How Trump Killed the Green-Red Movement

JANUARY 24, 2023

NY Times:Depleted Under Trump, a ‘Traumatized’ E.P.A. Struggles With Its Mission

Despite an injection of funding, the agency still has not recovered from an exodus of scientists and policy experts, both insiders and critics say.

Previously, I spoke about how Trump’s de-balling of NATO has saved the world from the planned World War III which Soros himself had been openly “predicting.” Today’s story in “the paper of record” whines about a similar neutering of the once almighty and tyrannical EPA (Environmental Protection Agency)Enjoy this bit of butt-hurt, from the article’s opening paragraph:

“The nation’s top environmental agency is still reeling from the exodus of more than 1,200 scientists and policy experts during the Trump administration. The chemicals chief said her staff can’t keep up with a mounting workload. The enforcement unit is prosecuting fewer polluters than at any time in the past two decades.” (emphasis added)
*

Three other mighty blows struck against the extremely dangerous GreenReds which were not mentioned in the article — yet every bit as significant — are:

* 1. The Trump Supreme Court ruling barring the EPA from “regulating” harmless CO2 emissions
* 2. Trump’s 2017 pullout from the Paris Climate Scam (*Biden’s “re-entry” has been properly described as “toothless”)
* 3. Trump’s installation one of his own, Jeffrey Bossert Clark to run things at ENRD(Environment and Natural Resources Division) at the Justice Department. The ENRD  — responsible for the civil and criminal enforcement of environmental laws — was loaded up with Trump’s people, as was the DOJ in general. Strangely enough, some of these key players remain in place under “Biden.”

1. Nominally speaking, “Biden’s” Justice Department is headed by Merrick Garland. But in essence — as observant Leftists are openly complaining about) — Trump’s people remain in charge! // 2. Jeffrey Bossert Clark may have resigned as the “Biden” administration came in — but his boys remain in charge on environmental enforcement — and will not prosecute petty “polluters.”

The genocidal NATO World War 3: — deactivated
The genocidal CDC / WHO 5-year lock down scheme: — deactivated (by “Warp Speed”)
The genocidal WEF Great Reset: — deactivated
The genocidal EPA Climate Con / Carbon Tax Menace: — deactivated

And yet, some of the Sunshine Patriots and members of the whiny backseat “Are-We-There-Yet Chorus — under the pernicious influence of dirty trickster CIA cyber operatives pretending to be patriots — still denigrate the man as a “Globalist” …. “but but, muh Trump’s death jab.” (palm to face, shaking head, sighing)

More delightful whining from the Times article:

“Mr. Trump tried each year to slash the E.P.A. budget by at least 30 percent. Highly skilled scientists and other experts left the agency as the Trump administration dismantled science advisory panels, disregarded scientific evidence and weakened protections against pollution.”

“They beat down the E.P.A. work force, a lot of people left dispirited,” said Senator Tom Carper, Chairman of the Committee on Environment and Public Works, which oversees the E.P.A.”

At the same time that the Deep State Greens in the Suites were being de-funded and dis-empowered, the Greens in the Streets disappeared as well. Where’s Leonardo DiCaprio and the March for the Climate & March for Science rent-a-mobs? Where’s Greta Gloomberg’s commie kiddie Fridays for Future army? Bill Lie the Science Guy? — Neil DeGrasshole Tyson? — Hello? —  You see, without a puppet master, the puppets can no longer dance.

Thank You, President Trump — and also, “President” “Biden.”

The Globo-Marxist-created “Climate Bogeyman” is failing because The Donald killed it.

Elon Musk Warns of World Government

A wave of lawsuits argue that Tesla’s self-driving software is dangerously over-hyped. What can its blind spots teach us about the company’s erratic C.E.O.?

JANUARY 20, 2023

NY Times: Elon Musk’s Appetite for Destruction

NY Times: Elon’s Crumbling Empire

Ya just knew this was coming! Within hours of “Elon Musk” having trashed the World Economic Forum as a front for “world government,” the big guns of “the paper of record” began viciously unloading on the suddenly reformed billionaire ex-Globalist that “conspiracy theorists” have now fallen in love with. What a “coincidence,” eh?

The man in the mask has gone full blown Frankenstein Monster on the very One Worlders who manufactured Musk Inc. out of whole cloth. For months, out of fear of upsetting Musk’s worldwide legions of fanboys, the NWO organs of Fake News were compelled to carefully calibrate their slowly-increasing fire against the living legend of their concoction. Now, “they” have no choice but to unload at full blast. Damned if they do — damned if they don’t. Deeee-lightful!

Elon Mask began his latest provocation by running a poll  that asked whether the WEF should control the world. A staggering 2 million fanboys responded — 86% of them saying “NO” with many also submitting strong comments. The White Hat imposter followed up on his polling tweet by ripping the WEF as:

“an unelected world government that people never asked for and don’t want.” 

Tell it, “Elon,” Tell it!

Elon Musk was a publicity-seeking international “rock star” who had everything handed to him by the New World Order. What accounts for his sudden transformation to Q-ish “conspiracy theorist?” We believe that he has been arrested, replaced with “Elon Mask,” and his assets and persona hijacked by the White Hats.

FOX News

Elon Mask is confirming what we “kooks” and ‘Nazis” used to be laughed at and even feared for saying. But because it’s the great and all-knowing “genius” uttering the forbidden term “world government” now, Musk’s malleable multitudes don’t feel threatened by hearing it — and will surely turn on the Judenpresse Mafia for counter-attacking their sainted sage and his magic cars.

* Note: A loyal reader recently informed us of how a previously unreachable normie friend of his is now being positively informed and influenced by Musk’s activism for fanboys.

The rabbit hole trickery gets even deeper. The cyber sleuths at “The Editorial Board” of The Anti-New York Times — after careful observation and analysis — do not believe that the current annual session of the WEF at Davos is even real. The unusual and deliberate conspicuousness of the conspiratorial activity smells of White Hat staging — as does the oddly reduced attendance.

For example, while surely knowing that he was being filmed, a gesturing character (or a CGI image) playing John Kerry spoke nonsense about WEF members being like “extraterrestrials”  saving the planet. Also surely knowing that he was being filmed, a screaming character playing Al Gore (or a CGI image) ranted about “rain bombs” and the “oceans boiling” and a “billion refugees” etc. Too weird — too out-in-the-open for easy mockery— too “Straw Man-ish.” Then there were the reports that so many “elites” — including George Soros — pulled out of this year’s event. We suspect (((they))) are already in Gitmo, with the original Elon Musk. 

Call this analysis “crazy” — but one must admit: It all seems to fit!

Guardian (UK)

BBC

1. This year’s gathering seemed strangely conspicuous — as if staged to wake up more normies // 2. Kerry’s remarks about the elites as an “alien force” were a bit TOO weird. // 3. Gore’s remarks about the “rain bombs” and “oceans boiling” were also TOO weird.

World Economic Forum: There Are ‘Rational’ Reasons To Microchip Your Child

WEF suggests there are ways to “ethically make these amazing technologies a part of our lives.”

world economic forum there are 'rational' reasons to microchip your child

by Didi Rankovic

The latest highly controversial technology/policy that the World Economic Forum (WEF) has set out to normalize is the idea of implanting tracking chips into humans.

It wasn’t that long ago that those speculating on a future where this is happening would get dismissed as conspiracy theorists, but now the world elites’ most vocal outlet is predicting that chip implants will eventually become just a commodity.

And the WEF makes a case that implanting chips into children could be viewed by parents as a “solid, rational” move. All of this crops up in a blog post on the organization’s website dedicated to the future of augmented reality (AR), and what is referred to as “an augmented society.”

Like in many of WEF’s other takes on the future of various types of technology, the emphasis is put on inserting the “right,” i.e., its own “vision” in the direction these should be developing, with the inevitable mention of undefined society stakeholders who will hold the key to the ethics issue of it all.

The WEF is talking up the allegedly broad usefulness of AR going forward in fields such as healthcare, education, and professional settings, with the underpinning notion of providing guidelines as to how to “ethically” regulate this vast potential power – and therefore, when all’s said and done, control it.

The WEF calls AR and similar tech transformative – but in need of “the right support, vision, and audacity.”

Once again it isn’t at all clear why “audacity” is thrown in, unless it is a euphemism to sell some pretty outrageous “visions” that the WEF is expressing, such as replacing drugs with brain implants that will manipulate the body with electrical pulses, and pairing all sorts of chips put into humans through surgery, with sensors one might find in a chair.

And so, with the human and the chair “seamlessly integrated,” the quality of life across the board shoots up, the Davos-based group promises.

“As scary as chip implants may sound, they form part of a natural evolution that wearables once underwent. Hearing aids or glasses no longer carry a stigma,” the blog post reads. “They are accessories and are even considered a fashion item. Likewise, implants will evolve into a commodity.”

But critics of these trends say their opposition has nothing to do with “stigmas” – rather with serious concerns about civil rights, privacy, and the very concept of human autonomy.

World Economic Forum Calls For Merging Of Human And AI Intel To Censor ‘Hate Speech’ & ‘Misinformation’

Despite the fact that no one asked, the World Economic Forum is now advocating for the merger of human and artificial intelligence systems to censor “hate speech” and “misinformation” online before it is even allowed to be posted.

report published to the official WEF website ominously warns about the peril of “the dark world of online harms.”

But the globalist body, run by comic book Bond villain Klaus Schwab, has a solution.

They want to merge the ‘best’ aspects of human censorship and AI machine learning algorithms to ensure that people’s feelings don’t get hurt and counter-regime opinions are blacklisted.

“By uniquely combining the power of innovative technology, off-platform intelligence collection and the prowess of subject-matter experts who understand how threat actors operate, scaled detection of online abuse can reach near-perfect precision,” states the article.

After engaging in a whole host of mumbo jumbo, the article concludes by proposing “a new framework: rather than relying on AI to detect at scale and humans to review edge cases, an intelligence-based approach is crucial.”

“By bringing human-curated, multi-language, off-platform intelligence into learning sets, AI will then be able to detect nuanced, novel abuses at scale, before they reach mainstream platforms. Supplementing this smarter automated detection with human expertise to review edge cases and identify false positives and negatives and then feeding those findings back into training sets will allow us to create AI with human intelligence baked in,” the article rambles.

In other words, your free speech will probably get censored before you’re even able to post it on social media sites. Some are calling it “preemptive censorship.”

Or as the WEF puts it, “Trust and safety teams can stop threats rising online before they reach users.”

No doubt that a central part of such “misinformation” will be strident denunciation of the WEF itself, given that the organization is notorious for blocking its critics on Twitter.

Many would ask why the World Economic Forum, amidst a cost of living crisis, upcoming energy rationing and a global recession, is concerning itself with any of this.

Why don’t they just stick to the economy?

“It’s never a sure bet if this Davos-based elite’s mouthpiece comes up with its outlandish “solutions” and “proposals” as a way to reinforce existing, or introduce new narratives; or just to appear busy and earn its keep from those bankrolling it,” writes Didi Rankovic.

“No – it’s not the runaway inflation, energy costs, and even food security in many parts of the world. For how dedicated to globalization the organization is, it’s strangely tone-deaf to what is actually happening around the globe.”

Reference: Summit.news

UN & WEF Are Behind Global War On Farmers

The United Nations’ “Agenda 2030” Sustainable Development Goals and the U.N.’s partners at the World Economic Forum (WEF) are directly related to the rising regulatory assault on agricultural producers from Holland and the United States to Sri Lanka and beyond.

un & wef are behind global war on farmers

In fact, a number of the U.N.’s 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are directly tied to the implementation of laws that put pressure on global agriculture, ranching, and food sources.

High-ranking Chinese Communist Party (CCP) officials within the U.N. system assisted in the development of the SDGs and are currently assisting in directing the organization’s execution of the global strategy.

The U.N.-backed sustainability regulations on agriculture and food production, according to a number of experts, would cause economic ruin, shortages of essential items, widespread starvation, and a significant loss of personal freedoms if not stopped.

Officials predict that as the year goes on, the dangerous food shortages that millions of people are already experiencing will only worsen.

According to experts, there is a hidden goal behind everything.

According to U.N. papers, private land ownership is in the crosshairs as global food production and the global economy are modified to fulfill the global sustainability targets.

The goals set in 2015 “build on decades of work by countries and the U.N.,” as the U.N. explains on its SDG website.

The United Nations Conference on Human Settlements, often referred as Habitat I, which embraced the Vancouver Declaration (read below), was one of the first conferences to define the “sustainability” agenda.

According to the agreement, private land ownership is “a principal instrument of accumulation and concentration of wealth, therefore contributes to social injustice,” and “land cannot be treated as an ordinary asset controlled by individuals.”

The U.N. resolution stated that “public control of land use is therefore indispensable,” setting up the World Economic Forum’s now-famous “prediction” that by 2030, “you’ll own nothing.”

Since then, a number of U.N. organizations and representatives have described their vision of “sustainability,” which includes demands for significant limits on energy use, consumption of meat, travel, living space, and material wealth.

In an attempt to centralize control over food production and squelch independent farmers and ranchers, some of the richest and most influential corporate leaders in the world are collaborating with communists in China and other countries, says experts.

A “strategic partner” of the U.N. on Agenda 2030 is the WEF, a network of significant international corporations that works closely with the CCP.

As officials from all over the world, including U.S. President Joe Biden and the head of the United Nations World Food Programme David Beasley, warn of impending food shortages worldwide, the regulation of food production is becoming more strict, and there are even attempts to shut down numerous farms and ranches.

But Western nations and many aid-dependent states are tightening regulations even more, rather than loosening them and promoting increased production.

This summer, Dutch farmers — who were already near breaking point — responded with widespread, huge protests. That was followed by tumultuous upheaval in Sri Lanka related to food shortages brought on by political decisions.

Governments and international organizations have used a variety of justifications for the policy, such as fostering “economic justice,” safeguarding various species of flora and fauna, and even giving back land to aboriginal peoples.

However, the policies’ detractors contend that the objective is not at all to protect the environment or stop climate change. The “sustainability” story and the other explanations, the experts caution, are actually a tactic to obtain control over food, farm, and people.

According to Craig Rucker, head of the Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow (CFACT), a public policy organization that focuses on environmental and development issues, “the end goal of these efforts is to reduce sovereignty on both individual nations and people.”

The purpose, is to consolidate authority at the national and even international level. “The intent for those pushing this agenda is not to save the planet, as they purport, but to increase control over people,” he said.

UN Sustainable Development Goals — Agenda 2030

The United Nations and its member nations approved the Sustainable Development Goals, often known as Agenda 2030, in 2015 as a roadmap for “transforming our world.” The 17 goals contain 169 targets covering every aspect of the economy and human life, and are heralded by top U.N. officials as a “master plan for humanity” and a global “declaration of interdependence.”

The document’s preamble states that “no one will be left behind” and states that “all countries and all stakeholders, acting in collaborative partnership, will implement this plan.”

Goal 10 of the U.N. plan includes, among other things, redistribution of wealth on a national and worldwide scale, in addition to “fundamental changes in the way that our societies produce and consume goods and services.”

The SDGs emphasize using governments to reform all economic activity, with Goal 12 requiring “sustainable consumption and production patterns.”

Several of the specific goals listed in Goal 12 are closely related to agricultural practices that jeopardize food production. These include “sustainable management and efficient use of natural resources.”

The document requires “environmentally sound management of chemicals and all wastes throughout their life cycle, in accordance with agreed international frameworks,” which is perhaps more significant.

As a result, “significantly reduce their release to air, water, and soil in order to minimize their adverse impacts on human health and the environment,” in particular for farmers.

Goal 14 of the SDGs, which covers “marine pollution of all kinds, in particular from land-based activities, including … nutrient pollution,” is another SDG that is directly related to what detractors have dubbed the “war on farmers.” Agriculture and food production are frequently cited by the U.N. as threats to the ocean.

Leading the charge is the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), which is overseen by Qu Dongyu, a former vice minister of agriculture and rural affairs for the CCP.

The U.N. body asks for severe limitations on the application of fertilizers, pesticides, emissions, and water in the agricultural sector in its 2014 report, “Building a Common Vision for Sustainable Food and Agriculture: Principles and Approaches.”

According to the FAO report, “excessive use of nitrogen fertilizer is a major cause of water pollution and greenhouse gas emissions.” This statement serves as an illustration of how agriculture must be transformed in order for it to be recognized by the U.N. as sustainable.

World Economic Forum Reveals Plan To Block Out The Sun With ‘Space Bubbles’

In June of 2019, the World Economic Forum — a private group of elite billionaires — signed a strategic partnership with the United Nations, an intergovernmental organization. This highly questionable partnership was formed with the explicit goal of “accelerating the implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.”

world economic forum reveals plan to block out the sun with ‘space bubbles’

This move was seen by many across the world as a “corporate takeover” on the United Nations and was opposed by hundreds of NGOs, non-profits, think tanks, and government officials. An open letter in September of 2019, signed by these organization, detailed the the problem with such a move:

“The provisions of the strategic partnership effectively provide that corporate leaders will become ‘whisper advisors’ to the heads of UN system departments, using their private access to advocate market-based profit-making ‘solutions’ to global problems while undermining real solutions embedded in public interest and transparent democratic procedures.”

Since that fateful day in June of 2019, the WEF’s influence has grown and their relevance and power within the government has vastly increased.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, the WEF put out their mission, entitled The Great Reset, to use the pandemic to push what they say is a need for “global stakeholders to cooperate in simultaneously managing the direct consequences of the COVID-19 crisis ” to “help inform all those determining the future state of global relations, the direction of national economies, the priorities of societies, the nature of business models and the management of a global commons.”

The Great Reset was written off by fact-checkers as a conspiracy theory despite the WEF advocating for it publicly and the head of the WEF, Klaus Schwab, literally writing a book with that title — advocating for these very initiatives.

After amassing massive government influence for years, the group, which openly refers to themselves as “elites” has come to the same conclusion that Billy Boy has come to years ago — we need to block out the sun to slow climate change.

Differing from the Gates plan of spraying aerosol particles into the atmosphere to block out the sun, the WEF has gotten behind the MIT proposal to use “space bubbles” to form a solar shield.

“Space-based solutions would be safer – for instance, if we deflect 1.8 per cent of incident solar radiation before it hits our planet, we could fully reverse today’s global warming.”

Another advantage of this particular solar shield is that it is reversible, as the bubbles could be deflated and removed from their position.

The spheres would be made from a material such as silicon, transported to space in molten form, or graphene-reinforced ionic liquids.

For now, the plan is a working hypothesis and scientists behind it are only conducting experiments in the lab. Citing the highly controversial nature of such geoengineering plans, the WEF fell back on their relationship with the UN to justify it.

Geoengineering has proven controversial, but the United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has said it is a necessary Plan B if temperature rises can’t be capped at a manageable level.

Indeed, regardless of the assurances of the elite, many scientists and government bodies are making moves to prevent such actions. Some countries have even banned the practice.

Last year, the nation of Sweden recanted on their plan to test Billy Boy’ plan to spray particles in the sky to test blocking out the sun — citing disagreements among scientists.

Others simply want to compensate anyone who is harmed by these projects.

David Keith, a professor of applied physics and public policy at Harvard University, recognizes the “very many real concerns” of geoengineering, according to a report in Forbes. To offset these risks he has proposed the creation of a “risk pool” to collect funds for the risks associated with playing mother nature — up to and including cooling an area so much that inhabitants are unable to grow food.

As Forbes reports:

Again, these temperature decreases bring with them serious risks. Freezing temperatures in 1815 led to failed crops in near-famine conditions. British scientists have cited stratospheric aerosols from volcanic eruptions in Alaska and Mexico as the potential cause of drought in Africa’s Sahel region. Major disruption of the global climate could bring unintended consequences, negatively impacting highly populated regions and engineering another refugee crisis.

David Keith has proposed the creation of a “risk pool” to compensate smaller nations for collateral damage caused by such tests, but such a payout might be little comfort to those displaced by unlivable conditions.

Indeed. No amount of money would compensate for a family losing all of their land to freezing temperatures and being forced to relocate to another country. But these are some of the risks involved in weather modification — which is why a small group of global elites who are not scientists — should not be making these decisions for 8 billion people.

Source: TheFreeThoughtProject.com

The ‘Council For Inclusive Capitalism’ Is The New World Order

The idea that there is an agenda for global government among the financial and political elites of the world has long been called a “conspiracy theory” within the mainstream and the establishment media.

council for inclusive capitalism nwo

And sadly, even when you can convince people to look at and accept the evidence that banking institutions and certain politicians work together for their own purposes, many folks will STILL not entertain the notion that the ultimate goal of these power mongers is one-world empire. They just can’t wrap their heads around such a thing.

People will say that the establishment is driven by greed alone and that their associations are fragile and based only on individual self interest.

They will say that crisis events and shifts in social and political trends are random, not the product of deliberate engineering. They will say that elitists will never be able to work together because they are too narcissistic, etc.

All of these arguments are a coping mechanism for the public to deal with evidence they cannot otherwise refute. When the facts become concrete and the powers-that-be admit to their schemes openly, some people will revert to confused denial.

They don’t want to believe that organized evil on such a scale could actually exist. If it did, then everything they thought they knew about the world might be wrong.

For many years the agenda for global governance was only whispered about within elitist circles, but every once in a while one of them would speak aloud in public about it. Perhaps out of arrogance or perhaps because they felt the time was right to ease the populace into accepting the possibility.

Whenever they did mention it, they called it the “New World Order.” World leaders from George HW Bush to Barack Obama to Joe Biden to Gordon Brown to Tony Blair and beyond have all given speeches talking about the “New World Order.”

Money and political elites like George Soros and Henry Kissinger have mentioned the NWO incessantly over the years.

One of the most revealing quotes on the agenda comes from Clinton Administration Deputy Secretary of State Strobe Talbot, who stated in Time magazine that:

In the next century, nations as we know it will be obsolete; all states will recognize a single, global authority… National sovereignty wasn’t such a great idea after all.”

He adds in the same article a lesser known quote:

…The free world formed multilateral financial institutions that depend on member states’ willingness to give up a degree of sovereignty. The International Monetary Fund can virtually dictate fiscal policies, even including how much tax a government should levy on its citizens. The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade regulates how much duty a nation can charge on imports. These organizations can be seen as the protoministries of trade, finance and development for a united world.”

To understand how the agenda works, I offer a quote from globalist and Council on Foreign Relations member Richard Gardner in an article in Foreign Affairs Magazine in 1974 titled ‘The Hard Road To World Order’:

“In short, the “house of world order” will have to be built from the bottom up rather than from the top down. It will look like a great “booming, buzzing confusion,” to use William James’ famous description of reality, but an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece, will accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault.”

The “NWO” has since changed names multiple times as the public grows increasingly wise to the conspiracy. It’s been called the Multilateral World Order, the 4th Industrial Revolution, the “Great Reset,” etc. The names change but the meaning is always the same.

In the past two years in the face of extensive global crisis events the “new order” establishment globalists have been talking about has arrived, and with almost no fanfare or mention in the mainstream media. The beginnings of global government already exist, and it’s called the “Council For Inclusive Capitalism.”

Lately, many analysts myself included have been highly focused on the World Economic Forum and their role in the global government agenda. Mainly because WEF head Klaus Schwab is such a loudmouth and he can’t help but talk about future plans for centralization.

As I have noted in past articles, the elites within the WEF got way too excited about the covid pandemic, thinking that they had the perfect crisis to implement numerous globalist policies in the form of the Great Reset. As it turned out, covid was nowhere near as deadly as they initially predicted during Event 201, and the public was not as submissive and compliant as they had hoped we would be. The WEF let the cat out of the bag too soon.

So, onward we go, with crisis after crisis like dominoes falling until we get to the one event that they think will drive the masses to accept world governance. And while the WEF is regularly attended by top level globalists, they are more of a high level think-tank, the Council for Inclusive Capitalism appears to be about implementation rather than theory.

The founder of the group is Lynn Forester de Rothschild, member of the infamous Rothschild Dynasty that has long been monetarily involved in influencing governments for generations. Pope Francis and the Vatican publicly aligned with the council in 2020, and one of the primary narratives of the CIC is that all religions must unite with the leaders of capital to build a society and an economy that is “fair for all.”

This mission statement is rather familiar, as it echoes the goals of the WEF and its concept of the “Shared Economy”: A system in which you will own nothing, have no privacy, borrow everything, be completely reliant on the government for your survival and you will “like it.”

In other words, the purpose of “inclusive capitalism” is to con the masses into accepting a rebranded version of communism. The promise will be that you won’t have to worry anymore about your economic future, but the cost will be your freedom.

The CIC is led by a core group of global leaders they refer to as “The Guardians” (No, I’m not joking, this is real).

Members of the CIC have included: Mastercard, Allianz, Dupont, the UN, the Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America (TIAA), CalPERS, BP, Bank of America, Johnson & Johnson, Visa, the Rockefeller Foundation, the Ford Foundation, Mark Carney, the Treasurer of the State of California and many more companies around the world.

The list is extensive, but what it represents is a kind of corporate led government with a congress of corporate representatives mixed with pliable political leaders.

One of the top missions of the CIC has been to change our economic models to “promote equity and inclusion.” Hilariously, proponents of the CIC argue that “too much wealth has been accumulated into the hands of too few people and this proves that existing capitalism does not work, yet THEY are the very people that rigged the system to centralize that wealth into THEIR HANDS.

They aren’t “capitalists,” they are an aristocracy. Do you really think that these people are going to build a whole new system that doesn’t continue to benefit them?

If you have ever wondered why the Pope has been pushing woke ideology, climate alarmism and one world religion rhetoric in conflict with traditional Christian doctrine, this is why – He’s following the dictates of the CIC.

Another mission of the CIC is to enforce carbon controls and taxation in the name of “climate change” with the purpose of reaching “net-zero” emissions. As we all know, net zero carbon will be impossible without a complete upheaval of our economy and industry, along with the deaths of billions of people in the process.

It is an unattainable scenario, which is why it is perfect for the globalists. Humans are the enemy of the Earth, they claim, so we need to let the elites control our every action to ensure we don’t destroy the planet and ourselves, and the process will never end because there will always be carbon emissions to deal with.

Members of the CIC, including the head of Bank of America, openly suggest that they don’t actually need governments to cooperate in order to meet their goals. They say corporations can implement most social engineering without political aid. In other words, it is the every definition of “shadow government” – A massive corporate cabal that works in tandem to implement social changes without any oversight. As noted, we’ve already seen this with the spread of woke ideology by hundreds if not thousands of corporations working as a hive.

Is the CIC the final form of global government? No, probably not. But, it is the beginning of it; a government by corporations and money elites for corporations and money elites. It bypasses all political representation, all checks and balances and all voter participation. It is conglomerates and their partners making decisions for our society unilaterally and in a centralized fashion. And, since big business acts as if they are separate from government rather than partners with government, they can claim they are allowed to do whatever they please.

However, with corporations and globalists increasingly showing their true colors and acting as if they should be in charge, the public must hold them accountable as if they are part of government. And if they are found to be authoritarian and corrupt, they must be overthrown like any other political dictatorship.

The War Of Inversion: An All-Out Assault Against Humanity

There’s a war going on that no one is safe from. It’s a War of Inversion and an all-out assault against humanity. It’s multipronged, relentless, and taking place simultaneously in every sphere of life.

the war of inversion an all out assault against humanity

Its thrust is anti-human, anti-science, anti-nature, anti-truth, anti-freedom, and decidedly anti-Christ. Its methods employ every weapon and technique available including sophisticated forms of propaganda and psyops. Its objective is to crush the human spirit and make it bend the knee to a superclass of elitist, authoritarian overlords who genuinely believe they are better than the rest of us.

The perpetrators have every intention of subjugating the masses to their rule, while trying to convince us it’s for our own good. They are master magicians and sly Svengalis casting spells of doom and gloom upon the world to keep people locked in a state of fear and paranoia.

In 2020, when they said that life would not return to normal, they really did mean it.

Everything they touch has been turned upside down and rendered completely opposite of nature and reality. This Bizarro World war seeks to completely overturn societal norms, laws, customs, and traditions. It revels in substituting evil for good and darkness for light.

The wizards behind the curtain are creating chaos and disorder on an unprecedented scale with the goal of rebuilding a new, global, and totalitarian society from the rubble of destruction. They have mastered war techniques from ancient Chinese general Sun Tzu’s Art of War, which includes sowing division, promoting deception, and attacking while the enemy is weak and most unprepared. Racial strife is one of their most prized tactics, but there are many others.

They Want Control Of Everything

Not satisfied with controlling most of the wealth, they seek to own and control everything including all-genetic materialnatural resources, the food supply, and even human DNA. Stating the obvious, the War of Inversion goes by other names such as the Great Reset, where the chief warmongers claim you will own nothing and be happy.

Its proponents masquerade as benevolent heads of nations, militaries, central banks, NGO’s and think tanks. It’s being planned and executed by some of the wealthiest families, most powerful corporations, and most secretive organizations the world has ever known, along with the boot-licking minions that do their bidding.

It’s also known as the New World Order, which was ridiculed as a conspiracy theory not too long ago but is now out in the open parading its inverted virtues for all the world to see. In reality, all this jockeying for world control is nothing short of international organized crime with the military industrial complex and corrupt police serving as the muscle to keep resistance in check.

29 un nwo website

This Build Back Better bunch believes it can reshape human biology, nature, economies, and the social order into a new and improved technocratic utopia. They claim to be building a better future for all, but in reality, are installing a new form of feudalism, technofascism or whatever authoritarian system you’d like to call it.

Transhumanism Takes Center Stage

The new “gods” of the Fourth Industrial Revolution (or Fourth Reich depending on how you view it) are attempting to outdo and outlaw any reverence to the Creator of all things. They pretend to love and protect nature, while seeking to override it through technology such as genetic editing and gain of function research. They are aggressively pursuing a complete rewrite of history by merging man with machine, creating food from synthetic (and often toxic) materials, and altering and patenting the genetic codes for every species of life on the planet. Yes, they are that brazen, and their hubris reaches beyond the stratosphere.

One of their most lauded philosophers is a gay, futurist proponent of transhumanism named Yuval Noah Harari, who believes that:

  • Christ’s resurrection is fake news
  • the poor will continue to die, but in 50 or 100 years the rich will achieve exemption from death
  • future surveillance must be “under the skin”
  • the era of free will is over
  • the masses are useless, and their lives are meaningless and worthless
  • the masses don’t stand much of a chance against what’s coming even if organized
  • “history began when humans invented gods and will end when humans become gods.”

Harari is an advisor to Bond villain caricature and World Economic Forum Chairman Klaus Schwab. You know, the man who has openly stated that the Fourth Industrial Revolution would challenge “ideas about what it means to be human.” Schwab has also boasted that his cadre of young global leaders has penetrated government cabinets in many countries throughout the world. Much has been written lately about these twin terrors, further revealing what the elitists are planning.

However, what often gets lost is that these plans are being carried out in the halls of (local and state) government; corporate board rooms; military strategy sessions; secret meetings; elementary, secondary, and higher education classrooms; and over the airwaves via propaganda vomited from the mouths of CIA puppet “journalists.”

Recent meetings of the World Health OrganizationWorld Economic ForumWorld Government Summit, and Bilderberg Group have brought together many of the main conspirators and a host of other toadies eager to change the course of history in their favor. You are in the crosshairs of all of their attacks, as they have declared war on everything once thought of as good, just, and normal.

They completely despise your freedom, individuality, and independence. They loathe law and order and seek to circumvent all governing principles that stand in their way including the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights. They want to restrict your speech, movement, thoughts, and even what you eat. They yearn to annihilate your individuality and merge you into a collectivist hive mind much like The Borg from the Star Trek franchise:

Born humanoid, they are almost immediately implanted with bio-chips that link their brains to a collective consciousness via a unique subspace frequency emitted by each drone.

This collective consciousness is experienced by the Borg as “thousands” of voices — they are collectively aware, but not aware of themselves as separate individuals. 

The LGBTQ+ Agenda Erodes Stable Societies

They seek to achieve their goals by any means necessary. It doesn’t matter how many innocent people die, how much pain and suffering are inflicted, or how many children’s lives are permanently damaged as a result of their ideologies, policies, and technology.

They promote a disordered view of reality that declares men can have menstrual cycles, become pregnant, and birth children while they pump harmful drugs and perform dangerous, often irreversible surgeries on minors so they can become transgender. They tell women it’s okay to lop off their breasts, remove their vaginas, take testosterone, and surgically create fake penises.

Meanwhile, pedophiles are seeking to gain public acceptance as they rebrand themselves as Minor Attracted Persons (MAPs) instead of the criminally deviant predators they really are.

Biden’s USDA has recently announced that transgender-identifying students must be allowed to enter the bathrooms of their choosing or they will be deprived of federal funds used to pay for school lunches. Yes, Biden wants to starve your kids if school administrators don’t comply with the agenda. If you haven’t pulled your child out of these government indoctrination centers known as public schools, now is a great time to do it!

This particularly insidious form of warfare is slowly destroying what it even means to be a male or female and how the two different sexes should relate to one another. With at least 68 (most newly invented) terms describing gender and identity, millions are being groomed to rebel against nature and proudly embrace confusion. If alive today, Karl Marx would be thrilled to see his plans to destroy the traditional nuclear family take shape. If this agenda continues unabated, what happens to humanity fifty years from now?

The Occult Roots Of Societal Change

These smug, self-appointed rulers represent all that is evil and vile while presenting themselves as saviors. In truth, they are nothing but wolves in sheep’s clothing and dark clouds without rain. Many of them have aligned themselves with the occult and practiced the satanic “do as thou will shall be the whole of the law” doctrine.

Popularized by Aleister Crowley’s Telema, Anton LaVey’s Church of Satan, and Michael Aquino’s Temple of Set, satanic teaching achieved widespread influence in Hollywood, the music industry, education, the military, and many other sectors. Though there are some variations, this belief system allows practitioners to justify anything they do no matter how repugnant, harmful, and horrifying it may truly be. This is why you are seeing celebrities such as Megan Fox admit to drinking human blood.

former u.s. army lt. col. michael aquino and the satanic temple of set

Former U.S. Army Lt. Col. Michael Aquino and the Satanic Temple of Set

Though they may pretend otherwise, at the core, all of them are narcissists, many are sociopaths, and an increasing number have become psychopaths. However, they’re usually not the ones committing atrocities like mass shootings and bombing innocent civilians “mistaken” for terrorists. They operate in the shadows, remaining clandestine while creating the policies and giving the orders for other foot soldiers to carry out these sadistic acts of violence.

Depopulation-Another Weapon In The Arsenal

They see themselves as men and women of renown, a special, gifted class destined to rule the world and everything in it. Some of them even believe they will colonize Mars, upload their consciences to the cloud, and achieve immortality.

Full of extreme pride and conceit, these tyrants see you and me as nothing more than “hackable animals” here to serve their every need. In fact, if technology continues to progress at the rate they desire, they won’t even need much of our service in the near future. Their ultimate plan is to  supplant us with robots, artificial intelligence, and Internet of Things (IoT) smart technology.

If all goes according to plan, these technological breakthroughs will make much of humanity expendable, so they’ve employed all kinds of methods to kill us including DNA altering and experimental gene therapies known as COVID-19 jjabs. They’ve tried to tell us that millions died from COVID-19, but that narrative has been exposed so now they are shifting to new threats like Monkeypox, bird flu, and bioterror attacks.

I believe this pivot is largely to steer people away from the fact that the COVID-19 bioweapon jabs have caused a massive die-off of the human population. As population control is one of the central tenets of the globalist overlords, those duped into taking the jabs have helped them reduce the population to a much more manageable level. After all, there is a monument in Georgia called the “Guidestones” openly declaring the population must be maintained under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature.

georgia guidestones, elbert county georgia

Georgia Guidestones, Elbert County Georgia

For those who aren’t killed off by big pharma, war, toxic chemicals, starvation or other means, the plan is to plunge us into poverty and government dependence. Creepy Joe Biden and the Federal Reserve are doing their best to oversee the controlled demolition of the economy under the guise of the “Putin price hike” and transition to the so-called green economy.

As a result, gas prices have soared to over $9.00/gal in one California town and inflation is rising so fast that it’s quickly emptying everyone’s wallets.

Very rapidly, the paradigms of life experienced over the last half century plus are shifting from:

  • Representative governments to technocratic authoritarianism
  • Governance through public institutions accountable to the people to governance by public/private partnerships accountable to no one
  • Recognition and enforcement of natural borders to fully open borders
  • Individual nation states to regional/global governance
  • Natural biological humans to transhuman or “augmented humans”
  • Free market economies to digital, surveillance capitalism economies
  • Freedom of movement to restricted movement through biometric digital IDs, IoT, artificial intelligence, and social credit monitoring
  • A world populated with over 7 billion people to a desired population of 1-2 billion people
  • Individual ownership leading to wealth and upward mobility to owning nothing and surviving on the pittance of Universal Basic Income
  • Bodily autonomy to government ownership as a “patented” corporate asset
  • Protected free speech to government-approved speech and draconian censorship
  • Freedom of religion to worship of the state
  • Robust natural food production and consumption to tightly controlled food production allowing only GMOs, lab grown meat, insects, seaweed, and algae for consumption
  • Unlimited enjoyment and exploration of the natural world to restrictions on travel and movement relying on digital experiences like the metaverse and a digital twin of the earth
  • Limited human contact and strong personal relationships to digital relationships through social media, metaverse, etc.
  • Rule of law to rule by the decrees of technocratic tyrants

This is indeed a lot to digest, and for many it is so unpalatable they simply bury their head in the sand and continue blindly through life, hoping this will all just go away. But this War of Inversion will not cease unless there is continued resistance at every turn. They desire to achieve most of their objectives by 2030, right in line with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. This is the reason there was such an acceleration of change beginning with the plandemic in 2020.

25 un sdgs 2020 year of acceleration

The fork-tongued snakes at the top of the global pyramid want you dependent on them for everything. This is why they want control of everything under the guise of saving the planet from climate change, ever-mutating viruses and plagues, and devastating cyber-attacks that threaten critical infrastructure and expose all of your private data.

They trot out crisis after crisis to keep you traumatized and focused on anything but their continued plans of domination. What we’re witnessing is pure engineered chaos at its best.

Their Rule Is Not A Foregone Conclusion

They love to pretend they are a united front, but they often disagree on how to implement their schemes. This should encourage us to continue to defy them, as a house divided cannot stand. Through predictive programming and publicly stating their goals, they want to make us think that their rule is inevitable, and that resistance is futile.

However, there are victories occurring every day by ordinary people taking on the big bad machine.

It’s sad but true that much of their power has been achieved by our own dereliction of duty. As abolitionist Wendel Phillips stated in 1852, “Eternal vigilance is the price of liberty.”

In many ways we have failed to protect our children, communities, wealth, health, and peace of mind by giving government bureaucrats and anointed experts too much control, all for the sake of ease and convenience. But it’s time to get back in the trenches and fight this enemy by speaking truth to power, overcoming evil with good, forming our own support systems, and continuing to live our lives without fear and panic.

We all have a part to play in wresting control from those who seek to do us harm. Whether it is through writing, speaking, creating, organizing, planning, inventing, or teaching, all of us have been gifted in some area to contribute to defeating this beast seeking to devour us.

Now is the time to use whatever talents and gifts you have to advance the cause of freedom and truth. Be a light in the midst of all this darkness. If your message is not received by some, keep it moving and don’t waste time and energy arguing with fools.

Pay attention to what’s happening, but don’t let it consume you. Find time to do things you enjoy despite the dire conditions. Connect with God and people who have your best interest in mind.

Remember, nothing is impossible to them that believe! This war can be won by those who are courageous, committed, steadfast, and willing to make sacrifices to see that the enemies of God, humanity, and nature are all exposed and brought to justice.

The Great Reset Aims To End Freedom Of The Press, Speech, And Expression

Governments, corporations, and elites have always been fearful of the power of a free press, because it is capable of exposing their lies, destroying their carefully crafted images, and undermining their authority.

the great reset aims to end freedom of the press, speech, and expression

In recent years, alternative journalism has been growing and more people are relying on social media platforms as sources of news and information.

In response, the corporate state, digital conglomerates, and the mainstream media have been increasingly supportive of the silencing and censoring of alternative media outlets and voices that challenge the official narrative on most issues.

At the recent World Economic Forum meeting in Davos, Switzerland, “Australian eSafety commissioner” Julie Inman Grant stated that “freedom of speech is not the same thing as a free for all,” and that “we are going to need a recalibration of a whole range of human rights that are playing out online—from freedom of speech … to be free from online violence.”

Meanwhile, the Canadian government is seeking to restrict independent media and the freedom of expression via the implementation of Bill C-11, which would allow it to regulate all online audiovisual platforms on the internet, including content on Spotify, Tik Tok, YouTube, and podcast clients.

Similarly, the UK is seeking to introduce an Online Safety Bill, the US “paused” the establishment of a Disinformation Governance Board following backlash, and the European Union approved its own Digital Services Act, all of which aim to limit the freedom of speech. Attempts by elites and politicians to silence dissenters and critical thinkers is not something new.

In fact, history is full of examples of “the persecution of men of science, the burning of scientific books, and the systematic eradication of the intelligentsia of the subjected people.”1

However, these current efforts to curtail freedom of speech and press by supposedly liberal governments are still somewhat ironic, given that even “the most intolerant of churches, the Roman Catholic Church, even at the canonization of a saint, admits, and listens patiently to, a ‘devil’s advocate.’

The holiest of men, it appears, cannot be admitted to posthumous honors, until all that the devil could say against him is known and weighed.”2

The corporate state, digital conglomerates, and the mainstream media want to ensure that they have the exclusive authority to dictate people’s opinions, wants, and choices through their sophisticated propaganda techniques. To do so, they have even resorted to transforming falsehoods into truth.

In fact, the word truth has already had its original meaning altered, as those who speak the truth on certain subjects are now regularly accused of spreading hate speech, misinformation, and disinformation.

Presently, truth is no “longer something to be found, with the individual conscience as the sole arbiter of whether in any particular instance the evidence (or the standing of those proclaiming it) warrants a belief; it becomes something to be laid down by authority, something which has to be believed in the interest of the unity of the organized effort, and which may have to be altered as the exigencies of this organised effort require it.”3

However, modifying the definition of truth comes with the potential for great peril, as truth-seeking often contributes to human progress in that it leads to discoveries that ultimately benefit society at large. It should be noted that truth is by no means the only word whose meaning has been changed recently in order for it to serve as an instrument of propaganda; others include freedom, justice, law, right, equality, diversity, woman, pandemic, jjab, etc..

This is highly concerning, because such attempts at the “perversion of language, the change of meaning of the words by which the ideals” of the ruling class are expressed is a consistent feature of totalitarian regimes.4

As a number of liberal-democratic governments increasingly move toward totalitarianism, they want people to forget that there is “the greatest difference between presuming an opinion to be true, because, with every opportunity for contesting it, it has not been refuted, and assuming its truth for the purpose of not permitting its refutation.”5

According to them, “public criticism or even expressions of doubt must be suppressed because they tend to weaken public support.”6

In fact, they believe that all views and opinions that might cast doubt or create hesitation need to be restricted in all disciplines and on all platforms. This is because “the disinterested search for truth cannot be allowed” when “the vindication of the official views becomes the sole object” of the ruling class.7

In other words, the control of information is practiced and the uniformity of views is enforced in all fields under totalitarian rule.

The suppression of freedom of the press, speech, expression, and thought means that current and future generations will be “deprived of the opportunity of exchanging error for truth: if wrong, they lose, what is almost as great a benefit, the clearer perception and livelier impression of truth, produced by its collision with error.”8

They are also at risk of becoming ignorant of the fact that the only way in which a person can know “the whole of a subject” is by “hearing what can be said about it by persons of every variety of opinion, and studying all modes in which it can be looked at by every character of mind.”9

That is to say, current and future generations will be unaware that “the steady habit of correcting and completing” one’s own “opinion by collating it with those of others, so far from causing doubt and hesitation in carrying it into practice, is the only stable foundation for a just reliance on it.”10

At present, it is likely that the masses do not regard freedom of the press, speech, expression, and thought as being particularly important, because “the great majority are rarely capable of thinking independently, that on most questions they accept views which they find ready-made, and that they will be equally content if born or coaxed into one set of beliefs or another.”11

Nevertheless, no one should have the power and authority to “select those to whom” freedom of thought, enlightenment and expression is to be “reserved.”12

In fact, John Stuart Mill went so far as to claim that “if all mankind minus one, were of one opinion, and only one person were of the contrary opinion, mankind would be no more justified in silencing that one person, than he, if he had the power, would be justified in silencing mankind.”13

He further added that silencing the expression of an opinion is essentially an act of “robbing the human race,” which applies to both current and future generations.14

Even though the suppressors can deny the truth to people at a particular point in time, “history shows that every age having held many opinions which subsequent ages have deemed not only false but absurd; and it is as certain that many opinions, now general, will be rejected by future ages, as it is that many, once general, are rejected by the present.”15

If current efforts to suppress freedom of the press, speech, expression, and thought succeed, then the search for truth will eventually be abandoned and totalitarian authorities will decide what “doctrines ought to be taught and published.”16 There will be no limits to who can be silenced, as the control of opinions will be extended to all people in all fields.

Accordingly, contemporary authoritarian policy makers need to be reminded about the crucial importance of freedom of speech, expression, and thought, which the US Supreme Court recognized in the 1957 case Sweezy v. New Hampshire when it ruled that:

“to impose any strait jacket upon the intellectual leaders in our colleges and universities would imperil the future of our Nation. No field of education is so thoroughly comprehended by man that new discoveries cannot yet be made…. Teachers and students must always remain free to inquire, to study and to evaluate, to gain new maturity and understanding; otherwise, our civilization will stagnate and die…. Our form of government is built on the premise that every citizen shall have the right to engage in political expression and association.

“This right was enshrined in the First Amendment of the Bill of Rights. Exercise of these basic freedoms in America has traditionally been through the media of political associations…. History has amply proved the virtue of political activity by minority, dissident groups, who innumerable times have been in the vanguard of democratic thought and whose programs were ultimately accepted. Mere unorthodoxy or dissent from the prevailing mores is not to be condemned. The absence of such voices would be a symptom of grave illness in our society.”

  • 1. F.A. Hayek, The Road to Serfdom (New York: Routledge 2006), p. 168.
  • 2. John Stuart Mill, On Liberty (Kitchener: Batoche Books, 2001), p. 22.
  • 3. Hayek, The Road to Serfdom, p. 167.
  • 4. Hayek, The Road to Serfdom, p. 161.
  • 5. Mill, On Liberty, p. 21.
  • 6. Hayek, The Road to Serfdom, p. 164.
  • 7. Hayek, The Road to Serfdom, p. 165.
  • 8.  Mill, On Liberty, p. 19.
  • 9. Mill, On Liberty, p. 22.
  • 10. Mill, On Liberty, p. 22.
  • 11. Hayek, The Road to Serfdom, p. 168.
  • 12. Hayek, The Road to Serfdom, p. 168.
  • 13. Mill, On Liberty, p. 18.
  • 14. Mill, On Liberty, p. 19.
  • 15. Mill, On Liberty, p. 20.
  • 16. Hayek, The Road to Serfdom, p. 165.

The Great Reset Is Turning Back The Clock On Civilization

The covid-19 pandemic featured an unprecedented fusion of the interests of large and powerful corporations with the power of the state. Democratically elected politicians in many countries failed to represent the interests of their own citizens and uphold their own constitutions and charters of rights.

great reset john bush

Specifically, they supported lock-down measures, jab mandates, the suppression of a variety of early treatment options, the censorship of dissenting views, propaganda, interference in the private spheres of individuals, and the suspension of various forms of freedom. All of these policies and measures were centrally designed by the social engineers of the pandemic.

Globalists, who are obsessed with societal control, decided to take advantage of the pandemic in order to increase their authoritarian power. Prominent among them was, Klaus Schwab, founder and executive chairman of World Economic Forum (WEF). In June 2020, he stated that “the pandemic represents a rare but narrow window of opportunity to reflect, reimagine, and reset our world.” According to him, “every country, from the United States to China, must participate, and every industry, from oil and gas to tech, must be transformed.”

It is no secret that the WEF has focused on accelerating the implementation of central planning for the entire global population since the early days of pandemic. This plan to establish a new world order, known as the Great Reset, was a key theme at the recent annual meeting of the WEF, which was held during May 22–26 in Davos, Switzerland.

Drastic changes to the world order like the Great Reset do not happen spontaneously; rather, they are designed by global policy makers, including influential billionaires, politicians, celebrities, biased academics, wealthy philanthropists, and the bureaucrats of international organizations and institutions. These types of people support social engineering, because it will enable them to acquire control over the world’s wealth and natural resources, and strengthen their ability to shape society as they see fit.

Like their predecessors across history, the social engineers of the WEF believe that “there must be no spontaneous, unguided activity, because it might produce results which cannot be foreseen and for which the plan does not provide. It might produce something new, undreamt of in the philosophy of the planner.”1

Based on the WEF agenda, the successful completion of the current industrial transformation will require redesigning and controlling every minuscule aspect of human life and behavior, including the private spheres of individuals, the economy, politics, and societal organizations, without the possibility of voluntary and spontaneous cooperation between individuals based on their will, values, thoughts, and beliefs.

We were warned almost two centuries ago that when this type of tyrannical power succeeds, it will be “busy with a multitude of small” tasks penetrating “into private life,” governing families, and dictating the “actions” and “tastes of individuals.”2

In fact, some of the most ridiculous controls proposed by the WEF included limiting the washing of jeans to no “more than once a month” and “pyjamas once a week.” The WEF also advocates for transforming entire food systems by encouraging people to consume insects, arguing that “insect protein has high-quality properties and can be used as an alternative source of protein throughout the food chain, from feed for aquaculture to ingredients for nutritional supplements for humans and pets.”

Reforming the food system would also involve eating “cultured meat,” referring to “meat product created by cultivating animal cells in a controlled lab environment.”

The WEF also supports the elimination of “car ownership,” as “paying for a ride or delivery is as easy as tapping a smart phone app,” and “renting a vehicle” means that “car loans and insurance payments shrink or disappear.” Ultimately, the Great Reset aims to create a world where “you will own nothing, and will be happy” by 2030, as people will not possess any private property and rent everything they “need in life.”

However, this premise ignores the fact that private property ownership is associated with the advancement of civilizations, higher stages of material and moral development, and the development of modern family life. The WEF scenario would also diminish the sense of security, which is strengthened by the possession of private property.

Once the Great Reset is complete, individuals will essentially have their thinking and decision-making “done for them by men much like themselves, addressing them or speaking in their name.”3 Such a “desire to force upon the people a creed which is regarded as salutary for them is … not a thing that is new or peculiar to our time.”4

However, as various totalitarian regimes throughout history have demonstrated, the oppressive central planning of social engineers leads to the masses’ losing their sense of autonomy, freedom, dignity, creativity, and strength. Also lost is the incentive to improve one’s own condition and contribute to the progress of society.5

If the social engineering of the WEF is successful, then, by 2030, one will not be able to rely on oneself, family members, relatives, friends, or the community. This is because the supporters any absolutist regime want traditions and customs to be corrupted, “memories obliterated, habits destroyed, … liberty, chased from the laws.”6

In other words, they want to design a societal order where sympathy and mutual assistance will be rendered obsolete and where every citizen of the world is equally powerless, poor, and isolated, so that people will be unable to oppose the organized strength of global governance and become dependent on governments and their allies for their survival.

Eventually, nothing will protect citizens any longer, and citizens will no longer protect themselves.

Social engineers of the WEF are essentially advocating for natural freedom, which would allow the strong to exercise their power while subjugating the weak.

In doing so, they are basically calling for the world to move backward in the development of human history toward the re-institution of feudalism and slavery.

It is important to remember that economic freedom, positive freedom, political freedom, freedom of thought, freedom of speech, and freedom of the press are not attributes of primitive man or serfdom; rather, they are products of the most advanced stages of society.

To be more precise, these types of freedom are outcomes of the efforts of countless thinkers, social movements, revolutions, and wars throughout human history.

However, social engineers are not interested in the history and struggles of our civilization, as they believe that they possess expertise in all areas, which is the line of thought at the heart of all dictatorial regimes.7 They do not think that social engineering is alien to the true nature of human beings, even though it is based on “mechanical exactness” and does not “spring from a man’s free choice.”8

Furthermore, advocates of social engineering ignore the fact that “the progress of mankind, in powers of mind and heart, in well-being and in technique, in law and morality, necessarily involves the participation of the lower classes.”9

Anyone who believes that the social engineers of the WEF have noble intentions at heart as they design and implement the Great Reset should heed the warning of President Franklin D. Roosevelt (1935), who (ironically) declared:

The doctrine of regulation and legislation by “master minds” in whose judgment and will all the people may gladly and quietly acquiesce, has been too glaringly apparent at Washington during these last 10 years. Were it possible to find “master minds” so unselfish, so willing to decide unhesitatingly against their own personal interests or private prejudices, men almost godlike in their ability hold the scales of justice with an even hand, such a government might be to the interests of the country; but there are no such on our political horizon, and we cannot expect a complete reversal of all the teachings of history.

References:

1. F.A. Hayek, The Road to Serfdom (1944; repr., New York: Routledge, 2006), p. 166.
2. Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy in America: Historical-Critical Edition of “De la démocratie en Amérique,” ed. Eduardo Nolla and trans. James T. Schleifer, bilingual ed., 4 vols. (Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund, 2010), 1:223.
3. John Stuart Mill, On Liberty (Kitchener, ON: Batoche Books, 2001), p. 261.
4. Hayek, The Road to Serfdom, p. 168.
5. Hayek, The Road to Serfdom.
6. Tocqueville, Democracy in America, 2:156.
7. Hayek, The Road to Serfdom.
8. Wilhelm von Humboldt, The Limits of State Action. (1792; repr., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969).
9. Gustav Friedrich Schmoller, “Class Conflicts in General.” (American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 20, No. 4, 1915), p. 519.

Source: MISES.org