New Genome Study Destroys Zionist Claims to Palestine

Zionists design myth of Jewish genome to usurp Palestine

by Jim W. Dean, VT Editor with Press TV

– February 27th, 2013

Update: This article did very well on Press TV. We jumped on it at VT because we saw its Mideast-shattering implications regarding the Zionist-myth biblical claims to Palestine.

My readers know what I have always felt about a bunch of communist atheist Jews claiming a God-given right to anything. But this new genome study was written from a purely scientific approach. The study was covered internationally everywhere but in the U.S., surprise, surprise.

All geopolitical implications below are mine and not Dr. Elhaik’s. The militant Zionists have already politicized it by sending arch-Zionist Dore Gold out to do a hit piece on this new work. Dore has handed me his head on a platter, and I will be serving it to you all on a follow-up piece platter, with all the trimmings. You might want to get a good bottle of wine to go with it. The real holocaust deniers have exposed themselves … Jim W. Dean

Geneticist, Dr. Eran Elhaik

On December 14, 2012, Dr. Eran Elhaik turned almost two generations of Jewish genome research upside down.

But he went even further. The young Israeli-American geneticist has charged former researchers with academic fraud, and he has the research to back it up.

How could those those eminent Jewish scientist before him have been so wrong?

Easy says Dr. Elhaik, “First these researchers decided what conclusions they wanted to find, and then they set off to find evidence to support it.”

I was not bashing Jewish scientists. What Elhaik has described is a slam dunk fraud.

But why? Why would Jews who take such pride in academic achievement risk exposing themselves to a group deception, which was bound to be discovered later? Dr. Elhaik does not delve into the quicksand of the politics, but I will gladly do so.

They perpetrated the fraud solely to support the bogus biblical claim to Palestine which was anchored in their being a separate people. This distinguished them from all others because they claimed a land title in their blood.

They bet the farm on this DNA proof of purchase, a God given bar coded passport to the Palestine. Dr. Ehaik just erased the bar code. It was just stamped on anyway, because it was never in the blood.

Why, why did they do it? The second half of the answer not revealed in his research was that you had a bunch of atheist, communist Jews shoot their way into taking over the Land with the sole moral cover that ‘God gave it us only’.

Before I had a bookcase of Judacia in my library I must say I was a bit suspicious of these atheist Jews whipping out God’s dual land title and passport. It was propaganda of course. It always was. And the story for another day is why did an entire academic community who should have known better, cower down and debase themselves in their own community by allowing the fraud to not only be birthed, but continued?

Arthur Koestler’s The Thirteenth Tribe was a major influence in cracking the fraud. It was published in the day when Zionist propagandist were very savvy in not attacking an esteemed Jewish author. They had no fear from the academic community, already neutralized, and Koestler’s book did not generate a moral tipping point challenge to the Zionist false claim on the Land.

Dr. Elhaik literally nails the fraudsters to the cross, “….[they] assumed that the Jews constitute a group that is genetically isolated from other nations.”…That’s because Jews were never genetically isolated, making all those other studies fatally flawed and very often contradictory.

I was wondering what weapon of mass destruction that the Jewish Lobby bullies would unleash upon the young Israeli-American geneticist.

I expected to be reading about Alan Dershowitz denouncing him as a self hating Jew when actually it is Dershowitz who is the self-hating Jew. He and Abe Foxman compete for the most negative Jewish stereotype and best bully competition award annually.

But there has been no attack. The 32-year-old Dr. Elhaid is getting the Arthur Koestler treatment, in spades. What do I mean? Well, his research paper was published by the Oxford University Press, in the prestigious journal Genome Biology and Evolution.

But do you think a bunch of savvy Zionist propagandists are going to worry about the mass public ever hearing a thing about his research? Of course not. And are these same pretend-a-Jews going to risk giving his work a 100 times more exposure by attacking him publicly?

Let’s get back to Dr. Elhaik hammering the nails in, “First these researchers decided what conclusion they wanted to find, and then they set off to find evidence to support it…It is my impression that their results were written before they began the research. First they shot the arrow – and then the painted a bull’s-eye around it.”

Take a moment to ponder what he said there, folks. Does that sound like someone trembling in fear of Jewish Lobby power in America, or someone thinking that his career is over and committing hari-kiri? No. That ‘painted a bull’s-eye around it’ was not an off the cuff remark, but one he had chosen to use in a Haaretz interview.

This is a young man who is NOT standing on the shoulders of the fraudsters who have gone before him. On the contrary he wants to stand on their academic bones by exposing them, and he has.

More from his Haaretz interview, “The various groups of Jews in the world today do not share a common genetic origin. We are talking here about groups that are very heterogeneous and which are connected solely by religion…[the] genome of European Jews is a mosaic of ancient peoples and its origin is largely Khazar.”The Genome Project spelled doom for the founding myths of Israel

Now onto some of the science highlights. Dr. Elhaik’s research shows that the dominant element in the genetic makeup of European Jews is Khazar. For Central European Jews, it is 38%, while for East Europeans it is 30%.

To that you can add his findings that, in both groups, their genome is mostly Western European. Surprise, surprise.

The Roman empire is the dominant lineage there, those that settled on the frontier, like retired soldiers, and the locals with whom they produced families.

There were some Jewish merchants there, as Elhaik did find some Middle Eastern roots, which he suspects are Mesopotamian and a bit of biblical Israel.

But here comes the slam dunk…the Israel connection is such a tiny part of their overall genome that it cancels out their DNA title claim to the Land. The good doctor would not wander into this swamp, but I will, by calling a spade a spade.

What Dr. Elhaik has discovered folks is a ‘reverse holocaust’, the inventing of huge numbers of pseudo-Jews who have no more a blood claim to the land of Palestine than I do, even if I converted.

What I have just stated in no way challenges a religious or cultural affiliation. But as we all know, most Jews are not religious, including in Israel, where way more than most are not. Subtracting that, then all you have is the tribe, the DNA, which unites them to a shared history of persecution. But that folks, is now all gone. Poof…gone.

Who among use does not have some genetic make up of a people who had suffered in ancient times, even numbers of different peoples, five or ten different ones? Why should we allow the pretend-a-Jews to send all of our gene pool to the back of the historical suffering bus as Club Med ancestors who enjoyed the ‘all inclusive’ treatment. I find that just a bit too convenient.The Human Genome cannot be holocausted – even if Zionists wanted to.

So these ‘Jews’, are they then just a gang, united to be against all those not in the gang? Have they invented the whole story in a way like gang members take an oath and defend territory?

And is that not where Herzl and others before him saw an opening, that the Land could be a territory bond to unite Jews who were always fighting like cats and dogs among-st each other?

And is not the 2000 years of persecution claimed mostly by those who are not really descended from those actual people?

Who really has holocausted whom here, and why? We had Golda Meir’s instant holocausting of the Palestinian people with her infamous, “There are no Palestinian people.”

Is this not poetic justice from Dr. Elhiak, that he brings us scientific proof of there being no biblical Jewish people as such as they have presented themselves? And does this not also make a fraud of the historical ‘Anti-Semite’ smear, by a people who aren’t even Semites?

I think it might be time to start setting things straight on the Founding Myths. I must admit that I never expected to get a free ticket to the truth from a smart young Israeli doctor from John Hopkins who has his moral rudder deep in the water.

He is not a gangster, whoever his ancestors were. We call this…leadership, with maybe a touch of Moses parting the Founding Myth waters for those who want to walk through to the other side.

We shall now see if others choose to be free, or to run with the gang. The militant Israelis always knew this day was coming. That is what their nukes have been for, always. They knew. They never believed in it themselves. They were atheists for heaven’s sake.

Want More?…

John’s Hopkin’s Genome Study Proves Jews ‘Interlopers’ in Palestine…no ‘Semitic Blood’ WHATSOEVER…

The “phantom time hypothesis” claims 297 years of history never happened.

What would happen if two emperors and a pope decided to fast-forward the calendar 300 years into the future? According to the “phantom time” conspiracy theory, that’s exactly what happened around a thousand years ago in Europe. This startling hypothesis was put forth by German amateur historian Heribert Illig in his 1996 book The Invented Middle Ages: The Greatest Time-Falsification in History, which suggests the years 614 to 911 CE — a sizable chunk of the Middle Ages — never happened. Illig argues that Holy Roman Emperor Otto III, Pope Sylvester II, and possibly Roman Emperor Constantine VII conspired to make up 297 years of history — including the reign of Charlemagne, the Viking raids on Europe, and countless other historical events — in order to place Otto’s rule in the year 1000 CE. The main reason? That date was exactly a thousand years after the birth of Christ (although some scholars now believe Jesus was born closer to 4 BCE).

Illig supports his claim by pointing out discrepancies between the Julian and Gregorian calendars that could be explained by the fabricated dates. He also suggests that Otto III and Sylvester II ordered scribes to create manuscripts from the missing centuries. Historians, however, have offered considerable evidence that debunks the theory, not least of which is that Illig’s hypothesis ignores the development of other cultures around the world during those 300 years. Astronomical science offers additional proof that a royal and holy alliance didn’t invent centuries of history. As astrophysicist Brian Koberlein wrote in Forbes, “If 300 years of history were simply added to the record, the forgery would be written in the stars, and this simply isn’t the case.”

Experts have proposed a simpler version of our modern calendar.

The Gregorian calendar, which has been in use for more than 400 years, improved upon the mistakes of the Julian calendar that preceded it, but it’s still a complicated way to keep time. At Johns Hopkins University, professors Steve H. Hanke and Richard Conn Henry have come up with a revised, simpler version: the Hanke-Henry Permanent Calendar (HHPC). Unlike our current calendar, the HHPC uses fixed dates — each date is identical every year. For example, someone born on Monday, February 3, would always celebrate their birthday on a Monday. Instead of using leap years, the HHPC includes 364 days in a year, plus a weeklong “Mini-Month” that occurs once every five to six years.

Church: What does it means? Where does it come from? and Where is it going?

The word “church” does not come from the Scriptures. Let’s put it to the test to see what we can find.

“The word ‘Church’ is not really a translation of any word that was used by Christ or the apostles, but is the Anglican form of a different word that Roman Catholicism substitutes in place of the word used by Christ and his apostles…is in our English scriptures by order of King James, who instructed his translators of 1611 not to translate the word ‘ecclesia‘, either “congregation” or “assembly“, but to use the word “church” instead of a translation. ” Lee Jackson (Gospel Advocate, 1915, p. 589). The word “Church” is neither Hebrew nor Greek. When the words were translated into English, the word “Church” already existed. The Greek word used in the New Testament for “Church” is “ekklesia,” which means “those called out.” Ekklesia does not refer to a building at all, but only to a group of people. cluster.”

Benjamin Franklin said, “This occurs 116 times in the New Testament, and is translated “church” in all but three places. In all three places the word has the same meaning that it has in all other places. Those three places are found in (Acts 19:32, 39, 41) In these places it is translated “assembly.” But anyone can see that it means “assembly” in all other places, as certainly as it does in these places… The word it simply means “assembly” or “congregation.” (Gospel Preacher, 1899, p. 476).

“Some, then, shouted one thing and others another; because the crowd was confused, and most of them did not know why they had gathered together.” Acts 19:32 (KJV)

The word “Church” as stated in Acts is translated “Assembly,” but in other passages it is translated “Church.” Church is commonly defined as a “building” for public worship, especially for Christian worship, as a spiritual body, but this tells us nothing about its original definition, meaning, and use. Ekklesia is also spelled “Ecclesia“, and is in our English dictionary, so why has this word changed to “church”? Bible “scholars” say that the word is derived from the word “kyriakon”, which means “the house of the Lord”, but kyriakon is not used in the Bible, it is Ekklesia.

Oxford Dictionaries defines church as “a building for public use for Christian worship” or “a particular Christian organization with its own clergy, buildings, and distinctive doctrines.”

E. G. Sewell: “The original Greek word is “ecclesia,” which means “those called out”… but whether “church” is the best translation… is a question, since that word is emphatically an ecclesiastic to long term. ‘Ecclesia’ was used in the days of the apostles to mean any type of gathering of people, called together for any purpose” (Gospel Advocate, 1912, p. 1024).

Phrase and Fable Dictionary, 1898, says:

Church – The etymology of this word is supposed to derive from the Greek oikos, Kuriou (house of God), but this is highly unlikely, as the word exists in all Celtic dialects long before the introduction of the Greeks. There is no doubt that the word means “a circle.” The places of worship between the German and Celtic towns always circulate. (Welsh, cyrch, French, circus, Scottish, church, Greek, Kirk-os, etc) Compare Anglo-Saxon Circe, a church, with Circol, a circle. E. Cobham Brewer 1810-1897. Phrase Dictionary and Fable. 1898.

Oxford Dictionary says about the origin of the word (Church): Old English circuit (i) ce,-Cyr (i) ce, related to Dutch Kerk and German Kirche, based on medieval Greek kurikon, from Greek kuriakon (DOMA) “(house of the Lord), from kurios’master or lord.” Compare to Kirk.

Now let us compare it with the Scottish noun church (church) and Northern English

1) A church.

2) (the Kirk or the Church of Scotland), the Church of Scotland, as distinguished from the Church of England or the Episcopal Church of Scotland. Origin: Middle English: from Old Norse Kirkja, from Old English Cirice (see church)
Oxford English Dictionary says: “Church forms. (A) CIRICE, CYRICE, CHIRICHE, CHURICHE, CHERECHE (b), CIRCE, CIRKE, etc. Further derivation has been intensely disputed” Further derivation?

What should be in dispute? According to the Oxford English Dictionary of Etymology, the word Church comes from the Old English “Circe”, a word that appears to be clearly related to “Circe”. The dialectical form of CIRCE [also found in Greek] was Kirke, and etymologists agree that the Dutch word for “Kerk”, the German word “Kirche” and the Scots word “KIRK”, come from the old Saxons” Kirika”, another similar to “Kirke” or “Circe”

So, what is “Kirke”/”Circe”? And why was the real name changed?

Jesus Christ used a different word to identify his followers. Kirke [or a circle] or as it is called in English today “the Church” was a Greek goddess “PHARMEKEIA [witch or sorceress] who lived on the island AIAIA [AIAIA is the oldest form of the appellation of” Gaia “, the pagan goddess of “fertility” The daughter] of the sun god Helios [Saturn], she had the power to change men into wolves, lions and swine, maintaining human senses, but trapped in animal form. The Greeks attribute the invention of the circus to her (PHARMEKEIA or GAIA). They claim that it was made to honor her father the sun, which is actually the “black sun” [Saturn], hence the term “Cirque de Soleil”. “, [French] or in English “Church of the Sun” [Black Sun, Saturn].

• 

  GAIA

• 

  PHARMEKEIA

• 

  Black Sun

Obviously, this explains the behavior of many of these institutions. True Christians are born in Jesus Christ, to be free from slavery, from slavery and that includes the freedom of religious confessions. It is not supposed to be learning from institutions or ministers. Gospel of Jesus does not command us to submit to his teachings. We have the gospels and the prophets at home in the Bible and we must put everything on trial mode before accepting it. Many of these “Christian” denominations or cults are becoming a type of circus or stand-up comedy clubs and people enjoy them as they offer entertainment. They have contaminated the purity and simplicity of the Gospel by creating confusion and no one seems to care.

The apostle John said:

“As for you, the anointing that you received from him remains in you, and it is not necessary for anyone to teach you. But as his anointing teaches you about all things and as the anointing is real, not false, just as it teaches you has taught, abide in it.” 1 John 2:27

If you are one of those wondering why there are so many “Christian” denominations, all of them preaching a different gospel and claiming the “truth”, the answer is because many of them have turned away from the truth to follow their own leaders and the prophets, to their own teachers and preachers.

An Assembly composed of believers is “called out” because of their common belief in Jesus Christ, and not all “Ecclesiastes” or religious denominations are Christian. In fact, some of them are violently hostile toward Jesus Christ and his followers. The book of Revelation says:

“Then one of the seven angels who had the seven bowls, and spoke with me, saying, ‘Come, I will show you the sentence against the great harlot who sits on many waters, with whom the kings of the earth have committed fornication, and the inhabitants of the land have become drunk with the wine of their fornication. So he took me in the Spirit to the desert. And I saw a woman sitting on a scarlet beast full of names of blasphemy, having seven heads and ten horns. The woman was dressed in purple and scarlet, and adorned with gold and precious stones and pearls, and she had in her hand a golden cup full of abominations and the filthiness of her fornication. And on his forehead a name written:

A mystery: BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH. “Revelation 17:1-5 (NIV)
Jesus never said: Go find a religious denomination and submit to its authority. He never commanded us to be subject to temples or structures built by men. He never told us to follow specific ways of life.

Jesus said: “…But the hour is coming, and now is, when the true worshipers will worship the Father in spirit and in truth, for they are the kind of worshipers that the Father seeks God is spirit, and his worshipers must worship “in the Spirit and in truth.” John 4:23-24 (New International Version 1984)

And for those who go to the temples in search of God, this is what the Bible says in the book of Acts:

“The God who made the world and everything, who is Lord of heaven and earth, does not dwell in temples made by human hands. And he is not served by human hands, as if he needed anything, because he is the one who gives to all life and breath and all the others “Acts 17:24-25 (New International Version 1984) Read also (Acts 7:47-51)

Conclusion:

“Flee from Babylon! Save yourself! It was not destroyed because of its sins. It is time for the Lord’s vengeance, he will pay what he deserves” Jeremiah 51:6 (New International Version 1984).

References:

http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/church?view=uk&wwparam=1301411166

http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/view/entry/m_en_us1233167?rskey=oUKlLQ&result=1 # m_en_us1233167

“American Horror Story: Delicate” and its Messages About Hollywood’s Occult Underbelly

Starring Emma Roberts and Kim Kardashian, American Horror Story’s 12th season turns the joys of motherhood into an absolute nightmare. More importantly, it reveals, with very little subtlety, the dark forces at play in the entertainment industry, including Satanic Ritual Abuse and suspicious celebrity deaths disguised as accidents.

Warning: Pharaonic spoilers ahead!

Since 2011, the television series American Horry Story (AHS) has been horrifying Americans with stories some would describe as “pretty messed up.” But that doesn’t stop people from watching. Indeed, AHS has garnered an immense viewership while winning countless awards in every category imaginable. Some even stated that AHS “unquestionably joined the ranks of television’s landmark series.”

While most series become stale after a few years, AHS managed to remain relevant by casting big stars in starring roles while promoting each season with highly fashionable posters and trailers.

Lady Gaga in AHS Hotel (2015).

As you can see in the poster above, despite the praises the series received, there’s actually something terribly wrong with AHS. The “horror” on display is not your usual scary stuff. It goes way deeper than that. It is about putting on display the sick obsessions of the occult elite and, in a way, celebrating them. In the case of the image above, Lady Gaga holds children on a leash in a ritualistic manner, an “artistic” way of representing the elite’s love for preying on children (read my article on that season of AHS here).

The 12th season of AHS—titled Delicate—follows the same formula. Kim Kardashian was enlisted as the buzzworthy lead actress and the subject matter is, more than ever, pure occult elite madness. Of course, the season was preceded by a fashionable photoshoot.

This poster featuring Cara Delevigne alludes to the satanic-medical complex seen in AHS: Delicate.

Emma Roberts poses with a giant spider as her pregnant belly.

As expressed by the poster above, AHS: Delicate centers around the theme of motherhood. But, like, evil, foul, Satanic motherhood where every single aspect of childbearing is corrupted and turned into a complete nightmare.

A scene from AHS: Delicate takes place in a room full of babies in jars. As we’ll soon see, the series is in excuse to turn the elite’s obsession with harming, sacrificing, and exploiting babies into “art”.

While the main story of the series is about the struggles of a mother-to-be, the context surrounding it is all about Hollywood and its dark tendencies. Indeed, through various side stories, AHS actually reveals the occult side of historical Hollywood events.

While AHS is a work of fiction, there’s a clear effort to draw parallels with real-life Hollywood. For instance, Kim Kardashian plays the role of a powerful Hollywood figure who is also part of a Satanic witch coven. The least one can say is that this role wasn’t much of a stretch for her (the Kardashian clan is a coven of witches). Is this why Kim K was (surprisingly) selected to play this important role in the series?

Here’s a look at the main themes of the series.

Corruption of Motherhood

The series’s opening sequence is all about translating into “art” the elite’s obsession with corrupting motherhood.

A gynecological exam chair drips in blood. Motherhood turns into a Satanic blood ritual.

The skeleton of a baby is inside a “gift box” emblazoned with the Sigil of Lucifer. The person who thought of that image has serious issues that need to be addressed.

A stroller on fire. The message: Babies are being sacrificed.

With these psychopathic images ingrained in our brains, the story begins.

Emma Roberts plays the role of Anna Victoria Alcott, a Hollywood actress who is trying to get pregnant. Evidently, someone doesn’t want her to.

After failing to get pregnant several times, Anna is referred to the best fertility clinic in town. Spoiler: It is secretly controlled by Satanists. Through IVF, she finally gets pregnant, and she and her husband Dex, are very happy.

However, Anna starts seeing weird things happening around her.

On her way to the clinic, Anna sees a nest with a dead baby bird inside. More anti-baby “art” from the same people who are obsessed with abortions.

Throughout the episodes, several characters engage in anti-baby rhetoric that seems to be written by the WEF. One woman (who turns out to be a witch) tells Anna:

“But, honestly, why anyone would want a child boggles my mind. You wait your whole childhood to be free to make your own choices and then what choice do you make? To create an unnecessary being who contributes to global warming, who feeds on our body and whose survival you’re responsible for.”

“An unnecessary being who contributes to global warming”. Yup, that’s how they see our children.

Other than parroting unhinged WEF-sponsored rhetoric, a great portion of the series is dedicated to people giving Anna weird looks, and her looking up things on her iPhone™. Indeed, Apple™ products get a ridiculous amount of screentime during the series, which leads me to believe that the company paid big bucks for product placements … in a series about Satanists sacrificing babies. It is unsurprising because the company’s logo is a bitten apple. Fun fact: In Genesis, Lucifer told Eve to bite a fruit (traditionally represented as an apple).

Anna’s husband Dex offers her to bite an apple. Symbolic. We’ll soon understand that Anna cannot trust anybody and nearly everything she’s given to eat is tainted.

We later learn that Dex’s father is a high-level cultist who subjected his mother to Satanic Ritual Abuse (SRA).

Not unlike Eve, Anna bites the apple. In fact, she eats the whole thing. Symbolic.

While her pregnancy is supposed to be a blessing, we soon realize that it is very cursed.

Anna is followed by creepy bird ladies who walk around with goats. Remember the creepy bird nest above? The series is full of bird symbolism.

The bird ladies perform gynecological procedures on Anna while repeating a Satanic chant. She’s being impregnated with a cursed demon baby.

Translated from Latin, the chant says:

Hail, O child of Satan, long live the children of our Lord

Without exaggerating, this chant is heard at least a hundred times during the series. It keeps popping up as witches creepily dance to it or perform rituals. I believe that one of the objectives of the series is to get that (rather catchy) chant inside one’s head for days on end.

Eventually, Anna gives birth, surrounded by the coven of witches. The inverted pentagram indicates that the miracle of life got turned into an unholy satanic ritual.

If you look closely at the image above, Anna is holding an Oscar while giving birth to the demon baby. That’s because she agreed to give up her baby to the coven in order to win it.

The Real Witches of Hollywood

Kim Kardashian plays the role of Siobhan Corbyn, Anna’s publicist and “best friend.” The snake around her neck indicates that there’s something evil going on with her.

Before getting pregnant, Anna starred in a horror “feminist” movie called The Author. Against all odds, she’s winning countless awards for it. We’ll soon learn that dark forces are at play.

In one of her iPhone searches, Anna comes across the “insane ramblings” of a conspiracy theorist. We soon learn that the conspiracy theorist was very correct.

At the end of the series, the obvious is revealed: Siobhan is actually the head of a Satanic witch coven. And, through dark forces, she manipulates the entire industry to get the results she is looking for.

For instance, Anna’s main competition for an Oscar is a young actress named Babette Eno. Something happens to her that often happens in Hollywood.

Babette is murdered by the coven, and it is framed as a car crash in mass media.

As seen in the screenshot above, Babette was decapitated in the car crash. This parallels a real-life Hollywood event.

In 1969, actress Jayne Mansfield died in a car crash and it was long rumored that she was decapitated in the process. Strange fact: She was a high priestess in the Church of Satan. Is AHS sending us a message about the true cause of her death?

Pictures of Jayne Mansfield with Anton LaVey – the head of the Church of Satan.

Through its narrative, AHS also communicates other truths about Hollywood. Anna starred in a movie titled The Author, which was credited to a male director named Hamish Moss. In actuality, Siobhan, the witch, wrote the “feminist” movie and convinced the director to take the credit by using sex. However, Hamish ends up feeling uncomfortable with this literal deal with the devil and gets the urge to reveal the truth to the world.

Then, something happens to him that often happens in Hollywood.

The Hollywood witches get him killed, and the media frames it as a suicide.

With Siobhan and her coven manipulating Hollywood behind the scenes, Anna reaps the rewards. Of course, that comes with a sacrifice.

Anna wins an Oscar for Best Actress … after agreeing to give up her child.

This entire scenario is eerily similar to what happened in real life this year.

Emma Stone gives her acceptance speech after winning Best Actress at the 2024 Academy Awards.

In AHS, Anna won an Oscar for starring in a disturbing “feminist” movie credited to a man. In 2024, Emma Stone won an Oscar for starring in a disturbing “feminist” movie credited to a man. The movie in question is Poor Things and it is also a sickening display of the elite’s depravity. Is reality stranger than fiction?

On a few occasions, AHS flashes back to past real-life Hollywood events to show how the coven intervened behind the scenes. One such flashback involves the 1968 movie Rosemary’s Baby.

Director Roman Polanski (seen behind the cameraman) forces actress Mia Farrow to walk in actual New York City traffic to film a scene. He famously told her that “nobody would hit a pregnant woman”.

It actually happened, Mia Farrow was made to walk in live traffic during the filming of Rosemary’s Baby.

As explained in my article about Rosemary’s Baby, there’s an entire puzzle of occult strangeness surrounding this movie. Directed by Roman Polansky (who would later be accused of drugging and raping a 13-year-old girl), the movie is about a woman being groomed by a Satanic cult to give birth to the Antichrist.

In AHS, Sharon Tate (Roman Polanski’s wife) approaches Mia Farrow and tells her, “The devil is beautiful, you know?”

While this scene might seem random, a bit of context gives it an eerie meaning. From my article on Rosemary’s Baby:

Before settling on Mia Farrow, Roman Polanski originally envisioned his wife, Sharon Tate, as playing the role of Rosemary. She was not cast in the role, but did make an uncredited appearance in the movie, during a party scene. Fourteen months after the release of the movie, Tate (who was 8 months pregnant) was ritualistically killed by members of the Manson family. She was stabbed 16 times and her killers wrote the word “pig” in her blood on the wall of her house. (…)

Did Roman Polanski sacrifice his wife (the same way Guy sacrificed Rosemary in the movie) to obtain the favors of Hollywood? Soon after the death, he allowed himself to be photographed by Life Magazine in the house where Tate had died. Her dried blood was still clearly visible in the pictures. The photoshoot caused him to be heavily criticized.

Polanski poses next to the word “PIG” written in his dead wife’s blood. Suspicious behavior.

In short, everything about Rosemary’s Baby reeks of the occult elite’s involvement. AHS seems to agree.

Behind the scenes, Mia Farrow discovers that Siobahn (who doesn’t age because she’s a witch) is behind this foul satanic movie. In AHS, Siobahn represents the occult elite as a whole.

The Ending Explained

So what happens to Anna and her baby? While the ending is somewhat enigmatic, it is also exactly the ending one would expect from occult Hollywood.

After giving birth to the demon baby, Anna’s apartment mysteriously turns red (the color of sacrifice). There, Siobahn reveals her master plan.

Siobhan reveals that she is breeding an army of demon babies to kill all men on Earth (while keeping some of them as sex slaves) and bring about a matriarchy. In yet another Hollywood production, witchcraft and Satanism are associated with feminism.

Also, all of the women around Anna during her pregnancy were secretly part of the coven. Well, they’re not all women. The witch on the right is a transgender woman. Yup, a biological male is part of the matriarchy plan. Makes perfect sense.

So Siobahn gives Anna a choice:

“Join us and receive our gifts: Eternal youth, beauty, and power. Or not and wander the world ugly, aging and alone.”

Alright, let’s pause a second. Why is she talking about youth, beauty, and the threat of being alone if the goal is to kill all men? Evidently, someone needs to sit down with the witches to revise their matriarchy business plan.

But, in the end, it doesn’t matter because Anna manages to kill Siobahn. How? Well, a ghost appears to her and gets her to start chanting “Ave Hestia” (referring to the Greek goddess of hearth and home) to counter the “Ave Satanas” of the witches. And that alone killed the powerful witch who had been influencing the world for centuries. Yeah, it was lame, and fans of the show hated that part. But, hey, they had to wrap up the story in the final 10 minutes somehow.

In the final scene of the series, Anna wears Siobhan’s headdress while holding her baby (who is now normal and not demonic). She’s also holding her Oscar. She has it all.

So, did the light win against the darkness? Did good win over evil? One would think so, but not really.

The baby’s bedroom is full of plush goats, hinting that evil is still lurking. Furthermore, we faintly hear “Ave Satanas” as Anna grabs her Oscar. Anna got greedy. She wants the baby, the Oscar, and the power represented by the headdress. While Siobahn is dead, Satan might have found her replacement.

The message: In the elite-sponsored stories, Satan never loses.

In Conclusion

On one hand, AHS: Delicate is a fictional story with an outlandish premise filled with supernatural nonsense. On the other hand, it is a scarily accurate depiction of the occult elite’s true mindset and its influence on real-life events. And that is the ultimate goal of such “entertainment”: To disclose truths to the unsuspecting public while also fictionalizing them. It makes them part of “art” and popular culture while also making people believe they’re made-up stories.

AHS: Delicate was about a group of Satanists who carried out rituals, sacrifices, Satanic Ritual Abuse, and murders disguised as suicides and accidents. All of these topics were discussed on this site for real using real-life events. The series turned these horrific things into “art” and entertainment for the masses to consume. And, as people praise Kim Kardashian’s performance as a Hollywood witch in the series, most have no idea that she wasn’t playing a role at all.

What Everyday Life Was Like in Ancient Rome

Ancient Roman history is usually dominated by larger-than-life rulers such as Julius Caesar and eloquent senators such as Cicero. However, these men led an empire of millions of everyday citizens who were usually less concerned with conquering the world than they were with putting bread on the table and simply enjoying life. A look at the lives of typical Roman citizens reveals a culture that in many fundamental ways is not so different from ours; the ancient Romans worked, played, socialized, and expressed themselves — albeit often quite rudely. Here are six facts that offer a glimpse of what it was like to be an average citizen in one of the world’s largest and most influential empires.

No Matter Where You Went, You Could Always Find a Public Bath

The Romans were masterful architects of public baths, called thermae. These were complex facilities with elaborate heating systems where Romans from all walks of life came together to relax, socialize, and of course, get clean. Bathing in the Roman thermae wasn’t just a simple dip in the water — there was a whole process involved. A visitor would begin by doing some light exercise followed by a hot bath, then a warm bath, and then a cold bath; they could also spend time in a steam room or get a massage. Public baths were a central part of Roman culture, and some citizens even considered them a symbol of Roman identity. In fact, baths were such an essential component of daily life that they were built in nearly every part of the Roman Empire, even in its most remote regions. Roman thermae could be found as far north as the British Isles and as far south as Egypt.

The Empire’s Cities Were Filled With Graffiti

Archaeological evidence from well-preserved ancient Roman cities such as Pompeii and Herculaneum reveals that, much like people in modern society, the denizens of ancient Rome liked to express themselves through some good old-fashioned graffiti. Since the ancient Romans lived a few millennia before the invention of spray paint, they had to make do by scratching and carving their designs and messages into plaster surfaces around the empire’s cities. Graffiti carved by everyday Romans can be found on the walls of bars, public baths, and other places where people commonly went to socialize. Ancient Roman street art ranged from simple drawings of stick figures and animals to colorful, R-rated jokes and insults. While some of the more famous Romans, such as emperors and statesmen, were commemorated through huge monuments and stately statues, graffiti was often a common person’s best shot at leaving their mark on the world, and many ancient graffiti artists included their names in the messages they left, to be remembered by future generations — even if it was just for a rude boast or scatological joke.

The Roman Workday Ended at Noon

The ancient Romans didn’t have clocks they could use to count the hours of the day. Instead, they kept track of the time using the position of the sun, and employed devices such as sundials to divide the day and night into 12 evenly spaced units called “hora” (hours). Since tracking the sun was the Roman citizen’s principal timekeeping method, the workday was structured around solar positions that were easy to measure with the naked eye, such as sunrise, noon, and sunset. For this reason, a typical citizen would usually start their workday at dawn, which marked the first “hora” of the day, and stop working at noon. This left the rest of the afternoon open for leisure, and citizens from all levels of Roman society would spend that time attending sporting events, theatrical performances, and the all-important public baths.

The Roman People Loved to Gamble

A love of gambling extended to all levels of ancient Roman society. Less-wealthy citizens would place bets on a wide variety of board games and dice games, which they played in taverns, city streets, and other public spaces, while the rich would build private gaming rooms in their homes. Romans would also frequently bet on the outcomes of gladiator fights and chariot races. (For the most part, only men were permitted to gamble, though women were allowed to participate in games of chance during special festivals.) Even the Roman emperors got in on the action. Rulers such as Augustus and Nero were known for their gaming habits, and for betting small fortunes on a single throw of the dice. Roman Emperor Claudius even had a custom-made carriage built with a gaming table so that he could gamble while traveling.

The Roman Forum Was the Center of Public Life

With its location right in the middle of the city, the Roman Forum was quite literally the center of everyday life in ancient times. It was where the typical Roman citizen could shop, talk, and find entertainment. It was also the site of most of the city’s public gatherings, the Roman courts of law, and the meeting place of the Roman Senate. What’s more, the forum housed some of Rome’s most important religious sites, including multiple temples dedicated to Roman deities. In other words, if you were a Roman citizen, chances were good that you’d be making frequent visits to the forum for everything from daily errands to grand citywide ceremonies.

There Was a Temple Where Citizens Could Go to Worship Caesar

One prominent temple in the Roman Forum was dedicated not to the worship of a mythological god, but to the former dictator of Rome, Julius Caesar. During the funeral games held in Caesar’s honor shortly after his assassination in 44 BCE, a comet appeared in the sky for seven days, which the Roman populace interpreted as a divine omen that Caesar’s soul had ascended to the status of divinity. This popular belief that Caesar had become a god was codified into law two years later in 42 BCE, when the Roman Senate officially declared him a deity. After this, a temple was built in the forum in Caesar’s honor. It even had an altar where Roman citizens would offer sacrifices to the deified leader, just as they would to supernatural Roman gods such as Jupiter and Saturn.

About the Government Crackdown on Antisemitism

House Passes Antisemitism Bill Despite Free Speech Concerns

Biden to Speak on Antisemitism at a Holocaust Remembrance Next Week
President Biden has made little effort to personally address the anti-Israel protests, frustrating some Democrats who want him to show more public leadership.

Rebuttal…

The wall-to-wall buzzword in the White Hat-managed media lately is “antisemitism” ™ — now upgraded to TM ². Unlike previous uses of the smear word — which has long been utilized for the covering purpose of evoking undeserved sympathy for “the usual suspects” — this time around, the sentiment is being directly associated to the mythical, yet increasingly unpopular, “genocide” taking place in Gaza. Therefore, instead of the captive subjects of Normiedom saying: “Leave the Jews alone!” — the popular opinion now is: “Israel, and Zionist Jews in general, have gone too far!” How many people now, from all points of the political line, set against “events” in Gaza, are, for the first time ever, asking themselves: “Why do so many people hate the Jews?” — and so it begins.
.
As for this “antisemitism” bill (passed by an imaginary Congress) that’s got so many people, again, from all points of the political spectrum, all concerned over “free speech rights,” the “Editorial Board” of The Anti-New York Times came up with a brilliant and totally original, never-heard-of-before idea for aiding in the analysis of it. We actually read the bill. Imagine that!

In a nutshell, what the bill — H.R 6090, aka the Antisemitism Awareness Act  — says is essentially this:

* Antisemitism = bad.
* Saying Jews control the world = bad (bill cites definition by the Holocaust Remembrance Alliance)
* Holocaust Denial = bad (as per Holocaust Remembrance Alliance)
* No employment discrimination against Jews (or any other race).
* Antisemitic speech is protected by the First Amendment.

Section 6: 3b: Nothing in this Act shall be construed to diminish or infringe upon any right protected under the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.

Youse guys can relax. Nobody is coming to lock up yours truly nor will your Facebook and Twitter posts be investigated for “antisemitism.”

1. The bill was introced by Rep. Mike Lawler of New York. // 2. Or is that masked man,”Mike Lawler?”  // 3. Right wing MAGA Congressgal Marjorie Taylor Greene voted against the bill, citing the fact that the story of the Jewish-instigated killing of Jesus Christ could make it illegal for Christians to believe the Gospels. Way to shake up the Christian Ziotards, Margie.Well played girl!

A bill defining and creating awareness of “antisemitism” — without imposing any sort of sanctions against it — would be akin to a bill defining and creating awareness about obesity while allowing fatties to keep on engorging themselves. What’s the point? Seriously now, if the bill, which passed the imaginary House on Wednesday by a margin of 320 to 91, has no teeth; then what purpose does it really serve?

The key to answering that question lies in the understanding of the contextual reality of “The Movie” in which we are literally all part of now. Ironically as all heck, the purpose of the “Antisemitism Awareness Act” is indeed to create more “awareness” of “antisemitism” — NOT for the purpose of suppressing this age-old sentiment, but rather, for the opposite purpose of INCREASING it, anti-Zionism to be more precise! The more that people talk about “antisemitism” and these seemingly extraordinary methods of suppressing it (laws, police brutality) — the more people become curious about its origins, motives and assertions. Get it?

Consider this anology. Suppose you were accused, justly or wrongly, of committing certain unethical acts at your workplace. Naturally, you would deny the assertions, counterattack your accusers, and then let the controversy die a quick natural death by silence. But would you really want your “friends” to keep going on and on and on about how innocent and honest you really are; and how the old accusations against you were really false and motivated by the jealousy of bad co-workers? Is that really the type of office conversation you would want to continue day after day? Wouldn’t such a dramatic “debate,” in and of itself, become damaging to your reputation in a “methinks he doth protest too much” sort of way?

This is exactly, by design, what is happening with the campus protests and all of these “antisemitism” bills (Florida, South Dakota, and now, the Feds). Predictably, members of the anti-Trump Black Pill bunch are all screaming: “da Jews!” “da Jews!” over this “violation of the First Amendment.” Let them hiss. It all adds to the effect. Just know that there is nothing to worry about here. So, keep on fearlessly spreading the truth, brothers and sisters. The Jewish power has been broken.

Trust the plan.

DRAMA DRAMA DRAMA
Fake “police” crackdowns against and fake laws condemning “antisemitism” support the mission boldly declared in a Q Post from 2018: “We are saving Israel for last.”

In the End…

Trump’s Poison Pills Expose Jewish Mafia

No one delivers a poison pill in a sugar-coated capsule quite like Trump. So adept is he at this game of subtle shit-stirring that even many amongst us “far right” folks — unable to (or unwilling to) understand the chess that he is playing — still believe that Trump is just another “shabbos goy” in slavish service to “the usual suspects.”

Here are just a few examples of Trump’s game of sugary poison:

* Trump on Bill Clinton (2016 FOX interview):“Bill Clinton. Nice guy (the sugar) — but he’s got some problems with that Island — Epstein’s. (the poison).

* Trump on the Israel Lobby (2021 radio show):“Israel literally owned Congress (the poison)... And it was so powerful. It was so powerful (more poison). And today it’s almost the opposite … Israel is no longer a force in Congress anymore. It’s amazing. I’ve never seen such a change…. Israel had such power over Congress (still more poison), and rightfully so (the sugar), and now it doesn’t.”

Trump on Bibi “I liked Bibi. I still like Bibi. (the sugar) But I also like loyalty. The first person to congratulate Biden was Bibi. And not only did he congratulate him, he did it on tape. He was very early — like, earlier than most. I haven’t spoken to him since. Fuck him.” (the poison)

I said, ‘Bibi, you don’t want to make a deal. Do you?’ And he said, ‘Well, uh, uh uh’ — and the fact is, I don’t think Bibi ever wanted to make a peace deal.” (more poison)

Trump on the imaginary “Wag the Dog” War in Gaza

“I stand with Israel” (the sugar). … “But Israel has to be very careful because you’re losing a lot of the world, you’re losing a lot of support (the poison).

There are many more examples of this effective tactic — a trick which your activist reporter here, not lacking in cunning himself — has used often to penetrate radio call-in shows. I would start out by telling the screener, and then the host, how insightful and thought-provoking his commentary was: “Hi Geraldo (Rivera). Long time listener, first time caller. Love your delivery and your content man!” —- And then, I’d transition and casually drop a quickie truth bomb before the stunned screener could scramble and end the call within the 5-second time lag. That, in essence, is what Trump is doing to fight the Jewish Mafia.

One form of calculated poison-pilling that really gets the Judenpresse squealing is when Trump praises the Israel-worshipping Evanglical Scofield Bible lunatics (the sugar) — but then, in the next breath, criticizes American Jews for not being as pro-Israel as the Scofieldtards (the poison which calls attention to Jewish dual loyalty). Whereas the Trump-hating Black Pill addicts on the “far right” will only see the pro-Israel sugar; the more astute among us will smell out the real message that Trump is sending.

Let’s analyze an article from a few years back which appeared in The New York Intelligencer magazine, titled: Trump Claims Israel Controlled Congress, Jews Run New York Times; and subtitled: The Most Anti-Semitic President in History

Trump: People in this country that are Jewish no longer love Israel (The sugar: Trump is speaking in the context of one who is saddened by Jews who don’t love Israel). … I’ve said this for a long time: The Jewish people in the United States either don’t like Israel or don’t care about Israel. (The poison: Trump is telling the Israel Firsters and Likudniks that everyone, even many Jews, are sick of them!)

Analysis: Trump is exploiting the very real division between the Israel Firsters and those Jews who really don’t identify with — and in many cases, even loathe — Israeli ultra-nationalism (and there are plenty.)

Trump: I’ll tell you, the evangelical Christians love Israel more than the Jews in this country.

Analysis: This is calculated to reassure the many millions of Israel-worshiping “Judeo-Christian” crazies that Trump still loves Israel and that he identifies with the Evangelicals. Nauseating as it may sound, it is absolutely critical to prevent Israel’s paid “pastors” from counterattacking Trump — as some already have been.

Trump: It used to be that Israel had absolute power over Congress. And today I think it’s the exact opposite. And I think Obama and Biden did that.

Analysis: Trump, as he has done before, again repeats the “anti-Semitic trope” that Israel controlled the US Congress (the poison). Blaming Obama and Biden for the loss of this influence is only a strategic disclaimer — implying that Israel’s weakened position is a bad thing (the sugar).

Trump: I mean, you look at The New York Times. —- The New York Times hates Israel, hates them. And they’re Jewish people that run the New York Times. I mean, the Sulzberger family.

Analysis: Oh no he didn’t! —- Oh yes he just did! Trump prefaced his coming attack in the context of his professed love for Israel (the protective sugar). Then, he outed the “Jewish people” — specifically, the almighty Sulzbergers — before millions of Americans who were previously unaware of this mighty Jewish clan which controls the hated New York Times. (a massive dose of poison)

Though the planted “far right” traitors in our ranks (and their innocent Black Pill dupes) will continue to shout “but, but, muh Jared Kushner — but, but muh Jerusalem Embassy” — but, but muh Trump wore a beanie cap at the Wailing Wall — rest assured that the “usual suspects” know EXACTLY what Trump is doing. This is clearly evidenced by the sound of the usual suspects screaming that Trump is “invoking anti-Semitic tropes.”

None have dared to call out the 125 year old Sulzberger Dynasty by name and ethnicity– until Trump.

Trump’s strategic courting of Evangelicals put him in a position in which he was able to deal strongly with Israel. Though some paid pastors turned on him (see headlines below), Trump will not lose the Christian-Zio crazies.

The Sinister Meaning of Taylor Swift’s “Fortnight”

Taylor Swift’s highly anticipated video “Fortnight” is said to be about heartbreak. But what about the parts where she’s chained to a bed, drugged with pills, and electroshocked by mad scientists? Here’s the actual, sinister meaning of this video.

The least one can say is that Taylor Swift characterized the first half of 2024. And that’s an understatement. In the past months, this already insanely popular singer turned into some kind of untouchable icon as she transcended her status as a celebrity to reach mass media sainthood. Indeed, Taylor simply cannot do any wrong. Even if she’s churning out music that’s arguably mediocre, news outlets walk on eggshells when attempt to review her offerings.

Whether it be lawsuits or outright “threats of violence”, there’s a bizarre aura of repression surrounding Taylor Swift. Criticism of her work or actions is not well received and has consequences.

The 2024 Grammys did nothing to upset Taylor. Quite to the contrary, they’ve ensured she won the Album of the Year award, becoming the first artist ever to win this “prestigious” trophy four times. And, after weirdly snubbing Celine Dion (because nobody is allowed to top her), Taylor Swift used her acceptance speech to announce the coming of her album The Tortured Poets Department.

That album title is quite symbolic. Tortured Poets is indeed an apt way of describing artists in the music industry—it can also be taken quite literally. Although Taylor Swift has an “untouchable queen” aura about her, she remains an industry slave.

Taylor promoted her album in a picture featuring a blatant one-eye sign. The message: She’s owned the industry.

While Taylor is super rich and influential, she still has to bow down to the industry’s higher-ups who built her fame and granted her the media exposure needed to maintain it.

The 2024 Super Bowl media coverage was at least 50% about Taylor Swift. Coincidentally, she spent most of her time with Ice Spice, an industry plant who wore a giant, very visible inverted cross around her neck. Ice Spice was planted there to remind us that Taylor is owned by the Satanic elite.

In short, there’s a price to pay to be a big music star. The title The Tortured Poets Department conveys this fact as industry artists are literally tortured by a system that uses Monarch mind control (an offshoot of MKULTRA) to control them.

Some might say, “I was following you until you mentioned MKULTRA, bro.” Well, bro, let’s look at the first video from that album. It could not be more blatantly about MKULTRA. It just can’t.

Exposing Swifties to Mind Control

As usual, Taylor Swift’s album mainly consists of her complaining about her exes. Meanwhile, her fans take great pleasure in finding Easter eggs and hidden meanings in her music videos … while completely missing the SUPER OBVIOUS hidden meaning. A simple, semi-educated look at the video shows it is about much more than heartbreak.

The video’s first scene is rife with symbolism relating to Monarch programming.

Taylor Swift is in a psych ward-type room and is chained to a bed. Her bed is “floating” in the air, which hints at her dissociative state as an MK slave. Other items in the room are askew or upside down, further conveying the slave’s confused perception of reality due to various techniques, including lots of drugs. Speaking of which, a creepy (upside down) nurse enters the room to give Taylor her dose.

The pill bottle says “Forget Him” – a Taylor Swift way of saying “Amnesia Drug.

Causing amnesia through drugs and other methods is a vital part of MK programming. In the scene above, Taylor is in a dissociative state and is given “medication” to further programming.

A chained Taylor Swift shows off a mind-erasing pill to her fans. She’s not special; she’s yet another star who has to celebrate her own slavery.

After taking the pill, Taylor wipes her face, revealing face tattoos.

The tattoos are a replica of Post Malone’s face tattoos. While most fans will believe that Post Malone plays the role of Taylor Swift’s love interest in the video, the symbolism implies a much darker truth: He’s her MK handler. His tattoos on her face represent that she’s being imprinted with his programming.

The following scenes will make this fact abundantly clear.

In another room, Taylor and Post Malone type up words as a colorful haze emerges from the paper.

This scene takes place in Taylor’s mind, where memories are stored in locked compartments. Post Malone—the MK handler—is inside Taylor’s head, and he’s writing new memories.

The following quote from Fritz Springmeier’s book about Monarch programming describes this exact process using a similar analogy.

“By building in amnesia walls between Event (personal history) memories, and by producing altered states of consciousness, the memories of a slave can be “nested” as the Programmers call it. “Nested” means that it is hidden behind several “locked doors” when the mind files the memory.”
– Fritz Springmeier, The Illuminati Formula to Create a Mind Control Slave

The two singers are literally inside Taylor’s head, which is made of “files,” aka memories. This is all about controlling/altering her mind.

Taylor’s MK programming is taken to another level in the next scenes.

Taylor is tied up, and her brain is connected to an electroshock machine. For some reason, Ethan Hawk is there. 

Considering that Ethan Hawk was the main actor in the terrible movie Leave the World Behind, the elite seems to love using him for its indoctrination projects.

Post Malone – the primary MK handler – examines Taylor’s brainwaves.

The brainwaves spell out lyrics from the song, implying they’ve been programmed into her.

The words “I love you it’s ruining my life” seem to refer to a sad love story. However, they also describe the twisted relationship between a handler and a slave, where programming and dissociation cause mixed feelings of love and suffering.

Taylor gets electroshocked under the watchful eyes of her handlers. Is this video still about heartbreak?

After the electroshock, we see what’s happening inside Taylor’s mind: A whirlwind of burning files representing memories being erased and scrambled.

“Each person’s original mind is like an open computer. The original computerlike mind, in order to continue working, when confronted with overwhelming trauma, splits a part of the mind off and walls it up with amnesia barriers. The electro-shock also scrambles the brain’s filing of a memory, so that it is filed in bits and pieces. Because of the use of electro-shock, if memories do start surfacing they surface in pieces.”
– Ibid.

As with several music videos described on this site, Fortnight is less about “art” as it is about normalizing mind control. The following scene is the ultimate confirmation of the Monarch programming narrative.

Taylor breaks the mirror inside her room.

All MK-themed narratives NEED to contain a mirror/glass-shattering scene. It was true in the 1986 movie Labyrinth, and it is also true in the 2024 music video V.A.N. While, at face value, the scene appears to depict a rebellion, it actually represents the fracturing of the slave’s persona into multiple pieces.

The video ends with Post Malone talking inside a phone booth while Taylor sits atop it.

Wow. So artistic. Taylor Swift is a visual genius. But hold on. What does it mean? How does it relate to heartbreak? It doesn’t. It represents an MK handler programming his dissociated slave. Also, is it a coincidence that telephone tones are actually used to trigger MK slaves from a distance?

And that’s the video. Is there a single “music critic” who mentioned any of these blatant details in their “reviews”? Of course not. They’d rather talk about how fabulous she looked in the black dress.

In Conclusion

Although Taylor Swift ascended to music business royalty and transcended the realm of celebrity to become a social force to be reckoned with, Fortnight brings forth an important truth: She’s still a slave. The elite granted her incredible fame, wealth, and influence on the condition that she does as she’s told. If she stops complying, it can be taken away extremely easily. Yes, even Taylor Swift can become irrelevant in months if she is not provided the media attention required to maintain her status.

In Fortnight, Taylor is not an empowered queen; she’s a powerless slave. She has zero control over her mind and even the words that come from her mouth. Under the guise of a love song, the video depicts the destruction of an MK slave’s core persona to create an alter. While this story might sound fictional, it is all too real, especially in the entertainment industry.

A few years ago, Kanye West – one of the biggest stars in the world – was handcuffed and was forcibly hospitalized for months. Yes, months. People close to him stated that he suffered memory loss as a result of drugs and possibly “treatments” such as electroshock. He came out of this ordeal a thoroughly different person and even sported the trademark “MK slave platinum blonde” look. Today, he’s a creepy shell of a man who acts as Bianca Censori’s MK handler (high-profile MK slaves sometimes turn into handlers themselves).

While Taylor might not have undergone the same MK treatment, she’s nevertheless used to promote it, normalize it, and even make it glamorous to the millions of people who will inevitably watch the video—and to the millions of kids who will think that this video was about their favorite video game (Fortnite). It is not. It is about Taylor Swift being electroshocked into incoherence because she’s part of the music industry… aka The Tortured Poets Department.

The least one can say is that Taylor Swift characterized the first half of 2024. And that’s an understatement. In the past months, this already insanely popular singer turned into some kind of untouchable icon as she transcended her status as a celebrity to reach mass media sainthood. Indeed, Taylor simply cannot do any wrong. Even if she’s churning out music that’s arguably mediocre, news outlets walk on eggshells when attempt to review her offerings.

Globalist Scum Invented Fake Nation of Ukraine…

(Two NY Times Headlines What’s different?)

May 7, 1986: Nuclear Accident in the Ukraine

April 23, 2024: Aid to Ukraine is on Its Way

Rebuttal

From time to time, I’ve been asked why I refer to that corrupt puppet state based in Kiev as “Ukraine” (using quotes). That’s because the so-called nation of “Ukraine” — known for the longest time simply as “the Ukraine” — and the very idea of “Ukrainian Nationalism” itself are actually artificially created concepts cooked up and incited by western intelligence agencies for the purpose of splitting up the Soviet Union / Russia. The Ukraine is a REGION — like say, the Ohio Valley, or the Caucasus, the Florida Everglades, or the French Riviera etc. The Globalist script writers dropped the grammatical article “the” so as to transform this 1200-year-old REGION (the Ukraine) of Russia into a proper, though concocted nation (Ukraine). Modern day brainwashed normies of “Ukraine” — having been suckled on toxic Globalist teats dripping irrational hatred for their Russian brothers for several decades — now take offense to the use of “the” as a prefix for their “nation.” But the facts of real history show how foolish this artificial “nationalism” really is.

The massive federation of 800s Kievan Rus was the historical, ethnic, linguistic Viking ancestor entity of Belarus, Russia, and “Ukraine.” The Mongols took control in the 1200s, and when their grip was finally broken some 200 years later, the center of power and influence emerged in Moscow, though Kiev always remained an important part of the Russian Empire. Thus, from the early days of Kievan Rus, down through the centuries of the Tsars, and for most of the 20th Century as part of the Soviet Union, the Ukraine was nothing more than a region — with its westernmost inhabitants speaking a bastardized dialect of Russian, and the now oppressed easterners never deviating at all from their Russianity.

1 & 2. The Ukraine was Russian / Rus since the day when the Vikings arrived and merged with the Slavics, who had invited them to rule over them. // 3. Modern day “Ukrainians” now take offense at the descriptive “the” for their region. A large number of gullible dupes in the western half have been poisoned with fake”ultra-nationalism” and “neo-Nazism” created in CIA / Mossad laboratories and injected by the NGO groups.

Ukraine’s western distance from the Russian center and its slight cultural differences gave the “usual suspects” an opening to use “nationalism” to play their usual divide and conquer scheme — very similar to the fake-ass “Bavarian Nationalism” movement which (((they))) juiced up in an effort to further splinter Germany after World War I — and also strikingly similar to how secessionist secret society conspirators in the American South spent the 25 years leading up to the Civil War riling up the newspaper-reading normies of Dixieland into an irrational fear of Union “tyranny” and hatred for “Yankees.”

After the Soros-CIA-engineered disintegration of the Soviet Union, “Ukrainian” secessionism became a reality — though there was still much propaganda work to be done to generate the hatred needed to sustain a war which (had it not been for the ascension of Commander Trump) would have expanded into World War 3. The dangerous final phase of this decades-long project to turn brother against brother began with the violent CIA-Mossad coup of “Ukraine’s” elected Russia-friendly government, in 2014. That bloody infamy was incited by Senator John McStain (later executed by Trump) and Victoria Nuland (probably dead and replaced by now as well). For that reason, and with all due respect to the mentally and physically captive inmates of the Orwellian asylum that is today’s “Ukraine” — I will continue to “cancel” this fake state entity known as “Ukraine” by using quotes, or simply reverting back to the age old Russian regional name: the Ukraine.

1. 2014: McStain in Kiev, inciting the traitorous mob of CIA-Mossad assets and dupes to overthrow the government. // 2. The internal traitors of the Ukraine have since named a street after that wretched black-hearted bastard. // 3. 2015; After the coup, George Soros, founder of the subversive Open Society Institute, speaks with Volodymyr Groysman, then the parliament speaker, in Kiev.

The playing board for RISK — the popular game of world conquest invented in the peak “Cold War” year of 1957. Notice how “Ukraine” (no “the”) is the massive blue territory in the center (the largest on the world map?) As an inquisitive child who loved geography and enjoyed playing RISK, I wondered why “Ukraine” was distorted into such a massive size; why it was not referred to as “the” Ukraine, and why there was no territory named Russia or USSR. Now it all makes sense.

The Dark Origins of the Davos’ Great Reset

Important to understand is that there is not one single new or original idea in Klaus Schwab’s so-called Great Reset agenda for the world. Nor is his Fourth Industrial Revolution agenda his or his claim to having invented the notion of Stakeholder Capitalism a product of Schwab.

Klaus Schwab is little more than a slick PR agent for a global technocratic agenda, a corporatist unity of corporate power with government, including the UN, an agenda whose origins go back to the beginning of the 1970’s, and even earlier.  The Davos Great reset is merely an updated blueprint for a global dystopian dictatorship under UN control that has been decades in development. The key actors were David Rockefeller and his protégé, Maurice Strong.

In the beginning of the 1970’s, there was arguably no one person more influential in world politics than the late David Rockefeller, then largely known as chairman of Chase Manhattan Bank.

Creating the new paradigm

At the end of the 1960’s and into the early 1970’s, the international circles directly tied to David Rockefeller launched a dazzling array of elite organizations and think tanks. These included

The Club of Rome;

the 1001: A Nature Trust, tied to the World Wildlife Fund (WWF);

the Stockholm United Nations Earth Day conference;

the MIT-authored study, Limits to Growth;

and David Rockefeller’s Trilateral Commission.

Club of Rome

In 1968 David Rockefeller founded a neo-Malthusian think tank, The Club of Rome, along with Aurelio Peccei and Alexander King. Aurelio Peccei, was a senior manager of the Fiat car company, owned by the powerful Italian Agnelli family. Fiat’s Gianni Agnelli was an intimate friend of David Rockefeller and a member of the International Advisory Committee of Rockefeller’s Chase Manhattan Bank. Agnelli and David Rockefeller had been close friends since 1957. Agnelli became a founding member of David Rockefeller’s Trilateral Commission in 1973. Alexander King, head of the OECD Science Program was also a consultant to NATO. That was the beginning of what would become the neo-Malthusian “people pollute” movement.

In 1971 the Club of Rome published a deeply-flawed report, Limits to Growth, which predicted an end to civilization as we knew it because of rapid population growth, combined with fixed resources such as oil. The report concluded that without substantial changes in resource consumption, “the most probable result will be a rather sudden and uncontrollable decline in both population and industrial capacity.”

It was based on bogus computer simulations by a group of MIT computer scientists. It stated the bold prediction, “If the present growth trends in world population, industrialization, pollution, food production, and resource depletion continue unchanged, the limits to growth on this planet will be reached sometime within the next one hundred years.” That was 1971. In 1973 Klaus Schwab in his third annual Davos business leader meeting invited Peccei to Davos to present Limits to Growth to assembled corporate CEO’s.

In 1974, the Club of Rome declared boldly, “The Earth has cancer and the cancer is Man.” Then: “the world is facing an unprecedented set of interlocking global problems, such as, over-population, food shortages, non-renewable resource [oil-w.e.] depletion, environmental degradation and poor governance.” They argued that, ‘horizontal’ restructuring of the world system is needed…drastic changes in the norm stratum – that is, in the value system and the goals of man – are necessary in order to solve energy, food, and other crises, i.e., social changes and changes in individual attitudes are needed if the transition to organic growth is to take place.

In their 1974 report, Mankind at the Turning Point, The Club of Rome further argued: Increasing interdependence between nations and regions must then translate as a decrease in independence. Nations cannot be interdependent without each of them giving up some of, or at least acknowledging limits to, its own independence. Now is the time to draw up a master plan for organic sustainable growth and world development based on global allocation of all finite resources and a new global economic system. [v]That was the early formulation of the UN Agenda 21, Agenda2030 and the 2020 Davos Great Reset.

David Rockefeller and Maurice Strong

By far the most influential organizer of Rockefeller’s ‘zero growth’ agenda in the early 1970s was David Rockefeller’s longtime friend, a billionaire oilman named Maurice Strong. Canadian Maurice Strong was one of the key early propagators of the scientifically flawed theory that man-made CO2 emissions from transportation vehicles, coal plants and agriculture caused a dramatic and accelerating global temperature rise which threatens “the planet”, so-called Global Warming. As chairman of the 1972 Earth Day UN Stockholm Conference, Strong promoted an agenda of population reduction and lowering of living standards around the world to “save the environment.

”Strong stated his radical ecologist agenda: “Isn’t the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn’t it our responsibility to bring that about?” [vi]This is what is now taking place under cover of a hyped global pandemic. Strong was a curious choice to head a major UN initiative to mobilize action on the environment, as his career and his considerable fortune had been built on exploitation of oil, like an unusual number of the new advocates of ‘ecological purity,’ such as David Rockefeller or Robert O. Anderson of Aspen Institute or Shell’s John Loudon. Strong had met David Rockefeller in 1947 as a young Canadian  eighteen and from that point, his career became tied to the network of the Rockefeller family.[vii]  Through his new friendship with David Rockefeller, Strong, at age 18, was given a key UN position under UN Treasurer, Noah Monod. The UN’s funds were conveniently enough handled by Rockefeller’s Chase Bank. This was typical of the model of “public-private partnership” to be deployed by Strong—private gain from public government. [viii]In the 1960s Strong had become president of the huge Montreal energy conglomerate and oil company known as Power Corporation, then owned by the influential Paul Desmarais. Power Corporation was reportedly also used as a political slush fund to finance campaigns of select Canadian politicians such as Pierre Trudeau, father of Davos protégé Justin Trudeau, according to Canadian investigative researcher, Elaine Dewar.

Earth Summit I and Rio Earth Summit

By 1971 Strong was named Undersecretary of the United Nations in New York and Secretary General of the upcoming Earth Day conference, United Nations Conference on the Human Environment (Earth Summit I) in Stockholm, Sweden.  He was also named that year as a trustee of the Rockefeller Foundation – which financed his launch of the Stockholm Earth Day project. In Stockholm the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) was created with Strong as its head.

By 1989 Strong was named by the UN Secretary General to head the 1992 UN Conference on Environment and Development or UNCED (“Rio Earth Summit II”). He oversaw the drafting of the UN “Sustainable Environment” goals there, the Agenda 21 for Sustainable Development  that forms the basis of Klaus Schwab’s  Great Reset, as well as creation of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) of the UN. Strong, who was also a board member of Davos WEF, had arranged for Schwab to serve as a key adviser to the Rio Earth Summit. As Secretary General of the UN Rio Conference, Strong also commissioned a report from  the Club of Rome, The First Global Revolution, authored by Alexander King which admitted that the CO2 global warming claim was merely an invented ruse to force change: “The common enemy of humanity is man.
In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up
with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming,
water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. All these
dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through
changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome.
The real enemy then, is humanity itself.” President Clinton’s delegate to Rio, Tim Wirth, admitted the same, stating, “We have got to ride the global warming issue. Even if the theory of global warming is wrong, we will be doing the right thing in terms of economic policy and environmental policy.” At Rio Strong first introduced the manipulative idea of “sustainable society” defined in relation this arbitrary goal of eliminating CO2 and other so-called Greenhouse Gases. Agenda 21 became Agenda 2030 in Sept 2015 in Rome, with the Pope’s blessing, with 17 “sustainable” goals. It declared among other items, “Land, because of its unique nature and the crucial role it plays in human settlement, cannot be treated as an ordinary asset, controlled by individuals and subject to the pressures and inefficiencies of the market. Private land ownership also is a principal instrument of accumulation and concentration of wealth and therefore contributes to social injustice…Social justice, urban renewal, and development, the provision of decent dwellings and healthy conditions for the people can only ‘be achieved if land is used in the interests of society as a whole. “In short private land ownership must become socialized for “society as a whole,” an idea well-known in Soviet Union days, and a key part of the Davos Great Reset.

At Rio in 1992 where he was chairman and General Secretary, Strong declared: “It is clear that current lifestyles and consumption patterns of the affluent middle class— involving high meat intake, consumption of large amounts frozen and convenience foods, use of fossil fuels, appliances, home and work place air-conditioning, and suburban housing — are not sustainable.” (emphasis added) By that time Strong was at the very center of the transformation of the UN into the vehicle for imposing a new global technocratic “paradigm” by stealth, using dire warnings of planet extinction and global warming, merging government agencies with corporate power in an unelected control of pretty much everything, under the cover of “sustainability.” In 1997 Strong oversaw  creation of the action plan following the Earth Summit, The Global Diversity Assessment, a blueprint for the roll out of a Fourth Industrial Revolution, an inventory of every resource on the planet, how it would be controlled , and how this revolution would be achieved. At this time Strong was co-chairman of Klaus Schwab’s Davos World Economic Forum. In 2015 on Strong’s death, Davos founder Klaus Schwab wrote, “He was my mentor since the creation of the Forum: a great friend; an indispensable advisor; and, for many years, a member of our Foundation Board.” Before he was left UN over an Iraq Food-for-Oil corruption scandal, Strong was member of the Club of Rome, Trustee of the Aspen Institute, Trustee of the Rockefeller Foundation and Rothschild Foundation.  

Strong was also a director of the Temple of Understanding of the Lucifer Trust (aka Lucis Trust) housed at the Cathedral of St. John the Divine in New York City,“ where pagan rituals include escorting sheep and cattle to the alter for blessing. Here, Vice President Al Gore delivered a sermon, as worshippers marched to the altar with bowls of compost and worms…” This is the dark origin of Schwab’s Great Reset agenda where we should eat worms and have no private property in order to “save the planet.” The agenda is dark, dystopian and meant to eliminate  billions of us “ordinary humans.”