The U.S. Government’s Vast New Privatized Censorship Regime

By Jenin Younes

One warm weekend in October of 2020, three impeccably credentialed epidemiologists—Jayanta Bhattacharya, Sunetra Gupta, and Martin Kulldorff, of Stanford, Oxford, and Harvard Universities respectively—gathered with a few journalists, writers, and economists at an estate in the Berkshires where the American Institute for Economic Research had brought together critics of lockdowns and other COVID-related government restrictions. On Sunday morning shortly before the guests departed, the scientists encapsulated their views—that lockdowns do more harm than good, and that resources should be devoted to protecting the vulnerable rather than shutting society down—in a joint communique dubbed the “Great Barrington Declaration,” after the town in which it was written.

The declaration began circulating on social media and rapidly garnered signatures, including from other highly credentialed scientists. Most mainstream news outlets and the scientists they chose to quote denounced the declaration in no uncertain terms. When contacted by reporters, Drs. Anthony Fauci and Francis Collins of the NIH publicly and vociferously repudiated the “dangerous” declaration, smearing the scientists—all generally considered to be at the top of their fields—as “fringe epidemiologists.” Over the next several months, the three scientists faced a barrage of condemnation: They were called eugenicists and anti-vaxxers; it was falsely asserted that they were “Koch-funded” and that they had written the declaration for financial gain. Attacks on the Great Barrington signatories proliferated throughout social media and in the pages of The New York Times and Guardian.

Yet emails obtained pursuant to a FOIA request later revealed that these attacks were not the products of an independent objective news-gathering process of the type that publications like the Times and the Guardian still like to advertise. Rather, they were the fruits of an aggressive attempt to shape the news by the same government officials whose policies the epidemiologists had criticized. Emails between Fauci and Collins revealed that the two officials had worked together and with media outlets as various as Wired and The Nation to orchestrate a “takedown” of the declaration.

Nor did the targeting of the scientists stop with the bureaucrats they had implicitly criticized. Bhattacharya, Gupta, and Kulldorff soon learned that their declaration was being heavily censored on social media to prevent their scientific opinions from reaching the public. Kulldorff—then the most active of the three online—soon began to experience censorship of his own social media posts. For example, Twitter censored one of Kulldorff’s tweets asserting that:

“Thinking that everyone must be vaccinated is as scientifically flawed as thinking that nobody should. COVID vaccines are important for older, higher-risk people and their caretakers. Those with prior natural infection do not need it. Not children.”

Posts on Kulldorff’s Twitter and LinkedIn criticizing mask and vaccine mandates were labeled misleading or removed entirely. In March of 2021, YouTube took down a video depicting a roundtable discussion that Bhattacharya, Gupta, Kulldorff, and Dr. Scott Atlas had with Gov. Ron DeSantis of Florida, in which the participants critiqued mask and vaccine mandates.

Because of this censorship, Bhattacharya and Kulldorff are now plaintiffs in Missouri v. Biden, a case brought by the attorneys general of Missouri and Louisiana, as well as the New Civil Liberties Alliance (NCLA), which is representing them and two other individuals, Dr. Aaron Kheriaty and Jill Hines. The plaintiffs allege that the Biden administration and a number of federal agencies coerced social media platforms into censoring them and others for criticizing the government’s COVID policies. In doing so, the Biden administration and relevant agencies had turned any ostensible private action by the social media companies into state action, in violation of the First Amendment. As the Supreme Court has long recognized and Justice Thomas explained in a concurring opinion just last year, “[t]he government cannot accomplish through threats of adverse government action what the Constitution prohibits it from doing directly.”

Federal district courts have recently dismissed similar cases on the grounds that the plaintiffs could not prove state action. According to those judges, public admissions by then-White House press secretary Jennifer Psaki that the Biden administration was ordering social media companies to censor certain posts, as well as statements from Psaki, President Biden, Surgeon General Vivek Murthy, and DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas threatening them with regulatory or other legal action if they declined to do so, still did not suffice to establish that the plaintiffs were censored on social media due to government action. Put another way, the judges declined to take the government at its word. But the Missouri judge reached a different conclusion, determining there was enough evidence in the record to infer that the government was involved in social media censorship, granting the plaintiffs’ request for discovery at the preliminary injunction stage.

Collusion Between Government and “Big Tech” To Suppress Free Speech: Illegal Censorship of Stories involving Covid Jab Refusal

The Missouri documents, along with some obtained through discovery in Berenson v. Twitter and a FOIA request by America First Legal, expose the extent of the administration’s appropriation of big tech to effect a vast and unprecedented regime of viewpoint-based censorship on the information that most Americans see, hear and otherwise consume. At least 11 federal agencies, and around 80 government officials, have been explicitly directing social media companies to take down posts and remove certain accounts that violate the government’s own preferences and guidelines for coverage on topics ranging from COVID restrictions, to the 2020 election, to the Hunter Biden laptop scandal.

Correspondence publicized in Missouri further corroborates the theory that the companies dramatically increased censorship under duress from the government, strengthening the First Amendment claim. For example, shortly after President Biden asserted in July of 2021 that Facebook (Meta) was “killing people” by permitting “misinformation” about COVID vaccines to percolate, an executive from the company contacted the surgeon general to appease the White House. In a text message to Murthy, the executive acknowledged that the “FB team” was “feeling a little aggrieved” as “it’s not great to be accused of killing people,” while he sought to “de-escalate and work together collaboratively.” These are not the words of a person who is acting freely; to the contrary, they denote the mindset of someone who considers himself subordinate to, and subject to punishment by, a superior. Another text, exchanged between Jen Easterly, director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), and another CISA employee who now works at Microsoft, reads: “Platforms have got to get more comfortable with gov’t. It’s really interesting how hesitant they remain.” This is another incontrovertible piece of evidence that social media companies are censoring content under duress from the government, and not due to their directors’ own ideas of the corporate or common good.

Further, emails expressly establish that the social media companies intensified censorship efforts and removed particular individuals from their platforms in response to the government’s demands. Just a week after President Biden accused social media companies of “killing people,” the Meta executive mentioned above wrote the surgeon general an email telling him, “I wanted to make sure you saw the steps we took just this past week to adjust policies on what we are removing with respect to misinformation, as well as steps taken further to address the ‘disinfo dozen’: we removed 17 additional Pages, Groups, and Instagram accounts tied to [them].” About a month later, the same executive informed Murthy that Meta intended to expand its COVID policies to “further reduce the spread of potentially harmful content” and that the company was “increasing the strength of our demotions for COVID and vaccine-related content.”

Alex Berenson, a former New York Times reporter and a prominent critic of government-imposed COVID restrictions, has publicized internal Twitter communications he obtained through discovery in his own lawsuit showing that high-ranking members of the Biden administration, including White House Senior COVID-19 Advisor Andrew Slavitt, had pushed Twitter to permanently suspend him from the platform. In messages from April 2021, a Twitter employee noted that a meeting with the White House had gone relatively well, though the company’s representatives had fielded “one really tough question about why Alex Berenson hasn’t been kicked off from the platform,” to which “mercifully we had answers” (emphasis added).

About two months later, days after Dr. Fauci publicly deemed Berenson a danger, and immediately following the president’s statement that social media companies were “killing people,” and despite assurances from high-ups at the company that his account was in no danger, Twitter permanently suspended Berenson’s account. If this does not qualify as government censorship of an individual based on official disapproval of his viewpoints, it would be difficult to say what might. Berenson was reinstated on Twitter in July 2022 as part of the settlement in his lawsuit.

In 1963, the Supreme Court, deciding Bantam Books v. Sullivan, held that “public officers’ thinly veiled threats to institute criminal proceedings against” booksellers who carried materials containing obscenity could constitute a First Amendment violation. The same reasoning should apply to the Biden administration campaign to pressure tech companies into enforcing its preferred viewpoints.

The question of how the Biden administration has succeeded in jawboning big tech into observing its strictures is not particularly difficult to answer. Tech companies, many of which hold monopoly positions in their markets, have long feared and resisted government regulation. Unquestionably—and as explicitly revealed by the text message exchanged between Murthy and the Twitter executive—the prospect of being held liable for COVID deaths is an alarming one. Just like the booksellers in Bantam, social media platforms undoubtedly “do not lightly disregard” such possible consequences, as Twitter’s use of the term “mercifully” indicates.

It remains to be seen whether Bhattacharya and Kulldorff will be able to show that Fauci and Collins explicitly ordered tech companies to censor them and their Great Barrington Declaration. More discovery lies ahead, from top White House officials including Dr. Fauci, that may yield evidence of even more direct involvement by the government in preventing Americans from hearing their views. But Bhattacharya, Kulldorff, and countless social media users have had their First Amendment rights violated nonetheless.

The government’s involvement in censorship of specific perspectives, and direct role in escalating such censorship, has what is known in First Amendment law as a chilling effect: Fearing the repercussions of articulating certain views, people self-censor by avoiding controversial topics. Countless Americans, including the Missouri plaintiffs, have attested that they do exactly that for fear of losing influential and sometimes lucrative social media accounts, which can contain and convey significant social and intellectual capital.

Moreover, the Supreme Court recognizes that a corollary of the First Amendment right to speak is the right to receive information because “the right to receive ideas follows ineluctably from the sender’s First Amendment right to send them.” All Americans have been deprived—by the United States government—of their First Amendment rights to hear the views of Alex Berenson, as well as Drs. Bhattacharya and Kulldorff, and myriad additional people, like the reporters who broke the Hunter Biden laptop story for the New York Post and found themselves denounced as agents of Russian disinformation, who have been censored by social media platforms at the urging of the U.S. government. That deprivation strangled public debate on multiple issues of undeniably public importance. It allowed Fauci, Collins, and various other government actors and agencies, to mislead the public into believing there was ever a scientific consensus on lockdowns, mask mandates, and vaccine mandates. It also arguably influenced the 2020 election.

The administration has achieved public acquiescence to its censorship activities by convincing many Americans that the dissemination of “misinformation” and “disinformation” on social media presents a grave threat to public safety and even national security. Over half a century ago, in his notorious concurrence in New York Times v. United States (in which the Nixon administration sought to prevent the newspaper from printing the Pentagon Papers) Justice Hugo Black rejected the view that the government may invoke such concepts to override the First Amendment: “[t]he word ‘security’ is a broad, vague generality whose contours should not be invoked to abrogate the fundamental law embodied in the First Amendment,” he wrote. Justice Black cited a 1937 opinion by Justice Charles Hughes explaining that this approach was woefully misguided: “The greater the importance of safeguarding the community from incitements to the overthrow of our institutions by force and violence, the more imperative is the need to preserve inviolate the constitutional rights of free speech, free press, and free assembly … that government may be responsive to the will of the people and that changes, if desired, may be obtained by peaceful means. Therein lies the security of the Republic, the very foundation of constitutional government.”

The Founders of our country understood that line-drawing becomes virtually impossible once censorship begins and that the personal views and biases of those doing the censoring will inevitably come into play. Moreover, they recognized that sunlight is the best disinfectant: The cure for bad speech is good speech. The cure for lies, truth. Silencing people does not mean problematic ideas disappear; it only drives their adherents into echo chambers. People who are booted off Twitter, for example, often turn to Gab and Gettr, where they are less likely to encounter challenges to patently false posts claiming, for example, that COVID vaccines are toxic.

Indeed, this case could not illustrate more clearly the First Amendment’s chief purpose, and why the framers of the Constitution did not create an exception for “misinformation.” Government actors are just as prone to bias, hubris, and error as the rest of us. Drs. Fauci and Collins, enamored of newfound fame and basking in self-righteousness, took it upon themselves to suppress debate about the most important subject of the day. Had Americans learned of the Great Barrington Declaration and been given the opportunity to contemplate its ideas, and had scientists like Bhattacharya, Gupta, and Kulldorff been permitted to speak freely, the history of the pandemic era may have unfolded with far less tragedy—and with far less damage to the institutions that are supposed to protect public health.

International Group Of Attorneys Proceed With Covid-19 Crimes Against Humanity Grand Jury

A group of attorneys from around the world have convened a model grand jury in Germany in order to provide testimony from various expert witnesses attesting to the crimes against humanity committed amidst government responses to covid-19.

• The various witnesses, consisting of professors, doctors, journalists, military, and government officials will testify regarding a number of topics including Project Dark Winter, psychological operations, economics, eugenics, and more.

international group of attorneys proceed with covid 19 crimes against humanity grand jury

A collective of lawyers and attorneys, and one judge, from around the globe representing an independent organization known as the Peoples’ Court of Public Opinion on behalf of the German based Corona Investigative Committee, have come together to begin criminal investigation proceedings to present what they allege to be evidence of crimes against humanity committed by policy makers in response of the covid-19 pandemic.

The Grand Jury is a model proceeding, meaning that at the present moment it holds no legitimate legal standing.

However, the aim of this undertaking is to provide to a grand jury, in this case the general public, throughout the proceedings, legal statements and evidentiary materials — including testimony, affirming that willful criminal activity took place on behalf of the accused.

In hopes that the exposure of this evidence may provoke actual criminal charges and indictments in the future.

The committee consists of Attorney at Law Virginie de Araujo Recchia, (France); Judge Rui Fonseca E Castro, (Portugal); Attorney at Law Claire Deeks, (New Zealand); Attorney at Law Viviane Fischer, (Germany);.Attorney at Law Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, (Germany); Attorney at Law N. Ana Garner, (USA); Attorney at Law Dr. Renate Holzeisen, (Italy); Attorney at Law Tony Nikolic, (Australia); Attorney at Law Dipali Ojha, (India); Attorney at Law Dexter L-J. Ryneveldt (Adv.), (South Africa); Attorney at Law Deana Sacks, (USA); and Attorney at Law Michael Swinwood, (Canada).

Within a six page press release, they assert the charges against world leaders and policy makers, stating:

“This Grand Jury Investigation serves as a model legal proceeding to present to a jury (consisting of the citizens of the world) all available evidence of COVID-19 Crimes Against Humanity to date against “leaders, organizers, instigators and accomplices” who aided, abetted or actively participated in the formulation and execution of a common plan for a pandemic. Crimes to be investigated include all acts performed or omitted by a person in pursuance of a common design to commit Crimes Against Humanity, and all such criminal acts condemned in the various communities of jurors around the world.”

Continuing to proclaim,

“The allegation is that the world’s governments have come under the controlling influence of corrupt and criminal power structures. They colluded to stage a pandemic that they had been planning for years. To this end they deliberately created mass panic through false statements of fact and a socially engineered psychological
operation whose messages they conveyed through the corporate media.”

On Saturday, February 5th, the committee convened to issue opening statements beginning with Dr. Reiner Fuellmich:

During the course of the proceedings Dr. Fuellmich asserted the following:

“This case, involving the most heinous crimes against humanity committed under the guise of a corona pandemic, looks complicated only at first glance.”

Elaborating further,

“But when you put together all those pieces of the puzzle as we will do for you with the help of renowned experts, you will see four sets of facts: One, there is no corona pandemic, but only a PCR test ‘plandemic’ fueled by an elaborate psychological operation designed to create a constant state of panic among the world’s population,” explained Fuellmich. “This agenda has been long-planned.”

“Its ultimately unsuccessful precursor was the swine flu some 12 years ago, and it was cooked up by a group of super rich psychopathic and sociopathic people who hate and fear people at the same time, have no empathy, and are driven by the desire to gain full control over all of us, the people of the world,” he continued, adding that they’re using “governments and the mainstream media” to spread “panic propaganda 24/7.”

Fuellmich went on to mention the coordinated deliberate suppression of effective covid-19 treatments such as vitamin C, vitamin D, zinc, Ivermectin, and hydroxychloroquine. Done so by an establishment determined to prioritize “ineffective and lethal experimental injections”.

Then going on to acknowledge what we here at The Rundown Live have referred to ad nauseam — The capture of governmental institutions the world over by globalist bodies such as the World Economic Forum.

Absolute must-watch: Klaus Schwab Brags About Controlling Western Governments.

“Our governments are not our governments anymore, rather they have been taken over by the other side through their main platform, the World Economic Forum, which had started to create their own global leaders through their ‘Young Global Leaders’ program as early as 1992,” Fuellmich said, adduncing figures such as former German Chancellor Angela Merkel and Bill Gates as being among its first graduates.

Later mentioning the tie-in of the eugenics agenda;

“This involves population control which, in their view, requires both a massive reduction of the population and manipulating the DNA of the remaining population with the help – for example – of mRNA experimental injections.”

And the replacement of national sovereignty with a more centralized globalist power structure;

“But it also requires the deliberate destruction of democracy, of the rule of law, and of our constitutions through chaos so that ultimately, we will agree to losing our national and cultural identities and instead will accept a One World Government under the UN – which is now under the full control of them and their World Economic Forum – a digital passport through which each and every move is monitored and controlled, and one digital currency which we will only be able to receive from one World bank — theirs, of course,”

Finally concluding with the recommendation of indictment of six key figures:

  • German virologist Christian Drosten
  • U.S. NIAID director Dr. Anthony Fauci
  • World Health Organization Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus
  • billionaire Bill Gates
  • investment corporation BlackRock
  • pharmaceutical giant Pfizer

Continuing, Fuellmich elaborates upon the panel of experts, to be presented in the coming weeks. Including former military insider James Bush, investigative journalist Whitney Webb, former employees of the World Health Organization, British intelligence officials, and others to explain the historical and geopolitical significance of the ongoing crisis. Beginning with Operation Dark Winter, and continuing into the Rockefeller Lockstep Scenario, and Event201 into the current day.

Further adding to the testimony, the next group of witnesses will consist of an assortment of lung experts, professors, a pharmaceutical executive, and biologists; who Fuellmich stated in part will:

“explain to us what is behind the legend of the Wuhan wet market outbreak. They will show that the virus is no more dangerous than the common flu. The PCR test cannot tell us anything about infections, but is the only basis for all anti-Corona measures, including the ultimate measure, the so-called vaccines and the so-called vaccines are not only ineffective, but extremely dangerous.”

The next group of experts comprised of doctors from around the world including Switzerland, Texas, South Africa, England, and Germany. All who will attest to the misguided policies of government bodies intentionally suppressing effective treatments capable of mitigating the spread and severity of the virus.

Continuing on, they will then call the next group of experts including Dr. Mike Eaton, professor Sucharit Bhakdi, and Dr. Robert Malone, among others from France and Germany.

“They will show us, that while the virus did not cause any excess mortality, it has a survival rate of 99.97%, the shots are now killing people and have been causing excess mortality of up to 40% since September, as a result of a poisoning with a spike protein and of shutting off our immune system.”

The committee will further proceed by calling numerous experts from the US, France, Belgium, and Germany; including renowned psychology professor Dr. Mattias Desmet.

Who will elucidate the facts upon how various authoritarian measures were introduced into society, and maintained through induced apathy via a massive psychological fear campaign.

Finally concluding with the last two groups of experts, various professors and economists from the United States and Germany to elaborate as to the controlled implosion of the world’s economy through the imposition of economically destructive measures. Moving towards a technocratic end goal of digital currency and global digital passport programs.

Lastly, the committee will hear an assortment of testimonies including those from an investigative journalist, a Holocaust survivor, and a technocracy expert among them. Specifically detailing the role of eugenics and depopulation.

Though this committee has been nearly two years in the making, its opening statements are timely. Coming only days after the release of a bombshell report from John Hopkins University, coincidentally echoing much of the same sentiment, concluding once and for all that lockdowns were ineffective at preventing the spread of the virus. Adding to the continually mounting evidence asserting the same now causing a shift in public dialogue.

As reported previously, primary among any other coronavirus policy, lockdowns have arguably had the most devastating impact on civilization. Not only in facilitating the largest wealth transfer in history to the rich and powerful, coinciding with an unprecedented economic catastrophe pushing an excess of 130 million plus humans into poverty.

But also having disastrous consequences on public health. Causing massive spikes in several mental health disorders, self harm, suicide, drug addiction and overdose, child abuse, domestic assault, starvation, and a slew of preventable deaths from untreated illnesses. Ultimately killing more people than they saved.

Fuellmich concluded his opening statements saying:

“After you have heard all the evidence, we have no doubt that you will recommend indictments against all our putative defendants for crimes against humanity. Thank you.”

The COVID Narrative is Falling Apart

By James Stansbury

Joe Biden claims this is a pandemic of the unvaccinated and wants everyone in the world vaxxed with the “safe and effective” vaccines.  In addition, he plans to distribute millions of “effective” N-95 masks.  Anyone paying attention knows this is a big lie.  Masks may be a comforting placebo, but even the N95s  don’t work as advertised.  And new revelations about dangerous vaccine side effects have surfaced despite media suppression.     

New Virginia governor Glenn Youngkin made masks and vaccinations optional for state employees and public schools.  Immediately some parents, teachers, and school boards threw a hissy fit (at least seven lawsuits have resulted so far).  Meanwhile, those who voted for him see this as much-needed relief from a pandemic that has run its course.   

Why is there so much disagreement? The late Malcolm Muggeridge put it this way; “People do not believe lies because they have to, but because they want to.”  Think about it; the Left and their media allies have terrified our children and ordinary citizens so much that they desperately want to believe masks and vax mandates are the only answer.  Anyone who disagrees must be silenced, socially destroyed, or even allowed to die by withholding organ transplants or life-saving therapeutics. 

I was taught the only way to fight a lie is with the truth.  However, I also know those who placed all their hope in the big COVID lie will do whatever it takes to silence anyone who disagrees.  Just ask Joe Rogan about being silenced. It is nearly impossible to overcome emotion with facts, but I will present some anyway:

1). Alarming vax side effects reported by military whistleblowers.  This story made a few waves last week when Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) included a mention in his five-hour Senate hearing. The information came from the Defense Medical Epidemiology Database (DMED), a mundane accounting tool used to track all medical diagnoses of military personnel and dependents for insurance billing purposes.  DMED did better than the CDC’s ineffective Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).  Following is a summary of the most alarming vax side effects:

  • Myocardial infarction (heart attack) — 269% increase
  • Cancer diagnoses — 300% increase
  • Miscarriage — 300% increase
  • Bell’s palsy — 291% increase
  • Congenital malformations (for children of military personnel) – 156% increase
  • Female infertility — 471% increase
  • Pulmonary embolisms — 467% increase
  • Neurological issues — 1,000% increase

2). Athletes are mysteriously dying of sudden heart attacks:  In Dec. 2021, Lorphic News, a non-traditional news source reported on the extraordinary number of physically fit, fully vaccinated athletes experiencing fatal heart attacks.  This claim was systematically denied by most news sources.  However, a chart compiled by the Federation Internationale de Football [soccer] Association (FIFA) confirms this is real and like the above military data, is based on a large sample size.  FIFA has member athletes from 209 countries and has routinely tracked athlete health data for 20 years.  Their long-term data confirms a fivefold increase in sudden cardiac deaths in only six months of 2021.

In the above sample, Australia had the most severe police state lockdowns, mask mandates, and a high vax rate of around 80%.  After some initial success, it has suddenly gone from near zero cases and deaths to having an explosion in both.  Since spring of 2021 Sweden, noted for its minimal mandates, had maintained near-zero cases and deaths as a result of achieving herd immunity early.  All that changed when for reasons unknown Sweden pushed vaccinations despite the herd immunity achievement.  As a result, Sweden’s flat-lined case and death rate also spiked, thus indicating its herd immunity achievement is compromised by vax negative efficacy.  

4). Omicron provides long-lasting natural immunity:  A peer-reviewed article titled “Cross-reactive memory T cells associate with protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection in COVID-19 contacts” published Jan. 10 in the scientific journal Nature provided a warning and some encouragement:

Once widespread infection (such as the Omicron wave) occurs across the world, the virus will eventually circulate endemically, meaning that infections may still happen but with milder symptoms and much less mortality.

There are two reasons that the transition from pandemic to endemic didn’t happen until Omicron: 1) all the widely used vaccines are based on the spike protein, which doesn’t induce a protective long-lasting T-cell response, and 2) natural immunity wasn’t widespread.

In other words, the current vaccines too narrowly target only the original Alpha spike protein and ignore the rest of the virus proteins.  This inhibits the production of long-lasting memory T-cells that can more readily adapt to new variants and this omission for those most heavily vaccinated appears to have changed omicron from mild to more dangerous. 

Conclusions:  Considering the dangerous vax side effects described above, it’s time to recognize that COVID is becoming endemic like the closely related common cold or seasonal flu.  This means the safest way for the unvaccinated to produce the necessary long-lasting memory T-cells may be by catching omicron. 

For those facing omicron with an immune system weakened by multiple vaxxes and boosters, age, or comorbidities, an emergency use authorization by the FDA for the therapeutics (chiefly ivermectin) India used could be a lifesaver.  However, the political climate today makes FDA authorization unlikely — many hospitals have already allowed patients to die rather than try these proven, safe therapeutics.  And last week, effective monoclonal antibody treatments have mysteriously lost their FDA approval.  

Therefore, it wouldn’t hurt to fortify your immune system with a daily dose of over-the-counter vitamin D3, C, and zinc (all are included in India’s COVID kit).  Around 80 to 85 percent of people who died from COVID were deficient in these vitamins and the most vulnerable are senior citizens and the obese (because fat cells absorb vitamin D before it can reach where needed).  I’m no doctor so ask yours for dose rates since each can vary widely by weight, age, etc.   We are still on our own for an early treatment option so it may be better to contact an organization of rebel doctors like the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC).  

U.K. PM Boris Johnson did the right thing by ending all vax and mask mandates and letting nature take its course. (The Remnant features an excellent analysis of the politics behind the COVID tyranny.) Denmark has just followed his lead.  Will 50,000 fearless Canadian truckers succeed in bringing a strong enough emotion to Canada or the U.S. to end the mandates? 

Reference: https://www.americanthinker.com/

2022 Will Mirror 2021 Unless We Openly Disobey Unscientific Tyranny

To those who have been paying attention since the beginning of the pandemic, the authoritarianism currently unfolding in front of us was easily predictable.

2022 will mirror 2021 unless we openly disobey unscientific tyranny

In fact, in March of 2020, TFTP predicted mandatory injections, the police state, and travel restrictions. This doesn’t make us special or psychic, it is easy to deduce once you realize the nature of the state and their tendency to use the only tool in their toolbox to tackle problems faced by society. That sole tool is force.

While the intentions of the state may have been noble at first in order to prevent transmission of the virus, thanks to their tendency to use force without question, their noble intentions quickly became a conduit for tyrants to usurp your freedoms.

“Give us your freedom, and we will make the pandemic go away,” was the mantra of team lock-down and, despite completely eroding what little freedom Americans had left, we are seeing yet another large spike in cases and hospitalizations.

One need only look at Australia and the sheer Nazi-esque approach they took to covid to see that no amount of police state can stop a virus. Over the last year, Australia has beaten, kidnapped, arrested, and harassed anyone who didn’t toe the line and submit to their authority. A few months ago, they even began kidnapping completely healthy people and locking them up in internment camps for merely being exposed to someone who may have been positive with covid.

The country has fallen. Everyone was locked down and everyone was vaccinated, yet covid did what covid does. Despite becoming one of the most tyrannical countries on the planet in regards to the pandemic, Australia is seeing its largest spike of cases since the covid hysteria began.

On top of the loss of economic and physical freedom, governments across the planet also took to attacking your medical freedom. Politicians once again grabbed their only tool in the toolbox and began forcing people to take the jab — informed consent be damned.

People were forced out of their jobs, thousands of frontline medical workers laid off — creating a staffing shortage — because they didn’t take a jab for a disease which they may have already been immune to.

Vaccines, Americans were told, would be our way out of this mess. Early on, politicians and media blowhards alike, took to their soapboxes and falsely claimed that getting the jab would keep you safe from covid. The fact checkers are unable to run cover for these folks now, as they did it so often that they are on video.

In the video below, from earlier this year, media blowhard and known liar, Rachel Maddox claims — with no scientific data to back her up — that the vaccine will keep you safe from getting covid.

“Now we know that the vaccines work well enough that the virus stops with every vaccinated person… A vaccinated person gets infected with the virus… the virus does not infect them…the virus then cannot… use a vaccinated person as a host to get more people.”

It wasn’t just Maddow either.

From Bill Gates to Fauci to the president himself, these people took to their pulpits to spread a false narrative that getting vaccinated would stop covid in its tracks. Spoiler alert: it did not.

Also, remember the mantra repeated by corporate media and the US government ad nauseum, about the “pandemic of the unvaccinated,” which the White House COVID-19 Response Team introduced in mid-July, and which the president was still regurgitating inaccurately as late as December 14?

That was also proven to be false as well, even The Atlantic admitted it. 

Now, as the tyrannical Branch Covidians watch their predictions and fear mongering fall flat, they are forced into a corner and are attempting to suppress their comments like the ones made in the videos above. But the cat is out of the bag and people have had enough.

No amount of definitions can be changed, boosters mandated, or lock-downs enforced that can keep the establishment’s ship from sinking.

Sure, there are still fearful people locked away in their homes, paralyzed with fear because their leaders tell them to be scared. But they are now the minority. In many parts of the world, despite constant fear mongering about “cases surging,” people are getting back to normal.

Despite tyrannical mandates, people are disobeying. And despite the best efforts of corporate media and their puppet masters in the establishment, the narrative around covid is collapsing. We welcome this collapse with open arms.

It is high time we take “normal” back. This virus is here, you will come into contact with it, and you need to make your own personal choices on how to deal with it. The government has not and never will be able to protect you from getting sick. Thankfully, many people are starting to get it.

As more people resist, the state will lose its grip and freedom will once again take center stage. They even admit it. As the CDC director announced loosening the restrictions on quarantine from 10 days to 5, Director Rochelle Walensky admitted that their new policy is dependent on “what we thought people would be able to tolerate.”

How much more are you going to tolerate?

Australian Health Official Issues Threat That Is Borderline A Crime Against Humanity: ‘We Will Be Bringing In Virus In Vaccinated People… Every Single Queenslander Is Going To Get Exposed To The Covid-19 Virus And Will Get Infected. But If You’re Vaccinated, That’s Not A Problem.’

AUSTRALIA: Queensland health official Jeannette Young is now promising to flood the country with vaccinated super spreaders who carry covid, claiming on video, “Every single queenslander is going to get exposed to the covid-19 virus and will get infected.”

She adds, “We will be bringing in virus in vaccinated people…” and then specifically explains she is targeting unvaccinated people with this biowarfare attack by explaining, “But if you’re vaccinated, that’s not a problem.”australian health official issues threat that is borderline a crime against humanity

Queensland Health Official Jeannette Young

This unthinkable admission of coordinated criminal activity by the government of Queensland is just the latest assault on humanity being waged by Australian officials who are so corrupt and evil, it’s almost like they’re competing for an award from Satan himself.

Watch this stunning comment in the following video. The text callout was added to the video by someone else and was not in the original broadcast video:

https://www.brighteon.com/8d554303-cd88-45d7-b6ad-2020c26075c9

Dr. Young is fully aware that vaccines are killing people. She previously warned that blood clot-inducing vaccines shouldn’t be given to people under the age of 50, saying, “Wouldn’t it be terrible that our first 18-year-old in Queensland to die from this pandemic died from the vaccine?”

Since then, she has been “corrected” by the genocidal medical establishment and anti-human news media that are coordinating their attacks on anyone who questions vaccines. Dr. Young has fallen in line and is now waging actual biological warfare against humanity, bragging that vaccinated people are the super spreaders who will infect everyone.

They’re not even trying to hide their agenda anymore.

Let us all remember the names of these criminals as the international war crimes tribunals commence.

Sources: AFinalWarning.comBrighteon.com

Physician And Ex Medical Journal Editor: 8 Ways Covid Masks Are HARMFUL

Billions of people worldwide are terrified of the Wuhan Flu and will do everything they are told to do to avoid catching it, but that’s where the biggest problems come into play. It is theorized that much of the advice about Covid prevention and minimization is fundamentally flawed, and some to the extent that it makes matters worse, endangering the lives of those who follow it and those around those “sheeple” followers.

There are no better examples of this than all those mask wearers seen everywhere, every day. Some folks even wear their masks when they are outside away from other people, or even when alone in their automobile.

physician and ex medical journal editor 8 ways covid masks are harmful

Thanks to mass media, vaccine-shilling talking heads, and fake “experts” promoting mask-wearing, billions of people are accomplishing the exact opposite of their goals in warding off Covid – they’re setting themselves up for infection of the worst kind.

Have you experienced the health detriment of wearing a Covid mask for hours on end? People are experiencing nausea, headaches, shortness of breath, blurred vision, compromised hearing, hindered communication abilities, and those are just the symptoms of health detriment that are being “bred” by the masks.

physician and former medical journal editor is blowing the whistle on the whole mask scam, proving how they add to the chaos of the pandemic, weakening humans, and setting people up for exactly what they’re trying so hard to avoid.

Covid masks are creating and “masking” major health problems that none of the wearers seem to realise:

#1. Masks lower oxygen levels in the blood.

#2. Masks raise carbon dioxide levels in the blood.

#3. Masks trap exhaled viral pathogens thus increasing viral load and severity of disease.

#4. SARS CoV-2 becomes more dangerous when blood oxygen levels decline.

#5. Masks give a false sense of security.

#6. Masks divert exhaled air and pathogenic plumes into the eyes.

#7. Masks are dangerous for people with pre-existing medical conditions.

#8. Cloth masks increase risk of contracting respiratory infections, including Covid.

You can read the complete article HERE.

People are terrified of catching Covid because it attacks the respiratory system, causing lung tissues to swell with fluid. It’s a horrible way to die, yet, the Covid masks can also lead to respiratory infections and ultimately, death. As the masks inhibit air flow in and out of the lungs, people with chronic lung diseases, asthma and COPD are worsening their conditions by wearing masks.

Here’s what most people don’t know. Because masks increase the depth and frequency of breaths, they also increase the likelihood that each breath contains a larger amount of pathogenic virus particles.

This is called an increase of the “viral load” as it contains greater levels of infectious particles, just the opposite of what mask wearers are being told by the CDC, mass media and fraudulent Fauci.

This can also back up the viral particles deeper in the lungs, increasing the severity of Covid infection.

The Covid SCAM Industry Does Not Want Anyone To Realize That Masks Lower Oxygen And Nutrient Levels In The Blood, Creating WORSE Cases Of Covid

Even after just a few minutes of wearing a disease mask, the wearer can suffer a SIGNIFICANT reduction in their blood oxygen level, according to research conducted by 53 surgeons that was published in a medical journal as a Preliminary Report on Surgical Mask Induced Deoxygenation during Major Surgery. The findings suggest that wearing surgical masks for more than just one hour a day can lower arterial oxygen enough to “induce physiologically detrimental effects.”

In fact, two recorded instances of blood oxygen deprivation from masks resulted in tragic consequences where two Chinese boys died of sudden cardiac arrest while wearing masks while running during P.E. classes at school. How?

The heart muscle needs oxygen to function and survive, and the harder it works, the more oxygen it needs. The masks were severely limiting that oxygen flow, blocking air intake and decreasing arterial oxygen.

Check out the diagram below for the main symptoms of carbon dioxide toxicity, and you will better understand why wearing masks to prevent contraction or transmission of Covid is a very bad idea:

carbon dioxide toxicity 300x260

It doesn’t take a scientist or doctor to see that Covid vaccinesRemdesivir and ventilators are compounding the problems of the pandemic, creating a pandemic of their own.

Source and reference: NaturalNews.comNCBI.nlm.nih.gov

7 In 10 Recent COVID-19 Deaths In Sweden Happening In Fully Vaxxed

Vaccine specialists listed several reasons for the spike in breakthrough infections, including that it’s been a while since the earliest vaccinations were administered, the increased vaccine coverage, the removed restrictions, and the incidence of the more contagious Delta strain.

by Igor Kuznetsov7 in 10 recent covid 19 deaths in sweden happening in fully vaxxed

Foto: Sofia Ekström

Given the high inoculation rate, the share of those vaccinated among confirmed COVID-19 cases has risen is Sweden, which according to researchers is seen as a signal of waning vaccine protection.

The Swedish Public Health Agency reported that between 1-24 September 7 out of 10 COVID-related deaths were fully vaccinated individuals.

According to Farshid Jalalvand, a researcher in clinical microbiology at Lund University, there are several reasons why the proportion of fully vaccinated among the deceased has increased.

“The main reasons are probably that it has now been quite a while since the oldest ones were vaccinated, that the vaccine coverage has increased, that the restrictions have been eased, and that the Delta strain has taken over”, Jalalavand told the newspaper Svenska Dagbladet.

The Delta strain is known to spread more easily among both vaccinated and unvaccinated than the Alpha strain. According to Jalalavand, though, fully vaccinated people “generally have good protection”.

BREAKING: Study Finds The Current Covid-19 Vaccines Will Cause ‘Vaccine Induced Enhanced Disease’ When Infected With Delta.

Gunilla Karlsson Hedestam, professor of vaccine immunology at the Karolinska Institute, said it is not unexpected that vaccine protection decreases over time.

“The mRNA vaccines are fantastic in that they could be developed so quickly and they reduce the risk of serious illness significantly. However, they don’t produce as high antibody levels as protein-based vaccines. The higher the antibody concentration in the blood after vaccination, the more robust and lasting the protection will be”, Karlsson Hedestam said.

At present, there are currently no protein-based COVID-19 vaccines on the global market, but Novavax and Sanofi Pasteur have both filed for approval by the WHO and in Europe, respectively.

Nevertheless, Gunilla Karlsson Hedestam called the idea of completely vaccinating yourself free from SARS-CoV-2 “overly optimistic”.

“We know that the COVID-19 vaccine reduces the risk of illness and death, which is very important, but at the same time we must accept that the breakthrough infections will increase and that we must continue to live with this virus, at least until we have an even better vaccine”, she mused, calling on her compatriots to avoid “certain risk situations” to keep the spread of infection down.

State epidemiologist Anders Tegnell confirmed that no vaccine offers 100-percent protection.

“Therefore, there will be mild cases where one dies with COVID-19, but not because of the disease. That proportion will get bigger and bigger the more people who are vaccinated”, Tegnell said.

At the same time, age is also seen as a factor, as the median age of those fully vaccinated who have died since 1 July has been over 80 years old. Yet, cases of infection in elder care have recently increased to their highest levels since February, and the proportion of the elderly among those infected has risen to some of the highest levels since mass testing began.

Since the start of the pandemic, Sweden, a nation of over 10 million, has seen 1.16 million cases with nearly 15,000 fatalities. Nearly 65 percent of the Swedish population is fully vaccinated.

Agenda 2030 And Your Carbon Allowances

Personal carbon allowances are being advanced in alignment with the goals of Agenda 2030, the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and the manmade climate change hoax. I have written about this hoax before in articles such as Good Hearts, Fooled Minds: Top 4 Fallacies of the Hijacked Environmental Movement where I have pointed out that humanity is indeed polluting the planet, but that such pollution has absolutely nothing to do with carbon dioxide or CO2, which is a gas of life.

Since Operation Coronavirus is a natural outgrowth of the New World Order (NWO) agenda in general, it is to be expected that its pattern of deception would mimic other scams and hoaxes promoted by the cabal.

global warming co2 hoax

There are many examples of this, but are 2 quick ones: check out the similarities between COVID and 9/11 (the 20th anniversary of which just recently passed), and between COVID and the manmade climate change scam. This article will explore the latter, especially the specific area of personal carbon allowances.

The Technocratic Idea Of Carbon Credits

technocracy

The idea of personal carbon allowances and carbon credits has been around a long time, and has its roots in technocracy, which can be defined as “a government or social system controlled by technicians, especially scientists and technical experts.” The technocrats want to set up a system where the energy unit of society is under their control, and thus all people, naturally dependent upon energy, would also come under their control.

In a way, we have such a system now, where money is energy and that form of energy is under the control of private central banks. But carbon credits take the idea way, way further.

Imagine a world where everything people did – eat, drink, travel, use appliances, use electricity in any way, even breathe – was all tied to their personal carbon allowances. And imagine if all carbon credits were controlled and distributed by technocrats. Any dissident could then easily be cut out of the system at the flick of a switch, with devastating real life consequences.

Study Concludes Personal Carbon Allowances Could Be Trialed In Climate-Conscious Nations

A study in Nature entitled Personal carbon allowances revisited, published August 16th 2021, analyzes how person carbon allowances could be used to achieve climate goals.

To those familiar with the NWO agenda, ‘climate goals’ is an Orwellian term which basically translates to the creation of an artificial limit to human energy consumption (to fulfill the technocratic objective) and the creation of propaganda to make people think they are somehow saving the planet or helping the environment by going along with it. Here are a few quotes from the study:

“Here we discuss how personal carbon allowances (PCAs) could play a role in achieving ambitious climate mitigation targets. We argue that recent advances in AI for sustainable development, together with the need for a low-carbon recovery from the COVID-19 crisis, open a new window of opportunity for PCAs.

“Furthermore, we present design principles based on the Sustainable Development Goals for the future adoption of PCAs. We conclude that PCAs could be trialled in selected climate-conscious technologically advanced countries, mindful of potential issues around integration into the current policy mix, privacy concerns and distributional impacts.”

This is designed to dictate every little detail of your life:

“the allowance could cover around 40% of energy-related carbon emissions in high-income countries, encompassing individuals’ carbon emissions relating to travel, space heating, water heating and electricity. Allowances were envisioned to be deducted from the personal budget with every payment for transport fuel, home-heating fuels and electricity bills. People in shortage would be able to purchase additional units in the personal carbon market from those with excess to sell. New, more ambitious PCA proposals include economy-wide emissions, encompassing food, services and consumption-related carbon emissions, for example.”

This next quote lets the cat out of the bag. The whole point is that personal carbon allowances are about behavioral modification or behavioral change. This entire scheme is a psychological operation designed to change your actions. They want you to perform carbon budgeting which would mean, essentially, becoming OCD about your every act! There is yet another parallel with COVID, which has been encouraging people to be OCD about touching any surface or having human interaction:

“Building on this literature, PCAs are envisaged to deliver carbon-emissions-related behavioural change via three interlinked mechanisms: economic, cognitive and social. Similar to a carbon tax, a policy with which it is often compared, the economic mechanism of PCAs is envisaged to influence decision-making by assigning a visible carbon price to the purchase and use of fossil-fuel-based energy in the first instance, and possibly also to consumption-related emissions in more advanced PCA designs.

“However, in addition to the economic mechanism, PCAs aim to influence energy and consumption behaviour by increasing carbon visibility, by evoking users’ cognitive awareness of carbon in their daily routines and by encouraging carbon budgeting. Moreover, the shared goal of emissions reduction and the equal-per-capita allocation of PCAs is envisaged to create a social norm of low-carbon behaviour.”

It Worked For COVID, So Why Can’t It Work For Climate Change?

Here is same theme yet again, which goes something like this: it worked for COVID, so why can’t it work for climate change? If the NWO controllers can trick people and propagate mass fear over a bogus virus that has never been proven to exist, why not try the same thing over an imaginary impending carbon apocalypse?

“In particular, during the COVID-19 pandemic, restrictions on individuals for the sake of public health, and forms of individual accountability and responsibility that were unthinkable only one year before, have been adopted by millions of people. People may be more prepared to accept the tracking and limitations related to PCAs to achieve a safer climate and the many other benefits (for example, reduced air pollution and improved public health) associated with addressing the climate crisis. Other lessons that could be drawn relate to the public acceptance in some countries of additional surveillance and control in exchange for greater safety.

“For instance, in many countries, mobile apps designed for COVID-19 infection tracking and tracing played an important part in limiting the spread of the pandemic. The deployment and testing of such apps provide technology advances and insights for the design of future apps for tracking personal emissions.”

Introducing AI Into The Decision-Making Process

Remember the creepy Google video The Selfish Ledger (my analysis here) which outlined a dystopian future where decision-making was surrendered to AI (Artificial Intelligence) in the ultimate act of social engineering? That’s also promoted right here:

“Finally, advances in digitalization and AI for sustainable development promise to shrink implementation costs and logistical challenges for PCAs … An ever-increasing number of decision-making tasks are being delegated to software systems, allowing the presentation of targeted personalized information to future users on their emissions patterns. The latest science on AI for learning, including the use of virtual agents, could help refine the type of information that users are shown to manage and reduce their carbon emissions. To the user, all of the above could be packaged in an easy-to-use smartphone app that presents tailored information and advice on personal carbon emissions and facilitates carbon savings.”

Personal Carbon Allowances: Final Thoughts

Some scams and hoaxes need an injection of new variants to keep the official fear narrative alive. We now have ISIS-K (sounds like a cereal) and the dreaded Delta variant and Mu variant.

At some point, after all the new variants, vaccines, boosters and whatever else, the NWO controllers may find it is too difficult to keep up the pretense that there’s an imminent threat.

They may then pivot to the decades-old concocted climate change threat and push for personal carbon allowances, riding on the back of COVID or other propaganda. The details of the scam du jour may change, but the patterns of manipulation remain the same.

We must remember that the war on carbon is a war on life, since we are carbon-based creatures living in a world of carbon-based life. The dodgy or rather non-existent science behind the official COVID narrative is the same non-existent science behind the manmade climate change narrative. Don’t give up your freedom and rights or sell yourself short by confining your behavior to a carbon scheme that purports to save the environment when it does nothing of the sort.

By Makia Freeman, Guest writer, HumansAreFree.com

Makia Freeman is the author of the book Cancer: The Lies, the Truth and the Solutions.