Ukrainian Cancel Culture Goes Full…

A street named after the classical composer Tchaikovsky in Lviv, Ukraine.

JUNE 24, 2022


NY Times: Goodbye, Tchaikovsky and Tolstoy: Ukrainians Look To ‘Decolonize’ Their Streets.

by M. King,

The madness of the bought & paid-for leaders of this CIA-created Satanic farce of a “nation” that calls itself “Ukraine” has, evidently, urinated down upon local governments and a broad element of the population itself. The invented mythology holds that the REGION historically referred to as “the Ukraine” has always been a distinct ethnicity and identity “suppressed” by the “cultural colonizing” Russians. The Times article sympathetically describes the latest “cancel culture” insanity to come out of this pathetic “nation.” —

“Far from Ukraine’s embattled eastern front, a new struggle is being waged — not from the trenches, but over leafy side streets and broad avenues. That is where the enemy goes by the name Pavlov. Or Tchaikovsky. Or Catherine the Great.

Across Ukraine, streets and subway stops whose names evoke the history of the Russian Empire or the Soviet Union are under scrutiny by a population eager to rid itself of traces of the nation that invaded in late February.

“We are defending our country, also on the cultural front lines,” said Andriy Moskalenko, the deputy mayor of Lviv and the head of a committee that has reviewed the names of each of the city’s more than 1,000 streets. “And we don’t want to have anything in common with the killers.”

“When we rename a street, it doesn’t mean we are saying: ‘This person didn’t make this invention, or was not important,’” said Mr. Moskalenko, the deputy mayor of Lviv. “It means this person’s work has been used as a tool of colonization.”

Shit! One has to wonder how many of these Russia-hating Ukrainians are actually “Ukrainians”

Russian novelist Tolstoy: cancelled // Russian composer 
Tchaikovsky: cancelled // Russian scientist / 
physiologist
 Pavlov: cancelled

THE Ukraine is a REGION — like say, THE Ohio Valley, or THE Caucasus, THE Florida Everglades, or THE French Riviera, or THE Donbas etc. The “nationalist” script writers canceled the grammatical article “the” so as to transform this 1200-year-old REGION (The Ukraine) of Russia into a proper, though fake, nation (Ukraine). The historical reality of the matter is that the massive federation of 800s Kievan Rus is the historical, ethnic, linguistic Viking ancestor entity of BelarusRussia, and “Ukraine.” The Mongols took control in the 1200s, and when their grip was finally broken some 200 years later, the center of power and influence emerged in Moscow, though Kiev always remained an important part of the Russian Empire.

Thus, from the early days of Kievan Rus, down through the centuries of the Tsars, and for most of the 20th Century as part of the Soviet Union, the Ukraine was nothing more than a region — with its westernmost inhabitants speaking a bastardized dialect of Russian, and the now oppressed easterners never deviating at all from their Russianity. Ukraine’s western distance from the Russian center and its slight cultural differences gave the “usual suspects” an opening to use “nationalism” to play their usual divide and conquer scheme — very similar to the fake-ass Bavarian Nationalism movement which (((they))) juiced up in an effort to further splinter Germany after World War I.

Given the recent history of Ukraine I would like to suggest some new street names to replace the old ones being removed – names which better reflect the true “heritage” of this modern day fake state.

  • Soros Street
  • Brzezinski Parkway
  • Nuland Drive
  • Bush Road
  • Obongo Square
  • McCain Highway
  • Clinton Court
  • Biden Boulevard
  • CIA Circle
  • Mossad Park
  • Tel Aviv Terrace
  • NATO Avenue
  • MI6 Alley

Without those Globalist entities and individuals, Ukrainian “Nationalism” wouldn’t even exist today. So it is they that the Ukrainians should be “honoring” – instead of some obscure “Ukrainian” poet not worthy to carry Tolstoy’s pen, or some unheard-of composer not fit to tune Tchaikovsky’s piano.

1. The vile John McStain in Kiev (2013) — stirring up a violent coup. (I thought he couldn’t lift his arms due to a Vietnam war injury?? // 2. Victoria Nuland-Kagan (cough cough) shows off her newly-installed Ukraine puppet criminals (2014). // 3. Vice President Biden (when he still had pearly white teeth implants) with puppet Poroshenko.

Killing Napoleon…Again

JUNE 7, 2022

NY Times:
 
Napoleon Isn’t a Hero to Celebrate

“Professor” Marlene L. Daut “Phd” teaches “African Diaspora Studies” at the University of Virginia. That alone — neither supporting research nor footnotes needed — absolutely proves that she talks out of her ass and hates “The White Man” (even though she is married to a White “cuck”).

The latest target of the “cancel culture” Napoleon Bonaparte — who, Hitler defied the House of Rothschild and was forced into protracted defensive warfare against Britain and her allies.

Daut’s ignorance, on full display in this Op-Ed piece for the NY Times, is as appalling as her bigotry. Join us for a well-deserved bitch-smacking of this hateful hell-cat.

1. The untaught anti-White professorette (who clearly happens to have an abundance of White DNA) wishes to teach us about Napoleon. // 2. Read book by M. King // 3. Scene from 1934 Hollywood film, The House of Rothschild, depicts the cunning Brothers Rothschild dictating to “The Allies” the conditions for their financing of the war to topple Napoleon.

Daut: After statues of enslavers and colonizers were toppled, defaced or taken down across Europe and the United States, France decided to move in the opposite direction.
Analysis: Reading between the lines here, it is clear that Ms. Daut approves of physical and cultural vandalism.

Daut: The year 2021 was hailed by many museums and institutions in the country as the “Year of Napoleon” to commemorate France’s biggest tyrant.
Analysis: The “tyrant” actually liberated his people from usury; expanded educational opportunities for the children of common folk; opened up advancement based upon merit; and was universally beloved by the people of France — except for the Illuminati / Red Jacobin scum who tried to kill him.

Daut: As a Black woman of Haitian descent and a scholar of French colonialism, I find it particularly galling to see that France plans to celebrate the man who restored slavery to the French Caribbean.
Rebuttal: As a Hispanic Man of European (Spain), Black (Africa) and Taino Indian (Puerto Rico) descent and a “scholar” of real history, I find it particularly galling to have to listen you crybabies trash history and when our Black ancestors also practiced slavery. That’s the way it was back then — get over it!

Daut: He was an architect of modern genocide, whose troops created gas chambers to kill my ancestors.
Rebuttal: “Gas chambers?” — You too? Oy vey — or shall we say “Sacre bleu.” Did the French use Zyklon B too?

Daut: First, some history: In 1794, in the wake of the revolution that transformed France from a monarchy into a republic — France declared slavery’s abolition throughout its territory. But in 1802, Napoleon was in charge and reversed that decision, making France the only country to ever have brought back slavery after abolishing it. …The French only definitively re-abolished slavery in 1848.
Rebuttal: Waaaah! Waaaah! Waaaah! Get over it. And by the way, a reader named “Ken” informs us:

“As a Napoleonic scholar I would like to mention that Napoleon did not want to reintroduce slavery in Haiti. He was coerced into it by the reaction to the horrors committed against Whites; and many powerful people in France demanded it.”

Daut: Although Napoleon also destroyed the very republic the French claim to revere when he made himself emperor in 1804….
Rebuttal: Actually, Marlene, what Napoleon and his followers “destroyed” was the murderous atheistic Jacobin tyranny (early Bolsheviks) which called itself a “republic” –as well as the libtarded cousins that replaced them (The Directory). Though he named himself “Emperor,” France in many ways remained an “egalitarian” nation governed fairly by the rule of law (the Napoleonic Code).

Daut: It is still common for the French to lionize him as a hero…
Rebuttal: That’s because it is impossible to totally erase the memory of the great deeds of a great man — even in libtarded France. Give it another 30 years or so, and the legend of Hitler will also rise again (unless the New World Order achieves final victory, that is).

Daut:  … who not only stomped all over Europe at the Battle of Austerlitz….
Rebuttal: What the professorette doesn’t tell you (or probably doesn’t even know herself) is that the Battle of Austerlitz (in which the French soundly defeated the Austrians and Russians) brought an end to the Third Coalition War which the old monarchies of Europe — led by King George III’s British bullies — imposed upon revolutionary France. There would be four more “Napoleonic Wars” instigated against France — always led by Britain and later financed by the House of Rothschild. That is why Napoleon “stomped all over Europe.”

Daut: … but also created the modern legal code and the education system still in use.
Rebuttal: And a damn fine code and a damn system it must have been to serve France for 200 years and counting!

The Napoleonic Code — which Napoleon himself had a direct hand in authoring — has withstood the test of time.

Daut: Things unfolded tragically in Haiti. Under two generals who were sent to the island by Napoleon to, in his words, “annihilate the government of the Blacks,” the French Army was ordered to kill all the people of color in the colony who had ever “worn an epaulet.”
Analysis: Haiti was part of the French Empire. It fell to the Jacobinized Blacks. Many innocent Whites — not all of them slaveholders — were slaughtered. Napoleon had an obligation to protect the innocent French residents — many of whom were actually friendly and sympathetic toward the Blacks and mulattoes of Haiti (from which Ms. Daut is descended).

Daut: My students and colleagues, in both France and the United States, usually respond with shock and horror when I describe how thousands of Black people in Saint-Domingue were so cruelly killed by the French.
Analysis: What this forked-tongue serpent conveniently fails to mention is that both sides waged a brutal struggle. In 1804, after the French failed to retake Haiti, the cruel Haitian General Dessalines ordered the mass massacre of every last French man, woman and child on the island. (That’s why there are no Whites in Haiti today). The “shock and horror” that these Whites — who naively remained in “liberated” Haiti and harbored no animosity toward the Blacks — must have felt when machete-wielding killers went door-to-door at night doesn’t seem to move Ms. Daut to tears though. In fact, she evidently admires the beast Dessalines! (hereand (here)

Daut: Perhaps French leaders should open an inquiry into why Napoleon, a racist and genocidal warmonger….
Rebutal: Napoleon was NOT a warmonger. All seven of the “Coalition Wars” (3-7 aka “The Napoleonic Wars”) were imposed upon France by the old monarchies of Europe — thus compelling Napoleon to occupy other states and install friendly Kings.

Haitian Monster 
Jean-Jacques Dessalines ordered the massacre of every French man, woman and child in Haiti — many of whom had never even been slaveholders and had been friendly with the non-Whites. Dessalines’s legendary cruelty was such that many mulattoes and Blacks feared him as well.

* Dessalines — referred to even by many Haitians as a tyrant — would himself be assassinated in 1806. His body was then stomped upon and mutilated by an angry mob. Haiti has remained misgoverned ever since.

Did A Fragment Of The ‘True Cross’ Of Christ Just Sink With Russia’s Destroyed Warship?

Was the recently sunk Russian flagship, The Moskva , carrying a fragment of the ‘true cross’ of Christ?

did a fragment of the 'true cross' of christ just sink with russia’s destroyed warship?

The Moskva was Russia’s Black Sea fleet flagship. The warcraft sank last Thursday after an onboard explosion. In 2020, Russian state media reported that the ship was due to take a holy relic onboard.

Now, the question is being asked whether she sank with or without the piece of wood believed to have been a fragment from the cross of the crucified Christ.

A Lot Of Wood For One Cross

It has to be said from the top of this article that if all the fragments of the true cross were gathered together from museums, cathedrals and churches one would have enough wood to build a replica of Noah’s ark.

That said, great religious and cultural significance has been projected into the tiny piece of wood that is believed to have sunk on Thursday onboard the doomed Russian warship.

The Moskva was a Russian missile cruiser. She was heralded as the flagship of Russia’s Black Sea fleet. Nevertheless, Russian state media reported that it sank on Thursday following an explosion onboard. The association with the holy relic comes after the Russian Orthodox Church announced back in February 2020 that the relic had been delivered to the then-commander of the Black Sea fleet, Vice Admiral Igor Osipov. The state-run Tass news agency reported at the time that the piece of ‘true cross’ was being stored at the fleet’s headquarters before the planned delivery to the ship.

Questioning The Fate Of The True Cross Fragment

The fragment of wood believed to have originated from the crucifixion cross of Jesus Christ measures only around 5 millimetres long. Tass reported that it was embedded in a 19th-century metal cross kept in a reliquary in Russia.

Across the globe many churches and cathedrals claim to possess tiny pieces of wood believed to be fragments from the True Cross, but this ranks as one of the smallest.

Roman Catholic and Orthodox followers generally never doubt the authenticity of these magical, or miraculous, pieces of wood, and regard them ‘all’ as genuine pieces of the cross of Christ.

On the other hand, Protestants most often dispute the claimed holy relics believing the whole concept is nothing more than idolatry.

one of many ‘true cross’ relics

One of many ‘true cross’ relics (Lawrence OP / CC by SA 3.0 )

All of the claimed holy fragments have their origins in the writings of Historian Socrates of Constantinople who said Empress Helena travelled to the Holy Land in 326–328 AD, where she discovered the hiding place of three crosses. While two were associated with the crucifixion of the two thieves, St. Dismas and Gestas, the third bore the name of Jesus.

According to Fox 5 News the Moskva had the capacity to carry 16 long-range cruise missiles which could have had devastating effects on Ukrainian cities. Reports say the warship’s sinking ‘reduces Russia’s firepower in the Black Sea.’ It is not yet determined whether or not Ukrainian forces sank the Moskva , but if they did it represents the largest warship to be sunk in combat since the Falklands War, according to Fox. So why then was a sacred relic transferred onto a Russian warship?

The Moskva battleship had a small chapel onboard, said Sergiy Khalyuta, archpriest of the Russian Orthodox Church’s Sevastopol District. He told Tass that the holy relic was transferred at the request of its owner, who is an anonymous collector. Business Insider investigated the transference of the cross but they were unable to determine if it was onboard the Moskva at the time the vessel sank.

THE Ukraine is a Region — Not a Nation

The ignorance of the self-styled “sophisticated” readership of the “paper of record” is really appalling. The fact that they fancy themselves “informed” would make the farce comical, were it not for its deadly implications. If these bewildered boobs merely understood that the Donbas region of eastern “Ukraine” is totally Russian-speaking, pro-Putin and anti-Kiev, the Slimes could never get away with printing an opening absurdity like the following (the relevant words in bold red):

Spurred by reports of Russian atrocities outside Ukraine’s capital and alarmed at signs that Russia’s invasion force is about to escalate assaults in eastern Ukraine, many civilians in that region are fleeing while they can, officials said Wednesday.” (emphasis added)

This leaves the reader with the intentionally misleading impression that Donbas civilians are “fleeing” (assuming they really are as the “officials” claim) from the murderous Russian atrocity-makers. That doesn’t make any sense! For even if one were to swallow — hook, line & sinker — every last morsel of the Manhattan Mendacity Machine’s atrocity propaganda, a puzzling question would remain: Why would Russian troops carry out “atrocities” against Russian people in the Donbas region (the east)? One can understand Russian civilians wanting to flee the fighting (and the real atrocities of the Kiev’s mercenary monster) but why would they flee from Russian “atrocities” when they see the Russians as their liberators?

Did “you guys” catch how we referred to that concocted Globalist state as “Ukraine” — in quotes. That’s because the so-called “nation” of “Ukraine” — known for the longest time simply as “The Ukraine” — and the very idea of “Ukrainian Nationalism” are actually artificial created concepts cooked up and incited by western intelligence agencies for the purpose of slitting up the Soviet Union / Russia. THE Ukraine is a REGION — like say, THE Ohio Valley, or THE Caucasus, THE Florida Everglades, or THE French Riviera, or THE Donbas etc. The “nationalist” script writers dropped the grammatical article “the” so as to transform this 1200-year-old REGION (The Ukraine) of Russia into a proper, though fake, nation (Ukraine).

The massive federation of 800s Kievan Rus is the historical, ethnic, linguistic Viking ancestor entity of BelarusRussia, and “Ukraine.” The Mongols took control in the 1200s, and when their grip was finally broken some 200 years later, the center of power and influence emerged in Moscow, though Kiev always remained an important part of the Russian Empire. Thus, from the early days of Kievan Rus, down through the centuries of the Tsars, and for most of the 20th Century as part of the Soviet Union, the Ukraine was nothing more than a region — with its westernmost inhabitants speaking a bastardized dialect of Russian.

Ukraine’s western distance from the Russian center and its slight cultural differences gave the “usual suspects” an opening to use “nationalism” to play their usual divide and conquer scheme — very similar to the fake-ass Bavarian Nationalism movement which (((they))) juiced up in an effort to further splinter Germany after World War I.

Henceforth — and with all due respect to the mentally and physically captive folks of the Orwellian asylum that is today’s “Ukraine” — the Anti-NY Times will be “cancelling” this fake state entity known as “Ukraine” by using quotes, or simply reverting back to the age old Russian regional name: The Ukraine.

1 & 2. The Ukraine was Russian / Rus since the day when the Vikings arrived and merged with the Slavics, who had invited them to rule over them. // 3. Modern day “Ukrainians”  now take offense at the descriptive “the” for their region. A large number of people in the west have been slowly poisoned with artificial “ultra-nationalism” created in and injected by MI6, CIA and Mossad laboratories.
Decades of well-funded, slick, pseudo-nationalist Deep State propaganda dating back 100 years (but really kicking into high gear after WW II) has brainwashed the Rus of The Ukraine region into hating their Rus brothers and sisters in the east of The Ukraine region and Mother Russia. Newsflash people! Stalin (a Georgian), Kaganovich (a Jew) and 
Dzerzhinsky
 (a Jew) et al killed plenty of Rus in Russia proper as well!
Below, the playing board for RISK — the popular game of world conquest invented in 1957. 
“Ukraine” is the massive blue territory in the center (the largest on the map!) As an inquisitive child who loved geography and enjoyed playing RISK, I always wondered why “Ukraine” was distorted into such a massive size; why it was not referred to as “The Ukraine,” and why there was no territory AT ALL named Russia! Now it all makes sense.


*Editor’s Note: 
 (((They))) want an expanded Ukraine to be the new Khazaria — where the Ashkenazi Jews originated.

Yes, Zelensky = Churchill — Both Human Scum

MARCH 28, 2022


NY Times:
 Zelensky Doesn’t Know the End of His Story. Churchill Didn’t Either.

Zelensky and Churchill — Churchill and Zelensky. The names of these two diminutive demons now go together like Hitler & Putin. A Google search of their paired names yields page after page of results — all linking to stories about the “inescapable parallels” between the two “heroes” of history who stood strong and defiantly led their respective nations against the aggressive onslaught of an evil, superior adversary (barf). Acting out the script which his handlers have given him, Zelensky essentially plagiarized Churchill — himself a proven plagiarist. Note the similarity between their “iconic” ™ “We-will-fight-them” speeches vomited out before their respective normies:

* Churchill: June 4, 1940 (As Hitler continues to urge a peaceful settlement)

“We shall fight on the seas and oceans. We shall fight with growing confidence and growing strength in the air. We shall defend our island, whatever the cost may be. We shall fight on the beaches. We shall fight on the landing grounds. We shall fight in the fields and in the streets. We shall fight in the hills. We shall never surrender.”

*  Zelensky: March 7, 2022 (As Putin continues to urge a peaceful settlement)

“We will not give up, and we will not lose. We will fight till the end, at sea, in the air. We will continue fighting for our land, whatever the cost. We will fight in the forests, in the fields, on the shores, in the streets.”

*****Now, when these tough-talking “heroes” speak of all this “fighting,” who exactly do they mean by “we,” anyway? Such tough guys, eh?

Ironically, for reasons totally contrary to the heroes-of-history portrayals which the Judenpresse Armada is presenting to the bewildered captive subjects of the overlapping tyrannical kingdoms of Normiedon and Libtardia — and even, sadly, much of Conservatardia — there are indeed “inescapable parallels” between The British Mad Dog and the Ukrainian Usurper. None of them good. Let’s review:

* Both installed by unseen Jewish Oligarchs (Churchill by Bernard Baruch and Zelensky by Igor Kolomoisky)
Both puffed-up to demigod status by Fake News
Both corrupt.
Both unpopular, at least before their respective wars.
Both used for the specific purpose of waging war against peaceful nations governed by anti-Globalist leaders. (Hitler & Putin)
* Both refused multiple reasonable peace offers as they pleaded for US assistance / involvement instead
* Both incited their respective normie populations to extreme hatred for a brother nation
* Both terrorized their people with false tales of imminent poison gas attacks
Both drug addicts (Churchill: Brandy, Bourbon // Zelensky: Cocaine)
Both “heroically” fled their capitals in fear while urging the people to fight “in the streets.”
Both manifested strange proclivity for displaying their genitals (here & here)  
Both proven plagiarists (here & here)
Both rumored homosexuals and / or pro-homosexual (possible pedos) (here and here)

In short, both were/are the worst specimens of human scum  — the typical type of moral reprobate and ne’er-do-well who gets exalted to high office in the modern age of parliamentary “democracy,”  while real men of honor, intellect, courage, culture, peace and accomplishment are hated. Stand with Ukraine? Screw that! I stand with Russia! or better yet, NONE!!

The New World Order That Is Being Prepared Under The Pretext Of War In Ukraine

The conflict in Ukraine was not opened by Russia on February 24, but by Ukraine a week before. The OSCE is a witness to this. This peripheral conflict had been planned by Washington to impose a New World Order from which Russia, then China, were to be excluded. Don’t be fooled!

the new world order that is being prepared under the pretext of war in ukraine

Russia’s military operations in Ukraine have been going on for more than a month and NATO’s propaganda operations for a month and a half.

As always, the war propaganda of the Anglo-Saxons is coordinated from London. Since the First World War, the British have acquired an unparalleled know-how. In 1914, they had managed to convince their own population that the German army had carried out mass rapes in Belgium and that it was the duty of every Briton to come to the rescue of these poor women.

It was a cleaner version of Kaiser Wilhelm II’s attempt to compete with the British colonial empire. At the end of the conflict, the British population demanded that the victims be compensated. A census was taken and it was found that the facts had been extraordinarily exaggerated.

This time, in 2022, the British managed to convince the Europeans that on February 24 the Russians had attacked Ukraine to invade and annex it. Moscow was trying to reconstitute the Soviet Union and was preparing to attack all its former possessions in succession. This version is more honorable for the West than evoking the “Thucydides trap” – I will come back to this.

In reality, Kiev’s troops attacked their own population in Donbass on the afternoon of February 17.

Number of explosions recorded in Donbass

Number of explosions recorded in Donbass (February 14-22, 2022)

Then Ukraine waved a red rag in front of the Russian bull with President Zelenskyy’s speech to the political and military leaders of NATO gathered in Munich, during which he announced that his country was going to acquire nuclear weapons to protect itself from Russia.

Don’t believe me? Here are the OSCE readings from the Donbass border. There had been no fighting for months, but the observers of the neutral organization observed 1,400 explosions per day as of the afternoon of February 17. Immediately, the rebel provinces of Donetsk and Lugansk, which still considered themselves Ukrainian but claimed autonomy within Ukraine, moved more than 100,000 civilians to protect them. Most retreated to the interior of Donbass, others fled to Russia.

In 2014 and 2015, when a civil war had pitted Kiev against Donestk and Lugansk, the material and human damage was only a matter of Ukraine’s internal affairs.

However, in the course of time, almost the entire Ukrainian population of Donbass considered emigrating and acquired dual Russian citizenship. Therefore, Kiev’s attack on the population of Donbass on February 17 was an attack on Ukrainian-Russian citizens. Moscow came to their rescue, in an emergency, from February 24.

The chronology is indisputable. It was not Moscow that wanted this war, but Kiev, despite the predictable price it would have to pay. President Zelenskyy deliberately put his people in danger and bears sole responsibility for what they are enduring today.

Why did he do this? Since the beginning of his term, Volodymyr Zelenskyy has continued the support of the Ukrainian state, which began with his predecessor Petro Poroshenko, for the embezzlement of funds by his American sponsors and for the extremists in his country, the Banderists. President Putin called the former “a bunch of drug addicts” and the latter “a bunch of neo-Nazis” [1].

Not only did Volodymyr Zelensky publicly declare that he did not want to solve the conflict in Donbass by implementing the Minsk Agreements, but he banned his fellow citizens from speaking Russian in schools and administrations and, worse, signed a racial law on July 1, 2021, de facto excluding Ukrainians claiming their Slavic origin from the enjoyment of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.

The Russian army first invaded Ukrainian territory, not from the Donbass, but from Belarus and Crimea. It destroyed all Ukrainian military installations used by NATO for years and fought the Bandit regiments. It is now dedicated to annihilating them in the east of the country. The propagandists in London and their almost 150 communication agencies around the world assure us that, pushed back by the glorious Ukrainian Resistance, the defeated Russian army has given up its initial goal of taking Kiev.

However, never, absolutely never, did President Putin say that Russia would take Kiev, overthrow the elected President Zelenskyy and occupy his country. On the contrary, he has always said that his war aims were to denazify Ukraine and eliminate foreign (NATO) weapons stockpiles. This is exactly what he is doing.

The Ukrainian population is suffering. We are discovering that war is cruel, that it always kills innocent people. Today we are overwhelmed by our emotions and, as we ignore the Ukrainian attack of February 17, we blame the Russians, whom we wrongly call “aggressors”. We do not feel the same compassion for the victims of the simultaneous war in Yemen, its 200,000 dead, including 85,000 children, who died of hunger. But it is true that the Yemenis are, in the eyes of the West, “only Arabs”.

The fact of suffering should not be interpreted a priori as proof that one is right. Criminals suffer like the innocent.

How is such manipulation of the court possible? [2] Ukraine referred to the fact that President Putin, during his speech on the Russian military operation, said that the people of Donbass were victims of “genocide”.

She therefore denied this “genocide” and accused Russia of having used this argument improperly. In international law, the word “genocide” no longer refers to the eradication of an ethnic group, but to a massacre ordered by a government. Over the past eight years, between 13,000 and 22,000 civilians have been killed in the Donbass, depending on whether one refers to Ukrainian or Russian government statistics.

Russia, which had sent its plea in writing, argues that it is not relying on the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, but on Article 51 of the UN Charter, which authorizes war in self-defence, as President Putin had explicitly stated in his speech. The Tribunal did not attempt to verify anything. It stuck to the Ukrainian denial. It therefore concluded that Russia had improperly used the Convention as an argument.

Moreover, as Russia did not consider it necessary to be physically represented at the Court, the Court used its absence to impose an aberrant provisional measure. Russia, sure of its good right, refused to comply and is demanding a judgment on the merits, which will not be given before the end of September.

All this being said, we can only understand the duplicity of the West if we put the events in their context. For a decade, American political scientists have been telling us that the rise of Russia and China will lead to an inevitable war. The political scientist Graham Allison created the concept of the “Thucydides trap” [3].

He was referring to the Peloponnesian wars that opposed Sparta and Athens in the fourth century BC.. The strategist and historian Thucydides analyzed that the wars had become inevitable when Sparta, which dominated Greece, realized that Athens was conquering an empire and could replace its hegemony. The analogy is telling, but false: while Sparta and Athens were close Greek cities, the United States, Russia and China do not have the same culture.

China, for example, rejects President Biden’s proposal for trade competition. Instead, it has the opposite tradition of “win-win”. In doing so, it is not referring to mutually beneficial trade contracts, but to its history. The “Middle Kingdom” has an extremely large population. The emperor was forced to delegate his authority to the maximum. Even today China is the most decentralized country in the world.

When he issued a decree, it had practical consequences in some provinces, but not in all. The emperor therefore had to make sure that each local governor would not consider his decree irrelevant and forget his authority. He then offered compensation to those who were not affected by the decree so that they would still feel subject to his authority.

Since the beginning of the Ukrainian crisis, China has not only taken a non-aligned position, but has protected its Russian ally in the UN Security Council. The United States has wrongly feared that Beijing would send weapons to Moscow.

This has never been the case, although there is logistical assistance in the form of prepared meals for the soldiers, for example. China is watching how things are going and deducing how they will go when it tries to get the rebel province of Taiwan back.

Beijing has kindly declined Washington’s offers. It is thinking in the long term and knows from experience that if it allows Russia to be destroyed, it will once again be plundered by the West. Its salvation is only possible with Russia, even if it must one day challenge it in Siberia.

Let’s go back to Thucydides’ trap. Russia knows that the United States wants to erase it from the scene. It anticipates a possible invasion/destruction. But its territory is immense and its population insufficiently large. It cannot defend its overly large borders. Since the 19th century, it has imagined defending itself by hiding from its adversaries.

When Napoleon, then Hitler, attacked her, she moved her population further and further east. And it burned its own cities before the invader arrived. The latter found himself unable to supply his troops. He had to face the winter without means and, finally, retreat. This “scorched earth” strategy only worked because neither Napoleon nor Hitler had logistical bases nearby. Modern Russia knows that it cannot survive if US weapons are stored in Central and Eastern Europe.

That is why, at the end of the Soviet Union, Russia demanded that NATO never expand eastward. French President François Mitterrand and German Chancellor Helmut Köhl, who knew history, demanded that the West make this commitment. At the time of German reunification, they drafted and signed a treaty guaranteeing that NATO would never cross the Oder-Neisse line, the German-Polish border. Russia set this commitment in stone in 1999 and in 2010 with the OSCE declarations in Istanbul and Astana. But the United States violated it in 1999 (accession of the Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland to Nato), in 2004 (Bulgaria, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania, Slovakia and Slovenia), in 2009 (Albania and Croatia), in 2017 (Montenegro), and again in 2020 (Northern Macedonia).

The problem is not that all these states have allied themselves with Washington, but that they have stored U.S. weapons at home. No one is criticizing these states for choosing their allies, but Moscow is blaming them for serving as a rear base for the Pentagon in preparation for an attack by Russia.

In October 2021, the Straussian Victoria Nuland [4], the State Department’s number 2, came to Moscow to urge Russia to accept the deployment of US weapons in Central and Eastern Europe. She promised that Washington would invest in Russia in return. Then she threatened Russia if it did not accept her offer and concluded that he would have President Putin tried before an international tribunal.

Moscow responded with a proposal for a treaty guaranteeing peace on the basis of respect for the United Nations Charter on December 17. This is what has caused the current storm. Respecting the Charter, which is based on the principle of the equality and sovereignty of states, implies reforming NATO, whose operation is based on a hierarchy among its members. Caught in the “Thucydides trap”, the United States then fomented the current war in Ukraine.

If we admit that their goal is to remove Russia from the international scene, the way the Anglo-Saxons react to the Ukrainian crisis becomes clear. They are not trying to push back the Russian army militarily, nor to embarrass the Russian government, but to wipe out all traces of Russian culture in the West. And secondly, they are trying to weaken the European Union.

They started with the freezing of the assets of Russian oligarchs in the West, a measure that was applauded by the Russian population, which considers them illegitimate beneficiaries of the plundering of the USSR. Then they imposed on Western companies to stop their activities with Russia.

Finally, they continued by cutting off Russian banks’ access to Western banks (the SWIFT system). However, if these financial measures were disastrous for Russian banks (but not for the Russian government), the measures against companies working in Russia are on the contrary favorable to Russia which recovers their investments at lower costs.

Moreover, the Moscow Stock Exchange, which had been closed from February 25 (the day after the Russian response) to March 24, recorded an increase as soon as it reopened. The RTS index fell by 4.26% on the first day, but it measures mainly speculative stocks, while the IMOEX index, which measures national economic activity, rose by 4.43%. The real losers of the Western measures are the members of the European Union who had the stupidity to take them.

Already in 1991, the Straussian Paul Wolfowitz wrote in an official report that the USA should prevent a power from developing to the point of competing with it. At the time, the USSR was in tatters. So he named the European Union as the potential rival to be destroyed [5].

This is exactly what he did in 2003, when, as number 2 in the Pentagon, he forbade Germany and France to participate in the reconstruction of Iraq [6]. This is also what Victoria Nuland talked about in 2014 when she instructed her US ambassador in Kiev to “fuck the European Union” (sic) [7].

The European Union has now been ordered to stop its imports of Russian hydrocarbons. If it complies with this injunction, Germany will be ruined and with it the whole Union. This will not be collateral damage, but the fruit of structured thinking, clearly expressed for thirty years.

The most important thing for Washington is to exclude Russia from all international organizations. It has already managed, in 2014, to exclude it from the G8. The pretext was not the independence of Crimea (which it had been demanding since the dissolution of the USSR, several months before Ukraine thought of its own independence), but its membership in the Russian Federation.

Ukraine’s alleged aggression provides a pretext for excluding it from the G20. China immediately pointed out that no one could be excluded from an informal forum without a constitution. However, President Biden returned to the charge on March 24 and 25 in Europe.

Washington is increasing its contacts to exclude Russia from the World Trade Organization. In any case, the principles of the WTO are being undermined by the unilateral “sanctions” implemented by the West. Such a decision would be detrimental to both sides. This is where the writings of Paul Wolfowitz come into play.

He wrote in 1991 that Washington should not seek to be the best at what it does, but to be the first in relation to others. This implies, he noted, that in order to maintain its hegemony, the United States should not hesitate to hurt itself, if it does much more to others. We will all pay the price for this way of thinking.

The most important thing for the Straussians is to exclude Russia from the United Nations. This is not possible if one respects the UN Charter, but Washington will not bother with it there any more than elsewhere. It has already contacted every member state of the UN with a few exceptions.

The Anglo-Saxon propaganda has already succeeded in making them believe that a member of the Security Council has embarked on a war of conquest against one of its neighbors. If Washington succeeds in convening a special UN General Assembly and changing the statutes, it will succeed.

A kind of hysteria has taken hold of the West. Everything Russian is being hunted down without thinking about its links with the Ukrainian crisis. Russian artists are forbidden to perform even if they are known to be opposed to President Putin.

Here a university bans the study of the anti-Soviet hero Solzhenitsyn from their curriculum, there another bans the writer of debate and free will Dostoyevsky (1821-1881) who opposed the tsarist regime. Here a conductor is deprogrammed because he is Russian and there Tchaikovsky (1840-1893) is removed from the repertoire.

Everything Russian must disappear from our consciousness, just as the Roman Empire razed Carthage and methodically destroyed all traces of its existence, to the point that today we know little about this civilization.

On March 21, President Biden made no secret of the fact. In front of an audience of business leaders, he said:

“This is the moment when things change. There is going to be a New World Order and we have to lead it. And we have to unite the rest of the free world to do it” [8].

Ukrainian PM Says Quiet Part Out Loud: ‘We Not Only Fight For Ukraine – We Fight For This New World Order’.

This new order [9] should cut the world into two hermetic blocks; a cut such as we have never known, without comparison with the Iron Curtain of the Cold War.

Some states, such as Poland, believe that they can lose a lot like the others, but also gain a little. Thus, General Waldemar Skrzypczak has just demanded that the Russian enclave of Kaliningrad become Polish [10].

Indeed, after the world has been cut off, how will Moscow be able to communicate with this territory?

By Thierry Meyssan, Voltairenet.org / Translation via Lewrockwell.com

[1] See the ninth article in this series: “A bunch of drug addicts and neo-Nazis“, 5 March 2022.

[2] “Allegation of genocide under the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide“, Order, International Court of Justice, March 16, 2022.

[3] “The Thucydides Trap: Are the U.S. and China Headed for War?“, Graham T. Alllison, The Atlantic, September 24, 2005. Destined For War: Can America and China Escape Thucydides’s Trap?, Graham T. Allison, Mariner Books; (2017).

[4] For what the Straussians are, see the eighth article in this series, “Vladimir Putin declares war on the Straussians“, 5 March 2022.

[5] This document was revealed in “US Strategy Plan Calls For Insuring No Rivals Develop”, Patrick E. Tyler, New York Times, March 8, 1992. See also the excerpts published on page 14: “Excerpts from Pentagon’s Plan: ’Prevent the Re-Emergence of a New Rival’”. Additional information is provided in “Keeping the US First, Pentagon Would Preclude a Rival Superpower” Barton Gellman, The Washington Post, March 11, 1992.

[6] « Instructions et conclusions sur les marchés de reconstruction et d’aide en Irak », par Paul Wolfowitz, Réseau Voltaire, 10 décembre 2003.

[7] “What about apologizing to Ukraine, Mrs. Nuland?”, by Andrey Fomin, Oriental Review (Russia) , Voltaire Network, 7 February 2014.

[8] «Remarks by President Biden Before Business Roundtable’s CEO Quarterly Meeting», White House, March 21, 2022.

[9] « Histoire du “Nouvel ordre mondial” », par Pierre Hillard, Réseau Voltaire, 21 février 2010. “The plan for a New World Order stumbles on geopolitical realities”, by Imad Fawzi Shueibi, Translation Roger Lagassé, Voltaire Network, 17 August 2012.

[10] “Poland claims Kaliningrad”, Voltaire Network, 27 March 2022.

NYT Lies About Ukraine by Telling Truth about Ukraine

MARCH 23, 2022


NY Times:
 Truth Is Another Front in Putin’s War
.

By Steven Lee Meyers

One of the most recognizable liar’s tricks which a properly accused criminal will often resort to is the tactic of actually repeating all of the accusations made against him in a dismissive manner which appeals to incredulity of the listener. It’s sort of like a “Straw Man” argument, but not exactly because in such cases, the pathological liar will actually recite a litany of absolute truths — instead of absurd falsehoods. The deception lurks in the manner of delivery — in which he hopes to induce his target into interpreting the absolutely true accusations leveled against him as absurdities. The simple-minded mark will often fall for this maneuver because he “reasons” that the accused — by mere virtue of the fact that he volunteered the allegations against himself on his own — must be truthfully defending himself against false testimony.

Surely, “you guys” have all “been around the block” enough times to have personally experienced this form of “gas-lighting” from some psychopath you have crossed paths with; and we all know what the New York Times is about. Armed with the knowledge of such “reverse psychology” deception tactics, we can properly “decode” this particular Times article by Putin-hater Steven Lee Meyers for what it truly represents — an actual CONFESSION regarding the situation in Ukraine.

Times: Russian officials denounced the United States and its NATO allies for stoking panic and anti-Russian hatred.
Embedded Truth: The United States and NATO are stoking panic and anti-Russian hatred.

Times: The Kremlin has cycled through a torrent of lies to explain why it had to wage a “special military operation” against a sovereign neighbor.
Embedded Truth: Russia stated many just and logical reasons for its actions against an aggressive neighbor.

Times: Drug-addled neo-Nazis. Genocide. American biological weapons factories.
Embedded Truth: Drugged-up ultra-nationalists are killing innocent Russian-speaking civilians and US-funded bio-weapons labs have been uncovered in Ukraine.

Times: Ukrainian forces bombing their own cities, including theaters sheltering children.
Embedded Truth: Ukrainian forces are bombing their own cities, including theaters sheltering children.

.Times: That has given Russia — and its allies in China and elsewhere — powerful means to prop up the claim that the invasion is justified,
Embedded Truth: Russia and its friends worldwide know the truth about Ukraine.

Times: Truth has simply become another front in Russia’s war.
Embedded Truth: Russia has done a very good job at getting the truth out to the world, at least the non-western world, that is.

Times: President Vladimir V. Putin has created an alternative reality in which Russia is at war not with Ukraine but with a larger, more pernicious enemy in the West.
Embedded Truth: Ukraine is just the tip of a deadly spear which the Globalists are aiming at the heart of Russia.

1. 
Ukrainian “ultras” — often wrongly referred to as “Nazis” — have terrorized the Russians of Donetsk & Luhansk. // 2. For his help in installing the gangster regime currently controlling Ukraine, the thugs in Kiev named a street after John McCain. // 3. The War Against Putin explains how the Globalists have turned the fake nation of Ukraine into a weapon aimed at Russia.

Times: (Russia) claimed that “true sovereignty” for Ukraine was possible only under Russia.
Embedded Truth: True sovereignty for Ukraine is possible only under Russian protection.

Times: Individual lies about bio-weapons labs or crisis actors are advanced by Russia …
Embedded Truth: Ukraine is full of bio-weapons and crisis actors.

Times: Supporters stubbornly cling to the belief that something is wrong in Ukraine and Russia will fix it.
Embedded Truth: Something is wrong in Ukraine and Russia wants to fix it.

Times: The bio-weapons claim gained ground in social media after a post by a Twitter account that had been suspended for peddling Q Anon conspiracy theories about secretive government plots.
Embedded Truth: The bio-weapons are real and so is Q.

*****
There! See how easy it is to read Fake News with a “third eye” and actually extract the truth from it? By applying certain basic rules of logical deciphering to the devious droppings of the reality-inverting scumbags at the Manhattan Mendacity factory, the “paper of record” can actually serve us as a very informative educational tool. How ironic is that?

Outrageous LIES About Russia’s Liberation of Mariupol

MARCH 21, 2022


NY Times:
 Russia
 Broadens Mariupol Assault as Signs of Stalemate Take Shape

The Times’ disinformation war on behalf of the gangster regime of Globalist puppet Ukraine is the type of stuff worthy of “Pulitzer Prize” awards. It’s that bad. Combining overt lies with elemental contextual omissions, the slimy scribblers who sit high atop the Manhattan Mendacity Machine are inverting the reality of Russia’s just action on its head.

Hazmat suits and hip waders on, boys and girls. Let jump in to Sulzberger’s cesspool for some cleanup work.

1 & 2. Propagandists working for the New York Times fabrication factory have been awarded  a total of 132 Pulitzer Prizes
 
over the past century — more than twice the nearest competitor! // 3. The “prestigious” Pulitzer Prize is named after Joseph Pulitzer — a notorious “Yellow Journalist” who’s “New York World” and “St. Louis Post Dispatch” newspapers used outrageous Fake News stories to manipulate the USA into the Spanish-American War of 1898.

Times: Firing rockets and bombs from the land, air —– Russian forces broadened their bombardment of the besieged Ukrainian city of Mariupol …..
Rebuttal: Mariupol is NOT a “Ukrainian city.” It is predominantly Russian-speaking and became part of the Donetsk People’s Republic in 2014. But the violent thugs of Globalist Ukraine — who evidently don’t believe in self -determination, have been occupying the port city since 2014.

Times: … and have forcibly deported thousands of residents….
Rebuttal: “Deported” = relocated to nearby Russia in order to protect them from the ultra-nationalists and foreign mercenaries.

Times: Among the freshly devastated was an art school, where about 400 residents were hiding…..
Rebuttal: Says who?

Times: …. according to city officials ….
Rebuttal: “City officials,” eh? Stooges of Kiev! No pro-Russian would ever be permitted to hold high office in occupied Mariupol.

Times: … who claimed it had been bombed by Russian forces targeting civilians.
Rebuttal: First of all, Russia is NOT “targeting civilians” — neither in Ukraine nor in the Russian republics of Donetsk and Luhansk. But let’s say, for argument’s sake, that Putin really is the monster that the Times says he is. Why would he “target civilians” in Mariupol — a city whose residents — notwithstanding a few “city officials” who may serve the Kiev bosses — support Russia?

Times: Maripol has come to symbolize Russia’s brutality, with its forces increasingly targeting civilian sites with long-range missiles to crush the public’s spirit …..
Rebuttal: “Crush the public spirit?” Why would Vlad the Bad want to do that when the public of Mariupol is 95% Russian-speaking and mostly anti-western? This doesn’t make any sense — unless, of course, the purpose of the article is to deceive.

Times: The city has been without food, water, electricity or gas …..
Rebuttal: Shut off by the western-backed Ukrainian oppressors, I’ll bet — as is their known method of operation against civilians.

Times: … since the early days after Russia’s Feb. 24 invasion.
Rebuttal: The REAL “invasion” of Mariupol occurred in 2014, and it was done by the Ukrainians, who still occupy the city. What Russia is doing now is a LIBERATION.

Times: “The besieged Mariupol will go down in the history of responsibility for war crimes,” President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine said in a speech to the nation late Saturday night. “The terror the occupiers perpetrated on this peaceful city will be remembered for centuries to come.”
Rebuttal: It is Ukraine that is doing the “occupying” here. The murderous little cocaine-snorting, penis-obsessed pervert is PROJECTING his exact foul deeds onto Russia. He truly is “another Churchill!”

1. 
Russian Mariupol was invaded by Ukrainian thugs after the violent coup of 2014 and remains occupied to this day. Putin is attempting to liberate the port city — not steal it. // 2. Mariupol belongs with the Russian-speaking Donetsk Republic, not to Globalist Ukraine. // 3. Churchill & Zelensky — both exhibitionist drug abusing perverts, both warmongers, and both pathological liars who projected their actual motives and evil deeds onto their adversaries.

Times: In a video address on Sunday to Israeli lawmakers, Mr. Zelensky seemingly compared the suffering of his people to those of the Jews during the Holocaust — an analogy some Israeli lawmakers criticized as going too far.
Rebuttal: Zelensky wants the bigger Jews to bail him out.

Times: Israel has attempted to act as a mediator between Ukraine and Russia, offering aid to the besieged country and accepting refugees, but refusing to provide weapons like its vaunted Iron Dome missile defense system or even defensive equipment, like helmets, to Ukraine. Israel’s stance has angered Mr. Zelensky.
Analysis: Israel is pro-Ukraine, but they will tread very carefully here because Russia — economically, militarily and diplomatically — is growing stronger by the year. The Yids in the shitty little state are smart. They’re not going to back the losing side with anything more than words because the Rooskies can offer some nice toys of their own to the Arab nations.

Times: “It is possible to mediate between countries,” Mr. Zelensky said in his 10-minute address, “but not between good and evil.”
Analysis: More PROJECTION. The comedian-turned-president is reverting to his comedy days again.

Times: As Russian forces pushed into the center of Mariupol, some 4,500 residents were forcibly taken across the nearby Russian border
Analysis: “Forcibly taken” = given refuge from the battle.

Times: Recently evacuated Mariupol residents also told The New York Times that they had been in touch with people who had been apprehended in basements and taken across the border against their will.
Analysis: So, “apprehended” people from “basements” later told other evacuated residents who then told the New York Times…. blah, blah, blah. Yep…. this beauty of a story ought to get a Pulitzer, for sure.

Times: “What the occupiers are doing today is familiar to the older generation, who saw the horrific events of World War II, when the Nazis forcibly captured people.
Analysis: Nazi! Nazi! Nazi! (give me strength)

“You Russians are Nazis!” — “No, you Ukrainians are the Nazis!” — “Oh yeah? Your mamma is a Nazi. How about that?” — Oh yeah? You mamma was Heinrich Himmler’s SS bitch!
(palm to face, sighing, shaking head)

Times: Even as the Russian invaders find military success entering Mariupol, the costs might limit the impact of any Russian victory.
Translation: Russia is kicking ass, Mariupol will soon be liberated, and the Times knows it. Patriots are in control.

1. Pulitzer Prize journalism in action: “The guy in the basement told another guy who was a refugee who told the guy at the New York Times who told his readers that the Russians were kidnapping people.” // 2 and 3. Is Putin the new Stalin? Or the new Hitler — the exact opposite of Stalin? You guys really need to make up your mind because this is confusing the normies.

If You “Stand with Ukraine,” You Stand with Leftist Scum

The fact that libtards and normies now “stand with Ukraine” was to be expected. Whatever cause-of-the-month that the authoritative reader in the TV tells them to believe in, the virtue-signalling simpletons will obediently support. Zelensky hero / Putin bad.

But to see so many FOX fans and self-proclaimed “conservatives” taking a similar position is particularly frustrating. For the benefit of any FOX conservatives in your circle of family, friends & contacts, we’ve put together a very simple-to-digest pictorial presentation. When they see what filthy Marxist-Globalist bedfellows they are making common cause with, they’ll hopefully reconsider their “stand” with the Deep State-owned gangsters misruling Ukraine.

BOOM! Ukraine Becomes The First Country To Implement The Great Reset

Until Russia invaded Ukraine, the Great Reset was failing miserably. Knowing how The Cult operates, we warned back in April of 2021 that the Globalists were surely preparing another crisis.

ukraine becomes the first country to implement the great reset

With Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, the Great Reset is not only back on schedule, but it has already made its first victim.

While everyday Ukrainians have their entire existence taken over by war, the Ukrainian government silently implemented the Great Reset – and barely anyone even noticed.

As a result, Ukraine becomes the first country in the world that surrenders to the New World Order, implementing a Social Credit score, a Universal Basic Income (UBI), a Digital Identity and a Vax Passport – all within a single app called Diia:

Also watch this official instructional video (make sure you activate English translation):

We’ve warned before that under a New World Order, the digital money issued by the government can be spent on select products only, and they will have an expiry date, which means that the people will not be able to save money ever again – this is exactly what happened in Ukraine:

ukraine great reset new world order

Image: screenshot of the Gov’t website

Here’s the Ukrainian Gov’t website announcing the draconian measures.

Ukrainian PM Says Quiet Part Out Loud: ‘We Not Only Fight For Ukraine – We Fight For This New World Order’.

And this is the truth about the current situation in Ukraine:

Until recently, Vladimir Putin seemed to oppose the Great Reset and the New World Order, but now it is looking increasingly possible that he might also be part of the NWO agenda, and the invasion of Ukraine served as the much-needed pretext for imposing unprecedentedly drastic mutual sanctions, which will eventually lead to the collapse of the global economy.

When the world economy inevitably collapses, the Great Reset / New World Order will be implemented on a global scale. Putin’s next moves will eventually reveal if he is part of the globalist agenda not.