Xi Has Crushed the CIA Scum of Hong Kong

Times Caption: A show of support in 2021 for 47 Hong Kong democracy advocates charged with subversion. Organized dissent of any kind is now dangerous in the city.

FEBRUARY 06, 2023

NY Times:How China Dealt a ‘Knockout Blow’ to Its Opponents in Hong Kong. Beijing used a national security law to quash dissent. Now another warning is being sent, with the mass trial of what was once Hong Kong’s political opposition.

The former British colony of Hong Kong had been a battleground in the factional war between Xi Jinping and China’s corrupt Shanghai Clique and also the CIA. The “spontaneous” Umbrella Revolution of 2014 (with offshoot protests lasting until 2021) was the last gasp of Deep State subversion in Hong Kong. The Times article – though portraying the cleansing of Hong Kong as some sort of mass “anti-democratic” persecution – reveals for us the totality of Xi’s triumph in Hong Kong:

“Boisterous demonstrations all but disappeared. Newsrooms were raided and shuttered. Labor unions, pro-democracy coalitions and other civil society groups disbanded, one after another.

Chinese officials have used the national security law, as it is called, to crack down on dissent in Hong Kong. In the last two years, more than 200 people have been arrested under the law, and more than 3,000 have been prosecuted on other charges over their roles in anti-government protests.

Xi allowed them to show their cards; then he caught them all and had them charged with subversion. Hong Kong is now at peace, and truly Chinese, as it should be.

Deep State media — in a frantic effort to hold on to their Hong Kong outpost — pimped the “spontaneous” CIA / Soros / Shanghai Clique “student-led” “Umbrella Revolution” protests hard. It failed.

The Shanghai Clique and the CIA stirred up the trouble in Hong Kong and worked to subvert Xi Jinping. The patient and cunning Xi (Trump’s ally) crushed them.

There are many ignorantly sincere mouthpieces from Conservative Inc.  who had seized upon Hong Kong’s “democracy movement” for the purpose of espousing “anti-Communism” (Xi’s dynamic pro-business system is actually fascist, not Marxist!). Ignore these superficial provincial clowns who are so lacking in intuitiveness and inquisitiveness that they failed to take notice that in “standing with Hong Kong” — as they now “stand with Ukraine” — they were making common cause with all of the various Rothschild-Soros Left fronts, the Council on Foreign Relations, Time Magazine, The Economist (UK), The New York Slimes, The Washington Compost, Barack Obongo, Nancy Pelosi, Killary Clinton et al.

Then there are the voices of deliberate deception — those CIA-affiliated disinformation specialists who oh-so-convincingly dwell amongst us on the “far right,” but whose true purpose is to spit at China from another direction. The fast-growing Epoch Times— with its pro-Umbrella Revolution articles and its bizarre anti-China / anti-Xi obsession — falls into this category. The wolves at Epoch — no matter how “pro-Trump” they may “sheep-dip” themselves as — are not to be trusted on certain matters.

As far as we can tell — after monitoring Xi for ten years now — he is on the side of Trump & Putin in this epic war against The New World Order. Hopefully, Xi can liberate the libtarded Globalist-occupied island of Taiwan next. True to form, “conservative” Epoch Times is rabidly pro-Taiwan too.

* Note: The incredibly well-funded Epoch Times and the super-heavily-promoted Shen Yun propaganda spectacles are both owned by the Falun Gong “spiritual movement.” Falun Gong, we are convinced, works with the CIA, and was denounced as an “evil cult” by the Chinese government.

FREE copies of the China-bashing Epoch Times and Shen Yun propaganda ads are everywhere. Who is funding Falun Gong’s slick anti-Xi marketing blitz?

The NY Times Is Orwell’s Ministry of Truth. “Newspeak, Double-Speak”

Eric Arthur Blair/ AKA George Orwell

“Ingsoc. The sacred principles of ingsoc. Newspeak, double-speak, the mutability of the past.” – George Orwell, 1984

I was greeted by an editorial from The New York Times’ Editorial Board, “A Brutal New Phase of the War in Ukraine.”  It is a piece of propaganda so obvious that only those desperate to believe blatant lies would not fall down laughing.  Yet it is no laughing matter, for The NY Times is advocating for a wider war, more lethal weapons for Ukraine, and escalation of the fighting that risks nuclear war.  So their title is apt because they are promoting the brutality.  This pissed me off.

The Times’ Editorial Board tells us that President Putin, like “Hitler”, is mad.

“Like the last European war, this one is mostly one man’s madness.”  Russia and Putin are “cruel”; are conducting a “regular horror” with missile strikes against civilian targets; are “desperate”; are pursuing Putin’s “delusions”; are waging a “terrible and useless war”; are “committing atrocities”; are responsible for “murder, rape and pillaging,” etc.

On the other hand, “a heroic Ukraine” “has won repeated and decisive victories against Russian forces” (Bullshit) who have lost “well over 100,000 Russian soldiers killed and wounded,” according to the “reliable” source, chairman of the U.S. Joint Chief of Staff, Gen. Mark A. Milley (Asshole).  To add to this rosy report, the Ukrainians seem to have suffered no causalities since none are mentioned by the cozy Times’ Editorial Board members from their keyboards on Eighth Avenue.  When you support a U.S. war, as has always been The Times’ modus operandi as a stenographer for the government, mentioning the dead pawns used to accomplish the imperialists’ dreams is bad manners.  So are the atrocities committed by those forces, so they too have been omitted.  Neo-Nazis, the Azov Battalion?  They too must never have  existed since they are not mentioned.

But then, according to the esteemed editorial writers, this is not a U.S. proxy war waged via Ukraine by U.S./NATO “to strip Russia of its destiny and greatness.”  No, it is simply Russian aggression, supported by “the Kremlin’s propaganda machinery” that has churned “out false narratives about a heroic Russian struggle against forces of fascism and debauchery.”  U.S./NATO were “horrified by the crude violation of the postwar order,” so we are laughingly told, and so came to Ukraine’s defense as “Mr. Putin’s response has been to throw ever more lives, resources and cruelty at Ukraine.”

Nowhere in this diatribe by the Times’ Board of propagandists – and here the whole game is given away for anyone with a bit of an historical sense – is there any mention of the U.S. engineered coup d’état in Ukraine in 2014.  It just didn’t happen.  Never happened.  Magic by omission.  The U.S., together with the Ukrainian government “led” by the puppet-actor “President Volodymyr Zelensky,” are completely innocence parties, according to the Times.  (Note also, that nowhere in this four page diatribe is President Putin addressed by his title, as if to say that “Mr. Putin” is illegitimate and Zelensky is the real thing.)

All the problems stem from when “Mr. Putin seized Crimea and stirred up a secessionist conflict in eastern Ukraine n 2014.”

Nowhere is it mentioned that for years on end:

that U.S./NATO has been moving troops and weapons right up to Russia’s borders,

that George W. Bush pulled the U.S. out of the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty and that

Trump did the same with the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty,

that the U.S. has set up so-called anti-ballistic missile sites in Poland and Rumania and asserted its right to a nuclear first-strike,

that more and more countries have been added to NATO’s eastern expansion despite promises to Russia to the contrary,

that 15,000 plus mostly Russian-speaking people in eastern Ukraine have been killed by Ukrainian forces for years before February 2022,

that the Minsk agreements were part of a scheme to give time for the arming of Ukraine, that the U.S. has rejected all calls from Russia to respect its borders and its integrity, that the U.S./NATO has surrounded Russia with military bases,

that there was a vote in Crimea after the coup,

that the U.S. has been for years waging economic war on Russia via sanctions, etc.

In short, all of the reasons that Russia felt that it was under attack for decades and that the U.S. was stone deaf to its appeals to negotiate these threats to its existence.

It doesn’t take a genius to realize that if all were reversed and Russia had put troops and weapons in Mexico and Canada that the United States would respond forcefully.

This editorial is propaganda by omission and strident stupidity by commission.

The editorial has all its facts “wrong,” and not by accident.  The paper may say that its opinion journalists’ claims are separate from those of its newsroom, yet their claims echo the daily barrage of falsehoods from its front pages, such as:

  • Ukraine is winning on the battlefield. (lol)
  • “Russia faces decades of economic stagnation and regression even if the war ends soon.” (lol)
  • That on Jan.14, as part of its cruel attacks on civilian targets, a Russian missile struck an apartment building in Dnipro, killing many.
  • Only one man can stop this war – Vladimir Putin – because he started it.
  • Until now, the U.S. and its allies were reluctant to deploy heavy weapons to Ukraine “for fear of escalating this conflict into an all-in East-West war.”
  • Russia is desperate as Putin pursues “his delusions.”
  • Putin is “isolated from anyone who would dare to speak truth to his power.”
  • Putin began trying to change Ukraine’s borders by force in 2014.
  • During the last 11 months Ukraine has won repeated and decisive victories against Russian forces …. The war is at a stalemate.” (lol)
  • The Russian people are being subjected to the Kremlin’s propaganda machinery “churning out false narratives.”

This is expert opinion for dummies.  A vast tapestry of lies, as Harold Pinter said in his Nobel Prize address.  The war escalation the editorial writers are promoting is in their words, “this time pitting Western arms against a desperate Russia,” as if the U.S./NATO does not have CIA and special forces in Ukraine, just weapons, and as if “this time” means it wasn’t so for the past nine years at least as the U.S. was building Ukraine’s military and arms for this very fight.

It is a fight they will lose in the days to come.  Russia was, is, and will triumph.

Everything in the editorial is disingenuous.  Simple propaganda: the good guys against the bad guys.  Putin another Hitler.  The good guys are winning, just as they did in Vietnam, until reality dawned and it had to be admitted they weren’t (and didn’t).  History is repeating itself.

We are being subjected to a vast tapestry of lies told by the corporate media for their bosses, as the U.S. continues its doomed efforts to control the world.  It is not Russia that is desperate now, but propagandists such as the writers of this strident and stupid editorial.  It is not the Russian people who need to wake up, as they claim, but the American people and those who still cling to the myth that The NY Times Corporation is an organ of truth.  It is the Ministry of Truth with its newspeak, double-speak, and its efforts to change the past.

Let Harold Pinter have the last words:

The crimes of the United States have been systematic, constant, vicious, remorseless, but very few people have actually talked about them. You have to hand it to America. It has exercised a quite clinical manipulation of power worldwide while masquerading as a force for universal good. It’s a brilliant, even witty, highly successful act of hypnosis.

Biden Will Be Drip-Dripped to Ruination

JANUARY 22, 2023

NY Times:Investigators Seize More Classified Documents From Biden’s Home

A team from the Justice Department conducted a 13-hour search of the president’s Wilmington residence on Friday.

The drip-drip dismantling of the “Biden” presidency has now become news that is “fit to print” on the front page / Sunday Edition of “the paper of record.” In a desperate effort to control the coming storm, The Times remains a week or so behind in reporting on the most damaging data. But because they cannot stop the drip-drip, Deep State media is being forced to report on the developments.

For now, the Times watered down “limited hangout” version remains confined to Biden’s improper and reckless storage of classified documents. In due time, House investigations and related events will drag “the paper of record” to reporting upon the Biden’s multi-million dollar foreign bribery business which said documents are surely related to. There will be no spinning out of the truth this time.

1. Fox’s Maria Bartiromo — in describing the developing foreign bribery scandal — actually dropped the word “treason” during her interview with House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer. // 2. The Bidens (including two brothers of Joe) all became filthy rich on the back of “The Big Guy’s” corrupt foreign political connections.

Breaking News! Two prominent Demonrat Senators have just come out in support of the investigation of Biden’s documents. We may actually be able to trust them now because “The Donald” and the White Hats of Military Intel have got them BY THE BALLS and can make them sing whatever tune is needed. Think “Senator Geary” in Godfather II. (assuming it’s even them and not imposters)

Playing his assigned starring role perfectly, the imposter “Biden” is flubbing his lines — inviting even more suspicion as he denies any wrongdoing and subtly “obstructs” the investigation. Both the slow drip-drip and the Biden acting are critical elements here because, in this way, as the truth about the Biden-Obama-Clinton Crime Families’ dealings with corrupt elements in China and the Ukraine comes to light, normies won’t think that this is all just a “right wing conspiracy” to get Biden.

In previous issues of The Anti-New York Times, we demonstrated — by reposting actual Q posts from October 2020 — how Q had told us in advance (albeit in code language now very plain to see in hindsight) that “Biden” would be allowed to steal the election so that he could be investigated as a sitting president. Now if those Q forecasts (posted again below) don’t convince the Sunshine Patriots of the legitimacy of Q, then nothing will.

October 7, 2020 // Q essentially told us that the election would be stolen so that Biden could be taken down — as a sitting president — for accepting “massive amounts of bribes” from Chinese and Ukrainian sources.

FOX News

The badly bleeding “Biden” will not escape the hound dogs of the new MAGA Congress.

But there is another Q post that has vexed the “Anon” community for years. Q Post 3848, from February 8, 2020, is generally understood as referring to arrests. It says:

The first will send a shock wave.
Q

At the time, the “autists” speculated that the first public arrest would therefore have to be that of a very big name — Clinton? Obama? Those might have been rational guesses back then; but today, after three more years have passed, even such big names are by now approaching the “has been” shit-pile of history. Their public (tape delayed) arrests would certainly be newsworthy — but “shock wave” inducing? Not really.

Now I’ve said repeatedly, after missing a few exact prognostications, that the ANYT is no longer in the business of predicting exact dates for certain events (datetardism). Only the inner circle of White Hats know the times and places. Just take this as a “food for thought” exercise to stash away in the back of your mind, just for fun. What if  “the first” to be perp-walked, on live TV, is “Joe Biden” — the alleged sitting President of the United States? Now THAT would indeed send a “shock wave.”

It certainly does appear that something “shocking” is in the works. Of that we can be confident. Let’s just leave it at that and see what happens.

Stay tuned…

Elon Musk Warns of World Government

A wave of lawsuits argue that Tesla’s self-driving software is dangerously over-hyped. What can its blind spots teach us about the company’s erratic C.E.O.?

JANUARY 20, 2023

NY Times: Elon Musk’s Appetite for Destruction

NY Times: Elon’s Crumbling Empire

Ya just knew this was coming! Within hours of “Elon Musk” having trashed the World Economic Forum as a front for “world government,” the big guns of “the paper of record” began viciously unloading on the suddenly reformed billionaire ex-Globalist that “conspiracy theorists” have now fallen in love with. What a “coincidence,” eh?

The man in the mask has gone full blown Frankenstein Monster on the very One Worlders who manufactured Musk Inc. out of whole cloth. For months, out of fear of upsetting Musk’s worldwide legions of fanboys, the NWO organs of Fake News were compelled to carefully calibrate their slowly-increasing fire against the living legend of their concoction. Now, “they” have no choice but to unload at full blast. Damned if they do — damned if they don’t. Deeee-lightful!

Elon Mask began his latest provocation by running a poll  that asked whether the WEF should control the world. A staggering 2 million fanboys responded — 86% of them saying “NO” with many also submitting strong comments. The White Hat imposter followed up on his polling tweet by ripping the WEF as:

“an unelected world government that people never asked for and don’t want.” 

Tell it, “Elon,” Tell it!

Elon Musk was a publicity-seeking international “rock star” who had everything handed to him by the New World Order. What accounts for his sudden transformation to Q-ish “conspiracy theorist?” We believe that he has been arrested, replaced with “Elon Mask,” and his assets and persona hijacked by the White Hats.

FOX News

Elon Mask is confirming what we “kooks” and ‘Nazis” used to be laughed at and even feared for saying. But because it’s the great and all-knowing “genius” uttering the forbidden term “world government” now, Musk’s malleable multitudes don’t feel threatened by hearing it — and will surely turn on the Judenpresse Mafia for counter-attacking their sainted sage and his magic cars.

* Note: A loyal reader recently informed us of how a previously unreachable normie friend of his is now being positively informed and influenced by Musk’s activism for fanboys.

The rabbit hole trickery gets even deeper. The cyber sleuths at “The Editorial Board” of The Anti-New York Times — after careful observation and analysis — do not believe that the current annual session of the WEF at Davos is even real. The unusual and deliberate conspicuousness of the conspiratorial activity smells of White Hat staging — as does the oddly reduced attendance.

For example, while surely knowing that he was being filmed, a gesturing character (or a CGI image) playing John Kerry spoke nonsense about WEF members being like “extraterrestrials”  saving the planet. Also surely knowing that he was being filmed, a screaming character playing Al Gore (or a CGI image) ranted about “rain bombs” and the “oceans boiling” and a “billion refugees” etc. Too weird — too out-in-the-open for easy mockery— too “Straw Man-ish.” Then there were the reports that so many “elites” — including George Soros — pulled out of this year’s event. We suspect (((they))) are already in Gitmo, with the original Elon Musk. 

Call this analysis “crazy” — but one must admit: It all seems to fit!

Guardian (UK)

BBC

1. This year’s gathering seemed strangely conspicuous — as if staged to wake up more normies // 2. Kerry’s remarks about the elites as an “alien force” were a bit TOO weird. // 3. Gore’s remarks about the “rain bombs” and “oceans boiling” were also TOO weird.

An NWO Monster Falls in New Zealand

Jacinda Adern

JANUARY 19, 2023

NY Times: Jacinda Ardern, New Zealand’s Leader, Won’t Seek Re-election

The prime minister said she would step down on Feb. 7.

Oh how the mighty have fallen — and continue to fall — in this age of Q / Trump. Twas only a little more than six years ago when the exalted golden names of Globalist “world leaders” such as Barry Obongo, Killary Clinton, Angela Merkel, Emmanuel Maricon, Justine Trudeau, Aung San Suu Kyi (of Burma), Matteo Renzi and Poop Frankie had to be uttered in reverential tones. These were the sainted untouchables of Libtardia. But one by one, as if some hidden hand is at work, each of these scummy scoundrels (as well as many other important names) has been greatly diminished in the public estimation. We may now add to this list of holy has-beens (as of February 7th) that donkey-face with the donkey dick in the lands “down unda” — New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Adern.

In the aftermath of Killary’s stunning defeat, Marxist Adern — though her island country only has a population of 5 million — was trotted onto “the “world stage” as the next Great Female Hope. The cornball fanfare was reminiscent of that which had heralded the coming of Mr. & Mr. Obongo in 2008 and Poop Frankie in 2013. The fawning press itself even described their created commotion as “JacindaMania.” What a spectacle it was — and one which, unfortunately, most New Zealand normies succumbed to at the time. Not any more.

The world press went wild over the demented communist of dubious genitalia.

Jacinda? Or Jack?
Something strange “down unda”
It’s “partner” and alleged baby-daddy is named Clarke Gayford. That smells of scripting.

https://twitter.com/SpacePirate144/status/1617008029307928576?t=OXDYiw0SFlI3VKcJwpuY7A&s=09


Adern’s Red record is remarkably conspicuous. In 2008, at 27, it was elected president of the International Union of Socialist Youth at their world congress in the Dominican Republic for a two-year term. In 2014, Adern was also selected for and graduated from the World Economic Forum’s (WEF) Young Global Leaders program, founded by Dr. Evil himself — Klaus Schwab (cough cough). Adern remained involved publicly as a part of the Global Leaders Alumni and spoke regularly at WEF events. Is it any wonder now as to why this communist beast was showered with such love and veneration by the international Fake News?

After being elected PM in 2017, Adern, predictably, steered her small ship of state hard leftward. But it was two events in particular for which the deviant demi-goddess would become elevated to full-blown totalitarian goddess — the Christchurch mosque fake shootings and the Stupid-19 scamdemic.


* The Christchurch “Massacres” of 2019

Ardern received international praise for her “compassionate” response to the FAKE crisis-actor shootings which were said to have killed 49 and injured 51 Muslims. A cheesy photograph of Adern — in a Muslim head-covering hugging a member of the NZ Muslim community — went worldwide viral and was projected onto the world’s tallest building, in Dubai. In response to the shootings, Ardern demanded a tightening of New Zealand’s gun laws. Less than one month after the attack, the cowed Parliament passed a law banning most semiautomatic weapons. Ardern and French President Maricon (also a WEF grad) then co-chaired the 2019 Christchurch Call Summit, which aimed to “bring together countries and tech companies in an attempt to bring to an end the ability to use social media to promote terrorism and extremism.” The “massacres” led to more gun control and more internet censorship. How convenient!

Larger than life
The despicable WEF agent and her international colleagues politicized the FAKE mass shootings to accomplish two important Globalist objectives: Gun Control & Cyber Censorship of “Hate.”

Stupid-19 Scamdemic

The Stupid-19 years of 2020 & 2021 would mark peak JacindaMania as Adern garnered nausea-inducing “international acclaim” ™ and more “high marks” by Bill Gates and the Fake News for his / her “strong response” to the “pandemic.” The demented donkey shut down the already isolated island very early and very hard — like no other country in the world.

On March 14, 2020, Ardern announced that the government would force anyone entering the country to quarantine for 14 days — boasting that the new rule would give New Zealand “the widest ranging and toughest border restrictions of any country in the world”.

On March 19, the toothy tyrant decreed that New Zealand’s borders would be closed to all non-citizens, and that the country would move to Alert Level 4, including a nationwide lockdown. And with every new rule — every verbal threat — every vaccine mandate for public employees — and every fear-mongering press conference — the international Fake News puffed and praised Adern to dizzying levels. But by 2022, the harsh and destructive burdensome policies of 20 & 21 were being criticized.

Thankfully, the bloom is finally off of this fake flower now — as yet another superhero of NWO Globalism and its Stupid-19 operation seems destined for political destruction and eternal obscurity (assuming it is not already locked up in Gitmo prison).

Oh how the world worm has turned!

Guardian (UK)
BBC
NY Times

1. Adern’s daily COVID lectures and nasty threats delighted totalitarians worldwide. // 2. Adern backers Bill Gates of Epstein Island & his wife Melinda are no longer together (if they aren’t in Gitmo already.)

There’s Something Terribly Wrong With Gorsad Kyiv and it’s Worse than Balenciaga

Gorsad Kyiv is a collective of photographers that collaborates with the world’s largest brands. Apparently, everybody’s ignoring the fact that their work revolves around the graphic abuse and sexualization of children. Even worse, some of these “models” appear to be actual victims of child trafficking. Here’s a look at Gorsad Kyiv.

Warning: This article contains disturbing pictures.

Gorsad Kyiv is a photography collective consisting of three artists: Viktor Vasiliev, Maria Romaniuk, and Ulik Romaniuk. Based in Kyiv, Ukraine, the group has collaborated with many galleries, magazines, musicians, and brands such as I-D Vice, Dazed & Confused, Skim milk, Hood by Air, Ariel Pink, and others.

In 2022, Gorsad Kyiv was named in PhotoVogue’s list of “100 Next Great Fashion Image Makers”.

PhotoVogue Festival unites the biggest names in the fashion industry, along with numerous publishers from CondeNast – the megacorporation that owns hundreds of publications around the world. Here, PhotoVogue features a picture by Gorsad which features a sad and frightened girl.

One only needs to take a look at a few pics taken by Gorsad to realize one thing: There is something terribly wrong with them. Everything about their work refers directly to pedophilia, child abuse, and sex trafficking. Many children in these pictures appear deeply unwell as if they are actual victims of human trafficking that are constantly drugged and abused.

Instead of being alarmed by these pictures, “industry experts” actually celebrate Gorsad and reward them with lucrative contracts. And, since the Ukraine war, the collective is touted as “freedom fighters” by the media as it urges people to support them with donations. Are you crazy?

One of the ridiculous headlines praising Gorsad.

Why does the industry love Gorsad so much and why aren’t they being investigated by the police? Well, when one realizes that their works are also replete with the occult elite’s satanic symbolism, one realizes one important fact: They’re part of the same sick culture.

Here are the collective’s favorite themes.

Aggressively Sexualizing Children

This is one of these articles where I don’t feel comfortable posting pictures because they’re so vile. However, this insanity needs to be exposed for what it is or it will keep going due to general indifference. I did not dig these pictures from some obscure website – the following pictures are proudly exposed in trendy exhibitions, major fashion magazines, and all over social media accounts.

When fashion magazines describe Gorsad’s works, they like to use the words “youth, innocence, and sexuality”. That’s another way of saying “pedophilia”. Because that’s exactly what this is about.

A screenshot of an interview with Gorsad. They have to give vague answers because they cannot outright say that they’re catering to sick pedos.

A mere look at the following pictures is enough to realize that this is not about the natural “coming of age” of children, it is about their abuse, exploitation, and sexualization by sick adults.

Here are some pictures from Gorsad’s website and Instagram account.

In one of its exhibits, Gorsad proudly displays this picture of a young girl who looks deeply unwell while sitting in a suggestive position. This girl might be a victim of sex trafficking.

To promote an exhibition, Gorsad uses a highly symbolic picture: A balloon attached to a chain, representing the innocence of youth ruined by control and exploitation.

This picture could not be more obvious. This young girl is chained and bruised. This is all a reference to child sex trafficking.

Two young girls are chained next to something that looks like a cheese grater (which might refer to torture).

Inside the backpack is a dildo. Pedos love to mix kiddie stuff with adult things. They’re catering to this sick crowd.

This child is wearing a choker (used in BDSM) and the entire setup is deeply disturbing.

The innocence of youth mixed with adult things such as smoking.

How can this be considered “art” or “fashion”? It looks like a child trafficking catalog.

The same girl from above is bleeding from the nose. Are you Fucking kidding me?

This child is wearing a hat on which is written “BALLS” while suggestively poking a fruit. Next to the picture frame is an EROTICA book. I’m not kidding. They’re making it very clear that this is all pedophilia.

Beastiality.

In one of its many “stand with Ukraine” social media posts, Gorsad includes this pic of a girl who looks unwell with chains around her genitals. This is all about sex trafficking.

A girl bleeding from her genitals. A direct reference to rape?

Aggressively Abusing Children

Gorsad loves depicting the abuse, torment, humiliation, and torture of children. I’m honestly not sure how these pictures are allowed to exist without an in-depth police investigation.

A recurring theme in Gorsad’s works: Children choking in plastic bags. Gratuitous celebration of abuse.

Shirtless children choke on plastic bags. They really should not be taking part in any of this but I’m not even sure their parents are anywhere around them.

A child wrapped in plastic. This looks like a victim of human trafficking being “disposed of”.

This picture is not only disgusting but it also conveys the deeply sadistic nature of those behind it. Forcing people to stand in their own filth causes intense trauma (it is a major torture technique) and this guy has to go through the humiliation of posing for a picture. I’m inclined that no “special effects” were involved in this picture.

They took this girl to a cemetery and forced her to deal with death. They’re into killing the innocence of children and exposing them to trauma.

This child is “silenced” by an unseen adult. The arm is covered in latex, which is usually used in BDSM outfits. This is 100% about child abuse.

There are numerous Gorsad pictures of young boys in mussels. Once again this is about humiliation, control, and reducing them to animals.

Occult Elite Symbolism

Compared to those above, the following pictures are relatively tame. However, they contain the exact symbolism that has been described on this site for years. Through these symbols, the photographers are telling you that they are part of the elite’s sick, satanic culture that revels in abuse and desecration of youth and innocence. This is why they are being celebrated by mass media instead of being condemned.

As stated in numerous articles, the one-eye sign represents occult elite control. That sign is all over Gorsad pictures.

More one-eye sign.

A young girl has a butterfly hiding one eye. As seen in previous articles, this is 100% Monarch Programming symbolism.

Another recurring Gorsad theme is outright satanism, combined with the ridiculing of Christianity. One truly needs to worship outright evil to focus one’s “art” around the suffering of children. Appropriately enough, the entire entertainment industry is drenched in satanic symbolism.

They scribbled 666 on the forehead of this sad boy and took a picture of him. How is this “art” or “fashion”?

In occultism, holding the horns of a goat is highly symbolic. This is all about forcing children to embrace Satanism.

A staple of Satanism is ridiculing Christianity. Here, they are ridiculing Jesus and his crown of thorns.

The models bite the apple from the Garden of Eden while the proverbial serpent (which represents Lucifer) is wrapped around them. The message: They fully embrace evil.

This picture features an inverted pentagram which is used in satanism and black magic. This is what they’re about. Also, this is what the occult elite is about. And this is why they’re getting money, contracts, accolades and exposure.

In Conclusion

I easily could have posted three times more pictures in this article and I could have included some of Gorsad’s disturbing videos featuring children. But this is more than enough. While I’m sorry about exposing readers to these distressing pictures (they certainly distressed me), this imagery needs to be exposed and properly analyzed so we all clearly witness the sick and sadistic culture that prevails in the entertainment world.

Gorsad is not an exception, it is not “underground” and it is not even “counter-culture”. It is mainstream. They were praised by CondeNast, the mega-conglomerate that controls an astounding number of magazines around the world. In fact, those who are NOT part of this sick culture are the ones who are shunned by the industry.

As seen above, numerous pictures Gorsad pictures involve children who appear unwell, as if they recently underwent abuse or trauma. Several pictures directly refer to pedophilia, child abuse, and sex trafficking. There are clear references to trauma, torture, violence, and death combined with celebrations of satanism and black magic.

In short, Gorsad graphically puts on display all of the obsessions of the occult elite, in the sickest way possible. If you think any of this is still a “conspiracy theory”, you might as well be blind because these pictures could not be clearer.

Please report these fuckers (Instagram) and expose these motherfuckers wherever you see them online.

How & Why Deep State Ruined Richard Nixon

1974: President Nixon resigns.

The resignation from office of President Richard Nixon (over some petty nonsense) in 1974, after a year-long “impeachment process,” marked the first and only time that a US president has ever been forced out of office — while living, that is. Technically, it was a “resignation” because Nixon hadn’t been impeached. But the Democrat House certainly had enough votes to impeach and the Senate had enough gutless Republican’ts to convict him of obstruction of justice, abuse of power, and contempt of Congress related to a break-in at Washington’s Watergate Hotel by some low-level operatives looking for dirt on Democrats. Nixon, oblivious of the “burglary,” was crucified not for the minor act, but for the cover-up.

In those pre-Talk Radio / pre-cable TV / pre-Internet / pre-Twitter days of total media monopoly, the Big Five Jew bullhorns — New York Times: (Sulzberger) — Washington Post: (Meyer-Graham) — ABC: (Goldenson) — NBC: (Sarnoff) — CBS: (Paley (Paloff)) — controlled the public perception of reality — totally ! Nixon was defenseless. Their official fairy tale of Watergate — which is why all subsequent political scandals carry the suffix “gate” — holds that two young crusading reporters from The Washington Post, Carl Bernstein & Bob Woodward – supplied with information by an anonymous source called “Deep Throat” — took down an evil, duplicitous scoundrel of a president for the good of the country. The real story is something different.

A book review of the latest Nixon book to be puffed-up by the New York Times raises a question that many other “historians” have pondered, specifically: Why has Nixon’s name not at all been rehabilitated by the passage of time?

From the Times review of Michael Dobb’s Nixon and Watergate — An American Tragedy

“Yet for a spell in the late 20th century, some commentators and a few historians imagined that this dark stain on our democracy would quickly fade away. Some of Richard Nixon’s loyalists predicted that his foreign policy would soon overshadow his lawlessness.

But it never came. No Republican Party convention ever invited him to speak. Retrospective rankings of our chief executives always placed him low.”

It’s no mystery to us. We have our own ideas about the reason why the Nixon name must remain forever tarnished, and it’s something much deeper than libtards simply not liking him.

1. The famed Watergate Hotel where a minor “burglary” took place. // 2. Nasty Yenta Katherine Meyer (cough cough) and her hit-men reporters, Carl Bernstein (cough cough) & Bob Woodward). // 3. Nixon resigns before a stunned TV audience. He was an imperfect and ambitious man who had his flaws — but he was never one of “them” and might have done some great things in his second term.

THE TRUTH ABOUT “WATERGATE”

  • 1948: As a young Congressman (R-CA), Nixon co-sponsored a “Mundt-Nixon Bill” to address the crisis of internal communist subversion. The bill provided for registration of all Communist Party members and required the monitoring of “printed and broadcast material issued by Communist-front organizations.” The bill passed the House, but died in the Senate.
  • 1949-1950: Nixon served on the anti-Communist House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC). In that capacity, he played a part in exposing the communist traitor and Soviet agent Alger Hiss — who would be convicted of perjury in 1950. Nixon relished his role in the exposure and earned the ever-lasting animosity of the Establishment Left for it. Harvard boy Hiss was one of theirs, and people like Eleanor Roosevelt never forgave Nixon for serving on HUAC.
  • 1950: Nixon easily won a seat in the US Senate after suggesting that his ultra-liberal Democrat opponent, Helen Gahagan Douglas, might be a communist. Eleanor Roosevelt was again incensed, and continued to trash Nixon for this for many years to come. Once in the Senate, Nixon supported the efforts of the great Joseph McCarthy.
  • 1952: In order to bolster his anti-communist / conservative credentials among Republicans, the Leftist traitor and all-of-a-sudden “Republican” Dwight D. Eisenhower selected Nixon as his Vice Presidential running mate. Two months after having stolen the Republican nomination from Ohio Senator Robert Taft (a true conservative patriot), Eisenhower, who was certain to defeat the Democrat Adlai Stevenson in the general election, left Nixon twisting in the wind as the Fake News accused Nixon of inappropriate use of campaign funds. (((They))) wanted Nixon off the ticket. His place now in doubt, Nixon delivered a TV address in which he defended himself, attacked his opponents, and urged the audience to contact the Republican National Committee (RNC) to keep him on the ticket. During the speech, Nixon cleverly and cutely stated that he intended to keep a black-and-white dog that was gifted to him, and his children had named Checkers. This speech became known as “The Checkers Speech,” and it saved him — no thanks to Eisenhower!

1. Nixon the ambitious anti-communist showman holding newspaper telling of the conviction of communist Alger Hiss, which he helped to bring about. // 2. The “Checkers Speech” — Nixon, citing his new dog, takes to the airwaves to beg Republican voters to keep him on the Eisenhower ticket. // 3. Eisenhower, that FDR-loving butcher of German prisoners, never truly supported Nixon — but needed his anti-communist credentials in order to cover up the Marxist stench.

  • 1953 – 1961: Nixon, though basically a conservative and a patriot, was always an ambitious politician first. He faithfully served the Globalist bastard Eisenhower — even helping to clip Joe McCarthy‘s wings when called upon to do so — until he himself could run for the White House.
  • 1960: Nixon ran for president and lost a very close election to John F Kennedy.
  • 1968: Nixon was elected president, with “far right” Spirow Agnew (R-MD) as Vice President. Both men — we only know now but the all-knowing “usual suspects” surely must have known back then — held “anti-Semitic” views. (here) and (here)
  • 1972: Nixon & Agnew were re-elected in a historic landslide — winning 49 out of 50 states!

1. Nixon vs JFK: Election 1960: As Senators, Nixon and JFK had both supported Joe McCarthy and were never really part of “The Establishment.” They would both become American presidents, and both be removed. JFK by murder, and Nixon by “scandal.” // 2. Election 1968: Nixon’s VP, Spiro Agnew, was a rock-solid conservative not afraid to fight. // 3. Election 1972: The secretly “anti-Semitic” Nixon & Agnew won EVERYTHING except libtarded Taxxachussetts and mostly Black District of Colombia. Nixon would have had a lot of power and would probably have ended “The Cold War” in Term 2.

  • October 1973: Vice President Agnew was forced to resign over a fake “tax evasion” scandal hyped up by the Fake News. Globalist / Trilateralist , JFK assassination cover-upper Congressman Gerald Ford of Michigan was then forced upon Nixon as new Vice President.
  • August 1974: Nixon resigned. The Watergate “scandal” over a low level “burglary” was nothing more than a “Deep State” coup — led by Katherine Meyer Graham‘s Washington Post — not unlike what we are witnessing today in the effort to remove Trump. Nixon’s resignation elevated Rockefeller puppet Gerald Ford to the presidency.
  • November 1974: “The Watergate Babies” — A whole bunch of Bolshevik Democrats won House seats due to a backlash caused by the Fake News and their manufactured “scandal.” America’s political landscape was fundamentally altered by the influx of these Marxists

1. Deep State & Fake News take out VP Agnew // 2. Deep State & Fake News takes out Nixon. // 3.The damage done to the Republican brand ushered in the Democrat “Watergate Babies” of 1974.

Young hippy trash Killary Rodham worked for Watergate Judiciary Committee until being fired for unethical behavior.

ACTUAL QUOTES

  • December 1974: Globalist Ford chose “Republican” Nelson Rockefeller to be his Vice President. Rockefeller had been Governor of New York State and was known for his presidential ambitions. The problem for Rockefeller was that heartland Republicans hated him — and had already rejected him in 1964.
  • September 5, 1975: Lynette “Squeaky” Fromme, a member of the Charles Manson cult, pointed a handgun at Ford and pulled the trigger at point-blank range. As she did, a Secret Service agent grabbed the gun. Fromme was arrested and served 34 years in prison. Nelson Rockefeller came that close to becoming president.
  • September 22, 1975: As Ford left a hotel in San Francisco, another mind-controlled assassin, Sara Jane Moore, fired a handgun at the president — missing him only by a few feet. As she fired a second round, a retired Marine grabbed at the gun and deflected her shot. The second bullet struck a wall just six inches above Ford’s head, then ricocheted and wounded a taxi driver. Moore served 32 years in prison. Once again, over the span of just three weeks, Globalist Golden Boy Nelson Rockefeller came within inches of becoming the 39th president of the United States. How convenient would it have been, eh? It is interesting to note that when Ford ran for president against Jimmy Carter in 1976, he dumped Nelson Rockefeller!

And that, dear reader, is the real story behind the back-to-back “scandals” which took out VP Agnew first — and then President Nixon one year later.

1. Nelson Rockefeller wanted the presidency. // 2 & 3. President Ford, though a loyal Globalist soldier, was expendable. Two very close assassination attempts on him, just 17 days apart, could easily have put Rockefeller into the office which Nixon had held just 1 year earlier.

1. Nixon letter to Donald Trump (1987): “… whenever you decide to run for office, you will be a winner!” // 2. Nixon and Trump all chummy at a 1980’s black-tie event. // 3. CIA rats Woodward & Bernstein were dragged out of mothballs to help ignite another coup — this time against Trump. But this time around, the old media magic was gone. Most people under 55 don’t even remember the role that these two wicked has-been played in Watergate.

Deep State Media Dumping “Biden”

Biden – Biden – Biden

JANUARY 13, 2023

New York Times Headlines:

Discovery of More Classified Records Raises Questions Over Biden’s Handling of Documents
*
Garland Appoints Special Counsel to Handle Biden Documents Inquiry.
*
Hunter Biden’s Tangled Tale Comes Front and Center
*
Here Are All the Ways Republicans Plan to Investigate Biden

As a flock of starlings turning left or right in perfect mid-air unison, the entirety of the Judenpresse Armada — following the lead of the front page of “the paper of record” in Manhattan– has just turned on the stumbling, bumbling, mumbling actor in the skin mask we like to refer to as “Joe Biden.” As more dirt about the money-grubbing, child molesting Biden Crime Family comes out — thanks to the efforts of the new “Radical Right” Congress and other various investigators — we expect the exposure to garner wall-to-wall “flood the zone” media coverage. The question which even beginning students of Conspiracy Theory Studies must surely be asking themselves at this point is this: What motive does the Fake News have for suddenly bailing on “Biden” like this? 

Rock solid question because we know for darn sure that it’s not out of any sense of moral indignation or civic responsibility. If the Piranha Press was ever motivated by such noble sentiments, their news hounds would have wrecked the Biden’s many years ago. So, what accounts for this sudden turnabout? Answer: Two possibilities:

* 1. The usual suspects know that Hunter & Joe Biden will soon be completely non-salvageable — no matter how the not-so-dominant-any-more media spins it. For that reason, the far too toxic Biden / “Biden” has got to be cut loose and “thrown under the bus” in order for Fake News to maintain any illusion of credibility at all.

— OR —-

* 2. The White Hats have put the Talking Heads & Seditious Scribblers — much like many within GOP and even the Democrat Party — under submission. “Report truthfully and loudly on this or it’s Gitmo, — you understand, m-effer?!”

It could also be a combination of those two factors. In either the case, the Patriots would be in control of the unfolding drama.

1. Whether out of necessity or coercion, the entire media from left to right — social to conventional — print to TV — is now moving in sync over the emerging stories of the parallel investigations being launched against the Biden Crime Family. // 2. The man playing “Joe Biden” should be awarded the Congressional Medal of Honor when this is all over — and an Academy Award too!

The role which the Q team and “The Donald” played in maneuvering events to get to this point — though hidden from the bewildered subjects of the Kingdom of Normiedom and even many seasoned “conspiracy theorists” — was critical. Like Br’er Rabbit — who pleaded with Br’er Fox to not be thrown into the briar patch when that was exactly what the cunning little critter had wanted the angry fox to do — Trump baited his enemies by repeatedly refusing — for 6 years — to release his tax returns. He finally did so just recently, and it turned out to be a big “Nothing Burger.”

Trump further baited these clowns by setting up the Mar-a-Lago Raid for declassified documents. Now that these precedents have been established —-Trump’s wholly-owned Congress and other various investigators and special prosecutors will hang Biden with the classified documents he, when he was Vice President, took home with him — as well as his own tax returns full of ill-gotten gains (such as bribes from Ukraine and China’s corrupt “Shanghai Clique”).

Well played, President Trump. Well played!

Chess master Trump baited his enemies into establishing precedents for demanding the release of a president / former president’s tax returns — and also for gathering up classified / declassified documents from private residences. Both will now be done to “Biden.”

Clever Br’er Rabbitt saved himself by baiting Br’er Fox with reverse psychology. Now we can see why “Br’er Trump” went out of his way to bait his enemies — “Oh please don’t make me release my tax returns. I’m under audit!”

Q — at a time when we all were certain that Trump would be re-elected — actually told us that Biden (not Trump) was going to be elected and then investigated for his ties to Ukraine. This means that the White Hats ALLOWED the election to be rigged as part of a sting operation. It was also important to have “Biden” as the sitting president when the investigations came.

How to Talk to Crazy Conspiracy (Analysts) Theorists…

DECEMBER 21, 2022

NY Times:How to Talk to Friends and Family Who Share Conspiracy Theories

Fringe movements will persist. Here’s how to help.

By CHARLIE WARZEL

No matter how many shells the Judenpresse Armada fires at us, we “conspiracy tanalysts” not only remain afloat but — as even the Times acknowledges — we continue to grow our ranks with each passing day. As a public service to the bewildered boobs who worship “the paper of record” and Fake News in general, Times scribbler Charlie Warzel has so graciously taken it upon himself to put together  a tutorial on “how to help” the viral crazies now popping in every family and circle of friends — and just in time for holiday gatherings with family members too.

Warzel sets forth six strategies that “concerned” normies should use to “help” their crazy loved ones — and he prefaces his advice with the following word of caution about dealing with “conspiracy theorists”–

“Reminder: This advice pertains to friends or relatives with whom you are already close and who are not demonstrating unstable or violent behavior. It’s important to exercise restraint and good judgment in all cases.”

Fuck you Weasel. It’s the Left that’s “unstable” and “violent,” not us. And it is the standard practice of every liar, criminal and psychopath to label his adversary as “crazy.” Let’s review and rebut these six pieces of Warzel’s excrement.

1. Charlie Weasel tells people how to “help” the critical thinkers in their circle. // 2. Crazy Uncle Bob needs a family intervention. // 3. Of course, the Q Anon movement is featured in this story.

1. Ask Where the Information is Coming From.

Rebuttal: Genetic Fallacy Alert! Genetic Fallacy Alert! It doesn’t matter where the data comes from. What matters is whether a thing is true, or whether it is false. Although it is perfectly natural and logical to be skeptical of information coming from a dubious source; a wise man never automatically disregards data based on source alone. Never ask: “Where did you read this?” — Always ask: Is this true — and can it be independently confirmed or debunked?

2. Create Some Cognitive Dissonance — (By acknowledging that certain past conspiracies were real and have been exposed — and then asking why the conspiracy in question has not been exposed by “whistle-blowers”).

There are indeed whistle-blowers usually associated with the big conspiracy of (fill-in-the-blank). But because the press itself is part of the Deep State, you may not always come to know about it. Why would you assume that just because a certain whistle-blower or victim has been ignored by the corrupted corporate media, that he or she does not exist or is not legitimate? Do you blindly worship the Fake News?


3. Debunking is Difficult — (*Because people form emotional attachments to their beliefs.)

That works both ways, Weasel. People, in general, regardless of intelligence or “education,” are pridefully slow when it comes to changing their minds. But what strikes me about you Q Anon / Satanist “debunkers” is that you NEVER even attempt to “debunk” the data — such as the disgusting child-abuse artwork preferred by the Podesta Brothers — or the shocking images and texts posted on social media by the perverted Pizza-gate clique.  Are those stomach-turning images and posts that have so repulsed so many millions of people real — or are they not real? Is the Hunter Biden laptop real (public disclosure coming soon), or is it not real? Please answer.

1. All that matters is if a thing is “True” or “False.” Fixating on the “source” of the data point is a diversion. // 2. “There are no whistle-blowers, eh Warzel?” — Vicky Polin on the Oprah Winfrey Show in 1989 reveals how she was raised in a Satanic Jewish cult that sacrificed “breeder” babies (video here). She then ran the Jewish Coalition Against Sexual Abuse/Assault — a support group which, after years of being attacked by “the usual suspects,” finally closed in 2014. // 3. No one has ever even tried to “debunk” Demonrat big-shot Tony Podesta’s favorite works of “art.”

4. Don’t Debate on Facebook — (too confrontational)

Rebuttal: Why not, Mr. Weasel? I’ve seen in-person “debates” between normies and truthers get pretty nasty (been there myself!). Could your advice to avoid Facebook debates have anything to do with the fact that online exchanges allow a truther — who may not be so articulate or well-versed in the subject matter — to instantly drop a link to one of the countless excellent articles and videos out there which provide powerful proofs for “conspiracy theories” ™? Indeed, some of the assigned anti-conspiracy monitors at You Tube were themselves converted by some of the very videos they were tasked with reviewing for censorship! Weasel is trying to prevent naive “debunkers” from fighting in a highly populated arena more favorable to truthers.

5. Mocking and Scolding Won’t Work

Rebuttal: You see that? Behind our backs, he mocks us and tells our normie friends & family that we are essentially insane little children in need of an “intervention” — but then instructs them to conceal their scorn from us — as if we astute “empaths” wouldn’t be able to instinctively sense and be properly offended by the concealed condescension of these sneaky, snarky, back-stabbing mental midgets in our midst! Oh that just does wonders for a family relationship (been there too) eh, Weasel? Typical manipulative Marxist.

6.Know When to Walk Away.

There it is!!! The payoff punch — the truth at last!

Weasel knows bloody damn well that once one has contracted the truth-virus, there’s no going back to the overlapping tyrannical Kingdoms of Libtardia and Normiedom. It is a mental and moral impossibility — notwithstanding these FAKE stories we hear about “reformed” conspiracy cultists who now “have a warning for others.” Hence, Warzel’s previous five pieces of advice were all just part of a grand smoke-screen. What this devious (((devil))) really wants is for people to “walk away” and — as a natural consequence in many cases — alienate the truther from “polite company” and even family gatherings.

In his own words, while quoting a “conspiracy researcher” named – get this – Mike Rothschild:

“If you have legitimate concerns about their health and safety, that is usually a job for professionals. In some cases, it’s important to realize there may be little you can do in the moment, some cautioned. Mr. Rothschild told me: If you have to, be ready to walk away from them. There comes a point where you may not be able to have that instability in your life.’”


Too late for you Bolshevik bastards to isolate this writer, Mr. Weasel and Mr. Rottenchild. You see, though I will tolerate disagreement — I’ve already distanced myself from anyone and everyone who actually thinks me mad — and with zero regrets (yet with deep and persistent sorrow).

1. (((They))) want normies to stay out of Facebook debates for fear of what they may discover — and then spread. /// 2. “That weirdo thinks 9/11 was an inside job. Ja Ja Ja (oh, sorry) Ha ha ha ha.” // 3. The lonely walk of a truther is never easy.

“A time is coming when men will go mad, and when they see someone who is not mad, they will attack him, saying, ‘You are mad; you are not like us.’”

– St. Antony the Great

“Inside the COVID-19 Global Coup d’état”

Geopolitics & Empire with Hrvoje Morić

Geopolitics & Empire: Geopolitics & Empire is joined by Emanuel Pastreich, who serves as the president of The Asia Institute and as director general of the Institute for Future Urban Environments. He declared his candidacy for president of the US as an independent in February of 2020. Welcome to Geopolitics & Empire, Mr. Pastreich.

Emanuel Pastreich: It’s an honor to be here.

Geopolitics & Empire: I came across your work recently, your writing and your interviews, and I thought I had to have you on the show because you have many unique insights and you’ve got a fascinating life experience. It is hard to peg who you are because of your interesting background. If you could just briefly maybe tell us, who is Emanuel Pastreich?

Emanuel Pastreich: Right. Well, that’s a tough one and I’m maybe not the most qualified to explain myself. I came from a relatively establishment background in the United States. I’m still wearing a tie, and I was a professor of Asian studies, so I spent a good part of my life in Korea and Japan, and I studied Chinese, Japanese, and Korean. When I was at the University of Illinois back in 2000, 2001, I became quite committed to opposing the totalitarian rule in the United States, which continues to the day. And as a result of my efforts with others, I ended up being basically unable to work in the United States and living in Korea from 2007. Tried to come back to the United States once in 2019, which was not successful.

I’m back in the United States after three years away; just arrived a week ago. I am trying my best to address real issues in the United States and to puncture a hole in the blanket of hypocrisy and fraud that has wrapped around every aspect of American society, and, by extension, around the world. I want to talk about real things.

I had declared in February, 2020, when I saw what was happening with this so-called Biden-Trump election, that I would run as an independent candidate for president and address real issues, not with any particular leftist or rightist perspective. I tried to just scientifically address what were the problems in the United States. And that caused a lot of problems, but it did give me the chance to get in the habit of giving talks, speeches, which has now become my primary means of expressing myself.

I hope we can return to politics based on intellectual inquiry, on a moral commitment, and on real engagement with citizens, as opposed to a fraudulent “feel good” approach to blanket marketing.

Geopolitics & Empire: I purchased your book “I Shall Fear No Evil.” I think people can download it for free. You touch on most of your points in that book.

I agree with much of what you say. And maybe we can start with what you touched on: what’s wrong with the US?

I’m from Illinois, I’m from Chicago, and 20 years ago I saw a lot wrong. I’m a history major, former teacher, former professor of history, I could just see the cycle of history.

Emanuel Pastreich: Where were you teaching?

Geopolitics & Empire: Well, I taught abroad in Kazakhstan and in Mexico. That’s part of the story. I decided to leave the United States. When you’re born as an American, you never imagine we were an empire. I thought we were just a country, the United States, and then you realize there is stuff we get into like 9/11, and other things. The reality is we’re an empire, and we’re the biggest empire in the history of the world. So we are starting all these wars, killing millions of people.

There’s a lot of good that America has done, but a lot of bad too. We have to be fair. There’s the militarism. And we’re bankrupt financially–you talk about that. I also think that spiritually we’re bankrupt.

Emanuel Pastreich: Intellectually too.

Geopolitics & Empire: We’re at each other’s throats. Then there’s the techno-authoritarianism. I might get you in into trouble. In April, I believe the Department of Homeland Security told PayPal to shut off my account. I’m banned from using PayPal.

Emanuel Pastreich: Well, congratulations.

Geopolitics & Empire: And so if you could tell us basically, what’s wrong with America as you see it?

Emanuel Pastreich: Well, to some degree it’s a cyclical process. If you have any institution, any government or empire and it runs 250 years, you start to have these institutional contradictions and collapse. To some degree it’s because of the institutions that were originally set up no longer correspond with the reality of how decisions are made, or how the economy works. I happen to like the US Constitution and I refer to it. It’s not a perfect document, but it gives some basic principles for governance, which I think are quite unique.

It was a unique, successful experiment in history. It doesn’t mean the United States was successful, it just means that concept of constitutional government where they took some of the essence of what was discussed in Greece and Rome and tried to take the empire out of it. That was the concept behind the United States. It was a noble experiment that offers much for us.

However, it was flawed from the beginning. Obviously slavery, the destruction of the native peoples, also the idea of real estate and how it was imported here and enclosure, all that part of the project was obviously flawed. But we did have some good aspects to the United States, which sometimes were positive for the world.

But over the last 50 years, we saw the militarization of the economy and then this move towards a radical expansion of financialization and privatization. And in that process, I think, we also have to take note of the end of the Cold War, which has been celebrated in what we’re force fed in media and in academics. But the end of the Cold War was essentially the end of an opposing perspective in the world. Basically during the Cold War (I’m not saying Soviet Union or the People’s Republic of China got it all right) socialist nations at least offered a different perspective, were able to suggest that things like class struggle, the concentration of capital, and ideology were topics to talk about. These were things that were important in their newspapers and universities. And when the Soviet Union and China basically went over to a modified neo-capitalism, with a little bit of socialist characteristics mixed in the drink, then we lost that other perspective in the world.

And as a result from the 1990s on increasingly these ridiculous ideas about economics spread. In the United States, or in Japan, or in Germany in the 1970s—through the 80s even, there were professors of economics who took Marxist economics as a major part of their approach to economic theory. There are zero people like that now, except for bloggers.

We’ve lost this potential for other perspectives. It’s not saying that Marxism is perfect. I’m not a Marxist by the way, but I’m sympathetic to Marxist analysis. I think that addressing class issues and finance and ideology is critical. And so we now are in this position in which consumption, growth, exports are assumed by basically everybody to be essential for the wellbeing of people, or that the stock market has a relationship (other than parasitic) to the lives of ordinary citizens.

These things are accepted as truths, right? They’re talking about a rise in the stock market as good for you.

And we have in the United States now these cardboard messiahs, whether it’s Bernie Sanders, or AOL, or Donald Trump who come up with these quirky ideas about what economics is, or how we can be more progressive, concerned with working people.

But essentially they buy into the entire economic money system and they’re not interested in saying, “Why don’t we make people independent from money?” They’re not trying to say, we can support ourselves.

We don’t have to spend money. People in the 19th century, most of them didn’t use money. They used it only when they went to market once a month to buy things they needed. Some metal products or certain items like clocks. But basically in their daily lives, they were able to support themselves and their communities were able to support them. That is real economics; that’s positive.

Actually that’s the real meaning of market economy. It has become a horrible term that’s been so distorted. Market economy means you go to the market in your community and you sell carrots, or the chairs you made, and you exchange them with your neighbor who is selling butter, or fabrics or whatever. And you have this mutual support system.

Now market economy means Google and Facebook and all these techno tyrants, which print up their own money by devaluing our money, and they control the entire system. They set up these IT systems (like the technology we are using now) in which we are forced to communicate with each other, to exchange, to buy things through them. They control the means of production, means of distribution, means of sales, and the means of communication, and increasingly the ideological structure itself. They produce these false conservatives and these false progressives whom we are supposed to buy.

Geopolitics & Empire: That was my next question. We’ve got an oligarchy in the US and I think it’s just as bad as the Russian oligarchies and these foreign dictatorships. I think the issue for us is that because Americans are more prosperous, we care less—as long as we can buy our nice cars, iPhones, and other stuff. We don’t really care about our oligarchy, but they’re just as bad, if not worse.

You mention sham elections. I agree with you; just to read a quote from your book, you say, “I say that if we do not have an election in which someone like me can be a candidate, can have a chance to be covered in the media, that we are not holding elections but rather holding an impressive sham. We have no intention of recognizing any such sham elections. In fact, until there is an election in which someone like me can get proper attention and the chance to be on the ballot, we will not recognize any of these elections.”

Just a quick thought on the elections. As you say, on our left, our right, we’ve got fake conservatives and a fake left. No one is anti-war anymore on the left.

Emanuel Pastreich: That’s true.

Geopolitics & Empire: There’s a handful on the right, but they all stay within a certain bounds. None of them have ever crossed the red line.

Emanuel Pastreich: Right. Well I think the decision to run as independent candidate for president was a serious one. I take it quite seriously and I put a lot of work into the speeches. The preference to my book is out in 40 languages. I don’t have Croatian, but I have many other languages—many from Central Europe for that matter. It was a campaign both in the United States and also globally meant to say, let’s have an alternative view.

And we’ve been basically blocked out. I think that American elections were always flawed. I wouldn’t say there was a perfect time, but there’s been a catastrophic collapse of the political system over the last 20 years. And the result is these sham elections, as I was suggesting in my recent post.

Now politics is determined not by elections, but by false flag operations, like 9/11 or COVID-19 or these mass shootings, whatever, these are how politics are determined, not by voting at the ballot.

In order to move beyond, to go back to some logical, scientific, rational process, I think we have to look back to the founding of the United States, or other countries, and recognize that the basis for the United States in the beginning, and the ways in which it was successful, were based on revolutionary thought, recognized that the United States is a revolutionary country.

That’s the core where we start. And we have to say that the Declaration of Independence notes very clearly,

“When a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.”

Our two founding documents are the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution.  You not only are entitled to, but you have a moral obligation to oppose this system, to overthrow it, and to create a system which is democratic, transparent and accountable.

That is my position when I am running as a candidate. I would love it if people vote for me, if they put me on TV, and if I got attention like Donald Trump, or these bedridden people like Joe Biden.

But that’s not my purpose. My purpose is to be revolutionary. And so I believe the best way that I can affect politics, that we can affect politics, is to take a stand and to say, “This is the truth. This is what needs to be done.” I’m not interested in whether the New York Times or CNN will cover me, because they’re so corrupt and so useless and dangerous, that as far as I’m concerned, we should lock them all up too. I have no interest in pandering to them.

And I would also say that that was the major mistake made by so many people in the United States over the last decade (as we fell into late imperial decay): they thought, I have this good idea, what might be a good idea, and in order to realize that idea, I’m going to compromise. I’m going to downplay it, going to soften it up a little bit, modify it in such a way that, one, the New York Times will mention me, and two, some wealthy donor will give me money.

And my position is to say, I’m not going to do that. And that this is the only way to achieve real change in the United States, and globally, to draw a line in the sand.

It may seem pointless. You might see me as someone who is a failure. I was not able to work in the United States from 2007. I have been unemployed for long periods of time, which was not all that pleasant. But I think that my actions were more politically meaningful than if I had compromised on 9/11 and other issues and tried to play the game here in Washington D.C.

Geopolitics & Empire: Just one real quick question on 9/11, not to go in depth, just get your big picture take. One of my subscribers recently tuned to the email list told me they’re signing off because I believe 9/11 was a false flag operation. And I’m like…

Emanuel Pastreich: It’s so obvious

Geopolitics & Empire: For me you’re not a serious person if you can’t take on the false flag operations. My response to him was that in graduate school in Geneva, Switzerland I was taught about this type of thing. It is a basic historical fact. The Roman Empire did it. Nazi Germany did it.

Emanuel Pastreich: I would even say it is an ancient tradition.

Geopolitics & Empire: Russia has done it. It’s a basic military strategy. NATO has done it. Japan has done it, Israel has done it, Turkey has done it. Tell me a country which has not run the false flag operation.

But just real quick, you mentioned previously, but also in one of your writings, you’ve written the false flag “serves as critical tool in American politics by creating mass trauma in the population that inhibits the formation of organized resistance or the possibility of rational intellectual discourse.” And so just your quick take on 9/11.

Emanuel Pastreich: Well I think that in that respect, 9/11 was extremely successful. Basically it shut down the American mind.

We need to use Hermann Broch’s term “the sleepwalkers” to describe our ruling class. We see people who are intellectuals, who are extremely well educated. They read books. They are lawyers, doctors, businessmen, but they’re incapable of conceiving of what is happening. They’re basically sleepwalking through history, unable to conceive of these higher-level traumatic shifts in governance.

And so 9/11, is most representative in that respect. If you’ve taken one semester of physics in high school, you can figure out that this event was impossible. It cannot possibly be true. I watched it. I was in the US, at the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign at the time. I saw it. I was not a physics major. I thought, this is not possible. Something else is going on here.

But there’s no way that if two (if it’s what happened) airliners crash, it’ll cause three buildings that made of concrete reinforced with steel to collapse. It cannot possibly be true.

But I think looking back on it now, that that was the whole point; the point was, just like with COVID-19, to force-feed the population a story which was not credible from the beginning. And the purpose of that was to degrade the ability of citizens to think for themselves scientifically and co-opt an entire class of intellectuals.

I’ve written about this topic using the ideas from Julien Benda’s classic book “The Treason of the Intellectuals” from 1927.

That was a large part of 9/11, and of COVID-19. This large class of privileged intellectuals, people like myself, decided –and I saw this at the University of Illinois and elsewhere– that they would go on with this incredibly stupid, unbelievable, argument on physics and on geopolitics to explain this trauma.

They went along with it. They took the money. There are always going to be some intellectuals like that, but the fact that there were so many for both 9/11 and COVID-19 who were willing to buy the story indicates something deeply wrong.

I have a classmate who’s a teaching at MIT and I talked to her, and talked to her about COVID-19 at the very start. She was just following the rules. I know that she’s smart enough to know that it just doesn’t make any sense scientifically.

As I put it in one of my articles, technology buried science in a shallow grave. We have a system in which technology is mistaken for science. We moved towards this “sciencism,” as opposed to science. In sciencism the truth is determined by experts at Harvard or Stanford, or wherever, as opposed to by a rigorous investigation of phenomena.

That started before 9/11. You can trace it back. In some ways it started with Oklahoma, which was the precursor to 9/11. I think if we hadn’t had the trauma of the Oklahoma bombings, that 9/11 would’ve been harder to pull off. And finally, I would conclude by saying that many of these things they’re planned out. DARPA (defense advanced research projects agency) and RAND and other agencies–now there’s a proliferation of these think tanks or consulting firms—planned these traumas. From the 1960s on they carried out a whole series of studies in psychology, mass trauma, et cetera, in which they essentially came up with these classified plans, some of which have been declassified, most of which have not. The plans describe how to transition a population from one state to another over time through the use of mass trauma.

And that’s what 9/11 was about. Oklahoma was the first point of mass trauma, then 9/11, then COVID-19–and there were a few others in between.

On the one hand the operations had very specific agendas, what they were trying to do in the short term. But there is a larger agenda, which is to create a totalitarian state, on in which people are not aware, as you mentioned, that the system is totalitarian.

There’s a radical alienation between the reality on the ground and the manner in which ruling class intellectuals, who set the tone and the message, perceive the world. We live in a fantasy world in which we are told this is how the United States works. And then there’s the reality of how it really works. Basically they’ve become two unrelated realms.

Geopolitics & Empire: Just to comment on the academic aspect, I worked in education, in academia here in Mexico, and just as you described it, I find it sad. Most academics, all they care about is their money, their salary, their wages, and their career. I want the truth. I had my classes taken away from me when I taught at a high school and at a university. And the trick was that it’s harder to get fired from the high school than it is the university.

Emanuel Pastreich: Interesting.

Geopolitics & Empire: After one or two semesters they took away my courses at the university on international relations because I was talking like you are. Eventually there was a new person who took charge and he didn’t know my way of thinking. And so I got my courses back. It’s just really sad. It just goes back to the fact that the people want the money, they don’t care about the truth.

Emanuel Pastreich: Well, I’ve seen that. Certainly many academics now, and I see this in my colleagues, people who I used to be quite close to in another lifetime. Consider the priority to be getting grants. And so grants are the goal, certainly not scientific method, right? They must go along with what grantors want. And that process no longer involves any sense of public good, or of government or institutions that are run for the public good.

We have the Drew Faust, the previous president of Harvard. When she retired, she was appointed to the board of directors of Goldman Sachs. Unprecedented in American history. But it’s telling. So the priority for these research institutes and their administrators is their ability to suck up to global capital.

That is what it’s about. And so obviously if we’re talking about Goldman Sachs, BlackRock, or other Blackstone, or other private equity, these guys are sophisticated. They hire consulting firms and tell them how to modify teaching and academic research at Harvard over time so that it serves their purpose, essentially they help to cover your tracks for you. You do not modify intellectual discourse in too explicit a way. You throw in a little bit of multiculturalism here, a little bit of gender theory there; you talk about how unfair it is that poor people are not doing so well, but you don’t identify the process of how we got here.

It’s become, I think it’s a major, major industry, this whole distortion of reality in advertising, public relations, consulting, and then on beyond that in research, academics, journalism, and the basic principles of discourse now. It’s a form of prostitution.

I like to talk this trauma in terms of incest, rape, and prostitution, the three fundamental traumas in human relations, in sexual relations–sexual relations have profound symbolic power in our society.

And all of them, incest, rape and prostitution, have their equivalents in our political world and in our intellectual world. And that’s what we’re witnessing. Increasingly we’re talking about all of those. Incest is the false flag, the internal compromise in which the compromise is so profound for the victim that it can’t even be addressed. Rape is similar in that it brings the person into this relationship which was unwanted, but in a way which is so embarrassing (and sometimes involves some mutual attraction), that it becomes so horrific that the individual cannot even conceive of what happened.

And so in many cases of rape in the real world, people never report it because they think it is so demeaning to the self and they can’t even confront it in themselves.

In the case of prostitution, that which should be expression of concern, or affection, or love, or commitment to family, becomes a means of making money, a service. And we see such a distortion all across our society, especially in education. Rather than teachers being concerned with society or with students, or with family, it becomes just a means to produce money. Maybe you are not selling your body but you are selling your soul.

Geopolitics & Empire: I wanted to have you unpack COVID-1984, as I call it, and basically the same thesis I’ve held from the very beginning, January, 2020, you put into words, I never viewed that there was a pandemic at all. My theory is that it was planned, this whole event. It was either some low key bio weapon or it was entirely manufactured from whole cloth. Either way, there was no pandemic. We just could have just gone on with our lives normally.

You wrote recently on your Substack, and I recommend people read this article, the links will be in the description. You say, “Operation COVID-19 was a global coup d’etat disguise as a pandemic that was launched against China and the world in December, 2019. And that continues onto the present.”

You say that, the reality is that a tiny group of key players representing the super-rich in the US and in China coordinate closely to promote COVID lockdowns in China. And you say that everywhere they were applying this digital dictatorship. This is my interpretation. All the nations did it. I was living in Kazakhstan, I fled through the US to Mexico. I observed the creation of the “algorithm ghetto” social credit system, the “electronic concentration camp” passports, QR codes, and mandatory injections. And in some places you couldn’t even buy food without it. It’s like the Book of Revelation. You can’t buy or sell without the mark.

Emanuel Pastreich: That’s true.

Geopolitics & Empire: I some places they say you can’t even go to the public park without vaccine certificates. I can see that it’s a global elite that has no allegiance to nationality. It’s the US elite, it’s the Chinese elite. And they use, as you said, these private tech IT companies that are already embedded within all of our countries. We’re basically being run by big tech. Could you tell us more about how you see COVID?

Emanuel Pastreich: Well, I think you’ve described it quite accurately there. I maybe just add a few words to say how it works. I think one of the key aspects of this takeover has to do with the concept of government. So we’re being fed this narrative by the controlled opposition that says government is bad, inherently bad, and all the bad things happen because of evil politicians or bad government. Now, obviously, government is bad these days, but if you say that government cannot possibly serve a purpose, meet the needs of the people, that this is a nihilistic and depressing perspective. I think that view is being force-fed to us by those power elites in order to discourage us from trying to organize ourselves and to create government. That is the first thing I would say.

The second part is the takeover of local government, and central governments, around the world by these IT companies. So, whether it’s in Sichuan province or it’s in Oklahoma, local governments are lobbied and then intimidated, bribed and threatened, in order to get these IT companies to run government for them. So whereas you previously had government officials, good and bad, who basically made the decisions based upon various pressures from around them in the community, now you have just one or two government officials, the president or the governor, or whatever. And their job is to outsource the budget to these IT companies who run everything for them. This happened to universities; it happened elsewhere.

This is a profound transformation. So essentially when you see a message that says, the government does this, or this is the government, or this QR code is scanned by the government, in fact, there’s no government behind it. It’s not government in any sense of the word. It’s a totalitarian dictatorship run by these global IT companies.

And they have some tricks to hide their tracks, but it’s not that hard to figure out. Basically Amazon, Google, Alibaba, there are 10 or so big players are taking over the world. And then there are smaller customized players. For example, as I mentioned, in Israel we have Black Cube and other customized private intelligence firms that facilitate the transformation. I think they were very much involved in what’s happened in China. I was criticized for this for not giving the evidence for this transformation in China, but just take my word for it.

I’d be happy to give you the evidence at some future date. But they also were very much involved in it.

And so we need to combine the evidence from these precedents. On the one hand, we have the research from DARPA and from RAND from the 1960’s and 70’s, how to modify people’s behavior and also how to take over basically the government through this privatization drive. Then we have the research from Guantanamo Bay and the so-called torture programs after 2001 in which experiments were carried out (Naomi Klein describes this in some detail) on how to modify behavior through isolation, i.e social distancing, masks, and other forms of repeated ritual behavior.

These rituals associated with COVID-19 are meant to be meaningless and fraudulent, and most importantly, the person involved at some level knows that the rituals (like wearing a mask) are fraudulent—but he still does them. And that action of participation in one’s own destruction degrades the ability to resist. So you can create very passive environments through those policies.

Those two strategies were combined with some understanding of AI and how it could be used to induce a passive, narcissistic, self-indulgent and decadent culture among people, especially in the mid-level ruling class. I discussed this in my article, “the terrarium economy.” We see in America this fake ruling class, people who went to Harvard and they become lawyers and doctors. They own three million, five million, $10 million in assets and a house by the beach or in France or in Italy.

They think they’re the ruling class, but it’s a fraud. The ruling class are these people who control basically the means of production and they control the nature of money. Those people are worth hundreds of billions. We don’t even know how much they’re worth because they make it up for themselves.

But for those people, the billionaires, the difference between a lawyer who has $10 million in assets and a homeless person is the difference between a roly poly and a spider. We are all bugs from their perspective. They know, based upon the reports they receive from their private intelligence and strategy teams, that by creating this false terrarium economy wherein there’s an imagined ruling class headed by someone like Biden, and it also contains a lot of poor people in it so as to create a visible little conflicts among us, that you can blind people to the fact that the whole system is all enclosed and controlled by this elite group.

And finally, much of the analysis that could be helpful for understanding economics is prohibited.

I hate to stress Marxist analysis because I’m not really a Marxist, but I’m also practical. Whatever approach works I will use—as I told Josh Jadwin the other day.

Marxist economics can be extremely helpful. I don’t think we should dismiss it just because we have some bias fed to us by the controlled opposition. We’re trapped in this system wherein the ideology is controlled by these people, as is the means of production, the means of distribution, the means of communication, and money itself is controlled by them.

And they’re dumbing us down. I think we have supercomputers doing this. They’ve calculated how fast or how slow to move towards the totalitarian system, how to create false conflicts like how Trump is excluded from Twitter, or whatever—all irrelevant. But it works because people’s thinking has been so degraded by technology. In fact, technology like Facebook or Twitter is designed to degrade your ability to think.