Commies Helping Students Spot “Misinformation”

More than 350,000 Communist teachers are working hard to “debunk” the “Digital Army” of Truthers.

Times Caption: Paul Blakesley has spent years teaching high school students in Colorado how to identify bias and misinformation.

SEPTEMBER 13, 2022

NY Times:
 When Teens Find Misinformation, These Teachers Are Ready


Media literacy efforts are intensifying, targeting students as they approach voting age.

Here’s a story about a well-organized and well-funded nationwide movement of “educators” dedicated to training their captive kiddies in the art of detecting “misinformation” online. Well it’s about time that critical thinking and logic were taught to students!

From the article:

“Between lessons about the Revolutionary War and the functions of Congress, juniors in several history and U.S. government classes at Palmer High School in Colorado Springs are taught to defend themselves against disinformation.

The students, many of them on the cusp of voting age, spend up to two weeks each fall exploring how falsehoods, prejudices and opinions can lurk in the many places they get information.”(emphasis added)

Sounds good, but do “you guys” smell a Red rat here? Sugar the late great Conspiracy Cat sure does. Let’s subject this piece to a bit of critical analysis of our own, shall we?

Oh Yeah! Shut it down! 

Times: Students learn to trace the origins of documents, to validate a website by leaving it to consult other sources ….
Translation: In other words, when students discover an inconvenient truth online, they’re made to “fact check” ™ the information at a more “respectable” source — like Reuters, AP, or Yahoo.

Times: … and to train a critical eye on the claims made by TikTok influencers and on YouTube videos.
Translation: “Now students. Do not believe anything those crazy ‘conspiracy theorists have to say.”

Times: “With students and adults alike, it’s just easy to look at stuff on social media and take it as it is and not question it,” said Paul Blakesley,
Analysis: That is true. There is plenty of garbage online — including some coming from our own lesser brethren on the right. The question is: who are your “trusted sources,” Mr. Blakesley? Just the fact that the deceitful, duplicitous, devious, demonic “paper of record” is pimping you is sufficient evidence to indict YOU as a misinformation agent yourself. Project much?

Times: Children and teenagers are not the only ones susceptible to misinformation: Several studies suggest …
Analysis: “Studies suggest” — Whenever you spot that rhetorical lead-in term, there is no need to even finish the sentence. It simply means that the Fake Journalist has dug up a bought-off Fake “Scholar” to enhance and amplify the Marxist mendacity.

Times: But with young people spending more time online, where misleading and false narratives swirl ….
Analysis: “Misleading and false narratives,” eh? And what does Sulzberger’s Slimes publish every day? Truth?

Times: … around the upcoming midterm elections, the Covid-19 pandemic and other topics …
Analysis: The coming Red Wave and the deterioration of the Stupid-19 lie have really got “the usual suspects” worried.

Times: Educators are increasingly trying to offer protection.
Analysis: That’s very noble of them. (rolling eyes)

The “protection” is actually code language —- as in “protection” of the Global Crime Syndicate. Get it?

Who is “fact checking” the “fact checkers”  which the “educators” are directing students too?

Times: At Palmer High School, Mr. Blakesley tries to demonstrate how to distinguish between good information and bad: ….When is it appropriate to turn to Wikipedia?
Analysis: Wikipedia, eh? Wiki can indeed be used as a valuable source for acquiring verifiable raw data on a subject. But on political matters, it is notoriously libtarded — perfectly suited for “educators.”

Times: Alarmed by the surge of misinformation online, ….
Analysis: What they are really “alarmed by” are the successful efforts of the growing army of digital truthers.

Times: … several educational groups representing more than 350,000 teachers created an alliance… the National Association for Media Literacy Education, said its own membership had more than doubled in the past five years.
Analysis: “More than 350,000” Communist teachers (and growing) are working hard to “debunk” the “Digital Army” of Truthers.

Times: Five states, including Colorado, passed language since early 2020 that required education departments to take steps such as providing …. literacy education
Analysis: The First Amendment of the Bill of Rights — generally applied to State as well as Federal institutions — bars governments from overtly censoring political speech. But by requiring schools to manipulatively teach selective “debunking” skills to curious students, the state is essentially achieving exactly that.

Times: Researchers at Stanford University asked 3,446 high school students to evaluate content. They did not do well. In one example, a website claimed to offer facts about climate science, but was actually tied to the fossil fuel industry. It duped nearly 97 percent of the students.
Analysis: There it is! Questioning the Climate Con means that you have been “duped.” What’s ironic here is that these “Stanford researchers” are oblivious to their own fallacious logic. Discrediting the information from a website just because it is “tied to the fossil fuel industry” represents a classic example of “The Appeal to Motive Fallacy.” These shameless charlatans aren’t teaching critical thinking. They are stifling it!

Times: Such findings suggest that many students need help learning to filter the barrage of information coming their way, said Sam Wineburg, one of the researchers, who leads the Stanford History Education Group.
Analysis: Wineburg, eh? These darn Norwegians are under every rock!

Times: He and other researchers have suggested teaching students to fact-check online information by exploring beyond the original website.
Translation: Weinberg will refer the kiddies to his buddy Goldberg’s website for the “fact-check .” That’s how these Norwegians operate.

Times: In November, a pilot program (designed with) the American Federation of Teachers will be piloted in Cleveland, helping in part to train educators to teach media and information literacy.
Analysis: The American Federation of Teachers is involved in this?! Yikes. That’s the Communist Union headed by the infamous Norwegian Communist lesbian, Randi Weingarten.

Times: New educational efforts are constantly being deployed. Twitter and Google have so-called pre-bunking initiatives to warn users about common misinformation tactics.
Analysis: “Pre-bunking” —- In other words, censorship via prejudicial branding instead of overt banning. These Marxists are always thinking while we’re sleeping.

Times: The nonprofit News Literacy Project, which said the number of students using its free Checkology curriculum surged 248 percent between 2018 and 2022.
Analysis: Let me see what I can find out about this News Literacy Project and its “Checkology curriculum.” Be right back…….

Ok. back. As I suspected, NLP is loaded up with pinko personnel from the usual cast of characters — Ford Foundation, National Public Radio, Corporate America, Quackademia — and some more Norwegians. The good news is this: For them to have to resort to this vast scheme proves that the digital army has got them peein’ in their pink panties.

They’re after the children, folks. Keep your kids out of public schools if you can.

1. Stanford’s Sam Wineburg did a “study.” // 2. The Big Tech commies are involved in this effort too. // 3. Communist lesbian teacher union boss Randi Weingarten (right) and her “spouse” — the “Rabbi ” Sharon Kleinbaum. Nice to know these greasy characters are “protecting” the children from “misinformation.”
NLP’s “Checkology” teaches kids “how to think” by branding truth as “misinformation.”

CA School District Textbook Claims There Are EIGHT Genders

Schools in California are teaching children that there are not just two genders, but that there are eight or nine, according to a report highlighting the claims made in a textbook.

ca school district textbook claims there are eight genders

Fox News Digital Screenshot

Fox News reports that the textbook titled “Comprehensive Health Skills for High School,” which also makes reference to ten sexual preferences, was ordered by the Newport-Mesa Unified School District.

The different ‘genders’ that the book lists include agender, androgynous, bigender, cisgender, gender fluid, gender non-conforming and gender questioning.

The book also lists sexual preferences as hetero, homo, and bisexual as well as androsexual, polysexual, skoliosexual, demisexual, pansexual, gynesexual, and asexual.

health skills text

Fox News Digital Screenshot

Responding to the findings, one mother of a child in the district, who is also a credentialed school psychologist, charged that the education system with sexualizing children.

“We are placing them in a situation where they think that this is safe, that this is healthy, this is how we show love,” Alicia Beget said, adding “And so they are being exploited by very evil people.”

“This is part of a larger agenda that those at the very top are well aware of what they’re doing,” she further asserted.

The report also notes that the same school district uses the so called ‘genderbread person’ project to push transgender ‘education’ on children.

The same school district also made headlines last year when a teacher posted a TikTok video admitting that she encouraged children to pledge allegiance to a gay pride flag after she removed the American flag from her classroom.

Newport-Mesa Unified School District responded to the report, stating “We follow the state-adopted standards for health education, which includes sexual health. We use a state-approved health curriculum with select modules, taught by credentialed teachers.”

The statement continued, “Parents can opt out their child from participating in comprehensive sex education. Parents also have the ability to review all curriculum taught in our schools so that they can be well-informed and make the best decisions for their child. We understand that there are varying viewpoints and beliefs and we follow California State Standards for curriculum, while also supporting parent choice.”

Parents Outraged About Explicitly Anti-White Racism And Pedophilia In School Curriculum

As parents around the country increasingly become fed up with left-wing hacks running school boards, more are beginning to take action against board members who refuse to listen to reason and respond to concerns.

parents outraged about explicitly anti white crt curriculum

In particular, parents are outraged at the adoption of an explicitly anti-white critical race theory curriculum, ridiculous and pointless COVID masking, tyrannical mandates and the inclusion of sexually inappropriate books and materials in school libraries that includes illegal acts of pedophilia.

In fact, parents and activists have just served members of the Scottsdale (Arizona) Unified School District with surety bonds totaling $1 million (that is, 10 parents have filed bonds of $100,000 each, totaling $1 million for each board member) as they move to get rid of several policies.

Watch:

As Citizen Free Press noted:

Leigh Dundas and Miki Klann speak to the Scottsdale Unified School District in Arizona. During the meeting, Miki declares her intention to file a claim against the Governor’s surety bond on behalf of the SUSD board members. Each member of the board will be charged with practicing medicine without a license, child abuse, segregation and inappropriate sexual material in the school libraries.

Miki served each board member with 10 letters of intent by 10 different parents. Each claim carries a liability of up to 100K – this means each board member carries a total liability of $1 million in the event that the claims are filed. Now the board members have 5 days to rectify the situation or the parents of SUSD will file the claim.

In order to resolve the problem, the board members must:

– Remove all mask mandates and recommendations

– Remove all “experimental treatment” clinics and recommendations

– Discontinue the Critical Race Theory and GLSNEN.org agendas

– Remove all inappropriate sexual material from the libraries

– Former board president Jann-Michael Greenberg must resign

In addition to inappropriate content, behaviors, and mandates, the SUSD board has had its problems in the past.

For instance, in November the board met in emergency session and voted 4-1 to remove Greenberg from his post following reports that he distributed “dossiers” on parents who were showing up at board meetings and voicing opposition to its left-wing policies.

The board voted to elect Patty Beckman as interim president. The ‘dossiers’ included photographs and personal financial information on some parents, US News reported.

“We do not have all the facts at this time. To make a decision without those facts that’s in the best interest of the district is simply not possible,” Greenburg said. “I strongly support the investigations that have been announced both publicly and privately.”

“When I first saw the contents of the Google Drive and I saw my 8- and 10-year-old’s photos, that was terrifying. And like, what’s he doing?” mother Amanda Wray told AZFamily.com.

“But he has pictures of my vacation home, property records. I’m not a political opponent, I’m an involved parent and that is threatening to me and it makes me wonder why and what he was planning to do with those photos,” she continued, adding she was “disgusted” by what she saw.

“I think we identified 47 people that were background checked, divorce decrees, Social Security numbers, property records, mortgages,” added Wray, who noted that the Google Drive included a number of cruel memes.

In the case of one woman, Wray said that whoever created the dossier “took her photos and superimposed it over a lynching and I can tell you, she’s distraught by this and it’s disgusting.”

She went on to say she thinks some parents are being targeted because they sought to have Greenberg recalled over the district’s manifestly stupid COVID-19 policies, according to AZ Family.

“We’re not anti-mask, we’re not anti-[jabs]. They’ve painted us that way because it fits their inflammatory narrative. We’re all for parent choice and really, transparency,” she said.

World Economic Forum Endorses ‘Insane Pro-CRT Propaganda’

world economic forum endorses 'insane pro crt propaganda'

The World Economic Forum (WEF) has come under fire for a video which initially appears as a neutral explainer on Critical Race Theory (CRT), only to quickly shift into a full-throated endorsement of the ideology.

CRT charges an entire demographic with a collective crime, uses the charge as grounds for framing individuals within that demographic of perpetrators of that crime, and then seeks to strip condemned individuals of rights, dignity, and equal protection based on that charge (h/t).

The WEF video defines CRT as a theory “first developed by US legal scholars in the 1980s” which “argues that the laws, rules and, regulations that govern society today have been shaped by the historical subordination of people of colour and that this is a driving force behind racial inequality today,” according to Breitbart.

As an example of the supposed racism embedded in every fiber of America’s institutions, the WEF points to the high number of incarcerated black males throughout the country.

“Take the US criminal justice system, for example,” it says. “While everyone is seen as equal under the law, Black Americans are imprisoned at 5 times the rate of white people.

“CRT says this disparity is a legacy of America’s racist past,” but that opponents say it “paints all white people as bigots.”

The video then positions CRT awareness as an honorable pursuit. Watch what opponent Chris Rufo described as an “Insane pro-CRT propaganda video.”

Others condemned the WEF as well (via Breitbart):

“Ah yes, the world economic forum promoting a radical departure from the current relations of power,” wrote video essayist and author Peter Coffin.

This PROVES CRT is the revolution. I’ve been wrong this whole time!” he mocked.

“Run from the WEF working class people,” warned clinical psychologist and psychology professor Dr. Jordan Peterson.

“Why would the World Economic Forum come out in support of Critical Race Theory?” asked author and mathematician Dr. James Lindsay, who warned last month that CRT activists aim to dismantle the U.S. and establish “a total dictatorship” of the so-called “anti-racists.” 

“Because they’re the ones who want to divide our society with this Marxist Theory or any other tool they can use to break the world and seize power,” he said.

Sen. Ted Cruz’s (R-TX) national security adviser tweeted “I can’t believe you’re advocating for ‘equality’ at the expense of equity” in 2022. “You’re either on board or you’re not. Be better.”

Read the rest of the comments here.

Sources: NaturalNews.comZeroHedge.com;

Complete Moral Decline: Elementary School Hosts ‘SATAN Club’ For Children With The Satanic Temple

Satanists are targeting kids as young as six years old.

Parents in Illinois were shocked to discover that their children’s school approved an event for children organised by the Satanic Temple.

elementary school hosts ‘satan club’ for children

The event, titled ‘Satan Club’ held at Jane Addams Elementary School in Moline vowed to introduce children to “a scientific, rationalist, non-superstitious worldview.”

Satan club is intended for children from grades 1-5, meaning that presumed satanists are targeting kids as young as six years old.

A flier promoting the event, posted to Facebook by one parent, noted that all involved had been “vetted” by the Satanic Temple and had passed criminal background checks.

Well, that’s comforting then.

It also notes that “the Satanic Temple is a non-theistic religion that views Satan as a mythical figure representing individual freedom,” and that the club “does not attempt to convert children to any religious ideology.”

“Hey Kids, let’s have fun at After School Satan Club!” the flier states:

Yeah, no thanks.

Former High Ranking Satanist Claims: ‘I Performed Satanic Rituals Inside Abortion Clinics’.

Among other posts prompting their rampant advocacy for abortion and Hailing Satan for 2022, the Satanic Temple is promoting the kids’ clubs:

The Illinois school provided more information, claiming that it was just renting out a space to the organisation:

Many expressed anger and disbelief that the school would allow the organisation in:

One user reminded parents to get their kids out of public “education” (i.e. indoctrination) system:

Another commented that the far left is a demonic cult:

More activities aimed at children: “let’s summon demons.”

Meanwhile, a lot of people are fine with Satanists having access to six year old kids, which made someone comment the following:

“The truly scary part about this is the comments section. It’s unbelievable how many people actually AGREE with this! Folks, we are in the end of days. Find Jesus Christ before it’s too late!”

Source: Summit.news

Communists Plea for “Academic Freedom” to Defend Critical Race Theory

Parental opposition to the mind rape which the communist scum “educators” are committing against White children is now a “threat to free speech.”

In this putrid propaganda poop-pie served up by Jennifer Schuessler — the yapping yenta deceptively defends, in an all too familiar fashion, the anti-White, anti-western, Marxist / Frankfurt School “Critical Race Theory” initiative infesting America’s schools. According to the Slimes scribblerette “culture reporter” and her commie crowd of cliche-quoting quackademics, parental opposition to the self-loathing mind rape which the communist scum “educators” are committing against defenseless White children is a “threat to free speech,” dontcha know?

From the article:

“The (anti-CRT) measures have been widely assailed by Democrats as a threat to liberal education and to the teaching of even some of the most basic facts about American history.

In a new report released Monday, the free expression group PEN America emphasizes what it says is another threat they pose: to the free speech guaranteed in the First Amendment.”

The left-wing PEN America organization which Jenny cites as some high-minded, high authority “advocacy” source actually sued Donald Trump for “press censorship” in 2018. You see, any challenge whatsoever of the Left’s lies — be it in the media, quackademia or the lower schools — is deemed by these characters to be “censorship”. This insane form of “projection” is coming from the same crowd which will reprimand or even fire any teacher who dares to question Evolution, the Climate Con, the Holohoax, the Queer agenda etc.

Picture
Slimes yenta, Jennifer Schuessler 
Picture
Picture
Note the communist raised fist on the PEN America banner.
Picture
This isn’t about “freedom of speech” or academic freedom.” It’s about the fight between the Marxists and the Americanists.  .
Picture
My Central Jersey
Picture
The Daily Signal
Picture
FOX News
Picture
WTLC 106.7
Picture
The New American
Picture
WBNS News (Ohio)
Picture
Calling the dauntless defenders of “free speech” and “academic freedom” at Sulzberger’s Slimes and PEN America….. Hello?… Hello? …. (sound of crickets)

A few paragraphs into the article we learn that the name of PEN America’s executive director is — Suzanne Nossel…… Under — Every — Rock.

More Satanic sophistry from the PEN report:

“These bills appear designed to chill academic and educational discussions and impose government dictates on teaching and learning. In short: They are educational gag orders. Taken together, the efforts amount to a sweeping crusade for content- and viewpoint-based state censorship.”

Translation: Shut up, you stupid ‘Nazi” parents! You’re children belong to us and we shall shape them in our image, not yours.

Picture
Bolshevik bitch Suzanne Nossel
Picture
self-anointed champion of “free speech” — just as long as the speech is anti-White and anti-American. 

In recent months, we have noticed more and more “mainstream conservatives” invoking the name of the late great Senator Joseph McCarthy — but not in the usual negative manner. Even our lesser “FOXtard” brethren are finally coming around to the idea that “St. Joseph of Wisconsin,” as we like to refer to him, was, well — right after all!

Boy was he ever! And the most fitting way to end today’s rebuttal to the commies’ appeal of “academic freedom” is to quote from the last pages of McCarthy’s 1952 pamphlet, “McCarthyism: The Fight for America” — in which the patriotic prophet, writing at a time when the Marxist takeover of education was not all that noticeable, rebutted their phony arguments.

McCarthy on education:

“Every man and woman in America can appoint himself or herself to undo the damage which is being done by Communist-minded teachers and Communist-line textbooks. Countless times I have heard parents throughout the country complain that their sons and daughters were sent to college as good Americans and returned four years later as wild-eyed radicals. The education system of this country cannot be cleansed of Communist influence by legislation. It can only be scrubbed and flushed and swept clean if the mothers and fathers, and the sons and daughters of this nation individually decide to do this job.

This can be your greatest contribution to America. This is a job which you must do if America and Western Civilization are to live. I warn you, however, that the task will not be a pleasant one. When you detect and start to expose a teacher with a Communist mind, you will be damned and smeared. You will be accused of endangering academic freedom. Remember, to those Communist-minded teachers, academic freedom means their right to force you to hire them to teach your children a philosophy in which you do not believe.

To Communist-minded teachers, academic freedom means their right to deny you the freedom to hire loyal Americans to teach your children. We cannot win the fight against Communism if Communist-minded professors are teaching your children. We cannot lose the fight against Communism if loyal Americans are teaching your children.”

Tell it, Senator. Tell it!

Picture
In Joe McCarthy’s day, the problem was still mainly confined to the universities. Today, the pinko poison has trickled down to even the kindergarten level.
Picture
St. Joseph of Wisconsin
, by yours truly — a MUST READ!
Picture
The lovely Marxist lesbian Randi Weingarten (cough cough) heads the United Federation of Teachers. Enough said.

Children’s Book Publishers Pummeling Kids With Fear-Based Propaganda About Masks And Social Distancing

“Children are being taught to hate in the name of diversity.”

As I warned back on May 7, They are coming for your kids: Globalists launch all-out assault on childrenthe main target of the Covid scare and resulting global Great Reset is the children.

children’s book publishers pummeling kids with fear based propaganda about masks and social distancing

It’s no coincidence that Anthony Fauci and the global pharma cabal are now recklessly promoting the experimental gene-therapy injections for children ages 5 and up. One of the ways you do this is to scare children and divide them off from their parents.

The children’s propaganda machine works through social media, schools, video games, books, magazines, TV and film. Today we take a look at just one aspect, books.

Deborah DeGroff is an expert on children’s books and what parents need to know about the books their kids are reading or being assigned to read from the school library.

Below is a condensed version of an article DeGroff posted Sept. 16 at her website, whatsinchildrensbooks.com about the many children’s books published of late about viral pandemics.

I encourage everyone to check out her website because it includes many excellent reviews, reader-friendly charts and articles about children’s books, some of which will shock your conscience:

FEVER, FLU, AND FEAR

by Deborah DeGroff

I have been curious about children’s books that address diseases, pandemics, and more specifically, COVID-19. I found so many books on the subject that I decided to chart only the selections found on the Accelerated Reader website.

The 22 books on my first chart are for lower grades (K-3) and middle grades (4-8) and range from a 2.7 to a 6.4 reading level. All but two of these books were published in 2021. Each book consists of 24, 32, 48, or 49 pages. The Word Count range is from 263 to 5,268. To put this in perspective — Margret Rey’s Curious George Plays Baseball has 299 words and Dr. Seuss’s Hop on Pop has 384. Mary Pope Osborne’s Magic Tree House BookThe Knight at Dawn, has 5,340 words.

With such a limited number of words – seven of the books charted have fewer words than Hop on Pop – how much information can be covered? Some or all the following would be mentioned: social distancing, flattening the curve, mask wearing, washing hands, how viruses spread, and perhaps some facts about previous epidemics or pandemics.

If your children read these books or listen as someone reads the books to them, what will be their take away? Is the information factual and/or does it instill fear? How much immersion in this is necessary and how much is too much? Who should be determining this – the state or the parent?

Accelerated Reader is used in many schools, both private and public. Children receive points for reaching a certain percentage on the online multiple-choice tests. Children assigned to do projects or reports on COVID-19 would most likely use these sources since they could also take the online test and earn points simultaneously.

The inclusion of titles on this chart does not mean that these books are good or bad, correct or incorrect. They are simply books found on this subject on Accelerated Reader which anyone can easily access. Ask yourself some questions as you are the one who knows your children best. Would it be important for your children to read one or many of these, or would it be better if they read books that had nothing to do with this?

Do your children need to be focused on this issue, or would time be better spent learning how to read, write, and do their arithmetic? Would concentrating on learning their basic skills or reading different books help alleviate the constant rhetoric that is possibly causing their fear or anxiety?

Obviously, there is a great deal of fear created because Social Emotional Learning is now being presented as the necessary cure to alleviate this fear. This has spawned the creation of even more books for children. As Rahm Emanuel once said, “You never let a serious crisis go to waste.”

The children also sense this fear from the adults in their lives. After all, the adults are terrified to have any thoughts that are not in alignment with the fact checkers. The children also fear that they may kill Grandma or Grandpa if they don’t wear their masks properly or wash their hands for the proper number of seconds.

Adding fuel to the fire, children are being taught to hate in the name of diversity. Perhaps it is about skin color, whether boys can become girls, whether someone does or does not wear a mask, or whether those 12 or older have been vaccinated the mandated number of times.

The child has learned early that there is only one viewpoint allowed. If their parents are not in agreement with the position the child is learning in school, the child becomes more conflicted.

Learning that everyone has to have the same thoughts and feelings and act accordingly hardly fits under the “diversity” umbrella. At what point did we begin accepting that the meaning of diversity is actually sameness?

A quick trip to Amazon or YouTube will reveal numerous other books for the very young about this subject:

Attitudes and ideas are not shaped overnight. Understanding that premise, I searched for children’s books about epidemics or pandemics prior to COVID-19. Once again, I am only charting the books I found on the Accelerated Reader website. Almost all the books on the following charts were originally published prior to COVID-19.

These books include both fiction and non-fiction books. Were some of these books written at the suggestion of publishers or were they just products of creative minds?

I read Albert Marrin’s Very, Very, Very Dreadful: The Influenza Pandemic of 1918. Marrin was a history professor and has written many non-fiction books for young adults. Marrin’s book was published in January of 2018. Marrin’s book is thoroughly researched and includes an extensive list of books and articles for further reading. It was quite timely that Marrin included a section about Dr. Ron Fouchier, a virologist, and his gain-of-function research. The subheading reads: “Engineering Doomsday.”

Seldom is a topic as simple and straightforward as we have been led to believe. Marrin broadens the scope of this pandemic for a young adult audience. He probably hopes that the readers will utilize the various sources for further study that he included to come to their own conclusions. His depictions of war are brutally honest. If your child is reading this in school, the teacher could lead the children to conclusions that are not those of your own family.

I also read Jim Murphy’s An American Plague: The True and Terrifying Story of the Yellow Fever Epidemic of 1793. Since no one really knew what caused the fever, doctors had different methods of treating patients. One of these methods included ingesting mercury!

The actions of political leaders in our newly formed government, blacks caring for white patients, and even the decision as to whether the United States should come to the aid of the French in their own revolution are all subjects addressed in this book. Accelerated Reader includes this book for Upper Grades (9th-12th) and lists it at a 9.0 reading level. Both the publisher’s website and Amazon list this book for children from 10-12 in grades 5 to 7.

An American Plague: The True and Terrifying Story of the Yellow Fever Epidemic of 1793 is a 7th grade selection in the Wit and Wisdom in Sync™ Core Text Library. All of the aforementioned subjects listed in this book could be handled differently by teachers leading the discussions.

Children today are taught to think very highly of their own feelings and opinions. Discussions often become a free-for-all of these opinions which, eerily, are usually about the same. Facts don’t have to come into play in these discussions. If or when they do, the class is usually persuaded by the emotional arguments.

An example of this was Lily & Dunkin’, by Donna Gephart. Tim is in eighth grade and wants to take hormone blockers to delay puberty. This is a basic theme of this book. Poor Tim! His father objects to this, at first. He changed his mind when the therapist asked him if he “would rather have a dead son or a live daughter?” One of the discussion questions reads: “Why is it best that she begin the hormone therapy now?” After the children ages 10 and up read this book, how do you think they will respond?

These are some questions a parent should consider about books in general:

  • If the child is reading the book on his/her own, what is the take-away? Is that take-away formed by factual or emotional persuasion? Is the book objective?
  • Are there links or resources included in the book that could be harmful? (One book I found in the juvenile section of a library had links to Kinsey Confidential, San Francisco Sex Information, Advocates for Youth, Go Ask Alice!, Scarleteen, Planned Parenthood, many LGBT resources, and adult books about sexual issues such as stories about transgender females to males. When the children venture to these websites, they discover other links that may well lead them to porn sites. One of the resource links from this book gives quite an education about beastiality.)
  • If the book is required, is it being discussed by the teacher? Is the information being slanted to a particular worldview?
  • What about climate change or global warming? What about BLM? What about Critical Race Theory? How are Christians portrayed? How are other religions depicted? How was Trump addressed in books for kids? Biden? Obama? Fauci? (Kate Messner’s book, Dr. Fauci: How a Boy from Brooklyn Became America’s Doctor, was released in June of 2021.) Who is God in children’s books? What about social activism? How is America represented? Capitalism? Marxism?
  • What are the themes and messages in the books being prominently displayed in the children’s sections of the public libraries? Are these same books found in Christian school libraries?
  • Why are high school students being assigned books that are written on such low reading levels?
  • Are the children assigned multiple books with the same message? How many does it take to change a worldview?

These are just a few of the questions a parent needs to consider.

Sources: LeoHohmann.comWhatsInsideChildrensBooks.com

Dozens Of School Districts Are Using Book That Claims ‘Whiteness’ Is The Devil And That White Children Sell Their Soul For ‘Stolen Land And Stolen Riches’

Investigative Journalist and avid CRT opponent Chris Rufo has identified over 30 school districts across 15 different states that are teaching the radical ‘anti-whiteness’ book, “Not My Idea” by Anastasia Higginbotham.

dozens of school districts are using book that claims ‘whiteness’ is the devil and that white children sell their soul for ‘stolen land and stolen riches’

Rufo notes that the book, meant for children as young as kindergartners, ‘traffics in the noxious principles of race essential-ism, collective guilt, and anti-whiteness.’

One part includes images portraying whiteness as the devil, offering the reader a contract that ‘bids them to whiteness’ in exchange for stolen land and the ability to ‘mess endlessly’ with the lives of people of color.

The book teaches children to primarily identify by their skin color while it paints white children as evil, saying: “Whiteness is a bad deal. It always was.”

Another page says, “Racism is a white person’s problem and we are all caught up in it.”

pic 2 jc story july 9 913x479

Not My Idea” is a clear example of how CRT brands white children as oppressors that should feel shame for the color of their skin.

In June, A law firm associated with Ruffo filed a law suit in Illinois against a school district for instructing teachers to read the book, among others, and use it in their curriculum.

Parents across the country have been pushing back against this racist and anti-American indoctrination by speaking up against the teachers and school boards.

Despite their opposition, the largest teachers union in the country approved a plan last week to promote CRT across all 50 states and their 14,000 districts.

Some states, like Oklahoma and Florida have stepped up and banned CRT from schools, but we need more to do the same.

Why are certain 5G cell tower components labeled “COV-19?”

Reports are coming out to show that some of the electrical components being used in 5G tower installations bear the marking of “COV-19,” which just so happens to be almost identical to COVID-19, the name used for the infection supposedly caused by the Wuhan coronavirus. The “Patriot Street Fighter” account on Telegram is one of the latest to share video footage of the components, which can clearly be seen with the marking of COV-19 on their chipsets. 5G component installers all around the world have reported similar markings on the equipment going into their towers, which shows that the phenomenon is strangely widespread and clearly not coincidental. As you may recall from early on in the plandemic, reports emerged about how Wuhan, China, where it all originated, had just turned on its 5G towers at almost the exact same time that area residents started to get sick. Some of them got so sick that they dropped dead in the streets, or so we were told. Donald Trump fast-tracked the rollout of 5G here in the United States not long after that, and here we are a year later with many who are sick and dying, purportedly from the “virus.” What is really going on here? We will leave it up to our readers to decide if there is a connection between 5G and the symptoms and sickness associated with the Chinese virus. Be sure to watch the following video from Brighteon.com, which shows yet another COV-19 chipset component being used in 5G installations (WARNING: LANGUAGE):

https://www.brighteon.com/9db72eaa-834a-4b3f-bbe1-1405afa50ba2

Vaccines and 5G, not some phantom “virus,” are spreading disease and death

Throughout the past year while tens of millions of Americans were on lockdown, telecommunications carriers were busy installing 5G chipsets in towers all across the land, including at schools where developing children spend all day in the classroom. Could it be that 5G radiation exposure produces the very same symptoms that are now being blamed on the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19)? What about Chinese virus injections? Are they, too, producing symptoms that mirror those caused by exposure to 5G radiation? Perhaps the jabs and the towers are delivering a one-two punch, creating the same health problems together. All of it combined is a recipe for health disaster, and yet the mainstream media is solely focused on the “virus,” with the occasional mention of a “rare” blood clot or death. Try as they might to convince us all that only the “virus” is dangerous, while everything they propose as the “solution” is perfectly “safe,” millions are waking up to the fact that it is all a sham. “Oh dear, technocrats, the cat’s out of the bag,” wrote one Brighteon commenter. “Targeted frequencies causing certain designer illnesses in conjunction with bioweapons.” “If real, what more proof do you need, 5G deniers, than the wording stamped right on the custom-made RF modulator module (which determines output frequency)? The FCC must be investigated.” Another responded by recommending that those interested check out the book The Invisible Rainbow: A History of Electricity and Life by Arthur Firstenberg. “Over the last 220 years, society has evolved a universal belief that electricity is ‘safe’ for humanity and the planet. Scientist and journalist Arthur Firstenberg disrupts this conviction by telling the story of electricity in a way it has never been told before—from an environmental point of view—by detailing the effects that this fundamental societal building block has had on our health and our planet,” part of the book’s synopsis reads. More news about the damaging effects of 5G can be found at 5GAlert.comSources for this article include:RumorMillNews.comT.meNaturalNews.comNaturalNews.comChelseaGreen.com

Lost Generation? America’s War Against Parents and the Destruction of Childhood

Left: Highschool band practice in Wenatchee, WA. Right: Biden Administration pick for HHS Secretary Transgender Rachel Levine.

Dr. Rachel Levine, born as Richard Levine, the name his parents gave to him, is a transgender doctor who has been nominated by the Biden administration to serve as the Assistant Secretary of Health.

Levine has two children, David and Dayna, through his ex-wife Martha Peaslee Levine. They allegedly divorced in 2013, after Richard Levine transitioned into a woman and became Rachel Levine.

Rachel Levine is a pediatrician who served as Secretary of the Pennsylvania Department of Health from 2017 to 2021, and is also a professor of pediatrics and psychiatry at the Penn State College of Medicine.

In Dr. Levine’s confirmation hearing before the U.S. Senate today, Senator Rand Paul questioned Levine on the topic of genital mutilation of minors, which is universally condemned by organizations such as the World Health Organizaion, the United Nations Children Fund, and the United Nations Population Fund, where genital mutilation is recognized as a violation of human rights.

Senator Paul also addressed the issue of forcing minors to take hormone blocking drugs against the advice of their parents, and specifically asked if Dr. Levine would condemn these practices.

Dr. Levine refused to answer the questions.

While transitioning children’s gender and the market growth for hormone blocking drugs has been increasing in recent years, this assault on children and the transgender political agenda has gone into overdrive now since COVID last year, as the Globalists use medical tyranny to fast-track their agenda, which includes destroying parenthood by removing parental rights, and giving the task of raising children to the State.

In Washington D.C., for example, a bill was introduced in October that would allow children as young as 11 years old to consent to receive a COVID vaccine without their parents’ approval or even knowledge. See:

Washington D.C. Bill Allows Children 11 Years and Older to be Vaccinated Without Parental Knowledge

And while children have a near ZERO percent chance of dying from COVID, social distancing and isolation measures with roots in CIA torture have been implemented for almost a year now, causing far more harm to children than any “virus” could. See:

Children Have 0.00% Chance of Dying from COVID but are Harmed for Life by Social Distancing, Which has its Roots in CIA Torture Techniques

And yet, teacher unions around the nation have fought against reopening schools for in-classroom teaching, and for those locations where children are allowed back in school, we are seeing reports like this one out of Wenatchee, WA showing what these children must endure just to participate in a group activity like a band practice.

Peachy Keenan, writing for The American Mind, recently published an article titled: The Doctor Is In(sane), where she relates a recent visit to their pediatrician with her teenage son. Some excerpts:

Your Pediatrician Wants a Word—Alone—with Your Teen. A Warning!

Hard to believe, but I have a kid approaching driving age. He’s a wonderful boy, in every way.

Devout, intelligent, and obsessed with basketball and video games, says his prayers every night before bed. Always reminds me to do penance on Fridays if I forget what day it is and eat meat (what day is this?).

Anyway, the Catholic formation we attempted, albeit imperfectly, to impose on him took. It blossomed.

Our son is always dressed for sports practice. He asked for a new weight bench and plates for Christmas.

He spent all of lockdown working out, just to make himself into a better basketball player. He measures himself every day and prays for more height. He is obviously, and very apparently, comfortable with all aspects of boyhood.

When it comes to his gender identity, the science is not only settled, but set in stone. You would have to be an imbecile not to see this instantly.

Or a pediatrician.

The Doctor Will Seize You Now

It started out as a normal annual checkup, until the pediatrician asked me to leave the room.

I didn’t understand at first. “Why?” I asked.

“There are some questions I need to ask him without you here.”

“Like what?”

“Oh, you know, about drugs and smoking.”

I stared at her, my mind racing. I realized that if I refused, other issues would be raised. Red flags would be added to the chart.

Why wouldn’t I want him to talk to a doctor? Was I hiding something? Did he have secrets I wanted kept secret?

“Do I have to leave?” I asked, still stunned.

“Yes, I need to ask him these things.” She stared at me not smiling.

My longtime doctor who had always been attentive and kind, was suddenly swinging iron keys to my gulag cell while punching the number to Child Protective Services on her phone.

Reader, I left. I lingered outside the door for a minute until a nurse ushered me into an empty storage room to wait, where I couldn’t eavesdrop.

A few minutes later, the doctor slinked out and waved goodbye without a word.

On the way to the car, the boy told me what happened.

“She talked to me about drugs and alcohol. And she told me when I have sex to use a condom.”

And finally, the kicker: “Then she asked me if I was comfortable with my gender.”

Beware the Pedo-atrician

He thought the gender question was absurd and funny. But he was outraged about the condom question.

“Mom, she told me to use birth control. Until I’m twenty-five! I’d be committing a mortal sin.”

He’s so good. I don’t deserve him. I got angrier and angrier as we drove home.

Here was this doctor my son had seen in person a total of five times in his life probing his most intimate secrets.

Does the white coat magically melt away kids’ stranger danger and cause them to open up to middle-aged harridans holding clipboards?

Guys, they really do want to separate you from your children and dictate their own agenda to them!

It’s not just theoretical anymore. This time it’s personal.

(Full article.)

Dr. Fauci Finally Confirms That Children Don’t Catch Or Transmit COVID-19 In Large Numbers

Better late than never. Perhaps because he believes Joe Biden will be inaugurated in January, Dr. Fauci is finally admitting that children do not get terribly ill from or transmit COVID-19 in any significant way. Weird, since Switzerland figured this out in AprilDetailed genetic studies in Iceland showed that children were not passing the virus to adults in any significant numbers in June. And German researchers asserted that children could actually act as a brake on transmission within the community.

But good old “follow the science” Fauci was wringing his hands and hedging his bets in the media and during congressional testimony. Most notably, he got into a heated exchange with Senator Rand Paul, who is also a doctor.

Paul noted the devastating effects of school closures, especially on disadvantaged childrenIt is only in the next decade that we will understand the impact of all the missed support services on these children. However, we do know many are not logging in for digital learning. Failure rates have also gone up where children only engage in distance learning.

Doctors and other agencies note increases in child abusedepression, and other mental health issues in children. There has also been an uptick in self-harm and suicidal ideation. This, over a respiratory virus with an infection fatality rate (IFR) of 0.13%, according to the WHO, which is very stratified by age and tends to affect the very elderly.

This debate raged on through the summer, when President Trump said reopening schools was a priority. It became gobsmackingly stupid when mayors and governors began to convert public space to daycare centers where children could engage in distance learning. Yet, they would not reopen schools. State leaders who chose to, such as Georgia Governor Brian Kemp and Ron DeSantis in Florida, were widely criticized.

They were also widely covered for a bumpy first week. Then nothing bad happened. So, you really don’t hear about them anymore, likely because these states would blow up the preferred narrative. Your children can’t go to school because Donald Trump is president, basically. A health official in Los Angeles even said the quiet part out loud.

Because Dr. Fauci and other Health Experts™ would not realistically frame the virus’s risk for children, teachers’ unions used the pandemic as cover for their destructive political agenda. In many urban districts, they refused to return unless political demands were met. We also saw just how far left these organizations were when they joined radical protests with the Democratic Socialists of America and other groups. Their list of demands was a cornucopia of dangerous policies, such as defunding the police. Now, one of these radicals will likely lead the Department of Education. Fabulous.

But now that the Very Bad Orange Man is presumed to be leaving office, Dr. Fauci can report what this author and many other outlets have been reporting for months:

“Look at the data, the spread from children and among children is not very big at all, not like one would have suspected.”

Team Reason has known this since April and pushed the data, despite Fauci saying (fearfully) otherwise – https://t.co/lqqddqhVAlpic.twitter.com/i9ME6tNf8j— Aaron Ginn (@aginnt) November 29, 2020

Actually, it was what anyone who was paying attention should have expected. By the time the virus ripped through Italy, it was apparent that the elderly and those with preexisting conditions were at the greatest risk. Dr. Birx was communicating that in the earliest briefings. Once the Iceland genetic and German studies came out, it should have been confirmed. As we watched other nations’ experiences, especially those that never closed schools, we could have made reasonable assumptions and moved forward.

But we didn’t. And our children will be paying for years to come in some of the more ridiculous areas of the countryNew York City and Kentucky just closed schools again. Los Angeles has never opened them. One has to wonder what excuse they will use now—or if one is no longer necessary because they believe they won an election.