1848 – 1913 PLANTING THE SEEDS OF EUROPE’S FUTURE ‘WORLD WARS’

1848

’SPRING TIME OF THE PEOPLES’; PRE-PLANNED
REVOLUTIONS AFFECT 50 COUNTRIES

Pre-planned uprisings – similar to today’s “color revolutions” – begin in Sicily in
January of 1848. Soon after, revolts “spontaneously” break out in 50 states
throughout Europe and South America. The rebel Reds and other groups demand
“democracy” (mob rule manipulated by the Banking Dynasties / Globalists).
Although there are legitimate grievances in any nation, and many of the 1848
reformers are sincere people with noble visions, the higher purpose of the revolts is
not to improve the lives of the people. The true goal is to subvert the authority of
existing governments and install “democratic” governments that can be easily
controlled by agents working for The New World Order.

The New World Order refers to a movement among banking, media and academic
elites – the legendary Rothschild Family foremost among them – with philosophical

roots dating back to the days of the French Revolution.

The N.W.O. envisions the future establishment of an integrated system of “Global
Governance” to be erected upon the ruins of the “Old World Order” – a world

based on sovereign and independent nations.

The controlled revolutions wreak havoc, causing thousands of deaths and leading to
political changes in some states. Within a year, the revolutions will have been put
down, but the political structure of Europe has now been weakened by the slow
poison of “liberalism”. Tsarist Russia, the hated enemy of the legendary Globalist
Rothschild Family, is unaffected by the Red tumult of 1848, but not for long.

1848 was a big year for the Globalists and their controlled ‘pro-democracy’ mobs
of Communists, Republicans and assorted dupes of varying stripes.

1848

KARL MARX PUBLISHES THE ‘COMMUNIST MANIFESTO’

As well-funded and well-organized revolutionary movements spread across
Europe, German-Jewish “philosopher” Karl Marx sets forth the goals of the
Communists. For all his lofty talk and empty promises of a “workers’ paradise” and
“social justice”, the Communist Manifesto is just an intellectual mask for the
Rothschild Family’s Globalist plan to enslave humanity under a New World Order.
Marx’s grandparents were actually related to the Rothschild Family, through
marriage. (1)
The Communists call for heavy income taxes, a Central Bank with monopoly on
credit, abolition of private land ownership and inheritance, state control over
communication, education, manufacturing, agriculture, and medicine. Marx refers to
this totalitarian scheme as ‘dictatorship of the proletariat (downtrodden masses).
Marx’s cult followers promote violence, class envy, and hostility towards free
markets, family, business, tradition, and Christianity. In addition to the angry misfits
and maladjusted criminals who worship Marx, there are many well-meaning idealists
who fall for Marx’s poisonous promises of a better world with security and prosperity
for all. These “useful idiots” are known, to this day, as “liberals” or
“progressives”. Their thoughtless idealism will unwittingly help the Reds and
Globalists greatly.

1 & 2 – The revolutionary philosophy and false promises of Marx & Engels will
destabilize Europe for many years to come. 3- George Orwell’s classic, ‘Animal
Farm’ is an allegorical expose of what idealistic Communism is really all about.

1865

JEWISH MOGUL ESTABLISHES REUTERS NEWS AGENCY

The Reuters Telegram Company is the world’s first major news organization.
Established by Paul Reuter (born Israel Bere.Josafat), Reuter’s builds a reputation in
Europe for being the first to report news ‘scoops’ from abroad, such as Abraham
Lincoln’s assassination. Almost every major news outlet in the world today subscribes
to Reuters’ services, which operates in over 200 cities in 94 countries in about 20
languages. The creation of the Reuters media empire marks the critical point in
history when Jewish moguls begin to dominate the press of Europe and the US.
Though the Reuters family founders and heirs have since passed away, the public
company today continues to vomit out pro-Globalist and pro-Zionist propaganda.

Jewish domination of the press, and thus, the public mind, began with Reuters

1870-71

FRANCE STARTS – AND LOSES – A WAR WITH THE GERMAN

STATE OF PRUSSIA

The Franco-Prussian War is a conflict between the French Empire of Napoleon III
(a nephew of Napoleon Bonaparte), and the Germanic Kingdom of Prussia. Prussia is
aided by a confederation of many smaller German states. The swift Prussian /
German victory thwarts French ambitions in central Europe, and brings about the end
of Napoleon III’s rule.
After the war, the French branch of the Rothschild Family steps up with a massive
bail out of the nearly bankrupt French government. The new government (The 3rd Republic) is again a “democracy”, bought and paid for by the Rothschild’s, and under
their influence more so than before.

Imperial France started the Franco-Prussian War, not the Germans. Right:
Prussian leader Bismarck (right) meets with the defeated Napoleon III.

JANUARY, 1871

GERMAN STATES DECLARE UNITY / GLOBALISTS SEEK TO

CONTROL NEW GERMAN EMPIRE

The Prussian / German victory over France brings about the unification of the
German states under Kaiser (King) Wilhelm I of Prussia. United Germany will soon
become the main economic power of continental Europe with one of the most
powerful and professional armies in the world.
Meanwhile, back in England, the Globalists plot to control the new German
nation. Although Jewish bankers thrive in Germany, Germany (like Tsar Alexander’s
Russia), has the capacity to shape its own destiny and thwart the ambitions of the
“City of London”. Not only is German politics outside of Rothschild’s total control,
but the fact that several German Royals are intermarried with British nobility
complicates ‘the City’s” ability to menace Germany with British power.
It will be 48 years before the new German nation can be brought under the
thumb of The New World Order. But the long-range plan goes into effect
immediately. Rothschild agent and future (as well as ex) “British” Prime Minister
Benjamin Disraeli plots against both Germany and Russia.

The voluntary unification of the German states gives rise to a great German Reich.

1871

THE NEW GERMAN REICH GRANTS CITIZENSHIP RIGHTS TO

JEWS / THE JEWS OF GERMANY PROSPER

Otto Von Bismarck is the Chancellor of the new German Reich under Kaiser
Wilhelm I. Through his skilled and energetic diplomacy, he will keep Germany out of
war, and the rest of Europe at peace.
Soon after united Germany is established, Bismarck’s government becomes the first
European nation to grant citizenship privileges to its Jewish population. (2) Even
Rothschild’s England has yet to do this. The UK’s Jewish Prime Minister (Disraeli)
holds office because he had “converted” to Christianity.
By the end of the 1800’s, this remarkable people will have obtained a great
degree of influence over German commerce, universities, press, politics, arts,

and Central Banking.

Bismarck, the political father of the German Reich, treated the Jews very well.
They prospered in tolerant Germany.

1874

REDS ATTEMPT TO KILL CHANCELLOR BISMARCK

A Jewish Red named Frederick Cohen had previously shot Bismarck when he was
Prime Minister of Prussia in 1866. Now, in 1874, terrorist Eduard Kullman attempts
to assassinate Chancellor Bismarck. Kullman’s gunshot strikes Bismarck’s hand.
Kaiser Wilhelm I and Chancellor Von Bismarck are the peacemakers of Europe, but
the New World Order crime gang would like these leaders dead so that mighty
Germany can be subdued under their thumb.

Kullmann (on right) nearly killed Bismarck.

OCTOBER, 1873

GERMANY, AUSTRIA-HUNGARY, & RUSSIA FORM ‘THE

LEAGUE OF THE THREE EMPERORS

Chancellor Bismarck negotiates an agreement between the monarchs of Austria-
Hungary (Emperor Franz Joseph), Russia (Czar Alexander II), and Germany

(Kaiser Wilhelm I). The alliance, known as The League of the Three Emperors, has
three purposes:

  1. The League serves as a mutual defense against the growing Red movements, which
    have menaced Europe with violence since 1848.
    .
  2. The League will avoid war among-st each other when diplomacy can resolve
    differences.
  1. The League opposes the expansion of French and British power, as well as plots to
    threaten the internal order of their countries.

The military and financial power of these three Empires forms a Central-Southern-
Eastern European power base that the Rothschild’s and their British & French “hit

men” cannot control. There can be no New World Order until this mighty
defensive coalition of Empires is somehow broken up and individually smashed.

British cartoon on left mocks The Three Emperors League. Bismarck is depicted as
puppet master of the Emperors.

1877-78

RUSSIA DEFEATS THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE (TURKEY) IN THE

RUSSO-TURKISH WAR

There are two main causes of the Russo-Turkish War. First, Russia desires to
reclaim vital Black Sea territory lost in the Rothschild-financed Crimean War of 20
years earlier. The other objective, or at least, the other stated objective, is to liberate
the Orthodox Christian Slavic populations of the Balkan states. Russia’s Orthodox
Christian and Slavic allies, Serbia, Montenegro, Romania, and Bulgaria, all rebel
against Turkey and fight with Russia. Claims of Turkish mistreatment of Bulgarian
Christians further upset the Russians.
Russia dominates the fighting, and begins advancing towards Istanbul
(Constantinople). Dismayed that Russia may capture Constantinople and even
Palestine from the beaten Turkish Empire, Britain’s Jewish Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli pressures Russia to accept a truce offered by Turkey. Britain sends ships to
the area to intimidate Russia and force a peace conference in Berlin, Germany.

Russia wins the Russo-Turkish War.

MAY 11 & JUNE 2, 1878

REDS MAKE TWO ASSASSINATION ATTEMPTS AGAINST

KAISER WILHELM I

Just days before the important international conference is due to take place in Berlin,
two assassination attempts are made against Kaiser Wilhelm I. On May 11, ’78, a
Red named Emil Max Hodel fires shots at the Emperor and his daughter as they
travel in their carriage. Hodel is captured and then executed in August.
Three weeks later, another Red named Karl Nobiling fires a gun at the Emperor. The
82 year old Kaiser is wounded, but he survives. Nobiling then shoots himself, and
dies 3 months later. The New World Order’s secret war against The Three Emperors
League, and all of Europe’s Christian Monarchs, is really starting to heat up.

The War on the Three Emperors Leagues heats up with two assassination attempts
against German Kaiser Wilhelm

JUNE, 1878

BENJAMIN DISRAELI PLAYS DIRTY TRICKS IN BERLIN

Rothschild-owned British Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli dominates the
conference which was called into session to settle the Russo-Turkish war. Britain,
Germany, Austria-Hungary, Russia, France, Italy, and Turkey attend the Congress of
Berlin. The Ottoman Turks still control the “The Holy Land”, but Britain and the
Rothschild’s wish to ultimately take over Palestine. Russia is committed to the
protection of Orthodox Christians throughout southern Europe and Turkey.
Before the Congress opens, Disraeli concludes a secret deal with Turkey against
Russia, in which Britain will keep the strategic island of Cyprus. (3) This gives
Disraeli an advantage, leading him to issue threats of war if Russia doesn’t comply
with the demands of the Turks, who had lost the war!
Another dirty pre-Congress deal is struck between Disraeli and Russia’s soon-to-be
ex-ally, Austria-Hungary. Slavic Orthodox Christians, including the Serbs of
Bosnia, are to be put under Austria-Hungary’s rule. Russia and its Slavic allies had
won the war against Turkey, but now many of the Slavs are to be transferred from
Turkish rule to Austro-Hungarian rule. This breeds resentment among the Slavic
subjects of Austria-Hungary, especially the Serbs of Bosnia who are forbidden from
uniting with the independent nation of Serbia. Court Intriguers on all sides have
put a permanent wedge between Russia and Austria-Hungary.

Devious Disraeli (right) dominated the Berlin Congress and undermined its host,
Bismarck (left). The “victorious” Russians weren’t happy about the deal, nor were
their Bulgarian allies, and nor were the Serbs living in Austro-Hungarian Bosnia.

JUNE, 1878

DISRAELI’S DIRTY TRICKS CAUSE THE BREAKUP OF THE

THREE EMPERORS LEAGUE

Chancellor Bismarck tries to keep the Disraeli-engineered controversies from
breaking up the Three Emperors League, but the humiliation of Russia at the hands of
Britain, Turkey, and Austria-Hungary is too much to bear. Russia pulls out of the
League. Instead of being allied with Germany (whom Disraeli also wants to isolate),
Russia is now cut off from her, and placed in a position where it can be played off
against Germany’s ally, Austria-Hungary – a classic divide & conquer scheme.
The foundation of the Great War of 1914-1918 (World War I) was laid at the
Congress of Berlin, thanks to the dirty work of the Globalist-Zionist Benjamin
Disraeli. .Upon returning to England, Disraeli boasts to Queen Victoria of how he
killed the Three Emperor’s League.

By causing the Three Emperors League to split, dirty Disraeli laid the foundation
for the Global bloodbaths of the coming century.

1882

THE ANGLO – EGYPTIAN WAR / ROTHSCHILD’S BRITAIN

ADVANCES TOWARDS PALESTINE

The Zionists dream of one day capturing the Holy Land (currently under Ottoman
Turkish control). Recall how years earlier, with Ottoman Turkey on the brink of total
defeat, Benjamin Disraeli intervened to keep the Russians away from Palestine. Now,
the Zionists are positioning their “chess pieces” towards the next step.
When the British-French Suez Canal opens in 1869, it is Benjamin Disraeli’s Britain;
with Rothschild financing that purchases enough shares to make Britain the main
shareholder of the waterway linking the Mediterranean to the Red Sea.
By 1882, the Canal’s host nation, Egypt, is being treated like a colonial subject of
Britain. Always waging war under false pretenses, Rothschild’s UK attack-dog picks
a fight with Egypt, under the pretext of “protecting the Suez Canal.” During the
Anglo-Egyptian War, the British bomb Alexandria and invade Cairo. Rothschild’s
Britain becomes master of Egypt. During World War I, Egypt (which borders
Palestine) will be a useful staging post to launch attacks on Turkey. Palestine
(Israel) is now within the Zionist Rothschild Family’s reach.

Egypt’s strategic location and proximity to Palestine are coveted by the Rothschild’s.

JUNE, 1887

‘THE REINSURANCE TREATY’ / GERMANY AND RUSSIA FORM

A SECRET ALLIANCE

Although the British-Rothschild agent Disraeli had destroyed The Three Emperors
League (Russia /Germany/Austria-Hungary), German Chancellor Bismarck continues
to work for peace. To “reinsure” the peace of Eastern Europe, and to prevent British
or French intrigue from starting more wars, Bismarck’s Germany and Tsarist
Romanov Russia agree to a secret treaty known as “The Reinsurance Treaty”.
Under the terms of the agreement, Germany and Russia agree to remain neutral
should either become involved in war with a third nation. However, neutrality would
not apply if Russia attacks Germany’s ally, Austria-Hungary.
The two powers remain vulnerable to the Balkan controversy in Austria-Hungary
(Russia is the protector of the minority Slavic/Orthodox community under Austrian
rule, and also of small Slavic states like Serbia) .Nonetheless, the Reinsurance Treaty
is a very good sign that Russia and Germany will be able to work out any future
differences diplomatically.

Bismarck worked to keep France & Britain from getting Germany and Russia to
fight. Right: Bismarck with Russian Prince Andrey Lieven

APRIL 20, 1889
ADOLF HITLER IS BORN

At a time when the dark forces of the New World Order were already setting the
chess pieces for the future war to enslave Germany, Adolf Hitler, the man who
would become their greatest nemesis (I’ll explain later), is born into a very simple Austrian family.

Klara Hitler, Alois Hitler and baby Hitler

1890

NEW GERMAN KAISER DISMISSES BISMARCK / TURNS DOWN
RUSSIAN OFFER TO RENEW THE REINSURANCE TREATY
Kaiser Wilhelm I passes away in March of 1888 at the age of 91. He is succeeded by
his son Frederick I, who dies of throat cancer after a reign of just 3 months.
Frederick’s 29 year old son Wilhelm II then becomes Kaiser in June of 1888.

Like many young, “educated” Europeans, Wilhelm II is partially infected with the
poison of “liberalism”. Whereas ‘Iron Chancellor”’ Bismarck wants to smash the Reds
of Germany, young Wilhelm is hesitant to crush the Communists. He believes that if
Germany becomes more “democratic”, it will pacify the Red agitators. Wilhelm II
also wants better relations with the UK, the enemy of Russia. To that end, Wilhelm,
(possibly under the influence of NWO court intriguers) turns his back on Russia,
refusing repeated Russian requests to renew Bismarck’s Reinsurance Treaty.
These irreconcilable differences lead Wilhelm to dismiss the legendary Bismarck in

  1. As the grandson of Britain’s Queen Victoria, Wilhelm evidently believes that
    he can trust and befriend Britain (which really belongs to the Rothschilds, not
    Victoria). He also believes that he can solve problems with Russia by negotiation.
    Russia now feels isolated and mistrusts Germany’s ally, Austria-Hungary. This leaves
    Russia very vulnerable to French and British intrigue. .History will prove that wise
    old Bismarck was right, and naive young Wilhelm was wrong.
“Dropping the Pilot” – British cartoon mocks the dismissal of the great statesman
and peacemaker. Bad move Kaiser Wilhelm!

JANUARY, 1894

RUSSIA ENTANGLED INTO A ‘FRANCO-RUSSIAN ALLIANCE
Isolated from Germany and suspicious of Austria-Hungary, Russia (which wants
another crack at Turkey), falls into a clever trap set by France (which wants
another crack at Prussia/Germany) and Rothschild NWO agents (who have a
much bigger picture in mind). The Franco-Russian Alliance creates an
entangling military alliance between the two nations. The Russian giant can now

be used to create a deadly 2nd front in any future war with Germany. This is what
German Chancellor Bismarck had worked so hard to avoid!
The great Russian novelist Leo Tolstoy (War and Peace) passionately condemns
the Franco-Russian Alliance as a French trick to entangle Russia in a future war
against France’s enemy (Germany). Tolstoy sarcastically describes the suddenly
friendly French as “people who, without reason, suddenly professed
such spontaneous and exceptional love for Russia”.

1- Bismarck’s nightmare; French magazine glorifies the Franco-Russian Alliance.
2 & 3: Tolstoy warned of the danger: “The Franco-Russian alliance cannot now
present itself as anything else than what it is: a league of war.”

1896

GLOBALIST – ZIONIST PURCHASES THE NEW YORK TIMES
Since its founding in 1851 by Republican Henry Jarvis Raymond, The NY Times has
been a big player in shaping public opinion. In 1896, the Times takes a turn to the
internationalist left when it is purchased by a German-Jew named Adolph Ochs. In
1897, Ochs himself coins the paper’s self-serving slogan: “All the News That’s Fit
to Print”
Ochs’ daughter marries Arthur Hays Sulzberger, who becomes publisher when
Adolph dies. Ochs’ great grandson Arthur Ochs Sulzberger, Jr. is the publisher of
the NY Times today. For 117 years, America’s most influential.rag has been in the
hands of the same Zionist-Marxist family. Count on The Times to promote big
government, Globalism, phony environmentalism, Israel, the Fed, and endless wars.

Above: Adolph Ochs / The awesome power and influence of the New York Times
Jewish Ochs & Sulzberger dynasty cannot be denied.

AUGUST, 1897

THE 1ST ZIONIST CONGRESS MEETS IN BASEL SWITZERLAND /

THE PLOT TO STEAL PALESTINE IS HATCHED

The First Zionist Congress is held in Basel, Switzerland and is chaired by
Theodore Herzl. Jewish delegates from across Europe agree that Palestine should be
given to them. The idea of a Jewish takeover of Palestine had been floating around
for decades. Whenever Russia advanced its interests in the area, Rothschild’s Britain
would keep Russia out.
The problem is, Palestine is 90-95% Arab, and falls under the sovereignty of the
Ottoman Turks. Unless the Turks agree to give Palestine to the Jews, the Zionist
dream cannot be realized.
In 1901, the Zionists will offer to arrange a reduction of Turkey’s foreign debt (owed
to Zionist bankers) in exchange for Palestine. The Sultan of Turkey bluntly refuses.
Giving away the Holy Land to the Zionists would be a betrayal of Turkey’s, and
Palestine’s, Muslim population.
Herzl refuses to give up. The British offer to give the Jews part of the African colony
of Uganda. The Zionists refuse, insisting upon Palestine. Prior to his death in 1904,
Herzl predicts that a world body will one day give Palestine to the Jews, and that he
will go down in history as father of the Jewish State. For Herzl’s dream to come
true, a European military power will have to be manipulated into taking
Palestine away from the Ottomans by force.

Palestine lies deep within Ottoman territory. But Herzl has a long range plan. He
speaks of a “future world body” that will give the Jews a homeland in Palestine.

DECEMBER 8, 1897

THE DYING BISMARCK’S FINAL WARNING AND PREDICTION
Former German Chancellor Bismarck is now 83 years old and in poor health. Kaiser
Wilhelm II visits Bismarck for the last time in December of 1897. Again, the wise old
man warns the Kaiser to beware of the intrigues of courtiers around him, and of a
European disaster that may yet still come.
Bismarck warns Wilhelm not to trust court advisors:”Your Majesty, so long as you
have this present officer corps, you can do as you please. But when this is no longer
the case, it will be very different for you.”
Subsequently, Bismarck makes these accurate predictions:”… the crash will come
twenty years after my departure if things go on like this.” …..”One day, the great
European War will come out of some damned foolish thing in the Balkans.” (9)
This prophecy will be fulfilled almost to the year! .Bismarck knew that a Balkan
crisis could result in a 2-front war against Britain & France in the west, Russia in the
east, plush an internal Red uprising on the home front.

Bismarck foresaw the evil plot against Germany.

1898

U.S. STARTS A WAR WITH SPAIN TO GAIN A GLOBALIST

FOOTHOLD IN ASIAN PACIFIC

Using the ridiculous pretext of “liberating Cuba” and
a false accusation against Spain for the sinking of the
USS Maine, a warmongering faction of the American
Congress and “Yellow Press” are able to impose the
phony Spanish-American War upon a very reluctant
President William McKinley.


The true purpose of the war is to take Spain’s Pacific
Ocean naval bases in the Philippines and Guam. The
“crisis” of the war is also used to pass a
Congressional decree to annex Hawaii as a U.S.
territory, against the wishes of the native Hawaiians.
The Spanish-American War, and the U.S. – Philippines War which grows out of it,
are major turning points in the Globalist drive to dominate East Asia. These events
mark the true origin of the war with Japan which is to come 43 years later.

Within 24 hours of the start of the war to “free Cuba”, acting Naval Secretary
Theodore Roosevelt ordered Commodore Dewey to destroy the Spanish fleet in the
Philippines. The true, long range purpose was to achieve dominance over Asia.

APRIL, 1904

THE ‘ENTENTE CORDIAL’ / UK & FRANCE FORM AN ALLIANCE

/ GERMANY IS SUSPICIOUS

The Entente Cordiale is a series of agreements signed between France and Great
Britain. The agreements settle issues regarding colonial expansion and mark the end
of a centuries old era of on and off conflict between France and Britain.
Germany views the new alliance with great suspicion, especially because France had
already allied itself with Russia in 1892. The “chess pieces” of Europe are clearly
being set in preparation of the Big Game to come. The Anglo-French alliance will
one day entangle the U.S. as well. These nations will serve as the military “hit
men” of the New World Order.

German cartoon: John Bull (UK) walks by with his French whore as an armed
Germany looks on with suspicion. The forerunner of modern day NATO is born.

1905

ZIONIST BANKERS & REDS ATTEMPT REVOLUTION IN RUSSIA
The attempted Russian Revolution of 1905 is a wave of political uprisings, massive
labor strikes, and terrorist acts against the government of Russia. The Reds (under
orders from their Rothschild / Schiff masters) use the discontent surrounding the lost
war with Japan (financed by Schiff) to foment the revolution. From 1905 to 1909, Red
terrorists will kill 7,300 people and wound about 8,000.
Though the Jewish-inspired Red Revolution is suppressed, Tsar Nicholas II is forced
to make “democratic” concessions which weaken his power and set him up for a
future attempt. Nicholas makes a critical mistake by showing mercy to Red leaders
such as Lenin and Trotsky. Instead of executing the Marxist leaders, the Russians
merely arrest or deport them.
Lenin finds his way to Switzerland, and Trotsky ends up in New York after escaping
from prison. The exiled Communists will one day return, with more money from the
Zionist bankers, to terrorize Christian Russia once again.

1- Trotsky (center) and his Jewish-Marxist gang hung out in New York. 2- Jewish
Wall Street banker Jacob Schiff weakened Russia by financing Japan’s victorious
war effort

QUOTE TO REMEMBER

“The Jews have undoubtedly to a large extent furnished the brains and energy in
the revolution throughout Russia.”
George von Longerke / US Ambassador to Russia

1905

THE MYSTERIOUS PROTOCOLS OF THE LEARNED ELDERS OF

ZION IS PUBLISHED IN RUSSIA

Russian Professor Sergei Nilus publishes a full version of The Protocols of the
Learned Elders of Zion, a controversial document discovered a few years earlier.
The Protocols are alleged to be the minutes of a secret meeting of Jewish elites in
which a master plan for world domination, to be completed over the next 100
years, is laid out in chilling detail.
The Protocols tell of Jewish control of world banking, world media, Communism,
liberalism, and political parties of every type. The master plot includes plans to:
Destroy the Catholic Church and all Christianity
Promote Atheism
Wage class warfare / labor against management
Overthrow Tsarist Russia
Corrupt the morals of the people
Promote senseless “modern art” and dirty literature
Use anti-Semitism to keep “lesser Jews” cohesive
Manipulate women with ideas of “liberation”
Create economic depressions and inflations
Create “controlled opposition” to themselves
Use state debt as a weapon to enslave countries
Subvert and control all existing governments
Install tainted politicians that can be blackmailed
Manipulate college students with phony idealism
Assassinate world leaders
Spread deadly diseases
Use balance of power politics to control nations
Commit acts of terrorism
Promote sports and games to divert people
Start a World War which will include the USA
Set up world government after an economic crash
Some allege that the Protocols were forged by Russian security agents in order to
convince the Tsar Nicholas II of the New World Order’s existence. Although the
authenticity of the document remains in question, world events of the coming decades
will match the Protocols so closely that the document becomes a worldwide sensation
during the 1920’s and ’30’s. Forgery or not, whoever wrote it had an unusual
knowledge and spooky prescience.

Professor Nilus translated the Protocols; since re-translated widely.

MARCH 25, 1906

ZIONIST-OWNED NEW YORK TIMES PUBLISHES FALSE CLAIM
THAT 6 MILLION JEWS FACE EXTERMINATION IN RUSSIA

*Smaller newspapers later picked up the claim too.

1907

TRIPLE ENTENTE BRINGS EUROPE CLOSER TO WAR!


The Triple Entente (from French entente, “agreement”) is a military alliance

between the UK, France, and Russia, concluded after the signing of the British-
Russian Entente in 1907. Of course, Rothschild Britain is not allying with Russia out

of any friendship. The Globalist goal is to draw Russia into fighting Germany &
Austria-Hungary from the east. After Russia, Germany, and Austria-Hungary exhaust
themselves, all three former allies can then be subverted from within by Communists
and/or liberals, controlled by the Globalists.
The Triple Entente is the counterweight to the 1882 Triple Alliance (or Central
Powers) of Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Italy. Rothschild & Warburg agents are
also at work within The Triple Alliance. Italy later switches sides and is replaced by
the Ottoman Empire (Russia’s nemesis). The two alliances have been cleverly set up
as mechanisms for the purpose of triggering the coming world war to rearrange

Europe, and the world. One little incident in the Balkan region of southern Austria-
Hungary is all that it will take to ignite the two alliance powder kegs, and drag the

powers of Europe (and America) into a massive war. The New World Order and its
agents will skillfully manipulate the patriotic passion of the various nations so as
to bring about a disaster that will benefit Zionism, Communism, and Globalism.

Germany & Austria-Hungary are boxed-in by The Triple Entente. The three ladies
in the Russian propaganda poster represent France, Russia and Britain.

NOVEMBER, 1912

NEW WORLD ORDER GANG CAPTURES THE U.S. PRESIDENCY /
TEDDY ROOSEVELT RUNS INTERFERENCE FOR WILSON
After decades of strategic political preparation, the New World Order now has 7
major goals its wants to achieve in the coming decade:

  1. Establish a Central Bank in the U.S.
  2. Impose an Income Tax on America so that State debt to the Central Bank can be
    collateralized with human labor
  3. Trigger the long planned Triple Entente-Triple Alliance war to reshape Europe
  4. Entangle the U.S. in the coming war and World Organization
  5. Finish off Russia and convert the Eurasian giant into a Red tyranny
  6. Establish a World Political Body under the pretext of “world peace”
  7. Carry out Herzl’s plan to steal Palestine from the Turks and Arabs.
    Popular U.S. President William Howard Taft will never involve America in such
    treasonous schemes. So the Globalists recruit Woodrow Wilson, a Princeton
    professor who is rocketed to Governor of New Jersey, then to Democrat nominee for
    President. To steal Republican votes from Taft, ex-President Roosevelt runs as the

Progressive Party candidate (aka Bull-Moose). The divide & conquer trick works.
Due to TR’s meddling; Wilson wins with just 41% of the vote.

TR’s interference undermined Taft (center) and enabled Puppet Wilson (right) to
become President and make a HUGE mess of the world.

1910-1920

NEW AMERICAN ZIONIST KINGPINS EMERGE
The Rothschild orbit includes other Zionist bankers who emerge as giants in their
own right. These “American” moguls will dominate the 8-year Presidency of
their pathetic puppet, Woody Wilson.
JACOB SCHIFF: .The Schiff Family shared a home with the Rothschilds in
the 1700’s. Schiff helped Japan defeat Russia in 1905. He also funds the
NAACP and the ADL.
BERNARD BARUCH: .Baruch first introduced Woodrow Wilson to the
wealthy Jewish community of New York City. According to one account,
“Baruch led Wilson as one would a poodle on a string”. During World
War I, Baruch will head up Wilson’s War Industries Board, making him the
most powerful figure in U.S. industry.
THE WARBURG BROTHERS: .‘German.banker.Paul Warburg will soon
become the “Father of the U.S. Federal Reserve” – a private banking and stock
manipulation syndicate which collects interest for the privilege of printing the
nation’s currency. His son James will set up the United World Federalists in
1947 to openly promote the world government. His brother, Max is a very
powerful banker in Germany, and his other brother, Felix, a ‘philanthropist’,
uses his fortune to promote Globo-Zionist causes.

Other Zionist power players of that era

“Against Our Better Judgment” by journalist and historian Alison Weir
reveals how early Zionists manipulated Wilson, and others.

Why Orwell (Eric Arthur Blair) Matters…

Eric Arthur Blair

Most people think that George Orwell was writing about, and against, totalitarianism – especially when they encounter him through the prism of his great dystopian novel, Nineteen Eighty-Four.

This view of Orwell is not wrong, but it can miss something. For Orwell was concerned above all about the particular threat posed by totalitarianism to words and language. He was concerned about the threat it posed to our ability to think and speak freely and truthfully. About the threat it posed to our freedom.

He saw, clearly and vividly, that to lose control of words is to lose control of meaning. That is what frightened him about the totalitarianism of Nazi Germany and Stalinist Russia – these regimes wanted to control the very linguistic substance of thought itself.

And that is why Orwell continues to speak to us so powerfully today. Because words, language and meaning are under threat once more.

Totalitarianism in Orwell’s time

The totalitarian regimes of Nazi Germany and Stalin’s Soviet Union represented something new and frightening for Orwell. Authoritarian dictatorships, in which power was wielded unaccountably and arbitrarily, had existed before, of course. But what made the totalitarian regimes of the 20th century different was the extent to which they demanded every individual’s complete subservience to the state. They sought to abolish the very basis of individual freedom and autonomy. They wanted to use dictatorial powers to socially engineer the human soul itself, changing and shaping how people think and behave.

Totalitarian regimes set about breaking up clubs, trade unions and other voluntary associations. They were effectively dismantling those areas of social and political life in which people were able to freely and spontaneously associate. The spaces, that is, in which local and national culture develops free of the state and officialdom. These cultural spaces were always tremendously important to Orwell. As he put it in his 1941 essay, ‘England Your England’: ‘All the culture that is most truly native centres round things which even when they are communal are not official – the pub, the football match, the back garden, the fireside and the “nice cup of tea”.’

Totalitarianism may have reached its horrifying zenith in Nazi Germany and Stalin’s USSR. But Orwell was worried about its effect in the West, too. He was concerned about the Sovietisation of Europe through the increasingly prominent and powerful Stalinist Communist Parties. He was also worried about what he saw as Britain’s leftwing ‘Europeanised intelligentsia’, which, like the Communist Parties of Western Europe, seemed to worship state power, particularly in the supranational form of the USSR. And he was concerned above all about the emergence of the totalitarian mindset, and the attempt to re-engineer the deep structures of mind and feeling that lie at the heart of autonomy and liberty.

Orwell could see this mindset flourishing among Britain’s intellectual elite, from the eugenics and top-down socialism of Fabians, like Sidney and Beatrice Webb and HG Wells, to the broader technocratic impulses of the intelligentsia in general. They wanted to remake people ‘for their own good’, or for the benefit of the race or state power. They therefore saw it as desirable to force people to conform to certain prescribed behaviours and attitudes. This threatened the everyday freedom of people who wanted, as Orwell put it, ‘the liberty to have a home of your own, to do what you like in your spare time, to choose your own amusements instead of having them chosen for you from above’.

Edmond O’Brien as Winston Smith and Jan Sterling as Julia, in an adaptation of Nineteen Eighty-Four, 3 June 1955.

In the aftermath of the Second World War, this new intellectual elite started to gain ascendancy. It was effectively a clerisy – a cultural and ruling elite defined by its academic achievements. It had been forged through higher education and academia rather than through traditional forms of privilege and wealth, such as public schools.

Orwell was naturally predisposed against this emergent clerisy. He may have attended Eton, but that’s where Orwell’s education stopped. He was not part of the clerisy’s world. He was not an academic writer, nor did he position himself as such. On the contrary, he saw himself as a popular writer, addressing a broad, non-university-educated audience.

Moreover, Orwell’s antipathy towards this new elite type was long-standing. He had bristled against the rigidity and pomposity of imperial officialdom as a minor colonial police official in Burma between 1922 and 1927. And he had always battled against the top-down socialist great and good, and much of academia, too, who were often very much hand in glove with the Stalinised left.

The hostility was mutual. Indeed, it accounts for the disdain that many academics and their fellow travellers continue to display towards Orwell today.

The importance of words

Nowadays we are all too familiar with this university-educated ruling caste, and its desire to control words and meaning. Just think, for example, of the way in which our cultural and educational elites have turned ‘fascism’ from a historically specific phenomenon into a pejorative that has lost all meaning, to be used to describe anything from Brexit to Boris Johnson’s Tory government – a process Orwell saw beginning with the Stalinist practice of calling Spanish democratic revolutionaries ‘Trotsky-fascists’ (which he documented in Homage to Catalonia (1938)).

Or think of the way in which our cultural and educational elites have transformed the very meanings of the words ‘man’ and ‘woman’, divesting them of any connection to biological reality. Orwell would not have been surprised by this development. In Nineteen Eighty-Four, he shows how the totalitarian state and its intellectuals will try to suppress real facts, and even natural laws, if they diverge from their worldview. Through exerting power over ideas, they seek to shape reality. ‘Power is in tearing human minds to pieces and putting them together in new shapes of your own choosing’, says O’Brien, the sinister party intellectual. ‘We control matter because we control the mind. Reality is inside the skull… You must get rid of these 19th-century ideas about the laws of nature.’

In Nineteen Eighty-Four, the totalitarian regime tries to subject history to similar manipulation. As anti-hero Winston Smith tells his lover, Julia:

‘Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every book has been rewritten, every picture has been repainted, every statue and street and building has been renamed, every date has been altered. And that process is continuing day by day and minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Party is always right.’

As Orwell wrote elsewhere, ‘the historian believes that the past cannot be altered and that a correct knowledge of history is valuable as a matter of course. From the totalitarian point of view history is something to be created rather than learned.’

This totalitarian approach to history is dominant today, from the New York Times’ 1619 Project to statue-toppling. History is something to be erased or conjured up or reshaped as a moral lesson for today. It is used to demonstrate the rectitude of the contemporary establishment.

But it is language that is central to Orwell’s analysis of this form of intellectual manipulation and thought-control. Take ‘Ingsoc’, the philosophy that the regime follows and enforces through the linguistic system of Newspeak. Newspeak is more than mere censorship. It is an attempt to make certain ideas – freedom, autonomy and so on – actually unthinkable or impossible. It is an attempt to eliminate the very possibility of dissent (or ‘thoughtcrime’).

As Syme, who is working on a Newspeak dictionary, tells Winston Smith:

‘The whole aim… is to narrow the range of thought. In the end we shall make thoughtcrime literally impossible, because there will be no words in which to express it. Every year fewer and fewer words, and the range of consciousness always a little smaller… Has it ever occurred to you, Winston, that by the year 2050, at the very latest, not a single human being will be alive who could understand such a conversation as we are having now?’

The parallels between Orwell’s nightmarish vision of totalitarianism and the totalitarian mindset of today, in which language is policed and controlled, should not be overstated. In the dystopia of Nineteen Eighty-Four, the project of eliminating freedom and dissent, as in Nazi Germany or Stalinist Russia, was backed up by a brutal, murderous secret police. There is little of that in our societies today – people are not forcibly silenced or disappeared.

However, they are cancelled, pushed out of their jobs, and sometimes even arrested by the police for what amounts to thoughtcrime. And many more people simply self-censor out of fear of saying the ‘wrong’ thing. Orwell’s concern that words could be erased or their meaning altered, and thought controlled, is not being realised in an openly dictatorial manner. No, it’s being achieved through a creeping cultural and intellectual conformism.

The intellectual turn against freedom

But then that was always Orwell’s worry – that intellectuals giving up on freedom would allow a Big Brother Britain to flourish. As he saw it in The Prevention of Literature (1946), the biggest danger to freedom of speech and thought came not from the threat of dictatorship (which was receding by then) but from intellectuals giving up on freedom, or worse, seeing it as an obstacle to the realisation of their worldview.

Interestingly, his concerns about an intellectual betrayal of freedom were reinforced by a 1944 meeting of the anti-censorship organisation, English PEN. Attending an event to mark the 300th anniversary of Milton’s Areopagitica, Milton’s famous 1644 speech making the case for the ‘Liberty of Unlicenc’d Printing’, Orwell noted that many of the left-wing intellectuals present were unwilling to criticise Soviet Russia or wartime censorship. Indeed, they had become profoundly indifferent or hostile to the question of political liberty and press freedom.

‘In England, the immediate enemies of truthfulness, and hence of freedom of thought, are the press lords, the film magnates, and the bureaucrats’, Orwell wrote, ‘but that on a long view the weakening of the desire for liberty among the intellectuals themselves is the most serious symptom of all’.

Orwell was concerned by the increasing popularity among influential left-wing intellectuals of ‘the much more tenable and dangerous proposition that freedom is undesirable and that intellectual honesty is a form of anti-social selfishness’. The exercise of freedom of speech and thought, the willingness to speak truth to power, was even then becoming seen as something to be frowned upon, a selfish, even elitist act.

An individual speaking freely and honestly, wrote Orwell, is ‘accused of either wanting to shut himself up in an ivory tower, or of making an exhibitionist display of his own personality, or of resisting the inevitable current of history in an attempt to cling to unjustified privilege’.

These are insights which have stood the test of time. Just think of the imprecations against those who challenge the consensus. They are dismissed as ‘contrarians’ and accused of selfishly upsetting people.

And worst of all, think of the way free speech is damned as the right of the privileged. This is possibly one of the greatest lies of our age. Free speech does not support privilege. We all have the capacity to speak, write, think and argue. We might not, as individuals or small groups, have the platforms of a press baron or the BBC. But it is only through our freedom to speak freely that we can challenge those with greater power.

Orwell’s legacy

Orwell is everywhere today. He is taught in schools and his ideas and phrases are part of our common culture. But his value and importance to us lies in his defence of freedom, especially the freedom to speak and write.

His outstanding 1946 essay, ‘Politics and the English Language’, can actually be read as a freedom manual. It is a guide on how to use words and language to fight back.

Of course, it is attacked today as an expression of privilege and of bigotry. Author and commentator Will Self cited ‘Politics and the English Language’ in a 2014 BBC Radio 4 show as proof that Orwell was an ‘authoritarian elitist’. He said: ‘Reading Orwell at his most lucid you can have the distinct impression he’s saying these things, in precisely this way, because he knows that you – and you alone – are exactly the sort of person who’s sufficiently intelligent to comprehend the very essence of what he’s trying to communicate. It’s this the mediocrity-loving English masses respond to – the talented dog-whistler calling them to chow down on a big bowl of conformity.’

Lionel Trilling, another writer and thinker, made a similar point to Self, but in a far more insightful, enlightening way. ‘[Orwell] liberates us’, he wrote in 1952:

‘He tells us that we can understand our political and social life merely by looking around us, he frees us from the need for the inside dope. He implies that our job is not to be intellectual, certainly not to be intellectual in this fashion or that, but merely to be intelligent according to our lights – he restores the old sense of the democracy of the mind, releasing us from the belief that the mind can work only in a technical, professional way and that it must work competitively. He has the effect of making us believe that we may become full members of the society of thinking men. That is why he is a figure for us.’

Orwell should be a figure for us, too – in our battle to restore the democracy of the mind and resist the totalitarian mindset of today. But this will require having the courage of our convictions and our words, as he so often did himself. As he put it in The Prevention of Literature, ‘To write in plain vigorous language one has to think fearlessly’. That Orwell did precisely that was a testament to his belief in the public just as much as his belief in himself. He sets an example and a challenge to us all.

A Classic: The Dancing Israelis of 9/11, This Is Just One Angle…

A Mossad surveillance team made quite a public spectacle of themselves on 9-11 — so much so that the story of their actions initially penetrated the media screening, before disappearing down the Orwellian “memory hole.”

As the world watched in disbelief and asked the question….

Mossad agents were seen dancing with joy.

New York Times // October 8, 2001
5 Young Israelis, Caught in Net of Suspicion


“As their lawyer tells it, when the five young men were picked up by F.B.I. agents in midday on Sept. 11, they had a box cutter with them. One man carried $4,000 in cash, another had two passports. In short, there probably were good reasons to be suspicious of the men who became the subjects of widespread news coverage.

What those early news accounts missed, however, was that all five of the men were Israeli Jews, and that if they had box cutters, it was because at least four of them and possibly all five worked for Urban Moving Systems, a household moving company in New York and New Jersey.”(here)

A Mossad surveillance team made quite a public spectacle of themselves on 9-11 — so much so that the story of their actions initially penetrated the media screening, before disappearing down the Orwellian “memory hole.” Some quotes from various “mainstream media” sources.

“The New York Times reported Thursday that a group of five men had set up video cameras aimed at the Twin Towers prior to the attack on Tuesday, and were seen congratulating one another afterwards.” 

“Police received several calls from angry New Jersey residents claiming “middle-eastern” men with a white van were videotaping the disaster with shouts of joy and mockery.

“They were like happy, you know … They didn’t look shocked to me” said a witness.

“They were seen by New Jersey residents on Sept. 11 making fun of the World Trade Center ruins and going to extreme lengths to photograph themselves in front of the wreckage.” 

Witnesses saw them jumping for joy in Liberty State Park after the initial impact. Later on, other witnesses saw them celebrating on a roof in Weehawken, and still more witnesses later saw them celebrating with high fives in a Jersey City parking lot. 

“It looked like they’re hooked in with this. It looked like they knew what was going to happen when they were at Liberty State Park.” 

One anonymous phone call to the authorities actually led them to close down all of New York’s bridges and tunnels. The mystery caller told the 9-1-1 dispatcher that a group of Palestinians were mixing a bomb inside of a white van headed for the Holland Tunnel. Here’s the transcript from NBC News:

Dispatcher: Jersey City police.
Caller: Yes, we have a white van, 2 or 3 guys in there, they look like Palestinians and going around a building.
Caller: There’s a minivan heading toward the Holland tunnel, I see the guy by Newark Airport mixing some junk and he has those sheikh uniform.
Dispatcher: He has what?
Caller: He’s dressed like an Arab.

(*Note: Why would this mystery caller specifically say that these “Arabs” were Palestinians? How would he know that? Palestinians usually dress in western style clothes, not “sheikh uniforms”)

1. The story of the 5 arrested Israelis made it to the front page of a New Jersey newspaper on 9/12, but was never followed up on. // 2. Bibi Satanyahu was happy about 9/11! // 3. Israeli children dress up in 9/11 costumes for Purim, 2013

Based on that phone call, police then issued a “Be-on-the-Lookout” alert for a white mini-van heading for the city’s bridges and tunnels from New Jersey.

“White, 2000 Chevrolet van with ‘Urban Moving Systems’ sign on back seen at Liberty State Park, Jersey City, NJ, at the time of first impact of jetliner into World Trade Center Three individuals with van were seen celebrating after initial impact and subsequent explosion. FBI Newark Field Office requests that, if the van is located, hold for prints and detain individuals.” 

When a van fitting that exact description was stopped just before crossing into New York, the suspicious “middle-easterners” were apprehended. Imagine the surprise of the police officers when these terror suspects turned out to be Israelis!

According to ABC’s 20/20, when the van belonging to the cheering Israelis was stopped by the police, the driver of the van, Sivan Kurzberg, told the officers:

“We are Israelis. We are not your problem. Your problems are our problems. The Palestinians are your problem.” 

Why did he feel Palestinians were a problem for the NYPD?

The police and FBI field agents became very suspicious when they found maps of the city with certain places highlighted, box cutters (the same items that the hijackers supposedly used), $4700 cash stuffed in a sock, and foreign passports. Police also told the Bergen Record that bomb sniffing dogs were brought to the van and that they reacted as if they had smelled explosives.

The FBI seized and developed their photos, one of which shows Sivan Kurzberg flicking a cigarette lighter in front of the smouldering ruins in an apparently celebratory gesture.

The Jerusalem Post later reported that a white van with a bomb was stopped as it approached the George Washington Bridge, but the ethnicity of the suspects was not revealed. Here’s what the Jerusalem Post reported on September 12, 2001:

“American security services overnight stopped a car bomb on the George Washington Bridge. The van, packed with explosives, was stopped on an approach ramp to the bridge. Authorities suspect the terrorists intended to blow up the main crossing between New Jersey and New York, Army Radio reported.” 

“…two suspects are in FBI custody after a truckload of explosives was discovered around the George Washington Bridge … The FBI … says enough explosives were in the truck to do great damage to the George Washington Bridge. It was reported the van contained tonnes of explosives.” 

What’s really intriguing is that ABC’s 20/20, the New York Post (14), and the New Jersey Bergen Record (15) all clearly and unambiguously reported that a white van with Israelis was intercepted on a ramp near Route 3, which leads directly to the Lincoln Tunnel.

But the Jerusalem Post, Israeli National News (Arutz Sheva) (16), and Yediot America (17) all reported, just as clearly and unambiguously, that a white van with Israelis was stopped on a ramp leading to the George Washington Bridge, which is several miles north of the Lincoln Tunnel.

It appears as if there may actually have been two white vans involved, one stopped on each crossing. This would not only explain the conflicting reports as to the actual location of the arrests, but would also explain how so many credible eye-witnesses all saw celebrating “middle-easterners” in a white van in so many different locations. It also explains why the New York Post and Steve Gordon (lawyer for the 5 Israelis) originally described how three Israelis were arrested but later increased the total to five.

Perhaps one van was meant to drop off a bomb while the other was meant to pick up the first set of drivers while re-crossing back into New Jersey? If a van was to be used as a parked time-bomb on the GW Bridge, then certainly the drivers would need to have a “get-away van” to pick them up and escape. And notice how the van (or vans) stayed away from the third major crossing -the Holland Tunnel- which was where the police had originally been directed to by that anti-Palestinian 9-1-1 “mystery caller.” A classic misdirection play.

From there, the story becomes even more suspicious. The Israelis worked for a Weehawken moving company known as Urban Moving Systems Incorporated. An American employee of Urban Moving Systems told the The Record of New Jersey that a majority of his co-workers were Israelis and they were joking about the attacks.

The employee, who declined to give his name said: “I was in tears. These guys were joking and that bothered me.” These guys were like, “Now America knows what we go through.” (18)

A few days after the attacks, Urban Moving System’s Israeli owner, Dominick Suter, dropped his business and fled the country for Israel. He was in such a hurry to flee America that some of Urban Moving System’s customers were left with their furniture stranded in storage facilities (19).

Suter’s departure was abrupt, leaving behind coffee cups, sandwiches, cell phones and computers strewn on office tables and thousands of dollars of goods in storage. Suter was later placed on the same FBI suspect list as 9/11 lead hijacker Mohamed Atta and other hijackers and suspected al-Qaeda sympathizers, suggesting that U.S. authorities felt Suter may have known something about the attacks. (20)

1 & 2. As bad as 9/11 was, it could have been worse had the Israeli “movers” bombed the tunnels and bridges leading into New York from New Jersey. // 2. The mysterious “mover” Dominick Suter fled to Israel after the attacks.

The Jewish weekly, The Forward, reported that the FBI finally concluded that at least two of the detained Israelis were agents working for the Mossad, the Israeli intelligence agency, and that Urban Moving Systems, the ostensible employer of the five Israelis, was a front operation. This was confirmed by two former CIA officers, and they noted that movers’ vans are a common intelligence cover. (21). The Israelis were held in custody for 71 days before being quietly released. (22)

“There was no question but that [the order to close down the investigation] came from the White House. It was immediately assumed at CIA headquarters that this basically was going to be a cover-up so that the Israelis would not be implicated in any way in 9/11.” (23)

Several of the detainees discussed their experience in America on an Israeli talk show after their return home. Said one of the men, denying that they were laughing or happy on the morning of Sept. 11:

“The fact of the matter is we are coming from a country that experiences terror daily. Our purpose was to document the event.” (24)

How did they know there would be an event to document on 9/11? It doesn’t take Sherlock Holmes to connect the dots of the dancing Israeli Mossad agents – here’s the most logical scenario:

1. The Israeli “movers” cheered the 9-11 attacks to celebrate the successful accomplishment of the greatest spy operation ever pulled off in history.
2. One of them, or an accomplice, then calls a 9-1-1 police dispatcher to report Palestinian bomb-makers in a white van headed for the Holland Tunnel.
3. Having thus pre-framed the Palestinians with this phone call, the Israeli bombers then head for the George Washington Bridge instead, where they will drop off their time-bomb van and escape with Urban Moving accomplices.
4. But the police react very wisely and proactively by closing off ALL bridges and tunnels instead of just the Holland Tunnel. This move inadvertently foils the Israelis’ misdirection play and leads to their own capture and even slight torture.
5. To cover up this story, the U.S. Justice Department rounds up over 1000 Arabs for minor immigration violations and places them in New York area jails. The Israelis therefore become less conspicuous as the government and media can now claim that the Israelis were just immigration violators caught in the same dragnet as many other Arabs.
6. After several months, FBI and Justice Department “higher-ups” are able to gradually push aside the local FBI agents and free the Israelis quietly.

1. A day of horror which kicked off the “War on Terror” — celebrated by “The Dancing Israelis.” // 2. Consistent with the use of exotic weapon technologies (Nukes & DEW’s), many of those covered in dust died of cancer in later years.
Building 7 — a THIRD skyscraper — which was clearly demolished by pre-planted explosives, later in the afternoon of 9/11/2001.

Osama bin Laden was immediately blamed for the 9/11 attacks even though he had no previous record of doing anything on this scale. Immediately after the Flight 11 hit World Trade Center 1, CIA Director George Tenet said: “You know, this has bin Laden’s fingerprints all over it.” (25)The compliant mainstream media completely ignored the Israeli connection. Immediately following the 9-11 attacks the media was filled with stories linking the attacks to bin Laden. TV talking-heads, “experts”, and scribblers of every stripe spoon-fed a gullible American public a steady diet of the most outrageous propaganda imaginable.We were told that the reason bin Laden attacked the USA was because he hates our “freedom” and “democracy”. The Muslims were “medieval” and they wanted to destroy us because they envied our wealth, were still bitter about the Crusades, and were offended by Britney Spears shaking her tits and ass all over the place!But bin Laden strongly denied any role in the attacks and suggested that Zionists orchestrated the
9-11 attacks. The BBC published bin Laden’s statement of denial in which he said:“I was not involved in the September 11 attacks in the United States nor did I have knowledge of the attacks. There exists a government within a government within the United States. The United States should try to trace the perpetrators of these attacks within itself; to the people who want to make the present century a century of conflict between Islam and Christianity. That secret government must be asked as to who carried out the attacks. … The American system is totally in control of the Jews, whose first priority is Israel, not the United States.” (26)You never heard that quote on your nightly newscast did you? Or this one from renowned investigative journalist, Sy Hersh:“A number of intelligence officials have raised questions about Osama bin Laden’s capabilities. “This guy sits in a cave in Afghanistan and he’s running this operation?” one C.I.A. official asked. “It’s so huge. He couldn’t have done it alone.” A senior military officer told me that because of the visas and other documentation needed to infiltrate team members into the United States a major foreign intelligence service might also have been involved.” (27)By the way, Bin Laden was never named as the perpetrator of 9/11 by the FBI. When asked why there is no mention of 9/11 on Bin Laden’s Most Wanted web page (28), Rex Tomb, Chief of Investigative Publicity for the FBI said:

“The reason why 9/11 is not mentioned on Osama Bin Laden’s Most Wanted page is because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11.” (29)Dickhead Cheney actually said:

“So we’ve never made the case, or argued the case that somehow Osama bin Laden was directly involved in 9/11. That evidence has never been forthcoming.”  (30)To date, the only shred of “evidence” to be uncovered against bin Laden is a barely audible fuzzy amateur video that the Pentagon just happened to find “lying around” in Afghanistan. How very convenient, and how very fake. (31)There is no evidence, be it hard or circumstantial, to link the Al Qaeda “terrorist network” to these acts of terror, but there is a mountain of evidence, both hard and circumstantial, which suggests that Zionists have been very busy framing Arabs for terror plots against America. Senator Bob Graham of Florida said this:“I think there is very compelling evidence that at least some of the terrorists were assisted not just in financing — although that was part of it — by a sovereign foreign government … It will become public at some point when it’s turned over to the archives, but that’s 20 or 30 years from now” –  (32)If the sovereign foreign government mentioned by Senator Graham was an enemy of the United States the “compelling evidence” would not be kept secret for 20+ years.One final point; at 09:40 on 9-11 it was reported that the Democratic Front for the Liberation of Palestine claimed responsibility for the attacks (33). This claim was immediately denied by the DFLP leader Qais abu Leila who said it had always opposed “terror attacks on civilian targets, especially outside the occupied territories.” (34)Why would a Palestinian organization comprising of less than 500 people (35) make the suicidal move of immediately claiming responsibility for the attacks?Sharon and the other Israeli leaders aspire to fulfill what the goals of the political Zionist movement have been since its origin a century ago: to turn all of historic Palestine into an exclusively Jewish state. A central tenet of the Zionist ideology is expressed in the racist slogan, “A land without people for a people without a land.” (36) The implication of Palestinians in the 9/11 attacks would have handed Zionists a golden opportunity to achieve the above because all Palestinians would have been labelled terrorists.In closing, a US official quoted in Carl Cameron‘s Fox News report on the Israeli spy ring said:

“Evidence linking these Israelis to 9/11 is classified. I cannot tell you about evidence that has been gathered. It’s classified information.” (37)Hmmm. In order for such evidence “linking Israelis to 9/11” to have been classified, it must therefore have existed in the first place. No doubt about it. With the blessing of, and in collaboration with the Globalist CIA / “Deep State” and its Fake News arm, Mossad’s fingerprints were all over 9/11.

1. Dan Rather of CBS went off script and spoke about the mystery bombers who were arrested near the George Washington Bridge. // 2. Carl Cameron of FOX also reported on the Israelis, but was stopped from following up. // 3. The Bogeyman.

We, the people, want the truth!

By Ned Cosby

In the movie The Right Stuff, flight control in Houston gets a warning that astronaut John Glenn’s Mercury capsule has a possible loose heat shield.  “What are we going to tell him?” voices an anxious member of flight control.

Astronaut Alan Shepard, who is part of flight control for this first orbital flight, speaks up and says, “He’s a pilot.  You tell him the condition of his craft.”  In other words, Alan Shepard says, tell him the truth.

“A wise man is hungry for truth, while the mocker feeds on trash,” says the Living Bible translation of Proverbs 15:14.

Why should we be hungry for truth?  Most of us, like John Glenn, want to know the reality of our circumstances.  When we see things happening around us that we cannot understand, we want to erase our ignorance with accurate information.

In 2022, there are questions hanging over America that remain unresolved, and the journalists who are supposed to bring us the facts refuse to investigate.  Even worse, they seem to want to keep the truth from us. Unresolved issues and questions tend to fester and sow doubts.  Here are some of the clouds hanging over America in July 2022:

  • Seth Rich’s death
  • Jeffrey Epstein’s death
  • Where are the twelve missing pen drives from the 7/19/2022 primary election in Baltimore?
  • Why do we keep sending money to Ukraine when we are 30 trillion dollars in debt?
  • Why are we allowing illegal aliens to flood into this country and rewarding these lawbreakers with social benefits?
  • Why can France hold a clean nationwide election in one day and we cannot?
  • Why are the riots of 2020 uninvestigated, but January 6, 2021 gets primetime coverage?
  • How did the Wuhan Flu get started?
  • Why are the media so disinterested in the questions about the 2020 election?
  • Is Joe Biden mentally competent to be POTUS?

All our lives, we have been told to tell the truth.  We have been programmed to expect the truth, but reporters give us trash and call it the truth.  When we press them for the truth, they insult us by calling us racists or conspiracy theorists.

As I was foraging for the truth this morning, I came across a recent Gallup survey revealing that I am not alone in my quest for the truth.  American confidence in newspapers and television news is at an all-time low.  I am encouraged by the report suggesting that many in America are hungry for the truth, but I am troubled that their confidence in news outlets is very low.

As someone who regularly comments on American news, I am not surprised by the Gallup findings, but I am disturbed.  We want clean air.  We want clean water.  It should not come as a surprise to the editors and reporters that we want clean, un-slanted news.  We are hurtling through space on this planet called Earth, and warning lights are flashing like crazy.  We, the people, want the truth.

Debunking The Myth Of “Nazi-Looted Art”

THE MONUMENTS MEN

Starring George Clooney, Matt Damon, Bill Murray, Cate Blanchett – directed by George Clooney.

 Based on the book by Robert Edsel

OFFICIAL DESCRIPTION

Based on the true story of the greatest treasure hunt in history, The Monuments Men is an action-thriller focusing on an unlikely World War II platoon, tasked by FDR with going into Germany to rescue artistic masterpieces from Nazi thieves and returning them to their rightful owners.

It would be an impossible mission: with the art trapped behind enemy lines, and with the German army under orders to destroy everything as the Reich fell, how could these guys, seven museum directors, curators, and art historians, all more familiar with Michelangelo than the M-1, possibly hope to succeed?
But as the Monuments Men, as they were called, found themselves in a race against time to avoid the destruction of 1000 years of culture, they would risk their lives to protect and defend mankind’s greatest achievements.”

The REAL Story of “Nazi Looted Art”

ART PROTECTION DURING WORLD WAR I

Under Kaiser Wilhelm II during World War I, the highly cultured Germans go to great lengths to protect and preserve artworks located in enemy territory or near a zone of combat. The German word to describe this principal of saving Europe’s cultural and artistic treasures during wartime is “Kunstschutz” (art protection).

Kaiser Wilhelm tried to avert the war which was forced upon Germany. Even while winning the war, the Kaiser held out an olive branch to the Allies, while his Kunstschutz units protected artworks belonging to enemy nations.

ART IS RETURNED AFTER THE WAR

At the end of World War I, rescued artworks are returned voluntarily. Unlike World War II, anti-German propaganda actually fades away following World War I. As a result, Germany is later praised for “Kunstschutz” / art protection during “The Great War”. 

World War I was very destructive. Thanks to Germany, many works of art located in Belgium and France were saved.

ART PROTECTION DURING WORLD WAR II

A talented painter himself, Adolf Hitler has a great appreciation for art and culture. He sees Churchill and FDR as uncultured barbarians with merciless disregard for innocent life, architecture, and works of art. As the Germans under Kaiser Wilhelm II had done during World War I, Hitler too ordered the protection of artworks throughout the combat theaters of Western and Eastern Europe.

“Again and again I uttered these warnings against this specific type of aerial warfare, and I did so for over three and a half months. That these warnings failed to impress Mr. Churchill does not surprise me in the least. For what does this man care for the lives of others? What does he care for culture or for architecture?” — Adolf Hitler

Churchill the Barbarian   //  
Hitler the cultured gentleman (with Norwegian figure skater Sonja Henning)  //  A Painting By Adolf Hitler

MARSHAL GORING HEADS THE KUNSTSCHUTZ

The task of protecting the art of Europe is handed over to Air Force Marshal Hermann Goring.  As Allied terror bombing ravages Europe, thousands of paintings and sculptures from Italy, France, Belgium, Russia, Romania, and Poland are gathered and meticulously inventoried by the Germans.
This process only began in the fall of 1943. Had the Germans wanted to “loot” the art of Europe, they could easily have done so in 1940, 1941, 1942, and the first 9 months of 1943. It was only after Allied carpet bombardment was unleashed upon Italy (later on France), and the Soviets began advancing from the East, that the German began gathering up the artwork.

As men of culture, Hitler and Goring placed high priority on art protection.
Rescued from Naples: ‘Danaë’ by Titian (l) and “The Blind Leading The Blind” by Pieter Bruegel

HITLER SAVES ROME

Hitler respects ancient Rome as one of the cultural pillars of Europe. As the Americans and British approach Rome from the South, Hitler orders his troops to evacuate. Knowing that an Allied air and ground attack would destroy many of its cultural icons, The “Eternal City” is left open for the Allies to march in uncontested.  Hitler’s decision to leave Rome as an undefended “Open City” saves the great city from ruin. Athens and Florence are also declared Open Cities.

Hitler’s unforced evacuation spared Rome and its cultural wonders from the “collateral damage” of the merciless barbarian Allies.

SPEAKING OF “LOOTED ART’

Irony of irony! Barbaric American looting of Europe includes the taking of personal possessions, livestock, women, and works of art. In the East, it’s not even necessary to speak about the wholesale looting and ghastly gang raping carried out by the Red Army.
Again in 2003, the U.S. occupiers of Iraq deliberately stood down as barbarians and professional thieves looted the priceless cultural treasures of that unfortunate nation.

Much of the stuff the Allies stole has never been returned.During the Iraq war, U.S. surrogates systematically looted the ancient treasures of the Baghdad Museum.

WHO INVENTED THE ‘NAZI LOOTING’ STORY?

After the war, the American Art Looting Investigation Unit (ALIU) of the Office of Strategic Services (OSS) issues 13 reports on the German plundering of art.  By the way, this is the same OSS whose other “findings” accuse the Germans of using the bodies of dead Jews to make “shrunken heads”, “lamp shades” and “bars of soap” – allegations which are today universally acknowledged to have been false.

The OSS is the forerunner to the CIA.

The “Cloak & Dagger” Logo of the OSS says it all! An Agency whose stated purpose involves strategic deception and propaganda crafted the “looted art” lie. The mass-murderer Eisenhower (shown examining “looted art”) also helped to sell the post war lie.

THE LIE WON’T DIE

In the months, years, and decades following the war, endlessly repeated propaganda has elevated the OSS-CIA fable of “looted Nazi art” into a virtual reality in the minds of the brainwashed public. However, as is the case with so many other elements of the “official story” of World War II, this too is a lie.

Bullshit

Bullshit

POISONED PRESIDENTS? #3

POISONED PRESIDENTS?
Case 3 of 7 / Zachary Taylor

Zachary Taylor 1850

Zachary Taylor, elected the 12th president in 1848,  had been a general and national military hero from the War of 1812 and the Mexican-American War (1846-48). Like General Andrew Jackson, his military record served as the foundation for an eventual presidency. Like Jackson, he was a southerner (having lived in several southern states) and a slave owner. And like Jackson, he was a steadfast pro-Unionist with zero tolerance for the secessionists. Like William Henry Harrison, (see Case 1) Taylor’s presidency was brief — just 16 months.

Taylor’s tenure occurred at a momentous time in both world and United States history. As “spontaneous” secessionist / independence revolutions were “coincidentally” rocking Europe and Latin America, the issue (pretext) of slavery in the western territories of the US pitted southern secessionists dubbed by Unionists as “the fire-eaters” against  the pro-Union patriots of both North and South. The nation looked to General-turned-President Taylor for a solution.

Taylor wanted the western territories seeking statehood (New Mexico, California) to be admitted to the Union as soon as their state constitutions arrived in Washington, with no language from Congress about slavery. He did so understanding that both would bar slavery in their state constitutions (“free states”).

At that time, there were thirty states in the Union, equally split between slave and free states. Hence, Taylor’s proposal would have added two or three free states to the Union, upsetting the North-South balance in the Senate. The secessionists cried betrayal! The stage was set for either a clash or a “compromise.” The debate that ensued was one of the most contentious episodes in American history. Taylor, knowing that the Calhounites would only use compromise as a stepping stone for the next offensive (exactly as Andrew Jackson had warned a decade earlier) would have none of it. Some southern Democrats responded to Taylor’s position by calling for a secession convention.

In February of 1850, Taylor held a contentious conference with southern leaders who were threatening secession. He told them that he personally would lead the Army, and “Any persons taken in rebellion against the Union will be hanged with less reluctance than I had hanged deserters and spies in Mexico.”  Being a southerner, a slave holder and a popular military hero, he, like Jackson could have done exactly that and still retained the support of many common southerners while doing so. 

What to do, what to do about a strong “bad ass” southern Unionist like General Taylor? Fortunately for the secessionist intriguers, Taylor wouldn’t be around much longer.

1. Rothschild’s “spontaneous” European & Latin American “nationalist” secessionist revolutions of 1848 (also the same year that the Communist Manifesto was published) failed to break up the various empires, but they did succeed in weakening the existing order of things. The parallels between these subversive uprisings and the curious growth of anti-Union Southern nationalism are striking. // 2. The radical secessionists dubbed “the fire-eaters” originally formed in 1850. // 3. Edmund Ruffin — a leader of the Fire-Eaters — would later go on to fire the first gun of the Civil War, at the Union-held Fort Sumter in South Carolina in 1861.

After participating in Fourth of July ceremonies at the Washington Monument, Taylor became ill. Within five days he was dead.  A tummy ache caused by eating too many cherries and drinking cold milk, the Fake News said (rolling eyes). Diarrhea, fever, chills — a prolonged death — eerily similar to the death of Presidents Harrison (another pro-Union southern war hero opposed to expanding slavery westward) just nine years earlier, and Polk (another pro-Union southerner) the year before. How conveeenient!

After Taylor’s death, “The Compromise of 1850” — authored by “the great compromiser” that Andrew Jackson wished he had shot, Henry Clay of Kentucky — was passed and signed into law by Taylor’s weak successor, Millard Fillmore. Fillmore — a New York lawyer — feared the secessionists and tried to appease them. But exactly as Taylor had foreseen, it would not satisfy the intriguers. The tragedy of the Civil War was still on course, with the first wave of state secessions being just 12 years away. It would be a conflict in which a future president from a northern state — Abraham Lincoln of Illinois — could, unlike southern slave-owning military heros Jackson, Harrison and Taylor — easily be labeled as an anti-southern “Yankee” and “tyrant.”

As for South Carolina’s John C. Calhoun — the man that Jackson wished he had hanged about 20 years earlier — he died just four month’s before Taylor did. But conspiratorial Calhounism lived on and grew stronger throughout the South. After Calhoun’s passing, Mississippi Senator Jefferson Davis  assumed the unofficial role of southern leadership — until being named President of the Confederate States in 1862 — with “Davis’s pet Jew” (and probably Rothschild-linked)Judah Benjamin telling him what to do.

It’s also worth noting that Fillmore would also go on to send Commodore Matthew Perry to “open up Japan” by threat of force in 1853.  Thus began the military modernization of medieval Japan in advance of its Rothschild-US-UK backed war on Tsarist Russia in 1905 — a war which weakened Russia and strengthened the Bolsheviks. Commodore Perry’s daughter was married to the European-born Jew August Belmont(born August Schönberg — Rothschild’s openly known US agent who became head of the Democrat National Committee in 1860. Though a northerner, Belmont was later suspected of trying to undermine Lincoln and the Union during the Civil War. Yes indeed. The flow of history took some nasty and bloody turns because of those “cherries and milk!” 

* Conspiracy Theory: The same secret society networks  — quite likely connected (at the highest levels) to the “usual suspects” running the tumultuous 1848 secessionist movements of Europe & Latin America — realized that the tough Taylor was willing to smash — by military force if necessary — their southern “nationalist” scheme to split the United States in two. So (((they))) poisoned him to death.

1. Like General Jackson before him, son-of-the-South General Taylor was also ready to use force to hang secessionists. / 2. Taylor’s grave-site: Louisville, Kentucky. // Cherries & milk, eh?

At the urging of a researcher and with the permission of Taylor’s descendants, his body was exhumed in 1991 and tested for arsenic poisoning only. The results were negative, but no test for any other forms of poison were performed.

Some establishment Fake Historians now speculate that Harrison, Polk & Taylor were all killed by “bad water supply” flowing to the White House. Evidently, the “bad water” knew to kill only presidents, but not their wives, children, servants, staff etc.

16 Ways To Tell If You Are An Old Soul

How can you tell if you are an old soul? Are there differences in traits or behaviors? What signs can I look for that can help me differentiate the difference?

16 ways to tell if you are an old soul

Generally speaking, we are all old souls, but some of us have been here longer than others.

The word “old” is only relative to time. Because time is linear and our souls are eternal, 10,000 years would be the blink of an eye.

Dolores Cannon believes that we need to incarnate many, many times to learn all of the lessons we came here for.

16 Ways To Tell If You Are An Old Soul

1. You Understand Many Of Life’s Deeper Lessons.

For some people, it is hard to fathom that the soul of a child may be much older than the soul of his or her parents. For these particular people, this is a sign that their soul might be younger than yours. When you begin to understand why you keep incarnating to this 3rd dimensional reality, it becomes similar to the movie, Groundhog Day, where Phil wakes up each day to find out that it’s still February 2nd until he learns how to remove his ego and starts doing kind deeds for others.

Once you realize that time, space, energy and matter are 3rd dimensional products, the theory of time becomes irrelevant, thus the theory of how old your soul is also becomes irrelevant.

But for the sake of understanding how old your soul may be, we’ll continue!

2. You Are In Touch With Your Natural Abilities Or Have An Extreme Interest In These Abilities.

Some people are born with innate gifts, such as special healing abilities or psychic abilities. The truth is that we all possess these abilities, but an older soul is more in tune with how to access and implement these abilities in the name of humanity. If you don’t have any particular ability, but have a strong interest in them, this is simply your soul trying to recall these abilities that you may have had in a previous lifetime.

3. You Become Spiritually Aware.

Everyone is pure consciousness, but many people have a difficult time understanding what this means. Your soul is pure consciousness and love. It has a unique understanding of how the matrix is being played on this planet and understands that everything we do as a collective will help to facilitate the awakening of others.

4. You Understand The Importance Of Forgiveness.

Some people are old souls who still have much to learn because they are trapped inside the box with their ideologies, they are stubborn, or they have not learned the importance of forgiveness. By forgiving yourself and others, we can release any karma between these people.

5. You’re Able To Transcend Ego.

It’s nearly impossible for anyone to completely transcend ego 100% of the time but simply being aware of our ego and how it plays against unity consciousness is a definite sign of an old soul. On the other side, there is no ego. During your life review, you will re-live your ego and will see how it affected others, as well as yourself. At this point in “time”, you will probably make a soul contract with the hopes of overcoming ego and atoning for whatever ego issues you had in your previous incarnation.

6. You’re Able To Transcend Materialism.

Money and materialism are products of this 3rd dimensional reality and it’s easy to succumb to materialism, especially when it’s in your face through advertising, programming and peer pressure. An older soul realizes that money is non-existent on the other side and it generally takes away from who we truly are as spiritual beings.

Those who are older souls will generally use money as a tool to either help facilitate their spiritual progression through spiritual retreats or by possibly creating a lavish feng shui home decorated with spiritual meaning versus the most luxurious furnishings. They may also use their money to help others who are less fortunate.

7. You Are Able To Understand The Concept That Your Body Is A Shell For Your Soul.

Before you were born, you not only chose your parents, you also chose your life situations and challenges that would help to facilitate your spiritual growth while atoning for any previous karma. The body that you are currently in is simply a vessel for your soul.

Your name is what your soul currently refers itself as, but in previous lifetimes, you had many different names and you have lived many previous lives as either a male or a female. Your name and title are both associated with ego because ultimately, you are infinite consciousness and we are all on the same team.

8. You Seem To Have A Special Connection To Eras Long Before You Were Born.

Did you ever watch an old movie or see some artwork from a specific era in time and have a connection to that era? Chances are, you lived a previous life during that time period and this is your cellular memory letting you know!

9. You Have An Understanding Of What You Need To Do To Complete Your Spiritual Progression.

Just by making it this far, you are more awakened than most people on this planet. You have an understanding of Universal laws and what is left to do on your soul contract. Even if you are not specifically sure of either, your higher self and spirit guides will continue to lead you in the right direction.

10. You Have A Strong Feeling That Home Isn’t Earth.

Did you ever look at a random area of the sky and stare at an unknown star for no particular reason? Do you have a special connection with specific star systems such as the Pleiades or Orion’s Belt? Do wars and corruption make you feel uneasy, as if they didn’t exist where you originally came from? Are you one of the souls who volunteered to come here at this specific point in time to help with the Earth’s ascension? If you answered yes to any of these questions, then chances are, Earth is not your home planet.

11. You Tend To Be A Loner.

The stigma on the word loner is often condescending, but those who are old souls are merely looking for other fragments of themselves and will often distance themselves from younger souls who need more incarnations into a 3rd dimensional planet. Older souls will seek out other like-minded people because there’s a comfort and familiarity with these types of people who will help to facilitate each others spiritual progression.

12. You Have A Rebellious Nature.

Whether you rebel from religion, laws or anything else, this is a sign that your soul knows the only true laws… the Laws of the Universe. While you respect the reasoning and intention behind laws and religion, you might not be compelled to use these as absolute laws when you know there are a set of higher laws that are intended to facilitate our spiritual progressions.

13. You Have A Burning Desire To Attain Truth And Inner Wisdom.

Many older souls can easily see through the lies we’ve been taught through religion, politics and through our educational facilities. While they realize they are all one with the universe, they also want the truth exposed to help other people’s awakening process. They also continue to seek knowledge in the spiritual, metaphysical and esoteric fields and will absorb this information much easier than anything they were taught in school.

14. You Are Not Controlling Of Others.

Older souls are more accepting, not just of other people, but of circumstances as well. For example, while you don’t approve of the corruption within politics, you understand how the corruption will help to awaken other people to the truth. You respect the free will of others and are more likely to use tact than verbal demands of others. You tend to be more of a team player than anything else.

15. You Sense A Separation Between Yourself And The “Real World”.

As you transcend ego and materialism, you find yourself living a different lifestyle. While this lifestyle is unique to your current incarnation, there also seems to be a familiarity of the direction you’re heading.

16. You Are Curious Whether You’re An Old Soul Or Not.

Many young souls wouldn’t ask this question or much less be concerned about it. While many older souls aren’t concerned either, for different reasons, they simply “know” they’re old souls, but it’s nice to have affirmations that coincide with your spiritual progression.

There are many lessons we have learned throughout our lifetimes, all of which has culminated into this particular incarnation. All of your previous life incarnations are embedded into your cellular memory and can be recalled through past life regressions.

Most of the people on this planet are old souls, yet many remain unawakened and still have a lot more to learn and will need several more incarnations to a 3rd dimensional planet.

Many of those who are awakened will probably move on to their next level of spiritual progression. It’s important to remember that this is not a race because in the end, we all win. Enjoy every millisecond in this incarnation because this may be the last time you’ll ever experience a 3rd dimensional reality!

By Gregg Prescott, M.S., In5D.com

America’s Insidious Plan to Invade Canada and Bomb Montreal, Vancouver, Halifax and Quebec City (1930-39)

As “Leader of the Free World”, the United States has waged numerous wars against sovereign countries since the end of World War II resulting in millions of deaths. The atrocities and crimes committed are on record. 

The corporate media has upheld ALL these military interventions (without exception) starting with the Korean war in 1950 as “peace-making operations” intent upon spreading democracy Worldwide. 

At this juncture in our history, namely the Ukraine Crisis, it is important that a peace process be initiated with a view to preventing escalation. What is happening in Ukraine has serious geopolitical implications and could potentially lead to a World War III scenario. 

In the context of the Ukraine crisis, Canada is unconditionally supporting the United States without reflecting on an unspoken chapter in the history of our country. 

Most Canadians are unaware of the fact that the United States of America had formulated in 1924 a carefully designed plan to invade Canada and bomb Montreal, Quebec City, Halifax and Vancouver.

What has been deliberately omitted from our history books is that our American neighbour had envisaged a detailed plan to invade Canada. The use of “poison gas” was part of that project. 

War Plan Red was officially approved by the US War Department in May 1930.

The 1928 draft stated that “it should be made quite clear to Canada that in a war she would suffer grievously”.

And guess who was in charge of planning the bombing raids against Canadian cities:  

General Douglas MacArthur who during World War II was put in charge of waging the Pacific War and coordinating the extensive bombing of Japanese cities (1941-1945). 

The war plan was explicitly geared towards the conquest of Canada.

“The U.S. Army’s mission, [written in capital letters], was “ULTIMATELY, TO GAIN COMPLETE CONTROL OF CRIMSON [Canada].”

Canada’s Global and Mail has twisted realities upside down. The Red War Plan to Attack CRIMSON was casually presented as a peacemaking endeavor. It was a plan to rightfully defend the US:

First approved in 1930, Joint Army and Navy Basic War Plan – Red was drawn up to defend the United States in the event of war with Britain.

It was one of a series of such contingency plans produced in the late 1920s. Canada, identified as Crimson, would be invaded to prevent the Britons from using it as a staging ground to attack the United States. (Globe and Mail, December 31, 2005, emphasis added)

The war plan directed against Canada initially formulated in 1924 was entitled “Joint Army and Navy Basic War Plan — Red”. It was approved by the US War Department under the presidency of Herbert Hoover in 1930. It was updated in 1934 and 1935 during the presidency of Franklin D. Roosevelt. It was withdrawn in 1939 (but not abolished) following the outbreak of the Second World War.

Screenshot, Daily Mail

Acccording to Floyd Rudmin: 

“Though ostensibly for war against Britain Plan RED is almost devoid of plans to fight the British. The Plan is focused on the conquest of Canada, which was color- coded CRIMSON. The U.S. Army’s mission, written in capital letters, was “ULTIMATELY, TO GAIN COMPLETE CONTROL OF CRIMSON.” The 1924 draft declared that U.S. “intentions are to hold in perpetuity all CRIMSON and RED territory gained… The Dominion government [of Canada] will be abolished.”

The strategic bombing of Halifax, Montreal and Quebec City were envisaged under Plan RED. Moreover, the US Army had been instructed (in capital letters),

“TO MAKE ALL NECESSARY PREPARATIONS FOR THE USE OF CHEMICAL WARFARE FROM THE OUTBREAK OF WAR. THE USE OF CHEMICAL WARFARE, INCLUDING THE USE OF TOXIC AGENTS, FROM THE INCEPTION OF HOSTILITIES, IS AUTHORIZED…” (quoted by Floyd Rudmin, op cit).

In a bitter irony, General Douglas MacArthur who led US forces in The Pacific during World War II, not to mention the conduct of the carpet bombing raids against North Korea (1950-1953) was actively involved in the planning of war directed against Canada.

“In March 1935, General Douglas MacArthur proposed an amendment making Vancouver a priority [bombing] target comparable to Halifax and Montreal” (Ibid)

Screen Shot, Daily Mail 

Today, Canada’s sovereignty as a Nation State is threatened by the Justin Trudeau government which is firmly aligned with Joe Biden’s military agenda, acting as a de facto US proxy.

The article below (first published in June 2013) reviews in detail, the US plans to annex and wage war on Canada.

The historical documents of Annexation (1866), Invasion of Canada “War Plan Red” (1930)  and “War Plan Red” (1935) (95 pages) are contained in Annex

Michel Chossudovsky, Global Research, March 25, 2022

***

The following article by Michel Chossudovsky was first published in 2013

America’s Plan to Invade and Annex Canada

Michel Chossudovsky

 June 30th, 2013

Canada Day July 1st is an opportunity for Canadians to reflect on issues of national sovereignty.

Territorial control over Canada has been part of Washington’s geopolitical and military agenda since the 1860s,  following the end of the American civil war.

In 1867, Canada became a nation, a federation, under the British North America Act,  largely in response to the threat of annexation by the United States as formulated in a bill adopted by the US Congress in 1866:

“A Bill for the admission of the States of Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, Canada East, and Canada West, and for the organization of the Territories of Selkirk, Saskatchewan, and Columbia. (Annexation Bill)” (see map below)

Fast Forward:  The plan to annex Canada to the USA is still on the books?

In April 2002, upon the creation of US Northern Command (USNORTHCOM), Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld put forth the concept of “Binational integration” of military command structures, alongside a major revamping in the areas of immigration, law enforcement and intelligence.

Rumsfeld also stated without consulting Ottawa, that the areas of territorial jurisdiction of USNORTHCOM on land and sea would extend into the Northwest territories and the Canadian Arctic.

Moreover, territorial integration under the proposed North American Union  and Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP) (launched in 2005) would embody Canada (as well as Mexico) into the US Homeland Security apparatus. Broadly speaking, Washington would set the agenda for “integration” and would exert an overriding influence in developing the legal, political, economic, military and national security architecture of the proposed NAU.

What is at stake is de facto annexation, where Canada would cease to function as a sovereign nation, relegated to the status of a US protectorate.

The Conservative government in Ottawa has not only embraced the SPP, it is also actively supporting the US war agenda, its national security agenda and its “Global War on Terrorism”.

In the last few years “Securing the North American Security Perimeter” has been viewed by Washington as a means to “bringing Canada into Fortress America”.

Historical Background: US Bill to Annex Canada (1866)

President Andrew Johnson.jpg

Most Canadians are unaware that a Bill to Annex Canada into the US was introduced and adopted by the US Congress in 1866 prior to the 1867 Alaska Purchase from Russia. The Complete text of the 1866 Bill is contained in Annex to this article.

The text of the bill is tantamount to an invasion plan. It was to come into force upon its proclamation by US president Andrew Johnson (left). It included the territories of British North America from Newfoundland and the Maritimes to British Columbia, extending North into the Hudson Bay territory and North West Territory bordering onto “Russian America”. (i.e Alaska) (See map below)

It consisted in the outright confiscation of public lands. It also implied US control over the trans Canada railway system, waterways, canals as well as control over the Saint Lawrence seaway.

The US government had also contemplated paying “compensation” to the Hudson Bay Company. This consisted essentially in a plan to confiscate the territories under H.B.C jurisdiction (see map), “in full discharge of all claims to territory or jurisdiction in North America, whether founded on the charter of the [Hudson Bay] company or any treaty, law, or usage.”

The United States will pay ten millions of dollars to the Hudson Bay Company in full discharge of all claims to territory or jurisdiction in North America, whether founded on the charter of the company or any treaty, law, or usage. (Article XI)

The territorial division of British North America is outlined in the bill.  The various constituent “Canadian states” would conform to US laws in setting up their legislature.

Map of British North America (1862)

US War Department Plan to Invade Canada (1930)

While the 1866 Annexation project was stalled upon the adoption of the British North American Act in 1867, US plans to annex and/or invade Canada militarily were contemplated in the 1930s.

In the late 1920s, Washington formulated a detailed plan to invade Canada, entitled “Joint Army and Navy Basic War Plan — Red”. The plan was approved by the US War Department under the presidency of Herbert Hoover (right) in 1930. It was updated in 1934 and 1935 during the presidency of Franklin D. Roosevelt. It was withdrawn in 1939 following the outbreak of the Second World War.

Secretary of War Patrick J. Hurley (left below) was largely instrumental in the formulation and approval of Plan Red by the US administration.

The plan to invade Canada consisted of a 94-page document “with the word SECRET stamped on the cover. It had been formulated over a period of over five years (See full text in Annex).

In February 1935, the [US] War Department arranged a Congressional appropriation of $57 million dollars to build three border air bases for the purposes of pre-emptive surprise attacks on Canadian air fields. The base in the Great Lakes region was to be camouflaged as a civilian airport and was to “be capable of dominating the industrial heart of Canada, the Ontario Peninsula” (from p. 61 of the February 11-13, 1935, hearings of the Committee on Military Affairs, House of Representatives, on Air Defense Bases (H.R. 6621 and H.R. 4130). This testimony was to have been secret but was published by mistake. See the New York Times, May 1, 1935, p. 1.

In August 1935, the US held its largest peacetime military manoeuvres in history, with 36,000 troops converging at the Canadian border south of Ottawa, and another 15,000 held in reserve in Pennsylvania. The war game scenario was a US motorized invasion of Canada, with the defending forces initially repulsing the invading Blue forces, but eventually to lose “outnumbered and outgunned” when Blue reinforcements arrive. This according to the Army’s pamphlet “Souvenir of of the First Army Maneuvers: The Greatest Peace Time Event in US History” (p.2). ( Professor F.W. Rudmin, Queen’s University Kingston, Ontario, Comments on “War Plan Red”, see complete text in Annex III)

One of the updates to the 1930 invasion plan was the use of chemical weapons against civilians:

“In 1934, War Plan Red was amended to authorize the immediate first use of poison gas against Canadians and to use strategic bombing to destroy Halifax if it could not be captured.” (Ibid)

It is worth noting that in the course of World War II,  a decision was taken by the War Department to retain the invasion plan on the books. War Plan Red was declassified in 1974.

The Washington Post, which casually dismissed the historical significance of “Joint Army and Navy Basic War Plan — Red”, nonetheless acknowledged the aggressive nature of the proposed military endeavor:

PJayHurl.jpg

“A bold plan, a bodacious plan, a step-by-step plan to invade, seize and annex our neighbor to the north. …First, we send a joint Army-Navy overseas force to capture the port city of Halifax, cutting the Canadians off from their British allies.

Then we seize Canadian power plants near Niagara Falls, so they freeze in the dark.

Then the U.S. Army invades on three fronts — marching from Vermont to take Montreal and Quebec, charging out of North Dakota to grab the railroad center at Winnipeg, and storming out of the Midwest to capture the strategic nickel mines of Ontario.

Meanwhile, the U.S. Navy seizes the Great Lakes and blockades Canada’s Atlantic and Pacific ports.  … “(Raiding the Icebox; Behind Its Warm Front, the United States Made Cold Calculations to Subdue Canada, by Peter Carlson, Washington Post, 30 December 2005, emphasis added).

The original documents pertaining to the invasion of Canada including “War Plan Red” and Canada’s “Defence Scheme No. 1.” are in the archives of the US Army War College in Carlisle, Pa. [link no longer active]

The complete text of War Plan Red is contained in Annex III. The complete text of the Annexation Plan is contained in Annex I.

The  plan is detailed. It involves both military as well an intelligence components.

According to historian John Major “War, Plan Red” also consisted in “a series of possible pre-emptive American campaigns to invade Canada in several areas and occupy key ports and railways before British troops could provide reinforcement to the Canadians…”

Canada’s National Defense

The Canadian federal government and military were fully aware of these “Secret” US plans to invade Canada. In the 1920s, Lieutenant James “Buster” Sutherland Brown  had been appointed Director of Military Operations and Intelligence in Ottawa to address the issue of Canada’s national security.  His tasks consisted in developing contingency war plans in the case of a US attack against the Dominion of Canada.  Under the helm of “Buster” Sutherland Brown (subsequently promoted to Brigadier), Canada’s response to US threats was formulated under “Defence Scheme No. 1”, a counterattack contingency plan, in the case of a US invasion.

“Defense Scheme No. 1” was abandoned in 1931 by Canada’s chief of the general staff, A.G.L. McNaughton (following the adoption of “War Plan Red” in 1930) , on the grounds that “the Americans would inevitably win such a war” and there was no use in acting upon a contingency plan.

Ottawa had caved in. The watershed decision by the Conservative government of Prime Minister R. B. Bennett which came to office in August 1930 to abandon a Canada national defense plan constituted a de facto recognition of  US hegemony in North America.  While the invasion of Canada  under  Joint Army and Navy Basic War Plan — Red was never carried out, the military threat of an invasion plan served to oblige Canada to ultimately surrender to US political and economic pressures.

Let us remember on Canada Day, July 1st, 2020 that the greatest threat to Canadian national sovereignty emanates from US plans of “deep integration”, which have been supported by both the Harper and Trudeau governments.

Minor revisions on July 1st 2020


ANNEX I: (emphasis added)

TRANSCRIPT OF US BILL TO ANNEX CANADA INTO THE US (1866)

A Bill for the admission of the States of Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, Canada East, and Canada West, and for the organization of the Territories of Selkirk, Saskatchewan, and Columbia. (Annexation Bill)

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the President of the United States is hereby authorized and directed, whenever notice shall be deposited in the Department of State that the governments of Great Britain and the provinces of New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island, Newfoundland, Canada, British Columbia, and Vancouver’s Island have accepted the proposition hereinafter made by the United States, to publish by proclamation that, from the date thereof, the States of Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, Canada East, and Canada West, and the Territories of Selkirk, Saskatchewan, and Columbia, with limits and rights as by the act defined, are constituted and admitted as States and Territories of the United States of America. SEC. 2 And be it further enacted, That the following articles are hereby proposed, and from the date of the proclamation of the President of the United States shall take effect, as irrevocable conditions of the admission of the States of Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, Canada East, and Canada West, and the future States of Selkirk, Saskatchewan, and Columbia, to wit:

ARTICLE I.

All public lands not sold or granted; canals, public harbors, light-houses, and piers; river and lake improvements; railway stocks, mortgages, and other debts due by railway companies to the provinces; custom-houses and post offices, shall vest in the United States; but all other public works and property shall belong to the State governments respectively, hereby constituted, together with all sums due from purchasers or lessees of lands, mines, or minerals at the time of the union.

ARTICLE II.

In consideration of the public lands, works, and property vested as aforesaid in the United States, the United States will assume and discharge the funded debt and contingent liabilities of the late provinces, at rates of interest not exceeding five per centum, to the amount of eighty-five million seven hundred thousand dollars, apportioned as follows: To Canada West, thirty-six million five hundred thousand dollars; to Canada East, twenty-nine million dollars; to Nova Scotia, eight million dollars; to New Brunswick, seven million dollars; to Newfoundland, three million two hundred thousand dollars; and to Prince Edward Island, two million dollars; and in further consideration of the transfer by said provinces to the United States of the power to levy import and export duties, the United States will make an annual grant of one million six hundred and forty-six thousand dollars in aid of local expenditures, to be apportioned as follows: To Canada West, seven hundred thousand dollars; to Canada East, five hundred and fifty thousand dollars; to Nova Scotia, one hundred and sixty-five thousand dollars; to New Brunswick, one hundred and twenty-six thousand dollars; to Newfoundland, sixty-five thousand dollars; to Prince Edward Island, forty thousand dollars.

ARTICLE III.

For all purposes of State organization and representation in the Congress of the United States, Newfoundland shall be part of Canada East, and Prince Edward Island shall be part of Nova Scotia, except that each shall always be a separate representative district, and entitled to elect at least one member of the House of Representatives, and except, also, that the municipal authorities of Newfoundland and Prince Edward Island shall receive the indemnities agreed to be paid by the United States in Article II.

ARTICLE IV.

Territorial divisions are established as follows: (1) New Brunswick, with its present limits; (2) Nova Scotia, with the addition of Prince Edward Island; (3) Canada East, with the addition of Newfoundland and all territory east of longitude eighty degrees and south of Hudson’s strait; (4) Canada West, with the addition of territory south of Hudson’s bay and between longitude eighty degrees longitude ninety degrees; (5) Selkirk Territory, bounded east by longitude ninety degrees, south by the late boundary of the United States, west by longitude one hundred and five degrees, and north by the Arctic circle; (6) Saskatchewan Territory, bounded east by longitude one hundred and five degrees, south by latitude forty-nine degrees, west by the Rocky mountains, and north by latitude seventy degrees; (7) Columbia Territory, including Vancouver’s Island, and Queen Charlotte’s island, and bounded east and north by the Rocky mountains, south by latitude forty-nine degrees, and west by the Pacific ocean and Russian America. But Congress reserves the right of changing the limits and subdividing the areas of the western territories at discretion.

ARTICLE V.

Until the next decennial revision, representation in the House of Representatives shall be as follows: Canada West, twelve members; Canada East, including Newfoundland, eleven members; New Brunswick, two members; Nova Scotia, including Prince Edward Island, four members.

ARTICLE VI.

The Congress of the United States shall enact, in favor of the proposed Territories of Selkirk, Saskatchewan, and Columbia, all the provisions of the act organizing the Territory of Montana, so far as they can be made applicable.

ARTICLE VII.

The United States, by the construction of new canals, or the enlargement of existing canals, and by the improvement of shoals, will so aid the navigation of the Saint Lawrence river and the great lakes that vessels of fifteen hundred tons burden shall pass from the Gulf of Saint Lawrence to Lakes Superior and Michigan: Provided, That the expenditure under this article shall not exceed fifty millions of dollars.

ARTICLE VIII.

The United States will appropriate and pay to “The European and North American Railway Company of Maine” the sum of two millions of dollars upon the construction of a continuous line of railroad from Bangor, in Maine, to Saint John’s, in New Brunswick: Provided, That said “The European and North American Railway Company of Maine” shall release the government of the United States from all claims held by it as assignee of the States of Maine and Massachusetts.

ARTICLE IX.

To aid the construction of a railway from Truro, in Nova Scotia, to Riviere du Loup, in Canada East, and a railway from the city of Ottawa, by way of Sault Ste. Marie, Bayfield, and Superior, in Wisconsin, Pembina, and Fort Garry, on the Red River of the North, and the valley of the North Saskatchewan river to some point on the Pacific ocean north of latitude forty-nine degrees, the United States will grant lands along the lines of said roads to the amount of twenty sections, or twelve thousand eight hundred acres, per mile, to be selected and sold in the manner prescribed in the act to aid the construction of the Northern Pacific railroad, approved July two, eighteen hundred and sixty-two, and acts amendatory thereof; and in addition to said grants of lands, the United States will further guarantee dividends of five per centum upon the stock of the company or companies which may be authorized by Congress to undertake the construction of said railways: Provided, That such guarantee of stock shall not exceed the sum of thirty thousand dollars per mile, and Congress shall regulate the securities for advances on account thereof.

ARTICLE X.

The public lands in the late provinces, as far as practicable, shall be surveyed according to the rectangular system of the General Land office of the United States; and in the Territories west of longitude ninety degrees, or the western boundary of Canada West, sections sixteen and thirty-six shall be granted for the encouragement of schools, and after the organization of the Territories into States, five per centum of the net proceeds of sales of public lands shall be paid into their treasuries as a fund for the improvement of roads and rivers.

ARTICLE XI.

The United States will pay ten millions of dollars to the Hudson Bay Company in full discharge of all claims to territory or jurisdiction in North America, whether founded on the charter of the company or any treaty, law, or usage.

ARTICLE XII.

It shall be devolved upon the legislatures of New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, Canada East, and Canada West, to conform the tenure of office and the local institutions of said States to the Constitution and laws of the United States, subject to revision by Congress.

SEC 3. And be it further enacted, That if Prince Edward Island and Newfoundland, or either of those provinces, shall decline union with the United States, and the remaining provinces, with the consent of Great Britain, shall accept the proposition of the United States, the foregoing stipulations in favor of Prince Edward Island and Newfoundland, or either of them, will be omitted; but in all other respects the United States will give full effect to the plan of union. If Prince Edward Island, Newfoundland, Nova Scotia, and New Brunswick shall decline the proposition, but Canada, British Columbia, and Vancouver island shall, with the consent of Great Britain, accept the same, the construction of a railway from Truro to Riviere du Loup, with all stipulations relating to the maritime provinces, will form no part of the proposed plan of union, but the same will be consummated in all other respects. If Canada shall decline the proposition, then the stipulations in regard to the Saint Lawrence canals and a railway from Ottawa to Sault Ste. Marie, with the Canadian clause of debt and revenue indemnity, will be relinquished. If the plan of union shall only be accepted in regard to the northwestern territory and the Pacific provinces, the United States will aid the construction, on the terms named, of a railway from the western extremity of Lake Superior, in the State of Minnesota, by way of Pembina, Fort Garry, and the valley of the Saskatchewan, to the Pacific coast, north of latitude forty-nine degrees, besides securing all the rights and privileges of an American territory to the proposed Territories of Selkirk, Saskatchewan, and Columbia.


ANNEX II 

DETAILS OF “WAR PLAN RED” (1930)

The  plan is detailed (See annex III). It involves both military as well an intelligence components:

  • Nova Scotia and New Brunswick:
    • Occupying Halifax, following a poison gas first strike, would deny the British a major naval base and cut links between Britain and Canada.
    • The plan considers several land and sea options for the attack and concludes that a landing at St. Margarets Bay, a then undeveloped bay near Halifax, would be superior to a direct assault via the longer overland route.
    • Failing to take Halifax, the U.S. could occupy New Brunswick by land to cut Nova Scotia off from the rest of Canada at the key railway junction at Moncton.
  • Quebec and the valley of the Saint Lawrence River:
    • Occupying Montreal and Quebec City would cut the remainder of Canada off from the Eastern seaboard, preventing the movement of soldiers and resources in both directions.
    • The routes from northern New York to Montreal and from Vermont to Quebec are both found satisfactory for an offensive, with Quebec being the more critical target.
  • Ontario and the Great Lakes area:
    • Occupying this region gains control of Toronto and most of Canada’s industry, while also preventing Britain and Canada from using it for air or land attacks against the U.S. industrial heartland in the Midwest.
    • The plan proposes simultaneous offensives from Buffalo across the Niagara River, from Detroit into Ontario, and from Sault Ste. Marie into Sudbury. Controlling the Great Lakes for U.S. transport is considered logistically necessary for a continued invasion.
  • Winnipeg
    • Winnipeg is a central nexus of the Canadian rail system for connecting the country.
    • The plan sees no major obstacles to an offensive from Grand Forks, North Dakota, to Winnipeg.
  • Vancouver and Victoria:
    • Although Vancouver’s distance from Europe reduces its importance, occupying it would deny Britain a naval base and cut Canada off from the Pacific Ocean.
    • Vancouver could be easily attacked overland from Bellingham, Washington, and Vancouver Island could be attacked by sea from Port Angeles, Washington.
    • The British Columbia port Prince Rupert has a rail connection to the rest of Canada, but a naval blockade is viewed as easy if Vancouver were taken. (Wikipedia)

ANNEX III

COMPLETE TRANSCRIPT OF  “WAR PLAN RED”

The original documents pertaining to the invasion of Canada including “War Plan Red” and “Defence Scheme No. 1.” are in the archives of the US Army War College in Carlisle, Pa.  (link no longer functional)

A 1935 US Plan for Invasion of Canada

The following is a full-text reproduction of the 1935 plan for a US invasion of Canada prepared at the US Army War College, G-2 intelligence division, and submitted on December 18, 1935. This is the most recent declassified invasion plan available from the US archival sources. Centered pagination is that of the original document. The spelling and punctuation of the original document are reproduced as in the original document, even when in error by present-day norms.

This document was first identified by Richard Preston in his 1977 book, “The Defence of the Undefended Border: Planning for War in North America 1867-1939” (Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.) Preston’s reference citation (p. 277) identified this to be archived at the US Military History Collection, Carlisle Barracks, Pa., coded AWC 2-1936-8, G2, no. 19A. It was located by the US National Archives and supplied on microfilm.

The military planning context of this document is War Plan Red, which was approved in May 1930 by the Secretary of War and the Secretary of Navy. War Plan Red and supporting documents are available from the US National Archives on microfilm, in the Records of the Joint Board, 1903-1947, Roll 10, J.B. 325, Serial 435 through Serial 641. In War Plan Red, the US Army’s theatre of operations is defined to be: “All CRIMSON territory” (p.80), and the US Army’s mission, in bold type: ULTIMATELY, TO GAIN COMPLETE CONTROL OF CRIMSON (p. 84). CRIMSON is the colour code for Canada. In 1934, War Plan Red was amended to authorize the immediate first use of poison gas against Canadians and to use strategic bombing to destroy Halifax if it could not be captured.

In February 1935, the War Department arranged a Congressional appropriation of $57 million dollars to build three border air bases for the purposes of pre-emptive surprise attacks on Canadian air fields. The base in the Great Lakes region was to be camouflaged as a civilian airport and was to “be capable of dominating the industrial heart of Canada, the Ontario Peninsula” from p. 61 of the February 11-13, 1935, hearings of the Committee on Military Affairs, House of Representatives, on Air Defense Bases (H.R. 6621 and H.R. 4130). This testimony was to have been secret but was published by mistake. See the New York Times, May 1, 1935, p. 1.

In August 1935, the US held its largest peacetime military manoeuvres in history, with 36,000 troops converging at the Canadian border south of Ottawa, and another 15,000 held in reserve in Pennsylvania. The war game scenario was a US motorized invasion of Canada, with the defending forces initially repulsing the invading Blue forces, but eventually to lose “outnumbered and outgunned” when Blue reinforcements arrive. This according to the Army’s pamphlet “Souvenir of of the First Army Maneuvers: The Greatest Peace Time Event in US History” (p.2).

The following document is a declassified public domain document and may be freely reproduced. This should be of particular interest to people in the Halifax and Quebec City regions, then considered to be the most strategic cities in Canada.

F.W. Rudmin Queen’s University Kingston, Ontario

[page numbers oof original document are indicated]

-40-

SUPPLEMENT NO. 3

TO

REPORT OF COMMITTEE NO. 8

SUBJECT:

CRITICAL AREAS OF CANADA AND APPROACHES THERETO _______________________________________________ .

Prepared by:

SUBCOMMITTEE NO. 3

Major Charles H. Jones, Infantry, Chairman. Lt. Col. H.W. Crawford, Engineers.

I. Papers Accompanying. ___________________ 1. Bibliography. (Omitted, filed in Rec.Sec.) 2. List of Slides. ” 3. Appendices (1 and 2). ” 4. Annexes. (Incl. A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H,K, and L) ”

II. The Study Presented. ___________________ Determine under the geographical factor, the critical areas in Crimson (Canada) and the best approaches thereto for Blue. A critical area is assumed to be any area of such strategic importance to either belligerent that control thereof may have a material bearing on the out- come of the war.

III. Facts bearing on the study. __________________________ 1. General Considerations: An area in Crimson territory may be of strategic importance from the viewpoint of tactical, economic, or political considerations. In the final analysis, however, critical areas must be largely determined in the light of Red’s probable line of action and Crimson’s contribution to that effort. 2. Geographical Features of Canada. a. Location and extent. The location and extent of the Dominion of _ Canada is shown on the Map herewith (see Exhibit A). It comprises the entire northern half of the the North American continent, excepting only Alaska and the coast of Labrador, a dependency of the colony of New- foundland. The principal political subdivisions are those located along the border of the United States. These from east to west are: (1) The Maritime Provinces: Prince Edward Island. Nova Scotia. New Brunswick. (2) Quebec. (3) Ontario. (4) The Prairie Provinces: Manitoba. Saskatchewan. Alberta.

-41-

(5) British Columbia. Newfoundland, while not a part of the Dominion of Canada, would undoubtedly collaborate in any Crimson effort. b. Topography. (Slide 14852) _ The great area in eastern Canada underlain by rocks of Precambrian age is known as the Canadian Shield. Its northern boundary crosses the Arctic archipelago; the eastern boundary lies beyond Baffin Island and Labrador, and reaches the depressed area occupied by the St. Lawrence, a short spur crossing this valley east of Lake Ontario to join the Adirondack Mountains of New York. The southern boundary runs from this spur west to Georgian Bay thence along the north shore of Lake Huron and Lake Superior, thence northwest from the Lake of the Woods to the western end of Lake Athabaska. Its average elevation does not exceed 1500 feet. The greatest known elevations are in the eastern part of Baffin Island and along the coast of northern Labrador. Peaks of the Torngat Mountains of Labrador have elevations of between 4000 and 5000 feet.

The coast is one of the boldest and most rugged in the world, with many vertical cliffs rising 1000 to 2000 feet high. Occasional exceptions occur in which there are reliefs of several hundred feet, as in the hills along the north shore of Lake Huron and Lake Superior. The area is dotted with lakes, large and small, and of irregular outline. A lowland of considerable extent stretches for some distance into Ontario and Manitoba from Hudson Bay. Extending south and west form the Canadian Shield, between the Ap- palachian Mountains on the east and the Cordilleras on the west, lies the Great North American plain.

The northeastern portion of this plain called the St. Lawrence lowlands occupies southern Ontario, south of a line ex- tending from Georgian Bay to the east end of Lake Ontario; eastern Ontario lying between the Ottawa and St. Lawrence rivers, and that part of Quebec lying adjacent to the St. Lawrence between Montreal and Quebec. The plain west of the Canadian Shield, known as the Interior Plains, stretches northward to the Arctic Ocean between a line approximately join- ing Lake Winnipeg and Lake Athabasca, Great Slave Lake and Great Bear Lake on the east, and the foothills of the Rocky Mountains on the west.

That part of the St. Lawrence Lowlands lying in the eastern angle of Ontario, and in Quebec south of Montreal and extending down the St. Law- rence is comparatively flat and lies less than 500 feet above sea level. On the lower St. Lawrence it is greatly narrowed by the near approach of the Appalachian system to the Canadian Shield. The part lying adjacent to Lakes Ontario, Erie and Huron is of less even surface, has its greatest elevation of over 1700 feet south of Georgian Bay and slopes gently to the Great Lakes. The Interior Plains region is in general rolling country with broad undulations and a slope eastward and northward of a few feet per mile, descending from an elevation of 3000 to 5000 feet near the mountains on the west to less than 1000 feet at the eastern border. The rolling character of the area is relieved by several flat topped hills, by flat areas that formed the beds of extensive lakes, and by deep river valleys. The Appalachain and Arcadian regions occupy practically all that part of Canada lying east of the St. Lawrence, with the exception of the lowlands west of a line joining Quebec City and Lake Champlain. The Applachain region is a continuation into Quebec of three chains of the Applachain system of mountains. The most westerly of these ranges, the Green Mountains of Vermont, stretches northeast into the Gaspe peninsula, where it forms flat topped hills some 3000 feet high. The Acadian region, which includes

-42-

New Brunswick, Nova Scotia and Prince Edward Island is an alternation of upland with hills and ridges rising 2500 feet and higher. Adjacent to the Bay of Fundy is a series of ridges rising in places to 1200 feet. Between these two New Brunswick uplands, which converge toward the southwest is a lowland forming the whole eastern part of the province. This lowland ex- tends east to include Prince Edward Island, the western fringe of Cape Breton Island and the mainland of Nova Scotia north of the Cobequid moun- tains, which have an elevation of 800 to 1000 feet. South of the Cobequid Mountains lies a long narrow lowland stretching from Chedabucto Bay to Minas Basin, and along the Cornwallis Annapolis valley between North and South Mountains. South of this lowland is a highland sloping to the Atlantic Coast.

The northern part of Cape Breton Island is a tableland 1200 feet high with its central part rising to an elevation of over 1700 feet. The Cordelleran region, a mountainous area bordering the Pacific extends from the United States through Canada into Alaska and embraces nearly all of British Columbia and Yukon and the western edge of Alberta and the Northwest Territories. The eastern part of the Cordillera is occu- pied by the Rocky Mountains, with peaks rising to 10,000 feet and 12,000 feet. They extend northwest and fall away towards the Liard River. The western part of the Cordillera is occupied by the Coast Range and the mountains of Vancouver and Queen Charlotte Islands.

The Coast Range rises to heights of 7000 to 9000 feet. Between the Rocky Mountains and the Coast Range lies a vast plateau 3000 to 4000 feet high and cut by deep river valleys. 3. Population. According to the census of 1931, the total population on June 1, 1931 was 10,376,786, of whom 5,374,541 were males. The inhabited areas of the Dominion are essentially confined to a narrow strip alolo the United States boundary, generally south of the 56th parallel of latitude west of the Lake Winnipeg, and south of the 49th parallel of latitude east of Lake Superior. Approximately 10% of the total population are found in the Maritime provinces, 61% in Quebec and Ontario, 23% in the Prairie Provinces and 6% in British Columbia. Of the present population, 51.86% are of British descent, 28.22% French, and the remainder of widely scattered nativity. 4. Climate. The climate of southern Canada is comparable to that of the northern tier of the states of the United States. The west coast of British Columbia tempered by the Pacific Ocean is mild and humid. The prairie provinces generally experience extreme cold weather from November to March, with heavy snow fall. The climate of southern Ontario, the St. Lawrence Valley and the Maritime Provinces is much milder that that of the prairie provinces, but freezing temperatures are general between the end of November and the first of April, and the ground is usually covered with between one and three feet of snow. Any extensive military operations in Canada between November 1st and April 15th would be extremely difficult, if not impossible. 5. Communications. a. Railways. _ There are only two railway systems in Canada, both crossing Canada east and west from the Atlantic to the Pacific. These lines generally parallel the United States border, in some instances crossing through the United States.

-43-

(1) The Canadian national Railways system (See inclosure B) belonging to and operated by the government, has eastern terminals at Halifax, N.S., Portland, Maine (Grand Trunk), and through the Central Vermont, at Boston, New London and New York. Western terminals are Vancouver and Prince Rupert B.C. An extension from Cochrane, Ontario, to Moosonee, Ontario on James Bay, was completed by the Province of Ontario in July 1932, to connect with water routes to Churchill, Hudson Bay and with the northern route to Europe. (2) The Canadian Pacific system (see inclosure C) has its eastern terminus at Saint John, N.B. and it western terminus at Vancouver, B.C. As indicated by the systems maps, there are numerous branch lines serving the industrial and farming areas of the Dominion, and connecting lines ty- ing in with various railroads of the United States. From a military viewpoint, these railroads provide excellent trans- portation facilities for Blue, if invasion of Crimson is decided upon, and being located in close proximity to the border are, from the Crimson view- point, very liable to interruption. This is particularly true at Winnipeg some 60 miles north of Blues border, through which both transcontinental systems now pass. This fact probably encouraged Canada to construct the railroad from The Pass, Manitoba and develop the port at Churchill. Complete details concerning all railroads of Canada are contained in Appendix No. 1. b. Highways. _ In recent years Canada has greatly increased and improved her road con- struction and while there are enormous stretches of country, particularly in the northern portion of the Dominion, with few or no roads, the southern portion is well served with improved roads. A number of transcontinental motor roads are under construction or projected, the most important being the “Kings International Highway” from Montreal to Vancouver, via Ottawa, North Bay, Sudbury, Sault Ste. Marie, Winnipeg, MacLeod, Crow’s Nest Pass, Fernia and Cranbrook. Another highway is being constructed from Calgary to Vancouver. The principal roads in Ontario, Quebec and the Maritime Provinces are shown on Inclosure D, herewith. Roads in the Prairie Provinces and British Columbia are shown on inclosure E. The majority of improved roads are classified as gravel; macadam and concrete construction amounting to only 7870 miles out of a total of some 95,000 miles improved. Gravel roads will require extensive maintenance under heavy motor traffic, especially during the spring. c. Water Transportation. _ (1) Inland Waterways. The Great Lakes, with the St. Lawrence River, is the most im- portant fresh water transportation system in the world. At the present time it affords a draft of 21.0 feet over all the Great Lakes and through the Welland Canal into the St. Lawrence. From the Atlantic Ocean to Mon- treal, the present head of ocean navigation on the St. Lawrence, a draft of 30.0 feet is available, adequate for the great majority of ocean shipping. For some distance above Montreal the present channel has an available depth of only 14.0 feet. The inland waterway is of prime importance to the economic life of both the United States and Canada for the transportation of bulk com- modities, especially for the movement of wheat from the western plains to shipping centers on the eastern seaboard; of iron ore from the mines in Minnesota to foundaries along Lake Ontario; and for coal from the mines of Pennsylvania and West Virginia to Ontario, Quebec and the northwest.

-44-

The locks at Sault Ste. Marie, the boundary channels between Port Huron and Detroit and to a lesser degree the Welland Canal are the critical points on this waterway and effective control of such areas is vital to Blue. Navigation on the Great Lakes is generally closed by ice from about the end of November to the first of April. The St. Lawrence River is ordinarily ice bound for a similar period, but somewhat later about early in December to the latter part of April. While there are a number of Canadian lake ports of importance, Montreal is the only one which would not be automatically closed by Blue control of the Lakes. Montreal is also an important ocean port and will be considered along with other deep sea ports. (2) Ocean Shipping. The Dominion of Canada owns and operates a cargo and passenger carrying fleet consisting of some 57 cargo vessels and 11 passenger ships. The principal ocean ports and the magnitude of Canadian ocean traffic is indicated by the following tabulation:

A. Number and tonnage of sea-going vessels entered and cleared at the principal ports of Canada. (For year ending March 31, 1934.)

SEA-GOING VESSELS PORT arrived departed TOTAL TONS (REGISTERED) ____ _______ ________ _______________________ Halifax, N.S. * 1259 1484 7,540,990 Yarmouth, N.S. 535 519 1,102,191 St. John, N.B. * 684 688 2,924,822 Montreal, Quebec * 1078 907 7,266,569 Quebec, Que. * 397 308 3,388,829 Prince Rupert, B.C. 1141 1155 251,881 Vancouver, B.C. * 2332 2137 11,705,775 Victoria, B.C. 1927 1938 8,874,481 New Westminster, B.C. 678 700 3,123,606

IMPORTANT SECONDARY PORTS.

Churchill, Man. * 15 15 132,000 Three Rivers, Que 79 79 424,560 Windsor, N.S. 56 69 201,032

Note: The above figures do not indicate amount of commerce; Register tons ______ are gross tons. (Namely cubical contents in cubic feet divided by 100) less deductions for crews space, stores, etc.

A brief description of the above ports to indicate size, avail- able depths and important terminal facilities is included in Appendix No. 2. While the above tabulation lists the principal ports, it should be _________ realized that there are a large number of less desirable ports having available depths at low water of from 20 to 30 feet and provided with satis- factory terminal facilities, which can be used in an emergency for landing troops or supplies. Examples of this class of harbors are: Pictou, N.S. Sydney, N.S. Canso, N.S. Gaspe’, Quebec Sorel, Quebec

-45-

The port of Montreal, favorably located at the head of ocean naviga- tion on the St. Lawrence and the foot of inland navigation of the Great Lakes, is a natural shipping and railroad center. The port of Quebec is less favorable situated economically being more than 100 miles northeast of Montreal. Strategically, however, Quebec controls the commerce of Canada moving to or from the Atlantic seaboard. Its possession by Blue would interrupt eastern rail and water communication between England and the Mari- time Provinces and the rest of Canada. The port of Halifax is one of the best harbors on the Atlantic Coast and the principal winter port of Eastern Canada. The harbor has been ex- tensively developed by the Dominion government as a modern ocean terminal and naval base. It is fortified, though much of the armament is obsoles- cent. In case of war with Red, Halifax would become of prime importance to Red as a naval base and as a debarkation point for overseas expeditions in case Blue controlled the St. Lawrence. However, the routes available for a Red advance from Halifax into northeastern United States or towards Quebec and Montreal are quite difficult. The port of Saint John, New Brunswick is similar in many respects to the port of Halifax. It is open throughout the year and equipped with the most modern terminal facilities, including one of the largest drydocks in the world. It is an important shipping center for grain and dairy products. Due to the proximity of the port to the United States border and the fact that the principal rail connections (C.P. Ry.) passes through the state of Maine, the port would be of little use to Crimson or Red, at least in the early stages of war, provided Blue made any effort to control this area. The port of Vancouver, B.C. came into prominence with the opening of the Panama Canal, providing an alternate route to that of the transcontinental railroads for grain, dairy, lumber and the other products of western Canada to Europe. The port of Victoria, on Vancouver Island, is similarly situated, but due to the absence of rail connection with the mainland is more concerned with passenger and mail traffic than with bulk commodities. Esquimalt, two miles west of Victoria, and the only Canadian naval base on the west coast, is equipped with a large modern drydock, and affords good anchorage for the largest vessels. Consequently this area is of prime importance to Crimson. With the closing of the Panama Canal to Red traffic and the presence of Blue naval forces based on Honolulu, its commercial value is largely des- troyed. Assuming that Blue controls the St. Lawrence and cuts Crimson’s eastern communication with Red, the areas importance is enhanced, although it remains a decidedly unsatisfactory outlet. If Red should win control of the Pacific steamship lanes, the area becomes of first importance to Red. All factors considered, it must be controlled by Blue. The port of Prince Rupert is a first class harbor with modern terminal facilities and excellent and extensive anchorages. It becomes of extreme importance to Crimson, if and when they are denied the use of the southwest British Columbia ports, although, as in the case of Vancouver, it affords a most unsatisfactory and hazardous route to Europe. Physical occupation of Prince Rupert harbor by Blue is not vital, but closing the port to ocean traffic should be effected. The port of Churchill, Manitoba now offers a good harbor and limited but modern terminal facilities, affording a back door to the Prairie Provin- ces and, by way of Moosonee, Ontario, and the Temiskaming and Northern Ontario Railroad, with central and western Ontario. Hudson Bay and James Bay are open to navigation only about 4 months of the year, but this condition is partially offset by the fact that the distance from the Prairie Provinces

-46-

to Europe, via Churchill is from 500 to 1000 miles shorter than the rail- water route via Montreal. In case Red is denied the use of the Atlantic or Pacific ports, or both, Churchill will afford an outlet for grain and meat products from Ontario, Manitoba and Sasketchewan and an inlet for mili- tary supplies and troops from Europe unless the northern trade route through Hudson Strait is controlled by the Blue fleet, and this is improbable. d. Air Transportation (Civil). _ During 1933 there were 90 commercial aircraft operators in Canada. Their activities included forest file patrols, timber cruising, air photo- graphy, transportation of passengers, express and mail, etc. To encourage a more widespread interest and knowledge of aviation the Department of National Defense, since 1928, has issued two light air- planes and made certain grants to each of 23 flying clubs and a large air terminal has been built at St. Hubert, seven miles south of Montreal and a terminal airdrome at Rimouski, Quebec for the reception of trans-atlantic mails. At the close of 1934 there were 101 air fields of all types, 368 civil aircraft and 684 licensed pilots in Canada. Some details of airports in New Brunswick and Nova Scotia are given in a letter from the Office of the Chief of Air Corps, herewith. (See inclosure F) e. Telephone and Telegraph. _ (1) Cables. Six transoceanic cables have termini in Canada, five on the Atlantic and one on the Pacific. The Atlantic cables are landed at Halifax, though several of them are routed through Newfoundland. The Pacific cable lands at Vancouver from whence a cable also leads to the United States. (2) Radio. A transoceanic commercial radio beam service is carried on by a station at Drummondville, Quebec, with Australia, Great Britain and the United States. In 1932 a direct radio telephone circuit with Great Britain was opened through the medium of this beam station. (3) General. Canada is well supplied with local telephone, telegraph and radio service. Interruption of Canada’s trans-oceanic telegraph and radio service will seriously handicap Red-Crimson cooperation. 6. Other Economic Factors. a. Agriculture. _ Agriculture, including stock raising and horticulture, is the chief single industry of the Canadian people. Canada is not only self-sustaining, as far as food is concerned, but has a large excess for export. Food pro- duction is varied and so distributed throughout the dominion that each section is practically self-sustaining and cutting her off from the outside would would mere serve to deny her people certain luxuries, such as coffee, tea, sugar, spices and tropical fruit. The Maritime Provinces are noted for their fruit and vegetable crop, particularly for the oat and potato crops of Prince Edward Island and New Brunswick and apples in Nova Scotia. Quebec and Ontario are mixed farming communities with the Niagara peninsula specializing in fruit. Manitoba, Saskatchewan and Alberta are the principal wheat producing centers, with other grains and stock raising of increasing importance. The rich valleys of British Columbia produce apples, other fruit and vegetables.

-47-

b. Forests. _ The principal forests are in the provinces of British Columbia, Ontario, Quebec, New Brunswick and Nova Scotia. The manufacture of lumber, lath, shingles and other products such as paper pulp, is the second most important Canadian industry. c. Mineral Resources. _ Canada is one of the greatest mineral producing countries of the world. Nova Scotia, British Columbia, Quebec, Ontario, Alberta and the Yukon Ter- ritory contain the chief mining districts. The following summary notes pertinent facts concerning minerals of primary military importance. Aluminum. Aluminum was the 16th ranking Canadian export in 1934. Large quantities of bauxite, the principal source of supply were imported from the United States. Coal. There are enormous deposits of coal in Canada, largely in Nova Soctia and New Brunswick, in the east and in Alberta, Saskatchewan and British Columbia in the west. Due mainly to the distance of the fields from the manufacturing and industrial centers, about 50% of the coal consumed is imported from the United States, via the Great Lakes. Statistics for the calendar year 1933 show: Produced: Nova Scotia 6,340,790 tons New Brunswick 314,681 ” Manitoba 3,036 ” Saskatchewan 903,776 ” Alberta 4,748,074 ” British Columbia 1,484,653 ” Yukon Territory 638 ” Imported: From United States 8,865,935 tons From United Kingdom 1,942,875 ” Total – – – – – – ……………………….22,265,235 tons. (see slide 14855) In case of war with the United States, Canadas coal imports from this country would be cut off and her railroads and industrial activities seriously handicapped. If Blue controlled the Quebec area and Winnipeg, Canada’s railroads and industries dependent upon “steam power” would be crippled. Copper. The world production of copper in 1933 was (in short tons): Canada 149,992 Mexico 43,900 Rhodesia 144,954 Peru 28,000 Belgian Congo 73,409 Spain and ) Chile 179,200 Portugal ) 34,720 Japan 75,459 United States 196,190 Canada’s production was distributed approximately as follows: Province Tons ________ ____ Quebec 35,000 Eastern Townships Ontario 72,700 Sudbury area Manitoba 19,000 Flin Flon Saskatchewan 1,600 British Columbia 21,600 Western Manitoba

-48-

Iron and Steel. Canada ranks seventh among the nations as a producer of iron and steel but only a small percentage of her production is derived from domestic ores, in view of the abundant supply of higher grade ores in Newfoundland and Minnesota. The Wabana section of Newfoundland contains the largest known single deposit of iron ore in the world. There are large iron ore deposits in Quebec, northern Ontario and British Columbia but for various reasons they are handicapped for blast furnace treatment. Iron and steel are produced in Nova Scotia (Sydney) and in Ontario. Iron ore is obtained from the Mesabi Range in Minnesota, via the Great Lakes and from Newfound- land. (See slide 14856) The bulk of iron and steel products, however, are imported, principally from the United States and the United Kingdom.

Lead. Lead is obtained in Canada largely from deposits in British Columbia, the largest porting being exported to England. Nickel. The world production of nickel in 1933 was about 50,736 tons, of which about 82% originated in the Sudbury district, north of Georgian Bay in Ontario. The remainder came chiefly from New Caledonia (Fr.). A new deposit of nickel was recently discovered in northern Saskatchewan but has not yet been worked. Nickel is necessary to industry and indispensable in war. Control of the Sudbury mines, in case of war, is therefor of vital importance. Petroleum. The production of crude oil or petroleum in Canada during 1934 amounted to 1,417,368 barrels, principally from the Turner Valley field in Alberta. A small amount is also obtained from wells near Monkton, New Brunswick and in southwest Ontario, between Lake Huron and Lake Erie. Considerable quantities are also imported from the United States. Zinc. Canada ranks fourth among the worlds producers of zinc. Her out- put in 1934 totaled 298,579,531 pounds.

The principal producing mines are located in the Kootenay district of British Columbia and near Flin-Flon in northwest Manitoba. Approximately 2/3 of the zinc exported goes to Great Britain. d. Manufacturing. _ (1) General. Canada is the second largest manufacturing country in the British Empire, with Ontario and Quebec the most important industrial centers. The relative standing of the various provinces during 1933, based on the value of products manufactured, was approximately as follows: Ontario $1,000,000,000. Quebec 650,000,000. British Columbia * 146,500,000. Manitoba 91,000,000. Alberta 55,000,000. Nova Scotia 53,000,000. New Brunswick 45,000,000. Saskatchewan 36,000,000. Prince Edward Island 3,000,000. *Includes Yukon Territory

-49-

The principal industries ranked according to gross value of products (1932) are: Pulp and Paper $123,415,492. Central Electrical Stations 117,532,081. Non-ferrous metal smelting 100,561,297. Slaughtering and meat packing 92,366,137. Flour and food mills 83,322,099. Butter and Cheese 80,395,887. Petroleum Products 70,268,265. Bread and other bakery product 51,244,162. Cotton yarn and cloth 51,197,628. Printing and publishing 50,811,968. Clothing factory, women’s 44,535,823. Automobiles. 42,885,643. Rubber goods. 41,511,556. Hosiery and knitted goods 40,997,210. Sawmills. 39,438,057. (2) Munitions. (a) Aircraft.

There are at present six firms manufacturing aircraft as follows: Canadian-Vickers……………Montreal, Que. De Haviland………………..Toronto, Ont. Curtis Reid………………..Cartierville, Que. Fairchild………………….Longueuil, Que. Boeing…………………….Vancouver, B.C. Ottawa Car Mfg. Co………….Ottawa, Que. Aero engine factories have been established by: Armstrong-Siddeley Motors Co. at Ottawa, Que. Aero Engines of Canada at Montreal, Que. Canadian Pratt-Whitney Aircraft Co. at Longueuil, Que. (b) Miscellaneous. During the World War Canada demonstrated her ability to divert her peace time industries to the production of munitions, when she manufactured and exported large quantities of shells, fuses, cartridge cases, explosives, gun forgings, machine guns and small arms ammunition.

This production could not be obtained in case of war with Blue but some munitions could be produced if her factories were free to operate and raw materials were available. The government arsenal at Lindsey, Ont., is equipped to produce small arms ammunition and the arsenal at Quebec manu- factures some small arms and artillery ammunition. e. Commerce. _ Analysis of Canada’s industry and resources indicate that she has a sufficiency or surplus of certain raw materials but a deficiency of others. The more important of these materials are as follows: (1) Sufficiency or surplus; Arsenic, asbestos, cadmium, cobalt, copper, feldspar, fish oil, fluospar, foodstuffs, furs, gold, graphite, gypsum, lead, leather, magnesium, mica, nickel, silver, talc, wood and zinc. (2) Deficiency; Aluminium, antimony, bauxite, barytes, camphor, chromite, coal, cotton, flax, hemp, iron, jute, kaolin, manganese, mercury, nitrates, phosphate, petroleum, opium, quinine, rubber, silk, sugar, sulphur, tea, tin, tobacco and wool.

Who’s Behind the Canada Truckers Revolt?

FEBRUARY 15, 2022


NY Times:

 Trudeau Declares Rare Public Emergency to Quell Protests


“We cannot and will not allow illegal and dangerous activities to continue,” Canada’s prime minister said in a speech to the nation.

The odious Globalist weasel who lords over conquered Canada was never exactly the sharpest knife in the drawer. Nonetheless, when it comes to cunning and politicking, Prime Minister Justine Trudeau (Castro Jr), much like Bill Clinton of America, of such “skills” has no lack. Though a Soros-Schwab leftist through and through, Trudeau, like Clinton, instinctively knows how to “moderate” back to the “center” the moment the concerned public starts to push back against the Marxist advance.

It therefore comes as quite a shock to observe Trudeau antagonizing his own countrymen to the extent that he is — going so far as to label the trucker-protesters and their growing legions of supporters as “racists and misogynists.”  And now, this — from the article:

“Trudeau took the rare step of declaring a national public order emergency in a push to end protests that have paralyzed the center of the Canadian capital for more than two weeks and reverberated across the country. Mr. Trudeau and several of his cabinet ministers said the move would allow the government to take a variety of steps, including freezing bank accounts of protesters.”

Trudeau’s hard line is so hard that even the high & mighty Editorial Board of The New York Times (fearful of a Canadian backlash)felt compelled to distance itself from Trudeau’s heavy-handedness. What’s this shaggy-haired clown doing to Canada? Does he not see that this tyrannical decree has the potential for backfiring? — Or does he?

Check this out:

There has never been, and there will never be, a successful “spontaneous” uprising of “the people”  which came to fruition solely as a result of the initiative and actions of “the people.”

Memorize that!

“The people” — for the most part — will ever be an inert mass of normies waiting to be activated by some higher hand. All revolts — whether “good” or “bad” — must therefore be engineered and executed or, at the very least, be critically aided, abetted and financed by a second tier faction of the ruling class that has turned against the dominant faction.

The American Revolution was the secretive work of some of the richest and most talented men in the colonies; the Jacobin clubs of revolutionary France had the Illuminati behind them; the Bolsheviks were guided and funded by the limitless pockets of the Schiff-Warburg-Rothschild crime syndicate which simultaneously waged war on the Russian Monarchy from the outside; the various “Color Revolutions” and “Arab Spring” uprisings of the 2000’s were the handiwork of Soros and the CIA; and even Hitler’s ground-up revolution still required the money of the industrial class and the tacit blessing of both retired and active military leaders in order to succeed in the end.

This is not “conspiracy theory.” It’s just basic social dynamics — which leads to the question: Who is the power behind Canada’s “Trucker Revolution?”

We waited awhile before calling this one. But now that the trucker revolt shows no signs of abating any time soon — (actually, it is going global) — Trump and the international White Hat coalition have to be the only suspects behind this “spontaneous” anti-vax-mandate movement. The Globalists are getting a taste of their own medicine. In due time, we expect, hopefully, that the Trudeau regime (as well as others like it in Europe) will be toppled via cascading “Color Revolutions” similar to Eastern Europe’s Soros “Velvet Revolutions” of 1989.

As for Trudeau’s astonishingly antagonistic “blundering” here — a series of fuel-to-the-fire missteps so “foolish” that it seems as though he’s actually working for Trump — well, we believe that he is! Only that he, meaning Trudeau, is actually “Trudeau” — meaning, a Deep Fake imposter. (incoming hate mail in 3… 2… 1).

Like so many others (Biden, Maricon sorry “Macron”, Bojo, Hillary, Obongo, Pelosi, numerous celebrities et al) “Trudeau” doesn’t look the same, nor sound the same (accent sounds American, not Canadian)And then there was that eyebrow of his which literally started falling off, on camera, at the most recent G-7 conference!(image below)

Keep your eye on Canada, and expect these “spontaneous” trucker revolts to keep gaining and expanding internationally.

NYT’s Krugman Would KILL the Unvaxxeds

NY Times:What to Do With Our Pandemic Anger

By Paul Krugman

The Nobel Prize Winning” Fake Economist Paul Krugman is one of the most senior propagandists at the Manhattan Mendacity Machine and a ubiquitous TV gadfly. The odious little demon’s subtle condescending scorn and veiled hatred for White people — the American rural class in particular — have been well exposed in previous articles by “Moi”.  But in this vile attack against the non-vaccinated, the sneaky sniveling specimen of Satanic scum leaves absolutely nothing to subtlety.

Krugman’s kikey kookiness is really “off the charts” this time. He is openly inciting the type of Trotskyite hatred which — if he had his way — would lead to internment and even mass murder of the modern incarnation of the “kulaks” (Russian private farmers). Let’s analyze what this “Pulitzer Prize” nominee has to say about us “selfish” non-normies.

1. Fake Economist Krugman is a compulsive liar who has many deluded fanboys. // 2. Nobel Prizes for the hard sciences tend to be valid, but in the realms of foreign affairs and economics, the million dollar award is an indicator of high level criminality. // 3. In comparison to the hateful Bolshevik revolutionary Leon Trotsky, Vladimir Lenin and Joe Stalin (who later had his exiled rival Trotsky killed with a pick axe through his skull in Mexico) were moderates. Krugman is a Trotsykite world revolutionary with a pathological hatred for White country folk.

Krugman: New York City remains America’s gateway to the world — a status that brings many good things, but also makes it a place where new variants of the corona-virus can spread fast.
Analysis: The reason why New York was the “epicenter” of Stupid-19 and its never-ending spawn of Greek-lettered “variants” has got nothing to do with being a “gateway to the world.” It’s because New York is the Jewish media capital of the world. What happens in New York gets magnified and amplified — just like the 9/11 false flag did.

Krugman: The good news is that the city appears to have weathered the rapidly receding Omicron wave relatively well.
Analysis: So, what’s all the fuss about then?

Krugman: It is a very different story from what happened during the initial wave in 2020, when New York was uniquely vulnerable because of its high population density and reliance on public transportation
Analysis: Provincial New York libtards & normies have an exaggerated view of themselves and their “uniqueness.” In reality, “The Big Apple” doesn’t even register on the list of the world’s most densely populated urban areas. How is it that cities like Manila, Cairo, Bangalore et al had nowhere near the number of “Covid deaths” per capita as New York Shitty? Answer: The numbers were rigged for the media capital of the western world.

Krugman: This time, the city was able to cope much better, in part because a great majority of its residents are vaccinated, and they generally follow rules about wearing masks, showing proof of vaccination before dining indoors, and so on.
Analysis: New Yorkers survived Omicron because they were obedient little commies.

Krugman: In other words, New Yorkers have been behaving fairly responsibly by U.S. standards. Unfortunately, U.S. standards are pretty bad.
Analysis: Now comes the Satanic hatred.

Krugman: America has done a very poor job of dealing with Covid.
Analysis: Americans were locked-down, socially-distanced, masked-up and, for the most part, vaccinated. And it’s still not enough for this nasty swine.

Krugman: We’ve had more deaths, as a percentage of the population, than any other large, wealthy nation.
Analysis: Not exactly. What we’ve had was more fraudulent PCR “test” results and more rigged statistics than any other large, wealthy nation.

Krugman: Why? Because so many Americans haven’t behaved responsibly. And I know I’m not alone in feeling angry about this irresponsibility.
Analysis: Putrid Paulie is “angry.” Be afraid! The bellowing Bolshevik is essentially calling we-the-disobedient MURDERERS.

1 & 2: The 9/11 False Flag and the Stupid-19 hoax were both “epicentered” in New York City for maximum media impact. // 3. The Times has been inciting hatred against the disobedient, particularly those in Republican states of the South and the Heartland.

Krugman: There are surely many Americans feeling a simmering rage against the minority that has placed the rest of us at risk and degraded the quality of our nation’s life.
Analysis: A “simmering rage” against we-the-disobedient, eh? Feeling’s mutual, you malevolent Marxist motherfucker.

Krugman: Available surveys suggest that  a majority of vaccinated Americans were frustrated or angry with the unvaccinated.
Analysis: The only reason that the bewildered boobs of the overlapping tyrannical Kingdoms of Normiedom and Libtardia are “angry” at we-the-disobedient is because scum like Kikeman have incited them to hatred with 24/7 fear porn and disinformation.

Krugman: I wouldn’t be surprised if those numbers grew so that Americans fed up with their compatriots who won’t do the right thing are now a silent majority.
Analysis: The Satanic spirit of Trotsky and the Cheka of Russia’s early Bolshevik days animates Kikeman’s keyboard.

Krugman: Oh, and don’t tell me that how you behave during a pandemic is just an individual choice.
Analysis: If it’s not an “individual choice” — then it must be a collective mandate, which can only be enforced by hired thugs. Kill the kulaks!

Krugman: I don’t claim any special expertise in the science…..
Analysis: “Yeah but” alert — Here comes the “but” in 3… 2…. 1…

Krugman:  but there seems to be clear evidence ….
Analysis: The terms “seems to be” and “clear evidence” actually contradict each other. Just sayin’. Continue, asshole.

Krugman: ….that wearing masks in certain settings has helped limit the spread of the coronavirus.
Rebuttal: Wrong again, Crockman. A viral molecule is to the fibers of a mask as a mosquito is to a chain link fence. It still gets through the “protection” — into your lying mouth and up your hooked nose, to say nothing of your beady little eyeballs, wax-filled ear canals, and snake-skin pores etc.

Krugman: I know that some people in red America …
Analysis: There it is! The diminutive little rat bastard can’t resist. “America” —- those damned unwashed uncultured kulak rednecks of red-state “flyover country.” This is quintessentially  cosmopolitan snobbery.

Krugman: Those who refuse to take basic Covid precautions are, at best, being selfish — at worst, they’re engaged in deliberate aggression .
Analysis: Wow! Even by Krugman’s standards, this is shocking language. We-the-disobedient are now “aggressors.”

Krugman: The fact that some of the people around us are deliberately putting others at risk takes its own psychological toll.
Analysis: According to this logic, we-the-disobedient could be sued for inflicting emotional distress on normies…. or perhaps even imprisoned.

Krugman: Tell me that it doesn’t bother you when the person sitting across the aisle or standing behind you in the checkout line ostentatiously goes maskless or keeps his or her mask pulled down.
Analysis: It doesn’t bother me at all. What bothers me are the sanctimonious dumb-as-dirt normies who remain under your hypnotic spell.

Krugman: Many Americans are angry at the bad behavior that has helped keep this pandemic going.
Analysis: Many Americans are also “angry” over having had their businesses destroyed and their lives disrupted — all for a HOAX perpetrated by the usual suspects. Satan help you, Crookman, if we-the-disobedient ones ever get the upper hand on you guys.

Krugman: This quiet rage of the responsible should be a political force to be reckoned with.
Analysis: Dream on, Kikeman. The Communists of America will be wiped out this November. Let’s “hope and pray” that it will be a permanent purge this time.
*

Insane criminals like Krugman really ought to be strung up from a lamppost. Sound harsh? He’d do it to us in a Jew York minute if he could. It’s him or us.

1 & 2. Bolshevik anti-kulak propaganda led to mass arrests of the “selfish” farmers who resisted the “collective interest.” // 3. Trotsky & Krugman — more than just commies. Unlike Stalin (who was merely a political tyrant) these types have always had an ethnically-based murderous Talmudic hatred for the rural class.