The Rise Of Control-Biology

It is a tragic fact that humanity has been living amidst a regime of perpetual warfare since known history. From the last 100 years alone, we have seen (amongst many others), two major European world wars, the Korean War, the Vietnam War, the Cold War, the War on Terror, the War on Drugs, and now the Virus Wars.

the rise of control biology

In line with the unfolding trend of technology, the ‘wars’ are shifting from inter-bodies (between bodies) to intra-body (within bodies).

In this current state of ‘perpetual warfare’, there are now attempts to colonise the terrain within our most sacred space – the human biological body.

In my previous essay on biopower (see New Dawn 183), I noted there had been a shift from the disciplinary societies as described by French philosopher Michel Foucault toward more fluid networks of biopower control.

As Foucault noted, the biopower model functions to tax rather than organise production, and to rule on death rather than to administer life.

The older biopower models focused on the exterior modes of enclosure – school, factory, hospital, prison, etc. – whereas what I put forth in this essay is that the new reign of biopower is about gaining access to our interior spaces.

Older exterior institutions (school, factory, etc.) have an expiration date – the human being, in contrast, is an ongoing and continuous ‘body’ available for generational control.

The new regime seeks an ongoing vested interest in the exterior and interior spaces. These are the reconfigured social-body politics of control – or, the politics of control-biology. The new reign of biopower is concerned with continual modulation, adapting to ongoing events more like a wavelength than a fixed broadcast.

The ‘virus wars’ (to use their terminology) represent an enemy that attacks and infiltrates not only inter-bodily but especially intra-bodily. Human societies exist in open, not closed, systems. As such, the emerging biopower regimes need to gain access through these porous social-body systems.

To gain control, they thus need to have proprietary dominion over an individual’s body, outside and within. We only have to recognise the rise in molecular engineering, genetic manipulations, and pharmaceutical interventions to see how external systems have been increasingly gaining interior ground.

psychological warfare in the new biopower reality

The rapid rise in city and nationwide COVID-19 testing stations gives the impression of an open-society granting permission for mobile freedoms – yet they are the facades for the encroaching control systems.

As an example of what is to come, Liverpool in the UK began a city-wide ‘mass testing’ program with walk-through and drive-through testing stations set up around the city.1

Liverpool was chosen as the pilot for a new ‘Lateral Flow System’ testing scheme. Broadgreen International School is running a pilot scheme with Public Health England that will: 1) bring in the military to run COVID-19 tests; 2) test children without parental consent; 3) identify each individual with a “unique barcode,” and 4) “isolate” and “secure” anyone who tests positive.2

No-one should be complacent under the illusion this is ‘one-off’ mass testing. It potentially represents the beginning of forms of continual control – persistent or ‘perpetual testing’.

Perpetual Testing, Tracking & Tracing

The new regimes of biopower are establishing continuous variations of ‘testing,’ with continual iterations of ‘being at risk’. If we are to be continually ‘at risk’, then we have to be perpetually monitored – the two concepts go hand in hand. And in the present age of heightened mobility, we cannot expect a fixed ‘administration of control’. Instead, it will come through the fluid flows of always-on, surveillant tracking/tracing.

As I write this, UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson had placed himself in self-isolation after receiving notification from his track-and-tracing app.

He stated in a video address, with a tone of deprecating ‘programming’ humour, that:

“The good news is that NHS Test and Trace is working ever-more efficiently, but the bad news is that they’ve pinged me and I’ve got to self-isolate.”3

‘Track and trace’ record-keeping is now being imposed not only on the hospitality sectors but also places of worship, businesses, and other organisations.

For example, governments in Australia are mandating businesses and organisations to collect data on “every person including staff, patrons and contractors entering the premises.”4

Further, any records collected on paper must, by law, be digitised within 24 hours. Similar measures have been implemented by the UK hospitality sector, although not yet across the whole board or fully digitised.

Also being implemented is government access to card payment data for tracking people in “coronavirus hotspots,” as announced by the Australian government recently.5

In Spain, where this author currently lives, all arrivals into the country from 23 November will need to show certification of a negative COVID-19 test taken 72 hours prior to arrival.

Such procedures are likely forerunners to the ‘soon to be expected’ arrival of digital health passports, such as CommonPass which is being trialled by a small number of passengers flying from the UK to the US.6

At the G20 summit – an online meeting of heads of state from the world’s 20 largest economies hosted by Saudi Arabia over the 21-22 November weekend – Chinese President Xi Jinping called for a “global mechanism” that would use QR codes to open up international travel.7

As if in direct response to this, a day later (23 November) the boss of Qantas Airways announced that international air travellers would, in the future, need proof they have taken a COVID-19 vaccine to board Qantas flights. He claims it will be a “necessity” once vaccines are available and that it’s going to be a “common thing” in other airlines around the globe.8

As with risk and monitoring, the tracking goes hand in hand with testing. And in order to undergo testing, people must succumb to giving up their biological data. Intra-body data will enter the burgeoning biometric data-machine of huge corporations.

In an interview with the Wall Street Journal in October 2020, the US administration’s appointed ‘vaccine czar’, Moncef Slaoui, stated that tech giants Google and Oracle were to “collect and track vaccine data.”9

In a previous interview, Slaoui referred to this tracking “data-driven timeline” as a “very active pharmacovigilance surveillance system.”10

This almost real-time biosecurity testing and tracking will soon be necessary for most everyday activities, such as going to a live music concert.

Ticketmaster, which merged with Live Nation in 2010 to create the music industry’s foremost concert promotion and ticketing agent, announced in November 2020 that it would check the COVID-19 vaccination status of ticket buyers before issuing passes when live events return in 2021.11

Ticketmaster has been working on developing what they call a system for “post-pandemic fan safety” to verify fans’ vaccination status or whether they’ve tested negative for the coronavirus within a 24 to 72-hour window.

Ticketmaster plans to combine the Ticketmaster digital ticket app with third party health information companies like CLEAR Health Pass or IBM’s Digital Health Pass, and testing and vaccine distribution providers.

When the person receives their test/ vaccine certification via their “health pass company,” the health pass would verify COVID status to Ticketmaster. If all was ‘clean’, Ticketmaster will issue the fan the credentials needed to access the event. On the other hand, if a person tested positive or didn’t have a valid, up-to-date vaccine certificate, they would not receive a ticket.

Ticketmaster president Mark Yovich is on record saying that he expects the demand for “digital screening services” will attract a new wave of investors and entrepreneurs to “fuel the growth of a new COVID-19 technology sector” (i.e. biopower capitalism).

Marianne Herman, co-founder of a company that focuses on assisting entertainment companies develop COVID-19 strategies, stated:

“In order for live events to return, technology and science are going to play huge roles in establishing integrated protocols so that fans, artists, and employees feel safe returning to venues.”12

Welcome to the new biopower capitalism of “integrated protocols”!

Biopower ‘Good For Business’

Some major players in healthcare and business have already come together to declare what these “integrated protocols” may likely consist of. The Riyadh Declaration on Digital Health was formulated during the Riyadh Global Digital Health Summit, 11-12 August 2020. It called itself a “landmark forum” for highlighting the importance of digital technology, data, and innovation for “fighting pandemics.”

According to their Health Summit webpage:

“It aims to bring together leaders of healthcare systems, public health, digital health, academic institutions and businesses in order to discuss the vital role of digital health in the fight against current and future pandemics.”13

The Lancet medical journal did a feature on The Riyadh Declaration in which a “panel of 13 experts” articulated seven key priorities and nine recommendations “for data and digital health that need to be adopted by the global health community to address the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic and future pandemics.”14

They outline that the first priority for the health and care sectors to adopt is applied health intelligence (HI). According to the report, “HI is used for the surveillance, monitoring, and improvement of population and patient outcomes.”

The second priority relates to “interoperable digital technology” and for this technology to be scaled up and sustainable. The third priority is to support the adoption of artificial intelligence.

From the nine recommendations, the following are of particular interest: 2) Work with global stakeholders to confront propagation of misinformation or disinformation through social media platforms and mass media; 3) Implement a standard global minimum dataset for public health data reporting; 7) Ensure surveillance systems combine an effective public health response; and 9) Maintain, continue to fund, and innovate surveillance systems as a core component of the connected global health system for rapid preparedness and optimal global responses.

At the very least, these recommendations sound ominously like the framework for establishing a biosecurity apparatus of a biocapitalist consortium of healthcare businesses, digital health corporations, and governments.15

Do not think for a moment that the average working person will not need to pay for this apparatus. It was recently announced that Deutsche Bank researchers propose a 5% tax for people choosing to work from home rather than the office.

The reality, as we know, is that many people will not be given a choice; yet, as per the new report from the German bank, the average person would be “no worse off if they paid this tax” because by working remotely “they save money on travel, food, and clothes.”

One of the report’s authors (a research strategist at Deutsche Bank) said:

“Working from home will be part of the ‘new normal’ well after the pandemic has passed. We argue that remote workers should pay a tax for the privilege… That means remote workers are contributing less to the infrastructure of the economy whilst still receiving its benefits.”16

In other words, within the new biopower regime, people may not be contributing enough ‘into the system’ if they are working from home – and so must be taxed for the privilege.

What we are seeing through this increased regulation and intrusion between and within human bodies is a direct curtailing of human sovereignty.

The Question Of Human Sovereignty

The new enclosures are no longer disciplinary institutions (as identified by Foucault) but the fluid flows and networks of inter and intra-body spaces and the new regimes that are arising to govern these social-biological terrains.

The individual human body is being fully incorporated into the global body politique. There are no ‘fixed markets’ for biopower; instead, there are flexible networks of exchange.

Yet the question remains – who sets the parameters of legal authority on these exchanges?

We have truly entered the age of the erosion of biological boundaries. We are all being targeted as possible mobile hosts for our own crippling disease – regardless of the true potency of the viruses – just as a person could be a suspect in the War on Terror.

In both cases, the human being has been re-cast as a site of suspicion and risk. The body is now re-classified as a ‘site of weakness’ – which may itself play into a later transhumanism agenda.

Becoming ever clearer is that the new reign of biopower will deny us our rights to keep the frontiers of the human body closed. The fundamental right to health (health safety) is being reconstituted as a legal obligation to health (biosecurity).17

This process, overtly and covertly, attempts to reorganise human citizenry in a way to create maximum obedience to institutions of governance and security. This is also a process that will eventually lead to denying each person their individual sovereignty.

The rise of biosecurity amid the converging health intelligence (HI), along with tech-based “integrated protocols,” and increased reliance on Artificial Intelligence both within healthcare systems as well as state-sponsored surveillance, all point towards a worryingly cohesive ‘full spectrum dominance’ over human life.

It is a biopower-enforced control system not only between bodies and within bodies but also within the human mind.

Biopower is also, I propose, a control system for human consciousness. This is confirmed by rapid moves on the internet to censor any information that criticises or is contrary to consensus narratives and programming.

A case in point: the UK Shadow Health Secretary Jonathan Ashworth (Labour) is demanding a law be put into effect, with financial and criminal penalties, to “stamp out dangerous” anti-vaccine content online.

It is time for all political parties, says Ashworth, “to work with the government on a cross-party basis to build trust and help promote take-up of the vaccine.”18

According to a report in the Sunday Times, UK ministers are preparing to launch a massive public information campaign to convince people to get vaccinated.

The Times reported that the British Army mobilised the 77th Brigade’s Defence Cultural Specialist Unit to monitor and “counter online propaganda against vaccines.”19

The news report admits the 77th Brigade specialises in creating “behavioural change.”

The current biological ‘state of emergency’ is forcing people, on a global scale, to accept previously unimagined ideas to the point where the human psyche is tested to its limits.

A new narrative is being established and seeded into mass human consciousness. The usual response to anomalous data is to try to fit it into pre-existing parameters of thought – our existing ‘reality boxes’ – to maintain a sense of stability.

When the irrational encroaches upon consensus reality, a person is forced to accept the abnormalities as the ‘new normal’ or to undergo critical, often radical, change at a personal level.

Which do you think is the easiest, most popular option?

Polarising events have the result of affecting both the conscious and the unconscious mind. A person can be both consciously and unconsciously torn between what they are told to believe and what actually is.

This can easily create a schism in the human psyche and result in further social divisions and polarisations within familial and cultural groupings. This is not the time to be fostering mental, emotional, and socio-cultural dissociations.

On the contrary, we should be asking ourselves: what does human sovereignty and empowerment mean to me? The question of human sovereignty applies to each and every one of us. It is not a privilege or a luxury – it is a basic right and necessity.

As the reign of biopower continues to unfold, we are going to be seeing – and receiving – many more instances where control-biology situates itself into our daily lives.

It is a calculating narrative because, after all, does not everyone wish for good health and well-being? The situation, though, is being managed and coerced into a state where each person will have no choice over how they make their own health decisions.

Biopower forces dominion over our external and internal realms through the rhetoric (or double-talk) of representing the power of well-being. The end result is more on the side of controlling the human being, and few people, it seems, have an adequate response to this. Too many people continue to respond as if caught off-guard in the coming headlights.

The very nature of how we recognise human well-being is at the core of what is transpiring now. This is the fundamental issue we need to address. It is no longer simply a matter of whether we need to wear masks or not – it is a question of our humanity being masked.

By Kingsley Dennis, NewDawnMagazine.com / This article was published in New Dawn 184.

Footnotes:

1. Liverpool.Gov.Uk
2. Off-Guardian.Org
3. BBC.Com
4. NSW.Gov.Au
5. SMH.Com.Au
6. TottNews.Com
7. BBC.Com
8. BBC.Com
9. WSJ.Com
10. NYTimes.Com
11. Billboard.Com
12. Billboard.Com
13. Rgdhs2020.Com
14. TheLancet.Com
15. The Renewed Push For A Biocapitalism Agenda Was Discussed In My Previous Essay, ‘Biopower In The Age Of The Great Reset’, New Dawn 183. 
16. BusinessInsider.Com
17. See The Work Of Patrick Zylberman, Tempêtes Microbiennes, Gallimard 2013.
18. BBC.Com
19. TheTimes.Co.Uk

© New Dawn Magazine and the respective author.

Official Public Health England Data Says COVID Infection Rates Higher In Vaxxed Than Unvaxxed

The Spectator has published an article citing official data from Public Health England, which states that for the over 30’s, “the rates of Covid infection per 100,000 are now higher among the vaxxed than the unvaxxed.”

Well, this is awkward.

official public health england data says covid infection rates higher in vaxxed than unvaxxed

The article, written by Lionel Shriver, is titled ‘The absurd theatre of vaccine passports’.

It points out that according to official data, vaccines only offer about 17 per cent protection for the over-fifties.

“As I observed then, this would mean the vaxxed and unvaxxed pose a comparable danger to each other,” writes Shriver. “All Covid apartheid schemes are therefore insensible.”

She then clearly explains how the official data undermines the entire argument behind vaccine passports, which ban the unvaccinated from entering innumerable venues.

“Fresher information has fortified this conclusion of the summer. In every age group over 30 in the UK, the rates of Covid infection per 100,000 are now higher among the vaxxed than the unvaxxed.

“Indeed, in the cohorts aged between 40 and 79, infection rates among the vaccinated are more than twice as high as among the unvaccinated.

“PHE’s fruitlessly rechristened body, the UK Health Security Agency, frantically clarifies that the data ‘should not be used to estimate vaccine effectiveness’, a caveat which I include for the sake of accuracy. But the differences in the infection rates are drastic enough for you to draw your own conclusions.”public health england “the rates of covid infection per 100,000 are now higher among the vaxxed than the unvaxxed.”

Public Health England: “The rates of Covid infection per 100,000 are now higher among the vaxxed than the unvaxxed.”

Shriver then summarizes how that data demolishes the reason for implementing vaccine passport schemes.

“Gatekeeping of pleasure palaces promotes the wrong impression — statistically, the lie — that the unvaccinated riff-raff exiled to the pavement pose a far graver threat of communicable disease than the diners in the nearby banquette who, like you, have righteously got the shot.

“In truth, the double-jabbed airline passenger in 24A can be just as risky a seat-mate as the great unwashed banished from the flight.”

Meanwhile, the Times reports the results of another study which “found the double-jabbed are just as likely to pass on Covid-19 as unvaccinated people.”

The Case For Vaccine Passports Has Been Demolished:

Government data, and peer reviewed studies, show the vaxxed are just as likely to spread the virus as the unvaxxed.

After Public Health England published the data, government bureaucrats begin to panic that people would use it to suggest vaccines were not that effective.

Explosive Admission by Dr. Fauci: Vaccines Did Not Work as Advertised and Vaccinated Are in Great Danger Today.

Even Bill Gates Finally Admitted to the Failure of the COVID Vaccines.

Office for Statistics Regulation director Ed Humpherson called an urgent meeting with U.K. Health Security Agency during which he worried about the data having “the potential to mislead.”

“We noted that these data have been used to argue that vaccines are ineffective,” Humpherson subsequently wrote.

Isn’t it strange how the government and associated regulatory bodies appear to be afraid of raw data?

If the vaccines are as effective as they tell us, why would they be worried?

Source: Summit.news / Reference: Spectator.co.uk

Children Are Dying At A Rate 62% Higher Than The 5-Year-Average Since They Began To Be Given The Covid-19 Vaccine

On September 13th 2021, the four Chief Medical Officer’s (CMO’s) of the United Kingdom advised the UK Government to offer the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine to all children over the age of twelve.

This was despite the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) previously stating they could not support universal vaccination of children.

Is it just a coincidence that deaths among children have since increased by 62% against the five-year-average?

children are dying at a rate 62% higher than the 5 year average since they began to be given the covid 19 vaccine

Chris Whitty endorsed the move to vaccinate all healthy children over the age of 12, claiming it may “help prevent outbreaks in classrooms and further disruptions to education this winter”.

The letter sent to the Government by the four CMO’s states that they looked at wider public health benefits and risks of universal vaccination in children to determine if this shifted the risk-benefit ration either way. Chris Whitty and his colleagues claim in their letter that “the most important in this age group was impact on education”.

But if Chris Whitty does not know that the Covid-19 vaccines are ineffective at preventing transmission or infection by now, then his incompetence should cost him his job. Because even the director of the Centre for Disease Control (CDC) in the USA knows that the Covid-19 injections do not prevent transmission or infection.

The Delta variant is allegedly now the most dominant variant in the United Kingdom, and it has been for months, and we now know thanks to Public Health England data that people who had been Covid-19 vaccinated accounted for 71% of all Delta Covid-19 deaths since February 1st 2021 up to September 12th 2021.

One-hundred-sixty-six deaths were recorded among the partly vaccinated population, 722 deaths were recorded among the unvaccinated population, and 1,613 deaths were recorded among the fully vaccinated population.

Even if the Covid-19 vaccines were effective at preventing deaths, which they clearly aren’t, this still wouldn’t justify giving the experimental treatment still in clinical trials until 2023 at the earliest to children, because they are not dying of Covid-19.

Data available from the NHS shows that between March 2020 and October 20th 2021, just 14 people under the age of 19 died in UK hospitals with Covid-19 who had no known pre-existing conditions, whereas just 50 people under the age of 19 died in UK hospitals who had other extremely serious, debilitating, pre-existing conditions.

There are approximately 15.6 million people aged 19 and under in the United Kingdom which means just 1 in every 312,000 children and teenagers have allegedly died with Covid-19 in 18 months who had other serious pre-existing conditions. Whilst just 1 in every 1.1 million children have allegedly died with Covid-19 in 20 months, who had no know pre-existing conditions.

children dying covid vax

As you can see, there is absolutely no justification for giving an experimental Covid-19 vaccine to children, and the excuse used by Chris Whitty that it may “help prevent outbreaks in classrooms and further disruptions to education this winter” is outrageous because they do not prevent infection or transmission, even the UK Government and Oxford University have admitted this in recently published scientific studies.

So with all that said and done, evidence available from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) most definitely suggests that Chris Whitty, the Chief Medical Officer for England, has some serious questions to answer.

Chris Whitty advised the UK Government to roll-out the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine to all children over the age of 12 in week 37 of 2021. Thanks to preparations already being made by the NHS to intrude on education in schools and administer the jab to children, the roll-out got underway the following week (week 38).

The Five-Year-Average (2015-2019) edition of ‘Deaths registered weekly in England and Wales’, which can be downloaded here, and accessed on the ONS website here, shows that shows that between week 38 and week 41 a total of 21 deaths occurred among 10 – 14-year-olds.

children dying 5 yea average

Whereas the 2021 editions of ‘Deaths registered weekly in England and Wales, which can be downloaded here, and accessed on the ONS website here, shows that between the week 38 and week 41 of 2021, a total of 34 deaths occurred among children aged between 10 and 14.

10 14 year olds england wales

This shows that the number of deaths between week 38 and week 41 of 2021 among children aged 10-14 were 62% higher than the five-year-average for the number of deaths in this age group during the same period, and the increase in deaths began at precisely the same time children started receiving the Covid-19 vaccine.

For instance in the 6 weeks prior to week 38 the five-year-average for deaths among all children between the ages of 10 and 14 was 28. Whereas in the 6 weeks prior to week 38 of 2021 there were 29 deaths among children over the age of 10, representing an increase of just 3.5% in 2021 on the five-year-average.

We compiled the following table of ONS figures so that we were able to easily compare the number of deaths per week among children separated by male and female.

child deaths male female covid

As you can see above the highest increase in deaths since kids were offered the Covid-19 vaccine came in week 40 of 2021, which saw a 120% increase on the five-year-average number of deaths among children.

There is however some cause for concern for the number of deaths that occurred in week 34 of 2021, prior to Chris Whitty approving the Covid-19 vaccine roll-out to all children over the age of 12.

Week 34 saw a 175% increase in deaths of all children, a 100% increase in deaths of male children, and a 400% increase in deaths of female children against the five-year-average. Could this have anything to do with a large chunk of children deemed vulnerable being given the Covid-19 vaccine the previous week, as recommended by the JCVI, or is it just another coincidence?

The data is there now for the authorities to see, a 62% increase in deaths of children against the five-year-average since they started to be given the Covid-19 vaccine. Will they investigate this and cease the roll-out of this experimental injection to children with immediate effect? We doubt it.

Source: TheExpose.uk

UK Investigation: Deaths Among Male Children Have Increased By 400% Since FUCKING Chris Whitty Decided They Should Have The Covid-19 Vaccine

On September 13th 2021, the four Chief Medical Officer’s (CMO’s) of the United Kingdom advised the UK Government to offer the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine to all children over the age of twelve.

This was despite the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) previously stating they could not support universal vaccination of children.

uk investigation deaths among male children have increased by 400% since chris whitty decided they should have the covid 19 vaccine

Is it just a coincidence that deaths among male children have since increased by 400%, or does FUCKING Chris Whitty, the Chief Medical Officer for England have blood on his hands?

FUCKING Chris Whitty endorsed the move to vaccinate all healthy children over the age of 12, claiming it may “help prevent outbreaks in classrooms and further disruptions to education this winter”.

The letter sent to the Government by the four CMO’s states that they looked at wider public health benefits and risks of universal vaccination in children to determine if this shifted the risk-benefit ration either way.

FUCKING Chris Whitty and his colleagues claim in their letter that “the most important in this age group was impact on education”.

But if FUCKING Chris Whitty does not know that the Covid-19 vaccines are ineffective at preventing transmission or infection by now, then his incompetence should cost him his job.

Because even the director of the Centre for Disease Control (CDC) in the USA knows that the Covid-19 injections do not prevent transmission or infection.01 cdc statement

Soure: CDC

The Delta variant is allegedly now the most dominant variant in the United Kingdom, and it has been for months, and we now know thanks to Public Health England data that people who had been Covid-19 vaccinated account for 71% of all Delta Covid-19 deaths since February 1st 2021 up to September 12th 2021.

One-hundred-sixty-six deaths were recorded among the partly vaccinated population, 722 deaths were recorded among the unvaccinated population, and 1,613 deaths were recorded among the fully vaccinated population.02 deaths delta covid uk

Source

So not only are the vaccines incapable of preventing infection or transmission, they also seem to be incapable of preventing deaths. You only need to compare the number of Covid-19 deaths occurring compared to summer 2020 to see that.new deaths covid 19 uk kids

Source

But even if the Covid-19 vaccines were effective at preventing deaths, which they aren’t, this still wouldn’t justify giving the experimental treatment still in clinical trials until 2023 at the earliest to children, because they are not dying of Covid-19.

Data available from the NHS shows that between March 2020 and August 25th 2021, just 9 people under the age of 19 died in UK hospitals with Covid-19 who had no known pre-existing conditions, whereas just 39 people under the age of 19 died in UK hospitals who had other extremely serious, debilitating, pre-existing conditions.04 covid 19 deaths by age group kids boys increase

Source

There are approximately 15.6 million people aged 19 and under in the United Kingdom which means just 1 in every 410,526 children and teenagers have allegedly died with Covid-19 in 18 months who had other serious pre-existing conditions. Whilst just 1 in every 1.7 million children have allegedly died with Covid-19 in 18 months, who had no know pre-existing conditions.

As you can see, there is absolutely no justification for giving an experimental Covid-19 vaccine to children, and the excuse used by FUCKING Chris Whitty that it may “help prevent outbreaks in classrooms and further disruptions to education this winter” is outrageous because they do not prevent infection or transmission, even the UK Government and Oxford University have admitted this in recently published scientific studies.

So with all that said and done, evidence available from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) most definitely suggests that FUCKING Chris Whitty, the Chief Medical Officer for England, has blood on his hands.

The 2020 edition of ‘Deaths registered weekly in England and Wales’, which can be downloaded here, and accessed on the ONS website here, shows that in the week ending 25th September 2020, just one single male child between the age of 10 and 14 lost their life.05

Source

Whereas the 2021 editions of ‘Deaths registered weekly in England and Wales, which can be downloaded here, and accessed on the ONS website here, shows that in the week ending 24th September 2021, 5 male children between the ages of 10 and 14 lost their lives.06

Source

This shows that the number of deaths in the week ending 24th September 2021 among male children between the ages of 10 and 14 teens were 400% higher than the number of deaths in this age group during the same period in 2020, and the increase in deaths has come immediately after they started to be given the Covid-19 vaccine.

This is of course only the beginning, and we hope that no children lose their lives because of the experimental Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine. However, with emergency calls requesting an ambulance being at an all time high against the expected rate since teens started being given the jab…cardiac arrest covid 19 kids

Source

And myocarditis and pericarditis being officially added to the safety label of the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine as a possible side effect that may occur, especially among young males…08

Source

And a 63% increase in deaths among Teen boys between the ages of 15 and 19 since they were first given the Covid-19 vaccine according to ONS data…09 investigation the expose weekly deaths boys

Source – ONS 2020 + 2021 datasets

It’s not hard to work out what’s going to happen to children over the coming weeks. Especially to younger boys, and it looks like the deaths among children due to the Covid-19 vaccines have already started, with official ONS data showing a 400% increase in deaths among male children since FUCKING Chris Whitty, the Chief Medical Officer for England, overruled the JCVI and decided all children over the age of 12 should be given the experimental Covid-19 injection.

The roll-out of the Covid-19 vaccine to children must be stopped immediately.

Scamdemic! Leaked Data Shows Over Half Of UK “COVID Hospitalizations” Tested AFTER Admission

Leaked Data Shows Over Half of UK 'COVID Hospitalizations' Tested AFTER Admission

Proving the COVID “pandemic” to be a total scam, leaked data out of the UK shows 56% of alleged COVID hospitalizations were people who tested positive after going to the hospital for a different health issue.

NHS figures exclusively provided to The Telegraph allegedly show patients counted as COVID-positive by the British government were originally admitted to the hospital for separate ailments.

No wonder the UK requires a COVID test to everyone admitted to hospitals, they’re trying to pump up the numbers!

Essentially, while the individuals may have “had COVID,” it was not the virus that caused them to seek medical attention in the first place.

Have a broken foot and need to see a doctor?

Once you’re admitted to the hospital you have to take a COVID test, and if it comes back positive you are added to the list of positive hospitalizations despite the fact you were originally there for your foot.

Of the 56% of patients who tested positive after admission, 43% were tested within two days of being admitted and 13% weren’t tested for days or weeks.

So, how many of these “COVID positive” patients caught the virus while at the hospital?

In addition to testing those who were hospitalized for non-COVID reasons, the tests being used in UK hospitals are often rapid antigen tests.

Despite America’s FDA recently revoking emergency authorization for the Innova SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Rapid Qualitative Test due to an inordinate frequency of false-positive and negative results, the UK just extended its emergency approval of the product.

Between faulty PCR tests and suspect procedures mandated by the NHS, the people of the UK should demand a full audit of all COVID-19 related data.