Dangerous Precedents and Hypothetical Threats: “Vaccine Exemption” and The Deportation of Tennis Player Novak Djokovic

Australia’s treatment of Novak Djokovic, the tennis world number one, has been revelatory.  Unintentionally, this has exposed the seedier, arbitrary and inconsistent nature of Australia’s border policies.  The approval by the Australian Federal Court of the Immigration Minister Alex Hawke’s decision to re-cancel the prominent Serb’s visa left the country a heaving precedent that will be invoked, in future, with relish.

Djokovic had originally entered the country under the assumption that he had been granted a legitimate vaccine exemption.  As the former Australian Tennis Open director Paul McNamee explained to the ABC, “every player and support member fills in a form, visa 408, and everyone does that, you are guided through it by Tennis Australia, every step of the way, and then you get approval, that is the process.”

On December 30, 2021, Djokovic received a letter from the Chief Medical Officer of Tennis Australia explaining that he had been granted a “Medical exemption from COVID vaccination” on the grounds that he had recently recovered from COVID-19. The exemption certificate had been furnished by an Independent Medical Review panel commissioned by Tennis Australia and approved by the Victorian state government’s independent Medical Exemptions Review Panel.

To cap things off, the Department of Home Affairs informed Djokovic that his Australia Travel Declaration has also been given the nod.  His “responses [i]ndicated that [he met] the requirements for a quarantine-free travel into Australia where permitted by the jurisdiction of your travel.”

The story turned out rather differently.  Such documentation proved insufficient for Djokovic on entering Australia on January 5.  A delegated officer of the Australian Border Force hastily cancelled his visa, giving Djokovic insufficient notice to prepare his explanation on the morning of January 6.  It was this procedural blunder that led to the Serb’s victory in the Federal Circuit Court, where Judge Anthony Kelly stated the following with some pungency: “Here, a professor and a physician have produced and provided to (Djokovic) a medical exemption.  Further to that, that medical exemption and the basis on which it was given was separately given by a further independent expert specialist panel established by the Victorian state government […] The point I am agitated about is, what more could this man have done?”

The Commonwealth, for its part, rejected claims that any deferral of vaccination should not have been read as an excuse not to get vaccinated.  The Tennis Australia exemption letter did not constitute sufficient information for the purpose of entering the country unvaccinated.

Exercising ministerial discretion

The Commonwealth’s defeat in the Federal Circuit Court did not end matters.  Hawke was left to exercise his vast executive discretion in a none-too Solomonic way.  The federal Labor opposition leader, Anthony Albanesewondered whether the government was conducting a focus group in order to receive “the answer before it responds to the issue”.

As Hawke dithered, Djokovic was ritually torched in media and social media circles for incorrectly filling out the travel declaration.  Much of the kindling had been provided by the tennis player himself.  He had, it transpired, been in Spain; his agent had made a “human error” in stating that he had not travelled abroad in the 14 days prior to arriving in Australia on January 5.Top Tennis Player Forced to Stop Competing Due to COVID-19 Shot Side Effects – Other Top Tennis Stars Say “No” to Shots

He had also breached Serbian pandemic restrictions by avoiding isolating for 14 days after receiving a positive PCR result on December 16.  Instead, on December 17, he breezily attended a tennis event in Belgrade where he presided over the giving of awards to children and, on the following day, conducted an interview with French journalist Franck Ramella of L’Equipe.  “The instructions were clear,” Ramella subsequently wrote on realising that the tennis star had done the interview after testing positive for COVID-19.  There were to be “no questions about vaccination.”

This was all a bit much even for the otherwise supportive Serbian Prime Minister Ana Brnabić, who told the BBC that, “If you’re positive you have to be in isolation.”  She did, however, leave it to Djokovic to explain the matter. “I do not know when he actually got the results, when he saw the results, so there is some grey area… the only answer to this can be provided by Novak.”

This growing resume of seeming shiftiness did not augur well for Djokovic’s already anaemically thin chances.  The Minister had been furnished with fuel and duly ignited it.  The cancellation came, timed with brutal effect, on January 14.  It had been made“on health and good order grounds, on the basis that it was in the public interest to do so.”  The Australian Open, for which Djokovic had started training for on court, was to commence on January 17.

The threat inflation factor

Within hours, the legal team began proceedings in the Federal Court of Australia in a speedy effort to overturn Hawke’s cancellation.  The government submission was telling, consciously magnifying the Djokovic threat.  He had “indicated publicly that he was opposed to becoming vaccinated against COVID-19”.  He had “acted inconsistently with certain COVID-19 restrictions in the past.”

The second ground drew more attention to the first point, with the Minister insisting that Djokovic was stirring an anti-vaccination insurrection: “[T]here are some media reports that some groups opposed to vaccination have supported Mr Djokovic’s presence in Australia, by reference to his unvaccinated status.”  The ground was barely credible, given that his reservations about vaccination were already known before entering Australia.  As is often the case Down Under, the Australian public is treated as a potentially wayward child who might be tempted by anti-institutional contrarianism.

The third ground followed on from the first: that encouraging such resistance against COVID-19 vaccinations and restrictions “would present a problem for the health of individuals and the operation of Australia’s hospital system”.  What a revolutionary monster the Serbian player was being made out to be.

Djokovic’s submission

The defence outlined, plausibly, that Hawke had engaged in a crude bit of threat inflation.  It was one thing to deport an individual who, posing an individual health risk, had entered Australia lacking a medical exemption and inconsistently with the guidelines of ATAGI (Australian Technical Advisory Group on Immunisation).  It was quite another to do so to a person “who poses negligible individual health risk, enter with an exemption, and consistently with ATAGI guidelines, etc.”

Such reasoning, it followed, was “perverse, illogical, or irrational” and distinctly “out of keeping with the proper exercise of a power the purpose of which is to reduce risk to health”.  This also ignored that the cancellation “creates a much larger health risk (or good order risk).”

The Minister had also not addressed “in express terms” what those dangerous consequences to health and good order Djokovic posed might be.  This was a “counterfactual” that the Minister did not consider.  The “anti-vaccination sentiment” approach was also at odds with the original delegate of the Minister for Home Affairs.

In attempting to hole Hawke’s argument, emphasis was placed on the Minister’s one-sided approach in considering the consequences of Djokovic’s presence, rather than absence. It might very well be that the visa cancellation, the Serb’s detention and deportation, rather than the player’s presence in Australia, could cause unrest.  “Mr Djokovic’s point is that that material [suggesting that anti-vaccination groups were upset at the cancellation and his detention] is not referred to or considered in the Minister’s reasons.”

Valiantly, the defence also argued that Hawke’s discretion to cancel the visa could not be undertaken “on an evidence-free figment of his imagination.”  The point on whether there was evidence supporting the contention that Djokovic’s presence “may foster sentiment against vaccination” was not addressed.  The media reports cited by the Minister to supposedly show anti-vaccination support by groups in Australia failed to even mention Djokovic.

The mess became even more elaborate with the defence salvo that the Minister did not himself know what Djokovic’s actualviews on vaccination were.  This was despite claiming that his anti-vaccination stance was a “well-known” one.  “This,” the submission bluntly states, “is illogical.”  Djokovic’s statement for the record should, the argument went, lead one to an inference that his public views had been “taken out of context” and that he did “not accept the depiction by the ‘international media’ of his views on vaccination”.

All it would have taken was a request by Hawke that Djokovic furnish him with material on the issue.  As the player had previously pointed out in other media reports, he was “no expert” on vaccinations and was keeping an “open mind” on the issue; he simply wanted to have “an option to choose” what was “best” for his body.

Dark consequences, sinister precedents

On Sunday, January 16, the decision of the full court of the Federal Court was handed down.  (Full reasons are yet to be published.)  In finding for the Commonwealth, Chief Justice James Allsop affirmed the traditional reservation shown by Australian judges to challenging exercises of executive power. The grounds made by Djokovic “focus on whether the decision was, for different reasons, irrational or legally unreasonable.  It is not part or function of the court to decide upon the merit or wisdom of the decision.”

The Djokovic precedent presents the authorities with a large tarring brush, one to be used against other notable figures of certain opinions seen to pose a risk to Australia’s public interest.  Hypotheticals will suffice, given that the Minister need only be satisfied that the person might be a risk to health, safety and good order.

Such latitude also grants authorities a heavy hand to target future dissent and protest. The Australian government will be able “to justify,” barrister and president of Liberty Victoria Mike Stanton warns, “the suppression of legitimate political expression because others might engage in unrest.”

With a stunning lack of imagination, the Djokovic precedent promises that the executive will not be accountable for the disorder and disruption arising from deporting individuals who might command a following.  Oppression promises to be twinned with unpardonable stupidity.

Complete Moral Decline: Elementary School Hosts ‘SATAN Club’ For Children With The Satanic Temple

Satanists are targeting kids as young as six years old.

Parents in Illinois were shocked to discover that their children’s school approved an event for children organised by the Satanic Temple.

elementary school hosts ‘satan club’ for children

The event, titled ‘Satan Club’ held at Jane Addams Elementary School in Moline vowed to introduce children to “a scientific, rationalist, non-superstitious worldview.”

Satan club is intended for children from grades 1-5, meaning that presumed satanists are targeting kids as young as six years old.

A flier promoting the event, posted to Facebook by one parent, noted that all involved had been “vetted” by the Satanic Temple and had passed criminal background checks.

Well, that’s comforting then.

It also notes that “the Satanic Temple is a non-theistic religion that views Satan as a mythical figure representing individual freedom,” and that the club “does not attempt to convert children to any religious ideology.”

“Hey Kids, let’s have fun at After School Satan Club!” the flier states:

Yeah, no thanks.

Former High Ranking Satanist Claims: ‘I Performed Satanic Rituals Inside Abortion Clinics’.

Among other posts prompting their rampant advocacy for abortion and Hailing Satan for 2022, the Satanic Temple is promoting the kids’ clubs:

The Illinois school provided more information, claiming that it was just renting out a space to the organisation:

Many expressed anger and disbelief that the school would allow the organisation in:

One user reminded parents to get their kids out of public “education” (i.e. indoctrination) system:

Another commented that the far left is a demonic cult:

More activities aimed at children: “let’s summon demons.”

Meanwhile, a lot of people are fine with Satanists having access to six year old kids, which made someone comment the following:

“The truly scary part about this is the comments section. It’s unbelievable how many people actually AGREE with this! Folks, we are in the end of days. Find Jesus Christ before it’s too late!”

Source: Summit.news

Why The Elites Are Obsessed With The End Of The World

In 1999, a young PhD candidate in philosophy named Nick Bostrom published an article in Mind entitled “The Doomsday Argument is Alive and Kicking.” The article asked whether probabilistic attempts to predict when the last human being would be born were reasonable. (They were, it argued.) The title, however, signaled something far more significant: the end of post–Cold War optimism. Human extinction was back on the menu.

why the elites are obsessed with the end of the world

In the years following the Mind article, Bostrom’s star would rise. He was instrumental in founding at Oxford the academic think tank Future of Humanity Institute, devoted to preventing human extinction. Seven years later, his work would help inspire the founding at Cambridge of a second such institute, the Centre for the Study of Existential Risk. By 2015, Bostrom had made Foreign Policy’s “Top 100 Global Thinkers” list for the second time.

Largely thanks to Bostrom and a battery of his associates, the study of “existential risks” — threats that could bring about human extinction or permanent civilizational collapse — has become an interdisciplinary academic cottage industry.

With acolytes ranging from the prominent astrophysicist and Astronomer Royal Martin Rees to the neuroscientist Anders Sandberg, the “x-risk” crowd has now spent the past two decades meticulously inventorying threats to our species, particularly those posed by artificial intelligence and emergent technologies.

X-risk preoccupations extend far beyond the ivory tower. Jaan Tallinn, formerly of Skype, co-founded both the CSER and the Future of Life Institute in Cambridge, Massachusetts, and has donated generously to the FHI and the Berkeley Existential Risk Initiative.

The mercurial Elon Musk sits on the advisory board of both the CSER and the FLI and has bequeathed millions to each. The Open Philanthropy Project, a charitable organization run by Facebook co-founder Dustin Moskovitz, has pledged to donate over $15 million to the FHI.

It is no exaggeration to say that billionaires are quietly bankrolling existential risk research.

Over the past summer, this behind-the-scenes activity played out in flamboyant fashion with a pair of private space launches spearheaded by Richard Branson and Jeff Bezos. Like Musk, Bezos in particular has long professed that private space colonization is necessary to safeguard humanity.

In an article for The Guardian published in July, the Oxford historian Thomas Moynihan’s response was to lampoon Silicon Valley’s obsession, arguing that aspiring “space barons” like Musk and Jeff Bezos are abdicating responsibility for sublunar crises here on Earth.

His book, X-Risk: How Humanity Discovered Its Own Extinction, more meticulously locates this obsession within a longer history. Like much of his other public writing, it traces how our species “discovered its own extinction.”

Paradoxically, however, the book is wildly Panglossian — within a few pages it becomes apparent that he shares the techno-optimism of the very space tycoons he criticizes. Although he is at pains to argue that existential risk “cannot be rejected as a Silicon Valley fad,” he nonetheless traffics in tried-and-true Silicon Valley rhetoric: that we must enthusiastically embrace promising new technologies to realize “the full scope of our potential” as a species. (Moynihan is the Future of Humanity Institute’s informal in-house historian, surely no accident.)

A case in point: he tells us that the “discovery” of human extinction was the ultimate triumph of Enlightenment rationalism. Thanks to a series of intellectual breakthroughs — and growing awareness that the cosmos might be devoid of intelligent life — modern science and Enlightenment philosophy confronted the fact that human survival is not preordained.

We alone can secure our future:

“Remember, the human is a being whose vocation […] is to liberate itself from its own extinction,” he intones.

Yet, while X-Risk represents an exhaustive catalog of reflections on our species’s potential demise — spanning centuries, academic disciplines, and national borders — Moynihan’s history also contains a glaring, dangerous, and obviously intentional omission: the word “eugenics” does not appear once in 424 pages.

This is no mere oversight. His book systematically glosses over the fact that human extinction was a hobbyhorse of the eugenics movement, and it has now reemerged as a fascination of the contemporary existential risk crowd, often rebranded as “bioenhancement,” “transhumanism,” and even “new eugenics.”

Indeed, although he avoids the word “eugenics,” his desire to rehabilitate eugenic discourse is clear:

“[T]he pathway to the future — and to maturity over extinction — is the path of bioenhancement,” Moynihan proclaims near the end of his book.

He then writes: “To truly assume maturity, perhaps, is to realize that we must leave Earth and our evolutionary past behind.”

Throughout X-Risk, he uses precisely such euphemisms. When discussing the work of the turn-of-the-20th-century British geneticist and early x-risk aficionado J. B. S. Haldane, for example, Haldane’s eugenicism is innocuously described as the “daring task of redirecting our own evolution.”

Likewise, when Moynihan suggests that Haldane’s championing of “ectogenesis” — the artificial development of embryos outside the womb — actually anticipates the radical feminism of Shulamith Firestone, he conveniently fails to mention that Haldane conceived of ectogenesis as a tool for eugenic advancement. It could be said that Musk’s intellectual antecedents are anxious British aristocrats who mulled civilizational decline well over a century ago — many of whom were willing to consider extreme strategies à la Musk.

In short, neither Musk’s nor the Oxbridge think tanks’ interest is novel.

In the 19th-century Anglophone world, no single text did more to refashion thinking about human extinction than the publication of Darwin’s on The Origin of Species in 1859. It was often viewed as an “outrage” to humanity’s “naïve self-love” (as Freud famously described Darwin’s impact decades later).

But an influential cross section of Darwin’s contemporaries and inheritors saw evolutionary science not as a scythe that cut humankind down to size but as heralding glorious possibilities for human supremacy.

They accepted the assertion that human beings are precarious animals vulnerable to extinction, but they rejected the idea that the human species is not uniquely privileged among organic beings.

After all, we are the only animal capable of being paranoid about our evolutionary future, and potentially able to safeguard it.

Darwin argued that extinction is mundane: a regular feature of the evolutionary process. By making extinction boring — the result of unexceptional changes accumulating over vast stretches of time, rather than of unprecedented and uncontrollable upheavals (as had previously been believed) — evolutionary theory made it possible to view extinction as a long-term risk that might be anticipated, and thus strategized against, in advance.

Early Darwinian science fiction featured the looming threat of interspecies competition, but in fact many mainstream British intellectuals believed that the greatest danger to human survival might be the human species itself.

Darwin’s cousin Francis Galton capitalized on this evolutionary fever, and fear, kicking off the eugenics movement with his 1883 book, Inquiries into Human Faculty and Its Development.

In the decades to follow, Galton’s movement would establish a particularly strong foothold in the United States, where it was dominated by a noxious combination of economic anxiety and racialized nativism. It was British eugenics that was marked by grander ambitions.

The English physician Caleb Saleeby spoke in 1909 for a growing number of British intellectuals when he declared that “eugenics is going to save the world.” This conviction would rapidly coalesce after World War I into the paranoid worldview that inflects existential risk discourse today: the belief that the human species is the only species that has evolved to bear the moral imperative of survival, whatever the cost.

¤

In 1923, J. B. S. Haldane wrote a short book, Daedalus; or, Science and the Future. The first installment in the English publisher Kegan Paul’s infamous “To-day and To-morrow” series, it imagines a future remade by eugenic enhancement.

“Had it not been for ectogenesis, there can be little doubt that civilization would have collapsed […] owing to the greater fertility of the less desirable members of the population in almost all countries,” writes Haldane.

The book ends with an unsettling prediction:

“The scientific worker of the future will more and more resemble the lonely figure of Daedalus as he becomes conscious of his ghastly mission, and proud of it.” The following year, the prominent Oxford philosopher F. C. S. Schiller would pen the next “To-day and To-morrow” contribution.

In Tantalus, or The Future of Man, he warns that humanity’s “future has always been precarious […] because it has always been uncertain whether [our species] would use its knowledge well or ill, to improve or to ruin itself.”

Biological knowledge — politically mediated through eugenics — promised a means by which this improvement might be achieved and existential ruin avoided. Anthony Ludovici, a fellow British philosopher and translator of Nietzsche, would similarly maintain that the stakes of “eugenic mating” were nothing less than “the survival of human life in a desirable form.”

He offered these insights in a 1926 book (part of the same series) on “woman’s future and future woman” in which he opined that birth control should ideally be replaced by “some kind of controlled and legalized infanticide.”

The year 1926 would prove a banner year for eugenicists. Ronald Fisher, a major figure in the “modern synthesis” of Darwinian evolution and Mendelian genetics, would write an ambitious essay entitled, “Eugenics: Can it Solve the Problem of Decay of Civilizations?” which argued that guided evolution might hold the key to permanently safeguarding society from disaster.

These concerns were also taken up by the English schoolteacher Leonard Huxley. The son of Thomas Huxley, Leonard would tarnish the family name with his book Progress and the Unfit, in which he compared Western Europe to declining Rome, with failing racial hygiene as the chief threat to the survival of England and perhaps human civilization itself.

This worry was likewise shared by Leonard Darwin, son of Charles and president of the British Eugenics Society, who in 1925 warned that biological decay would drive civilizational collapse unless the reproduction of the unfit was curbed by eugenic means.

As the decade wound to a close, such pronouncements only grew more dire and disturbing. Charles John Bond, a doctor and euthanasia enthusiast, would deliver the 1928 Galton Lecture in which he proclaimed that the biologically feeble poor were akin to “parasitic cancer cells” that threatened humanity by out-reproducing the wealthy.

Assuming that “civilized” temperament and fecundity were inversely related, he speculated that increasing the fertility of the elites “might prove to be the deciding factor in race survival in the future.”

As for the lower classes? “We ought to welcome the extinction of the degenerate race,” Bond counseled.

Olaf Stapledon, the prodigiously talented author of a number of eugenics-soaked sci-fi masterpieces — much admired by Moynihan in X-Risk — would deliver a national broadcast on “The Remaking of Man” in 1931.

The address waxed in rapturous fashion about our possible eugenic futures while also warning that accidents or terrestrial catastrophes “may easily disinfect the earth of the microbe, man.”

In a modestly titled 1934 tract If I Were Dictator, Stapledon’s friend and esteemed biologist Julian Huxley — son of Leonard, brother of the novelist Aldous — continued this line of inquiry. There, the biologist argued that, while “evolution […] may go backwards, or spread sideways […] or become fossilized,” human intelligence spares us of this fate.

“Other organisms are the passive subjects of evolutionary forces,” Huxley wrote, but “man can become the conscious trustee of Evolution.”

Two years after this pronouncement, in his own Galton Lecture, Huxley would ominously declare that if eugenics was not widely adopted:

“[W]e can be sure of this alarming fact. […] Humanity will gradually destroy itself.”

Less than a decade later, in a bid to end a world war marked by the deranged application of eugenics, two bombs would fall out of a clear blue Japanese sky, ushering humanity exponentially closer to the very destruction Huxley prophesied.

¤

In fleshing out this partial history of existential risk’s entanglement with eugenics, my aim is not to paint contemporary x-risk researchers as mustache-twirling villains.

I had the pleasure of speaking on a panel with Moynihan a few years ago — he came across as thoughtful, modest, and unlikely to be engaged in a malicious conspiracy. Likewise, it seems a stretch to suggest that Nick Bostrom’s philosophy “contains all the ingredients necessary for a genocidal catastrophe,” as the philosopher Phil Torres recently claimed in a rather hyperbolic article for Current Affairs.

What I am saying, though, is that we cannot claim to take existential risk seriously — and meaningfully confront the grave threats to the future of human and nonhuman life on this planet — if we do not also confront the fact that our ideas about human extinction, including how human extinction might be prevented, have a dark history.

Although eugenics was not a univocal movement — in Britain or internationally — the thinkers I highlight above all tended to share the assumption that Darwinian biology (and its synthesis with genetics) marked a turning point, a view shared by most x-risk scholars. This fact bears scrutiny, especially given the growing penetration of tech billionaires into this x-risk space.

In the broadest terms, people like Moynihan, Bostrom, and even Musk are united by conviction that we — or, rather, they — have a profound moral imperative to prevent human extinction and provide a livable world for far-future human beings. These are laudable aims.

Yet, we should also remember that many early eugenicists also had noble aspirations: Haldane was a staunch anti-imperialist who died an Indian citizen, and Julian Huxley was a vocal opponent of racialized eugenics who spoke vociferously against the Nazi program.

Many of them viewed their work as part of the struggle against capitalistic inequality, and yet they also believed in the liberatory potential of eugenics. Any history that attempts to enlist them as Moynihan does in the fight against human extinction must reckon with this complicated legacy.

Today, “man” is no longer the “political animal,” as Aristotle once pronounced. Rather, the human species has become the paranoid animal: the only form of intelligent life able to fear for its future, and now hypothetically (at least according to x-riskers like Musk) capable of using that fear to secure its long-term survival.

It remains to be seen whether human beings at large are capable of leveraging this paranoia in the service of a just future — for those currently inhabiting a rapidly warming Earth as well as those to come — or whether “the good of the species” will continue to be the rallying cry of the elite who desire a world remade in their own image.

In any case, any attempt to secure a future must aim to learn from past hubris.

Here, it is again worth recalling Julian Huxley, who delivered a speech at Madison Square Garden not long after human shadows were transposed onto Hiroshima concrete.

Speaking to an audience of some 18,000 assembled there for a “crisis meeting” on nuclear weapons, the biologist radiated optimism.

In a marked departure from his earlier premonitions of dysgenic collapse, Huxley now opined that the species might yet be saved from existential peril by repurposing the split atom for the common good.

A few hundred atomic bombs might usefully be dropped on the “polar regions,” Huxley cheerfully advised the crowd. He reasoned that the resulting ice melt would transform the Earth, leading to a warmer, more pleasant climate.

Reference: GreatGameIndia.com

Dr Fauci’s Wife Is Director Of Bioethics At NIH On Human Subjects Research

By Lloyd Billingsley,

Anthony Fauci’s wife is director of bioethics at the National Institutes of Health, and that’s a problem.

“I would imagine, given the size of our country and the diversity of vaccination versus not vaccination, that it likely will be more than a couple of weeks, probably by the end of January, I would think.”

dr fauci’s wife is director of bioethics at nih on human subjects research

That’s the latest prophecy on the Omicron surge, from White House advisor Dr. Anthony Fauci, a government bureaucrat since 1968 and head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) since 1984. Dr. Fauci commands a budget of more than $6 billion and also holds a strategic position unknown to many Americans. 

Fauci’s wife, Christine Grady, is director of the Department of Bioethics at the National Institutes of Health and heads the NIH section on human subjects research. Some Americans first received that revelation last February in Michelle Ruiz’s Vogue feature headlined, “For Dr. Anthony Fauci and Dr. Christine Grady, Love Conquers All.”

Back in 1983, Grady was a clinical nurse at NIH when Fauci suddenly asked her out to dinner. It was “love at first sight,” Fauci told Ruiz, “she was intelligent, beautiful, spoke multiple languages, and she had a very wonderful bedside manner.” Fauci and Grady married in 1985 and the pair now form a “a medical power couple leading the fight against the coronavirus.” Nice story, but it wasn’t exactly love at first sight. 

 “The couple met at the outset of the AIDS epidemic,” Ruiz explained, “with Fauci driving research at the NIAID and inviting activists to the table on scientific and medical discussions.” Grady had served on President Reagan’s HIV/AIDS commission, and the couple found their true bond in the government response to AIDS. Fauci predicted that AIDS would ravage the entire population but as Michael Fumento showed in The Myth of Heterosexual AIDS, that never happened. 

Fauci’s wife earned a Ph.D. in philosophy and bioethics from Georgetown but she is not a medical doctor and, like her husband, holds no advanced degrees in biochemistry or molecular biology. In 1995, Grady authored The Search for an AIDS Vaccine:Ethical Issues in the Development and Testing of a Preventative AIDS VaccineAs the back cover explains, “Grady explores the current wisdom governing research with human subjects” (emphasis added) and “clinical trials are already ongoing.” Those would be clinical trials of drugs. 

Fauci’s remedy of choice for AIDS was AZT (azidothymidine), marketed under the names Zidovudine or Retrovir. The drug has toxic effects but in the summer of 1989, Fauci announced clinical trials of AZT on pregnant mothers with HIV.

As UC Berkeley molecular biologist Peter Duesberg explained in Inventing the AIDs Virus, “a drug that interferes with growth can lead only to physical deformities in babies developing in the womb.”

By all indications, nurse and bioethicist Christine Grady was sanguine about these trials, not the last of their kind to test human subjects with AZT and other powerful drugs.

In 1992, Fauci’s NIAID provided funding for the Incarnation Children’s Center (ICC) in New York as an outpatient clinic for HIV-positive children. The city’s Administration for Children’s Services (ACS) offered up children under its care, nearly all of them African American, for secretive drug experimentation. As the BBC’s 2004 documentary “Guinea Pig Kids,” demonstrated, drugs forced on the children included AZT, Didanosine and Nevirapine. 

According to biochemist Dr. David Rasnick, the children were going to be miserable and one nurse discovered that some 80 of the children died. The medical establishment attacked the documentary but a 2009 New York Times report confirmed that children were enrolled without proper consent and many were subjected to medication trials not reviewed by an advisory panel. 

In 2014, Valerie Leiter and Sarah Herman of Simmons College found similarities between Fauci’s NIAID-backed drug trials and the government’s Tuskegee syphilis study. Since most of the children in the New York trials were black, the authors branded the case a “modern Tuskegee.” If nurse, bioethicist, and mother of three, Christine Grady, objected to these experiments on human subjects, nothing has been made public. 

In 2012, the NIH named Christine Grady chief of the Department of Bioethics of the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center. Grady came billed as “a strong international voice in human subjects protections,” but no word that she had been married to Fauci for nearly 30 years, and nothing on the conflict of interest in the new arrangement. Since NIH ethics guide NIAID, Grady’s ethical decisions inform her husband’s research and development decisions.

Fauci decided to fund dangerous gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in Communist China. No word from Grady about the ethics of making viruses more lethal and more transmissible. Fauci and NIH boss Francis Collins both lied about funding that research, but no word from Grady on the ethics of that deception. 

In early 2020, Fauci opposed President Trump’s ban on travel from China. Fauci recommended the destructive lockdowns that caused untold suffering and loss. No word from Grady about the ethics involved in those decisions. 

As Elle reported in June, Christine Grady “identifies, researches, and writes about ethical issues concerning COVID-19 vaccines, resource allocation, and the safety of healthcare workers during the pandemic.” No word from the NIH bioethics boss about the safety of all those human subjects in the general population. 

Fauci has reversed himself many times but the NIAID boss now claims “I represent science,” an open confession of megalomania. By all indications, Christine Grady’s husband can say or do just about anything, and the NIH bioethics boss has no problem with it. As it turns out, white coat supremacy is a husband-and-wife act.

Why Do Globalist “Prophecies” Come True?

Picture

Time and time again throughout history — whenever the masters of The New World Order have had a major “trans-formative” chess move in mind — they gave advance notice to the lower criminal ranks of the power pyramid as well as to the naïve normie camp followers of their trusted publications. In this way, when the event which they “warned about” actually came to pass, they were already perfectly positioned as the geniuses who “saw it coming” and should therefore now be looked to for guidance and solutions.
 
We present here four such cases of self-fulfilling rigged “prophecies” which came to pass and led to the outcomes which the Globalists wanted.

Picture
Picture
Picture

It doesn’t take a magic crystal ball nor any real imagination to predict the future when you’re the one controlling the present.

PROPHECY: JANUARY 1906

The mighty international banker Jacob Schiff stated before the New York Chamber of Commerce that unless the currency system was reformed (meaning, unless a Rothschild Central Bank was re-instituted in America), there would be:

“Such a panic in this country compared with which the threewhich had preceded it would look like child’s play.”(here)

EVENT: OCTOBER 1907: “The Panic of 1907”
The stock market crashed down to 50% off of its peak, triggering bank runs and a nasty recession. The deliberate panic eventually spread throughout the nation when many state and local banks and businesses went bankrupt.

President Theodore Roosevelt used the pretext of The Panic of 1907 to appoint a “commission” (beholden to the Jewish banking Mafia) from which came the proposal for the evil Federal Reserve System(Central Bank) that would be established in 1913). In short, the same crime gang which crashed the economy stepped forward with a “solution” to prevent crashes from ever occurring again.

Picture
We rank the Jewish Mobster Jake the Snake Schiff as the most influential man in American history (here) 
Picture
Teddy Roosevelt with the big boss Jacob Schiff just behind him.
Picture
1907: Wall Street in “panic” — exactly as Schiff had said one year earlier.
Picture
Picture

The Panic of 1907 was engineered so that the Federal Reserve counterfeiting, loan-sharking and market-rigging operation could be re-established (nearly 80 years after Andrew the Great Jackson killed the US Central Bank)

PROPHECY: NOVEMBER, 1998

A trio of high-ranking Deep Staters — Ashton B. Carter, John Deutch, and Philip Zelikow, wrote an article in the “prestigious” Foreign Affairs quarterly (the official publication of the Council on Foreign Relations). The piece was titled:

Catastrophic Terrorism: Tackling the New Danger – and subtitled:
“Imagining the Transforming Event.”

An excerpt:

Such an act of catastrophic terrorism would be a watershed event in American history. It could involve loss of life and property unprecedented in peacetime and undermine America’s fundamental sense of security. Like Pearl Harbor, this event would divide our past and future into a before and after. The United States might respond with draconian measures, scaling back civil liberties, allowing wider surveillance of citizens, detention of suspects, and use of deadly force. As the 1993 World Trade Center incident demonstrated, a terrorist group can include U.S. citizens and foreign nationals, operating and moving materials in and out of American territory over long periods of time.(emphasis added)  /// (here)

EVENT: SEPTEMBER 11, 2001
The ultimate “transforming” event – a horrifying made-for-TV mass slaughter which traumatized the nation — played out exactly as foretold. The attacks led to a 20-year “War on Terror” which was finally ended by President Donald Trump.

Picture
Philip Zelikow “warned us” about the coming “transforming event.”
Picture
Picture
Picture
Afterwards, he was put in charge of the 9/11 Commission which “investigated” (covered-up) the CIA-Mossad massacre?

PROPHECY: OCTOBER, 2018

* LiveScience (October 20, 2018):
Headline:
An Unknown ‘Disease X’ Could Become an Epidemic. Can We Find It Before It’s Too Late?

Excerpt:

Earlier this year, the World Health Organization listed “Disease X” among the diseases most in need of research and development.

Disease X is not a specific illness, but rather a hypothetical epidemic that could be caused by a pathogen (contagious strain of a virus or bacterium) that we don’t yet realize affects humans.

Experts at the World Health Summit in Berlin this week warned that we’re not prepared to find such a disease at its likely animal source, or spot it quickly when it starts making people sick.(here)
*

“Disease X” was the basis of the “prophetic” pandemic “war game” exercise scenario Event 201, held in New York City one year later, in October, 2019 — a dress rehearsal sponsored by the WHO, Johns Hophins University and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. During the years leading up to Stupid-19, Bill Gates and Dr. Anthony Falsie had also publicly made “predictions” of what was to come. (hereand (here)

EVENT: COVID-19
Pneumonia and seasonal flu redefined as “Covid” is used to panic the masses. The worldwide lock-downs, economic destruction, transition to mail-in ballots (against Trump), curtailment of basic liberties and attempts at forced vaccination were all part of a political plan.

Picture
Picture
Headline and “Disease X” image above from October 2018 Live Science Magazine article (Here
Picture
Picture
New York Slimes Op-Ed later confirms that Covid-19 met all the criteria of Disease X.
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture

Gates and Fauci had “no doubt” that an epidemic was coming.

PROPHECY: OCTOBER, 2020

* NY Times: (September 3, 2020)
This Is Democrats’ Doomsday Scenario for Election Night

Excerpt:

“What if early results in swing states on Nov. 3 show President Trump ahead, and he declares victory before heavily Democratic mail-in votes, which he has falsely linked with fraud, are fully counted?”
—–

* NY Times:(October 22, 2020)
Headline: Democrats Have a Contingency Plan if Trump Prematurely Declares Victory

Excerpt:

“Senator Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut said that Democrats, anticipating that President Trump could declare victory before all the votes are counted in the election, have prepared for that exact scenario. “There’s a plan to deal with it,” Mr. Blumenthal said on Wednesday night.

Mr. Blumenthal did not give any details of the plan, but (said) during a Zoom call with his colleague, Senator Kirsten Gillibrand of New York, that there could be a prolonged fight over the results.

“You know that the right-wing echo chamber is going to be filled with disinformation about how they stole the election, how they stuffed ballot boxes, ‘we need to rebel,’ ” Mr. Blumenthal said. “That right wing is not America. It’s certainly not the America we know.”

EVENT: THE STOLEN ELECTION OF NOVEMBER 3, 2020

They did indeed stuff the ballot boxes with phony mail-in votes (on top of computer rigging) — and then immediately went into preemptive counter-attack mode when Trump claimed fraud.

Picture
Senator Blumenthal (cough cough) knew in advance that millions of fake mail-in ballots would be used to steal the election — and twisted reality by “warning” in advance that Trump would not accept the results. 
Picture
9/3/2020
Picture
10/22/2020

The NY Times is always front & center when it comes to publicizing these “prophecies.” 

Picture
Yes, Dems cheated, but they might not get away with it.

FBI Declassifies Files On The CIA’s Involvement In Satanic Ritual Abuse And Child Sex Trafficking

After retiring from the FBI, Ted Gunderson set up a private investigation firm, “Ted L. Gunderson and Associates,” in Santa Monica. In a 1995 conference in Dallas, Gunderson warned about the proliferation of secret Satanic groups, and the danger posed by the New World Order, a shadow government that controls the U.S. government.

Gunderson discovered that in the U.S. there is a secret widespread network of groups who kidnap children and infants, and subject them to Satanic ritual abuse and subsequent human sacrifice.

fbi declassifies files on the cia’s involvement in satanic ritual abuse and child sex trafficking

One of those groups is The Finders, which Gunderson said is operated by the CIA. He wrote a book on The Finders, which can still be downloaded from his website (Ted Gunderson died in 2011).

This is the same CIA group that the FBI just declassified many of the files from their investigation into The Finders, although many names remain redacted to protect the guilty. (See below.)

Gunderson traveled around the country giving lectures about his work, which included cases that led him to discover the hidden groups involved with the Satanic Occult, which included child sex abuse and child sacrifice. His general lecture was about 4 hours, but there is one lecture still available today where he condensed this down to just a little over one hour.

At the end of this lecture, Gunderson has a woman named Linda Weigand come up and give her testimony. As he introduced her, Gunderson said:

“This is one of the most classic examples of corruption, I have ever seen. And believe me, you can tell from my lecture, that I’ve seen some pretty awful examples of corruption.”

We have extracted Linda Weigand’s testimony from his lecture, but I have to warn you, this is very GRAPHIC, and very evil. It will disturb you.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/YlASzbTLFzev/

The vehicle that is used by the U.S. Government and the CIA to traffick these children and run these Satanic ritual abuse networks, is the government funded Child Social Services and Foster Care network, most commonly known as “CPS” (Child Protection Services).

Massive government funds exist for all 50 U.S. States that can only be collected if they meet certain quotas of children put into this system, so many children are literally kidnapped, mostly medically kidnapped, from their parents to meet the demand for children in this evil, Satanic system, which is mostly operated by Christian Churches collecting funds from the Government.

Many people have courageously tried to expose this evil system that exists in every state and every county within the U.S., and sadly, many of them are now dead.

In 2009, Bill Bowen released a trailer for a documentary film he was producing exposing the corruption within Child Protection Services across the United States. The film is called Innocence Destroyed.

Bill Bowen died unexpectedly the next year, in 2010, reportedly from a heart attack, before he was able to finish the film.

The segments that were completed were published on YouTube, in three different videos.

To preserve Bill’s work we have combined all 3 segments and published them on our Bitchute channel.

WARNING: Video contains graphic content not suitable for children! For adults only.

Another person who exposed the corrupt Child Protection Services network was Georgia Senator Nancy Schaefer. Before she was murdered, she had produced evidence of this corruption, and the main lecture she gave on that evidence is now hard to find on YouTube, so we have published it on our Bitchute channel.

This lecture and the report that she created cost her her career, and ultimately her life.

Learn more about Senator Nancy Schaefer here including the report that she wrote.

Nancy was interviewed by Alex Jones just 7 months before her murder, and it is the best interview I have watched on her work. The interview was originally broken up into several parts and published on YouTube, but most of those copies have disappeared.

We uploaded a copy of the interview to our Bitchute channel.

Another State Senator who tried to expose the corruption in CPS and child sex trafficking and was murdered in the summer of 2019 was Arkansas Senator Linda Collins-Smith.

We covered her story in 2019, and it also has ties to child sex trafficking in Arizona, which I covered on a radio show I produced back in 2019 on KFNX out of Phoenix.

The radio broadcast we did is still on YouTube, and if it disappears just let us know and we will publish it on our other video platforms.

Much of this very evil Satanic ritual abuse and child sex trafficking happening in the United States was exposed in 2016 by Julian Assange and Wikileaks, which was named “Pizza Gate.”

I believe this is the main reason why Hillary Clinton was thrown under the bus in 2016, because she had too many ties to this network.

Donald Trump was recruited instead, not because he wasn’t involved in all this (there is evidence, including being in Epstein’s black book, that Trump has been part of all this also, and a book published by investigative journalists chronicle dozens of women and girls who say they were sexually molested by Trump), but because he was not part of the political establishment but part of the Wall Street Billionaire club and could be counted on to usher in the Great Reset and the COVID plandemic and further enrich the Globalists and distract the public from concentrating on the evil child trafficking network.

This is my opinion, but it would also explain why the CIA probably developed “Q” and pretended to make Trump look like a “savior” who was going to come in and “drain the swamp” of all these child traffickers.

And it worked brilliantly as a distraction from the truth.

But just the opposite happened. He further enriched the Globalists, and carried out the COVID plan with great precision, distracting people with the very real problem of child sex trafficking and Satanic ritual abuse by concentrating on the “war against the virus.”

Biden was probably brought in to not only continue the COVID policies including rolling out the bioweapon shots, but to also reverse all the work done on our southern border to allow a fresh flow of children and criminals to keep the child trafficking and Satanic ritual abuse operation going.

I have been covering this issue for many years now, and it is why I have no hope that this country will ever see justice through our judicial system. It is thoroughly corrupt, and I have been threatened numerous times by judges in family courts, including district attorneys (mostly in Arizona), to take down our articles because they expose their corruption.

But by the Grace of God I am still alive, still publishing, and to date have NOT TAKEN DOWN ONE SINGLE ARTICLE on this topic.

Here is the article written by Russ Winter on The Finders.

The FBI Declassifies Files On The Finders And McMartin Pre-School Child Trafficking Cases

Winter Watch

In 1983, a woman named Judy Johnson from the affluent California community of Manhattan Beach went to the police, claiming that her 2-year-old son had been molested by Raymond “Ray” Buckey, a 28-year-old teacher at McMartin Preschool. Police began their investigation by notifying the parents of current and former students about the possibility of sexual abuse their child.

Numerous children told similar stories of satanic animal sacrifices and sexual rituals in secret rooms at the school. By 1984, Buckey was arrested on 79 counts of child molestation. His mother was also arrested as a conspirator, as well as several other members of the Buckey family, because McMartin Preschool was owned and operated by the Buckey-McMartin family.

The children said they were warned that if they told anyone, their parents would be killed. And sure enough, just as Buckey’s trial got underway in 1986 — a trial in which Judy Johnson was a key witness — she was discovered dead in her home, cause unknown. She was just 42 years old.

Almost exactly one year later, a former police officer who served as an investigator for the defense suicided himself at home.

With Johnson dead, Buckey’s defense attorney was able to impeach her character during the trial. It was also argued that the testimony of the children had been influenced (or implanted) by the psychological examiners who interviewed them. Ultimately, Buckey was not convicted. A second jury deadlocked in 1990, and the case was dismissed.

For six years, the police and the FBI had actively investigated the McMartin Preschool case, according to the Los Angeles Times. After they closed their file — and the Buckey family revealed they had sold the shuttered McMartin Preschool to Arnold Goldstein for the development of an office building — frustrated parents of the abused children hired the subsequently retired chief and head of the Los Angeles FBI, special agent Ted L. Gunderson (1928-2011) to continue with the investigation, and commissioned an archaeological survey.

A decade later, you could find Gunderson speaking out about the McMartin case as well as a network of child molesters and traffickers called “The Finders.”

For decades, the FBI’s files on the McMartin case and The Finders were sealed. Not anymore. The agency declassified and released its filesIt shows a decade of research spanning from California to Belgium.

The FBI Files

The investigation into the cases described cults, child sex trafficking and kompromat. In recent decades, the mainstream media has refused to report on such cases. Such cases (see below) have been “debunked” by the usual suspects that the Crime Syndicate uses for cover. But the FBI’s own investigation suggests the cases were real enough and points to cover ups.

A timeline of events is in the report.

From the news article “Officials describe ‘cult rituals in child abuse case” by Saundra Saperstein and Victoria Churchville of The Washington Post on Feb. 7, 1987:

‘Douglas J Ammerman’ and ‘Michael Houlihan’ were arrested at odd hours at a Tallahassee park with 6 unrelated children with no understanding of modern amenities, hot water, TV or phones. The children were reportedly bug bitten, wearing old and ragged clothes and 2/6 reported to have been ‘obviously abused.

Before their arrests in the park, Ammerman and Houlihan had told police that they were teachers from Washington “transporting these children to Mexico and a school for brilliant children,” according to Hunt. When police asked the men where the children’s mothers were, “they said they were being weaned from their mothers.”

finders 1
finders 2

Pages 4-10 shows The Finders were caught many times, but various prosecutors declined to press charges. FBI, the U.S. State Department and others helped cover it up every time.

On page 39 we learn of a request that the FBI review original first-hand docs on The Finders instead of relying on previous agents summaries or review reports. Permission would be required to see the direct evidence.

finders 3

On page 40 we see clues as to how the Crime Syndicate’s star chamber sistema buries investigative evidence in the wrong agencies, making serious pursuit difficult. The U.S. Customs Service is the agency with briefing materials on The Finders. DOJ and FBI have to request copy of materials from USCS.

finders 4

Page 41, evidence is turned over to US Attorney District of Columbia who refused to prosecute.

finders 5

What’s worse, page 50 from 1991 shows a memo on jurisdiction. It describes how the U.S. Postal Service, the FBI and USCS carve up the turf on child crimes. USCS has jurisdiction over “interdiction and international distribution of child pornography”.

finders 6

Note: “Recently the USCS experienced a massive reorganization. This … caused the Child Porn and Protection Unit to be integrated into the Smuggling Investigations Division. All Units, Branches, and Sections were eliminated during the reorg,” the report states.

So somebody in high authority had the power to wipe out a whole unit of agents on the cases. But those names are redacted.

Next we learn that several congressional committees were sniffing around, and that a never-aired documentary was in the works. The story of what happened here has fallen down the memory hole.

finders 7

But this document ties in and confirms:

finders 8

On page 41, the FBI report contains a link to a Washington Post article in which neighbors of one sketchy property said the residents were “a close-knit group of feminists who liked to help people and were not a cult.”

The U.S. Attorney for D.C. declined to prosecute despite extensive evidence of abuse and satanic rituals. The case was complicated by the mothers being found, and possibly having given consent. US Attorney involved has an interesting career path to say the least.

john bates

The USCS was pursuing the case. Page 9 points to a cell and repeats the impregnation of females, and the trading of children and kidnapping. What kind of “normal child exploiters” have the operational security to breed and kidnap children for abduction?

finders 9

On page 68, a D.C. police investigation concluded that a CIA employee (1950-1979) was a member of The Finders.

“At Approximately 1530 hrs, 2/18/87 Dt. [redacted] spoke with S/A [redacted] reference any contact the members of the Finders may have had with the Agency, S/A/ [redacted] was guarded but frank in his responses. He confirmed that [redacted] Isabelle, now deceased, was an employee of the agency from 1950 until 1971”

WW Note: Likely Isabelle Pettie. Marion David Pettie, was the leader of the cult. “Dr. Greenberg” shows up and runs obfuscation.

finders 10

The report later states that the CIA saw the D.C. police department as treading on their toes. On page 225, it refers to the “vested interest” of the CIA.

Report mentions bodies being buried on a Finders’ farm in Culpepper, Virginia. There were also cages. The role of the CIA is referenced, but it’s convoluted. It’s almost as if the more powerful agencies treat satanists as a special protected class. In today’s inverted, captured world, that wouldn’t be surprising.

finders 11
finders 12

Indeed, more evidence that there were white hats within the FBI trying to deal with the cover ups. Page 89-95: FBI tries to open an obstruction of justice case to determine if U.S. intelligence is involved.

finders 13

The D.C. Metro police on page 67 also offered up a rather sketchy theory that The Finders was a CIA psyop of some sort, but it never concluded the obvious.

finders 14

Page 68 states that during war time, The Finders’ people visited restricted Moscow, North Korea and North Vietnam, “which could only have been arranged by the CIA.”

Page 85 indicates another Finders property location. So far: Florida, D.C., Maryland, Virginia and Ohio. Funded: CIA Founder: CIA lifer into Satanism. Known activities: Breed and raise kids. “Shape” them. Deliver intel assignments.

Did page 214 show the redacted name of former Los Angeles FBI chief, the aforementioned special agent Ted Gunderson?

finders 15

Page 69 shows that agents tried to pass a report to a contact in Europe, but the disc is intercepted and memory holed.

finders 16

The next document, from pages 52 to 53, appear to be another jurisdictional grab, instructing that MPD investigative reports were to be classified secret and not to be shared with the FBI.

Of course, today we have no idea who the white hats might have been behind the scenes. A star chamber hidden hand is keeping them in the dark. The second document shows the FBI being steered (aka controlled) to HQ level.

finders 17
finders 18
finders 19

Page 99 from Nov. 12, 1993, shows the State Department asked the FBI to handle inquiries on a HQ level.

finders 20

Winter Watch Takeaway

This seems to be about breeding or “finding” made brainwashed assassins and other operatives à la Don Brown’s “Angels and Demons.” These individuals are raised from infancy and are then inserted within the system as needed.

That “Angels and Demons” assassin character may well be the revelation of the method and the template. Additionally, this was 30 years ago, back when white-hats elements were still in play.

Today, agencies like the FBI and D.C. Metro are captured. White hats are shuttled to the boondocks, gotten out of the way.

An Important Note About McMartin Students And Debunkers

The McMartin preschool case was high profile at the time and became part of what the neuro-linguist programmers called day-care sex-abuse “hysteria, and moral panic” over alleged Satanic ritual abuse in the 1980s and early 1990s. But that doesn’t mean that “wild” and “impossible” stories told by the children don’t contain some elements of truth.

It’s as if debunkers haven’t factored in that hallucinogens and drugs were administered to affect the memory. No, that would require critical thinking, and pajama people are ready for the first feeble explanation. Additionally, the Crime Syndicate concocted the false memory syndrome.

One of the controversies in the case were reports by the children and speculation that there were tunnels and rooms under the school center. The debunkers ultimately succeeded in pigeon holing this into the realm of “crazy conspiracy theory.”

But lo and behold, we have confirmation of tunnels and rooms by the FBI itself!

Page 48-49 states tunnels were found at McMartin Preschool, as well as pentagrams and bones. It’s all part of a descriptive report shown below. Then, at the bottom, comes the standard WTF hidden hand shutting the investigation down.

But lo and behold, we have confirmation of tunnels and rooms by the FBI itself!

Page 48-49 states tunnels were found at McMartin Preschool, as well as pentagrams and bones. It’s all part of a descriptive report shown below. Then, at the bottom, comes the standard WTF hidden hand shutting the investigation down.

finders 21
finders 22

Read the full article at Winter Watch.

Edited 12/28/21:

After being attacked by Trump supporters for mentioning Trump’s connection to Epstein, I have added a link to a book review of “All The President’s Women” published by investigative journalists in 2019 documenting Trump’s alleged predatory history towards women and girls.

Famous Faces Have Been Replaced by FAKES

Picture
Slimes caption: Actors were filmed in a variety of scenes. The top picture is their actual image, with a deep-fake altered image below it.

— Various 2019-2021 NY Times Articles

Here Come the Fake Videos
*
Eerie Tom Cruise Videos, Reanimate Unease With Deepfakes
*

Internet Companies Prepare to Fight the ‘Deepfake’ Future
*
Deepfakes — Believe at Your Own Risk
*
(NYT YouTube): Do These AI Fake People Look Real to You?
*
Deepfakes: Is This Video Even Real?
*

(NYT Tweet by Nick Kristoff: “Deep Fake” of Queen Elizabeth – Reminder of the Perils of Deep Fakes

Over the course of the past three years, many well-known specimens of bottom-feeding scum from the intertwined worlds of Fake News and politics have been “warning” normiedom about the “dangers” of “Deep Fake” video technology that can present the  appearance, voice and in-sync lip movement of a targeted individual in a manner almost indistinguishable from the actual person himself. Just do an Internet search for “Deep Fake” and see for yourself just how afraid of this technology “the usual suspects” are. Even Poop Frankie the Fake has warned the world’s Catholics about Deep Fakes! (here)

The “Editorial Board” of The Anti-New York Times has, for some time now, maintained that the White Hats have already been using Deep Fake technology, masks and imposters as fill-ins for certain Satanic celebrities and crooked politicians who have already been “disappeared” to the military prison at Guantanamo Bay on the island of Cuba. We also believe that actors — some wearing sophisticated masks — are being utilized for the same purpose. These assertions always draw a mixed response from the loyal readership — ranging from: “Holy shit! You’re right, Mike! These ARE fakes!” on one side, to: “Mike, love your work, but you’re really discrediting yourself with this crazy talk!” – on the other end.

Rather than make this case with words, it’s better to use images — because, after all, it is imagery that we are talking about. Let’s have a look at some of these imposters — and some headlines from various entertainment media sources, all containing the word “unrecognizable.”

https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-biden-notdeepfake/fact-check-bidens-skin-tone-mismatch-in-video-is-not-evidence-of-a-deepfake-idUSL2N2NC1U8

Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture

JOE BIDEN & ANTHONY FAUCI
Column 1: Fake Biden in mask — on CNBC (Video Here) //  Columns 2 & 3: Fake Dr. Falsie in mask — on NBC’s Meet the Press (Video Here)

Biden?
Picture
Fake Will Smith on Left
Picture
Daily Mail (UK)
Picture
US Magazine

WILL SMITH is “unrecognizable.”

Picture
Picture

India Today
Picture
Radar Online

TOM CRUISE is “unrecognizable.”

Picture
Barkley should not dwarf ‘The Rock” like this.
Picture
Picture

DWAYNE “THE ROCK” JOHNSON
1. “The Rock” (r) is 6′ 5″ tall and 260 pounds. (here) Charles Barkley (l) is 6’6″ tall and 250 pounds. (here) — If the two men are roughly the same size, then why does Barkley — in both height & weight — appear to dwarf Johnson in a recent photo? // 2. Has an Alabama cop taken The Rock’s place?

Picture
NOT BEYONCE!
Picture
US DAILY REPORT
Picture
SANDRAROSE.COM

BEYONCE is “unrecognizable.”

Picture
NOT J LO!
Picture
SHE FINDS
Picture
US DAILY REPORT

JENNIFER LOPEZ is “unrecognizable.”

Picture
NOT BEN AFFLECK!
Picture
SHE FINDS
Picture
THE SUN (UK)

BEN AFFLECK is “unrecognizable.”

Picture
MERYL STREEP?
Picture
SHE FINDS
Picture
AMOMOMA

MERYL STREEP is “unrecognizable.”

Picture
NOT CHRISSY TIEGEN!
Picture
SUGGEST
Picture
THE SUN

CHRISSY TIEGEN is “unrecognizable.”

Picture
NOT NICOLE KIDMAN
Picture
AUDACY.COM
Picture
YAHOO

NICOLE KIDMAN is “unrecognizable.”

Picture
NOT DEMI MOORE
Picture
WIO NEWS
Picture
YAHOO

DEMI MOORE is “unrecognizable.”

Picture
NOT TOM HANKS!
Picture
NICKISWIFTS.COM
Picture
SHEFINDS

TOM HANKS is “unrecognizable.”

Picture
NOT MADONNA!
Picture
WIO NEWS
Picture
YAHOO

MADONNA is “unrecognizable.”

There’s something strange going on. Nancy Pelosi doesn’t quite look nor sound like herself; Alec Baldwin (who also looks “unrecognizable”) is finished after that “shooting” incident; the once holy names of St. Andrew Cuomo and St. Bill Gates are shit now; and a 40-year personal friend of Bruce Willis’s (whom we will not name) tells us that the star actor has disappeared.

So, why this pantomime act, you ask? That’s a good question — and the best we can theoretically infer is this: Under the perfect cover and noise of “Covid” — the White Hats removed or placed under submission as many of the black chess pieces from the board as possible — thus rendering the crooks and the Satanists harmless — before presenting the grand finale of “The Movie” to all of shell-shocked Normiedom. After the coming “Dark Winter” of high heating bills, food inflation and shortages has passed, the approval ratings of the deliberately stumbling and bumbling “Joe Biden” should be down in the 20s by the time Trump’s “Truth Social” media colossus rolls out in February. That’s when the White Hats — a la Sun Tzu — will, we believe, strike with maximum ferocity.

Some will say: “Mike, love you man. But you’ve really taken a ride on the Q crazy train now!” —– But have I though? Let’s wait and see. In the meantime, “youse guys” have gotta admit: the fact that so many big names are suddenly being Deep Faked or turned “unrecognizable”(ENTERTAINMENT MEDIA’S WORD, NOT MINE) is like something out of a … well, movie! — Like Mission Impossible.

Exactly Which Dystopian Novel Are We Living In? Brave New World, 1984, Fahrenheit 451?

There’s a debate going on among the disaffected/ terrified over which dystopian novel we’re now living in.

As John Rubino remarks, some point to social media addiction and designer drugs to suggest Brave New World.

Others see mass surveillance and pandemic lockdowns as putting us squarely in 1984.

Still others cite online censorship and cancel culture as favoring Fahrenheit 451.

Each of these opinions seems valid, which is confusing.

A prisoner should know the shape of their cell. So it’s a relief to find out that someone (not sure who) has settled the argument by creating the following Venn diagram (Tweeted by our friend David Morgan).

dystopia novel

Turns out we’re not in a single dystopian novel. We’re in all of them simultaneously.

What about movies?

Well, take your pick…

well, we all know the first amendment is going down the drain, free speech is not that free anymore.

Take for example the movie Demolition Man…

The winters never end for the doomed children...
you’ll know is coming …

AI is all over the place, soon it will be the one that will tell us what to do.

Terminator…

terminator GIF | Terminator, Terminator movies, Terminator genesis
AI at its best…

and the ultimate dystopian future, Mad Max where the future its just FUCKED…

Was science fiction architecture on the right track?

The saddest part, is that WE are allowing it. So pick your favorite dystopian future and dress warm.

NY Times “Admits” Stupid-19 is a Hoax

Picture
DECEMBER 15, 2021


NY Times:
 As U.S. Nears 800,000 Virus Deaths, 1 of Every 100 Older Americans Has Perished


They are among the most vaccinated groups, but people 65 and older make up about three-quarters of the nation’s corona-virus death toll.

Though certainly not intending to do so, the “paper of record” — in big bold headline letters as well as in the small print — has just announced  to all of Normiedom (though to no effect) that the Stupid-19 scamdemic (including its oh-so-scary “son of” variant sequels) is a hoax of historic proportions. In case the subtle significance of the headline escaped your own notice, let’s try it again and let it sink in: 1 of Every 100 Older Americans Has Perished.

Just to keep this discussion on “normal” grounds — let us put aside, for argument’s sake only — the little known (concealed) facts that:

* No new virus has ever been purified, isolated and identified.
* There has been and continues to be a deliberate misclassification of deaths (for money).
* The PCR “test” is calibrated to yield false positives (for money).
* Hospitals and nursing homes have deliberately isolated, sedated, ventilated and mass murdered many seniors (for money).
Hospitals in poorer areas have also deliberately isolated, sedated, ventilated and murdered some healthy younger people (for money).

Those damning little details aside, this headline still means that over the course of nearly a 2 year long period, in a country with an average life expectancy of 78.8years, 1 out of every 100 of those “65 and older” (that includes folks in their 80s, 90s, and 100s!) has passed away.

……. Yeah … so?

Is 1% really such a wildly disproportionate  ratio? Are humans not mortal? Furthermore, as the article itself confirms, most of the dead suffered from other serious conditions (94% according to the CDC).

Picture

You would think that the OPENLY publicized death-by-age statistics would cause Normie to scratch his head in bewildered confusion and ask: “What’s the big deal?” —- But no.

Picture
Normie

Here’s another “open conspiracy” confirmation from the articles headline graphic:

“Three quarters of U.S. Covid deaths have been among people 65 and older.”

So then, why the frickety-frack are we traumatizing and masking up toddlers and children for?

The astonishing takeaway from these admissions is this: Even when the “respectable” media  OPENLY serves up — albeit unintentionally and indirectly — enough raw data for any semi-astute reader to quickly pick up and easily debunk the “crisis” story line, the stupefied subjects of the overlapping tyrannical kingdoms of Normiedom & Libtardia still can’t critically think their way out of the brown bag of dog shit which has been placed over their stone-filled heads. Providing them with a “2” and another “2” (in a frickin’ headline, no less!) still isn’t enough. No, only when the Judenpresse specifically announces “4” are they finally able to puzzle out such advanced algebra equations — proudly believing they did it “on their own.”

Nuts! 

Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Think, Normie…. Think!!!

The shattered mind of a normie has been gang-raped to pieces and cemented back together in such a hardened block form that it can no longer recognize blatantly contradictory double-think — even when it’s in his face. Point out the almighty CDC‘s own published statistics to an “educated” normie (including doctors and scientists!) and you’re likely to get the type of response which so frustrated the protagonist of Orwell’s “1984,” Winston Smith, while he was being  schooled by O’Brien of the “Thought Police:”

“What can you do, thought Winston, against the lunatic who is more intelligent than yourself; who gives your arguments a fair hearing and simply persists in his lunacy?”

Short of whacking a normie over the head with a tire iron, what can you do to get him to see the obvious? Answer: Other than planting a seed in a dry crack of his block head and praying for rain at a future date, not much. So save your breath and move on to the next lost soul.

Picture
2021 is — literally — as bad as “1984.”
Picture
O’Brien “intelligently” preaches well-worded madness to Winston.
Picture
Normie blockheads may hold advanced degrees and can memorize reams of data — yet they cannot detect the simplest clues, nor recognize patterns, nor think things through to a logical conclusion without guidance from media-anointed “experts.”
Picture

Normie 1:  I read in the New York Times today that people over 65 make up the majority of Covid deaths, even though they have the highest vaccination rates.

Normie 2: Interesting. I wonder why that is.
*
Me: Because they’re frickin’ OLDER Dumbass!!!

In An Insane World, The Truly Sane Are Regarded As Crazy – Don’t Even Try To Fit

We live in a world where the masses are delusional. They have been manipulated via engineered media hysteria into believing in an invisible “pandemic” that’s going to kill them if they don’t comply.

At first, the compliance demand was something like, “Wear these masks. You’ll only need to wear them until there’s a vaccine.” Once the vaccine became available, the compliance demand was ramped up to, “Take two shots and we’ll get back to normal.”

Now, of course, at the end of 2021, people are required to both take endless booster shots and keep wearing masks… all while social distancing and complying with endless lockdowns and covid quarantine camps, of course.

At this point, anyone going along with this insanity is clinically delusional and suffering from shared mass psychosis (or what’s called “mass formation” by some scientists). They are proving that they cannot cognitively parse the world around them in a meaningful way that supports their own continued existence.

Importantly, the fact that delusional thinking is widespread does not make it sane. Through media programming, censorship and authoritarian measures, entire nations can be ensnared under grotesque delusions. Look no further than North Korea if you need a current example, and then realize that North Korea-style censorship and propaganda has been on the march in the USA for several years now.

Anyone Who Trusts The Mainstream Media Is Both Delusional And Gullible

msm fake news mind control false flag psyop

Virtually the entire corporate media establishment fell for the Jussie Smollett hate crime hoax. They fell for the Russia collusion hoax, and they fell for the “meat market” origins lie about the coronavirus. They also still push the fraudulent PCR “cases” lie that’s rooted in complete scientific fraud.

If there were any honest news trust rating system in place, every major media outlet would be rated with an “F” grade, since they’ve falsified or misreported nearly every major event over the last several years (including news about Nick Sandman and Kyle Rittenhouse, for example).

Any person who still believes the mainstream media has credibility is delusional (and gullible). Anyone who believes the CDC or FDA have “scientific authority” is either stupid or living in a fairy tale world. What we’ve all learned over the past two years — or should have learned if we were paying attention — is that when it matters most, every mainstream institution will deliberately deceive you even if such deception results in the loss of innocent human life.

Because of all this, it’s easy to identify gullible, delusional people in our society: They’re the ones still wearing masks! They’re the ones somehow still watching CNN, the pedophile network. They’re the ones still lining up for booster shots, somehow telling themselves that the reason they need booster shots is because all the previous shots have failed, yet this booster will magically work even though it’s the same shot from the same exact company.

Never forget the definition of insanity.

Delusional people will also tell you they believe women have a penis and men can get pregnant. These are the truly insane ones, and they’ve become so mass hypnotized into their fairy tale false realities that they’ve become completely disconnected from biological reality.

It’s truly bizarre that these are the same people who line up for vaccine booster shots, because if they really believed physiology was subjective, couldn’t they just decide to “self identify” as someone who’s already immune to covid? Why do they believe biology is real when it comes to vaccine injections but biology is imaginary when it comes to pregnancy and penises?

The answer, of course, is because they are mentally ill delusional lunatics. And by the laws of natural selection, they are gradually removing themselves from the human gene pool through vaccine-assisted suicide, which may be one of the few silver linings in this entire mess.

Signing up for spike protein depopulation injections really is a kind of global IQ test, and billions of people are failing it… with fatal consequences that will play out over the next ten years or so.

Don’t Even Try To Fit In With An Insane, Delusional Culture

pardon my sanity in a world insane

For those of us who are still anchored in reality, it’s important to remember that there’s no need to try to conform to an insane, demonic culture or society. When society (or “sickciety”) has turned into a clown world of lunatics, trying to fit in is just a bizarre form of self-inflicted suffering. Instead of bending to the twisted will of the delusional masses, spend your time reconnecting with reality. That’s your consciousness anchor that prevents you from drifting off into la la libtard land.

How do you reconnect with reality?

  • Have a garden and grow some food. Touch soil. Save seeds. Experience reality through firsthand senses. Listen, touch, feel and see.
  • Take walks in nature. Experience the real world around you.
  • Avoid artificial worlds, augmented worlds and virtual reality. They enslave you in fake illusions. They sap your soul.
  • Connect with God and rediscover your spiritual self. Your soul is real. Consciousness is real. It may not be physical, but it’s the most real thing about human existence.
  • Connect with real people who are living in reality, and distance yourself from old “friends” who are delusional herd followers and gullible conformists.
  • Take time away from all screens. Although it’s great to gather information from those who have something valuable to share, don’t allow your life to be dominated by screens and mobile devices.

In today’s Situation Update podcast, I cover the nature of reality. It’s a wild ride through the delusions of a society gone mad… and how to maintain your sanity through it all. (Laughter is also a great anchoring tool, which is why I mock so many things happening in the world today).

https://www.brighteon.com/735b38ce-8b06-4641-be2f-48619082f81a

References: NaturalNews.comBrighteon.com