Bad Guys of History Are Not So Bad After All

When we look back at the (((Globalist)))-owned Anglo Empire’s long record of making war against various “Bad Guys” from A-Z, the discerning student of history can’t help but notice the conspicuous absence of “the other side of the story.” Why is that? Consider; even serial killers such as Ted Bundy and David Berkowitz (aka “Son of Sam”); and mass murderers like Charles Manson were not only given their day in court, but also a forum in the media. Shouldn’t the related courts of history and current events at least present the version of affairs that the “bad guys” put forth?

If it’s all lies, then it would be a simple enough task to put forth the lie, and then dispel it with facts. Even if all of history’s “bad guys” were either “crazy” or just lying through their teeth; shouldn’t we get to hear their lies, for the sake of historical curiosity if nothing else?

It is often said that truth does not fear investigation. If that is so, then why are “the bad guys” always muzzled in the world press? Are we like retarded little children that must be shielded from the cunningly persuasive arguments of the “bad guys?” Or perhaps there is another reason why “the bad guys” have been silenced, even in death. In the interest of historical curiosity, and self-professed “American justice,” we present just a small sampling of the numerous claims of innocence issued by “the bad guys” – past and present, who dare to oppose the Holy US-UK alliance. Do with them as you wish.

Berkowitz – Manson – Bundy
Vicious mass-murdering psychos can speak before a national audience. Why not “the bad guys” of America’s foreign wars?

SPAIN / SPANISH-AMERICAN WAR

Spain’s Ambassador to the U.S. Enrique de Lôme / False-Flag Bombing of the Maine

de Lome: “No Spaniard would be guilty of such an act (sinking of the USS Maine). The explosion must have been caused by some accident aboard the ship.”

GERMANY / WORLD WAR I

* Kaiser Wilhelm II of Germany tried to avert The Great War.

“The Slavs have now become unrestful and will want to attack Austria. Germany is bound to stand by her ally – Russia and France will join in and then England…I am a man of peace – but now I have to arm my Country so that whoever falls on me I can crush.”

* Kaiser Wilhelm’s telegram to Russian Tsar:

“I therefore suggest that it would be quite possible for Russia to remain a spectator of the Austro-Serbian conflict without involving Europe in the most horrible war she ever witnessed. I think a direct understanding between your Government (Russia) and Vienna possible and desirable, and my Government is continuing its exercises to promote it. Of course military measures on the part of Russia would be looked upon by Austria as a calamity we both wish to avoid and jeopardize my position as mediator which I readily accepted on your appeal to my friendship and my help.”
* Kaiser Wilhelm on Woodrow Wilson’s efforts to drag America into the war

“This is the end of negotiations with America, once and for all! If Wilson wants war, let him prove it and then have it.”

GERMANY / WORLD WAR II

Adolf Hitler / Allied firebombing victims (Dresden)

Hitler: “It is untrue that I or anyone else in Germany wanted war in 1939. It was wanted and provoked solely by international statesmen either of Jewish origin or working for Jewish interests. I have made too many offers for the control and limitation of armaments, which posterity will not for all time be able to disregard for the responsibility for the outbreak of this war to be laid on me. I have further never wished that after the first fatal world war a second against England, or even against America, should break out.”

JAPAN / WORLD WAR II

Emperor Hirohito / Charred remains of America’s firebombing of Tokyo

Hirohito: “It has truly been unavoidable and far from our wishes that our Empire has been brought to cross swords with America and Britain…. Eager for the realization of their inordinate ambition to dominate the Orient, both America and Britain, giving support to the Chungking regime, have aggravated the disturbances in East Asia. Moreover these two powers, inducing other countries to follow suit, increased military preparations on all sides of our Empire to challenge us. They have obstructed by every means our peaceful commerce and finally resorted to a direct severance of economic relations, menacing greatly the existence of our Empire. …  Patiently have we waited and long have we endured, in the hope that our Government might retrieve the situation in peace. But our adversaries, showing not the least spirit of conciliation, have unduly delayed a settlement; and in the meantime they have intensified the economic and political pressure to compel our Empire to submission.”

IRAQ / GULF WAR I

Saddam Hussein and his sons (who would all be killed after Gulf War 2) / Scenes from General Colin Powell’s infamous “Highway of Death”

Hussein: “We know that you can harm us although we do not threaten you. ……We do not place America among the enemies. We place it where we want our friends to be and we try to be friends. But repeated American statements last year made it apparent that America did not regard us as friends.”

OSAMA BIN LADEN / WAR ON TERROR

– Osama Bin Laden repeatedly denied having anything to do with 9/11

Bin Laden: “I have already said that I am not involved in the September 11 attacks in the United States. As a Muslim, I try my best to avoid telling a lie. I had no knowledge of these attacks, nor do I consider the killing of innocent women, children and other humans as an appreciable act.”

IRAQ / GULF WAR II

Saddam lynched by U.S. surrogates / Iraqi children and babies killed by the U.S.

Hussein: “To the American people: I address you in this letter from the place of my confinement, as my attempt on the basis of my moral, human, and constitutional responsibility so that no one among you might say that no one came to you with a message of peace after the war began, refuting the arguments for it and desiring peace for you and for our upright, loyal, heroic people.”

IRAN / PERENNIAL “BAD GUY”

Ex-Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad also pleaded for peace

“Noble Americans,
Were we not faced with the activities of the US administration in this part of the world and the negative ramifications of those activities on the daily lives of our peoples, coupled with the many wars and calamities caused by the US administration as well as the tragic consequences of US interference in other countries;

Were the American people not God-fearing, truth-loving, and justice-seeking, while the US administration actively conceals the truth and impedes any objective portrayal of current realities;  And if we did not share a common responsibility to promote and protect freedom and human dignity and integrity; Then, there would have been little urgency to have a dialogue with you. While Divine providence has placed Iran and the United States geographically far apart, we should be cognizant that human values and our common human spirit, which proclaim the dignity and exalted worth of all human beings, have brought our two great nations of Iran and the United States closer together.”

LIBYA / PROXY WAR

After pretending to offer friendship to Libyan Leader Qaddafi, Obama had him murdered. Secretary of State Killary Clinton then cackled on CBS: “We came, We saw. He died.”
Qaddafi: “Americans are good people. They have no aggressions against us and they like us as we like them. They must know I don’t hate them. I love them.… I hear it is a complex society inside. Many Americans don’t know about the outside world. The majority have no concern and no information about other people. They could not even find Africa on a map. I think Americans are good, but America will be taken over and destroyed from the inside by the Zionist lobby. The Americans do not see this. They are getting decadent. Zionists will use this to destroy them.” – Qaddafi

NORTH KOREA / PERENNIAL “BAD GUY”

Kin Jong Un and NBA Basketball legend Dennis Rodman:
“Tell Obama to call me. If you can, Dennis – I don’t want to do war. I don’t want to do war.” – Told to Dennis Rodman

SYRIA / PROXY WAR / 2011-2019

Dr. Assad and his beautiful family have also been targeted for death by N.W.O. & Israel

Assad Quotes:

“For two years, the Iraqi people have suffered from the aftermath of a horrific war and occupation by America. The world is beginning to speak with one voice. We want that democracy in Iraq to succeed, and we know it cannot succeed so long as she is occupied by a foreign power and that power is America.”

“While we are after peace, Israel is after war.”
How is it possible that any country would use chemical weapons, or any weapons of mass destruction, in an area where its own forces are located? This is preposterous! These accusations are completely politicized and come on the back of the advances made by the Syrian Army against the terrorists.”

RUSSIA / PERENNIAL “BAD GUY”

Ignore the media vilification. Russia’s Putin is a man of peace.

Putin: “The West is constantly trying to drive us into a corner because we have an independent position, because we maintain it and because we tell it like it is and don’t engage in hypocrisy. But there is a limit to everything. And with Ukraine, our Western partners have crossed the line, playing the bear and acting irresponsibly and unprofessionally.”

Why Do White Libtards Virtue Signal

DECEMBER 6, 2022

NY Times:Her Family Owned Slaves. How Can She Make Amends?

Stacie Marshall, who inherited a Georgia farm, is trying on a small scale to address a generations-old wrong that still bedevils the nation.

About the only noise that grates worse than the skin-crawling sound of whinging & whining coming from some virtue-signalling, self-hating, cosmopolitan, White Yankee libtard prattling on about the lasting legacy of slavery and “White privilege” — is the similar whinging & whining coming from a virtue-signalling, self-hating, southern born & bred White Dixie libtard. You see, the former is merely a provincial ignoramus; whereas the latter is a dad-gum traitor to his kin. Heck, at least the self-hating Germans can falsely accuse themselves — if they are very old — or their parents or grandparents for the Holohoax. But this pathetic wench has to go back nearly 160 years to dig up and trash unknown ancestors for an institution which had actually been established in the Americas by “the usual suspects” who absolutely dominated the slave trade — and whose tribal descendants have pretty much scrubbed several excellent works on that subject from the search engines of Amazon (surprise surprise).

The article tells of how “long-blond-haired” ex-beauty queen Stacie Marshall slipped into a marketing seminar in Athens, Georgia which was attended by about  two dozen Black farmers. But St. Stacie wasn’t there to learn how to better peddle veggies. When the Black speaker, Matthew Raiford, asked if there were questions, our sanctimonious heroine raised her hand and cleared her soul. You see, she had inherited 300 acres upon which she was going to farm — thus making her the first woman in her family to own a farm. But St. Stacie had discovered something so horrific — so traumatizing — so guilt-inducing that it compelled her to show up at this all-Black farming seminar and make Holy Confession to Father Raiford.

From the article:

“My family owned seven people,” Ms. Marshall said. She wanted to know how to make it right.

Mr. Raiford was as surprised as anyone in the room. “Those older guys have probably never heard that from a white lady in their entire lives,” he recalled.

For almost three years now, with the fervor of the newly converted, Ms. Marshall has been on a quest that from the outside may seem quixotic and even naïve. She is diving into her family’s past and trying to chip away at racism in the Deep South.”


Wethinks St. Stacie watches too much TV — and that the publicity surrounding her virtue-signaling was either contrived in advance or sought after the fact.

1. St. Stacie is following in the footsteps of St. Harper Lee — the Alabama traitoress who proudly pooped-out the anti-southern “To Kill a Mockingbird” that has since been force-fed to scores of millions of High School students and made into several plays and a “classic” movie. // 2. The flag stands for heritage and culture — not “racism.” // 3. I wonder if St. Stacie — the ageing former beauty pageant winner — is ridin’ dirty with farmer Raiford as a form of “reparations.” …. Yeah, I think she is.

Now, about this matter of libtard virtue-signaling and excited tail-wagging in the presence of “people of color ( I guess I’m including myself).” What we have in such cases are not examples of well-intentioned people being stupid; nor really “self-hate” as much as it is a bizarre  and unhealthy form of self-love. These are mainly rotten and ego-driven people trying to exalt themselves above the rest of common humanity. To we the observant, they are vice-signaling by declaring:  “Hey! Look at me everybody! I’m trashing my White ancestors for owning slaves! Look at me!” — or — “Hey! Look at me everybody! I just adopted a Black baby from Haiti or a Brown/Black baby from the Dominican Republic!” There is absolutely ZERO “virtue” in that sort of spectacle-making behavior.

Let us hearken back to our New Testament Sunday School lessons to better understand what virtue-signaling libtards like St. Stacie are really about. Some excerpts from Matthew, Chapter 6:

“Be careful not to perform your righteous acts before men are seen by them. If you do, you will have no reward from your Father in heaven.

“So when you give to the needy, do not sound a trumpet before you, as the hypocrites do in the synagogues and on the streets, to be honored by men.”

“And when you pray, you shall not be as the hypocrites are: for they love to pray standing in the synagogues and in the corners of the streets, that they may be seen of men.

“When you fast, do not be somber like the hypocrites, for they disfigure their faces to show men they are fasting.”

Tell it, Jesus. Tell it!

1 & 2. Never trust a virtue-signaling or “philanthropist” libtard who craves to “be seen of men.” // 3. I know, Jesus. I know.

These character types aren’t virtuous; they are self-aggrandizing and potentially dangerous neurotics — even if their advertised deeds do sometimes serve for the good. Put St. Stacie in a time machine and transport her back to Atlanta 1861; and she’ll be front & center (where she loves to be!) hosting fundraisers for the Confederacy as she conspicuously drops jewelry into the donation basket. “Look at me everybody!I’m supporting the cause! Oh -Look away! Look away! Look away! Dixie Land.”  — Bitch, please.

Libtards like St. Stacie needs to be called out at every turn as phony virtue-signalers, and promptly yanked down from their posturing pedestals when they act like this. The moral high ground is not for show-offs – especially ones who betray their own for personal gain. If you want to be a good “non-racist,” it will suffice to simply treat “people other than white” with the same degree of respect you’d like anyone else to show for you — no more, no less; and just leave it at that.

We need to remember, assholes come in all colors.

1. Southern-born actress Sandra Bullock with Black baby (who seems to be thinking: “Dis White bitch cray cray.” // 2. South African-born actress Charlize Theron proves to all that she is truly anti-Apartheid. // 3. Anorexic nutcase and CIA asset Angelina Jolie also showing up and doing her part.

There’s Something Terribly Wrong With Gorsad Kyiv and it’s Worse than Balenciaga

Gorsad Kyiv is a collective of photographers that collaborates with the world’s largest brands. Apparently, everybody’s ignoring the fact that their work revolves around the graphic abuse and sexualization of children. Even worse, some of these “models” appear to be actual victims of child trafficking. Here’s a look at Gorsad Kyiv.

Warning: This article contains disturbing pictures.

Gorsad Kyiv is a photography collective consisting of three artists: Viktor Vasiliev, Maria Romaniuk, and Ulik Romaniuk. Based in Kyiv, Ukraine, the group has collaborated with many galleries, magazines, musicians, and brands such as I-D Vice, Dazed & Confused, Skim milk, Hood by Air, Ariel Pink, and others.

In 2022, Gorsad Kyiv was named in PhotoVogue’s list of “100 Next Great Fashion Image Makers”.

PhotoVogue Festival unites the biggest names in the fashion industry, along with numerous publishers from CondeNast – the megacorporation that owns hundreds of publications around the world. Here, PhotoVogue features a picture by Gorsad which features a sad and frightened girl.

One only needs to take a look at a few pics taken by Gorsad to realize one thing: There is something terribly wrong with them. Everything about their work refers directly to pedophilia, child abuse, and sex trafficking. Many children in these pictures appear deeply unwell as if they are actual victims of human trafficking that are constantly drugged and abused.

Instead of being alarmed by these pictures, “industry experts” actually celebrate Gorsad and reward them with lucrative contracts. And, since the Ukraine war, the collective is touted as “freedom fighters” by the media as it urges people to support them with donations. Are you crazy?

One of the ridiculous headlines praising Gorsad.

Why does the industry love Gorsad so much and why aren’t they being investigated by the police? Well, when one realizes that their works are also replete with the occult elite’s satanic symbolism, one realizes one important fact: They’re part of the same sick culture.

Here are the collective’s favorite themes.

Aggressively Sexualizing Children

This is one of these articles where I don’t feel comfortable posting pictures because they’re so vile. However, this insanity needs to be exposed for what it is or it will keep going due to general indifference. I did not dig these pictures from some obscure website – the following pictures are proudly exposed in trendy exhibitions, major fashion magazines, and all over social media accounts.

When fashion magazines describe Gorsad’s works, they like to use the words “youth, innocence, and sexuality”. That’s another way of saying “pedophilia”. Because that’s exactly what this is about.

A screenshot of an interview with Gorsad. They have to give vague answers because they cannot outright say that they’re catering to sick pedos.

A mere look at the following pictures is enough to realize that this is not about the natural “coming of age” of children, it is about their abuse, exploitation, and sexualization by sick adults.

Here are some pictures from Gorsad’s website and Instagram account.

In one of its exhibits, Gorsad proudly displays this picture of a young girl who looks deeply unwell while sitting in a suggestive position. This girl might be a victim of sex trafficking.

To promote an exhibition, Gorsad uses a highly symbolic picture: A balloon attached to a chain, representing the innocence of youth ruined by control and exploitation.

This picture could not be more obvious. This young girl is chained and bruised. This is all a reference to child sex trafficking.

Two young girls are chained next to something that looks like a cheese grater (which might refer to torture).

Inside the backpack is a dildo. Pedos love to mix kiddie stuff with adult things. They’re catering to this sick crowd.

This child is wearing a choker (used in BDSM) and the entire setup is deeply disturbing.

The innocence of youth mixed with adult things such as smoking.

How can this be considered “art” or “fashion”? It looks like a child trafficking catalog.

The same girl from above is bleeding from the nose. Are you Fucking kidding me?

This child is wearing a hat on which is written “BALLS” while suggestively poking a fruit. Next to the picture frame is an EROTICA book. I’m not kidding. They’re making it very clear that this is all pedophilia.

Beastiality.

In one of its many “stand with Ukraine” social media posts, Gorsad includes this pic of a girl who looks unwell with chains around her genitals. This is all about sex trafficking.

A girl bleeding from her genitals. A direct reference to rape?

Aggressively Abusing Children

Gorsad loves depicting the abuse, torment, humiliation, and torture of children. I’m honestly not sure how these pictures are allowed to exist without an in-depth police investigation.

A recurring theme in Gorsad’s works: Children choking in plastic bags. Gratuitous celebration of abuse.

Shirtless children choke on plastic bags. They really should not be taking part in any of this but I’m not even sure their parents are anywhere around them.

A child wrapped in plastic. This looks like a victim of human trafficking being “disposed of”.

This picture is not only disgusting but it also conveys the deeply sadistic nature of those behind it. Forcing people to stand in their own filth causes intense trauma (it is a major torture technique) and this guy has to go through the humiliation of posing for a picture. I’m inclined that no “special effects” were involved in this picture.

They took this girl to a cemetery and forced her to deal with death. They’re into killing the innocence of children and exposing them to trauma.

This child is “silenced” by an unseen adult. The arm is covered in latex, which is usually used in BDSM outfits. This is 100% about child abuse.

There are numerous Gorsad pictures of young boys in mussels. Once again this is about humiliation, control, and reducing them to animals.

Occult Elite Symbolism

Compared to those above, the following pictures are relatively tame. However, they contain the exact symbolism that has been described on this site for years. Through these symbols, the photographers are telling you that they are part of the elite’s sick, satanic culture that revels in abuse and desecration of youth and innocence. This is why they are being celebrated by mass media instead of being condemned.

As stated in numerous articles, the one-eye sign represents occult elite control. That sign is all over Gorsad pictures.

More one-eye sign.

A young girl has a butterfly hiding one eye. As seen in previous articles, this is 100% Monarch Programming symbolism.

Another recurring Gorsad theme is outright satanism, combined with the ridiculing of Christianity. One truly needs to worship outright evil to focus one’s “art” around the suffering of children. Appropriately enough, the entire entertainment industry is drenched in satanic symbolism.

They scribbled 666 on the forehead of this sad boy and took a picture of him. How is this “art” or “fashion”?

In occultism, holding the horns of a goat is highly symbolic. This is all about forcing children to embrace Satanism.

A staple of Satanism is ridiculing Christianity. Here, they are ridiculing Jesus and his crown of thorns.

The models bite the apple from the Garden of Eden while the proverbial serpent (which represents Lucifer) is wrapped around them. The message: They fully embrace evil.

This picture features an inverted pentagram which is used in satanism and black magic. This is what they’re about. Also, this is what the occult elite is about. And this is why they’re getting money, contracts, accolades and exposure.

In Conclusion

I easily could have posted three times more pictures in this article and I could have included some of Gorsad’s disturbing videos featuring children. But this is more than enough. While I’m sorry about exposing readers to these distressing pictures (they certainly distressed me), this imagery needs to be exposed and properly analyzed so we all clearly witness the sick and sadistic culture that prevails in the entertainment world.

Gorsad is not an exception, it is not “underground” and it is not even “counter-culture”. It is mainstream. They were praised by CondeNast, the mega-conglomerate that controls an astounding number of magazines around the world. In fact, those who are NOT part of this sick culture are the ones who are shunned by the industry.

As seen above, numerous pictures Gorsad pictures involve children who appear unwell, as if they recently underwent abuse or trauma. Several pictures directly refer to pedophilia, child abuse, and sex trafficking. There are clear references to trauma, torture, violence, and death combined with celebrations of satanism and black magic.

In short, Gorsad graphically puts on display all of the obsessions of the occult elite, in the sickest way possible. If you think any of this is still a “conspiracy theory”, you might as well be blind because these pictures could not be clearer.

Please report these fuckers (Instagram) and expose these motherfuckers wherever you see them online.

The FrankenMusk Monster is Out of Control

Picture

“When does a bird sing?

DECEMBER 12, 2022

NY Times Headlines:The Great Delusion Behind Twitter
**A Political Theory of King Elon Musk

*Critics Say Musk Has Revealed Himself as a Conservative. It’s Not So Simple.
*Elon Musk, Matt Taibbi, and a Very Modern Media Maelstrom
*Hate Speech’s Rise on Twitter Is Unprecedented, Researchers Find

The “paper of record” and all the rest of the Judenpresse Armada now find themselves in quite a panicked pickle over Elon Musk’s drip-drip exposure of the vast criminal enterprise which he (or his imposter) recently purchased. In addition to the fake liberal “bots” infesting the Twitter user rolls and ripping off advertisers, Mr. “Musk” has also started exposing Twitter’s look-the-other-way protection of child rapists. Big problems for the pervert “elite” if this can of worms is fully opened up.

The High Priests of Propaganda spent more than a decade puffing up this connected con-artist who became “the world’s richest man” on government subsidies, government credits, government mandates, government purchases and TONS of free publicity bestowed upon him and his multiple companies by the fawning press. Now, with countless legions of artificially-induced Musk fanboys worldwide, what do “they” do about this Frankenstein Monster — the persona, that is — of their own creation as he exposes what he himself just referred to as “a crime scene” at Twitter, and beyond? If they attack FrankenMusk directly, they will upset and alienate his fanboys. But if “they” pull their punches, the plundering monster will continue to rampage throughout the cyber villages of Normiedom unchallenged.

This is really getting fun, boys & girls!

Musk’s staggering 120 Million worldwide Twitter followers are getting a steady dose of MAGA Q-ish doctrine from the ex-Globalist con artist who has EITHER been placed under submission — OR Gitmo’d with assets seized and replaced with Deep Fakery.

Musk’s post-purchase tweets — and their exponential amplification through other forms of media — are now “red-pilling” millions of fanboys. And because Globo-Musk leaned Leftist and Global Warmist in the past, and claims to be “moderate” today, Fake News cannot so easily tag MAGA-Musk with the oh-so-scary “far right” label. This makes the White Hat’s “Musk” operation all the more effective in influencing “centrists” and even some libtards. FrankenMusk’s daily dose of damaging drip-drip is only the start. The real blows against the Deep State will be:

1. The restoration of 10’s of 1000’s of banned Q-related accounts, including  those of some Q-Anon influencers who had six-digit follower totals. This will go a long way to bypassing the Judenpresse and forcing new data into the public consciousness.

2. Musk’s expected testimony before the post-January 1, MAGA-dominated House Oversight Committe – to be chaired by “conspiracy theorist” James Comer (R-KY). Comer has confirmed that he is already in communication with, and receiving information from, Mr. “Musk.” (here)

Comer on FrankenMusk’s expected appearance before his committee:

“We will roll out the red carpet for Elon Musk.”

The FrankenMusk Monster is loose and running wild throughout the overlapping kingdoms of Normiedom and Libtardia — where the Myth of Musk was artificially concocted in a propaganda laboratory. God only knows the full extent of what this recreated “White Hat” version of “Elon Musk” is about to expose; but expect it to be very, very bad stuff. Might this be what — whose threats against Twitter date back as far as November, 2017 — meant when he frequently riddled us: “When does a bird sing?”

The “tweeting” bird, of course, is Twitter’s logo. And the word “sing” is used to describe the disclosure of criminal acts. 

Sing it, “Elon.” Sing it!

1. Powerful Chairman Elect James Comer belongs to Trump — and he plans to invite “Musk” to “sing” before the committee. // 2. Headline above — from Democrat.org — says it all.

GOP leader Kevin McCarthy WAS Establishment scum, but The Donald — who openly mocks him as “My Kevin” — has owned his ass ever since 2019 (think Senator Geary in “The Godfather II). McCarthy is also threatening Biden with investigative hearings.

Frankie says: “Elon …. sing gooood!”

2008 Spy Paper Predicted the Covid Scamdemic

As a Conspiracy Analyst, just sniffed out and channeled a real gem for us. Of all the past hints and “prophecies” which the Globalists communicated to their Deep State henchmen about a future “pandemic,” this find ranks high when it comes to pinpoint accuracy and shock value.

In a November 2008 report titled: Global Trends 2025: A Transformed World, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (DNI) — the agency which oversees all intelligence agencies — and the National Intelligence Council didn’t just telegraph Stupid-19, but also “guessed” the time-window and foretold how many people were to have been genocided in America and worldwide.

Just to add a bit of critical context, the multi-topic report about a “transformed world” was published right about the time that Obongo was elected, marking the start of the Bilderberg-certified “16-year plan” to finish off America once and for all with 8 years of Bath House Barry followed by 8 years of Killary Clinton. The math: 2009 + 16 = 2025.

The opening page provides the synopsis of the report:

“We prepared Global Trends 2025: A Transformed World to stimulate strategic thinking about the future by identifying key trends, the factors that drive them, where they seem to be headed, and how they might interact. It uses scenarios to illustrate some of the many ways in which the drivers examined in the study may interact to generate challenges and opportunities for future decision makers. The study as a whole is more a description of the factors likely to shape events than a prediction of what will actually happen.”

Spy-Speak to English translation: These are our goals and secret programs for the coming 16 years.

The “study” covers issues like BRICS, the Climate Con, migration, terrorism, international trade etc. — always from the Globalist perspective. But it is the “description of a factor” on page 75 — which was not a “prediction,” of course (rolling eyes) — that really causes the jaw to drop and the blood to boil. As you read this evil excerpt, keep in mind that this scamdemic was supposed to have struck with the Satanic Witch Killary lording over us in her second term. Evidently, it was moved up a few years in order to strike at Trump during an election year (mail-in ballot fraud.)

Headlined Potential Emergence of a Global Pandemic, the entire 1-page item is copied below.

The Deep State doesn’t get any deeper than the DNI — whose “scenario” of a “before 2025” global pandemic constitutes proof of a conspiracy.

Potential Emergence of a Global Pandemic
(bold emphasis and parentheticals in certain places are ours)

The emergence of a novel, highly transmissible, and virulent human respiratory illness for which there are no adequate countermeasures could initiate a global pandemicIf a pandemic diseaseemerges by 2025, internal and cross-border tension and conflict will become more likely as nations struggle—with degraded capabilities—to control the movement of populations seeking to avoid infection or maintain access to resources.

The emergence of a pandemic disease depends upon the natural genetic mutation or reassortment of currently circulating disease strains or the emergence of a new pathogen into the humanpopulation. Experts consider highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) strains, such as H5N1, to be likely candidates for such a transformation, but other pathogens– such as the SARScoronavirus or other influenza strains—also have this potential.

If a pandemic disease emerges, it probably will first occur in an area marked by high population density and close association between humans and animals, such as many areas of China and Southeast Asia, where human populations live in close proximity to livestock. Unregulated animal husbandry practices could allow a zoonotic (from humans to animals) disease such as H5N1 to circulate in livestock populations—increasing the opportunity for mutation into a strain with pandemic potential. To propagate effectively, a disease would have to be transmitted to areas of higher population density.

Under such a scenario, inadequate health-monitoring capability within the nation of origin probably would prevent early identification of the disease. Slow public health response would delay the realization that a highly transmissible pathogen had emerged. Weeks might pass before definitive laboratory results could be obtained confirming the existence of a disease with pandemic potential. In the interim, clusters of the disease would begin to appear in towns and cities within Southeast Asia. Despite limits imposed on international travel, travelers with mildsymptoms or who were asymptomatic could carry the disease to other continents.

Waves of new cases would occur every few months (variants). The absence of an effective vaccine (they would have waited years before coming up with their death jab.) and near universal lack of immunity would render populations vulnerable to infection. In this worst-case, tens to hundreds of millions of Americans within the US Homeland would become ill anddeaths would mount into the tens of millions.

Outside the US, critical infrastructure degradation and economic loss on a global scale would result as approximately a third of the worldwide population became ill and hundreds of millions died.
_____________________________
A: US and global health organizations currently are working to develop vaccines that may prevent or mitigate influenza pandemics. A breakthrough in the next several years could reduce the risk posed by
pandemic influenza during upcoming decades.

B: How fast a disease spreads, how many people become sick, how long they stay sick, the mortality rate, and the symptoms and after-effects will vary according to the specific characteristics of whatever pathogen is responsible for a pandemic. This scenario posits plausible characteristics that fall within a
range of possibilities for these variables.

End ***

2008 Scenario / DNI Report


“If a pandemic disease emerges, it probably will first occur in an area marked by high population density and close association between humans and animals, such as many areas of China.”

***

2021 Headline / Nature Magazine

FAKE! // Tell it, Church Lady. Tell it!

Let us review:

“Before 2025” — “Coronavirus” — “respiratory illness” — “animal to human transition” — “from China” — “spread by air travel” — “waves of new cases every few months”
 — “hundreds of millions dead.”

But not a “prediction,” eh?

These demonic bastards had a long term plan to crush the world economy, cull humanity with their vaccine, and then nano-chip the survivors with the Bill Gates “666” technology. And they would have succeeded had Killary Clinton not been derailed by the man that some of “youse guys” are now attacking (and in some cases, defunding) little ol’ me for defending.

Please share this amazing find.

*The full DNI.gov pdf of the report itself is linked here.

Page 75 of the official report, page 95 of the pdf: “Tens to hundreds of millions of Americans within the US Homeland would become ill and deaths would mount into the tens of millions.”

Conspiracies Can’t Be Stopped

by Maggie Koerth 

Shortly before killing 50 people at two New Zealand mosques, the man arrested for the Christchurch massacre posted an online manifesto that alluded to the “Great Replacement” — a racist demographic theory that stokes fears of white people becoming, effectively, extinct. Within hours of the shootings, this act of terrorism inspired by a conspiracy theory had already gone on to birth conspiracy theories about itself. Conservative radio host Rush Limbaugh speculated that the shooter was a secret leftist hoping to use the attack to smear the reputation of the political right.

That a single tragedy could be so tangled in conspiracy mongering should be no surprise at this point. We’ve all watched conspiracies grow from myriad soils: the missing Malaysia Airlines jet, the political passions of George Sorosvaccinesclimate change, even the football secrets of the New England Patriots. Conspiracy theories appear to have become a major part of how we, as a society, process the news. It might be harder to think of an emotionally tinged event that didn’t provoke a conspiracy theory than it is to rattle off a list of the ones that did.

The ubiquity — and risks — of all these conspiracies has caught the attention of scientists. For years, the potentially dangerous consequences of conspiracy led many researchers to approach belief in conspiracies as a pathology in need of a cure. But that train of thought tended to awkwardly clash against some of the facts. The more we learn about conspiracy beliefs, the more normal they look — and the more some scientists worry that trying to prevent them could present its own dangers.

The experts I spoke with all said that the internet had changed the way conspiracies spread, but conspiracies, both dangerous and petty, have always been with us. Nobody knows, really, how popular conspiracy beliefs used to be, because it wasn’t a thing surveys regularly tracked until recently, said Jan-Willem van Prooijen, a psychologist at VU Amsterdam. But he and Michael Wood, professor of psychology at the UK’s University of Winchester, both pointed to a study that suggests conspiracies have consistently peered out of the pages of American newspapers for at least a century.

Joseph Uscinski, a political scientist at the University of Miami, cataloged and coded more than 100,000 letters to the editor published in The New York Times and the Chicago Tribune, and found the number of letters alleging and discussing conspiracy theories to have been pretty consistent over the last 120 years. This study isn’t perfect — the newspapers are still gatekeepers to what conspiracies were deemed fit to publish — but because it encompasses two different papers over a wide swath of time and many editorial leadership changes, Uscinski told me that it’s reasonable to assume we’re looking at something that reflects what interests readers, more so than what interests editors.

That research is significant to understanding conspiracy belief as a societal norm. “There was some crazy stuff that they were more than happy to publish,” Uscinski said. “The CIA is creating lesbianism. We found alien planets. … Jimmy Carter is a communist agent. Secret baby farms where they’re growing organs for people. It all wound up in there.”

And, it turns out, most of us believe in some strange goings-on behind the curtains. More than half of Americans think there was more than one person involved in the assassination of John F. Kennedy, for example. A 2014 study found that more than half of Americans believe in at least one medical conspiracy — a list that includes things like doctors giving children vaccines they know to be dangerous or the idea that the Food and Drug Administration intentionally suppresses natural cancer cures because of pressure from the pharmaceutical industry. The more specific conspiracies you ask about in polls, the higher the percentage of Americans that believe in at least one, Uscinski said. He thinks it’s likely everyone has a pet conspiracy to call their own.

What’s more, conspiracy beliefs aren’t necessarily all that special, said Carrie Leonard, a postdoctoral fellow in psychology at the University of Lethbridge in Canada. Leonard studies broader categories of what are known as “erroneous beliefs” — paranormal experiences, gambling fallacies, that sort of thing. The more we learn about conspiracy beliefs, the more they seem to have in common with these other kinds of wrong ideas, she said. Feeling a lack of control over various aspects of life, a tendency toward paranoid thinking, failure to understand and use statistics and probabilistic reasoning — all those things correlate with belief in ghosts and slot-machine prowess as much as with belief in the Illuminati. In fact, Leonard said, if you believe in the paranormal, you’re more likely to believe in conspiracy theories, and vice versa. (A finding that is probably completely unsurprising to the editors of The Fortean Times.)

At the same time, though, conspiracy theories have a sociopolitical aspect that makes them stand out. Leonard, and other researchers, think of belief in conspiracy as an interaction between individual tendencies and social circumstances. So, for instance, if you’re part of a group that is marginalized by society or lacks power in important ways you’re more likely to believe in conspiracy theories. That means being a member of a racial minority is a predictor of conspiracy belief — and so is unemployment, low economic status, or even just being a member of a cultural group that’s looked down on by people in positions of power.

Likewise, consider who is accusing whom of engaging in conspiracy. Uscinski’s study of newspaper letters to the editor tracked the social status of the letter writers. Consistently, he found conspiracies were punching up. Not only did average people write more than 70 percent of the conspiracy letters — as opposed to elite members of society — the conspiracies alleged were usually aimed at people in positions of power. There’s also no evidence to suggest that conspiracy belief is a phenomenon of the far right or the far left, Uscinski said. Americans broadly believe in a “them” pulling the strings and manipulating the country.

And this is where conspiracy beliefs start to get tangled up with truth. Because history does contain real examples of conspiracy. Pizzagate was a dangerous lie that led an armed man to walk into a family restaurant, convinced he was there to rescue children from pedophilic members of the Democratic Party. But that incident also exists in the same universe as the Tuskegee experimentsredlining and the Iran-Contra Affair. “I have this conspiracy that Western governments are involved in an international spying ring,” Wood said. “Before about 2014 that would have made you a conspiracy theorist. Now we know it’s true.”

Summoning — and demonizing — the belief in conspiracies can also have political consequences. “During the Bush Administration, the left was going fucking bonkers … about 9/11 and Halliburton and Cheney and Blackwater and all this stuff,” Uscinski said. “As soon as Obama won they didn’t give a shit about any of that stuff anymore. They did not care. It was politically and socially inert.” In turn, conspiracy theories about Obama flourished on the right. Uscinski said he is frustrated by this tendency for partisans to build up massive conspiracy infrastructures when they are out of power, only to develop a sudden amnesia and deep concern about the conspiracy mongering behavior of the other side once power is restored. It’s a cycle, he said that threatened to make social science a tool of partisan slapfights more than a standard of truth. And in a 2017 paper, he argued that conspiracy beliefs could even be useful parts of the democratic process, calling them “tools for dissent used by the weak to balance against power.”

These issues add up to more scientists beginning to have questions about what the goals of conspiracy belief research should actually be. Do we want an entire field of study aimed at preventing conspiracy theories from forming and dispelling the ones that do?

“I don’t think so,” Wood said. “I’m sure some people would disagree with me on that. But the objective shouldn’t be nobody speculates about people in power abusing power. That’s a terrible outcome for the world.”

He’s right — some scientists do disagree. Leonard, for instance, acknowledged that the world is complex, but viewed conspiracy theories as largely negative — erroneous beliefs, like gambling fallacies, but with the power to disrupt whole societies rather than just one person’s bank account.

Of course, all this debate assumes eliminating conspiracy theories is even possible. Van Prooijen told me that he’s currently working on a line of research to see whether a false conspiracy belief can be corrected by giving the people who believe in it something they’ve lacked — power and control over their own lives. In laboratory experiments, this seems to work, he said. Empower people, give them a sense of control, operate with transparency, and conspiracy theories seem to become less appealing.

Trouble is, in the real world, who has the ability to offer that kind of empowerment?

That’s right. THEM.

“If a group of people strongly distrusts a government or group of leaders, anything they do will raise suspicion,” van Prooijen said. Whether they want to get rid of conspiracies or not, scientists (and global leaders) are kind of stuck. Conspiracy beliefs are the norm, and difficult to shake because the people with the most interest in shaking them are, usually, the very people the conspiracy is meant to fight. As van Prooijen put it: “It’s not an easy task.”

It’s Not a ‘Conspiracy Theory’ Rape & Murder of Boy Was Once Shown on Italian TV News

It was during the early days of my awakening more than two decades ago — at a time when my own boys were just 13 and 9 — that this sickeningly unforgettable story left me shaken. Even then,  one could sense by intuition alone that there was some undefinable, CONSPIRATORIAL force protecting child rapists and torturers in high places. Today — as a result of the Q Anon movement and the ongoing revelations about the Jeffrey Epstein / Ghislane Maxwell pedo-sex operation — this ghastly tale of horror can be much better understood as part of a high-level phenomenon instead of just low-level rings of everyday average perverts.

In a story titled, Paedophile Outrage Exposes Italian MediaThe UK Guardian (among many other outlets) reported on October 4, 2020:
“A prime time news broadcast of child pornography has stunned Italy, triggered political uproar in the state-owned RAI television network. Graphic images of children being tortured and apparently murdered were followed within minutes by an apology which in turn led to resignations and allegations of rampant corruption.

Interrupting programs to make an emotional late night broadcast, Gad Lerner (cough cough) accepted responsibility for the fiasco and quit as news director of RAI’s first channel.”  (emphasis & coughing added)

Italy was on fire for several days over this event. In an editorial titled “The Silence of the Lambs,” Turin’s La Stampa said it was “frightening” that at least 1,700 Italians were being investigated for  ordering such material.

“They are links in a chain of monsters. They say good morning to you, talk about the health of their children, about politics, and all the while, an evil film is running through their brain.”

The Corriere della Sera newspaper wrote in its front-page editorial.

“From our comfortable seat in life … we never could have imagined that thousands of well-off adults, integrated and even cultured, find pleasure in seeing children tortured and killed.” 

The event happened after Russian and Italian police cracked an international pervert network selling expensive child “snuff” (murder porn) videos to clients in Italy, the U.S. and Germany. Why Lerner allowed a clip of snuff porn to air nationally (and then re-air one hour later!) remains a mystery. Perhaps Lerner himself — an outspoken pro-homosexual — was into this type of stuff? After 1000’s of complaints from horrified and enraged viewers jammed the switchboards of RAI, Lerner had to go. He delivered his ‘apology” on air and resigned.

Gad Lerner’s “co-religionists” in Russia dominated the child porn / snuff business in Yeltsin’s broken-down, Deep State-owned Russia. After stepping down from his position at the head of left-wing RAI, (Italy’s main channel) the Jew Lerner (who looks like a pervert himself) soon resurfaced as a big player in Italian media and left-wing politics.

Never before and never since has a scene of a boy being raped and killed been aired on television. Italians were shocked.

In another article from the UK Observer, published one week prior to the Italian TV scandal, we found some clues that the fall guys behind this monstrous business likely had higher-ups protecting them — or at least arranging to have their punishments mitigated.

It turns out that the main suspect — Dmitri Vladimirovich Kuznetsov — was arrested in Moscow for distributing thousands of sadistic child porn / snuff videos and images. He had been traced following the seizure of his filth from British perverts. In Italy alone, police seized 3,000 of Kuznetsov’s videos on their way to clients. The Italian investigators confirmed that the material included footage of children being murdered during the rape. They said that some of the clients had specifically requested murder videos.

Following are some excerpts from The Observer article, along with our observations:

UK Observer: A second Russian child porn ring, which allegedly had a British distributor, was broken up earlier this year… Since then there have been dozens of other finds. “We have seen some very, very nasty stuff involving sadistic abuse of very young children, but actual deaths on film takes it a whole step further. That is very worrying,” said one senior customs officer.
Analysis: This shows the sickness is widespread. Yet, we can recall no national wall-to-wall media uproar in the US or the UK over the fact that so many monsters were paying to watch the sodomizing and murdering of Russian children on film.

UK Observer: Though two men arrested with Kuznetsov have also been imprisoned by Moscow authorities, only one of the three remains behind bars. Dmitri Ivanov was sentenced to 11 years for actually participating in the abuse that was being filmed. The others were released under an amnesty aimed at clearing Russia’s overcrowded prisons.
Analysis: This lucrative business was booming in pre-Putin’s broken-down Russia of the Jewish Oligarchs. The fact that snuff producers were released in order to relieve “prison overcrowding” is evidence of higher-ups intervening. The very LAST people that any sane society would grant “amnesty” and such light sentences to would be child torturers / murderers.

UK Observer: When officers from the Moscow Criminal Investigation Department raided Kuznetsov’s flat they found two boys in a makeshift studio. They seized a huge quantity of films and other pornographic material as well as lists of clients in Italy, Germany, America and Britain.
Analysis: Who were these people that ordered snuff porn? We never did find out. Why didn’t “60 Minutes” or any of the “investigative journalists” from Sulzberger’s seditious stable of “Pulitzer Prize winners” ever do an in-depth investigation into this widespread underground crisis? Certainly, such a story would have had tremendous audience appeal.

UK Observer: The Italian police say they now have evidence against about 500 people. Among the suspects were businessmen and public employees. Hundreds of people are also under investigation in Germany.
Analysis: Italy, UK, Germany, USA — how many thousands of monsters are involved in this?

1. The international horror show is not a fictional “conspiracy theory,” and many elites are either directly involved, or willing to cover up for colleagues. / 2. Satanic witch Marina Abramovic. // 3. DC power-broker Tony Podesta (heavier man) collects snuff “art.” Both he and his brother, Clinton-hack John Podesta (thin man), are fans of Marina Abramovic, sadistic pedos, and child kidnapping suspects.

The 2007 Chicago Sun Times obituary for “Mama” Mary K. Podesta revealed that she “adopted” 25 children after moving to Washington DC.


Fake News NEVER investigates the international phenomenon of child kidnapping, trafficking rape and murder — but they’ll often run “fact-check” stories about us “conspiracy theorists” and our “baseless” claims. You see, a “conspiracy theorist” is to be hated and feared more than a child snuff practitioner! See headlines below.

Continued:

UK Observer: They cost between £300 and £4,000, depending on what type of film was ordered.
Analysis: Obviously, the snuff vids had to be the most expensive ones. Converting pounds into dollars and adjusting for the inflation of the past 21 years — that means that these individuals were paying today’s equivalent of $12,000 to watch a screaming boy get sodomized and murdered on film — one time. We therefore infer that some of the people possessing that type of throwaway money had to have been in high stations in life. And if one is willing and able to pay out that much money to view snuff on film, would he not pay even more (if he could afford it) to actually perform the acts on a live child himself?

UK Observer: Covert film of young children naked or undressing was known as a ‘SNIPE’ video. The most appalling category was code-named “Necros Pedo” in which children were raped and tortured until they died.
Analysis: Can you imagine the sheer terror a young boy or girl is sensing during “Necros Pedo?” Imagine if it were your child! Where’s the Greta Thunberg-like crusade against this global horror? How many normies are even aware of the extent of this?

UK Observer: Many customers repeatedly ordered videos from him. The Naples newspaper Il Mattino published a transcript of an alleged email exchange between a prospective client and the Russian vendors.
‘Promise me you’re not ripping me off,’ says the Italian.
‘Relax, I can assure you this one really dies,’ the Russian responds.
‘The last time I paid and I didn’t get what I wanted.’
‘What do you want?’
‘To see them die.’
Analysis: Hug your children / grandchildren and remember that this is why we fight these devils.

When you take an old story like this — with elements  of it clearly indicating the involvement of some “elites” — and then factor in the big names of certain individuals since definitively exposed as child-raping monsters; then the “debunked” assertion that Satanic child rapists sit at the head table of the “Big Club” which runs this world isn’t so “crazy” and not so debunkable after all.

These people, no, these monsters are sick, evil, numerous and, by necessity, CONSPIRATORIAL. They must all be publicly exposed and killed. Please share this.

1. “Sir” Edward Heath (1916-2005) was UK Prime Minister from 1970 to 1974 and Leader of the Conservative Party from 1965-1975. (story here) // 2. Dennis Hastert, US Speaker of the House from 1999-2007 (story here) // 3. Lord Mountbatten (1900-1979) — The last British Viceroy of India — was a member of the British Royal family and second cousin of Queen Elizabeth II. (story here)

Some more intriguing factoids:
* In our opinion — admittedly based upon circumstantial evidence — World War II instigator Winston Churchill was a boy rapist as well.

* The two atomic bombs dropped on Japan in 1945 were named “Fat Man” & “Little Boy.”
* Hollywood pedo-rapist rings covered up (here)
* CIA covered up rape of children by some of its employees (here)
* Pentagon covered up rapes of Afghan boys (here)

* State Department under Hillary Clinton covered up child rape (here)

The Satanic World of the White House’s New Monkeypox Czar

Demetre Daskalakis, the Sick Fuck Deputy Coordinator of the Derange White House National Monkeypox Response (Monkeypox was never a thing), is deep into everything satanic. He’s now one of the country’s leading public health officials (I have never see him/she/it/ or whatever the Fuck this is) in front of a camera addressing Anything. Here’s a look at his disturbing and fucked up social media pictures.

The spread of monkeypox in the United States is not a good look for the Biden administration which is heading towards mid-term elections. So, on August 2nd, some moves were made. Robert Fenton, the former acting head of FEMA was named “monkeypox coordinator” and Demetre Daskalakis, director of the CDC’s Division of HIV prevention, became his deputy.

Anthony Fauci, Chief Medical Advisor to the President said:

“From Bob’s work at FEMA leading COVID-19 mass vaccination efforts and getting vaccines to underserved communities to Demetre’s extensive experience and leadership on health equity and STD and HIV prevention, this team will allow the Biden Administration to further accelerate and strengthen its monkeypox response.”

Between the two, Robert Fenton is, by far, the “biggest” name. Considering the fact that he was in charge of FEMA’s response to 9/11 and Hurricane Katrina, he can already be considered a historical figure in US history. However, it is Daskalakis who is garnering 99% of media attention. Why? Because, like everything else in politics, the move had an important PR dimension attached to it.

One of the many headlines celebrating Daskalakis.

The main focus of media: Daskalakis is gay. That is quite an accomplishment. To his credit, he’s been active in places where monkeypox is being spread.

Daskalakis operated an HIV and hepatitis screening clinic out of a small office inside a Manhattan S&M club called Paddles, where men could pay $40 to party without their coats or clothes, according to the Atlantic. He also dressed in drag to administer meningitis vaccines at sex clubs and bath houses during an outbreak in New York City, NBC News reported. In an interview with The Atlantic, he claims to have learned his bedside manner from “East Village drag queens.”
– Daily Caller, Meet Joe Biden’s Monkeypox Czar — A Gay Doctor In Drag Who Wants To ‘Dismantle Stigma’

In a 2021 interview with Advocate, Daskalakis outlined his “plan” to eradicate HIV:

“To end the epidemic, we must have a clear focus on the STI and hepatitis [epidemics] and we must address the systemic racism, sexism, homophobia, and transphobia that hamper our progress. I’m thrilled that we are going to approach addressing HIV like a new outbreak all over again so we can end it.”

By using politically-charged words like “systemic racism, sexism, homophobia, and transphobia” to address a health issue, we can already see that there’s a clear ideological dimension to Daskalakis’ nomination.

But there’s even more to this. When Daskalakis is literally covered in satanic imagery. What does that say about “public health” in the United States and the White House in general?

Daskalakis wears a pentagram harness on the cover of Plus magazine. The unholy combination of PR, occultism, and public health.

Daskalakis’ social media accounts are filled with pics of him showcasing his tattoos which include an inverted pentagram and another one mocking Christ.

These pics caused some people to wonder: Did the White House appoint an actual satanist to become one of the nation’s “public health officials”?

As usual, media sources spun the story. In an article by The Advocate titled Why Are Conservatives Tearing Their Hair Out Over This Gay Doctor? we can read:

Trolls have targeted his tattoos shown on his personal Instagram page. Of the many tattoos, Daskalakis has one with a pentacle.

That’s what made others on social media lose it. A gay doctor posting thirst traps and baring a pentacle tattoo? Many came to the conclusion that he’s a satanist.

“I am certainly not a satanist,” Daskalakis tells The Advocate.

And why do people think he is? “It’s because I wear high-fashion harnesses by Zana Bayne,” he cheekily replies.

The harness has been making a splash in the fashion world for more than a year now. Also, the pentagram (or really a pentacle, since it has a circle around it) has been around for thousands of years, even predating Christianity. The HIV prevention specialist has tattoos including other iconography, including a more Christian-oriented one. Maybe it’s all about balance?

To spin this story, this article engaged in shameless disinformation. First, the tattoo is not a simple pentacle, it is an inverted pentacle – the same one that is used on the official logo of the Church of Satan.

The sigil of Baphomet – the official symbol of the Church of Satan. Daskalakis has pretty much this exact thing on his chest.

Here’s what Manly P. Hall, an actual occultist (and not a disinformation journalist), has to say about inverted pentagrams:

“In symbolism, an inverted figure always signifies a perverted power. The average person does not even suspect the occult properties of emblematic pentacles (…).

The black magician cannot use the symbols of white magic without bringing down upon himself the forces of white magic, which would be fatal to his schemes. He must therefore distort the hierograms so that they typify the occult fact that he himself is distorting the principles for which the symbols stand. (…)

The pentagram is used extensively in black magic, but when so used its form always differs in one of three ways: The star may be broken at one point by not permitting the converging lines to touch; it may be inverted by having one point down and two up; or it may be distorted by having the points of varying lengths.

When used in black magic, the pentagram is called the “sign of the cloven hoof,” or the footprint of the Devil. The star with two points upward is also called the “Goat of Mendes,” because the inverted star is the same shape as a goat’s head. When the upright star turns and the upper point falls to the bottom, it signifies the fall of the Morning Star.”
– Manly P. Hall, The Secret Teachings of All Ages

The article also purposely ignores the HUNDREDS of highly satanic pictures that can be found on Daskalakis’ Instagram accounts.

Satangram

Shortly after he got the job, Daskalakis’ Instagram account went private. Nevertheless, some sources managed to take a few screenshots. And they’re rather telling.

His personal account contained occult and satanic images such as this inverted pentagram and crucifix which appears to be used for ritualistic purposes.

Here, Daskalakis mocks the Christ – a recurring theme in his pictures.

Internet sleuths also discovered that Daskalakis followed The Satanic Temple on Instagram.

These pictures prove that he’s not simply “interested” in satanism and that he’s not just trying to be “edgy”. He’s deeply committed to it. It defines him. And there’s more.

Some years ago, Daskalakis and his partner Michael MacNeal founded Monster Cycle in NYC. And, long story short, it’s a satanic gym. That’s the only way to put it. The Instagram account of the gym contains every single occult and satanic symbol that was ever mentioned on The Vigilant Citizen.

The location of the gym itself is highly symbolic.

The gym is inside a former Church. Satanic black masses are all about desecrating Christianity and turning a church into a satanic shrine is the ultimate way of accomplishing this.

The workouts are framed as “rituals” (see the caption) and they take place pseudo-occult symbols. 

“Our version of Black Friday”: Black magic rituals.

Daskalakis’ personal Instagram account was tagged on this pic that features inverted crosses drawn in blood. He’s tagged on numerous pictures posted on this IG account.

In a photo taken by Daskalakis, Macneal poses in front of a giant inverted pentagram, while wearing a creepy plague mask … while posing as Jesus crucified.

The church’s stained glass windows were replaced with “art” such as this thing depicting the devil in the place of Jesus at the last Supper. Daskalakis poses proudly in front of it.

Devil. The caption of the pic: “It’s almost time to sell ur soul”. Is this really a spinning class? 

Daskalakis with his husband in front of 666 background.

666 is everywhere on that Instagram account.

The “Devil’s Night Event” is promoted using a picture from the highly satanic show Chilling Adventures of Sabrina.

The gym celebrates Halloween with a “blood rave” – a party where everyone is covered in blood (fake, hopefully). So, yes, they’re completely down with the occult elite’s obsession with human blood. 

A happy customer of the blood rave.

Do you need more proof that Dskalakis is involved in satanism? I mean, seriously. Look at that pic, read the caption and read the hashtags. 

Dozens of other highly symbolic pictures could be added. So, no, Daskalakis being highly invested in satanism is not an invention by “crazy conservative trolls”. It is an undeniable fact.

In Conclusion

When Daskalakis was first nominated as “monkeypox czar”, mass media went into full PR mode. Completely ignoring ex-FEMA director Robert Fenton, media coverage focused on Daskalakis’ sexual orientation. However, when it was revealed that Daskalakis was deeply invested in everything satanic, mass media went into full denial, even shamelessly plunging into full-on disinformation.

As seen in this article, Daskalakis is not simply “interested” in satanism, he’s completely defined by it. Let’s imagine for a second that he was Christian and that he posted a similar amount of Christian-themed pictures on his Instagram account. What would be the general consensus? That he’s a devout Christian. Well, using the same logic, one can assume that he’s a devout satanist.

With that being said, I couldn’t care less about his personal beliefs. However, he is now a leading public health figure in the country. And, since COVID, we’ve discovered (much to our horror) that “health officials” can be given sweeping, never-seen, God-like powers.

Should this kind of power be given to someone who is so obsessed with Satanism and everything that comes with it? His own social media posts revolve around the concepts of evil, death, blood, occult rituals, human sacrifices, and outright hatred of Christianity. Is this the kind of mindset you want from someone who wants to put a needle in your arm?

That’s gonna be a ‘no’ from meFUCK OFF

The Real Story Behind Drag Queen Story Hour

Drag Queen Story Hour—in which performers in drag read books to kids in libraries, schools, and bookstores—has become a cultural flashpoint. The political Right has denounced these performances as sexual transgressions against children, while the political Left has defended them as an expression of LGBTQ pride. The intellectual debate has even spilled into real-world conflict: right-wing militants affiliated with the Proud Boys and the Three Percenters have staged protests against drag events for children, while their counterparts in the left-wing Antifa movement have responded with offers to serve as a protection force for the drag queens.

Families with children find themselves caught in the middle. Drag Queen Story Hour pitches itself as a family-friendly event to promote reading, tolerance, and inclusion. “In spaces like this,” the organization’s website reads, “kids are able to see people who defy rigid gender restrictions and imagine a world where everyone can be their authentic selves.” But many parents, even if reluctant to say it publicly, have an instinctual distrust of adult men in women’s clothing dancing and exploring sexual themes with their children.

These concerns are justified. But to mount an effective opposition, one must first understand the sexual politics behind the glitter, sequins, and heels. This requires a working knowledge of an extensive history, from the origin of the first “queen of drag” in the late nineteenth century to the development of academic queer theory, which provides the intellectual foundation for the modern drag-for-kids movement.

The drag queen might appear as a comic figure, but he carries an utterly serious message: the deconstruction of sex, the reconstruction of child sexuality, and the subversion of middle-class family life. The ideology that drives this movement was born in the sex dungeons of San Francisco and incubated in the academy. It is now being transmitted, with official state support, in a number of public libraries and schools across the United States. By excavating the foundations of this ideology and sifting through the literature of its activists, parents and citizens can finally understand the new sexual politics and formulate a strategy for resisting it.

Start with queer theory, the academic discipline born in 1984 with the publication of Gayle S. Rubin’s essay “Thinking Sex: Notes for a Radical Theory of the Politics of Sexuality.” Beginning in the late 1970’s, Rubin, a lesbian writer and activist, had immersed herself in the subcultures of leather, bondage, orgies, fisting, and sado-masochism in San Francisco, migrating through an ephemeral network of BDSM (bondage, domination, sadomasochism) clubs, literary societies, and New Age spiritualist gatherings. In “Thinking Sex,” Rubin sought to reconcile her experiences in the sexual underworld with the broader forces of American society. Following the work of the French theorist Michel Foucault, Rubin sought to expose the power dynamics that shaped and repressed human sexual experience.

“Modern Western societies appraise sex acts according to a hierarchical system of sexual value,” Rubin wrote. “Marital, reproductive heterosexuals are alone at the top erotic pyramid. Clamouring below are unmarried monogamous heterosexuals in couples, followed by most other heterosexuals. . . . Stable, long-term lesbian and gay male couples are verging on respectability, but bar dykes and promiscuous gay men are hovering just above the groups at the very bottom of the pyramid. The most despised sexual castes currently include transsexuals, transvestites, fetishists, sadomasochists, sex workers such as prostitutes and porn models, and the lowliest of all, those whose eroticism transgresses generational boundaries.”

Rubin’s project—and, by extension, that of queer theory—was to interrogate, deconstruct, and subvert this sexual hierarchy and usher in a world beyond limits, much like the one she had experienced in San Francisco. The key mechanism for achieving this turn was the thesis of social construction. “The new scholarship on sexual behaviour has given sex a history and created a constructivist alternative to” the view that sex is a natural and pre-political phenomenon, Rubin wrote. “Underlying this body of work is an assumption that sexuality is constituted in society and history, not biologically ordained. This does not mean the biological capacities are not prerequisites for human sexuality. It does mean that human sexuality is not comprehensible in purely biological terms.” In other words, traditional conceptions of sex, regarding it as a natural behavior that reflects an unchanging order, are pure mythology, designed to rationalize and justify systems of oppression. For Rubin and later queer theorists, sex and gender were infinitely malleable. There was nothing permanent about human sexuality, which was, after all, “political.” Through a revolution of values, they believed, the sexual hierarchy could be torn down and rebuilt in their image.

There was some reason to believe that Rubin might be right. The sexual revolution had been conquering territory for two decades: the birth-control pill, the liberalization of laws surrounding marriage and abortion, the intellectual movements of feminism and sex liberation, the culture that had emerged around Playboy magazine. By 1984, as Rubin acknowledged, stable homosexual couples had achieved a certain amount of respectability in society. But Rubin, the queer theorists, and the fetishists of the BDSM subculture wanted more. They believed that they were on the cusp of fundamentally transforming sexual norms. “There [are] historical periods in which sexuality is more sharply contested and more overtly politicized,” Rubin wrote. “In such periods, the domain of erotic life is, in effect, renegotiated.” And, following the practice of any good negotiator, they laid out their theory of the case and their maximum demands. As Rubin explained: “A radical theory of sex must identify, describe, explain, and denounce erotic injustice and sexual oppression. Such a theory needs refined conceptual tools which can grasp the subject and hold it in view. It must build rich descriptions of sexuality as it exists in society and history. It requires a convincing critical language that can convey the barbarity of sexual persecution.” Once the ground is softened and the conventions are demystified, the sexual revolutionaries could do the work of rehabilitating the figures at the bottom of the hierarchy—“transsexuals, transvestites, fetishists, sadomasochists, sex workers.”

Where does this process end? At its logical conclusion: the abolition of restrictions on the behavior at the bottom end of the moral spectrum—pedophilia. Though she uses euphemisms such as “boy-lovers” and “men who love underaged youth,” Rubin makes her case clearly and emphatically. In long passages throughout “Thinking Sex,” Rubin denounces fears of child sex abuse as “erotic hysteria,” rails against anti–child pornography laws, and argues for legalizing and normalizing the behavior of “those whose eroticism transgresses generational boundaries.” These men are not deviants, but victims, in Rubin’s telling. “Like communists and homosexuals in the 1950’s, boy-lovers are so stigmatized that it is difficult to find defenders for their civil liberties, let alone for their erotic orientation,” she explains. “Consequently, the police have feasted on them. Local police, the FBI, and watchdog postal inspectors have joined to build a huge apparatus whose sole aim is to wipe out the community of men who love underaged youth. In twenty years or so, when some of the smoke has cleared, it will be much easier to show that these men have been the victims of a savage and undeserved witch hunt.” Rubin wrote fondly of those primitive hunter-gatherer tribes in New Guinea in which “boy-love” was practiced freely.

Such positions are hardly idiosyncratic within the discipline of queer theory. The father figure of the ideology, Foucault, whom Rubin relies upon for her philosophical grounding, was a notorious sadomasochist who once joined scores of other prominent intellectuals to sign a petition to legalize adult–child sexual relationships in France. Like Rubin, Foucault haunted the underground sex scene in the Western capitals and reveled in transgressive sexuality. “It could be that the child, with his own sexuality, may have desired that adult, he may even have consented, he may even have made the first moves,” Foucault once told an interviewer on the question of sex between adults and minors. “And to assume that a child is incapable of explaining what happened and was incapable of giving his consent are two abuses that are intolerable, quite unacceptable.”

French philosopher Michel Foucault, the father figure of queer theory, an academic discipline that seeks to subvert sexual hierarchies

Rubin’s American compatriots made the same argument even more explicitly. Longtime Rubin collaborator Pat Califia, who would later become a transgender man, claimed that American society had turned pedophiles into “the new communists, the new niggers, the new witches.” For Califia, age-of-consent laws, religious sexual mores, and families who police the sexuality of their children represented a thousand-pound bulwark against sexual freedom. “You can’t liberate children and adolescents without disrupting the entire hierarchy of adult power and coercion and challenging the hegemony of antisex fundamentalist religious values,” she lamented. All of it—the family, the law, the religion, the culture—was a vector of oppression, and all of it had to go.

The second prerequisite for understanding Drag Queen Story Hour is to understand the historical development of the art of drag. It begins with a freed slave named William Dorsey Swann, who dressed in elaborate silk and satin women’s costumes, called himself the “queen of drag,” and organized sexually charged soirées in his home in Washington, D.C. Over the course of his life, Swann was convicted of petty larceny—he had stolen books from a library and dinnerware from a private residence—and then, in 1896, was charged with “keeping a disorderly house,” a euphemism for running a brothel, and sentenced to 300 days in jail. From the viewpoint of modern sexual politics, the story has all the elements of the perfect left-wing archetype: Swann was a man who liberated himself from chattel slavery and then from a repressive sexual culture, despite the best efforts of the oppressors, the puritans, and the police.

Drag became explicitly political seven decades later, during the Stonewall riots of 1969, in which patrons of a gay bar in New York City rioted against police and began a wave of gay and lesbian political activism. As writer Daniel Harris explained in the counterculture journal Salmagundi, traditional drag performances from William Dorsey Swann until the mid-1960’s were sensual experiences, “an innocuous camp pastime,” but with the onset of the sexual revolution, they became forms of resistance and revolution. “After the 1960’s,” Harris wrote, “ideology [tightened] its grip on the aesthetic of drag when gay men began to use their costumes to reevaluate the whole concept of normality and thus carry out a crucial part of the cross-dresser’s agenda: revenge.” Drag performers increasingly saw their vocation as political and started street organizations such as Street Transvestite Action Revolutionaries in order to join the wave of activism rising through their communities in New York, San Francisco, and other hubs.

Suddenly, drag was not a private performance but a statement of public rebellion. The queens began using costume and performance to mock the fashion, manners, and mores of Middle America. In time, the need to shock required the performers to push the limits. “Men now wear such sexually explicit outfits as ball gowns with prosthetic breasts sewn on to the outside of the dresses, black nighties with gigantic strap-on dildos, and transparent vinyl mini-skirts that reveal lacy panties with strategic rips and telltale stains suggestive of deflowerment,” Harris noted. “The less drag is meant to allure, the bawdier it becomes, with men openly massaging their breasts, squeezing the bulges of their g-strings, sticking out their asses and tongues like porn stars in heat, and lying spread-eagle on their backs on parade routes with their helium heels flung into the air and their virginal prom dresses thrown over their heads.”

“The goal of drag, following Butler and Rubin, is to obliterate conceptions of gender through performativity.”

The next critical turn occurred in 1990, with the publication of Gender Trouble, by the queer theorist Judith Butler. Gender Trouble was a bombshell: it elevated the discourse around queer sexuality from the blunt rhetoric of Gayle Rubin to a realm of highly abstract, and sometimes impenetrable, intellectualism. Butler’s essential contribution was twofold: first, she saturated queer theory with postmodernism; second, she provided a theory of social change, based on the concept of “performativity,” which offered a more sophisticated conceptual ground than simple carnal transgression. Gender Trouble’s basic argument is that Western society has created a regime of “compulsory heterosexuality and phallogocentrism,” which has sought to enforce a singular, unitary notion of “sex” that crushes and obscures the true complexity and variation of biological sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, and human desire. Butler argues that even the word “woman,” though it relates to a biological reality, is a social construction and cannot be defined with any stable meaning or categorization. There is nothing essential about “man,” “woman,” or “sex”: they are all created and re-created through historically contingent human culture; or, as Butler puts it, they are all defined through their performance, which can change, shift, and adapt across time and space.

Butler’s theory of social change is that once the premise is established that gender is malleable and used as an instrument of power, currently in favor of “heterosexual normativity,” then the work of social reconstruction can begin. And the drag queen embodies Butler’s theory of gender deconstruction. “The performance of drag plays upon the distinction between the anatomy of the performer and the gender that is being performed. But we are actually in the presence of three contingent dimensions of significant corporeality: anatomical sex, gender identity, and gender performance,” Butler writes. “When such categories come into question, the reality of gender is also put into crisis: it becomes unclear how to distinguish the real from the unreal. And this is the occasion in which we come to understand that what we take to be ‘real,’ what we invoke as the naturalized knowledge of gender is, in fact, a changeable and revisable reality. Call it subversive or call it something else. Although this insight does not in itself constitute a political revolution, no political revolution is possible without a radical shift in one’s notion of the possible and the real.”

By the 2000’s, the performance of drag had absorbed all these elements—the social-justice origin story of William Dorsey Swann, the carnal shock-and-awe of Gayle Rubin, the ethereal postmodernism of Judith Butler—and brought them together onto the stage. The queer theorist Sarah Hankins, who performed extensive field research in drag bars in the Northeast, captured the spirit of this subculture and its ideology in a study for the academic journal Signs. Drawing on the work of Rubin and Butler, Hankins describes three genres of drag—straight-ahead, burlesque, and genderfuck—that range from stripteases and lap dances to simulations of necrophilia, bestiality, and race fetishism. Hankins describes the world of drag as a “sociosexual economy,” in which the members of “queerdom” can titillate, gratify, and reward one another with cash tips and money exchanges. “As an audience member, I have always experienced the tip exchange as payment for sexual gratification,” Hankins writes. “And I am aware that by holding up dollar bills, I can satisfy my arousal, at least partially: I can bring performers’ bodies close to mine and induce them to touch me or to let me touch them.” Or, as one of her research subjects, the drag queen Katya Zamolodchikova, puts it: “I’m literally out there peddling my pussy for dollar bills.”

The goal of drag, following the themes of Butler and Rubin, is to obliterate stable conceptions of gender through performativity and to rehabilitate the bottom of the sexual hierarchy through the elevation of the marginal. “The act of paying a dominant/domineering woman, a male supplicant, a hapless wage slave, or a boy allows the audience member to temporarily embody one or more of a number of ‘bad/unnatural’ social positions, for instance the pedophile, the closeted gay chickenhawk, the predatory female cougar, the sugar daddy or momma, even the sexualized youth/child themselves,” Hankins writes. And the discipline of “genderfuck” takes it a step even beyond adult–child sex. As Hankins describes, this style of performance “foregrounds tropes of primitivism and degeneracy as tools of protest and liberation” and seeks to subvert taboos against “pedophilia, necrophilia, erotic object fetishism, and human–animal sex.” These performances constitute the end of the line: the culmination of more than a century’s work, from the silk-and-satin drag balls to the hyper-cerebral politics of deconstruction to the annihilation of traditional notions of sex.

The final turn in the story of drag is, in some ways, the most surprising. As the dark side of drag pushed transgression to the limits, another faction began moving from the margins to the mainstream. Some drag queens—most notably, the drag performer RuPaul—toned down the routines, pushed the ideology deep into the background, and presented drag as good old-fashioned, glamorous American fun. Television producers packaged this new form of drag as reality programming, softening the image of the drag queen and assimilating the genre into mass media and consumer culture.

This provided an opportunity. As the queer theorists’ vanguard intellectual project was running aground on incest and bestiality fantasies, the most enterprising among them took a different tack: using the commercialization of drag and the goodwill associated with the gay and lesbian rights movement as a means of transforming drag performances into “family-friendly” events that could transmit a simplified version of queer theory to children. The key figure in this transition was a “genderqueer” college professor and drag queen named Harris Kornstein—stage name Lil Miss Hot Mess—who hosted some of the original readings in public libraries and wrote the children’s book The Hips on the Drag Queen Go Swish, Swish, Swish. Kornstein sits on the board of Drag Queen Story Hour, the nonprofit organization that was founded by Michelle Tea in 2015 to promote “family-friendly” drag performances and has since expanded to 40 local chapters that have organized hundreds of performances across the United States.

College professor Harris Kornstein, aka Lil Miss Hot Mess, a key figure in transforming drag performances into “family-friendly” events

Kornstein also published the manifesto for the movement, “Drag Pedagogy: The Playful Practice of Queer Imagination in Early Childhood,” with coauthor Harper Keenan, a female-to-male transgender queer theorist at the University of British Columbia. With citations to Foucault and Butler, the essay begins by applying queer theory’s basic premise of social constructivism and heteronormativity to the education system. “The professional vision of educators is often shaped to reproduce the state’s normative vision of its ideal citizenry. In effect, schooling functions as a way to straighten the child into a kind of captive alignment with the current parameters of that vision,” Kornstein and Keenan write. “To state it plainly, within the historical context of the USA and Western Europe, the institutional management of gender has been used as a way of maintaining racist and capitalist modes of (re)production.”

To disrupt this dynamic, the authors propose a new teaching method, “drag pedagogy,” as a way of stimulating the “queer imagination,” teaching kids “how to live queerly,” and “bringing queer ways of knowing and being into the education of young children.” As Kornstein and Keenan explain, this is an intellectual and political project that requires drag queens and activists to work toward undermining traditional notions of sexuality, replacing the biological family with the ideological family, and arousing transgressive sexual desires in young children. “Building in part from queer theory and trans studies, queer and trans pedagogies seek to actively destabilize the normative function of schooling through transformative education,” they write. “This is a fundamentally different orientation than movements towards the inclusion or assimilation of LGBT people into the existing structures of school and society.”

For the drag pedagogists, the traditional life path—growing up, getting married, working 40 hours a week, and raising a family—is an oppressive bourgeois norm that must be deconstructed and subverted. As the drag queens take the stage in their sexually suggestive costumes, Kornstein and Keenan argue, their task is to disrupt the “binary between womanhood and manhood,” seed the room with “gender-transgressive themes,” and break the “reproductive futurity” of the “nuclear family” and the “sexually monogamous marriage”—all of which are considered mechanisms of heterosexual, capitalist oppression. The books selected in many Drag Queen Story Hour performances—CinderelliotIf You’re a Drag Queen and You Know ItThe Gender WheelBye Bye, Binary, and They, She, He, Easy as ABC—promote this basic narrative. Though Drag Queen Story Hour events are often billed as “family-friendly,” Kornstein and Keenan explain that this is a form of code: “It may be that DQSH is ‘family friendly,’ in the sense that it is accessible and inviting to families with children, but it is less a sanitizing force than it is a preparatory introduction to alternate modes of kinship. Here, DQSH is ‘family friendly’ in the sense of ‘family’ as an old-school queer code to identify and connect with other queers on the street.” That is, the goal is not to reinforce the biological family but to facilitate the child’s transition into the ideological family.

After the norms of gender, sexuality, marriage, and family are called into question, the drag queen can begin replacing this system of values with “queer ways of knowing and being.” Kornstein and Keenan make no bones about it: the purpose of what they call drag pedagogy, or the “pedagogy of desire,” is about reformulating children’s relationship with sex, sexuality, and eroticism. They describe drag as a “site of queer pleasure” that promises to “turn rejection into desire” and “[transform] the labour of performance into the pleasure of participation,” and DQSH as offering a “queer relationality” between adult and child. They litter their paper with sexualized language and double entendres, blurring the lines between adult sexuality and childhood innocence. In fact, as the queer pedagogist Hannah Dyer has written, queer pedagogy and, by extension, drag pedagogy seek to expose the very concept of “childhood innocence” as an oppressive heteropatriarchal illusion. “Applying queer methods of analysis to studies of childhood can help to queer the rhetoric of innocence that constrains all children and help to refuse attempts to calculate the child’s future before it has the opportunity to explore desire,” Dyer writes.

The purpose, then, is to subvert the system of heteronormativity, which includes childhood innocence, and re-engineer childhood sexuality from the ground up. And drag performances provide a visual, symbolic, and erotic method for achieving this. Kornstein and Keenan’s language of the discipline—“pleasure,” “desire,” “bodies,” “girls,” “boys,” “glitter,” “sequins,” “wigs,” and “heels”—gives it away.

Of course, the organizers of Drag Queen Story Hour understand that they must manage their public image to continue enjoying access to public libraries and public schools. They have learned how to speak in code to NGO’s and to appease the anxieties of parents, while subtly promoting the ideology of queer theory to children. While many of Drag Queen Story Hour’s defenders claim that these programs are designed to foster LGBTQ “acceptance” and “inclusion,” Kornstein and Keenan explicitly dismiss those objectives as mere “marketing language” that provides cover for their real agenda. “Though DQSH publicly positions its impact in ‘help[ing] children develop empathy, learn about gender diversity and difference, and tap into their own creativity,’ we argue that its contributions can run deeper than morals and role models,” they write. “As an organization, DQSH may be incentivized to recite lines about alignment with curricular standards and social-emotional learning in order to be legible within public education and philanthropic institutions. Drag itself ultimately does not take these utilitarian aims too seriously (but it is quite good at looking the part when necessary).” In other words, as a movement, Drag Queen Story Hour has learned the dance of operating a cash-flow-positive activist organization, winning government contracts, and securing access to audiences, while providing a plausible rhetorical defense against parents who might question the wisdom of adult men creating “site[s] of queer pleasure” with their children.

This gambit has been remarkably successful. Drag Queen Story Hour began with voluntary programs at public libraries, which are required by law to provide equal access to organizations regardless of political affiliation or ideology. But within a few years, those state-neutral events have turned into state-subsidized drag performances for children. The New York City Council and New York Public Library have provided taxpayer funding directly to the Drag Queen Story Hour nonprofit, sparking a trend of state-subsidized drag readings, dances, and performances across the country. Next, the New York City Public Schools, with more than $200,000 in funding from the municipal government, began hosting dozens of drag performances in elementary, middle, and high schools in all five boroughs. Other political figures seem to want to go even further. The attorney general of Michigan has called for a “drag queen for every school.” California state senator Scott Wiener has suggested in a tweet that he might propose legislation to offer “Drag Queen 101 as part of the K–12 curriculum” and mandate that students attend Drag Queen Story Time as a way to “satisfy the requirement.” Both might have said this tongue in cheek—but in any case, these things have a way of going from joke to reality at the speed of light.

“New York City began hosting dozens of drag performances in public schools in all five boroughs.”

Though the spread of sexually charged drag performances has an aura of inevitability, one should keep in mind that transgressive ideologies always contain the seeds of their own destruction.

As the movement behind drag shows for children has gained notoriety and expanded its reach, some drag performers have let the mask slip: in Minneapolis, a drag queen in heels and a pink miniskirt spread his legs open in front of children; in Portland, a large male transvestite allowed toddlers to climb on top of him, grab at his fake breasts, and press themselves against his body; and in England, a drag queen taught a group of preschoolers how to perform a sexually suggestive dance.

Scenes from drag events hosted across the United States in bars, clubs, and outdoor festivals have been even more shocking and disturbing: in Miami, a man with enormous fake breasts and dollar bills stuffed into his G-string grabs the hand of a preschool-aged girl and struts her in front of the crowd; in Washington, D.C., a drag queen wearing leather and chains teaches a young child how to dance for cash tips; in Dallas, hulking male figures with makeup smeared across their faces strip down to undergarments, simulate a female orgasm, and perform lap dances on members of a roaring audience of adults and children. Newspaper headlines have also announced abuses: “Tucson High School Counselor Behind Teen Drag Show Arrested for Relationship with Minor”; “Houston Public Library Admits Registered Child Sex Offender Read to Kids in Drag Queen Storytime”; “Drag Queen Charged with 25 Counts of Felony Child Sexual Abuse Material Possession”; “Second ‘Drag Queen Story Hour’ Reader in Houston Exposed as Convicted Child Sex Offender”; “Drag Queen Story Hour Activist Arrested for Child Porn, Still Living with His Adopted Kids.”

Advocates of Drag Queen Story Hour might reply that these are outlier cases and that many of the child-oriented events feature drag queens reading books and talking about gender, not engaging in sexualized performances. But the spirit of drag is predicated on the transgressive sexual element and the ideology of queer theory, which cannot be erased by switching the context and softening the language. The philosophical and political project of queer theory has always been to dethrone traditional heterosexual culture and elevate what Rubin called the “sexual caste” at the bottom of the hierarchy: the transsexual, the transvestite, the fetishist, the sadomasochist, the prostitute, the porn star, and the pedophile. Drag Queen Story Hour can attempt to sanitize the routines and run criminal background checks on its performers, but the subculture of queer theory will always attract men who want to follow the ideology to its conclusions.

When parents, voters, and political leaders understand the true nature of Drag Queen Story Hour and the ideology that drives it, they will work quickly to restore the limits that have been temporarily—and recklessly—abandoned. They will draw a bright line between adult sexuality and childhood innocence, and send the perversions of “genderfuck,” “primitivism,” and “degeneracy” back to the margins, where they belong.

https://www.city-journal.org/magazine?issue=348

The Bikini Atoll Nuclear Testswere Faked

First published June 14, 2014

by Miles Mathis


The first Bikini Atoll nuclear tests took place in 1946, we are told. The Bikini Atoll is part of the
Marshall Islands in the East Indies. The tests were the first since the bombs dropped in Japan in 1945.
Two tests took place, called Able and Baker. Both were about 23 kilo-tonnes. For reference, the bomb dropped on Hiroshima was said to be 15 kt. They were detonated just 3.5 miles or 5.6 kilometers from shore.


The first strange thing to note is that the encyclopedia sites can’t figure out when either test took place. On the same page, Wikipedia tells us they took place on June 30 and July 24, or July 1 and July 25. It looks like they could get the story straight, after 68 years. I will be told that one is local time and one is UTC, but we don’t need both times. Choose one.
Since we have photos of both detonations, it is easy to study the two for continuity. Unfortunately, there is no continuity. The second photo disproves the first.
Here is Able, which took place first:


We will look at the ships in close-up in a moment, but the first thing you should notice is the little huts on the shore, and the palm trees.


That is a close-up of Baker. Also notice the little sunning deck, about 10 feet out in shallow water. Doesn’t look too sturdy, does it? So how did these wicker structures survive the first blast? The little trees didn’t lose a leaf after the Able detonation. Compare that tree near center to the same tree pre Able. Exactly the same fronds in the same positions. You will say the tree on the far right has lost all its fronds, but check the Able photo again: it didn’t have any to begin with. A real nuclear bomb detonated that nearby should have caused not only a tsunami, swamping this entire beach, it should have also caused a heavy wind. I remind you of the Nevada Trinity test films, with the wind ripping across the film sites miles away.

Those soldiers are said to be six miles from the blast, so the beach at Bikini Atoll was about twice as close. You can watch the wind from the Nevada Trinity blast here. [Trinity’s detonation was about the same size as Able and Baker.] There you can see the surge that should have been caused in both water and air by the Able and Baker detonations. And yet somehow that beach on the Bikini Atoll is exactly the same before and after the Able detonation.
I also urge you to study the black and white stripes painted on the trees in the Able and Baker photos. What are those for, you should ask. They are there to measure the water surge. The stripes act as a simple flood meter.


So the people involved apparently want you to think they are expecting a surge, but then they forget to fake the signs of one. If there had been a surge after Able, we should see some sign of it in the Baker photo. But we don’t. No lines appear on the trees. Even more damning is that we see no sand piled up in front of the trees (toward the beach). If there had been any wave caused by the blast, the sand would have piled up around the trunk of the tree.
You will say, “No, no, they swept that all away, to start fresh for the second test.” Right. And did they also rebuild the little structures in exactly the same configuration and same place, down to matching the sticks and the holes in the roofs?
Now let’s look at the ships. This is a close-up of Baker, taken from a 5137 x 2696px photo, so it has a lot of resolution.


I copied that with enough resolution that you can zoom in even more if you want to. If you think those black ships look real, I don’t know what to say. They shouldn’t be black, for a start. The nearer ships are lit from this side, so why aren’t the bigger ships? But an even better question is this: if you think they are black because they have been charred by the blast, tell me why they weren’t swamped by the blast? Why are they just sitting there upright? Again, they should have been hit by a strong surge in both air and water. Whoever faked this photo has tried to indicate the surge by whitening the water out in a circle, but the surge should be far stronger than that. As we see from the Trinity blasts, the detonation shouldn’t just throw water and air up, it should also throw both water and air out to all sides. A wave should be coming right at us here, in both water and air. So this photo has no continuity with the Trinity films, as well as no continuity with physics or logic. Remember, Baker was detonated underwater—halfway down to the sea floor—so why would it create this gigantic water spout up, but no wave to the side? We should see a large concentric water wave moving out from the blast, but we don’t.
When that huge spout of water and sea-floor sediment that we see going up came back down, we would get a second gigantic wave, possibly even larger than the first. And yet we are told that only 10 of 78 ships in the area were sunk. That makes no sense.
You will say that none of the stuff going up will come down, since it is all vaporized. But the stuff in the spout isn’t vapor. If it were vapor, it would look like the vapor above it. That is vapor. We don’t know what the stuff in the spout is, but to me it looks like a cat’s scratching post. Let’s zoom in a bit more:


First, study the edge of the spout, where it meets the background. Doesn’t look right, does it? It looks like one photo was superimposed on top of another, sort of like they do with green-screen now.
Next, stare at the spout itself for a moment. Looks a lot like carpet, doesn’t it? Is that a nuclear spout, or a cat’s scratching post?


That’s one brave kitty cat. And this gives a whole new meaning to “carpet bombing.”
Here’s another picture of the Baker detonation:


So many problems there it is hard to know where to start. First of all, the spout doesn’t match the other spout. The spout here is larger at the bottom and tapers up; the other doesn’t. This spout is surrounded by white foam; the other isn’t. If you answer that this photo is a few seconds later, allowing these things to change and develop, then you have to answer this, too: How did the white cloud above get smaller? If this is a few seconds later, allowing the white foam below to develop, why hasn’t the vapor cloud above expanded? The top of the cloud, containing the broccoli shapes, has expanded, so why would the white vapor halo beneath that have contracted? They forgot to match the photos to one another.
The ships here are also too big. We are at least three times farther away, but the ships next to the foam haven’t diminished in size proportionally. Another problem is the fall-off of light from right to left across the photo. See how the right side is bright and the left side is dark? Whoever faked this photo was trying to match the shadows on the sailors, which—as we can see—fall to the left. The sailors are bright to the right and dark to the left. But there wouldn’t be a shadow on the ocean as a whole. The sun to the right won’t cast a shadow to the left on the ocean! Just go outside in a field or on the beach or on the ocean or on a lake, in the morning or evening when the sun is to your right. Then see if it is darker overall to your left. I will tell you: it isn’t.
Finally, we have sailors watching without protective clothing, goggles, or—in at least one case—a
shirt. Even if these guys are ten miles out, this makes no sense. The blast is traveling out through the air. The expanding event doesn’t magically stop ten miles out, or even twenty, and they knew that at the time. Do you honestly think they knew enough about radiation and fission to build a successful bomb, but not enough to know how the event would travel through air? Even if they were so stupid or careless they couldn’t figure that out from equations, the earlier tests in Nevada would have told them that. The mushroom in Nevada was said to have traveled out many dozens of miles, and that was just the visible cloud. This was also after the events in Japan, where they tell us they saw the effects of radiation firsthand. So you have to be an idiot to accept this picture as real. Here’s a third photo of the Baker event, from the air:


As you can see, it doesn’t match either of the previous two. The overall shape of the halo is completely different in all three photos. Beyond that, the ambient cloud cover isn’t even close to matching. Here we have a very few tiny wispy clouds. In the second picture, we had lots of medium sized cumulus clouds. And in the first picture, we had a mostly cloudy sky.
You will tell me that in the previous pictures, we see signs that the blast blew the local clouds out of the near vicinity. In the first picture, we saw some clearing above the blast. But it has to be one or the other: either the blast will clear the clouds or it won’t. There is no halfway, as we see in this last photo. We should have a super strong wind, right? If the clouds are blown away, you wouldn’t expect to see a few wispy, very light clouds remaining. How did these little clouds dodge the wind?
For more proof, we can go to Goo gle. You can get a picture of the Bikini Atoll today from Google
Earth.


That’s dated 2013, not 1945. We are told the locals can’t live there now because of radioactivity, but we see at least three proofs against that. One, we see lots of plant life both on and offshore. Radioactivity affects plants just as it affects animals, so the island should be barren. Remember, the Bikini Atoll wasn’t said to be blasted by only Able and Baker. It was blasted 23 times, including three of the biggest blasts ever from US testing: the 4.5 megaton Navajo and the 5 megaton Tewa, in 1956; and the 15 megaton Bravo in 1954. Bravo was therefore 750 times more powerful than Baker. Multiply the Baker mushroom by 750 times. Since the average elevation of Bikini is only 7 feet above low tide, a blast that size inside the atoll would have sunk the entire island under a boiling sea of radiation. They admit that the crater from Bravo on the sea floor “is 2,200 yards across and 80 yards deep, shaking islands more than 120 miles away.” That’s a crater more than a mile and a quarter across. The heat created was almost 100,000 Fahrenheit, which is 9 times hotter than the surface of the Sun. The fireball was nearly five miles wide, and the mushroom rose to 60 miles.
But get this: just 10 years after the last nuclear blast there in 1958, the original residents were allowed to go back to Bikini. It was only after finding high levels of Strontium 90 in crabs that they were removed again. I beg you to read that closely, since it is stated in just that way at Wikipedia. They wanted to go back, they did go back, and the only reason they couldn’t stay was because of radiation tests on crabs? You have to be kidding me! The place should have looked worse than the surface of the Moon and been completely uninhabitable. The natives would have burst into tears and told the ship to turn around and get them out of there. Instead, they landed and began living there, only to be removed after tests. We are told that crops were replanted in 1968, and grew!
Beyond that, we see something is planted there in rows. Who planted it? Does that seem like a good place to plant a crop? Do you think that crop was planted by guys in radiation suits?


Finally, look at all the well maintained roads. Do you think those are left over from 56 years ago? I
will be told the US Army is using the Atoll to test radiation-tolerant plants. If so, the test looks
incredibly successful. Whatever they have injected into the plants and soil they should inject into
themselves, to make radiation-tolerant people. Oh, and don’t forget the radiation-tolerant cat:


In 2008, the Daily Mail in London admitted that sea life in and around the atoll is abundant, with huge coral trees growing underwater and schools of fish swimming in the mile-wide Bravo “crater.” What’s more, Wikipedia admits that diving tours have been given there since 1998. Do they swim in lead suits? Oh, they don’t need to because nuclear contamination can’t move through sea water, and doesn’t last for decades. Wrong. Just ask yourself this: is that what they are telling you about Fukushima: the sea water is blocking all release of radiation and it will only last a few years? No. If that were the case, Los Alamos National Laboratory could just throw all its high-level waste into the oceans. Why do you think they go to the trouble of burying that waste at great depths in unpopulated areas? Because according to the mainstream story, it will be hot for centuries. High-level waste has a very long half life, and while it is true that decommissioned bombs aren’t said to be as big a problem, it isn’t decommissioned bombs were are talking about here. It is exploded bombs. In exploded bombs—as in reactor cores—very high heats have been created, as well as large amount of fission. Over 42 megatons of fission yield were detonated in Bikini from 1946 to 1958. It is for this reason that the stories don’t add up. We are being told many contradictory things. If all these giant hydrogen bombs had actually been detonated there, the Bikini Atoll should not be now be green and cultivated, the coral and fish should not thrive there, no diving tours should be given there, and no natives should have ever
returned, even for a moment.
Also consider this: if the Bravo blast had really created surface temperatures of 100,000 Fahrenheit in a fireball five miles wide, that heat would have to dissipate in all directions, through all media. The sea would have boiled for many miles and the atmosphere would have been scorched for many more. The landmass of the Atoll would have been in or near the edge of that initial fireball, so we should ask what happens to land that is heated to that degree. Even if the temperature had dropped by a factor of ten at that distance from center, that would still indicate a temperature of the land of 10,000 Fahrenheit, which is the temperature they now give to the core of the Earth. If you heat land to that temperature and then let it cool, you wouldn’t expect it to just return to its original form, would you? If you heat sand and rocks and dirt to that temperature, it melts. In fact, it melts at about 1/5th that temperature, creating magma.
When it cools, it is then igneous rock. But the surface of the Bikini Atoll is still limestone and sand.
Limestone melts at 1,500 Fahrenheit, which is 67 times cooler than the temperature said to be created by Bravo.
Sand normally melts at above 2,000 Fahrenheit, so we should also see the beaches at Bikini turned to glass. We don’t.
So what does this faking indicate? I would say it indicates one of two things*: either the entire nuclear program has been faked to keep your ass under the desk, ducked and covered; or the nuclear program is real but our military didn’t wish to cause this amount of real destruction on our lovely home planet Earth. Those who are familiar with the scruples of the military wouldn’t bet on the second possibility, seeming to leave us with the first. However, the second possibility may have a variation: perhaps the military wasn’t allowed to run these tests. That implies someone or something which has the power to disallow the military from doing things, which leads us into other problems. I will leave that problem unsolved for now, only giving you a pointer, which is this: either someone behind our own government is more benevolent than we think, or someone behind the Russian government is more benevolent (and powerful) than we think, or the apparent benevolence we see here comes from some hidden third party.
Whatever explanation you choose to embrace should give you a surge of hope. Things may be bad, but they may not be quite as bad as the story we have been sold. The fact that our government has long been faking so many events gives you no reason to trust them, but it beats the hell of the events being real. Given the choice of an honest government and terrible real events or a dishonest government and terrible fake events, I will take the second any day.