When Libtards Write “Letters to the Editor”

DECEMBER 1, 2022

NY Times (Letter to Editor) :Dialogue Is Not Possible With ‘Opposing Views of Reality’

One need only peruse the “Letters to the Editor” section of “the paper of record” to find enough diagnostic evidence to prove that the demented denizens of Libtardia are indeed crazed members of an “authoritarian” cult. No matter how nonsensical or misinformed a given opinion may be; they all repeat the same talking points; they all engage in the mirroring of their journalistic or academic icons; they all read (or at least buy to collect dust with) the same books; they all psychotically project their own vices and madness onto those that they hate; they all have an inverted sense of reality; they all engage in Orwellian “double think;” and they are all consumed with a grossly inflated sense of self-importance and holier-than-thouism…. OK, maybe not all — but certainly above 95% are indeed deranged.

After previous reviews of Letters-to-the-Editor, some of “you guys” have suggested that the New York Times might be faking its own letters. Though (((they))) are certainly capable of such tactics, we “The Editorial Board” of the Anti-New York Times have had enough personal interaction with “educated” libtards — most memorably with those residing in the quaint but snooty New Jersey college towns of Montclair and Princeton —  to understand that there would be no need for Sulzberger’s henchmen to have to fake such idiotic responses. This is exactly how these creatures “think.”

Let’s analyze / psychoanalyze some of the Marxist madness recently submitted to the Times in response to an article originally titled, “We Don’t Have to be Fanatics” then changed online to “Is There a Way to Dial Down the Political Hatred?” by Molly Worthen — in which the writer argued, sensibly, that people “on both sides” should overcome political “fanaticism” and try to reconnect.

1. Historian Molly Worthen suggested that the political factions in society should “moderate” and try to get along better. // 2. For that, her reasonable, non-political piece was criticized by a pair of insane letter writers. // 3. The stained glass window from the Headquarters of the socialist Fabian Society of Britain depicts leading members (Sydney Webb & George Bernard Shaw) molding the world. An inscription reads: “Remold it nearer to the heart’s desire.” Beneath the floor of the workshop, a cult of gullible ‘”educated” idiots (libtards) fanatically worship (and recite from) the books that the Fabians above have fed to them.

To the Editor — by M. Zimmerman:

Writer: Dr. Worthen’s prayer that we get past the hatred characterizing contemporary American politics is not merely futile — it embodies a false equivalence. The brutal reality is that Democrats and Republicans are divided by fundamental values, as well as by opposing views of reality, and that the G.O.P. is just wrong.
Analysis: Demonrats = right — G.O.P. = wrong. End of discussion as far as he’s concerned.

Writer: I don’t regard all Republican voters as malign individuals. But I am convinced that their party and its leaders are indeed a force for evil,
Analysis: He believes that many Republican voters are simply the innocent dupes of “evil” individuals (presumably led by Trump). Very well, the writer is entitled to his opinion, especially if he can back up his claims. But the cult-like stupidity / insanity lies in what he will now define as “evil.”

Writer: … as they propagate the false claim of a stolen election,
Analysis: How can he say that the claim is “false” when the ballot audit results haven’t been completed yet? A reasonable man — politically inclined or not — would at least wait until the process has ended before condemning those who ordered the audit as “evil.”

Writer: … attack voting rights,
Analysis: In no way, shape, manner or form does the tightening of Voter ID requirements and mail-in ballot controls infringe upon anyone’s “right” to vote. How does one even begin to have a dialogue with someone who holds to such a distorted “view of reality?”

Writer: … foment political violence,
Analysis: By any objective observation, the heated and hateful class-warfare and race-warfare rhetoric routinely bellowed out by so many leading Demonrats, dwarfs Trump’s “incitement” of January 6th.

Writer: … defend authoritarianism,
Analysis: “Authoritarianism,” eh? Says the fool whose beloved Demonrat Party would have had us all forcefully locked down and masked up in perpetuity, and then vaxxed with microchips while under threat of punishment.

Writer: … pander to racism,
Analysis: “Racism,” eh? Says the moron whose beloved Demonrat Party degrades and disparages White people at every turn.

Writer: … promote white supremacy, and in the end move to destroy our democracy.
Analysis: “White supremacy,” eh? Says this probable member of “The Tribe” (surname Zimmerman) which proudly lords supreme over the White Man of North America and Western Europe.

Writer: I am not ashamed that I would be appalled if my son or daughter were to marry someone who voted for these evils.
Analysis: So, your child’s marital bliss would be secondary to your twisted politics? Sounds a bit “authoritarian,” doesn’t it? Goodness gracious. As much as I have always detested their libtardation, I have never personally hated the Demonrat voters in my extended family.

Dear Libtards:

If the idea of organized voter fraud is such a “baseless” “conspiracy theory” — then why have so many people (usually of color ™) been arrested for it over the years?

To the Editor — by J. Levandusky:

Writer: Unfortunately, Molly Worthen’s article is a few years too late. We appear to be beyond a point in America where respectful listening may be a viable path to reconciliation.

Analysis: Agreed.

Writer: Indeed, the debate has gotten too extreme and too divorced from factuality on one side.

Analysis: And which side is that?

Writer: As the Republican Party ….

Analysis: Of course. Just like the other writer — Demonrats = good — G.O.P. = bad. This is the type of personal hatred which leads to genocide.

Writer: …. slides ever closer to full-on fascism,

Analysis: Putting aside the misunderstood and misapplied term “fascism”  — (for the sake of argument) — and thus misdefining it as a repressive “authoritarian” system of total thought control — 100% of the recent Amazon book banning, You Tube censoring, Facebook / Twitter removals, Google algorithm-rigging, PayPal account terminations and career-killing events involves the silencing of “the right” by folks on “the left.” Can anyone cite a single occurrence of a Marxist or Libtard author or blogger ever having been subjected to such cyber “fascism?”

Writer: … there appear to be few remaining with whom to engage.

Analysis: He misses the phony Paul Ryans, John McStains & Liz Cheneys of the pre-Trump Republican’t Party.

Writer:  Can you have a respectful dialogue with someone who believes that the election was stolen from Donald Trump Analysis: Ya know, “you guys” really do seem a bit too concerned about election fraud coming out.

Writer:  … or that Hillary Clinton ran a child sex ring out of a pizza parlor?

Analysis: No. Killary ran the Haiti child kidnapping operation. That was James Alefantis who owned that pedo-pizzeria with the revolting Instagram and Twitter posts. You could at least get your facts straight before you distort them. And y’all seem a bit too concerned about the pedo-sex stuff as well.

Writer: …..Can you have a civilized conversation with people who violently storm the Capitol and beat up police officers?

Analysis: Uh, those were actually CIA / Antifa agents. I know, I know… “conspiracy theory.”

Writer:  We are facing a profound threat to our democracy.

Analysis: The single most “profound threat to our democracy” is Demonrat voter fraud, with online censorship and cancel culture a close second and third. Historical precedents of Republican’t voter fraud are actually very few; and almost always involve one Republican’t stealing an election from another.

Writer: There is a need for stronger, more strategic measures, lest our country go down a path not unlike Europe in the 1930’s.

Analysis: Oh how I wish that would happen! But you needn’t worry too much about a 1930’s scenario, Boobus. Though some good things may be coming, Americans haven’t got the moral or mental stuff to go full-blown Hitler. Too bad.

These loony letter writers may be actual Communists who KNOW that they are spouting lies — or they may just be Libtard cultists blindly repeating what their media masters tell them to. It’s a difference without a distinction. The late philosopher, conservative author and recovered communist James Burnham once put it this way:

“The only difference between a Communist and a liberal is that the Communist knows what he is doing.”

Tell it, Mr. Burnham. Tell it!

 1. Kari Lake’s now nearly 1-month-old refusal to concede defeat in the yet-to-be-certified Arizona steal has got the Left very worried. // 2. Image from the Instagram page of Comet Pizza shows two naked homosexuals licking a cheese pizza. “Cheese Pizza” is code language used by child-rapists. // 3. Tony Podesta — a disgraced Demonrat big shot and collector of disgusting child abuse / torture “art” — is pals with “James Alefantis” (openly homosexual owner of Comet Pizza) whose fake name loosely translates into “I Love Children” in French (J’aime les enfants).

The “Oy Vey” League and the Corruption of Education

Harvard University

NOVEMBER 21, 2022

NY Times:

Elite Universities Are Out of Touch. Blame the Campus.

Even as concerns about social justice preoccupy students and administrations, these universities often seem to be out of touch with the society they claim to care so much about.

OP-ED BY NICK BURNS

For an Opinion-Editorial appearing in the Times, this critique of America’s “elite” universities by Nick Burns is actually quite objective.

An example:

“To put it another way, what’s most dangerous for the health of America’s intellectual elite is not that most professors have similar cultural tastes and similar liberal politics. That will probably always be the case. It’s that the campus setup makes it easy for them to forget that reasonable people often don’t share their outlook.“(emphasis added)

Mr. Burns (a common adaptation of ‘Bernstein’) raises some other interesting points as well about the insular world-within-a-world created by campus isolation from local communities. Where, as expected, he comes up short is in his explanation for the root cause of the conformist madness gripping the hallowed halls of “elite” academia. Can you say “Frankfurt School“, Mr. Burns?” We know you can’t — not if you wish to continue working and hobnobbing in polite society — and not unless you wish to be crucified by your fellow tribesmen as a “self-hating Jew.”

That’s OK, Burnsie. The Anti-New York Times  will finish what you started.

1. Nick Burns (Bernstein,we presume) writes a decent “limited hangout” — but avoids the root causes.  // 2. After The Great One came to power in Germany, many of the “long marchers” of the infamous “Frankfurt School” fled to American universities. // 3. Leftist (disproportionately Jewish) Students for a Democratic Society in 1963 give the Communist raised-fist salute. Many went on to become college professors.

Second only to the influence of the Jewish Mafia-dominated news-media, — or maybe third place behind Jewish Mafia-dominated Hollywierd as well — the “intellectual authority” of the Jewish-Marxist dominated universities of the “elite” Ivy League shapes the attitudes, opinions and behaviors of Normiedom whatever way “they” want to shape them as. The “Long March Through the Institutions” is what the Frankfurt Filth called it. One thing is certain: If a thorough cleansing of “higher education” is not part of the coming “storm,” the Marxist political cancer afflicting America will return in due time.

Let’s have a look at some of the top-of-the-pyramid positions that this tiny minority holds. THIS is where the stifling ideological conformity and the condescending intolerance — which Mr. Burns is supposedly troubled by — flows down from.

Globalist Lawrence Bakow is the president of Harvard

Globalist Peter Salovey is the president of Yale.

Globalist Christopher Eisgruber is the president of Princeton.
* Born of a Jewish mother — He self identifies as an Atheist Jew (here)

Globalist Martha Pollack is the president of Cornell.

Globalist Amy Gutman is the president of Penn.

Globalist Christina Paxson is the president of Brown.
* Converted to Judaism in 1981 while engaged to her future husband, a Jew. (here)

Surprise — surprise — surprise —- Count em’! Six out of the elite eight headed by chosenite Marxist-Globalists — and the only two Whites are known to be Demonrats obediently presiding over Jewish-loaded faculties and student-bodies. Not much “diversity”  in the leadership ranks of that greasy bunch — is there now?  No sir. The Ivy League is now the “Oy Vey League”  — and the Jewish domination of so many other elite and non-elite universities nationwide, from their presidencies to the down-level deanships / department leadership is just as pervasive.

Our research turns up some more Jewish-Demonrat-Deep State presidents of other universities generally rated among the most “prestigious” in the United States:

• Stanford: Marc Tessier-Lavigne 
• MIT: Leo Reif 
• Northwestern: Morton Schapiro 
• University of Michigan: Mark Schlissel 
• Johns Hopkins: Ronald Daniels
• University of Wisconsin: Rebecca Blank

1. Lavigne  of Stanford // 2. Reif of MIT // 3. Schapiro of Northwestern

4. Schlissel of Michigan // 5. Daniels of Johns Hopkins (of Covid-19 “death graph” fame!) //
6. Blank of Wisconsin

And that, boys and girls — and with all due respect to our small handful of righteous Jewish fans — is why “higher education” — as well as middle and lower “education” — as well as Hollywierd, the news-media, book publishing, psychiatry, medicine, politics, music, the “arts,” sports, law, banking etc. has all turned into Marxist / Globalist “woke” shit.

Trump’s attacks on the “Left Wing” education cartel had really smoked these red rats into rabidity mode. After every salvo, the Libtard Twittersphere lit up with shrieks about “dictatorship,” “censorship,” “academic freedom,” and, of course, “McCarthyism.” When it comes to critique, the hallowed eggheads of “education” are not to be touched.

Speaking of St. Joseph McCarthy and the Left’s familiar whine about “academic freedom ,” in his 1952 book, “McCarthyism: The Fight for America,” he wrote something really prophetic and fitting for the current situation:

“The education system of this country can only be scrubbed and flushed and swept clean if the mothers and fathers, and the sons and daughters of this nation individually decide to do this job. This can be your greatest contribution to America. This is a job which you must do if America and Western Civilization are to live.

I warn you, however, that the task will not be a pleasant one. When you detect and start to expose a teacher with a Communist mind, you will be damned and smeared. You will be accused of endangering academic freedom. Remember, to those Communist-minded teachers, academic freedom means THEIR right to force YOU to hire THEM to teach YOUR children a philosophy in which you do not believe.

To Communist-minded teachers, academic freedom means their right to deny you the freedom to hire loyal Americans to teach your children. We cannot win the fight against Communism if Communist-minded professors are teaching your children. We cannot lose the fight against Communism if loyal Americans are teaching your children.”

Tell it, Senator. Tell it!

1 & 2. “Congratulations my young educated goyim! Now, go forth and spread the mental and moral diseases which we poisoned you with here at the Oy Vey League!”

The Massive Damage of Covid-Mania Is Now Clear

Not a single state was able to improve test scores for math

NOVEMBER 02, 2022

NY Times:

 Math Scores Fell in Nearly Every State, and Reading Dipped on National Exam.

The results, from what is known as the nation’s report card, offer the most definitive picture yet of the pandemic’s devastating impact on students.

Now here’s a real shocker: the Stupid-19 lock-downs of the nation’s schools and the associated era of “virtual learning” turned out to have had a severely negative impact on academic progress. From the article:

“U.S. students in most states and across almost all demographic groups have experienced troubling setbacks in both math and reading, according to an authoritative national exam released on Monday, offering the most definitive indictment yet of the pandemic’s impact on millions of schoolchildren.

In math, the results were especially devastating, representing the steepest declines ever recorded on the National Assessment of Educational Progress, known as the nation’s report card, which tests a broad sampling of fourth and eighth graders and dates to the early 1990’s.”

Apart from the fact that the whole bloody “pandemic” drama of 2020-2022 was a HOAX — even if, for sake of argument, we were to accept the moronic myth as real; the fact remains that school age children were always invulnerable to this “virus” which, like all other cold & flu illnesses, disproportionately impacted the elderly. The closing of schools — enthusiastically embraced by the Communist Teacher’s Unions — was totally uncalled for and contrary to “the science  .” The children were dumb enough to begin with  — without mentally stunting them out of a whole year of reading, writing and arithmetic. Somebody has got to pay for this — and all of the other hurtful policies that people were made to suffer through as well.

1. Remote learning was a joke. // 2. Pure child abuse on so many levels. // 3.Lesbian Randi Weingarten — president of the American Federation of Teachers — was a forceful advocate for school closures.

As is often the case in post-mania, clearer and calmer thinking is now overtaking the irrationality. In hindsight, most rational people understand by now that the school closure scheme advocated by the Left was a really bad (evil) idea. In fact, the Marxists and Libtards themselves aren’t even defending their past actions anymore. We now witness a new pattern of “gas-lighting” – which goes like this: “Let us not focus on the past. Let us move forward to help the children.”

Here are a few examples of this latest save-our-ass talking point:

* From today’s Times article: Kevin Huffman, former Education Commissioner of Tennessee, urged leaders to: “set aside finger pointing about what went wrong during the pandemic, and instead make a moral commitment to helping students recover.”

* The aforementioned Randi Weingarten: “The bottom line is that everyone suffered. We are now focused on the urgent need to help kids recover and thrive.”

* In a story for the Globalist Atlantic Magazine titled, “Let’s Declare a Pandemic Amnesty,” Ivy League Professorete Emily Oster writes: “We need to forgive one another for what we did and said when we were in the dark about COVID.”

“Let’s all just “move on” like nothing happened, right? Sure, mistakes were made, but let’s look forward, not backwards. Screw that! The purposefully guilty as well as the sanctimoniously stupid must be punished severely. Justice demands blood!

Huffman — Weingarten — Oster”No finger pointing.” — Let’s “forgive” and “move on.”

On the other end of the life spectrum, another class of victims, the elderly, suffered horribly and needlessly. Those fortunate enough to have not been misdiagnosed with “Covid” and then ventilator murdered were still made to endure 1-2 years of unnecessary and unhealthy isolation by their stupid normie children.

Funerals cancelled, weddings cancelled, businesses ruined and inflation through the roof. Again, even if one were to accept the false underlying premise of Stupid-19, the “cure,” by any objective standard, turned out to be far worse than disease. They have got to pay for this!

This talk about “amnesty” is a good indicator that “they” fear that accountability is coming. Let us see what the coming new MAGA Congress majority — whose leading members have already promised to investigate the infamous Dr. Falsie — will bring.

Greenpeace Founder Patrick Moore Says Climate Change Based On False Narratives

A series of email exchanges between Greenpeace Founder Patrick Moore and South Korean Professor Seok-soon Park shows him saying that climate change is based on false narratives and that it has become more of a political movement than an environmental movement.

One of Greenpeace’s founding members, Patrick Moore, said in an email why he had quit the organisation:

“Greenpeace was ‘hijacked’ by the political left when they realised there was money and power in the environmental movement. [Left-leaning] political activists in North America and Europe changed Greenpeace from a science-based organisation to a political fundraising organization,” Moore said.

15 years after he co-founded Greenpeace, Moore left the organisation in 1986.

“The ‘environmental’ movement has become more of a political movement than an environmental movement,” he said. “They are primarily focused on creating narratives, stories, that are designed to instil fear and guilt into the public so the public will send them money.”

He claimed that they typically carry out their political operations behind closed doors with other operatives at the United Nations, the World Economic Forum, and other organisations of a similar kind.

He asserted that the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [IPCC] is “not a science organization.” The World Meteorological Entity and the United Nations Environment Program make up this political organisation.

“The IPCC hires scientists to provide them with ‘information’ that supports the ‘climate emergency’ narrative.

Their campaigns against fossil fuels, nuclear energy, CO2, plastic, etc., are misguided and designed to make people think the world will come to an end unless we cripple our civilization and destroy our economy. They are now a negative influence on the future of both the environment and human civilization.”

“Today, the left has adopted many policies that would be very destructive to civilization as they are not technically achievable. Only look at the looming energy crisis in Europe and the UK, which Putin is taking advantage of.

“But it is of their own making in refusing to develop their own natural gas resources, opposing nuclear energy, and adopting an impossible position on fossil fuels in general,” Moore wrote.

The Left ‘Hijacked’ Greenpeace

The organization’s basic values, according to him, were “green” for the environment and “peace” for the people, but peace had largely been forgotten and green had taken precedence.

“Many [so-called] ‘environmental’ leaders were now saying that ‘humans are the enemies of the Earth, the enemies of Nature.’ I could not accept that humans are the only evil species. This is too much like ‘original sin,’ that humans are born with evil, but all the other species are good, even cockroaches, mosquitos, and diseases,” Moore argued.

The idea that there should be fewer people in the world is the current dominant philosophy, according to him.

“But the people who said this were not volunteering to be the first to go away. They behave as if they are superior to others. This kind of ‘pride’ and ‘conceit’ is the worst of the Cardinal Sins,” Moore said.

False Narrative on Chlorine

“At the time I decided to leave Greenpeace, I was one of 6 Directors of Greenpeace International. I was the only one with formal science education, BSc Honors in Science and Forestry, and Ph.D. in Ecology. My fellow directors decided that Greenpeace should begin a campaign to ‘Ban Chlorine Worldwide.’”

Moore argued that although chlorine is one of the 94 [naturally-occurring] elements on the Periodic Table and plays many important roles in biology and human health, it is also true that elemental chlorine gas is very toxic and was employed as a weapon in World War I.

For instance, sodium chloride, also known as table salt, is a necessary nutrient for all animals and many plants. NaCl cannot be “banned.”

He emphasised that one of the most important developments in public health history in reducing the spread of water-borne communicable illnesses like cholera was the addition of chlorine to drinking water, swimming pools, and spas.

Additionally, roughly 25% of all of our medicines involve chlorine, and about 85% of pharmaceutical drugs are created using chemistry related to chlorine. Without halogens, such as chlorine, bromine, and iodine, medicine would not be the same. Halogens are all potent antibiotics.

“Greenpeace named chlorine ‘The Devil’s Element’ and calls PVC, polyvinyl chloride, or simply vinyl, ‘the Poison Plastic.’ All of this is fake [and] to scare the public. In addition, this misguided policy reinforces the attitude that humans are not a worthy species and that the world would be better off without them. I could not convince my fellow Greenpeace directors to abandon this misguided policy. This was the turning point for me,” Moore said.

False Narrative on Polar Bears

Moore responded when asked how Greenpeace used its big contributions, saying money was used to fund “a very large staff” (possibly numbering over 2,000), extensive advertising, and fundraising initiatives.

Additionally, almost all of the organization’s fundraising advertisements are founded on myths that he had thoroughly debunked in his books, with polar bears serving as one such example.

“The International Treaty on Polar Bears, signed by all polar countries in 1973, to ban unrestricted hunting of polar bears, is never mentioned in the media, Greenpeace, or politicians who say the polar bear is going extinct due to melting ice in the Arctic. In fact, the polar bear population has increased from 6,000 to 8,000 in 1973 to 30,000 to 50,000 today. This is not disputed,” Moore said.

“But now they say the polar bear will go extinct in 2100 as if they have a magic crystal ball that can predict the future. In fact, this past winter in the Arctic saw an expansion of ice from previous years, and Antarctica was colder during the last winter than in the past 50 years.”

Like many in the “climate emergency” sector, Moore said he does not pretend to be an expert or foresee the future with certainty.

The Goal of the ‘Environmental Apocalypse’ Theory

“I believe the human population has always been vulnerable to people who predict doom with false stories,” Moore said.

“The Aztecs threw virgins into volcanos, and the Europeans and Americans burned women as witches for 200 years claiming this would ‘save the world’ from evil people. This has been [referred to as] ‘herd mentality,’ ‘groupthink,’ and ‘cult behavior.’ Humans are social animals with a hierarchy, and it is easiest to gain a high position by using fear and control.”

Moore added that he is committed to proving to people that the situation is not as dire as they are led to believe that the environmental apocalypse hypothesis is really about “political power and control.”

“Today, in the richest countries, our descendants are making decisions that our grandchildren will have to pay for,” he said. “Predictions that the world is coming to an end have been made for thousands of years. Not once has this come true. Why should we believe it now?”

“People are naturally afraid of the future because it is unknown and full of risks and difficult decisions. I believe there is also an element of ‘self-loathing’ in this apocalypse movement.”

According to Moore, today’s youth are taught that people are unworthy and are destroying the planet. They now feel guilty and ashamed of themselves as a result of this indoctrination, which is the incorrect attitude to have in life.

The Demonization of Carbon Dioxide

“Very few people believe the world is not warming. The record is clear that the world has been warming since about the year 1700, 150 years before we were using fossil fuels. 1700 was the peak of the Little Ice Age, which was very cold and caused crop failures and starvation. Before that, around 1000 A.D. was the Medieval Warm period when Vikings farmed Greenland. [And] before that, around 500 A.D. were the Dark Ages, and before that, the Roman Warm Period when it was warmer than today, and the sea level was 1–2 meters higher than today,” Moore said.

“Even until about 1950, the amount of fossil fuel used and CO2 emitted were very small compared to today. We do not know the cause of these periodic fluctuations in temperature, but it was certainly not CO2.”

Moore made it clear that the “minority opinion” is not about the temperature history of the Earth; rather, the relationship between the temperature and CO2 is the subject of dispute.

“In this regard, I agree that many believe CO2 is the main cause of warming. CO2 is invisible, so no one can actually see what it is doing. And this ‘majority’ are mainly scientists paid by politicians and bureaucrats, media making headlines, or activists making money. [The rest are] the public who believe this story even though they can’t actually see what CO2 is doing,” Moore said.

Moore presented a graph showing the temperature in central England during a period of 350 years, from 1659 to 2009. He said that “If carbon dioxide was the main cause of warming, then there should be a rise in temperature along the carbon dioxide curve, but it doesn’t.”

In addition to stating that CO2 is the foundation of all life on Earth and that its concentration in the atmosphere is currently lower than it has been for a significant portion of life’s history, Moore called the demonization of CO2 “completely ridiculous.”

‘Wind and Solar Power Are Parasites on the Economy’

“Solar and wind power are both very expensive and very unreliable. It is almost like a mental illness that so many people have been brainwashed to think entire countries can be supported with these technologies,” Moore said.

“I believe wind and solar energy are parasites on the larger economy. In other words, they make the country poorer than if other more reliable and less costly technologies were used.”

According to Moore, companies that provide wind and solar energy heavily rely on government mandates, tax write-offs, and subsidies. Under these mandates, people are compelled to buy wind and solar energy, even if it is more expensive, under the guise that it is “environmentally friendly.”

“Millions of people pay more for wind and solar energy while a few people make millions of dollars, marks, pounds, etc. It is a bit like a Ponzi scheme in the stock markets,” Moore added.

“They require vast areas of land, are not available most of the time, and require reliable energy such as nuclear, hydroelectric, [coal, and natural] gas to be available when wind and solar are unavailable.”

According to Moore, the mining, transporting, and building of wind and solar farms need significant amounts of fossil fuels. In many places, they also don’t generate nearly as much energy during their lifetimes as is needed to construct and maintain them.

“Why not use reliable energy [such as nuclear, hydroelectricity, natural gas, etc.] as the primary source?” Moore questioned, adding if that were the case, “then wind and solar would be unnecessary.”

‘Plastic Is Not a Toxic Substance’

“Plastic is not a toxic substance. That is why we package and wrap our food in it, to prevent it from becoming contaminated. Plastic does not magically become toxic when it enters the ocean,” Moore said.

“Of course, they say on one hand that plastic will never break down, and then, on the other hand, they say it will quickly decay into ‘microplastics,’ which, of course, are conveniently invisible so no one can observe or verify this for themselves. How clever!”

Moore claims that our digestive system can distinguish between “food” and plastic or minute sand particles. No matter how minute the sand is, our body does not absorb it into our bloodstream.

He claimed that, like driftwood, floating plastic in the ocean is similar to a little floating reef. It gives marine organisms a surface to attach to, lay their eggs on, and eat things that are attached to it.

“Pollution is usually toxic or causes harm to life. Plastic is simply ‘litter’ beside the road. It is not hurting anything. One exception is discarded fishing nets, not because they are plastic but because they are shaped to catch fish.

“The environmental community should work with the fishing industry to stop throwing damaged nets in the sea and bring them back to the dock, where they can be recycled, used in a waste-to-energy plant, or discarded safely,” Moore added.

Why Are Leftists Obsessed With Destroying Hero Culture?

In the movie ‘Batman: The Dark Knight’ the well regarded district attorney Harvey Dent makes a statement that has since woven itself into our popular culture to the point that we often hear it quoted as if it was said by some ancient philosopher. He noted:

“You either die a hero or you live long enough to see yourself become the villain.”

The most predictable interpretation of this is that there is a fine line between doing good and doing evil with the best of intentions. People can start out as heroes and quickly fall to darkness in the name of serving the “greater good.” I think there is more meaning behind the quote, however.

There is also the issue of historical revision and the fact that the heroes of yesterday might be considered the terrorists of tomorrow given who is in charge of writing the history books or reporting the news. Sometimes heroes become villains through their own mistakes, other times they are just rewritten that way.

For example, today we hear constant gnashing and wailing from the political left about the “evils” of the Founding Fathers and why they should be erased or canceled from our cultural zeitgeist.

They have even attempted to revise the very foundations of American history through their “1619 Project” as they assert that no American accomplishment is valid because EVERYTHING was built around the institution of slavery.

They make no mention that slavery has been an institution in every single culture on the planet since civilization began, but that doesn’t matter to them.

The goal of the 1619 Project was to diminish or dismiss everything distinctly American, right down to the revolution that founded our nation. What they care about is the deconstruction of heroes, in part because if you can destroy the character of a hero then you might be able to also destroy what they stood for in the process. And, if you can destroy the ideals of a society, it becomes a lot easier to then control that society.

When the political left seeks to undermine the legacy of the founders they aren’t just engaging in character attacks against men who can no longer defend themselves, they are also attempting to sabotage the vision those men created – The vision of a free republic outside of the dictates of collectivism and monarchy (rule by the elites).

Obviously the Founding Fathers are no longer alive, but there are millions of people that have carried on their legacy for generations that are in fact still living to see their heroes be made into monsters through revisionism.

But the destruction of heroes goes even deeper than historical rewrites.

Leftists are also targeting the very foundations of heroic archetypes and mythologies by attacking heroic representations in our society.

They are seeking to change the nature of heroism by hijacking cultural pillars and erasing beloved stories and characters in order to “reboot” them in the image of the leftist cult.

This is usually done under the cover of “diversity and equity” as a means to obscure the true agenda. Let’s break down the tactics and motives behind this trend…

Rewriting Heroes To “Reflect Our Modern Era”

Woke ideology does not reflect our modern era in any way; it is actually a masked version of the old social models of collectivism and communism, specifically the social Marxism displayed by Mao’s Cultural Revolution.

The only difference is today we have online struggle sessions and corporations are fully onboard with the movement. When leftists claim they are fighting the system, they have no idea what this really means.

Leftists use the reflection argument all the time to justify the gutting of hero mythologies and replacing them with vapid clones. A recent example would be the latest Amazon release of their Lord Of The Rings prequel series.

I wrote about this extensively months ago in my article ‘Amazon’s Woke Lord Of The Rings Is The Death Rattle Of Social Justice Content.’

To summarize, the new Lord of The Rings is designed to spread a political message and undermine the values of the past rather than tell a meaningful organic story that pays homage to Tolkien. Amazon even released their woke Lord of The Rings on the anniversary of Tolkien’s death.

Sometimes the propaganda is subtle, and sometimes it’s a train wreck in your face.

Specifically, I examined the political left’s obsession with injecting their own Cultural Marxism into every new entertainment product as a means to saturate the media space with their ideology.

When they say they want to rehash old stories and old heroes but write them to “reflect the world of today,” what they are really doing is erasing past ideals and principles and eliminating choice.

They don’t want you to see the world from different points of view; you are only allowed to see it from THEIR point of view. This is the exact opposite of good story telling.

Diversity As A Crutch And A Cudgel

Diversity is meaningless. It serves no purpose in terms of heroic representations. People identify with actions and deeds and principles, not skin color.

Leftists in Hollywood do not actually care about diversity of skin color, they only care about two things – Using minorities as a crutch to justify poor storytelling and lazy productions, and using minorities as a cudgel or weapon when they face criticism.

That is to say, when they make garbage media with no imagination or effort, they announce “we got diversity, though,” and this is supposed to make you want to watch their products anyway, otherwise you might be “racist.”

By extension, when you dare to criticize the political pontificating and terrible writing in their media, they can then say “our stories are fantastic, you just don’t like us because we hire brown people.” See how that works?

They use minorities as a shield, either for their ineptitude or their malicious intent, but they DO NOT care about such people if they can’t exploit them.

“Diversity and inclusion” is the new slave plantation that leftist elites in Hollywood use to farm virtue points and ESG loans.

That’s all there is to it. If they actually respected the idea of presenting diverse heroes, they would create original minority heroes and write them well.

Or, they would pick minority heroes from real history and avoid implanting current day woke politics into that era.

Narcissists Can’t Write Heroes

It has long been my contention that the leftist ideology is rooted in appeals to narcissism. Everything about it is based in entitlement rather than sacrifice. It is based in demands for special treatment rather than respect for accomplishment and merit. It is based in equity of outcome while eliminating equality of opportunity.

A person that has embraced the victim mentality can never be a hero or imagine how a hero would act. They have no relationship to the concept, because narcissists are usually villains in the real world and villains tend to see themselves as victims while they spend their time victimizing others. How else can they justify the evils they do?

No Conservative Heroes Allowed

As our media world was overrun with woke ideologues over the years the depictions of heroes and villains have become utterly twisted. Heroes act selfishly with ego and hubris, and villains are usually depicted as either misunderstood people that are only reacting to the trespasses of society, or they are ridiculous exaggerations of conservatives and liberty activists.

This trend has become an epidemic in films, television, video games, comic books, etc. Only in the past couple of years has there been mass push-back against the agenda, but there is a long way to go before things can change for the better.

Many of these woke productions fail miserably, but they aren’t necessarily interested in box office success or making money.

Again, what they care about is saturation, as well as murdering the hero archetype openly where everyone can see.

They want to destroy your heroes in front of you and replace them with woke pod people. This is what drives them.

The biggest problem is that most conservatives ignored the culture war while only focusing on fleeting political battles. They acted as if the culture war didn’t matter, and in the process we have almost lost our country completely.

Future generations need heroic ideals and examples to live by, among real live people as well as in popular media. By ignoring the culture war, conservatives ignored the future.

There are some people out there that are working to change our country’s course by producing original media with a heroic message based in American foundations of freedom, individualism, self reliance and meritocracy.

I’m working to join them by producing my own graphic novel project based on a survivalist hero. The best we have is Burt Gummer from Tremors – He’s great but we need more. Readers who are interested in original non-woke entertainment can learn more about that project HERE.

It’s important not to underestimate the power of media in culture. There is a reason why leftists are so obsessive with it; by changing all our heroes to villains they hope to change our values and our behaviors.

They aren’t just rewriting movies, or characters, or comic books, they are trying to rewrite us.

The only way to stop this is to identify the threat, neutralize the propaganda, and then bring back legitimate hero culture by writing it once again with our own hands and our own deeds.

Translating Biden’s ‘Soul of a Nation’ Speech…

By Pete McArdle

Joe Biden, with his history of brain injuries (two!), rapidly advancing dementia, lifelong tendency to plagiarize, lie, and self-aggrandize, and his mouthful of marbles and no doubt costly white porcelain, can be quite difficult to understand.

As a public service, then, allow me to translate some of Crusty Joe’s “Soul of America” speech to the best of my ability.

“We, the people.”

By that, Biden meant Democrats, teachers unions, the fake-news media, the hopelessly corrupt DoJ and FBI, and Big Tech.

“MAGA forces“

Everyone else.

“MAGA forces are… a threat… to the very soul of this country!”

What old Joe means is, if Republicans recapture Congress and Trump wins re-election, that will most certainly threaten the Biden Crime Family’s various lucrative grifts involving Ukraine, China, and Russia.

“They (the Ultra-MAGA movement) look at the mob who stormed the Capitol… as patriots!”

Of the Jan. 6^th and BLM protestors, I previously had a single thought. People who cause injuries, fear, and property damage should be seen as criminals and robustly prosecuted. But considering the Axis justice applied to the Jan 6^th demonstrators and the get-out-of-jail-free passes given the Antifa and BLM movements, Biden’s statement may well be worth considering.

“They live, not in the light of truth, but in the darkness of lies!”

I have no idea what  Joe was trying to say here, except that he reminded me of the fire-and-brimstone priests of my youth. In more ways than one.

Considering the way Biden squints in bright light, perhaps that line’s merely an allegory on his pressing need for double cataract surgery.

“We are still an America that believes in… respect for others.”

Except you Ultra-MAGA maggots. Kiss the floor and give me twenty, you pro-life, flag-waving, Trump-loving scum!

“A willingness to engage in political violence is fatal to democracy.”

For the millionth time, Slow Joe, the United States is not a democracy. Thank God. And come November, “a willingness to engage in political violence” will be electorally fatal to more than a few Democrats.

“FBI agents just doing their job as directed.”

That statement proves conclusively that even a brain-compromised nitwit is right once a millennium. The FBI has been doing their job, exactly as directed by Obama, Biden, and God knows who else. No one ever said the Feebs don’t work hard, no, just that they’re Democrat tools in suits.

“We can’t let the integrity of our elections be undermined.”

What Biden undoubtedly meant to say — perhaps the teleprompter or Biden’s cortex suffered a momentary glitch while he spoke — was that we can’t allow integrity in our elections, hence, the Democrat drive for mail-in voting, drop-boxes, early and late voting, ballot harvesting, I.D.-free voting, etc., etc.

“Today, COVID no longer controls our life.”

This was a dog whistle to all of Biden’s white coat supremacist pals, to please, please come up with another health emergency soon so we can strangle our constituents with mandates, declare winners and losers in the marketplace, and find new and innovative ways to cheat electorally.

“Light is now visible.”

This is just a rumor, but… sources tell me V.P. Kamala Harris wrote that line.

“The future will be made in America, no matter what the white supremacists… say.”

Wait, what? Why wouldn’t white supremacists want our country to have increased industry and production? Seems no one in the White House bothered to ask any white supremacists their views on U.S. GDP.

“My word as a Biden.”

Trust me! Biden’s saying. Just because Barry and me sicced the FBI and several other federal agencies on Trump before, during, and after his presidency, doesn’t mean I’m a Fibber McGee, you plant-based pony soldier!

“The soul is what makes us, us.”

Kammy definitely wrote that.

“Speak out! Speak up! Get engaged! Vote, vote, vote!”

What Sleepy Joe’s saying to his supporters here, in order of appearance: Make people of other persuasions miserable with your constant sermonizing! Do it loudly! And obnoxiously! And make sure to vote multiple times, wink, wink!

“Donald Trump and the MAGA Republicans represent… extremism.”

Heading into the midterm elections, that’s what Joe really wanted his listeners to know. The people who want to work, raise families, and be left alone; who defend the rights of the unborn; who want protection from the drugs, weapons, and unsustainable tide of humanity flowing across our southern border, they’re extremist.

The people who want their kids taught reading, writing, and math, not racial grievance, absurd gender theories, and a million reasons to hate America, they’re extremist.

The folks who want criminals and drug dealers arrested and incarcerated, so they and their family can walk the city streets without fear, they’re extremist.

The citizens who pay their bills (and taxes!) faithfully, and resent having to pay someone else’s college loans?

Extremists!

Now, loopy Joe Biden may have no idea what he means about anything. All we can say for sure, is that he can still read off a teleprompter what someone else wrote for him. After which he is no doubt rewarded with a cup of butterscotch pudding.

But whoever wrote the “Soul of the Nation” speech clearly thinks those who oppose the current corrupt and lawless administration are “extremists.” And this speech is clearly a prelude to the federal government bringing the hammer down hard on their political opponents.

Because that’s what you do with extremists.

10 Ways to Change a Liberal’s Mind…

Have you ever talked with a liberal and made a comment that shuts him down completely?  “Trump sure is getting a raw deal with that FBI raid, isn’t he?”  His eyes go glassy, and he starts to look for the exit.  Or he repeats something automatically, like “Trump deserves anything he gets.” 

This “orange man bad” mantra is often called “Trump Derangement Syndrome.”  It effectively shuts down all communication between disagreeing sides and prevents any kind of meaningful dialogue, even between good friends or family members.  Even intelligent people who are suffering greatly from Biden/liberal policies, through loss of jobs, high gas and oil prices, rapid inflation, high taxes, or curbs on religious freedoms, won’t be able to change their minds and consider voting for a conservative or moderate candidate once he is somehow linked to Donald Trump. 

They say, “If Trump is for it, then I am against it” even if that means they pay $5 a gallon for gas, can’t get formula for their babies, or can’t afford to heat their homes this winter. 

Why does this happen?  How do people make up their minds, and why do they stubbornly refuse to change them? 

You would think that people would evaluate important issues logically, like a math equation where 2+2=4, but this is not true with beliefs, especially when politics is involved.

Keith M. Bellizzi, professor of human development and family sciences, from the University of Connecticut, is among many who study cognitive psychology and neuroscience, and his article on the subject is a good start.  He explains that there are survival systems that are hard-wired into our brains that actually cause stubborn adherence to wrong beliefs.

“Belief perseverance” is one such system.  “Being presented with facts — whether via the news, social media or one-on-one conversations — that suggest their current beliefs are wrong causes people to feel threatened.”  They will reject the evidence, and often their original beliefs will become stronger.

“Confirmation bias” is “the natural tendency to seek out information or interpret things in a way that supports your existing beliefs.  Interacting with like-minded people and media reinforces confirmation bias.”  This is why liberals watch MSNBC and conservatives watch Fox. 

The brain itself is hardwired to reinforce existing opinions and beliefs, even if this might cause harm.  When you win an argument, your body releases a rush of pleasurable hormones like dopamine and adrenaline.  In a high-stress or threatening situation, cortisol is released, which depresses your logical mind and triggers the more basic part of your brain, which controls fight or flight.  You “see red,” voices are raised, fists get clenched, and it’s much more difficult to understand what the other side is saying. 

Other sociologists have identified other biases that effect logical vs. emotional thinking.

“Believing people from your tribe” 

Humans developed in tribal cultures, which continue to this day.  You are much less likely to believe an outsider.  Nowadays, a tribe is not just a reference to ethnicity or religion, but also belief systems in global warming or abortion, where members are easily identified by how they look or what they say. 

“The big lie” 

People, by nature, are well intentioned, and they assume that others are as well.  So when they hear a lie, they tend to believe it.  Interestingly, the bigger the lie, the more likely it is to be believed because they assume that no one would lie about something of such importance.  

All of these factors are related to survival going back to the earliest days of mankind.  If you constantly have to be re-evaluating your beliefs, such as “growling tigers are a reason to run,” then you might consider having a chat with such a tiger — and end up being his lunch. 

So how can you reach people with closed minds? 

1. Be from within their tribe.  Start by reinforcing what the two of you have in common — you may have lived in the same city, had similar jobs or similar backgrounds.  

2. Get permission to discuss — “Would you like to tell me about your views on global warming?”  This makes the idea of a discussion non-threatening. 

3. Resolve never to argue or raise your voice.  Don’t threaten or invoke fear.  If things start to become even a little heated, then withdraw — “we can always discuss this later” or “now may not be the time to discuss this.”  Getting into a heated argument is going to activate the liberal’s lizard brain and end logical reasoning.  

4. Start small.  Don’t try to convince the liberal that Donald Trump is the next George Washington.  Go for a smaller issue that doesn’t challenge one of his core beliefs.  “Should Iran have a nuclear weapon?” or “Would it be good for China to control our farmland?” 

5. Pick topics where you are well-versed.  Most of the people you will be talking with know very little factual information — they are used to hearing talking points and then parroting them back to you. 

6. Ask questions.  There is nothing threatening about asking an honest question, especially about something that is important to the liberal.  Make it clear that you are open and willing to listen to his side and willing to change your mind.  There is a brain/hormone thrill associated with converting someone to his side that will entice him to interact.  Your openness models good behavior — if you’re willing to change your mind, then he should be open-minded as well.

7. Ask “why?”  Few can survive three “whys” in a row.  The brainwashed rarely know the logic behind what they parrot.  

8. Focus on common sense and fairness.  “Does it make sense to spend $2 trillion to lower global temperature by 0.0006 degrees?”  “Does it seem fair to make a middle-class worker who never went to college pay for the student loan of a Harvard graduate with a women’s studies degree?” 

9. If you start to see the liberal’s resistance crumbling, share how you used to feel how he did, but you changed your mind when you learned new information. 

10. If you get him to change his mind on one topic, don’t gloat or insist that he admit he was wrong.  Just say, “I’m glad we had a chance to discuss this.  I learned a lot from you.  I hope we can talk again in the future.”  Then come back another time with a different topic that is more important.  

Changing minds is not a quick process.  Patience and self-control are essential.  Unless we can learn how to speak to our fellow Americans in a kind and understanding manner, we will never heal the divide in our nation.