Against NYT’s Paul Krugman And Climate Change

JULY 19, 2022

 
NY Times: 
Climate Politics Are Worse Than You Think


By PAUL KRUGMAN

The despicable Nobel Prize Winning Fake Economist Paul Krugman is one of the most senior propagandists at the “paper of record” and a ubiquitous TV gadfly. The odious little rodent’s subtle condescending scorn and veiled hatred for White people. In this propaganda piece, the sneaky sniveling specimen of Satanic scum attempts to prop up the weakening Climate Con by utilizing every commie cliché and logical fallacy in his arsenal of asininity.

Rather than repeating my usual rebuttals to the usual lies of “climate science,” let’s focus on the deliberately deceptive logical fallacies / rhetorical devices which this master of mendacity — this juvenile joker — this heckling hyena vomits out for his legions of stupid and vapid groupies to gulp down like mother’s milk.

1. Rat-faced lying greaseball. // 2. Nobel Prizes for the hard sciences tend to be valid, but in the realms of foreign affairs and economics, the million dollar award is an indicator of high level criminality. // 3. Putrid Paulie will often scamper out of his rat’s nest to give “expert opinion” by TV Fake News.

Krugman: Texas is often hot, but not like this.
Analysis: This is Recency Bias. With far less asphalt than there is today — Waco, Texas reached 104 degrees in 1917, 1935 and 1978. During the heat wave of 1980, the Dallas/Fort Worth area recorded 42 consecutive days with temperatures above 100 ° F — with temperatures reaching 117 °F at Wichita Falls, Texas.

Krugman: Current forecasts have the temperature in Dallas hitting 109 degrees Tuesday, with highs in triple digits well into next week.
Analysis: This is the Fallacy of Incomplete Evidence, aka “Cherry-Picking” data. On any given day, one can just as easily pick out places on Earth that are experiencing normal temps, or having an unusual cool spell.

Krugman: You have to be willfully blind — unfortunately, a fairly common ailment among politicians, not to see that —
Analysis: This is the ad Hominem Attack Fallacy. He is essentially calling anyone who disputes the Climate Con stupid, dishonest, or both — without presenting any hard evidence to support his own case.

Krugman: — global warming has stopped being a debatable threat.
Analysis:  This is The Science is Settled Fallacy — a variation of what I like to refer to as the “Case Closed Fallacy” — in which a fool or a liar (in this case, a liar) will declare in an authoritative tone that “There is no longer any debate.” — as if such pathetic posturing actually proves anything!

Krugman: Climate scientists — whose warnings ….
Analysis: This is the Appeal to Authority Fallacy. It is intended to intimidate us mere mortals into bowing before the bought & paid for whore “scientists” without so much as even attempting to do our own research and use our own reasoning. This device also ignores the fact that there are many other scientists (all censored) who refute this garbage.

Krugman: …have been overwhelmingly vindicated …
Analysis: They will often say that the evidence for this or that “latest thing” is “overwhelming” — yet they never actually produce any. The powerful-sounding word itself is intended to substitute for the lack of evidence. This is salesmanship, not scholarship. Let’s just call this trick “The Evidence is Overwhelming Trick.” (no link)

God gave us the capacity to reason. The world would be a much brighter place if only people learned to recognize the fundamental fallacies which deceivers (and innocent dupes) utilize to spread dangerous falsehoods and errors.

Krugman: (West Virginia Senator) Joe Manchin just pulled the plug on what may have been the Biden administration’s last chance to do something — anything — meaningful about climate change. Manchin represents a state that still thinks of itself as coal country. He gets more political contributions from the energy industry than any other member of Congress …. He has a large financial conflict of interest arising from his family’s ownership of a coal business.
Analysis: This is the Appeal to Motive Fallacy. Senator Manchin’s perceived motives for opposing the Climate Con (from a coal state, donations from energy companies) is not at all relevant for establishing the veracity of the fundamental theory that man-made CO2 will cause catastrophic “Global Warming.”

Krugman: My guess is that Manchin’s act has as much to do with vanity as with money. His act has, after all, kept him in the political limelight month after month.
Analysis: Let’s call this one the “Little Paulie is a Nasty Slandering Piece of Shit Human Being Fallacy.(no link)

Krugman: Scientific consensus in favor of such policies doesn’t help.
Analysis: This is the Appeal to the Popular Fallacy — truth is arrived at by research and analysis of facts and patterns — not by the “overwhelming consensus” of whore “scientists.”

Krugman: Emission taxes are the Econ 101 solution to pollution.
Analysis: The unspoken reference to “emissions” (CO2) as “pollution” is an Assumptive Fallacy because the casual mention of it as such leads the reader to accepting something that it actually false as being true. CO2 is no more of a “pollutant” than oxygen or water vapor are!

Krugman: The modern G.O.P. is hostile to science and scientists.
Analysis:   Not sure whether to file this doozie under  ad Hominem Attack Fallacy or escalate it to “Little Paulie is a Nasty Slandering Piece of Shit Human Being Fallacy. Probably the latter.

Krugman: Death rates since vaccines became widely available have been far higher in strongly Republican areas than in Democratic areas.
Analysis: This is False Equivalence Fallacy and also Red Herring (Diversion) Fallacy. Even if we were to accept, purely for argument’s sake, that the Stupid-19 scamdemic was real; that vaccines saved millions of lives; and that anti-science Republicans got it all wrong — that would not prove the ludicrous theory which holds that manmade CO2 “emissions” will melt Antarctica and wash away our heavily populated coastal regions.

Krugman: Overwhelming scientific consensus….
Analysis: Wow! A “three-fer” of high-school-level debate team fallacies back-to-back-back — “overwhelming” (“The Overwhelming Trick,” again) “scientific” (Appeal to Authority, again) and “consensus”(Appeal to the Popular, again)

Krugman: That hostility is the fundamental reason we appear set to do nothing while the planet burns.
Analysis: “While the planet burns, eh?” With that bit of drama, Paulie Propagandists closes with a classic example of the Appeal to Fear Fallacy.

*********
So there it is. As usual, not one iota of hard data to support the Climate Con. Just one classic fallacy (lie) heaped upon another upon another. One could actually teach a college course on logic just by analyzing the seditious scribbling of this demented little “Nobel Prize winning” ™ demon.

Once one learns the tricks of the “intellectual” deceiver, his diversionary tactics become very easy to spot. For that reason, critical thinking skills are NOT something that Krugman’s quackademic comrades want their normie students to develop.

1. The “usual suspects” at the Manhattan Mendacity Machine manufacture lies like an auto factory assembly line churns out Fords. // 2. Climate Bogeyman — an entertaining and comprehensive debunk of the Climate Con (in paperback or pdf)
 // 3. Paul Krugman is a deceitful, slandering, anti-White / America-hating COMMUNIST in the mold of “Russian” Red Leon Trotsky — a creature so vile that even Joe Stalin hated him (and had him murdered).
In 2020, Krugman claimed that the child porn on his computer may have been put there by Q Anon hackers.

NY Times Mocks “Rural America” Mocked for “Vaccine Skepticism”

This hatred for the country class by the likes of Krugman, Sulzberger, Soros, , Schwab, Rothschild and the rest of the loony Left mirrors that which the Bolsheviks of revolutionary Russia had for the “kulaks.”

Picture
Politically, rural America is increasingly a world apart.

DECEMBER 21, 2021
(Headlines of past 2 years)

NY Times:

* Faith, Freedom, Fear: Rural America’s Vaccine Skeptics
 * Rural America’s Covid Problem
 * Coronavirus Spreads to Rural America
  * Why Rural America’s Digital Divide Persists
 * America’s Red State Death Trip
 * Getting Real About Rural America
 * H.I.V. Is Coming to Rural America. Rural America is Not Ready

The elitist denigration of America’s country / rural class — aka “Rural America” — has long been a journalistic staple of the (((city-slickers))) at Sulzberger’s Slimes. After Trump’s unexpected victory of 2016, there was talk of disenfranchising his country supporters by abolishing the electoral college in favor of the straight popular vote — a deliberate subversion of the Constitution which would leave heartland folk politically disenfranchised as urban Demonrat voters overpower them in presidential elections.

After Stupid-19 was launched, “Rural America” was attacked for not embracing perpetual lock-downs, mask-wearing and “social distancing.” And now, in response to the “vaccine hesitancy” of folks in “Rural America”  we notice the malicious Marxists at the Manhattan Madhouse on 8th Avenue are again launching snobbish cheap shots at the good and Godly people of Thomas Jefferson‘s “Rural America.”

In all nations and in all ages — virtue, religion, tradition, hard work, family, self-reliance and love of liberty have always been more deeply-rooted in rural / agricultural regions than in the big cities. Much like typhus, the metaphorical “lice” of corruption spread much easier and faster in the crowded financial centers than in the open spaces where people work hard for an honest living. Indeed, whereas Alexander Hamilton and, decades later, Karl Marx favored the cities; Jefferson, (the main Father of the Declaration of Independence & 3rd President), once wrote to James Madison(the main father of the U.S. Constitution & 4th President):

“I think our governments will remain virtuous for many centuries as long as they are chiefly agricultural; and this will be as long as there shall be vacant lands in any part of America. When they get plied upon one another in large cities, as in Europe, they will become corrupt as in Europe.”

In “Notes on the State of Virginia,” Jefferson wrote:

“Those who labour in the earth are the chosen people of God, if ever he had a chosen people, whose breasts he has made his peculiar deposit for substantial and genuine virtue. It is the focus in which he keeps alive that sacred fire, which otherwise might escape from the face of the earth. … The mobs of great cities add just so much to the support of pure government, as sores do to the strength of the human body. It is the manners and spirit of a people which preserve a republic in vigour. A degeneracy in these is a canker which soon eats to the heart of its laws and constitution.”

Tell it, Mr. President. Tell it!

Picture
Thomas Jefferson & James Madison — The two Virginians — primary authors of the Declaration of Independence and the US Constitution respectively —  understood the importance of a thriving rural class as the true foundation for morality and liberty
Picture
The anti-family degenerate control-freak Karl Marx, on the other hand, was pro-big-city.

The content of the Slimes articles listed above — all from the past few years — is as offensive as it is inaccurate. How is it that the journalistic hyper-sensitivity manifested toward the delicate feelings of “the Jewish People,” Asians, “people of color,” queers, trannies, alien invaders and even child-sex monsters is suddenly discarded when it comes to spewing raw, ignorant bigotry at the rural country class? Though none of the above-referenced pieces preach overt hatred, the patronizing “looking-down-their-hooked-noses” condescension is apparent. The spin, though not blatantly stated, is unmistakable to a semi-discerning reader: — Rural folk are not “educated” …. rural folk are xenophobic …. rural folk are obsessed with guns — rural folk are homophobic .. rural folk refuse to “follow the science” of Stupid-19 — and rural folk remain prudishly anti-“sex education” in the face of sexually transmitted diseases… and, of course, the bottom-line, quoting Paul Krugman(cough cough) — the author of two of the three articles listed above:

“Rural America is also pretty much the only place where Donald Trump remains popular.”

There it is! The true Globalist Bolshevik motive behind the relentless attacks against the true America: Those damn, rebellious, backwards-ass, “fly-over country” rubes, in spite of our Fake News barrage, continue to support Donald Trump — even though he “lost” the election!

Of course, in that oh-so-typical narcissistic psycho manner which these (((slicksters))) are notorious for; Putrid Paulie preemptively rebuts the expected objections to his anal analysis by feigning empathy as he assures “rural readers” (does he actually believe he has “rural readers?”)  that what he just said is not really what he just said:

“I’m sure that some rural readers will be angered by everything I’ve just said, seeing it as typical big-city condescension. But that’s neither my intention nor the point.

Ok, Paulie. That’s very gracious of you. I’m sure that Billy-Bob, Jethro & Bubba are quite moved by that clarification (rolling eyes).

Picture
Picture

In accordance with UN “Agenda 21” and “The Great Reset” Klaus Schwab (cough cough) and & Paulie Krugman (cough cough) want all the rural folk disarmed, chipped and then herded into easily controllable and easily corruptible cities.

Picture
Election 2016: Trump won rural counties in red — Killary won the urban counties in Blue.
Picture
The Electoral College system blocked the crowded cities from dominating the rural voters. Though Killary won the popular vote (due to fraud), Trump still won the election.
Picture
CBS TV’s Jewish-produced “Beverly Hillbillies” made mockery of southern rural folks. It’s all connected.

This barely-veiled hatred for the country class by the likes of Krugman, Sulzberger, Soros, , Schwab, Rothschild and the rest of the loony Left mirrors that which the Jewish Bolsheviks of revolutionary Russia had for the “kulaks.” The kulaks were those Russian peasants who — after Tsar Alexander‘s emancipation of the serfs in 1861 — became independent enough to own a farm and hire labor. For years after the  Bolshevik revolution, the conservative kulaks resisted Lenin’s, and then Stalin’s forced agricultural collectivization schemes. Millions of kulaks — as well as millions of non-land-owning rural Christian conservative Russian folk — were exiled, starved, arrested, tortured, raped and murdered by the hate-filled Jewish-run Checka and its secret-police successor organizations. This program was openly referred to as “de-kulakization” — an earlier and far more comprehensive version of the ongoing South African Farm Murders.

Make no mistake about it. If odious semi-human scum such as Krugman — notwithstanding his pathetically feigned and apologetic qualifiers for his “rural readers” — had his way, a modern-day Cheka would be unleashed to kill off and urban-herd many millions of America’s rural “deplorables” too — albeit more humanely — maybe.

Picture
A Soviet parade under the banners “We will liquidate the kulaks as a class” and “All to the struggle against the wreckers of agriculture”
Picture
Soviet propaganda poster stating “Oust the kulaks”
Picture
Red Monster Felix Dzerzhinsky formed the dreaded terroristic Cheka.
Picture
Under his command, as many as 90,000 Bolshevik Jewish agents killed and, in many cases, sadistically tortured countless millions of rural Christian Russians.
Picture
Killary Rotten Clinton — who wants to abolish the electoral college and go to urban-driven popular vote only — made this overtly bigoted comment during the 2016 campaign: 
“You know, to just be grossly generalistic, 
you could put half of Trump’s supporters into what I call the
 basket of deplorables. Right? The racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamaphobic—you name it.”