British Government Used ‘Propagandistic’ Fear Tactics To Scare Public Into Mass Compliance

Why is the United Kingdom flag called the Union Jack? - Great British Mag

The British government used “propagandistic” fear tactics to scare the public into mass compliance during the first COVID lockdown, according to a behavioral scientist who worked inside Downing Street.

Simon Ruda co-founded Number 10’s ‘Nudge Unit’, which was initially set up to encourage positive behavioral changes in the British public without the need for coercion or legislation, but was weaponized during the pandemic to create scaremongering.

Artist finds inspiration in war propaganda for COVID-19 'Stay In' posters -  ABC News

“In my mind, the most egregious and far-reaching mistake made in responding to the pandemic has been the level of fear willingly conveyed on the public,” wrote Ruda.

“That fear seems to have subsequently driven policy decisions in a worrying feed-back loop,” he added, noting that such actions amounted to “state sanctioned propaganda.”

The behavioral scientist said that an obsession with daily case numbers came to dominate thinking, serving to spread even more fear.

That process included grossly exaggerating the threat posed by COVID and producing lurid, alarmist propaganda to frighten the population into subservience.

Leaked: ‘Mass Formation Psychosis’ Admittedly Used by Governments as Tool of Population Control.

Professor of Clinical Psychiatry Who Studied the Psychology of Totalitarianism: ‘This Is How We Win’.

As we previously highlighted, scientists in the UK working as advisors for the government admitted using what they now concede to be “unethical” and “totalitarian” methods of instilling fear in the population in order to control behavior during the pandemic.

The London Telegraph reported the comments made by Members of the Scientific Pandemic Influenza Group on Behaviour (SPI-B), a sub-committee of the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (Sage) the government’s chief scientific advisory group.

The report quotes a briefing from March 2020, as the first lockdown was decreed, that stated the government should drastically increase “the perceived level of personal threat” that the virus poses because “a substantial number of people still do not feel sufficiently personally threatened.”

One scientist with the SPI-B admits that:

“In March [2020] the Government was very worried about compliance and they thought people wouldn’t want to be locked down. There were discussions about fear being needed to encourage compliance, and decisions were made about how to ramp up the fear.”

The unnamed scientist added that, “The way we have used fear is dystopian.”

The scientist further confessed that, “The use of fear has definitely been ethically questionable. It’s been like a weird experiment. Ultimately, it backfired because people became too scared.”

The fearmongering campaign clearly worked.

By the summer of 2020, the average Brit thought 6-7% of the population of the UK had died from coronavirus, a figure equating to around 4.5 million people.

At the time, COVID-19 had actually claimed around 40,000 lives.

But don’t worry, all this is of no importance whatsoever, because ‘fact checkers’ have ruled that ‘mass formation psychosis’ isn’t a thing that happened at all during the pandemic.

Once Government Acquires A Power, It Never Lets It Go Voluntarily

We often think as we embark on a new year that each year will be similar to the year before and we make our plans accordingly. Obviously the last two years have taught us that this is not always true and yet we say to ourselves after the 2022 and 2024 elections we will get back on track. Will we? Will we get back to normal and will our freedoms not be hindered? We believe that our Constitution and the American traditions of faith and freedom will save us. Maybe it is time to look back in history for a wake up call.

once government acquires a power, it never lets it go voluntarily

Sir John Glubb was a British author and lecturer and a decorated officer in the British army. His famous and succinct essay, “The Fate of Empires and Search For Survival” looks at the lifespan of empires from their origins to their eventual decline. Glubb estimates that most empires do not last longer than roughly 250 years, with many of them lasting much shorter. periods of time.

For example Persia ruled from 538-330 B.C. for only 208 years. Greece 231 years (Alexander and his successors) from 331-100 B.C. The Roman Republic was 233 years and the Roman Empire 207 years. Most recently Britain ruled from 1700 to 1950 and it ended after 250 years. America from 1776 to today is 246 years and from many indicators we are nearing an end of empire and leader of the free world.

Many historians including Gibbon (The Decline and Fall of The Roman Empire) and others have given us the stages an empire goes through from beginning to end. Alexander Tyler of the University of Edinburg noted eight stages that articulate well what history discloses.

1) From bondage to spiritual growth

2) From Spiritual growth to great courage

3) From courage to liberty

4) From liberty to abundance

5) From abundance to complacency

6) From complacency to apathy

7) From apathy to dependence

8) From dependence back to bondage.

People in bondage no longer have the virtues necessary to fight.

We often think that this is a slow process over decades, which has an element of truth, however when the crumbling of freedom begins it can happen quickly.

Our own experience since March of 2020 is a wake up call to all of us. Studying the rise of Hitler is eerily similar to our own situation. Anticipating an election in March 1933 that he knew he could not win, he chose to create a crisis.

On February 27, 1933, the Reichstag Building (the capital) was in flames. Hitler blamed the arson on a communist conspiracy and induced Paul von Hindenburg (the aged German president) to sign a decree that suspended individual liberties.

The National Socialists (Nazis) could search homes without a warrant, confiscate property, and outlaw the meetings of groups that might oppose them. How similar the situation where it is easier to obey than to accept the dangers of freedom.

A more recent example is Venezuela that in 2001 was the 3rd richest country in the Western Hemisphere and the world’s leader in oil reserves.

In 2001 the people voted for a Socialist President to address “income inequality”. In 2012 Bernie Sanders said “Venezuelans are living the American dream better than Americans”.

Now the economy is in shambles, citizens pick through garbage looking for scraps of food, vital medicines are in short supply and more than three million people have fled the socialist destination of Chavez’s policies.

The currency has collapsed and now they import oil. How quickly a nation can go from freedom to tyranny.

Our country and freedom are undoubtedly under attack and yet we stand out as a beacon and a savior of western civilization compared to Europe, Canada, Australia and New Zealand. It is if these countries have gone mad in their attacks on free speech, freedom of religion and our self autonomy.

Rod Dreher wrote an insightful book a few years ago entitled Live Not By Lies that is so important in our culture today.

Recently Rod made a five minute video for Prager University entitled “Totalitarianism: Can it Happen in America?”. This is an important video for all to see. (ANP: 1st video at the bottom of this story!)

Francis Schaeffer in his landmark book How Shall We Then Live? said “The danger in regard to the rise of authoritarian government is that Christians will be still as long as their own religious activities, evangelism, and life-styles are not disturbed.

We are not excused from speaking, just because the culture and society no longer rest as much as they once did on Christian thinking.

Moreover, Christians do not need to be in a majority in order to influence society.” Will churches and Christians speak out?

I will end this column with a quote from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.:

1.) Once government acquires a power, it never lets it go voluntarily.

2.) Every power that government acquires, using this pandemic as a pretense, it will ultimately abuse to the maximum effect possible. This is a rule that is as certain as gravity.

3.) Nobody has ever complied their way out of totalitarianism. Every time you comply the demands will get greater and greater.

https://www.brighteon.com/6922191d-8bce-411c-84f7-8d8bc9e0fe3f

Sources: AllNewsPipeline.comYouTube.com

It Is Now Infinitely Easier To Control A Billion People Than It Is To Kill A Billion People

How many people do you personally know whom spend their creative efforts in life seeking ways in which to control or kill people? They’re out there.

it is now infinitely easier to control a billion people than it is to kill a billion people

In 2008 at a speech at the international affairs think tank Chatham House, the late, great swamp creature Zbigniew Brzezinski (the father of MSNBC’s Mika Brzezinskimade the following comment:

“In early times, it was easier to control a million people than to kill a million. Today, it is infinitely easier to to kill a million people than to control a million.”

Brzezinski would know, as he haunted to halls of the world’s most powerful organizations and think tanks for decades. He held a uniquely elitist perspective on the world, and in his classic globalist book The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives he shared an inside look at this mindset. Those in power view the entire world as a play ground to be manipulated, controlled, conquered, and destroyed if necessary. Our lives are the pawns of tyrants… as they see it.

This is the curse of government, which is nothing without force and violence, and Brzezinski was a key player and architect of the current global tension we all endure.

I wonder, though, had he lived long enough to play a role in the pandemic power grab, would he have been impressed by advances in the ability to control so many people without deploying troops, smart-bombs and sanctions? My magic eight-ball says, ‘you may rely on it.’

You see, one thing we’ve learned (whether you recognize it or not) is that it is now far easier to control people than ever before. How so?

Simple. You sideline them by programming them to engage in self-sabotage and self-destructive behavior.

And how do you accomplish this?

Mind control.

Mind control comes in many forms, but in essence it is the ability to get people to believe, think, and act against their natural impulses and in accordance with an imposed agenda.

American psychologist and professor emeritus at Stanford University, Phillip Zombardo, refers to mind control as, “the process by which individual or collective freedom of choice and action is compromised by agents or agencies that modify or distort perception, motivation, affect, cognition or behavioral outcomes.” His ground breaking research project, The Stanford Prison Experiment, demonstrated that most people are highly susceptible to the influence of group behavior, and that many of us would go so far as to harm others just to be in compliance with the directives of someone in a perceived position of authority.

In today’s fustercluck world, the effects of mind control are evident everywhere, and under present conditions is even manifesting it its most dangerous form… mass psychosis. People living in this dark cloud of disillusionment are easily influenced and will readily sacrifice their own health and well-being in deference to the advice and mandates of ‘experts’ and policy makers who pimp fear then offer a phony respite from it.

Consider how this plays out in our society:

1. Dumb down the population with chemical sedatives including alcohol, pharmaceuticals and toxic food ingredients.

2. Monopolize the media under corporate control. Present biased, toxic opinions as ‘news’ 24 hours a day, deliberately creating division and discord amongst the majority population.

3. Censor any information and opinions which counter the propaganda of the corporate state, making it seem like minority authoritarian positions are of the majority.

4. Entrain the masses to believe that censorship is necessary for their protection, and that to speak out in opposition to the corporate state amounts to a physical threat to their safety.

5. Elevate a culture of celebrity worship, and promote degeneracy and stupidity as virtuous forms of pseudo-rebellion.

6. Indoctrinate children from an early age to learn obedience over critical thinking, while teaching them that the state is infallible no matter how many atrocities it commits.

7. Isolate people from each other. Disconnect them from the grounding and diverse influence of family and friends.

8. Assault the senses of the population with an endless stream of trauma based mind control and fear propaganda.

9. Entrain common people to believe that being broke and poor is virtuous, while encouraging a massive wealth gap between the elites and the rest of society.

10. Destabilize traditional communal and familial structures by encouraging promiscuity, divorce and dysfunctional relationships.

11. Gut the value of the only permissible currency so that typical gender roles are flipped and both members of a nuclear family must work in order to provide a basic life while children their must be sent to expensive daycares and government run schools.

12. Confuse people over simple biological issues like gender, and create a cult of official science followers who are unwilling to acknowledge such basic scientific facts.

13. Destroy the most powerful and capable members of society, the alpha-males, through media campaigns which demonize them.

14. Focus the attention of the masses on an invisible, intangible, omni-present fear such as an unstoppable plague that is constantly changing forms.

15. Require people to seek permission from the government for practically every productive endeavor possible.

16. Corral the masses into a system of technological control which prohibits free association and free enterprise, and punishes those most likely to resist.

15. Elevate the most criminally insane members of government, and give them open-ended, free access to 24 hour monopolized media.

16. Eradicate natural and holistic forms of medicine, corralling everyone into a top-down, one-size fits all, for-profit, absurdly expensive, allopathic medical system.

17. Disconnect people from genuine, personal spiritual connection, so that they live with an insatiable fear of death in constant inner turmoil.

18. Over time, socially engineer a societal tribe of dysfunctional, unhealthy, confused, resentful, broke, state-worshippers who may wish to live a prosperous life, but cannot ever manage to overcome the urges of their subconscious mind’s in order to act in their own best interests.

The end result of all this is an individual who has been so beaten down by circumstance and chronic stress that they require stimulants all day to function, and sedatives all night to cope with the madness of it all.

And conveniently, there just happens to be a coffee shop on every corner and a full service bar on every street.

Nearly all of us engage in self-sabotaging and self-destructive behavior, which is great for guys like Brzezinski, because it makes controlling the masses easier than ever before.

The act of living ‘normally’ in this environment makes you a non-threat to those managing the chessboard. You are controlled by virtue of your inability to stay on your own unique path of self-mastery.

Friends, this is social engineering at its most advanced, and while it’s informative to understand what has happened to our society, your imperative now is to internalize this as a demand to eliminate such influences from your life.

You must seek to understand how these influences have derailed your potential, and then you must engage in the work needed to reconnect you with you inner wisdom and authority.

Self-sabotage is a gift to the elite. It puts you on the sideline of life and has you constantly burning your energy in a permanent war against yourself.

It makes it nearly impossible for you to make positive changes in your life or have a positive impact on your community or this world. It makes you aloof and dependent on the directives of skilled profiteers who utilize the science of the mind against you.

So, yeah, in today’s world it is far easier to control billions of people than to murder them. And unless you commit to taking back control of your life, you are fulfilling your directive as their pawn.

Dystopian: China Introduces ‘AI Prosecutor’ That Can Automatically Charge Citizens Of A Crime

While in the West mostly speech and movement of people are policed through automated “AI” censorship and surveillance systems, in China, work appears to be well under way to create a machine that would act as an AI-powered prosecutor.

dystopian china introduces 'ai prosecutor' that can automatically charge citizens of a crime

The product, which has already been tested by the busy Shanghai Pudong prosecutor’s office, is able to achieve 97 percent accuracy in charging people suspected of eight criminal acts, researchers developing it have alleged.

According to the South China Morning Post, the cases that the “AI prosecutor” is allegedly highly competent in handling involve crimes like credit card fraud, dangerous driving, gambling, intentional injury, obstructing officials, theft, but also something called “picking quarrels and provoking trouble.”

The last one is considered particularly “problematic” since its definition, or lack thereof, can cover different forms of political dissent.

And now the plan is to introduce a machine that would be given decision-making powers, such as whether to file charges, and what sentence to seek on a case-to-case basis.

That, said Professor Shi Yong, who heads the Chinese Academy of Sciences’ big data and knowledge management lab that is behind the project, is a marked difference between this and other “AI” tools that have already been in use in China for years.

One of them is System 206, whose tasks are limited to assessing evidence, the danger a suspect poses to the public, and conditions under which they may be apprehended.

But the tech behind the new artificial prosecutor looks to be at the same time far more ambitious, and advanced. What has been disclosed is that it can be run on a desktop PC, processing 1,000 traits extracted from case description filed by humans, and based on that press a charge.

It’s unclear if the database of 17,000 cases spanning five years used to train the algorithms is enough to consider the project as true AI – and if the same result can be achieved by rule-based algorithms.

Either way, not all human prosecutors are thrilled about having some of their workload replaced in this way – although precisely this has been given as the motive for developing the tech.

“The accuracy of 97 per cent may be high from a technological point of view, but there will always be a chance of a mistake. Who will take responsibility when it happens? The prosecutor, the machine or the designer of the algorithm?,” one Guangzhou-based prosecutor noted, speaking on condition of anonymity.

World’s Most Prestigious Medical Journal Roasts Facebook Over ‘Inaccurate, Incompetent & Irresponsible’ Fact Check

The Machiavellian quote (sic) that “if you’re going to come at the king, you best not miss,” may be about to bite Mark Zuckerberg and his army of fact-checking mercenaries.

While Zuckerberg may feel omnipotent atop his opaque algo-world but the so-called ‘fact-checkers’ – so expert at shutting down any narrative-conflicting-information (on behalf of, and often at the behest of, the Biden administration) – may have met their match by claiming that one of the world’s oldest and most prestigious medical journals delivered “false information” that “could mislead people.”

britihs medical journal mark zuckerberg

Bombshell That Went Virtually Unreported in the Corporate Media: Facebook Court Filing ADMITS ‘Fact Checks’ Are Just A Matter Of Opinion.

As we detailed in early NovemberThe British Medical Journal (BMJ) – a weekly peer-reviewed medical trade journal, published by the trade union the British Medical Association – published a whistle-blower report calling into question data integrity and regulatory oversight issues surrounding Pfizer’s pivotal phase III Covid-19 vaccine trial.

Brook Jackson, a now-fired regional director at Ventavia Research Group, revealed to The BMJ that vaccine trials at several sites in Texas last year had major problems – including falsified data, broke fundamental rules, and were ‘slow’ to report adverse reactions.

When she notified superiors of the issues she found, they fired her.

“A regional director who was employed at the research organisation Ventavia Research Group has told The BMJ that the company falsified data, unblinded patients, employed inadequately trained vaccinators, and was slow to follow up on adverse events reported in Pfizer’s pivotal phase III trial. Staff who conducted quality control checks were overwhelmed by the volume of problems they were finding. After repeatedly notifying Ventavia of these problems, the regional director, Brook Jackson, emailed a complaint to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Ventavia fired her later the same day. Jackson has provided The BMJ with dozens of internal company documents, photos, audio recordings, and emails.” – The BMJ

Very soon after, as the worrisome story went viral, BMJ soon would get a taste of what Facebook, Google, and others are doing to independent media platforms. As TrialSiteNews.com reportseven though BMJ is one of the most prominent medical journals and the information was rigorously peer-reviewed, strange things started occurring.

For example, readers would try to post some of the information on social media such as Facebook to share with their networks. But “some reported being unable to share it [the information].” Moreover, those individuals that were simply sharing this content, peer-reviewed from The BMJ, were warned by Facebook that, “Independent fact-checkers concluded, “This information could mislead people.”

biden's bodyguards facebook and twitter

Moreover, they were told, “Those trying to post the article were informed by Facebook that people who repeatedly share ‘false information’ might have their posts moved lower in Facebook’s News Feed.”

In addition, some group administrators received notices from Facebook that the information was “partly false.”

Readers were sent to a “fact check” performed by Lead Stories, a third-party fact-checker.

And so, as possibly the top experts in the world when it comes to medical research information, BMJ has now been forced to fact-check the ‘fact-checkers’.

In a no-holds-barred ‘open letter to Mark Zuckerberg’, the editors exposed that ‘fact-check’ as “inaccurate, incompetent, and irresponsible.”

Having received no response from Facebook or from Lead Stories, after requesting the removal of the “fact checking” label, the BMJ’s editors raise a “wider concern”:

We are aware that The BMJ is not the only high quality information provider to have been affected by the incompetence of Meta’s fact checking regime…

Rather than investing a proportion of Meta’s substantial profits to help ensure the accuracy of medical information shared through social media, you have apparently delegated responsibility to people incompetent in carrying out this crucial task.

Fact checking has been a staple of good journalism for decades.

What has happened in this instance should be of concern to anyone who values and relies on sources such as The BMJ.

Additionally, ‘goopthink’ offered more anti-censorship fire and brimstone in an eloquent comment at ycombinator:

In addition to the points raised by BMJ and in the comments below, there is a limit to what independent fact checking can accomplish.

For example, are their fact checkers conducting their own scientific experiments validating claims and outcomes of a scientific paper? Are fact checkers reaching out to sources from a news article and verifying quoted information? When “breaking news” or “scoops” are reported presenting totally new information about the world, how can that be verified against other information that – by virtue of something being new – cannot be verified by other preexisting sources?

If the fact checking process is limited to verification based on other information that is currently available, and if the fact checking process cannot distinguish between factual information and the opinions people hold as a result of that information, the outcome will be an inevitable echo chamber that reinforces currently dominant views or whatever preexisting biases are present.

… and that is exactly what the establishment wants.

Bombshell That Went Virtually Unreported in the Corporate Media: Facebook Court Filing ADMITS ‘Fact Checks’ Are Just A Matter Of Opinion.

Full letter from The BMJ below (emphasis ours):

Open Letter From The BMJ To Mark Zuckerberg

Dear Mark Zuckerberg,

We are Fiona Godlee and Kamran Abbasi, editors of The BMJ, one of the world’s oldest and most influential general medical journals. We are writing to raise serious concerns about the “fact checking” being undertaken by third party providers on behalf of Facebook/Meta.

In September, a former employee of Ventavia, a contract research company helping carry out the main Pfizer covid-19 vaccine trial, began providing The BMJ with dozens of internal company documents, photos, audio recordings, and emails. These materials revealed a host of poor clinical trial research practices occurring at Ventavia that could impact data integrity and patient safety. We also discovered that, despite receiving a direct complaint about these problems over a year ago, the FDA did not inspect Ventavia’s trial sites.

The BMJ commissioned an investigative reporter to write up the story for our journal. The article was published on 2 November, following legal review, external peer review and subject to The BMJ’s usual high level editorial oversight and review.

But from November 10, readers began reporting a variety of problems when trying to share our article. Some reported being unable to share it. Many others reported having their posts flagged with a warning about “Missing context … Independent fact-checkers say this information could mislead people.” Those trying to post the article were informed by Facebook that people who repeatedly share “false information” might have their posts moved lower in Facebook’s News Feed. Group administrators where the article was shared received messages from Facebook informing them that such posts were “partly false.”

Readers were directed to a “fact check” performed by a Facebook contractor named Lead Stories.

We find the “fact check” performed by Lead Stories to be inaccurate, incompetent and irresponsible.

  • It fails to provide any assertions of fact that The BMJ article got wrong
  • It has a nonsensical title: “Fact Check: The British Medical Journal Did NOT Reveal Disqualifying And Ignored Reports Of Flaws In Pfizer COVID-19 Vaccine Trials”
  • The first paragraph inaccurately labels The BMJ a “news blog”
  • It contains a screenshot of our article with a stamp over it stating “Flaws Reviewed,” despite the Lead Stories article not identifying anything false or untrue in The BMJ article
  • It published the story on its website under a URL that contains the phrase “hoax-alert”

We have contacted Lead Stories, but they refuse to change anything about their article or actions that have led to Facebook flagging our article.

We have also contacted Facebook directly, requesting immediate removal of the “fact checking” label and any link to the Lead Stories article, thereby allowing our readers to freely share the article on your platform.

There is also a wider concern that we wish to raise. We are aware that The BMJ is not the only high quality information provider to have been affected by the incompetence of Meta’s fact checking regime. To give one other example, we would highlight the treatment by Instagram (also owned by Meta) of Cochrane, the international provider of high quality systematic reviews of the medical evidence. Rather than investing a proportion of Meta’s substantial profits to help ensure the accuracy of medical information shared through social media, you have apparently delegated responsibility to people incompetent in carrying out this crucial task. Fact checking has been a staple of good journalism for decades. What has happened in this instance should be of concern to anyone who values and relies on sources such as The BMJ.

We hope you will act swiftly: specifically to correct the error relating to The BMJ’s article and to review the processes that led to the error; and generally to reconsider your investment in and approach to fact checking overall.

Best wishes,

Fiona Godlee, editor in chief

Kamran Abbasi, incoming editor in chief

The BMJ

Competing interests:

As current and incoming editors in chief, we are responsible for everything The BMJ contains.

It appears the ‘fact-checkers’ have some facts of their own to check… or otherwise admit they are simply there – as Fauci and Collins collusion was exposed this week – to maintain the propaganda peace for whoever is pulling the strings.

Famous Faces Have Been Replaced by FAKES

Picture
Slimes caption: Actors were filmed in a variety of scenes. The top picture is their actual image, with a deep-fake altered image below it.

— Various 2019-2021 NY Times Articles

Here Come the Fake Videos
*
Eerie Tom Cruise Videos, Reanimate Unease With Deepfakes
*

Internet Companies Prepare to Fight the ‘Deepfake’ Future
*
Deepfakes — Believe at Your Own Risk
*
(NYT YouTube): Do These AI Fake People Look Real to You?
*
Deepfakes: Is This Video Even Real?
*

(NYT Tweet by Nick Kristoff: “Deep Fake” of Queen Elizabeth – Reminder of the Perils of Deep Fakes

Over the course of the past three years, many well-known specimens of bottom-feeding scum from the intertwined worlds of Fake News and politics have been “warning” normiedom about the “dangers” of “Deep Fake” video technology that can present the  appearance, voice and in-sync lip movement of a targeted individual in a manner almost indistinguishable from the actual person himself. Just do an Internet search for “Deep Fake” and see for yourself just how afraid of this technology “the usual suspects” are. Even Poop Frankie the Fake has warned the world’s Catholics about Deep Fakes! (here)

The “Editorial Board” of The Anti-New York Times has, for some time now, maintained that the White Hats have already been using Deep Fake technology, masks and imposters as fill-ins for certain Satanic celebrities and crooked politicians who have already been “disappeared” to the military prison at Guantanamo Bay on the island of Cuba. We also believe that actors — some wearing sophisticated masks — are being utilized for the same purpose. These assertions always draw a mixed response from the loyal readership — ranging from: “Holy shit! You’re right, Mike! These ARE fakes!” on one side, to: “Mike, love your work, but you’re really discrediting yourself with this crazy talk!” – on the other end.

Rather than make this case with words, it’s better to use images — because, after all, it is imagery that we are talking about. Let’s have a look at some of these imposters — and some headlines from various entertainment media sources, all containing the word “unrecognizable.”

https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-biden-notdeepfake/fact-check-bidens-skin-tone-mismatch-in-video-is-not-evidence-of-a-deepfake-idUSL2N2NC1U8

Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture

JOE BIDEN & ANTHONY FAUCI
Column 1: Fake Biden in mask — on CNBC (Video Here) //  Columns 2 & 3: Fake Dr. Falsie in mask — on NBC’s Meet the Press (Video Here)

Biden?
Picture
Fake Will Smith on Left
Picture
Daily Mail (UK)
Picture
US Magazine

WILL SMITH is “unrecognizable.”

Picture
Picture

India Today
Picture
Radar Online

TOM CRUISE is “unrecognizable.”

Picture
Barkley should not dwarf ‘The Rock” like this.
Picture
Picture

DWAYNE “THE ROCK” JOHNSON
1. “The Rock” (r) is 6′ 5″ tall and 260 pounds. (here) Charles Barkley (l) is 6’6″ tall and 250 pounds. (here) — If the two men are roughly the same size, then why does Barkley — in both height & weight — appear to dwarf Johnson in a recent photo? // 2. Has an Alabama cop taken The Rock’s place?

Picture
NOT BEYONCE!
Picture
US DAILY REPORT
Picture
SANDRAROSE.COM

BEYONCE is “unrecognizable.”

Picture
NOT J LO!
Picture
SHE FINDS
Picture
US DAILY REPORT

JENNIFER LOPEZ is “unrecognizable.”

Picture
NOT BEN AFFLECK!
Picture
SHE FINDS
Picture
THE SUN (UK)

BEN AFFLECK is “unrecognizable.”

Picture
MERYL STREEP?
Picture
SHE FINDS
Picture
AMOMOMA

MERYL STREEP is “unrecognizable.”

Picture
NOT CHRISSY TIEGEN!
Picture
SUGGEST
Picture
THE SUN

CHRISSY TIEGEN is “unrecognizable.”

Picture
NOT NICOLE KIDMAN
Picture
AUDACY.COM
Picture
YAHOO

NICOLE KIDMAN is “unrecognizable.”

Picture
NOT DEMI MOORE
Picture
WIO NEWS
Picture
YAHOO

DEMI MOORE is “unrecognizable.”

Picture
NOT TOM HANKS!
Picture
NICKISWIFTS.COM
Picture
SHEFINDS

TOM HANKS is “unrecognizable.”

Picture
NOT MADONNA!
Picture
WIO NEWS
Picture
YAHOO

MADONNA is “unrecognizable.”

There’s something strange going on. Nancy Pelosi doesn’t quite look nor sound like herself; Alec Baldwin (who also looks “unrecognizable”) is finished after that “shooting” incident; the once holy names of St. Andrew Cuomo and St. Bill Gates are shit now; and a 40-year personal friend of Bruce Willis’s (whom we will not name) tells us that the star actor has disappeared.

So, why this pantomime act, you ask? That’s a good question — and the best we can theoretically infer is this: Under the perfect cover and noise of “Covid” — the White Hats removed or placed under submission as many of the black chess pieces from the board as possible — thus rendering the crooks and the Satanists harmless — before presenting the grand finale of “The Movie” to all of shell-shocked Normiedom. After the coming “Dark Winter” of high heating bills, food inflation and shortages has passed, the approval ratings of the deliberately stumbling and bumbling “Joe Biden” should be down in the 20s by the time Trump’s “Truth Social” media colossus rolls out in February. That’s when the White Hats — a la Sun Tzu — will, we believe, strike with maximum ferocity.

Some will say: “Mike, love you man. But you’ve really taken a ride on the Q crazy train now!” —– But have I though? Let’s wait and see. In the meantime, “youse guys” have gotta admit: the fact that so many big names are suddenly being Deep Faked or turned “unrecognizable”(ENTERTAINMENT MEDIA’S WORD, NOT MINE) is like something out of a … well, movie! — Like Mission Impossible.

Professor Of Clinical Psychiatry Who Studied The Psychology Of Totalitarianism: ‘This Is How We Win’

As many of you may know, all of humanity is under a massive psychological warfare attack. And Professor of Clinical Psychiatry, Matthias Desmet, who has studied the psychology of totalitarianism has done an excellent job of explaining how we got here and how we win.professor mattias Desmet

Professor of Clinical Psychiatry, Matthias Desmet

In dictatorships, obedience comes from a basic fear of the dictator. But with totalitarianism, people are hypnotized into obedience. In psychological terms, this mass hypnosis is known as mass formation.

And totalitarianism always starts with a mass formation inside the population.

A mass formation requires 4 conditions for it to take root:

1) The masses must feel alone and isolated.

2) Their lives must feel pointless and meaningless.

These conditions have been growing for years with social media [i.e. narcissism, sociopathy, addiction and mental illness]

3) The masses then must experience constant free-floating anxiety, and

4) They must experience free-floating frustration and aggression.

This simply means there is no discernible source for the anxiety or aggression. And so, the person begins to irrationally crave a remedy, no matter how absurd or destructive it may be.

And these conditions were met in 2020, with the COVID lockdowns and the BLM Riots.

They are now ripe for hypnosis.

And once they accept the experimental jabs, they feel solidarity, which validates the whole thing for them, no matter how senseless. They are now changed, no longer rational. They become intolerant and cruel.

So How Do We Win?

Studies have shown that about 25% of the population cannot be hypnotized. And about 10% are highly-susceptible to hypnosis.

Professor Desmet simplifies this even more for us. He says that 30% of people are now deeply hypnotized and have irrationally accepted the experimental shots as their solution40% are not yet hypnotized but will ultimately go along with the herd.

And the rest of us are seeing things clearly.

What the enemy is trying to do is extremely dangerous, because if the masses ever awaken from their spell, they will demand justice and so stress must constantly be maintained upon the masses until the “mass formation” is complete.

We are the voice of dissent. And while we may not have much in the way of influence over the hypnotized 30%, we must definitely hold sway over the 40% who will go along with the herd.

We need to become the herd.

Whether you think this all happened by accident or conspiracy; whether your reasons are based on religion or personal health, our voice of dissent must become one, it must grow and it must never end.

We must spread the seeds of doubt to everyone: At the gas station, at the grocery store, at work, with the neighbors.

They are desperately trying to provoke a civil war or a violent revolution, because they can control that.

Violence will not break people out of the hypnosis, it will only push more people into it.

Telling the truth has become a revolutionary act. Telling the truth to everyone you meet will save humanity, so keep doing it.

Learn Here: How to Defeat the New World Order Through Peaceful Non-Compliance.

https://rumble.com/vqf9fw-this-is-how-we-win.html

New York Times Wants To “Help” Conspiracy Theorists Recover

The Times has so graciously put together a tutorial on “how to help” the viral crazies now popping in every family and circle of friends.

Picture

DECEMBER 1, 2021

NY Times:How to Talk to Friends and Family Who Share Conspiracy Theories

Fringe movements will persist. Here’s how to help.

By CHARLIE WARZEL

REBUTTAL BY Luis T

No matter how many shells the Judenpresse Armada fires at us, we “conspiracy theorists” ™ not only remain afloat but — as even the Times acknowledges — we continue to grow our ranks with each passing day. As a public service to the bewildered boobs who worship “the paper of record” and Fake News in general, Times scribbler Charlie Warzel has so graciously taken it upon himself to put together  a tutorial on “how to help” the viral crazies now popping in every family and circle of friends.

Warzel sets forth six strategies that normies should use to “help” their crazy loved ones — and he prefaces his advice with the following word of caution about dealing with “conspiracy theorists” ™ 

“Reminder: This advice pertains to friends or relatives with whom you are already close and who are not demonstrating unstable or violent behavior. It’s important to exercise restraint and good judgment in all cases.”

Fuck you Weasel. It’s the Left that’s “unstable” and “violent,” not us. Let’s review and rebut these six pieces of Warzel’s excrement.

Picture
Charlie Weasel tells people how to “help” the critical thinkers in their circle.
Picture
Crazy Uncle Bob needs a family intervention.
Picture
Of course, the Q Anon movement is featured in this story.

1. Ask Where the Information is Coming From.

Rebuttal:Genetic Fallacy Alert! Genetic Fallacy Alert! It doesn’t matter where the data comes from. What matters is whether a thing is true, or whether it is false. Although it is perfectly natural and logical to be skeptical of information coming from a dubious source; a wise man never automatically disregards data based on source alone. Never ask: “Where did you read this?” — Always ask: Is this true — and can it be independently confirmed or debunked?

*

2. Create Some Cognitive Dissonance — (*By acknowledging that certain past conspiracies were real and have been exposed — and then asking why the conspiracy in question has not been exposed by “whistle-blowers”).

There are indeed whistle-blowers usually associated with the big conspiracy of (fill-in-the-blank). But because the press itself is part of the Deep State, you may not always come to know about it. Why would you assume that just because a certain whistle-blower or victim has been ignored by the corrupted corporate media, that he or she does not exist or is not legitimate? Do you blindly worship the Fake News?

*
3. Debunking is Difficult — (*Because people form emotional attachments to their beliefs.)

That works both ways, Weasel. People, in general, regardless of intelligence or “education,” are slow to change their minds. But what strikes me about you Q Anon / Satanist “debunkers” is that you NEVER even attempt to “debunk” the data — such as the disgusting child-abuse artwork preferred by the Podesta Brothers — or the shocking images and texts posted on social media by the perverted PizzaGate clique.  Are those stomach-turning images and posts that have so repulsed so many millions of people real — or are they not real? Is the Hunter Biden laptop real, or is it not real? Please answer.

Picture
All that matters is if a thing is “True” or “False.” Fixating on the “source” of the data is a diversion.
Picture
“There are no whistle-blowers, eh Warzel?” — Vicky Polin on the Oprah Winfrey Show in 1989 reveals how she was raised in a Satanic Jewish cult that sacrificed “breeder” babies (video here). She then ran the Jewish Coalition Against Sexual Abuse/Assault — a support group which, after years of being attacked by “the usual suspects,” finally closed in 2014.
Picture
No one has ever even tried to “debunk” Demonrat big-shot Tony Podesta’s favorite works of “art.”

4. Don’t Debate on Facebook — (too confrontational)

Rebuttal: Why not, Mr. Weasel? I’ve seen in-person “debates” between normies and truthers get pretty nasty (been there myself!). Could your advice to avoid Facebook debates have anything to do with the fact that online exchanges allow a truther — who may not be so articulate or well-versed — to instantly drop a link to one of the countless excellent articles and videos out there which provide powerful proofs for “conspiracy theories” ™. Indeed, some of the assigned anti-conspiracy monitors at You Tube were themselves converted by some of the very videos they were tasked with reviewing for censorship! Weasel is trying to prevent naive “debunkers” from fighting in a highly populated arena more favorable to truthers.

*

5. Mocking and Scolding Won’t Work

Rebuttal: You see that? Behind our backs, he mocks us and tells our normie friends & family that we are essentially insane little children in need of an “intervention” — but then instructs them to conceal their scorn from us — as if we astute “empaths” wouldn’t be able to instinctively sense and be properly offended by the concealed condescension of these sneaky, snarky, back-stabbing mental midgets in our midst! Oh that just does wonders for a relationship (been there too!) eh, Weasel? Typical manipulative Marxist.

*

6.Know When to Walk Away.

There it is!!! The payoff punch — the truth at last!

Weasel knows bloody damn well that once one has contracted the truth-virus, there’s no going back to the overlapping tyrannical Kingdoms of Libtardia and Normiedom. It is a mental impossibility — notwithstanding these FAKE stories we hear about “reformed” conspiracy cultists who “have a warning for others.” Hence, Warzel’s previous five pieces of advice were all just part of a grand smoke-screen. What this devious (((devil))) really wants is for people to “walk away” and — as a natural consequence in many cases — alienate the truther from “polite company” and even family gatherings.

In his own words, while quoting a “conspiracy researcher” named — get this — Mike Rothschild(cough cough):

“If you have legitimate concerns about their health and safety, that is usually a job for professionals. In some cases, it’s important to realize there may be little you can do in the moment, some cautioned. Mr. Rothschild told me: If you have to, be ready to walk away from them. There comes a point where you may not be able to have that instability in your life.’”

*
Too late for you Bolshevik bastards to isolate this writer, Mr. Weasel and Mr. Rothschild. You see, though I will tolerate disagreement — I’ve already distanced myself from anyone and everyone who actually thinks me mad — and with zero regrets (yet with deep and persistent sorrow).

Picture
(((They))) want normies to stay out of Facebook debates for fear of what they may discover — and then spread.
Picture
“That weirdo thinks 9/11 was an inside job. Ha ha ha ha.” 
Picture
The lonely walk of a truther is never easy.
Picture

Why ‘Metaverse’ Is Big Brother In Disguise

The term metaverse, like the term meritocracy, was coined in a sci fi dystopia novel written as cautionary tale. Then techies took metaverse, and technocrats took meritocracy, and enthusiastically adopted what was meant to inspire horror.” — Antonio García Martínez

why 'metaverse' is big brother in disguise

Welcome to the Matrix (i.e. the metaverse), where reality is virtual, freedom is only as free as one’s technological overlords allow, and artificial intelligence is slowly rendering humanity unnecessary, inferior and obsolete.

Mark Zuckerberg, the CEO of Facebook, sees this digital universe — the metaverse — as the next step in our evolutionary transformation from a human-driven society to a technological one.

Yet while Zuckerberg’s vision for this digital frontier has been met with a certain degree of skepticism, the truth—as journalist Antonio García Martínez concludes — is that we’re already living in the metaverse.

The metaverse is, in turn, a dystopian meritocracy, where freedom is a conditional construct based on one’s worthiness and compliance.

In a meritocracy, rights are privileges, afforded to those who have earned them. There can be no tolerance for independence or individuality in a meritocracy, where political correctness is formalized, legalized and institutionalized.

Likewise, there can be no true freedom when the ability to express oneself, move about, engage in commerce and function in society is predicated on the extent to which you’re willing to “fit in.”

We are almost at that stage now.

Consider that in our present virtue-signaling world where fascism disguises itself as tolerance, the only way to enjoy even a semblance of freedom is by opting to voluntarily censor yourself, comply, conform and march in lockstep with whatever prevailing views dominate.

Fail to do so — by daring to espouse “dangerous” ideas or support unpopular political movements — and you will find yourself shut out of commerce, employment, and society: Facebook will ban you, Twitter will shut you down, Instagram will de-platform you, and your employer will issue ultimatums that force you to choose between your so-called freedoms and economic survival.

This is exactly how Corporate America plans to groom us for a world in which “we the people” are unthinking, unresistant, slavishly obedient automatons in bondage to a Deep State policed by computer algorithms.

Science fiction has become fact.

Twenty-some years after the Wachowskis’ iconic film, The Matrix, introduced us to a futuristic world in which humans exist in a computer-simulated non-reality powered by authoritarian machines—a world where the choice between existing in a denial-ridden virtual dream-state or facing up to the harsh, difficult realities of life comes down to a blue pill or a red pill—we stand at the precipice of a technologically-dominated matrix of our own making.

We are living the prequel to The Matrix with each passing day, falling further under the spell of technologically-driven virtual communities, virtual realities and virtual conveniences managed by artificially intelligent machines that are on a fast track to replacing human beings and eventually dominating every aspect of our lives.

In The Matrixcomputer programmer Thomas Anderson a.k.a. hacker Neo is wakened from a virtual slumber by Morpheus, a freedom fighter seeking to liberate humanity from a lifelong hibernation state imposed by hyper-advanced artificial intelligence machines that rely on humans as an organic power source. With their minds plugged into a perfectly crafted virtual reality, few humans ever realize they are living in an artificial dream world.

Neo is given a choice: to take the red pill, wake up and join the resistance, or take the blue pill, remain asleep and serve as fodder for the powers-that-be.

Most people opt for the blue pill.

In our case, the blue pill — a one-way ticket to a life sentence in an electronic concentration camp — has been honey-coated to hide the bitter aftertaste, sold to us in the name of expediency and delivered by way of blazingly fast Internet, cell phone signals that never drop a call, thermostats that keep us at the perfect temperature without our having to raise a finger, and entertainment that can be simultaneously streamed to our TVs, tablets and cell phones.

Yet we are not merely in thrall with these technologies that were intended to make our lives easier. We have become enslaved by them.

Look around you. Everywhere you turn, people are so addicted to their internet-connected screen devices — smart phones, tablets, computers, televisions — that they can go for hours at a time submerged in a virtual world where human interaction is filtered through the medium of technology.

This is not freedom. This is not even progress.

This is technological tyranny and iron-fisted control delivered by way of the surveillance state, corporate giants such as Google and Facebook, and government spy agencies such as the National Security Agency.

So consumed are we with availing ourselves of all the latest technologies that we have spared barely a thought for the ramifications of our heedless, headlong stumble towards a world in which our abject reliance on internet-connected gadgets and gizmos is grooming us for a future in which freedom is an illusion.

Yet it’s not just freedom that hangs in the balance. Humanity itself is on the line.

If ever Americans find themselves in bondage to technological tyrants, we will have only ourselves to blame for having forged the chains through our own lassitude, laziness and abject reliance on internet-connected gadgets and gizmos that render us wholly irrelevant.

Indeed, we’re fast approaching Philip K. Dick’s vision of the future as depicted in the film Minority Report. There, police agencies apprehend criminals before they can commit a crime, driverless cars populate the highways, and a person’s biometrics are constantly scanned and used to track their movements, target them for advertising, and keep them under perpetual surveillance.

Cue the dawning of the Age of the Internet of Things (IoT), in which internet-connected “things” monitor your home, your health and your habits in order to keep your pantry stocked, your utilities regulated and your life under control and relatively worry-free.

The key word here, however, is control.

In the not-too-distant future, “just about every device you have—and even products like chairs, that you don’t normally expect to see technology in—will be connected and talking to each other.”

By the end of 2018, “there were an estimated 22 billion internet of things connected devices in use around the world… Forecasts suggest that by 2030 around 50 billion of these IoT devices will be in use around the world, creating a massive web of interconnected devices spanning everything from smartphones to kitchen appliances.”

As the technologies powering these devices have become increasingly sophisticated, they have also become increasingly widespread, encompassing everything from toothbrushes and lightbulbs to cars, smart meters and medical equipment.

It is estimated that 127 new IoT devices are connected to the web every second.

This “connected” industry has become the next big societal transformation, right up there with the Industrial Revolution, a watershed moment in technology and culture.

Between driverless cars that completely lacking a steering wheel, accelerator, or brake pedal, and smart pills embedded with computer chips, sensors, cameras and robots, we are poised to outpace the imaginations of science fiction writers such as Philip K. Dick and Isaac Asimov. (By the way, there is no such thing as a driverless car. Someone or something will be driving, but it won’t be you.)

These Internet-connected techno gadgets include smart light bulbs that discourage burglars by making your house look occupied, smart thermostats that regulate the temperature of your home based on your activities, and smart doorbells that let you see who is at your front door without leaving the comfort of your couch.

Nest, Google’s suite of smart home products, has been at the forefront of the “connected” industry, with such technologically savvy conveniences as a smart lock that tells your thermostat who is home, what temperatures they like, and when your home is unoccupied; a home phone service system that interacts with your connected devices to “learn when you come and go” and alert you if your kids don’t come home; and a sleep system that will monitor when you fall asleep, when you wake up, and keep the house noises and temperature in a sleep-conducive state.

The aim of these internet-connected devices, as Nest proclaims, is to make “your house a more thoughtful and conscious home.” For example, your car can signal ahead that you’re on your way home, while Hue lights can flash on and off to get your attention if Nest Protect senses something’s wrong. Your coffeemaker, relying on data from fitness and sleep sensors, will brew a stronger pot of coffee for you if you’ve had a restless night.

Yet given the speed and trajectory at which these technologies are developing, it won’t be long before these devices are operating entirely independent of their human creators, which poses a whole new set of worries. As technology expert Nicholas Carr notes:

“As soon as you allow robots, or software programs, to act freely in the world, they’re going to run up against ethically fraught situations and face hard choices that can’t be resolved through statistical models. That will be true of self-driving cars, self-flying drones, and battlefield robots, just as it’s already true, on a lesser scale, with automated vacuum cleaners and lawnmowers.”

For instance, just as the robotic vacuum, Roomba, “makes no distinction between a dust bunny and an insect,” weaponized drones will be incapable of distinguishing between a fleeing criminal and someone merely jogging down a street. For that matter, how do you defend yourself against a robotic cop — such as the Atlas android being developed by the Pentagon — that has been programmed to respond to any perceived threat with violence?

Moreover, it’s not just our homes and personal devices that are being reordered and reimagined in this connected age: it’s our workplaces, our health systems, our government, our bodies and our innermost thoughts that are being plugged into a matrix over which we have no real control.

It is expected that by 2030, we will all experience The Internet of Senses (IoS), enabled by Artificial Intelligence (AI), Virtual Reality (VR), Augmented Reality (AR), 5G, and automation. The Internet of Senses relies on connected technology interacting with our senses of sight, sound, taste, smell, and touch by way of the brain as the user interface.

As journalist Susan Fourtane explains:

“Many predict that by 2030, the lines between thinking and doing will blur. Fifty-nine percent of consumers believe that we will be able to see map routes on VR glasses by simply thinking of a destination… By 2030, technology is set to respond to our thoughts, and even share them with others… Using the brain as an interface could mean the end of keyboards, mice, game controllers, and ultimately user interfaces for any digital device. The user needs to only think about the commands, and they will just happen. Smartphones could even function without touch screens.”

In other words, the IoS will rely on technology being able to access and act on your thoughts.

Fourtane outlines several trends related to the IoS that are expected to become a reality by 2030:

1: Thoughts become action: using the brain as the interface, for example, users will be able to see map routes on VR glasses by simply thinking of a destination.

2: Sounds will become an extension of the devised virtual reality: users could mimic anyone’s voice realistically enough to fool even family members.

3: Real food will become secondary to imagined tastes. A sensory device for your mouth could digitally enhance anything you eat, so that any food can taste like your favorite treat.

4: Smells will become a projection of this virtual reality so that virtual visits, to forests or the countryside for instance, would include experiencing all the natural smells of those places.

5: Total touch: Smartphones with screens will convey the shape and texture of the digital icons and buttons they are pressing.

6: Merged reality: VR game worlds will become indistinguishable from physical reality by 2030.

This is the metaverse, wrapped up in the siren-song of convenience and sold to us as the secret to success, entertainment and happiness.

It’s a false promise, a wicked trap to snare us, with a single objective: total control.

George Orwell understood this.

Orwell’s masterpiece, 1984, portrays a global society of total control in which people are not allowed to have thoughts that in any way disagree with the corporate state. There is no personal freedom, and advanced technology has become the driving force behind a surveillance-driven society. Snitches and cameras are everywhere. And people are subject to the Thought Police, who deal with anyone guilty of thought crimes. The government, or “Party,” is headed by Big Brother, who appears on posters everywhere with the words: “Big Brother is watching you.”

As I make clear in my book Battlefield America: The War on the American People, total control over every aspect of our lives, right down to our inner thoughts, is the objective of any totalitarian regime.

The Metaverse is just Big Brother in disguise.

By constitutional attorney John W. Whitehead. He is the founder and president of The Rutherford Institute, and the author of Battlefield America: The War on the American People.

Australian Officials Again Announce A New World Order

An Australian New World Order is coming into being, judging by the frequent uses of the phrase in the Land Down Under. In yet another slip of the tongue, which can hardly be considered anything other than calculated and deliberate, New South Wales (NSW) chief health officer Dr. Kerry Chant has come out and explicitly stated that “we will be looking at what contact tracing looks like in the New World Order.”australian officials again announce a new world order 2

NSW health officials keep announcing an Australian New World Order at COVID press conferences. Why are they deliberately using the explicit “New World Order” phrase?

This is not the first time Chant has used the New World Order (NWO) phrase regarding governmental COVID policies, nor is it the first time that officials in NSW (Australia’s most populous state) have used it either.

Another official, the NSW Minister for Health and Medical Research Brad Hazzard, has talked of the NWO numerous times in the context of COVID.

Read more here:
1. Australian Public Health Chief Says COVID Contact Tracing Is Part Of ‘New World Order’
2. Disturbing! Australia Health Minister: ‘We’ve Got To Accept That This Is The New World Order,’ As Harsh COVID Lockdowns Imposed

Could it get any more blatant and brazen?

What Is Happening To Chant’s Face As She Speaks?

I don’t know if anyone else has noticed this, but take a look at the above linked 30-second clip where Chant talks about her Australian New World Order. Watch her face closely. Notice how a dark presence comes across her face (from the 6 second mark to the 9 second mark or so) when her brows sharply furrow above her nose. Her face goes from open to closed, almost like some entity has overtaken her face and is speaking through her:

australian officials again announce a new world order

Look at her eyes. Look at her eyebrows. Then, all of a sudden, it disappears. It’s a really creepy effect, and I have noticed it several times when I’ve watched her speak in public. I have written before about wetikoArchons and other interdimensional entities which appear to be at the base of the NWO worldwide conspiracy. I am not saying that is necessarily what is happening here, but Chant’s facial expressions are eerie.

Whistleblower Phil Schneider once said: The New World Order agenda is the alien agenda.

Military engineer and geologist Phil Schneider was a brave whistleblower, who went public in 1995 (and was murdered by “suicide” a year later in 1996).

He is the one who first voiced the sentence “The New World Agenda is the alien agenda” – and he would have known, because according to his claim, he personally came face-to-face with both hostile Grey and hostile Reptilian ETs while working on the construction of DUMBs (Deep Underground Military Bases). — Continue reading

Australian Draconian COVID Rules, Policies And Legislation

The Australian New World Order theme has also been trumpeted in MSM rags like the SMH (Sydney Morning Herald) in articles with headlines such as “Australia’s COVID-19 inquiry presents a roadmap for a new world order.”

The Australian government has been engaging in some utterly horrific and draconian actions such as shooting rescue dogs, with the rationale being to stop volunteers at an animal shelter from traveling to pick up the animals. Why? Because COVID. No need for logic – or a scrap of humaneness, either.

Just recently on August 25th 2021, both houses of the Australian Parliament passed another tyrannical bill entitled the Surveillance Legislation Amendment (Identify and Disrupt) Bill 2021 via which the government nonchalantly grants itself the right to “disrupt data by modifying, adding, copying or deleting data in order to frustrate the commission of serious offences online.”

What does this mean? It means the government can come in and change what you said online – and there’s nothing you can do about it! It also allows the police to “take over a person’s online account for the purposes of gathering evidence to further a criminal investigation.”

Read more here: Australian Authorities Can Now LEGALLY CHANGE Citizens’ Social Media Posts.

In this Activist Post article, Jeff Thompson writes:

“If we go back to our initial example, authorities could easily decide that you are promoting harmful content or some other similar nonsense. For those Americans who haven’t been paying attention, this is not uncharted waters for Australians:

1. We’ve recently witnessed Australia arrest a pregnant woman in her home – in front of her screaming children – simply because she attempted to organize an anti-lockdown/ pro-freedom protest via a Facebook post. She was thus deemed a threat to public safety and hauled away in handcuffs one hour before an ultrasound appointment. (Later, we learned that three more people have been arrested for similar “crimes.”)

2. We later saw Australian police arrest hundreds at (yet another) large anti-lockdown / pro-freedom protest within the country.

3. Then we saw the creation of veritable concentration camps for Australian citizens.

The article Facebook or Twitter posts can now be quietly modified by the government under new surveillance laws from The Conversation explains:

“The bill introduces three new powers for law-enforcement agencies:

1. “data disruption warrants” allow authorities to “disrupt data” by copying, deleting or modifying data as they see fit
2. “network activity warrants” permit the collection of intelligence from devices or networks that are used, or likely to be used, by subject of the warrant
3. “account takeover warrants” let agencies take control of an online account (such as a social media account) to gather information for an investigation.

There is also an “emergency authorisation” procedure that allows these activities without a warrant under certain circumstances.”

In other words, they can now change what you write, hijack your phone or computer and take over your account – and all without a warrant! Holy cow! What the heck does this have to do with COVID? Imagine for a minute – you’re writing a comment on social media or a blog post, and the government steps in and decides it will rewrite what you said, and there’s nothing you can do about it. At this point in time, they are not even trying to pretend they care about human rights or mask these authoritarian rules in the cloak of protecting public health.

As things stand in the US, this kind of legislation would run up against a 4th Amendment protection against searches and seizures, but in the COVID NWO era, nothing is guaranteed. I have no doubt at all such legislation will be introduced in the US. Let’s remember: this is a worldwide agenda, and while Down Under has gone into full tyranny mode with an Australian New World Order, the plan is to harmonize all laws across the world to make every single nation identically tyrannical.

Australian New World Order: NSW And Victoria Openly Declare The Agenda

The premiers of Australia’s 2 most populous states, NSW and Victoria, have been explicitly declaring the NWO future in the island nation. NSW premier Gladys Berejiklian told unvaxxed Aussies “You have been warned!” as she pronounced that Australians who had not received the dangerous and experimental COVID vax would remain under indefinite lockdown.

Meanwhile Victorian premier Dan Andrews, or Dictator Dan / Kim Jong Dan if you prefer, openly warned of the coming vaccinated economy, where the unvaccinated would be locked out of participating in normal economic life. This is a staggering act of unlawful segregation and discrimination – to actually prevent people who simply want bodily autonomy and medical sovereignty from visiting hospitals. However in the Australian New World Order, this will apparently be the norm, unless enough Aussies step into their power right now, and rise up to put an end to this nonsense once and for all.

Final Thoughts

The more they push, the more they expose their authoritarian agenda. Australia is well known for its love of booze, but even that raucous pastime is now under attack, as a recent report reveals that NSW officials limited residents in a prison quarantine tower to 6 beers per day. Crikey! Things must be getting bad if the inmates can’t even drown their sorrows in alcohol.

On a more serious note, there can only be so many wake-up calls before the world reaches a point of no return. It bears repeating that all this insanity can be stopped – and quickly – if enough people unify and peacefully but very very determinedly refuse to cooperate any more with any aspect of Operation Coronavirus.

By Makia Freeman