Please do your own research. The information I share is only a catalyst to expanding ones confined consciousness. I have NO desire for anyone to blindly believe or agree with what I share. Seek the truth for yourself and put your own puzzle together that has been presented to you. I'm not here to teach, preach or lead, but rather assist in awakening the consciousness of the collective from its temporary dormancy.
Signatures of some of the January 6 Republicans who voted against certifying the election of 2020
OCTOBER 03, 2022
NY Times: They Cemented the Myth of a Stolen Election
On the day the Capitol was attacked, 139 Republicans in the House voted to dispute the Electoral College count.
By inducing both his overt and covert enemies into continuously defending the integrity of the Great Election Steal of 2020, The Donald has skillfully maneuvered Sulzberger’s Times, the Piranha Press and the corrupt and/or cowardly politicians (within both parties) into swimming into a trap net from which they cannot now extricate themselves. And what do trapped schools of fish instinctively do when caught in such a net? They start to frantically wiggle, and continue to wiggle and wiggle ever more aggressively. Though the situation is hopeless, they will furiously (and illogically) wiggle until the bitter end; even when — now starved of oxygen and really freaking out — they are hauled up and dumped onto the boat deck itself!
With ever-increasing numbers of normies now open to the question of voter fraud; and with solid Trump allies in position to win Governor’s races in badly defrauded Arizona, badly defrauded Michigan and badly defrauded Pennsylvania — the wiggling has gotten worse than ever with this dramatic front, top & center page attack on the “Election Denying” Republicans who have since out-muscled the cowards and traitors to now dominate the new Republican Party — the Trump Party.
The article describes the huge shift:
“Five days after the attack on the Capitol last year, the Republican members of the House of Representatives braced for a backlash. Two-thirds of them — 139 in all — had been voting on Jan. 6, 2021, to dispute the Electoral College count that would seal Donald J. Trump’s defeat just as rioters determined to keep the president in power stormed the chamber. One lawmaker after another warned during a conference call that unless Republicans demanded accountability, voters would punish them for inflaming the mob.
More than 20 months later, the opposite has happened. The votes to reject the election results have become a badge of honor within the party, in some cases even a requirement for advancement, as doubts about the election have come to define what it means to be a Trump Republican.” (emphasis added)
As both Q and Trump himself have posted many, many times: “Nothing Can Stop What Is Coming“ — and the rotten netted fish at the Times all know it.
“Vote! They know if they lose, it’s over.”
1. Kari Lake appears to be a lock in Arizona. // 2. Doug Mastriano (though said to be “losing”) may win Pennsylvania. // 3. Trapped in the J-6 gefilte fish net — the Fake News has no choice but to keep defending the stolen election (a “sting” operation, actually) of 2020 and the criminal J-6 certification of 2021.
Now, about this Nothing Can Stop What Is Coming (NCSWIC) code language — which we explained soon after the Big Steal of 2020. It’s worth reviewing at this time because the GOP has — slowly but surely since January 6th™ — been transformed into a fighting party seemingly determined to expose 2020, when the timing is perfect.
An excerpt from our piece, dated November 7, 2020:
In November of 2018, Trump’s DHS established the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Agency (CISA) to protect the integrity of US elections. CISA itself oversees another sub-agency to develop the products needed to assist DHS in working with “public safety partners involved in interoperable communications at all levels of government.”
In other words, if something like a blockchain communication embedded in a watermark was indeed added to the ballots, this particular sub-division of CISA (itself a subgroup of DHS) would have been tasked with setting up the sting operation by working with “private vendors” and “public safety partners.” And the name of this sub-group is (dramatic drum roll) — the National Council of StateWide Interoperability Coordinators — official acronym being NCSWIC (here) — initials which also perfectly match Nothing Can Stop What Is Coming.”
Coincidence? We shall know soon enough.
*** END OF EXCERPT ***
Obviously, especially in hindsight, the hidden meanings of NCSWIC and January 6th ™ are closely linked — which is interesting because this imposter “Joe Biden,” on several occasions, also uttered some code language before the 2020 election. Much to the confusion of the Fake News, Biden, on several occasions, predicted an “epiphany” (a sudden manifestation, a revelation) among Republicans who would turn the party against Trump. Of course, as “Biden” himself has since acknowledged, this “epiphany” has gone the exact opposite direction!
For those of you whose Christianity is a bit rusty, the Epiphany – the revelation of Christ to the Maji (The Three Kings) – is observed by most Christian denominations on …….. drum roll please
January 6th…. Coincidence?
The movie continues.
1. Q posts about “Nothing Can Stop What Is Coming” : 2018 – 2020, & one more from 2022 // 2. Trump, just last week, with added word: “Believe!”
NY Times: Inflation May Save You Money on Your Taxes
The government adjusts its tax code every year, including the standard deduction and tax brackets. Rising costs mean big changes next year.
BY ANN CARRNS
Finally — after more than one year of steadily rising costs across the entire spectrum of goods and services — a bit of good economic news from “the paper of record.” The criminal debasement of our currency is actually going to “save” us money on our taxes next year! Some astonishingly Orwellian anti-logic, from the article:
“In addition to a big boost to Social Security payments, inflation could help save money on your federal tax bill next year. That’s because the federal government annually adjusts many elements of its complex tax code, including the standard deduction and tax brackets, to reflect inflation and avoid so-called stealth tax increases.
The adjustments also mean you can contribute more next year to retirement savings and other accounts that offer tax breaks, like health savings accounts.
Happy days are here again.
Cheese & crackers! Ms. Ann Carrns — the felonious freelancer who drooled out this demented drivel — ought to be locked up in an insane asylum for spinning the ongoing econo-meltdown into a welcome “tax savings” benefit.
1. Insane-looking Ann Carrns (with her daughter’s dolls) fancies herself as a financial writer. // 2. Cheer up, Mr. & Mrs. America.All that currency debasement will benefit you come tax time! // 3. Because Uncle Sam is your friend.
First of all, the upward adjustments of the tax brackets and standard deductions only represent “savings” in terms of numbers, not actual value, which has been lost due to inflation. You see, the IRS, in its infinite graciousness, allows for the fact the dollar isn’t what is used to be yesterday — and will not in the near future be what it is today either. Indeed, that’s why the adjustments were put in place in the first place, as Carrns herself does explain:
“If the bracket boundaries weren’t periodically adjusted for inflation, more of your income would move into a higher bracket, increasing your tax bill.”
In other words, you’ll be paying “less” only because you are, in reality, earning less in terms of purchasing power.
Secondly, the various adjustments for inflation NEVER keep pace with the understated (rigged) rate of inflation. To therefore describe these adjustments as “savings” — or even break-even — is just as fallacious as referring to a 5% nominal salary increase — when under-reported inflation is at 10% annual — as a “pay raise.” It’s not.
More “good news” from Crazy Carrns:
“The adjustments also mean you can contribute more next year to retirement savings and other accounts that offer tax breaks, like health savings accounts.”
Again, the “more” contributions in this case only means more nominal dollars — not more actual value.
The most exasperating element of this horrible piece of financial propaganda comes in the form of an “Inflation F.A.Q. (Frequently Asked Questions) box — inserted into the body of the article — followed by a reply that is so incomplete that it raises more questions than it answers:
We all know “what” inflation is!
How insulting! Even the dullest of the befuddled boobs in the dimmest corner of the overlapping tyrannical Kingdoms of Normiedom & Libtardia already knows WHAT inflation is: It is a widespread rise in prices. But the High Priests at “the paper of record” NEVER tell the worshipers about the true HOW and WHY of inflation — even though those questions are just as easy to define as the “what.”
Here it is — in a nutshell:
“Inflation is the loss of purchasing power over time caused by excessive expansion (legalized counterfeiting) of the money supply — injected into the economy at unpayable compounding interest (usury) — relative to the amount of goods and services available. The debt virus is injected partly through the banking system in the form of loans (out of nothing) to businesses and consumers; and partly through the Central Bank’s purchase (also with nothing) of government bonds to fund deficits. The ever increasing amounts of debt money chasing a more stable supply of goods debases the value of all existing currency, thus increasing prices.”
There — in just 100 words that an 10-year old, or even a “college educated” economist can digest. Now why can’t the esteemed, and, we presume, very well-shekeled, Ms. Carrns do that for her readers? Hmmm? Truth simplifies. Liars (and idiots) complicate.
Adding insult to idiocy, Ms. Carrns seems to hold a very “inflated” (no pun intended) opinion of her analytical and reporting capabilities. From her Stinked-In bio:
“I’m a talented journalist covering personal finance, including health care, retirement, college saving, taxes and more. I excel at making complex topics understandable for readers. My column, “Your Money Adviser,” appears weekly in The New York Times.”
The most severely cracked up of crackpots always think so highly of themselves, and feel compelled to share that opinion with us — ever notice that?
1. The more you print and lend out at interest, the more you drive up the cost of goods and services. // 2. By manipulating interest rates and reserve requirements, The Fed can expand or contract the volume of loans to people and businesses. // 3. Expansion (recovery / boom) or Contraction (recession / bust) is also achieved through the Fed’s buying of U.S. Bonds and other securities with new counterfeit money (expansion), or the selling off of those securities which it holds (contraction).
Most people think that George Orwell was writing about, and against, totalitarianism – especially when they encounter him through the prism of his great dystopian novel, Nineteen Eighty-Four.
This view of Orwell is not wrong, but it can miss something. For Orwell was concerned above all about the particular threat posed by totalitarianism to words and language. He was concerned about the threat it posed to our ability to think and speak freely and truthfully. About the threat it posed to our freedom.
He saw, clearly and vividly, that to lose control of words is to lose control of meaning. That is what frightened him about the totalitarianism of Nazi Germany and Stalinist Russia – these regimes wanted to control the very linguistic substance of thought itself.
And that is why Orwell continues to speak to us so powerfully today. Because words, language and meaning are under threat once more.
Totalitarianism in Orwell’s time
The totalitarian regimes of Nazi Germany and Stalin’s Soviet Union represented something new and frightening for Orwell. Authoritarian dictatorships, in which power was wielded unaccountably and arbitrarily, had existed before, of course. But what made the totalitarian regimes of the 20th century different was the extent to which they demanded every individual’s complete subservience to the state. They sought to abolish the very basis of individual freedom and autonomy. They wanted to use dictatorial powers to socially engineer the human soul itself, changing and shaping how people think and behave.
Totalitarian regimes set about breaking up clubs, trade unions and other voluntary associations. They were effectively dismantling those areas of social and political life in which people were able to freely and spontaneously associate. The spaces, that is, in which local and national culture develops free of the state and officialdom. These cultural spaces were always tremendously important to Orwell. As he put it in his 1941 essay, ‘England Your England’: ‘All the culture that is most truly native centres round things which even when they are communal are not official – the pub, the football match, the back garden, the fireside and the “nice cup of tea”.’
Totalitarianism may have reached its horrifying zenith in Nazi Germany and Stalin’s USSR. But Orwell was worried about its effect in the West, too. He was concerned about the Sovietisation of Europe through the increasingly prominent and powerful Stalinist Communist Parties. He was also worried about what he saw as Britain’s leftwing ‘Europeanised intelligentsia’, which, like the Communist Parties of Western Europe, seemed to worship state power, particularly in the supranational form of the USSR. And he was concerned above all about the emergence of the totalitarian mindset, and the attempt to re-engineer the deep structures of mind and feeling that lie at the heart of autonomy and liberty.
Orwell could see this mindset flourishing among Britain’s intellectual elite, from the eugenics and top-down socialism of Fabians, like Sidney and Beatrice Webb and HG Wells, to the broader technocratic impulses of the intelligentsia in general. They wanted to remake people ‘for their own good’, or for the benefit of the race or state power. They therefore saw it as desirable to force people to conform to certain prescribed behaviours and attitudes. This threatened the everyday freedom of people who wanted, as Orwell put it, ‘the liberty to have a home of your own, to do what you like in your spare time, to choose your own amusements instead of having them chosen for you from above’.
Edmond O’Brien as Winston Smith and Jan Sterling as Julia, in an adaptation of Nineteen Eighty-Four, 3 June 1955.
In the aftermath of the Second World War, this new intellectual elite started to gain ascendancy. It was effectively a clerisy – a cultural and ruling elite defined by its academic achievements. It had been forged through higher education and academia rather than through traditional forms of privilege and wealth, such as public schools.
Orwell was naturally predisposed against this emergent clerisy. He may have attended Eton, but that’s where Orwell’s education stopped. He was not part of the clerisy’s world. He was not an academic writer, nor did he position himself as such. On the contrary, he saw himself as a popular writer, addressing a broad, non-university-educated audience.
Moreover, Orwell’s antipathy towards this new elite type was long-standing. He had bristled against the rigidity and pomposity of imperial officialdom as a minor colonial police official in Burma between 1922 and 1927. And he had always battled against the top-down socialist great and good, and much of academia, too, who were often very much hand in glove with the Stalinised left.
The hostility was mutual. Indeed, it accounts for the disdain that many academics and their fellow travellers continue to display towards Orwell today.
The importance of words
Nowadays we are all too familiar with this university-educated ruling caste, and its desire to control words and meaning. Just think, for example, of the way in which our cultural and educational elites have turned ‘fascism’ from a historically specific phenomenon into a pejorative that has lost all meaning, to be used to describe anything from Brexit to Boris Johnson’s Tory government – a process Orwell saw beginning with the Stalinist practice of calling Spanish democratic revolutionaries ‘Trotsky-fascists’ (which he documented in Homage to Catalonia (1938)).
Or think of the way in which our cultural and educational elites have transformed the very meanings of the words ‘man’ and ‘woman’, divesting them of any connection to biological reality. Orwell would not have been surprised by this development. In Nineteen Eighty-Four, he shows how the totalitarian state and its intellectuals will try to suppress real facts, and even natural laws, if they diverge from their worldview. Through exerting power over ideas, they seek to shape reality. ‘Power is in tearing human minds to pieces and putting them together in new shapes of your own choosing’, says O’Brien, the sinister party intellectual. ‘We control matter because we control the mind. Reality is inside the skull… You must get rid of these 19th-century ideas about the laws of nature.’
In Nineteen Eighty-Four, the totalitarian regime tries to subject history to similar manipulation. As anti-hero Winston Smith tells his lover, Julia:
‘Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every book has been rewritten, every picture has been repainted, every statue and street and building has been renamed, every date has been altered. And that process is continuing day by day and minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Party is always right.’
As Orwell wrote elsewhere, ‘the historian believes that the past cannot be altered and that a correct knowledge of history is valuable as a matter of course. From the totalitarian point of view history is something to be created rather than learned.’
This totalitarian approach to history is dominant today, from the New York Times’ 1619 Project to statue-toppling. History is something to be erased or conjured up or reshaped as a moral lesson for today. It is used to demonstrate the rectitude of the contemporary establishment.
But it is language that is central to Orwell’s analysis of this form of intellectual manipulation and thought-control. Take ‘Ingsoc’, the philosophy that the regime follows and enforces through the linguistic system of Newspeak. Newspeak is more than mere censorship. It is an attempt to make certain ideas – freedom, autonomy and so on – actually unthinkable or impossible. It is an attempt to eliminate the very possibility of dissent (or ‘thoughtcrime’).
As Syme, who is working on a Newspeak dictionary, tells Winston Smith:
‘The whole aim… is to narrow the range of thought. In the end we shall make thoughtcrime literally impossible, because there will be no words in which to express it. Every year fewer and fewer words, and the range of consciousness always a little smaller… Has it ever occurred to you, Winston, that by the year 2050, at the very latest, not a single human being will be alive who could understand such a conversation as we are having now?’
The parallels between Orwell’s nightmarish vision of totalitarianism and the totalitarian mindset of today, in which language is policed and controlled, should not be overstated. In the dystopia of Nineteen Eighty-Four, the project of eliminating freedom and dissent, as in Nazi Germany or Stalinist Russia, was backed up by a brutal, murderous secret police. There is little of that in our societies today – people are not forcibly silenced or disappeared.
However, they are cancelled, pushed out of their jobs, and sometimes even arrested by the police for what amounts to thoughtcrime. And many more people simply self-censor out of fear of saying the ‘wrong’ thing. Orwell’s concern that words could be erased or their meaning altered, and thought controlled, is not being realised in an openly dictatorial manner. No, it’s being achieved through a creeping cultural and intellectual conformism.
The intellectual turn against freedom
But then that was always Orwell’s worry – that intellectuals giving up on freedom would allow a Big Brother Britain to flourish. As he saw it in The Prevention of Literature (1946), the biggest danger to freedom of speech and thought came not from the threat of dictatorship (which was receding by then) but from intellectuals giving up on freedom, or worse, seeing it as an obstacle to the realisation of their worldview.
Interestingly, his concerns about an intellectual betrayal of freedom were reinforced by a 1944 meeting of the anti-censorship organisation, English PEN. Attending an event to mark the 300th anniversary of Milton’s Areopagitica, Milton’s famous 1644 speech making the case for the ‘Liberty of Unlicenc’d Printing’, Orwell noted that many of the left-wing intellectuals present were unwilling to criticise Soviet Russia or wartime censorship. Indeed, they had become profoundly indifferent or hostile to the question of political liberty and press freedom.
‘In England, the immediate enemies of truthfulness, and hence of freedom of thought, are the press lords, the film magnates, and the bureaucrats’, Orwell wrote, ‘but that on a long view the weakening of the desire for liberty among the intellectuals themselves is the most serious symptom of all’.
Orwell was concerned by the increasing popularity among influential left-wing intellectuals of ‘the much more tenable and dangerous proposition that freedom is undesirable and that intellectual honesty is a form of anti-social selfishness’. The exercise of freedom of speech and thought, the willingness to speak truth to power, was even then becoming seen as something to be frowned upon, a selfish, even elitist act.
An individual speaking freely and honestly, wrote Orwell, is ‘accused of either wanting to shut himself up in an ivory tower, or of making an exhibitionist display of his own personality, or of resisting the inevitable current of history in an attempt to cling to unjustified privilege’.
These are insights which have stood the test of time. Just think of the imprecations against those who challenge the consensus. They are dismissed as ‘contrarians’ and accused of selfishly upsetting people.
And worst of all, think of the way free speech is damned as the right of the privileged. This is possibly one of the greatest lies of our age. Free speech does not support privilege. We all have the capacity to speak, write, think and argue. We might not, as individuals or small groups, have the platforms of a press baron or the BBC. But it is only through our freedom to speak freely that we can challenge those with greater power.
Orwell’s legacy
Orwell is everywhere today. He is taught in schools and his ideas and phrases are part of our common culture. But his value and importance to us lies in his defence of freedom, especially the freedom to speak and write.
His outstanding 1946 essay, ‘Politics and the English Language’, can actually be read as a freedom manual. It is a guide on how to use words and language to fight back.
Of course, it is attacked today as an expression of privilege and of bigotry. Author and commentator Will Self cited ‘Politics and the English Language’ in a 2014 BBC Radio 4 show as proof that Orwell was an ‘authoritarian elitist’. He said: ‘Reading Orwell at his most lucid you can have the distinct impression he’s saying these things, in precisely this way, because he knows that you – and you alone – are exactly the sort of person who’s sufficiently intelligent to comprehend the very essence of what he’s trying to communicate. It’s this the mediocrity-loving English masses respond to – the talented dog-whistler calling them to chow down on a big bowl of conformity.’
Lionel Trilling, another writer and thinker, made a similar point to Self, but in a far more insightful, enlightening way. ‘[Orwell] liberates us’, he wrote in 1952:
‘He tells us that we can understand our political and social life merely by looking around us, he frees us from the need for the inside dope. He implies that our job is not to be intellectual, certainly not to be intellectual in this fashion or that, but merely to be intelligent according to our lights – he restores the old sense of the democracy of the mind, releasing us from the belief that the mind can work only in a technical, professional way and that it must work competitively. He has the effect of making us believe that we may become full members of the society of thinking men. That is why he is a figure for us.’
Orwell should be a figure for us, too – in our battle to restore the democracy of the mind and resist the totalitarian mindset of today. But this will require having the courage of our convictions and our words, as he so often did himself. As he put it in The Prevention of Literature, ‘To write in plain vigorous language one has to think fearlessly’. That Orwell did precisely that was a testament to his belief in the public just as much as his belief in himself. He sets an example and a challenge to us all.
“Rambostein” Liberated Auschwitz the bloody fictional made-for-normies drama! As even the Holohoaxers acknowledge, the Germans had already abandoned the camp before the Soviets arrived.
NY Times: David Dushman, Soviet Soldier Who Helped Liberate Auschwitz, Dies at 98
No pretext for Sulzberger’s Times to sing the song that never ends about the event that never happened is too trivial. In this case, the death of a 98-year-old Soviet “liberator” of the Bullshwitz concentration camp is enough to merit a longer than usual obituary — because David Dushmanwas like, ya know — such a famous and important personage of world history (rolling eyes sarcastically).
Hours after the Germans had unconditionally surrendered (and were thus rendered voiceless) on May 8, 1945, the “paper of record” ran an uncritical account of a just-released Soviet report of the “horrors” which took place there. Incredibly, it is that specific atrocity propaganda report — pooped out by the commie comedy writers of Stalin’s “Extraordinary State Commission for the Establishment and Investigation of the Atrocities of the German Fascist Invaders and Their Accomplices and the Damage They Caused to Citizens, Collective Farms, Public Organizations, State Enterprises and Institutions of the USSR”(we kid you not, that’s the actual official name of the commission) — which remains the academic foundation of the Holocaust tale until this day.
Let’s dive in into this obituary of Devious Dushman for some Anti-New York Times debunking that will never end about the song that never ends about the event that never happened (like they say it did.)
1 & 2. As soon as Germany has unconditionally surrendered — and hence, could no longer speak in its defense — C.L. Sulzberger of the Sulzberger Crime Family published an article summarizing the Soviet “Extraordinary Commission’s” report on Bullshwitz — which included false tales of gas chambers, torture and experiments on live humans. // 3. Dushman is the only witness to his “heroic and proudly told (again, and again, and again) tale of driving a tank through the “electric fence” surrounding Bullschwitz.
Times: David Dushman, who as a soldier for the Soviet Union drove his tank through the electric fence surrounding the Nazi death camp at Auschwitz on Jan. 27, 1945,… Rebuttal: Oh the bloody fictional made-for-normies drama! As even the Holohoaxers acknowledge, the Germans had already abandoned the camp before the Soviets arrived. There would have been no need for Dushman to “drive his tank through the electric fence.” The gates of Bullshwitz were wide open!
Times: … died in Munich on Saturday. He was 98. Rebuttal: Such a tragic irony — the Bolshevik invader ended up living in Germany. God only knows how many blonde Berlin “shiksas” he must have raped back in ’45.
Times: Mr. Dushman was a 21-year-old Red Army soldier when he drove his T-34 into the high, electric barbed-wire fence surrounding the Auschwitz death camp in Nazi-occupied Poland. Rebuttal: Did anyone, other than Dushman, actually witness this heroic tank assault on Bullshwitz? No matter how many times the writer, Berlin correspondent Melissa Eddy, states that Dushman drove his tank through the electric fence (twice in the text of the article and once again in a picture caption), the story is still implausible and unverifiable.
Times: Approaching the camp, he recalled, he peered through the viewing slit of his tank and was shocked by what he saw. Rebuttal: Oh dear. Get your hip waders on, boys and girls. Here comes the stinky stuff.
Times: “Everywhere there were skeletons,” he told the German newspaper Süddeutsche Zeitung in 2015. “They stumbled from the barracks, sat and lay among the dead. It was horrifying. We threw all of our canned food at them and drove on quickly, to keep chasing the fascists.” Rebuttal: (palm to face, sighing, shaking head) I hope you didn’t hit any of those skeletal Jews and Communists on the head with those cans of food (made in the USA and shipped via Alaska, by the way) that you threw at them, Mr. Dushman.
1. Soviet soldiers staged drama shots as they walked in and out of the undamaged front gate of Bullschwitz — while tank-boy Dushman drove “through the electric fence” throwing canned food at “the skeletons.” // 2. Starving skeletons? Where? In other photos, some of the “survivors” actually look a bit chubby! // 3. Oy vey! I see skeletons stumbling from the barracks!JIM FEEZEL
FLASHBACK / October 2020 Same tank-through-gate and skeletons drama, from the American side:
“World War II Hero Who Drove Tank Through Gate of Dachau Concentration Camp Dies At 95”
“We were facing the front gate at Dachau prison,” Feezel said. “My commander said, ‘Jim, put the tank through that gate.’ So, I have the dubious honor of doing that. And, immediately glancing over at the bodies stacked like cordwood, this young 19-year-old just about lost it.”
Times: By the time Mr. Dushman reached Auschwitz, he had been wounded three times. He said he was one of only 69 men from the 12,000 in his division to survive. Rebuttal: Wow. He was a regular “John Rambostein.” If you say so, Mr. Dushman. We won’t ask for verification of your battlefield heroism. That would be “anti-Semitic ,” dontcha’ know?
Times: More than 1.1 million men, women and children were murdered in the camp… Rebuttal: But the original report issued by the “Extraordinary State Commission,” pumped-up by the Slimes, and cited by “scholars” up until about 1990 said it was 4 million. Oops.
Times: A Russian Jew, Mr. Dushman and his family were familiar with anti-Semitism and state-sanctioned discrimination against Jews in the Soviet Union. Rebuttal: You see, even in the Jewish-established Soviet Union, the atheistic anti-Christian “Goy” Communists, like Stalin, never trusted the Trotskyite Jews and turned on them later on. I guess that blows the “anti-Semitism is the product of Christian bigotry” argument out of the water, no?
Times: “My biggest dream and hope for future generations is to live in a world where there is no war,” Dushman (a former fencing coach) said during a 2015 visit to Switzerland. Rebuttal: Well, that’s a noble sentiment, Doucheman. But if you were sincere about that dream, you should have had that talk with some of your “higher brethren” during the living years — the same gang of greasy ghouls that engineered and funded just about every major war since the “Coalition Wars” against Napoleon. But I suspect that when your ilk speaks of “a world where there is no war,” you mean a planetary government lorded over by “the usual suspects.”
1. From “4 million” dead at Bullschwitz down to 1.5 million — now down to 1.1 million (yet the total of 6 Million never changes! // 2. (top) — When (((they))) speak of a world without war, they often mean One World Government over helplessly disarmed nations and individuals.
More than 350,000 Communist teachers are working hard to “debunk” the “Digital Army” of Truthers.
Times Caption: Paul Blakesley has spent years teaching high school students in Colorado how to identify bias and misinformation.
SEPTEMBER 13, 2022
NY Times: When Teens Find Misinformation, These Teachers Are Ready
Media literacy efforts are intensifying, targeting students as they approach voting age.
Here’s a story about a well-organized and well-funded nationwide movement of “educators” dedicated to training their captive kiddies in the art of detecting “misinformation” online. Well it’s about time that critical thinking and logic were taught to students!
From the article:
“Between lessons about the Revolutionary War and the functions of Congress, juniors in several history and U.S. government classes at Palmer High School in Colorado Springs are taught to defend themselves against disinformation.
The students, many of them on the cusp of voting age, spend up to two weeks each fall exploring how falsehoods, prejudices and opinions can lurk in the many places they get information.”(emphasis added)
Sounds good, but do “you guys” smell a Red rat here? Sugar the late great Conspiracy Cat sure does. Let’s subject this piece to a bit of critical analysis of our own, shall we?
Oh Yeah! Shut it down!
Times: Students learn to trace the origins of documents, to validate a website by leaving it to consult other sources …. Translation: In other words, when students discover an inconvenient truth online, they’re made to “fact check” ™ the information at a more “respectable” source — like Reuters, AP, or Yahoo.
Times: … and to train a critical eye on the claims made by TikTok influencers and on YouTube videos. Translation: “Now students. Do not believe anything those crazy ‘conspiracy theorists‘ have to say.”
Times: “With students and adults alike, it’s just easy to look at stuff on social media and take it as it is and not question it,” said Paul Blakesley, Analysis: That is true. There is plenty of garbage online — including some coming from our own lesser brethren on the right. The question is: who are your “trusted sources,” Mr. Blakesley? Just the fact that the deceitful, duplicitous, devious, demonic “paper of record” is pimping you is sufficient evidence to indict YOU as a misinformation agent yourself. Project much?
Times: Children and teenagers are not the only ones susceptible to misinformation: Several studies suggest … Analysis: “Studies suggest” — Whenever you spot that rhetorical lead-in term, there is no need to even finish the sentence. It simply means that the Fake Journalist has dug up a bought-off Fake “Scholar” to enhance and amplify the Marxist mendacity.
Times: But with young people spending more time online, where misleading and false narratives swirl …. Analysis: “Misleading and false narratives,” eh? And what does Sulzberger’s Slimes publish every day? Truth?
Times: … around the upcoming midterm elections, the Covid-19 pandemic and other topics … Analysis: The coming Red Wave and the deterioration of the Stupid-19 lie have really got “the usual suspects” worried.
Times: Educators are increasingly trying to offer protection. Analysis: That’s very noble of them. (rolling eyes)
The “protection” is actually code language —- as in “protection” of the Global Crime Syndicate. Get it?
Who is “fact checking” the “fact checkers” which the “educators” are directing students too?
Times: At Palmer High School, Mr. Blakesley tries to demonstrate how to distinguish between good information and bad: ….When is it appropriate to turn to Wikipedia? Analysis: Wikipedia, eh? Wiki can indeed be used as a valuable source for acquiring verifiable raw data on a subject. But on political matters, it is notoriously libtarded — perfectly suited for “educators.”
Times: Alarmed by the surge of misinformation online, …. Analysis: What they are really “alarmed by” are the successful efforts of the growing army of digital truthers.
Times: … several educational groups representing more than 350,000 teachers created an alliance… the National Association for Media Literacy Education, said its own membership had more than doubled in the past five years. Analysis: “More than 350,000” Communist teachers (and growing) are working hard to “debunk” the “Digital Army” of Truthers.
Times: Five states, including Colorado, passed language since early 2020 that required education departments to take steps such as providing …. literacy education Analysis: The First Amendment of the Bill of Rights — generally applied to State as well as Federal institutions — bars governments from overtly censoring political speech. But by requiring schools to manipulatively teach selective “debunking” skills to curious students, the state is essentially achieving exactly that.
Times: Researchers at Stanford University asked 3,446 high school students to evaluate content. They did not do well. In one example, a website claimed to offer facts about climate science, but was actually tied to the fossil fuel industry. It duped nearly 97 percent of the students. Analysis: There it is! Questioning the Climate Con means that you have been “duped.” What’s ironic here is that these “Stanford researchers” are oblivious to their own fallacious logic. Discrediting the information from a website just because it is “tied to the fossil fuel industry” represents a classic example of “The Appeal to Motive Fallacy.” These shameless charlatans aren’t teaching critical thinking. They are stifling it!
Times: Such findings suggest that many students need help learning to filter the barrage of information coming their way, said Sam Wineburg, one of the researchers, who leads the Stanford History Education Group. Analysis: Wineburg, eh? These darn Norwegians are under every rock!
Times: He and other researchers have suggested teaching students to fact-check online information by exploring beyond the original website. Translation: Weinberg will refer the kiddies to his buddy Goldberg’s website for the “fact-check .” That’s how these Norwegians operate.
Times: In November, a pilot program (designed with) the American Federation of Teachers will be piloted in Cleveland, helping in part to train educators to teach media and information literacy. Analysis: The American Federation of Teachers is involved in this?! Yikes. That’s the Communist Union headed by the infamous Norwegian Communist lesbian, Randi Weingarten.
Times: New educational efforts are constantly being deployed. Twitter and Google have so-called pre-bunking initiatives to warn users about common misinformation tactics. Analysis: “Pre-bunking” —- In other words, censorship via prejudicial branding instead of overt banning. These Marxists are always thinking while we’re sleeping.
Times: The nonprofit News Literacy Project, which said the number of students using its free Checkology curriculum surged 248 percent between 2018 and 2022. Analysis: Let me see what I can find out about this News Literacy Project and its “Checkology curriculum.” Be right back…….
Ok. back. As I suspected, NLP is loaded up with pinko personnel from the usual cast of characters — Ford Foundation, National Public Radio, Corporate America, Quackademia — and some more Norwegians. The good news is this: For them to have to resort to this vast scheme proves that the digital army has got them peein’ in their pink panties.
They’re after the children, folks. Keep your kids out of public schools if you can.
1. Stanford’s Sam Wineburg did a “study.” // 2. The Big Tech commies are involved in this effort too. // 3. Communist lesbian teacher union boss Randi Weingarten (right) and her “spouse” — the “Rabbi ” Sharon Kleinbaum. Nice to know these greasy characters are “protecting” the children from “misinformation.”NLP’s “Checkology” teaches kids “how to think” by branding truth as “misinformation.”
Vladimir Solovyov, a talk-show host and “top cheerleader” for President Vladimir Putin .
AUGUST 23, 2022
NY Times: What Russians See in the News: A War Over Western Plans to Subjugate Them
In the Kremlin-controlled news media, the war is not about Ukraine, but about a long history of enemies trying to keep Russia down.
In a classic textbook case of the psychopathic phenomenon known as “projection” — this atrocious article depicts the Russian people as helpless brainwashed victims of Kremlin propaganda and Russian news shows. The poor lost souls of Russia have been led to believe that the “West” (New World Order Mafia) is out to get them. Ha ha ha ha goes the tone of the propaganda piece — as in: “Who would believe such a silly thing?”
From the article:
“Vladimir Solovyov, a talk-show host and top cheerleader for President Vladimir V. Putin’s government, said this month that “Russia was invited to join Western society for dinner — not as a guest, but as a dish.” One of his nightly shows recently presented the war as a kind of cosmic showdown between good and evil.
The United States is the main antagonist, with Europe and NATO its lackeys.”
This is where the importance of understanding history — real history, that is — comes into play. When one understands that Putin and the Russian people weren’t the first and only ones to accuse “the international community” of plotting to take control of their nation, it adds critical context to recent events. The Russians are right!
1. Russia’s ’60 Minutes’ show host Evgeny Popov (center), urged Americans to quickly replace president Biden with former-President Donald Trump // 2. Putin’s declaration of war on the internal “scum and traitors” of Russia is amplified by news shows.
Some historical precedents — profound quotes from the “bad guys” — that “the paper of record” won’t tell you about:
“First, Roosevelt incites war, then falsifies the causes, then odiously wraps himself in a cloak of Christian hypocrisy and slowly but surely leads mankind to war, not without calling God to witness the honesty of his attack, in the approved manner of an old Freemason.” — The Führer (Hitler)
“It has truly been unavoidable and far from our wishes that our Empire has been brought to cross swords with America and Britain…. Eager for the realization of their inordinate ambition to dominate the Orient, both America and Britain, giving support to the Chungking regime, have aggravated the disturbances in East Asia. Moreover these two powers, inducing other countries to follow suit, increased military preparations on all sides of our Empire to challenge us.” — Emperor Hirohito of Japan
“We know that you can harm us although we do not threaten you. ……We do not place America among the enemies. We place it where we want our friends to be and we try to be friends. But repeated American statements last year made it apparent that America did not regard us as friends.” — Saddam Hussein
Americans must know I don’t hate them. I love them.… I hear it is a complex society inside. Many Americans don’t know about the outside world. The majority have no concern and no information about other people. They could not even find Africa on a map. I think Americans are good, but America will be taken over and destroyed from the inside by the Zionist lobby. The Americans do not see this. They are getting decadent. Zionists will use this to destroy them.” — Qaddafi of Libya
“When our interests matched, the Americans have been good to us, and when the interests differed, they wanted us to mold ourselves to them, which we refused. … I am not a puppet. I was not made by the West to go to the West or to any other country.” — Bashar al Assad of Syria
See the pattern? Plenty more — from plenty of other world leaders past and present — just like those. So you see — this persistent assertion that “the West” has been up to no good throughout the world didn’t start with “Kremlin propaganda” and “Russian news shows.” It actually dates back to the 1800’s, back when Rothschild UK and Rothschild France served as the pre-American global bully boys with a hand in plotting and/or fighting the 1848 uprisings, the Crimean War, the Russo-Turkish War, the Chinese Opium Wars, the British-Afghan War, the U.S. Civil War, and the Franco-Prussian War — not to mention the various covert intrigues, assassinations and “spontaneous” color revolutions targeted at the “bad guy” of the day.
Hitler, Hussein, Qadaffi & Assad — They all said the EXACT same thing as “Russian state media” about “western subjugation” plots.
Though the tone here is one of overall “straw-man” mockery, the astute reader will, ironically, recognize the absolute truth of the current geo-political and cultural conflict between Russia and Rothschild’s “West” from the following excerpt:
“On state media, Russia is a pillar of traditional values, bound to prevail over the moral swamp that is the West. There is a daily fixation with L.G.B.T.Q. matters. To watch Russian television is to get the impression that the gay community runs the decadent Western world. For all their professed shock and horror, Russian news outlets avidly air footage with lurid depictions of gay life.”
It’s very simple, boys and girls. Putin and pals, in a very strong voice, are saying “Nyet!” to the Satanic, homosexualized, pedosexualized, denationalized, super-centralized New World Order. This righteous defiance is what “the usual suspects” refer to as “authoritarianism” and “conspiracy theory.”
This is the type of moral madness that Sulzberger’s Slimes and “the international community” want to impose upon Russia. The “propagandized” people of “authoritarian” Russia are not interested!
A spate of recent stomach-churning books, TV shows and films suggests we’ve never looked so delicious — to one another.
I can’t quite say that I was expecting this type of “soft-on-cannibalism” piece to soon appear in the “paper of record” — but given the “normalization” of gender insanity and child grooming; as well as the trial balloons regarding Satanism and child rape (we refuse to utter the benign-sounding term: “pedophilia” (love of children) — we are not at all surprised by this article. Repulsed, yes. Surprised, no.
The excerpts — from a story which does not seem to mind the spate of cannibalism books, shows and movies being churned out lately — speaks for itself:
“An image came to Chelsea G. Summers: a boyfriend, accidentally on purpose hit by a car, some quick work with a corkscrew and his liver served Tuscan style, on toast.
That figment of her twisted imagination is what prompted Ms. Summers to write her novel, “A Certain Hunger,” about a restaurant critic with a taste for (male) human flesh. Turns out, cannibalism has a time and a place. In the pages of some recent stomach-churning books, and on television and film screens, Ms. Summers and others suggest that that time is now.
There is “Yellowjackets,” a Showtime series about a high school women’s soccer team stranded in the woods for a few months too many… The film “Fresh,” released on Hulu in March, involves an underground human meat trade for the rich.
“Lapvona,” a novel published in June, portrays cannibalism in a medieval village overcome by plague and drought. Agustina Bazterrica’s book “Tender Is the Flesh,” released in English in 2020 imagines a future society that farms humans like cattle. From 2017, “Raw,” tells the story of a vegetarian veterinary student whose taste for meat escalates after consuming raw offal.
Still to come is “Bones and All,” about a young love that becomes a lust for human consumption, is expected to be released later this year.”
The cannibalistic columnist and occasional Slimes contributor, Alex Beggs, is actually a food writer — formerly for Bon Appetit magazine — and there is not a hint of disgust or reasonable judgement about these sick and twisted stories from Ms. Beggs. Maybe she eats the stuff herself?
1. The article “beggs” the question — does Ms. Beggs eat people? // 2. In “Fresh,” a woman becomes charmed by a man she meets at a grocery store, whom she later discovers is involved in an underground human flesh trade. // 3. Another disgusting image from the Slimes (yet they won’t show what aborted babies look like).Times image & caption: A course on cannibalism in contemporary fiction would include “Lapvona,” “A Certain Hunger” and “Tender Is the Flesh.”
The Times’ first foray into cannibalistic “normalization” came in the form of a December 2020 story about consumable human meat, on display at a London museum exhibit.
From that piece:
“Orkan Telhan, an artist and associate professor of fine arts ,spent the last year imagining how climate change might impact the future of food consumption. He collaborated with scientists to create a provocative development of what they call “Ouroboros Steak,” meat cultivated from human cells and expired blood, that challenged the sustainability practices of the nascent cellular agriculture industry, which develops lab-grown products from existing cell cultures.“
Cannibalism to solve the climate “crisis?” A Swedish “behavioral scientist” named Magnus Söderlund was actually given a respectful hearing when he proposed that in 2019; as was “evolutionary biologist,” militant atheist and apologist for what he calls “mild pedophilia” Richard Dawkins in 2018. The abuse of children and the consumption of human flesh and blood are indeed part of the ritual practice of Satanism. This stuff is real, boys & girls — and it’s a lot more vast and historically entrenched in high places than what most analysts of this phenomenon might previously have imagined.
1. “Ouroboros Steak,” meat cultivated from human cells and expired blood on display in London. // 2. “Art” imitates life? // 3. Professor Magnus Söderlund
One of the “tricks of the trade” for deconstructing the devious dung presented by the “paper of record” is to look for instances in which the writers will attempt to dispel a shocking absolute truth by actually stating said truth openly and precisely. This is done to make the truth seem ridiculous because, upon hearing such astonishing assertions – without any context or advance “baby step” preparation — the normie mind shuts down and automatically accepts that the “conspiracy theorists” are quite insane. For example, here’s a 2020 excerpt from the Slimes, about Q Anon’s core beliefs:
“The QAnon movement is a false belief that Trump is saving the world from a Satanic cult made up of Democratic pedophiles and cannibals.“ (as the readers shake their heads and laugh at us)
ANYT Translation to Truth: There is a Satanic cult made up of Leftist child rapists and cannibals ruling the world.
See how the “in broad daylight” coverup trick works?
1. Time Mag: 1979 // 2. Time has run many stories sympathetic to Satanism.At some of her “art” events, Satanist-to-the-Stars Marina Abramovic invites her “elite” guests to eat mock human bodies. They probably eat the real stuff in super secret settings.
NY Times: Climate Politics Are Worse Than You Think
By PAUL KRUGMAN
The despicable Nobel Prize Winning Fake Economist Paul Krugman is one of the most senior propagandists at the “paper of record” and a ubiquitous TV gadfly. The odious little rodent’s subtle condescending scorn and veiled hatred for White people. In this propaganda piece, the sneaky sniveling specimen of Satanic scum attempts to prop up the weakening Climate Con by utilizing every commie cliché and logical fallacy in his arsenal of asininity.
Rather than repeating my usual rebuttals to the usual lies of “climate science,” let’s focus on the deliberately deceptive logical fallacies / rhetorical devices which this master of mendacity — this juvenile joker — this heckling hyena vomits out for his legions of stupid and vapid groupies to gulp down like mother’s milk.
1. Rat-faced lying greaseball. // 2. Nobel Prizes for the hard sciences tend to be valid, but in the realms of foreign affairs and economics, the million dollar award is an indicator of high level criminality. // 3. Putrid Paulie will often scamper out of his rat’s nest to give “expert opinion” by TV Fake News.
Krugman: Texas is often hot, but not like this. Analysis: This is Recency Bias. With far less asphalt than there is today — Waco, Texas reached 104 degrees in 1917, 1935 and 1978. During the heat wave of 1980, the Dallas/Fort Worth area recorded 42 consecutive days with temperatures above 100 ° F — with temperatures reaching 117 °F at Wichita Falls, Texas.
Krugman: Current forecasts have the temperature in Dallas hitting 109 degrees Tuesday, with highs in triple digits well into next week. Analysis: This is the Fallacy of Incomplete Evidence, aka “Cherry-Picking” data. On any given day, one can just as easily pick out places on Earth that are experiencing normal temps, or having an unusual cool spell.
Krugman: You have to be willfully blind — unfortunately, a fairly common ailment among politicians, not to see that — Analysis: This is the ad Hominem Attack Fallacy. He is essentially calling anyone who disputes the Climate Con stupid, dishonest, or both — without presenting any hard evidence to support his own case.
Krugman: — global warming has stopped being a debatable threat. Analysis: This is “The Science is Settled Fallacy“ — a variation of what I like to refer to as the “Case Closed Fallacy” — in which a fool or a liar (in this case, a liar) will declare in an authoritative tone that “There is no longer any debate.” — as if such pathetic posturing actually proves anything!
Krugman: Climate scientists — whose warnings …. Analysis: This is the Appeal to Authority Fallacy. It is intended to intimidate us mere mortals into bowing before the bought & paid for whore “scientists” without so much as even attempting to do our own research and use our own reasoning. This device also ignores the fact that there are many other scientists (all censored) who refute this garbage.
Krugman: …have been overwhelmingly vindicated … Analysis: They will often say that the evidence for this or that “latest thing” is “overwhelming” — yet they never actually produce any. The powerful-sounding word itself is intended to substitute for the lack of evidence. This is salesmanship, not scholarship. Let’s just call this trick “The Evidence is Overwhelming Trick.” (no link)
God gave us the capacity to reason. The world would be a much brighter place if only people learned to recognize the fundamental fallacies which deceivers (and innocent dupes) utilize to spread dangerous falsehoods and errors.
Krugman: (West Virginia Senator) Joe Manchin just pulled the plug on what may have been the Biden administration’s last chance to do something — anything — meaningful about climate change. Manchin represents a state that still thinks of itself as coal country. He gets more political contributions from the energy industry than any other member of Congress …. He has a large financial conflict of interest arising from his family’s ownership of a coal business. Analysis: This is the Appeal to Motive Fallacy. Senator Manchin’s perceived motives for opposing the Climate Con (from a coal state, donations from energy companies) is not at all relevant for establishing the veracity of the fundamental theory that man-made CO2 will cause catastrophic “Global Warming.”
Krugman: My guess is that Manchin’s act has as much to do with vanity as with money. His act has, after all, kept him in the political limelight month after month. Analysis: Let’s call this one the “Little Paulie is a Nasty Slandering Piece of Shit Human Being Fallacy.“(no link)
Krugman: Scientific consensus in favor of such policies doesn’t help. Analysis: This is theAppeal to the Popular Fallacy — truth is arrived at by research and analysis of facts and patterns — not by the “overwhelming consensus” of whore “scientists.”
Krugman: Emission taxes are the Econ 101 solution to pollution. Analysis: The unspoken reference to “emissions” (CO2) as “pollution” is an Assumptive Fallacybecause the casual mention of it as such leads the reader to accepting something that it actually false as being true. CO2 is no more of a “pollutant” than oxygen or water vapor are!
Krugman: The modern G.O.P. is hostile to science and scientists. Analysis: Not sure whether to file this doozie underad Hominem Attack Fallacy or escalate it to “Little Paulie is a Nasty Slandering Piece of Shit Human Being Fallacy.“ Probably the latter.
Krugman: Death rates since vaccines became widely available have been far higher in strongly Republican areas than in Democratic areas. Analysis: This is False Equivalence Fallacy and also Red Herring (Diversion) Fallacy. Even if we were to accept, purely for argument’s sake, that the Stupid-19 scamdemic was real; that vaccines saved millions of lives; and that anti-science Republicans got it all wrong — that would not prove the ludicrous theory which holds that manmade CO2 “emissions” will melt Antarctica and wash away our heavily populated coastal regions.
Krugman: Overwhelming scientific consensus…. Analysis: Wow! A “three-fer” of high-school-level debate team fallacies back-to-back-back — “overwhelming” (“The Overwhelming Trick,” again) “scientific” (Appeal to Authority, again) and “consensus”(Appeal to the Popular, again)
Krugman: That hostility is the fundamental reason we appear set to do nothing while the planet burns. Analysis: “While the planet burns, eh?” With that bit of drama, Paulie Propagandists closes with a classic example of the Appeal to Fear Fallacy.
********* So there it is. As usual, not one iota of hard data to support the Climate Con. Just one classic fallacy (lie) heaped upon another upon another. One could actually teach a college course on logic just by analyzing the seditious scribbling of this demented little “Nobel Prize winning” ™ demon.
Once one learns the tricks of the “intellectual” deceiver, his diversionary tactics become very easy to spot. For that reason, critical thinking skills are NOT something that Krugman’s quackademic comrades want their normie students to develop.
1. The “usual suspects” at the Manhattan Mendacity Machine manufacture lies like an auto factory assembly line churns out Fords. // 2. Climate Bogeyman — an entertaining and comprehensive debunk of the Climate Con (in paperback or pdf) // 3. Paul Krugman is a deceitful, slandering, anti-White / America-hating COMMUNIST in the mold of “Russian” Red Leon Trotsky — a creature so vile that even Joe Stalin hated him (and had him murdered).In 2020, Krugman claimed that the child porn on his computer may have been put there by Q Anon hackers.
Caption: School-aged children last year at an award ceremony in Vladimir, Russia.
NY Times: Putin Aims to Shape a New Generation of Supporters, Through Schools
Sweeping changes in the curriculum will soon cast the Russian president as a pivotal historical figure and mark an end of openness to the West.
Oh the horrible howls of non-lubricated butt-hurt emanating from high atop Manhattan’s Marxist Mendacity Machine! Not only has (((their crowd))) lost the opportunity to mind-rape the youth of Russia like they have been doing in “the free world” — but Vlad the Bad & friends are now doing a bit of benevolent brainwashing themselves instead!
From the article:
“Starting in first grade, students across Russia will soon sit through weekly classes featuring war movies and virtual tours through Crimea. They will be given a steady dose of lectures on topics like “the geopolitical situation” and “traditional values.” In addition to a regular flag-raising ceremony, they will be introduced to lessons celebrating Russia’s “rebirth” under President Vladimir V. Putin.
And, according to legislation signed into law by Mr. Putin on Thursday, all Russian children will be encouraged to join a new patriotic youth movement in the likeness of the Soviet Union’s red-cravatted “Pioneers” — presided over by the president himself.”
Oy vey! Vlad the Bad is busting out his own version of the Hitler youth!
A properly instructed youth will not be morally conquered so easily when they grow older.
Notwithstanding the deeply embedded historical errors surrounding Russia’s “heroic” resistance against Napoleon and Hitler — both of whom had multi-national wars imposed upon them by “the usual suspects” — this is the sort of patriotic, social and moral indoctrination that our misguided youth so desperately need. Let us analyze a few excerpts from the story:
Times: As the war in Ukraine approaches the five-month mark, the vast ambitions of Putin’s plans for the home front are coming into focus: a wholesale reprogramming of Russian society to end 30 years of openness to the West. Analysis: The necessary and proper military action in Ukraine gave Putin the opening he needed to smoke out the libtarded “scum and traitors” (his actual words) of Russia and “reprogram” society with strong doses of truth and decency.
Times: The Kremlin has already jailed or forced into exile just about all activists speaking out against the war; it has criminalized what remained of Russia’s independent journalism; it has cracked down on academics, bloggers and even a hockey player with suspect loyalties. Analysis: Good! These traitors should be thankful they weren’t publicly flogged and then hanged in Red Square.
Times: But nowhere are these ambitions clearer than in the Kremlin’s race to overhaul how children are taught at Russia’s 40,000 public schools. Analysis: The hand that rocks the cradle rules the future. In this case, the cradle is in the hands of the good guys.
Times: The nationwide education initiatives, which start in September, are part of the Russian government’s scramble to indoctrinate children with Mr. Putin’s militarized and anti-Western version of patriotism. Analysis: The Slimes didn’t complain about “indoctrination” when NGO-engineered Russian school books containing Globalist propaganda and even chapters on US history and presidents started popping up during the Yeltsin years.
Times: A ninth-grader, Irina, said that a computer class in Moscow was replaced by the viewing of a state television report on Ukrainians surrendering to Russian troops and a lecture explaining that only information from official Russian sources was to be trusted. Analysis: The Slimes dug up a little Russian traitoress named Irina– probably coached by her bitch of a mother (assuming these people even exist) — and interviewed her by phone (supposedly).
Times: She soon noticed a transformation among some friends who had been initially scared or confused by the war. “They suddenly started repeating everything after the television.” Analysis: Repeating the TV News is suddenly bad? Idiotic Irina sounds like one of them “conspiracy theorists” now.
Times: Irina said in a phone interview alongside her mother, “They suddenly started saying that this is all deserved, that this had to happen. They couldn’t even attempt to explain this to me.” Analysis: Allow me. It’s very simple, Irina. You see, the CIA/Mossad puppets based in Kiev have been oppressing the Russians in the east for years while threatening to extend the reach of the violent NATO war machine 800 miles closer to the heart of Russia itself. Putin ain’t putin (pun intended) up with it — nor should he. Understand?
Times: Irina said that when she challenged her friends about Russian war crimes, they shot back: “It’s all propaganda.” Analysis: Irina’s friends are correct. The brainwashed one is Irina.
Times: Irina’s parents, driven in part by their refusal to raise their children in an increasingly militarized environment, left for Poland this spring. Analysis: Ah… so the red rats abandoned Russia! They are indeed traitors after all. Good riddance — filthy scum pigs. Wonder if this alleged family is actually even “Russian,” — know what I’m sayin’?
Times: In the city of Pskov near the Estonian border, Irina Milyutina (an English teacher) said that the children at her school scrawled Z’s and V’s — symbols of support for the war — on chalkboards, desks and even the floors. At recess, fifth and sixth graders pretended to be Russian soldiers. Analysis: The libtard traitor teachers have lost their students. Hopefully, they’ll soon lose their jobs.
Times: A proposed decree published by the education ministry shows that Mr. Putin’s two decades in power are set to be enshrined in the standard curriculum as a historical turning point. The decree says that Russian history classes will be required to include several new topics like “the rebirth of Russia as a great power in the 21st century,” “reunification with Crimea,” and “the special military operation in Ukraine.” Analysis: In other words, everything that yours truly wrote in “The War Against Putin” is about to be taught to millions and millions of Russian kids. Take that, Globalists!
Napoleon — Hitler — Putin. They all fought the same war against the same unseen enemy. Has Vlad the Bad finally succeeded where the others fell short?
NY Times Caption: Elon Musk has not helped Tesla’s stock price by turning his bid to buy Twitter into a financial soap opera.
May 22, 2022
NY Times:
Tesla’s Aura Dims as Its Plunging Stock Highlights the Risks It Faces *
How Elon Musk Winged It With Twitter, and Everything Else
*
Elon Musk Left a South Africa That Was Rife With Misinformation and White Privilege
*
The Problem With Elon Musk’s Vision of Tesla’s Autopilot Future
*
Piecing Together the Messages of Elon Musk
*
The Allegations Against Musk
Elon Musk — that mysterious mogul who owes his entire “richest-man-in-the-world” fortune to —
1. Exploitation of the Global Warming / Climate Change HOAX 2. Unlimited positive free publicity from the Globalist media 3. Never-ending government contracts, mandates and subsidies associated with his companies (SpaceX, Tesla, Solar City, Boring, Neuralink)
— is now at war with the “elites” who made him and the activist radicals who once admired him. His tweets — amplified by countless millions of fanboys — are rocking the foundations of Libtardia even more so than Trump’s ever did because, in Musk’s case, his brutal and unremitting attacks on the Left are coming from a politically left-leaning “moderate” — not a “far right extremist.”
Musk — though probably hurting his business in the process — is making it safe for the mushy middle to turn against the Demonrat Party; and the sudden vicious counter attacks by pinko press against Musk and his Tesla company only serve to expose their “mainstream media” bias even more. This is truly a delightful development that we could never have anticipated.
The questions remain, on Musk:
“Is Musk a “White Hat” now? Was he a sleeper all along? Is he faking it? Or is he a “Gray Hat” now — meaning, someone who — either for money or under duress — was flipped from Black to White by the White Hats?
The Mystery of Musk just gets murkier and murkier.”
Let’s examine this matter further.
Musk’s “tweets” are even mightier than Trump’s used to be — and he is killing the Democrats with them on many different issues. (((They))) never saw this one coming either.
In November & December of 2021 — at a time when Tesla stocks were still rising and rising — Musk — or shall we say “Musk” — sold off an eye-popping $16 Billion worth of Tesla shares. In April of this year, an additional $8.5 billion was sold — ostensibly to help buy Twitter. Just before Elon began his late 2021 selling spree, his equally shady younger brother, Kimbal Musk, sold off $109 Million. Eight months earlier, Kimbal had sold $25,000,000 worth. Since the 2021 sell-offs, Tesla stock has plunged from its November high of $1,208 down to $663 as of today! Nice “pump & dump” there, Elon — or “Elon.”
Not only did the Musk boys avert big personal losses, but Elon’s shift to the “far right” — a move that has already killed the favorable free publicity which created him and is now hammering down Tesla stock even further — is sure to hurt sales as many goofy global warmists will now buy their electric cars from BMW or Mercedes. What’s going on here?
We should all reject, out of hand, any consideration of the possibility that Murky Musk, or “Musk,” is now a morally motivated adopted American patriot for whom “noblesse oblige“ outweighs profits. That characterization may work for his fawning fanboys, but to a seasoned analyst of these slimy characters, any such naive notion is laughable. And we may also now rule out the aforementioned option that he is faking his sudden rightward tilt as part of a Deep State psyop. He’s gone waaay too “far right” on too many issues by now. He’s even mentioning “red pills” and promoting the John Durham investigation of Q fame! Deductively speaking, that leaves us with only three options:
1. Musk is a self-serving, money & fame addicted, long term sleeper recruited by the White Hats a long time ago and secretly working for them all along. 2. The White Hats, in recent years, made crooked Musk an offer he couldn’t refuse — specifically this: “Work for us and let us access some of your billions — or die in Gitmo!” 3. The real Musk — like the real Biden, the real Killary, the real Fauci et al. — was disappeared & deep faked, his fortune commandeered, and his mighty twitter account taken over.
* Editor’s Note: Musk isn’t the only character to suddenly and surprisingly start attacking liberals and/or sounding conciliatory toward Trump. In recent months, we have noticed examples of this growing phenomenon with extreme Left TV hosts Bill Maher & Trevor Noah, race-baiter extraordinaire Al Sharpton, and ultra-libtard “intellectual” guru, Noam Chomksy.
It’s a vexing riddle — with each of the three possibilities sounding “crazier” than the other; and yet, it must be one of those options. But whichever way one leans as to the answer, the multiple-choice question itself represents a win-win-win for our side — a BIG win. Hence, the hateful Fake News barrage now being unloaded against “the world’s richest man” — a now out-of-control Frankenstein monster (or Frankenstein Ghost?) which (((they))) created.
The World We Live In 