Leaked: Google Got Involved in the Control of Human Evolution



Google has now made it clear what it plans to do with your data:behavior modification, social engineering and directed human evolution via the “Selfish Ledger”, i.e. AI.

The Selfish Ledger is the title of a leaked Google video released earlier this year in May 2018. Now, a few months later, it’s worth taking a closer look at this apparently leaked vid.

The title is quite innocuous and not so fitting, belying the creepy agenda of military fund-seeded Google to control and own you by taking over your data. This will be a digital, corporate-owned ledger.

Google wants a complete ledger of your life – a complete account using extensive data of all your actions, decisions, preferences, movements and relationships. It then wants to use pattern recognition and other tools with this data to direct your life.

At first, this so-called Selfish Ledger will be user-driven, but the implication is that soon thereafter it will be driven by the ledger itself (i.e. AI) programmed with “Google’s values” (whatever they are).

The deeper meaning of the Selfish Ledger is shocking: Google freely admits that it is aiming for complete species-wide understanding with the Selfish Ledger, and thus to be able to direct human evolution.

What is the Selfish Ledger?

As described in the video, the Selfish Ledger will be a complete record or account of who you are. The word “ledger” denotes accounting, numbers and (now) blockchain.

Google is planning to pitch the idea to the public by presenting it as a “selfish” ledger that is all about you. They state in the video that initially the ledger would be user-driven.

So, the user would select “the volition” of the ledger, e.g. input the goals or values, then allow the ledger to help him/her make better decisions to reach those goals. The video states people would initially use it in the areas of health or environmental impact, then measure themselves up to it.

Google gives the examples of the ledger suggesting to the user where they could buy locally-sourced bananas or how they could carpool (better environmental choices).

The ledger could also be used to suggest entirely new, custom (bespoke) and never-before-made products for people based on their data (needs and preferences, which it would know intimately). The ledger would rely on all existing data.

Google = Do a Lot of Evil

However, the video quickly moves on to point out how the Ledger could then seek other data sources to fill the data gap.

It also implies that after the initial period, Google would provide the Ledger with the goals, and the user would therefore be molded and directed to adhere to objectives and values which he or she did not choose.

Google’s values appear to be anything but good or neutral. They recently dropped their original company motto of “do no evil” (didn’t want to be hypocritical I guess) and were caught numerous times flagrantly rigging the search algorithms in Hillary Clinton’s favor during the 2016 US presidential elections (but don’t worry about that because it was all the evil Russians’ fault).

Google simply fires employees who speak out against its bias and ideology (e.g. James Damore). Google has never really been about a “search engine” but rather a filter, censor and controller of information.

Google-owned YouTube has been an active purger of alternative channels for years now.

Google’s philosophy is clear; it’s motto may as well be We decide what information you will be permitted to access.

They are even helping China, under a project code-named Dragonfly, by building a massive censorship search engine which will “blacklist websites and search terms about human rights, democracy, religion, and peaceful protest.”

Will You Allow the Selfish Ledger AI to be Your Conscience and Auto Pilot?

The Selfish Ledger video is quite explicit in what it advocates. It’s the same agenda many in the freedom movement have been exposing for quite some time: transhumanism.

Episode 1 is entitled “Il Grillo Parlante” (Italian for talking cricket) which is a reference to Disney’s Jiminy Cricket, who was Pinocchio’s conscience. The idea is that Google wants you to let the Ledger/AI be your conscience.

The idea is to goad you into giving up control and autonomy and to learn to trust the “machine.” Episode 2 is about the self-writing quill, a reference to Cornelius Fudge, a character in the Harry Potter series.

This is a continuation of the same theme of letting AI run your life, with the promise of great comfort, ease and convenience by allowing the machine to run things on auto-pilot.

As Melissa Dykes of Truthstream Media points out in her analysis, the user ends up being gamed or modified in a constant feedback loop by AI that decides the values. The person no longer makes decisions using the machine as a tool; the machine makes the decisions and carries the person along with it.

Behavioral Modification

The third and final part, episode 3, contains the Latin phrase unus pro omnibus which can be translated as “one for all.”

The 8-minute video is filled with scenes of ants and bees, so that subtext is that we’re being led into a hive-mind society controlled by AI, a collectivist “one” world for “all” where individuality is obliterated.

The overt message is that data outlives us. Our DNA has been mapped.

Now, certain parts can be targeted for modification to achieve a specific result, a technique known as behavioral sequencing.

Google wants to think of user data as multi-generational, wants new generations to use previous generations’ data stream/trail. Google will be able to make very accurate predictions based on previous generation’s choices.

Google wants to become “God” at pattern recognition, growing to the point where it can pioneer, in its own words, “species-wide” prediction.

Google-style Social Engineering: Selfish Ledger Explained

As much as Google tries to portray the Ledger as a great tool for innovation and understanding, the truth is that it will be used for social engineering on a never-before-seen scale.

If one organization had access to everything about you – from your likes/dislikes to your purchase history to your web-browsing habits all to the way to your health records, your personal conversations and even your DNA – they would literally know you better than you know yourself.

Manipulation becomes easy. Directing you in ways that you can’t detect also becomes easy.

It is important to remember here that Google is a for-profit corporation with deep ties to the US Government and US Military Intelligence Complex.

The internet itself grew out of an old military communications system, and Google could not have become the behemoth it is today without seed money from the CIA and other such alphabet soup agencies.

Google makes algorithms, products etc. to achieve a certain purpose.

Yes, it already makes billions of dollars taking your data and selling it to advertisers, but that is peanuts compared to where this is going.

Yes, it already surveils and spies on you, but now, this video is ever more proof that Google is being used by the NWO to usher in the age of transhumanism.

Data will be used for behavior modification to a high degree.

The Ledger/AI is planned to become the ultimate tool for social engineering by encouraging you to hand over your thinking, your decision-making capacity and even your conscience (the very thing that makes you human and different from a machine).

How can a machine ever replace the human conscience? Will you be fooled into buying into the promise of the Selfish Ledger?

Final Thoughts

We live in a world where we leave a constant data trail, even if we don’t use so many electronic devices. Google is sucking up so much of that data.

Now this “internal” Google video leaked to the public reveals Google’s agenda. Data will be used for behavior modification; the “selfish ledger” will be driven at first by the user, but soon will run on auto-pilot, powered by AI and Google’s values – not yours.

This means never-before-seen NWO social engineering and, if Google gets their way, directed human evolution on a species-wide scale. This is a vitally important topic to understand as we head into an AI-driven future.

Remember: all of your data can and will be used against you.

One solution to this is to take care of your data way more carefully. Keep more of your life offline. When you communicate, use encrypted email services (ProtonMail, HushMail, StartMail) or encrypted text message/SMS services (Signal, What’s App, Viber) as much as possible.

Some of these even have encrypted voice calling. Avoid pointless social media interactions that only serve to portray a glorified image of yourself to the world.

With more and more companies offering end-to-end encryption, why not make a change and support companies offering this?

If you don’t try to take back control of your data, and treat it like a precious commodity, it will be used against you.


The Social Media Purge Is Silencing ALL Dissenting Voices, Not Just Conservative

I don’t use Social Media anymore but…

Just about every website owner I know is feeling personally victimized by the recent social media purge that has been going on. But here’s an interesting fact: it isn’t, as is widely perceived, just conservative voices that are being silenced. It is dissenting voices.

It’s the voices of critical thinkers whose ideas run the gamut of philosophies who find that they no longer have much in the way of reach.

This social media purge affects everyone, even people who are not on social media. It does so in several ways:

  • Dissenting information is silenced which stifles discussion


  • Young people who are avid consumers of social media are being literally brainwashed because they only see one side of the story – any story


  • The social media purge harms websites that post non-establishment information because it stamps out their ability to reach readers who would be interested in their content.


  • The unfairly biased search results show people who are trying to learn more about a topic only one side of the information.

You don’t have to be on a Twitter feed to see how this is an overwhelmingly anti-American problem. Like it or not, social media is a monumental source of information these days, and when it’s censored to only show one point of view, the future of our republic is in peril.

We are well on our way to peak censorship and this has been carefully orchestrated.

Non-establishment websites are in trouble

Their website traffic is plummeting because they no longer show up anywhere near the top of search results. Their posts on social media are not presented to the public – or even the people who deliberately opted to “follow” them.

Edits from Alexander to reflect my own numbers: Here’s an example from my own page. I have more than 44K people who chose to follow my page [by the way, Facebook basically blocked my page from gaining more followers, since I’m at 44k for over a year — this is basically “shadow banning”], as you can see in the top image. But in the image below, you can see how many of those people were actually shown my post. Some posts are censored entirely:

And the same thing goes for social media like Twitter too. I have an email list and if I didn’t, I’d hardly reach anyone.

If you haven’t signed up for my newsletter, you can do so right here.

And I really have to wonder – will our “offensive” websites one day just disappear, scrubbed from the internet permanently? It’s only a matter of time until the web hosting companies are being pressured to get in on the censorship game.

For the record, I consider myself neither conservative nor liberal. I try to veer away from any form of extremism and I make an effort to think a situation through before automatically aligning myself with a “side.”

If anything, I’m a small l libertarian. My core beliefs are personal autonomy and freedom of association are to be sought in all cases that are not harmful to others. And yet, somehow, that is threatening to some people.

Don’t think it’s limited to website owners. Twitter recently banned 70 million accounts, claiming they were “fake.” But there have been repeated accusations that conservative accounts have been at the very least “shadow-banned” if not all out deleted.

The most notable purge recently has been Alex Jones and Infowars

Love Alex Jones, hate him, or feel utterly ambivalent aside from an occasional eye-roll, he has been the most notable victim to have been thoroughly erased from the public eye as far as the large social media outlets are concerned.

He lost his voice on Twitter, YouTube, Facebook, Apple, and Google. Even his email service provider dumped him.

I’m not personally a huge fan of Jones, but I do believe what happened to him was collusion between social media giants. Big Tech got together and now Alex Jones has to find new ways to reach his very large audience.

No one is going to stumble across him accidentally in a Google Search anymore. No one is going to see his videos embedded in another website anymore. Like him or not, he has the right to exist publicly.

Jones has a lot of money so this may not be the end of him, but for most website owners, this would be the absolute end of our ability to do business. And to be able to bring the information we bring, we do have to run our websites as businesses.

It’s far more expensive than most people realize to run a site. I know that my own operating costs every month are more than $2000. A site as big as Jones’s would be many times that amount. When all your avenues of monetization are cut off, it wouldn’t be hard for a site – and the dissent and information they share – to cease to exist.

If nothing else, dissent is the American way.

A little allegory on becoming an unperson

Think back to high school lit class when you read 1984 by George Orwell.

If it’s been a while, I’ll recap the pertinent parts of the plot from Spark Notes.

“Winston Smith is a low-ranking member of the ruling Party in London, in the nation of Oceania. Everywhere Winston goes, even his own home, the Party watches him through telescreens; everywhere he looks he sees the face of the Party’s seemingly omniscient leader, a figure known only as Big Brother.

“The Party controls everything in Oceania, even the people’s history and language. Currently, the Party is forcing the implementation of an invented language called Newspeak, which attempts to prevent political rebellion by eliminating all words related to it. Even thinking rebellious thoughts is illegal. Such thoughtcrime is, in fact, the worst of all crimes…

“…As the novel opens, Winston feels frustrated by the oppression and rigid control of the Party, which prohibits free thought, sex, and any expression of individuality. Winston dislikes the party and has illegally purchased a diary in which to write his criminal thoughts…

“…Winston works in the Ministry of Truth, where he alters historical records to fit the needs of the Party.” (source)

The Ministry of Truth is control of all the things from which people could garner their opinions. They provide their own twist on history, current events, entertainment, education, and the arts. The people of Oceania believe them because there isn’t enough information to believe anything else.

And questioning the Ministry is a thoughtcrime, punishable by horrible torture or worse. Part of Winston’s job is to turn anyone who doesn’t follow the Ministry line into an unperson and erase them from history as though they never even existed.

So who is behind this mass purge of dissenting voices?

There’s always a money trail to follow. Any time you wonder why or how something has occurred, look for the money. In this video by Ben Swann, an independent journalist who was mysteriously silenced for quite some time, he provides some important insight.

This is happening RIGHT NOW. We are living it. We are living in the world of 1984.

Rest assured, the way things are going, it isn’t long before we will see only what “they” – the people with the power and money to make it happen – want us to see.

Social pressure is also limiting free thought

And not only do we have organizations limiting our views of things that would broaden our minds, there’s also the rampant social pressure that we’ve seen since the last election.

When we were recently looking at rental homes, a potential landlady asked me for whom I voted in the last election. I didn’t even bother looking at the place because that is not a standard question one asks of a new tenant.

It certainly has nothing to do with my ability to pay the rent. It has nothing to do with my potential for keeping things clean and in good shape. I just left because no house is worth dealing with a person who clearly let me know she was not someone with whom I wanted to do business.

And that is only my personal example. Employers check the social media accounts of prospective employees to see if they approve of how the person thinks. People who disagree publicly with powerful groups get doxxed.

Dozens of stories have circulated about social pressure, lost friendships, disagreements, and mistreatment in the workplace that originated from differences in political beliefs.

How can people be expected to form accurate opinions without all the information? How can they do so when they’re under pressure for their livelihood or their ability to rent a home or when they fear for their privacy?

It’s pretty clear that there are those who don’t want people to form accurate opinions. They want to gently, quietly, insidiously get everyone on board by limiting our access to the variety of philosophies and theories that make the world go round.

By making free thought something that is frowned upon and erased, they silence us all.

Doctors Against Vaccines – Hear From Those Who Have Done the Research


The general public shares a common misconception – that all doctors, or all “real doctors” support vaccination. Although it is true that the majority of doctors support vaccines, not all do.

Most doctors blindly support the recommendations of the American Medical Association and the American Academy of Pediatrics.

Doctors are trained in administering vaccines, not in how they are made. There are some doctors that choose to do the research themselves in order to develop an informed opinion on the subject.

 These doctors who become knowledgeable about vaccines usually become anti-vaccine. A little knowledge goes a long way.

Without a doubt we live in the age of autism, but it is also the age of chronic illness. One in eighty-eight children are diagnosed with autism, while half of all children now struggle with chronic illnesses such as asthma, diabetes, ADHD, etc..

This rise in illness correlates with the dramatic increase in vaccines given to our children along with a growing exposure to other toxic chemicals.

Dr. Russell Blaylock

Dr. Blaylock is a man who wears many hats. He is a board certified neurosurgeon who owns a nutritional practice. Dr. Blaylock is a health practitioner, lecturer, and author. He practiced medicine for 25 years before pursuing his nutritional studies and research full time.

What Happens to the Brain With Vaccination?

It seems the brain is always neglected when pharmacologists consider side effects of various drugs. The same is true for vaccinations. For a long time no one considered the effect of repeated vaccinations on the brain.

This was based on a mistaken conclusion that the brain was protected from immune activation by its special protective gateway called the blood-brain barrier.

More recent studies have shown that immune cells can enter the brain directly, and more importantly, the brain’s own special immune system can be activated by vaccination.

You see, the brain has a special immune system that operates through a unique type of cell called a microglia.

These tiny cells are scattered throughout the brain, lying dormant waiting to be activated. In fact, they are activated by many stimuli and are quite easy to activate. For our discussion, activation of the body’s immune system by vaccination is a most important stimuli for activation of brain microglia.

Numerous studies have shown that when the body’s immune system is activated, the brain’s immune cells are likewise activated. This occurs by several pathways, not important to this discussion. The more powerfully the body’s immune system is stimulated the more intense is the brain’s reaction. Prolonged activation of the body’s immune system likewise produces prolonged activation of the brain’s immune system.

Therein lies the danger of our present vaccine policy.

The American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Academy of Family Practice have both endorsed a growing list of vaccines for children, even newborns, as well as yearly flu shots for both children and adults. Children are receiving as many as 22 inoculations before attending school.

What Happens When the Brain’s Immune System is Activated?

The brain’s immune system cells, once activated, begin to move about the nervous system, secreting numerous immune chemicals (called cytokines and chemokines) and pouring out an enormous amount of free radicals in an effort to kill invading organisms. The problem is–there are no invading organisms. It has been tricked by the vaccine into believing there are.

Unlike the body’s immune system, the microglia also secrete two other chemicals that are very destructive of brain cells and their connecting processes. These chemicals, glutamate and quinolinic acid, are called excitotoxins. They also dramatically increase free radical generation in the brain.

Studies of patients have shown that levels of these two excitotoxins can rise to very dangerous levels in the brain following viral and bacterial infections of the brain. High quinolinic acid levels in the brain are thought to be the cause of the dementia seen with HIV infection.

The problem with our present vaccine policy is that so many vaccines are being given so close together and over such a long period that the brain’s immune system is constantly activated. This has been shown experimentally in numerous studies.

This means that the brain will be exposed to large amounts of the excitotoxins as well as the immune cytokines over the same period.

Studies on all of these disorders, even in autism, have shown high levels of immune cytokines and excitotoxins in the nervous system. These destructive chemicals, as well as the free radicals they generate, are diffused throughout the nervous system doing damage, a process called bystander injury.

It’s sort of like throwing a bomb in a crowd. Not only will some be killed directly by the blast, but those far out into the radius of the explosion will be killed by shrapnel.

Normally, the brain’s immune system, like the body’s, activates quickly and then promptly shuts off to minimize the bystander damage. Vaccination won’t let the microglia shut down. In the developing brain, this can lead to language problems, behavioral dysfunction, and even dementia.

In the adult, it can lead to the Gulf War Syndrome or one of the more common neurodegenerative diseases, such as Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s dementia, or Lou Gehrig’s disease (ALS).

Dr. Jay Gordon

In 1980, I abandoned the recommended vaccine schedule. I received dozens and dozens of phone calls from moms and dads reporting that their child had received shots a couple of days ago and they were acting a little different.

They couldn’t quite put their finger on it but their child was just not acting quite the same as before I gave the shots. They’d ask if this was okay…was it normal? Initially, as I was trained to do, I replied yes. After dozens and dozens and dozens of phone calls, I decided that I had better listen to these moms a lot more.

I stopped some vaccines. I delayed others. No, I am not ‘anti-vaccination.’

I am aware of the public health implications of completely abandoning our current vaccine schedule, and I certainly don’t advocate that. What I really want is an honest discussion of the risks and benefits of each vaccine and combinations of vaccines for your child. Just your child. My experience is that many parents don’t have the opportunity to discuss these concepts and these details with their doctors.

As you can see, Dr. Gordon really isn’t all that anti-vaccine. He’s been made famous because he is the doctor that is treating Jenny McCarthy’s son, and she isn’t all that anti-vaccine either. Dr. Gordon has earned himself a reputation for being anti-vaccine because he is against some vaccines and the current recommended vaccine schedule.

Dr. Suzanne Humphries

I am a conventionally educated medical doctor who was a participant in the conventional system from 1989 until 2011. During those years I saw how often that approach fails patients and creates new diseases.

I left conventional medicine to research the many problems with mainstream medical theory.

I do not consider it my place to tell anyone whether to vaccinate or not. It is my place to understand as much as I can about vaccines and give people a more complete understanding from which to make their choices.

This has never been a priority to the public health services. In fact there is ample documentation that the priority was quite the opposite, and actually to quell ‘any possible doubts, whether well founded or not’ regarding vaccines.

The following document is the American 1984 DHHS federal register, which listed final rules pertaining to the polio vaccination campaigns in USA after three decades of scandal and misinformation.

That priority has placed many lives in jeopardy as major problems with vaccination were and are overlooked by vaccine policy makers.

There are many problems with the science that underpins vaccine information. I’ve yet to meet a pediatrician who is informed enough to offer informed consent. Infant immunity has been misunderstood by immunologists, as the immunology literature admits to.

Only recently have some important questions been answered about why infant immune systems don’t function like adult ones. There is good reason for the tolerance that an infant has, and the answer is not to interrupt the program with aluminum and vaccines to ramp it up. That is now known to have long term consequences.

There is a paucity of studies comparing never vaccinated children, with partially or fully vaccinated children. In terms of safety studies, a major issue is that most vaccine studies use another vaccine as the control placebo, or use the background substance of the vaccine.

There is only one recent study (Cowling 2012) where a true saline placebo was used, rather than another vaccine or the carrier fluid containing everything except the main antigen.

That study showed no difference in influenza viral infection between groups but astonishingly it revealed a 5-6 times higher rate of non-influenza viral infections in the vaccinated. It is no small wonder more true placebos are not used in vaccine research.

Dr. Tenpenny, D.O.

Dr. Sherri Tenpenny is ardently anti-vaccine. She has spent countless hours researching the vaccine debate, and she is familiar with all of the arguments for and against. She is adamantly against vaccines.

She, like the other doctors on this list, has been accused of cashing in on vaccine fears, but which side of the debate is really making more money?

It continually breaks my heart that people have to personally experience a severe vaccine injury – or observe a serious reaction in someone they love – before they wake up to the absolute truth: vaccines can and do cause harm. They have heard the arguments and the stories from others.

They ignored the pleas about risks and poo-pooed the concerns about vaccine reactions put forth by concerned friends. Instead, they trusted their uninformed pediatrician or caved under the pressure of their badgering RN mother-in-law.

And now, they are left holding the bag, so to speak: a terrible tragedy and a lifetime of medical care and medical bills, as they watch their loved one’s health deteriorate before their helpless, regretful, angry eyes. Gardasil alone has had more than 38,000 adverse events reported through March, 2015. And that number is estimated to be only 10% of all actual adverse events.

SaneVax.org  documents case, after expensive case, of injured girls with huge medical bills after this vaccine – and Gardasil is only one of 16 vaccines given to children.

How many dollars are actually spent on vaccine injuries, looking for a diagnosis, paying for medications and desperately trying to find a way to reverse the damage?

The true cost of vaccination is more than the cost of buying and administering vaccines. The untold tens of millions spent on injuries are not included in the calculations.

Dr. Andrew Wakefield

Dr. Wakefield is a gastroenterologist and researcher who followed the evidence where it lead him. In 1998, Wakefield, Prof. John Walker Smith, Dr. Simon Burch, and 10 other co-authors published a paper in the Lancet, a British Medical Journal, which showed a possible correlation between the MMR vaccine and resultant gastrointestinal dysfunction along with developmental delays and autism.

Though the paper did not state a conclusive causal effect, it did state the need for further study into the possibility that the MMR shot was to blame. Wakefield went on to publicly bring attention to the possibility, criticizing the MMR shot and calling for separation of the three vaccines.

Read any pro-vaccine article that disputes the link between vaccinations and autism and chances are Andrew Wakefield and this fraudulent study will be mentioned. His offense wasn’t so much being a vaccine separatist so much as him questioning the vaccine dogma. This also made him big pharma enemies.

Dr. Wakefield was accused of fraud, and subsequently lost his medical license. Dubbed the father of the anti-vaccine movement, Wakefield has been both revered and vilified, depending on which side of the argument uses his name.

The bizarre thing is, he is not anti-vaccine. He is, however, a critic of the MMR vaccine and has publicly stated that the measles, mumps, and rubella vaccines should be given separately.

In 1999, I proposed that the MMR-autism risk may, in part, be a function of age of exposure: the younger you get the vaccine the greater the risk.

Why? Because, the younger you get measles, the greater the risk of an adverse outcome. This idea was shared with the CDC. They tested the hypothesis in children in the Atlanta Metro area and they found it to be true.

They found beyond a shadow of a doubt that two subgroups of children were at risk: children who were in effect developmentally normal to age 1 and black boys. They concealed this risk for 13 years and deceived everyone, putting millions of children at risk.

In the words of Dr. William Thompson, the senior scientist responsible for this study, for the data analysis, and for disclosure of the fraud: I was involved in deceiving millions of tax payers regarding the potential negative side effects of vaccines.

I have filed a formal complaint with the Office of Research Integrity detailing the fraud. It is provided for you to examine. The matter is currently under investigation by the US Congress with the prospect of hearings later this year.

Dr. Lawrence Palevsky

I did not turn my back when I heard parent after parent – in the dozens, in the hundreds, and then in the thousands – start to say that their children were fine, then they got vaccinated, and then something really bad happened to them acutely or within days, weeks, or even months.

Those parents were told 100 percent of the time by the conventional medical system, ‘It’s a coincidence. It couldn’t possibly be related to the vaccine.

As a person who’s curious about science and questioning, it became obvious to me that there may not be a coincidence here and that something more may be going on.

The literature is pretty supportive of the fact that vaccines have much greater adverse outcomes on the genotype of the body, the immune system of the body, the brain of the body, and the intracellular functions of the body than we are willing to tell the public about.

Pro-vaccine advocates argue that there are thousands of studies that prove that vaccines are safe. Dr. Palevsky explains why those studies are flawed.

…in order for us to really delve into those studies, we have to look at who supported the studies. What was the study design? What were the control groups? How big was the actual number of kids or adults that was used in those studies? I think we will see that in most of those studies, the actual safety has never really been proven.

One of the reasons that I think we can fairly say that is that the vaccine manufacturers and the conventional medical organizations have not done studies that compare vaccinated to unvaccinated children.

In order for us to really know if children who were vaccinated are having an adverse effect from a vaccine, we have to use a placebo group that’s given an injection of maybe normal saline to evaluate whether or not they developed the same symptoms that children who were vaccinated may develop after they’re injected with the vaccine.

Those studies are not done. They’re not done because the conventional medical system says it’s unethical to leave kids unvaccinated for any length of time. But, most of the vaccine safety studies that are being done last anywhere between one and four weeks anyway.

The kids are followed within those one to four weeks. Then, they’re not followed in a very detailed way to recognize whether any of their health outcomes could be related to the vaccine that they got one to four weeks ago.

What ends up happening is they compare the incidence rates of these vaccine reactions or these symptoms that kids get after they’re vaccinated to how often those symptoms are seen in the general population, to check and see if this vaccinated group is in any way getting an increased incidence of these symptoms than the general population would get.

But the fact of the matter is that the general population is vaccinated, so they’re comparing a vaccinated group with a vaccinated group.

Dr. Buchwald, M.D.

The decline in infectious diseases in developed countries had nothing to do with vaccinations, but with the decline in poverty and hunger.

Dr. Glen Dettman

It is pathetic and ludicrous to say we ever vanquished smallpox with vaccines, when only 10% of the population was ever vaccinated.

Dr. Archie Kalokerinos, M.D.

Up to 90% of the total decline in the death rate of children between 1860-1965 because of whooping cough, scarlet fever, diphtheria, and measles occurred before the introduction of immunizations and antibiotics.

Dr. Mendelsohn, M.D.

My suspicion, which is shared by others in my profession, is that the nearly 10,000 SIDS deaths that occur in the United States each year are related to one or more of the vaccines that are routinely given children. The pertussis vaccine is the most likely villain, but it could also be one or more of the others.

Peter Baratosy, M.D. PhD, Australia

I see many children in my practice. I see the difference between the immunized and the non-immunized. The non-vaccinated are much healthier and have less infections, colds, otis media, and tonsillitis.

John B.Classen, M.D., M.B.A.

My data proves that the studies used to support immunization are so flawed that it is impossible to say if immunization provides a net benefit to anyone or to society in general. This question can only be determined by proper studies, which have never been performed.

The flaw of previous studies is that there was no long-term follow-up and chronic toxicity was not looked at. The American Society of Microbiology has promoted my research…and thus acknowledges the need for proper studies.

Raymond Obomsawin, PhD

Delay of DPT immunization until 2 years of age in Japan has resulted in a dramatic decline in adverse side effects. In the period of 1970-1974, when DPT vaccination was begun at 3 to 5 months of age, the Japanese national compensation system paid out claims for 57 permanent severe damage vaccine cases, and 37 deaths.

During the ensuing six-year period 1975-1980, when DPT injections were delayed to 24 months of age, severe reactions from the vaccine were reduced to a total of eight with three deaths. This represents an 85 to 90 percent reduction in severe cases of damage and death.

Dr. Howard Weiner, Immunologist, Harvard Medical School

If a person has a tendency towards a disease, at a certain age, a vaccine might make him/her more susceptible later when other challenges come along.

Philip Incao, M.D. Testimony on the Hepatitis Vaccine, Ohio 3/1/99

A critical point, which is never mentioned by those advocating mass vaccination is that children’s health has declined significantly since 1960 when vaccines began to be widely used. According to the National Health Interview Survey conducted annually… a shocking 31% of US children today have chronic health problems…

In my medical career, I’ve treated vaccinated and unvaccinated children, and the unvaccinated were far healthier and more robust. Allergies, asthma, and behavioral and attention disturbances were clearly more common in my young patients who were vaccinated.

Mary N. Megson, M.D.

Autism may be a disorder linked to the disruption of the G-alpha protein, affecting retinoid receptors in the brain. A study of sixty autistic children suggests that autism may be caused by inserting a G-alpha protein defect, the pertussis toxin found in the D.P.T. vaccine, into genetically at-risk children.

Guylaine Lanctot M.D.

The medical authorities keep lying. Vaccination has been a disaster on the immune system. It actually causes a lot of illnesses. We are changing our genetic code through vaccination.

Dr. Kalokerinos, M.D.

It was similar with the measles vaccination. They went through Africa, South America and elsewhere, and vaccinated sick and starving children…They thought they were wiping out measles, but most of those susceptible to measles died from some other disease that they developed as a result of being vaccinated.

The vaccination reduced their immune levels and acted like an infection. Many got septicaemia, gastro-enteritis, etcetera, or made their nutritional status worse and they died from malnutrition. So there were very few susceptible infants left alive to get measles. It’s one way to get good statistics, kill all those that are susceptible, which is what they literally did.


The AMA has always been corrupt. Just look back at their old recommendations for smoking tobacco. The AMA has also been sued for maintaining an illegal boycott of chiropractors. Their expert advice has always been for sale to the highest bidder. The CDC is no different.

Recently they’ve been outed for covering up the link between the MMR vaccine and autism in African American children. Their advisory board is filled with industry insiders promoting their own self-interest. The AAP seems to be working primarily for vaccine manufacturers.

There are two kinds of pro-vaccine experts; those who regurgitate pro-vaccine rhetoric and those who are getting paid by pharmaceutical industries. Most regulators are the second kind of expert. (We all know money talks, and big money yells).

You cannot do all of the research and come to the conclusion that vaccines are safe. Those that do the research invariably reject all vaccines, or refuse many of them.

How To Reach The The 4th Level of Consciousness


Your consciousness is your ability to be aware of yourself and the world around you and to feel connected to it.

Raising one’s consciousness while often used with specific spiritual connotation is becoming more aware and in tune with your life, having less misconceptions, false beliefs, and traumas running your life from behind the scenes.

But how does one measure consciousness? We are all conscious to some degree, and so are animals. Even trees have shown that they are conscious, even if not self-conscious. Many spiritual leaders say that absolutely everything that came from Earth has consciousness.

When it comes to people, there has been a great push towards raising the consciousness of society as a whole — and this evolution starts with each person individually.

Rev. Dr. Michael B. Beckwith, minister and founder of the Agape International Spiritual Center, grouped human consciousness awareness into four distinct stages. While it is possible, to be between any two stages, most people fall into one of these belief systems.

They are:

  • Life happens to you.
  • Life happens by you.
  • Life happens through you.
  • Life is you.

Level of Consciousness #1: Life Happens To You

Unless you were lucky enough to be born quite awakened, chances are we have all been there — feeling like the victim, feeling powerless, and blaming the world for everything that has ever happened without taking any personal responsibility.

A lot of people you know may still be stuck at this stage. When you feel like life is happening to you, suddenly everything is moving too fast around you and everyone is out to get you.

Bosses at work are ruining your peace, family members are being rude and selfish, friends are being flaky, and the government is the root of almost all of your other problems.

All of these are just stories people tells to themselves. They are not reality. It also leads to complaining and a pessimistic outlook on life. This attitude does not help, but only manifests more of what you do not want.

This is how many people get stuck on this level one consciousness, because their beliefs feed into the reality they do not want, thus confirming their false beliefs about life such as “life is unfair.”

Level of Consciousness #2: Life Happens By You

In many cases, a person eventually gets tired of constantly being the victim and begins to believe that life can be controlled by them. This is when the person rises to the second level of consciousness.

At this level you can take your power back, which is a good thing and a step forward. The downfall at this level is that a person can become controlling and greedy and begin to put others down—consciously or unconsciously.

This is where politicians, misogynistic men, radical religious groups, and all extremist groups re-enforcing an “us vs. them” mentality, are born.

Another level of negative control that can stem at this level is controlling yourself in a way that prevents you from being you. Instead, you are constantly hard on yourself and are pushing yourself too much. Making goals can be used as a control tactic at this level.

Even spiritually-driven individuals can get caught up in this level, thinking that it is possible to create any reality. While the statement is mostly true, gaining full control of reality separates you from the natural flow of life and other people’s wishes and freedoms.

Level of Consciousness #3: Life Happens Through You

Chances are the first two levels did not work out for you. Feeling like a victim and constantly trying to control everything both lead to burning out and unhappiness.

At this point you may be able to rise to the next level of consciousness where you believe that life happens through you. That means that you trust in life itself, and that everything that happens in life is meaningful and has a purpose.

When you achieve this level of understanding you should be able wake up each morning with feelings of peace, joy, and excitement for the new day and what it brings. You are no longer reactive to things that happen, neither are you trying to control every single part of your life.

Instead you are going with the flow and enjoying every moment while feeling immensely grateful for everything. You feel alive; you feel free; and you feel deeply connected to the universe.

To stay this present, each moment you can practice repeating to yourself what Ram Dass wrote:

“Where am I? Here. What time is it? Now.”

Level of Consciousness #4: Life Is You

“You are not in the universe; you are the universe, an intrinsic part of it. Ultimately you are not a person, but a focal point where the universe is becoming conscious of itself. What an amazing miracle.” — Eckhart Tolle

Once you have realized through level three that everything in your life flows, you open yourself to the possibility of reaching the top level of consciousness. This is the realization that life is you, and you are life.

You are not separate from anything around you. Nature, animals, people, and every experience anyone has ever had are all connected to you. You are experiencing life, and life in experiencing itself through you. And everything is perfect; everything is love.

This is the level of consciousness where you come home to the universe and fully enjoy the miracle that you are — and you just are.

This state of being is also known as being Enlightened, Self-Actualized, or being a No Limit Person. There is nothing specific that you need to do, achieve or have. All you have to do is trust the universe, and just be.

Brothers of the Shadows: A Perspective on the Weaponization of the Word ‘Conspiracy’


In his book Perpetual War for Perpetual Peace Gore Vidal suggests that the American public has been conditioned to respond to the word ‘conspiracy’ with a smirk and a chuckle.

Conspiracy, in other words, is for the nuts and the loners, and is not to be taken seriously. In this way, he argues, through the media’s association of the concept of conspiracy with fringe or extreme elements, the real conspirators go unnoticed.

It is a vital point, and Vidal courageously chases and exposes genuine conspiracies by politicians, the FBI, lobbyists for the tobacco companies, and so on. But the flip-side of the conspiracy coin is the proliferation of fanciful and fantastic theories that now crisscross the globe in seconds with the help of electronic media.

The spread of the internet has democratised conspiracy theory. Millions of people now have the means to publish their own unique analysis of what is going on. A necessary consequence of this massive growth in personal digital publishing is that it is getting to be much more difficult to find the pearls among the rubbish.

Someone even observed that, in the age of the internet, if you want to keep something secret you make it public…

Amidst the more fantastic theories of UFOs and intergalactic lizards, certain core themes do persistently reoccur in the mass of ‘conspiracy theory’ material now available. Principal among them is the idea that a shadowy elite is seeking to enslave humanity under the auspices of a single, centralised world government.

The name of the mysterious ‘Illuminati’ is most often associated with such a group, although what is meant by it is frequently ill defined. The Illuminati are, supposedly, a cabal of top bankers, politicians and businessmen seeking to create the aforesaid all-powerful government.

What is the truth of all this? I do not propose to give a full answer here, but would like to introduce a perspective on the theme – one that has generally not been given serious consideration – taken from the research of Rudolf Steiner.

In the second part of the article I will try and relate Steiner’s ideas to other more familiar conspiracy research.

So why Steiner? Because, if for no other reason, his pronouncements and indications on practical areas of life have borne such remarkable fruit, testimony to which are thousands of Waldorf schools offering a new kind of education, farms successfully practicing bio-dynamics, clinics dispensing anthroposophic medicines, and so on.

As a profound clairvoyant, Steiner claimed to investigate other dimensions of reality for insight into the human condition. His legacy is hundreds of volumes of published talks and written works on a cornucopia of themes.

However, as mentioned above, his work – in contrast to that of many other spiritual teachers and gurus – has shown itself to have practical applications in all areas of life. This in itself does not provide ultimate evidence for the truth of his work, but it does correspond to the biblical dictum: “[B]y their fruits ye shall know them.”

In 1916 and 1917, in the midst of the catastrophic First World War, Steiner gave a series of 25 lectures to a group of his followers who gathered together at their centre in Dornach in neutral Switzerland. These lectures, since translated and published in English,1 offer a unique reading of contemporary events.

Behind the outer façade of world affairs, suggested Steiner, the machinations of occult groups or ‘brotherhoods’ were at work. Certain of these brotherhoods had wanted the Great War to take place, and had manipulated events to bring it about.

In doing this, they sought to protect the dominant economic position of the English-speaking world, and in turn to crush the ‘mediating’ role of Central European powers such as Germany, the Austro-Hungarian empire, and so on.

These occult brotherhoods – small groups of men who met together in ‘lodges’ and practiced ceremonial magic as a means of achieving certain goals – originated from the English-speaking (Anglo-Saxon) world and were allied, in particular, with Anglo-American interests.

Their aim was to extend Anglo-American influence across the globe, and to ensure the predomination of Anglo-American culture. Furthermore, they sought to extend its superiority into the distant future; essentially to ensure that the present state of affairs continues evermore.

According to Steiner’s research, human evolution goes through ‘great periods’ of development. During each of these periods, a particular people is given the task of leading humanity in a spiritual sense.

Over the millennia, it has been the destiny of different peoples to bring specific qualities, in a benevolent way, to the whole of humanity. Particular periods of history are thus led by particular nations.

This does not imply a form of political control or empire – and is certainly not a theory of national or racial superiority – but is referring to a spiritual form of authority.

Steiner suggested that the Western world, and in particular the English-speaking peoples, have been given the task of getting to grips with the material world – of becoming comfortable on Earth and developing in harmony with it. In this specific sense, the West was to introduce a certain kind of (beneficial) materialism into human development.

But this materialism was only meant to be developed up to a certain point. It was necessary in order for humans to become fully part of the earthly world, and to help introduce an individualised consciousness (the ‘I’).

But beyond that it had the potential to be destructive. Materialism as a philosophy, which shuts out the possibility of soul and spirit, is retrogressive, asserted Steiner, and works as an evil in human evolution.

The Anglo-American brotherhoods that seek dominion over mankind know this, and hence today are deliberately sponsoring various kind of materialism in the hope of halting and trapping humanity at the present stage of its development. They don’t want humans to progress beyond the present stage of immersion in the material world.

In other words, they don’t want us to reconnect in a free way with our spiritual ‘I’, because they know that their grip over humanity would then be lost. Human progress is dependent on spiritual knowledge, and thus the occult brotherhoods work against it.

Steiner explained further the brotherhoods were aware that the Slavic peoples were to be given the task of leadership on behalf of humanity during the next ‘great period’ of history.

For this reason, the Anglo-American brotherhoods not only sought to dominate the present great period of human development, but – knowing that the Slavs had an important mission in the future – sought to gain control over the Slavic peoples (Russia in particular) in the present, in order to interfere with or even put a halt to their coming task.

In this way, the Anglo-American brotherhoods could extend their control over human development into the distant future.

Steiner later claimed that the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia, which led to the creation of the USSR and the 72-year cultural, intellectual, economic and political repression of the populations of its various peoples, was masterminded and sponsored by these same brotherhoods as a means of controlling the region and its peoples.2

What is the evidence for Steiner’s analysis? Apart from anything else, it is interesting to note the present state of world affairs, and how – since Steiner spoke about this topic in 1916-17 – Anglo-American culture has come to dominate the globe in tandem with American economic and political influence (with the enthusiastic support of British politicians).

The assertion of unilateral military action by the United States and Britain in the 2003 invasion of Iraq – in the face of almost total global opposition – was a good example of this formidable power at work. However, admittedly these observations do not provide ‘proof’ in a strict sense.

Another source of evidence is the remarkable research of Prof. Carroll Quigley (1910-77) who wrote two substantial volumes, The Anglo-American Establishment (1949) and Tragedy and Hope (1966),3 on the secret network which emerged from the enterprise of Cecil Rhodes. Quigley characterised the power of this group through its influence in politics, culture and social life as “terrifying”.

It is important to note that Quigley was no crazed and paranoid conspiracy nut, but a respected Georgetown professor, and even the teacher of Bill Clinton. (How such networks might be related to the brotherhoods Steiner is talking about will be considered later.) Other authors have followed Quigley’s lead and complemented his studies with contemporary observations.

A few have even related Steiner’s ideas to Quigley’s research.4 In this context, however, I would like to mention only two external ‘symptoms’, which, at the very least, offer circumstantial evidence for Steiner’s diagnosis.

In 1893, an Englishman called C.G. Harrison delivered six lectures to the Berean Society, a mysterious group of ‘Christian esotericists’. A record of these lectures is to be found in Harrison’s remarkable book The Transcendental Universe.

Little is known about the Berean Society or Harrison, although he wrote two further books in his lifetime. What is clear is that Harrison, who speaks in defense of the “high” Church, had access to a phenomenal store of esoteric thought, and was furthermore privy to a certain amount of inside knowledge.

In his second lecture, he spoke not only of “the next great European war”, but also of the “national character” of the Slavic peoples and its ability to “enable them to carry out experiments in Socialism, political and economical, which would present innumerable difficulties in Western Europe”.5

Remember that these lectures were given in 1893, 21 years before the First World War and 24 years before the Bolshevik Revolution!

While Harrison claimed to be a “theoretical occultist” as opposed to a “practical” one – i.e. he did not practice magic or ritual, with the implication that he was not a member of a “lodge” himself – from his work it is evident he represents an esoteric strain of thought which clearly defends the English establishment.

How could he know about the forthcoming War as well as the “experiments in Socialism”, which would take a grip on Russia and its surrounding states for most of the twentieth century? If he was not, as he claimed, a “practical occultist” himself, it is reasonable to assume he had contact with people who were, and who had access to the malign plans of such secret groups referred to above.

The second significant piece of evidence which offers some backing for Steiner’s claims of occult interference in world politics is to be found in a special edition of the satirical weekly The Truth, published at Christmas 1890. Under the heading ‘The Kaiser’s Dream’, the magazine featured a cartoon map of Europe together with a humorous commentary.

Many observations can be made of the map, but the most pertinent point to note in relation to the above is that all the countries of Europe are shown as republics with the exception of Russia and its neighbouring states, over which are written the words “Russian Desert”.

In addition, Germany is identified with the words “German Republics”! This map signifies not only a foreknowledge – similar to Harrison – of the fate of Russia to become a cultural as well as an economic ‘desert’, but also of the future splitting of Germany into ‘republics’.

The magazine’s editor, Henry Labouchère, was a Freemason. Was his remarkable foresight pure luck, or once again did he have some inside knowledge of future plans to shape the world?

It is of course possible that the above examples are merely coincidences and happy flukes, but surely it is unlikely. Do these examples offer evidence for the existence of occult brotherhoods with pernicious plans for political manipulation?

We may never know for sure, but it is evident that Steiner’s perspective offers much serious food for thought, and opens up important new vistas for understanding current world events.

Steiner and Modern Conspiracy Research

Having sketched out Steiner’s picture of secret brotherhoods, I would like now to try and show how his perspective might relate to the more general conspiracy research referred to earlier.

To many readers of this magazine the Bilderberg Group, the Council on Foreign Relations and the Trilateral Commission will be more than familiar. In addition, the Yale University secret society Skull and Bones is often identified by investigators in the conspiracy field.

The latter has been thrown into the limelight recently due to the remarkable admission by both Republican and Democratic candidates of the 2004 American presidential election that they are members of the exclusive club.

As Skull and Bones is a tiny society that invites only 15 undergraduates per year to join its ranks – and at any one time has only 800 or so living members – the fact that the two candidates for the post of the most powerful position in the world are members of it (from a population totaling some 293 million people) is quite incredible!

It has long been known that George W. Bush is an initiate of Skull and Bones (as was his father George Bush Snr. and grandfather Prescott Sheldon Bush).6 According to the key researcher of Skull and Bones, Antony C. Sutton, the society was first founded in 1833.

Members, who meet secretly in its ‘tomb’ on the grounds of Yale, are sworn to secrecy about the group’s rites and activities. In terms of its operations and philosophy, Sutton refers to the ‘dialectical’ process, based on the philosopher Hegel, as being at the heart of Skull and Bones thinking.

In particular, he tries to prove that the group has been instrumental in funding and encouraging the development of both far-left and far-right political groupings – principally the Communists and Nazis – in the twentieth century.

From the point of view of Skull and Bones’ broad vision of human development, left and right are viewed as two parts of the Hegelian dialectical process; one political wing represents ‘thesis’ while the other represents ‘antithesis’.

These two aspects clash and fight each other, but eventually merge to form a ‘synthesis’. It is this synthesis, according to Sutton, that Skull and Bones is aiming to create. By controlling and manipulating the conflict, it controls the outcome (or synthesis).

It is interesting to note that Sutton first published his interpretation of Skull and Bones in the mid-1980s. At that time, he quoted the group as working for a ‘New World Order’ (NWO). This NWO was to be the product of the synthesis of political left and right.

Shortly after the collapse of the Eastern-bloc communist countries, and the subsequent triumph of Western capitalism – a triumph that Francis Fukuyama referred to in his famous book as ‘the end of history’ – George Bush Snr. began to use the specific phrase ‘New World Order’ in public speeches.

This fascinating fact offers some circumstantial evidence for Sutton’s reading. Presuming that Sutton is correct, humanity is living right now within the period of ‘synthesis’ – the birth of a NWO led by the West, and principally the United States.

(And perhaps it will come as no surprise to adherents of Sutton’s analysis that a new ‘dialectic’ has suddenly appeared to take the place of the old, i.e. Communism versus Capitalism is replaced with the West versus Islamic Fundamentalism.)

Antony Sutton’s series of booklets on Skull and Bones begins with hisIntroduction to the Order,7  in which he points out that – despite them being commonly associated with conspiracy – organisations such as the Council on Foreign Relations and Trilateral Commission are ultimately not secret, and have large public memberships.

Likewise, it could be added that despite the fact the Bilderberg conferences are not open to the press or public, the names of the people who attend these yearly private meetings are not concealed. (The minutes of the 1999 meeting in Sintra, Portugal were even leaked and published wholesale on the internet.)

Lists of members of the above groups can be found in Robert Gaylon Ross’s Who’s Who of the Elite, Members of the Bilderbergs, Council on Foreign Relations, Trilateral Commission and Skull and Bones Society.)

Sutton suggests that organisations such as the above form a larger ‘outer circle’ of members, while societies such as Skull and Bones form part of an ‘inner circle’ of truly secret groupings, of which there is a still further ‘inner core’ – the ‘decision-making core’ – which remains completely out of public view, i.e. truly hidden (or, literally, ‘occult’).

This is a reasonable hypothesis. From what is known of the Bilderberg conferences, for example, it could be inferred that their essential motivation is to further the Western Capitalist Project through high-level networking and the grooming of young talent.

To put it in another way, they are working for the economic, political and cultural domination of a globalised world by the West – in particular by the English-speaking peoples led by the United States and Britain. (Although the Bilderberg conferences include guests from around the world, the emphasis is on North America and Europe, and its leadership is Anglo-Saxon.)

From what is known of the Bilderbergers – and much has reached the public domain – there appears to be no more conspiracy than that. Groups such as Skull and Bones (and Sutton deduces that there are others such as Scroll and Key) are not completely secret in that their existence and membership are well documented.

According to Sutton these are the ‘core’, with similar objectives to the more public groups but with more focused and consciously-held goals.

In contradistinction to the Bilderbergers etc., true secret societies usually have elaborate initiation ceremonies and use ritual as a critical part of their mutual enterprise. The brotherhoods Steiner speaks of, as has already been mentioned, are also built on Masonic principles of secrecy and ritual, but are hidden from public view.

In relation to the groups referred to above, it is quite possible that such genuinely occult brotherhoods form part of the inner, ‘decision-making’ core, which Sutton refers to. Having said that, as Sutton points out, most members of the larger groups would have no inkling of any subterfuge or conspiracy, and neither would many members of Skull and Bones.

This work would be left to the directors, or ‘initiates’, with esoteric knowledge and understanding. According to Steiner, the specific brotherhoods he is referring to not only have the conscious goal of maintaining Anglo-American domination, but complement this aim with real esoteric insight – i.e. an understanding of the evolutionary cycles referred to above.

The above sketch gives a useful framework for comprehending how public groups such as Bilderberg, more secret groups like Skull and Bones, and the occult societies that Steiner refers to might interact and co-exist.

In this sense, the true occult societies would be the central inspiration for the larger intersecting groups of organisations with politically active individuals. To my mind, such a complex picture is more convincing than the nebulous idea of a single all-powerful ‘Illuminati’ that is supposedly responsible for creating a massive conspiracy that controls every aspect of modern life.


1. Karma of Untruthfulness Volumes I & II, Rudolf Steiner Press, London, 1988 and 1992.
2. See further in Sergei O. Prokofieff, The Spiritual Origins of Eastern Europe and the Future Mysteries of the Holy Grail, Temple Lodge Publishing, London, 1993.
3. The Anglo-American Establishment was only published in 1981, Books in Focus, New York.Tragedy and Hope was published in 1966 by Macmillan, New York.
4. See Terry Boardman, Mapping the Millennium, Behind the Plans of the New World Order, Temple Lodge Publishing, London, 1998, and Amnon Reuveni, In the Name of the ‘New World Order’, Manifestations of Decadent Powers in World Politics, Temple Lodge Publishing, London, 1996.
5. The Transcendental Universe, Lindisfarne Press, New York, 1993, pages 98-99.
6. Daily Telegraph, London, 12 July 2004.
7. The Secret Cult of the Order (1983), An Introduction to the Order (1984), How the Order Creates War and Revolution (1985), How the Order Controls Education (1985), Veritas Publishing Co., Aukland. A more recent and high profile study is Alexandra Robbins Secrets of the Tomb.

Mandela Effect Explained by Parallel Universe and Multiverse Theory


What if I tell you, that its possible for a person to have this strong belief that an event happened in the past only to later realize that that belief was false? Or that there is another “you”, somewhere in a parallel universe just like ours who is totally the opposite of who you are?

This phenomenon is known as the “Mandela Effect” and many people believe it’s the result of some kind of merging between parallel realities.  Whether or not that’s the case, join the Universe Inside You to find out.

It all began with the story of one man known as Nelson Mandela. Nelson Mandela was a South African anti-apartheid revolutionary, political leader, and philanthropist who was imprisoned in the 80s. That’s when things get interesting.

In 2010, a paranormal writer and researcher Fiona Broome recalled having a clear memory of Mandela dying in the 1980s while he was still at the notorious Robben Island prison, she even recalled watching the riots that ensued on the news with great detail.

The strange part was many other people in South Africa also shared her opinion and her memories. Broome was famously quoted to have said the following:

“See, I thought Nelson Mandela died in prison. I thought I remembered it clearly, complete with news clips of his funeral, the mourning in South Africa, some rioting in cities, and heartfelt speech by his widow. Then, I found out he was still alive.”

She called this strange phenomenon the “Mandela Effect”. She and many other people believe that the phenomenon was as a result of distortion caused by the movement between parallel realities. As a result of this, a website known as mandelaeffect.com was born.

A website that acts as an archive not only for the false memories surrounding the death of Mandela, but others, like the Reverend Billy Graham’s popular televised funeral and the wrong spellings of the popular cartoon character Looney Toons. Broome was also known to have given other examples of the Mandela Effect.

There have been many definitions to this strange occurrence. Psychologists explain the Mandela Effect via memory and social effects – particularly false memory.

This involves mistakenly recalling events or experiences that have not occurred, or distortion of existing memories. The unconscious manufacture of fabricated or misinterpreted memories is called confabulation.

In everyday life confabulation is relatively common. But most people dismiss this psychological explanation, simply because there are way too many people who remember the exact same thing, with great detail.

These people attribute these false memories, to the existence of multiple universes, or parallel universes, and believe their consciousness tapped into these realities which left them with the so called false memories, who in fact are real memories, simply not of this reality, but of a parallel one.

Most of the times, people who believe in this phenomenon, use quantum explanations, and some other assumptions to support their theory of parallel realities.

They firmly believe that the share of false memory is a concrete evidence of the existence of a parallel universe, which sometimes, because of some quantum events, interferes and perhaps merges with our own reality, leaving many people with the false memories of the reality before that.

Cases of the Mandela Effect are everywhere

In 2016, the social networking world went agog when a popular children’s storybook and animated TV series known as the Berenstain Bears was posted on a blog post. Thousands of people are absolutely sure that the title of the cartoon was spelled Berenstein not Berenstain.

While some believed it was as a result of wrong spelling, others believed it was due to the Mandela Effect. They believe that a collective memory pointed to a parallel reality, in which the animation is called the Berenstain family and the other parallel reality being the home of the Berenstein family.

Other examples of the Mandela Effect include the TV show “Sex and the City”, with many people remembering it as “Sex IN the City”.

Viewers of the popular sitcom sex and the city claimed the name was ones known as “Sex in the City”, even though there is no evidence to back that claim, some people can swear it to be so.
Here are some more examples:

• The Pikachu with a black tail

Some people believed the Pikachu’s tail had a black tip. How come thousands of people came up with such beliefs is still baffling, and judging by the latest pictures of Pikachu’s tail, you will see that the back tip is not present. Perhaps in this parallel reality, the creators of Pokemon decided to make Pikachu without a black tip tail.

• Rich Uncle Pennybags

People who believe in the Mandela Effect also claimed that the famous Monopoly man also known as Rich Uncle Pennybags had a monocle. They believed the Monopoly man use to wear one, but evidence has shown that that’s not true.

• Darth Vader

This is probably one of the most popular examples of the Mandela Effect, even Fiona Broome attested to this too. She claims that she remembered perfectly how Darth Vader said to Luke, “Luke, I am your father.”

But watching the movie again and again, confirms that Darth Vader never said “Luke, I’m your father” what he said was “No, I’m your father”. So, question is, was this just a misremembered movie line or some unexplained phenomenon? Who knows?

• “We Are the Champions” by Queen ends differently than many recalls

Many of those familiar with the hit song “We are the champions” by Queen, remember the final lyrics being “No time for losers, ’cause we are the champions…of the world!” Well, guess what? There is no “of the world!” The song just ends, and it’s driving people crazy because they feel 100% sure that they’ve heard otherwise in the past.

• Curious George had no tail

Why some people still believe that Curious George uses to have a tail is still strange, some even claim that they saw George using his tail to swing from one tail to the other, but a picture of George right now when viewed doesn’t have a tail.

Another interesting case of the Mandela Effect is with the famous painting of Mona Lisa

People think the Mona Lisa is smiling now, but they remember clearly that she used to be emotionless. A lot of folks passionately insist that the Mona Lisa has changed because they remember her having a straight face without any emotion. When we look closely at the magnificent painting now, it seems as if she’s got a smirk, instead of a straight emotionless face.

All of these stories and cases of the Mandela Effect sound amazing, but they all make you wounder – If there are parallel universes and sometimes they merge with our reality, wouldn’t be some people who believe that perhaps the Germans won WW2, or that they live in a country which doesn’t exist in our reality. Well, there are records of a lot of people who had similar unexplained memories.

One famous case, is the case of:

The Man From the Country That Doesn’t Exist

According to the legend, at some point in a particularly hot summer of 1954, a gentleman entered Haneda Airport in Tokyo, Japan. He was traveling from Europe and had visited Japan many times.

On his person was various different currencies of European countries, as well as Japanese money for his upcoming trip. He was also adept at several languages, including Japanese, but it appeared French was his native tongue.

Nothing out of the ordinary by any stretch of the imagination. When the gentleman went on to state his country of origin as he produced his passport, however, things took a strange turn.

According to his official papers, and the man himself, his home country was Taured. He was able to produce such documents as his driving license, bank statements, and his official business papers.

Perhaps sensing confusion, the man offered that it was a small country, nestled between Spain and France. Further still, Taured enjoyed a long and proud history stretching back over one-thousand years. Needless to say, the customs officials didn’t recognize such a country. Nor could they find one on any existing map at their disposal or find any mention of it in history books.

Perplexed as to what to do, with his cooperation, the gentleman was taken into immigration’s custody. Under constant guard outside his room, the gentleman would spend the night in a nearby hotel. His passport and official papers were confiscated in order that immigration could resolve the issue. The following morning would bring a bizarre twist to the already mysterious affair.

As officials went to collect the gentleman from his hotel room, they discovered to their amazement, an empty room. Despite the guards outside the room and the building, he had simply vanished into thin air. His room was high up, with only a single window. If the man had attempted to leave via this route, he would have simply fallen to his death as the window had no ledge or balcony.

Further still, the passport and official documents were also missing from immigration offices. In any case, the papers had failed to yield any results. Immigration officers would ring a phone number on his business papers. According to the reports, the number didn’t exist.

How is it possible that thousands of people remember so many things with clear detail, just to discover them to be completely different from what they remembered? How is it possible that people emerge, stating to live in a country that never existed in our reality?

A country for which they can present pure evidence supporting it’s existence. One might ask, is there some quantum explanation for this phenomenon. Perhaps there’s some quantum event, unlocking some kind of portals which allow parallel dimensions to shift and merge with one another.

According to some people, there are various portals into these parallel realities and a recent discovery made by some scientist of the possible first proof of parallel universes might just change the whole thing. The study carried out by a group of British Astronomers shows the inexplicable places in the cosmos that may offer the very first proof that we are all living in the multiverse.

The theory itself has raised a whole lot of question, like: “Is there another you and I out there? Another you, on another planet, living another life?”

Is there another version of events out there in another world?

The theory of the multiverse proposes that there is an infinite amount of universes out there, and that includes our own planet. But this is just one of the numerous theories that tend to prove the possibility of the existence of a multiverse.

Another theory that tends to prove this theory of a multiverse is the infinite universe.  It’s not known what the shape of space-time is, but a particular theory tends to show that the universe is flat and infinite, meaning the universe goes on forever.

The believers of this theory say it is possible for universes to start repeating themselves, owing to the fact that particles can be put in more than one way, creating a series of parallel universes and dimensions.

Another interesting theory is the Mathematical Universes Theory.  The foundation of this theory is the fact that our external physical reality is made completely out of mathematical equations.

This leads people to believe that the physical universe is mathematics in a well-defined sense, and in those worlds complex enough to contain self-aware substructures they will subjectively perceive themselves as existing in a physically ‘real’ world”.

The hypothesis suggests that worlds corresponding to different sets of initial conditions, physical constants, or altogether different equations may be considered equally real. The structure of this theory may change, but that would depend on the universe that you are on. Max Tegmark of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology was ones quoted saying the following:

“A mathematical structure is something that you can describe in a way that is completely independent of human baggage.”

The most known theory is the Parallel Universe theory, designed by a man named Hugh Everett III, a young Princeton University doctoral candidate, who in 1954 came up with an idea, that there was and is a high probability of the existence of parallel universes, ones that looks exactly like ours.

He claimed that within these parallel universes, our wars have had different outcomes than the ones we know. This theory could give us an explanation for the mysterious occurrence of the Mandela Effect.

Could it be that those who believed that Mandela died in the prison, somehow shifted their consciousness into one of these parallel universes and dimensions, but were later drawned back to ours? This could explain all of their false memories, which perhaps weren’t false, but were true, simply not in this parallel universe.

One might want to doubt the credibility of this theory, but what seems strange here is, why would Mr. Hugh Everett want to risk his future over a fallacy, risk his own future career by posing a theory about the Parallel Universes? That would have been suicidal career-wise, so he had to be sure to have posted such a theory.

Another Man who also spoke more about this theory was the late Stephen Hawking. His last paper before his death talked about the multiverse theory. It was published few months after his death and Stephen Hawking talked about the theory in detail.

He said, “We are not down to a single, unique universe, but our findings imply a significant reduction of the multiverse to a much smaller range of possible universes.”

According to Stephen Hawking’s theory we have more than one universe, and there are infinitely more “parallel universes” that are just like ours, that also contains someone like you, meaning there is another you out there, who is not watching this video right now and he’s probably the direct opposite of what you are right now.

If you still have doubts about whether to believe this or not, well, that totally depends on what you think. We will leave you to decide what is true and what is not.

By Stefan Dimitrov, UniverseInsideYou.net

4 Key Signs You Have Finally Made a Soul Connection With Someone



To say that one waits a lifetime for his soulmate to come around is a paradox. People eventually get sick of waiting, take a chance on someone, and by the art of commitment become soulmates, which takes a lifetime to perfect.” ― Criss Jami

Contrary to popular belief, a soulmate is not always romantic in nature. Soulmates may take the form of a sibling, a creative partner, or a best friend.

Having more than one soulmate is completely possible throughout your lifetime.

But soulmates are not magically born, well, it depends on what you call magic.

Soulmates are created when 2 regular people create such a strong and deep bond between each other that it transcends time and space.

It takes a lot of hard work on both your parts to eventually establish such soul connection. It takes trust, tolerance, love and constant choice to stand by each other in order to create such strong bond.

That’s why the relationship you have with a soulmate is distinct from your other relationships, because both of you invested so much in your relationship throughout many lifetimes.

To find out if you have created a soul connection with someone, here are the signs!

4 Key Signs You Have Finally Made a Soul Connection:Key Signs You Have Made Soul Connection

1. You are more understanding and patient with them than you are with others.

You often find yourself extending more patience and understanding with people who you’ve made a soul connection with.

The things that would have irritated you in others don’t mean a thing when they come from your soulmate. You understand their hearts and it’s easier for you to forgive them.

While you doubt the motivations of other people, with your soulmate you just couldn’t feel the same because you see them clearly. And seeing them as a whole human being, with pureness in their heart, comes naturally.

2. You have no personal boundaries with them.

In romantic relationships, soulmates have a powerful sexual attraction; they can’t seem to keep their hands off of one another.

While in a platonic friendship or family connection, soulmates are often found play-fighting, frequently hugging, holding hands, or cuddling.

The closeness you have with your soulmate is not limited by the emotional level, it extends to the way you physically interact with each other. It’s a connection between all the pillars, physical, emotional, spiritual and mental!

3. Your commitment with each other lasts a lifetime.

Living life without your soulmate is a thought you could not fathom because life seems unbearable without them. You have a strong commitment in looking after each other’s happiness.

Whatever your plans are in the future, whether it involves having a family, starting a small business, or buying a house, your soul connection is part of your every plan.

You are there to support each other’s dreams and do BIG things together.

4. You give them your undivided attention.

Giving your full attention to your soulmates comes naturally. Despite the constant distractions around, you are fully focused in their presence.

For some people it looks like both of you go to another dimension when you start talking to each other, a dimension only the 2 of you can understand.

You listen actively and engage with empathy. This makes your soul connection grow stronger and flourishes your communication.

Soul Connections Create Soulmates!

Like diamonds, soulmates are rare and very hard to find, even harder to be created.

When you finally find a person worthy to create a soul connection with, cherish, love, and respect them, choose to stand by them because that’s how soulmates are created.

Your life has a lot more meaning with soulmates in it!