Parents Outraged About Explicitly Anti-White Racism And Pedophilia In School Curriculum

As parents around the country increasingly become fed up with left-wing hacks running school boards, more are beginning to take action against board members who refuse to listen to reason and respond to concerns.

parents outraged about explicitly anti white crt curriculum

In particular, parents are outraged at the adoption of an explicitly anti-white critical race theory curriculum, ridiculous and pointless COVID masking, tyrannical mandates and the inclusion of sexually inappropriate books and materials in school libraries that includes illegal acts of pedophilia.

In fact, parents and activists have just served members of the Scottsdale (Arizona) Unified School District with surety bonds totaling $1 million (that is, 10 parents have filed bonds of $100,000 each, totaling $1 million for each board member) as they move to get rid of several policies.

Watch:

As Citizen Free Press noted:

Leigh Dundas and Miki Klann speak to the Scottsdale Unified School District in Arizona. During the meeting, Miki declares her intention to file a claim against the Governor’s surety bond on behalf of the SUSD board members. Each member of the board will be charged with practicing medicine without a license, child abuse, segregation and inappropriate sexual material in the school libraries.

Miki served each board member with 10 letters of intent by 10 different parents. Each claim carries a liability of up to 100K – this means each board member carries a total liability of $1 million in the event that the claims are filed. Now the board members have 5 days to rectify the situation or the parents of SUSD will file the claim.

In order to resolve the problem, the board members must:

– Remove all mask mandates and recommendations

– Remove all “experimental treatment” clinics and recommendations

– Discontinue the Critical Race Theory and GLSNEN.org agendas

– Remove all inappropriate sexual material from the libraries

– Former board president Jann-Michael Greenberg must resign

In addition to inappropriate content, behaviors, and mandates, the SUSD board has had its problems in the past.

For instance, in November the board met in emergency session and voted 4-1 to remove Greenberg from his post following reports that he distributed “dossiers” on parents who were showing up at board meetings and voicing opposition to its left-wing policies.

The board voted to elect Patty Beckman as interim president. The ‘dossiers’ included photographs and personal financial information on some parents, US News reported.

“We do not have all the facts at this time. To make a decision without those facts that’s in the best interest of the district is simply not possible,” Greenburg said. “I strongly support the investigations that have been announced both publicly and privately.”

“When I first saw the contents of the Google Drive and I saw my 8- and 10-year-old’s photos, that was terrifying. And like, what’s he doing?” mother Amanda Wray told AZFamily.com.

“But he has pictures of my vacation home, property records. I’m not a political opponent, I’m an involved parent and that is threatening to me and it makes me wonder why and what he was planning to do with those photos,” she continued, adding she was “disgusted” by what she saw.

“I think we identified 47 people that were background checked, divorce decrees, Social Security numbers, property records, mortgages,” added Wray, who noted that the Google Drive included a number of cruel memes.

In the case of one woman, Wray said that whoever created the dossier “took her photos and superimposed it over a lynching and I can tell you, she’s distraught by this and it’s disgusting.”

She went on to say she thinks some parents are being targeted because they sought to have Greenberg recalled over the district’s manifestly stupid COVID-19 policies, according to AZ Family.

“We’re not anti-mask, we’re not anti-[jabs]. They’ve painted us that way because it fits their inflammatory narrative. We’re all for parent choice and really, transparency,” she said.

World Economic Forum Endorses ‘Insane Pro-CRT Propaganda’

world economic forum endorses 'insane pro crt propaganda'

The World Economic Forum (WEF) has come under fire for a video which initially appears as a neutral explainer on Critical Race Theory (CRT), only to quickly shift into a full-throated endorsement of the ideology.

CRT charges an entire demographic with a collective crime, uses the charge as grounds for framing individuals within that demographic of perpetrators of that crime, and then seeks to strip condemned individuals of rights, dignity, and equal protection based on that charge (h/t).

The WEF video defines CRT as a theory “first developed by US legal scholars in the 1980s” which “argues that the laws, rules and, regulations that govern society today have been shaped by the historical subordination of people of colour and that this is a driving force behind racial inequality today,” according to Breitbart.

As an example of the supposed racism embedded in every fiber of America’s institutions, the WEF points to the high number of incarcerated black males throughout the country.

“Take the US criminal justice system, for example,” it says. “While everyone is seen as equal under the law, Black Americans are imprisoned at 5 times the rate of white people.

“CRT says this disparity is a legacy of America’s racist past,” but that opponents say it “paints all white people as bigots.”

The video then positions CRT awareness as an honorable pursuit. Watch what opponent Chris Rufo described as an “Insane pro-CRT propaganda video.”

Others condemned the WEF as well (via Breitbart):

“Ah yes, the world economic forum promoting a radical departure from the current relations of power,” wrote video essayist and author Peter Coffin.

This PROVES CRT is the revolution. I’ve been wrong this whole time!” he mocked.

“Run from the WEF working class people,” warned clinical psychologist and psychology professor Dr. Jordan Peterson.

“Why would the World Economic Forum come out in support of Critical Race Theory?” asked author and mathematician Dr. James Lindsay, who warned last month that CRT activists aim to dismantle the U.S. and establish “a total dictatorship” of the so-called “anti-racists.” 

“Because they’re the ones who want to divide our society with this Marxist Theory or any other tool they can use to break the world and seize power,” he said.

Sen. Ted Cruz’s (R-TX) national security adviser tweeted “I can’t believe you’re advocating for ‘equality’ at the expense of equity” in 2022. “You’re either on board or you’re not. Be better.”

Read the rest of the comments here.

Sources: NaturalNews.comZeroHedge.com;

Complete Moral Decline: Elementary School Hosts ‘SATAN Club’ For Children With The Satanic Temple

Satanists are targeting kids as young as six years old.

Parents in Illinois were shocked to discover that their children’s school approved an event for children organised by the Satanic Temple.

elementary school hosts ‘satan club’ for children

The event, titled ‘Satan Club’ held at Jane Addams Elementary School in Moline vowed to introduce children to “a scientific, rationalist, non-superstitious worldview.”

Satan club is intended for children from grades 1-5, meaning that presumed satanists are targeting kids as young as six years old.

A flier promoting the event, posted to Facebook by one parent, noted that all involved had been “vetted” by the Satanic Temple and had passed criminal background checks.

Well, that’s comforting then.

It also notes that “the Satanic Temple is a non-theistic religion that views Satan as a mythical figure representing individual freedom,” and that the club “does not attempt to convert children to any religious ideology.”

“Hey Kids, let’s have fun at After School Satan Club!” the flier states:

Yeah, no thanks.

Former High Ranking Satanist Claims: ‘I Performed Satanic Rituals Inside Abortion Clinics’.

Among other posts prompting their rampant advocacy for abortion and Hailing Satan for 2022, the Satanic Temple is promoting the kids’ clubs:

The Illinois school provided more information, claiming that it was just renting out a space to the organisation:

Many expressed anger and disbelief that the school would allow the organisation in:

One user reminded parents to get their kids out of public “education” (i.e. indoctrination) system:

Another commented that the far left is a demonic cult:

More activities aimed at children: “let’s summon demons.”

Meanwhile, a lot of people are fine with Satanists having access to six year old kids, which made someone comment the following:

“The truly scary part about this is the comments section. It’s unbelievable how many people actually AGREE with this! Folks, we are in the end of days. Find Jesus Christ before it’s too late!”

Source: Summit.news

Communists Plea for “Academic Freedom” to Defend Critical Race Theory

Parental opposition to the mind rape which the communist scum “educators” are committing against White children is now a “threat to free speech.”

In this putrid propaganda poop-pie served up by Jennifer Schuessler — the yapping yenta deceptively defends, in an all too familiar fashion, the anti-White, anti-western, Marxist / Frankfurt School “Critical Race Theory” initiative infesting America’s schools. According to the Slimes scribblerette “culture reporter” and her commie crowd of cliche-quoting quackademics, parental opposition to the self-loathing mind rape which the communist scum “educators” are committing against defenseless White children is a “threat to free speech,” dontcha know?

From the article:

“The (anti-CRT) measures have been widely assailed by Democrats as a threat to liberal education and to the teaching of even some of the most basic facts about American history.

In a new report released Monday, the free expression group PEN America emphasizes what it says is another threat they pose: to the free speech guaranteed in the First Amendment.”

The left-wing PEN America organization which Jenny cites as some high-minded, high authority “advocacy” source actually sued Donald Trump for “press censorship” in 2018. You see, any challenge whatsoever of the Left’s lies — be it in the media, quackademia or the lower schools — is deemed by these characters to be “censorship”. This insane form of “projection” is coming from the same crowd which will reprimand or even fire any teacher who dares to question Evolution, the Climate Con, the Holohoax, the Queer agenda etc.

Picture
Slimes yenta, Jennifer Schuessler 
Picture
Picture
Note the communist raised fist on the PEN America banner.
Picture
This isn’t about “freedom of speech” or academic freedom.” It’s about the fight between the Marxists and the Americanists.  .
Picture
My Central Jersey
Picture
The Daily Signal
Picture
FOX News
Picture
WTLC 106.7
Picture
The New American
Picture
WBNS News (Ohio)
Picture
Calling the dauntless defenders of “free speech” and “academic freedom” at Sulzberger’s Slimes and PEN America….. Hello?… Hello? …. (sound of crickets)

A few paragraphs into the article we learn that the name of PEN America’s executive director is — Suzanne Nossel…… Under — Every — Rock.

More Satanic sophistry from the PEN report:

“These bills appear designed to chill academic and educational discussions and impose government dictates on teaching and learning. In short: They are educational gag orders. Taken together, the efforts amount to a sweeping crusade for content- and viewpoint-based state censorship.”

Translation: Shut up, you stupid ‘Nazi” parents! You’re children belong to us and we shall shape them in our image, not yours.

Picture
Bolshevik bitch Suzanne Nossel
Picture
self-anointed champion of “free speech” — just as long as the speech is anti-White and anti-American. 

In recent months, we have noticed more and more “mainstream conservatives” invoking the name of the late great Senator Joseph McCarthy — but not in the usual negative manner. Even our lesser “FOXtard” brethren are finally coming around to the idea that “St. Joseph of Wisconsin,” as we like to refer to him, was, well — right after all!

Boy was he ever! And the most fitting way to end today’s rebuttal to the commies’ appeal of “academic freedom” is to quote from the last pages of McCarthy’s 1952 pamphlet, “McCarthyism: The Fight for America” — in which the patriotic prophet, writing at a time when the Marxist takeover of education was not all that noticeable, rebutted their phony arguments.

McCarthy on education:

“Every man and woman in America can appoint himself or herself to undo the damage which is being done by Communist-minded teachers and Communist-line textbooks. Countless times I have heard parents throughout the country complain that their sons and daughters were sent to college as good Americans and returned four years later as wild-eyed radicals. The education system of this country cannot be cleansed of Communist influence by legislation. It can only be scrubbed and flushed and swept clean if the mothers and fathers, and the sons and daughters of this nation individually decide to do this job.

This can be your greatest contribution to America. This is a job which you must do if America and Western Civilization are to live. I warn you, however, that the task will not be a pleasant one. When you detect and start to expose a teacher with a Communist mind, you will be damned and smeared. You will be accused of endangering academic freedom. Remember, to those Communist-minded teachers, academic freedom means their right to force you to hire them to teach your children a philosophy in which you do not believe.

To Communist-minded teachers, academic freedom means their right to deny you the freedom to hire loyal Americans to teach your children. We cannot win the fight against Communism if Communist-minded professors are teaching your children. We cannot lose the fight against Communism if loyal Americans are teaching your children.”

Tell it, Senator. Tell it!

Picture
In Joe McCarthy’s day, the problem was still mainly confined to the universities. Today, the pinko poison has trickled down to even the kindergarten level.
Picture
St. Joseph of Wisconsin
, by yours truly — a MUST READ!
Picture
The lovely Marxist lesbian Randi Weingarten (cough cough) heads the United Federation of Teachers. Enough said.

Children’s Book Publishers Pummeling Kids With Fear-Based Propaganda About Masks And Social Distancing

“Children are being taught to hate in the name of diversity.”

As I warned back on May 7, They are coming for your kids: Globalists launch all-out assault on childrenthe main target of the Covid scare and resulting global Great Reset is the children.

children’s book publishers pummeling kids with fear based propaganda about masks and social distancing

It’s no coincidence that Anthony Fauci and the global pharma cabal are now recklessly promoting the experimental gene-therapy injections for children ages 5 and up. One of the ways you do this is to scare children and divide them off from their parents.

The children’s propaganda machine works through social media, schools, video games, books, magazines, TV and film. Today we take a look at just one aspect, books.

Deborah DeGroff is an expert on children’s books and what parents need to know about the books their kids are reading or being assigned to read from the school library.

Below is a condensed version of an article DeGroff posted Sept. 16 at her website, whatsinchildrensbooks.com about the many children’s books published of late about viral pandemics.

I encourage everyone to check out her website because it includes many excellent reviews, reader-friendly charts and articles about children’s books, some of which will shock your conscience:

FEVER, FLU, AND FEAR

by Deborah DeGroff

I have been curious about children’s books that address diseases, pandemics, and more specifically, COVID-19. I found so many books on the subject that I decided to chart only the selections found on the Accelerated Reader website.

The 22 books on my first chart are for lower grades (K-3) and middle grades (4-8) and range from a 2.7 to a 6.4 reading level. All but two of these books were published in 2021. Each book consists of 24, 32, 48, or 49 pages. The Word Count range is from 263 to 5,268. To put this in perspective — Margret Rey’s Curious George Plays Baseball has 299 words and Dr. Seuss’s Hop on Pop has 384. Mary Pope Osborne’s Magic Tree House BookThe Knight at Dawn, has 5,340 words.

With such a limited number of words – seven of the books charted have fewer words than Hop on Pop – how much information can be covered? Some or all the following would be mentioned: social distancing, flattening the curve, mask wearing, washing hands, how viruses spread, and perhaps some facts about previous epidemics or pandemics.

If your children read these books or listen as someone reads the books to them, what will be their take away? Is the information factual and/or does it instill fear? How much immersion in this is necessary and how much is too much? Who should be determining this – the state or the parent?

Accelerated Reader is used in many schools, both private and public. Children receive points for reaching a certain percentage on the online multiple-choice tests. Children assigned to do projects or reports on COVID-19 would most likely use these sources since they could also take the online test and earn points simultaneously.

The inclusion of titles on this chart does not mean that these books are good or bad, correct or incorrect. They are simply books found on this subject on Accelerated Reader which anyone can easily access. Ask yourself some questions as you are the one who knows your children best. Would it be important for your children to read one or many of these, or would it be better if they read books that had nothing to do with this?

Do your children need to be focused on this issue, or would time be better spent learning how to read, write, and do their arithmetic? Would concentrating on learning their basic skills or reading different books help alleviate the constant rhetoric that is possibly causing their fear or anxiety?

Obviously, there is a great deal of fear created because Social Emotional Learning is now being presented as the necessary cure to alleviate this fear. This has spawned the creation of even more books for children. As Rahm Emanuel once said, “You never let a serious crisis go to waste.”

The children also sense this fear from the adults in their lives. After all, the adults are terrified to have any thoughts that are not in alignment with the fact checkers. The children also fear that they may kill Grandma or Grandpa if they don’t wear their masks properly or wash their hands for the proper number of seconds.

Adding fuel to the fire, children are being taught to hate in the name of diversity. Perhaps it is about skin color, whether boys can become girls, whether someone does or does not wear a mask, or whether those 12 or older have been vaccinated the mandated number of times.

The child has learned early that there is only one viewpoint allowed. If their parents are not in agreement with the position the child is learning in school, the child becomes more conflicted.

Learning that everyone has to have the same thoughts and feelings and act accordingly hardly fits under the “diversity” umbrella. At what point did we begin accepting that the meaning of diversity is actually sameness?

A quick trip to Amazon or YouTube will reveal numerous other books for the very young about this subject:

Attitudes and ideas are not shaped overnight. Understanding that premise, I searched for children’s books about epidemics or pandemics prior to COVID-19. Once again, I am only charting the books I found on the Accelerated Reader website. Almost all the books on the following charts were originally published prior to COVID-19.

These books include both fiction and non-fiction books. Were some of these books written at the suggestion of publishers or were they just products of creative minds?

I read Albert Marrin’s Very, Very, Very Dreadful: The Influenza Pandemic of 1918. Marrin was a history professor and has written many non-fiction books for young adults. Marrin’s book was published in January of 2018. Marrin’s book is thoroughly researched and includes an extensive list of books and articles for further reading. It was quite timely that Marrin included a section about Dr. Ron Fouchier, a virologist, and his gain-of-function research. The subheading reads: “Engineering Doomsday.”

Seldom is a topic as simple and straightforward as we have been led to believe. Marrin broadens the scope of this pandemic for a young adult audience. He probably hopes that the readers will utilize the various sources for further study that he included to come to their own conclusions. His depictions of war are brutally honest. If your child is reading this in school, the teacher could lead the children to conclusions that are not those of your own family.

I also read Jim Murphy’s An American Plague: The True and Terrifying Story of the Yellow Fever Epidemic of 1793. Since no one really knew what caused the fever, doctors had different methods of treating patients. One of these methods included ingesting mercury!

The actions of political leaders in our newly formed government, blacks caring for white patients, and even the decision as to whether the United States should come to the aid of the French in their own revolution are all subjects addressed in this book. Accelerated Reader includes this book for Upper Grades (9th-12th) and lists it at a 9.0 reading level. Both the publisher’s website and Amazon list this book for children from 10-12 in grades 5 to 7.

An American Plague: The True and Terrifying Story of the Yellow Fever Epidemic of 1793 is a 7th grade selection in the Wit and Wisdom in Sync™ Core Text Library. All of the aforementioned subjects listed in this book could be handled differently by teachers leading the discussions.

Children today are taught to think very highly of their own feelings and opinions. Discussions often become a free-for-all of these opinions which, eerily, are usually about the same. Facts don’t have to come into play in these discussions. If or when they do, the class is usually persuaded by the emotional arguments.

An example of this was Lily & Dunkin’, by Donna Gephart. Tim is in eighth grade and wants to take hormone blockers to delay puberty. This is a basic theme of this book. Poor Tim! His father objects to this, at first. He changed his mind when the therapist asked him if he “would rather have a dead son or a live daughter?” One of the discussion questions reads: “Why is it best that she begin the hormone therapy now?” After the children ages 10 and up read this book, how do you think they will respond?

These are some questions a parent should consider about books in general:

  • If the child is reading the book on his/her own, what is the take-away? Is that take-away formed by factual or emotional persuasion? Is the book objective?
  • Are there links or resources included in the book that could be harmful? (One book I found in the juvenile section of a library had links to Kinsey Confidential, San Francisco Sex Information, Advocates for Youth, Go Ask Alice!, Scarleteen, Planned Parenthood, many LGBT resources, and adult books about sexual issues such as stories about transgender females to males. When the children venture to these websites, they discover other links that may well lead them to porn sites. One of the resource links from this book gives quite an education about beastiality.)
  • If the book is required, is it being discussed by the teacher? Is the information being slanted to a particular worldview?
  • What about climate change or global warming? What about BLM? What about Critical Race Theory? How are Christians portrayed? How are other religions depicted? How was Trump addressed in books for kids? Biden? Obama? Fauci? (Kate Messner’s book, Dr. Fauci: How a Boy from Brooklyn Became America’s Doctor, was released in June of 2021.) Who is God in children’s books? What about social activism? How is America represented? Capitalism? Marxism?
  • What are the themes and messages in the books being prominently displayed in the children’s sections of the public libraries? Are these same books found in Christian school libraries?
  • Why are high school students being assigned books that are written on such low reading levels?
  • Are the children assigned multiple books with the same message? How many does it take to change a worldview?

These are just a few of the questions a parent needs to consider.

Sources: LeoHohmann.comWhatsInsideChildrensBooks.com

Dozens Of School Districts Are Using Book That Claims ‘Whiteness’ Is The Devil And That White Children Sell Their Soul For ‘Stolen Land And Stolen Riches’

Investigative Journalist and avid CRT opponent Chris Rufo has identified over 30 school districts across 15 different states that are teaching the radical ‘anti-whiteness’ book, “Not My Idea” by Anastasia Higginbotham.

dozens of school districts are using book that claims ‘whiteness’ is the devil and that white children sell their soul for ‘stolen land and stolen riches’

Rufo notes that the book, meant for children as young as kindergartners, ‘traffics in the noxious principles of race essential-ism, collective guilt, and anti-whiteness.’

One part includes images portraying whiteness as the devil, offering the reader a contract that ‘bids them to whiteness’ in exchange for stolen land and the ability to ‘mess endlessly’ with the lives of people of color.

The book teaches children to primarily identify by their skin color while it paints white children as evil, saying: “Whiteness is a bad deal. It always was.”

Another page says, “Racism is a white person’s problem and we are all caught up in it.”

pic 2 jc story july 9 913x479

Not My Idea” is a clear example of how CRT brands white children as oppressors that should feel shame for the color of their skin.

In June, A law firm associated with Ruffo filed a law suit in Illinois against a school district for instructing teachers to read the book, among others, and use it in their curriculum.

Parents across the country have been pushing back against this racist and anti-American indoctrination by speaking up against the teachers and school boards.

Despite their opposition, the largest teachers union in the country approved a plan last week to promote CRT across all 50 states and their 14,000 districts.

Some states, like Oklahoma and Florida have stepped up and banned CRT from schools, but we need more to do the same.

Why are certain 5G cell tower components labeled “COV-19?”

Reports are coming out to show that some of the electrical components being used in 5G tower installations bear the marking of “COV-19,” which just so happens to be almost identical to COVID-19, the name used for the infection supposedly caused by the Wuhan coronavirus. The “Patriot Street Fighter” account on Telegram is one of the latest to share video footage of the components, which can clearly be seen with the marking of COV-19 on their chipsets. 5G component installers all around the world have reported similar markings on the equipment going into their towers, which shows that the phenomenon is strangely widespread and clearly not coincidental. As you may recall from early on in the plandemic, reports emerged about how Wuhan, China, where it all originated, had just turned on its 5G towers at almost the exact same time that area residents started to get sick. Some of them got so sick that they dropped dead in the streets, or so we were told. Donald Trump fast-tracked the rollout of 5G here in the United States not long after that, and here we are a year later with many who are sick and dying, purportedly from the “virus.” What is really going on here? We will leave it up to our readers to decide if there is a connection between 5G and the symptoms and sickness associated with the Chinese virus. Be sure to watch the following video from Brighteon.com, which shows yet another COV-19 chipset component being used in 5G installations (WARNING: LANGUAGE):

https://www.brighteon.com/9db72eaa-834a-4b3f-bbe1-1405afa50ba2

Vaccines and 5G, not some phantom “virus,” are spreading disease and death

Throughout the past year while tens of millions of Americans were on lockdown, telecommunications carriers were busy installing 5G chipsets in towers all across the land, including at schools where developing children spend all day in the classroom. Could it be that 5G radiation exposure produces the very same symptoms that are now being blamed on the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19)? What about Chinese virus injections? Are they, too, producing symptoms that mirror those caused by exposure to 5G radiation? Perhaps the jabs and the towers are delivering a one-two punch, creating the same health problems together. All of it combined is a recipe for health disaster, and yet the mainstream media is solely focused on the “virus,” with the occasional mention of a “rare” blood clot or death. Try as they might to convince us all that only the “virus” is dangerous, while everything they propose as the “solution” is perfectly “safe,” millions are waking up to the fact that it is all a sham. “Oh dear, technocrats, the cat’s out of the bag,” wrote one Brighteon commenter. “Targeted frequencies causing certain designer illnesses in conjunction with bioweapons.” “If real, what more proof do you need, 5G deniers, than the wording stamped right on the custom-made RF modulator module (which determines output frequency)? The FCC must be investigated.” Another responded by recommending that those interested check out the book The Invisible Rainbow: A History of Electricity and Life by Arthur Firstenberg. “Over the last 220 years, society has evolved a universal belief that electricity is ‘safe’ for humanity and the planet. Scientist and journalist Arthur Firstenberg disrupts this conviction by telling the story of electricity in a way it has never been told before—from an environmental point of view—by detailing the effects that this fundamental societal building block has had on our health and our planet,” part of the book’s synopsis reads. More news about the damaging effects of 5G can be found at 5GAlert.comSources for this article include:RumorMillNews.comT.meNaturalNews.comNaturalNews.comChelseaGreen.com

Lost Generation? America’s War Against Parents and the Destruction of Childhood

Left: Highschool band practice in Wenatchee, WA. Right: Biden Administration pick for HHS Secretary Transgender Rachel Levine.

Dr. Rachel Levine, born as Richard Levine, the name his parents gave to him, is a transgender doctor who has been nominated by the Biden administration to serve as the Assistant Secretary of Health.

Levine has two children, David and Dayna, through his ex-wife Martha Peaslee Levine. They allegedly divorced in 2013, after Richard Levine transitioned into a woman and became Rachel Levine.

Rachel Levine is a pediatrician who served as Secretary of the Pennsylvania Department of Health from 2017 to 2021, and is also a professor of pediatrics and psychiatry at the Penn State College of Medicine.

In Dr. Levine’s confirmation hearing before the U.S. Senate today, Senator Rand Paul questioned Levine on the topic of genital mutilation of minors, which is universally condemned by organizations such as the World Health Organizaion, the United Nations Children Fund, and the United Nations Population Fund, where genital mutilation is recognized as a violation of human rights.

Senator Paul also addressed the issue of forcing minors to take hormone blocking drugs against the advice of their parents, and specifically asked if Dr. Levine would condemn these practices.

Dr. Levine refused to answer the questions.

While transitioning children’s gender and the market growth for hormone blocking drugs has been increasing in recent years, this assault on children and the transgender political agenda has gone into overdrive now since COVID last year, as the Globalists use medical tyranny to fast-track their agenda, which includes destroying parenthood by removing parental rights, and giving the task of raising children to the State.

In Washington D.C., for example, a bill was introduced in October that would allow children as young as 11 years old to consent to receive a COVID vaccine without their parents’ approval or even knowledge. See:

Washington D.C. Bill Allows Children 11 Years and Older to be Vaccinated Without Parental Knowledge

And while children have a near ZERO percent chance of dying from COVID, social distancing and isolation measures with roots in CIA torture have been implemented for almost a year now, causing far more harm to children than any “virus” could. See:

Children Have 0.00% Chance of Dying from COVID but are Harmed for Life by Social Distancing, Which has its Roots in CIA Torture Techniques

And yet, teacher unions around the nation have fought against reopening schools for in-classroom teaching, and for those locations where children are allowed back in school, we are seeing reports like this one out of Wenatchee, WA showing what these children must endure just to participate in a group activity like a band practice.

Peachy Keenan, writing for The American Mind, recently published an article titled: The Doctor Is In(sane), where she relates a recent visit to their pediatrician with her teenage son. Some excerpts:

Your Pediatrician Wants a Word—Alone—with Your Teen. A Warning!

Hard to believe, but I have a kid approaching driving age. He’s a wonderful boy, in every way.

Devout, intelligent, and obsessed with basketball and video games, says his prayers every night before bed. Always reminds me to do penance on Fridays if I forget what day it is and eat meat (what day is this?).

Anyway, the Catholic formation we attempted, albeit imperfectly, to impose on him took. It blossomed.

Our son is always dressed for sports practice. He asked for a new weight bench and plates for Christmas.

He spent all of lockdown working out, just to make himself into a better basketball player. He measures himself every day and prays for more height. He is obviously, and very apparently, comfortable with all aspects of boyhood.

When it comes to his gender identity, the science is not only settled, but set in stone. You would have to be an imbecile not to see this instantly.

Or a pediatrician.

The Doctor Will Seize You Now

It started out as a normal annual checkup, until the pediatrician asked me to leave the room.

I didn’t understand at first. “Why?” I asked.

“There are some questions I need to ask him without you here.”

“Like what?”

“Oh, you know, about drugs and smoking.”

I stared at her, my mind racing. I realized that if I refused, other issues would be raised. Red flags would be added to the chart.

Why wouldn’t I want him to talk to a doctor? Was I hiding something? Did he have secrets I wanted kept secret?

“Do I have to leave?” I asked, still stunned.

“Yes, I need to ask him these things.” She stared at me not smiling.

My longtime doctor who had always been attentive and kind, was suddenly swinging iron keys to my gulag cell while punching the number to Child Protective Services on her phone.

Reader, I left. I lingered outside the door for a minute until a nurse ushered me into an empty storage room to wait, where I couldn’t eavesdrop.

A few minutes later, the doctor slinked out and waved goodbye without a word.

On the way to the car, the boy told me what happened.

“She talked to me about drugs and alcohol. And she told me when I have sex to use a condom.”

And finally, the kicker: “Then she asked me if I was comfortable with my gender.”

Beware the Pedo-atrician

He thought the gender question was absurd and funny. But he was outraged about the condom question.

“Mom, she told me to use birth control. Until I’m twenty-five! I’d be committing a mortal sin.”

He’s so good. I don’t deserve him. I got angrier and angrier as we drove home.

Here was this doctor my son had seen in person a total of five times in his life probing his most intimate secrets.

Does the white coat magically melt away kids’ stranger danger and cause them to open up to middle-aged harridans holding clipboards?

Guys, they really do want to separate you from your children and dictate their own agenda to them!

It’s not just theoretical anymore. This time it’s personal.

(Full article.)

Dr. Fauci Finally Confirms That Children Don’t Catch Or Transmit COVID-19 In Large Numbers

Better late than never. Perhaps because he believes Joe Biden will be inaugurated in January, Dr. Fauci is finally admitting that children do not get terribly ill from or transmit COVID-19 in any significant way. Weird, since Switzerland figured this out in AprilDetailed genetic studies in Iceland showed that children were not passing the virus to adults in any significant numbers in June. And German researchers asserted that children could actually act as a brake on transmission within the community.

But good old “follow the science” Fauci was wringing his hands and hedging his bets in the media and during congressional testimony. Most notably, he got into a heated exchange with Senator Rand Paul, who is also a doctor.

Paul noted the devastating effects of school closures, especially on disadvantaged childrenIt is only in the next decade that we will understand the impact of all the missed support services on these children. However, we do know many are not logging in for digital learning. Failure rates have also gone up where children only engage in distance learning.

Doctors and other agencies note increases in child abusedepression, and other mental health issues in children. There has also been an uptick in self-harm and suicidal ideation. This, over a respiratory virus with an infection fatality rate (IFR) of 0.13%, according to the WHO, which is very stratified by age and tends to affect the very elderly.

This debate raged on through the summer, when President Trump said reopening schools was a priority. It became gobsmackingly stupid when mayors and governors began to convert public space to daycare centers where children could engage in distance learning. Yet, they would not reopen schools. State leaders who chose to, such as Georgia Governor Brian Kemp and Ron DeSantis in Florida, were widely criticized.

They were also widely covered for a bumpy first week. Then nothing bad happened. So, you really don’t hear about them anymore, likely because these states would blow up the preferred narrative. Your children can’t go to school because Donald Trump is president, basically. A health official in Los Angeles even said the quiet part out loud.

Because Dr. Fauci and other Health Experts™ would not realistically frame the virus’s risk for children, teachers’ unions used the pandemic as cover for their destructive political agenda. In many urban districts, they refused to return unless political demands were met. We also saw just how far left these organizations were when they joined radical protests with the Democratic Socialists of America and other groups. Their list of demands was a cornucopia of dangerous policies, such as defunding the police. Now, one of these radicals will likely lead the Department of Education. Fabulous.

But now that the Very Bad Orange Man is presumed to be leaving office, Dr. Fauci can report what this author and many other outlets have been reporting for months:

“Look at the data, the spread from children and among children is not very big at all, not like one would have suspected.”

Team Reason has known this since April and pushed the data, despite Fauci saying (fearfully) otherwise – https://t.co/lqqddqhVAlpic.twitter.com/i9ME6tNf8j— Aaron Ginn (@aginnt) November 29, 2020

Actually, it was what anyone who was paying attention should have expected. By the time the virus ripped through Italy, it was apparent that the elderly and those with preexisting conditions were at the greatest risk. Dr. Birx was communicating that in the earliest briefings. Once the Iceland genetic and German studies came out, it should have been confirmed. As we watched other nations’ experiences, especially those that never closed schools, we could have made reasonable assumptions and moved forward.

But we didn’t. And our children will be paying for years to come in some of the more ridiculous areas of the countryNew York City and Kentucky just closed schools again. Los Angeles has never opened them. One has to wonder what excuse they will use now—or if one is no longer necessary because they believe they won an election.

DC Bill Will Allow Kids As Young As 11 To Be Vaccinated Without Parental Knowledge Or Consent

On Oct. 7, 2020, during a hastily scheduled virtual meeting,1 four District of Columbia Council members making up the Health Committee2 amended and unanimously passed a minor consent bill, B23-0171.3

The bill would not only permit children aged 11 years and older to give consent for doctors and other vaccine administrators to give them vaccines without their parents’ knowledge or consent, but would also require insurance companies, vaccine administrators and schools to conceal from parents that the child has been vaccinated.

On Oct. 20, 2020,4 the entire DC Council voted in favor of the bill 12:15 on the first reading in yet another virtual online meeting6 with no public testimony.

11 Year Old Vaccine

It was announced that the second reading, which will be the final vote, will take place on Nov. 10, 2020.7

Committee Chair And Bill Sponsor Admit “Imminent” COVID-19 Vaccine Is Reason For Sudden Push To Eliminate Parental Rights

NVIC issued an alert8 through the online NVIC Advocacy Portal when the bill had it’s first public hearing in June of 2019 advising opposition to the bill, which violated parental medical informed consent rights.

Testimony was taken,9 and NVIC submitted testimony against the bill.10 B23-0171 then sat for over a year untouched and unmoved.

In a revealing statement Vincent C. Gray (D-Ward 7), the chair of the DC Health Committee which passed the bill, explained why the bill was all suddenly being revived and pushed through so quickly.

Gray was quoted in The Washington Post as saying, “the hope of an imminent corona­virus vaccine gave the bill new urgency.”11

Primary sponsor of this bill, DC Council Member Mary Cheh (D-Ward 3), emphasized that coronavirus vaccines were her the main reason why she wants to remove parents from the process of vaccinating children. Advocating for passage of her bill, she stated:

“And given our ongoing pandemic and the incredible work being done to develop a COVID-19 vaccine, it’s more important than ever I think that we reduce any and all barriers to these treatments and this legislation aims to do just that by increasing access to vaccines for minors who choose to get vaccinated but have not been able to do so.”12

If this bill passes, it is clear that minor children will be at risk of being pressured and coerced into getting a COVID-19 vaccine behind their parents’ back once it is available and added by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) to the childhood vaccine schedule recommended by the U,S. Centers for Disease Control (CDC).

Violation Of The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act And Parental Rights

B23-0171 permits minor children 11 years and older to consent to any vaccine recommended by ACIP without a parent’s knowledge or consent (bill lines 27-30).

Federal legislative history provides evidence that Congress never intended for a minor child to make decisions to get a vaccine without parents’ knowledge or consent.

When the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 198613 was passed, the Act clearly stated that before the administration of vaccines14 to a child, a health care provider shall give a copy of the CDC’s vaccine information materials to the, “parent or legal representative of any child to whom the provider intends to administer such vaccine…”

The CDC confirms that there is a requirement that their Vaccine Information Statement (VIS) is provided to the parent/legal guardian prior to vaccination of a minor child on their VIS Q&A page.15

Under the question, “Is there a requirement to verify that parents/legal representatives have actually received and reviewed the VIS,” the answer is a clear “YES”.

These requirements under federal law for a parent to be educated with CDC materials prior to their minor child being vaccinated will not be met if a child is allowed to make these decisions on their own.

The United States Supreme Court has recognized the right of parents to be an active and integral part of their children’s lives as “perhaps the oldest of the fundamental liberty interests recognized by [the Supreme] Court.” Troxel v. Granville, 530 U.S. 57 (U.S. 2000)16

B23-0171 Endangers The Health And Well Being Of Children

A minor child is far less likely than an adult parent to understand personal and family medical history, including vaccine reactions, allergies, and autoimmune or neurological disorders.

Children do not have the same kind of critical thinking skills or emotional maturity required to make a well-informed vaccine benefit-risk decision compared to an adult.

Vaccines can cause injury and death as evidenced by the creation of a federally operated Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP), which has paid out over $4.4 billion dollars to vaccine victims.17

If a child consents to vaccination without their parent knowledge and has a reaction, the parent may not recognize vaccine reaction symptoms and the reason for their child’s sudden personality change and decline in physical, mental or emotional health, and this lack of knowledge could be life threatening for the child.

The parent’s lack of knowledge about the fact that their child was given vaccines that carry a risk of injury or death may well prevent the parent from seeking immediate medical care.

Under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act18 Congress gave partial liability protection to vaccine manufacturers in 1986 and then added an amendment giving vaccine administrators liability protection from vaccine injury lawsuits in 1987.

In 2011, the U.S. Supreme Court judges in Bruesewitz et al v. Wyeth et al19 affirmed that government licensed and recommended childhood vaccines were “unavoidably unsafe” and effectively removed all remaining liability from vaccine manufacturers.

Today, pharmaceutical companies making and selling vaccines and doctors and other vaccine administrators have no legal accountability or financial liability in civil court when a mandated vaccine causes permanent injury or death.

There is no justification for the state to eliminate a parent’s legal and moral right to make an informed benefit and risk decision about vaccination on behalf of a minor child, especially when doctors and other vaccine providers have no liability or accountability for what happens to the child after vaccination.

Violates Family Educational Rights And Privacy Act (FERPA)20

B23-0171 compels schools (bill lines 52-54) to conceal vaccine administration from parents, whose children give consent to receive vaccinations on their own, even when their parents have already declined one or more vaccines for health risk reasons or have filed a religious vaccine exemption.

FERPA, 34 CFR § 99.1021, guarantees parents the right to have access to their children’s education records. The definition of “education records” include health and vaccine records at the K-12 level22.

While B23-0171 blocks parents from getting access to their child’s vaccination status, the bill does permit schools to share the child’s vaccination record with the DC Department of Health or the school-based health center (bill lines 53-54).

This is also in conflict with FERPA because 34 CFR §99.30 requires prior written parental consent before personally identifiable information (PII) is disclosed to others and requires schools to provide copies of those records disclosed.23

While FERPA does allow for release of PII under the health and safety emergency exception, the release of information that personally identifies the student is extremely limited.24

Bill Conflicts With Religious Exemption, Requires Falsification Of Records

Section 5300.11 of the DC Municipal Regulations states:

“The immunization requirements subject to this Chapter, shall not apply to any student whose parent or guardian objects in writing to the immunization on grounds that the medical treatment or medical test is forbidden by their religion or religious beliefs and practices25.”

Granting vaccine providers the ability to vaccinate children in the absence of parental consent conflicts with the already codified religious exemption rights of parents.

There are other serious legal issues creating the potential for criminal violations and civil liability lawsuits: the bill requires vaccine providers and insurers to conceal the fact that the child was vaccinated and it requires the falsification of official medical records by vaccine administrators.

The bill (lines 37-41) requires providers to seek reimbursement from the parent’s insurance company but prohibits insurers from sending an Explanation of Benefits.

Lines 48-52 requires a health care provider to leave part of the immunization record blank concealing from the parent the fact that their own child was given vaccines.

DC Vaccine Bill Part Of The Dangerous Agenda To Remove Parents From Vaccination Decisions For Minor Children

Congress held two vaccine hearings on Feb. 2726 and Mar. 5, 2019.27 The hearings, which focused on vaccine hesitancy, pitted children against their parents.

Veteran vaccine safety and informed consent advocates with decades of experience, including time spent serving as consumer representatives on federal advisory committees, were denied the ability to testify.

However, a teenager, who had no expertise in the area of vaccine safety and law and whose only experience related to the subject being discussed was recently criticizing his mother on social media28 for not vaccinating him, was invited to testify.29

After the hearing, the mainstream media published multiple similar articles promoting the ill-conceived concept of doctors being given the power to convince minor children to receive vaccines without their parents’ consent, often quoting the teen’s testimony as justification for why parents should be cut out of the vaccination process for their minor children.30

Medical trade groups representing liability-free vaccine administrators also endorsed the concept of giving children liability free vaccines without parental consent.

Doctors, who are frustrated with having to spend time talking with educated parents about vaccines, have identified minor consent as a way to coerce children into consenting to vaccines on their own.

Pre-adolescents and teenagers are vulnerable to peer and authority-figure persuasion.

An opinion piece expressing support for removing parental informed consent rights was published in the New England Journal of Medicine, 31 and the American Medical Association passed a resolution supporting state laws to allow minors to consent to vaccination.32

This coordinated effort resulted in 13 minor consent bills being introduced in state legislatures in 2019, and there was a big jump to 21 similar bills being introduced in 2020.

Legislators listened to parents and rejected a total of 33 minor consent bills filed in 2019 and 2020. The DC minor consent bill in is the only one moving.33

What Happens If The Bill Passes On November 10th?

If the bill passes a second reading in the City Council, it goes to the DC Mayor Muriel Bowser, who has up to 10 days to sign the bill, let it go into effect without her signature, or veto it.

If Mayor Bowser vetoes the bill, the City Council can override the veto by a two-thirds vote.

The final step before becoming law is the bill must be sent to the United States House of Representatives and the United States Senate for a period of 30 days before becoming effective as law.

During this period of review, the U.S. Congress may enact into law a joint resolution disapproving and negating the legislation.

If, during the review period, the President of the United States approves a joint resolution by Congress disapproving the DC legislation, it will be prevented from becoming law.

If, however, upon the expiration of the congressional review period, no joint resolution disapproving the Council’s Act has been approved by the President, the bill finally becomes a law and is assigned a law number.34

Litigation is also likely if the DC Council passes B23-0171.

In an Oct. 21, 2020 update by ParentalRights.org, “DC Council Would Discard Constitution, End Parents’ Rights,” Executive Director Michael Ramey asserts this bill is contrary to the U.S. Constitution and lays out existing U.S. Supreme Court precedent to back this up.

He says, “For nearly 100 years, consistent Supreme Court precedent has held that parents have both the duty and the right to direct the care, custody, and control of their minor children.”35

What Can People Do To Help Defeat This Legislation?

Families living or sending their children to school in the District of Columbia should contact all thirteen members of the DC Council36 and tell them to Vote NO on B23-0171 in the second and final reading.

Specific directions, talking points, and contact information is published in the alert on the NVIC Advocacy Portal.

Everyone else can help get this information to people they know in DC. NVIC anticipates that there will be similar minor consent bills filed in other states in 2021.

Registered users of the free online NVIC Advocacy Portal will receive action alerts with talking points when vaccine related bills like this one are introduced in 2021 so they can take action in their own states to protect their informed consent rights.

By Dawn Richardson / References:

Advisory Committee on Immunization PracticesAmerican Medical AssociationB23-0171Bruesewitz et al v. Wyeth et alCDCCenters for Disease Control and PreventioncoronavirusCOVID-19Dawn RichardsonDistrict of Columbia CouncilMary ChehNational Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986National Vaccine Information CenterNew England Journal of MedicineNVICNVIC Advocacy Portalpersonally identifiable informationPIIThe Vaccine ReactinThe Vaccine ReactionThe Washington PostTroxel v. GranvilleVaccine Information StatementVincent C. GrayVIS

We Are Becoming The Pod People

Clearly, the COVID “pandemic” is not intended to be a passing emergency but a ruse to impose a “new normal” corresponding to the UN’s Agenda 2030.

The dystopian future is taking shape. Mass gatherings have been canceled. We must experience the world on a TV screen. The NFL and MLB plays in front of a cardboard crowd to sound effects.

We Are Becoming The Pod People

Millions are stuck at home, working “remotely,” or paid to do nothing. (Will they ever agree to work again?)

Restaurants and other businesses in urban centers are going bust.

Students are deprived of the society of their peers, forced to take their courses online. Many are confined to their dorms without proper provisions.

Everyone is required to wear filthy masks.

Locally, the Royal Winnipeg Ballet canceled their annual Nutcracker ballet, scheduled for Christmas. Imagine hundreds of artists out of jobs.

Hap Birthday


There is talk that Christmas gatherings may be canceled. Every source of solace or happiness is being shut down.

At the local Safeway, the lounge where old folk enjoyed their Timbits and coffee has been closed. They have nowhere to go.

Montreal residents won’t be allowed to visit friends or family at home for most of October or eat out at their favorite restaurant as the provincial government struggles to slow the surge of new coronavirus cases.

All bars, casinos, and restaurants are closed (takeout only). Libraries, museums, cinemas, and theatres will also be closed. Being less than two meters apart will be prohibited.

Masks will be mandatory during demonstrations. Houses of worship and venues for events, such as funerals and weddings, will have a 25-person limit. Hair salons, hotels, and other such businesses will stay open. Schools will remain open.”

For 16 million people in Northeast England, pubs and restaurants can stay open, but it will be illegal to go for a drink with a member of another household or visit them at their home.

Roughly 100 students at the University of Western Ontario were referred for investigation under the school’s code of conduct after campus police broke up parties in university residences on the weekend.

“At the University of Alabama in Tuscaloosa, with at least 1,889 virus cases since mid-August, and at the University of Notre Dame, with about 550 cases, students have reported their classmates for violating quarantine and wandering outside.”

Our social lives have moved to Facebook.

We’re being reengineered.

The economy is tilting to cabin fever. Home exercise programs and food delivery are thriving. Amazon stock is soaring.

Meanwhile, Main Street is boarded up.

“The housebound are nimbly pivoting to virtual social gatherings,” The New York Times reports.

“They’re holding birthday parties and bar mitzvahs over video chat, broadcasting D.J. sets and streaming concerts (some from the luxurious confines of celebrity homes), and establishing quarantine movie nights on Twitter for “virtual companionship.”

Pod People Lithuania


A lot of communal events are taking place on Zoom, a videoconferencing app now being used by many classrooms and businesses (thus transforming it into one of the few companies doing well on the stock market). But it’s not just Zoom.

There are, for example, a small but highly vocal number of people gathering in the digital plazas, pet stores, and pizza shops of Club Penguin Online.

There are happy hours being held on Google Hangout, and poker games taking place over FaceTime.

There are flute meditation sessions on Instagram and thousands of people participating in dance raves that are broadcast on Twitch.

It’s a lot for the internet. On Monday, Discord, the chat app popular with gamers, announced that it would increase its capacity by 20 percent to keep up with demand; it crashed shortly thereafter.”

Conclusion
The plan is to dehumanize us in advance of full-blown tyranny. The scary part is that the masses still think the “authorities” have their best interests at heart.

The medical profession, media, and politicians are all taking their orders from the Rockefellers.

This psyop is an egregious betrayal of trust from which society will not recover unless the traitors are all sent packing.

All we can do is refuse to become “pod people.”