Get Ready For “I Stand With Taiwan” Idiocy.

Taiwan Presidential Office

AUG 7, 2022


 NY Times (Guest Essay): 
I’m Taiwanese, and I Want to Thank Nancy Pelosi

By Yu-Jie Chen

Yu-Jie Chen is a research professor at the Law Institute of Taiwan’s “Academia Sinica” and an affiliated scholar at New York University’s U.S.-Asia Law Institute. Though usually averse to making hasty generalizations, — on the basis of those “credentials” alone, coupled with the fact that the “paper of record” thought to feature her “Guest Essay” — can confidently label her as a Globalist-Libtard of the Asian branch of Globalist Libtardation.

A proper framing of this wench is necessary for understanding why, in the dispute between the “Two Chinas,” we side with Xi of “communist” China over “democratic” Taiwan. You see, the “I Stand With Taiwan” crowd is made up of the same cult cretins as the “I Stand With Ukraine” bunch. Don’t be surprised if, in few more weeks from now, the usual deluded, virtue-signalling followers of “the latest thing” swap out their yellow and blue Jukraine flags for the red and blue of Taiwan.

To get a better understanding of what this brewing “crisis” is really all about, let’s dive into “Professor” Chen’s love letter to Speaker Pelosi for some analysis.

Column 1: The “Taiwanese” writer is Soros’s bitch. // Column 2:
 Taiwan & Ukraine are both puppet states that the Globalists use to antagonize their Russian & Chinese adversaries. That is why the cult followers of “the latest thing” — some consciously, some obliviously — support both “causes.”
And so it begins.

Chen: As a Taiwanese,….
Rebuttal: Stop right there! You’re only “Taiwanese” by a geographical / historical quirk necessitated by the aftermath of the Chinese Civil War which ended 73 years ago. You are, racially, historically, linguistically, culturally — Chinese. Be proud of that, traitor.

Chen: … I’m sometimes asked what it’s like living in “the most dangerous place on earth.”
Rebuttal: Oh the bloody drama! Who says Taiwan is “the most dangerous place on earth?”

Chen: That’s what The Economist labeled Taiwan last year.
Rebuttal: The Economist eh?  Ooooh, such an authority. The Economist is a Globalist propaganda organ half-owned by the Rothschilds. We can tell who’s buttering your egg roll, honey.

Chen: Taiwan’s people have lived for decades under Chinese rhetorical threats to absorb the island.
RebuttalActually, the official Chinese position is for Taiwan to maintain a maximum level of autonomy, but as part of a single Chinese nation. The name for this idea is “One Country, Two Systems.” Under this proposed arrangement, Taiwan (like Hong Kong & Macao) would keep its governmental system and manage its own financial affairs. It’s a total win-win situation — sort of like the decentralized “cantons” of Switzerland — but the Globalists and their minions in Taiwan won’t allow it.

Chen: China often reacts furiously when any U.S. official visits Taiwan … 
RebuttalAnd how would Americans react if Chinese busy-bodies were to visit the commonwealth of Puerto Rico to incite them against the US mainland?

Chen: ….Beijing has a special loathing for Ms. Pelosi.
Rebuttal: The fact that China “loathes” that corrupt drunken bitch is all the more reason for decent Americans to NOT “stand with Taiwan.”

Chen: Ms. Pelosi’s visit was a welcome expression of U.S. solidarity with Taiwan ….
RebuttalDrunken Nancy (if that’s even her) won’t be speaking for Americans for much longer. The Demonrat Party is headed for a devastating humiliation in about 12 weeks.

Chen: Taiwan is critical to the entire democratic project.
Rebuttal: What exactly do you mean by the “democratic project?” — And why is Taiwan so “critical” to it?

Chen: We are the first place in Asia to legalize same-sex marriage.
Rebuttal: There it is! “Gay – Gay – Gay” — the very first thing she mentions. Yes, the Globalists are turning Taiwan into an Asian outpost of decay and degeneracy. In hindsight, foreknowledge of that alone might have made me root for Mao’s Reds to take back the island.

Chen: And one of the first to elect a female leader — our current president, Tsai Ing-wen —
Rebuttal: President Tsai Ing Wen is a rancid libtarded harridan cut from the same Soros cloth as libtarded western shrews like Satanist Hillary, Drunken Pelosi, Frumpy Merkel, Donkey-Faced Adern (gender questionable) et al. Again, give me bloody old Chairman Mao over this bossy neo-Marxist hag any day.

1. The Rothschild Crime Syndicate made Taiwan “the most dangerous place on Earth” — then their magazine blames China for making it so dangerous. // 2. The queering of Taiwan — brought to you by the CIA. // 3. The Wicked Witch of the West meets the Wicked Witch of the East (still with the theatrical face diapers!)
As thick as thieves! George Soros, Drunken Nancy and Alex Soros

Chen: We are a successful economy, with some of the highest living standards in Asia.
Rebuttal: Morally decaying Taiwan, like its western counterpart “democracies,” also has below-replacement-level birth rates and growing divorce rates. Keep ageing the population and keep ruining your families — and we shall see how much longer you can maintain a “successful economy.”

Chen: If Taiwan were brought to heel by China, ….
Rebuttal: The fact that Taiwan was “brought to heel” by the Globalist Cabal a long time ago doesn’t seem to trouble this “sovereignty” loving cosmopolitan C-word one bit.

Chen: …. the world would lose a shining example of democracy and the liberal international economic order
Rebuttal: “The liberal international economic order,” eh? — That says it all.

Chen: … at a time when the authoritarian tentacles of the likes of Russia and China are expanding.
Globalese to English Translation: “Authoritarianism” refers to the act of saying “NO!” to the Globalist Crime Syndicate.

Chen: Seizing Taiwan would fulfill Mr. Xi’s nationalistic goal of annexing the island.
Rebuttal: It would not be a “seizure.” What Xi seeks is peaceful reunification.

Chen: Rarely does anyone bother to ask what the Taiwanese want. The answer: to live our democratic way of life …..
Rebuttal: Lying she-devil. Taiwan is being offered “One Country, Two Systems.” You can keep your precious “democracy” and “gay rights” — just as long as you don’t allow the CIA and the Soros NGOs to set up subversive shop on the island. 

Chen:  … without outside interference.
Rebuttal: The “outside interference” (always inciting Taiwan to maintain an adversarial posture toward China) comes from the West, not China!

Chen: When Mao Zedong’s Communist forces won the Chinese Civil War in 1949, China’s Nationalist regime, led by Chiang Kai-shek, fled to Taiwan and ruled with martial law. Civil liberties were curtailed, and regime opponents suffered greatly.
Rebuttal: Chiang Kai-shek knew how to deal with not only Maoists, but also the libtarded democratic types. Ironically, Nationalists Chiang and Xi would probably have gotten along very well today.

Chen: Through the efforts of democracy advocates and pragmatic post-Chiang leaders, Taiwan evolved peacefully into a firm democracy.
Translation: After Chiang’s death, the CFR-CIA complex got its tentacles into the island’s parliamentary politics and started recruiting traitors and weaklings.

Chen: We watched with shock and sadness as Beijing cracked down on Hong Kong’s freedoms — a disturbing glimpse of our own possible future.
Rebuttal: China’s “crackdown” was on the CIA / Soros “Umbrella Revolutionaries” of Hong Kong. The people at large are doing just fine.

Chen: And Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has prompted fears that China could do the same to us.
Rebuttal: As they say in poker parlance, this is yet another “tell” from this quackademic whore. She hates Putin (surprise surprise).

Chen: Beijing repeats its tired old gospel that Taiwan is an ancient and inseparable part of the Chinese motherland.
Rebuttal: Well, tiny Taiwan is an ancient part of China. Why is that a “tired old gospel?”

Chen: We do not want a war with China. But we are ready to protect our home if attacked.  Our determination to safeguard our beloved homeland should not be underestimated. Freedom is worth fighting for.
Rebuttal: The evil bitch would have her fellow islanders (a decent chunk of whom, in spite of CIA propaganda, actually want reunification with the mainland) to die in defense of the “liberal world order,” not for “freedom” — as she safely sits out any potential conflict sipping lattes with her queer American comrades in some faculty lounge on the NYU campus.

Chen: All democracies will be strengthened by standing with Taiwan.
Rebuttal: Sounds just like Zelensky of Jukraine. She wants “all democracies” to go to war against Russia & China in defense of the “”liberal world order” — which was exactly what the N.W.O. would have unleashed by now had Killary Clinton won in 2016. Soros himself had even “warned” (threatened) so. (in 2015: here) and again in 2022: here)

***************

And that, boys and girls, is all “you guys” need to know about the true meaning of “standing with Taiwan.”

 1. Nationalist Chiang and Communist Mao put their civil war on hold to fight Japan — a war which Chiang was lured into by the western powers who later betrayed him. // 2. Chiang’s forces — denied arms by the Truman administration — eventually fled to Taiwan. After his death in 1975, CIA infiltration began the slow process of turning the conservative island into an anti-China Globalist outpost. // 3. Nationalist Xi with his buddy, Nationalist Putin. Ironically, Xi’s modern China is much more similar to Chiang’s old Taiwan than it is Mao’s old China.

The Great Reset Agenda Has Failed – Is Ukraine Plan B?

By Brandon Smith

There are people in the liberty movement that attribute FAR too much intelligence to the global power elites, to the point that they seem to think the globalists are always planning “ten steps ahead.”

the great reset agenda has failed – is ukraine plan b?

The funny thing about planning ten steps ahead though is that if anything goes wrong with steps 1-9 then getting to step number 10 will be impossible and you just wasted a whole lot of energy on an elaborate plan that ended up going nowhere.

The globalists are NOT the smartest people around; not even close. They aren’t even all that effective when their plans actually function and there are no surprises. Their ideas fail constantly.

There is only one reason that centralizing criminals have not been brought down, and that is because no one has ever targeted them directly.

Every time there is a governmental shake up or rebellion or mass movement for change people target “the system”; they blame the system for all our problems (or they blame a handful of political puppets) and they seek to add a fresh coat of paint or change some of its basic functions, but the men behind the curtain always end up back behind the curtain.

The problem is never “the system”, it’s the people running and influencing the system while enjoying the comfort of the shadows.

Here is how the globalists seem to operate the best that I can tell – They aim a fist full of darts at a board and throw as hard as they can and whatever sticks is what sticks. When a plan does stick, well the globalists appear to be brilliant, don’t they?

In reality they were just throwing around schemes blindfolded and half of those schemes landed in the gutter. The problem is that while the globalists are fumbling around in the dark searching for a plan that works they can do a lot of damage and draw a lot of attention.

Every once in a while it becomes obvious when they have invested an immense amount of time and planning into a single unique scheme, a fulcrum point that many of their other plans will rely on in the future.

There is no doubt that the response to the covid outbreak was meant to bulldoze over numerous social and legal conventions and achieve full bore centralization before the vast majority of people even knew what hit them.

The pure excitement and adrenaline on display by the globalists at the onset of the pandemic was palpable. They were practically dancing in the streets, jabbering about how many worldwide socialist programs they were about to railroad through, not to mention how many individual liberties they were about to erase.

That said, when a plan doesn’t stick the way they want, sometimes they try to force it to work and this never goes well for them. We’ve seen this multiple times with their attempts to institute gun control in the US and they have failed over and over again.

More recently, the covid agenda and by extension the globalist “Reset” has fallen apart in the US and this has led to problems for them in other parts of the world.

American resistance to the vax mandates and lockdowns was key to everything, more so than I think many people realize. Even if the globalists could implement medical tyranny through much of the rest of the world, with conservative red states blocking the agenda at every turn this created a focal point for resistance.

Meaning, all the people in the world can still see that there is another way to do things that does not involve authoritarianism.

Life in the red states goes on as if covid barely existed. Conservatives are not “dying in the streets” like the lunatic liberals said would happen.

In fact, millions of people have been LEAVING blue states and coming to red states just to be free.

When you offer people alternatives, you offer them a glimpse of freedom, and sometimes a glimpse is all that is needed to inspire rebellion.

I believe that it was red state resistance that led directly to the Supreme Court blocking Biden’s illegal and unconstitutional vaccine mandates.

If the red states had not take such an aggressive stand, the whole country might be under Biden’s thumb right now as he hands out dictates from on high, or, we would be at war.

I also don’t think it’s a coincidence that the UK government decided to remove all covid mandates right after the US Supreme Court dropped restrictions in the US. When freedom is visible it spreads.

It’s hard for western governments to explain to their people why they should be enslaved over the covid virus when so many other people across the ocean live their lives normally in the face of the same illness.

This doesn’t mean that some of the worst offenders will not try to maintain their wretched grip on their populations. It would seem that the Australian government has been lost to globalist tyranny forever, but they still will not be able to deny the reality that conservative Americans are free.

There will always be a chance for revolt within Australia exactly because we are living proof that covid mandates do not need to exist.

Since the very beginning of the covid pandemic I have argued that the virus itself was a lab engineered bioweapon, most likely created in the bowels of the Level 4 facilities in Wuhan right down the street from what is widely recognized as ground zero. I have also argued from the very beginning that evidence shows that the NIH and Anthony Fauci have been involved in the funding of manipulation of coronaviruses at the Wuhan Lab for many years. Meaning, there has been collusion between western elitists and Chinese scientists to weaponize covid through gain of function research. This is now exposed as FACT.

What I don’t know for certain is if the virus was released deliberately, or accidentally. What I can say, though, is that the globalists at the World Economic Forum and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation held a “simulation” of a global coronavirus pandemic only two months before the real thing happened. The simulation, called “Event 201”, seemed to predict almost everything that would eventually happen with the real coronavirus outbreak that started in China, right down to news companies and social media giants locking down all information that didn’t fit the narrative. There was just one problem – The virus wasn’t as deadly as they had hoped.

Event 201 predicted 65 million initial deaths worldwide and the WHO predicted a much higher infection fatality rate of 3% of the population or more. This never happened. The globalists and the media have been scrambling for the past couple years to convince the public that the death rate of covid is much higher higher than it is, but the fact remains that dozens of studies show covid’s average IFR is a mere 0.27%. It’s not going to change for the worse, it is only going to decline as covid continues to mutate into less deadly forms of itself.

Why did this happen? It’s impossible to say. Maybe the virus performed differently in the lab but then changed dramatically once it was let out into the wild? That would be my guess. Maybe it was divine intervention?

For whatever reason, the globalists invested an intense amount of energy into the covid virus and it let them down, and now they are stuck trying to create mass panic over a nothing-burger.

So, what happens next?

It makes sense that they will need a distraction as a means to redirect momentum, and the globalists will do what they always do, which is create war tensions. This does not mean that large scale war is the intended outcome, but limited regional wars that could grow into something more are always on the table.

It is not a mistake that the US could potentially be caught up in not one but two major regional conflicts at this time, including a Chinese invasion of Taiwan as well as a Russian invasion of Ukraine.

For now, Ukraine is the most hyped. We have seen such spill over with Ukraine many times in the past and it’s hard to say if this is yet another false start or if a full blown Russian attack is going to happen.

With constant US influence, funding and arming being pursued in the region I suppose getting the Russians to invade would not be that hard. I’m not really interested in trying to read the dice on this one. My only interest in Ukraine is in how it might benefit the overall globalist agenda.

First, the economic instability that has been growing exponentially the past couple years will now hit overdrive.

Inflation, gas prices, the supply chain, all the threats that are already looming over us will expand tenfold with two nuclear powers at odds. Even if Ukraine saber rattling was to choke out into nothing just the existence of the danger is enough to inspire widespread economic fear.

Second, the pandemic issue can be cast to the wayside with little fanfare. The globalists know its going nowhere for them but they need a way to exit without explaining the numerous lies they have peddled in the past two years. War is a way to wipe the slate clean on the news cycle.

Third, heightened tensions with Russia open the door to a different form of paranoia at home. How many times have we heard media claims of “Russian influence” on US elections? There is ZERO proof of this, but the narrative has already been planted among leftists.

It would not surprise me in the slightest if US elections were “postponed” or the outcomes ignored because of unverified claims of Russian “interference.” What better way to prevent a complete conservative sweep in the US than to simply stop the elections altogether?

Fourth, by extension, it is only a matter of time before a conservative rebellion arises in the US to unseat the globalists from power. It is already happening in may forms today, for those who are paying attention.

The most common way for corrupt governments to undermine a rebellion for freedom is to accuse it of being an astroturf revolution created by a foreign enemy.

That is to say, the corrupt government seeks to take away the heart and soul of the rebellion by claiming they aren’t fighting for freedom, they are only fighting in exchange for money or power from a foreign nation. Their reason for fighting is “fake.”

We saw this with the Chinese CCP when they brutally took over Hong Kong. We also saw this in Kazakhstan when the people rioted in the streets over price inflation and Russian troops were sent in to quell what was called a “foreign created color revolution.” Nothing could have been further from the truth.

Make no mistake, when the fighting starts in the US, our rebellion will not be called a fight for freedom. We will be accused as “Russian agents”, traitors, insurrectionists, etc, etc..

They’ll say we’re fighting to support foreign governments, not to bring liberty and sanity back to our society. We’ll be the villains; it’s important to understand this and not be bogged down by 4th generation warfare. It is for this reason primarily that conflict with Russia makes a lot of sense for the globalists.

Perhaps not on the scale of a global war, but enough to keep their prospective populations in line. Whether or not this plan succeeds is another matter entirely. As already mentioned, these people fail regularly.

If You Live In Taiwan, It’s Time To Worry

Taiwan needs to worry about American reliability. Unlike Afghanistan, where the United States had committed its forces for two decades, Taiwan has no U.S. forces and no assurance that the United States will come to their defense if attacked by China.

The United States has a bad habit of walking out on its allies and friends. The list is long. It includes Vietnam and Cambodia, Iraq and Afghanistan, and Iran. In all of those cases, one way or another, the United States, for its own reasons, took a hike.

Obama pulled U.S. troops from Iraq, opening the door to Iran. While the United States has a few thousand soldiers still in Iraq in training and advisory capacities, they’re under siege and it’s unlikely the United States will protect them.

In fact, President Joe Biden has said the United States will end combat missions in Iraq by the end of 2021. Unless U.S. troops are pulled out in the middle of the night, as they were in Afghanistan, they’ll quite possibly have to shoot themselves out while exiting.

Carter let Iran collapse into chaos and refused to support the Shah. Prior to that time, the United States had massively supplied Iran with weapons and military advisors. But when the Shah asked for help, he got none. The collapse of the Shah’s regime, without U.S. backing, was a foregone conclusion.

Nixon let Vietnam and Cambodia go down the drain, trying to cover their tracks with the so-called Paris Peace Accords that required U.S. troops’ withdrawal from Vietnam, a key demand of North Vietnam. South Vietnam hung on for a while, but without U.S. airpower and support, they couldn’t win against a North Vietnamese army supported by Russia and China.

The debacle in Cambodia involved the mass murder of perhaps 2 million Cambodians by the Khmer Rouge over a three-year period. Washington could have prevented it but didn’t. The United States was fully aware of what the Khmer Rouge was doing as the flow of starved and brutalized victims flowed into Phnom Penh as the impending collapse gained momentum. (The author was in Cambodia in the last two weeks of the war.)

The United States also let mass murder happen elsewhere, although the United States wasn’t under any specific obligation to intervene. The Rwanda genocide in 1994 took the lives of 1.1 million people in that country.

The U.N. had a peace-keeping mission there (UNAMIR), but because of restrictive rules of engagement and logistical limitations, those forces failed to stop the genocide. Its head, a Canadian named Romeo Dallaire, afterward tried to commit suicide four times.

No one (yet) is saying there’s anything comparable happening in Afghanistan, but the future there looks bleak. Already, there are numerous reports of executions of Afghan army soldiers and many murders.

In Taiwan, a prosperous middle-class, Asian country, there’s a palpable fear of China. The United States is obligated to supply Taiwan with defense materials under the Taiwan Relations Act of 1979.

That act provides for the United States to supply Taiwan with “arms of a defensive character” and “to maintain the capacity of the United States to resist any resort to force or other forms of coercion that would jeopardize the security, or the social or economic system, of the people on Taiwan.”

In 1979, the United States canceled the Sino-American Mutual Defense Treaty with Taiwan. That treaty required that if either party was attacked, the other would come to its assistance with military aid. The language of the Taiwan Relations Act doesn’t reflect this key mutual defense provision and only requires the United States to “maintain the capacity” to resist any resort to force.

In truth, the United States faces many issues in “maintaining the capacity” to resist any resort to force. China has been building up its conventional and military forces and has been harassing Taiwan and Japan increasingly by using its air and naval power.

The U.S. response to the stepped-up tempo of China’s aggressive actions has been less than stellar. U.S. Navy ships have conducted freedom of navigation exercises in the South China Sea and in the Taiwan Strait, but those exercises have been few and far between. Moreover, there’s already pushback about freedom of navigation exercises, mainly because there’s fear it’ll get the United States into a war with China.

But the United States has also pulled its long-range bombers (B-52s and B-1s) out of Guam and has taken few steps to reinforce U.S. forces in Japan and Okinawa. The single U.S. aircraft carrier in the Pacific, the USS Ronald Reagan, has been redeployed to the Indian Ocean, removing a formidable capability from the area. These measures, especially Guam and the redeployment of the Reagan, represent dangerous Biden administration concessions to China.

No one in the administration has explained why the United States is reducing its profile in East Asia while the threat from China is rising.

A few voices have been raised in Congress, even by Democrats who are alarmed. One of them is Rep. Elaine Luria (D-Va.), vice chairperson of the House Armed Services Committee-Sea Power subcommittee. Luria called the redeployment of the Ronald Reagan carrier “one of the biggest mistakes we have made in maybe my lifetime, strategically.”

Luria served two decades in the Navy, retiring at the rank of commander. She served at sea on six ships as a nuclear-trained surface warfare officer, deployed to the Middle East and Western Pacific, and culminated her Navy career by commanding a combat-ready unit of 400 sailors.

Even before the Afghanistan debacle, Japanese leaders reflected growing alarm about Chinese threats to Taiwan. Japan’s Deputy Prime Minister Taro Aso asserted that a Chinese invasion would be an “existential threat (to Japan) since Okinawa could be next.”

The primary issue is U.S. reliability. South Korea, Japan, and Taiwan all depend directly on the United States. Without its support, none of them can avoid war—in Korea, the threat from Pyongyang and in Japan and Taiwan, the threat from Beijing.

Neither Taiwan nor Japan can defend against China by themselves. South Korea is different only in the sense that it has a formidable army and a lot of firepower. But in any war, South Korea would pay a very high price.

The United States has troops in Japan and on Okinawa and in South Korea. Will they fight or leave? The United States has mutual defense treaties with both countries, unlike the case of Taiwan, where only the Taiwan Relations Act offers some help to Taiwan.

Will the United States stay the course in the Pacific?

Stability in the Pacific depends on strong and visible U.S. resolve and U.S.-led deterrence. That seems to be at risk right now.

The signals coming from Washington are anything but positive.