The Battle of the Fake Historians Heats Up

A panel on “The Past, the Present and the Work of Historians,” held at the annual meeting of the American Historical Association in Philadelphia

NY Times: As Historians Gather, No Truce in the History Wars

At the annual meeting of the American Historical Association, the raging battle over how to write about the past — and why — was uncomfortably front and center.

This year’s quackademic nerd prom of the 140-year-old American Historical Association (AHA) featured 3,000 assorted eggheads and a contentious debate over how history should be taught. On one side were the hard core young radicals who seek to politicize everything past and present. Standing in opposition were the old-fashioned liars and ignoramuses — who have no desire to disrupt the embedded lies and mythologies of the past by injecting what they refer to as “a trend toward presentism” into the subject — such as the irrelevant discovery of this or that “racist” or this or that alleged anal poofter from decades or centuries gone by.  Absent altogether in this great “binary” argument, of course, are folks like yours truly — “correctionist historians” who propose the really radical concept of objectively digging out the TRUTH of history and faithfully reporting it in a manner such that people can understand the present much better. Imagine that.

Prior to the annual convention, AHA President James Sweet had written a critical column which peeved the young “presentists” — in which he stated:

“Too many on both left and right treat history as an evidentiary grab bag. We suffer from an overabundance of history, not as a method of or analysis, but as anachronistic data points for the articulation of competing politics.”

The ensuing hissy-fit from the young radicals prompted a quick apology from Sweet for “alienating some of my Black colleagues and friends,” — although he did not retract his arguments. This is the level of madness which the AHA had descended to. Traditional leftist liars / fools such as President Sweet are now coming off sounding somewhat sane and responsible — that is, relative to the barbarian radicals who want to, and ultimately will, devour their quackademic elders for not being “woke” enough. “The revolution eats its own,” as they say.

Standard Fake Historian James Sweet criticized what he saw as a “dangerous tilt toward presentism.” His comments stirred up the hornets’ nest of “woke” historians who want to inject “racism” and “LGBT” into everything. 

Woke Historian Rashauna Johnson said that historians of Black people should “think of the cause of justice as deeply tied to the work of history.”

The Insanity Continues…

Founded in 1884, the American Historical Association (AHA) is the oldest and largest professional association of historians in the United States, and the largest in the world. Like the similarly once-venerable New York Times and various universities of the Ivy League, the AHA once pursued true scholarship in a methodical and responsible manner. To give you an idea of the level of “progress” that took place over the decades, consider the fact that one of the AHA’s early annual presidents was the noted scholar, Henry Adams (1893-94) — the grandson and great-grandson of early US Presidents John Quincy Adams and John Adams, respectively. Adams once wrote:

“I detest the Jews and everything connected with them, and I live only and solely with the hope of seeing their demise, with all their accursed Judaism. I want to see all the lenders at interest taken out and executed…. We are in the hands of the Jews. They can do what they please with our values.”

Adams advised against investment except in the form of gold locked in a safe deposit box:

“There you have no risk but the burglar. In any other form you have the burglar, the Jew, the Czar, the socialist, and, above all, the total irremediable, radical rottenness of our whole social, industrial, financial and political system.”

Now THAT was a serious historian talking. About 50 years later, the same AHA would elect Arthur Schlesinger as president. Various other chosenite quackademics would subsequently serve one-year terms.

Historian and former AHA president Henry Adams. A contemporary once described Adams’ “antisemitism” by saying that: “when Adams saw Vesuvius (volcano in Italy) reddening… he searched for a Jew stoking the fire.”

Image #2

Image #3

The students of America were once influenced by the Anglo patriot Adams. Decades later, students got their history “education” from the likes of AHA president Arthur Schlesinger (Image 2) and Howard Zinn (Image 3).

The tragic transformation of the AHA from a scholarly organization to an instrument of  Orwellian Globalist propaganda — and now, to the brink of full-fledged Frankfurt School “wokeism” / “presentism” was not by accident. For those of us who understand how academic subversion works, this Times article itself inadvertently gives the game away.

“Ford and Mellon — the two mega-foundations — have gotten out of the history business , …have recently ended or reduced support for graduate study and higher education generally, as part of a broader refocusing on social justice.” (emphasis added)

Translation: The mighty tax-exempt foundations which were behind the falsification of history are now moving their resources toward insane “wokeism.” Follow the money.

Norman Dodd (Director of Research for Special House committee investigating the large tax-exempt foundations, 1953-54): “It seems incredible that the trustees of American fortune-created foundations should have permitted them to be used to finance ideas and practices incompatible with the fundamental concepts of our Constitution. Yet there seems evidence that this may have occurred.”

Usual Suspects Keep Memory of KKK Alive

NY Times: The Rise and Fall of a Grand Dragon of the Ku Klux Klan

Book Review: A FEVER IN THE HEARTLAND: The Ku Klux Klan’s Plot to Take Over America, and the Woman Who Stopped Them, 

by Timothy Egan

Oh look! A new book is out about the Ku Klux Klan. Now there’s an original topic to write about. (rolling eyes)

The “usual suspects” just can’t let go of the long-gone white-hooded bogeyman that is the KKK. In terms of sheer piss-inducing scare power, the KKK ranks second only to “zee Nazis” when it comes to stirring up white guilt in the malleable minds of the bewildered boobs of the overlapping tyrannical Kingdoms of Libtardia and Normiedom. A “chilling” excerpt from the book review: 

“In Indiana the Klan found its fullest expression: its largest membership rolls, its greatest influence on civic life. “The Klan owned the state,”  …. As a narrative, “A Fever in the Heartland” is gripping; as a rumination on the moral obscenity of white supremacy — whatever guises it wears — the book is damning.

This moronic, Middle School-drivel isn’t even worth rebutting because “you guys” already know the cliches and slogans; and this latest book holds no interest for us either. It’s the same old tiresome routine: White-rural-people-bad. But the article does offer us an ideal “teachable moment” for correcting historical misconceptions about the “dominance” of the Ku Klux Klan — all three versions of it.

Libtard author Timothy Egan (whose wife is Jewish) is an occasional op-ed contributor to Sulzberger’s Times — which is now puffing up his book about the 1920’s KKK. 

The Klansmen and “zee Nazis” — eternal bogeymen (now played by CIA agents) used to scare the Normies.

The First KKK

The first Klan was founded in Tennessee soon after the end of the U.S. Civil War, in 1865, by former officers of the Confederate army. It started as a men’s social club. About a year later, the KKK’s purpose transformed from that of a mere fraternal order to a self-defense force for oppressed and politically disenfranchised Southern Whites. Decentralized Klans spread across the South, targeting and intimidating interloping Northern politicians and their politically active black front-men. As portrayed in the immensely popular 1915 silent film, “The Birth of a Nation,” the KKK also defended and avenged the White women who were being raped and murdered by Blacks. The Klan had limited success in driving some of the scoundrels out of politics before fading in the early 1870’s —  due partly to its lack of central organization and also to the fact that a normal post-war order of things had been restored by then.

The Second KKK

In 1915, the second Klan was founded atop Stone Mountain, Georgia, based in large part upon the  The Birth of a Nation film. When the film was shown in Atlanta that year, the revived Klansmen paraded to the theater in white robes and pointed hoods – just like in the movie. Marching in parades was an activity of the new Klan that had not existed in the original 1860’s version.

This KKK appealed to new members mainly as a fraternal organization for WASPs (White Anglo-Saxon Protestants). It grew rapidly nationwide, spreading to every state both North & South. The Second KKK preached “One Hundred Percent Americanism” and demanded clean politics and strict moral codes. Its appeal was directed exclusively toward WASPs. The group viewed Jews, Blacks, Catholics and newly arriving Southern and Eastern European immigrants as racially impure and carriers of subversive ideas. At its peak in the mid-1920’s, the KKK claimed to include 4 million men and female auxiliary groups — most of them having joined just for social reasons, with some being too hard-core for other Americans to stomach. Like its forerunner, KKK 2.0 also faded away after a short life — in the 1930’s.

The Third KKK

The “Ku Klux Klan” name was again picked up by numerous independent local groups opposing the Communist-led “civil rights movement” and forced desegregation in the 1950’s-60’s. Early on in version 3.0, Fed infiltrators not only neutralized the KKK, but surely must have engineered false flag acts in order to discredit the anti-civil rights backlash and generate sympathy for subversive operatives like Marxist Loser King instead. For the past 50 years, KKK 3 has existed mainly as either a few unconnected groups of bored good ol’ boys donning the robes now & then and adopting highways stretches  for litter-cleaning; or Marxist / Deep State provocateurs who want simple-minded “people of color” and panty-wetting libtards to believe that there is an “invisible empire” of secret Klansmen hiding under every rock.

The Birth of a Nation movie depicts the First Ku Klux Klan rescuing White women from Black rapists. Call it “racist,” but innocent Southern Whites did indeed endure some nasty stuff during the Reconstruction Era. 

The Second Ku Klux Klan, though mainly a social group, espoused the ideals of “America First” and anti-Globalism / anti-Communism. Unlike most of today’s “Scofield Bible” Southern Christians, KKK 2 mistrusted the Jews. 

The Third Ku Klux Klan: A few remnant true believers, but mostly false-flagging Jewish Marxists and Feds.

And now you know the real story of the KKK that you’ll not get from the anti-White Jews and their hired goy at the “paper of record.” To sum it up; Version 1 was a short-lived heroic reaction to the Carpetbaggers (who were often Jewish) and freed Negro oppression of Whites; Version 2 was a short-lived social club which reacted to the already observable Jewish / Marxist war on Whites, America and Christianity; and Version 3 was (and remains) a total non-phenomenon of tiny sporadic groups forming out of nostalgia or attention-seeking and also, in many cases, false-flagging feds or commies.

The KKK, during its very brief spasms, has never actually influenced the course of American political history in any meaningful or lasting way. Ironically, its exaggerated “bogeyman” image remains far more useful to the Left than it ever did to the “America First” movement. And yet, if one were to only read the Jew York Times or listen to its preferred “scholars,” he’d come away with the impression that ‘the Klan” has been wielding its invisible might for 150 uninterrupted years now — the last few years of which under the new cover of “Trumpism.”

What a joke.

The idiotic KKK propaganda of the Judenpresse continues to work on libtards and normies.

Why Do White Libtards Virtue Signal

DECEMBER 6, 2022

NY Times:Her Family Owned Slaves. How Can She Make Amends?

Stacie Marshall, who inherited a Georgia farm, is trying on a small scale to address a generations-old wrong that still bedevils the nation.

About the only noise that grates worse than the skin-crawling sound of whinging & whining coming from some virtue-signalling, self-hating, cosmopolitan, White Yankee libtard prattling on about the lasting legacy of slavery and “White privilege” — is the similar whinging & whining coming from a virtue-signalling, self-hating, southern born & bred White Dixie libtard. You see, the former is merely a provincial ignoramus; whereas the latter is a dad-gum traitor to his kin. Heck, at least the self-hating Germans can falsely accuse themselves — if they are very old — or their parents or grandparents for the Holohoax. But this pathetic wench has to go back nearly 160 years to dig up and trash unknown ancestors for an institution which had actually been established in the Americas by “the usual suspects” who absolutely dominated the slave trade — and whose tribal descendants have pretty much scrubbed several excellent works on that subject from the search engines of Amazon (surprise surprise).

The article tells of how “long-blond-haired” ex-beauty queen Stacie Marshall slipped into a marketing seminar in Athens, Georgia which was attended by about  two dozen Black farmers. But St. Stacie wasn’t there to learn how to better peddle veggies. When the Black speaker, Matthew Raiford, asked if there were questions, our sanctimonious heroine raised her hand and cleared her soul. You see, she had inherited 300 acres upon which she was going to farm — thus making her the first woman in her family to own a farm. But St. Stacie had discovered something so horrific — so traumatizing — so guilt-inducing that it compelled her to show up at this all-Black farming seminar and make Holy Confession to Father Raiford.

From the article:

“My family owned seven people,” Ms. Marshall said. She wanted to know how to make it right.

Mr. Raiford was as surprised as anyone in the room. “Those older guys have probably never heard that from a white lady in their entire lives,” he recalled.

For almost three years now, with the fervor of the newly converted, Ms. Marshall has been on a quest that from the outside may seem quixotic and even naïve. She is diving into her family’s past and trying to chip away at racism in the Deep South.”

Wethinks St. Stacie watches too much TV — and that the publicity surrounding her virtue-signaling was either contrived in advance or sought after the fact.

1. St. Stacie is following in the footsteps of St. Harper Lee — the Alabama traitoress who proudly pooped-out the anti-southern “To Kill a Mockingbird” that has since been force-fed to scores of millions of High School students and made into several plays and a “classic” movie. // 2. The flag stands for heritage and culture — not “racism.” // 3. I wonder if St. Stacie — the ageing former beauty pageant winner — is ridin’ dirty with farmer Raiford as a form of “reparations.” …. Yeah, I think she is.

Now, about this matter of libtard virtue-signaling and excited tail-wagging in the presence of “people of color ( I guess I’m including myself).” What we have in such cases are not examples of well-intentioned people being stupid; nor really “self-hate” as much as it is a bizarre  and unhealthy form of self-love. These are mainly rotten and ego-driven people trying to exalt themselves above the rest of common humanity. To we the observant, they are vice-signaling by declaring:  “Hey! Look at me everybody! I’m trashing my White ancestors for owning slaves! Look at me!” — or — “Hey! Look at me everybody! I just adopted a Black baby from Haiti or a Brown/Black baby from the Dominican Republic!” There is absolutely ZERO “virtue” in that sort of spectacle-making behavior.

Let us hearken back to our New Testament Sunday School lessons to better understand what virtue-signaling libtards like St. Stacie are really about. Some excerpts from Matthew, Chapter 6:

“Be careful not to perform your righteous acts before men are seen by them. If you do, you will have no reward from your Father in heaven.

“So when you give to the needy, do not sound a trumpet before you, as the hypocrites do in the synagogues and on the streets, to be honored by men.”

“And when you pray, you shall not be as the hypocrites are: for they love to pray standing in the synagogues and in the corners of the streets, that they may be seen of men.“

“When you fast, do not be somber like the hypocrites, for they disfigure their faces to show men they are fasting.”

Tell it, Jesus. Tell it!

1 & 2. Never trust a virtue-signaling or “philanthropist” libtard who craves to “be seen of men.” // 3. I know, Jesus. I know.

These character types aren’t virtuous; they are self-aggrandizing and potentially dangerous neurotics — even if their advertised deeds do sometimes serve for the good. Put St. Stacie in a time machine and transport her back to Atlanta 1861; and she’ll be front & center (where she loves to be!) hosting fundraisers for the Confederacy as she conspicuously drops jewelry into the donation basket. “Look at me everybody!I’m supporting the cause! Oh -Look away! Look away! Look away! Dixie Land.”  — Bitch, please.

Libtards like St. Stacie needs to be called out at every turn as phony virtue-signalers, and promptly yanked down from their posturing pedestals when they act like this. The moral high ground is not for show-offs – especially ones who betray their own for personal gain. If you want to be a good “non-racist,” it will suffice to simply treat “people other than white” with the same degree of respect you’d like anyone else to show for you — no more, no less; and just leave it at that.

We need to remember, assholes come in all colors.

1. Southern-born actress Sandra Bullock with Black baby (who seems to be thinking: “Dis White bitch cray cray.” // 2. South African-born actress Charlize Theron proves to all that she is truly anti-Apartheid. // 3. Anorexic nutcase and CIA asset Angelina Jolie also showing up and doing her part.

The Manufactured Legacy of General Robert E Lee…

DECEMBER 30, 2022

NY Times:West Point to Remove Confederate Monuments From Its Campus

Bronze plaques that depict Gen. Robert E. Lee and other Confederate figures at the U.S. Military Academy at West Point will be placed in storage.

The US Military Academy at West Point in New York State has announced that it will begin removing Confederate symbols from its campus, including taking down a portrait of General Robert E. Lee from the library and removing a bust of him as well. This is being done for the wrong reason, of course — specifically, the Marxist obsession with denigrating the White Man through the never-ending remembrance whine about southern slavery and modern “racism .” Nonetheless, due to my recent epiphany regarding General Lee, perhaps he should cease to be exalted as some sort of von Clausewitz-like military tactician for the ages.

*Note: After the war, Lee was opposed to the building of Confederate war monuments because he felt that such structures would “retard” the nation’s healing and coming together.

This may be as much of surprise for “you guys” to hear for the first time as it was for me — but it turns out that, at the end of the US Civil War, many Southerners (including military men)  actually blamed Lee for losing the war. During the final post-war years of his life and even for several years after his death in 1870, Lee’s record was subject to harsh criticism in both North, South and abroad. It was only the “Lost Cause Ideology” of 1870’s – 1880’s Southern revisionists — a dubious recounting of the war which erased the ambition of certain southern politicians, European intrigue (Rothschild), and the westward expansion of slavery as fundamental factors behind the unprovoked and unnecessary secession declarations of 1860-61— that rehabilitated Lee’s reputation. The revisionists needed a saint, and who better than a “war hero” to posthumously fill that role. By the turn of the 19th century, Lee had been canonized.

According to this school of artificial scholarship, the South valiantly outfought the Union but inevitably lost “The War of Northern Aggression” only because of the North’s superior industrial wealth and manpower numbers — not because of General Lee or Confederate President Jefferson Davis— the latter being one of the founders of Lost Cause doctrine. In reality, many of Lee’s failures were epic. So much so that a “conspiracy theorist”  might even be inclined to speculate if Lee — the former superintendent of West Point who had opposed secession before declaring allegiance to the Confederacy  — was secretly working to preserve the Union. Let’s put the legend and propaganda (and passion) aside and consider the poor performance.

1. Robert E. Lee’s portrait is coming down at West Point. // 2 & 3. Virginia: After the pedestal was defaced by Black Lives Matter Communists, the statue was removed.

1. Jefferson Davis lived until 1889. He actively promoted “Lost Cause” ideology which absolved himself politically, and General Lee militarily. // 2. Stone Mountain Monument in Georgia — a project begun in 1915 and completed in 1972 — depicts Davis in front and Lee right behind him. The figure lagging behind them is General Stonewall Jackson — whose reputation as a skilled commander is truly deserved. Jackson died before Gettysburg after having been shot in the arm by friendly fire, dropped twice from a stretcher, and then contracting pneumonia after his arm was amputated. // 3. St. Robert’s statue was once revered — even though Lee himself would never have wanted it.

WAS LEE A CLOSET UNION MAN?
Lee’s father, Henry  Lee, was an early American Patriot, revolutionary war hero and, later on, a Federalist Party (strong Union) politician. He was very close to George Washington (who had once courted Lee’s mother before she married). It was Henry Lee who famously eulogized George Washington at the latter’s 1799 funeral as “first in war, first in peace, and first in the hearts of his countrymen.”

– Robert E Lee // pre-war 1861 letter to his son, George Washington Custis Lee (Step Great Grandson of George Washington)

“As an American citizen, I take great pride in my country, her prosperity and institutions, and would defend any State if her rights were invaded. But I can anticipate no greater calamity for the country than a dissolution of the Union. It would be an accumulation of all the evils we complain of, and I am willing to sacrifice everything but honor for its preservation. I hope, therefore, that all constitutional means will be exhausted before there is a resort to force. Secession is nothing but revolution. The framers of our Constitution never exhausted so much labor, wisdom, and forbearance in its formation, and surrounded it with so many guards and securities, if it was intended to be broken by every member of the Confederacy at will. It was intended for “perpetual union,” so expressed in the preamble, and for the establishment of a government, not a compact, which can only be dissolved by revolution, or the consent of all the people in convention assembled.”

*Note: 100,000 southern men volunteered and fought for the Union.

In the June 1969 issue of Civil War History (Volume 5) University of South Carolina professor, proud southerner and renowned historian Thomas L. Connelly  — attacked Lee’s legacy thusly:

“No single war figure stands in greater need of reevaluation than Lee. One ponders whether the South may not have fared better had it possessed no Robert E. Lee.”

Connelly’s 1969 essay was immediately scorned and ridiculed. But the argument that Lee — being out-manned — should have taken a more defensive posture and thus drawn the North into difficult southern terrain makes perfect sense. Instead, he was too often on the offensive and in full frontal assault manner. This resulted in unnecessary heavy casualties and demoralization. All that the Confederacy needed to confirm itself as a separate country was a stalemate. The burden was on the North to defeat and physically occupy the South — an achievement which came after too many losses were suffered by unnecessarily offensive southern forces.

Civil War Historian James McPherson put it this way:

“The South could ‘win’ the war by not losing. However, the North could win only by winning.”

Under Lee’s command, the Army of Northern Virginia racked up a total of 209,000 casualties. That’s 55,000 more than Ulysses S. Grant, who’s been criticized for “butchering” his men. Lee’s unnecessarily offensive strategy, and various other lost opportunities and blunders (here) and (here) — doomed the Confederacy to defeat. Lee burned through men faster than recruitment and the unpopular Confederate draft could replace them.

1 & 2. Thomas Connelly (1938-1991, no photo available) authored many scholarly books on the US Civil War of 1861-1865 — including “The Marble Man” (a title mocking the immortalizing of Lee by statues). Connelly maintains that it was not until the 1880’s that certain southern cliques transformed Lee into the invincible general and, later still, a southern and even a national hero. // 3. Criticism of Lee is still frowned upon in academic circles both North & South — liberal and conservative; but the case of the Correctionist Historians is indeed compelling.

Of all Lee’s blunders, the most damaging and decisive occurred at The Battle of Gettysburg in the opening days of July of 1863. On the third day of battle, in what shamefully became known as “Pickett’s Charge” — (I say “shamefully” because General George Pickett was not responsible for ordering the reckless charge and never forgave Lee (nor spoke to him again) for having ordered it) — Confederate troops were ordered to advance across an open 3/4 mile long field, into the teeth of heavy Union artillery and gunfire.

Lee issued the charge order against the advice of several subordinates. The repulse of “Pickett’s Charge” resulted in more than 6,000 casualties on the rebels — turning the tide of both the battle and the war itself. Lee was severely and properly criticized by military contemporaries and the southern press. What the heck was Lee doing — again, against the advice of subordinates — invading the northern state of Pennsylvania anyway? Even if Lee had won at Gettysburg, the depleted rebel force would eventually have had to retreat southward anyway.

The 1880’s propagandists not only continued to unjustly tag the demoralizing fiasco as “Pickett’s Charge,” but also scapegoated General James Longstreet’s execution of the attack for its failures — another underhanded deflection which Connelly and many modern military strategists find laughable. In a 2006 paper, a Department of Defense research center described Lee’s effort at Gettysburg as a “blunder” that “doomed the hopes of the Confederate States of America.”

The late military historian Edward Bonekemper III — author of “How Robert E. Lee Lost the Civil War” — spoke about Lee’s faults for many years. Early on, he faced much resistance, but before his death in 2017 remarked:

“Now people don’t get nearly as emotional as they used to. They are more open to hearing that there is another side to the story.”

Monuments may fall. But mythologies take a bit more time to undo.

LEE’S CHARGE!

Lee’s name has been scrubbed clean from responsibility for the demoralizing disaster of “Pickett’s Charge” at Gettysburg — leaving Pickett & Longstreet to take the blame for a charge — and a battle — which should never have taken place.

A Confederate soldier of Gettysburg in a letter to his sister:
(misspellings his)

“We got a bad whiping  . . . they are awhiping us . . . at every point. . . . I hope they would make peace so that we that is alive yet would get home agane . . . but I supose Jef Davis and Lee don’t care if all is killed.”  

1 & 2. Edward Bonekemper III — a military historian who caught flak for daring to critique Lee’s decisions. // 3. General George Pickett of “Pickett’s Charge” infamy. His name was eternally dirtied for a disastrous bloodbath which he opposed — yet still bears his name, not that of the exalted “Marble Man” who ordered it.

Marxists Panicking Over the Coming “Autocracy”

OCTOBER 19, 2022

NY Times:
 The U.S. Thinks ‘It Can’t Happen Here.’ It Already Has.

By Jamelle Bouie

The scary buzzword of the day (again) is “autocracy” — a moronic mantra which Marxists & Libtards repeatedly screech whenever a man and a movement dare to declare to the usual suspects, with firmness: “No! We will not submit!” 

In this high school-level column — puked out by race hustler / blogger Jamelle Bouie — the term, or one of its variants, is repeated about ten times — three times from the Affirmative Action pseudo scholar’s opening paragraph alone:

“The move from democracy to autocracy isn’t a sudden shift. It is not a switch that flips from light to dark with nothing in between. But it’s also not quite right to call the path to authoritarianism a journey. ….. It is better, in the U.S. context at least, to think of authoritarianism as something like a contradiction nestled within the American democratic tradition.” (emphasis added)

Such a profound scholar, isn’t he? (rolling eyes)

Another buzzword repeatedly used here is “democracy”  — a term which Marxists & Libtards use to describe situations in which an obedient majority of voting normies consistently make the “correct” choice. Boo-Hooie drops this word about ten times as well. Like the anti-White race-baiting piece-of-excrement that he is, he argues that “democracy” in America is threatened by the tradition of “authoritarianism”  which exists in a country:

“… whose notions of freedom and liberty are deeply informed by both the experience of slave-holding and the drive to seize land and expel its previous inhabitants…. for many Anglo-Americans in the 18th century, freedom was an exclusivist ideal.”

Slavery, Indian resettlement and Anglo-Saxon exclusivity, eh? The anti-White-sim never ends with you Satanic commies, does it? Ah, show us the shekels, Boo-Hooie. Show us the shekels.

Jamelle Bouie — doing his best to keep the historical memory of slavery (without mentioning the dominant role played by the Jews in the slave trade) and Indian displacement alive — and relevant to Trump — even as more and more Black voters continue to abandon the Demonrat Party.

As long as these journalistic hit-men for the Global Crime Syndicate keep presenting this century-old false Autocracy-Democracy duality, the “Editorial Board” of The Anti-New York Times  will repeatedly counter it with the most clear and concise rebuttal that anyone has ever issued on the subject.

Hitler:

“What does democracy or authoritarian state mean for these international hyenas? They don’t care. They are interested only in one thing: are you willing to be plundered? Yes or No? Are you stupid enough to keep quiet in the process? Yes or No? And when a democracy is stupid enough, then it is good. And when an authoritarian state declares: No. You will not plunder our people any longer! Then it is bad.”

Tell it…!

Democracy = Artificially induced mob voting for a criminal puppet
Autocracy = A strong principled leader protecting and serving his people

In Boo-Hooie’s piece, however, there’s something more specific than the usual general plunder that’s got his bosses worried – really, really worried. After taking us on his incomprehensible commie crash course through the history of US “racism” and how it relates to “authoritarianism,” he finally gets to the intended punchline at the very end:

“As we look to a November in which a number of vocal election deniers are poised to win powerful positions in key swing states, I think that the great degree to which authoritarianism is tied up in the American experience makes it difficult for many Americans to really believe that democracy as we know it could be in serious danger.Many Americans still think it can’t happen here, when the truth is that it already has and may well again.”

In other words, the Great Steal of 2020 – which – which Trump has dubbed “The Crime of the Century” – is– is destined to be exposed to the general public in a devastating manner. And not only do Boo-Hooie and his beaked Bolshevik bosses all know it, but there’s not a damn thing they can do to stop the coming age of “authoritarianism”. As the saying goes: “Nothing Can Stop What Is Coming. Nothing”

Tell it, Q. Tell it!

Trump’s soon-to-be Governors are all “vocal election deniers” in states that were stolen with phony ballots. L-R: Kari Lake (Arizona), Doug Mastriano (Pennsylvania), Tudor Dixon (Michigan)

The Eulogy Of Queen Elizabeth II That You Won’t See On Your TV

Turn on a TV, open a web browser, or scroll social media and you will not be able to avoid headlines and hashtags about Queen Elizabeth II passing away. After news broke that she was under “medical supervision,” media crews have stationed themselves out front of Buckingham Palace and its a veritable red carpet event as royals from all over Europe arrive to pay their respects and offer support.

On Thursday, newly elected British PM Liz Truss said the “whole country” was “deeply concerned” over the news of The Queen’s deteriorating health.

“My thoughts – and the thoughts of people across our United Kingdom – are with Her Majesty The Queen and her family at this time,” Truss stated.

Hours later, and surrounded by her royal family, Queen Elizabeth II took her last breath. Now, all the constant reporting has turned to memorializing her.

But is the queen really someone to be hailed as this expounder of all that is good? Should her face be plastered on screens worldwide and a 24/7 memorial be rolled out in her honor? Maybe so, but not for the reasons corporate media will tell you.

On top of mothering a child predator and helping to cover up his crimes, Queen Elizabeth — during her time as a monarch — fleeced the taxpayers of England for hundreds of millions just to pay for her castle.

During this time, she hid her finances offshore — despite the fact that the Royal Family is tax exempt — and made countless billions off the backs of her subjects.

She also oversaw the horrific colonization of multiple territories in Africa and Asia in which people were savagely tortured, their land stolen, and their people slaughtered.

She was tortured with axes during Kenya's struggle for independence from British colonial rule.

As Britain celebrates the Platinum Jubilee of its monarch, this old fighter wants to send her a message: "Let Elizabeth bring what belongs to me." pic.twitter.com/EofKAOqFtW

— DW News (@dwnews) June 2, 2022

Africa, asked to celebrate the life of #QueenElizabeth, you only celebrate it correctly by showing what exactly the British did to our ancestors! Subjugation. Torture. Murder. Slavery. Looting of our resources. Don't edit history. Don't use euphemism. Say it the way it is! pic.twitter.com/fz5kpMpW65

— Lord Abraham Mutai (@ItsMutai) September 9, 2022

Also read: Queen Elizabeth II Is Direct Lineage Of The Roman Caesars By Blood! (Proven Fact).

Though the Queen-friendly press have tried to downplay her role in the slaughter mentioned above, her racist roots were exposed in a document released last year by the Guardian. The papers revealed that the Queen’s courtiers banned “coloured immigrants or foreigners” from serving in clerical roles in the royal household until at least the late 1960s — when it was no longer considered “acceptable.”

It wasn’t just torture, racism and covering up her son’s affinity for children either. In one of the most damning admissions to date by the Church of England, the head of the church admitted in 2017 they “colluded” with and helped to hide the long-term sexual abuse of children and young men.

Archbishop of Canterbury Justin Welby apologized to the victims who spoke out and helped bring their attacker to justice in 2017. However, according to the report on how the church handled the case, as well as the slap on the wrist ex-bishop Peter Ball received for decades of abuse, ‘justice’ is a loosely thrown around term.

According to the AP, Welby ordered the report after Ball was convicted and imprisoned in 2015 for misconduct in public office and indecent assaults against teenagers and young men over a period of 20 years.

Despite admitting to sexually abusing 18 people, this serial child rapist was let out of prison after only serving 16 months.

The roots of the Church of England go back to the time of the Roman Empire when Christianity entered the Roman province of Britain and is the official state church of Britain. And, the supreme governor of the church is the Queen herself.

As the monarch is the supreme governor, it can be assumed that it took part in the cover up as well.

When not covering for pedophiles or overseeing torture, the Queen was also sympathizing with Nazis. In 2015, the Queen was seen on video giving the Nazi salute, during Hitler’s rise to power.

As TFTP reported at the time, in the video the Queen and the Queen’s mum raise their Nazi salutes proudly for the camera.

According to the Sun:

The film shows the then Princess Elizabeth, just seven, larking about in 1933.

Egging on her sister Princess Margaret, three, is their uncle Prince Edward, Prince of Wales. He was a sympathiser towards Hitler’s Nazi Germany and became King Edward VIII.

The stunning film footage of the Queen performing a Nazi salute is today revealed by The Sun.

The astonishing clip lay hidden for eight decades. The grainy home movie is thought to have been shot in 1933 or 1934, as Hitler rose to supreme power in Germany.

It is a matter of historical record that Edward VIII was, in fact, a Nazi sympathizer which makes the claims of childhood fun by the Queen to defend the video, all but irrelevant.

Exposed: All The Queen’s Agents And Corporations That Control The World.

It gets worse, intelligence given to the FBI claimed the Nazis were using the Duke and Duchess to glean information that would scuttle the war effort of the allies and help the Nazis win.

When the Queen isn’t saluting the regime responsible for the horrid deaths of 6 million Jews, she exploiting poor and mentally ill individuals.

As TFTP reported, the release of the Paradise Papers, a leak comprised of over 13.4 million documents, exposed the Queens insidious exploits of the mentally ill.

The documents included in the leak came from two offshore services providers and the company registries of 19 tax havens, which was obtained by the German newspaper Süddeutsche Zeitung and shared by the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists.

The report from ICIJ claimed that according to records from the offshore law firm Appleby, Queen Elizabeth II’s private estate has invested millions of pounds in a Cayman Islands fund that has a history of taking advantage of poor families:

“Queen Elizabeth II has invested millions of dollars in medical and consumer loan companies, Appleby’s files show. While the Queen’s private estate, the Duchy of Lancaster, provides some details of its investments in U.K. property, such as commercial buildings scattered across southern England, it has never disclosed details of its offshore investments.

‘Yes, the Duchy was aware that the Jubilee Absolute Return Fund was run offshore,’ said Chris Addock, chief finance officer of the Duchy of Lancaster.

The records show that as of 2007, the queen’s private estate invested in a Cayman Islands fund that in turn invested in a private equity company that controlled BrightHouse, a U.K. rent-to-own firm criticized by consumer watchdogs and members of Parliament for selling household goods to cash-strapped Britons on payment plans with interest rates as high as 99.9 percent.”

According to a report from the Guardian, which partnered in sharing the revelations from the Paradise Papers, over the span of more than a decade at least, the Queen’s estate has made significant investments in businesses such as the off-license chain Threshers and the retailer BrightHouse.

In 2017, BrightHouse, which is Britain’s biggest rent-to-own retailer, was ordered to pay 14.8 million pounds to 249,000 customers after the watchdog Financial Conduct Authority found that the retailer was guilty of overcharging customers and intentionally taking advantage of people with mental health problems and learning disabilities.

So, to recap, the queen has overseen horrifying torture and occupation for decades, covered for pedophiles, exploited people with disabilities for personal gain, fleece her subjects for billions in tax revenue, and has a history of sympathetic intentions to the Nazis. And, this is by no means, a comprehensive list… there is still much more.

Her legacy is not kindness, altruism and majesty — it is colonization, brutality, land disposition, mineral theft and torture.

During #QueenElizabeth’s reign, my country was a British protectorate that oppressed my peoples, set up our entire #torture system that is active, and made sure the self imposed monarchy stayed in power by cracking down on any attempts to bring about basic rights and freedoms.

— Maryam Alkhawaja (@MARYAMALKHAWAJA) September 9, 2022

After knowing all this, we have to ask ourselves why… why is her face plastered all over televisions, computers, and newspapers? Why are thousands going to weep in the streets for her? Why will corporate media make her out as a hero?

This is not normal. The queen was a monarch, an unaccountable, legally immune descendent of a long line of brutal dictators who continued that role — and no, it wasn’t merely “symbolic.” Society needs to stop celebrating people like this. If we continue to make role models out of abusive tyrants, don’t be surprised when society starts to resemble that very thing.

We Are Witnessing What Happens When Unrestrained Youth Gets Power

From Madison reading Cato and Cicero when framing the Constitution to the outsized impact both Rome and America had on the world around them, the United States has long been associated with historical Rome. There are great similarities, and there can be much to learn—and what’s happening now does not reflect well on either historical Rome or America.

When most of us think of the worst emperors in Roman history we think of names like Commodus, Nero, Caligula, and Elagabalus. To a man they were vain, self-centered, bloodthirsty hedonists who took what they wanted and tortured and killed many thousands of Romans and provincials.

All emperors, including the great ones like Augustus, Trajan, and Aurelian had blood on their hands to one degree or another but most tried to maintain or grow the empire. Commodus et al didn’t. Their goal was to satiate their lusts, whether literal lust or gluttony or, sadly, bloodlust. While there were other bad emperors, these four are among the worst.

What makes this relevant today is the fact that all four of these “men” were spoiled, pampered, entitled sadists who were given free rein when they were still essentially children. Commodus was the oldest at 19, while Nero was 17, and both Elagabalus and Caligula were 16.

They were overindulged brats who never faced consequences for their behavior. They were given virtually anything they wanted or, just as often, allowed to take what they wanted with impunity. And at those ripe young ages, and with that upbringing, they were literally given the keys to the kingdom and unleashed on the Empire—and virtually everyone in it suffered as a result.

Every day in America we see modern-day Commoduses or Caligulas wreaking havoc on our streets and in our stores, restaurants, schools, and more. Instead of a single entitled Emperor, America in 2022 is being ravaged by a generation of young men—many of whom have grown up fatherless—who have been told that they can do and say anything they want and that, regardless of what they do, there will be no consequences for them.

Just as Elagabalus et al brought nothing but blood, despair, and dysfunction to the Empire, these 21st-century youth are bringing blood, despair, and destruction to America. A generation of Americans has grown up being given “time outs”, “participation trophies,” and grades that have nothing to do with actual academic success, while at the same time they’ve been told that all inequality is due to racism, sexism, homophobia, or anything other than individual choices or actions.

The consequence of this indoctrination is that far too many young Americans think they can do anything with impunity. If they want something they take it. If they’re mad about something they protest, disrupt the lives of everyone within shouting distance, and frequently riot. They assault, rape and, sometimes, even murder, increasingly with impunity.

Pat Moynihan predicted much of this 60 years ago in his “The Negro Family: The Case for National Action.” In it he “…described through pages of disquieting charts and graphs, the emergence of a “tangle of pathology,” including delinquency, joblessness, school failure, crime, and fatherlessness that characterized ghetto—or what would come to be called underclass—behavior.”

While most of the scenes of flash mobs, carjackings, Knock Out Game punches, subway shovings, and daily shootings involve black male youth, this is not a race issue. Yes, the problem is disproportionately black, but White and Hispanic America is increasingly experiencing the same challenges of unwed mothers, school failures, and the lack of responsibility that underpins much of the dysfunction.

Whether a California college student getting 6 months for rape, a Texas boy getting no jail time for killing four people in a car crash, or charges being dropped against a South Carolina boy for killing someone in a boat crash, unaccountable America spans across races, wealth, and indeed the country itself. This is nowhere better demonstrated than by the legions of rioters who participated in the “peaceful protests” of 2020 who found their charges dropped or their bails funded by the glitterati.

Killing Napoleon…Again

JUNE 7, 2022

NY Times:
 
Napoleon Isn’t a Hero to Celebrate

“Professor” Marlene L. Daut “Phd” teaches “African Diaspora Studies” at the University of Virginia. That alone — neither supporting research nor footnotes needed — absolutely proves that she talks out of her ass and hates “The White Man” (even though she is married to a White “cuck”).

The latest target of the “cancel culture” Napoleon Bonaparte — who, Hitler defied the House of Rothschild and was forced into protracted defensive warfare against Britain and her allies.

Daut’s ignorance, on full display in this Op-Ed piece for the NY Times, is as appalling as her bigotry. Join us for a well-deserved bitch-smacking of this hateful hell-cat.

1. The untaught anti-White professorette (who clearly happens to have an abundance of White DNA) wishes to teach us about Napoleon. // 2. Read book by M. King // 3. Scene from 1934 Hollywood film, The House of Rothschild, depicts the cunning Brothers Rothschild dictating to “The Allies” the conditions for their financing of the war to topple Napoleon.

Daut: After statues of enslavers and colonizers were toppled, defaced or taken down across Europe and the United States, France decided to move in the opposite direction.
Analysis: Reading between the lines here, it is clear that Ms. Daut approves of physical and cultural vandalism.

Daut: The year 2021 was hailed by many museums and institutions in the country as the “Year of Napoleon” to commemorate France’s biggest tyrant.
Analysis: The “tyrant” actually liberated his people from usury; expanded educational opportunities for the children of common folk; opened up advancement based upon merit; and was universally beloved by the people of France — except for the Illuminati / Red Jacobin scum who tried to kill him.

Daut: As a Black woman of Haitian descent and a scholar of French colonialism, I find it particularly galling to see that France plans to celebrate the man who restored slavery to the French Caribbean.
Rebuttal: As a Hispanic Man of European (Spain), Black (Africa) and Taino Indian (Puerto Rico) descent and a “scholar” of real history, I find it particularly galling to have to listen you crybabies trash history and when our Black ancestors also practiced slavery. That’s the way it was back then — get over it!

Daut: He was an architect of modern genocide, whose troops created gas chambers to kill my ancestors.
Rebuttal: “Gas chambers?” — You too? Oy vey — or shall we say “Sacre bleu.” Did the French use Zyklon B too?

Daut: First, some history: In 1794, in the wake of the revolution that transformed France from a monarchy into a republic — France declared slavery’s abolition throughout its territory. But in 1802, Napoleon was in charge and reversed that decision, making France the only country to ever have brought back slavery after abolishing it. …The French only definitively re-abolished slavery in 1848.
Rebuttal: Waaaah! Waaaah! Waaaah! Get over it. And by the way, a reader named “Ken” informs us:

“As a Napoleonic scholar I would like to mention that Napoleon did not want to reintroduce slavery in Haiti. He was coerced into it by the reaction to the horrors committed against Whites; and many powerful people in France demanded it.”

Daut: Although Napoleon also destroyed the very republic the French claim to revere when he made himself emperor in 1804….
Rebuttal: Actually, Marlene, what Napoleon and his followers “destroyed” was the murderous atheistic Jacobin tyranny (early Bolsheviks) which called itself a “republic” –as well as the libtarded cousins that replaced them (The Directory). Though he named himself “Emperor,” France in many ways remained an “egalitarian” nation governed fairly by the rule of law (the Napoleonic Code).

Daut: It is still common for the French to lionize him as a hero…
Rebuttal: That’s because it is impossible to totally erase the memory of the great deeds of a great man — even in libtarded France. Give it another 30 years or so, and the legend of Hitler will also rise again (unless the New World Order achieves final victory, that is).

Daut:  … who not only stomped all over Europe at the Battle of Austerlitz….
Rebuttal: What the professorette doesn’t tell you (or probably doesn’t even know herself) is that the Battle of Austerlitz (in which the French soundly defeated the Austrians and Russians) brought an end to the Third Coalition War which the old monarchies of Europe — led by King George III’s British bullies — imposed upon revolutionary France. There would be four more “Napoleonic Wars” instigated against France — always led by Britain and later financed by the House of Rothschild. That is why Napoleon “stomped all over Europe.”

Daut: … but also created the modern legal code and the education system still in use.
Rebuttal: And a damn fine code and a damn system it must have been to serve France for 200 years and counting!

The Napoleonic Code — which Napoleon himself had a direct hand in authoring — has withstood the test of time.

Daut: Things unfolded tragically in Haiti. Under two generals who were sent to the island by Napoleon to, in his words, “annihilate the government of the Blacks,” the French Army was ordered to kill all the people of color in the colony who had ever “worn an epaulet.”
Analysis: Haiti was part of the French Empire. It fell to the Jacobinized Blacks. Many innocent Whites — not all of them slaveholders — were slaughtered. Napoleon had an obligation to protect the innocent French residents — many of whom were actually friendly and sympathetic toward the Blacks and mulattoes of Haiti (from which Ms. Daut is descended).

Daut: My students and colleagues, in both France and the United States, usually respond with shock and horror when I describe how thousands of Black people in Saint-Domingue were so cruelly killed by the French.
Analysis: What this forked-tongue serpent conveniently fails to mention is that both sides waged a brutal struggle. In 1804, after the French failed to retake Haiti, the cruel Haitian General Dessalines ordered the mass massacre of every last French man, woman and child on the island. (That’s why there are no Whites in Haiti today). The “shock and horror” that these Whites — who naively remained in “liberated” Haiti and harbored no animosity toward the Blacks — must have felt when machete-wielding killers went door-to-door at night doesn’t seem to move Ms. Daut to tears though. In fact, she evidently admires the beast Dessalines! (here) and (here)

Daut: Perhaps French leaders should open an inquiry into why Napoleon, a racist and genocidal warmonger….
Rebutal: Napoleon was NOT a warmonger. All seven of the “Coalition Wars” (3-7 aka “The Napoleonic Wars”) were imposed upon France by the old monarchies of Europe — thus compelling Napoleon to occupy other states and install friendly Kings.

Haitian Monster 
Jean-Jacques Dessalines ordered the massacre of every French man, woman and child in Haiti — many of whom had never even been slaveholders and had been friendly with the non-Whites. Dessalines’s legendary cruelty was such that many mulattoes and Blacks feared him as well.

* Dessalines — referred to even by many Haitians as a tyrant — would himself be assassinated in 1806. His body was then stomped upon and mutilated by an angry mob. Haiti has remained misgoverned ever since.

Parents Outraged About Explicitly Anti-White Racism And Pedophilia In School Curriculum

As parents around the country increasingly become fed up with left-wing hacks running school boards, more are beginning to take action against board members who refuse to listen to reason and respond to concerns.

In particular, parents are outraged at the adoption of an explicitly anti-white critical race theory curriculum, ridiculous and pointless COVID masking, tyrannical mandates and the inclusion of sexually inappropriate books and materials in school libraries that includes illegal acts of pedophilia.

In fact, parents and activists have just served members of the Scottsdale (Arizona) Unified School District with surety bonds totaling $1 million (that is, 10 parents have filed bonds of $100,000 each, totaling $1 million for each board member) as they move to get rid of several policies.

Watch:

As Citizen Free Press noted:

Leigh Dundas and Miki Klann speak to the Scottsdale Unified School District in Arizona. During the meeting, Miki declares her intention to file a claim against the Governor’s surety bond on behalf of the SUSD board members. Each member of the board will be charged with practicing medicine without a license, child abuse, segregation and inappropriate sexual material in the school libraries.

Miki served each board member with 10 letters of intent by 10 different parents. Each claim carries a liability of up to 100K – this means each board member carries a total liability of $1 million in the event that the claims are filed. Now the board members have 5 days to rectify the situation or the parents of SUSD will file the claim.

In order to resolve the problem, the board members must:

– Remove all mask mandates and recommendations

– Remove all “experimental treatment” clinics and recommendations

– Discontinue the Critical Race Theory and GLSNEN.org agendas

– Remove all inappropriate sexual material from the libraries

– Former board president Jann-Michael Greenberg must resign

In addition to inappropriate content, behaviors, and mandates, the SUSD board has had its problems in the past.

For instance, in November the board met in emergency session and voted 4-1 to remove Greenberg from his post following reports that he distributed “dossiers” on parents who were showing up at board meetings and voicing opposition to its left-wing policies.

The board voted to elect Patty Beckman as interim president. The ‘dossiers’ included photographs and personal financial information on some parents, US News reported.

“We do not have all the facts at this time. To make a decision without those facts that’s in the best interest of the district is simply not possible,” Greenburg said. “I strongly support the investigations that have been announced both publicly and privately.”

“When I first saw the contents of the Google Drive and I saw my 8- and 10-year-old’s photos, that was terrifying. And like, what’s he doing?” mother Amanda Wray told AZFamily.com.

“But he has pictures of my vacation home, property records. I’m not a political opponent, I’m an involved parent and that is threatening to me and it makes me wonder why and what he was planning to do with those photos,” she continued, adding she was “disgusted” by what she saw.

“I think we identified 47 people that were background checked, divorce decrees, Social Security numbers, property records, mortgages,” added Wray, who noted that the Google Drive included a number of cruel memes.

In the case of one woman, Wray said that whoever created the dossier “took her photos and superimposed it over a lynching and I can tell you, she’s distraught by this and it’s disgusting.”

She went on to say she thinks some parents are being targeted because they sought to have Greenberg recalled over the district’s manifestly stupid COVID-19 policies, according to AZ Family.

“We’re not anti-mask, we’re not anti-[jabs]. They’ve painted us that way because it fits their inflammatory narrative. We’re all for parent choice and really, transparency,” she said.

World Economic Forum Endorses ‘Insane Pro-CRT Propaganda’

The World Economic Forum (WEF) has come under fire for a video which initially appears as a neutral explainer on Critical Race Theory (CRT), only to quickly shift into a full-throated endorsement of the ideology.

CRT charges an entire demographic with a collective crime, uses the charge as grounds for framing individuals within that demographic of perpetrators of that crime, and then seeks to strip condemned individuals of rights, dignity, and equal protection based on that charge (h/t).

The WEF video defines CRT as a theory “first developed by US legal scholars in the 1980s” which “argues that the laws, rules and, regulations that govern society today have been shaped by the historical subordination of people of colour and that this is a driving force behind racial inequality today,” according to Breitbart.

As an example of the supposed racism embedded in every fiber of America’s institutions, the WEF points to the high number of incarcerated black males throughout the country.

“Take the US criminal justice system, for example,” it says. “While everyone is seen as equal under the law, Black Americans are imprisoned at 5 times the rate of white people.”

“CRT says this disparity is a legacy of America’s racist past,” but that opponents say it “paints all white people as bigots.”

The video then positions CRT awareness as an honorable pursuit. Watch what opponent Chris Rufo described as an “Insane pro-CRT propaganda video.”

This is what you need to know about critical race theory.

Learn more about racial equality: https://t.co/aNh1BmXuyi pic.twitter.com/R0eAn4P7lJ

— World Economic Forum (@wef) February 8, 2022

Others condemned the WEF as well (via Breitbart):

“Ah yes, the world economic forum promoting a radical departure from the current relations of power,” wrote video essayist and author Peter Coffin.

“This PROVES CRT is the revolution. I’ve been wrong this whole time!” he mocked.

“Run from the WEF working class people,” warned clinical psychologist and psychology professor Dr. Jordan Peterson.

Run from the WEF working class people. https://t.co/VmXzZfZHC5

— Dr Jordan B Peterson (@jordanbpeterson) February 9, 2022

“Why would the World Economic Forum come out in support of Critical Race Theory?” asked author and mathematician Dr. James Lindsay, who warned last month that CRT activists aim to dismantle the U.S. and establish “a total dictatorship” of the so-called “anti-racists.” 

“Because they’re the ones who want to divide our society with this Marxist Theory or any other tool they can use to break the world and seize power,” he said.

Why would the World Economic Forum come out in support of Critical Race Theory? Because they're the ones who want to divide our society with this Marxist Theory or any other tool they can use to break the world and seize power. https://t.co/wpsl3JAsh9

— James Lindsay, so emotional and sensitive (@ConceptualJames) February 9, 2022

Sen. Ted Cruz’s (R-TX) national security adviser tweeted “I can’t believe you’re advocating for ‘equality’ at the expense of equity” in 2022. “You’re either on board or you’re not. Be better.”

Read the rest of the comments here.

Sources: NaturalNews.com; ZeroHedge.com;

Dozens Of School Districts Are Using Book That Claims ‘Whiteness’ Is The Devil And That White Children Sell Their Soul For ‘Stolen Land And Stolen Riches’

Investigative Journalist and avid CRT opponent Chris Rufo has identified over 30 school districts across 15 different states that are teaching the radical ‘anti-whiteness’ book, “Not My Idea” by Anastasia Higginbotham.

Rufo notes that the book, meant for children as young as kindergartners, ‘traffics in the noxious principles of race essential-ism, collective guilt, and anti-whiteness.’

SCOOP: At least 25 public school districts in 12 states are now teaching "Not My Idea," a book that claims "whiteness" is the devil, luring children with the promise of "stolen land [and] stolen riches."

Critical race theory is driving public education—and must be stopped. pic.twitter.com/FRzpxywwbj

— Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️ (@realchrisrufo) July 8, 2021

One part includes images portraying whiteness as the devil, offering the reader a contract that ‘bids them to whiteness’ in exchange for stolen land and the ability to ‘mess endlessly’ with the lives of people of color.

The book teaches children to primarily identify by their skin color while it paints white children as evil, saying: “Whiteness is a bad deal. It always was.”

Another page says, “Racism is a white person’s problem and we are all caught up in it.”

“Not My Idea” is a clear example of how CRT brands white children as oppressors that should feel shame for the color of their skin.

In June, A law firm associated with Ruffo filed a law suit in Illinois against a school district for instructing teachers to read the book, among others, and use it in their curriculum.

Parents across the country have been pushing back against this racist and anti-American indoctrination by speaking up against the teachers and school boards.

Despite their opposition, the largest teachers union in the country approved a plan last week to promote CRT across all 50 states and their 14,000 districts.

Some states, like Oklahoma and Florida have stepped up and banned CRT from schools, but we need more to do the same.