Putin is Winning Global Information War

AUGUST 12, 2022


NY Times:
 How Russian Propaganda Is Reaching Beyond English Speakers


Social media companies have taken steps to restrict Russian state media accounts. But posts from those accounts still spread in Spanish, Arabic and other languages.


By: Steven Lee Myers

In this textbook example of the psychosis known as “projection” — world class propagandist and “Pulitzer Prize winner” Steven Lee Myers not only applauds Twitter & Facebook censorship of “disinformation” — but goes a step further by moaning and groaning about how “Russian propaganda” (truth) continues to influence the perception of Putin’s righteous military operation in nations around the world.

It’s not enough to suppress the information flow for the English-speaking peoples. Meyers and his tribesmen want the whole world kept in the dark. The Satanic inversion of reality presented in his article is astonishing. The good news is that, in more and more places around the world, the Jurisprudence Armada’s propaganda flotilla is no match for Russia’s information warfare campaign. Meyers’ lies are easy to deconstruct. Let’s clean up some of his filth.

1. The despicable deceiver Steven Lee Myers 
is also the author of “The New Tsar: The Rise and Reign of Vladimir Putin.” // 2. A Pulitzer Prize constitutes, in and of itself, direct first impression evidence of journalistic criminality.

Meyers: In Spanish in Latin America or in Arabic across the Middle East, a steady stream of Russian propaganda and disinformation ………
Analysis: Deep State-affiliated news agencies also operate in all nations of the world. So if US / NATO version of events was true, there wouldn’t be any need to worry about “Russian propaganda and disinformation” because, in a fair head-to-head match, truth will always trump falsehood. What Meyers fears isn’t the “disinformation,” but rather — the competition.

Meyers: … continues to try to justify President Vladimir V. Putin’s unprovoked invasion
Analysis: More projection. The word “unprovoked” actually applies to NATO’s relentless eastward expansion and Jukraine’s violent oppression of the Russian-speaking Donbas republics — Donetsk and Luhansk.

Meyers: The result has been a geographical and cultural asymmetry in the information war over Ukraine that has helped undercut American- and European-led efforts to put broad international pressure on Mr. Putin to call off his war.
Translation: The days when (((they))) could invent and sell the most preposterous and unchallenged lies to the sheeple of the world are — thanks to the Internet and sophisticated Russian communication operations — over.

Meyers:  The failure of Facebook and Twitter to impose stronger checks on Russian posts in non-English languages has begun to draw criticism as the war drags on.
Analysis: There was a time, not too long ago, when most libtards openly expressed horror over the mere thought of news organizations or platforms “imposing strong checks” on the flow of information — even if it was “hate speech.” — “I may disagree with what you say but I will defend to the death your right to say it,” went the old cliche (falsely attributed to Voltaire)

Of course, they made such self-righteous declarations during an era when they were absolutely dominating the info-war. Now that we truthers — thanks to the Internet — have crawled back into the ballgame, the Voltairian mask of magnanimity has dropped as abusive Orwellian “cancel culture” becomes the “the new normal” for the Left.

Meyers: Two weeks ago, a bipartisan group of United States senators added to the criticism, accusing the platforms of allowing Russia to “amplify and export its lies abroad” in Spanish.
Analysis: U.S. Senators “accusing” platforms of “allowing” the Russian side of the story to be presented? Do Slimes readers not see a problem with this? Evidently not.

My times have changed. On the day after Japan’s justified 1941 attack on the Pearl Harbor naval base in Hawaii, this same NY Times actually printed the Japanese Emperor’s entire declaration (here) —  in which he put the blame for the event on the United States. Now (((they))) want Putin to be cancelled — even in foreign countries?

The N.W.O. media monopoly is no more… and Meyers doesn’t like it.
1. RT in Spanish // 2. RT in Arabic

Meyers: The lawmakers urged the companies to do more to block Russia’s Spanish outlets, including RT en Español and Sputnik Mundo.
Analysis: Keeping Americans in the dark isn’t enough. The scum feel they have the right to shape the opinions of the whole world.

Meyers: Russian disinformation is flowing freely in parts of the world where the war in Ukraine is viewed in less stark, good-versus-evil terms as in the United States and Europe.
Analysis: “Good vs Evil” — total reality inversion. Putin actually is a good man (read The War Against Putin.”) Zelensky and his Globalist handlers are the evil ones.

Meyers: Robert Menendez of New Jersey and Tim Kaine of Virginia, both Democrats, and Bill Cassidy, a Republican from Louisiana, wrote in a letter to Facebook’s chief executive, Mark Zuckerberg.
Analysis: Senator Bill Cassidy, FYI, is notorious for having stabbed Trump in the back after “January 6th” . It figures he’d be the “bipartisan” part of this tyrannical effort. After crossing “The Donald,” Cassidy’s days are numbered.

Meyers: On these sites, Russia’s war is falsely portrayed as a just cause …..
Analysis: Actually, Russia’s struggle against the Globalist West is very much a “just cause” – 100% and easily proven. Indeed, Mike King wrote a whole book on the topic which – by the way – was banned by Amazon in 2021. There will be no “Pulitzer Prizes” for Mr. King.

Enemies of free speech who fear “Russian propaganda” — Senator Menendez (D-NJ)  — Senator  Kaine (D-DE) — Senator Cassidy (R-LA)

Get Ready For “I Stand With Taiwan” Idiocy.

Taiwan Presidential Office

AUG 7, 2022


 NY Times (Guest Essay): 
I’m Taiwanese, and I Want to Thank Nancy Pelosi

By Yu-Jie Chen

Yu-Jie Chen is a research professor at the Law Institute of Taiwan’s “Academia Sinica” and an affiliated scholar at New York University’s U.S.-Asia Law Institute. Though usually averse to making hasty generalizations, — on the basis of those “credentials” alone, coupled with the fact that the “paper of record” thought to feature her “Guest Essay” — can confidently label her as a Globalist-Libtard of the Asian branch of Globalist Libtardation.

A proper framing of this wench is necessary for understanding why, in the dispute between the “Two Chinas,” we side with Xi of “communist” China over “democratic” Taiwan. You see, the “I Stand With Taiwan” crowd is made up of the same cult cretins as the “I Stand With Ukraine” bunch. Don’t be surprised if, in few more weeks from now, the usual deluded, virtue-signalling followers of “the latest thing” swap out their yellow and blue Jukraine flags for the red and blue of Taiwan.

To get a better understanding of what this brewing “crisis” is really all about, let’s dive into “Professor” Chen’s love letter to Speaker Pelosi for some analysis.

Column 1: The “Taiwanese” writer is Soros’s bitch. // Column 2:
 Taiwan & Ukraine are both puppet states that the Globalists use to antagonize their Russian & Chinese adversaries. That is why the cult followers of “the latest thing” — some consciously, some obliviously — support both “causes.”
And so it begins.

Chen: As a Taiwanese,….
Rebuttal: Stop right there! You’re only “Taiwanese” by a geographical / historical quirk necessitated by the aftermath of the Chinese Civil War which ended 73 years ago. You are, racially, historically, linguistically, culturally — Chinese. Be proud of that, traitor.

Chen: … I’m sometimes asked what it’s like living in “the most dangerous place on earth.”
Rebuttal: Oh the bloody drama! Who says Taiwan is “the most dangerous place on earth?”

Chen: That’s what The Economist labeled Taiwan last year.
Rebuttal: The Economist eh?  Ooooh, such an authority. The Economist is a Globalist propaganda organ half-owned by the Rothschilds. We can tell who’s buttering your egg roll, honey.

Chen: Taiwan’s people have lived for decades under Chinese rhetorical threats to absorb the island.
RebuttalActually, the official Chinese position is for Taiwan to maintain a maximum level of autonomy, but as part of a single Chinese nation. The name for this idea is “One Country, Two Systems.” Under this proposed arrangement, Taiwan (like Hong Kong & Macao) would keep its governmental system and manage its own financial affairs. It’s a total win-win situation — sort of like the decentralized “cantons” of Switzerland — but the Globalists and their minions in Taiwan won’t allow it.

Chen: China often reacts furiously when any U.S. official visits Taiwan … 
RebuttalAnd how would Americans react if Chinese busy-bodies were to visit the commonwealth of Puerto Rico to incite them against the US mainland?

Chen: ….Beijing has a special loathing for Ms. Pelosi.
Rebuttal: The fact that China “loathes” that corrupt drunken bitch is all the more reason for decent Americans to NOT “stand with Taiwan.”

Chen: Ms. Pelosi’s visit was a welcome expression of U.S. solidarity with Taiwan ….
RebuttalDrunken Nancy (if that’s even her) won’t be speaking for Americans for much longer. The Demonrat Party is headed for a devastating humiliation in about 12 weeks.

Chen: Taiwan is critical to the entire democratic project.
Rebuttal: What exactly do you mean by the “democratic project?” — And why is Taiwan so “critical” to it?

Chen: We are the first place in Asia to legalize same-sex marriage.
Rebuttal: There it is! “Gay – Gay – Gay” — the very first thing she mentions. Yes, the Globalists are turning Taiwan into an Asian outpost of decay and degeneracy. In hindsight, foreknowledge of that alone might have made me root for Mao’s Reds to take back the island.

Chen: And one of the first to elect a female leader — our current president, Tsai Ing-wen —
Rebuttal: President Tsai Ing Wen is a rancid libtarded harridan cut from the same Soros cloth as libtarded western shrews like Satanist Hillary, Drunken Pelosi, Frumpy Merkel, Donkey-Faced Adern (gender questionable) et al. Again, give me bloody old Chairman Mao over this bossy neo-Marxist hag any day.

1. The Rothschild Crime Syndicate made Taiwan “the most dangerous place on Earth” — then their magazine blames China for making it so dangerous. // 2. The queering of Taiwan — brought to you by the CIA. // 3. The Wicked Witch of the West meets the Wicked Witch of the East (still with the theatrical face diapers!)
As thick as thieves! George Soros, Drunken Nancy and Alex Soros

Chen: We are a successful economy, with some of the highest living standards in Asia.
Rebuttal: Morally decaying Taiwan, like its western counterpart “democracies,” also has below-replacement-level birth rates and growing divorce rates. Keep ageing the population and keep ruining your families — and we shall see how much longer you can maintain a “successful economy.”

Chen: If Taiwan were brought to heel by China, ….
Rebuttal: The fact that Taiwan was “brought to heel” by the Globalist Cabal a long time ago doesn’t seem to trouble this “sovereignty” loving cosmopolitan C-word one bit.

Chen: …. the world would lose a shining example of democracy and the liberal international economic order
Rebuttal: “The liberal international economic order,” eh? — That says it all.

Chen: … at a time when the authoritarian tentacles of the likes of Russia and China are expanding.
Globalese to English Translation: “Authoritarianism” refers to the act of saying “NO!” to the Globalist Crime Syndicate.

Chen: Seizing Taiwan would fulfill Mr. Xi’s nationalistic goal of annexing the island.
Rebuttal: It would not be a “seizure.” What Xi seeks is peaceful reunification.

Chen: Rarely does anyone bother to ask what the Taiwanese want. The answer: to live our democratic way of life …..
Rebuttal: Lying she-devil. Taiwan is being offered “One Country, Two Systems.” You can keep your precious “democracy” and “gay rights” — just as long as you don’t allow the CIA and the Soros NGOs to set up subversive shop on the island. 

Chen:  … without outside interference.
Rebuttal: The “outside interference” (always inciting Taiwan to maintain an adversarial posture toward China) comes from the West, not China!

Chen: When Mao Zedong’s Communist forces won the Chinese Civil War in 1949, China’s Nationalist regime, led by Chiang Kai-shek, fled to Taiwan and ruled with martial law. Civil liberties were curtailed, and regime opponents suffered greatly.
Rebuttal: Chiang Kai-shek knew how to deal with not only Maoists, but also the libtarded democratic types. Ironically, Nationalists Chiang and Xi would probably have gotten along very well today.

Chen: Through the efforts of democracy advocates and pragmatic post-Chiang leaders, Taiwan evolved peacefully into a firm democracy.
Translation: After Chiang’s death, the CFR-CIA complex got its tentacles into the island’s parliamentary politics and started recruiting traitors and weaklings.

Chen: We watched with shock and sadness as Beijing cracked down on Hong Kong’s freedoms — a disturbing glimpse of our own possible future.
Rebuttal: China’s “crackdown” was on the CIA / Soros “Umbrella Revolutionaries” of Hong Kong. The people at large are doing just fine.

Chen: And Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has prompted fears that China could do the same to us.
Rebuttal: As they say in poker parlance, this is yet another “tell” from this quackademic whore. She hates Putin (surprise surprise).

Chen: Beijing repeats its tired old gospel that Taiwan is an ancient and inseparable part of the Chinese motherland.
Rebuttal: Well, tiny Taiwan is an ancient part of China. Why is that a “tired old gospel?”

Chen: We do not want a war with China. But we are ready to protect our home if attacked.  Our determination to safeguard our beloved homeland should not be underestimated. Freedom is worth fighting for.
Rebuttal: The evil bitch would have her fellow islanders (a decent chunk of whom, in spite of CIA propaganda, actually want reunification with the mainland) to die in defense of the “liberal world order,” not for “freedom” — as she safely sits out any potential conflict sipping lattes with her queer American comrades in some faculty lounge on the NYU campus.

Chen: All democracies will be strengthened by standing with Taiwan.
Rebuttal: Sounds just like Zelensky of Jukraine. She wants “all democracies” to go to war against Russia & China in defense of the “”liberal world order” — which was exactly what the N.W.O. would have unleashed by now had Killary Clinton won in 2016. Soros himself had even “warned” (threatened) so. (in 2015: here) and again in 2022: here)

***************

And that, boys and girls, is all “you guys” need to know about the true meaning of “standing with Taiwan.”

 1. Nationalist Chiang and Communist Mao put their civil war on hold to fight Japan — a war which Chiang was lured into by the western powers who later betrayed him. // 2. Chiang’s forces — denied arms by the Truman administration — eventually fled to Taiwan. After his death in 1975, CIA infiltration began the slow process of turning the conservative island into an anti-China Globalist outpost. // 3. Nationalist Xi with his buddy, Nationalist Putin. Ironically, Xi’s modern China is much more similar to Chiang’s old Taiwan than it is Mao’s old China.

The Putin Youth Are Coming..

Caption: 
School-aged children last year at an award ceremony in Vladimir, Russia.

NY Times: Putin Aims to Shape a New Generation of Supporters, Through Schools

Sweeping changes in the curriculum will soon cast the Russian president as a pivotal historical figure and mark an end of openness to the West.

Oh the horrible howls of non-lubricated butt-hurt emanating from high atop Manhattan’s Marxist Mendacity Machine! Not only has (((their crowd))) lost the opportunity to mind-rape the youth of Russia like they have been doing in “the free world” — but Vlad the Bad & friends are now doing a bit of benevolent brainwashing themselves instead!

From the article:

“Starting in first grade, students across Russia will soon sit through weekly classes featuring war movies and virtual tours through Crimea. They will be given a steady dose of lectures on topics like “the geopolitical situation” and “traditional values.” In addition to a regular flag-raising ceremony, they will be introduced to lessons celebrating Russia’s “rebirth” under President Vladimir V. Putin.

And, according to legislation signed into law by Mr. Putin on Thursday, all Russian children will be encouraged to join a new patriotic youth movement in the likeness of the Soviet Union’s red-cravatted “Pioneers” — presided over by the president himself.”

Oy vey! Vlad the Bad is busting out his own version of the Hitler youth!

A properly instructed youth will not be morally conquered so easily when they grow older.

Notwithstanding the deeply embedded historical errors surrounding Russia’s “heroic” resistance against Napoleon and Hitler — both of whom had multi-national wars imposed upon them by “the usual suspects” — this is the sort of patriotic, social and moral indoctrination that our misguided youth so desperately need. Let us analyze a few excerpts from the story:

Times: As the war in Ukraine approaches the five-month mark, the vast ambitions of Putin’s plans for the home front are coming into focus: a wholesale reprogramming of Russian society to end 30 years of openness to the West.
Analysis: The necessary and proper military action in Ukraine gave Putin the opening he needed to smoke out the libtarded “scum and traitors” (his actual words) of Russia and “reprogram” society with strong doses of truth and decency.

Times: The Kremlin has already jailed or forced into exile just about all activists speaking out against the war; it has criminalized what remained of Russia’s independent journalism; it has cracked down on academics, bloggers and even a hockey player with suspect loyalties.
Analysis: Good! These traitors should be thankful they weren’t publicly flogged and then hanged in Red Square.

Times: But nowhere are these ambitions clearer than in the Kremlin’s race to overhaul how children are taught at Russia’s 40,000 public schools.
Analysis: The hand that rocks the cradle rules the future. In this case, the cradle is in the hands of the good guys.

Times: The nationwide education initiatives, which start in September, are part of the Russian government’s scramble to indoctrinate children with Mr. Putin’s militarized and anti-Western version of patriotism.
Analysis: The Slimes didn’t complain about “indoctrination” when NGO-engineered Russian school books containing Globalist propaganda and even chapters on US history and presidents started popping up during the Yeltsin years.

Times: A ninth-grader, Irina, said that a computer class in Moscow was replaced by the viewing of a state television report on Ukrainians surrendering to Russian troops and a lecture explaining that only information from official Russian sources was to be trusted.
Analysis: The Slimes dug up a little Russian traitoress named Irina– probably coached by her bitch of a mother (assuming these people even exist) — and interviewed her by phone (supposedly).

Times: She soon noticed a transformation among some friends who had been initially scared or confused by the war. “They suddenly started repeating everything after the television.”
Analysis: Repeating the TV News is suddenly bad? Idiotic Irina sounds like one of them “conspiracy theorists” now.

Times: Irina said in a phone interview alongside her mother, “They suddenly started saying that this is all deserved, that this had to happen. They couldn’t even attempt to explain this to me.”
Analysis: Allow me. It’s very simple, Irina. You see, the CIA/Mossad puppets based in Kiev have been oppressing the Russians in the east for years while threatening to extend the reach of the violent NATO war machine 800 miles closer to the heart of Russia itself. Putin ain’t putin (pun intended) up with it — nor should he. Understand?

Times: Irina said that when she challenged her friends about Russian war crimes, they shot back: “It’s all propaganda.”
Analysis: Irina’s friends are correct. The brainwashed one is Irina.

Times: Irina’s parents, driven in part by their refusal to raise their children in an increasingly militarized environment, left for Poland this spring.
Analysis: Ah… so the red rats abandoned Russia! They are indeed traitors after all. Good riddance — filthy scum pigs. Wonder if this alleged family is actually even “Russian,” — know what I’m sayin’?

Times: In the city of Pskov near the Estonian border, Irina Milyutina (an English teacher) said that the children at her school scrawled Z’s and V’s — symbols of support for the war — on chalkboards, desks and even the floors. At recess, fifth and sixth graders pretended to be Russian soldiers.
Analysis: The libtard traitor teachers have lost their students. Hopefully, they’ll soon lose their jobs.

Times: A proposed decree published by the education ministry shows that Mr. Putin’s two decades in power are set to be enshrined in the standard curriculum as a historical turning point. The decree says that Russian history classes will be required to include several new topics like “the rebirth of Russia as a great power in the 21st century,” “reunification with Crimea,” and “the special military operation in Ukraine.”
Analysis: In other words, everything that yours truly wrote in “The War Against Putin” is about to be taught to millions and millions of Russian kids. Take that, Globalists!

Napoleon — Hitler — Putin. They all fought the same war against the same unseen enemy. Has Vlad the Bad finally succeeded where the others fell short?

Handling International Crises: From JFK to Biden

Since Biden appointed the chief architect of the Ukraine coup, Victoria Nuland, to be the third top official at the State Department, one cannot realistically expect a change in policy from this administration.

There are significant parallels between the international crises in Cuba in 1962 and Ukraine today. Both involved intense confrontations between the USA and the Soviet Union or Russia. Both involved third-party countries on the doorstep of a major power. The Cuban Missile Crisis threatened to lead to WW3, just as the Ukraine crisis does today.

Cuban Missile Crisis and  the current crisis in Ukraine 

In 1961, the US supported the “Bay of Pigs” invasion of Cuba. Although it failed, Washington’s hostile rhetoric and threats against Cuba continued, and the CIA conducted many failed assassination attempts against Cuban leader Fidel Castro.

Cuba, seeking to defend itself, or at least have a means of retaliating in case of another attack, sought missiles from the Soviet Union. The Soviets agreed and began secretly installing the missiles. As a sovereign nation having been attacked and under continuing threat, Cuba had the right to obtain these missiles.

US President John F. Kennedy thought otherwise. Invoking the Monroe Doctrine, he said the missiles endangered the US and must be removed. He imposed an air and sea quarantine on Cuba and threatened to destroy a Soviet ship traveling on the high seas to Cuba. The world was on edge, and there was global fear that World War 3 was about to erupt. In my homeland Canada, we went to bed seriously worried that nuclear war would break out overnight.

Fortunately for humanity, cooler heads prevailed, and there were negotiations. The Soviets agreed to withdraw the missiles in Cuba. In return, JFK agreed to withdraw US missiles in Turkey aimed at the Soviet Union. The Cubans were furious, thinking they had been betrayed and lost their means of defense. But the Soviets had the bigger picture in mind, along with a US commitment to not invade Cuba.

The situation now in Ukraine has similarities. Instead of missiles in Cuba being a threat to the US, NATO in Ukraine is seen as a threat to Russia. NATO has steadily expanded east and installed missiles in Poland and Romania. Since 2008, Russia has explicitly said that Ukrainian militarization by NATO was a red line for them. Kiev is much closer to Moscow than Havana is to Washington. If it was justifiable for JFK to give the ultimatum regarding missiles in Cuba, is it not justifiable for Russia to object to Ukraine being a part of a hostile military alliance?

How Both Putin and Biden Bungled in Ukraine

Different Responses

In 1962, the US and the Soviet Union realized that escalating tensions and hostilities must be avoided, and they turned to negotiations. They found a mutually acceptable compromise.

The situation seems more dangerous today. Instead of seeking an end to the war, the US and NATO are pouring in weapons and encouraging more bloodshed. It appears to be a proxy war with the US prepared to fight to the last Ukrainian. There are calls to escalate the conflict.

Ukraine Background 

Knowing the background to the current crisis is essential to understanding Putin’s actions. Unknown to most Americans, a crucial event took place in 2014 when a violent US-supported coup overthrew the democratically elected Ukrainian government. US State Department official Victoria Nuland handed out cookies as Senator John McCain encouraged the anti-government protesters. In a secretly captured conversation with the US Ambassador to Ukraine, Nuland selected who would run the government after the pending coup. In the final days, opposition snipers killed 100 people on both sides to inflame the situation and “midwife” the coup. Oliver Stone’s video “Ukraine on Fire” describes the background and events.

On the first day in power, the coup government issued a decree that removed Russian as a state language.

Within weeks, Crimea organized a referendum. With 85% participation, 96% voted to leave Ukraine and reunite with Russia. Why did they do this? Because most Crimeans speak Russian as their first language, and Crimea had been part of Russia since 1783. When Soviet premier Khrushchev transferred Crimea from the Russian republic to the Ukrainian republic in 1954, they were all within the Soviet Union.

In Odessa, anti-coup protesters were attacked by ultra-nationalist thugs who killed 48, including many burned alive as they sought refuge in the Trade Unions Hall. In eastern Ukraine, known as the Donbass, the majority of the population also opposed the ultra-nationalist coup government. Civil war broke out, with thousands killed.

With the participation of France, Germany, the Kiev government, and eastern Ukraine rebels, an agreement was reached and approved by the United Nations Security Council. It was called the Minsk Agreement. Russia has repeatedly encouraged the implementation of this agreement. Instead of negotiations and peace, the Kiev government and NATO have done the opposite. Since 2015, there have been more weapons, more threats, more NATO training, more encouragement of ultra-nationalism plus NATO military exercises explicitly designed to threaten and antagonize Russia. This is not speculation; it is described in a 2019 Rand report about “Overextending and Unbalancing Russia.”

Endangering the world

The Biden administration appears to want to prolong the conflict in Ukraine. President Biden declared in a “gaffe” that Putin must be replaced. Defense Secretary Austin has said the US goal is to “weaken Russia”. Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton thinks Afghanistan in the 1980s is a “model” to follow in Ukraine by bogging Russia down in a protracted war. Republican and Democratic senators Graham and Blumenthal visited Kiev on July 7 and called for sending even more weapons. There is evidence that the US and UK have been advising Ukrainian president Zelensky to NOT negotiate.

The Need for Courage and Compromise

With war and bloodshed happening now, we need cooler heads to prevail as in 1962. We can have a LOSE – LOSE situation, endangering the whole world, or a compromise that guarantees Ukrainian independence while providing security assurances to Russia.

JFK had the courage and wisdom to resist the CIA and military generals who wanted to escalate the crisis. Does Joe Biden? There is a huge difference between the two presidents. JFK knew war first hand. He was injured and his brother died in WW2. He became an advocate for peace. It may have cost him his life, but millions of people were saved. In contrast, Joe Biden has been a proponent of every US war of the past three decades.  Not only that, he was a major player in the 2014 Ukraine coup and aftermath.

Since Biden appointed the chief architect of the Ukraine coup, Victoria Nuland, to be the third top official at the State Department, one cannot realistically expect a change in policy from this administration. Neo-cons are in charge.

If we are to avoid disaster, others must speak up and demand negotiations and settlement before the situation spirals out of control.

Ukrainian Cancel Culture Goes Full…

A street named after the classical composer Tchaikovsky in Lviv, Ukraine.

JUNE 24, 2022


NY Times: Goodbye, Tchaikovsky and Tolstoy: Ukrainians Look To ‘Decolonize’ Their Streets.

by M. King,

The madness of the bought & paid-for leaders of this CIA-created Satanic farce of a “nation” that calls itself “Ukraine” has, evidently, urinated down upon local governments and a broad element of the population itself. The invented mythology holds that the REGION historically referred to as “the Ukraine” has always been a distinct ethnicity and identity “suppressed” by the “cultural colonizing” Russians. The Times article sympathetically describes the latest “cancel culture” insanity to come out of this pathetic “nation.” —

“Far from Ukraine’s embattled eastern front, a new struggle is being waged — not from the trenches, but over leafy side streets and broad avenues. That is where the enemy goes by the name Pavlov. Or Tchaikovsky. Or Catherine the Great.

Across Ukraine, streets and subway stops whose names evoke the history of the Russian Empire or the Soviet Union are under scrutiny by a population eager to rid itself of traces of the nation that invaded in late February.

“We are defending our country, also on the cultural front lines,” said Andriy Moskalenko, the deputy mayor of Lviv and the head of a committee that has reviewed the names of each of the city’s more than 1,000 streets. “And we don’t want to have anything in common with the killers.”

“When we rename a street, it doesn’t mean we are saying: ‘This person didn’t make this invention, or was not important,’” said Mr. Moskalenko, the deputy mayor of Lviv. “It means this person’s work has been used as a tool of colonization.”

Shit! One has to wonder how many of these Russia-hating Ukrainians are actually “Ukrainians”

Russian novelist Tolstoy: cancelled // Russian composer 
Tchaikovsky: cancelled // Russian scientist / 
physiologist
 Pavlov: cancelled

THE Ukraine is a REGION — like say, THE Ohio Valley, or THE Caucasus, THE Florida Everglades, or THE French Riviera, or THE Donbas etc. The “nationalist” script writers canceled the grammatical article “the” so as to transform this 1200-year-old REGION (The Ukraine) of Russia into a proper, though fake, nation (Ukraine). The historical reality of the matter is that the massive federation of 800s Kievan Rus is the historical, ethnic, linguistic Viking ancestor entity of BelarusRussia, and “Ukraine.” The Mongols took control in the 1200s, and when their grip was finally broken some 200 years later, the center of power and influence emerged in Moscow, though Kiev always remained an important part of the Russian Empire.

Thus, from the early days of Kievan Rus, down through the centuries of the Tsars, and for most of the 20th Century as part of the Soviet Union, the Ukraine was nothing more than a region — with its westernmost inhabitants speaking a bastardized dialect of Russian, and the now oppressed easterners never deviating at all from their Russianity. Ukraine’s western distance from the Russian center and its slight cultural differences gave the “usual suspects” an opening to use “nationalism” to play their usual divide and conquer scheme — very similar to the fake-ass Bavarian Nationalism movement which (((they))) juiced up in an effort to further splinter Germany after World War I.

Given the recent history of Ukraine I would like to suggest some new street names to replace the old ones being removed – names which better reflect the true “heritage” of this modern day fake state.

  • Soros Street
  • Brzezinski Parkway
  • Nuland Drive
  • Bush Road
  • Obongo Square
  • McCain Highway
  • Clinton Court
  • Biden Boulevard
  • CIA Circle
  • Mossad Park
  • Tel Aviv Terrace
  • NATO Avenue
  • MI6 Alley

Without those Globalist entities and individuals, Ukrainian “Nationalism” wouldn’t even exist today. So it is they that the Ukrainians should be “honoring” – instead of some obscure “Ukrainian” poet not worthy to carry Tolstoy’s pen, or some unheard-of composer not fit to tune Tchaikovsky’s piano.

1. The vile John McStain in Kiev (2013) — stirring up a violent coup. (I thought he couldn’t lift his arms due to a Vietnam war injury?? // 2. Victoria Nuland-Kagan (cough cough) shows off her newly-installed Ukraine puppet criminals (2014). // 3. Vice President Biden (when he still had pearly white teeth implants) with puppet Poroshenko.

Economic World War: Who Benefits And How Much Time Is Left?

I have been warning about an inevitable East vs. West economic war for many years now. The question was never a matter of likelihood, it was always just a matter of timing. When would the most convenient time be for World War III?

The issue of “convenience” might sound odd, but I want readers to remember one rule: All wars are banker wars.

economic world war who benefits and how much time is left?

There is nothing you cannot eventually understand in terms of geopolitics as long as you accept the fact that international conflicts are generally engineered and always designed to benefit a particular group of establishment power brokers and financial elites.

If you are one of those people who assume all of these events are merely “random and unfortunate coincidence” then you’ll remain in the dark for the rest of your life – and will never grasp why terrible things are happening to you as the world falls apart.

You will go to an early grave because you were unprepared while still thinking you were the smartest person in the room.

In the article Order out of Chaos: How the Ukraine Conflict Is Designed to Benefit Globalists, Is outlined the many factors that tie the Kremlin to globalist institutions like the World Economic Forum (WEF), the Bank of International Settlements (BIS), the International Monetary Fund (IMF), elitists like Henry Kissinger and international banks like Goldman Sachs. The reality is, Russia has long been attached to globalist interests and this is not going to change because of the war in Ukraine, just as it did not change after Russia annexed Crimea.

China is, of course, even worse when it comes to collusion with globalist institutions. The nation accrued trillions of dollars in debt because this is a prerequisite for joining the IMF’s Special Drawing Rights (SDR) basket of currencies. Yes, China went from being a nation of minimal debt to being trillions in the red just because the IMF demands “liquidity” for a nation’s currency to be considered viable for their global centralization initiative. This is not the behavior of a country that is anti-globalist.

I’m not going to continue rehashing the facts surrounding eastern nations and their attachments to the globalists here. I’ve already done that for well over a decade and frankly I grow tired of having to rehash the lessons that brilliant researchers like Antony Sutton expertly addressed back before I was born. If there’s a major war, then there are globalists behind it influencing both sides and seeking to gain more power. If you haven’t figured this out by now, then you never will.

Here’s What War Is Good For

Why engineer a war? Simple – when you play both sides of a chess game, you always end up the winner. Beyond that, chaos is the ultimate recipe for advancing draconian agendas that the public would never allow to pass during peacetime.

What I want to examine here instead is the issue of timing and development; how is this massive economic war going to play out and how long will it take to happen? Once we understand the stages, maybe we can brace for impact and take actions to change the outcome.

The first step is to acknowledge that the ball is in the court of eastern nations and that their actions will dictate the pace of events.

The Economic Lesson The West Has Forgotten

True wealth has nothing to do with money or debt creation; true wealth comes from resources, the means of production and labor. This is something the Marxists actually got right in their philosophy; the problem is that Marxists are only interested in ways to steal labor, resources and production while making the public think that such theft is a good thing.

Eastern nations continue to understand what real wealth is. You can have all the money in the world but if you have no manufacturing base or resource development then you have nothing.

It’s as simple as that.

If a nation has no real wealth and no means of creating it, no printing press is going to save its economy.

The West has abandoned much of its means of production and has crippled the exploration of its own resources through fake environmental concerns like “carbon pollution.” The East has not done this, at least not in a way that affects long term productivity. Therefore, the East is in the strongest position to survive a global economic conflict.

But the real key to the progression of an economic world war is the combination of countries involved and their trade agreements.

Russia and China, for example, have been developing bilateral trade meant to cut out the U.S. dollar for many years now. Russia is resource-rich, and China has the world’s largest manufacturing and export base. An alliance makes perfect economic sense. And this is exactly what has happened.

Only weeks before the invasion of Ukraine, Russia signed a 30-year oil and gas contract with China worth hundreds of billions of dollars. This deal coincides with the construction of a major pipeline from Russia to China which will be completed by 2025.

India also made arrangements for increased oil shipments from Russia, and will pay without the dollar (formerly the world’s sole petro-currency). Furthermore, the promise of lower prices while the rest of the oil world is experiencing rapid inflation in energy prices is highly tempting for those purchasing oil, natural gas or coal from Russia.

The other nations of the BRICS bloc (Brazil, India, China and South Africa) have all been highly active in trade with Russia despite western sanctions and the removal of Russian banks from the SWIFT international payments network. This is exactly what I predicted would happen many years ago.

But how does this trading bloc affect the time frame of the world war?

An Economic War Has Economic Targets

It has been my belief that the real target of this war is not Russia or China, but the U.S. dollar and the American economy. Yes, there will be far reaching financial consequences beyond the U.S., but our economy is the only economy that is completely reliant on our currency’s global reserve status.

A world war using economic weapons and tactics is the worst type of war we could fight because it is not a war we can win. The dollar’s global reserve status is our Achilles heel. It is not a strength, but a weakness.

While all eyes are on the shooting war in Ukraine on the other side of the planet, very few realize that the worst damage is going to hit us right here at home.

The sanctions on Russia are only a part of the problem, as this is creating momentum towards a general decoupling from the dollar trade. The bigger issue is the BRICS nations (and their export/import partners) who will refuse to accept sanctions because they are economically dependent on each other.

One example is the recent announcement by Hungary that they plan to refuse any cuts to Russian oil and gas imports. Why? Because this would cause an energy crisis in their country, one they couldn’t recover from.

Many other nations are following this logic around the world, and if NATO is going to continue pushing for economic isolation of Russia, then those countries will invariably stop using the dollar as their reserve currency.

Why “invariably,” you might ask – why does Russia’s economic isolation lead to the end of the dollar’s global reserve status? Here’s why: when the Biden administration and the European Union (EU) sanctioned Russia, they also froze Russia’s U.S. dollar accounts and terminated Russia’s connection with the international payments platform. This was a very clear method of coercion! It’s as though Biden called up Putin and told him, “Get out of Ukraine or else. That’s a real nice economy you got there. Be a shame if something, ah, happened to it…”

The rest of the world watched the West financially cancel Russia with a mix of awe and horror. This act of economic warfare revealed a nearly-unthinkable conclusion: If they did it to Russia, they could do it to us, too…

As Credit Suisse’s global head of interest rate strategy Zoltan Poszar told Bloomberg’s “Odd Lots” show:

…wars tend to turn into major junctures for global currencies, and with Russia losing access to its foreign currency reserves, a message has been sent to all countries that they can’t count on these money stashes to actually be theirs in the event of tension. As such, it may make less and less sense for global reserve managers to hold dollars for safety, given that they could be taken away right when they’re most needed.

Dylan Grice of Calderwood Capital put this in more stark terms:

In other words, the establishment elites in the US and Europe are creating the conditions which can destroy the dollar.

The dollar’s status is entirely dependent on faith and belief in its demand. If demand for dollars wavers because of global sanctions, then all those trillions of greenbacks held in overseas banks will come flooding back into the U.S., shoving the nation deeper into stagflationary crisis.

The globalists are perfectly aware that this will be the consequence. In fact, they’re counting on it.

We Have Eight Years To Prepare

The year 2030 is consistently mentioned by the United Nations, the IMF, the WEF and the rest of the cabal of globalist institutions as the final milestone for their Great Reset agenda.

If a global economic crisis is the catalyst as it appears to be, then several years would be required to let the collapse play out – along with the introduction of a “solution” to the problem. This means that the economic war will have to accelerate quickly going into the next year.

Today we are already seeing 40 year highs in inflation, along with considerable supply chain disruptions. Multiple globalist foundations are “predicting” food shortages around the world in the next 3-6 months. I believe the war itself will expand rapidly within a year to include China, and most of the damage will be done by the end of 2024. This will all depend on how fast exporters (mainly China) dump the dollar; the dollar dump will be the primary trigger.

A significant part of the WEF’s Great Reset agenda and the IMF’s Special Drawing Rights global digital currency initiative would require the end of the dollar as the world’s reserve currency. This is a process the globalists have been talking about openly for some time. It’s not “conspiracy theory,” it is conspiracy reality. The IMF has argued on many occasions that the global currency framework must be “managed” by a centralized entity that can prevent national governments from exploiting currency trade for their own ends, and this includes digital currencies.

The stage is already set for this narrative. The U.S. will be painted as an example of why nationalism is a “path to disaster” and why no single nation should be trusted with so much power in the form of a world reserve currency. That kind of power tempts governments not only into excessive money creation power debt-financed spending sprees. Not only to print new money to pay for those old debts, thus debasing and degrading the dollar’s purchasing power worldwide (also known as inflation). But look at what the U.S. did to Russia – freezing bank accounts and canceling credit cards of the world’s 10th largest economy. The globalists would call this an abuse of power.

Throughout history, global reserve currencies have risen and fallen. From the Greek drachma in the 5th century B.C. to the British pound sterling (1700-1931), every single one has collapsed. And the resulting implosion of a reserve currency spreads like a tsunami, wrecking economies worldwide.

Thus, it is only “logical” that a global central authority with no national loyalties be put in control of an “international” reserve currency, right? Maybe a multi-currency-based basket system, or, perhaps, a single world currency… To prevent any future tragedies and abuses of power from ever happening again. Right?

Don’t be fooled.

It’s a complete con.

World war, whether economic or kinetic, and the death of the dollar as the global reserve currency is a perfect excuse for the “perfectly rational” introduction of an international financial oligarchy.

And, unlike its predecessors, this ruling council would operate right out in the sun for everyone to see, not in the shadows deep in the bowels of central banking cartels. Their authority would be “official,” and their control established as necessary, even vital for world peace.

This is the same thing that has happened after every major war or world war; the argument is made that national sovereignty was the cause and that nation states should not exist because when people are left to organize into groups they might form differing ideas on how to live, and differing ideas cause conflict.

After World War I, they introduced the League of Nations.

After World War II, they established the UN and the IMF.

And, after economic World War III, they will try to implement a program of one world currency and global economic governance(and dominance, as well).

Globalists claim it is better for there to be no sovereigntyno groups and no differing ideas. “We need one homogeneous global collective with a single hive mind,” goes the argument, “so that no conflict ever happens.”

Of course, they get to have their own group, and that group intends to garner all the benefits of the crisis and the power that will be derived from the panic.

strongly recommend you prepare yourself, and your family, for the end of the U.S. dollar’s global reserve status. That means securing your financial future with what’s been called “money of last resort,” in other words, physical gold and silver. Physical precious metals are safe from hacking, immune to the collapse of the electrical grid and will very likely always be worth something, which is more than we can say for the vast majority of the fallen currencies. They’re a solid financial foundation to build your future on, whatever the future brings.

Take yourself off the dollar standard before the globalists do it for you – because once they come for your dollars, it will be too late.

With that warning, I leave you with a quote from globalist and Council on Foreign Relations member Richard Gardner, published in Foreign Affairs magazine in 1974, which I think drives home the reality of the people we are dealing with:

In short, the “house of world order” will have to be built from the bottom up rather than from the top down. It will look like a great “booming, buzzing confusion,” to use William James’ famous description of reality, but an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece, will accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault.

Source: BirchGold.com

‘Ministry Of Truth’ Trends On Twitter After Government Unveils New ‘Disinformation Governance Board’

On Wednesday news broke that the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) — a department that didn’t exist 20 years ago but today spends $52 billion annually — had created a new “Disinformation Governance Board.”

'ministry of truth' trends on twitter after government unveils new 'disinformation governance board'.jpg

The news comes just days after Twitter accepted Tesla-Owner Elon Musk’s offer to buy Twitter for $44 billion, a move that critics of the deal claimed could unleash disinformation. (Musk has been vocal in his support for free speech.)

DHS declined to be interviewed by the Associated Press, but issued a statement after news broke of the development.

“The spread of disinformation can affect border security, Americans’ safety during disasters, and public trust in our democratic institutions,” DHS said.

A Ministry Of Truth?

Perhaps naturally, the revelation that the government had created a new board to fight “disinformation” prompted a slew of Nineteen Eighty-Four comparisons, especially since it came so soon after Musk’s purchase of Twitter.

“Elon Musk buys Twitter to save free speech and days later President Biden announces a Ministry of Truth,” one observer quipped. “It’s like we’re living through an Ayn Rand/George Orwell novel mash-up.”

For those unfamiliar with George Orwell’s masterpiece, the Ministry of Truth is the propaganda and censorship department of Oceania, the fictional setting for Orwell’s dystopia.

Known as Minitrue in Newspeak, the name Ministry of Truth is a misnomer. Like all the departments in 1984, the name reflects the opposite of what the government actually does.

The book’s protagonist, Winston Smith, learns this in the second half of Nineteen Eighty-Four.

Even the names of the four Ministries by which we are governed exhibit a sort of impudence in their deliberate reversal of the facts. The Ministry of Peace concerns itself with war, the Ministry of Truth with lies, the Ministry of Love with torture and the Ministry of Plenty with starvation.

These contradictions are not accidental, nor do they result from ordinary hypocrisy; they are deliberate exercises in doublethink. For it is only by reconciling contradictions that power can be retained indefinitely.

Smith, who works at the Ministry of Truth, realizes the Ministry of Truth is not the least bit interested in truth. Its use of propaganda is overt, as is its use of banal slogans designed to confuse and humiliate the people of Oceania.

On the exterior of the Ministry of Truth building are three party slogans:

WAR IS PEACE,” “FREEDOM IS SLAVERY,” and “IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH.”

Inside the structure, problematic documents are incinerated, dropped down a Memory Hole where they are conveniently forgotten.

1984: ‘Based Chiefly On Communism’

One might be tempted to laugh off comparisons between a “Disinformation Governance Board” and the propaganda department in Orwell’s classic work. After all, we’re talking about a novel.

This would be mistaken, however.

For starters, Nineteen Eighty-Four is indeed a fictional work. But it was inspired by the authoritarian regimes and ideologies Orwell witnessed firsthand. A one-time socialist who observed the fighting in the Spanish Civil War — a conflict between fascists and communists — Orwell became a budding libertarian who became disillusioned with collectivism.

In fact, Orwell makes it clear that Nineteen Eighty-Four was inspired by communism.

“[Nineteen Eighty-Four] was based chiefly on communism, because that is the dominant form of totalitarianism,” he told Sidney Sheldon, who purchased the stage rights to the book; “but I was trying chiefly to imagine what communism would be like if it were firmly rooted in the English speaking countries, and was no longer a mere extension of the Russian Foreign Office.”

Stalin’s regime was not the only totalitarian regime to utilize propaganda and censorship, of course. Joseph Goebbels, the chief propagandist for the Nazi Party, is perhaps the single most infamous wielder of propaganda in human history. And of course the Nazis were infamous for their book burning.

The Chinese Communist Party uses propaganda and censorship to such great effect today that scholars say it’s difficult to even know what’s actually happened in the country over the last century.

“At a time when censorship is a part of everyday experience of the Chinese people, even few historians actually know all the history of the party,” historian Sun Peidong recently told The Guardian. “It’s hard to get hold of party history materials as a history researcher nowadays. It’s even harder to know what the past 100 years has really been about.”

This is why Americans should be concerned that the US government — nearly two and a half centuries after it was founded — is suddenly in the business of rooting out “disinformation.”

Humans will always disagree over what is true. Descartes’ first principle — “cogito, ergo sum” posited that the only thing we can know with total certainty is “I think, therefore I am.”

It doesn’t take a philosopher to see that a lot of stuff one finds online is drek, so it shouldn’t surprise us that “misinformation” — in various forms and to various degrees — is rampant online.

But history shows that no one wields misinformation and propaganda with greater effectiveness — or at greatest cost — than government.

Orwell understood this. Americans would do well to heed his warning.

Source: FEE.org

Fake News Forced to Admit That Russia is Winning

What’s this about “Ukraine’s last stand?” How can that be? For weeks, Fake News had been trumpeting Russia’s disastrous campaign against the plucky Ukrainians — even calling it “Putin’s Vietnam.” Now, this sudden turn of events from Sulzberger’s Times:

“After weeks of shelling and bombings, the Russian siege of the critical Ukrainian port city of Mariupol has culminated in a last stand by a few thousand Ukrainian troops, holed up in a sprawling, smoldering steel plant that backs up to the sea. Russia had given the Ukrainian fighters in Mariupol until Sunday morning to lay down their weapons or be “eliminated.”  … Capturing Mariupol would be a major victory for Russia that could strengthen its push to command Ukraine’s east. (emphasis added)

Evidently, the “disinformation” put out by the Russian media these past 7 weeks was true after all. The big bad Rooskies have indeed been “kicking ass and taking names” all along — so much so, in fact, that even “the paper of record” is now compelled to acknowledge the reality. “Putin’s Vietnam” my ass!

While researching old archived issues of the New York Slimes from the World War II years, your original source historian here always noticed a similar pattern of spinning crushing defeat into stalemate or even victory for the ALL LIES– until circumstances rendered the lie no longer tenable. Always in justifiable preemptive self-defense, the Germans would easily roll through country after country after country. And always, the Times would hype up the heroic effectiveness of the Polish, or Norwegian, or Dutch, or Greek etc. “resistance,” and the UK-France “counterattacks.” Days later, when the Germans would occupy the Capital city, the truth of the rout would finally be reported.

It’s not clear what the motives for initially portraying a rout as a defeat are. Wishful thinking in the form of reporting? A bias toward believing the propaganda of the favored nation? A desire to prop up the illusion of a close match so that the western nations will be more apt to help the underdog? An attempt to penetrate the population of the enemy state with demoralizing news? A combination of all these factors?

Though we can’t define the motives with 100% certainty; the historical pattern of depicting the defeat of the preferred state as a close match or even victory is well established, as the rebutted Times’ WW 2 headlines below indicate:

The day-to-day reporting throughout all of World War followed that same pattern of optimistic deception — until, of course, the tide truly started to turn against Germany in 1943. When (not “if”) Mariupol is completely liberated, the end of Putin’s targeted military operation (we hesitate to call it a “war”) will be near. Then all of the idiot libtards can pull their stupid yellow & blue flags down (there are 5 such homes along the route that I often drive to get to the local stores) and maybe put those “Thank You Healthcare Heroes” signs back up in honor of the BA.2 “variant” currently making its way through the malleable minds of the overlapping kingdoms of Normiedom & Libtardia.

The string of “causes” never ends for these juvenile junkies.

Did A Fragment Of The ‘True Cross’ Of Christ Just Sink With Russia’s Destroyed Warship?

Was the recently sunk Russian flagship, The Moskva , carrying a fragment of the ‘true cross’ of Christ?

did a fragment of the 'true cross' of christ just sink with russia’s destroyed warship?

The Moskva was Russia’s Black Sea fleet flagship. The warcraft sank last Thursday after an onboard explosion. In 2020, Russian state media reported that the ship was due to take a holy relic onboard.

Now, the question is being asked whether she sank with or without the piece of wood believed to have been a fragment from the cross of the crucified Christ.

A Lot Of Wood For One Cross

It has to be said from the top of this article that if all the fragments of the true cross were gathered together from museums, cathedrals and churches one would have enough wood to build a replica of Noah’s ark.

That said, great religious and cultural significance has been projected into the tiny piece of wood that is believed to have sunk on Thursday onboard the doomed Russian warship.

The Moskva was a Russian missile cruiser. She was heralded as the flagship of Russia’s Black Sea fleet. Nevertheless, Russian state media reported that it sank on Thursday following an explosion onboard. The association with the holy relic comes after the Russian Orthodox Church announced back in February 2020 that the relic had been delivered to the then-commander of the Black Sea fleet, Vice Admiral Igor Osipov. The state-run Tass news agency reported at the time that the piece of ‘true cross’ was being stored at the fleet’s headquarters before the planned delivery to the ship.

Questioning The Fate Of The True Cross Fragment

The fragment of wood believed to have originated from the crucifixion cross of Jesus Christ measures only around 5 millimetres long. Tass reported that it was embedded in a 19th-century metal cross kept in a reliquary in Russia.

Across the globe many churches and cathedrals claim to possess tiny pieces of wood believed to be fragments from the True Cross, but this ranks as one of the smallest.

Roman Catholic and Orthodox followers generally never doubt the authenticity of these magical, or miraculous, pieces of wood, and regard them ‘all’ as genuine pieces of the cross of Christ.

On the other hand, Protestants most often dispute the claimed holy relics believing the whole concept is nothing more than idolatry.

one of many ‘true cross’ relics

One of many ‘true cross’ relics (Lawrence OP / CC by SA 3.0 )

All of the claimed holy fragments have their origins in the writings of Historian Socrates of Constantinople who said Empress Helena travelled to the Holy Land in 326–328 AD, where she discovered the hiding place of three crosses. While two were associated with the crucifixion of the two thieves, St. Dismas and Gestas, the third bore the name of Jesus.

According to Fox 5 News the Moskva had the capacity to carry 16 long-range cruise missiles which could have had devastating effects on Ukrainian cities. Reports say the warship’s sinking ‘reduces Russia’s firepower in the Black Sea.’ It is not yet determined whether or not Ukrainian forces sank the Moskva , but if they did it represents the largest warship to be sunk in combat since the Falklands War, according to Fox. So why then was a sacred relic transferred onto a Russian warship?

The Moskva battleship had a small chapel onboard, said Sergiy Khalyuta, archpriest of the Russian Orthodox Church’s Sevastopol District. He told Tass that the holy relic was transferred at the request of its owner, who is an anonymous collector. Business Insider investigated the transference of the cross but they were unable to determine if it was onboard the Moskva at the time the vessel sank.

French Journalist Who Returned From Ukraine: Americans Are ‘In Charge’ Of The War

A French journalist who returned from Ukraine after arriving with volunteer fighters told broadcaster CNews that Americans are directly “in charge” of the war on the ground.

french journalist who returned from ukraine americans are 'in charge' of the war

The assertion was made by Le Figaro senior international correspondent Georges Malbrunot. Malbrunot said he had accompanied French volunteer fighters, two of whom had previously fought against ISIS.

“I had the surprise, and so did they, to discover that to be able to enter the Ukrainian army, well it’s the Americans who are in charge,” said Malbrunot.

Adding that he and the volunteers “almost got arrested” by the Americans, who asserted they were in charge, the journalist then revealed that they were forced to sign a contract “until the end of the war.”

“And who is in charge? It’s the Americans, I saw it with my own eyes,” said Malbrunot, adding, “I thought I was with the international brigades, and I found myself facing the Pentagon.”

Malbrunot also mentioned America providing Ukraine with switchblade suicide drones, something highlighted by Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin in a tweet that revealed Ukrainian soldiers were being trained to use the devices in Biloxi, Mississippi.

Citing a French intelligence source, Malbrunot also tweeted that British SAS units “have been present in Ukraine since the beginning of the war, as did the American Deltas.”

Russia is apparently well aware of the “secret war” being waged in Ukraine by foreign commandos who have been in the region since February.

sas ukraine 2

Both the United States and the UK have publicly asserted that there won’t be “boots on the ground” in Ukraine, but apparently there has been a US-UK military presence since the start of the war.

“Polls showed in the run up to the war the overwhelming majority of Americans wanted our government to stay out of it but our leaders know best and are more than happy to risk World War III in defense of Ukraine’s puppet regime,” writes Chris Menahan.

Reference: Summit.news