The Rockefeller Plan For The BRICS New World Order, In Their Own Words

Decades before President George H.W. Bush introduced the “New World Order” (NWO) into the American vernacular, the Rockefeller family and their minions were making plans to expend America’s post-World War 2 power to bring about such an order.

In the course of researching Laurance Rockefeller for my last entry, “The Rockefellers Are The Founders Of The UFO Disclosure Movement – Why?,” I came across a book titled Prospect for America: The Rockefeller Panel Reports:

prospectforamerica

…It was the product of a 1956 Rockefeller Brothers Fund effort known as the Special Studies Project, and it lays out the blueprint for the multilateral / multipolar New World Order that is currently materializing around us.

In the aftermath of World War 2 and the resulting formation of the United Nations (which the Rockefellers were instrumental in creating and funding), the Special Studies Project, directed by Henry Kissinger, was formed to carry out two apparent tasks:

1) to create an action plan to bring about the “elite’s” long-sought world government within the existing postwar environment, and

2) to spin the agenda in such a way that it could be sold to the American people as being in their best interest.

Upon completion of their work, the Special Studies Project’s various panels compiled their reports in an incomplete, sanitized, and heavily spun book, the above-mentioned Prospect for America. The book spells out how to sacrifice the national interests of the United States for…

first35

…(from page 35)

To begin our journey through the Rockefeller plan for the NWO, let’s start with their definition of the Old World Order (OWO).

The 13 Empires Of The Old World Order

From pages 163-164 of Prospect for America

owo163
owo164

So after having consolidated power over most of the world through empire building, the Occulted Powers (OPs) faced a problem. Empires, by their very nature, are territorial, competitive and nationalistic, and are not amenable to submitting to outside control as would be required for world governance.

Clearly, these old structures would need to be demolished and replaced by newer, more malleable structures in order to finish the global consolidation. For this reason, the OPs fomented and financed the two world wars to break down the old empires and create international chaos from which a New Order could be birthed.

At the end of each world war, the OPs immediately planted the seed of global governance, but the seeds didn’t germinate as expected…

TNWO164b

…(from page 164)

De-spinning the last underlined statement, they are basically saying that the nations were insufficiently motivated to hand over sovereignty to the globalist institutions. So to overcome this lack of “shared aspirations,” the OPs fostered the Cold War between the United States and the Soviet Union.

By threatening some nations with Soviet aggression and others with American aggression, they compelled the nations to band together and join sides for protection. The members of each side were then pressured to increase economic and defensive cooperation to fend off the menace of the other side.

Those who were programmed to believe they lived in the “people’s (communist) world” cooperated to block aggression from the “imperialist world,” and those who were programmed to believe they lived in the “free world” cooperated to block aggression from the “Soviet sphere”…

sovthreat180

…(from page 180)

In the United States, people were programmed to believe that fending off the “Red Menace” was a matter of life and death…

sovthreat162

…(from page 162)

But the Cold War, just like the current crop of engineered conflicts raging about us (ISIS, Ukraine, and the China Seas), was all about forcing nations into groups and groups into a world order. Once it had served its purpose, the Cold War was ended in order to allow the two sides to be merged under the NWO…

…from The New York Times. Here are some key excerpts:

>>> President Mikhail S. Gorbachev of the Soviet Union ended an exhausting transcontinental visit to the United States today with an appeal for a radically changed system of global alliances…

Rather than strengthening defense, he asserted, alliances of the future should be designed to foster an international unity that would ”protect the environment, combat hunger, diseases, drug addiction and ignorance”…

The Soviet leader said his second summit conference with Mr. Bush had helped move the United States and the Soviet Union ”toward a new world”…

”For a new type of progress throughout the world to become a reality, everyone must change,” Mr. Gorbachev added. ”Tolerance is the alpha and omega of a new world order.” <<<

And as one would expect, Prospect for America offers a glimpse of what Gorbachev and Bush’s New World Order will look like.

The New World Order

On page 26, we’re told what the OPs and their globalist minions are hoping for…

nwovision26

Take note of how the passage says “combined so as to be able to deal with those problems that increasingly the separate nations will not be able to solve alone.” Here they are telling us that they’ll be purposefully creating increasingly difficult problems to compel the nations to accept the NWO. We’ve certainly been witnessing that, haven’t we?

As for the NWO structure itself, we’re told that it will “consist of regional institutions under an international body of growing [to the point of total control] authority.” Elsewhere in the book, we’re told that the NWO will also include functional structures for matters that require management beyond the regional boundaries. So let’s delve deeper into how such a structure would look and operate:

1) At the top is the “international body of growing authority.” Needless to say, this is…

…(from page 33) Also note this…

UNNWO35

…(from page 35)

2) Below the UN will be the…

…(from page 189)

Here are the ten UN development regions…

ungroupings

And page 190 spells out how the regional arrangements will manifest themselves…

regional190

Free trade agreements, joint economic development institutions, exchange agreements — this all sounds very familiar, doesn’t it? So when an East versus West propagandist tries to sell you the idea that the BRICS Development Bank or a Chinese/Russian currency swap deal demonstrates nations trying to free themselves from the New World Order, just remember this passage. Russia and China are following the NWO script to the letter, but I’ll get back to this point a little later in the article.

3) Below the UN will also be…

…(from page 191)

One example of a functional arrangement is the BRICS alliance. It cuts across regional lines and gives form to the dialectic clash between Anglo-American bankers and BRICS bankers which will birth the NWO. Another example is the International Monetary Fund, which will manage the new global reserve currency after the engineered East versus West drama has climaxed.

With the planned structure of the New World Order laid before us, let’s have a look at how the Rockefellers planned to get America to join in.

The NWO As America’s Grand Objective

Prospect for America goes to great lengths to make the counterintuitive case that building a global government is in America’s best interest. It starts by implying that nation-states are somehow outmoded by the fact that they trade with each other, and then it offers the false choice of floundering by engaging in no trade at all…

declinenat60b

…(from page 60) or prospering by engaging in trade managed by the NWO…

declinenat161b

…(from page 161) They conveniently fail to mention that there are many other options besides resorting to either of those two extremes.

Kissinger and Co. also make the assertion that building the NWO is the “grand objective” of America’s foreign policy…

forpol26b

…(from page 26) and that the effectiveness of US policy will be judged by how well America fosters the globalist institutions…

forpol27

…(from page 27) Also note how the passage assigns the US to the Western Sphere. The planners had another nation in mind to lead the Eastern Sphere (China).

The book then goes on to offer specific ways America can sacrifice its national interests to build the global government.

The Deindustrialization of America

On page 173, we see the genesis of the economic policies that have brought the American economy to ruin…

liberaltrade173

…as the globalists make the case for unilaterally removing the trade barriers that protected America’s economy from competition with foreign slave labor.

Kissinger and Co. also make the case that we shouldn’t economically defend ourselves since it might create “impediments… to the progress of others”…

deindust75a

…(from page 75)

And to give Americans a taste of what’s coming, page 75 also drops this little hint…

china75b

…As it turns out, America did indeed lay itself down as a bridge to pull China into the NWO. We did it by luring them in with a great deal of our national wealth through lopsided trade and outsourcing.

And this brings us to the subject of the BRICS…

The BRICS Role In Erecting The New World Order

Prospect goes on to address the status of those nations that were “freed” by the engineered collapse of the Old World Order…

stragglers164a

…(from page 164)

If we remove the spin from this passage, it tells us that the new nation-states’ drive to achieve true independence must be “balanced by converging forces.” And what form did these “converging forces” take? The globalists employed hot & cold wars and insurgencies, trade conflicts, and “economic hit men” to make life unbearable for any nation-state attempting to be independent. All this strife forced such nations to reach out to international institutions for “help” (which came in the form of military occupation or debt bondage).

Only in the arms of the globalist institutions would such nations find any peace…

colonial61

…(from page 61)

When Prospect spoke on page 60 of what animates such peoples…

colonial60c

…it brought to mind something I wrote in an old article titled David Wilcock and the Real NWO, Part 2 of 2:

>>>Why China? Why would the Illuminati, whose home base is in Western Europe, have the Chinese front the public face of their New World Order?

A clue to their motivations and strategy can be found in this article, titled “Colonial Elite Rules China for the Illuminati.” In it, the author states…

“The Chinese people would revolt against overt foreign domination, but embrace their place in the NWO if they believed they were in control.”

The Chinese have suffered greatly at the hands of Western imperialism, as has much of the world. As a result, the Illuminati would have trouble roping many nations into a Western-led New World Order, especially the nationalistic Chinese. Since you can’t have a truly global order without the most populous nation on Earth, the Illuminati opted to use their own legacy of destruction to their advantage. Their two-part strategy to do so is as follows:

1 – They set up a China-centered alliance as an opposing force to the Western alliance.
This part of the strategy was hinted at in the mainstream press in this 2002 UPI article, titled “China Wants Its Own ‘New World Order’ To Oppose US Version.” It is common practice for the Cabal to use opposing forces to achieve their ends, and they always make sure they have influence or control over both sides.

2 – They have been driving the world public into the hands of the Chinese alliance.
How have they approached this, you ask?

> They have widely publicized a heinous New World Order planned by the Western Powers…

…while simultaneously publicizing a benign New World Order planned by China and its allies…

thefivewhores

…thus establishing danger from one side and safety from another.

> They have instigated outrageous and provocative action, both economic and military, by the Western powers (this adds a new insight into the open-for-all-to-see Wall Street / City of London criminality and recent Western military boondoggles in Afghanistan, Iraq, Egypt, Libya, and Syria).

> They have broadly exposed damaging information about Western nations, especially the US. This is the motivation behind WikiLeaks, Snowden, and a thousand smaller disclosures. And after Snowden outed the NSA’s activities to the general public, where did he run to hide? First to China (Hong Kong), then to Russia. So what is the psychological message? China and Russia (the BRICS alliance) are where you run for safety from the evil US, its Western allies, and all their horrible behavior.

It is really very simple: the Illuminati built a rabbit trap (in the BRICS alliance) that looks like a nice, safe hole to hide from danger. Now they are beating the bushes (with the Western powers) to drive the rabbits toward the trap.<<<

Clearly, the globalists took into account “the aspirations of peoples all over the globe… to emerge rapidly and conclusively from the era of colonialism” in their planning of the NWO. It is for this reason that the BRICS alliance was formed and the NWO was designed in a multipolar fashion. They want the oppressed peoples of the world to join together and see themselves beating the West. And they want them to believe that the Illuminati’s multipolar New World Order represents their final victory over oppression and ascension to equality, when it is actually just the beginning of a new phase of subjugation and their fall into equality as global serfs.

With the Rockefeller plan for the BRICS New World Order laid out before us, let’s take a look at how it was implemented.

China: Building up the False Savior

Major moves towards building the New World Order outlined in Prospect for America began in the late sixties…

1969 – The International Monetary Fund (IMF) introduces the Special Drawing Right, the planned replacement for the US dollar as the global reserve currency

July 1971 – former Special Studies Project director Henry Kissinger held secret meetings in China to lay the groundwork for their introduction onto the global stage. Here he is with Chinese Premier Chou En-Lai (a.k.a. Zhou Enlai) during the visit…

kisschina

August 1971 – President Richard Nixon takes America off of the gold standard…

…This was the first major explosion in the dollar’s demolition as the global reserve currency (to make way for its replacement by the globalists’ SDR sometime around 2018).

February 1972 – Nixon visits (and “opens”) China. Here he is with Chairman Mao…

June 1973 – David Rockefeller Sr. visits China to start working out implementation details for what is to come. Here he is meeting with Premier Chou En-Lai…

So what was set in motion by these events? By 1978, Deng Xiaoping took power and “developed ‘Socialism with Chinese characteristics’ and Chinese economic reform, also known as the ‘socialist market economy,’ and opened China to the global market.” An interesting view on the hidden dynamics behind this development is offered in the above-linked “Colonial Elite Rules China for the Illuminati” article…

“Wang Hao, a historian at the China Institute of International Studies, has recorded that Mao’s deputy Zhou Enlai met David Rockefeller in June 1973:

‘When meeting David Rockefeller, Zhou said to him that it was necessary to find appropriate methods conducive to the development of the trade between two sides under different political systems.’

The corporate-communist merger began when Deng Xiaoping came to power in the late 1970s and introduced his market reforms with the slogan ‘to get rich is glorious.’

However, after 30 years of Maoism his regime was hopelessly ill equipped to run a market economy. They turned to the wealthiest Chinese tycoons in Hong Kong for guidance.

The most powerful HK tycoon is Li Ka-Shing, the richest Asian in the world and an Illuminati insider.”

(For Fritz Springmeier’s writeup on the Illuminati Li family, click here.)

This helped put in place a Chinese elite that “is a merger between the Communist leadership, Hong Kong tycoons, and the criminal Triads. All three factions derive their power from Illuminati collaboration.”

Needless to say, globalist coordination with China…

kissingerxi

…and their BRICS partner Russia…

kissputie

…has continued unabated to this day.

In closing, I’d simply say that any global solution offered to us in the coming years is, in fact, a globalist solution. If you do not get together with your neighbors to start exercising self-sufficiency and control over your life, you will fall into globalist dependency and control by default. And if you do not get together with those in your local community to devise a currency (or other method of trade/barter) of your own, you will end up using bankster currency by default. Power that is not taken into your own hands is left to the predators who grasp for it.

[Update 1 – 11 November 2014]

In response to this comment from a suspected webtroll…

“How do you know that Putin isn’t telling Kissinger, ‘Buddy, your days are numbered.’”

…I looked up an old New York Times article I ran across a while ago…

kissputfriends

So while the front page news has blaring headlines about the supposed conflict between West and East, you’ll find the truth a little deeper in the paper: that all these political types work for the same bosses and are actually buddies behind the scenes. Don’t be distracted by the public puppet theater.

Love always…

Reference: RedefiningGod.com

Remembering Devious Despicable Drew Pearson

Picture

Drew Pearson, the Muckraking Journalist With the Bully Pulpit.

Back in the days when newspapers ruled, nationally syndicated political columnist Drew Pearson ranked first among all journalistic jackals for his influence on public opinion. Pearson’s “Washington Merry-Go-Round” appeared daily from late 1932 until his death in 1969.  During that time, the gutter-dwelling, left-wing libeler helped to shape history, though not in a good way. According to his one-time writing partner, Jack Anderson, Pearson used journalism as a weapon against those he hated. When Pearson had to choose between a story’s fairness and accuracy or his desire to trash an American patriot / conservative, Pearson always attacked.

* PEARSON vs DOUGLAS MACARTHUR 

In May 1934, Pearson published a hit piece accusing Army Chief of Staff Gen. Douglas MacArthur of “dictatorial, insubordinate, disloyal, mutinous and disrespectful” actions during the crackdown on the 1932 Communist-led “Bonus March” in Washington DC — so named because  a bunch of World War I vets demanded their bonuses 13 years early. MacArthur had broken up the Marxist-led mob of 45,000 by force — using tear gas and tanks commanded by General George Patton. Enraged by Pearson’s claims, MacArthur sued Pearson — which must have scared Pearson because he would not have been able to prove his false claims against MacArthur. After a Democrat Congressman informed Pearson of an alleged affair that the general had with a Filipino actress, Pearson used that bit of dirt as a threat to force MacArthur to withdraw his action.

Picture
Pearson’s scandalous Washington Merry-Go-Round’ spewed vicious attacks at the nation’s leading anti-Communists.
Picture
Gen. Douglas MacArthur
Picture
Picture
When MacArthur put down the Communist-backed “Bonus Army” occupation of Washington in 1932, he became the number # 1 enemy of the Reds and Globalists. Pearson led the attacks.

PEARSON AND WORLD WAR II

After FDR had deliberately-induced the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, Pearson — eager to see the US come to the rescue of the Soviet Union — reported that 90% of the US ships docked there were destroyed. In reality, about 30% were destroyed. Typical Pearsonism.

During the first few years of America’s involvement in World War II, Pearson, although a Roosevelt-lover, criticized FDR’s conduct of the war. As a supporter of the Soviet Union, Pearson was frustrated with the delay in creating a second front in Europe to take some of the pressure off of his beloved Soviets. He complained that the Soviet Union was being “bled white” by the lack of a second front. Pearson’s chief “aide” during this time period was David Karr, a disgraced former employee at the WW2 propaganda agency, OWI (Office of War Information). Karr (born “Katz) was not only a supporter of various communist front groups; he was also a former employee of the Communist newspaper, The Daily Worker and evidently Pearson’s assigned handler — (one under every rock!).

  • PEARSON vs GEORGE PATTON

After a front was opened up in Africa — then southern Italy — in 1943, Pearson redirected his filth toward the legendary anti-Communist American general — George S. Patton. Pearson, having been fed information by his Communist friend — Ernest Cuneo, the OSS (CIA forerunner) — breathlessly broke the story of Patton’s slapping of Jewish shirker-soldier, Charles Kuhl, for having checked himself into a medical facility for “bad nerves.” Demands for Patton to be recalled and sent home soon arose among certain Communists in Congress as well as in newspaper editorials across the country. You see, though the commies wanted to win the war against Hitler– they also dreaded the idea of a formidable anti-Communist like Patton becoming a living legend which they would have to contend with later on. However, public opinion favored Patton. While he was later reassigned, he was not relieved; and would later, out of necessity, take command the U.S. Third Army. It was left to the OSS (with Eisenhower’s cooperation) to murder Patton soon after the war had ended in 1945.

Picture
Frustrated with the US pace of early deployment, Joe Stalin, the Communist Daily Worker and Drew Pearson all advocated for an immediate “second front” to relieve German pressure on of the Red Army in the East. 
Picture
Officially, Jewish Communist David Karr was Pearson’s “aide.” In reality, he was Pearson’s Soviet handler. 
Picture
The attacks on Patton were engineered by Karr (formerly of The Daily Worker) and fed to Pearson.

* PEARSON vs JAMES FORRESTAL

In the late 1940s, Pearson made false allegations against the anti-Communist Secretary of Defense James V. Forrestal. Pearson told his associate Jack Anderson that he believed Forrestal was “the most dangerous man in America.”  He hounded the honorable Forrestal, insinuating that he was guilty of corruption, without ever providing any detailed allegations of wrongdoing. The lowest blow came in 1949, when Pearson wrote that Forrestal had once run away during a holdup — leaving his wife behind defenseless!

After the end of the war, Pearson began citing “anonymous sources” questioning Forrestal’s mental condition. He unrelentingly continued his attacks on Forrestal, both in columns and radio broadcasts, and he berated President Truman for not firing  him. Truman then asked for Forrestal’s resignation. After Forrestal’s “suicide” in May 1949 (caused by a fall from a 16th-floor window of the Bethesda Naval Hospital), Pearson wrote that Forrestal suffered from “paranoia” and had attempted suicide on four previous occasions. The claim was completely contradicted by the testimony of Forrestal’s attending physicians. Many in DC blamed the “suicide” on Pearson’s attacks.

* PEARSON vs JOSEPH McCARTHY

We all know the story of how Communism suddenly exploded across Europe and Asia, and entrenched itself in America, during the years following World War II. When the great Senator Joseph McCarthy launched his investigations into this post-war treason of both foreign and domestic affairs, he became Pearson’s ultimate nemesis .

In 1950, Pearson began attacking McCarthy after the Senator had declared that he had a list of 205 people in the State Department that were members of the American Communist Party. McCarthy counter-attacked Pearson, calling for a “patriotic boycott” of his radio show which cost Pearson the sponsor. Twelve newspapers also cancelled their contract with Pearson. McCarthy referred to Pearson’s aide, David Karr, as his “KGB handler” — a fact later confirmed by the 1994 declassification of the “Venona Intercepts.”

In December 1950 McCarthy and Pearson were involved in a brawl at the Sulgrave Club in Washington, D.C. The two men had traded insults over dinner. Later on, when Pearson went to the cloak room, he was grabbed from behind, spun around, slapped, choked and kneed in the groin by McCarthy. As the fight was broken up by a young Senator Richard Nixon (R-CA), Pearson ran away like the cowardly shit he was. McCarthy then said to Nixon “You shouldn’t have stopped me Dick.”

After McCarthy began investigating communist infiltration into the military, President Dwight Eisenhower instructed his minions to cooperate with the Communist Pearson in taking down McCarthy. The investigation stopped after 1954 and McCarthy, like Forrestal, died mysteriously in 1957 — like Forrestal, at Bethesda Naval Hospital.

****
The writer of this Slimes book review, as well as the Fake Historians who have written about Pearson, unanimously (and out of necessity) all concede  that Pearson played fast and loose with the truth. But the general spin is that although his methods weren’t always professional, he was serving a higher cause. The close of this article sums it up:

“When Pearson died, this newspaper (NY Times) editorialized about his “pugnacity,” “vindictiveness” and “irresponsibility.” But it also lauded his “fearless dedication to the belief that the independent and resourceful reporter is the indispensable guardian of good government.”

Unlike those of many historical figures, Drew Pearson’s contradictions were pretty well understood even in his own time.”

In other words, if you’re a Marxist / Globalist, then sleazy shoddy, slanderous journalism is forgivable. The ends justify the means.

Picture

Communist, Globalist and Zionist Jews all hated the Irish-Catholic anti-Communist James Forrestal.

Picture

Joe McCarthy outed both Karr and Pearson as traitors, and history has proven his assertions about Karr being a Soviet agent to be correct.

Picture

It’s no surprise that scum like LBJ and the ageing Pearson got along.

Why Has Nixon’s Name Remained So Hated?

JULY 5, 2021

NY Times: Was Richard Nixon a Tragic Hero?

The resignation from office of President Richard Nixon(over some petty nonsense) in 1974, after a year-long “impeachment process,” marked the first and only time that a US president has ever been forced out of office — while living, that is. Technically, it was a resignation because Nixon hadn’t been impeached. But the Democrat House certainly had enough votes to impeach and the Senate had enough gutless Republicans to convict him of obstruction of justice, abuse of power, and contempt of Congress related to a break-in at Washington’s Watergate Hotel by some low-level operatives looking for dirt on Democrats’. Nixon, oblivious of the “burglary,” was crucified not for the minor act, but for the cover-up.

In those pre-Talk Radio / pre-cable TV / pre-Internet / pre-Twitter days of total media monopoly, the Big Five Jew bullhorns — New York Times: (Sulzberger) — Washington Post: (Meyer-Graham) — ABC: (Goldenson) — NBC: (Sarnoff) — CBS: (Paley (Paloff)) — controlled the public perception of reality — totally ! Nixon was defenseless. Their official fairy tale of Watergate — which is why all subsequent political scandals carry the suffix “gate” — holds that two young crusading reporters from The Washington Post, Carl Bernstein & Bob Woodward – supplied with information by an anonymous source called “Deep Throat” — took down an evil, duplicitous scoundrel of a president for the good of the country. The real story is something different.

This book review of the latest Nixon book raises a question that many other “historians” have pondered, specifically: Why has Nixon’s name not at all been rehabilitated by the passage of time?

From the article:

“Yet for a spell in the late 20th century, some commentators and a few historians imagined that this dark stain on our democracy would quickly fade away. Some of Richard Nixon’s loyalists predicted that his foreign policy would soon overshadow his lawlessness.

But it never came. No Republican Party convention ever invited him to speak. Retrospective rankings of our chief executives always placed him low.”

It’s no mystery to us. We have our own ideas about the reason why the Nixon name must remain forever tarnished, and it’s something much deeper than libtards simply not liking him.

Picture
The famed Watergate Hotel where a minor “burglary” took place.
Picture
Nasty Yenta Katherine Meyer and her hit-men reporters, Carl Bernstein & Bob Woodward).
Picture
Nixon resigns before a stunned TV audience. He was an imperfect and ambitious man who had his flaws — but he was never one of “them” and might have done some great things in his second term.

THE TRUTH ABOUT “WATERGATE”

  • 1948: As a young Congressman (R-CA), Nixon co-sponsored a “Mundt-Nixon Bill” to address the crisis of internal communist subversion. The bill provided for registration of all Communist Party members and required the monitoring of “printed and broadcast material issued by Communist-front organizations.” The bill passed the House, but died in the Senate.
  • 1949-1950: Nixon served on the anti-Communist House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC). In that capacity, he played a part in exposing the communist traitor and Soviet agent Alger Hiss — who would be convicted of perjury in 1950. Nixon relished his role in the exposure and earned the ever-lasting animosity of the Establishment Left for it. Harvard boy Hiss was one of theirs, and people like Eleanor Roosevelt never forgave Nixon for serving on HUAC.
  • 1950: Nixon easily won a seat in the US Senate after suggesting that his ultra-liberal Democrat opponent, Helen Gahagan Douglas, might be a communist. Eleanor Roosevelt was again incensed, and continued to trash Nixon for this for many years to come. Once in the Senate, Nixon supported the efforts of the great Joseph McCarthy.
  • 1952: In order to bolster his anti-communist / conservative credentials among Republicans, the Leftist traitor and all-of-a-sudden “Republican” Dwight D. Eisenhower selected Nixon as his Vice Presidential running mate. Two months after having stolen the Republican nomination from Ohio Senator Robert Taft (a true conservative patriot), Eisenhower, who was certain to defeat the Democrat Adlai Stevenson in the general election, left Nixon twisting in the wind as the Fake News accused Nixon of inappropriate use of campaign funds. (((They))) wanted Nixon off the ticket. His place now in doubt, Nixon delivered a TV address in which he defended himself, attacked his opponents, and urged the audience to contact the Republican National Committee (RNC) to keep him on the ticket. During the speech, Nixon cleverly and cutely stated that he intended to keep a black-and-white dog that was gifted to him, and his children had named Checkers. This speech became known as “The Checkers Speech,” and it saved him — no thanks to Eisenhower!
Picture
Nixon the ambitious anti-communist showman holding newspaper telling of the conviction of communist Alger Hiss, which he helped to bring about.
Picture
The “Checkers Speech” — Nixon, citing his new dog, takes to the airwaves to beg Republican voters to keep him on the Eisenhower ticket.
Picture
Eisenhower, that FDR-loving butcher of German prisoners, never truly supported Nixon — but needed his anti-communist credentials in order to cover up the Marxist stench.
  • 1953 – 1961: Nixon, though basically a conservative and a patriot, was always an ambitious politician first. He faithfully served the Globalist bastard Eisenhower — even helping to clip Joe McCarthy‘s wings when called upon to do so — until he himself could run for the White House.
  • 1960: Nixon ran for president and lost a very close election to John F Kennedy.
  • 1968: Nixon was elected president, with “far right” Spirow Agnew (R-MD) as Vice President. Both men — we only know now but the all-knowing “usual suspects” surely must have known back then — held “anti-Semitic”  views. (here) and (here)
  • 1972: Nixon & Agnew were re-elected in a historic landslide — winning 49 out of 50 states!
Picture
Nixon vs JFK: Election 1960: As Senators, Nixon and JFK had both supported Joe McCarthy and were never really part of “The Establishment.” They would both become American presidents, and both be removed. JFK by murder, and Nixon by “scandal.” 
Picture
Election 1968: Nixon’s VP, Spiro Agnew, was a rock-solid conservative not afraid to fight. 
Picture
Election 1972: The secretly “anti-Semitic” Nixon & Agnew won EVERYTHING except libtarded Taxxachussetts and mostly Black District of Colombia. Nixon would have had a lot of power and would probably have ended “The Cold War” in Term 2.
  • October 1973: Vice President Agnew was forced to resign over a fake “tax evasion” scandal hyped up by the Fake News. Globalist / Trilateralist , JFK assassination cover-upper Congressman Gerald Ford of Michigan was then forced upon Nixon as new Vice President.
  • August 1974: Nixon resigned. The Watergate “scandal” over a low level “burglary” was nothing more than a “Deep State” coup — led by Katherine Meyer Graham‘s Washington Post — not unlike what we are witnessing today in the effort to remove Trump. Nixon’s resignation elevated Rockefeller puppet Gerald Ford to the presidency.
  • November 1974: “The Watergate Babies” — A whole bunch of Bolshevik Democrats won House seats due to a backlash caused by the Fake News and their manufactured “scandal.” America’s political landscape was fundamentally altered by the influx of these Marxists.
Picture
Deep State & Fake News take out VP Agnew
Picture
Deep State & Fake News take out Nixon.
Picture
The damage done to the Republican brand ushered in the Democrat “Watergate Babies” of 1974.
Picture
Picture
Young hippy trash Killary Rodham worked for Watergate Judiciary Committee until being fired for unethical behavior.

ACTUAL QUOTES

Picture
Young hippy trash Killary Rodham worked for Watergate Judiciary Committee until being fired for unethical behavior.
  • December 1974: Globalist Ford chose “Republican” Nelson Rockefeller to be his Vice President. Rockefeller had been Governor of New York State and was known for his presidential ambitions. The problem for Rockefeller was that heartland Republicans hated him — and had already rejected him in 1964.
  • September 5, 1975: Lynette “Squeaky” Fromme, a member of the Charles Manson cult, pointed a handgun at Ford and pulled the trigger at point-blank range. As she did, a Secret Service agent grabbed the gun. Fromme was arrested and served 34 years in prison. Nelson Rockefeller came that close to becoming president.
  • September 22, 1975: As Ford left a hotel in San Francisco, another mind-controlled assassin, Sara Jane Moore, fired a handgun at the president — missing him only by a few feet. As she fired a second round, a retired Marine grabbed at the gun and deflected her shot. The second bullet struck a wall just six inches above Ford’s head, then ricocheted and wounded a taxi driver. Moore served 32 years in prison. Once again, over the span of just three weeks, Globalist Golden Boy Nelson Rockefeller came within inches of becoming the 39th president of the United States. How convenient that would have been, eh? It is interesting to note that when Ford ran for president against Jimmy Carter in 1976, he dumped Nelson Rockefeller!

And that, dear reader, is the real story behind the back-to-back “scandals” which took out VP Agnew first — and then President Nixon one year later.

Picture
Nelson Rockefeller wanted the presidency.
Picture
President Ford, though a loyal Globalist soldier, was expendable. Two very close assassination attempts on him, just 17 days apart, could easily have put Rockefeller into the office which Nixon had held just 1 year earlier.
Picture
Picture
Nixon letter to Donald Trump (1987): “… whenever you decide to run for office, you will be a winner!” 
Picture
Nixon and Trump all chummy at a 1980’s black-tie event. 
Picture
CIA rats Woodward & Bernstein were dragged out of mothballs to help ignite another coup — this time against Trump. But this time around, the old media magic was gone. Most people under 55 don’t even remember the role that these two wicked has-beens played in Watergate.