists vs. the appearance attributed to them today.
Today: Genghis Khan – Batu Khan – Timur

YuanEmperorAlbumGenghisPortrait.jpg
batu-khun.jpg
Tamerlan.jpg

Here is how 17th, 18th century books saw these three
Genghis Khan
with wife here

ching_khun.jpg
ching_khun_wife.jpg
ching_khun_1.jpg
ching_khun_2.jpg
ching_khun_3.jpg
ching_khun_4.jpg
ching_khun_5.jpg
ching_khun_6.jpg

Timur – Tamerlane

timur_tartary.jpeg
timur_tartary_0.jpg
timur_tartary_0_1.jpg
timur_tartary_1.jpg
timur_tartary_1_1.jpg
timur_tartary_2.png

Batu Khan​Well, I could not find any, but apparently in Turkey we have a few busts of the following Gentlemen. A few of them I do not know, but the ones I do look nothing like what I was taught at school. Also dates are super bizarre on those plaques. Do Turks know something we don’t?

2_batu_khan.jpg
1_timur.jpg
3_bumin_kagan.jpg
4_erturgul.jpg
5_babur_suh.jpg
7_attila.jpg
8_BİLGE_KAĞAN_DÖNEMİ.JPG


The other reason why I think Tartary had to be multi-religious, and multi-cultural is its vastness during various moments in time. For example in 1652 Tartary appears to have control over the North America.

1652 Nova Totius Terrarum Orbis geographica ac hydrographica tabula_1.jpg


The Coverup​The official history is hiding a major world power which existed as late as the 19th century. Tartary was a country with its own flag, its own government and its own place on the map. Its territory was huge, but somehow quietly incorporated into Russia, and some other countries. This country you can find on the maps predating the second half of the 19th century.

Ngram by Google Books shows how Tartary was quietly put away.

Tartary_Ngram.png


Yet, some time in the 18th century Tartary Muskovite was the biggest country in the world: 3,050,000 square miles.

tartaria_book_1.jpg
tartaria_book_3.jpg
tartaria_book_2.jpg
tartaria_book_5.jpg
tartaria_book_4.jpg
Tartary_HUGE_1.jpg
Tartary_HUGE.jpg


Some of the maps showing Tartary

1584 - ortelius-russland-tartaren-reich-nordwesten-usa.jpg
1680 -Tartary-China-Russia-Japan-De-Wit.jpg
1684_tartary.jpg
1707 guillaume de l'ile.jpg
1714 Mappe-Monde ou Carte Universelle.jpg
1753 Mappa Mundi generalis.jpg
1754 I-e Carte de l’Asie.jpg
1806-Herisson-37-grand-tartary.jpg
1820_tartary.jpg
great_tartarie_1.jpg
great_tartarie_2.jpg
great_tartarie_3.jpg
great_tartarie.jpg
great_tartarie_4.jpg
great_tartarie_5.jpg
tartaria_map_x_1.jpg
tartaria_map_x_2.jpg
tartaria_map_x_3.jpg
tartaria_map_x_4.jpg
tartaria_map_x_5.jpg

Tartary had its own flag, crest, its own emperor, and of course its own people.
​The Kings of Tartary – (Genealogie Des Anciens Empereurs Tartares, Descendus De Genghiscan)

Kings_of_tartary.jpg


The people of Tartary.

tartary_people_1.jpg
tartary_people_2.jpg
tartary_people_3.jpg
tartary_people_4.jpg
tartary_people_5.jpg
tartary_people_6.jpg
tartary_people_7.jpg


The flag and crest of Tartary had an owl depicted on it. The emperor’s flag contained a griffin on a yellow background.

tartary_flag_11.jpg
Tartary_flag_11.jpeg
flag_country_1.jpg
flag_country.jpg
Flag_crest.jpg

​And it was different from China

large_tartarychina.jpg

​There were multiple publications listing the country of Tartary and its flag/crest. Some of those publications came out as late as 1865.

Flags_of_all_nations_1865.jpg
tartary_flag_6.png
tartary_flag_4.jpg
Flags_of_all_nations_1865_1.jpg
1276px-Bowles's_naval_flags_of_the_world,_1783.jpg
tartary_flag_1.jpg
tartary_flag_3.jpg

​It is also worth mentioning that in the British Flag Table of 1783, there are three different flags listed as a flag of the Tsar of Moscow. There is also an Imperial Flag of Russia as well as multiple naval flags. And all of them are proceeded by a flag of the Viceroy of Russia.

Significance of the Viceroy is in the definition of the term. A viceroy is a regal official who runs a country, colony, city, province, or sub-national state, in the name of and as the representative of the monarch of the territory. Our official history will probably say that it was the Tsar of Russia who would appoint a viceroy of Moscow. I have reasons to doubt that.

Why is the flag of the Viceroy of Moscow positioned prior to any other Russian flag?

viceroymoscovie.jpg
large_moscovian.jpg
large_russianimperial_copy.jpg
large_russiamarine.jpg
large_russiamarine1.jpg

​There is a growing opinion in Russia that French invasion of Russia played out according to a different scenario. The one where Tsar Alexander I, and Napoleon were on the same side. Together they fought against Tartary. Essentially France and Saint Petersburg against Moscow (Tartary). And there is a strong circumstantial evidence to support such a theory.

1. The capitol of Russia was Saint Petersburg. Yet Napoleon chooses to attack Moscow. Why?

2. It appears that in 1912 there was a totally different recollection of the events of 1812. How else could you explain commemorative 1912 medals honoring Napoleon?

medal_1.gif
medal_2.gif
medal_4.gif
medal_3.gif


And specifically the one with Alexander I, and Napoleon on the same medal. The below medal says something similar to, “Strength is in the unity: will of God, firmness of royalty, love for homeland and people”

Napoleon_Alexander_medal.jpg

I have hard time imagining the below two guys on the same medal.

hitler_stalin.jpg

3. Similarity between Russian and French uniforms. There are more different uniforms involved, but the idea remains, they were ridiculously similar.

How did they fight each other in the dark?
French – Russian

french_soldier_1812.jpg
russian_soldier_1812.jpg


There was one additional combat asset officially available to Russians in the war of 1812. And that was the Militia.

It does appear that this so-called Militia, was in reality the army of Tartary fighting against Napoleon and Alexander I.

moscow_defender_9.gif
moscow_defender_3.gif
moscow_defender_10.gif
moscow_defender_1.gif
moscow_defender_2.gif
moscow_defender_4.gif
moscow_defender_5.jpg
Moscow Militia 03.jpg
Moscow Militia 01.jpg
Moscow Militia 04.jpg
moscow_defender_11.gif
Moscow Militia 02.jpg

4. Russian nobility in Saint Petersburg spoke French in the 18th/19th centuries. The general explanation was, that it was the trend of time and fashion. Google contains multiple opinions on the matter.

5. This one I just ran into: 19th-century fans were totally into a Napoleon/Alexander romance

Books and Publications

* * * * *
Summary: I think there is enough circumstantial evidence to justify a deeper look into who fought who, and why this Tartary country is so little known about.

And the main question out of this all should be what is the purpose of misleading generations of people? It appears there is something tremendously serious hidden in our recent history.

Arthur And Merlin

 

 

 

 

I already had the opportunity to evoke Merlin the Magician as well as his friend King Arthur and his fabulous sword Excalibur, but I want to come back here on the mythical couple they form both, and on his incredible influence on the language and behavior of the French, and others.

Arthur

King Arthur is the hero of many Arthurian legends and chivalric novels since the Middle Ages. Military leader of the Bretons (Britons), he fought against the invader Saxon around the year 500. Become legendary, it represents the ideal king came to restore in their power the divided Bretons. Sung by the Welsh bards and then by various chroniclers such as Nennius or Geoffrey Monmouth, his gesture was developed by Wace and then Chrétien de Troyes who made a portrait less advantageous than that of the legend. The romantic cycle that ends with the famous novel “Death the King Arthur” (1215/1235) has largely contributed to spreading the traditional image of King Arthur and Knights of the Round Table. (source)

In fact, its historical existence is disputed by many historians. I would say even by all. For the official story, Arthur is a myth, a legend, a romance, an invention pure and simple. “King Arthur or Arthur Pendragon is, according to medieval romances, a Breton lord who would have organized the defense of the Celtic peoples of the British Isles and Armorican Brittany against the invading Germanic at the end of the fifth century or the beginning of the sixth century .” (source But Arthur is much more. Like his inseparable sorcerer Merlin, Arthur is archetypal like King Aragorn and his wizard Gandalf. A valiant king, endowed with magical powers like his Excalibur sword, and accompanied by a magician with surprising powers, very far from the funny character concocted by Alexandre Astier in Kaamelott. Like Gilgamesh and Enkidu, like Rama and Hanuman, these two embody a powerful myth: the alliance of strength and cunning, head and legs.

Which bear?

Arthur comes from the old Breton arzhour or artos, which means the bear in Celtic language. “The name Arthur was etymologically related to the Celtic name of the bear,” artos “meaning both” bear” and “warrior.” (source As often, I do not agree with the conclusions of Wikipedia! Arthur was no doubt a great warrior, but the title given to him bears no part of his valor: for me, as for my most faithful readers, the bear designates Ursa Major ie the Great Bear, where originates the Hyperborean Arthur.

What corroborates another etymology, come this one of the language of the origins: Ars Ur means “art of Ur” or if one prefers “made in Ur” which means to about the same as Ex Qalib Ur, his magic sword Excalibur.

If we believe his name, Arthur was specially designed in the test tubes of our creators in Hyperborea. A genetic manipulation made him perfectly fit for his earthly mission: to federate a maximum of kingdoms around a single monarch of the great Celtic land, and to sign the end of the Roman Empire. It is possible to recognize the mission of Rama, carried out three millennia earlier on a planetary scale. Also from Hyperborea, Rama was a demi-god like Arthur.

Throughout our history, it is possible to find envoys of Hyperborea, developed by the creative gods. These exceptional humans are called the sons of the Sun – because their planet-ship was called the Sun— or the Sons of God, what they really are. All these divine ambassadors were called Christs, such as Enoch, Prometheus, Osiris, Dionysus, Zoroaster / Zarathustra, Mithras, Moses, and others.

 

A love of Merlin

Twice Merlin taught some of his secrets, very badly took him! Morgane, one of Arthur’s sisters, became a wicked fairy jealous of her sister-in-law, Queen Guinevere. His second pupil was Viviane. Merlin liked to disappear without explanation. In Brittany, the forest of Brocéliande was considered the most beautiful in the world. Merlin met Viviane at the fountain of Barenton. Seduced, he taught him his most poetic tricks.

The girl learned to dance on the water and make a river flow at will. But Viviane wanted to keep Merlin forever. She made him confess almost all his secrets and, one day when he had fallen asleep, she made three magic circles around him to lock him in a crystal coffin. Merlin had guessed everything from the beginning, but he had let it go, because he loved Viviane more than his freedom. (from : source)

Thus expresses the golden legend of the enchanter, who participates in the medieval movement for the rehabilitation of women, whom the knights call their lady, and who ensures, according to Denis de Rougemont, the foundations of love in the West. In addition to the legend, there is the work of historians who, in their own way, seek the truth behind the plot of the tale. “For Goodrich, Merlin is a title originally worn by the bishop who crowned the historic King Arthur.For Gardner, Myrddin was originally the title of the seer to the king, Taliesin being the first to Some people wearing these titles would have inspired the legend of Merlin.”  (source)

The problem remains that there is no historical King Arthur. The legend of Arthur and Merlin is rooted deep in the 6th millennium BCE, when the orcs were the terror of our ancestors, when the Little People were still talking to humans, where the giants were walking among men. There is a singular similarity of customs and costumes between this distant era and the early Middle Ages when Arthur and Merlin are supposed to have lived. Supposed, for all this is very much prior to the Middle Ages, and goes back to the mythical times of the Heroic Fantasy.

 

The bear and the wolf

Christian hagiography teaches us that St Martin and St Blaise were inseparable. We will see why, and understand at the same time that these two saints have nothing to do with Christianity. They are very much older than the new religion. Martin is a deformation of Myrdhyn, the Celtic name of Merlin. As for bleiz, it’s the wolf in Breton Diwan as Gallic … The Blesois, inhabitants of Blois, were once the sons of the wolf. And Saint Martin was always accompanied by a wolf. Like Merlin did!

Another animal related to Martin is the bear. Any French person knows Martin the bear, it’s common name for a bear. Why Martin? Because there is behind a powerful myth, which has helped to shape the soul and heart of the old Western culture. As we saw, the bear is Arthur. And Martin is Merlin. Evoking Martin the bear is implicitly refering to Arthur and Merlin. Whenever we pronounce these words, without knowing it we put ourselves under the protection of this legendary couple – legendary and yet very real in the present by its implications as by its ghostly apparitions in Broceliande, the French name of Dark Forest.

By the grace of his admirers, Merlin has become the nice blackbird.French: merle By the hatred of his detractors, in the form Myrdhyn, he has become the ugly shit.