Italian Election Rocks the New World Order!

“Thank You Italy.”

SEPTEMBER 27, 2022

NY Times:
  Giorgia Meloni Wins Voting in Italy, in Breakthrough for Europe’s Hard Right

BY JASON HOROWITZ

Mamma Mia! The screams of Bolshevik butt-hurt emanating from the press over the election of a “far right” female Prime Minister in Italy are reverberating throughout the hollowed heads of western Libtardia. From the opening paragraph of the Times’ Jason Horowitz whine-a-thon:

“Italy turned a page of European history on Sunday by electing a hard-right coalition led by Giorgia Meloni, whose long record of bashing the European Union, international bankers and migrants has sown concern about the nation’s reliability in the Western alliance. Ms. Meloni, the leader of the nationalist Brothers of Italy, a party descended from the remnants of fascism, had led a right-wing coalition to a majority in Parliament, defeating a fractured left.” (emphasis added)

Hmmm. No “hurrahs” for the 45-year-old Giorgia “breaking the glass ceiling” to become the first female Prime Ministerette of macho Italy? Come on now, Whorowitz. This is the type of “historic”  fluff you girlie boys usually get all warm and tingly about, is it not? Youse guys had such a hard-on for “strong women” like Killary, the Frumpy Frau of Germany and that trans donkey down in New Zealand. How about a little love for the Italian babe?

1. “Hard right” — “fascist” — “far right” — male chauvinist pig Horrorshitz has nothing good to say about Giorgia Meloni and her coalition partners. // 2. Meloni:
 “When you no longer have roots, you are  a slave. And when you are a slave, you serve the interests of Soros.”  // 3. The Globalist Press has Giorgia on its mind.

Although the success of the “far right” in Sweden’s elections last week came as delightful news, it doesn’t compare to what just occurred in Italy for the simple reason that Italy is one of Europe’s largest states (pop: 60 million) and largest economies. If Italy “turns its back” (or even just turns sideways) on NATO and the EU, the whole house of NWO cards may topple in Europe — exactly as Q had — when the idea of such a thing seemed unimaginable — accurately forecast as far back as 2017. That being said, infertile, ageing, corrupted and factionalized Italy, like Sweden, still may not be salvageable domestically.

I support the idea of women as political leaders (why not). We should acknowledge this, in a democracy, the placing of softer female masks on the face of the big bad “far right” has certain strategic advantages. And as far as we can tell, Signora Meloni — mother of one out-of-wedlock child by her “significant other” — seems solid in both her political and social positions as she is passionate. Meloni’s political activism dates back to her student days and has been what (((they))) would describe as “fascist” — though she seems to have “moderated” (rolling eyes) in recent years.

We’ll let the lady speak for herself — and then you’ll understand why the likes of Mr. Whorowitz are horrified:

* Giorgia Meloni on God, Family & Country:

A question: “Why is the family an enemy? Why is the family so frightening? There is a single answer to all these questions. Because it defines us. Because it is our identity. Because everything that defines us is now an enemy for those who would like us to no longer have an identity and to simply be perfect consumer slaves.

They attack national identity, they attack religious identity. They attack gender identity, they attack family identity. I can’t define myself as Italian, Christian, woman, mother. No. I must be citizen x, gender x, parent 1, parent 2. I must be a number. Because when I am only a number, when I no longer have an identity or roots, then I will be the perfect slave at the mercy of financial speculators — the perfect consumer.

That is the reason why we inspire so much fear. Because we do not want to be numbers. We will defend the value of the human being because every person has a unique genetic code that is unrepeatable… and like it or not, that is sacred.

We will defend God, country, and family. Those things that disgust people so much. We will do it to defend our freedom because we will never be slaves and simple consumers at the mercy of financial speculators. That is our mission. That is why I came here today.”

Tell it, Giorgia. Tell it! — Good Christian? well, marry the father of your daughter.

1. When the men are lacking, women must sometimes step up —Meloni with Le Pen of France — who may herself, in the near future, assume high office in France. // 2. If Italy exits the EU — or even just begins to ignore some its dictates — the cherished post WW2 project of the Globalists will, in essence, cease to exist in any meaningful way.

Putin is Winning Global Information War

AUGUST 12, 2022


NY Times:
 How Russian Propaganda Is Reaching Beyond English Speakers


Social media companies have taken steps to restrict Russian state media accounts. But posts from those accounts still spread in Spanish, Arabic and other languages.


By: Steven Lee Myers

In this textbook example of the psychosis known as “projection” — world class propagandist and “Pulitzer Prize winner” Steven Lee Myers not only applauds Twitter & Facebook censorship of “disinformation” — but goes a step further by moaning and groaning about how “Russian propaganda” (truth) continues to influence the perception of Putin’s righteous military operation in nations around the world.

It’s not enough to suppress the information flow for the English-speaking peoples. Meyers and his tribesmen want the whole world kept in the dark. The Satanic inversion of reality presented in his article is astonishing. The good news is that, in more and more places around the world, the Jurisprudence Armada’s propaganda flotilla is no match for Russia’s information warfare campaign. Meyers’ lies are easy to deconstruct. Let’s clean up some of his filth.

1. The despicable deceiver Steven Lee Myers 
is also the author of “The New Tsar: The Rise and Reign of Vladimir Putin.” // 2. A Pulitzer Prize constitutes, in and of itself, direct first impression evidence of journalistic criminality.

Meyers: In Spanish in Latin America or in Arabic across the Middle East, a steady stream of Russian propaganda and disinformation ………
Analysis: Deep State-affiliated news agencies also operate in all nations of the world. So if US / NATO version of events was true, there wouldn’t be any need to worry about “Russian propaganda and disinformation” because, in a fair head-to-head match, truth will always trump falsehood. What Meyers fears isn’t the “disinformation,” but rather — the competition.

Meyers: … continues to try to justify President Vladimir V. Putin’s unprovoked invasion
Analysis: More projection. The word “unprovoked” actually applies to NATO’s relentless eastward expansion and Jukraine’s violent oppression of the Russian-speaking Donbas republics — Donetsk and Luhansk.

Meyers: The result has been a geographical and cultural asymmetry in the information war over Ukraine that has helped undercut American- and European-led efforts to put broad international pressure on Mr. Putin to call off his war.
Translation: The days when (((they))) could invent and sell the most preposterous and unchallenged lies to the sheeple of the world are — thanks to the Internet and sophisticated Russian communication operations — over.

Meyers:  The failure of Facebook and Twitter to impose stronger checks on Russian posts in non-English languages has begun to draw criticism as the war drags on.
Analysis: There was a time, not too long ago, when most libtards openly expressed horror over the mere thought of news organizations or platforms “imposing strong checks” on the flow of information — even if it was “hate speech.” — “I may disagree with what you say but I will defend to the death your right to say it,” went the old cliche (falsely attributed to Voltaire)

Of course, they made such self-righteous declarations during an era when they were absolutely dominating the info-war. Now that we truthers — thanks to the Internet — have crawled back into the ballgame, the Voltairian mask of magnanimity has dropped as abusive Orwellian “cancel culture” becomes the “the new normal” for the Left.

Meyers: Two weeks ago, a bipartisan group of United States senators added to the criticism, accusing the platforms of allowing Russia to “amplify and export its lies abroad” in Spanish.
Analysis: U.S. Senators “accusing” platforms of “allowing” the Russian side of the story to be presented? Do Slimes readers not see a problem with this? Evidently not.

My times have changed. On the day after Japan’s justified 1941 attack on the Pearl Harbor naval base in Hawaii, this same NY Times actually printed the Japanese Emperor’s entire declaration (here) —  in which he put the blame for the event on the United States. Now (((they))) want Putin to be cancelled — even in foreign countries?

The N.W.O. media monopoly is no more… and Meyers doesn’t like it.
1. RT in Spanish // 2. RT in Arabic

Meyers: The lawmakers urged the companies to do more to block Russia’s Spanish outlets, including RT en Español and Sputnik Mundo.
Analysis: Keeping Americans in the dark isn’t enough. The scum feel they have the right to shape the opinions of the whole world.

Meyers: Russian disinformation is flowing freely in parts of the world where the war in Ukraine is viewed in less stark, good-versus-evil terms as in the United States and Europe.
Analysis: “Good vs Evil” — total reality inversion. Putin actually is a good man (read The War Against Putin.”) Zelensky and his Globalist handlers are the evil ones.

Meyers: Robert Menendez of New Jersey and Tim Kaine of Virginia, both Democrats, and Bill Cassidy, a Republican from Louisiana, wrote in a letter to Facebook’s chief executive, Mark Zuckerberg.
Analysis: Senator Bill Cassidy, FYI, is notorious for having stabbed Trump in the back after “January 6th” . It figures he’d be the “bipartisan” part of this tyrannical effort. After crossing “The Donald,” Cassidy’s days are numbered.

Meyers: On these sites, Russia’s war is falsely portrayed as a just cause …..
Analysis: Actually, Russia’s struggle against the Globalist West is very much a “just cause” – 100% and easily proven. Indeed, Mike King wrote a whole book on the topic which – by the way – was banned by Amazon in 2021. There will be no “Pulitzer Prizes” for Mr. King.

Enemies of free speech who fear “Russian propaganda” — Senator Menendez (D-NJ)  — Senator  Kaine (D-DE) — Senator Cassidy (R-LA)

Get Ready For “I Stand With Taiwan” Idiocy.

Taiwan Presidential Office

AUG 7, 2022


 NY Times (Guest Essay): 
I’m Taiwanese, and I Want to Thank Nancy Pelosi

By Yu-Jie Chen

Yu-Jie Chen is a research professor at the Law Institute of Taiwan’s “Academia Sinica” and an affiliated scholar at New York University’s U.S.-Asia Law Institute. Though usually averse to making hasty generalizations, — on the basis of those “credentials” alone, coupled with the fact that the “paper of record” thought to feature her “Guest Essay” — can confidently label her as a Globalist-Libtard of the Asian branch of Globalist Libtardation.

A proper framing of this wench is necessary for understanding why, in the dispute between the “Two Chinas,” we side with Xi of “communist” China over “democratic” Taiwan. You see, the “I Stand With Taiwan” crowd is made up of the same cult cretins as the “I Stand With Ukraine” bunch. Don’t be surprised if, in few more weeks from now, the usual deluded, virtue-signalling followers of “the latest thing” swap out their yellow and blue Jukraine flags for the red and blue of Taiwan.

To get a better understanding of what this brewing “crisis” is really all about, let’s dive into “Professor” Chen’s love letter to Speaker Pelosi for some analysis.

Column 1: The “Taiwanese” writer is Soros’s bitch. // Column 2:
 Taiwan & Ukraine are both puppet states that the Globalists use to antagonize their Russian & Chinese adversaries. That is why the cult followers of “the latest thing” — some consciously, some obliviously — support both “causes.”
And so it begins.

Chen: As a Taiwanese,….
Rebuttal: Stop right there! You’re only “Taiwanese” by a geographical / historical quirk necessitated by the aftermath of the Chinese Civil War which ended 73 years ago. You are, racially, historically, linguistically, culturally — Chinese. Be proud of that, traitor.

Chen: … I’m sometimes asked what it’s like living in “the most dangerous place on earth.”
Rebuttal: Oh the bloody drama! Who says Taiwan is “the most dangerous place on earth?”

Chen: That’s what The Economist labeled Taiwan last year.
Rebuttal: The Economist eh?  Ooooh, such an authority. The Economist is a Globalist propaganda organ half-owned by the Rothschilds. We can tell who’s buttering your egg roll, honey.

Chen: Taiwan’s people have lived for decades under Chinese rhetorical threats to absorb the island.
RebuttalActually, the official Chinese position is for Taiwan to maintain a maximum level of autonomy, but as part of a single Chinese nation. The name for this idea is “One Country, Two Systems.” Under this proposed arrangement, Taiwan (like Hong Kong & Macao) would keep its governmental system and manage its own financial affairs. It’s a total win-win situation — sort of like the decentralized “cantons” of Switzerland — but the Globalists and their minions in Taiwan won’t allow it.

Chen: China often reacts furiously when any U.S. official visits Taiwan … 
RebuttalAnd how would Americans react if Chinese busy-bodies were to visit the commonwealth of Puerto Rico to incite them against the US mainland?

Chen: ….Beijing has a special loathing for Ms. Pelosi.
Rebuttal: The fact that China “loathes” that corrupt drunken bitch is all the more reason for decent Americans to NOT “stand with Taiwan.”

Chen: Ms. Pelosi’s visit was a welcome expression of U.S. solidarity with Taiwan ….
RebuttalDrunken Nancy (if that’s even her) won’t be speaking for Americans for much longer. The Demonrat Party is headed for a devastating humiliation in about 12 weeks.

Chen: Taiwan is critical to the entire democratic project.
Rebuttal: What exactly do you mean by the “democratic project?” — And why is Taiwan so “critical” to it?

Chen: We are the first place in Asia to legalize same-sex marriage.
Rebuttal: There it is! “Gay – Gay – Gay” — the very first thing she mentions. Yes, the Globalists are turning Taiwan into an Asian outpost of decay and degeneracy. In hindsight, foreknowledge of that alone might have made me root for Mao’s Reds to take back the island.

Chen: And one of the first to elect a female leader — our current president, Tsai Ing-wen —
Rebuttal: President Tsai Ing Wen is a rancid libtarded harridan cut from the same Soros cloth as libtarded western shrews like Satanist Hillary, Drunken Pelosi, Frumpy Merkel, Donkey-Faced Adern (gender questionable) et al. Again, give me bloody old Chairman Mao over this bossy neo-Marxist hag any day.

1. The Rothschild Crime Syndicate made Taiwan “the most dangerous place on Earth” — then their magazine blames China for making it so dangerous. // 2. The queering of Taiwan — brought to you by the CIA. // 3. The Wicked Witch of the West meets the Wicked Witch of the East (still with the theatrical face diapers!)
As thick as thieves! George Soros, Drunken Nancy and Alex Soros

Chen: We are a successful economy, with some of the highest living standards in Asia.
Rebuttal: Morally decaying Taiwan, like its western counterpart “democracies,” also has below-replacement-level birth rates and growing divorce rates. Keep ageing the population and keep ruining your families — and we shall see how much longer you can maintain a “successful economy.”

Chen: If Taiwan were brought to heel by China, ….
Rebuttal: The fact that Taiwan was “brought to heel” by the Globalist Cabal a long time ago doesn’t seem to trouble this “sovereignty” loving cosmopolitan C-word one bit.

Chen: …. the world would lose a shining example of democracy and the liberal international economic order
Rebuttal: “The liberal international economic order,” eh? — That says it all.

Chen: … at a time when the authoritarian tentacles of the likes of Russia and China are expanding.
Globalese to English Translation: “Authoritarianism” refers to the act of saying “NO!” to the Globalist Crime Syndicate.

Chen: Seizing Taiwan would fulfill Mr. Xi’s nationalistic goal of annexing the island.
Rebuttal: It would not be a “seizure.” What Xi seeks is peaceful reunification.

Chen: Rarely does anyone bother to ask what the Taiwanese want. The answer: to live our democratic way of life …..
Rebuttal: Lying she-devil. Taiwan is being offered “One Country, Two Systems.” You can keep your precious “democracy” and “gay rights” — just as long as you don’t allow the CIA and the Soros NGOs to set up subversive shop on the island. 

Chen:  … without outside interference.
Rebuttal: The “outside interference” (always inciting Taiwan to maintain an adversarial posture toward China) comes from the West, not China!

Chen: When Mao Zedong’s Communist forces won the Chinese Civil War in 1949, China’s Nationalist regime, led by Chiang Kai-shek, fled to Taiwan and ruled with martial law. Civil liberties were curtailed, and regime opponents suffered greatly.
Rebuttal: Chiang Kai-shek knew how to deal with not only Maoists, but also the libtarded democratic types. Ironically, Nationalists Chiang and Xi would probably have gotten along very well today.

Chen: Through the efforts of democracy advocates and pragmatic post-Chiang leaders, Taiwan evolved peacefully into a firm democracy.
Translation: After Chiang’s death, the CFR-CIA complex got its tentacles into the island’s parliamentary politics and started recruiting traitors and weaklings.

Chen: We watched with shock and sadness as Beijing cracked down on Hong Kong’s freedoms — a disturbing glimpse of our own possible future.
Rebuttal: China’s “crackdown” was on the CIA / Soros “Umbrella Revolutionaries” of Hong Kong. The people at large are doing just fine.

Chen: And Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has prompted fears that China could do the same to us.
Rebuttal: As they say in poker parlance, this is yet another “tell” from this quackademic whore. She hates Putin (surprise surprise).

Chen: Beijing repeats its tired old gospel that Taiwan is an ancient and inseparable part of the Chinese motherland.
Rebuttal: Well, tiny Taiwan is an ancient part of China. Why is that a “tired old gospel?”

Chen: We do not want a war with China. But we are ready to protect our home if attacked.  Our determination to safeguard our beloved homeland should not be underestimated. Freedom is worth fighting for.
Rebuttal: The evil bitch would have her fellow islanders (a decent chunk of whom, in spite of CIA propaganda, actually want reunification with the mainland) to die in defense of the “liberal world order,” not for “freedom” — as she safely sits out any potential conflict sipping lattes with her queer American comrades in some faculty lounge on the NYU campus.

Chen: All democracies will be strengthened by standing with Taiwan.
Rebuttal: Sounds just like Zelensky of Jukraine. She wants “all democracies” to go to war against Russia & China in defense of the “”liberal world order” — which was exactly what the N.W.O. would have unleashed by now had Killary Clinton won in 2016. Soros himself had even “warned” (threatened) so. (in 2015: here) and again in 2022: here)

***************

And that, boys and girls, is all “you guys” need to know about the true meaning of “standing with Taiwan.”

 1. Nationalist Chiang and Communist Mao put their civil war on hold to fight Japan — a war which Chiang was lured into by the western powers who later betrayed him. // 2. Chiang’s forces — denied arms by the Truman administration — eventually fled to Taiwan. After his death in 1975, CIA infiltration began the slow process of turning the conservative island into an anti-China Globalist outpost. // 3. Nationalist Xi with his buddy, Nationalist Putin. Ironically, Xi’s modern China is much more similar to Chiang’s old Taiwan than it is Mao’s old China.

The Putin Youth Are Coming..

Caption: 
School-aged children last year at an award ceremony in Vladimir, Russia.

NY Times: Putin Aims to Shape a New Generation of Supporters, Through Schools

Sweeping changes in the curriculum will soon cast the Russian president as a pivotal historical figure and mark an end of openness to the West.

Oh the horrible howls of non-lubricated butt-hurt emanating from high atop Manhattan’s Marxist Mendacity Machine! Not only has (((their crowd))) lost the opportunity to mind-rape the youth of Russia like they have been doing in “the free world” — but Vlad the Bad & friends are now doing a bit of benevolent brainwashing themselves instead!

From the article:

“Starting in first grade, students across Russia will soon sit through weekly classes featuring war movies and virtual tours through Crimea. They will be given a steady dose of lectures on topics like “the geopolitical situation” and “traditional values.” In addition to a regular flag-raising ceremony, they will be introduced to lessons celebrating Russia’s “rebirth” under President Vladimir V. Putin.

And, according to legislation signed into law by Mr. Putin on Thursday, all Russian children will be encouraged to join a new patriotic youth movement in the likeness of the Soviet Union’s red-cravatted “Pioneers” — presided over by the president himself.”

Oy vey! Vlad the Bad is busting out his own version of the Hitler youth!

A properly instructed youth will not be morally conquered so easily when they grow older.

Notwithstanding the deeply embedded historical errors surrounding Russia’s “heroic” resistance against Napoleon and Hitler — both of whom had multi-national wars imposed upon them by “the usual suspects” — this is the sort of patriotic, social and moral indoctrination that our misguided youth so desperately need. Let us analyze a few excerpts from the story:

Times: As the war in Ukraine approaches the five-month mark, the vast ambitions of Putin’s plans for the home front are coming into focus: a wholesale reprogramming of Russian society to end 30 years of openness to the West.
Analysis: The necessary and proper military action in Ukraine gave Putin the opening he needed to smoke out the libtarded “scum and traitors” (his actual words) of Russia and “reprogram” society with strong doses of truth and decency.

Times: The Kremlin has already jailed or forced into exile just about all activists speaking out against the war; it has criminalized what remained of Russia’s independent journalism; it has cracked down on academics, bloggers and even a hockey player with suspect loyalties.
Analysis: Good! These traitors should be thankful they weren’t publicly flogged and then hanged in Red Square.

Times: But nowhere are these ambitions clearer than in the Kremlin’s race to overhaul how children are taught at Russia’s 40,000 public schools.
Analysis: The hand that rocks the cradle rules the future. In this case, the cradle is in the hands of the good guys.

Times: The nationwide education initiatives, which start in September, are part of the Russian government’s scramble to indoctrinate children with Mr. Putin’s militarized and anti-Western version of patriotism.
Analysis: The Slimes didn’t complain about “indoctrination” when NGO-engineered Russian school books containing Globalist propaganda and even chapters on US history and presidents started popping up during the Yeltsin years.

Times: A ninth-grader, Irina, said that a computer class in Moscow was replaced by the viewing of a state television report on Ukrainians surrendering to Russian troops and a lecture explaining that only information from official Russian sources was to be trusted.
Analysis: The Slimes dug up a little Russian traitoress named Irina– probably coached by her bitch of a mother (assuming these people even exist) — and interviewed her by phone (supposedly).

Times: She soon noticed a transformation among some friends who had been initially scared or confused by the war. “They suddenly started repeating everything after the television.”
Analysis: Repeating the TV News is suddenly bad? Idiotic Irina sounds like one of them “conspiracy theorists” now.

Times: Irina said in a phone interview alongside her mother, “They suddenly started saying that this is all deserved, that this had to happen. They couldn’t even attempt to explain this to me.”
Analysis: Allow me. It’s very simple, Irina. You see, the CIA/Mossad puppets based in Kiev have been oppressing the Russians in the east for years while threatening to extend the reach of the violent NATO war machine 800 miles closer to the heart of Russia itself. Putin ain’t putin (pun intended) up with it — nor should he. Understand?

Times: Irina said that when she challenged her friends about Russian war crimes, they shot back: “It’s all propaganda.”
Analysis: Irina’s friends are correct. The brainwashed one is Irina.

Times: Irina’s parents, driven in part by their refusal to raise their children in an increasingly militarized environment, left for Poland this spring.
Analysis: Ah… so the red rats abandoned Russia! They are indeed traitors after all. Good riddance — filthy scum pigs. Wonder if this alleged family is actually even “Russian,” — know what I’m sayin’?

Times: In the city of Pskov near the Estonian border, Irina Milyutina (an English teacher) said that the children at her school scrawled Z’s and V’s — symbols of support for the war — on chalkboards, desks and even the floors. At recess, fifth and sixth graders pretended to be Russian soldiers.
Analysis: The libtard traitor teachers have lost their students. Hopefully, they’ll soon lose their jobs.

Times: A proposed decree published by the education ministry shows that Mr. Putin’s two decades in power are set to be enshrined in the standard curriculum as a historical turning point. The decree says that Russian history classes will be required to include several new topics like “the rebirth of Russia as a great power in the 21st century,” “reunification with Crimea,” and “the special military operation in Ukraine.”
Analysis: In other words, everything that yours truly wrote in “The War Against Putin” is about to be taught to millions and millions of Russian kids. Take that, Globalists!

Napoleon — Hitler — Putin. They all fought the same war against the same unseen enemy. Has Vlad the Bad finally succeeded where the others fell short?

Handling International Crises: From JFK to Biden

Since Biden appointed the chief architect of the Ukraine coup, Victoria Nuland, to be the third top official at the State Department, one cannot realistically expect a change in policy from this administration.

There are significant parallels between the international crises in Cuba in 1962 and Ukraine today. Both involved intense confrontations between the USA and the Soviet Union or Russia. Both involved third-party countries on the doorstep of a major power. The Cuban Missile Crisis threatened to lead to WW3, just as the Ukraine crisis does today.

Cuban Missile Crisis and  the current crisis in Ukraine 

In 1961, the US supported the “Bay of Pigs” invasion of Cuba. Although it failed, Washington’s hostile rhetoric and threats against Cuba continued, and the CIA conducted many failed assassination attempts against Cuban leader Fidel Castro.

Cuba, seeking to defend itself, or at least have a means of retaliating in case of another attack, sought missiles from the Soviet Union. The Soviets agreed and began secretly installing the missiles. As a sovereign nation having been attacked and under continuing threat, Cuba had the right to obtain these missiles.

US President John F. Kennedy thought otherwise. Invoking the Monroe Doctrine, he said the missiles endangered the US and must be removed. He imposed an air and sea quarantine on Cuba and threatened to destroy a Soviet ship traveling on the high seas to Cuba. The world was on edge, and there was global fear that World War 3 was about to erupt. In my homeland Canada, we went to bed seriously worried that nuclear war would break out overnight.

Fortunately for humanity, cooler heads prevailed, and there were negotiations. The Soviets agreed to withdraw the missiles in Cuba. In return, JFK agreed to withdraw US missiles in Turkey aimed at the Soviet Union. The Cubans were furious, thinking they had been betrayed and lost their means of defense. But the Soviets had the bigger picture in mind, along with a US commitment to not invade Cuba.

The situation now in Ukraine has similarities. Instead of missiles in Cuba being a threat to the US, NATO in Ukraine is seen as a threat to Russia. NATO has steadily expanded east and installed missiles in Poland and Romania. Since 2008, Russia has explicitly said that Ukrainian militarization by NATO was a red line for them. Kiev is much closer to Moscow than Havana is to Washington. If it was justifiable for JFK to give the ultimatum regarding missiles in Cuba, is it not justifiable for Russia to object to Ukraine being a part of a hostile military alliance?

How Both Putin and Biden Bungled in Ukraine

Different Responses

In 1962, the US and the Soviet Union realized that escalating tensions and hostilities must be avoided, and they turned to negotiations. They found a mutually acceptable compromise.

The situation seems more dangerous today. Instead of seeking an end to the war, the US and NATO are pouring in weapons and encouraging more bloodshed. It appears to be a proxy war with the US prepared to fight to the last Ukrainian. There are calls to escalate the conflict.

Ukraine Background 

Knowing the background to the current crisis is essential to understanding Putin’s actions. Unknown to most Americans, a crucial event took place in 2014 when a violent US-supported coup overthrew the democratically elected Ukrainian government. US State Department official Victoria Nuland handed out cookies as Senator John McCain encouraged the anti-government protesters. In a secretly captured conversation with the US Ambassador to Ukraine, Nuland selected who would run the government after the pending coup. In the final days, opposition snipers killed 100 people on both sides to inflame the situation and “midwife” the coup. Oliver Stone’s video “Ukraine on Fire” describes the background and events.

On the first day in power, the coup government issued a decree that removed Russian as a state language.

Within weeks, Crimea organized a referendum. With 85% participation, 96% voted to leave Ukraine and reunite with Russia. Why did they do this? Because most Crimeans speak Russian as their first language, and Crimea had been part of Russia since 1783. When Soviet premier Khrushchev transferred Crimea from the Russian republic to the Ukrainian republic in 1954, they were all within the Soviet Union.

In Odessa, anti-coup protesters were attacked by ultra-nationalist thugs who killed 48, including many burned alive as they sought refuge in the Trade Unions Hall. In eastern Ukraine, known as the Donbass, the majority of the population also opposed the ultra-nationalist coup government. Civil war broke out, with thousands killed.

With the participation of France, Germany, the Kiev government, and eastern Ukraine rebels, an agreement was reached and approved by the United Nations Security Council. It was called the Minsk Agreement. Russia has repeatedly encouraged the implementation of this agreement. Instead of negotiations and peace, the Kiev government and NATO have done the opposite. Since 2015, there have been more weapons, more threats, more NATO training, more encouragement of ultra-nationalism plus NATO military exercises explicitly designed to threaten and antagonize Russia. This is not speculation; it is described in a 2019 Rand report about “Overextending and Unbalancing Russia.”

Endangering the world

The Biden administration appears to want to prolong the conflict in Ukraine. President Biden declared in a “gaffe” that Putin must be replaced. Defense Secretary Austin has said the US goal is to “weaken Russia”. Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton thinks Afghanistan in the 1980s is a “model” to follow in Ukraine by bogging Russia down in a protracted war. Republican and Democratic senators Graham and Blumenthal visited Kiev on July 7 and called for sending even more weapons. There is evidence that the US and UK have been advising Ukrainian president Zelensky to NOT negotiate.

The Need for Courage and Compromise

With war and bloodshed happening now, we need cooler heads to prevail as in 1962. We can have a LOSE – LOSE situation, endangering the whole world, or a compromise that guarantees Ukrainian independence while providing security assurances to Russia.

JFK had the courage and wisdom to resist the CIA and military generals who wanted to escalate the crisis. Does Joe Biden? There is a huge difference between the two presidents. JFK knew war first hand. He was injured and his brother died in WW2. He became an advocate for peace. It may have cost him his life, but millions of people were saved. In contrast, Joe Biden has been a proponent of every US war of the past three decades.  Not only that, he was a major player in the 2014 Ukraine coup and aftermath.

Since Biden appointed the chief architect of the Ukraine coup, Victoria Nuland, to be the third top official at the State Department, one cannot realistically expect a change in policy from this administration. Neo-cons are in charge.

If we are to avoid disaster, others must speak up and demand negotiations and settlement before the situation spirals out of control.

The “Strongmen” Are Killing the NWO…

Those naughty, naughty “strongmen” are up to their anti-NWO mischief again – “stalling unity” in the face of “aggression” by the ultimate “strongman” in Russia. Turkish President Recip Erdogan is using the unanimous consent clause of NATO to block Sweden and Finland from joining the war-making club; and Viktor Orban of Hungary is using the EU’s unanimous consent rule to block efforts to embargo Russian oil.

From the “botched” pullout from Afghanistan to their impotence regarding Ukraine, it seems that the Globalist “weakmen” can’t get anything done during the Trump Era. At this point, one has to wonder, as indeed many in the Fake News have openly speculated, whether or not the monster which grew out of World War II will exist much longer — or at least in any form that has actual fangs and claws.

Behold some the worried headlines of the Fake News from recent years:

1. Trump said that he is “a big fan” of Erdogan// 2. Trump said that he is a “big fan” of Orban // 3. The cartoon, which is intended to mock Trump & Putin, actually depicts the new reality.

These are such promising and exciting developments which would have seemed impossible just a few years ago — at a time when direct and indirect US / NATO / CIA / Mossad subversion and belligerence was wreaking death and destruction in Libya, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Sudan and Syria — and truly threatening to trigger World War III either in the Middle East / Iran, or the Korean peninsula, or in Eastern Europe. The world was about ready to explode in 2016. All that was needed was for the inevitable Killary Clinton to unleash the Satanic hell-on-earth World War III conflagration between “the international community” and the Russia-China alliance — a global catastrophe for the ages which George Soros himself was openly  “predicting” about in 2015. (here)

And still, due to the poison which has been deliberately injected into our community by CIA infiltrators posing as “right wing” digital warriors, a handful of “conspiracy theorists” still insist on branding Trump as either a failure at best, or a “false opposition psyop” at worst. Well, if it weren’t for this “psyop,” a good many of us might not even be here today. That’s a fact!

Since the days when the UK led various coalitions in numerous wars to topple Napoleon— and throughout the latter half of the 19th Century and early part of the 20th when that role was executed by the UK / France alliance — and all during the post WW II 70 year existence of NATO — the New World Order Crime Syndicate has always been able to command an enforcer force at its disposal. The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion (circa 1900) described the demonic dynamic this way, in Protocol 7:

“We must be in a position to respond to every act of opposition by war with the neighbors of that country which dares to oppose us: but if these neighbors should also venture to stand collectively together against us, then we must offer resistance by a universal war.”

What Trump, Putin and various other members of the “strongman” club have accomplished (or are in the process of accomplishing) is the deactivation of the NWO’s indispensable contemporary “hitman” — NATO. No NATO means no New World Order. PERIOD! —  How’s that for “false opposition?”

Of course, though saving millions of lives, in the physical sense, is a laudable achievement worthy of celebrating; repairing and restoring the shattered minds, morals, families and spirits of so many who have been afflicted may prove to be the most daunting challenge of all. Just have a look around you. The NWO’s culture-wreckers have done quite a number on humanity these past 50 years or so.

1. Mike’s illustrated & annotated Protocols of Zion // 2. The informal British-French “hit team” of the 1800’s collaborated during the Opium Wars against China, the Crimean War against Russia, and plotted against the US during the War Between the States. In 1904, in preparation for “The Great War” (WW I) to come 10 years later, the UK-France war-making alliance was formalized as “The Entente Cordiale.” // 3. After WW II, US-led NATO served as Rothschild’s pack of menacing attack dogs.

Economic World War: Who Benefits And How Much Time Is Left?

I have been warning about an inevitable East vs. West economic war for many years now. The question was never a matter of likelihood, it was always just a matter of timing. When would the most convenient time be for World War III?

The issue of “convenience” might sound odd, but I want readers to remember one rule: All wars are banker wars.

economic world war who benefits and how much time is left?

There is nothing you cannot eventually understand in terms of geopolitics as long as you accept the fact that international conflicts are generally engineered and always designed to benefit a particular group of establishment power brokers and financial elites.

If you are one of those people who assume all of these events are merely “random and unfortunate coincidence” then you’ll remain in the dark for the rest of your life – and will never grasp why terrible things are happening to you as the world falls apart.

You will go to an early grave because you were unprepared while still thinking you were the smartest person in the room.

In the article Order out of Chaos: How the Ukraine Conflict Is Designed to Benefit Globalists, Is outlined the many factors that tie the Kremlin to globalist institutions like the World Economic Forum (WEF), the Bank of International Settlements (BIS), the International Monetary Fund (IMF), elitists like Henry Kissinger and international banks like Goldman Sachs. The reality is, Russia has long been attached to globalist interests and this is not going to change because of the war in Ukraine, just as it did not change after Russia annexed Crimea.

China is, of course, even worse when it comes to collusion with globalist institutions. The nation accrued trillions of dollars in debt because this is a prerequisite for joining the IMF’s Special Drawing Rights (SDR) basket of currencies. Yes, China went from being a nation of minimal debt to being trillions in the red just because the IMF demands “liquidity” for a nation’s currency to be considered viable for their global centralization initiative. This is not the behavior of a country that is anti-globalist.

I’m not going to continue rehashing the facts surrounding eastern nations and their attachments to the globalists here. I’ve already done that for well over a decade and frankly I grow tired of having to rehash the lessons that brilliant researchers like Antony Sutton expertly addressed back before I was born. If there’s a major war, then there are globalists behind it influencing both sides and seeking to gain more power. If you haven’t figured this out by now, then you never will.

Here’s What War Is Good For

Why engineer a war? Simple – when you play both sides of a chess game, you always end up the winner. Beyond that, chaos is the ultimate recipe for advancing draconian agendas that the public would never allow to pass during peacetime.

What I want to examine here instead is the issue of timing and development; how is this massive economic war going to play out and how long will it take to happen? Once we understand the stages, maybe we can brace for impact and take actions to change the outcome.

The first step is to acknowledge that the ball is in the court of eastern nations and that their actions will dictate the pace of events.

The Economic Lesson The West Has Forgotten

True wealth has nothing to do with money or debt creation; true wealth comes from resources, the means of production and labor. This is something the Marxists actually got right in their philosophy; the problem is that Marxists are only interested in ways to steal labor, resources and production while making the public think that such theft is a good thing.

Eastern nations continue to understand what real wealth is. You can have all the money in the world but if you have no manufacturing base or resource development then you have nothing.

It’s as simple as that.

If a nation has no real wealth and no means of creating it, no printing press is going to save its economy.

The West has abandoned much of its means of production and has crippled the exploration of its own resources through fake environmental concerns like “carbon pollution.” The East has not done this, at least not in a way that affects long term productivity. Therefore, the East is in the strongest position to survive a global economic conflict.

But the real key to the progression of an economic world war is the combination of countries involved and their trade agreements.

Russia and China, for example, have been developing bilateral trade meant to cut out the U.S. dollar for many years now. Russia is resource-rich, and China has the world’s largest manufacturing and export base. An alliance makes perfect economic sense. And this is exactly what has happened.

Only weeks before the invasion of Ukraine, Russia signed a 30-year oil and gas contract with China worth hundreds of billions of dollars. This deal coincides with the construction of a major pipeline from Russia to China which will be completed by 2025.

India also made arrangements for increased oil shipments from Russia, and will pay without the dollar (formerly the world’s sole petro-currency). Furthermore, the promise of lower prices while the rest of the oil world is experiencing rapid inflation in energy prices is highly tempting for those purchasing oil, natural gas or coal from Russia.

The other nations of the BRICS bloc (Brazil, India, China and South Africa) have all been highly active in trade with Russia despite western sanctions and the removal of Russian banks from the SWIFT international payments network. This is exactly what I predicted would happen many years ago.

But how does this trading bloc affect the time frame of the world war?

An Economic War Has Economic Targets

It has been my belief that the real target of this war is not Russia or China, but the U.S. dollar and the American economy. Yes, there will be far reaching financial consequences beyond the U.S., but our economy is the only economy that is completely reliant on our currency’s global reserve status.

A world war using economic weapons and tactics is the worst type of war we could fight because it is not a war we can win. The dollar’s global reserve status is our Achilles heel. It is not a strength, but a weakness.

While all eyes are on the shooting war in Ukraine on the other side of the planet, very few realize that the worst damage is going to hit us right here at home.

The sanctions on Russia are only a part of the problem, as this is creating momentum towards a general decoupling from the dollar trade. The bigger issue is the BRICS nations (and their export/import partners) who will refuse to accept sanctions because they are economically dependent on each other.

One example is the recent announcement by Hungary that they plan to refuse any cuts to Russian oil and gas imports. Why? Because this would cause an energy crisis in their country, one they couldn’t recover from.

Many other nations are following this logic around the world, and if NATO is going to continue pushing for economic isolation of Russia, then those countries will invariably stop using the dollar as their reserve currency.

Why “invariably,” you might ask – why does Russia’s economic isolation lead to the end of the dollar’s global reserve status? Here’s why: when the Biden administration and the European Union (EU) sanctioned Russia, they also froze Russia’s U.S. dollar accounts and terminated Russia’s connection with the international payments platform. This was a very clear method of coercion! It’s as though Biden called up Putin and told him, “Get out of Ukraine or else. That’s a real nice economy you got there. Be a shame if something, ah, happened to it…”

The rest of the world watched the West financially cancel Russia with a mix of awe and horror. This act of economic warfare revealed a nearly-unthinkable conclusion: If they did it to Russia, they could do it to us, too…

As Credit Suisse’s global head of interest rate strategy Zoltan Poszar told Bloomberg’s “Odd Lots” show:

…wars tend to turn into major junctures for global currencies, and with Russia losing access to its foreign currency reserves, a message has been sent to all countries that they can’t count on these money stashes to actually be theirs in the event of tension. As such, it may make less and less sense for global reserve managers to hold dollars for safety, given that they could be taken away right when they’re most needed.

Dylan Grice of Calderwood Capital put this in more stark terms:

In other words, the establishment elites in the US and Europe are creating the conditions which can destroy the dollar.

The dollar’s status is entirely dependent on faith and belief in its demand. If demand for dollars wavers because of global sanctions, then all those trillions of greenbacks held in overseas banks will come flooding back into the U.S., shoving the nation deeper into stagflationary crisis.

The globalists are perfectly aware that this will be the consequence. In fact, they’re counting on it.

We Have Eight Years To Prepare

The year 2030 is consistently mentioned by the United Nations, the IMF, the WEF and the rest of the cabal of globalist institutions as the final milestone for their Great Reset agenda.

If a global economic crisis is the catalyst as it appears to be, then several years would be required to let the collapse play out – along with the introduction of a “solution” to the problem. This means that the economic war will have to accelerate quickly going into the next year.

Today we are already seeing 40 year highs in inflation, along with considerable supply chain disruptions. Multiple globalist foundations are “predicting” food shortages around the world in the next 3-6 months. I believe the war itself will expand rapidly within a year to include China, and most of the damage will be done by the end of 2024. This will all depend on how fast exporters (mainly China) dump the dollar; the dollar dump will be the primary trigger.

A significant part of the WEF’s Great Reset agenda and the IMF’s Special Drawing Rights global digital currency initiative would require the end of the dollar as the world’s reserve currency. This is a process the globalists have been talking about openly for some time. It’s not “conspiracy theory,” it is conspiracy reality. The IMF has argued on many occasions that the global currency framework must be “managed” by a centralized entity that can prevent national governments from exploiting currency trade for their own ends, and this includes digital currencies.

The stage is already set for this narrative. The U.S. will be painted as an example of why nationalism is a “path to disaster” and why no single nation should be trusted with so much power in the form of a world reserve currency. That kind of power tempts governments not only into excessive money creation power debt-financed spending sprees. Not only to print new money to pay for those old debts, thus debasing and degrading the dollar’s purchasing power worldwide (also known as inflation). But look at what the U.S. did to Russia – freezing bank accounts and canceling credit cards of the world’s 10th largest economy. The globalists would call this an abuse of power.

Throughout history, global reserve currencies have risen and fallen. From the Greek drachma in the 5th century B.C. to the British pound sterling (1700-1931), every single one has collapsed. And the resulting implosion of a reserve currency spreads like a tsunami, wrecking economies worldwide.

Thus, it is only “logical” that a global central authority with no national loyalties be put in control of an “international” reserve currency, right? Maybe a multi-currency-based basket system, or, perhaps, a single world currency… To prevent any future tragedies and abuses of power from ever happening again. Right?

Don’t be fooled.

It’s a complete con.

World war, whether economic or kinetic, and the death of the dollar as the global reserve currency is a perfect excuse for the “perfectly rational” introduction of an international financial oligarchy.

And, unlike its predecessors, this ruling council would operate right out in the sun for everyone to see, not in the shadows deep in the bowels of central banking cartels. Their authority would be “official,” and their control established as necessary, even vital for world peace.

This is the same thing that has happened after every major war or world war; the argument is made that national sovereignty was the cause and that nation states should not exist because when people are left to organize into groups they might form differing ideas on how to live, and differing ideas cause conflict.

After World War I, they introduced the League of Nations.

After World War II, they established the UN and the IMF.

And, after economic World War III, they will try to implement a program of one world currency and global economic governance(and dominance, as well).

Globalists claim it is better for there to be no sovereigntyno groups and no differing ideas. “We need one homogeneous global collective with a single hive mind,” goes the argument, “so that no conflict ever happens.”

Of course, they get to have their own group, and that group intends to garner all the benefits of the crisis and the power that will be derived from the panic.

strongly recommend you prepare yourself, and your family, for the end of the U.S. dollar’s global reserve status. That means securing your financial future with what’s been called “money of last resort,” in other words, physical gold and silver. Physical precious metals are safe from hacking, immune to the collapse of the electrical grid and will very likely always be worth something, which is more than we can say for the vast majority of the fallen currencies. They’re a solid financial foundation to build your future on, whatever the future brings.

Take yourself off the dollar standard before the globalists do it for you – because once they come for your dollars, it will be too late.

With that warning, I leave you with a quote from globalist and Council on Foreign Relations member Richard Gardner, published in Foreign Affairs magazine in 1974, which I think drives home the reality of the people we are dealing with:

In short, the “house of world order” will have to be built from the bottom up rather than from the top down. It will look like a great “booming, buzzing confusion,” to use William James’ famous description of reality, but an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece, will accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault.

Source: BirchGold.com

Just Imagine if Ukraine had Joined NATO

The Khazarian cross-dresser realizes by now that the NATO killing machine (de-fanged by Trump) isn’t going to come to his aid — not by instituting a “no fly zone” and certainly not with ground troops. The vulgar little coke-head is angry, and he’s lashing out over something that happened — or rather, did not happen — back in 2008. From the article:

“Mr. Zelensky was speaking about the 2008 NATO summit in Bucharest, Romania, where, after a major internal debate, NATO promised membership in the alliance to Georgia and Ukraine but without specifying when.

The Bucharest summit was marked by a debate over whether to give Ukraine and Georgia a formal “membership action plan” to guide them toward qualifying for NATO membership. President George W. Bush favored doing so. Ms. Merkel (Germany) and Mr. Sarkozy (France) were not alone in arguing that neither country was ready.” (emphasis added)

*

You see that? The same vile Bush-Cheney crew which aided and covered up the 9/11 false flag atrocities and brought us the never ending genocidal “War on Terror” was ready to induct the Ukraine into the killing cult of NATO and its infamous Article 5 “war-with-one-means-war-with-all” commitment. France & Germany however — knowing that World War III would touch their cities directly — balked at the idea of issuing a fixed date for admitting the Ukraine, preferring to play the “long game” of engaging Russia’s traitorous internal “fifth column” instead of provoking a war that would leave Berlin and Paris in ruins.

In January of that same year, just before that Bucharest Summit mentioned earlier, and at a time when it was presumed that Killary Clinton would be elected president in November (it turned out to be Obongo), the filthy harridan called for The Ukraine to be put on track for NATO membership. She issued a statement saying:

“I enthusiastically welcome the January 11 letter from Ukrainian President Yushchenko, Prime Minister Tymoshenko, and Rada Chairman Arsenii Yatsenyuk to NATO Secretary General Scheffer, which outlines Ukraine’s desire for a closer relationship with NATO, including a Membership Action Plan. (emphasis added)

As Secretary of State in 2010, she repeated her support for NATO membership (here) As the Demonrat’s candidate for president in 2016, she again called for NATO to offer military aid to The Ukraine — a form of de facto NATO membership that was more saleable. (here)

Fast forward from 2008 to 2014 — the year of the violent CIA coup which overthrew the duly-elected Russia-friendly government of The Ukraine. One of America’s most “respected” and influential Senators, John McStain, openly demanded that his new puppet pets in Kiev be placed on a definable timetable for NATO membership. (here)

So you see, the world came a lot closer to NATO membership for the Ukraine — and war with Russia — than most people realize. It was only the rise of Donald Trump — an unexpected historic event which led to the demise of Killary and the secret execution of McStain (here, (0:00 – 0:17) and (here) — which prevented the insanity of placing the fate of the world in the hands of the mad puppet gangsters of Kiev.

The 8-year oppression of the Russian people of the new republics of Luhansk and Donetsk is the most pressing reason for Russia’s limited action in The Ukraine. Of even greater importance, however, is the need to put a stop, once and for all, to the dangerous long term game of placing and arming an enemy outpost so deep into Russia’s backyard. The Ukraine’s potential absorption into the EU-NATO beast system would give The New World Order Satanists a population of 40 million from which to draw additional human cannon fodder; and a territory in which to place missiles in what would represent a nearly 800 mile eastward advance — putting them close enough to hit Moscow with hyper-sonic missiles within a matter of minutes.

To say that Putin’s action is morally justified would be a understatement. It’s much more than that. Anything less would be gross negligence and a dereliction of his sacred duty to protect his people from the Globalists who wish to “cancel” Russia. For this reason, Putin was absolutely correct to label internal “fifth columnists” as the “scum and traitors” that they are.

Ukraine is as wide as California is long. It’s fall to NATO would be the equivalent of an instant 800 mile conventional and nuclear military advancement upon Russia 
ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!

And that’s in addition to the previous Globalist eastern acquisitions of Poland, Hungary, Romania, Lithuania etc which followed the disintegration of the Soviet Union and Warsaw Pact alliance.

The New World Order That Is Being Prepared Under The Pretext Of War In Ukraine

The conflict in Ukraine was not opened by Russia on February 24, but by Ukraine a week before. The OSCE is a witness to this. This peripheral conflict had been planned by Washington to impose a New World Order from which Russia, then China, were to be excluded. Don’t be fooled!

the new world order that is being prepared under the pretext of war in ukraine

Russia’s military operations in Ukraine have been going on for more than a month and NATO’s propaganda operations for a month and a half.

As always, the war propaganda of the Anglo-Saxons is coordinated from London. Since the First World War, the British have acquired an unparalleled know-how. In 1914, they had managed to convince their own population that the German army had carried out mass rapes in Belgium and that it was the duty of every Briton to come to the rescue of these poor women.

It was a cleaner version of Kaiser Wilhelm II’s attempt to compete with the British colonial empire. At the end of the conflict, the British population demanded that the victims be compensated. A census was taken and it was found that the facts had been extraordinarily exaggerated.

This time, in 2022, the British managed to convince the Europeans that on February 24 the Russians had attacked Ukraine to invade and annex it. Moscow was trying to reconstitute the Soviet Union and was preparing to attack all its former possessions in succession. This version is more honorable for the West than evoking the “Thucydides trap” – I will come back to this.

In reality, Kiev’s troops attacked their own population in Donbass on the afternoon of February 17.

Number of explosions recorded in Donbass

Number of explosions recorded in Donbass (February 14-22, 2022)

Then Ukraine waved a red rag in front of the Russian bull with President Zelenskyy’s speech to the political and military leaders of NATO gathered in Munich, during which he announced that his country was going to acquire nuclear weapons to protect itself from Russia.

Don’t believe me? Here are the OSCE readings from the Donbass border. There had been no fighting for months, but the observers of the neutral organization observed 1,400 explosions per day as of the afternoon of February 17. Immediately, the rebel provinces of Donetsk and Lugansk, which still considered themselves Ukrainian but claimed autonomy within Ukraine, moved more than 100,000 civilians to protect them. Most retreated to the interior of Donbass, others fled to Russia.

In 2014 and 2015, when a civil war had pitted Kiev against Donestk and Lugansk, the material and human damage was only a matter of Ukraine’s internal affairs.

However, in the course of time, almost the entire Ukrainian population of Donbass considered emigrating and acquired dual Russian citizenship. Therefore, Kiev’s attack on the population of Donbass on February 17 was an attack on Ukrainian-Russian citizens. Moscow came to their rescue, in an emergency, from February 24.

The chronology is indisputable. It was not Moscow that wanted this war, but Kiev, despite the predictable price it would have to pay. President Zelenskyy deliberately put his people in danger and bears sole responsibility for what they are enduring today.

Why did he do this? Since the beginning of his term, Volodymyr Zelenskyy has continued the support of the Ukrainian state, which began with his predecessor Petro Poroshenko, for the embezzlement of funds by his American sponsors and for the extremists in his country, the Banderists. President Putin called the former “a bunch of drug addicts” and the latter “a bunch of neo-Nazis” [1].

Not only did Volodymyr Zelensky publicly declare that he did not want to solve the conflict in Donbass by implementing the Minsk Agreements, but he banned his fellow citizens from speaking Russian in schools and administrations and, worse, signed a racial law on July 1, 2021, de facto excluding Ukrainians claiming their Slavic origin from the enjoyment of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.

The Russian army first invaded Ukrainian territory, not from the Donbass, but from Belarus and Crimea. It destroyed all Ukrainian military installations used by NATO for years and fought the Bandit regiments. It is now dedicated to annihilating them in the east of the country. The propagandists in London and their almost 150 communication agencies around the world assure us that, pushed back by the glorious Ukrainian Resistance, the defeated Russian army has given up its initial goal of taking Kiev.

However, never, absolutely never, did President Putin say that Russia would take Kiev, overthrow the elected President Zelenskyy and occupy his country. On the contrary, he has always said that his war aims were to denazify Ukraine and eliminate foreign (NATO) weapons stockpiles. This is exactly what he is doing.

The Ukrainian population is suffering. We are discovering that war is cruel, that it always kills innocent people. Today we are overwhelmed by our emotions and, as we ignore the Ukrainian attack of February 17, we blame the Russians, whom we wrongly call “aggressors”. We do not feel the same compassion for the victims of the simultaneous war in Yemen, its 200,000 dead, including 85,000 children, who died of hunger. But it is true that the Yemenis are, in the eyes of the West, “only Arabs”.

The fact of suffering should not be interpreted a priori as proof that one is right. Criminals suffer like the innocent.

How is such manipulation of the court possible? [2] Ukraine referred to the fact that President Putin, during his speech on the Russian military operation, said that the people of Donbass were victims of “genocide”.

She therefore denied this “genocide” and accused Russia of having used this argument improperly. In international law, the word “genocide” no longer refers to the eradication of an ethnic group, but to a massacre ordered by a government. Over the past eight years, between 13,000 and 22,000 civilians have been killed in the Donbass, depending on whether one refers to Ukrainian or Russian government statistics.

Russia, which had sent its plea in writing, argues that it is not relying on the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, but on Article 51 of the UN Charter, which authorizes war in self-defence, as President Putin had explicitly stated in his speech. The Tribunal did not attempt to verify anything. It stuck to the Ukrainian denial. It therefore concluded that Russia had improperly used the Convention as an argument.

Moreover, as Russia did not consider it necessary to be physically represented at the Court, the Court used its absence to impose an aberrant provisional measure. Russia, sure of its good right, refused to comply and is demanding a judgment on the merits, which will not be given before the end of September.

All this being said, we can only understand the duplicity of the West if we put the events in their context. For a decade, American political scientists have been telling us that the rise of Russia and China will lead to an inevitable war. The political scientist Graham Allison created the concept of the “Thucydides trap” [3].

He was referring to the Peloponnesian wars that opposed Sparta and Athens in the fourth century BC.. The strategist and historian Thucydides analyzed that the wars had become inevitable when Sparta, which dominated Greece, realized that Athens was conquering an empire and could replace its hegemony. The analogy is telling, but false: while Sparta and Athens were close Greek cities, the United States, Russia and China do not have the same culture.

China, for example, rejects President Biden’s proposal for trade competition. Instead, it has the opposite tradition of “win-win”. In doing so, it is not referring to mutually beneficial trade contracts, but to its history. The “Middle Kingdom” has an extremely large population. The emperor was forced to delegate his authority to the maximum. Even today China is the most decentralized country in the world.

When he issued a decree, it had practical consequences in some provinces, but not in all. The emperor therefore had to make sure that each local governor would not consider his decree irrelevant and forget his authority. He then offered compensation to those who were not affected by the decree so that they would still feel subject to his authority.

Since the beginning of the Ukrainian crisis, China has not only taken a non-aligned position, but has protected its Russian ally in the UN Security Council. The United States has wrongly feared that Beijing would send weapons to Moscow.

This has never been the case, although there is logistical assistance in the form of prepared meals for the soldiers, for example. China is watching how things are going and deducing how they will go when it tries to get the rebel province of Taiwan back.

Beijing has kindly declined Washington’s offers. It is thinking in the long term and knows from experience that if it allows Russia to be destroyed, it will once again be plundered by the West. Its salvation is only possible with Russia, even if it must one day challenge it in Siberia.

Let’s go back to Thucydides’ trap. Russia knows that the United States wants to erase it from the scene. It anticipates a possible invasion/destruction. But its territory is immense and its population insufficiently large. It cannot defend its overly large borders. Since the 19th century, it has imagined defending itself by hiding from its adversaries.

When Napoleon, then Hitler, attacked her, she moved her population further and further east. And it burned its own cities before the invader arrived. The latter found himself unable to supply his troops. He had to face the winter without means and, finally, retreat. This “scorched earth” strategy only worked because neither Napoleon nor Hitler had logistical bases nearby. Modern Russia knows that it cannot survive if US weapons are stored in Central and Eastern Europe.

That is why, at the end of the Soviet Union, Russia demanded that NATO never expand eastward. French President François Mitterrand and German Chancellor Helmut Köhl, who knew history, demanded that the West make this commitment. At the time of German reunification, they drafted and signed a treaty guaranteeing that NATO would never cross the Oder-Neisse line, the German-Polish border. Russia set this commitment in stone in 1999 and in 2010 with the OSCE declarations in Istanbul and Astana. But the United States violated it in 1999 (accession of the Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland to Nato), in 2004 (Bulgaria, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania, Slovakia and Slovenia), in 2009 (Albania and Croatia), in 2017 (Montenegro), and again in 2020 (Northern Macedonia).

The problem is not that all these states have allied themselves with Washington, but that they have stored U.S. weapons at home. No one is criticizing these states for choosing their allies, but Moscow is blaming them for serving as a rear base for the Pentagon in preparation for an attack by Russia.

In October 2021, the Straussian Victoria Nuland [4], the State Department’s number 2, came to Moscow to urge Russia to accept the deployment of US weapons in Central and Eastern Europe. She promised that Washington would invest in Russia in return. Then she threatened Russia if it did not accept her offer and concluded that he would have President Putin tried before an international tribunal.

Moscow responded with a proposal for a treaty guaranteeing peace on the basis of respect for the United Nations Charter on December 17. This is what has caused the current storm. Respecting the Charter, which is based on the principle of the equality and sovereignty of states, implies reforming NATO, whose operation is based on a hierarchy among its members. Caught in the “Thucydides trap”, the United States then fomented the current war in Ukraine.

If we admit that their goal is to remove Russia from the international scene, the way the Anglo-Saxons react to the Ukrainian crisis becomes clear. They are not trying to push back the Russian army militarily, nor to embarrass the Russian government, but to wipe out all traces of Russian culture in the West. And secondly, they are trying to weaken the European Union.

They started with the freezing of the assets of Russian oligarchs in the West, a measure that was applauded by the Russian population, which considers them illegitimate beneficiaries of the plundering of the USSR. Then they imposed on Western companies to stop their activities with Russia.

Finally, they continued by cutting off Russian banks’ access to Western banks (the SWIFT system). However, if these financial measures were disastrous for Russian banks (but not for the Russian government), the measures against companies working in Russia are on the contrary favorable to Russia which recovers their investments at lower costs.

Moreover, the Moscow Stock Exchange, which had been closed from February 25 (the day after the Russian response) to March 24, recorded an increase as soon as it reopened. The RTS index fell by 4.26% on the first day, but it measures mainly speculative stocks, while the IMOEX index, which measures national economic activity, rose by 4.43%. The real losers of the Western measures are the members of the European Union who had the stupidity to take them.

Already in 1991, the Straussian Paul Wolfowitz wrote in an official report that the USA should prevent a power from developing to the point of competing with it. At the time, the USSR was in tatters. So he named the European Union as the potential rival to be destroyed [5].

This is exactly what he did in 2003, when, as number 2 in the Pentagon, he forbade Germany and France to participate in the reconstruction of Iraq [6]. This is also what Victoria Nuland talked about in 2014 when she instructed her US ambassador in Kiev to “fuck the European Union” (sic) [7].

The European Union has now been ordered to stop its imports of Russian hydrocarbons. If it complies with this injunction, Germany will be ruined and with it the whole Union. This will not be collateral damage, but the fruit of structured thinking, clearly expressed for thirty years.

The most important thing for Washington is to exclude Russia from all international organizations. It has already managed, in 2014, to exclude it from the G8. The pretext was not the independence of Crimea (which it had been demanding since the dissolution of the USSR, several months before Ukraine thought of its own independence), but its membership in the Russian Federation.

Ukraine’s alleged aggression provides a pretext for excluding it from the G20. China immediately pointed out that no one could be excluded from an informal forum without a constitution. However, President Biden returned to the charge on March 24 and 25 in Europe.

Washington is increasing its contacts to exclude Russia from the World Trade Organization. In any case, the principles of the WTO are being undermined by the unilateral “sanctions” implemented by the West. Such a decision would be detrimental to both sides. This is where the writings of Paul Wolfowitz come into play.

He wrote in 1991 that Washington should not seek to be the best at what it does, but to be the first in relation to others. This implies, he noted, that in order to maintain its hegemony, the United States should not hesitate to hurt itself, if it does much more to others. We will all pay the price for this way of thinking.

The most important thing for the Straussians is to exclude Russia from the United Nations. This is not possible if one respects the UN Charter, but Washington will not bother with it there any more than elsewhere. It has already contacted every member state of the UN with a few exceptions.

The Anglo-Saxon propaganda has already succeeded in making them believe that a member of the Security Council has embarked on a war of conquest against one of its neighbors. If Washington succeeds in convening a special UN General Assembly and changing the statutes, it will succeed.

A kind of hysteria has taken hold of the West. Everything Russian is being hunted down without thinking about its links with the Ukrainian crisis. Russian artists are forbidden to perform even if they are known to be opposed to President Putin.

Here a university bans the study of the anti-Soviet hero Solzhenitsyn from their curriculum, there another bans the writer of debate and free will Dostoyevsky (1821-1881) who opposed the tsarist regime. Here a conductor is deprogrammed because he is Russian and there Tchaikovsky (1840-1893) is removed from the repertoire.

Everything Russian must disappear from our consciousness, just as the Roman Empire razed Carthage and methodically destroyed all traces of its existence, to the point that today we know little about this civilization.

On March 21, President Biden made no secret of the fact. In front of an audience of business leaders, he said:

“This is the moment when things change. There is going to be a New World Order and we have to lead it. And we have to unite the rest of the free world to do it” [8].

Ukrainian PM Says Quiet Part Out Loud: ‘We Not Only Fight For Ukraine – We Fight For This New World Order’.

This new order [9] should cut the world into two hermetic blocks; a cut such as we have never known, without comparison with the Iron Curtain of the Cold War.

Some states, such as Poland, believe that they can lose a lot like the others, but also gain a little. Thus, General Waldemar Skrzypczak has just demanded that the Russian enclave of Kaliningrad become Polish [10].

Indeed, after the world has been cut off, how will Moscow be able to communicate with this territory?

By Thierry Meyssan, Voltairenet.org / Translation via Lewrockwell.com

[1] See the ninth article in this series: “A bunch of drug addicts and neo-Nazis“, 5 March 2022.

[2] “Allegation of genocide under the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide“, Order, International Court of Justice, March 16, 2022.

[3] “The Thucydides Trap: Are the U.S. and China Headed for War?“, Graham T. Alllison, The Atlantic, September 24, 2005. Destined For War: Can America and China Escape Thucydides’s Trap?, Graham T. Allison, Mariner Books; (2017).

[4] For what the Straussians are, see the eighth article in this series, “Vladimir Putin declares war on the Straussians“, 5 March 2022.

[5] This document was revealed in “US Strategy Plan Calls For Insuring No Rivals Develop”, Patrick E. Tyler, New York Times, March 8, 1992. See also the excerpts published on page 14: “Excerpts from Pentagon’s Plan: ’Prevent the Re-Emergence of a New Rival’”. Additional information is provided in “Keeping the US First, Pentagon Would Preclude a Rival Superpower” Barton Gellman, The Washington Post, March 11, 1992.

[6] « Instructions et conclusions sur les marchés de reconstruction et d’aide en Irak », par Paul Wolfowitz, Réseau Voltaire, 10 décembre 2003.

[7] “What about apologizing to Ukraine, Mrs. Nuland?”, by Andrey Fomin, Oriental Review (Russia) , Voltaire Network, 7 February 2014.

[8] «Remarks by President Biden Before Business Roundtable’s CEO Quarterly Meeting», White House, March 21, 2022.

[9] « Histoire du “Nouvel ordre mondial” », par Pierre Hillard, Réseau Voltaire, 21 février 2010. “The plan for a New World Order stumbles on geopolitical realities”, by Imad Fawzi Shueibi, Translation Roger Lagassé, Voltaire Network, 17 August 2012.

[10] “Poland claims Kaliningrad”, Voltaire Network, 27 March 2022.

NYT Lies About Ukraine by Telling Truth about Ukraine

MARCH 23, 2022


NY Times:
 Truth Is Another Front in Putin’s War
.

By Steven Lee Meyers

One of the most recognizable liar’s tricks which a properly accused criminal will often resort to is the tactic of actually repeating all of the accusations made against him in a dismissive manner which appeals to incredulity of the listener. It’s sort of like a “Straw Man” argument, but not exactly because in such cases, the pathological liar will actually recite a litany of absolute truths — instead of absurd falsehoods. The deception lurks in the manner of delivery — in which he hopes to induce his target into interpreting the absolutely true accusations leveled against him as absurdities. The simple-minded mark will often fall for this maneuver because he “reasons” that the accused — by mere virtue of the fact that he volunteered the allegations against himself on his own — must be truthfully defending himself against false testimony.

Surely, “you guys” have all “been around the block” enough times to have personally experienced this form of “gas-lighting” from some psychopath you have crossed paths with; and we all know what the New York Times is about. Armed with the knowledge of such “reverse psychology” deception tactics, we can properly “decode” this particular Times article by Putin-hater Steven Lee Meyers for what it truly represents — an actual CONFESSION regarding the situation in Ukraine.

Times: Russian officials denounced the United States and its NATO allies for stoking panic and anti-Russian hatred.
Embedded Truth: The United States and NATO are stoking panic and anti-Russian hatred.

Times: The Kremlin has cycled through a torrent of lies to explain why it had to wage a “special military operation” against a sovereign neighbor.
Embedded Truth: Russia stated many just and logical reasons for its actions against an aggressive neighbor.

Times: Drug-addled neo-Nazis. Genocide. American biological weapons factories.
Embedded Truth: Drugged-up ultra-nationalists are killing innocent Russian-speaking civilians and US-funded bio-weapons labs have been uncovered in Ukraine.

Times: Ukrainian forces bombing their own cities, including theaters sheltering children.
Embedded Truth: Ukrainian forces are bombing their own cities, including theaters sheltering children.

.Times: That has given Russia — and its allies in China and elsewhere — powerful means to prop up the claim that the invasion is justified,
Embedded Truth: Russia and its friends worldwide know the truth about Ukraine.

Times: Truth has simply become another front in Russia’s war.
Embedded Truth: Russia has done a very good job at getting the truth out to the world, at least the non-western world, that is.

Times: President Vladimir V. Putin has created an alternative reality in which Russia is at war not with Ukraine but with a larger, more pernicious enemy in the West.
Embedded Truth: Ukraine is just the tip of a deadly spear which the Globalists are aiming at the heart of Russia.

1. 
Ukrainian “ultras” — often wrongly referred to as “Nazis” — have terrorized the Russians of Donetsk & Luhansk. // 2. For his help in installing the gangster regime currently controlling Ukraine, the thugs in Kiev named a street after John McCain. // 3. The War Against Putin explains how the Globalists have turned the fake nation of Ukraine into a weapon aimed at Russia.

Times: (Russia) claimed that “true sovereignty” for Ukraine was possible only under Russia.
Embedded Truth: True sovereignty for Ukraine is possible only under Russian protection.

Times: Individual lies about bio-weapons labs or crisis actors are advanced by Russia …
Embedded Truth: Ukraine is full of bio-weapons and crisis actors.

Times: Supporters stubbornly cling to the belief that something is wrong in Ukraine and Russia will fix it.
Embedded Truth: Something is wrong in Ukraine and Russia wants to fix it.

Times: The bio-weapons claim gained ground in social media after a post by a Twitter account that had been suspended for peddling Q Anon conspiracy theories about secretive government plots.
Embedded Truth: The bio-weapons are real and so is Q.

*****
There! See how easy it is to read Fake News with a “third eye” and actually extract the truth from it? By applying certain basic rules of logical deciphering to the devious droppings of the reality-inverting scumbags at the Manhattan Mendacity factory, the “paper of record” can actually serve us as a very informative educational tool. How ironic is that?